The Impact of Surgical Technique on PDC

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Permanent canines in the maxilla usually erupt into the mouth at 11-12 years of age. In approximately 2% of the Swedish population they fail to erupt, and are then referred to as impacted. One severe complication of impacted maxillary canines is damage (root resorption) to the roots of adjacent teeth. The root resorption may be so severe that neighboring teeth are lost. If the impaction is detected early (at 9-10 years of age), the recommended treatment is to extract the deciduous canine, to help the permanent canine to resolve its unfavorable position. If there is no improvement of the position of the canine 1 year after the extraction, surgical and orthodontic treatment is indicated. Surgical exposure is followed by orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance for 2 to 3 years to bring the canine into correct position. Two different main principles of surgical exposure in palatally impacted maxillary permanent canines are the so called closed versus open surgical techniques. Closed technique involves surgically uncovering of the canine with a mucoperiosteal flap dissected off the bone. The bone covering the canine is being removed and an attachment with a chain is bonded to the tooth. The flap is repositioned and sutured back with the chain above the mucosa. Shortly after the surgery, orthodontic force is applied via the chain. The canine is orthodontically moved beneath the palatal mucosa by forced eruption. Open technique involves surgically uncovering of the canine, removing a window of tissue around it and placing pack to cover the exposed area. Then the treatment approaches vary depending on whether the attachment with a chain is bonded to the exposed tooth at surgery or if spontaneous eruption of the palatally impacted canine is expected postsurgically. In both alternatives orthodontic force is applied via the chain and the canine is orthodontically moved above the mucosa. These two techniques of surgical exposure of palatally impacted canines seem to be the two routinely used in Sweden. The purposes of this study are to examine, describe and compare the treatment outcomes in regard to success and duration of treatment, complications, side effects, cost-benefit aspects and patients´ perceptions in closed versus open surgical exposure techniques, in cases with palatally impacted canines. The objective is to test the null hypothesis that there are no differences in the above outcomes between open or closed surgical exposure of palatally impacted canines.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Methods of exposing canines are today left to the personal choice of the surgeon and orthodontist. According to an unpublished survey among orthodontists in Sweden 2012, 80% of them use the closed technique only, 9% use the open technique only and 11% use both techniques. This result may be compared to a similar survey performed in the UK, where 29% selected a closed surgical technique only, 40% selected an open surgical technique only and the remainder chose combinations of techniques. Mentioned reasons for preference of the closed technique are less pain and need for analgesics and faster recovery of pain, postsurgically. Some orthodontists that prefer the open exposure technique have experienced more patient related pain or discomfort in the closed exposure technique, in association with activation in orthodontically forced eruption, because the palatally impacted canine is moved beyond the mucoperiosteal flap. There are no previous studies in this aspect, though. Factors as operation time, total treatment time and periodontal health measurements after surgical exposure and orthodontic forced eruption of impacted canines, have shown heterogeneity in different retrospective studies. The management of the palatally impacted canines is a multidisciplinary, time consuming treatment, contributing to relatively high society costs, why this study is taking place, trying to clarify some issues in the choice of method and treatment. Subjects Patients with diagnosis of uni- or bilateral palatally impacted canine/-s planned for surgical exposure are included consecutively at three orthodontic centers of the Public Dental Health Service in the towns of Orebro, Eskilstuna and Jönköping, Sweden. Procedure At the appointment for treatment information, the orthodontist gives potential study participants and their parents verbal and written information about the trial. The potential study participants and their parents will be allowed at least one week to decide whether to participate in the trial and if they agree to participate, the written consent will be submitted to the orthodontic centre. After informed consent is obtained, the participants are randomly allocated to 1 of 2 interventions. A computer generated randomization is undertaken to ensure that there are equal numbers allocated to each intervention. Allocation concealment is held by one individual per centre, not involved with the trial, who will be contacted by the consenting clinician when the patient is going to be referred for surgical exposure. There will be no stratification for age or gender into the two different groups. If maxillary deciduous canine are present; they are removed at the time of surgical exposure. The two different surgical exposure techniques are described under Intervention arms. The patients are given verbal and written postsurgical information. Verbal pre-/postsurgical information consists of the recommendation of: Analgetic (paracetamol first choice) 1 hour before surgery and there after every 6 to 8th hour 2 days post surgically, according to the dosage recommended Tooth paste without sodium is recommended when used directly in association with chlorhexidine rinse Together with the written postsurgical information, a questionnaire is handed out at the surgical clinic to the patients, for assessment of their experience of pain and discomfort in the evening of the day of surgical exposure and one week there after. The postsurgical questionnaire contains questions that are validated. This questionnaire is submitted to the orthodontic centre at the first postsurgical control. After surgical exposure orthodontic force is applied; in the closed technique group no later than 2 weeks post surgically and in the open technique group when bonding attachment is possible. In both surgical exposure groups orthodontic force is applied to the palatally impacted canine via the chain attached to the bonded attachment on the canine, to a fixed orthodontic appliance. Questionnaires are handed out to the patients every 3rd month at the orthodontic clinic, to evaluate the patients´ perceptions of pain and discomfort, until the impacted canine is orthodontically positioned in the dental arch. These questionnaires are submitted at the orthodontic clinic the same day, in association with orthodontic appointment. Questionnaire to assess patients´ perceptions of dental anxiety is handed out to the patient before treatment, when the impacted canine has erupted and when active treatment is finished in each surgical exposure group, at the orthodontic centre. Dental anxiety will be evaluated and described according to Cuthbert MI and Melamed BG. The patients are followed until the active orthodontic treatment is finished and an orthodontic retainer is fitted. Observation schedule and material/registrations: Before surgical treatment (T0): Impression for study cast/ Registrations: sagittal, transversal and vertical relation, crowding and spacing of teeth (measured according to the current clinical routine), maxillary dental development stage according to Björk Panoramic radiograph/ Registrations: mesial position of the impacted canine crown, mesial inclination of the canine to the midline, distance to the occlusal line according to Ericson and Kurol CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) examination/ Registrations: exact position and follicle size of the impacted canine; crestal bone height in the lateral incisor in the impacted and nonimpacted contra lateral side in the same patient; root resorption in the impacted canine, the incisors and the eventual first premolar in the impacted and nonimpacted contra lateral side in the same patient Clinical examination (according to clinical routine)/ Registrations: periodontal pocket depth, gingival bleeding on probing, gingival recession; in the lateral incisor in the impacted and nonimpacted contra lateral side in the same patient CFSS-DS (dental anxiety) questionnaire/ Assessment of dental anxiety Registration of age, gender, presence of deciduous canine and date of eventual extraction of deciduous canine The day of surgical exposure (T1): A questionnaire (for the first evening and one week after surgical exposure)/ Assessment of experience of pain, discomfort (measured in VAS-scales) and consumption of analgesics one week after surgical exposure Measurement and registration of operation duration Palatally impacted canine erupted; here: when bonding attachment is possible/ approximately ⅓-½ of the clinical crown of the impacted canine is exposed intraorally (T2): Measurement and registration of the duration for the canine to erupt into the oral cavity; time between T1 and T2 Registration of presence, type and number of complications/failures associated with surgical technique CFSS-DS questionnaire/ Assessment of dental anxiety Previously impacted canine positioned in the dental arch; here: canine ligated to .016x.022 nickel titanium/standard steel arch-wire in the .018-appliance system and .019x.025 nickel-titanium/ standard steel arch-wire in the .022-appliance system (T3): Registration of presence, type and number of complications/failures associated with orthodontic treatment Measurement and registration of duration between T2 and T3 Orthodontic retainer is fitted/ Active treatment finished (T4): Impression for study cast/ Registration of sagittal, transversal/ vertical relation, crowding/spacing of teeth (measured according to the current clinical routine) Clinical examination(according to clinical routine/ Registration of pocket depth, gingival bleeding on probing, gingival recession in the canine, the lateral incisor and the first premolar in the impacted and nonimpacted contra lateral side in the same patient CFSS-DS questionnaire/ Assessment of dental anxiety Measurement and registration of duration between T3 and T4 Within 2 months after active treatment is finished (retainer fitted): • CBCT examination/ Registration of crestal bone height in the canine, the lateral incisor and the first premolar in the impacted and nonimpacted contra lateral side in the same patient; root resorption in the canine, the incisors and the first premolar in the impacted and nonimpacted contra lateral side in the same patient Between the day of surgical exposure (T1) and the day when the previously impacted canine is positioned in the dental arch; here: canine inligated to .016x.022 nickel titanium/ standard steel arch-wire in the .018-appliance system and .019x.025 nickel-titanium/ standard steel arch-wire in the .022-appliance system (T3): • A questionnaire is handed out to the patient every 3rd month at orthodontic appointments between T1 and T3/ Assessment of patients´ perceptions of pain and discomfort (measured in VAS-scales) and consumption of analgesics Ethical aspects The Regional Ethic Board of Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, which follows the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki has approved the study. The Radiation Protection Boards of the County Councils of Örebro, Eskilstuna and Jönköping have approved the planned radiographic examinations in the study. Patientdata are processed according to the laws Personuppgiftslagen, PUL, (1998:204) and Patientdatalagen (2008:355). The examinations and treatments used in this trial are the current examinations and treatments of palatally impacted canines in Sweden, which have been practiced during several years. All surgical exposures and orthodontic treatments are performed by specialists in dental pediatrics/ clinicians and specialists in orthodontics, respectively, with many years of surgical experience.

Official Title
-----------------
Closed Versus Open Surgical Exposure of Palatally Displaced Canines (PDC); Treatment and Treatment Outcome Including Aspects of Cost-benefit and Patients´Perceptions. A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Conditions
-----------------
Tooth, Impacted

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Closed surgical technique
* Procedure: Open surgical technique


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with diagnosis of uni- or bilateral palatally impacted canine/-s planned for surgical exposure at start of treatment of the impacted canines. In the bilateral impaction cases, the impacted canine in the more severe position according to the criteria (in Zone 2-4) proposed by Ericson and Kurol is included in the trial. Dental development stage: maxillary DS2M1 and DS3M2 according to Björk Pretreatment mesial position of the impacted canine in Zone 2-4, according to the criteria proposed by Ericson and Kurol, documented in panoramic radiographs. Exclusion Criteria: Diseases affecting the somatic and/or craniofacial growth Diseases not compatible with anaesthesia or surgery Known neuropsychiatric diagnosis or documented learning disability Problem to understand Swedish (patient and parent). Interpreter needed Patients older than 16 years of age at the year of start of treatment Ongoing orthodontic treatment Patients with agenesis of the lateral incisor in the impacted side Pretreatment mesial position of the impacted canine in Zone 5, according to the criteria proposed by Ericson and Kurol, documented in panoramic radiographs Pretreatment vertical position of the impacted canine above the full length root of the central incisor on the same side, according to Fleming, PS. et al.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 8 Years
Maximum Age: 16 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: Closed surgical technique<br>After randomization, the PDC:s randomized to this arm, are to undergo closed surgical exposure, which is an intervention to correct the position of PDC:s. | Procedure: Closed surgical technique<br>* Surgically uncovering of the impacted canine with a mucoperiosteal flap dissected off the bone The bone covering the canine is being removed Attachment with a chain is bonded to the exposed tooth The palatal flap is repositioned and sutured back with the chain above the mucosa. Shortly after the surgery The canine is orthodontically moved beneath the palatal mucosa<br>|
| Active Comparator: Open surgical technique<br>After randomization, the PDC:s randomized to this arm, are to undergo open surgical exposure, which is an intervention to correct the position of PDC:s. | Procedure: Open surgical technique<br>* Surgically uncovering of the impacted canine, removing a window of tissue from around the tooth Pack/filling material is applied on the tooth Spontaneous eruption of the palatally impacted canine is allowed expected The canine is orthodontically moved above the mucosa<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Treatment success; the previous impacted canine is positioned in the dental arch | Positioned in the dental arch; here meaning that the previous impacted canine has been treated with fixed orthodontic braces and is inligated in .016x.022 nickel titanium/ standard steel arch-wire in a .018- appliance system and .019x.025 nickel-titanium/ standard steel arch-wire in a .022- appliance system. | Within 3 years after surgery | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Duration from surgery until the previous impacted canine has erupted into the mouth | Erupted into the mouth; here meaning that approximately ⅓-½ of the clinical crown of the impacted canine is exposed intraorally. | Within 1,5 year from surgery |