Mackenzie's Mission: The Australian Reproductive Carrier Screening Project

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This study will investigate reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) in 10,000 couples across Australia. Carrier screening for approximately 1300 genes associated with severe, childhood-onset, X-linked and autosomal recessive conditions will be performed on each member of the couple. A combined result will be issued indicating whether the couple has a 'low' or 'increased' risk of having a child with a genetic condition. It is anticipated that 1-2% of couples will be at an increased risk of having an affected child. The study will evaluate all aspects of the RGCS program to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a publicly-funded population-wide RGCS program, including: education of recruiting healthcare providers education of participating couples implementation and uptake of RGCS frequency of increased-risk couples and their reproductive decisions psychosocial impacts ethical issues health economic implications health implementation research

Detailed Description
-----------------
PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS Couples will be invited to take part in the study by their healthcare provider (HCP). The couple will enrol via an online portal, complete an education module, provide consent and complete a questionnaire. Those who consent to carrier screening will be sent mouth swab kits with samples returned by mail.The carrier screening performed will be done via accredited testing laboratories in partnership with clinical genetics services. Genetic counselling will be available to study participants throughout the process. Couples at increased risk will be offered a genetic counselling consultation and offered support to access reproductive options (i.e. prenatal diagnosis, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) which will be funded by the study for one cycle of IVF with PGD). All participants will be asked to complete an initial survey at study enrolment and invited to complete optional surveys at the time of screening, after return of screening results, and approximately 13 to 19 months after results. Subsets of participants will also be invited to take part in interviews. GENE LIST FOR CARRIER SCREENING The approximately 1300 genes tested in the Mackenzie's Mission carrier screening panel meet the following criteria: The associated condition is one where an 'average' couple would take steps to prevent the birth of a child with that condition. - This includes conditions with significant negative impact on quality of life for the child, the condition being lethal in childhood, and a significant impact on the family. AND/OR: There is a potential benefit for knowing about the condition to inform management in the neonatal period. This criterion was particularly important if the condition was either not included on a newborn screening panel, and/or intervention would be required prior to results from newborn screening being known. AND there is strong evidence for mutations in the gene being causative of the condition in question, with enough variants reported to allow confidence in informing couples of their chance of having a child with the condition in question.

Official Title
-----------------
Mackenzie's Mission: The Australian Reproductive Carrier Screening Project

Conditions
-----------------
X-Linked Genetic Diseases, Autosomal Recessive Disorder

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
In order to take part in the study, couples need to have visited a recruiting HCP who will assess them for eligibility based on the criteria below: INCLUSION CRITERIA Planning to become pregnant or in early pregnancy (less than 10 weeks gestation at enrolment and less than 11 weeks gestation at sample receipt by the laboratory) Both members of the couple available to participate in the study and available to provide a sample for testing at the same time. If the couples are using an egg/sperm donor/s, the donor/s need to be available to provide a DNA sample for testing and consent to having carrier screening. NB: If both members of the couple are known carriers of the same autosomal recessive condition, or the female is a known carrier of an X-linked recessive condition, they will still be eligible to have RGCS through the study, but will only be considered an 'increased-risk' couple for the purposes of this study if they are identified through the study testing to be carriers of pathogenic variants in a different gene. EXCLUSION CRITERIA Participating couples meeting any of the following requirements will be excluded from this study: Pregnant and greater than 10 weeks gestation at enrolment. Only one member of the couple agrees to participate in the study. One or both members of the couple are less than 18 years old. Both members of the couple are not available to be tested at the same time. The couple are using an egg/sperm donor/s and the donor/s are not available for testing or the couple are using an anonymous donor. One member of the couple has already been screened as part of the study.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Participating Couples<br>Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening | Other: Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening<br>* Carrier screening for approximately 1300 genes associated with severe autosomal recessive and X-linked recessive conditions affecting children will be performed on each member of the couple. A combined result will be issued indicating whether the couple has a 'low' or 'increased' risk of having a child with a genetic condition<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Screening Uptake (Quantitative) | Practitioners offering screening will be asked to record the number of couples offered screening which will allow calculation of screening uptake. | At offer of screening | 
| Frequency of Increased-Risk Couples | Analysis of carrier frequencies of the genes tested and the frequency of identification of increased-risk couples | At reporting of results ( Weeks 5-6 since enrolment) | 
| Reproductive Choices made by Increased-Risk Couples | For pregnant couples, the investigators will ascertain how many have prenatal diagnosis (PND), and of those who have PND and an affected fetus is identified, how many terminate the pregnancy. For those who are not pregnant at the time of screening, the investigators will ascertain choices for future pregnancies that occur during the timeframe of the study, including how many choose preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), how many choose a naturally conceived pregnancy with PND and how many choose a naturally conceived pregnancy without any testing. | Reproductive choices made by couples will be tracked from the date an increased-risk result is received until study closure on 31 December 2022. A subset of couples will be interviewed  19 months after receiving an increased-risk result. | 
| Cohort Characteristics of those who decline and those who accept RGCS | Short survey capturing personal information: age, country of birth, language spoken at home, ethnicity, religion and religiosity, education level, employment status, household income, marital status, pregnancy history and family/genetic history information. | Couples who decline screening;at offer or at enrolment (Day 0); optional. Couples who accept screening; at enrolment (Day 0); compulsory. | 
| Predictors of Uptake - Decliners | Survey asking main reason(s) for declining to participate informed by the Health Belief Model (HBM). The HBM is used to predict and explain uptake of a health behaviour. It includes four components: perceived benefits, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity and perceived barriers (Janz and Becker 1984). A subset of declining couples will be invited for interview to explore the decision-making process and their reasons for declining testing. | Couples who decline screening; at offer or enrolment (Day 0); optional | 
| Predictors of Uptake - Decliners | Survey asking main reason(s) for declining to participate informed by the Health Belief Model (HBM). The HBM is used to predict and explain uptake of a health behaviour. It includes four components: perceived benefits, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity and perceived barriers (Janz and Becker 1984). A subset of declining couples will be invited for interview to explore the decision-making process and their reasons for declining testing. | At decision not to provide samples for screening, anticipated to be within ten days of enrolment (Days 2-10); optional | 
| Predictors of Uptake - Acceptors | Survey asking main reason(s) for choosing to participate informed by the Health Belief Model (HBM). The HBM is used to predict and explain uptake of a health behaviour. It includes four components: perceived benefits, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity and perceived barriers (Janz and Becker 1984) | Couples who accept screening; at offer or enrolment (Day 0); compulsory. | 
| Predictors of Uptake - Acceptors | Survey asking main reason(s) for choosing to participate informed by the Health Belief Model (HBM). The HBM is used to predict and explain uptake of a health behaviour. It includes four components: perceived benefits, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity and perceived barriers (Janz and Becker 1984) | At provision of samples for screening, anticipated to be within ten days of enrolment (Days 2-10); optional | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Participant Experience - Attitudes/Perceptions | Survey assessing attitudes towards carrier screening in the general population, and the attitudes of the couple towards carrier screening for themselves. | Couples who decline screening;at offer or at enrolment (Day 0); optional. Couples who accept screening; at enrolment (Day 0); compulsory. | 
| Participant Experience - State-Anxiety - pre-screening | Six-item short-form of the state-anxiety scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Marteau and Bekker 1992). This scale measures how the respondent feels right now, at this moment. Scores range from 20 to 80. A high score indicates the presence of high levels of anxiety. | Couples who decline screening; at enrolment (Day 0); optional. Couples who accept screening; at enrolment (Day 0); compulsory. | 
| Participant Experience - State-Anxiety - pre-screening II | Six-item short-form of the state-anxiety scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Marteau and Bekker 1992). This scale measures how the respondent feels right now, at this moment. Scores range from 20 to 80. A high score indicates the presence of high levels of anxiety. | At provision of samples for screening, anticipated to be within ten days of enrolment (Days 2-10); optional | 
| Participant Experience - State-Anxiety - post-result | Six-item short-form of the state-anxiety scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Marteau and Bekker 1992). This scale measures how the respondent feels right now, at this moment. Scores range from 20 to 80. A high score indicates the presence of high levels of anxiety. | Low-risk and increased-risk couples; post-result ( Weeks 17-18 since enrolment); optional | 
| Participant Experience - State-Anxiety - long-term follow-up | Six-item short-form of the state-anxiety scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Marteau and Bekker 1992). This scale measures how the respondent feels right now, at this moment. Scores range from 20 to 80. A high score indicates the presence of high levels of anxiety. | Low-risk couples; long-term follow-up ( 13 months since enrolment); optional. Increased-risk couples; long-term follow-up ( 19 months since enrolment); optional | 
| Participant Experience - Trait-Anxiety - pre-screening | 20-item trait-anxiety scale (Form Y2) of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). This scale measures how the respondent generally feels. Scores range from 20 to 80. A high score indicates the presence of high levels of anxiety. | Couples who decline screening; at enrolment (Day 0); optional. Couples who accept screening; at enrolment (Day 0); compulsory. | 
| Participant Experience - Trait-Anxiety - pre-screening II | 20-item trait-anxiety scale (Form Y2) of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). This scale measures how the respondent generally feels. Scores range from 20 to 80. A high score indicates the presence of high levels of anxiety. | At provision of samples for screening, anticipated to be within ten days of enrolment (Days 2-10); optional | 
| Participant Experience - Trait-Anxiety - post-result | 20-item trait-anxiety scale (Form Y2) of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). This scale measures how the respondent generally feels. Scores range from 20 to 80. A high score indicates the presence of high levels of anxiety. | Low-risk and increased-risk couples; post-result ( Weeks 17-18 since enrolment); optional | 
| Participant Experience - Trait-Anxiety - long-term follow-up | 20-item trait-anxiety scale (Form Y2) of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). This scale measures how the respondent generally feels. Scores range from 20 to 80. A high score indicates the presence of high levels of anxiety. | Low-risk couples; long-term follow-up ( 13 months since enrolment); optional. Increased-risk couples; long-term follow-up ( 19 months since enrolment); optional | 
| Health Economic Impact - Assessment of Quality of Life - pre-screening | 12-item Assessment of Quality of Life-4D (AQoL-4D) questionnaire (Hawthorne, Richardson and Osbourne 1999; Richardson and Hawthorne 1998). This questionnaire measures health-related quality of life in four dimensions: Independent Living, Relationships, Mental Health and Senses. Total scores range from a minimum of 12 to a maximum of 48. Higher scores indicate a lower health-related quality of life. | Couples who decline testing, at enrolment (Day 0); optional. Couples who accept testing, at enrolment (Day 0); compulsory | 
| Health Economic Impact - Assessment of Quality of Life - post-result | 12-item Assessment of Quality of Life-4D (AQoL-4D) questionnaire (Hawthorne, Richardson and Osbourne 1999; Richardson and Hawthorne 1998). This questionnaire measures health-related quality of life in four dimensions: Independent Living, Relationships, Mental Health and Senses. Total scores range from a minimum of 12 to a maximum of 48. Higher scores indicate a lower health-related quality of life. | Low-risk and increased-risk couples; post-result ( Weeks 17-18 since enrolment); optional | 
| Health Economic Impact - Assessment of Quality of Life - long-term follow-up | 12-item Assessment of Quality of Life-4D (AQoL-4D) questionnaire (Hawthorne, Richardson and Osbourne 1999; Richardson and Hawthorne 1998). This questionnaire measures health-related quality of life in four dimensions: Independent Living, Relationships, Mental Health and Senses. Total scores range from a minimum of 12 to a maximum of 48. Higher scores indicate a lower health-related quality of life. | Low-risk couples; long-term follow-up ( 13 months since enrolment); optional. Increased-risk couples; long-term follow-up ( 19 months since enrolment); optional | 
| Health Economic Impact - Participants' willingness to pay | Questions with randomised monetary values to assess maximum amount participants would be willing to pay, and whether the test should be government, privately or Medicare funded. | Couples who decline screening, at enrolment (Day 0); optional. Couples who accept screening, at enrolment (Day 0); compulsory | 
| Participant Experience - Health Literacy | Questions to assess health literacy level | At provision of samples for screening, anticipated to be within ten days of enrolment (Days 2-10); optional | 
| Participant Experience - Evaluation of Educational and Decision-Aid Materials | Questions to evaluate resources developed for participating couples e.g. decision aid, website, brochure | At provision of samples for screening, anticipated to be within ten days of enrolment (Days 2-10); optional | 
| Participant Experience - Decisional Conflict | 16-item scale measuring personal perception of uncertainty, factors contributing to uncertainty, and effective decision making. Includes five subscores: uncertainty, informed, values clarity, support, effective decision making (O'Conner 1993 (updated 2010)). Total scores range from 0 [no decisional conflict] to 100 [very high decisional conflict]. | At provision of samples for screening, anticipated to be within ten days of enrolment (Days 2-10); optional | 
| Participant Experience - Deliberation | 6-item scale measuring decision deliberation. Dichotomous scale: responses below the midpoint (11 or under) classified as not deliberated and those at or above the midpoint as deliberated (Van den Berg, Timmermans, Ten et al 2006) | At provision of samples for screening, anticipated to be within ten days of enrolment (Days 2-10); optional | 
| Participant Experience - Decision-Making Approach | Survey evaluating decision-making approach i.e. whether it was an individual or shared decision and who was involved in the decision-making process, e.g. couples, family, health-professional | At provision of samples for screening, anticipated to be within ten days of enrolment (Days 2-10); optional | 
| Participant Experience - Genomics Outcome Scale (GOS-6) | 6-item scale measuring empowerment as an outcome of clinical genetics services. Total scores range from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30. Higher scores indicate higher levels of empowerment (Grant et al. 2018) | Increased-risk couples, before and after genetic counselling session ( Weeks 5-6 since enrolment) | 
| Participant Experience - Decisional Regret - post-result | A 5-item scale measuring distress and remorse after a health care decision. Scores range from 0 [no regret] to 100 [high regret]. Subset of low-risk couples to be contacted for interview to explore experience of having testing and receiving a low-risk result. | Low-risk and increased-risk couples; post-result ( Weeks 17-18 since enrolment); optional | 
| Participant Experience - Decisional Regret - long-term follow-up | A 5-item scale measuring distress and remorse after a health care decision. Scores range from 0 [no regret] to 100 [high regret]. Subset of low-risk couples to be contacted for interview to explore experience of having testing and receiving a low-risk result. | Low-risk couples; long-term follow-up ( 13 months since enrolment); optional. Increased-risk couples; long-term follow-up ( 19 months since enrolment); optional | 
| Participant Experience - Qualitative Interviews | Subset of low-risk couples to be contacted for interview to explore longer-term experience of having testing and receiving a low-risk result. Subset of increased-risk couples to be contacted for interview to explore the experience of receiving a increased-risk result, the use of this information in reproductive decision-making, and the communication of genetic information within families. | Low-risk couples; long-term follow-up ( 13 months since enrolment); optional. Increased-risk couples; long-term follow-up ( 19 months since enrolment); optional | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
reproductive genetics, carrier screening, rare disease