Comparative Study Between Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Direct Pulp Capping

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Comparative study between Biodentine and MTA in direct pulp capping of deeply carious teeth.

Official Title
-----------------
A Comparative Study of the Performance of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Direct Pulp Capping of Deeply Carious Teeth.

Conditions
-----------------
Patients With Deep Carious Lesions

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Drug: Biodentine
* Drug: MTA


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: asymptomatic vital molars (upper or lower) with complete formation of roots Aged 15 to 30 years. Accidental point pulp exposure during the process of removing dental caries. Exclusion Criteria: If the molar not vital. If the molar is symptomatic. Immature molar. Patient not in age between (15-30 years).

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 15 Years
Maximum Age: 30 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Biodentine<br>The exposed area of the pulp is going to be covered with Biodentine. | Drug: Biodentine<br>* Biodentine is going to be used as the direct pulp capping material<br>|
| Active Comparator: MTA<br>The exposed area of the pulp is going to be covered with MTA | Drug: MTA<br>* MTA is going to be used as the direct pulp capping material in the second group<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Success at 3 months following capping | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of tooth are sound 100%. | the success of treatment is assessed at three months following the application of the material | 
| Success at 6 months following capping | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of tooth are sound 100%. | the success of treatment is assessed at six months following the application of the material | 
| Success at 9 months following capping | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of tooth are sound 100%. | the success of treatment is assessed at 9 months following the application of the material | 
| Success at 12 months following capping | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of tooth are sound 100%. | the success of treatment is assessed at 12 months following the application of the material | 
| Success at 18 months following capping | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of tooth are sound 100%. | the success of treatment is assessed at 18 months following the application of the material | 
| Success at 24 months following capping | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of tooth are sound 100%. | the success of treatment is assessed at 24 months following the application of the material |