Ease of Use and Blood Clotting for the Gambro Polyflux HD-C4 Big Dialyzer

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to collect information on the ease of use and thrombogenicity of the Polyflux HD-C4 Big and Fresenius Optiflux 180NR or 200NR dialyzers under conditions of routine clinical use for hemodialysis.

Detailed Description
-----------------
This ease of use study involves the use of FDA 510(k) cleared hemodialyzers and will have no impact on the patient's routine dialysis therapy. This study is aimed at obtaining feedback from the nursing and technical staff regarding the use and thrombogenicity of the Polyflux HD-C4 Big, and Fresenius Optiflux 180NR or 200NR dialyzers. The dialysis nursing staff will complete ease of use and thrombogenicity assessments following routine dialysis therapy. Any adverse events will be tracked for the study patients.

Official Title
-----------------
The Gambro Polyflux HD-C4 Big Ease Of Use And Thrombogenicity Study

Conditions
-----------------
Chronic Kidney Failure

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Hemodialysis patients 18 years of age or older Exclusion Criteria: n/a

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ease of Use: Priming Blood Side | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the ease of priming blood side as follows: Very Easy:Air is easily removed without knocking or clamping procedures. Acceptable:Knocking and/or clamping required for efficient air removal. Difficult:Knocking and/or clamping and additional volume of saline or extended recirculation needed to remove air. Very Difficult:Air could not be removed. | Priming at each treatment | 
| Ease of Use: Priming Dialysate Side | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the ease of priming dialysate side as follows: Dialysate Side at 500 ml Priming Volume (check one): Perfect: No air visible. Acceptable: Some air visible, but considered insignificant. Not Acceptable: Additional actions needed to sufficiently remove air. | Priming at each treatment | 
| Dialyzer Assessment: Fiber Condition | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the dialyzer fibers after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:All fibers appear white. Good:Few fibers (less than 10) appear PINK / RED. (check one) Poor:Several fibers (more than 10) appear PINK / RED. (check one) Very Poor:Most fibers (more than 75%) appear PINK / RED. (check one) | Each treatment: assessment of the condition of the dialyzer fibers after rinse-back | 
| Dialyzer Assessment: Arterial Header Condition | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the arterial header after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:Surface as clean as expected. Good:Distinct red ring appears at the dialyzer wall. Poor:Significant appearance of clots, randomly distributed on the surface. Very Poor:Completely red and/or covered with clots. | Each treatment: assessment of the condition of the arterial header after rinse-back | 
| Dialyzer Assessment: Venous Header Condition | For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the venous header after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:Surface as clean as expected. Good:Distinct red ring appears at the dialyzer wall. Poor:Significant appearance of clots, randomly distributed on the surface. Very Poor:Completely red and/or covered with clots. | Each treatment: the assessment of the condition of the venous header after rinse-back | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Dialyzer