Effectiveness of Child Intubation

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
We hypothesized that the Intubrite Video Laryngoscope System VLS 6600 is beneficial for intubation of pediatric manikins while performing CPR. In the current study, we compared effectiveness of the Intubrite and MIL laryngoscopes in child resuscitation with and without CC.

Official Title
-----------------
First Comparison of the /Intubrite VideoLaryngoscope System Versus the Miller Laryngoscope for Intubations by Non-anaesthetists: a Manikin Study.

Conditions
-----------------
Cardiac Arrest

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Intubrite
* Device: MIL


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Give voluntary consent to participate in the study minimum 1 year of work experience in emergency medicine experienced emergency medical personnel (physicians, nurses, paramedics) Exclusion Criteria: Not meet the above criteria Wrist or Low back diseases

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Intubation without chest compressions<br>Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation without chest compressions. | Device: Intubrite<br>* Video-Laryngoscopy<br>* Other names: Intubrite Video Laryngoscope System VLS 6600;Device: MIL<br>* Direct-Laryngoscopy<br>* Other names: Miller Laryngoscope;|
| Experimental: Intubation with uninterrupted chest compressions<br>Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions. In order to simulate the difficulties associated with intubation during uninterrupted chest compressions, CPR was performed by using LUCAS-2 (Physio-Control, Redmond, WA, U.S.). | Device: Intubrite<br>* Video-Laryngoscopy<br>* Other names: Intubrite Video Laryngoscope System VLS 6600;Device: MIL<br>* Direct-Laryngoscopy<br>* Other names: Miller Laryngoscope;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Success of intubation | effectiveness of first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants | 1 day | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intubation time | time in seconds required for a successful intubation attempt | 1 day | 
| POGO score | self-reported percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score | 1 day | 
| Cormack-Lehane grading | self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4) | 1 day | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
intubation