Propofol EC50 for Inducing Loss of Consciousness in General Combined Epidural Anesthesia

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The beneficial of perioperative usage of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia in various thoracic and upper abdominal surgery are well studied. However, intraoperative data are lacking whether combined thoracic epidural and general anesthesia have effect on the median (50%) effective effect-concentration (EC50) of propofol for inducing loss of consciousness (LOC). We performed this study among patients undergoing open gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients. Sixty patients undergoing open gastrectomy were randomly assigned to two groups with thoracic combined general anesthesia (TEA+GA) or general anesthesia (GA) alone. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol was used for anesthesia induction. The initial propofol concentration of target effect-site (Ceprop) was 3.5 ug/ml and was increased stepwise by 0.5ug/ml at each 4 min intervals by an un-down sequential method to reach LOC. The predicted Ceprop at the time of LOC, intravenous anesthetics, vasopressor requirement, emergency time from anesthesia and postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) were recorded and analyzed between two groups.

Detailed Description
-----------------
After received the approvement of ethics committee of the Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (approval number IRB- 2021-214). 60 adult gastric cancer patients between 18-75 yrs, ASA physical state I and II, undergoing open gastrectomy, were enrolled in this study. The exclusion criteria included: patients with contraindications to epidural puncture or catheter placement; chronic or acute (within 48 h) intake of psychotropic drugs, benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, or opioids; alcoholism; hepatic, renal, neurological or other organ dysfunction; younger than 18 years or older than 75 years; with allergic to local anesthetic solutions or opioids; received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; as well as patients who refuse to receive epidural puncture. Patients were randomly assigned to either TEA+GA group of GA group. The requirement for the modified up-down method was used to confirm sample size (1). Preoperative arrangements 3-lead electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry and continuously invasive artery blood pressure via left radial artery() were measured for basic monitoring. A central venous catheter was placed in the right internal jugular vein for fluid input and central venous pressure measurement and its position was confirmed by ultrasound. Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor (VT94306, Aspect VISTA, Covidien IIc, MA, USA) was measured for monitoring the depth of anesthetic. Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia Epidural puncture was performed in the left lateral position through the interspace between the eighth to ninth thoracic vertebra (T8-T9). Epidural catheter was inserted by median approach using loss-of-resistancetechnique and was placed advanced 4 cm cephalad. A test dose of 3ml, 1%, lidocaine was injected through the catheter after the aspiration test for blood and cerebrospinal fluid shows negative results. Non sensory and motor anesthesia after 4 min of test dose injection indicate the absence of accidental subarachnoid placement of the catheter. In group TEA+GA, 5-8ml of 0.375% ropivacaine depend on the height and weight of the patient was administrated through the epidural catheter at least 20 min before induction, by the second anesthesiologist, to obtain a bilateral segmentary sensory block to pinprick between T4 and T12 dermatomes. Continuous infusion of 4-6 ml 0.375% ropivacaine was applied using micro-infusion pump after induction(2). In group GA, same dose of normal saline was administered before induction and during surgery. General Anesthesia General anesthesia was induced by propofol plasma target-controlled infusion (TCI) (). To explore the EC50 of propofol for inducing LOC in two groups. We started induction using a series of predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol (Ceprop) with an equal step wise of 0.5 ug/ml, according to the up-down method of Dixon(1). The initial Ceprop for the first patient of each group was 3.5 ug/ml based on previous studies (3) . Positive response to propofol was defined as LOC happened within 4 min after start of TCI under initial concentration. Otherwise the response was taken as negative and propofol concentration was increased 0.5 ug/ml more each 4 min until patient reach LOC (LOC was defined as loss of response to verbal commands). The initial TCI Ceprop was increased by 0.5 ug/ml for the next patients if the previous patient shows negative in the same group. The initial TCI Ceprop was decreased by 0.5 ug/ml for the next patient if the previous patient shows positive in the same group. All the patients were increased by 0.5 ug/ml stepwise at 4 min intervals until they showed LOC. An interval of 4 min was based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) character of propofol in order to obtain the steady-state effect-site concentrations (4; 5). An intravenous of 0.25 mg/Kg oxycodone and 0.6 mg/Kg rocuronium were given after LOC to facilitate tracheal intubation. Maintenance of anesthesia Anesthesia was maintained with propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium during surgery. Ceprop was adjusted in stepwise of 0.5 ug/ml to keep the BIS between 45 to 55 in two groups. The lowest Ceprop was 2.0 ug/ml to avoid intraoperative awareness. Concentration for remifentanil was between 0.05 ug/Kg/min and 0.25 ug/Kg/ min during surgery depend on the blood pressure. The maintenance doses of rocuronium was 0.15mg/Kg as required to maintain surgical paralysis (6). Patients with hypertension were treated with 10 mg urapidil or 5 mg diltiazem i.v and hypotension was treated initially by speeding Ringger's solution, infusion voluven, then decrease concentration of remifentanil by 0.05 ug/Kg/min until reach the lower limit of 0.05 ug/Kg/min and finally given 5mg ephedrine i.v. 80 ug phenylephrine or 1mg metaraminol were then given if hypotension was remaining. Postoperative management Anesthetics were stopped when the final surgical suture was done and then 2-4mg/Kg of sugammadex was applied according to the train-of-four (TOF) ratio. The duration between the time of discontinuation of anesthetics and the time of spontaneous opening of eyes was defined as anesthesia emergency time. All patients received postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) 0f 0.175% ropivacaine with 0.7ug/ml sufentanil. The PCEA continuous infusion dose was 3-4 ml with patient-controlled bolus dose of 4-5ml depend on the height and weight of patient. Patients were transferred to PACU after extubation and stay at least 60 min there. In PACU, pain intensity using numerical analogue score of 0-10, postoperative nausea, vomiting and times of hypotension were evaluated and recorded at 30min, 60min and the time leave PACU.

Official Title
-----------------
Propofol EC50 for Inducing Loss of Consciousness in Gastrectomy: Combined General and Epidural Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia

Conditions
-----------------
Gastric Cancer

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Drug: 5-8ml 0.375% ropivacaine
* Other: 5-8ml normal saline


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Gastric cancer patients age between 18-75 yrs; ASA physical state I and II Undergoing open gastrectomy Exclusion Criteria: With contraindications to epidural puncture or catheter placement Chronic or acute (within 48 h) intake of psychotropic drugs, benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, or opioids; alcoholism Hepatic, renal, neurological or other organ dysfunctiony Younger than 18 years or older than 75 years Allergic to local anesthetic solutions or opioids Received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy Refuse to receive epidural puncture

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 75 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Interventional Model Description: 60 adult gastric cancer patients between 18-75 years, ASA physical state I and II, undergoing open gastrectomy, were enrolled in this study. Epidural puncture was performed in the left lateral position through the interspace between the eighth to ninth thoracic vertebra (T8-T9). Epidural catheter was inserted. In group TEA+GA, 5-8ml of 0.375% ropivacaine depend on the height and weight of the patient was administrated through the epidural catheter at least 20 min before induction, to obtain a bilateral segmentary sensory block to pinprick between T4 and T12 dermatomes. Continuous infusion of 4-6 ml 0.375% ropivacaine was applied using micro-infusion pump after induction. In group GA, same dose of normal saline was administered before induction and during surgery.
Masking: Double


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Combined epidural with general anesthesia<br>Patients in this group received 5-8ml of 0.375% ropivacaine depend on the height and weight of the patient was administrated through the epidural catheter at least 20 min before induction.Followed by a continuous infusion of 4-6 ml 0.375% ropivacaine was applied using micro-infusion pump after induction during surgery. | Drug: 5-8ml 0.375% ropivacaine<br>* 5-8ml of 0.375% ropivacaine depend on the height and weight of the patient was administrated through the epidural catheter at least 20 min before induction in experimental group. Followed by a continuous infusion of 4-6 ml/h using micro-infusion pump after induction during surgery.<br>* Other names: Experimental;|
| Sham Comparator: General anesthesia<br>In this group, same dose of normal saline was administered before induction and during surgery. | Other: 5-8ml normal saline<br>* 5-8ml of normal saline depend on the height and weight of the patient was administrated through the epidural catheter at least 20 min before induction. Followed by a continuous infusion of 4-6 ml/h using micro-infusion pump after induction during surgery.<br>* Other names: Sham control;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Propofol EC50 for inducing loss of conciousness | Recording propofol EC50 for inducing loss of conciousness between general with epidural anesthesia group and general group with propofol effect-site target-controlled infusion (TCI) system | Intraoperatively | 
| Predicted effect-site concentration of propofol (Ceprop) at certain time points | Recording the effect-site concentration of propofol (Ceprop) which showed on target-controlled infusion (TCI) system at loss of consciousness and discontinuation of anesthetics | Intraoperative | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Anesthetics consumption | Recording the total propofol and reminfentanil consumption during surgery | Intraoperative | 
| Postoperative exhaust time | Recording the first postoperative exhaust time by daily follow up | 0-14 days postoperatively | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Propofol EC50, Epidural anesthesia, Gastric cancer, Gastrectomy