Concomitant Basal Joint Arthroplasty and Carpal Tunnel Release

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Concomitant carpal tunnel syndrome and basal thumb junt osteoarthritis through a single incision has been described. Case serials have reported good with this technique. Nonetheless, there is a lack of comparative studies evaluating the effectivity and complications of single-incision versus double-incision technique. Only with an randomized clinical trial design it is possible to gain evidence about the advantages of one treatment method over another. The aim of the study is the comparison between two surgical techniques for concomitant carpal tunnel syndrome and basal thumb junt osteoarthritis: single versus double incision techniques.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Basal thumb joint osteoarthritis is a common disorder especially among postmenopausal women. In this specific subgroup of patients, radiographic signs appear in up to 40%. Approximately 28% of those cases are symptomatic. Its pathoanatomy and treatment has been well described. Trapeziometacarpal joint is the most commonly joint requiring treatment for osteoarthritis in the upper extremity, often involving removing the trapezius. The same demographic group is also frequently affected by carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which coexists with basal joint arthritis in 18% to 46% of patients. In those cases, a combined surgical approach has been reported to be beneficial. The two conditions have traditionally been treated surgically through separate incisions. a radial incision for trapeziectomy and standard midline volar carpal tunnel incision for median nerve decompression. Trapeziectomy has been proved to provide some degree of carpal tunnel decompression. However, as previous studies have suggested, release of the transverse carpal ligament should be performed in addition to basal joint arthroplasty incision, as trapeziectomy by itself does not completely decompress the carpal tunnel. The ability to decompress the carpal tunnel during basal joint arthroplasty using a single incision would allow to shorten surgery time, improve appearance, and potentially decrease morbidity compared to a staged or two-incision procedure. We sought to determine whether carpal tunnel release using a single incision during basal joint arthroplasty is as effective as two-incision approach in patients with concomitant CTS and basal thumb joint osteoarthrosis. The secondary hypothesis is that single incision prevents from morbidity associated to a second incision, such as pillar pain, longer surgical procedure, infection rate or necrosis of the skin bridge between incisions

Official Title
-----------------
Basal Joint Arthroplasty and Carpal Tunnel Release Comparing Single Versus Double Incision. Randomized Clinical Trial

Conditions
-----------------
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Osteoarthritis Thumb

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Carpal tunnel release and basal joint arthroplasty through single incision
* Procedure: Carpal tunnel release and basal joint arthroplasty through double incision


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Concomitant basal joint osteoarthritis and CTS in the ipsilateral extremity. Severe CTS sympthoms wiht positive physical examination findings (eg, Phalen test and Tinel test). Electromyography (EMG) results supporting the diagnosis of CTS. Failed CTS nonsurgical treatment. Basal joint osteoarthritis Eaton stage II or greater Unacceptable pain localized in the basal joint appeared with activity, or reproduced by grind test or direct palpation Failed basal joint osteoarthritis nonsurgical treatment. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy Diabetes mellitus Acute trauma Rheumatoid arthritis Hipothyroidism Hyperthiroidism Posttraumatic arthritis Prior hand surgery procedures Nerve compression at proximal level Other nerve entrapments

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Single incision<br>Carpal tunnel release and basal joint arthroplasty through a single radial approach | Procedure: Carpal tunnel release and basal joint arthroplasty through single incision<br>* Group I: experimental - single incision The surgical technique chosen for thumb basal join was trapeziectomy with ligamentous reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), using flexor carpi radialis (FCR). Through a dorsal approach over trapeziometacarpal joint, the entire trapezium was excised. Volar traction of FCR allowed us to longitudinally incise the deep leaflet of FCR tendon until flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon was clearly visualized. Then, ulnar half of FCR tendon was harvested proximally through a second transverse incision in middle third of the forearm and split all the way to its insertion on the index metacarpal. A hole was placed in the base of the first metacarpal and FCR tendon was routed through the bone canal and then fixed with non-reabsorbable sutures. Finally, the tendon remanent was rolled up and placed into the trapezial void to act as a spacer.<br>|
| Active Comparator: Double incision<br>Double approach: carpal tunnel release through palmar approach and basal joint arthroplasty through radial approach | Procedure: Carpal tunnel release and basal joint arthroplasty through double incision<br>* Group II: active comparator - double incision Trapezial excision and ligament reconstruction were performed in the same way as in group I, except that FCR deep leaflet was not incised. After radial incision wound closure, carpal tunnel release was performed through a second separate longitudinal palmar incision.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change of CTS symptoms intensity | To assess the CTS symptoms intensity, patients filled out the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionaire. This questionnaire evaluates symptom's severity (11 items) and functional status (8 items) (1: no complaints, 5 maximum complaints possible). Minimum score is 19 and maximum 95. | Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change of hand function | Hand function was assessed through Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH). Minimum score is 0 (no disability) and maximum 100 (total disability). | Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively | 
| Change of hand pain | Pain was assessed through 10-visual analog scale. Minimum score is 0 (no pain) and maximum 10 (sever pain). | Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively | 
| Change of grip strength | Grip strength was measured the mean of 3 attempts, in kilograms, with correction for hand dominance, using a standard dynamometer. | Preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively |