A Comparison of JointRep® and Microfracture in Repair of Cartilage Lesions on the Femoral Condyle or Trochlea,

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The aim of the study is to compare whether JointRep® plus microfracture is more effective than microfracture alone when treating symptomatic focal articular cartilage lesions in the knee (femoral condyles or trochlea).

Detailed Description
-----------------
The aim of the JMAC study, an international multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial, is to assess the effectiveness and safety of JointRep®, a second-generation chitosan-based hydrogel for cartilage repair. A total of 185 subjects will be randomized 2:1 to either Microfracture plus JointRep® or Microfracture alone. The follow up will be at 24 months, with a planned interim analysis at 12 months. The primary endpoint is an objectively measured structural one (quantity of new cartilaginous tissue, assessing the percentage of fill) and it will be blindly assessed using a sophisticated quantitative MRI at 12 and 24 months. Two of the secondary endpoints are also structurally based and blindly measured: quality of the new tissue, quantifying the T2 (which measures the Collagen 2 content and orientation as well as degree of hydration); the upper and lower half of the new tissue T2 measurement will depict the degree of stratification of the new cartilaginous tissue. A semiquantitative MOCART-2 blinded analysis will also be carried out. The clinical outcomes will be measured using KOOS and Tegner, as well as a VAS and an EQ-5 questionnaire. All the secondary endpoints will be analyzed at the same 12 and 24 months timepoints. In addition, subject safety will be assessed through a record of adverse events.

Official Title
-----------------
A Randomized, Controlled, Comparative, Single-blinded, Multi-center Study Evaluating JointRep® and Microfracture in Repair of Focal Articular Cartilage Lesions on the Femoral Condyle or Trochlea, The JMAC Trial.

Conditions
-----------------
Chondral Defect, Articular Cartilage Defect, Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: JointRep®
* Procedure: Microfracture


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Be between 18-65 years old Have one or two focal articular cartilage lesion(s) (ICRS Grade 3 or 4A) on the femoral condyles or trochlea of the index knee; patellar tracking must be normal if the index lesion(s) is on the trochlea. Individually, a lesion can be between 2-7cm2. If more than one lesion is present, the sum of the two lesions should not exceed 10cm2. Within 6 months prior to treatment, have a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or arthroscopic confirmation of lesion(s) in the index knee. For patients older than 40 y.o, to have a radiological Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) grading from a standing knee radiograph taken less than 6 months previously, Grade 1 or If not, an actual test will be performed as part of the visit 1 procedures. Have a clinically stable knee, with no ligament deficiencies (<5mm side-to-side difference on Lachman and varus/valgus stress testing & Grade 0 or 1 on Pivot shift test) and the meniscal rims are intact (a maximum of 50% resection is allowed) Be able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate and have signed an Informed Consent Form specific to this study VAS pain great than or equal to 4 in the last week. Be willing and able to comply with all study procedures including all preoperative, post-operative and rehabilitation requirements If female and of child-bearing potential, must report double-barrier, contraceptive use (e.g. use of birth-control pill and condom) for at least 2 months prior to treatment and in the 12 months following treatment. If female and of child-bearing potential, have a negative pregnancy test prior to the surgical procedure and no intention of becoming pregnant in the 12 months following treatment. Exclusion Criteria: Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) >35kg/m2 Have more than two lesions (ICRS grade 3 or 4A) on any surface in the index knee Have kissing or opposing lesion(s) (ICRS grade 3 or 4A) of the condyle, tibia or patella in the index knee; additional linear lesions which bear Grade 3 or 4 characteristics may be acceptable if they are determined by the Investigator to be incidental, not clinically relevant, and consistent with the subject demographic Have malalignment of >5 degrees varus or valgus in the index knee based on standard AP x-rays requiring an osteotomy Have had any surgical treatment for cartilage repair in the index knee within 1 year prior to treatment Have had intra-articular injections within 3 months in the index knee Have a diagnosis of a concomitant knee injury which may confound assessment of the index knee (e.g., important meniscal injury) Have significant pain emanating from other lower body joints in the ipsilateral (hip, ankle) or contralateral (hip, knee, ankle) limb. Have known allergies to shellfish Have a known history of crystalloid or inflammatory arthropathy Have any condition that is unrelated to the index knee and significantly impairs walking ability (e.g., spinal stenosis, sciatica) Have advanced musculoskeletal disease Have active coagulation disorders Are currently using antibiotics Are participating concurrently in another clinical investigation, or have participated in a clinical investigation within the last 90 days, or intend to participate in another clinical investigation during the course of the study Are currently abusing drugs or alcohol or have a history of the same within the last 12 months Have any mental or psychological disorder that would impair their ability to complete the study questionnaires Are currently breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed any time during the course of the study Are currently a prisoner Have significant comorbidities or conditions associated with high-risk for surgical or anesthetic survival (e.g., renal failure, peripheral vascular disease, unstable cardiac disease, poorly controlled diabetes, immunosuppression, etc.) Have any medical condition or other circumstances, in the judgment of the investigator, that might interfere with the ability to return for follow-up visits, including any systemic illness, neuromuscular, neurosensory, or musculoskeletal deficiency that would render the subject unable to perform appropriate post-operative rehabilitation Have any condition which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude adequate evaluation of the device's safety and performance Intra-operative Exclusion Criteria: Subjects who meet any of the following intra-operative screening criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: Have lesion(s) in the index knee that are not contained (intact shoulders) and/or exceed 7 cm² in total size after debridement for a single lesion and 10cm2 for more than one lesion, if within the same condyle or the trochlea. If only a single lesion suitable to be included is identified, it might be between 2-7cm2. Minor concomitant procedures are allowed such as, but not limited to: Removal of loose bodies Plica excision Minor synovial removing Minor chondroplasty (debridement) Lysis of adhesions Meniscal trimming/suturing which respects the exclusion criteria.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Intervention<br>JointRep® plus microfracture | Device: JointRep®<br>* JointRep® is a medical device based on a thermogel polymer (Chitosan) for the treatment of chondral lesions, which consists of an injectable aqueous composition that forms a solid and sticky hydrogel in situ within cartilage defect(s). JointRep® is composed of an injectable thermo-gelling aqueous composition. It is used in conjunction with a Bone Marrow Stimulation type of procedure like Microfracture.<br>Procedure: Microfracture<br>* Microfracture is a bone marrow stimulation type of procedure where after debridement of the damaged chondral tissue within the lesion, obtention of stable vertical margins and curettage of the entire calcified layer, multiple holes are created with a variety of instruments (awls, picks, microdills, nanofracture) to establish a communication with the subchondral bone to create a blood clot to elicit the natural healing process<br>* Other names: Bone Marrow Stimulation;|
| Other: Control<br>Microfracture alone | Procedure: Microfracture<br>* Microfracture is a bone marrow stimulation type of procedure where after debridement of the damaged chondral tissue within the lesion, obtention of stable vertical margins and curettage of the entire calcified layer, multiple holes are created with a variety of instruments (awls, picks, microdills, nanofracture) to establish a communication with the subchondral bone to create a blood clot to elicit the natural healing process<br>* Other names: Bone Marrow Stimulation;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Lesion fill. | Percentage of lesion fill measured by 3D quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (qMRI). | 24-months post procedure. | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Visual Analogue Scale. | Pain score in treated knee using the visual analogue scale from 0(no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) . | Baseline and then at 3-months, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months post procedure. | 
| T2 scores. | Difference in quantitative T2 scores between investigational subjects and control subjects measured by qMRI. | 12 and 24-months post procedure. | 
| Treatment failure. | Proportion of subjects who do not experience a treatment failure and achieve ≥80% lesion fill (success rate). | 24-months post procedure. | 
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). | Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (pain, function, symptoms, sports/recreation and quality of life). 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates extreme problems. | 6 and 12 and 24-months post procedure. | 
| Tegner Activity Scale | Tegner activity scale provides a level of activity and is scored between 0 and 10. Level 0 is the worst activity level and Level 10 is the best activity level. | 6 and 12 and 24-months post procedure. | 
| Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue 2.0 (MOCART-2) score. | MOCART-2 score ranges form 0 (worst outcome) to 100 (best outcome) . | 6 and 12 and 24-months post procedure. | 
| Euro Quality of Life-5D (EQ-5D) instrument for measuring quality of life. | EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) instrument for measuring quality of life has two parts. The first assesses health in five parts (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety depression) with each scored form 1 (best outcome) to 5 (worst outcome). The second part consists of a visual analogue scale rating perceived health form 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health). | 6 and 12 and 24-months post procedure. | 
| Safety as Adverse Events related to the procedure | Evaluation of adverse events. | Baseline to 24-months post procedure. | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Bone Marrow Stimulation, Microfracture, Matrix Augmented Bone Marrow Stimulation, Chitosan