Comparison of Viusal Outcomes After Implantation of the POD 26% FineVision Toric (PhysIOL) and POD 26% Toric (PhysIOL)

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The study is an observational non-randomised controlled study comparing the visual acuity after implantation of the POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC with respect to the POD 26% TORIC

Detailed Description
-----------------
The study is an observational non-randomised controlled study comparing the visual acuity after implantation of the POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC with respect to the POD 26% TORIC This study includes both eyes of 24 patients implanted with the POD 26%FineVision Toric (group 1: 12 patients) and the POD 26% Toric (group 2: 12 patients) . The study primary goal is to compare the near visual acuity in both groups. Distance and intermediate visual acuities, defocus curve, refraction and straylight will be compared.

Official Title
-----------------
Comparison of Viusal Outcomes After Implantation of the POD 26% FineVision

Conditions
-----------------
Cataract

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: FineVision Toric


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patient older than 50 years old Regular corneal astigmatism >1.0 dioptres by IOL Master (regularity determined by the topography of the keratometry). Regular corneal astigmatism <2.5 dioptres by IOL Master (regularity determined by the topography of the keratometry). Group 1: patients after cataract surgery with Fine Vision toric implanted in both eyes Group 2: patients after cataract surgery with Ankoris implanted in both eyes Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures Exclusion Criteria: • - Irregular astigmatism Difficulty for cooperation (distance from their home, general health condition) Acute or chronic disease or illness that would increase risk or confound study results (e.g. diabetes mellitus (with retinopathy), immunocompromised, glaucoma etc…) Any ocular comorbidity History of ocular trauma or prior ocular surgery including refractive procedures Capsule or zonular abnormalities that may affect postoperative centration or tilt of the lens (e.g. pseudoexfoliation syndrome, chronic Uveitis, Marfan's syndrome) Pupil abnormalitis (non-reactive, tonic pupils, abnormally shaped pupils or pupils that do not dilate under mesopic/scotopic conditions) IOL spherical equivalent power lower than 10 D or greater than 30D Complicated surgery

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 50 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| 1POD26PFT<br>Patients implanted with the POD 26% FineVision Toric | Device: FineVision Toric<br>* Posterior chamber IOL which consists in a small plastic lens with plastic side struts, called haptics, to hold the lens in place within the capsular bag inside the eye<br>|
| 2POD26PT<br>Patients implanted with the POD 26% Toric | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The visual acuity at near of the POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC with respect to the POD 26% TORIC is improved of at least LogMAR 0.2. |  | 3 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The secondary objective is to measure far and intermediate visual acuity, the refraction, centration, rotational stability and to determine the amount of photic phenomena for both IOLs: POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC and POD 26% TORIC. |  | 3 months |