Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Arthritis:

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
One of the greatest success stories in rheumatology - the achievement of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remission - is tempered by the fact that individuals with RA are dramatically under evaluated and under treated to reduce the risk for heart attacks and strokes. This project will build the foundation for an intervention that will test the hypothesis that the patient-centered intervention tailored to patients with RA to improve hyperlipidemia screening and treatment, thereby decreasing the risk for heart attacks and strokes. The aims of this proposal are: Aim 1: To identify patient and physician barriers to lower the risk for heart attacks and strokes in patients with RA. Aim 2: To develop an intervention designed to optimize lipid screening and management in RA patients. This will consist of patient education and a decision support program to facilitate screening for hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol level) or initiation of medications to lower cholesterol (primary outcome) and self-efficacy (level of confidence in performing a task) in taking medications to lower cholesterol secondary outcome). Aim 3: To pilot test the efficacy and feasibility of intervention developed in Aim 2. The investigators will apply methods related to clinical trials to test the feasibility of the newly developed intervention.

Official Title
-----------------
Optimization of Hyperlipidemia Management Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Patient-centered Intervention Development

Conditions
-----------------
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Cardiovascular Diseases, Hyperlipidemias

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
* Behavioral: Standard of care


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Have RA Age between 40 and 75 years (inclusive) Provide a date of their next appointment with their rheumatologist Willing to work with a peer coach No recollection of having a cholesterol test within the past 2 years OR talking with a physician about cholesterol test results Speaks English Have a phone Has access to the internet Resides or lives in the US Exclusion Criteria: Do not have rheumatoid arthritis Younger than age 40 or older than age 75 Taking a statin History of known cardiovascular disease

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 40 Years
Maximum Age: 75 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Screening
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Peer coach guided online learning program<br> | Behavioral: Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis<br>* This intervention will help people with RA get tested for hyperlipidemia so that they can later discuss with their physician how to better treat their increased risk for cardiovascular disease.<br>|
| Placebo Comparator: Self-administered online learning program<br> | Behavioral: Standard of care<br>* Participants in this group will not receive peer coaches calls. They will receive additional educational materials about CVD risk and the regular care provided by their doctors.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Number of subjects screened for hyperlipidemia | Self-reported | 3 months post-intervention | 
| Number of subjects who initiated a statin | Self-reported | 3 months post-intervention | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSF) score | The scale consists of 10 items and each item score ranges from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (exactly true). Values 2 and 3 are assigned barely true and moderately true, respectively. Scores are summed across the 10 items to give a total score, with a possible range of 10-40. Higher scores indicate greater confidence in generalized self-efficacy. Scores above 30 indicate high generalized self-efficacy, and scores 30 or below indicate low to moderate generalized self-efficacy. | 3 months post-intervention | 
| Patient Activation Measure (PAM) score - 13 item | The scale consists of 13 items and each item score ranges from 0 (not applicable) to 4 (agree strongly). Values 1, 2, and 3 are assigned disagree strongly, disagree, and agree, respectively. Scores are summed across the 13 items to give a total score, with a range of 0-52. The mean score is then transformed into a standardized activation score ranging from 0-100, (the PAM score), based on a conversion table provided by the developer of the scale. Score ranges correspond to levels of activation, with higher levels indicating more activation: Level 1 - score of 47.0 or lower, Level 2 - score between 47.1 to 55.1, Level 3 - score between 55.2 to 72.4, Level 4 - score 72.5 or above. | 3 months post-intervention | 
| Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) score | The scale consists of 12 score-able items. The range for items 1 through 10 are from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Values 1 and 2 are assigned with some difficulty and with much difficulty, respectively. Scores for items 1 through 10 are summed to give a total and a formal score is calculated from a provided formula to give the patient's functional score. Item 11 is a pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as it can be) and the raw score is used as an evaluation of pain tolerance. Item 12 is a global estimate scale from 0 (very well) to 10 (very poorly) and the raw score is used as an evaluation of global estimate. The scores from item 1 through 10, 11, and 12 are summed with a range of 0-30 and this is the RAPID3 cumulative score. A final conversion table is used to simplify the score. A score between 0-1.0 is defined as near remission (NR); 1.3-2.0 is low severity (LS); 2.3-4.0 is moderate severity (MS); and 4.3-10.0 is high severity (HS). | 3 months post-intervention | 
| Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8) score | The scale consists of 8 items and each item score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Values 1 and 2 are assigned several days and more than half the days, respectively. Scores are summed across the 8 items. A score of 10 or greater is considered major depression, 20 or more is sever major depression. | 3 months post-intervention | 
| Social Support Survey score | The scale consists of 19 items and each score ranges from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time). Values 2, 3, and 4 are assigned a little of the time, some of the time, and most of the time, respectively. The survey consists of 4 separate social support sub-scales and an overall functional social support index. To obtain a score for each sub-scale the average of the scores for each item is calculated and have a range of 1-5. To obtain an overall support index score, the average is calculated for both the first 18 items in the scale and a the last item in the scale and have a range of 1-5. Scale scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale using a formula. A higher score for an individual scale or for the overall support index indicates more support. The average score for the overall support index is 70, so individuals scoring above 70 are categorized as having high support and individuals scoring 70 or lower are categorized as having low to moderate support. | 3 months post-intervention | 
| Medication Understanding and Use Self-Efficacy Scale (MUSE) score | The scale consists of 8 items and each score ranges from 4 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree). Values 2 and 3 are assigned somewhat disagree and somewhat agree, respectively. The MUSE scale provides three scores: an overall scale score (8 items) and 2 sub-scale scores (4 items each). Possible scores for overall MUSE range from 8-32, while sub-scale scores range from 4-16. A higher overall MUSE score or sub-scale score indicates a higher level of self-efficacy in understanding and using prescription medications. The average overall MUSE score is 30, so individuals scoring above 30 are categorized as having high medication understanding and use self-efficacy and individuals scoring 30 or lower are categorized as having low to moderate medication understanding and use self-efficacy. | 3 months post-intervention | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Self-efficacy, Patient activation, Social Cognitive Theory, Peer coaches