This is the hard version of the problem. The only difference is that in this version 1 ≤ q ≤ 10^5. You can make hacks only if both versions of the problem are solved.

There is a process that takes place on arrays a and b of length n and length n-1 respectively. 

The process is an infinite sequence of operations. Each operation is as follows: 

  * First, choose a random integer i (1 ≤ i ≤ n-1). 
  * Then, simultaneously set a_i = min\left(a_i, \frac{a_i+a_{i+1}-b_i}{2}\right) and a_{i+1} = max\left(a_{i+1}, \frac{a_i+a_{i+1}+b_i}{2}\right) without any rounding (so values may become non-integer). 

See notes for an example of an operation.

It can be proven that array a converges, i. e. for each i there exists a limit a_i converges to. Let function F(a, b) return the value a_1 converges to after a process on a and b.

You are given array b, but not array a. However, you are given a third array c. Array a is good if it contains only integers and satisfies 0 ≤ a_i ≤ c_i for 1 ≤ i ≤ n.

Your task is to count the number of good arrays a where F(a, b) ≥ x for q values of x. Since the number of arrays can be very large, print it modulo 10^9+7.

Input

The first line contains a single integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 100).

The second line contains n integers c_1, c_2 …, c_n (0 ≤ c_i ≤ 100).

The third line contains n-1 integers b_1, b_2, …, b_{n-1} (0 ≤ b_i ≤ 100).

The fourth line contains a single integer q (1 ≤ q ≤ 10^5).

The fifth line contains q space separated integers x_1, x_2, …, x_q (-10^5 ≤ x_i ≤ 10^5).

Output

Output q integers, where the i-th integer is the answer to the i-th query, i. e. the number of good arrays a where F(a, b) ≥ x_i modulo 10^9+7.

Example

Input


3
2 3 4
2 1
5
-1 0 1 -100000 100000


Output


56
28
4
60
0

Note

The following explanation assumes b = [2, 1] and c=[2, 3, 4] (as in the sample).

Examples of arrays a that are not good: 

  * a = [3, 2, 3] is not good because a_1 > c_1; 
  * a = [0, -1, 3] is not good because a_2 < 0. 



One possible good array a is [0, 2, 4]. We can show that no operation has any effect on this array, so F(a, b) = a_1 = 0.

Another possible good array a is [0, 1, 4]. In a single operation with i = 1, we set a_1 = min((0+1-2)/(2), 0) and a_2 = max((0+1+2)/(2), 1). So, after a single operation with i = 1, a becomes equal to [-1/2, 3/2, 4]. We can show that no operation has any effect on this array, so F(a, b) = -1/2.

Difficulty: VERY_HARD

Solutions:
def solve():
	MOD = 10 ** 9 + 7
	n = int(input())
	c = list(map(int, input().split()))
	b = [0] + list(map(int, input().split()))
	q = int(input())
	queries = list(map(int, input().split()))
	maxans = 1
	for c1 in c:
		maxans = maxans * (c1 + 1) % MOD
	ans = {}
	for i in range(1, n):
		b[i] += b[i - 1]
	s = lb = 0
	for i in range(1, n):
		s -= b[i]
		lb = min(lb, s // (i + 1))
	s = ub = c[0]
	for i in range(n):
		s += c[i] - b[i]
		ub = min(ub, s // (i + 1))
	for x in queries:
		if x <= lb:
			print(maxans)
		elif x > ub:
			print(0)
		elif x in ans:
			print(ans[x])
		else:
			dp0 = [1] * 10002
			dp0[0] = 0
			bd = 0
			for i in range(n):
				dp1 = [0] * 10002
				bd += b[i] + x
				for j in range(max(bd, 0), 10001):
					dp1[j + 1] = (dp1[j] + dp0[j + 1] - dp0[max(j - c[i], 0)]) % MOD
				dp0 = dp1[:]
			a = dp0[-1]
			ans[x] = a
			print(a)
import sys
input = lambda : sys.stdin.readline().rstrip()
solve()