{"Signatur": "CH_BGE_005", "Spider": "CH_BGE", "Sprache": "de", "Datum": "2012-04-26", "HTML": {"Datei": "CH_BGE/CH_BGE_005_BGE-138-III-382_2012-04-26.html", "URL": "https://search.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/clir/http/index.php?lang=de&type=highlight_simple_query&page=21&from_date=&to_date=&from_year=2012&to_year=2012&sort=relevance&insertion_date=&from_date_push=&top_subcollection_clir=bge&query_words=&part=all&de_fr=&de_it=&fr_de=&fr_it=&it_de=&it_fr=&orig=&translation=&rank=207&highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F138-III-382%3Ade&number_of_ranks=308&azaclir=clir", "Checksum": "1c04b7bcfd3179eed3981a1cb88ef982"}, "Scrapedate": "2025-06-16", "Num": ["BGE 138 III 382", "5A_59/2012"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Bundesgericht (BGE) Band III 26.04.2012 BGE 138 III 382 (5A_59/2012)"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume III 26.04.2012 BGE 138 III 382 (5A_59/2012)"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume III 26.04.2012 BGE 138 III 382 (5A_59/2012)"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Eidgenossenschaft Bundesgericht (BGE) Band III"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Conf\u00e9deration Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume III"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Confederazione Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume III"}, {"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "II. zivilrechtlichen Abteilung"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Art. 278 Abs. 3 SchKG; Art. 328 ZPO; Arresteinsprache und Revision. Der Beschwerdeentscheid, mit dem die Gutheissung der Arresteinsprache best\u00e4tigt wird, kann nicht wegen nachtr\u00e4glich entdeckter Tatsachen und Beweismittel in Revision gezogen werden (E. 3)."}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Art. 278 al. 3 LP; art. 328 CPC; opposition \u00e0 l'ordonnance de s\u00e9questre et r\u00e9vision. La d\u00e9cision sur recours, qui confirme l'admission de l'opposition \u00e0 l'ordonnance de s\u00e9questre, ne peut pas faire l'objet d'une demande de r\u00e9vision pour cause de faits et moyens de preuve d\u00e9couverts ult\u00e9rieurement (consid. 3)."}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Regesto\n<br>Art. 278 cpv. 3 LEF; art. 328 CPC; opposizione al decreto di sequestro e revisione. La decisione su reclamo, con la quale viene confermato l'accoglimento dell'opposizione al decreto di sequestro, non pu\u00f2 essere oggetto di una domanda di revisione per fatti e mezzi di prova appresi successivamente (consid. 3)."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/47/2482", "Zeit UTC": "16.06.2025 04:48:44", "Checksum": "1a79fab4736b1b42dafa4684682b3189"}