{"Signatur": "GE_CJ_013", "Spider": "GE_Gerichte", "Sprache": "fr", "Datum": "1996-11-12", "HTML": {"Datei": "GE_Gerichte/GE_CJ_013_A-970-1996_1996-11-12.html", "URL": "https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1872438?doc=", "Checksum": "2f130f41d88fda9305a0770772bbd4f4"}, "Scrapedate": "2023-01-01", "Num": ["A/970/1996"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["fr", "de", "it"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative 12.11.1996 A/970/1996"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Genf Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Ginevra Chambre administrative"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "IMPOT; TAXATION D'OFFICE; DELAI; PROCEDURE; PROLONGATION DU DELAI; PRINCIPE DE LA BONNE FOI; NOTIFICATION DE LA DECISION; RETARD; FIN | La notification d'un bordereau de taxation d'office avant l'expiration du d\u00e9lai imparti \u00e0 l'administr\u00e9 n'est pas compatible avec le principe de la bonne foi au respect duquel la Constitution f\u00e9d\u00e9rale soumet l'ensemble de l'activit\u00e9 administrative. | LCP.331 al.3"}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/35/2105", "Zeit UTC": "08.09.2025 22:27:08", "Checksum": "dd97d8e64c28ef6bae676b8a61290ae6"}