{"Signatur": "GE_CJ_013", "Spider": "GE_Gerichte", "Sprache": "de", "Datum": "2000-10-10", "HTML": {"Datei": "GE_Gerichte/GE_CJ_013_A-868-1999_2000-10-10.html", "URL": "https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1870478?doc=", "Checksum": "8e47ac8a2313f78b60da17eb4a46a9e6"}, "Scrapedate": "2023-01-01", "Num": ["A/868/1999"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["fr", "de", "it"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative 10.10.2000 A/868/1999"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Genf Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Ginevra Chambre administrative"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "ASSURANCE SOCIALE; ACCIDENT; AA; PREUVE; EXPERTISE; MEDECIN TRAITANT; FORCE PROBANTE; ASSU/LAA | Le TA privil\u00e9gie les avis des m\u00e9decins traitants car l'expert n'a pas revu la patiente r\u00e9cemment. | LAA.6"}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/35/2105", "Zeit UTC": "09.09.2025 03:27:08", "Checksum": "db0be0cc1f9ef9631c8f070756726a35"}