{"Signatur": "GE_CJ_013", "Spider": "GE_Gerichte", "Sprache": "fr", "Datum": "1995-12-19", "HTML": {"Datei": "GE_Gerichte/GE_CJ_013_cause-No-A-1475-1995_1995-12-19.html", "URL": "https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1880238?doc=", "Checksum": "b54ca83b3948b4d0913eecadba05479e"}, "Scrapedate": "2023-01-01", "Num": ["cause No A/1475/1995 - IE"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["fr", "de", "it"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative 19.12.1995 cause No A/1475/1995 - IE"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Genf Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Ginevra Chambre administrative"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "ANIMAL; PROTECTION DES ANIMAUX; CHIEN; SEQUESTRE(MESURE PROVISIONNELLE); EFFET SUSPENSIF DU RECOURS; DECISION INCIDENTE | La recourante n'apportant pas d'\u00e9l\u00e9ments d\u00e9montrant que les affirmations de l'office v\u00e9t\u00e9rinaire seraient inexactes, l'effet suspensif ne sera pas restitu\u00e9 \u00e0 son recours. | LPA.66 al.2"}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/35/2105", "Zeit UTC": "09.09.2025 03:30:33", "Checksum": "f4562c2faa3d00b4caab94f04f099572"}