{"Signatur": "CH_BGE_004", "Spider": "CH_BGE", "Sprache": "fr", "Datum": "2021-01-01", "HTML": {"Datei": "CH_BGE/CH_BGE_004_BGE-81-II-475_nodate.html", "URL": "https://www.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/clir/http/index.php?lang=de&type=highlight_simple_query&page=5&from_date=&to_date=&from_year=1955&to_year=1955&sort=relevance&insertion_date=&from_date_push=&top_subcollection_clir=bge&query_words=&part=all&de_fr=&de_it=&fr_de=&fr_it=&it_de=&it_fr=&orig=&translation=&rank=49&highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F81-II-475%3Ade&number_of_ranks=270&azaclir=clir", "Checksum": "a5f206a01ab6c322df8e73952c4bbe84"}, "Num": ["BGE 81 II 475"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Bundesgericht (BGE) Band II BGE 81 II 475"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume II BGE 81 II 475"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume II BGE 81 II 475"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Eidgenossenschaft Bundesgericht (BGE) Band II"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Conf\u00e9deration Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume II"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Confederazione Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume II"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Revision, Art. 137 lit. a OG. 1. Zul\u00e4ssigkeit (Erw. 1). 2. Es gen\u00fcgt, dass die strafbare Handlung die tats\u00e4chlichen Feststellungen des kantonalen Entscheids beeinflusst hat (Erw. 2 a). 3. Voraussetzungen, unter denen die Revisionsinstanz selber \u00fcber das Vorliegen einer strafbaren Handlung entscheiden kann (Erw. 2 b)."}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Demande de revision, art. 137 litt. a OJ. 1. Conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 (consid. 1). 2. Il suffit que l'infraction ait influenc\u00e9 les constatations de fait du jugement cantonal (consid. 2 a). 3. Quand l'autorit\u00e9 de revision peut-elle se prononcer elle-m\u00eame sur l'existence de l'infraction? (consid. 2 b)."}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Regesto\n<br>Domanda di revisione, art. 137 lett. a OG. 1. Ricevibilit\u00e0 (consid. 1). 2. Basta che il reato abbia influito sugli accertamenti di fatto della sentenza cantonale (consid. 2 a). 3. Quando l'autorit\u00e0 di revisione pu\u00f2 pronunciarsi essa stessa sull'esistenza del reato? (consid. 2 b)."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/47/498", "Zeit UTC": "15.12.2021 22:32:54", "Checksum": "3dac8b2c622238e1233eb8d1c268b3cf"}