{"Signatur": "GE_CJ_013", "Spider": "GE_Gerichte", "Sprache": "fr", "Datum": "1999-11-02", "HTML": {"Datei": "GE_Gerichte/GE_CJ_013_A-1170-1998_1999-11-02.html", "URL": "https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1870578?doc=", "Checksum": "c0b940fe354eef70abde71931ba02279"}, "Scrapedate": "2023-01-01", "Num": ["A/1170/1998"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["fr", "de", "it"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative 02.11.1999 A/1170/1998"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Genf Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Ginevra Chambre administrative"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "ASSURANCE SOCIALE; ACCIDENT; AA; AFFECTION DENTAIRE; ECONOMIE DU TRAITEMENT; ASSU | Dent en mauvais \u00e9tat qui casse \u00e0 la suite d'un coup de poing.L'\u00e9tat pr\u00e9existant ne rompt pas le lieu de causalit\u00e9.Renvoi de la cause \u00e0 la CNA pour examiner quel traitement dentraire est justifi\u00e9 (selon le principe de l'\u00e9conomie de traitement). | OLAA.9 al.1; LAA.36 al.1; LAA.54"}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/35/2105", "Zeit UTC": "09.09.2025 03:28:21", "Checksum": "501b44dc0d16a5cf51d4756ccaf27fe6"}