{"Signatur": "GE_CJ_013", "Spider": "GE_Gerichte", "Sprache": "de", "Datum": "1995-06-27", "HTML": {"Datei": "GE_Gerichte/GE_CJ_013_cause-No-A-852-1994-_1995-06-27.html", "URL": "https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1880253?doc=", "Checksum": "ca6178908876722a2029d1972de865c9"}, "Scrapedate": "2023-01-01", "Num": ["cause No A/852/1994 - FIN"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["fr", "de", "it"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative 27.06.1995 cause No A/852/1994 - FIN"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Genf Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Ginevra Chambre administrative"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "IMPOT; IMPOT A LA SOURCE; EGALITE DE TRAITEMENT; NORME; EXAMEN PREJUDICIEL | N'est pas manifestement disproportionn\u00e9e, une diff\u00e9rence de Frs 18'984.entre l'imposition \u00e0 la source et l'imposition ordinaire, laquelle \u00e9quivaut \u00e0 un surplus d'imp\u00f4t de 11 %, sans tenir compte de l'imp\u00f4t sur la fortune. | RALCP.2"}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/35/2105", "Zeit UTC": "09.09.2025 03:30:58", "Checksum": "0ea4a7b4bc182149b0b0ce9895694497"}