{"Signatur": "CH_BGE_004", "Spider": "CH_BGE", "Sprache": "de", "Datum": "2019-12-09", "HTML": {"Datei": "CH_BGE/CH_BGE_004_BGE-146-II-217_2019-12-09.html", "URL": "https://search.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/clir/http/index.php?lang=de&type=highlight_simple_query&page=2&from_date=&to_date=&from_year=2019&to_year=2019&sort=relevance&insertion_date=&from_date_push=&top_subcollection_clir=bge&query_words=&part=all&de_fr=&de_it=&fr_de=&fr_it=&it_de=&it_fr=&orig=&translation=&rank=11&highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F146-II-217%3Ade&number_of_ranks=216&azaclir=clir", "Checksum": "f77c33fb79d5258090162114764cfeac"}, "Scrapedate": "2025-06-16", "Num": ["BGE 146 II 217", "2C_985/2015"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Bundesgericht (BGE) Band II 09.12.2019 BGE 146 II 217 (2C_985/2015)"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume II 09.12.2019 BGE 146 II 217 (2C_985/2015)"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume II 09.12.2019 BGE 146 II 217 (2C_985/2015)"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Eidgenossenschaft Bundesgericht (BGE) Band II"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Conf\u00e9deration Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume II"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Confederazione Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume II"}, {"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "II. \u00f6ffentlich-rechtlichen Abteilung"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Art. 7 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 49a KG; Art. 7 EMRK; Art. 2-6 SVKG; Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 11 Abs. 3 lit. a und b der Verordnung \u00fcber die Kontrolle von Unternehmenszusammenschl\u00fcssen; Voraussetzung und Missbr\u00e4uchlichkeit einer Kosten-Preis-Schere; gesetzliche Grundlage; Kriterien und Bemessung der Sanktionierung. Missbr\u00e4uchlichkeit einer Kosten-Preis-Schere (E. 5): strukturelle Voraussetzungen einer Kosten-Preis-Schere (E. 5.2); wettbewerbsrelevantes Verhalten ist die unzureichende Marge (E. 5.3), die mit einem Kosten-Preis-Vergleich beim marktbeherrschenden Unternehmen zu eruieren ist (E. 5.4); Nachweis einer missbr\u00e4uchlichen Kosten-Preis-Schere (E. 5.5); zeitliche Dimension des Kosten-Preis-Vergleichs (E. 5.7). Rechtsanwendung: Art. 7 Abs. 1 KG ist verletzt (E. 6). Pr\u00fcfung alternativer gesetzlicher Grundlagen (E. 7). Tatbestand von Art. 49a Abs. 1 KG und Subsumtion (E. 8): Abgleich zwischen Art. 7 EMRK und Art. 7 Abs. 1 KG (E. 8.3); Subsumtion (E. 8.5). Rechtsfolge von Art. 49a Abs. 1 KG (E. 9): Ermittlung (E. 9.2) und Erh\u00f6hung des Basisbetrags (E. 9.3); mildernde Umst\u00e4nde (E. 9.4)."}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Art. 7 al. 1 et 2, art. 49a LCart; art. 7 CEDH; art. 2-6 OS LCart; art. 5 al. 2, art. 11 al. 3 let. a et b de l'ordonnance sur le contr\u00f4le des concentrations d'entreprises; condition et caract\u00e8re abusif d'un effet de ciseau tarifaire; bases l\u00e9gales; crit\u00e8res et fixation de la sanction. Caract\u00e8re abusif d'un effet de ciseau tarifaire ou \"compression des marges\" (consid. 5): conditions structurelles d'un effet de ciseau tarifaire (consid. 5.2); le comportement pertinent sur le plan concurrentiel est la marge insuffisante (consid. 5.3), qui doit se d\u00e9terminer par une comparaison prix-co\u00fbts aupr\u00e8s de l'entreprise en position dominante (consid. 5.4); preuve d'un effet de ciseau tarifaire abusif (consid. 5.5); dimension temporelle de la comparaison prix-co\u00fbts (consid. 5.7). Application du droit: l'art. 7 al. 1 LCart est viol\u00e9 (consid. 6). Examen de bases l\u00e9gales alternatives (consid. 7). El\u00e9ments constitutifs de l'art. 49a al. 1 LCart et subsomption (consid. 8): compatibilit\u00e9 entre l'art. 7 CEDH et l'art. 7 al. 1 LCart (consid. 8.3); subsomption (consid. 8.5). Cons\u00e9quence juridique de l'art. 49a al. 1 LCart (consid. 9): fixation (consid. 9.2) et augmentation du montant de base (consid. 9.3); circonstances att\u00e9nuantes (consid. 9.4)."}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Regesto\n<br>Art. 7 cpv. 1 e 2, art. 49a LCart; art. 7 CEDU; art. 2-6 OS LCart; art. 5 cpv. 2, art. 11 cpv. 3 lett. a e b dell'ordinanza concernente il controllo delle concentrazioni di imprese; condizione e carattere abusivo di una compressione dei margini; base legale; criteri e fissazione della sanzione. Carattere abusivo di una compressione dei margini (consid. 5): condizioni strutturali di una compressione dei margini (consid. 5.2); il comportamento rilevante, sul piano concorrenziale, \u00e8 il margine insufficiente (consid. 5.3); esso deve essere determinato facendo un paragone tra prezzo e costi presso l'impresa in posizione dominante (consid. 5.4); prova di una compressione dei margini abusiva (consid. 5.5); dimensione temporale del paragone tra prezzo e costi (consid. 5.7). Applicazione del diritto: l'art. 7 cpv. 1 LCart \u00e8 violato (consid. 6). Esame di basi legali alternative (consid. 7). Fattispecie regolata dall'art. 49a cpv. 1 LCart e sussunzione (consid. 8): compatibilit\u00e0 tra l'art. 7 CEDU e l'art. 7 cpv. 1 LCart (consid. 8.3); sussunzione (consid. 8.5). Conseguenza giuridica dell'art. 49a cpv. 1 LCart (consid. 9): fissazione (consid. 9.2) e aumento del montante di base (consid. 9.3); circostanze attenuanti (consid. 9.4)."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/47/2482", "Zeit UTC": "16.06.2025 02:16:47", "Checksum": "90dd9207caf4af2dfde7ccc1a0f70cf0"}