{"Signatur": "CH_BGE_003", "Spider": "CH_BGE", "Sprache": "de", "Datum": "2021-01-01", "HTML": {"Datei": "CH_BGE/CH_BGE_003_BGE-118-Ib-49_nodate.html", "URL": "https://www.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/clir/http/index.php?lang=de&type=highlight_simple_query&page=25&from_date=&to_date=&from_year=1992&to_year=1992&sort=relevance&insertion_date=&from_date_push=&top_subcollection_clir=bge&query_words=&part=all&de_fr=&de_it=&fr_de=&fr_it=&it_de=&it_fr=&orig=&translation=&rank=241&highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F118-IB-49%3Ade&number_of_ranks=372&azaclir=clir", "Checksum": "ed97176446a83fa68e63872bf098363d"}, "Num": ["BGE 118 Ib 49"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Bundesgericht (BGE) Band Ib BGE 118 Ib 49"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume Ib BGE 118 Ib 49"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume Ib BGE 118 Ib 49"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Eidgenossenschaft Bundesgericht (BGE) Band Ib"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Conf\u00e9deration Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume Ib"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Confederazione Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume Ib"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Art. 24 RPG; Baubewilligungspflicht f\u00fcr einen Drahtmaschenzaun ausserhalb der Bauzone. 1. Zul\u00e4ssigkeit der Verwaltungsgerichtsbeschwerde gegen einen Entscheid, in dem statt kantonalem Recht richtigerweise Art. 24 RPG h\u00e4tte angewendet werden m\u00fcssen (E. 1a). 2. Ein Drahtmaschenzaun ausserhalb der Bauzone untersteht der Baubewilligungspflicht (E. 2)."}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Art. 24 LAT; exigence d'une autorisation de construire pour la r\u00e9alisation d'un enclos en treillis hors de la zone \u00e0 b\u00e2tir. 1. Recevabilit\u00e9 du recours de droit administratif contre une d\u00e9cision qui aurait d\u00fb \u00eatre fond\u00e9e non pas sur le droit cantonal, mais sur l'art. 24 LAT (consid. 1a). 2. Un enclos en treillis r\u00e9alis\u00e9 hors de la zone \u00e0 b\u00e2tir est soumis \u00e0 l'exigence d'une autorisation de construire (consid. 2)."}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Regesto\n<br>Art. 24 LPT; assoggettamento a un'autorizzazione a costruire per la realizzazione di una cinta metallica situata fuori dalla zona edificabile. 1. Ammissibilit\u00e0 del ricorso di diritto amministrativo contro una decisione in cui, invece del diritto cantonale, si sarebbe dovuto applicare, correttamente, l'art. 24 LPT (consid. 1a). 2. Una cinta metallica realizzata fuori dalla zona edificabile \u00e8 soggetta a un'autorizzazione a costruire (consid. 2)."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/47/498", "Zeit UTC": "16.12.2021 18:03:41", "Checksum": "9d90ffa75098f02f660098b402c75bbe"}