{"Signatur": "VD_TC_006", "Spider": "VD_FindInfo", "Sprache": "fr", "Datum": "2009-06-08", "HTML": {"Datei": "VD_FindInfo/VD_TC_006_AP---2009---50_2009-06-08.html", "URL": "https://www.findinfo-tc.vd.ch/justice/findinfo-pub/html/1483495", "Checksum": "cfe78ebfed52e90c0f6fd76f4903278d"}, "Num": ["AP / 2009 / 50"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["fr", "de", "it"], "Text": "Vaud Tribunal cantonal Cour de cassation p\u00e9nale 08.06.2009 AP / 2009 / 50"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Waadtland Cour de cassation p\u00e9nale"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Vaud Tribunal cantonal Cour de cassation p\u00e9nale"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Vaud Cour de cassation p\u00e9nale"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "NULLIT\u00c9, VICE DE PROC\u00c9DURE, DROIT D'\u00caTRE ENTENDU, ADMINISTRATION DES PREUVES, GAZ LACRYMOG\u00c8NE | 6 CEDH, 365 al. 1 CPP, 366 al. 1 CPP, 439 al. 2 CPP, 27 al. 2 Cst-VD, 29 al. 2 Cst."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/39/599", "Zeit UTC": "27.03.2022 14:54:39", "Checksum": "a07b7887af86a3e3a7621445d6d7bd37"}