{"Signatur": "CH_BGE_006", "Spider": "CH_BGE", "Sprache": "de", "Datum": "2021-01-01", "HTML": {"Datei": "CH_BGE/CH_BGE_006_BGE-82-IV-204_nodate.html", "URL": "https://www.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/clir/http/index.php?lang=de&type=highlight_simple_query&page=2&from_date=&to_date=&from_year=1956&to_year=1956&sort=relevance&insertion_date=&from_date_push=&top_subcollection_clir=bge&query_words=&part=all&de_fr=&de_it=&fr_de=&fr_it=&it_de=&it_fr=&orig=&translation=&rank=16&highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F82-IV-204%3Ade&number_of_ranks=207&azaclir=clir", "Checksum": "0760b7f199cacd6b378fdcf3311bfbb2"}, "Num": ["BGE 82 IV 204"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Bundesgericht (BGE) Band IV BGE 82 IV 204"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume IV BGE 82 IV 204"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume IV BGE 82 IV 204"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Eidgenossenschaft Bundesgericht (BGE) Band IV"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Conf\u00e9deration Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume IV"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Confederazione Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume IV"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>1. Art. 26 MSchG (Markenber\u00fchmung) schliesst die Anwendung von Art. 13 lit. b UWG aus. 2. Die unwahre Ank\u00fcndigung \"Patente angemeldet\" ist keine Patentber\u00fchmung im Sinne des Art. 82 PatG, dagegen unlauterer Wettbewerb nach Art. 13 lit. b U WG."}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>1. L'application de l'art. 26 LMF (en cas d'allusion fallacieuse au d\u00e9p\u00f4t de la marque) exclut celle de l'art. 13 lit. b LCD. 2. L'emploi, contraire \u00e0 la v\u00e9rit\u00e9, du terme \"Brevets demand\u00e9s\" constitue non pas une allusion fallacieuse \u00e0 une protection au sens de l'art. 82 LBI, mais un acte de concurrence d\u00e9loyale selon l'art. 13 lit. b LCD."}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Regesto\n<br>1. L'applicazione dell'art. 26 LMF (in caso di allusione al deposito di una marca atta a indurre in errore) esclude quella dell'art. 13 lett. b LCS. 2. L'uso, contrario alla verit\u00e0, del termine \"brevetto annunciato\" non costituisce un'allusione a una protezione atta a indurre in errore a'sensi dell'art. 82 LBI, ma un atto di concorrenza sleale giusta l'art. 13 lett. b LCS."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/47/498", "Zeit UTC": "15.12.2021 21:40:57", "Checksum": "c1f95e97f4016f59632fec54783d2cf1"}