{"Signatur": "CH_BSTG_001", "Spider": "CH_BSTG", "Datum": "2012-11-02", "PDF": {"Datei": "CH_BSTG/CH_BSTG_001_BB-2012-140_2012-11-02.pdf", "URL": "https://bstger.weblaw.ch/files/20120926_BB_2012_140.pdf", "Checksum": "6b8b1a7483f59207dd7b050d99a50288"}, "Num": ["BB.2012.140"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Bundesstrafgericht 02.11.2012(publiziert) BB.2012.140"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Tribunal p\u00e9nal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral 02.11.2012(publi\u00e9) BB.2012.140"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Tribunale penale federale 02.11.2012(pubblicato) BB.2012.140"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Eidgenossenschaft Bundesstrafgericht "}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Conf\u00e9deration Tribunal p\u00e9nal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral "}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Confederazione Tribunale penale federale "}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "Ausstand des gesamten Berufungsgerichts (Art. 59 Abs. 1 lit. d i.V.m. Art. 56 StPO). Aufschiebende Wirkung (Art. 387 StPO)."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/37/510", "Zeit UTC": "07.12.2021 02:34:27", "Checksum": "69941e9a2978309642045303611f52d3"}