{"Signatur": "GE_CJ_013", "Spider": "GE_Gerichte", "Sprache": "fr", "Datum": "1997-09-02", "HTML": {"Datei": "GE_Gerichte/GE_CJ_013_A-1248-1995_1997-09-02.html", "URL": "https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1871232?doc=", "Checksum": "fed7bef991cf2fd195a14862752a046e"}, "Scrapedate": "2023-01-01", "Num": ["A/1248/1995"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["fr", "de", "it"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative 02.09.1997 A/1248/1995"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Genf Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Ginevra Chambre administrative"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "ASSURANCE SOCIALE; AM; TARIF-CADRE; TRAITEMENT AMBULATOIRE; TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL; REMBOURSEMENT DE FRAIS(ASSURANCE); PRESTATION D'ASSURANCE(EN GENERAL); COUVERTURE; JURIDICTION ARBITRALE; PRINCIPE DE LA BONNE FOI; RETROACTIVITE; ASSU | La conclusion d'une nouvelle convention tarifaire ne saurait d\u00e9ployer des effets r\u00e9troactifs pour les assur\u00e9s, \u00e0 moins qu'elle ne le pr\u00e9voie express\u00e9ment. | LAMA.22 bis al.2"}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/35/2105", "Zeit UTC": "09.09.2025 03:29:27", "Checksum": "64fcff87071b5c2c96c30d7a2884348d"}