{"Signatur": "CH_BGE_006", "Spider": "CH_BGE", "Sprache": "de", "Datum": "2021-01-01", "HTML": {"Datei": "CH_BGE/CH_BGE_006_BGE-107-IV-194_nodate.html", "URL": "https://www.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/clir/http/index.php?lang=de&type=highlight_simple_query&page=8&from_date=&to_date=&from_year=1981&to_year=1981&sort=relevance&insertion_date=&from_date_push=&top_subcollection_clir=bge&query_words=&part=all&de_fr=&de_it=&fr_de=&fr_it=&it_de=&it_fr=&orig=&translation=&rank=74&highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F107-IV-194%3Ade&number_of_ranks=370&azaclir=clir", "Checksum": "ee83a6c8b439783f73789a46a35516bd"}, "Num": ["BGE 107 IV 194"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Bundesgericht (BGE) Band IV BGE 107 IV 194"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume IV BGE 107 IV 194"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume IV BGE 107 IV 194"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Eidgenossenschaft Bundesgericht (BGE) Band IV"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Conf\u00e9deration Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume IV"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Confederazione Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume IV"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Art. 40 SVG, Art. 29 VRV. 1. Die Beschr\u00e4nkung des Gebrauchs der Lichthupe bei Tage auf die Ank\u00fcndigung eines \u00dcberholman\u00f6vers gem\u00e4ss Art. 29 Abs. 3 VRV widerspricht Art. 40 SVG (Erw. 1a und b). 2. Radarwarnungen mittels der Lichthupe sind unn\u00f6tige Warnsignale und sind deshalb nicht erlaubt (Erw. 1c)."}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Art. 40 LCR, art. 29 OCR. 1. Le fait de n'autoriser l'usage diurne de l'avertisseur optique que pour aviser d'un d\u00e9passement, ainsi que le pr\u00e9voit l'art. 29 al. 3 OCR, n'est pas conforme \u00e0 l'art. 40 LCR (consid. 1 litt. a et b). 2. Avertir d'un contr\u00f4le radar au moyen d'un appel de phares est un signal inutile, partant illicite (consid. 1 litt. c)."}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Regesto\n<br>Art. 40 LCS, art. 29 ONCS. 1. Il fatto di autorizzare l'uso diurno dell'avvisatore luminoso solo per avvertire del sorpasso il conducente che precede, come stabilito dall'art. 29 cpv. 3 ONCS, \u00e8 in contraddizione con l'art. 40 LCS (consid. 1a, b). 2. Attirare mediante l'avvisatore luminoso l'attenzione su di un controllo radar costituisce un segnale d'avvertimento inutile ed \u00e8 pertanto illecito (consid. 1c)."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/47/498", "Zeit UTC": "15.12.2021 23:19:45", "Checksum": "577f34bdaf359c734f85f2e25ace5fc0"}