{"Signatur": "GE_CJ_013", "Spider": "GE_Gerichte", "Sprache": "de", "Datum": "2001-05-29", "HTML": {"Datei": "GE_Gerichte/GE_CJ_013_A-668-2000_2001-05-29.html", "URL": "https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1870426?doc=", "Checksum": "cc60fe664fd6b0a11d71fd3977042552"}, "Scrapedate": "2023-01-01", "Num": ["A/668/2000"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["fr", "de", "it"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative 29.05.2001 A/668/2000"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Genf Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Gen\u00e8ve Cour de justice (Cour de droit public) Chambre administrative"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Ginevra Chambre administrative"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "ASSURANCE SOCIALE; ACCIDENT; AA; REVISION(DECISION); EXPERTISE; AFFECTION PSYCHIQUE; ASSU | Une expertise donnant une appr\u00e9ciation diff\u00e9rente des faits n'est pas un fait nouveau cr\u00e9ant un cas de r\u00e9vision. | LAA.108"}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/35/2105", "Zeit UTC": "09.09.2025 03:25:16", "Checksum": "87c377ea73223d0e939b1dfe392f2cc2"}