{"Signatur": "CH_BGE_004", "Spider": "CH_BGE", "Sprache": "de", "Datum": "1977-01-01", "HTML": {"Datei": "CH_BGE/CH_BGE_004_BGE-103-II-307_1977.html", "URL": "https://search.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/clir/http/index.php?lang=de&type=highlight_simple_query&page=8&from_date=&to_date=&from_year=1977&to_year=1977&sort=relevance&insertion_date=&from_date_push=&top_subcollection_clir=bge&query_words=&part=all&de_fr=&de_it=&fr_de=&fr_it=&it_de=&it_fr=&orig=&translation=&rank=76&highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F103-II-307%3Ade&number_of_ranks=351&azaclir=clir", "Checksum": "343ea2f49c8a468e1a2341f50ebe3db3"}, "Scrapedate": "2025-05-15", "Num": ["BGE 103 II 307"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Bundesgericht (BGE) Band II 1977 BGE 103 II 307"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume II 1977 BGE 103 II 307"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume II 1977 BGE 103 II 307"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Eidgenossenschaft Bundesgericht (BGE) Band II"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Conf\u00e9deration Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume II"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Confederazione Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume II"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Kartellabrede, Rechtfertigungsgr\u00fcnde. 1. Art. 4 Abs. 1 und Art. 6 Abs. 1 KG. Kartellrechtliche Auseinandersetzung zwischen einer Handelsfirma, die keine eigenen Transportmittel besitzt, und Schiffahrtsunternehmen wegen angeblicher Behinderung im Transport von Getreide. Offen gelassen, ob die Firma behindert worden und klageberechtigt sei (E. 2). 2. Art. 5 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 KG. Schutzw\u00fcrdige Interessen, welche die angefochtene Massnahme jedenfalls zul\u00e4ssig machten (E. 3)."}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Accord cartellaire, motifs justifiant une entrave \u00e0 la concurrence. 1. Art. 4 al. 1 et art. 6 al. 1 LCart. Action intent\u00e9e pour une pr\u00e9tendue entrave \u00e0 la concurrence dans le transport de c\u00e9r\u00e9ales par une maison de commerce ne poss\u00e9dant pas ses propres moyens de transport contre des entreprises de navigation. La demanderesse a-t-elle subi une entrave \u00e0 la concurrence et a-t-elle qualit\u00e9 pour agir? Question laiss\u00e9e ouverte (consid. 2). 2. Art. 5 al. 1 et al. 2 LCart. Int\u00e9r\u00eats l\u00e9gitimes justifiant en tout cas la mesure attaqu\u00e9e (consid. 3)."}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Regesto\n<br>Accordi cartellari, motivi che giustificano ostacoli alla concorrenza. 1. Art. 4 cpv. 1 e art. 6 cpv. 1 LC. Azione fondata su pretesi ostacoli alla concorrenza nel trasporto di cereali, intentata da una ditta che non possiede propri mezzi di trasporto, contro imprese di navigazione. L'attrice ha subito ostacoli alla concorrenza ed \u00e8 pertanto legittimata all'azione? Questione lasciata indecisa (consid. 2). 2. Art. 5 cpv. 1 e cpv. 2 LC. Interessi legittimi che giustificano comunque il provvedimento impugnato (consid. 3)."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/47/2450", "Zeit UTC": "15.05.2025 23:37:46", "Checksum": "14a9f043da8fd161af705cbb7d6e8ddd"}