{"Signatur": "CH_BGE_007", "Spider": "CH_BGE", "Sprache": "fr", "Datum": "2013-10-28", "HTML": {"Datei": "CH_BGE/CH_BGE_007_BGE-139-V-496_2013-10-28.html", "URL": "https://search.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/clir/http/index.php?lang=de&type=highlight_simple_query&page=6&from_date=&to_date=&from_year=2013&to_year=2013&sort=relevance&insertion_date=&from_date_push=&top_subcollection_clir=bge&query_words=&part=all&de_fr=&de_it=&fr_de=&fr_it=&it_de=&it_fr=&orig=&translation=&rank=54&highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F139-V-496%3Ade&number_of_ranks=267&azaclir=clir", "Checksum": "9255e3fbd7c103df5e2db19ecea01f34"}, "Scrapedate": "2025-06-16", "Num": ["BGE 139 V 496", "9C_801/2012"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Bundesgericht (BGE) Band V 28.10.2013 BGE 139 V 496 (9C_801/2012)"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume V 28.10.2013 BGE 139 V 496 (9C_801/2012)"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume V 28.10.2013 BGE 139 V 496 (9C_801/2012)"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Eidgenossenschaft Bundesgericht (BGE) Band V"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Conf\u00e9deration Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume V"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Confederazione Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume V"}, {"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "IIe Cour de droit social"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Regeste\u00a0a\n<br>Art. 61 lit. a ATSG; Art. 69 Abs. 1<sup>bis</sup> IVG; Auferlegung der Kosten f\u00fcr ein Gerichtsgutachten im Verfahren der Invalidenversicherung. Kriterien zur Beurteilung der Frage, ob die Kosten eines Gerichtsgutachtens zu Lasten der Verwaltung gehen (E. 4.4). <br>\nRegeste\u00a0b\n<br>Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV; Anspruch auf rechtliches Geh\u00f6r; Pflicht zur Begr\u00fcndung von Entscheiden. Grunds\u00e4tze zur Begr\u00fcndungspflicht betreffend die Parteientsch\u00e4digung (Wiedergabe der Rechtsprechung; E. 5)."}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Regeste\u00a0a\n<br>Art. 61 let. a LPGA; art. 69 al. 1<sup>bis</sup> LAI; prise en charge des frais d'une expertise judiciaire dans la proc\u00e9dure en mati\u00e8re d'assurance-invalidit\u00e9. Crit\u00e8res \u00e0 prendre en consid\u00e9ration pour d\u00e9terminer si les frais d'une expertise judiciaire peuvent \u00eatre mis \u00e0 la charge de l'autorit\u00e9 administrative (consid. 4.4). <br>\nRegeste\u00a0b\n<br>Art. 29 al. 2 Cst.; droit d'\u00eatre entendu; obligation de motiver les d\u00e9cisions. Principes r\u00e9gissant l'obligation de motiver les d\u00e9cisions en mati\u00e8re de d\u00e9pens (rappel de la jurisprudence; consid. 5)."}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Regesto\u00a0a\n<br>Art. 61 lett. a LPGA; art. 69 cpv. 1<sup>bis</sup> LAI; presa a carico delle spese di una perizia giudiziaria nella procedura di assicurazione per l'invalidit\u00e0. Criteri da prendere in considerazione per determinare se le spese di una perizia giudiziaria possono essere poste a carico dell'autorit\u00e0 amministrativa (consid. 4.4). <br>\nRegesto\u00a0b\n<br>Art. 29 cpv. 2 Cost.; diritto di essere sentito; obbligo di motivare le decisioni. Principi disciplinanti l'obbligo di motivare le decisioni in materia di ripetibili (richiamo della giurisprudenza; consid. 5)."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/47/2482", "Zeit UTC": "16.06.2025 03:46:40", "Checksum": "aedaaccefe70ba32a6c9d9a93af5e98f"}