{"Signatur": "CH_BGE_004", "Spider": "CH_BGE", "Sprache": "fr", "Datum": "2022-05-30", "HTML": {"Datei": "CH_BGE/CH_BGE_004_BGE-148-II-426_2022-05-30.html", "URL": "https://search.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/clir/http/index.php?lang=de&type=highlight_simple_query&page=11&from_date=&to_date=&from_year=2022&to_year=2022&sort=relevance&insertion_date=&from_date_push=&top_subcollection_clir=bge&query_words=&part=all&de_fr=&de_it=&fr_de=&fr_it=&it_de=&it_fr=&orig=&translation=&rank=106&highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F148-II-426%3Ade&number_of_ranks=195&azaclir=clir", "Checksum": "578de261ec10f9f0b82ddf5092cb869a"}, "Scrapedate": "2025-06-16", "Num": ["BGE 148 II 426", "2C_575/2020"], "Kopfzeile": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Bundesgericht (BGE) Band II 30.05.2022 BGE 148 II 426 (2C_575/2020)"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume II 30.05.2022 BGE 148 II 426 (2C_575/2020)"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume II 30.05.2022 BGE 148 II 426 (2C_575/2020)"}], "Meta": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Eidgenossenschaft Bundesgericht (BGE) Band II"}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Conf\u00e9deration Tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral (ATF) Volume II"}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Confederazione Tribunale federale (DTF) Volume II"}, {"Sprachen": ["de", "fr", "it"], "Text": "IIe Cour de droit public"}], "Abstract": [{"Sprachen": ["de"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Art. 12 AVG; Art. 26 AVV; Art. 319 OR; Personalverleih; digitale Plattform, die Essenslieferungen nach Hause anbietet (Uber Eats). Gem\u00e4ss den Beh\u00f6rden des Kantons Genf unterstehe die Beschwerdef\u00fchrerin dem AVG, da ihre Kuriere als Arbeitnehmende zu betrachten seien und sie diese den Gastronomiebetrieben \u00fcberlasse, welche die Plattform Uber Eats f\u00fcr Essenslieferungen nutzen (E. 4). Begriff des Personalverleihs und Pflichten des Verleihers (E. 5). Uber Eats Kuriere sind Arbeitnehmende (E. 6). Zwischen Uber und den Gastronomiebetrieben besteht indessen kein Personalverleih (E. 7). Gutheissung der Beschwerde (E. 8)."}, {"Sprachen": ["fr"], "Text": "Regeste\n<br>Art. 12 LSE; art. 26 OSE; art. 319 CO; location de services; plateforme num\u00e9rique proposant la livraison de plats de restaurants \u00e0 domicile (Uber Eats). D'apr\u00e8s les autorit\u00e9s cantonales genevoises, la recourante serait soumise \u00e0 la LSE, car les livreurs seraient ses employ\u00e9s et elle louerait leurs services aux restaurateurs utilisant la plateforme Uber Eats pour la livraison de leurs plats (consid. 4). Notion de location de services et obligations du bailleur (consid. 5). Les livreurs Uber Eats sont des travailleurs (consid. 6). En revanche, la relation entre Uber et les restaurateurs ne rel\u00e8ve pas de la location de services (consid. 7). Admission du recours (consid. 8)."}, {"Sprachen": ["it"], "Text": "Regesto\n<br>Art. 12 LC; art. 26 OC; art. 319 CO; fornitura di personale a prestito; piattaforma elettronica che propone la consegna di cibo a domicilio (Uber Eats). Secondo le autorit\u00e0 cantonali ginevrine, la ricorrente soggiacerebbe alla LC, poich\u00e9 i fattorini sarebbero i suoi impiegati ed essa cederebbe i loro servizi ai ristoratori per mezzo della piattaforma Uber Eats per la consegna di cibo (consid. 4). Nozione di fornitura di personale a prestito e obblighi del prestatore (consid. 5). I fattorini Uber Eats sono dei lavoratori (consid. 6). La relazione tra Uber e i ristoratori non ricade sotto la fornitura di personale a prestito (consid. 7). Ricorso accolto (consid. 8)."}], "ScrapyJob": "446973/47/2482", "Zeit UTC": "16.06.2025 01:53:31", "Checksum": "c3ab7cdf1c2d34d52e8285d1daf4a5d5"}