Plé úsáideora:UpDeDubs

Haigh, UpDeDubs. Agus fáilte. Ar dtús, go raibh maith agat as do chuid iarrachtaí ar Drugaí, 1851, agus srl. Tá jab maith déanta agat anseo!
Tá cúpla íomhánna á "uaslódáil" agat le déanaí. An bhfuil "source" le fáil do :Íomhá:Bavaria.jpg, :Íomhá:Satoshi tomiie interview 1.jpg, nó :Íomhá:328130025180.jpg? (Need to be careful when uploading images, and provide source information and/or any reasons to cover copyright concerns. Otherwise they may be deleted). Beir bua! Guliolopez 11:42, 15 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Bláca

This is my talk page.  To discuss something with me on this page please follow my guidelines.  First, list the topic you are want to discuss with a header and second, start leaving comments.  An example is below.  And as always follow the golden rule.
I will hopefully translate this into Gaeilge soon.

Haigh Bláca (agus fáilte). Ar dtús, go raibh maith agat as do chuid iarrachtaí ar Port Láirge. Tá jab maith déanta agat anseo! Ach, tá cúpla athruithe déanta agat freisin (le déanaí) le "Teimpléadí" (MS: :Teimpléad:!, :Teimpléad:IAST, :Teimpléad:Cathair na Vatacáine, :Teimpléad:Búdachas, agus srl]]). Some of these templates are not entirely correctly formed, and may not be suited in their current form for use in this project. If you need help with the correct formatting to use in a given template, please let me know what your goal is, and I will try and help out. Just leave a message on my Talk page. Le meas. Guliolopez 19:46, 17 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

If I can recommend a good Irish-English dictionary? Yes! You should definitely get a copy of Niall Ó Dónaill's "Foclóir Gaeilge-Béarla". It is relatively up to date (well, more up to date than Tomás de Bhalraithe's English-Irish dictionary) and included lots of grammatial information and examples of usage. But remember: you need the unabridged version. There is a horrible thing called "Gearrfhoclóir" which is the abridged version of Ó Dónaill's dictionary. Don't touch that one with a bargepole. The unabridged one is the one to have. Actually, you can learn a lot of good Irish just by studying the many examples of usage that are found in it. Panu Petteri Höglund 09:53, 25 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

:Let me however add something. People often talk about "The Dreadful School Irish" (TM). What is dreadful about that school Irish, is not so much the vocabulary, but rather the way how idiomatic expressions and, above all, the syntax and word-order of the language is neglected and too much made out of words and inflectional forms. The annoying thing is, that I don't really know of a satisfactory book that would make it possible to upgrade your syntax easily - it would be not too difficult to write one, actually. I might look into it on my personal page. It is probably the time to resurrect that "Today's Tip from Panu", really. Panu Petteri Höglund 16:58, 6 Iúil 2007 (UTC)


Plé:Tennessee

Alright, I responded to you comments on the logs page so go there to see my response.  Úsáideoir:Bláca 18:32, 24 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

On the logs page? You follow the rules as the rest of us, and answer the questions HERE.Panu Petteri Höglund 22:36, 24 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

I know that but I gave my reason for moving the page and changing the name.  My reason for changing the name is: In ireland places are named based on what they represent, or their location etc. An example is Port Láirge. That is why this is a good title for tennessee. And another thing if you lived in Tennessee you would understand we don't just volunteer for wars! we also volunteer in other aspects, which is why Óglach would not work and the word I used is more appropriate.Úsáideoir:Bláca 18:39, 24 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

:Your reasons don't convince me. Romantic hogwash has no place in an encyclopedia. Tennessee is called Tennessee in Irish, and place-names are place-names by usage. I suggest you will be blocked, as you obviously do not listen to reason. Panu Petteri Höglund 23:01, 24 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

:ok, I guess then it should remain Tennessee, though I disagree, But i will be replacing everything with óglach to Stát na Saorálaithe because if you know your tennessee history you will know that óglach is not the right word.Úsáideoir:Bláca 19:05, 24 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

::I don't really think your Irish is enough for telling me what is the right word, and I think I rely more on the English Wikipedia page on Tennessee, which suggests that óglach is indeed historically speaking the correct term. I really think I am not going to take this from a person whose idea of Irish is as shaky as yours obviously is. If you have a second opinion, you should give us verified quotations from works of history. Panu Petteri Höglund 23:12, 24 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

::We were name for being war volunteers, but over time we have broaden that title to mean volunteers in many aspects.  I can give you many examples of tennesse volunteering in something other than a war.  I may not be up to par on my irish like you but i do know my Tennessee history and that word is incorrect.Bláca 19:20, 24 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

:::In that case, I suggest a compromise: "An Stát Deonach". That conveys the sense of the state itself being "willing", "volunteering" (to help, to contribute, whatever). I think it would do just fine. Panu Petteri Höglund 23:20, 24 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

:::Ok, I like that and I hope we can be friends.  And i know this may be out of place but do you know a good Irish/English dictionary because I can't find one with a good selection of vocab.Bláca 19:21, 24 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)
Is there any reason to call Tennessee "Stát Saorálaí"? No Gaeilgeoir I know of has ever used this. Panu Petteri Höglund 14:40, 20 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

I find the use of "Stát Saorálaí" a bit unusual as well. I can find no reference to support it's use as an equivalent to Tennessee. Sure, Tennessee may be called the "Volunteer state", but I don't think it's appropriate to translate that and replace it as the title(?) It would be equivalent to changing "Texas" to the "The Lone Star state" or Florida to "The Sunshine State". Etc. Unless someone can confirm "Stát Saorálaí" as a reasonable Irish equivalent to "Tennessee" (rather than just a translation of it's "nickname"), then I will be reverting all refs shortly. Guliolopez 17:08, 20 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

:Besides, "Stát Saorálaí" is not even particularly correct Irish. As the state is so called because of its many volunteers in war, a correct translation would be Stát na nÓglach. If "saorálaí" were used, then it would be "Stát na Saorálaithe", but war volunteers are called óglach.Panu Petteri Höglund 18:29, 20 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

Moltar gan ábhar a scrios ar leathanaigh phlé (má theastaíonn uait rud atá ráite agat a tharraingt siar, is féidir líne a chur tríd an téacs trí <s> agus </s> a chur ar an dá thaobh den téacs. M.sh. tarraingím siar an ráiteas seo.  Moltar cartlannú a dhéanamh má éiríonn leathanach plé ró-mhór.  Ní dóigh liom go bhfuil sé seo fíor sa chás seo.  Tá tuilleadh moltaí ar :en:Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines.  Beir bua, Nmacu 11:45, 25 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

Note that airde is feminine, so the correct form is "an airde is mó", "an airde is lú". Not *an t-airde. Panu Petteri Höglund 13:17, 25 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Conchuir~gawiki

tá sé ainm gaeilge.
tá cúpla ainm eile , mar shampla conchubair nó concúr.

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Conchuir. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Conchuir~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:43, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
 07:37, 19 Aibreán 2015 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:221.219.114.135

Please stop creating bogus spam articles. It's against policy (like you didn't know that already) - Alison ☺ 06:36, 29 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

Tá fáilte romhat sa Vicipéid. Iarraimis do gach aon duine cuidiú dearfach a thabhairt don chiclipéid seo . Féach ar an leathanach fáilte más mian leat a thuilleadh a fhoghlaim faoin saghas cuidithe sin. Meastar go bhfuil athruithe neamhdhearfacha ar chomhthrom le loitiméireacht, áfach; má leanann tú ar aghaidh sa stíl seo b'fhéidir go gcoscfar tú ón eagarthóireacht gan aon fhógra eile. Cuir deireadh leis más é do thoil é, agus déan machnamh ar saothair a rinne daoine eile a fheabhsú in áit iad a scrios. Go raibh maith agat.
----
 Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits (including adding spam links) are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks.

Guliolopez 11:30, 29 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:70.45.48.178

Ná cuir tursair ar an Vicipéid. Tá baol ann go gcuirfear cosc eagarthóireachta ort má leanann tú leis seo. Go raibh maith agat.
----
 Do not post spam to Wikipedia. You may be blocked from editing if you continue to do this. Thank you. Nmacu 15:40, 29 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:195.8.175.44

Tá fáilte romhat sa Vicipéid. Iarraimis do gach aon duine cuidiú dearfach a thabhairt don chiclipéid seo. Féach ar an leathanach fáilte más mian leat a thuilleadh a fhoghlaim faoin saghas cuidithe sin. Meastar go bhfuil athruithe neamhdhearfacha ar chomhthrom le loitiméireacht, áfach; má leanann tú ar aghaidh sa stíl seo b'fhéidir go gcoscfar tú ón eagarthóireacht gan aon fhógra eile. Cuir deireadh leis más é do thoil é, agus déan machnamh ar saothair a rinne daoine eile a fheabhsú in áit iad a scrios. Go raibh maith agat.
----
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive and hoax edits are considered vandalism, and may result in a block from editing without further warning. Your edit has been removed. In future, please consider improving the Vicipéid rather than engaging in unhelpful edits.

Guliolopez 10:02, 2 Iúil 2007 (UTC)


Plé:Stair Luimnigh

A Sheáin, a chara, D'athraigh mé an chéad alt le teideal an ábhair (Stair Luimnigh) a lua gar don tús. Is gnách é seo a dhéanamh sa Vicipéid agus bhí orm roinnt athscríobh a dhéanamh chun é a bhaint amach. Tá fáilte romhat dul ar ais go dtí an sean-leagan má shíleann tú gur cailleadh aon chuid den bhrí de bharr mo chuid athruithe. Ádh mór, Nmacu 13:04, 5 Iúil 2007 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat, a Nhmhacú, a chara. Ní neart go cur le chéile. Sean an Scuab 12:15, 6 Iúil 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Sean an Scuab

A Sheáin, a chara, Tá cúpla athrú déanta agam in ailt atá scríofa agat agus tá cúpla moladh agam duit:
*ceann amháin ná go moltar gan nasc a dhéanamh as ceannteideal (nó cuid de), m.sh.:
===Iománaíocht===
*ceann eile ná go moltar teideal ailt a bheith luaite go luath in alt i gcló dubh (sa chéad abairt más féidir)
**Moltar freisin gan nasc a dhéanamh d'aon chuid den teideal seo
Má ritheann aon rud eile liom, fágfaidh mé teachtaireacht duit. Bail ó Dhia ar an obair, Nmacu 13:32, 5 Iúil 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Sean an Scuab, ich habe eine Frage könntest du vielleicht den Artikel über die sorbische Moderatorin de:Bogna Koreng ins Irische übersetzen und entweder auf meine Diskussionsseite stellen oder selbst einfügen, würde mich sehr freuen, wenn du es übersetzen würdest. Bis dann de:Benutzer:Berlinersorbenbayer

Go raibh maith agat - für die Übersetzung, bis dann...de:Benutzer:Berlinersorbenbayer

Just as a note, as you seemed interested (actually, I would add some info about that in the article about aibítir Choireallach): the reason why Grodno is Hrodno (or Hrodna, to be exact) in Belorussian is, that the letter pronounced G in Russian is pronounced as something like H in Ukrainian and Belorussian. The old Slavic G has become H in Belorussian, Ukrainian, some Russian dialects, Slovak, Czech, and Upper Sorbian, but it still a G in literary Russian, Polish, Lower Sorbian, and the South Slavic languages (Slovenian, Bulgarian, Macedonian, Serbo-Croat).
The sound spelt as Kh in Khrushchev is distinct both aurally and etymologically and must be kept apart. For us in Finland, who usually transliterate the Cyrillic X as H (Hrushtshev), it is indeed a problem: how should we transliterate the Ukrainian-Belorussian H?
There is a distinct letter in Ukrainian and Belorussian for the G sound, which has survived in one or two native words ("brain" is mozog in Slovak and mazgí in Belorussian, although both are basically "H languages), as well as some Polish or German-via-Polish loanwords. (Latinate loanwords usually use the h - "orthography" is "arfahrafiya" in Belorussian, as far as I remember; new Anglicisms, such as "blog", have the g.)
This of course accounts for the fact that place-names with H tend to have a G in Russian: Tehran, for example, is called Tegran. H was for them simply "a kind of G". Besides, it was usual to pronounce the G in Church Slavonic words with a H sound, even if you were Russian - for historical reasons, the Ukrainian pronunciation was seen as normative for Church Slavonic even in Russia. (Even today, the G in the words "Bog" = God and "Gospod'" = Lord is often pronounced as a H by Russians, who otherwise seem unable to pronounce the sound.)Panu Petteri Höglund 13:04, 2 Deireadh Fómhair 2007 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat a Sheáin. Bail ó Dhia ar do chuid oibre féin! Nmacu 17:58, 13 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Please check your talk page at en for a message I left for you. Mike Halterman 00:27, 19 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 (UTC)

Táim tar éis é a athrú isteach ina Navbox, agus anois tá sé ceart go leor. Footyfanatic3000 12:41, 20 Meitheamh 2009 (UTC)

Go raibh míle maith agat, a Fhootyfanatic Sean an Scuab 19:38, 21 Meitheamh 2009 (UTC)

:Ó ná habair é, cúpla lá roimhe seo bhí fadhb agam le teimpléad a raibh scríofa agam! Shocraigh Gulio é dom sa deireadh. Footyfanatic3000 21:27, 21 Meitheamh 2009 (UTC)

[[Teimpléad:Clubanna CLG i gContae Luimnigh]]

Brón orm, a Sheain. Bhí rud éigin mícheart sa cumraíocht an róbó. Tá sí deisithe anois :) - Alison ❤ 02:05, 16 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé úsáideora:Sean an Scuab


Plé úsáideora:221.218.129.217

Believed to be same spamming source as 221.219.114.135.

Guliolopez 11:47, 18 Iúil 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:125.33.182.24

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked. Guliolopez 10:50, 31 Iúil 2007 (UTC)

Any chance of a block ban on editors coming from this range? Obviously totally oblivious/indifferent to various warnings, is probably robotic of somekind, and adding no value... Guliolopez 10:50, 31 Iúil 2007 (UTC)

Repeat offences from "CNCGROUP Beijing province network"


Plé:Mamach

mea culpa!
Éóg1916 12:13, 17 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)
Réitithe anois! Dála an scéal é, tá treoracha ar conas an bosca sonraí seo a úsáid anseo: Vicipéid:Conas bosca sonraí tacsanomaíochta a úsáid. Le dea-ghuí, Nmacu 12:24, 17 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:221.219.113.223

Trasna ort féin agus imigh sa diabhal le do chuid linkspam! Guliolopez 12:45, 1 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)
* Best. Warning message. Evar! Wish I could do this on en.wp :) - Alison ☺ 15:45, 1 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

Per note here and here and here, is it possible to block an entire range? Spam from this range is getting a bit much. Guliolopez 12:45, 1 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Mohave~gawiki

Excuse me, but what does "fobairt an t-alt" mean?Panu Petteri Höglund 12:45, 8 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mohave. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mohave~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:43, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
 07:37, 19 Aibreán 2015 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Seananoc

Cogar anois, a bhuachaill, is é an polasaí atá againn anseo ná cloí leis an téarmaíocht oifigiúil agus leis an gcineál Gaeilge a bhfuil údarás na húsáide léi. Níl tú ag déanamh maitheas ar bith ag cur isteach téarmaí nach dtuigeann aon duine. Ní féidir leat an cinneadh a dhéanamh beag beann ar an gcuid eile againn gur "ainm níos fearr" a leithéid seo nó siúd, más ainm é nach n-aithneodh aon duine. Níl glanteangachas den chineál sin de dhíth ar an nGaeilge, ach friotal nádúrtha dúchasach. Panu Petteri Höglund 07:21, 14 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

:And as it has turned out that you really don't have a particularly good idea of natural Irish syntax or grammar, it is clear that you are just tinkering with the Vicipéid in order to feel important, not in order to add anything worthwhile. Only one of your terms (oideasra) has any currency or justification, mostly you are just changing perfectly good terms into either something that you found in old books or something you thought out yourself. None of your terms is found in living Irish or standard dictionaries.

:Those old coinages are not particularly good Irish. As de Bhaldraithe says in his preface to the English-Irish Dictionary: "A new word has sometimes been coined where an equivalent [...] was already well established in traditional speech [...]. Such unnecessary coinings [my emphasis] have not been included here. On the other hand, new words that have gained wide currency and for which there are no equivalents in traditional speech are, of course, accepted."

:De Bhaldraithe's course of action - first traditional speech, if nothing is found there then established neologisms and only then new coinings - is to be preferred. Your faulty syntax and grammar shows that you are not especially fluent or keeping in touch with the bulk and mainstream of Irish speakers or users, nor can you be particularly well-read in the native literature or folklore. That is OK as far as you know you place and try to better yourself. But we simply cannot tolerate people who introduce long-dead unnecessary coinings that have already been rejected by the Irish-speaking community. It is a big enough job to try to correct the bad Irish of those learners who do know they are not very fluent. It is even worse if a learner with too high an opinion of himself and his Irish starts to tinker with the language.

:Your ideas of terminology could be taken seriously if you were fluent and cruinn. The sad fact is, that you are another tamperer who cannot piece together one single correct sentence. Panu Petteri Höglund 07:56, 14 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

The point Panu is making above (granted if a little bluntly) is that on this project, we tend to prefer common, natural or standard terminology - over archaic or "bookish" terms. Your rename of "Réabhlóid na Fraince" to "Muirthéacht na Fraince" (citing that "Muirthéacht is a better word", and "Réabhlóid is Béarlachas") may have come from a well meaning intent. However, NOBODY calls it "Muirthéacht na Fraince". Even my granny (at 97) would think this a little awkward and old-fashioned. The fact is that EVERYONE calls it "Réabhlóid na Fraince": The Dept of Education, An Chomhairle um Oideachas Gaeltachta, NUIM, the Oireachtas, the Govt, etc, etc, etc, etc. Your wording therefore falls well short of the conventions on using COMMONNAMEs. Please bear this in mind before renaming articles or "correcting" orthology. Guliolopez 14:56, 21 Meán Fómhair 2008 (UTC)

A chara, GRMA as ucht na hailt atá cruthaithe agat. Le do thoil, na déan dearmad faoi na catagóirí agus an t-eolas idirvicí nuair atá tú i mbun eagarthóireachta. Mion-rudaí b'fhéidir, ach tábhachtach fós. Buíochas..--Antóin 16:38, 9 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)


Plé:Nikita Khrushchev

Fuaimnítear an chéad litir mar CH na Gaeilge, agus í á cur in iúl le Kh- sa traslitriú Béarla. Mar sin, ba chóir "Khrushchev" a úsáid. Panu Petteri Höglund 15:26, 15 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

(In English for clarity)
Hi. Firstly, let me state that I also sometimes have issues when we artificially "Gallicise" names in this project.
However, in this case, EVERY Wikipedia article (apart from RU) has had to "translate" Hrushev’s name – because the alphabets are different.
The man’s name (as he used himself, and as appears on his grave stone), was "Ники́та Серге́евич Хрущёв". You can’t render that in the Irish alphabet. And so, "translation" is required.
As with EVERY OTHER language, a "translation" of the name has occured to accommodate local alphabets, spelling, and pronunciation. Consider the Interwiki’s for the subject. ("Exhibit A" as below.) They are all unique to local requirements. And yet, for some reason, a (unilateral) decision was taken that the Irish Wikipedia needed to follow the English spelling.
What’s wrong with "Nicíte Cruistsiof"? Why is it any different to the (say) the Hungarian Wikipedia using the spelling: "Nyikita Hruscsov"? Why follow the English spelling here? And not anywhere else?
With regard to the other "reasons" given for the change:
The first reason noted for the change was: "ní gá aistriú go dtí an litriú Gaeilge".  As above, yes there was. It was however a translation from the Russian. Not a translation from the English. Why "translate" to the English here?
The second reason given was: "ní bhíonn aon úsáid leis". Yes, there is. See acmhainn.ie.
And the final "reason" given was: "cuireann sé daoine amú". If the issue here is "confusion", or that people won’t know what to link on, then a redirect from the English Spelling solves that problem. And this is now done.
I would therefore like to revert the changes based on these grounds. (And the fact that the move resulted in a broken double redirect.)
However, I would welcome some discussion to gain concensus before doing so.
PLEASE discuss these kind of renames before making changes unilaterally. GRMA. Guliolopez 16:20, 15 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)
===Name in other langs (Exhibit A)===
*:ar:نيكيتا خوروشوف
*:bg:Никита Хрушчов
*:cs:Nikita Sergejevič Chruščov
*:da:Nikita Khrusjtjov
*:de:Nikita Sergejewitsch Chruschtschow
*:en:Nikita Khrushchev
*:et:Nikita Hruštšov
*:es:Nikita Jrushchov
*:eo:Nikita Ĥruŝĉov
*:fa:نیکیتا سرگیویچ خروشچف
*:fr:Nikita Khrouchtchev
*:hr:Nikita Hruščov
*:io:Nikita Hrushchev
*:id:Nikita Khrushchev
*:it:Nikita Khruščёv
*:he:ניקיטה חרושצ'וב
*:ka:ხრუშჩოვი, ნიკიტა
*:lb:Nikita Sergejewitsch Chruschtschow
*:lt:Nikita Chruščiovas
*:hu:Hruscsov, Nyikita Szergejevics
*:nl:Nikita Chroesjtsjov
*:ja:ニキータ・フルシチョフ
*:no:Nikita Khrusjtsjov
*:nn:Nikita Khrusjtsjov
*:pl:Nikita Chruszczow
*:pt:Nikita Khrushchev
*:ro:Nikita Sergheevici Hruşciov
*:ru:Хрущёв, Никита Сергеевич
*:simple:Nikita Khrushchev
*:sk:Nikita Sergejevič Chruščov
*:sl:Nikita Hruščov
*:sr:Никита Хрушчов
*:fi:Nikita Hruštšov
*:sv:Nikita Chrusjtjov
*:tl:Nikita Hruščëv
*:tr:Nikita Kruşçev
*:uk:Хрущов Микита Сергійович
*:zh:赫鲁晓夫

The problem with Gaelicizing Russian names in Irish is, that there is as yet no official Irish system for transliterating them systematically. Acmhainn.ie's suggestion can in my honest opinion be in this particular instance be contested, because a) it is not a particularly good idea to transliterate Russian names in a piecemeal way, without using an internally consistent system which could be applied to every Russian name, and b) it is in itself not a very good or a particularly accurate transcription - above all, the initial C- masks the fact that the first letter in the Russian name Хрущёв is pronounced as a German ach sound, i.e. as an Irish broad ch. This is a very serious problem, because K and this sound are very distinct phonemes in Russian and even in Irish (at least as it is spoken by most native speakers).
Myself, I am terribly unhappy with using English transcriptions such as "Khrushchev" in Irish. However,  I tend to think that as far as there is no official or systematic set of rules for transliterating Russian into Irish, the English transcription is the best alternative - "best" in the sense of "least bad". Most Irish speakers, natives included, can read English, and the English transcription gives them the best clue to how Russians would pronounce it. In my experience, native speakers, when seeing a foreign word or name, will read it out as if it were English.
There are scientific, non-national transliteration systems for Russian which follow the overall principles for writing Slavic languages in the Latin alphabet, and they would be my best bet, if the English transliteration is to be avoided for principal reasons. One such system would render Khrushchev's name as Nikita Sergejevič Xruščëv. Accurate as it is, I am afraid it looks rather intimidating for an Irish speaker not conversant in the Slavic languages.Panu Petteri Höglund 20:38, 15 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)
And while we are at it: "Khrushchev" is accurate, but "Krushchev" with a K is not accurate by any system, because Kh- stands for a German/Gaeltacht broad Ch sound, but K for a K sound. Panu Petteri Höglund 20:40, 15 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

Ceart go leor a Phanu. GRMA. I dtacaíocht le do chuid moladh, I'd happily advocate a transliteration to "Khrushchev". But what of his first name? Nikita, nó Nicíte, nó Nikíta, nó (some other combination)? :) Guliolopez 22:59, 15 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

::Now that I am back to Finland from Tír Chonaill, I can answer this: the correct form is Nikita, and as the T is hard, or broad, "Nicíota" would be the best approximation if we were to transliterate his name into Irish.Panu Petteri Höglund 20:44, 25 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)
A Ghulio, ceapaim gur dhein na Rúisigh iarracht cúpla bliain ó shin ar chaighdeán litriú na Rúisise sa chló Rómhánach a chruthú agus, dár leis an gcaighdeán sin, gurb é mar Nikita Hruščev a scríobhtar ainm iar-ardrúnaí an Aontais Sóibhéadaigh. Sean an Scuab 14:48, 16 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

Ceart go leor. I have renamed based on the discussion above (and similar transliteration in other langs) using Khrushchev over Krushchev. IE: Broader/softer/throatier "Kh" over hard/short "K". Anois - faoina chéad ainm. Cad a cheapaimid faoi "ath-ainmneach" go "Nicíota Khrushchev". De bharr an moladh a bhí ag Panu? Is such a rename kosher? Or are there any "original research" issues? Guliolopez 23:24, 25 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

:"Nicíota Khrushchev" would be a combination of Irish + English. I would reommend that if the English transliteration does not satisfy people, then we will find out about different scientific transliteration schemes - such as the one mentioned by Seán an Scuab - and vote for the one which we will prefer. Personally, I would prefer a scheme that uses Ch for the Cyrillic X, though, rather than X or H.Panu Petteri Höglund 15:26, 26 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

::Panu, you might know a bit more about this than anyone else. To the best of my recollection, the attempt at standardising Russian spelling in the Roman script took place some time during the early 1990s and it may also have been picked up by the Bulgarians, Belarussians and Ukrainians. (E.g. the city that was always spelled "Grodno" became "Hrodno" or Bulgarian soccer player "Christo Stoichkov" became "Hristo Stoichkov" etc.) Sean an Scuab 22:10, 26 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

Khrushchev's name: a note from somebody who is fluent in Irish and Russian


Plé úsáideora:81.213.207.195

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
-----
 Tá fáilte romhat, agus go raibh maith agat as do chuid "triail" leis  an Vicipéid. D'éirigh leis, agus scriosadh arís é. Féach ar an leathanach fáilte más mian leat a thuilleadh a fhoghlaim faoin saghas cuidithe sin. Más mian leat triail a dhéanamh arís, bhain úsáid as an "sandbox". GRMA.

Guliolopez 17:55, 16 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)


Plé:Jagadguru Kripaluji Maharaj

Jagadguru Shree Kripaluji Maharaj is one of India's foremost spiritual teachers. He teaches that the aim of human life is only to attain selfless Divine love the supreme form of God. Knowing this, he says that one must develop a deep desire to selflessly serve God and love God and develop a personal relationship with God, rather than the mere act of worshipping Him through rituals and emotionless routines.
In July 2007 scores of Irish people traversed the Irish sea to personally meet him during his world tour. They all gained invaluably from his teachings and his holy association.
This page is created in Gaelic, the ancient langauge of the Irish people in order to learn a little more about him and his teachings.
By the way it's been a while since i've spoken Gaelic on a regular basis so don't rely on my grammer being perfect. I would appreciate if someone could do any coorections needed. Thanks.
Dms9 09:06, 20 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

Hi Dms9. And welcome to the project. A couple of quick notes to help highlight some of the guidelines and policies here, and their application to this article.

Firstly, your note above suggests that this page is created to promote the teachings of the Jagadguru. This is inappropriate under the What Wikipedia is not guidelines. You may want to consider reading the relevant guidelines - specifically those relating to the expectation that: "Wikipedia is not for propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment of any kind: commercial, political, religious, or otherwise.". An objective article about the Jagadguru is fine, but a "promotion" piece (which includes attached statements like "one must develop a deep desire to selflessly serve Him and love Him and develop a personal relationship with Him") is wholly inappropriate under the Wikipedia's guidelines.

Secondly, some of the assertions made in this article (like "they were delighted with his knowledge of scripture") need both reword to temper the POV (to something like "they are said to have been impressed...") AND supporting sources are required. Please consider reading the policy guidelines for :en:Wikipedia:Verifiability and :en:Help:Describing points of view.

Finally, I have flagged the redirect from Guru for delete. This redirect inappropriate, as there is more than one meaning for this term. (Compare how INCREDIBLY inappropriate it would be to redirect "God" to an article about the Christian God.)

Happy editing. Guliolopez 10:30, 20 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)
Ya but i said that this page was "in order to learn a little more about him and his teachings."
What is the purpose of an encyclopedia but to learn a little more about a topic :->
Anyway, i've provided references now.
You totally misunderstood what i said above. I reworded it to avoid any confusion..
The phrase "one must develop a deep desire to selflessly serve Him and love Him and develop a personal relationship with Him" is consistent with his teachings that "one must desire to selflessly serve God, love God and develop a personal relationship with God." This is the essence of his teachings, without which, any description of his teachings would be void.
Dms9 14:07, 20 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

OK. Firstly, thanks for the sources. That will help a lot.

Secondly, apologies if I misinterpretted your (original) note above. However - frankly - this highlights the need to focus on "The Guru says that you must do X", or "in Christianity it is taught that you must do X", or whatever. Rather than simply "You must do X". As above, see: :en:Help:Describing points of view.

Thirdly, I note that you reintroduced the adjective "torthiuil" into the "is údar é" statement. Describing an author as "prolific" or "great" or "prominent" or whatever is commentary. Keep it simple/factual, note that "he is an author", and let the rest of it speak for itself.

And - finally - after rethinking, I have created a page for Gurú which highlights the different interpretations. (Instead of just deleting).

Le meas. (Agus beir bua!) Guliolopez 14:37, 20 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestions.
I have removed torthiuil etc. I have kept with the facts. I also added to the Guru article but i will add more later.
Dms9 16:18, 20 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)

Images used on this page (:Íomhá:Óráid.jpg & :Íomhá:Varnasi.jpg) have been flagged as having no licence or copyright information for over 6 months. If any user knows the licence status of these images, please provide. Otherwise they will need to be deleted under Wikipedia image copyright guidelines. GRMA. Guliolopez 12:24, 21 Márta 2008 (UTC)


Plé:Búistéirí na Seanchille

Still a síol. It only really started after Murphy's imprisonment. Panu Petteri Höglund 12:37, 31 Lúnasa 2007 (UTC)
An dteastaíonn uaibh go gcuirfinn cuma Ghaeilge Uladh ar an alt seo? Do yiz want me to give this article an Ulster flavour?Panu Petteri Höglund 15:44, 12 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)

Alt iontach - ceist beag - úsáidtear "drong murdaróirí" cúpla úair san alt. Ní raibh fios agam gur focal Gaeilge í murdar (ach dar le focal.ie is focal í!). Úsáidtear an focal dúnmharú níos minice. An ceart an drong murdaróirí a athrú chuig drong dúnmharfóirí? Ceapaim go bhfuil sé níos caighdeánach? Cliste 18:56, 17 Eanáir 2011 (UTC)


Ba chóir na leathanaigh nua (a bunaíodh le déanaí) a chur i Rang nua. (Equivalent possibly to :en:Category:Roman Catholic orders and societies). Bheadh sé mar "sub-cat" don Rang seo (:Catagóir:Eaglais Chaitliceach Rómhánach). Dhéanfainn an rang nua mé féin anois, ach - nílim cinte an "ainm" a chur air :(
* "Oird Caitliceach"?
* "Oird Caitliceach Rómhánach"?
* "Oird agus cumann an Eaglais Caitliceach Rómhánach"?
* Rud eile?
Tuairimí? (Help!?) Guliolopez 12:59, 5 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé catagóire:Eaglais Chaitliceach Rómhánach


Plé úsáideora:Peadarx

Haigh, Peadarx. Agus fáilte. Ar dtús, go raibh maith agat as do chuid iarrachtaí ar Pápa Pius XI, Pápa Pius XII, agus srl. Tá jab maith déanta agat anseo!
However, (as noted with these changes  ), please don't include lists of phone numbers or lists of event venues or similar. Under the "What Wikipedia is not" policy:
* Wikipedia is not a dictionary of phone numbers and is not the yellow pages or whitepages.
* Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site in which people can publish "events" or other
* Wikipedia is not a soapbox for "selling" a product, a belief, a way of thinking, (or anything else)
In the same way that it is inappropriate for (for example) a fan of U2 to list their latest concert dates and venues and ticket prices and ticket sales numbers, it's not appropriate to list "places where Tridentine mass is said, when and how to get there" type detail.
Please keep this in mind when adding additional content.
Otherwise, a repeated welcome, and keep up the good work. Happy editting agus beir bua! Guliolopez 16:31, 5 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)

Fáilte (contact lists, addresses, "event guides")

Dia duit féidir, cabhrú chun feabhas a chur ar an Airteagal seo, go raibh maith agat: Naomh Peadar na Betancur.--79.155.93.5 19:45, 2 Bealtaine 2013 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Vintagekits~gawiki

"Buachaill Dána" indeed! Fáilte romhat chuig on Vicipéid :) - Alison ☺ 05:31, 9 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)
Fáilte romhat, VK. Bhíomar ag feitheamh ort. Sean an Scuab 15:11, 10 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)

Fáilte anseo, VK. Tá súil agam nach mbeidh tú ró-dána anseo!! (Tá brón orm le haighaidh mo chuid Gaeilge, níl sé iontach). --The.Q | Caint 14:09, 10 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Vintagekits. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Vintagekits~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:45, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
 07:37, 19 Aibreán 2015 (UTC)


Plé:Ath Cinn

Is baile beag é Áth Cinn, Contae na Gaillimhe.  Tá sé 26 kilomeadar on Gaillimhe ar taobh iarthar na hEireann.  Tá an baile ar an bóthar N84 ó Gaillimh do Caisleán an Bharraigh.  Rith an bóthar R333 ó Áth Cinn do Tuaim.  Tá a lan bothairí eile beag, nó 'boreens' timpeall an baile.

Is báile coitanta iascaracht é Áth Cinn mar tá sé ach 6.5 kilomeadar ón Loch Corib.  Tá an báile súite in aice le an 'Black River', agus is é an críoch Gaillimh agus Maigh Eo.  Tá a lan rudaí stáire timpeall na háite, mar shámpla 'Rosseirrily Friary'.  Tá máirt feirme mor suite in Áth Cinn freisin, agus tháinig a lan daoine do.

Loch Corib


Plé catagóire:Úsáideoir ga-D

I'm trying to learn Irish, but I'm having serious problems with finding help with it. I have a vague comprehension of the spelling system and very, very vague understanding of how the language works, and I can say 'saoirse', 'is [...] me', and 'caol le caol agus leathan le leathan', and that's basically it. If you would like to help me, please make contact (MSNM would be best; mine's seto1@walla.co.il). Thank you. 212.29.211.18 13:52, 14 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:ArséniureDeGallium

Tá síol (stub) déanta agam duit anseo: Caiseal, Contae na Gaillimhe. Beir bua! Guliolopez 17:21, 19 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Fvasconcellos

Hey there ;) Fáilte romhat! - Alison ❤ 03:48, 22 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)

Hi Fvasconcellos, good to see you here too! --Kyoko 21:52, 22 Deireadh Fómhair 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:87.32.131.5

Tá fáilte romhat sa Vicipéid. Iarraimis do gach aon duine cuidiú dearfach a thabhairt don chiclipéid seo . Féach ar an leathanach fáilte más mian leat a thuilleadh a fhoghlaim faoin saghas cuidithe sin. Meastar go bhfuil athruithe neamhdhearfacha ar chomhthrom le loitiméireacht, áfach; má leanann tú ar aghaidh sa stíl seo b'fhéidir go gcoscfar tú ón eagarthóireacht gan aon fhógra eile. Cuir deireadh leis más é do thoil é, agus déan machnamh ar saothair a rinne daoine eile a fheabhsú in áit iad a scrios. Go raibh maith agat.
----
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Guliolopez 17:03, 3 Deireadh Fómhair 2007 (UTC)


Plé:Eochaill

(Youghal)
Seaport suite cois farraige ar abhainn Blackwater, i gContae Chorcaí, Poblacht na hÉireann.
Tá sí suite 30 nóiméad de thuras carr ó bhaile Corcaigh.
Baile stairiúl is ea í.
San am a chuaigh thart bhí sé tabhachtach mar ionad míleata agus tabhacht ar leith aici ó thaobh na heacnamaíochta de.
Tá ainm an bhaile bunaithe ar an crann iúr. Tá daonra de 7,000 míle duine ann.
Suite ar imeallbhord de Oirthear Chontae Chorcaí, is é an fuadrach agus pictiúrtha baile Eochaill airde ceann des na ceann cúrsa is coitianta le haghaidh turasóirí in Éireann. Tá an caisealta baile stairiúil seo sínte le 5km brat gorm trá alainn.--159.134.50.139 11:11, 7 Deireadh Fómhair 2007 (UTC)SR

Dob é Sir Walter Raleigh an céad Mhéara ar Eochaill, sa tréimhse idir 1588 go 1599.


Plé úsáideora:Bossi~gawiki

Haigh. Iarraimis do gach aon duine cuidiú dearfach a thabhairt don chiclipéid seo . Féach ar an leathanach fáilte más mian leat a thuilleadh a fhoghlaim faoin saghas cuidithe sin. Meastar go bhfuil athruithe neamhdhearfacha ar chomhthrom le loitiméireacht, áfach; má leanann tú ar aghaidh sa stíl seo b'fhéidir go gcoscfar tú ón eagarthóireacht gan aon fhógra eile. Cuir deireadh leis más é do thoil é, agus déan machnamh ar saothair a rinne daoine eile a fheabhsú in áit iad a scrios.
----
Hello. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others.

Guliolopez 10:16, 20 Deireadh Fómhair 2007 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Bossi. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Bossi~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:42, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Fiquem

Fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid :) - Alison ❤ 18:03, 24 Deireadh Fómhair 2007 (UTC)
Haigh arís. Chuir mé an teimpléad  ar do ghriangraf, noiméad o shin, mar níl aon ceadúnas air. An é sin ceart go leor? - Alison ❤ 03:30, 3 Eanáir 2009 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat! Níl fhios agam go raibh orm é a dheanamh... nó conas a dheanann sé :P

To request a delete, just tag with "". Guliolopez 01:42, 3 Eanáir 2010 (UTC)

Agus  anois ;) - Alison ❤ 06:48, 3 Eanáir 2010 (UTC)

: Go raibh míle! FiquemΩ 14:06, 3 Eanáir 2010 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:70.51.186.177

Tá fáilte romhat sa Vicipéid. Iarraimis do gach aon duine cuidiú dearfach a thabhairt don chiclipéid seo . Féach ar an leathanach fáilte más mian leat a thuilleadh a fhoghlaim faoin saghas cuidithe sin. Meastar go bhfuil athruithe neamhdhearfacha (díomhaointeas, bobanna, srl san áireamh) ar chomhthrom le loitiméireacht, áfach; má leanann tú ar aghaidh sa stíl seo b'fhéidir go gcoscfar tú ón eagarthóireacht gan aon fhógra eile. Cuir deireadh leis más é do thoil é. Go raibh maith agat. Guliolopez 19:05, 16 Samhain 2007 (UTC)
----
 Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits (including vanity articles, hoaxes, etc) are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop resubmitting your (wholly NN) bio. Thanks. Guliolopez 19:05, 16 Samhain 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:An Siarach~gawiki

Hello! Please do not copy and paste content within wikis. That's against the copyright, please move this page. Thanks, DerHexer 16:30, 24 Samhain 2007 (UTC)
B'fhearr liom dá staonfá ó bheith ag úthairt leis an Vicipéid Gaeilge gan aird a thabhairt ar na comhairlí ar chinn muid orthu in éineacht. Shocraigh muid le chéile cén téarma ab fhearr a úsáid mar aistriúchán ar "Scots", agus b'é an dóigh ar shocraigh muid é go mbainfimis úsáid as an téarma "Albainis" mar Ghaelú ar "Scots" agus "Béarla na hAlban" mar Ghaelú ar Scottish Standard English. Tá mé den tuairim gur drochrud amach is amach a rinne tú nuair a d'athraigh tú an leathanach beag beann ar an gcinneadh a rinne muid in éineacht.
Agus ná tabhair "Gaelic" ar Ghaeilge na hÉireann. "Irish" atá uirthi. Panu Petteri Höglund 18:13, 24 Samhain 2007 (UTC)
By the way: "Béarla" is masculine in Irish, not feminine. And who are you to suggest that "Albainis" is not commonly used? You should read Comhar, Lá or the other Irish-language publications for a change. In Irish the expression Béarla Gallda does not sound like an unambiguous term for "Scots", it sounds like a disparaging name for English.
Does your lairdship allow us to use such a word as múinteoir for teacher, or is it the hallowed will of your lairdship that we use tidsear instead, múinteoir being an ugly neologism?Panu Petteri Höglund 19:09, 24 Samhain 2007 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called An Siarach. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name An Siarach~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:42, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
 07:37, 19 Aibreán 2015 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Gangleri/monobook.js

__TOC__
[[image:This users contributes BiDi 03.jpg|thumb|right|meta:BiDi workgroupmozilla:402155  ·  landfill:3304]]

→ [ wikt:yi:user_talk:Gangleri/monobook.js|uselang=en#explanations] ←
·Gangleri·T·m: Th·T·email me· 06:28, 28 Samhain 2007 (UTC)


Plé teimpléid:Glanadh-mar

* 1
{{Glanadh-mar|PÍOSA TÉACS}}

* :Teimpléad:Glanadh


Plé úsáideora:Brian Honne~gawiki

Haigh, a Bhriain. Go raibh maith agat as do chuid iarrachtaí ar an tionscadal seo. Tá go leor íomhánna "uaslódáiltha" agat le déanaí áfach, agus níl foinse le fáil d'aon cheann acu.
Mar shampla, an cheann atá churtha isteach níos déarnaí: :Íomhá:Enyadeas1.jpg. Níl aon foinse, stádas cóipcheart, nó aon eolas eile churtha isteach agat.
This is not appropriate. Before uploading any image, our policies expect that:
* You own the rights to the image (usually meaning that you created the image yourself).
* You can prove that the copyright holder has licensed the image under an acceptable free license.
* You can prove that the image is in the public domain, or
* You believe, and state, a fair use rationale for the specific use of the image that you intend.
You've uploaded at least 11 images in the past year, and have provided none of the above for any of them. Continuing to do this will get the project into trouble from a legal perspective.
For now (to avoid such issues, and until the required detail is provided) I've replaced the image in the Enya article with a free-licensed version from Commons.
FYI. If this were the English project, I would be applying the below warning template to your talk page:
  Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images, however, it appears that one
 or more of the images you have recently uploaded, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors
 uploading a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reason, please read up on our Non-free image criteria.
 Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at
 the Media copyright questions page.
Beir Bua. Guliolopez 17:08, 11 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)

Hi Brian. Me again. I have flagged :Íomhá:Bradypaul.jpg with a warning template. The image has previously been released (whether by you or someone else, it doesn't matter) as "All rights reserved". Per http://flickr.com/photos/bluetit/50733481/. Either go back and update the status on your Flickr.com page to a free licence, or we will have to delete the image here. Cheers. Guliolopez 21:06, 31 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Brian Honne. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Brian Honne~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:42, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)


Plé MediaWiki:1movedto2 redir

"Rinneadh athsheoladh de $1 go $2."
Ó would be better than de.

Oddly enough, this message is in English on Wikipedia, yet its equivalent here is in Irish. I wonder why? Cathfolant (talk) 23:41, 20 Lúnasa 2013 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Viciln

Haigh. Agus fáilte. You appear to have created 3 articles with the same topic and different names. Please consider spending a little bit more time deciding on the correct name before creating new articles. And if you made a mistake, move the article (using the "Athainmnigh" button) instead of creating a new one. If you need help, let me know. GRMA. Guliolopez 14:15, 18 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:87.33.175.93

Tá fáilte romhat sa Vicipéid. Iarraimis do gach aon duine cuidiú dearfach a thabhairt don chiclipéid seo . Féach ar an leathanach fáilte más mian leat a thuilleadh a fhoghlaim faoin saghas cuidithe sin. Meastar go bhfuil athruithe neamhdhearfacha ar chomhthrom le loitiméireacht, áfach; má leanann tú ar aghaidh sa stíl seo b'fhéidir go gcoscfar tú ón eagarthóireacht gan aon fhógra eile. Cuir deireadh leis más é do thoil é, agus déan machnamh ar saothair a rinne daoine eile a fheabhsú in áit iad a scrios. Go raibh maith agat.
----
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Guliolopez 14:20, 18 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add hoax material to this project. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results.  Hoax articles and material will be marked for deletion within a few hours.  Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system.  Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point.  If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them.  Guliolopez 10:22, 19 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)

Seans deirneach anois,  a chara! - Alison ❤ 18:37, 19 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)

Cuir deireadh leis an bpleidhcíocht nó cuirfear cosc ar an seoladh IP seo. Nmacu 13:14, 20 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)

- Tá do sheoladh IP choisceadh le 2 lá mar níl aon suim agat ach déanamh loitiméaracht. Slán anois! - Alison ❤ 17:13, 20 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)


Plé:Vancouver, An Cholóim Bhriotanach

An bhfuil gá don "Bhancoubhair" a bheith ansin?  Ó thaobh an leathanaigh seo , sé Vancouver an Ghaeilge ar Vancouver.  Nuair a rinne mé googláil ar "Bhancoubhair", is i nGaeilge na hAlban a bhí gach leathanach.  Conor O Bradaigh 19:13, 23 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé:Vancouver, An Cholóim Bhriotanach


Plé:Athléiriú staire

Focal.ie gives "athachtú" for re-enactment. This applies only to parlamentary language though - re-enactment of law. "Achtú" does not mean "enacting" in the sense needed for "historical reenactment".   I propose "athléiriú". "Léiriú" can mean the production of a play. Panu Petteri Höglund 16:16, 31 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Fuzzbrian

Thanks for uploading :Image:Tramore Bay.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
As well as adding the source, please add a copyright licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Obair féin|GFDL}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as those in  :Catagóir:Clibeanna cóipchirt d'íomhánna nach bhfuil saor. Such tags must be accompanied with a Fair Use Rationale template such as {{Réasúnaíocht d'íomhánna nach bhfuil saor}}.
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks. Guliolopez 13:29, 10 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for [[:Image:Tramore Bay.jpg]]

A Fuzzbrain, a chara, Fáilte romhat isteach ar an Vicipéid. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh agus tairbhe aisti. Díreach nóta sciobtha le d'aird a tharraingt ar an gcnaipe "Taispeáin réamhamharc" ag bun an scáileáin eagarthóireachta.  Léiríonn sé seo conas mar a bhreathnóidh alt le do chuid athruithe i bhfeidhm sula ndéanann tú é a shábháil. Má úsáideann tú é seo, ní bheidh "Stair" an leathanaigh ag líonadh suas le go leor mionathruithe. Más féidir liom cabhrú leat in aon slí, fág teachtaireacht ar mo leathanach plé. Ádh mór, Nmacu 23:18, 10 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Jon beag

A Jon beag, a chara, Fáilte romhat isteach ar an Vicipéid. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh agus tairbhe aisti. Díreach nóta sciobtha le d'aird a tharraingt ar an gcnaipe "Taispeáin réamhamharc" ag bun an scáileáin eagarthóireachta.  Léiríonn sé seo conas mar a bhreathnóidh alt le do chuid athruithe i bhfeidhm sula ndéanann tú é a shábháil. Má úsáideann tú é seo, ní bheidh "Stair" an leathanaigh ag líonadh suas le go leor mionathruithe. Más féidir liom cabhrú leat in aon slí, fág teachtaireacht ar mo leathanach plé. Ádh mór, Nmacu 23:16, 10 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Haigh a "Jon beag". Go raibh maith agat as do chuid iarrachtaí. Ta jab an-mhaith déanta agat leis an :Catagóir:Daoine as Contae Dhún na nGall le déanaí. However, please be more careful when uploading images. It is not appropriate to source an image in Flickr or elsewhere, and simply "upload" without noting some licencing information. Tá cúpla íomhánna á "uaslódáil" agat le déanaí (one for Daniel O'Donnell, and one for Moya Brennan). Both represented "non-free" content and have been deleted. Unless you can definitively assert GFDL, OwnWork, PD, or some other licence, it's best to avoid "copying" images from other websites. GRMA. Guliolopez 15:37, 20 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Haigh Jon. As you continue your good work here, please consider remembering the following little pieces of advice:
* Log-in: Be sure to log-in properly. It seems that sometimes your edits are recorded against your IP address. Makes tracking/patrolling changes a little harder.
* Sandbox: In order to create a new page, you seem to be creating a new "red link", following the "create new page" link off this, and then deleting the red link again. As per this example. You shouldn't be doing this. It confuses the edit history and is unnecessary. Instead you could: (1) enter the new article name in the search box, and follow the resulting red link from there. (Also helps ensure hasn't already been created). Or (2) follow the red link from a preview box instead of a completed page. Or (3) create the red links on your own sandbox.
* Sorting: Categories are alphabetical. If adding a page to a category, either make sure you include a DEFAULTSORT tag, or simply "tell" the category that you want to sort it as "Lastname, Firstname" with [[Catagóir:Daoine a rugadh i 1900|Lastname, Firstname]]
* Pipelinking: On a few occasions you've created redirects where a pipe link would be more appropriate. For example, if I'm linking "[[American]]" and want it to go to the "United States" page, I SHOULD NOT create a redirect American->United States. (For several reasons. But mainly because "American" has multiple meanings). Instead, I SHOULD use a pipelink instead. As [[United States of America|American]].
Thanks! Guliolopez 18:19, 6 Feabhra 2009 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Guliolopez/Cartlann 1

A Ghulio, Go raibh míle maith agat as ucht an chabhair ar thugais dom le linn scríobh na n-alt faoi Luimneach, Kemper, Penn-ar-Bed agus An tSionnainn. Úsáideoir:Sean_an_Scuab, 7/4/07
Hi there are limited articles on animals and plants and I have limited Irish as shown by my typing in English. anon.

A chara, Tá ar a laghad beirt dochtúirí eile ins an Vicipéid gur féidir leat iad a chuir isteach i gcatagóir na ndoctúirí. Ní fios dom conas é sin a dhéanamh. Siad sin ná Rudolf Virchow agus Eugen Bleuler. Go neirigh leat. Beir Bua.--DaithíÓ 14:10, 25 Deireadh Fómhair 2006 (UTC)

Tá sa déanta agam. Féach ar na difríochtaí idir na leaganacha anseo.

FYI: Tá sé an-easca alt a chur i gcatagóir. Just add the text Catagóir:Dochtúirí to the article you want to categorise.

Bear 2 things in mind when adding a category.

# The convention is that you put the "category" tag at end (after the body text, but before any "Idirviki" links)

# Categories are automatically alphabetised based on the pagename, so - for person names - it may be appropriate to "tell" the category system to list based on last name first. Do this with: Virchow, Rudolf.

Le meas. Guliolopez 17:22, 25 Deireadh Fómhair 2006 (UTC)
Go raibh míle maith agatDaithíÓ 20:44, 25 Deireadh Fómhair 2006 (UTC)

A chara, go raibh maith agat le do chuid barúlacha. Measaim féin gur is rudaí maith an comhoibre agus an comhchomairle a mbíonn ar an Uicí seo agus na cinn eile, agus tá a fhios agam nach bhfuil mo chuid Gaeilge go h-iontach. Ach féach ar an saghas fáilte a fuair mé ar mo chuid phlé, agus ó shin. Ba mhaith liom bheith cuid den fhoireann anseo, ach muna bhfuil múineadh ag úsáideoraí eicínt, níl suim agam bheith ag obair nó ag labhairt leo. Má déanaim botúin, ní rud ollmhór iad a dheisiú, i mo thuairim. Déanaim mo ndicheall, agus níl éinne foirfe.
Cuir Mise An Locht Ar Na Tuistí 18:13, 12 Meitheamh 2006 (UTC)
Sin í an amaidí is mó a chuala mé i mbliana: Má dhéanaim botúin, ní rud ollmhór iad a dheisiú, i mo thuairim. Bhuel, ní hé sin mo thuairimse in aon chor, ós mise a chaithfidh na botúin sin a réiteach. Bhuel, a Ghuliolopez, tá a fhios agat an chuma atá ar na cúrsaí, mar a scríobh tú ar mo leathanach plé cheana féin. Dála an scéil, d'fhág duine éigin ionsaí pearsanta ormsa ar cheann de na leathanaigh phlé - sílim gurbh é Gabriel Beecham a chuir ar ceal é sular chuir mé féin sonrú ceart ann. Caithfidh sé gurbh é an bithiúnach seo a scríobh an t-ionsaí sin, freisin. Panu Petteri Höglund 20:46, 12 Meitheamh 2006 (UTC)

Panu, níl clú agam cé rinne an ionsaí pearsanta sin ort. Gulio, tá "cosc 'infinite'" orm anois, ó Evertype. Ba mhaith liom do thuairim a chloisteáil. Beir bua, CMALANT

CMALANT. Gabh mo leithscéal! Tá brón orm a fháil uait go bhfuil "cosc" ort.

As I hope you will recognise, I had hoped (as a largely impartial party) to help avoid this situation and facilitate a constructive dialog (per Plé úsáideora:Guliolopez/Eadráin) to remedy "an droch-barúil" and find a happy compromise which didn't involve anyone leaving VP. Unfortunately it seems that members of the admin community felt that PPH had taken all the steps he could to resolve the conflict, and that the recommendations to find a compromise were insufficient and so did not (or would not) work. I'm afraid that - while I am disappointed with this decision, as blocking is never a positive move - you may have backed yourself in to a corner by not responding to the issues that PPH raised earlier.

Since you asked for it, my own opinion is that an infinite block might be a particularly harsh punishment for what was mainly just "uni-lateral enthusiasm", and you may have (partially) been a victim of circumstance. While a possible response to that is to say: "sin an saol agat!", you may consider escalating for arbitration. You may have a case for re-instatement if you open a dialog again, and express to the admin community how you ARE going to address the behaviour which got you blocked, and see how that goes. (If it's worth that effort to you)

Tóg go bog é. Guliolopez 19:46, 27 Iúil 2006 (UTC)
Go raibh maith agat, Gulio. An bhfuil coiste eadrána againn anseo?
CMALANT

Ceapaim nach bhfuil. Is é sin an cúis a d'oscail mé an diaspóiracht (leatsa agus le PPH) ar mo leathanch-baile féin! But, as you know (possibly because it was not supported by any structured community policy) it didn't get very far... At this point, I think you may need (mar a dúirt mé níos luaithe) to contact the " lucht riarachán" directly for their input. As much as I would try and help with any balanced discussion on arbitration, I'm not sure I have the time/space/capability to "champion" the creation of an abritration process. (Go cinte níl mé ábalta é sin a dheanamh i m'aonar). Le beannacht Guliolopez 15:56, 29 Iúil 2006 (UTC)

Haigh a Guliolopez. Chonaic mé go bhfuil tú ag catagóiriú an-chuid alt, go raibh maith agat. Ach de réir dealraimh tá tú ag úsáid an sean-chóras, ina úsáideadh "Rang" roimh an frása catagóirithe, m.sh. Rang:Scríbhneoirí. Tá an córas sin as dáta ar feadh na míonna; an bhféadfá "Catagóir" a húsáid, mar seo: Catagóir:Scríbhneoirí? --Gabriel Beecham 22:20, 4 Iúil 2006 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat a Kwekubo. Ní raibh fhois agam go raibh "caighdeán" i bhfeidhm anseo. As seo amach, agus ag rangú, bainfidh mé feidhm as "Catagóir". Guliolopez 12:45, 5 Iúil 2006 (UTC)

brón orm, ach, cén fáth? cén fáth a bhfuil catagóiriú níos fearr ná rangú?
grma
--Spaircí 18:46, 18 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

Haigh a Guliolopez. Chonaic mé gur uaslódáil tú an t-íomhá seo inniu, ach tá amhras orm maidir leis a stádas cóipcheart. Tá an-chuid íomhánna shaora ar fáil a bhaineann le Cogadh Vítneam, agus mar sin nílím cinnte nach bhfuil sárú chóipchirt i gceist leis an íomhá seo a úsáid san alt Cogadh Vítneam. Más eol duit go bhfuil sé dleathach an íomhá a úsáid ag Vicipéid, cuir na sonraí riachtanacha ag :Íomhá:Nguyen.jpg más fearr duit nach scriosfar an íomhá. --Gabriel Beecham 21:02, 19 Iúil 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Gabriel. I understand your concern, and while - as you say - there may be other images available which illustrate the brutality of the war in Vietnam, there are few (and possible none - certainly in the public domain) which demonstrate the nature of the conflict between the opposing ideologies in the civil war. Yes, there are well documented images which demonstrate the brutality met upon the Vietnamese people by foreign forces (and indeed vice-versa), but there are few (and certainly few as powerful as this) which demonstrate the inter-community conflict. In that sense and context (and per similar Fair Use rationale given at :vi:Hình:Nguyen Ngoc Loan.jpg, :zh:Image:Nguyen.jpg and :en:Image:Nguyen.jpg), I expect that Fair Use is demonstrable. That said, I will - as you suggest - include detail of CP and FU rationale with the Image itself. Guliolopez 21:30, 19 Iúil 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I was wandering why Liverpool FC's article is Club Sacair Learphoill, when the official club name is Liverpool FC. I understand that Learphoill is the Irish for Liverpool, but why han't this then been done for Manchester United? Mattythewhite 15:17, 3 Deireadh Fómhair 2006 (UTC)

Hi Matty. You bring up a good and valid point. While the standard convention in Wikipedia is to follow a naming convention in the language of the wikipedia namespace (Irish in this case), for brand/product/trademark names the article title is actually supposed to be "untranslated".

You will probably have noted that the "Liverpool FC" article name is therefore untranslated in all other wikipedias: (:ast:Liverpool FC, :ca:Liverpool Football Club, :cs:Liverpool FC, :da:Liverpool F.C., :de:FC Liverpool, :es:Liverpool Football Club,:et:Liverpool FC, :eu:Liverpool FC, :fi:Liverpool FC, :fr:Liverpool Football Club, :hr:Liverpool F.C., etc. etc)

As such, the Irish language wikipedia is the only one breaking this convention - this is probably just an oversight, as (as a small wikipedia community by comparison to others) the GA VP community normally values content over adherance to convention.

So, what I suggest is that you propose an "move" (article name change) on the talk page for the Liverpool article. I will support the proposal and help move it.

Any other questions don't hestitate to ask. Le meas. Guliolopez 15:37, 3 Deireadh Fómhair 2006 (UTC)
Hi folks - I agree too. The same applies to Ceiltigh Ghlaschú, for example. It would be good to mention the Irish names in the articles too, because they are actually used quite often. But the titles should definitely be as Béarla, as is the case in other Wikis. --An Tóin Mór 19:25, 3 Deireadh Fómhair 2006 (UTC)
I agree with the above, with excception of Gaelic football and hurling / camogie teams (both club and county) - it seems to me that these should be charted under their Irish names with the English included in the article and a link to the English language article, if one exists; the argument being that these clubs / county teams names are in use in both languages and are basically interchangable - any thoughts? RóC 05:58, 16 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat a Guliolopez as ucht an leathanach nmacu/mapai a athdhiriú go dtí an seoladh ceart.  Nmacu 15:29, 5 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

Tá failte romhat... Guliolopez 15:39, 5 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)
Rinne mé arís é! Mo leithscéal. Bhí an botún tugtha faoi deara agam ach bhí tú an sciobtha á réiteach.  Buíochas. Nmacu 11:27, 28 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

A Guliolopez, a chara, Rinne mé botún leis an gcatagóir seo. "Comhlachtaí Ríomhaireachta" a chur mé ann ar dtús. Tá mé á athrú sin go dtí "Comhlachtaí ríomhaireachta" anois le cloí le caighdeáin na vicí-anna.  Go raibh maith agat as ucht an cúnaimh. Nmacu 16:01, 8 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

Ceart go lóir. (Agus go n-éirí leis an bhfeachtas ar na leathnaigh/catagóirí sin)! Guliolopez 14:41, 9 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

Haigh CmdrJameson (agus fáilte). Tá cúpla athruithe déanta agat le déanaí le naisceanna idirwiki. Tá iarracht maith déanta agat don cuid is mó, ach - i gcásanna - chuir tú naisc i cúpla ailt nach bhfuil ceangailthe i gceart. The standard is - de gnáth - to add interwikis only to an altlanguage version which corresponds to the same subject. (So, :ga:Bun Abhann Dalla has an interwiki to :en:Cushendall, :ga:N1 links to :en:N1 road, etc.) It is not generally an agreed wikipedia standard to (let's say where no corresponding article exists as béarla) to add an interwiki to a "related" article. (As you did to - mar shampla - Subh Milis). Just something to consider. Go raigh míle agus gabh mo leithscéal as mo chuid "soibealtas". Beir bua! Guliolopez 20:24, 9 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

Haigh agus go raibh maith agat. Is sampla siumiúl é Subh Milis. Sa Vikipéid Béarla is leathanach athdhíriú é 'Subh Milis', agus téigh sé go 'Séamus Ó Néill'. Cad ba ceart dom a déanamh sa cás sin? Within a wikipedia it's regarded as bad style to link to a redirect, does that apply to interwiki links too?

Sláinte! CmdrJameson 21:19, 9 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

:Is sampla simiúl é - ceart go leor. Not sure frankly that there should be a redirect in the EN WP from Subh Milis to Séamus Ó Néill. However being that there is, if you wanted to restore the "link to the redirect" (IE: en:Subh Milis in the GA article), I think that would be OK (in this unusual case). Sin é mo thuarimse féin in aon chur. Le meas. Guliolopez 20:17, 13 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

Hi! I am from the lithuanian wikipedia and I want to ask You one thing. How we should write in Irish these settlements located in County Laois: Ballaghmore, Ballybrittas and Ballyroan?--84.240.6.224 20:33, 12 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I updated the English language wikipedia articles with the relevant Irish names. They are:

*:en:Ballaghmore = ga:An Bealach Mór

*:en:Ballybrittas = ga:Baile Briotáis

*:en:Ballyroan = ga:Baile Átha an Róine

Regards. Guliolopez 11:04, 13 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

:Go raibh maith agat (I think it is "thank you" in Irish).--84.240.6.224 16:56, 13 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

D'fhreagair mé do cheist ar mo lch baile. Nmacu 11:07, 14 Márta 2007 (UTC)

:Eh yes, but you broke the link because there is no An Ghrian page, only a grian one. Wiktionary is case sensitive... Jcwf.
P.S. I think I fixed it. ;-)

Gosh, I cannot believe I just did that!  I was trying to delete a redirect that I created, as I misspelled a word, and then I was wondering why it didn't say "cealaigh" in the deletion tab.  Suffice it to say, it was a slip on my part!  My sincere apologies to you!  Sláinte Hoopydink 19:17, 22 Márta 2007 (UTC)

Mo baistim le tine, go deimhin!  Buíochas do tuigh! Hoopydink 19:28, 22 Márta 2007 (UTC)

Tá mo Íomhánna as an Vicipéid Béarla.
díreach céard a bhí mise chun a rá....
Íomhá:220px-Tolkien ring.jpg, Íomhá:Sg1stargatefront.jpg, agus Íomhá:Middle-earth.jpg, óna ich béarla...
ní dhéanaim ach aistriúcháin ar an ich Béarla...agus tógaim an Íomhá más féidir ón vicipéid Béarla....
grma as ocht é chuir os mo chomhair....
--Spaircí 18:31, 6 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

A Ghulio, tuigim cad atá á rá agat agus coinneod cuimhne air as so amach. Dónall Dubh 14 Aibreán 07

Heileo, a Ghulio. Dealraíonn sé go mbeidh revert war nua on our hands ar ball. Chonaic mé go raibh úsáideoir darb ainm Giorriamear tar éis seafóid a chur san alt faoi ghramadach na Gaeilge a mbím ag obair air ó am go ham, agus gur úsáideoir aonoíche a bhí ann - duine nach raibh a dhath eile déanta aige riamh. Tá mé in amhras faoi gur sock puppet de chuid an tseandiabhail sin CMALANT atá ann. :( Panu Petteri Höglund 20:34, 15 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Haigh. Chonaic mé na h-aistriúcháin a dhéantar ansin. I had intended to go back and review those changes when I saw them come in, but they were sufficiently "weird" that I couldn't figure out what the meat of the changes actually were. So I left 'em. Ar aon nós - ní dóigh liom go bhfuil CMALANT ar ais i riocht Giorriamear. Is dócha gur duine eile "seachránach" atá ann. (Don't let it keep you up at night :) Guliolopez 18:44, 18 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

A Ghulio, do scriosas 'dallramáin' agus do dheineas alt nua darb ainm An Lucht Seilge. Más dóigh leat go bhfuil an alt nua so neamhfhóinteach do Vicipéid, cuir fios orm ar Plé úsáideora:Dónall Dubh.16 Aibreán, Baochas

Haigh Dónall. Sin tús maith. Ach (ar an drochuair) tá an alt sin "tráchtaireacht" fós. It remains a "commentary" on hunting rather than a "description" of it. It may be worthwhile reading :en:Fox hunting for a form of wording that may be more appropriate. Guliolopez 21:49, 16 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Haigh - d'fhág mé rabhadh ag leathanach plé an úsáideora sin. GRMA as do chuid oibre go buan maidir leis an clib {{scrios}}! --Gabriel Beecham 00:13, 28 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Tâmâ tilanne on nyt kunnossa. Tâma on hyvâ Suomen kielen harjoitus.. (Anois)

Gabh mo leithscéal, ach níl fhios agam cad atá á rá agat anseo. Níl Fionlainnis agam (ar an drochuair). Do you think we need to do something more (or different) to the Cabonne article? Or are you unsure about the note I left on your talkpage about it? Guliolopez 15:34, 11 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

A Ghuliolopez, a chara, Sílim gur cheart teideal an teimpléid seo a athrú go dtí "Cúigí agus Dúiche Cheanada" nó gach seans "Cúigí agus Dúichí Cheanada" (más níos mó ná dúiche amháin a bhí i gceist agat).  Is tír firinscneach é Ceanada agus go hiondúil ní thagann an t-alt roimhe. Ádh mór, Nmacu 09:57, 11 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

Tá an ceart agat. So that I could remove the duplicate tables added to the half-dozen relevant articles, I created a template based on that table. I should have checked the grammar used in the table before I did that. I will make the change now. GRMA. Guliolopez 13:12, 11 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thx for editing completely in this languague. Could you translate the whole text of the English article? It'll only be that:
"The club was founded in 2005 by the "Violet-Whites", supporters of the former "SV Austria Salzburg" which was founded in 1933 and taken over by the Red Bull Concern in 2005. The so called "Violet-Whites" wished to preserve the 72-year old traditions of the old club, which had been destroyed by the Red Bull takeover. In February 2006, the "Violet-Whites" successfully registered the old club's original name "SV Austria Salzburg" and the old club emblem. An attempt to take over the football section of the Salzburg Police Sports Club, who played in the 1. Salzburg Landliga, the fourth tier of Austrian football, came to nothing. The Violet-Whites thus formed a new club, SV Austria Salzburg, which entered 2. Klasse Nord, the seventh tier of Austrian football for the 2006-07 season. The first match of the relaunched SV Austria Salzburg was played on July 29, 2006 against Lieferinger SV. SV Austria Salzburg won 6-0."
Sry, but I only can this languague so good to start the article and build standard sentences 84.172.131.34 18:17, 15 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Rí na Vicipéide

Haigh a "Rí na Vicipéide". (Or should I say "Your majesty" :) Go raibh maith agat as do chuid iarrachtaí. Ta jab an-mhaith déanta agat le déanaí. (Go háirithe leis na ceartúcháin do Dan Boyle, Oilibhéar Cromail, agus do na híomhánna arna thógáil ón gCómhaoin do ailt nó dhó.) However, can you slow down a small bit with the new images you are adding under "Fair use"? As I noted in a recent editsummary, adding a FairUse image is not as simple as sourcing one, and adding a generic rationale.
Strictly speaking an image added under "Fair use/non-free", shouldn't be replaceable by a "free" version. (See the first/bais criteria at Non-free content criteria that says: "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose.")
Some of the images you have added recently are possibly replaceable. (For example, the MaryHarney image you loaded was recently deleted from the EN project because of this issue.) Put as simply as possible, if a picture can reasonably be taken by another person, then we shouldn't have a copyrighted version here. (IE: If a person could reasonably wait outside Leinster House, and freely snap at Ms.Harney, then we shouldn't have somebody else's copyrighted version here. Similarly, because there is nothing stopping anyone from strolling down to Parnell Square and taking a snap of Coláiste Mhuire, we possibly can't claim "fairuse-not replaceable" - as we are doing here).
Anyway. I don't want to stifle the good work. Just please bear the above in mind before uploading any more images under "non-free/Fair use". Cheers. Guliolopez 15:31, 14 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

A Ghuliolopez, a chara,

Go raibh maith agat as an eolas sin. Tuigim go mbíonn fadhbanna ann maidir le cóipcheart agus mar sin de. Tá mé fós ag dul i dtaithí ar mhodh oibre na Vicipéide agus cuirim fáilte roimh do chuid moltaí. Is maith an rud é an t-eolas sin a bheith ar fáil dom. Níor mhaith liom an dlí a tharraingt anuas orainn! Déanfaidh mé mo dhícheall a bheith níos cúramaí amach anseo maidir lé híomhánna a uaslódáil. Déanaim iarracht iad a fháil ón gCómhaoin más féidir. Ní neart go cur le chéile. - Rí na Vicipéide

Críochnaithe. Féach anseo. Guliolopez 18:27, 15 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)
Míle buíochas leat a chara! Rí na Vicipéide 19:32, 15 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Mion-trácht: Cats are mainly hierarchical. If an article is in "Colleges in Ireland", then it doesn't need to be in the parent "Colleges" category. (As "Colleges in Ireland" is itself a child of "Colleges".) GRMA Guliolopez 17:02, 27 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)
Tuigim a Guliolopez. But in that case, shouldn't all the Irish universities be removed from the 'ollscoileanna' category and put in the 'Ollscoileanna in Éirinn' category? I went to put the rest of them in when I noticed some of them were in it and some of them not. QUB, UCC and UCD were in that international category already. Rí na Vicipéide 17:07, 27 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Tá an cheart agat. UCD and UCC shouldn't be there either. QUB is debateable. (As it depends on interpretation of "in Éirinn"). Will leave QUB as is. Guliolopez 17:13, 27 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)
Go raibh maith agat. Togha fir! Rí na Vicipéide 17:17, 27 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Good Afternoon Rí na Vicipéide,
Could you please write a stub http://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auckland_Grammar_School - just a few sentences based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auckland_Grammar_School? Only 2-5 sentences enough. Please. --Per Angusta 01:56, 1 Feabhra 2008 (UTC)
 Guliolopez 12:48, 16 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)

Reminder. Can you please review the licence/source/etc for the above? Otherwise it will have to be deleted. Guliolopez 12:24, 20 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)

Nach féidir an íomhá seo a chur ar Wikimedia? Ériugena (plé) 19:33, 14 Deireadh Fómhair 2021 (UTC)

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé úsáideora:Rí na Vicipéide


Plé MediaWiki:Common.css

/************************/
  /* CommonsTicker styles */
  /************************/

  /* links */
  .tickerDiffLink { } /* diff links in ticker */
  .tickerMiscLink { } /* misc links in ticker */

  /* remove list bullets */
  .tickerList ul,    .tickerList ul li    { list-style: none; text-indent:-2em; margin-left:2em;   text-align:left; }
  .tickerList ul ul, .tickerList ul ul li { list-style: none; text-indent:0;    margin-left:1.5em; text-align:left; }
  /* per-type styles */
  .tickerEntry_deleted     { }  /* entry for image deletion */
  .tickerEntry_restored    { }  /* entry for restored image */
  .tickerEntry_replaced    { }  /* entry for image replacement */
  .tickerEntry_tagged      { }  /* entry for adding/removing problem tags */
  .tickerEntry_redir       { }  /* entry for critical redirection (fot tag redirects) */
  .tickerEntry_recat       { }  /* entry for critical re-categorization (for tag categories) */
  .tickerEntry_notify      { }  /* entry for global notifications */
  .tickerEntry_changed     { }  /* entry for generic change */
  /* per-status styles */
  .tickerStatus_done     { text-decoration:line-through; }  /* strike through when entry has been handeled */
  /* per-action styles */
  .tickerAction_deleted:before     { content:" GONE "; color: #FF0000; font-family:monospace; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; }
  .tickerAction_restored:before    { content:" BACK "; color: #00BB00; font-family:monospace; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; }
  .tickerAction_deletedRev:before  { content:" -OLD "; color: #DDAAAA; font-family:monospace; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; }
  .tickerAction_replaced:before    { content:" REPL "; color: #CC88FF; font-family:monospace; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; }
  .tickerAction_replacedOwn:before { content:" UPDT "; color: #EEAAFF; font-family:monospace; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; }
  .tickerAction_addedBad:before    { content:" +VfD "; color: #FF8800; font-family:monospace; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; }
  .tickerAction_removedBad:before  { content:" -VfD "; color: #00BB00; font-family:monospace; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; }
  .tickerAction_addedGood:before   { content:" +OK  "; color: #00BB00; font-family:monospace; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; }
  .tickerAction_removedGood:before { content:" -OK  "; color: #FF8800; font-family:monospace; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; }
  /* ticker usage list */
  .tickerUsage  { font-size:80%; }
  /* entry applies to a template used by multiple images */
  .tickerTemplateEntry    { font-weight: bold; }
  /* entry applies to sub-entries, i.e. images that use a specific template */
  .tickerSubEntry         { }
  /* minor entry styles */
  .tickerMinorEntry  { color:#666; }     /* minor entry */
  .tickerMinorEntry a,
  .tickerMinorEntry a:link,
  .tickerMinorEntry a:visited { color:#669; }
  #bodyContent .tickerMinorEntry a.extiw,
  #bodyContent .tickerMinorEntry a.extiw:link,
  #bodyContent .tickerMinorEntry a.extiw:visited { color:#669; }

Hi Guliolopez/Nmacu - can you guys possibly add this to MediaWiki:Common.css to allow CommonsBot to work properly and to give us advance warning about image deletions/issues on commons, etc. Thanks - Alison ❤ 06:22, 16 Eanáir 2008 (UTC) (commons admin, BTW) - Alison ❤ 06:22, 16 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

agam :) Guliolopez 11:08, 16 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

: Yayy!! Ceann eile, le d'thoil:
/*Add formatting to make sure that "external references" from Template:Ref do
  not get URL expansion, not even when printed. The mechanism up to MediaWiki 1.4 was
  that the HTML code contained a SPAN following the anchor A; this SPAN had the class
  "urlexpansion", which was not displayed on screen, but was shown when the medium was
  "print". The rules below ensure (a) that there is no extra padding to the right of
  the anchor (displayed as "[<number>]"), (b) that there is no "external link arrow" for
  the link, and (c) that this SPAN of class "urlexpansion" is never shown.
  ~~~~
*/

.plainlinksneverexpand {
  background: none ! important;
  padding: 0 ! important;
}

.plainlinksneverexpand .urlexpansion {
  display: none ! important;
}

/* Make sure that ext links displayed within "plainlinksneverexpand" don't get
   the arrow...
*/
.plainlinksneverexpand a {
   background: none !important;
   padding: 0 !important;
}

/* With MediaWiki 1.5, the mechanism has changed: instead of a SPAN of class "urlexpansion"
   following the anchor A, the anchor itself now has class "external autonumber" and the
   expansion is inserted when printing (see the common printing style sheet at
   http://en.wikipedia.org/skins-1.5/common/commonPrint.css) using the ":after" pseudo-
   element of CSS. We have to switch this off for links due to Template:Ref!
   ~~~~
*/
.plainlinksneverexpand a.external.text:after {
  display: none !important;
}
.plainlinksneverexpand a.external.autonumber:after {
  display: none !important;
}

/* Messagebox templates */

.messagebox {
   border: 1px solid #aaa;
   background-color: #f9f9f9;
   width: 80%;
   margin: 0 auto 1em auto;
   padding: .2em;
}
.messagebox.merge {
   border: 1px solid #c0b8cc;
   background-color: #f0e5ff;
   text-align: center;
}
.messagebox.cleanup {
   border: 1px solid #9f9fff;
   background-color: #efefff;
   text-align: center;
}
.messagebox.standard-talk {
   border: 1px solid #c0c090;
   background-color: #f8eaba;
}
.messagebox.nested-talk {
   border: 1px solid #c0c090;
   background-color: #f8eaba;
   width: 100%;
   margin: 2px 4px 2px 4px;
}
.messagebox.small {
   width: 238px;
   font-size: 85%;
   float: right;
   clear: both;
   margin: 0 0 1em 1em;
   line-height: 1.25em;
}
.messagebox.small-talk {
  width: 238px;
  font-size: 85%;
  float: right;
  clear: both;
  margin: 0 0 1em 1em;
  line-height: 1.25em;
  background: #F8EABA;
}
This will make a major difference to all the local messagebox css class references. It also fixes external URL resolving and stuff. It shouldn't break anything - we've been using it on enwiki and gawikti for ages :) Thanks again - Alison ❤ 20:24, 16 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Ceart go leor.  arís. (FYI - I havn't checked for any conflicts between styles, so hopefully it doesn't muck anything up. I'll keep an eye out just in case.) Guliolopez 10:46, 17 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Hello! If this CSS adds or modifies icons shown after external links, you'll be interested in knowing that such icons have been removed from MediaWiki core, a change which will reach this wiki in few days. You may want to consider whether you still need them. If you have questions, please ask at bugzilla:63725. Regards, Nemo 09:45, 10 Aibreán 2014 (UTC)


Plé:Aerfort Chorcaí

An é ceann scríbe (destination) atá i gceist anseo? Nmacu 09:46, 17 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Is ea. Ní raibh fhios agam an focal ceart agus fuair mé an focal 'Ceannionaid' ó foclóir.


Plé úsáideora:Yurgenphogen

Haigh, a Yurgenphogen, agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí. Tá breis eolais fóinteach in ár reamhrá, freisin.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist orainn. Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat! ----Antóin 12:30, 16 Márta 2010 (UTC)
.........

A Chara, D'fhreagair mé do theachtaireacht ar mo leathanach plé an tseachtain seo caite - Plé úsáideora:Nmacu#S_na_G_i_UCD - táim ag scríobh chugat anseo ar fhaitíos nach bhfaca tú é. Beir bua, Nmacu 12:37, 21 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)


Plé:Airiél Searón

An raibh díospóireacht ann cheana faoi Gaelú ainmneacha daoine nach mbíonn a gcuid teangacha dúchasacha ag úsáid na haibítre Rómhánaigh?  Sílim go bhfuil argóint ann an leagan is coitianta (is dóigh an leagan Béarla, go hiondúil) a úsáid. Go pearsanta, ní thaitníonn leithéidí Airiél Searón liom agus ó thaobh eolas a chuardach (fiú ag baint úsáide as REDIRECT), measaim nach bhfuil sé idéalach. Dá n-iarrfaí ar deichniúr Gaelú a dhéanamh ar seo, d'fhéadfadh siad teacht suas le 10 leagan éagsúil. Nmacu 11:26, 18 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)


Plé catagóire:Polaiteoirí

Anois beidh píosa spraoi againn!  Cén chatagóir ar cheart baill pharlaiminte na Breataine gurb as an Tuaisceart dóibh a chur - "Polaiteoirí na Ríochta Aontaithe"????  Éinne ag iarraidh na hargóna a thosú?  B'fhéidir gur cheart rudaí a fhágail mar a bhí - gach duine faoi "Polaiteoirí" - is cosúil go réitíonn "fudge" an-chuid sa chomhthéacs seo. Nmacu 12:21, 18 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Ah. I've been dreading this "conspóid" ever since Daithí created the David Ervine article :p (Agus táim fós ag gáire ón lá a chonaic mé go bhfuil Ian Paisley sa :Catagóir:Polaiteoirí na hÉireann) Anyway, is "fudge" nó "avoidance" é go deo, ach is dócha go bhfuil sé níos éasca na daoine seo a leagaint isteach sa bpríomh-catagóir: Polaiteoirí. (Mar atá molta agat....) Guliolopez 13:35, 18 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Thug mé faoi deara agus mé ag athrú na gcatagóirí do na polaiteoirí go bhfuil an-chuid den eolas fúthu as dáta - go háirithe maidir le seanadóirí na Stát Aontaithe. Níl a fhios agam an fiú iad ar fad a mharcáil le teimpléad glantacháin - b'fhearr díreach an t-eolas a dhéanamh cothrom le dáta nuair a bhíonn deis ag daoine. Nmacu 12:54, 18 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Ceartú beag: Mo leithscéal, tar éis breathnú i gceart orthu, níl na hailt ar na Seanadóirí mórán as dáta. Nmacu 13:08, 18 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)


Cad chuige na teimpléid a thosaíonn le Ie cúige Contae
agus atá liostáilte in Speisialta:Uncategorizedtemplates ?
Feictear dom go bhfuil cuid acu atá leathanaigh ceaptha a bheith á úsáid cé nach bhfeicim é seo nuair a osclaím cód na leathanch sin.  Tá sé seo fíor i gcás Contae Chiarraí, mar shampla - Speisialta:Whatlinkshere/Teimpl%C3%A9ad:Ie_c%C3%BAige_Contae_Chiarra%C3%AD - ach nuair a osclaíonn tú leathanaigh na mbailte (m.sh. Cill Áirne), ní fheictear dom go bhfuil an teimpléad in úsáid.  Aon tuairimí?
Nmacu 15:09, 22 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Apologies for English, but I couldn't even begin to explain this otherwise. Firstly, having these in "uncategorised template" is OK in my view. They are "sub-templates", and there's no real value to the casual user to be able to find them by cat.

Now, with regard to the purpose of these templates, and "how they show as included in for example Cill Áirne, when not actually overtly included".

The "main" :Teimpléad:Ie baile infobox template includes a number of "sub-templates". The two main ones are: a zoomed map by county (EG: :Teimpléad:Mapa Contae Chiarraí), and the other is the province by county (EG: :Teimpléad:Ie cúige Contae Chiarraí).

It may seem overly complicated (and in a way it probably is), but the value of these templates is that, if the casual user wants to populate the IE infobox template for a town, he only has to tell the template what county the town is in. And then the county map, and the province get automatically populated. (And thereby, we don't have to clutter up the infobox with detail that is "constant" for all towns/places in that county.)

Anyway, as I said, I wouldn't worry about it too much - or finding a way of categorising them. More casual editors will just see this as a "magic box" that just works - and won't need to find these sub-templates in a cat. And more experienced editors will no where to look without being told.

Sin é mo thuarimse in aon chur. Le meas. Guliolopez 16:22, 22 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

:Déanann sé sin neart céille agus cabhróidh sé liom agus mé ag iarraidh na dteimpléad níos casta a thuiscint agus a athrú amach anseo. Is smaoineamh maith é na fo-teimpléid a bheith ann cinnte. Is iontach an rud é eolas mar seo a roinnt mar measaim go bhfuil roinnt eagarthóirí eile ann ar nós mé féin atá a gcuid scileanna eagarthóireachta ar fad foghlamtha tríd an Vicipéid seachas Wikipedia. Go raibh maith agat arís agus ádh mór, Nmacu 21:43, 22 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé teimpléid:Ie cúige Contae Ard Mhacha


Plé úsáideora:87.42.122.7

===Eanáir 2008===
 Tá fáilte romhat sa Vicipéid. Iarraimis do gach aon duine cuidiú dearfach a thabhairt don chiclipéid seo . Féach ar an leathanach fáilte más mian leat a thuilleadh a fhoghlaim faoin saghas cuidithe sin. Meastar gurb ionann athruithe neamhdhearfacha agus loitiméireacht, áfach; má leanann tú ar aghaidh sa stíl seo b'fhéidir go gcoscfar tú ón eagarthóireacht gan aon fhógra eile. Cuir deireadh leis más é do thoil é. Go raibh maith agat. Nmacu 12:28, 25 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)
----
 Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Thanks. Nmacu 12:28, 25 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)
===Feabhra 2008===
 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing without any further warning.
----
 Cuir deireadh leis más é do thoil é. Má leanann tú ar aghaidh leis an loitiméireacht seo b'fhéidir go gcoscfar tú ón eagarthóireacht gan aon fhógra eile.

Guliolopez 11:34, 29 Feabhra 2008 (UTC)
Guliolopez 17:11, 4 Márta 2008 (UTC)
Nmacu 12:06, 14 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)

This shared school connection has been cited before for disruptive and nonsense editing. If it continues, this IP address will be blocked from editing for a longer period this time. Guliolopez 12:52, 29 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)
Guliolopez 12:56, 29 Lúnasa 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning that will be afforded to editors from this IP address range. If there is any more vandalism associated with this address, it will be blocked from editing outright. Guliolopez 15:22, 15 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)
Guliolopez 14:23, 17 Mí na Nollag 2008 (UTC)

This shared school connection has been cited several times before for disruptive and nonsense editing. If there is continued vandalism from the IP range assigned to this school, it will result in an block on anonymous editing. Guliolopez 09:01, 27 Aibreán 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning this IP range will receive regarding disruptive edits. If there is any further vandalism, this range will be blocked from editing without further notice. Guliolopez 10:49, 7 Bealtaine 2010 (UTC)

Please stop disruptive editing. If vandalism continues, this IP range will be blocked from editing. Guliolopez 13:20, 1 Feabhra 2011 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Eoinomurchu

Cén fáth gur bhain tú amach na naisc agus an rang? Agus rud eile - is focal baininscneach é comhdhúil. Leis sin caithfidh orainn aidiacht baininscneach a úsáid. Níl aon chiall leis na focail comhdhúil ceimiceach - ainm baininscneach le haidiacht firinscneach?! MacTire01 15:10, 1 Feabhra 2008 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:71.192.59.22

Hi. Please stop resubmitting content in English. This is the Irish language Wikipedia. If someone gets around to translating that article, then so be it. Submitting content with a "translate this or else I'll keep submitting it" note is totally inappropriate. "Demanding" that someone translate it is hardly going to be successful now is it? Guliolopez 20:55, 2 Feabhra 2008 (UTC)