Plé úsáideora:Drummac~gawiki

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Drummac. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Drummac~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:42, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Roibeard~gawiki

Haigh, , agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom ar . Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat!  --AllieBot 05:16, 17 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Roibeard. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Roibeard~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:44, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
 07:37, 19 Aibreán 2015 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Gerry~gawiki

Haigh, , agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom ar . Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat!  --AllieBot 01:29, 18 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Gerry. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Gerry~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:43, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Lmallory~gawiki

Haigh, , agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom ar . Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat!  - Alison ❤ 09:19, 19 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Lmallory. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Lmallory~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:43, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:MerlLinkBot

Can you help me tranlating the edit summaries of my bot for gawiki?
;en
* bot=Bot:
* summary_replace_deadlink=replacing dead link {0} with {1}
* summary_update_deadlink=repairing dead link {0}
* summary_replace_outdated=replacing outdated link {0} with {1}
* summary_update_outdaded=repairing outdated link {0}
;de
* bot=Bot:
* summary_replace_deadlink=Ersetze defekten Weblink {0} durch {1}
* summary_update_deadlink=Repariere defekten Weblink {0}
* summary_replace_outdated=Ersetze veralteten Weblink {0} durch {1}
* summary_update_outdated=Repariere veralteten Weblink {0}

"replace" is used if the domain has changed, "update" if the domain stays the same

"outdated" is used if the url is still available but will be switched off soon, "deadlink" if the url is already unreachable.

{0} and {1} are placeholders for the domain name(s)
Merlissimo 13:37, 21 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)
;ga
* bot=
* summary_replace_deadlink=
* summary_update_deadlink=
* summary_replace_outdated=
* summary_update_outdated=

;ga
* bot=Róbó
* summary_replace_deadlink=nasc marbh (0) á bhaint amach, (1) á chur isteach
* summary_update_deadlink=nasc marbh (0) á dheisiú.
* summary_replace_outdated=nasc as dáta (0) á bhaint amach, (1) á chur isteach
* summary_update_outdated=nasc as dáta (0) á dheisiú
Tameamseo 22:09, 22 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

GRMA, Tameamseo :) - Alison ❤ 23:00, 22 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

: ;-). Thanks. Merlissimo 23:38, 22 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:212.37.169.162

Haigh, , agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí. Tá breis eolais fóinteach in ár reamhrá, freisin.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom ar . Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat!  - Alison ❤ 06:00, 22 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Sár-jab a chara. GRMA :) - Alison ❤


Plé úsáideora:MacCambridge

Haigh, a MacCambridge, agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí. Tá breis eolais fóinteach in ár reamhrá, freisin.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom armo leathanach phlé. Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat! --AllieBot 19:05, 23 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. If you see images on an article on another wiki that are local to that wiki but you'd like to use them here, just give me a shout and if they're licensed okay, I can transfer them over so we can use them, too. Like this one just now :) I do that quite a bit & it only takes seconds to sort out - Alison ❤ 05:01, 24 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Haigh a Alison, tá mé go dŕeach tar éis a bheith ag léamh faoi Wikicommons agus that Move-to-commons assistant agus an staif eile ach bhí tú níos luaithe (nóiméad nó dhó ar a mhéad ...) :)-- MacCambridge 05:17, 24 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

: Ceart go leor ^_^ Féach ar http://toolserver.org/~commonshelper2/index.php freisin, agus ar TUSC chun an róbó a úsáid - Alison ❤ 05:27, 24 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

:: Go raibh míle maith agat as do chúidiú --MacCambridge 05:38, 24 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Hi MacCambridge! Would you be so kind to help me translate part of this article into the wonderful Irish language? Please. 3-4 lines would be enough. Thanks a lot and best regards:)--Amaqqut 01:28, 6 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

Hi Amaqqut (a Greenlandic name?) Hmm, das ist aber ein ziemlich long article ... Aċ trí nó ceaṫair de línte a ḃeidh ceart go leor, I think. -- MacCambridge 18:46, 8 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

: Ḃuel, rinneas mo ċuid. Féaċ Lu Xun. -- MacCambridge 20:48, 8 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

Dia duit, a MhacCambridge! Quick question: why would the pronoun in the article "Geneva, Alabama" be "í" instead of "é"? I have been basing it on the noun "príomhbhaile" it refers to. If this isn't correct, how does one know which word to use? GRMA, always happy to have new input to improve my Irish. Réaltaeolais (plé) 15:49, 27 Iúil 2017 (UTC)

D’fhreagair mé ansin, a Réaltaeolais. --MacCambridge (plé) 17:04, 27 Iúil 2017 (UTC)

Haigh! D'fhiafraigh tú díom ar leathanach eile conas a scriostar ailt anseo. Thig le héinne scriosadh ailt a mholadh ach an teimpléad "scrios" a chur ar an leathanach atá i gceist (is é sin, an focal scrios idir lúibíní cuaracha dúbailte: {{ }} ) Tá riarthóirí (mise san áireamh) ábalta iad a scriosadh.   SeoMac (plé) 06:55, 29 Iúil 2017 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat. -- MacCambridge (plé) 11:53, 29 Iúil 2017 (UTC)

Hello dear MacCambridge, saw your good contribution in Irish Wikipedia, especially on the article "An Úcráin". According to the subject I would like to ask you translate/help to translate the small article into Irish, and add it to the Irish Wikipedia. Thank you in advance for your support/contribution and best wishes!

Request: '[[w:simple:United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262|United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262]]'

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
 WMF Surveys, 18:41, 29 Márta 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed.  Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone.
If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys.  You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.  Thanks!
 WMF Surveys, 01:39, 13 Aibreán 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC).   The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.  Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys.  You can also send any questions you have to this user email.  Learn more about this survey on the project page.  This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
 WMF Surveys, 00:49, 20 Aibreán 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey


Plé:Cill Airne

Nach Cill Airne (gan síneadh fada) an t-ainm ceart? (airne = sloe i mBéarla)
Slán -- MacCambridge 21:56, 23 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Sin fíor. Is Cill Airne é, mar logainm.ie Well spotted :) - Alison ❤ 22:23, 23 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

: B'in é an chéad dea-ghníomh 'amsa anseo ;-) -- MacCambridge 00:08, 24 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

:: Woohoo!!! ^_^ Ní mbeidh é an deirneach, is dócha! - Alison ❤ 01:39, 24 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)


Plé Vicipéide:Íomhánna roghnaithe/Iarrthóirí

Apologies for posting this in English, but I've restored the portrait of one of your great patriots.  Wanted to make sure you're aware it's available.  Best wishes, Durova 21:47, 27 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Strictly speaking the criteria here is that our "featured homepage pics" must have a decent supporting article (which is met), and have been selected as a "featured pic" on commons (which isn't quite met). While this image is selected as a "featured pic" on the EN project, it hasn't (yet) been selected on commons. I've added it to the candidate list here anyway however - as we're not that pedantic/picky on our selection criteria, and it's a nice image :) Guliolopez 13:26, 11 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Chaco

Haigh, a Chaco, agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí. Tá breis eolais fóinteach in ár reamhrá, freisin.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom armo leathanach phlé. Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat! --AllieBot 23:13, 29 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Dia duit, Chaco.
I'm Paucabot from catalan Wikipedia. I'm in Éire (Contae na Gaillimhe) and I woud really love to know some irish wikipedian. Do you think that you or some other irish wikipedian would be able to make an unplanned wikimeeting this week? A couple of beers would be enough for me... Thanks in advance and slán! Paucabot (talk) 17:24, 3 Lúnasa 2014 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat as an athrú sin ag Robin Williams. Áthas orm (agus faoiseamh agam) go bhfuil tú linn go fóill. Tá sos maith tuillte agat, ar ndóigh! SeoMac (talk) 00:47, 12 Lúnasa 2014 (UTC)
Haigh a SeoMac, go raibh maith agat! Tá ceart agat, tá gá agam sos! Beidh mé ar ais ar ball beag Chaco 17:45, 19 Lúnasa 2014 (UTC)

A Chaco, a chara, Feicim go bhfuil tú ag déanamh obair na gcapall ar na bailte i Londain faoi láthair. Tá moladh agam duit ó thaobh na habairte atá in  úsáid agat do na bailte.  M.sh. "Is baile é Edgware suite i Londain Thuaidh. Is suite san London Borough of Barnet é."
Má tá tú chun cloí le "London Borough of Barnet", b'fhearr "Is baile é Edgware atá suite i Londain Thuaidh. Tá sé suite sa London Borough of Barnet."  (níl aon ghá leis an é)
Sílim féin go bhfuil an iomarca tionchar ag an "of" i "London Borough of Barnet" ar an abairt agus sa chás go raibh tú chun é sin a athrú, mholfainn "Is baile é Edgware atá suite i mBarnet, Londain Thuaidh." (ach go mb'fhéidir go dtógann an nasc go dtí leathanch dar teideal "London Borough of Barnet" thú - nó an leagan Gaeilge air sin).  An rud eile a rith liom ná ar fearr "Tuaisceart Londain" a úsáid?  ... ach nuair a Google-áil mé an dá rud, bhí "Londain Thuaidh" i bhfad níos mó in úsáid.
Le dea-ghuí,
Nmacu (talk) 16:16, 10 Samhain 2014 (UTC)
* Okay, leanfaidh mé air an abairt sin "Is baile é Edgware atá suite i mBarnet, Londain Thuaidh." a úsáid as seo amach a Nmacu Chaco 11 Samhain 2014
** Hi Chaco, D'athraigh mé cúpla ceann a chruthaigh tú inné (m.sh. Finchley) mar bhí an t-urú "m" ag teacht roimh "Londain" seachas "Barnet" (rud nach n-oibríonn). Rith sé liom má tá tú ag iarraidh a lua gur buirg atá ann go bhféadfá an abairt a athrú go dtí  "Is baile é Edgware atá suite sa bhuirg Barnet, Londain Thuaidh." Beir bua, Nmacu (talk) 11:04, 12 Samhain 2014 (UTC)

D'athraigh mé an teideal go Clapton Íochtair. Bheadh Clapton Íochtarach ceart freisin. Má tá tú le Gaeilge a chur air. (Ciall amháin atá le Íochtar ná "an chuid thuaidh de áit" ach feicim Íochtar in úsáid le haghaidh logainmneacha den chineál seo anseo is ansiúd.)
Nuair a rinne mé iarracht nasc a chur idir an dá alt ag baint úsáid as Wikidata, theip orm. "Error: $1" an míniúchán a tugadh dom. Uaireanta tógann sé roinnt uaireanta sular féidir é a dhéanamh. Ní thuigim cén fáth. Bainfidh mé triail eile as amárach. SeoMac (talk) 05:53, 15 Samhain 2014 (UTC)

Hi Chaco! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see :m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, DerHexer (talk) 00:00, 15 Eanáir 2015 (UTC)

34K alt glan! Maith thú! Trua nach féidir liom coinneáil suas leat. SeoMac (talk) 03:40, 1 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)
Go raibh maith agat, a SeoMac. Tá an-jab déanta agatsa féin! Ach is trua nach bhfuil níos mó Gaeilgeoirí ag obair linn anseo. Cá bhfuil siad?!?  Chaco 1 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)

GRMA. Cá bhfuil siad? Ní bhíonn an t-am ag daoine. Cuid de na daoine a bhíodh ag déanamh a lán oibre anseo, ní raibh an t-am acu i ndáiríre, sílim. Bhí siad ag iarraidh an rud seo a choimeád beo agus nuair a tháinig daoine nua isteach, d'imigh siad. Léigh mé go mbíonn cúigear duine díograiseach—agus iad obair go rialta—de dhíth le Vicipéid cheart a bheith ann. Vicipéid na Bascaise, mar shampla. Níos mó ná sin ag na Catalónaigh, is dócha, agus b'fhéidir ag lucht na Malaeise. Ba mhór an cuidiú dúinn dá mbeadh sé mar nós ag na daoine gnóthacha seo againne beagán a dhéanamh ach go rialta. Agus tagann corrdhuine isteach le ceartúchán a dhéanamh nó blúire beag eolais nua a chur le Vicipéid na G. Ba chóir dúinn reach out, mar a deirtear anois, chucu. Poll dubh atá i gciclipéid, ar ndóigh. Féach ar Vicipéid an Bhéarla. Tá an dearcadh ceart ag na Vicipéideoirí Breatnaise — cóisir de shaghas atá ann. Bainimis sult as! SeoMac (talk) 16:40, 1 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)
Gan amhras, is fíor duit. Tá an formhór daoine ró-ghnóthach a bheith a chuir leis an tionscadal seo. Ach, ní fheadar má próifíl mhór ag Vicipéid na Gaeilge i measc pobal na Gaeilgeoirí? Bhfuil mic léinn nó daltaí scoile ag baint úsáid as? Nó an meáin Gaelach? Níor chuala mé trácht ar an dtionscadal seo ariamh sa mheáin. Chaco 2 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)

Bhí mise fiosrach chomh maith agus tá cupla lá ó shin Ghoogláil mé "Vicipéid". Ar éigin a bhí aon rud nua ann. Tá Niels JL Iversen, an foghlaimeoir iontach teangacha úd sa Danmhairg ag foghlaim Gaeilge, agus tá sé ag baint úsáide as ailt ón Vicipéid. Nuair a luaigh duine Vicipéid na Gaeilge le cara linn a bhfuil ard-Ghaeilge aige, sin a dúirt sé ná "Tá feabhas ag teacht ar an Vicipéid, caithfidh mé a rá".

Na fadhbanna atá againn, tá siad ag na meáin Ghaeilge uile nach mór: ba chóir go mbeadh níos mó léitheoirí ann, cinnte. Níl an fhadhb sin teorannta don Ghaeilge. Tá 160 milliún duine ag labhairt na Beangáilise, ach tá a Vicipéid acusan beagnach chomh beag lenár Vicipéid féin—36K alt nó mar sin. Léann siad an Béarla an iomarca. An bua atá againn maidir leis na mic léinn sna Gaelscoileanna ná go bhfuil gach rud scríofa i nGaeilge anseo agus ní gá dóibh dul i muinín foclóirí an oiread sin. Seachnaíonn Vicipéid sclábhaíocht aistriúcháin. Feicim comhartha anseo is ansiúd go bhfuil 'fhios ag roinnt mhaith daoine go bhfuilimid ann. Caithfidh go bhfuil corrdhuine ann nach bhfuil sásta le caighdeán na Gaeilge anseo, ach ní thuigeann siad cad is Vicí ann: Fáilte roimh chách, gan Ph.D. sa teanga riachtanach ná tógáil i gCarna ach oiread. Ar ndóigh, tá fáilte is céad rompu seo chomh maith!  SeoMac (talk) 18:03, 2 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)

Hi Chaco. Sorry to write to you in English but I just wanted to inform you of an option under "Luach an ich seo" called "Languages". Besides "Languages" there is a little clog which you click. You put in the code of the wiki (en for English, es for Spanish, de for German, etc) and it links you with all the other languages that has an article in that language, not just English. When you add "[[en:[articlehere]]] it will only link the Irish wikipedia to English, and not to all the other languages the article may be in. Even worse, it does not show on the English Wikipedia that the Irish Wikipedia has a topic on this matter as you would have to manually edit it. So I would suggest that you use the clog to make sure our articles connect with more languages and that other languages can see that our wikipedia has an article on that particular topic. Go raibh maith agat, Lucky102 (talk) 18:18, 17 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)
Hi Lucky, it seems like a lot of work! Maybe sometime in the future I'll go back over them and add the extra links. Le meas Chaco

:Hi again Chaco, you only have to input one language but it does work and adds the rest automtically. For example the pages about the books of the bible can be done by this and takes a few seconds to do. Lucky102 (talk) 10:22, 19 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)

::Tá sé tábhachtach alt a bheith ceangailte leis na hailt faoin ábhar céanna i dteangacha eile. But you might run into the problem I have. I always get an error message when I enter a link if it is the first one in a session working on Vicipéid. I have to go to the corresponding article on another Wikipedia and edit the language list from there. Once I have done that, I can link any additional articles I want normally from the Gaeilge side. This just happened when I tried to link the article Bryngwran. Bain triail as agus inis dúinn an raibh fadhb ar bith agatsa. SeoMac (talk) 13:56, 19 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)

::: That is certainly a very weird problem, I have never had an issue like that, except if someone else linked a different Irish article to the English article I am trying to link.
Hóigh Lucky102 agus SeoMac. Can someone talk me through step by step how to do this? When I click 'languages' it just asks me to enter the language I want the language menu to be displayed in. I'm baffled.Chaco

::: First of all you click the "Add links" option. After that type in the code of the language you want to input. For example if you wanted to put an article in English you would put "en". This is in the "Language" box. In the "Page" box translate the title into English if needs be and see if it comes up. Make sure it is the right article and not an article of another person. If there are other languages it will ask you to confirm it, click yes. That's it. Lucky102 (talk) 22:43, 21 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)

::::I take it you mean "Edit links" under Languages. Your method works fine for me if two conditions are met: 1. I have already linked another article by going to another language Wikipedia and linking it from there to gawiki, and 2. I do it from my home computer. From then on it works perfectly. I just tried to link the Joni Mitchell article and since it was my first attempt this work session to link an article from here at gawiki, it was unsuccessful: I got the usual response: Error: $1. When I clicked on Details I got this: Invalid token. If you think this is "weird", you should see what happens when I try to link articles from a library computer :-).  Thanks for your help, though. It actually does help clarify the problem for me in my own mind and I suspect Chaco will not have the same experience. SeoMac (talk) 00:01, 22 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)

:::::No, I mean "Add links" as there would be no links to add for a new page. If a page has no links you would have "add links". It is easy to do from ga wiki. It works fine for me. Lucky102 (talk) 11:08, 22 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)
This is a link explaining it also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Interlanguage_links#Adding_a_new_link Lucky102 (talk) 11:42, 22 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)
Aha! Thank you! I think I've done it :-) Chaco

Haigh, a Chaco
Go raibh maith agat as na leathanaigh nua. Ábhar suimiúil úsáideach. Ní dheachaigh éinne ariamh trí liosta iomlán phríomhchathracha an domhain. Anois tá muid bord ar bord lena lán Vicipéidí eile.
Ná déan dearmad nach gcuirimid na síntí fada isteach nuair dhéanaimid Defaultsort: Honiara, ní Hóniára. Coimeádann sin in ord na haibítire iad sna catagóirí.  SeoMac (talk) 17:38, 4 Lúnasa 2015 (UTC)
Go raibh maith agatsa féin a SeoMac. Okay. déanfaidh mé é sin as seo amach Chaco 4 Lúnasa 2015

Dia dhuit! İ have my profile translated in İrish Gaelic, but İ don’t know if iťs 100% correct. Can you check it for any mistakes? This is the text:

Dia dhuit, is mise Josep Maria Roca Peña agus táim fiche bliain d'aois.

Is as Barcelona mé, as an Chatalóin, mar sin is Catalónach mé agus tá dóchas agam go mbeidh an Chatalóin neamhspleách. Labhraím freisin an Spáinnis agus an Phortaingéilis, mar bhínn sa Phortaingéil ar feadh tamaill. Is maith liom, ach  go háirithe, na trí sraitheanna seo a leanas: Star Trek, Code Lyoko agus Winx Club, agus tá na sraitheanna sin curtha ar  vicí i dteangacha éagasúla agam .

Má theastaíonn uait go ndéanfainn aistriúcháin nó ceartúcháin duit i , , ,  nó , fág teachtaireacht domh le d'iarratas agus déanfaidh mé é, amháin má tá ag scríobh scéala uait i mo Bhalla Scéala.??Ériugena (talk) 16:45, 28 Feabhra 2016 (UTC)
Note that at the end of the second paragraph, İ’m talking about my wikis on Wikia which İ have in several languages. Thanks! --Josep Maria Roca Peña (talk) 14:12, 29 Meán Fómhair 2015 (UTC)
Very impressive Josep! The only correction I would make is 'tá súil agam a bhainfear an Chatalóin neamhspleáchas amach' rather than 'tá dóchas agam a bheidh Catalonia neamhspleách'. that's it, unless anyone else can spot any other botúin?
Chaco 30 Meán Fómhair 2015

Thanks a lot! --Josep Maria Roca Peña (talk) 18:10, 30 Meán Fómhair 2015 (UTC)

Mar eolas duit: . Rud éigin ar siúl ag Wikimedia. SeoMac (talk) 23:22, 22 Aibreán 2016 (UTC)

Chonaic mé do nóta faoi Bumaló. Casta. Tá speiceas éisc i gceist. Agus tá géineas d'éisc i gceist. Ach an ionann 'bumaló' leis an speiceas nó an leis an ngéineas? Is dócha gur chóir dúinn na hailt a athainmniú leis na hainmneacha eolaíochta. Beidh mé ag scrúdú na ceiste ach caithfidh mé m'alt i gcomhair 100Wikidays a ullmhú agus ansin m'aghaidh a thabhairt ar an Wikipicinic in Central Park :-)
Go raibh míle maith agat as na hailt ar fad seo agat!  SeoMac (talk) 17:08, 10 Iúil 2016 (UTC)
Okay a SeoMac, níl deifir ar bith ann! Chaco 20:45, 10 Iúil 2016 (UTC)

Dia duit, a stór Chaco! Níl a fhios agam do theanga, ach is cuimhin liom do amhránaí amhráin Enya, agus á di saincheaptha rinneadh ar do shon: Is féidir leat a dhéanamh ar do earraí Gaeilge faoi cheoltóirí dtús Nikolai Noskov, ansin Valery Leontyev Valery Meladze, Sergey Lazarev, agus ansin Philip Kirokorov? má dhéanann tú na hairteagail, beidh mé an-bhuíoch duit! Go raibh maith agat! --Anna Jarvinen (talk) 19:11, 11 Lúnasa 2016 (UTC)

Fáilte ar ais, Chaco! SeoMac (plé) 20:34, 11 Samhain 2016 (UTC)
Go raibh maith agat a SeoMac!

You are invited...
 You are invited...

The Celtic Knot: Wikipedia Language Conference  - Programme now live.
*Hosts:  The University of Edinburgh and  Wikimedia UK
*Supporting: Celtic & Indigenous Languages.
*Objective: The main objective for Celtic Knot 2017 is the coming together of practitioners in the same room at same time; strengthening the bonds of those working to support language communities into a 'knot' and leading into action. Attendees can expect to learn about and discuss innovative approaches to open education, open knowledge and open data that support and grow language communities.
*Date: 6 July 2017 - Booking is now open.
Stinglehammer (plé) 23:48, 22 Bealtaine 2017 (UTC)

Bí cúramach leis an focail seo a chur tú leis an alt seo https://ga.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Focail_Ghaeilge_sa_Bh%C3%A9arla&action=history
Is breága iad a chum mo dhuine Cassidy, seachain iad! EOMurchadha
Sorry, EOMurchadha, but I don't agree.
I have never heard of Cassidy before and I only came across him when I looked up to see if there was any evidence online for these words being of Irish origin (Crock, shanty, slug, mucker, glam). I came across a website dedicated to debunking him. I added my words without any knowledge of Cassidy's research. These are words - among many others - that I heard growing up. The person who wrote this website looks on etymology from a strictly school Gaeilge standpoint, which, as we all know is mostly artificial, unnatural and sometimes silly e.g. []. What this critic of Cassidy fails to realise is that the majority of Irish speakers in the 19th and 20th centuries did not die out, stop speaking the language or speak it in a way that he would be familiar with. They emigrated, to America, England, Australia and Scotland and the slang that peppered their English was picked up by their children. Through them, these words disseminated through the local slang and was picked up by non-Irish people in the Anglophone world. A good example of this example of this is dúdaire dubh for the Australian Aboriginal Didgeridoo, which some dolt made up a word for in Gaeilge as didiridiú completely ignoring its Irish origin.
Lots of slang words are not properly researched in English. More work must be done as the contribution of Irish speakers to that language has been overlooked. As has the community of Irish speakers in emigrant communities been completely ignored by the Gaeilgeoirí. I grew up in one and I can tell you that people from the western counties used Irish words frequently to a degree that we did not know these words were not Irish.
Chaco 12:42, 17 Lúnasa 2017 (UTC)

Haigh, a Chaco!
Maith thú as an obair ar fad atá á déanamh agat le déanaí. Ná déan dearmad ar na sínte fada a fhágáil ar lár agus tú ag cur defaultsort isteach. Gan é sin a dhéanamh cuireann an córas ríomhaire ag Wikipedia na focail le gutaí gearra agus gutaí fada in dhá áit dhifriúla sna catagóirí. Please remember to leave out the fadas when putting in defaultsorts. Otherwise, the system puts words with the same vowel in two different places in categories. Go raibh maith agat!   SeoMac (plé) 21:34, 14 Samhain 2017 (UTC)

Tabhair faoi deara, a Chaco, nach n-úsáidtear an t-alt le "Londain" ná le "Sasana". Mar sin, ba chóir "Stair Londan" agus "Stair Shasana" a scríobh. Le deaghuí,  SeoMac (plé) 05:48, 30 Samhain 2017 (UTC)
Okay, a Seomac ach níl cumhacht agam an t-ainm a athrú má dhéanaim botún gramadaí. Chaco 11:19, 30 Samhain 2017 (UTC)

Moladh duit faoi na blianta i dteidil do chuid alt: Cuir an bhliain ag deireadh an teidil. Long genitive strings like "2004 Crith talún agus súnámaí san tAigéan Indiach" are treacherous, but you can be reasonably sure that the year will come at the end. Go raibh maith agat as na hailt go léir a scríobhann tú.  SeoMac (plé) 18:17, 23 Eanáir 2018 (UTC)
Okay, go raibh maith agat  a Seomac -  Chaco 12:54 28 Eanáir 2018.

Dia dhuit, a Chaco!
Chuir tú tús leis an alt sin Abhainn Ghleann Rí. Tá abhainn den ainm seo in oirthuaisceart na hÉireann leis an ainm seo (An Rí, agus the River Newry a thugtar uirthi freisin). Ach ní féidir liom teacht ar aon abhainn (ná sráidbhaile) a bhfuil an t-ainm seo uirthi -- i Maigh Eo ná in aon áit eile. Ar thig leat cuidiú liom? GRMA  SeoMac (plé) 06:53, 8 Feabhra 2018 (UTC)
Tá brón orm ach ní cuimhin liom cá bhfuair mé an logainm sin (rinne mé é cúig bhliain ó shin). I have a vague recollection that I got them all from a map, I didn't make them up out of thin air, but just can't remember what map. Tá logaimn ann, áfach, i mBéarla Glenree River that can be found in the Barony of Gallen  ar an suíomh seo: http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V2,591271,743300,1,7
A SeoMac, an bhféadfá an loitiméireacht a dheisiú ar an leathanach Sasana. Duine éicint scrios an infobox. Rinne mé iarracht é a dheisiú mé féin ach ní raibh rath agam.
Chaco 19:43 8 Feabhra 2018.
Aha! D'aimsigh mé é: Abhainn Ghleann Riabh     https://www.logainm.ie/ga/1165303?s=Glenree+River
Chaco 19:47 8 Feabhra 2018.

GMMA! Tá sé níos soiléire anois! Abhainn Ghleann Riabh atá i gceist, agus ní an abhainn eile sin a théann trí Newry! Tá an bosca sonraí i gcomhair Shasana beagnach ar fónamh anois, ach cuirfidh mé an sean-leagan ar ais. Níor thuig mé ar dtús cad a bhí i gceist. I didn't go back far enough to see what the real problem was—I'll go back to it tomorrow.  SeoMac (plé) 07:39, 9 Feabhra 2018 (UTC)

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
 WMF Surveys, 18:41, 29 Márta 2018 (UTC)

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed.  Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone.
If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys.  You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.  Thanks!
 WMF Surveys, 01:39, 13 Aibreán 2018 (UTC)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC).   The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.  Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys.  You can also send any questions you have to this user email.  Learn more about this survey on the project page.  This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
 WMF Surveys, 00:49, 20 Aibreán 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience in this survey
Hi ,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with  and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes  to give your feedback through this survey.  It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
 RMaung (WMF) 16:20, 9 Meán Fómhair 2019 (UTC)

Share your experience in this survey
Hi ,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes  to give your feedback through this survey.  It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
 RMaung (WMF) 19:49, 20 Meán Fómhair 2019 (UTC)

Hi a Chaco, ba mhór an cúnamh é dá mbeifeá in ann géineas agus speiceas a chur san áireamh sna haltanna nua a bhaineann le speiceas ar leith. Bheinn ag súil leo san alt féin, ach bheinn sásta dá mbeadh an t-eolas sa mbosca tacsanomaíochta, mar a rinne mé anseo. GRMA!
Kevin Scannell (plé) 17:02, 29 Aibreán 2020 (UTC)
Okay, déanfaidh mé é sin as seo amach a Kevin Scannell Chaco 2:07, 30 Aibreán 2020 (UTC)
Nóta amháin eile ar an ábhar seo; is minic go gcruthaíonn tú altanna nua agus alt eile ar an ábhar céanna ann cheana, mar gheall ar ainm malartach ar speiceas, mílitriú, nó a leithéid. Mar shampla an t-alt Latráisc a chruthaigh tú inné, is mílitriú é sin — tá Liatráisc ann cheana. Agus go leor samplaí eile den sórt sin má chaitheann tú súil ar mo stair eagarthóireachta. Ba mhór an cúnamh é dá mbeifeá sásta tuilleadh taighde a dhéanamh ar dtús; m.sh. má theipeann ort nasc a chruthú leis an alt i mBéarla, seans gur tharla é sin toisc go bhfuil alt eile i nGaeilge nasctha leis cheana, agus ní bheadh an t-alt nua ag teastáil ar chor ar bith. Kevin Scannell (plé) 08:14, 12 Meitheamh 2020 (UTC)
Dá ina riarthóir mé, bheadh é sin níos fusa, agus d'fhéadfainn iad a scriosadh mé féin. Tá a fhios agam déanaim botúin, mar chuile dhuine, ach ní féidir liom é a cheartú. Chaco 14:03, 12 Meitheamh 2020 (UTC)
Nílim do do cháineadh; mar a dúirt tú, déanann gach duine botúin. I gcás nach bhfuil mílitriú ann, ba leor atreorú a dhéanamh ó leathanach amháin go leathanach eile. Is é mo thuairim go bhfuil leathanaigh atreoraithe den sórt sin an-úsáideach, go háirithe toisc go mbíonn mórán ainmneacha éagsúla ar speiceas amháin ar téarma.ie. Cabhraíonn siad le daoine teacht ar an ábhar go héasca Kevin Scannell (plé) 13:31, 12 Meitheamh 2020 (UTC)
Conas a dhéantar atreoraithe? Níl a fhios agam a Kevin. Chaco 14:03, 13 Meitheamh 22:48 (UTC)

An téacs seo a úsáid mar fhoinse an ailt le hatreorú: #athsheoladh Ainm an ailt

B’fhéidir go mbeadh sé fiúntach an cheist seo a leanas a iarraidh ar an gCoiste Téarmaíochta (Foras na Gaeilge; "Os rud é nach éan dúchasach é Pluvialis dominica, cén fáth gur aistriúchán ón Bhéarla (American golden plover) a chum siad, beag beann ar an 'Systema Naturae' (ainmníocht dhéthéarmach)?"  Ériugena (plé) 15:22, 27 Iúil 2020 (UTC)
I find the Coiste Téarmaíochta a Ériugena not fit for purpose, not in the context of coining terms to help describe the wider world. Then, like inaccuracies you've mentioned above, it doesn't clarify them. Also irritating is the (apparently) arbitrary nomenclature of various areas such as historical figures or events. Why Dióicléitiánas and not Diocletian, like every other language? How did they arrive at that name? Or An Bliotsa instead of An Blitz? Why is Irish the only language to change a word from English that was adopted from German? There were lots of Irish people in London during the Blitz and most likely native Irish speakers among them. Did any of them refer to that event as an Bliotsa? Deacair a shamhlú. Chaco 22:31, 27 Iúil 2020 (UTC)

* TGcoa - I don't appreciate your sarcastic remarks to articles I create. I am part of the Irish Diaspora, unlike you I have never had the privilege of access to an education in the Irish language, but I love my ancestral language and I want to do what I can to help promote it. I am self-taught. I have never claimed to be an expert. All I wish is to help Gaeilge interact with the wider world and modern culture, rather than have this project be solely focused on Irish nationalists from the 19th century, as you seem to wish. Your aim seems to be to sabotage Irish language enthusiasts and present Irish as a closed language for small-minded pedants whose sneer and mock anyone who does not consistently achieve the highest levels of language purity. You think there is no intermediate stage between no knowledge of the language, and total mastery.
Here's what you could do to encourage those without your privilege:
* Correct grammar without disparagingly drawing attention to the creator of the article.
* Encourage rather than discourage people who share your passion for the language.
* Share your concerns and frustrations in a private rather than public forum.
Chaco 12:43, 6 Lúnasa 2020 (UTC)

Hi Chaco
I was asked by Wikimedia Foundation to promote this call for participation on the planned Universal Code of Conduct.
Best regards --Holder (plé) 04:29, 14 Lúnasa 2020 (UTC)
At times, our contributor communities and projects have suffered from a lack of guidelines that can help us together create an environment where free knowledge can be shared safely without fear.
There has been talk about the need for a global set of conduct rules in different communities over time. Recently, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees announced a Community Culture Statement, asking for new standards to address harassment and promote inclusivity across projects.
The universal code of conduct will be a binding minimum set of standards across all Wikimedia projects, and will apply to all of us, staff and volunteers alike, all around the globe.. It is of great importance that we all participate in expressing our opinions and thoughts about UCoC and its values. We should think about what we want it to cover or include and what it shouldn’t include, and how it may create difficulties or help our groups.

This is the time to talk about it. Before starting drafting the code of conduct, we would like to hear from you and to solicit the opinions and feedback of your colleagues.
In order for your voice to be heard, we encourage and invite you to read more about the universal code of conduct (UCoC)  and then write down your opinions or feedback on the discussion page . To reduce language barriers during the process, you are welcomed to translate the universal code of conduct english main page into your respective local language . You and your community may choose to provide your opinions/feedback using your local languages.

Chaco,  in relation to your latest contribution, which I have renamed "Liosta na gcuradh ..."  fíor-chasta an tuiseal ginideach ǃ  Mar sin an féidir leat a bheith cúramach le do thoil... >?
So it seems like we share much the same story... I have lived most of my life outside Ireland and am largely self-taught, like you.
My method is to try to find formulae that seem to be correct and model text on them, as I explain on my profile page.
For your latest article on World Snooker Champions, I didn't know how to write the title, creid nó ná creid ǃ
But using  Google advanced search, I was able to find some similar text.
I had to search different combinations  of words and spelling iteratively, until I found what seems to be the most used.
... you could do this too, if you spend more time on it, I am sureǃ
I hope my formulation for the title of the page is correct, but I am not sure.
I actually consider that I have next to no knowledge of the grammar, but I hope my search techniques make up for thatǃ
This method  takes time and patience. However it is open to all,...  if editors can spend the time and want to be careful that is, and have some awareness of what they don't master ǃ
Other tools include using  the litreoir and the gramadóir  that Kevin Scannell has developed.
Given the availability of such tools, there is little excuse for e.g. large numbers of spelling mistakes in the articles of some users (not yours these days)ǃ
(actually I have an excuse... I work mostly on a Chromebook,... I haven't figured out how to install Linux (yet) and so I can't get Kevin Scannell's tools to work ǃ).
Anyway if an editor doesn't have much time or patience, and doesn't master topics like the ginideach, then it is extra important to stick to simple formulations, like I did when I edited your "Círéibeacha Manhattan, 1863".   Here a simple comma avoided having to use the ginideach (and again, believe it or not, I would have had to do some research to find out how to write your text).
More generally, the Vicipéid has a real problem with a fair number of articles which could be classified as pidgin.
I also have written professionally in French. I know that it is extraordinarily hard for non-natives not to make mistakes and to avoid bizarre or unnatural phrasing.
In the case of Irish,  the tolerance for poor writing is in most cases actually quite generous, given that most writers are not native or fluent.
However when there are a multitude of blatant mistakes, out of carelessness, that would shock most of our readers. then I strongly believe that action needs to be taken, either through "glanadh" or deletion  (the problem with "glanadh" is that the errors remain visible in Google searches, creating a bad reputation for the Vicipéid).
Rewriting someone's text for me is usually out of the question, as I find it very tedious and am actually quite slow at it. Writing fresh material with the formulae in my head and external references as Gaeilge is far easier
Titles are particularly important to get right, as they have a higher profile.
It is also important to nip careless writing in the bud.  It is awful to impose "glanadh" on the articles of some editors a long time afterwards, as I had to do recently (poor Mandatorymist77 ǃ).
And in many cases, the articles in the "glanadh" category are never going to be corrected... and could well end up being written over by some other editor (often easier to write anew than to correct).
So it is a courtesy to let an editor know quickly when there are problems.

Please read my profile page
https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9As%C3%A1ideoir:TGcoa
and  please send me personal messages if I can help with formulations etc.
Beir buaǃ  Ciaran
TGcoa (plé) 00:43, 20 Lúnasa 2020 (UTC)

Chaco it seems like we share much the same story

Chaco ... please please could you use the formula   "agus a fuair bás"  instead of xx agus fuair bás xx
It is a small issue but returns often.
What would be good in the article you created  just now about  "Ruth Bader Ginsburg"
 would be to add a reference to Irish language articles on the lawyer...
eg  by entering into Google  site:.tuairisc.ie "Ruth Bader Ginsburg"
This leads you to   https://tuairisc.ie/bhi-leargas-ar-leith-ag-ruth-bader-ginsburg-ar-chas-na-mban/
More generally, please stick to phrases and formulae you know to be correct.... so avoiding original use of plurals or genitives.
By the way, did you see the scandal recently about editing in Scots Wikipedia   ?   See here https://slate.com/technology/2020/09/scots-wikipedia-language-american-teenager.html
I note that you created many articles in 2018 in particular that were more adventurous and have remained problematic.  The issue for me is that articles like these have been creating a bad reputation for the Vicipéid and scaring off proficient Gaeilgeoirí (as people hate doing basic corrections... easier to write afresh  ... most articles though are short)
Beir buaǃ  Ciaran
TGcoa (plé) 23:43, 3 Deireadh Fómhair 2020 (UTC)
TGcoa – I am sure we both want the same thing, to see that Irish thrives. However we clearly have different approaches on how to achieve this via Vicipeid. I sense that you’d rather see the project full of articles with perfect grammar, whereas I would rather see articles exist, whatever the standard of grammar they have been written in.
Our role is to inspire others to contribute. They see the wiki, they see an article that interests them, they may decide to add to or improve it. It’s not ego. It’s about the bigger picture, that young and future Irish speakers will grow up with a Wikipedia that aids them. Lots of articles that I have created have been filled in by others, which shows that other people’s interest have been sparked. For the project to be truly successful, all of our articles that we have created will have been completely improved and rewritten by many others with better grammar than us. It will show that we have achieved what we have set out to do.
By being pedantic about grammar and harassing other contributors about it has the opposite effect and limits what can be achieved. If some glaring example of errant grammar really annoys you either correct it or learn to ignore it. Neither of us possesses a perfect level of grammar and there is always someone out there more proficient than us out there who will correct our mistakes, such as when your contribution 'Liosta gcuraidh snucair an domhain was corrected to Liosta churaidh snúcair an domhain. You have added lots of valuable information to articles, why waste your time and energy haranguing others about minor details?
Chaco 15:52, 10 Deireadh Fómhair 2020 (UTC)

Mholainn duit leas a bhaint as na logainmneacha  a úsáidtear in Albain!
Mar shampla, tá 'Achadh nan Càrn' acu, ní 'Achadh an Cáirn' (Tagairt:https://gd.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achadh_nan_C%C3%A0rn ) Ar ndóigh, má tá logainm  coibhéiseach i nGhaeilge na hÉireann ann cheana féin, is féidir é seo a úsáid freisin nó ina ionad, m.sh. Glaschú in ionad Glaschu or Dún Éideann in ionad Dùn Èideann Ériugena (plé) 15:51, 7 Lúnasa 2022 (UTC)


Plé:Liosta na Leabhar Gaeilge

Two points:
* Liosta Leabhar Gaelacha is bad grammar. After the weak genitive plural, adjective also takes genitive plural. Thus, Liosta Leabhar Gaelach would be correct. Besides, Irish often prefers to rely on definite articles where English doesn't, because in Irish definite articles are also used in a generic sense (this is why we say time will tell in English, but is maith an scéalaí an aimsir in Irish. Thus, Liosta na Leabhar Gaelach would look more natural.
* What exactly makes a book "Gaelach"? Language? Then it should be Liosta na Leabhar Gaeilge. Content? Panu Petteri Höglund 01:01, 5 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
* It would also be advisable to order the books by author, not by title.
* If a comprehensive list of all books in Irish, Gaelic and Manx is indeed needed, then it should also incorporate the lists of books about or in the main dialects.  Panu Petteri Höglund 01:07, 5 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

: A Phanu, a chara, Ní thigim cén fáth a mbíonn fonn ort na cúrsaí seo a phlé liomlinn i mBéarla na Banríona!? Éóg1916 11:46, 5 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

::Deirtear na teangacha Gaelacha nach féidir Liosta na Leabhar Gaelacha a rá freisin? Éóg1916 16:26, 7 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

:::An chéad rud: Iolra lag é "leabhair". Mar sin, ní chuirtear -a leis an aidiacht sa ghinideach iolra. "Na Leabhair Ghaelacha, ach liosta na leabhar Gaelach. (Ón taobh eile de, is tréaniolra é teangacha, nó ní athraíonn an iarmhír sa ghinideach iolra: bheadh liosta na dteangacha Gaelacha ceart go leor.)

:::Ach is é an fhadhb mhór atá ann ná céard is "leabhar Gaelach" ann? Leabhar i nGaeilge, nó leabhar i gceann de na teangacha Gaelacha? Nó leabhar a bhfuil ábhar Gaelach ann, cosúil le miotaseolaíocht Ghaelach, fiú más i mBéarla nó i bhFraincis atá sé scríofa? Leabhar faoi ghramadach na Gaeilge, nó faoi ghramadach Ghaeilge na hAlban, nó faoi ghramadach Ghaeilge Mhanann? Nó leabhar faoi mhatamaitic agus é i nGaeilge?Panu Petteri Höglund 13:12, 8 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
Scéal eile fós: ná scríobh "X do scríobh", murab é sin an leagan atá ar thul-leathanach an leabhair féin. Thar aon rud eile, ní Gaeilge Chaighdeánach atá ann ach seanlitriú nó Gaeilge Mhuimhneach. "X a scríobh" an leagan caighdeánach. Ach thairis sin, drochobair leabharliostaíochta atá ann má athraíonn tú an leagan a bhí sa leabhar féin. Cuir i gcás, tá leabhar againn ar scríobh duine darbh ainm Maitias Mac Cuarta é. Más é "Maitias Mac Cuarta a scríobh" atá ar thul-leathanach an leabhair, cuir an leagan sin sa leabharliosta. Más é "Maitias Mac Cuarta do scrígh" an leagan atá sa leabhar féin, cuir an leagan sin sa leabharliosta. Más é "Maitias Mac Cuarta a chum agus a cheap an scéal seo" an leagan sa leabhar, bain úsáid as sin. Sin dea-obair leabharlannaíochta agus bíbleagrafaíochta, go bunúsach. Panu Petteri Höglund 13:20, 8 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

:::: GRMA! Tá an sainmhíniú seo a leanas ag Wikipedia; "Gaelic as an adjective means "pertaining to the Gaels", including language and culture. As a noun, it may refer to the group of languages spoken by the Gaels, or to any one of the individual languages, all of which are members of the Goidelic branch of the Celtic languages." Cheap mé go mbeadh 'Gaeilge' (Gaeilge na hÉireann &na hAlban, srl.) ró-chúng, mar go raibh i gceist agam níos mó ná leabhair i nGaeilge amháin a liostáil. Bheadh leabhar i nGaeilge, nó leabhar a bhfuil ábhar Gaelach ann, cosúil le miotaseolaíocht Ghaelach, fiú más i dteanga eile atá sé scríofa, leabhar faoi ghramadach na Gaeilge, nó faoi ghramadach Ghaeilge na hAlban, nó faoi ghramadach Ghaeilge Mhanann? Nó leabhar faoi mhatamaitic agus é i nGaeilge.Éóg1916 14:31, 8 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

:Maith go leor. Athróidh mé ainm an leathanaigh arís, agus cuirfidh mé an sainmhíniú sin leis.Panu Petteri Höglund 14:57, 8 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

:: Arís eile tá mé fíor-bhuíoch díot. Adh mór! Éóg1916 20:06, 8 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
Dhá phointe:
* An bhfuil aon chiall le leabhair a liostáil de réir teidil? Nach gnáthach leabhair a liostáil de réir údair, ansin de réir teidil?
* Ní dóigh liom go bhfuil ciall ar bith le leabhair i nGaeilge na hEireann, na hAlban agus Mhanann, a rangú le chéile. Ar an gcéad dul síos beidh an liosta seo ollmhór. Nach fearr trí liosta a dhéanamh de? Micilin

an gá duinn nasc a chur chuig alt ar leabhar ar bith mar shampla Deoraíocht nó Artemis Fowl nó Harry Potter agus an Órchloch tá cúpla leabhair in easnamh, an Béal Bocht, srl ach ní raibh mé cinnte an raibh feidhm an ailt réitithe againn go fóil--137.43.105.17 13:44, 20 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

Ba chóir Liosta na Leabhar Gaeilge a bheith ar an alt seo, cé go bhfeicim fáth áirithe rud nios leithne a bheith ann. Eomurchadha (talk) 01:39, 9 Márta 2013 (UTC)

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé:Liosta na Leabhar Gaeilge


Plé:Halldór Laxness

Cad ina thaobh? Ní i mBéarla a scríobh sé na leabhair seo is dócha? Mangaire 20:39, 5 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

Deisithe!  Tameamseo 14:37, 6 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
Thig leat na teidil a aistriú mar atá deanta in ailt eile: 1909 - Ein Damenbrevier ("Portús do mhná") Níos úsáidí don té nach bhfuil an teanga aige/aici--agus sin a bhformor dinn.SeoMac 21:27, 6 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Favori12

Haigh, a Favori12, agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí. Tá breis eolais fóinteach in ár reamhrá, freisin.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom armo leathanach phlé. Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat! --AllieBot 05:15, 6 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

Naughty! - Alison ❤ 07:01, 6 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)


Plé:Naomh Iúdás Tadáias

Nach fearr Iúdás Tadáias a scríobh? -- MacCambridge 16:10, 8 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

Is fearr. (Freagraím mo cheist féin. :-). Rinne mé athdhiriú cheana. Agus is fearr ainm aspal ná ainm an (t-)aspal, nach ea? --MacCambridge 16:35, 8 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, cheers for that :)  Chaco


Plé úsáideora:Rop~gawiki

Haigh, a Rop, agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí. Tá breis eolais fóinteach in ár reamhrá, freisin.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom armo leathanach phlé. Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat! --AllieBot 00:45, 13 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Rop. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Rop~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:44, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
 07:37, 19 Aibreán 2015 (UTC)


Plé:Rugbaí

Nár cheart an Ghaeilge a chur sa chéad áit sa liosta, in áit Bhéarla? --Antóin 21:59, 22 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

An bhfuil gá do gach aistriúcháin na hionad a beith ann, nár mór don Gaeilge amháin a bheith ann? Agus an bhfuil siad ceart? D'aimsigh mé ainmneacha difriúla. FiquemΩ 17:39, 26 Meán Fómhair 2010 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:BRT

Haigh, a BRT, agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí. Tá breis eolais fóinteach in ár reamhrá, freisin.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom armo leathanach phlé. Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat!

Go raibh maith agat as ucht an obair a bhfuil déanta agat, ach le d'thoil ná bain aon teimpléidí ag baint leis an t-alt a ghlanadh ón leathanach. Caithfear an leagan amach a shocrú, agus ba cheart duit WP:NOTE a léamh. Footyfanatic3000 17:33, 23 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
Cad é an leagan amach is fearr? Bheinn sásta é a fheabhsú. Nach bhfaca tú an fhoinse san alt "Cúl na Béinn"?

Chonaic mé an fhoinse, ach fós ní chruthaíonn sé sin gur amhrán cháiliúil é. Maidir leis an leagan amach, ba cheart réamhrá ceart a scríobh (mar atá anseo, mar shampla), agus ba chóir na focail san amhrán a léiriú go cruinn, trí "" a chur tar éis gach líne. Is féidir ceist a chuir orm má tá níos mó cabhair ag teastáil uait. Footyfanatic3000 17:45, 23 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
Tuigim. Go raibh maith agat.


The link to the romanian wikipedia is wrong, pointing to the articles instead of the wikipedia name space. --Seewolf 15:15, 24 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
* Thanks for that. It seems to be okay, though; it's pointing to http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GNU_FDL - is this wrong? - Alison ❤ 00:45, 25 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé Vicipéide:GNU Free Documentation License


Plé úsáideora:Liquorice~gawiki

Haigh, a Liquorice, agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí. Tá breis eolais fóinteach in ár reamhrá, freisin.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom armo leathanach phlé. Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat! --AllieBot 23:24, 30 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Liquorice. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Liquorice~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:43, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)


Plé:Pedro Álvares Cabral

(My apologies for this message being in English) The vandal General Tojo is spamming Wikipedia by removing references and adding his books as the only reference. The books are nothing more than reprints of out of copyright sources, with spelling errors from the title page on forward (For example it is James McClymont, not MacClymont, and Gaspar Correia, not Correa, and Charles Edwards Lester, not Charles Lester Edwards). This article is one of his targets, please watch for removal of valid references and adding of the spam references by new users or IP's. The books spammed so far are:
* Magellan (2008) by Francis Guillemard (died 1933), Antonio Pigafetta (died 1534), Francisco Albo (contemporary of Magellan), Gaspar Correa (contemporary of Magellan), Keith Bridgeman (Editor) and Tahira Arsham (Editor); ISBN 978-1906421007
* Amerigo Vespucci (2009) by Charles Lester Edwards (died 1890), Amerigo Vespucci (died 1512), Keith Bridgeman (Editor) and Tahira Arsham (Editor); ISBN 978-1906421021
* Pedro Cabral (2009) by James Roxburgh MacClymont (out of copyright author), William Brooks Greenlee (edited around 1939), Pero Vaz de Caminha (died 1500), Keith Bridgeman (Editor), and Tahira Arsham (Editor);ISBN 978-1906421014
Please watch for removal of valid references and replacement with spam, and revert accordingly. As for the identity of the spammer and vandal General Tojo:
*Keith Bridgeman, London is the editor of all the books spammed by General Tojo
*Keith Bridgeman, London is the owner of the publishing house publishing the books spammed by General Tojo
*Keith Bridgeman, London is the owner of some Parkinson's disease patents spammed by General Tojo on Wikipedia for quite a few years now
*Keith Bridgeman, London is also the owner of the web page advertising both the Parkinson stuff and the books spammed by General Tojo.
For details see :en:Wikipedia:Long term abuse/General Tojo. PS: If a new editor is removing this message, it is most likely Keith Bridgeman. Please revert. -- Chris 73 15:13, 4 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Zobango

Haigh, a Zobango, agus tá fáilte romhat chuig an Vicipéid! Go raibh maith agat as do chuid dréachtaí a sheoladh isteach. Tá súil agam go mbainfidh tú taitneamh as d'am anseo! Tá sé éasca ailt nua a chruthú, agus téigh go dtí an Halla Baile chun caint leis na Vicipéideoirí eile (más mian leat é sin a dhéanamh), nó téigh go dtí an Lárionad Comhphobail chun breathnú ar na heachtraí Vicipéide is déanaí. Tá breis eolais fóinteach in ár reamhrá, freisin.
Más é do thoil é, sínigh do chuid theachtaireachtaí ar leathanaigh phlé le ceithre thilde a chlóscríobh (~~~~); ciallaíonn sé sinn go hionsáfar d'ainm úsáideora agus an dáta go huathoibríoch. Má tá cabhair ag teastail uait, féach ar Vicipéid:Cabhair, nó cuir ceist dom armo leathanach phlé. Uair amháin eile, fáilte romhat! - Alison ❤ 07:15, 10 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

I'm really sorry, but Google machine translations are unacceptable on this wiki as they're simply not good enough and it takes a huge amount of work from folks here to put them right. Currently, it's down to individual admins to make the call to delete or try to rescue but to be honest, Kilroy a bhí anseo had to go. Here's just one sentence;
There's just way too much Béarla in there, the grammar isn't up to scratch at all, and the phraseology is awkward and anglicized. And "Kilroy raibh Seo"??? Cad é sin? Brón orm, ach níl aon rogha agam - Alison ❤ 07:14, 10 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)


Plé:An Ungáiris

----
"Fionn-Úgracha"?? Nach gciallóchadh an téarma so "White-Ugric"?!
Do b'fhearr "Fion-Úgrach" ar aon dul le "Fionlainn".Murchadh 04:58, 12 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)
*Dhá n i leagan www.focal.ie.  Tameamseo 11:40, 12 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

:Thugas faoi ndear é sin. Nílim tógtha lena lán dá bhfuil ar an suíomh soin ar chor ar bith.   Is dóigh liom gurbh fhearr ar fad "Fion" - comhsheasamhach le "Fionlainn" agus sheachnódh sé athbhrí le "fionn".Murchadh 03:33, 13 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

Can you please add more sources? Kapeter77 (plé) 19:31, 3 Nollaig 2019 (UTC)


Plé Vicipéide:Tar-rolltóirí

An bhfuil cead iarratas a dhéanamh chun a bheith i do thar-rolltóir anseo? --Footyfanatic3000 18:15, 19 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

Tá cead agat :) -- Alison ❤ 18:40, 19 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

:Go raibh míle maith agat :-D --Footyfanatic3000 19:02, 20 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

*
**  - Alison ❤ 18:40, 19 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)


Plé:Aer Lingus

Hi! Would someone mind taking a photograph of the head office of Aer Lingus at Dublin Airport? This article needs a photo of the HQ building. Thanks WhisperToMe 21:05, 21 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)


Plé:Ryanair

Hi! Would someone mind taking a photograph of the head office of Ryanair at Dublin Airport? This article needs a photo of the HQ building. Thanks WhisperToMe 21:05, 21 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

Look, guys, this is exactly the sort of thing that makes me ask myself, why I bother at all. Since I last checked the page, little information had been added, but both style and grammar had been destroyed. Some innocent soul had actually changed "an aerlíne" into "an t-aerlíne", for instance, and some other insisted on "aerlíne bhuiséad" (!). Look now, guys, "líne" is feminine, and so is "aerlíne". This means that it does not take the "t-" before the initial vowel after an article. "Aer" is masculine, and thus it is correctly "an t-aer", but "aerlíne" is feminine, and thus it is correctly "an aerlíne". And if you use a noun such as "buiséad" as an attribute, it must be in the genitive case: aerlíne bhuiséid. However, I think aerlíne ísealchostais is more intelligible.
It really sucks that I must explain this sort of elementary grammar to people who fancy themselves lovers of the language. If you love it so much, please invest fifteen euros in the Christian Brothers Irish Grammar, and read some books written by native speakers. It really sucks big-time that this project must rely on me and one or two other guys for grammatical accuracy. Panu Petteri Höglund 19:03, 16 Bealtaine 2011 (UTC)
A Phanu, botúin bhunúsacha iad cinnte, ach is iomaí duine ar an suíomh a thuigeann sin. Eomurchadha 19:07, 16 Bealtaine 2011 (UTC) (cuid de na cinn is measa ceartaithe ansin, súil agam nach gá duit an t-alt ar fad a scríobh ó thús.) Eomurchadha 19:22, 16 Bealtaine 2011 (UTC)


Plé:Páirc an Chrócaigh

Thóg mé an abairt "Is foinse chonspóide í úsáid na páirce do chluichí Gaelacha amháin mar thug an Rialtas airgead don CLG chun an staid a athdhéanamh agus cheal staid náisiúnta." as an alt, mar ní aontaím go bhfuil sé neodrach, tá an rialtas tar éis a thuile airgead a tabhairt chun staid a tógáil don sacair agus rugbaí amháin. Cliste 17:58, 26 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)


Chuir mé tús leis an leathanach seo, mar is ábhar tábhachtach é, agus ní raibh aon treoireacha ann as Gaeilge go dtí seo.
Is é mo aidhm go mbeidh an leathanach éasca chun tuiscint, má tá aon duine ábalta feabhas a chur ar Le do thoil chur leis! Cliste 14:25, 28 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I'm sorry for the English. Please help translate my note if you think it is of use to your community. In response to multiple requests from users, the Wikimedia Foundation legal department has prepared a new wikilegal note about the laws governing Fair Use in the United States at :m:Wikilegal/Primer on U.S. Fair Use/Copyright Law for Website. (This is also in English, but is marked for translation, if you'd like to help.) We wanted to be sure you were aware, in case it is of use to you, since local exemption doctrine policies must accord with US law and the law of the country where the project content is predominantly access (if any). Thanks for all you do. :) --Mdennis (WMF) (talk) 15:54, 11 Iúil 2014 (UTC)

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé Vicipéide:Leathanach tuairiscithe íomhá