Plé úsáideora:Ériugena

Hi Ériugena. You have asked me here for help. I'll be glad to help you. Which article is it about? Best regards. --Holder (plé) 19:55, 24 Meán Fómhair 2019 (UTC)

Hello.
Can you translate and upload the article :en:List of birds of Azerbaijan in Irish Wikipedia?
Yours sincerely, Karalainza (plé) 10:22, 21 Aibreán 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Karalainza (plé) 21:36, 21 Aibreán 2020 (UTC)

Táimid ag troid lena chéile i Liosta na n-éan in Éirinn! Tá ríomhchlár agam chun na táblaí speiceas a thiontú. Chuunen Baka (plé) 13:52, 7 Iúil 2020 (UTC)
Níl mé ag troid..thuig mé go raibh tú ag cabhrú liom leis an alt.
Is oth liom go gceapann tú, de réir cosúlachta, a mhalairt.
Ar scáth a chéile a mhairfimid!
Ériugena (plé) 15:09, 7 Iúil 2020 (UTC)

Gan troid ach dul isteach faoi chosa a chéile. Coinnigh ort leis an dea-obair. Chuunen Baka (plé) 17:51, 7 Iúil 2020 (UTC)

: Maith sin...ach caithfidh go bhfuil rud ag cur as duit??

:: Tá súil agam tabhairt faoi sonraí na n-éan a scríobh mar ceapaim go bhfuil siad iad uilig luaite (ainmnithe) ar an liosta! Ériugena (plé) 18:59, 7 Iúil 2020 (UTC)

:Molaim dom na táblaí a chur isteach agus gur féidir linn an téacs a chur leis níos déanaí. Chuunen Baka (plé) 08:11, 8 Iúil 2020 (UTC)

Go deimhin, tá an chuma air go bhfuil na táblaí uile againn. Seiceálfaidh mé iad inniu. Chuunen Baka (plé) 08:23, 8 Iúil 2020 (UTC)

A chara, d'fhreagair mé an ceist a bhí agat ar leathanach phlé Katie Bouman. Thug mé faoi deara anois go mbeidh caint sa chomhdháil Celtic Knot ar siúl amárach, a bhaineann leis an rud céanna (ar fáil anseo). Dowlinme (plé) 14:17, 8 Iúil 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ériugena
I was asked by Wikimedia Foundation to promote this call for participation on the planned Universal Code of Conduct.
Best regards --Holder (plé) 04:29, 14 Lúnasa 2020 (UTC)
At times, our contributor communities and projects have suffered from a lack of guidelines that can help us together create an environment where free knowledge can be shared safely without fear.
There has been talk about the need for a global set of conduct rules in different communities over time. Recently, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees announced a Community Culture Statement, asking for new standards to address harassment and promote inclusivity across projects.
The universal code of conduct will be a binding minimum set of standards across all Wikimedia projects, and will apply to all of us, staff and volunteers alike, all around the globe.. It is of great importance that we all participate in expressing our opinions and thoughts about UCoC and its values. We should think about what we want it to cover or include and what it shouldn’t include, and how it may create difficulties or help our groups.

This is the time to talk about it. Before starting drafting the code of conduct, we would like to hear from you and to solicit the opinions and feedback of your colleagues.
In order for your voice to be heard, we encourage and invite you to read more about the universal code of conduct (UCoC)  and then write down your opinions or feedback on the discussion page . To reduce language barriers during the process, you are welcomed to translate the universal code of conduct english main page into your respective local language . You and your community may choose to provide your opinions/feedback using your local languages.

Hi Ériugena! The WD Bosca Sonraí Leabhar infobox won't work as its for people. As this is an article about a book it should have a different infobox (relevant to books). On the Welsh WP we have three Wikidata driven infoboxes: places, people and things. The 'people' infobox will eventually include all living things. You can copy templates form other language wikis. Let me know if I can help! Llywelyn2000 (plé) 10:21, 4 Meán Fómhair 2020 (UTC)

Mea culpa!Ériugena (plé) 17:57, 4 Meán Fómhair 2020 (UTC)

:RE: You can copy templates from other language wikis. Let me know if I can help!
Did not know that this was possible...would like to know about 'places' and 'things??Ériugena (plé) 17:59, 4 Meán Fómhair 2020 (UTC)

Tá an alt Próta-Ind-Eorpais beagnach réidh. Tá tagairtí flúirseach ann, agus creidim gur míníonn sé an t-ábhar go maith. An bhféadfa seiceáil gramadaí a dhéanamh air LDT? Creidim gur d'fhéadfadh sé bheith ina alt an-mhaith Samalou (plé) 16:46, 18 Deireadh Fómhair 2020 (UTC)

Hello Ériugena, Would you make an extension of the article of Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386) for the GA Wikipedia? She met Denis Diderot in The Hague. That would be appreciated. Boss-well63 (plé) 23:46, 17 Deireadh Fómhair 2020 (UTC)

Duine suntasach in a h-am, cas sí leis an fealsamh Denis Diderot...Ériugena (plé) 19:04, 20 Deireadh Fómhair 2020 (UTC)

Grma as an WD a chur isteach insna beathaisnéisí úd (James Murphy srl). Bhí mé ag cur defaultsort isteach ar dtús agus ansin bhí mé le dul tríothu an dara huair leis an WD a chur leo. Níos éasca mar sin agus mé ag baint úsáid as cut and paste! Beidh me ag dul fríd bhaill an Oireachtais ar fad. An oiread sin díobh as ord na haibítre! SeoMac (plé) 18:53, 21 Feabhra 2021 (UTC)

Hello,
Sorry to write in English, I am an ignoramus in Irish..., unfortunately. The bird on your page is really nice by the way!
I write you this message because we'll be celebrating our Catalan Viquipèdia 20th birthday soon and I would really appreciate having at least one user of your wikipedia (if you could have more people from your wikipedia it would be amazing!) saying a few words in your language in a short video, filmed horizontally, congratulating the Catalan Wikipedia. The time would be around 15 seconds and you are free to say what you want (if the background can be something beautiful of your country (building, monument) it would be just great..) though you would have to finish in Catalan saying "Bon aniversari" and/or "per molts anys". I really hope you will participate! The video has to be sent to viquipedia@wikimedia.cat if possible before next Wednesday.
I hope to have at least one Irish person among the international contributions! Take real care and have a great Sunday! Claudi/Capsot (plé) 14:09, 28 Feabhra 2021 (UTC)

Déanfaidh mé mo dhícheall / Faré tot el que pugui Ériugena (plé) 15:09, 28 Feabhra 2021 (UTC)

: Go raibh maith agat/Moltíssimes gràcies! Una abraçada! Claudi/Capsot (plé) 15:34, 28 Feabhra 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 20th anniversary of the Catalan Wikipedia

Dear Ériugena, I am very grateful to you for your translation.--Фәрһад (plé) 09:50, 11 Márta 2021 (UTC)

Dia duit, táim ag scríobh ar an Club Peile Dhún Dealgan Vicipéid, conas a uaslódáilim íomhá neamh-saor in aisce? Ba mhaith liom suaitheantas Club Peile Dhún Dealgan a nuashonrú go dtí an ceann nua

Cá bhfuil an ceann nua?Ériugena (plé) 22:17, 27 Márta 2021 (UTC)

Is é seo an suaitheantas nuashonraithe https://pngio.com/images/png-a2484528.html . Cuireadh réalta óir os cionn na scéithe. Tá sé ar an leathanach Béarla freisin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dundalk_F.C. .

GRMA, fiosróidh mé an t-ábhar agus toicfaidh mé ar ais chugat! Ériugena (plé) 12:25, 28 Márta 2021 (UTC)

Hello Ériugena, When you have time can you take a look in my sandbox: Úsáideoir:Nicola Mitchell/Clár Dubh?  I've been working on articles about Stefania Turkewich for the Wiki Gap project, trying to get her into Wikipediaes other than English.  I did an Irish Wikipedia machine translation of the English en: Stefania Turkewich and placed it in my sandbox.  Can you tell me if its worth fixing, or if its not, then I'll just erase it.  Thanks. Nicola Mitchell (plé) 20:03, 4 Aibreán 2021 (UTC)

Thank you!  I've added the bottom part of the article.  You might want to check the grammar on it. Nicola Mitchell (plé) 10:58, 5 Aibreán 2021 (UTC)

: Це було задоволення! Ba mhór an pléisiúr é! Можливо, ти колись можеш зробити те саме для мене! B’fhéidir go ndéanfá an rud céanna domsa am éigin!  Ériugena (plé) 11:18, 5 Aibreán 2021 (UTC)

::Let me know when, and I'll do my best to be of help.Nicola Mitchell (plé) 16:39, 5 Aibreán 2021 (UTC)

Grma a Eriugena as do chabhair leanúnach, go háirithe le Antonio Tabucchi. DaithíÓ (plé) 19:50, 30 Nollaig 2021 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat! B’fhéidir go bhféadfaimis bualadh le chéile i mBaile Átha Cliath lá éigin? Fan sábháiolte.  Ériugena (plé) 19:57, 30 Nollaig 2021 (UTC)
D'fhéadaimis. Táim i gcónaí thart! DaithíÓ (plé) 14:08, 31 Nollaig 2021 (UTC)

GRMA...déanfaidh mé teagmháil leat san athbhliain DV! Ériugena (plé) 14:18, 31 Nollaig 2021 (UTC)

Leathanach deas é Juho Kusti Paasikivi, ach ta leath den téacs sa dara paragraf ann faoi dhó. Ní raibh mé lánchinnte conas é a atheagthrú. SeoMac (plé) 12:24, 9 Feabhra 2022 (UTC)

Ta go maith.GRMA

Éamonn Ériugena (plé) 17:08, 9 Feabhra 2022 (UTC)

Ní thuigim cén fáth ar scrios tú foirmeacha an ailt neamhdheimhnigh ar an leathanach faoin nGearmáinis. Cuid thábhachtach iad de ghramadach na teanga. 10:12, 24 Márta 2022 (UTC)

Dealraíonn sé nach dtuigim! Mar sin féin, ós rud é gur tusa ár saineolaí teanga, theastaigh uaim ghlacadh le do bharúil! ( Féach: https://ga.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=An_Ghearm%C3%A1inis&action=submit ) Ériugena (plé) 13:14, 24 Márta 2022 (UTC)

Hmmm - tá fadhb againn ....
* Siondróm uireasa iaidín ó bhroinn agus
* Siondróm easnamh iaidín ó bhroinn
.. merge, b'fhéidir? - Alison ❤ 20:25, 8 Bealtaine 2022 (UTC)

Hi Alison!

Chinn mé ar 'uireasa iaidín' mar go raibh sin molta ag Tearma,ie...féachhttps://www.tearma.ie/q/iodine%20deficiency/

Sea, aontaím leat maidir le hiad a chomhcheangal ke chéile...ach ar an drochuair níl a fhios agam conas sin a dhéanamh! Ériugena (plé) 11:08, 9 Bealtaine 2022 (UTC)

A Éamoinn a chara, cé nach bhfuil ainm oifigiúil Gaeilge ar “Halfway” ar logainm, tá ”Leath Slighe” ar na comharthaí bóthair timpeall na háite; féach  mar shampla. An bhféadfá an t-athainmniú a rinne tú a chealú? GRMA Kevin Scannell (plé) 16:07, 20 Meitheamh 2022 (UTC)

Caption text
	I award you, Éamoinn a chara, this barnstar for your tireless work in the Celtic Editathon on Meta. You're the winner and indeed, you are the star! Llywelyn2000 (plé) 11:24, 4 Deireadh Fómhair 2022 (UTC)

Diolch yn fawr Iawn! Ériugena (plé) 11:51, 14 Deireadh Fómhair 2022 (UTC)

: Woohoo - chomhgáirdeas leat!! :) - Alison plé 15:03, 14 Deireadh Fómhair 2022 (UTC)

::Alison, a chara, GRMA! Ériugena (plé) 15:32, 14 Deireadh Fómhair 2022 (UTC)

A chara, toisc gur úsáideoir Vicipéide rialta thú, ba mhaith liom tusa a chur ar an eolas maidir le tionscadal nua atá ar siúl. Vicí na mBan, nó WikiWomen, is ainm do. Is comhfhiontar é idir Pobal Éireann Wikimedia, Coláiste Oiriall i Muineachán agus eagraíochtaí Vicipéide agus meánscoileanna sa Fhreaslainn agus i dTír na mBascach. Le linn na tionscadail seo, beidh muid ag cruthú acmhainní teagaisc ionas go mbeidh daltaí meánscoileanna in ann ailt Vicipéide a scríobh as Gaeilge, as Freaslainnis nó as Bascais faoi mhná iomráiteacha. Beidh na daltaí ag foghlaim faoi Vicipéid ón mí seo chugainn ar aghaidh agus tosóidh siad ag scríobh sa bhliain úr. Tá breis eolais ar fáil as Béarla ar an leathanach Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiWomen_Erasmus%2B_Project. Tá fáilte roimh cheisteanna agus bharúlacha chugamsa ar Vicipéid nó seol r-phost chugainn: wikimediaireland[at]gmail.com. Beidh mé ag cur teachtaireacht ar an halla baile chomh maith, mo leithscéal as crosphostáil a dhéanamh. Dowlinme (plé) 16:50, 28 Deireadh Fómhair 2022 (UTC)

A Mhegan, a chara,

Bhí an t-eolas a sheol tú chugam faoin tionscadal an-suimiúil, agus má tá aon rud gur féidir liom a dhéanamh chun cabhrú leat, ná bíodh leisce ort teacht ar ais chugam! Ériugena (plé) 11:06, 29 Deireadh Fómhair 2022 (UTC)

:Go raibh míle maith agat a chara, coinneoidh mé ar an eolas thú! Dowlinme (plé) 15:36, 1 Samhain 2022 (UTC)

::Ta go maith, adh mór ort!  Ériugena (plé) 17:28, 1 Samhain 2022 (UTC)

Hello.
Can you translate and upload the article :en:Geography of Azerbaijan in Irish Wikipedia, in 2023?
Yours sincerely, Karalainza (plé) 20:09, 23 Nollaig 2022 (UTC)

Hello Ériugena,
Can you create the article :en:Laacher See, which is the third most powerful volcano in Europe after Campi Flegrei and Santorini, in Irish Wikipedia?
Kindest regards, Multituberculata (plé) 16:51, 12 Meitheamh 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the new article! Multituberculata (plé) 16:38, 2 Lúnasa 2023 (UTC)

Tá fáilte romhat!

Nedankinde!

Gern geschehen!Ériugena (plé) 16:45, 2 Lúnasa 2023 (UTC)

You have been a medical translators within Wikipedia. We have recently relaunched our efforts and invite you to join the new process. Let me know if you have questions. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

By the way we have a tool that fixes references after the translation is live. It will run automatically after some time or you can run it manually it you want it to work faster. It gives you this Úsáideoir:Doc James/Work Best Doc James (plé) 03:15, 30 Meán Fómhair 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to Rejoin the [https://mdwiki.org/wiki/WikiProjectMed:Translation_task_force Healthcare Translation Task Force]

The 2023 Cure Award
	In 2023 you joined us as a medical translator. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs and we look forwards to working together in 2024.
Thanks again :-)  -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

:Was looking at this template  and it is not set up to handle ga terms for the item names... Adjusted to the en labels here Best Doc James (plé) 15:56, 7 Eanáir 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for being a medical contributors!

The 2023 Cure Award
	In 2023 you were one of the top medical editors in your language. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!
Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining for 2024, there are no associated costs.
Additionally one of our primary efforts revolves around translation of health content. We invite you to try our new workflow if you have not already. Our dashboard automatically collects statistics of your efforts and we are working on tools to automatically improve formating.
Thanks again :-)  -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 22:25, 3 Feabhra 2024 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:MacTire01

Haigh, MacTire01. Agus fáilte. Go raibh maith agat as do chuid iarrachtaí ar na h-ailt faoi bailte i gContae na Mí! Gabh mo leithscéal as mo chuid "cheek", ach an féidir leat an cnaipe "Taispeáin réamhamhairc" a úsáid agus athrú a dhéanamh? Sula ndéanann tú sábháil ar leathanach éigin? Mar sin, is féidir go leor athruithe a dhéanamh le sábháil amháin, agus níl an iomarca linte ar an leathanch "n-athruithe is déanaí". (It also makes editting "faster" and it means fewer committed changes - which in turn means reduced space requirements in Wikipedia version control database). [Apologies for the impertience]. Go raibh maith agat. Guliolopez 17:20, 22 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

Tá Bosca Sonraí nua déanta agam dos na mBallaonaid Chónaidhm na Rúise. Agus ailt nua á cruthú agat, an mbheifeá ábalta úsáid a bhaint as? Más mian leat úsáid a bhaint as an teimpléad, féach ar "An tSeisnia". GRMA. Guliolopez 22:57, 17 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)

Buíochas agus go raibh maith agat! :) Tá jab maith déanta agat anseo le déanaí. Beir bua! Guliolopez 13:11, 18 Nollaig 2007 (UTC)

[[:Teimpléad:Bosca Sonraí - Ballaonaid Chónaidhm na Rúise]]

The Working Man's Barnstar

Sílim go bhfuil jab an-mhaith déanta agat leis an :Teimpléad:Teanga. Bronnaim an Working Man's Barnstar ort. Is é seo an duais a thabhairt chuig daoine a dhéanann a lán obair dian, leadránach, ní ag bac leis an mbuíochas :)
(The Working Man's Barnstar may be awarded to those who work tirelessly and endlessly on the more laborious or repetitive of Wikipedia tasks. :)

Guliolopez 16:47, 15 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

Gabh mo leithscéal a chara, táim cineál ciotach leis na ríomhairí, níor thuigeas gur tusa a bhí a cabhrú liom, cheapas gur uathoibríocht an ríomhaire a bhí i gceist. Tuigim, chomh maith, ar a laghad cuid de ghramadach na teanga, ach ní raibheas i ndiaidh súil siar a chaitheamh ar m'obair, go raibh maith agat, ach maith dom é b'é an chéad alt a scríobhas.

Míle maith agat, a chara! :) - Alison ❤ 21:48, 1 Feabhra 2008 (UTC)

Fadhb ar bith! :) MacTire01 11:43, 2 Feabhra 2008 (UTC)

Haigh, a Mactíre. Regarding images on other wikis, what is it you'd like to know? Is it about moving images to Commons from, say, enwiki? Cur ríomhphost chugam, más maith leat :) - Alison ❤ 18:00, 5 Feabhra 2008 (UTC)

Seo dhuit! Tá siad ar an Cómhaoin anois. Bhí a lán fadhbanna faoin ceadúnais agus rudaí mar sin, ach tá siad ceart go leór anois :)

*:Íomhá:MountAndros.jpg

*:Íomhá:AmesRangeMap.jpg

- Alison ❤ 20:04, 5 Feabhra 2008 (UTC)

Féach anseo. Is dócha go bhfuil an "translathon" a bhí fógratha anseo tosnaithe acu i UCD. Hence 1 new article every 2 minutes. (Or - at least - I can't explain this increase any other way). Chonaic mé go bhfuil roinnt "wikification" déanta agat in alt nó dhó. Nílim cinnte an modh oibre a bhaint liom féin. (Do I wait for the tide to subside, and then tidy up the debris? Or do I try and keep bailing water?) Constant baling might sap all energies, so I'm gonna sit back for a while. Guliolopez 18:14, 8 Feabhra 2008 (UTC)

Translathon is ea é cinnte. Beidh mé ag fanacht ar feadh uair nó mar sin. Go at it now and it might sap energy. MacTire01 18:37, 8 Feabhra 2008 (UTC)

MacTire01, you are speaking gaelic and russian. This combination makes You to be "gold" for us :-)
We're planning to create articles of all irish towns and villages in the russian section of the Wikipedia. If would be great, if you would join our team. Especially we need to transcript gaelic names to russian (cyrillic letters). Can we count on Your support? --Obersachse 11:47, 5 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)

Конечно можно! Вы можете найти меня на русской Википедии здесь MacTire01 14:48, 5 Aibreán 2008 (UTC)

Твоя помощь нужна

In a recent edit you made to Birmingham City F.C., you took out and put ina few players, and tidied it up. Is the squad completely up to date or did you just take out some of them you knew were gone?--Lansdowneroad 11:57, 5 Iúil 2008 (UTC)

Squad is completely up to date as of 1st July '08. I haven't been active on the Irish language project for a while now but i do like to keep my team up to date ;-) --MacTire01 11:59, 5 Iúil 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. That information was valuable. I don't know anything at all about Birmingham City F.C.--Lansdowneroad 12:00, 5 Iúil 2008 (UTC)

:Fáilte romhat! --MacTire01 12:02, 5 Iúil 2008 (UTC)


Plé:Shell chun Sáile

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_To_Sea#Current_Situation
LiamÓ 17:01, 23 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

Is sofhriotal mór é " i ngleic". Is "tachtadh" an Gaeilge ar "choking". Ní measaim go raibh fáth eile a chaithfeadh Garda Egan a lámh a cur ar scornach an agóideoir.
LiamÓ 11:07, 28 Meitheamh 2008 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:84.205.151.49

Haigh a 84.205.151.49 agus tá fáilte romhat chuid an Vicipéid. Go raibh maith agat as do chuid iarrachtaí. Chonaic mé go bhfuil roinnt "Athsheolaidh" déanta agat le déanaí. Go mór mhór is athsheolaidh iad in a bhfuil ainm an áit as béarla athsheolaithe go dtí ainm an áit as gaeilge. Tá sé sin ceart go leor. Ach, nílim cinnte go bhfuil sé "cuí" é sin a dhéanamh. As béarla: I'm not sure it's entirely neccesary to do this. (It should not be neccesary to create an "English equivalent" of every article). That said, if you want to create such redirects (in a limited fashion and where you think they are absolutely neccesary) - please be careful! Bí cúramach agus an "athsheoladh" á dhéanamh agat. Please double check that you are using the right formatting, which is as below:

#ATHSHEOLADHpage_to_redirect_to.
And, please make sure you have the right article name before committing the change. Go raibh maith agat. Guliolopez 19:24, 23 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)


Plé:Téarma.ie

Ba chóir an leathanach seo (agus na leathanaigh Acmhainn.ie, Bebo, Beo!, Focal.ie agus cinn eile) a chur i gcatagóir éigin ar leithligh.
Would be equivalent to the :en:Category:Websites. Not sure what to call it though: láithreáin gréasáin/láithreáin ghréasáin/suímh gréasáin/suímh ghréasáin... Tuairimí? Guliolopez 20:03, 28 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

Úsáidim féin an téarma láithreán gréasáin i mo chuid teagaisc i gcomhair web site.  Mar sin, mholfainn Láithreáin Ghréasáin (web sites) don chatagóir. Ní chuireann suíomh as dom - bhíodh mé á úsáid cheana, ach sílim gur focal níos deise é láithreán. Nmacu 20:12, 28 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

:Aontaím! GRMA Guliolopez 14:40, 1 Márta 2007 (UTC)


Plé Vicipéide:À propos de cette page

Il y a deux livres francais pour apprendre L'irlandais:
*Parlons gaelique
*L'Irlandais de poche
Je ne sais pas si ces sont bon ou inutile. Gronky 21:05, 28 Feabhra 2007 (UTC)

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé Vicipéide:À propos de cette page


Plé:Niall Ó Brolcháin

Braithim go léann an t-alt seo ar nós feachtas toghchánaíochta seachas beathaisnéis mar is ceart i ciclipéid.  Is féidir nasc a chur ag bun na páirte beathaisnéise go dtí láithreán gréasáin phearsanta an duine áit a bheidh liosta na bpolasaithe, srl ar fáil.  Nmacu 10:48, 2 Márta 2007 (UTC)

I have to agree. The content in this article is well beyond WP guidelines. Politician bio articles should be about the politicians - not a run down on their policies. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for political views. The original author may want to trim/summarise the "policies" section (and any other SPAM style content) before a more dramatic cull is performed on this article. Guliolopez 11:19, 2 Márta 2007 (UTC)

:Measaim go bhfuil an easpa neodrachta nach mór réitithe anois. Nmacu 21:06, 2 Márta 2007 (UTC)


Plé:Shell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Dutch_Shell_Environmental_and_reputational_issues OK?
LiamÓ 13:37, 5 Márta 2007 (UTC)
Measaim féin gur clú bocht atá i gceist anseo gan amhras ar bith, Gulio. An féidir leat an alt sin a léimh, agus ansin tar ar ais liom.
LiamÓ 13:38, 30 Márta 2007 (UTC)

Haigh Liam. Leigh mé an alt "Shell reputational issues", agus - i ndiadh sin - rinne mé iarracht stíl níos "neodrach" a úsáid san alt anseo. My note in the edit summary was simply intended to highlight why I felt a minor reword was needed. So, instead of saying "Shell have a bad record in this area" (which is commentary) I just reworded to highlight the facts. In that way the reader (and not the writer) can interpret for themselves what Shell's record is. The guidelines of Wikipedia are pretty straight forward in this area: Stick to the facts and avoid commentary. (To the extent - as you might note - that the article you refer to on the EN WP has been renamed to a more NPOV title!). Le meas. Guliolopez 13:58, 30 Márta 2007 (UTC)
Cén fáth a chuir tú na "..." ar "imníthe shláinte, sábháilteacht agus truailliú"? Aontaíonn nó ná aontaíonn thú, tá na imníthe sin ag alán daoine.
LiamÓ 14:17, 30 Márta 2007 (UTC)

Is comharthaí athfhriotail iad. Chuirtear comharthaí athfhriotail nuair a mbíonn caint dhíreach i gceist.

The words within the quotation marks represent a statement made by ShellChunSáile. Quotations go in quotation marks.

So that a reader would understand WHY ShellChunSáile are against the development, I put in their reasons. However, because it's THEIR reasons and THIER opinion I left it in quotes.

(FYI - It is irrelevant whether you/I/or "alán daoine" believe the statement to be true or not. If it cannot be proven as fact, verified and referenced, it shouldn't be in WP).

Le meas. Guliolopez 15:03, 30 Márta 2007 (UTC)
Níor scríobh mé go raibh na h-imníthe fíor, scríobh mé go raibh siad ann. Tá difríocht eadarthu.
LiamÓ 16:33, 30 Márta 2007 (UTC)

Nuair a scríobh mé 800, ní raibh an ceart agam. An féidir leatsa an alt a cheartadh, Gulio?
* "An eventual total of around 100,000 internal refugees and an estimated 2,000 civilian deaths was recorded."
* "When the Ogoni mobilised in 1993, with Ken Saro-Wiwa leading the grassroots rebellion, 2,000 people were killed, with an estimated 80,000 made homeless in the next couple of years."
* "They razed 30 villages, arrested hundreds of protesters, and killed an estimated 2,000 people."
LiamÓ 18:00, 25 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)


Plé:An tSeisnia

Sin an t-ainm dúchasach. Cén fáth a úsáideann thú an focal Rúiseach?
LiamÓ 13:52, 5 Márta 2007 (UTC)

Focal Gaeilge is ea "Seisnia", ní focal Rúisise. "An tSeisnia" a thugann Gaeilgeoirí iad féin ar an réigiún; mar sin, úsáidtear anseo é mar ainm don alt. --Gabriel Beecham 14:39, 5 Márta 2007 (UTC)
Féach ar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chechen_people. Níl "Seisnia" ach litriúcháin Gaeilge cuirtear ar an Rúisis, Чечня. Ní sin an t-ainm dúchasach.
LiamÓ 14:57, 5 Márta 2007 (UTC)
Ní bhaineann sé leis an ábhar ar choir ar bith má tháinig an focal Gaeilge seo as Rúisis nó as teanga mhuintir na Seisnia - is é "an tSeisnia" an t-ainm a úsáideann na Gaeilgeoirí - m.sh., anseo, anseo, nó anseo. Ciclipéid do Ghaeilgeoirí is ea seo, ba chóir dúinn téarmaíocht na Gaeilge a úsáíd. --Gabriel Beecham 00:33, 6 Márta 2007 (UTC)
Mas fearr leat.
LiamÓ 14:38, 6 Márta 2007 (UTC)
Is í an chéad teanga oifigiúil sa phoblacht ná an Rúisis. Níl an tSeisnis ach an dara teanga oifigiúil sa phoblacht agus de bhrí sin caithfidh orainn é a thaispeáint sa bhosca sonraí. MacTire01 23:41, 16 Eanáir 2008 (UTC)

--Schekinov Alexey Victorovich 08:00, 21 Márta 2009 (UTC)

Táim cinnte gur fearr An tSeitséin ná An tSeisnia. Evertype 09:11, 18 Meán Fómhair 2009 (UTC)

Ach féach ar focal.ie anseo chun leagan oifigiúil den ainm a fheiceáil. --MacTire02 09:16, 18 Meán Fómhair 2009 (UTC)


Plé teimpléid:Síol

Tá an moladh céanna seo curtha agam ar :Plé Vicipéide:Stumpa:
An féidir focal eile a phiocadh seachas Stumpa? Tá brí ar leith leis an bhfocal i gConamara.  Ciallaíonn sé fear nó bean tarraingteach agus níl sé feiliúnach ar chor ar bith sa chomhthéacs ina bhfuil sé in úsáid sa Vicipéid.
Céard faoin bhfocal stupa - rud atá ag Ó Dónaill mar aistriúchán díreach ar "stub" (nílim cinnte an bhfuil sé mórán sa chaint ach is féidir liom é seo a fhiosrú)?  Buntáiste faoi úsáid an fhocail seo ná go mbreathnódh sé sách cosúil leis an bhfocal a bhí ann.
Le bheith ionraic faoi, sílim go mbeadh sé níos deise gan aon aistriúchán díreach a bheith ann ar an bhfocal "stub" ach abairt ar nós:
Tá tús curtha leis an alt seo.  Cuir leis, chun cabhrú leis an Vicipéid.
a úsáid sa teimpléad .... ach, pé réiteach atá ar an scéal, sílim go bhfuil sé riachtanach fáil réidh leis an bhfocal "Stumpa". Nmacu 21:23, 5 Márta 2007 (UTC)

Moladh amháin eile: céard faoi "síol"? Bheadh sé níos dearfaí ná stumpa nó stupa, i mo thuairimse. --Gabriel Beecham 00:36, 6 Márta 2007 (UTC)

:Cinnte. D'fhéadfaí meafar mar sin a úsáid agus ansin ráiteas éigin a bheith ann faoin alt a fhás. -- Nmacu 20:55, 6 Márta 2007 (UTC)

I removed the Catagóir:Síolta from this template so as to be able to see all pages without categories. Will add it back later


Plé:Comhphobal Valencia

Undid revision by user 87....
restoring the translation of the province to valencian.....
ní deireann sé go raibh sé oifigiúil, sin é ainm a thugann muintir na háite....agus sin é polsaí an Vicipéid, ceapaim

The correct proportions of the flag are 2:3, non 1:2
References:
Catalan association of vexillology
Catalan association of vexillology
Flags.net
Web of Spanish society of vexillology
Enciclopedia Encarta
http://www.san.gva.es/cas/inst/homeinst.html
http://www.flags.net/country.php?country=SPAN§ion=CURR&category=SUBN
http://www.minusval2000.com/version3/ocio/valencia/index.html
http://www.es.all-biz.info/regions/?fuseaction=adm_oda.showSection&sc_id=1&rgn_id=6
http://enciclopedia.us.es/index.php/Comunidad_Valenciana
http://club.telepolis.com/geografo/regional/espa/valint.htm
http://www.pueblosespana.net/myalbum-photo.lid-34-cid-15.htm
http://www.terra.es/personal/vexileon/sev/beval.htm
http://pista.dva.gva.es/ppal/Main?ISUM_Portal=87
http://www.angelfire.com/emo2/lourdespaises/simbolospatriosvalencia.html
http://www.angelfire.com/emo2/lourdespaises/Valencia.html
http://www.jdiezarnal.com/valenciatorresserranos.html
http://www.es.all-biz.info/regions/?fuseaction=adm_oda.showSection&sc_id=1&rgn_id=6
--85.53.66.146 17:28, 29 Meitheamh 2008 (UTC)


Plé:Ríomhaire

Sílim go mbeadh "na ríomhairí is luachmhara ar domhain" níos feiliúnaí ná "is luaithe" leis an mbrí reatha atá leis an téarma "sár-ríomhaire". Nmacu 12:04, 13 Márta 2007 (UTC)


Plé:Páirc na Tulcha

cheapaim go bhfuil tolka scriobhte tolca as Gaeilge

Rinne mé cuardach ar an idirlíon nuair a scríobh mé an t-alt seo agus tháinig mé ar an leagan "Tulcha" ar láithreán an Oireachtais, http://acts.oireachtas.ie/ga.act.1985.0007.6.html, agus i gcáipéisí eile ó Chomhairle Contae Fhine Gall. Ba mhaith liom ainm an ailt a athrú go "Páirc na Tulchan" - aon smaoineamh faoi seo ag éinne? (Daithimac 18:55, 16 Márta 2007 (UTC))


Plé:Béarla na hAlban

"Albainis" an leagan ba chóir a úsáid. Níl "Bhéarla Gallda" ag teacht leis an ngramadach féin. Panu Petteri Höglund 14:50, 16 Márta 2007 (UTC)

:Didn't we agree upon the following terminology:

:- Albainis = Scots

:- Béarla na hAlban = Scottish Standard English?

:Panu Petteri Höglund 18:04, 24 Samhain 2007 (UTC)

::Yup. That's what I remember as well. Hence I've updated the Interwiki here. The debate about whether "Scots" should be called "Albainis" or "Béarla Gallda" seems to be reopened however. (Or at least one user has changed all references to "Béarla Gallda") Guliolopez 18:10, 24 Samhain 2007 (UTC)

:::Yes, it seems to have been reopened by somebody who obviously speaks better ScGaelic than Irish and thinks that ScGaelic is somehow more correct than Irish. He treats for example "Béarla" as a feminine noun, which is wrong both in Standard Irish and in all Irish dialects I know of. It is true that Beurla is feminine in ScGaelic, but that does not have anything to do with Irish. I don't think we have any necessity to bow to a Scots Gaelic speaker's ideas of what is correct Irish, especially noting that ScGaelic has a different approach to new terminology from Irish. (Should we, for instance, use tidsear or neach-teagaisg for "teacher" in Irish, because his lairdship has never heard of múinteoir?) To me it seems that this is another instance of a person with a very shaky idea of Irish and with very little insight into our terminological necessities introducing terminology of his own, based entirely on his personal convictions. You remember the ructions about cianamharcaíocht instead of teilifís? - That said, I am not particularly fond of either Albainis or Lallainnis, myself, but Albainis has gained wide currency in Irish-language press and seems to be the preferred term. As regards An Béarla Gallda (or a' Bheurla Ghallda, as they probably say in Scotland), it is terminologically unclear in Irish - to a person conversant in Irish, it seems to be a disparaging name for the English language, not an unambiguous term for Scots.Panu Petteri Höglund 18:56, 24 Samhain 2007 (UTC)

:*Scots, a. & s. =SCOTTISH. To talk Scots, Béarla na hAlban a labhairt. Scots law, an dlí Albanach. (Tagairt: https://www.teanglann.ie/en/eid/Scots)

*A' Bheurla Ghallda (Tagairt: https://gd.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%27_Bheurla_Ghallda)

*Scots (endonym: Scots; Scottish Gaelic: Albais/Beurla Ghallda) (Tagairt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scots_language)

*The Scots language” should be translated as a’ Bheurla Ghallda or Scots, NOT as Albais, a’ chànain Albannach etc. (Tagairt:Scottish Parliament translation guidelines: https://external.parliament.scot/Gaelic/Scottish_Parliament_translation_guidelines_2019.pdf

Ériugena (plé) 20:58, 3 Eanáir 2022 (UTC)

::Haigh . An bhfuil athrú (nó athruithe) á mholthadh agat? Guliolopez (plé) 21:10, 3 Eanáir 2022 (UTC)


Plé:Albainis

Níl an téarma sin "a' Bhéarla Gallda" ceart in aon teanga, agus níl athbhrí ar bith ag baint le "Albainis" as Gaeilge - ní rithfeadh le haon Ghaeilgeoir "Albainis" a úsáid sa chiall "Gaeilge na hAlban". Ní mór an leathanach úd "Bhéarla Gallda" a luathscrios agus an t-idirdhealán a bhaint den leathanach seo.Panu Petteri Höglund 14:55, 16 Márta 2007 (UTC)

So, this page is still here. The fact is, that no fluent Gaeilgeoir would ever use "Albainis" for Scots Gaelic. These pages should be reorganized according to the following scheme:

Gaeilge na hAlban = Scots Gaelic

Albainis or Lallainnis (both neologisms that have been used for Lowland Scots) = Lowland Scots

Béarla na hAlban = an ambiguous term that can mean either Lowland Scots as a particular language distinct from English (for this, Albainis should be reserved), or that can mean the Scots version of standard English (Béarla Caighdeánach na hAlban).

Anyone? Panu Petteri Höglund 09:52, 25 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

:Aontaím.  Níl aon ghá leis an leathanach seo. Aontaím freisin leis an t-idirdhealú atá déanta agat idir na téarmaí éagsúla.  Nmacu 12:58, 25 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

"Albainis" ... since when did Irish Gaels refer to Lowland Scots as "Albainis"? In the real Irish of the early modern period Albainis if used for language would be a way to refer to the way Scottish Gaels spoke, but there's no historical distinction in either Scottish or Irish Gaelic between "Scots" and other English dialects. This is just an insulting neologism that's been made up by English speakers writing in Irish, who didn't give two thoughts about the blunder. It's so sad that the language, like so many others, is just a slave to English usage. Albainis ... preposterous.
---------------------
Terrible - why are you doing this? Gaidhlig as much right to be called the Scottish language as well. Sorry I can't write Irish, but I understand this slap in the face to Scottish Gaeldom easily enough. --81.149.154.254 19:36, 13 Márta 2008 (UTC)

:You have no business calling established Irish terms "preposterous". People who don't use Irish fluently and are not in touch with living Irish usage should not tamper with Vicipéid for political reasons which are intelligible only to themselves. I am not terribly happy with the terms Albainis or Lallainnis myself, but they are the terms that have been used in Irish-language press and literature, and your political considerations and perceived "slaps in the face to Scottish Gaeldom" are a problem of your own. We do not make the terminological policy here, we do our best to adhere to real usage and terms officially provided. It is difficult enough without non-Irish-speaking people with huge chips on their shoulders, like you, taking offense where none is meant. Panu Petteri Höglund 18:34, 5 Meitheamh 2008 (UTC)
This is not an established Irish usage. I can read Irish perfectly well. Would you like it if English was called "Eireannais" in Scottish Gaelic? (Probably you wouldn't care, as you're not Irish...) You are rewriting Irish language history!!!
I repeat this is highly offensive. Change it now!
History was rewritten in Scotland in the late Middle Ages (states rewrite history to reflect the culture and necessities of their rulers' interests and this has gone on throughout history, and not just in Scotland!)when "Inglis" became "Scottis" and it has stuck.  Should the "Afrikaans" articles be entitles "South African Dutch" in various languages? "Irish" is as much a neologism as "scots" after all, as the situation with Gaelic was very similair to that with Arabic (namely one written language and several spoken ones). Anyway, the etymology of the word "Alba" seems to be "Britain" and the Scots of Alba were "British Scots/Gaels" so any Scottish language could be referred to as "Albainis" (and seeing as the last King resident in Scotland spoke the English national language of the Scots and not the earlier Gaelic national language, it is reasonable to conclude that "Albainis" should be the right name for this article. 92.235.178.44 14:11, 22 Lúnasa 2009 (UTC)
---------------------

The argument that English be called Eireannais is nothing short of ridiculous. The fact is that there are three languages in Scotland - Scots Gaelic, Scots/Lallans, and English. Even in Scotland, Scots Gaelic is not referred to as Scottish. When I asked my relatives in the Ráth Chairn Gaeltacht about how they would call the languages they, without hesitation, referred to Scots Gaelic as Gaeilge na hAlban and Scots as Albainis. Maybe that is as a result of hearing the official terms from another source, but the fact is that's what's used. If you look here you will see that the Ulster-Scots language (a dialect of Scots) is referred to as Albainis Uladh. As you can see the Scots part of the term is translated as Albainis - OFFICIAL USAGE. There are many pecularities in many languages when it comes to naming people and languages - take Manx for example. Until the fairly recent official translation of Dutch as Ollanish, that language was known simply as Germaanish - the same term for German, and we know they are not the same language. I doubt many Dutch people would have been offended by that! Even the English name for that language is a corruption of Deutsch! The fact is that Albainis is the preferred term in Ireland for the language known in English as Scots. It is not a political slap in the face, it's not offensive, and it's not insulting. It's just how it is. We as a language community should not bow to the whims of one person who happens to find something insulting in a language he/she does not speak. Panu may not be Irish, but he has done an awful lot of work for the Irish language, and is probably more fluent than many native Gaeltacht speakers. I would have to agree with him on 99.99% of the things he says with relation to grammar, vocabulary and terminology. I only reserve that final 0.01% for a possible future disagreement.

Simply put:

:* Scots Gaelic  = Gaeilge na hAlban

:* Scots/Lallans = Albainis

:* Scots English = Béarla na hAlban

:* English       = Béarla
--MacTire02 15:49, 19 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 (UTC)

There are actually at least three people complaining here. No matter, the unsigned comment way above is correct. Albainis is used in early modern or late medieval Irish (i.e. when Irish was still reasonably independent, i.e. had a decent proportion of speakers who weren't more fluent in a more terminologically developed language like English), but not for "Scots", rather for the dialect, accent or language spoken by Scottish people speaking Gaelic or in Irish (as they are understood it's tough knowing how to phrase this); this would obviously be a more useful and natural use of the word anyway. Albainis to refer to Scots is a semi-valid translation of modern English ... Scots is itself the Scots word for Scots rather than an English word (which would be "Scottish"), though Scots speakers only usually call it Scots when contrasting with English English, a fact lost in the translation. Scottish Gaelic does not historically distinguish Scots and English, the reason being is that no-one did until the early modern period. Scottish Gaels, like Irish Gaels, believe themselves to be the indigenous inhabitants of Scotland and English (including Scots) to be foreign and intrusive. Calling Lowland Scots Albainis is the ideological equivalent of calling Irish "Gaelic of Ireland" and Hiberno-English "Irish". If you were to call it that in Scottish Gaelic it'd be a pretty quick way to become greatly disliked, though in the Irish revival world such concerns would be irrelevant and no-one would give a toss. To conclude, MacTire02, the Irish wikipedia users can call it what they like, but they can't truthfully make it out to be historical usage and they should hardly be surprised and complain if some Scots, esp. Scottish Gaelic speakers, come here offended. What exactly could you possibly expect? (138.251.242.137 18:09, 27 Eanáir 2009 (UTC)).

:Well we don't actually make it out to be historical usage. The fact is that the name Albainis is the word used by modern speakers to refer to the Scots language. At the end of the day, this wikipedia has a policy of adhering to official and spoken Irish as it is today, not as it was in the past. As I said above, I have spoken to relatives of mine who are native Irish speakers and provided above what they termed as the translations for the various languages/dialects of Scotland. I have also provided a link to the official Irish language terminology website which also shows their position on the term. Personally, I agree that Albainis is not an accurate term. I do prefer Béarla na hAlban as the translation for Scots, but I also have to stick with official and spoken Irish as is. This wikipedia is about the promotion of the Irish language, not avoiding the hurting of people's feelings who don't like official Irish terminology. If you wish to complain about the terms used, perhaps it would be better to contact the agency responsible for creating them. My apologies if that comes across as harsh, but personal feelings should not get in the way of creating a viable and valuable resource to Irish language speakers. --MacTire02 00:00, 28 Eanáir 2009 (UTC)

:Féach ar na leathanaigh seo a leanas chun samplaí a fháil:

:* BBC

:* Beo - Irish language ezine

:* Irish News newspaper based in Belfast

:--MacTire02 00:20, 28 Eanáir 2009 (UTC)

:: Yes, but the term is based on "translating" English and has only shallow usage; ga.wikipedia.org, whatever excuses its editors find to use the term, are consolidating its grip, and will ensure that however loose the grip was it won't be so loose in future. This is why all the process logic above is hollow.  Your argument apparently is that Albainis is closer to conforming to ga.wikipedia's rules. Well, enjoy the satisfaction knowing that gives you in this big world. So much for the work of Iomairt Cholm Chille. It doesn't bother me as much personally as it seems to bother some above, but can just see what's happening and don't think you should kid yourself. (138.251.242.137 04:22, 30 Eanáir 2009 (UTC))

:::I'm sorry you feel that way about it but as I've said before, this wikipedia is about the living Irish language as spoken today, not as it was in the past. The fact remains that the VAST majority of Irish speakers and Irish organisations/institutions/government departments/media outlets use Albainis as the term for Scots. I have found more evidence of this at the following links:

:::*Government usage

:::** Oireachtas.ie

:::** Northern Ireland government

:::*Personal blogs

:::** cainteoir.com

:::** Gael gan Náire

:::** iGaeilge

:::*Other

:::** Ealaín na Gaeltachta

:::** University of Limerick Students Union

:::** North-South Ministeral Council

:::** Ulster-Scots Agency

:::** Lá Nua
the Scottish humanist scholar (and nnative Gaelic speaker) George Buchanan is quoted as deriding Gaelic as "backwards" and this attitude was regrettably all too prevalent at the period when "Scots" came to mean the English language of Scotland and not the Gaelic one. Linguisticically dominant groups have a tendency of laying claim to nativeness (hence "Afrikaans/African"). The fact that in Scotland, most people since the days of George Buchanan have referred to the non Gaelic national vernacular as Scots and not the Scottish Gaidhlig language, should be the basis for the title in the modern Irish Wikipedia article 9despite the likeliehood of medieval Gaelic writers only ever using "Albainis" to refer to the Gaelic speakers and their language in Scotland). 92.235.178.44 14:21, 22 Lúnasa 2009 (UTC)

:::Yes the term may be a neologism, and yes it may be ugly but that's what's used. If we were to get rid of all neologisms and english-based words in our language we would have no language left. The same could be said for the Scots Gaelic language. Besides, surely Albainis is based on a perfectly good Gaelic word in Alba? Anyway, this is the last word I have on this. Unless concensus is reached on changing the name of the language, or unless the official Agency responsible for terminology in Irish changes its view on the translation, then Albainis it shall remain. --MacTire02 10:06, 30 Eanáir 2009 (UTC)

::::
RE:"The argument that English be called Eireannais is nothing short of ridiculous. MacTire02 15:49, 19 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 (UTC)"
Ach tá 'Yernish' ag http://gv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yernish?!Éóg1916 12:49, 9 Feabhra 2009 (UTC)

Relevance Éamonn? The idea expressed above that Hiberno-English be called Eireannais in Scots Gaelic is hardly analogous to Irish being called Yernish in Manx. To use that analogy would be to suggest that Yernish is the Manx for Hiberno-English, which it obviously is not. --MacTire02 14:04, 9 Feabhra 2009 (UTC)

:
Tugtar 'Irish'  ar 'Gaeilge na hÉireann' go minic, 'the Gaelic' a bhí ag máthair s'agamsa agus muintir Thír Chonaill ( na daoine a bhí an teanga acu ón chliabhán)!
Tugtar 'Yernish' uirthi ar http://gv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yernish, 'Gàidhlig na h-Èireann' ar http://gd.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A0idhlig_na_h-%C3%88ireann, agus 'Gaeilge' ar http://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaeilge!
Tugtar 'Manx' ar 'Gaeilge Mhanainn' go minic! Cé go bhfuil  'Gaelg' ag http://gv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaelg, agus 'Gàidhlig Mhanainn' ag http://gd.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A0idhlig_Mhanainn, tá 'Manainnis' (ar chúis éigean!) ag http://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manainnis!
Tugtar 'Scottish Gaelic' ar 'Gaeilge na hAlban' go minic, 'Gaelg Albinagh' ar http://gv.wikipedia.org, 'Gàidhlig' ar http://gd.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A0idhlig.
I Vicipéid an Bhéarla tá 'Manx', 'Scottish Gaelic' and 'Irish', ( ceapaim go mbeadh 'Manx Gaelic', 'Scottish Gaelic' agus 'Irish Gaelic' níos fearr) agus tá na Gaeil go léir ar aon intinn go bhfuil Gaelg/Gàidhlig/Gaeilge acu féin!Éóg1916 20:46, 9 Feabhra 2009 (UTC)

::Ach tá trí ainm ar an Mhanainnis sa teanga fhéin - Gaelg, Gailck, agus Manninish! Ta tushtey ard ny çhengey shen ayms as ta mee feer hickyr fo shen. Chomh maith as sin, ní bhaineann duine ar bith úsáid as Manx Gaelic i mBéarla. Caithfidh orainn glacfadh leis na caighdeáin atá ann. Níl éinne ag rá go gcaithfidh ar na Manainnigh úsáid a bhaint as Gaelg Nerin nó Gaelg Yernagh. In aon chor, ní thuigim an pointe. Tá an plé seo faoi ainm ny hAlbainise. --MacTire02 21:06, 9 Feabhra 2009 (UTC)

:::
RE: "..ní bhaineann duine ar bith úsáid as Manx Gaelic i mBéarla", ní gá duit ach amharc ar seo ar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manx_language "Manx (native name Gaelg or Gailck, pronounced [ɡilk] or [ɡilɡ][5]), also known as Manx Gaelic, is a Goidelic language spoken on the Isle of Man.",!
RE: "Caithfidh orainn [sic] glacfadh leis na caighdeáin atá ann." Cén 'caighdeán'? Tá caighdeán lucht an Bhéarla ann, agus is minic neamhaird a bheith déanta acu ar tábhacht na Gaeilge sna cúrsaí seo. Bíonn béim acu ar an tír ní ar na daoine. Tá 'caighdeán' ag na Gaeil,  bhí/tá béim ar lucht labhartha na teangaidh ní ar an áit ina bhfuil cónaí orthú. Ní 'Manx/Scottish Gaelic/Irish' ( 'Manninish/Gàidhlig na h-Alba/Gaeilge na hÉireann') ach 'Gaelic/Gaelg/Gàidhlig/Gaeilge' a bhíonn acu. ( Féach ar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/"Gaelic As a noun, it may refer to the group of languages spoken by the Gaels, or to any one of the individual languages.") Is i gcomhthéacsanna teoranta, faoi leith, a bhíonn gá nó go mbíonn sé inmholta idirdhealú a thabhairt agus ansin bíonn sé nádúrtha agus inghlactha an 'cineál Gaeilge' a shonrú.Éóg1916 23:23, 9 Feabhra 2009 (UTC)

Use of wikipedia as a source is not reliable. In that same quotation you mentioned there is no reference to who uses Manx Gaelic as a description. In the Isle of Man it is simply known as Manx. In Britain it is simply known as Manx. In Ireland it is known as Manx. I have never heard it named Manx Gaelic. Likewise, I have only heard the term Irish Gaelic used sparingly, and at that only when compared to Scots Gaelic, generally it is just Irish. At the end of the day the wikipedia is based on common usage - not what is politically correct. Anyway, I still don't see the relevance of talking about the names of the Gaelic languages. The talk page is about Albainis. And you still haven't shown relevance to the Yernish-Éireannais comment you left above. The commentor 138.251.242.137 above said that it would be like calling the English spoken in Ireland as Éireannais. The Manx do use Yernish (analogous with Éireannais), but NOT to refer to the English as spoken in Ireland, but to the Irish Gaelic language itself. They NEVER use Gaelg Yernagh or any other version thereof. Is it so hard for people to accept that languages change. Usage changes. Terminology changes. If in all languages we used historical usage, then Manx should get rid of Ollanish for Dutch and reinstate Germaanish (which is also the Manx for German). Maybe in English we should call Scots Gaelic and Irish Gaelic Erse again? I'm sure then that we on :gv will have plenty of irate Dutch people giving out about the usage. And do we risk calling Scots Béarla Gallda and risk angering the Scots community? How would we differentiate between Scots English and Scots (two separate but related languages albeit with the former as a dialect of a larger language)? Why not ask CnaG about the terminology, or Fiontar in DCU? What are they basing their terminology on? All I am doing is adhering to official language terminology. If you don't like the terms then go to the source if you feel so strongly about it. --MacTire02 23:47, 9 Feabhra 2009 (UTC)

Also, as you mentioned stress on country and not people then that only backs up Albainis. Scots is spoken by Scottish people of Gaelic descent, Norse descent, and Anglo-Saxon descent. It is a language of Scotland. Scots Gaelic is a language primarily of Scottish people of Gaelic descent, thereby making Albainis as the term for the Scots language more valid. --MacTire02 23:53, 9 Feabhra 2009 (UTC)

: Before you said this, it looked like you were arguing based on the necessity of modern usage, bona fide. But now you are justifying it with bad history. There is no such thing as "Gaelic descent", it's just a Celtic language which has developed from the Common Celtic introduced to Britain and from there to Ireland 2-3 millenia ago. For the record though, the area where Gaelic survives today is quite possibly the least Celtic part of Scotland apart from the Northern Isles, being Norse speaking very late. By your own argument, Irish English should be called Irish, since English speakers in Ireland are of English, French, Norse, Welsh and Gaelic descent, whereas Gaelic speakers are, presumably, only "Gaelic in origin". Let's face reality. Irish nationalists want to identity Gaelic primarily with Ireland, and thus calling Lowland Scots "Albainis", against common sense and traditional Irish language usage, promotes this. It's the same reason Irish nationalists prefer the term "Irish" to the term Gaelic, even though Gaelic is the cognate term in the actual language. -- Thomas

::I don't see how using my argument suggests the variety of English spoken in Ireland should be called Irish. That would imply I was suggesting that the variety of English spoken in Scotland should be called Scots. I have NEVER suggested that. What I have suggested is that the Scots LANGUAGE as distinct from the Scottish regional variety of English should be called Scots. Also, you argue that the area where Scots Gaelic survives is the least Celtic part of Scotland (Northern Isles excepted). What then are the criteria for making an area Celtic. I would have assumed the presence of a Celtic language, together with Celtic customs, tartans, Celtic music etc. should qualify an area as being Celtic. Surely you're not suggesting that Perth/Kinross is more Celtic having no Celtic language? Or Borders which probably only had a Celtic language during the era of Rheged - and at that not even a Gaelic one? Yes the Hebrides were a part of the Norse Kingdoms, but, like many areas dominated by a minority elite, most of those were incorporated into the local populace after their hegemony had ended. Also, perhaps you may want to check out the word "cognate". The word "Gaelic" is NOT cognate with "Gaeilge", "Gaidhlig", or "Gaelg". It is a transliteration or translation depending on the viewpoint. Cognate suggests that "Gaelic" is an English word having its origins deep in history - the same root as the modern Gaelic languages. This is not the case. The English word "Gaelic" is actually just a borrowing. --MacTire02 13:13, 19 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

:::You were the one talking about "Gaelic descent" and its importance. You have gotten yourself all tangled and are arguing with yourself now. I was just showing how ridiculous one of your arguments was ("Scots is spoken by Scottish people of Gaelic descent, Norse descent, and Anglo-Saxon descent. It is a language of Scotland. Scots Gaelic is a language primarily of Scottish people of Gaelic descent, thereby making Albainis as the term for the Scots language more valid."). Your contention for instance was that Scots had a stronger population base of Norse descent, which is rubbish, and that Gaelic speakers today have less diverse origin than "Scots" speakers (and presumably Irish speakers), also nonsense, besides being utterly irrelevant (as you are now acknolwedging). And no, my use of cognate was fine. You seem pretty fluent in the English language, so you should not need to be told that words have different shades of meaning. You might want to check the language history of Dublin by the way. Dumfriesshire in the Borders was Gaelic speaking in the 13th century. That's more than one could say for Dublin, your capital, where a Germanic language has been predominant since the 9th century. In fact, parts of England have more recent Gaelic history than Dublin! - Thomas

::::OK. Here are my final words on the matter for several reasons. 1) You didn't look up the definition of "cognate" in a dictionary did you? If you had you would have noticed how, in a linguistic context, the word does not have shades of meaning - it has ONE meaning. That's linguistics 101. A "cognate" is a pair, or more, of words in different languages that SHARE a common etymological root. A word that has been adopted directly from another language for common usage is known as a "loanword" or "borrowing". 2) Perhaps you should check your geography - I never stated that Dumfriesshire was Gaelic-speaking, Norse-speaking, or even Klingon-speaking. In fact I never mentioned it at all. Why may you ask? Well that's because, as you said, it was Gaelic-speaking in the 13th century. However, I did mention Borders. Dumfriesshire is not part of Borders. It is part of Dumfries and Galloway. Yes, I know it was part of Borders in the past, but I adhere to current terminology. (Otherwise we could include Manchester in Wales, Luxembourg as part of Germany, Finland as part of Russia etc.) I don't like living in the past. 3) I will not have further arguments with someone who's main points of argument is based on incorrect presumptions of someone else's arguments. This is supposed to be a debate about the terminology used in the naming of the Scots language. Yet, without knowing me, and by incorrectly reading what I have written, you presume to know my opinions on matters unrelated to the topic at hand. 4) Why are you mentioning Dublin? I didn't! I don't care about Dublin. Especially when we are talking about the Scots language. 5) I do not, and will not, argue any further with someone who refuses to read accurately what I have written. I will also refuse to argue with someone who's main line of defence is to throw someone else's argument back at them, especially seeing as how you don't seem to know what my arguments were in the first place. I will also not have a linguistics argument with someone who does not know the meaning of the word "cognate" in a linguistic sense. And I will not have an argument with someone who fails to open an atlas. For future reference, please make sure you have read, re-read, and understood the other person's argument before retaliating. Also, if you are going to focus on a particular area of study, make sure you are familiar with its terminology.

:::::I think your obsession with debating the word "cognate" at the expense of the other issues here just flags what little your real arguments have going for them. You prefer to use one meaning of the word cognate. Great. Have a party. I was clearly using another (the primary one, OED #1). Get over it. Debating the "real" meaning of a word is in any case a sign of intellectual immaturity. This is like you point about Borders: Dumfriesshire in on the Anglo-Scottish border. It's not in the council area, but who said that's what we were talking about? And you're substantial point? You actually wrote all that, and had no valid save for your ludicrous points above. Congratulations on wasting your own time! - Thomas

::::Irrelevant side-issue it is, but reading Thomas's claims about Dublin's language history and suppposed complete lack of Irish since the 9th century they seem to reveal an ignorance of the history of the Norse-Gaels, of the Normans, and of the Gaelic Resurgence exemplified in the English Lord Chancellor Gerrard's 1578 lament: "All Englishe, and the most part with delight, even in Dublin, speak Irishe." The Pale did not remain some unsullied bastion of non-Irish language and as the anti-Irish colonist Richard Stanihurst lamented "When their posteritie became not altogither so warie in keeping, as their ancestors were valiant in conquering, the Irish language was free dennized in the English Pale: this canker tooke such deep root, as the bodie that before was whole and sound, was by little and little festered, and in manner wholly putrified."
---------------------
Ní thuigim an fhadhb, as has been pointed out, Albanais directly translates Scots/Scottish, what is the problem? How is that insulting? Any suggestions for a more appropriate alternative?
---------------------

:
Dar le MacTire02 "Use of wikipedia as a source is not reliable." Tá  dúshlán romhainn uilig mar sin!
*I 'focal.ie', tá 'Albainis Uladh' = 'Ulster-Scots', ach níl 'Albainis' = 'Scots' ann!
*Tá 'Ulster-Scots s (Ling.)  Albainis f2 Uladh' ag Acmhainn.ie.
*Níl 'Albainis Uladh' nó 'Albainis' ar fáil i 'O'Reilly's Irish-English Dictionary' ( Sanas-Gaiodhilge-Sagsbhearla), 1823.
*Níl 'Albainis Uladh' nó 'Albainis' ar fáil i 'Foclóir Gaedhilge agus Béarla', Uí Dhuinnín, 1927.
*Tá 'Béarla na hAlban= Scots' ag Collins Pocket Irish Dictionary,1997..níl trácht ar Albainis nó Albainis Uladh ann.
*Níl Albainis nó Albainis Uladh ar fáil i Lane's Larger English-Irish Dictionary  , 1922.
*Tá " To talk Scots" = " Béarla na hAlban a labhairt" ag 'English-Irish Dictionary', De Bhaldraithe, 1992.
*I Vicipéid Ghaeilge na hAlban tá "A' Bheurla Ghallda, 'S e a Bheurla Ghallda (anns a chainnt fhèin Scots san latha an diugh agus Inglis gu h-eachdraidheal) cànan Tiùtonach a tha air a bhruidhinn anns a Ghalldachd, Arcaibh agus Sealtainn ann an Alba agus Ulaidh an Eirinn ( far an e 'Ullans' a bhios iad ag èigheachd air ann an còmhlan oifigeach ach 'se 'Scots' a chanas an sluagh fhein ris )."
Nach mór dúinn nós na nGael in Albain a leanúint? Éóg1916 17:46, 14 Feabhra 2009 (UTC)

::Éamonn, I think you're missing the point. Béarla na hAlban has been used for Scots (Scots Leid) and the Scottish variety of English (basically English in a Scottish accent). The two are separate though, and it has only been recent that a differentiation between the two has been acknowledged. I really don't see how using an 1823 dictionary is going to help matters. I sincerely doubt that dictionary has any words in it for Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan etc. Are you going to argue about how they now have Irish names as well? Despite the fact that in the Gaeltacht people would actually say bhí mé i gKazakhstan' and not bhí mé sa Chasacstáin, it is An Chasacstáin that is used for articles etc. I've already shown you several links documenting current common usage. Pointing out to me archaic references in a time when the Scots language was not acknowledged and regarded as bad English (therefore allowing the usage of Béarla na hAlban) is hardly providing me with any reason to abandon the use of Albainis. As far as I'm concerned, I live in 2009, not 1823 or 1927, and I happen to believe we need new terminology for new concepts and ideas - the idea of a separate Scots Leid being on of them. Unless you can provide an example as to how you would differentiate between the two, then I don't see how this will be resolved. --MacTire02 18:50, 15 Feabhra 2009 (UTC)
---------------------
Ní ceart "Albainis" a thabhairt ar theangain ar bith seachas Gaeilge na hAlbain.
Do b'aistriú leisciúil, neamhléannta, bómánta é, bunaithe go hiomlán ar Shacsbhéarla - cósúil le mórchuid na hoibre a dhéantar leis an gCoiste Téarmaíochta (nó cibé ar bith a cheap é).Murchadh 02:11, 31 Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (UTC)
---------------------

Talk about reinforcing the hegemony of Anglo-Saxon culture in Scotland...
---------------------
Baineann Gearóid Ua Nualláin feidhm as "Albanais" ag tagairt do Ghaeilge na hAlban dó i leabhar d'á chuid "Trí Seoda ó Albain". Murċaḋ (talk) 01:44, 25 Bealtaine 2015 (UTC)
---------------------


Plé úsáideora:Robocop

Haigh a Robocop. Chonaic mé go bhfuil tú tar éis "Béarla Gallda" a úsáid in áit an fhocail "Albainis", cé nach n-úsáidtear an nath "Béarla Gallda" as Gaeilge na hÉireann ar chor ar bith. Cén fath gur rinne tú é sin? --Gabriel Beecham 12:31, 18 Márta 2007 (UTC)

Béarla Gallda is safe, and is the established term in Scottish Gaelic for the language/dialect. Albainis used in this way is a neologism and is potentially offensive to speakers of Scottish Gaelic (who after all gave their name, scoti, to the country), and historically "Albainis" is used in Irish to refer to the Scottish variety of their language, not to a dialect of English. Very reasonable to keep the page a dab, even if Ulster-Scots is referred to as Albainis Uladh. Albainis is usable for both languages. Almost all interwikis disambiguate "Scottish" or "Scottish language". Naming Albainis solely for Lowland Scots would thus not only cause offense and be historically inaccurate, but consolidate such a designation. I'm not sure how many sensitive wikipedians on any language version would support such a step. Robocop 19:56, 18 Márta 2007 (UTC)

:Could you quote some examples of "Albainis" being used in Irish to refer to Scottish Gaelic, please? I'd be interested to see such usage, since I have never noticed it used _anywhere_ to refer to Scots. At any rate, it would be inappropriate to put the Scots article at Béarla Gallda, since this name is totally unused by Irish speakers. This is the Irish Wikipedia. --Gabriel Beecham 01:25, 19 Márta 2007 (UTC)

:: If one is going to separate Scottish and Irish Gaelic like that, then yeah, maybe Béarla Gallda ain't that good. But Béarla na hAlban is well established in Irish usage. The only difference between Scots and Scottish English is that one is more "archaic" and one less so. They fade into each other going from country to city in modern Lowland Scotland. Dont have it with me, but Wilson MacLeod's Divided Gaels: Gaelic Cultural Identities in Scotland and Ireland C.1200-C.1650 shows (and gives examples) that the Irish started to use the word "Albainis" when they began to see divergence between the two languages (Scottish and Irish Gaelic) in the later middle ages, and can be found earlier than that in one case. The idea of Lowland Scots and English as separate languages dates no earlier than the late 15th century and was never widespread until the 1920s; so you'll have to forgive the late medieval Irish for not knowing anything about a language/dialect that would later call itself "Scots". Robocop 02:02, 19 Márta 2007 (UTC)

::: Argh. Ive said enough. Youre going to do what youre going to do and im sure youll treat me like a vandal and block me if i actively disagree. if you want to strengthen the position of an offensive and inaccurate neologism in irish by calling lowland scots Albainis, be it on your own conscience. Robocop 02:09, 19 Márta 2007 (UTC)

:::: Robocop: Your attempted compromise was quite OK otherwise, but I am afraid we will not be able to do without "Albainis". You see, "Béarla na hAlban" is not unambiguous - it could also mean the Scots variant of Standard English. On the other hand, it is misleading to suggest in the Irish language Wikipedia that Albainis is in any way ambiguous in Irish - Irish never uses it in any other meaning than Scots. My idea is: Make "Béarla na hAlban" an idirdhealán, which leads to the two pages "Béarla Caighdeánach na hAlban" (Scottish Standard English) and "Albainis" (Lowland Scots when perceived as a different language). But remove entirely any suggestion that "Albainis" could refer to Scots Gaelic, because this is simply not how it works in Irish - Scots Gaelic is never, ever, ever called Albainis in Irish. - I admit that Albainis is not a very beautiful word, nor it is even very established. But we need an unambiguous three-way distinction between standard English as used in Scotland (Béarla Caighdeánach na hAlban), Lowland Scots when treated as a different language (Albainis), and Scots Gaelic (Gaeilge na hAlban). I admit that "Béarla Gallda" could come in handy, but regrettably enough, it is not an established term in Irish and would not be understood. Besides "a' Bhéarla Gallda" is not grammatically correct in Irish - you don't write "a'", but "an", "Béarla" is not femininine but masculine (it would be "an Béarla", not "an Bhéarla"), and it is not even consistent with itself (if Béarla were feminine, then the adjective should be lenited, "an Bhéarla Ghallda). The form "a' Bhéarla Gallda" must go - it is so wrong that it cannot be tolerated.Panu Petteri Höglund 08:40, 20 Márta 2007 (UTC)
Quite correct that the term 'Albainis' is totally unknown in Scotland and was never used by the bardic poets! My work is cited above to suggest otherwise. So far as I am aware no distinction was ever drawn by Gaelic writers between Lowland Scots and the English of England - at least until very recent times. 'Albais' is sometimes used nowadays in Scottish Gaelic, but this is a neologism, and quite unpopular with some. Note that Scottish Gaelic still uses the traditional nominative form Alba (not the dative-for-nominative Albain as in Irish) so that the adjectival form becomes simply Albais. Beurla Ghallda (or a' Bheurla Ghallda) is preferred by many; Dr John MacInnes has written on this. Note that Beurla is feminine in Scottish Gaelic so that the lenition of Gallda is correct in Scottish Gaelic, as is writing the definite article here as a' and not an.


Plé úsáideora:Spaircí

* Críoch a chur le Seirbia, Béalgrád agus chur le haltanna faoin tír agus a stair... Chomh maith leis an Réigiúin mór thimpeall
* leathnú ar An Spáinn, srl
* leathnú ar An Iodáil, srl
* téigh tríd imreoirí sacair, na foirne, na sraithe (go háirithe iad siúd a mbaineann le hÉireann, agus aon alt faoi sacair go gineáralta
* [gan catagóir]
* leathnú ar An Chróit, Seirbia srl
* leathnú ar An Ostair srl

A Chara,
Chruthaigh mé na leathanaigh bhreise seo ar mhaithe le daoine nach mbeadh scoth na Gaeilge acu agus nach mbeadh an leagan Gaeilge ar eolas acu do Mhanchain, Learpholl, Dún Éideann, srl.  Beidh daoine ag teacht ar cuairt chuig an Vicipéid le Gaeilge a fhoghlaim agus tá Béarla mar an chéad teanga ag formhór na bhfoghlaimeoirí seo.  Ní thabharfaidh daoine le scoth na Gaeilge na leathanaigh bhreise seo faoi deara mar go mbeidh an leagan Gaeilge ar eolas acu cheana féin ach má chabhraíonn na leathanaigh bhreise seo le foghlaimeoirí an t-eolas atá uathu a aimsiú, cén dochar? Is cleachtadh coitianta é ar vicí-anna eile leathanach athdhírithe a chruthú le haghaidh téarmaí a d'fhéadfadh daoine a úsáid agus iad ag tóraíocht eolais.
Dála an scéal, ná déan dearmad do chuid teachtaireachtaí a shíniú (trí ~~~~ a ionchur) ag an deireadh ionas go mbeidh sé soiléir cé a d'fhág an teachtaireacht.
Le gach dea-ghuí,
Nmacu 09:36, 21 Márta 2007 (UTC)

Haigh, Spaircí. Ar dtús, go raibh maith agat as do chuid iarrachtaí ar Comhphobail fhéinrialaitheacha na Spáinne agus Córas Idirnáisiúnta na nAonad le déanaí. Tá jab maith déanta agat anseo!
Tá cúpla íomhánna á "uaslódáil" agat le déanaí. An bhfuil "source" le fáil do :Íomhá:220px-Tolkien ring.jpg, :Íomhá:Sg1stargatefront.jpg, nó :Íomhá:Middle-earth.jpg? (Need to be careful when uploading images, and provide source information and/or any reasons to cover copyright concerns. Otherwise they may be deleted). Beir bua! Guliolopez 18:49, 4 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

You have a message there. We must hold a sysop request.

Thanks for uploading :Image:Char4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
As well as adding the source, please add a copyright licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as those in  :Catagóir:Clibeanna cóipchirt d'íomhánna nach bhfuil saor. Such tags must be accompanied with a Fair Use Rationale template such as {{Réasúnaíocht d'íomhánna nach bhfuil saor}}.
Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks. Guliolopez 10:43, 4 Mí na Nollag 2009 (UTC)

Unspecified source for [[:Image:Char4.jpg]]

See Plé:Traenálaí. The term traenálaí can be translated as trainer or coach btw. Onetonycousins 13:39, 29 Iúil 2010 (UTC)


Plé:Cathair na Mart

Ar féidir le héinne cabhair a thabhairt liom don alt seo, más é do thoil é? Leis an gramadach nó an aistriúchán. Scuzzball 13:11, 3 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:86.42.217.66

Tá fáilte romhat sa Vicipéid. Iarraimis do gach aon duine cuidiú dearfach a thabhairt don chiclipéid seo. Féach ar an leathanach fáilte más mian leat a thuilleadh a fhoghlaim faoin saghas cuidithe sin. Meastar go bhfuil athruithe neamhdhearfacha ar chomhthrom le loitiméireacht, áfach; má leanann tú ar aghaidh sa stíl seo b'fhéidir go gcoscfar tú ón eagarthóireacht gan aon fhógra eile. Cuir deireadh leis más é do thoil é, agus déan machnamh ar saothair a rinne daoine eile a fheabhsú in áit iad a scrios. Go raibh maith agat.
----
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive and hoax edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Your edits have been removed. In future, please consider improving the Vicipéid rather than engaging in unhelpful edits.

Guliolopez 15:57, 3 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Repeat vandalism/loitiméireacht (as to [http://ga.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_W._Bush&diff=prev&oldid=80095 GW Bush] [http://ga.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Contae_Chiarra%C3%AD&diff=prev&oldid=81386 Ciarraí] [http://ga.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liverpool_Football_Club&diff=prev&oldid=81405 LFC])

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Guliolopez 14:09, 17 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Yet more vandalism (as to [http://ga.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ceiltigh_Ghlasch%C3%BA&diff=prev&oldid=89386 Celtic] [http://ga.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liverpool_Football_Club&diff=prev&oldid=81404 LFC] and others)


Plé úsáideora:213.94.210.30

Ghlac mé leis an gcuireadh cabhrú chun tionscadal na Vicipéide a chur chun cinn trí eagarthóireacht a dhéanamh ar roinnt leathanach.
Níor aontaigh duine de na heagarthóirí a chuaigh romham le mo chuid athruithe. Tá an cead sin aige agus géillim dó de ghrá an réitigh, bíodh nach n-aontaím féin leis.
Cuireann an dá theachtaireacht thíos díomá orm. Tá brón orm má chuir na hathruithe a rinne mé isteach ar aon duine, ach nach féadfaí a chuir in iúl go múinte sibhialta nach bhfuiltear ag glacadh lena bhfuil déanta agam.  Ina ionad sin, tá an teachaireacht a tháinig ón eagarthóir a chuaigh romham maslach tarcaisneach.
Ní raibh sé i gceist agam é a fhreagairt, mar nár theastaigh uaim aon aighneas a adhaint.
Bhain an dara teachtaireacht geit asam áfach. An bhfeileann bagairt dá leithéid do thionscadal atá ceaptha a bheith bunaithe ar chomhoibriú. Níl aon loitiméireacht déanta agam ar an Vicipéid. Ní raibh sé i gceist agam riamh é sin a dhéanamh agus níl amach anseo.
Ó fuair mé an chéad ceann den dá theachtaireacht sin tá cuid de na treoirlínte atá ar fáil ar an leagan Béarla léite agam. Níl siad ann fós sa leagan Gaeilge cé go bhfuil nasc marbh ann.
Molaim go mór na treoracha céanna a léamh, go mór na cinn a bhaineann le cúirtéis.
Ainneoin an mhéid sin thuas molaim riarthóirí agus comhoibreoirí uile na Vicipéide.
Rath Dé ar bhur gcuid oibre.
Please do not tinker with my edits. It is obvious that you are just playing around with wording instead of adding anything worthwhile, and it is equally obvious that you are simply not good enough at writing Irish to be able to improve my edits in a particular way. Panu Petteri Höglund 13:34, 6 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)
Maith thú!
Éóg1916 20:51, 3 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Nílim ró-chinnte cad a bhí i gceist leis an rabhadh agus an díospóireacht ar fad, ach tá cás tábhachtach le phlé againn anseo, i mo thuairim. Caithfidh mé a rá go n-aontáim leis an méid atá scríobtha thuas ag úsáideoir 213.94.210.30. --An Tóin Mór 11:17, 9 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)

:Bhuel, tá Gaeilge réasúnta maith ag mo dhuine, ach ní dhearna sé ach tinkeráil timpeall mo chuid edits. Nuair a bhí "saoldearcadh" agam - téarma atá seanbhunaithe i litríocht Gaeilge ár linne - chuir sé "dearcadh saoil" ina áit, agus uaireanta, - de réir mar a fheictear dom - nuair a bhí focail agus abairtíní agam nár thuig sé (cé gur fhoghlaim mé as litríocht na Gaeltachta iad, agus cé go mbíonn foclóir Uí Dhónaill mar threoir agam an t-am ar fad le focail agus téarmaí a sheiceáil a bhfuilim in amhras fúthu) chuir sé focail nua ina n-áit nach raibh gá ar bith leo. Tá an Vicipéid ag cur thar maoil le síolta a bhfuil fad agus feabhas de dhíth orthu, ach b'fhearr le mo dhuine a chuid téarmaí féin a chur isteach i mo chuid altanna. Nílim a rá gur saoi gan locht mé, ach tá mé den bharúil nach obair fhónta a bhí idir lámhaibh aige de réir aon tuisceana. Panu Petteri Höglund 13:33, 11 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)
Tá mé cinnte go bhféadfá an méid sin a rá go múinte, seachas mar a rinne.  Tá sé ráite sa leagan Béarla go bhfuil cód iompair i measc 5 phrionsabail na Vicipéide ina ndeirtear gur chóir glacadh leis go bhfuil daoine ag feidhmiú le dea-thoil, agus nár chóir ionsaí pearsanta a dhéanamh, rud a rinneadh nuair a cuireadh útamáil ar son na hútamála i mo leith agus nuair a rinneadh mé a mhaslú.

:Ceart go leor, tá an ceart agat. Déanaim mo leithscéal. Tá mé ar bheagán foighne, toisc gur minic a tháinig daoine nach raibh d'ainm úsáideora acu ach an seoladh IP ag déanamh athruithe ar mo chuid oibre, agus sa chuid ba mhó de na cásanna bhí siad ar bheagán Gaeilge agus iad, mar a dúirt tú, ag útamáil ar son na hútamála amháin. Mar sin féin, má theastaíonn uait cuidiú linn, b'fhearr liom go gclárófá isteach faoi ainm seasta úsáideora, agus go ndéanfá an chuid ba mhó de do chuid oibre ag cur feabhas ar na síolta ailt nach bhfuil mórán téacs iontu ná mórán feabhais ar an nGaeilge iontu. Nílim a rá nach bhféadfá feabhas a chur ar mo chuid oibre, ach b'fhearr liom tú do chuid moltaí a chur faoi mo bhráid ar mo leathanach plé, nó ar leathanach plé an ailt atá i gceist. Ceart go leor? Panu Petteri Höglund 14:38, 12 Meán Fómhair 2007 (UTC)
Go raibh maith agat.
Beidh mé ag logáil isteach de ghnáth uaidh seo ar aghaidh.


Plé úsáideora:Scuzzball

Haigh, Scuzzball. Agus fáilte. Ar dtús, go raibh maith agat as do chuid iarrachtaí ar Bolton Wanderers F.C. agus Cathair na Mart. Tá jab maith déanta agat anseo!
Tá cúpla íomhánna á "uaslódáil" agat le déanaí. An bhfuil "source" le fáil do :Íomhá:Westportview.jpg, :Íomhá:Boltonwanderers.png, nó :Íomhá:Gaybyrne.jpg? (Need to be careful when uploading images, and provide source information and/or any reasons to cover copyright concerns. Otherwise they may be deleted). Beir bua! Guliolopez 18:49, 4 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)
 Guliolopez 12:49, 16 Bealtaine 2008 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Fionn~gawiki

Dia dhuit, agus fáilte.
GRMA as do chuid oibre, ach an féidir leat an Vicipéid:Réamhrá a léamh ar dtús? Chomh maith le sin, bí curamach leis an litriú agus an gramadach, le do thoil. Foinse amháin ná Gramadach na Gaeilge. Más féidir liom cabhair leat, cuir fios orm. --An Tóin Mór 13:37, 9 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Fionn. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Fionn~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:42, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
 07:37, 19 Aibreán 2015 (UTC)


Plé:Luimneach

Níl an eolas céanna agam ar chathir eile. Ach b'fhéidir go dtosnóidh mé ar scríobh alt cumasaigh faoi Chontae Luimnigh i ndiaidh dom críochnú le fo-ailt faoi daoine agus téamanna na cathrach. Sean an Scuab 12:18, 15 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Brón orm a Sheáin, bhí mé gan ach ag magadh. Lean ar aghaidh leis an dea-obair. --An Tóin Mór 16:02, 15 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)
Wow, alt iontach é seo! Maith thú, a Sheáin. An féidir leat an rud céanna a dhéanamh anois le gach aon cathair sa tír? :-) --An Tóin Mór 19:30, 9 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Tréaslaím leat freisin. Sár-jab. --Nmacu 10:48, 25 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Tá roinnt mhaith botún ceartaithe agam sa chéad leath ach measaim go bhfuil roinnt athscríobh le déanamh ar chuid den ábhar leis an gcaighdeán ginearálta a ardú. Nmacu 15:23, 24 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

Athraigh agus fáilte. Cé gur chainnteoir ó dhúchais mé, is annamh a scríobhaim as Gaeilge agus, ós rud é go bhfuil cúig bhliain déag ar scór imithe anois ónar dheineas an Ardteistiméaracht, tá an gramadach beagnach dearmadta agam. Ceapaim go mbeadh na botúin céanna le fáil sna h-ailt faoi Ailtireacht Luimnigh, Naisc Iompar Luimnigh, Turasóireacht i Luimneach, Stair Luimnigh, Spórt i Luimneach, Oidhreacht Luimnigh Thar Lear, Sionainn , Mainchín, Pádraig Sairséal, Peadar de Lása, Seoirse de Brún, Éamonn Ó Dálaigh, Seán Sabhat, Donnchadha Ó Máille, Pádraig Mac an Choiligh, Mícheál Mac Aodha, Seán de Paor, Stiofán Ó Fionáin, Cáitríona Ní hAodha, Cáit Ní Bhriain, Seán Céitinn, Nuala Ní Dhomhnaill, Dolores Ní Ríordáin, Peadar de Bhulbh, Labhrás Ó Dubhchonna, Dolores Nic Chonmara, Kemper agus Penn-ar-Bed chomh maith.###  Sean an Scuab 16:41, 2 Iúil 2007 (UTC)

:Tá sár-jab déanta agat, a Sheáin agus is saibhre an Vicipéid a bhuíochas le do chuid oibre. Déanfaidh mé iarracht breathnú trí cuid de na hailt seo sna laethanta amach romhainn agus an méid eolais atá agam féin a úsáid le botúin ghramadaí (más ann dóibh) a cheartú. Beir bua, Nmacu 10:05, 5 Iúil 2007 (UTC)

Cuirfidh mé an snas deireanach ar an alt anois beag. Tugaigí faoi deara gurb é "Luimnigh" agus ní "Luimní" an gineadach ceart. Maidir leis an tSionainn, is é "na Sionna" an ginideach a mholtar go hoifigiúil. Panu Petteri Höglund 20:20, 29 Meitheamh 2008 (UTC)

:Dia dár réiteach. Is é "na Sionainne" an ginideach a mholtar i nGasaitéar na hÉireann. Níl na diabhail ábalta teacht le chéile faoin ngramadach cheart. Bhuel, tá "na Sionainne" níos rialta agus níos oiriúnaí ag na foghlaimeoirí, só, bhain mé úsáid as an leagan sin anois. Cuirfidh mé tuilleadh snas ar an leathanach seo amárach. Tá mé róthuirseach anois. Le cúnamh Dé beidh sár-alt ann sa deireadh. Panu Petteri Höglund 20:44, 10 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 (UTC)

::Tógfaidh sé cupla lá eile fós, ach beidh alt sármhaith ann i gceann tamaillín, le cuidiú Dé.Panu Petteri Höglund 10:54, 11 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 (UTC)
Sea, sár-iarracht curtha isteach agaibh, agus sár-alt mar thoradh. --Antóin 11:17, 11 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 (UTC)
Go raibh maith agat, a Phanu. Éacht.Sean an Scuab 20:49, 11 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 (UTC)


Plé:Páirc Parnell

An é "Páirc Uí Parnell" an leagan atá le léamh ar na comharthaí sráide?Panu Petteri Höglund 13:47, 12 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Bhuel, thóg mé an litriú seo ón alt atá sa Vici Béarla, rud atá contúirteach, b'fhéidir. Cad faoi Páirc Pharnell? --An Tóin Mór 17:49, 12 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

: Tá Páirc Pharnell níos fearr ná Páirc Uí Parnell, nó dá mbeadh "Uí" ann, chaithfeá litriú agus gramadach na Gaeilge a chur i bhfeidhm ar an sloinne sin Parnell agus "Páirc Uí Phairnéil" nó rud éigin cosúil leis sin a dhéanamh de. Is amhlaidh, áfach, gur minic a fhágtar an séimhiú ar lár sna sráidainmneacha más sloinne dúchoimhthíoch nó dubh-Ghallda atá agat ansin. Bíonn na liostaí oifigiúla féin lochtach go minic.

:Maidir le sráidainmneacha BhÁC, is í an fhoinse is iontaofa, dar liom féin, ná [liosta Shéamuis Uí Bhrógáin], agus mar a fheicfidh tú, is é an leagan de "Parnell Street" agus a leithéidí eile i mBaile Átha Cliath is fearr le Séamas ná "Sráid Parnell" gan séimhiú. I rith na mblianta, d'fhoghlaim mé an-mhuinín a chur i mbreithiúnas Shéamais, agus mar sin, is é mo thuairim nár mhiste dúinn a pholasaí-sean a leanúint i sráidainmneacha agus logainmneacha cathrach taobh amuigh de Bhaile Átha Cliath féin. Ar ndóigh, má tá údarás áitiúil ann le leagan éigin eile, ní mór dúinn an leagan sin a roghnú, áfach. Panu Petteri Höglund 18:30, 12 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

:: Sea, tá leabharmharca agam go dtí liosta Uí Bhrógáin, an ceann is fearr atá le fáil gan dabht. Mar sin, Páirc Parnell as seo amach. Athróidh mé é. GRMA a Phanu. --An Tóin Mór 19:24, 12 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)
Agus imreoirí CLG (as BÁC)ag caint as Gaeilge an leagan is minice atá cloiste agam ná Páirc Pharnell. Sin ag scata maith cainteoirí. Rinagaeilge 23:33, 5 Márta 2010 (UTC)

Caithfidh dul ar ais go dtí an leagan roimh athruithe an úsáideora seo, rinneadh dhá athrú atá mí-cheart. Conas a ndéantar é arís, ní cuimhim liom. GRMA. --Antóin 06:42, 28 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 (UTC)

Díreach é, go raibh míle maith agat, a Alison! --Antóin 08:48, 28 Deireadh Fómhair 2008 (UTC)


Plé teimpléid:Bosca Sonraí Ollscoile

Aistriodh an teimpléad seo ó :w:en:Template:Infobox University; féach ar an leathanach sin le tuilleadh eolais.
{{Bosca Sonraí Ollscoile
|ainm                  =
|ainm dúchasach        =
|ainm_na_híomhá        =
|leithead_na_híomhá    =
|foscríbhinn_na_híomhá =
|ainm_laidine          =
|mana                  =
|sluán                 =
|bunaithe              =
|cineál                =
|reiligiún             =
|dearlaic              =
|fiachas               =
|reachtaire            =
|cathaoirleach         =
|seansailéir           =
|uachtarán             =
|leasuachtarán         =
|maoirseoir            =
|propast               =
|leas-seansailéir      =
|príomhoide            =
|déan                  =
|stiúrthóir            =
|lipéad_don_cheann     =
|ceann                 =
|foireann_teagaisc     =
|foireann              =
|mic_léinn             =
|fochéimithe           =
|iarchéimithe          =
|dochtúireachtaí       =
|diagacht              =
|cónaitheoirí          =
|eile                  =
|gairmithe             =
|céimithe              =
|cathair               =
|stát                  =
|cúige                 =
|tír                   =
|seoladh               =
|teileafón             =
|campas                =
|lipéad_saor           =
|saor                  =
|spóirt                =
|dathanna              =
|leasainm              =
|sonóg                 =
|amhrán foirne         =
|lúthchleasaíocht      =
|comhcheangail         =
|duaiseoirí_nobel      =
|láithreán_gréasáin    =
|lógó                  =
|iompar_poiblí         =
|fonótaí               =
}}

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé teimpléid:Bosca Sonraí Ollscoile


Plé úsáideora:Dónall Dubh

Haigh a Dhónaill. Agus Fáilte.
Tá an alt An Lucht Seilge: Dalldramáin ar Mhuin Capaill scríofa agat anseo trí huaire i rith an mí seo caite. It has been deleted twice, and - given that is not appropriate as a Wikipedia article - it will likely be deleted again.
This website is the Irish language "Wikipedia" - an online encyclopedia. As such, it is host to encyclopedic articles.
The page you created (An Lucht Seilge: Dalldramáin ar Mhuin Capaill) is a "commentary" piece, and as such it does not hold true to the intent of Wikipedia.
It may be more suited to a "blog" or similar website suited to hosting "personal opinion" style content.
Please consider this before submitting any more content to the Wikipedia.
For more information on what Wikipedia is (and is not), please read: :en:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.
Más féidir liom cabhair leat, cuir fios orm. (Just add a note to my talkpage) Le meas. Guliolopez 23:34, 13 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

D'fhreagraínn do thrácht is déanaí ar mo leathanch plé. Guliolopez 21:55, 16 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Failte / "An Lucht Seilge: Dalldramáin ar Mhuin Capaill"


Plé:The Who

Can anybody add this template in the article? .. Thank you in advance! 77.162.32.197 15:43, 14 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)


Plé:Adolf Hitler

Le hathscríobh go hiomlán, aistriúchán ó Vicipéid na Gearmáinise. OK? Panu Petteri Höglund 22:28, 15 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

san airm sa Ghearmáin nó in airm na gearmáine??
--193.1.172.187 14:18, 19 Aibreán 2010 (UTC)
in airm na Gearmáine
Irlandija 17:23, 21 Aibreán 2010 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:84.203.168.92

Haigh. Má tá tuairimí agat faoin ábhar seo, logáil isteach agus scríobh iad ar an leathanach "Plé". Ciclipéid é seo. Go raibh maith agat. --An Tóin Mór 20:59, 21 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Go raibh maith agat. Guliolopez 10:09, 6 Márta 2009 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Purodha

#redirect ksh:Metmaacher Klaaf:Purodha

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Purodha. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Purodha~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:44, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:143.239.192.137

Hi UCC user. (And welcome) I notice that you've created quite a few new pages for periodic table elements.
However, in all cases, the only content is an image showing it's position on the table, and it's atomic number.
Such an "article" is not a good "stub", and (with no content) should actually be deleted per the guidelines (see: Writing good stubs).
Can you please consider going back and updating those 13 pages you have just created with the below?:

Is dúil ceimiceach é NAME-OF_ELEMENT. Tá uimhir adamhach ATOMIC_NUMBER agus siombail ATAMOIC_SYMBOL air.
And add the following category tags to them - so that they are added to the "elements" category:

Catagóir:Dúile ceimiceacha
And possibly consider including Interwiki links. And maybe align the images you've already included to the right.
I'll help out where I can - as I have already done for Únúnoictiam, Únúinseiptiam and Únúinheicsiam - but (per above) left as they are, the articles you've created are not considered "complete" enough and may be deleted.
Le Meas. Guliolopez 13:21, 28 Aibreán 2007 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Gar77

Fáilte romhat isteach!! Nmacu 16:19, 14 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

Hi could yu help me translate Sineads article into beautiful irish?: Cheers.--217.209.116.113 16:21, 18 Márta 2009 (UTC)


Plé:Bacharach

Hello, Please see  an put it into the article, if you want (I don't know the right template... =) --87.166.162.211 16:34, 18 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC) :de:Benutzer:Fabian7351 | talk page


Plé teimpléid:Ie baile infobox

In ionad:
Daonra an bhaile:
Daonra tuathúil:
, d'fhéadfaí:
Daonra
   Baile:
   Tuath:
a úsáid.  Tá a mhacasamhail in úsaid sa leagan Béarla. Nmacu 13:53, 28 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

Smaoineamh maith é, i mo thuairim. (Would certainly solve PPH's point about "tuathúil" V "thuathúil") Ar aghaidh leat :) (Nó má tá cabhair uait maidir le "syntax" an teimpléid, táim sásta an t-aistriú a dhéanamh.) Guliolopez 14:11, 28 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

:Moladh curtha i bhfeidhm (tá súil agam!).  Tá ainmneacha nua ar na hathróga seo a leanas: "daonra_baile" agus "daonra_tuath" Nmacu 16:15, 28 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

::Níor éirigh leis na hathruithe! Déanfaidh mé roinnt útamála thart i mo bhosca gainimh agus nuair atá sé ag feidhmiú i gceart, aistreoidh mé an cód ansin. Mo leithscéal faoi na hathruithe a thriail beo. Nmacu 16:38, 28 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)
Tá sé seo ag obair anois. Tá na hathróga "daonra_baile" agus "daonra_tuath" i bhfeidhm anois in ionad "daonra_bhaile" agus "daonra_thuathúil".  Tá athróg nua ann "daonáireamh" don bhliain ar a bhfuil na figiúirí bunaithe. Nmacu 20:24, 28 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

Athrú beag eile. Níor thuig mé go raibh an oiread sin bailte ag úsáid na n-athróga "daonra_bhaile" agus "daonra_thuathúil". Tá na hainmneacha seo athruithe ar ais mar a bhí siad. Nmacu 21:46, 28 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

Is "eangach" really an official term? To me, it feels very much like a fishing-net. Or "cailín a fháil in eangach" (or "...in eangaigh", with a dative inflection) = to score a chick.

Is cosúil gurb ea, cé go n-úsáidim féin "greille" i mo chuid oibre féin. Tá an téarma "eangach" in úsáid san Fhoclóir Tíreolaíochta agus Pleanála (m.sh., Eangach Náisiúnta Éireann).  Tugaim faoi deara go bhfuil greille in úsáid i bhfoclóirí eile.  Is dóigh go bhfuil ceachtar téarma sásúil.  Nmacu 10:45, 31 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

:Ceart go leor más ea. B'fhearr liom féin go mór "greille", áfach. Ach gabhaimis leor le heangach, mura bhfuair na téarmadóirí locht air. Is leasc liom locht a fháil ar lorg láimhe Dé. Panu Petteri Höglund 15:04, 31 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plé teimpléid:Ie baile infobox


Plé:Íosa Críost

Noting that most Irish-speakers are Catholics, I guess I will use the terminology and place-name forms of the Maynooth Catholic translation of the Bible (An Bíobla Naofa). There is also a Protestant version of the New Testament by Cosslett Ó Cuinn which is often different. I'll check as soon as I find my Maynooth Bible. Panu Petteri Höglund 07:45, 29 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

Addition: Maynooth Bible does not always use very traditional names (for example, it has Z in many names such as Nazarat, in order to keep close to the Greek and Hebrew originals. It also does not use Iorua for Herod, but Héaród. However, as Maynooth Bible is the standard Irish-language Bible for Catholics today, I think we have no other choice but to use it. The name Iorua for Héaród should be mentioned in the article about Héaród. Objections? Panu Petteri Höglund 08:17, 29 Bealtaine 2007 (UTC)

: An bhfuil 'Irúath' i gceist agat in áit 'Iorua'? Féach http://www.ucc.ie/celt/online/G201021/text001.html
'Ro gab format Irúath án
re mac Muiri na mórdál,
do drech Irúath, céim nár cóir,
do marbudh Ísu ardmóir'.
"Beatha teanga í a labhairt" nó i mbéarlagar an lae inniu “Use it or lose it”.Éóg1916 09:59, 23 Mí na Nollag 2011 (UTC)

There should not be an qutomatic redirection from the search 'íosa'. 'Jesus' and 'Christ' are two separate concepts, and are not always synonymous.

Can you elaborate a bit further on that? If I follow your logic I think your argument is that "Críost" shouldn't redirect here? Right? Certainly on the EN project "Jesus" and "Jesus Christ" resolve to the same article. But "Christ" is a different article. Is that what you mean/meant? Guliolopez 16:28, 22 Mí na Nollag 2011 (UTC)
Elaboration: Searching the word Íosa directs to this page. A disambiguation page would allow users to go to this page should they wish. It should be noted that Jesus - the same person, but not considered the Christ - is recognised in various religions. Should there be a book, film, or indeed a living person called 'Íosa', this 'poor cousin' of Wikipedia should allow for the creation of a page on the subject.


Plé úsáideora:Randomevo~gawiki

Random Evo
Is Misé Garreth, Tá Mé ina chonai i gcondaí Lú agus Seinm An Giotár, An Dord, Na Drummaí, Na Méarchláir, An Feádóg Stain agus cupla rud eilé. Is é Ceol Mó Ghrá.Creid Mise! [=Beidh Mé Caint as Gaeilge, Berlá, Francais agus piosa beag den Spainis.
Táim San Idir Bhlian agus i mean fomhair taim sa cuigu blian.

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Randomevo. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Randomevo~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:44, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
 07:37, 19 Aibreán 2015 (UTC)


Plé:Iosrael

Athscríobh iomlán de dhíth. Tá cuid den alt dothuigthe go leor. Panu Petteri Höglund 20:04, 4 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)
I scarcely know any Irish, but I had the feeling the wrong estimation of citizens in Israel was given here: there are over 7,000,000 citizens in Israel, about 1,000,000 are Arabs (if the number didn't change from the last time I checked).

ní féidir liom na hathruithe a chealú mar "The edit could not be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits." ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Conradder (plé) 10:03, 11 Aibreán 2024 (UTC)


Plé úsáideora:Lughaidh~gawiki

: Tá mé go maith, agus tusa? Daoust ha ne vefe ket graet Loig Chevau ac'hanout ivez?--Kadwalan 00:30, 6 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)

Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Lughaidh. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Lughaidh~gawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,Keegan PeterzellCommunity Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
 01:43, 18 Márta 2015 (UTC)


Plé catagóire:Gaeilge

Ní dóigh liom gur ceart "daoine" a chur sa rang seo. Putting people into this category without context is confusing - and possibly inappropriate. (Because, presumably, we don't want to open a door for "Irish speakers" to fall into any one category - and certainly not a high level cat like this one.)
Is dócha go bhfuil éinne atá curtha sa rang seo (i láthair) in a "gníomhaíoch" / "language activist". Can anyone think of an appropriate cat title for these people? Possibly equivalent to ":en:Category:Irish-language activists"? Nó mar seo?
I ask for two reasons. One - As above, I think relevance/context to (for example) Aoife Ní Scolaí should be appropriately applied a level below :Rang:Gaeilge. And - Two - articles like Gearóid Ó Cuinneagáin agus Mícheál W. Ó Murchú languish uncategorised without an appropriate "home".
Tuairimí? Guliolopez 19:27, 11 Meitheamh 2007 (UTC)
Maidir le Mícheál W.Ó Murchú, tá cnuasach dá chuid aistí den teideal Páirc na hImeartha, foilsithe ag Coiscéim, 2005. Tá na haistí seo molta go hard ag na húdair Alan Titley agus Liam Prút.
(MWÓM, 31 Márta, 2008)