Diskussion:Hattori Sushi Devil

message: :Hitflyttad från Användardiskussion:Annika64
Please restore Hattori Sushi Devil, it's not an upload of the same article. New material has been added that notes the credibility and importance. Thanks.--Sushi8Eater (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 10.50 (CEST)
replies: text: Please read Wikipedia:Relevanskriterier. /Annika (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 10.53 (CEST)
replies: text: :I added the relevance before it was wrongly deleted. Please restore it if you could so I can continue to add more in regards to its relevance.--Sushi8Eater (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 10.56 (CEST)
replies: text: ::Wikipedia is not a commercial medium. Please advertise in Dagens Nyheter or in the Stockholm metro, for example. /Annika (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 11.22 (CEST)
replies: text: :::It's not intended for commercial purposes. Its relevance is noted for having over 20 varieties of fish in suburban Stockholm as well as being a luxurious Japanese restaurant. Now if you could please kindly restore the page so that I may continue noting its importance.--Sushi8Eater (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 11.27 (CEST)
replies: text: ::::I can't even find basic information about the company. Under what name is the restaurant registered?  -- Tegel (disk) 9 september 2014 kl. 11.29 (CEST)
replies: text: :::::Hattori Sushi Devil, I believe. A simple Google search could provide you information. Cheers.--Sushi8Eater (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 11.32 (CEST)
replies: text: ::::::Now I found it, I think. The closest I got was ALFRI Service AB with 10 employees. The other was sushiDevil AB  that went bankrupt four years ago. I don't see what there is to discuss. I can't see the relevance for the article. But Diskussion:Hattori Sushi Devil is at least a better place for the discussion than Annikas talk page. -- Tegel (disk) 9 september 2014 kl. 11.49 (CEST)
replies: text: :::::::Not sure which company it's listed under, to be honest. I'm just a culinary hobbyist. I agree, the article's discussion page would be a better place to hold these discussions. But if you could, please restore the page so that I may continue to add references. If a consensus has been reached that it's not worthy of an article, then you may delete it. Thanks, --Sushi8Eater (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 11.56 (CEST)
replies: text: ::::::::I don't see the reason why the article should be restored at this moment just to add references. You can add the references on the article discussion page and we can take it from there.  -- Tegel (disk) 9 september 2014 kl. 12.09 (CEST)
replies: text: :::::::::Look, it's your subjective viewpoint that it's not relevant. To me, it is. Therefore, the article should be reopened so that more information could be added in the form of statements and references. Now please restore the page. As I said, you may delete it in due time if a consensus has been reached that it's not noteworthy.--Sushi8Eater (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 12.14 (CEST)
Annika, please restore the page so that more information could be provided.--Sushi8Eater (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 12.17 (CEST)

text: Consensus has already been reached that it isn't relevant by the three admins that deleted it. For a restoration sources are required, end of discussion. Dieselmotorvagnar (till stationen) 9 september 2014 kl. 12.19 (CEST)
replies: text: :I beg to differ. The first time the article was posted it was correctly deleted for not being relevant. The second time, it was wrongly deleted for having been deleted in the past though its relevance was added. Same with the third. The article must be reopened for new information to be processed.--Sushi8Eater (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 12.23 (CEST)
replies: text: ::Detta är Wikipedia på svenska. Eventuellt fortsatt relevansdiskussion skall därför föras på svenska. Riggwelter (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 12.25 (CEST)

text: :: (redigeringskrock) Nej, artikeln var lika irrelevant samtliga gånger. Utöver detta kan ny information diskuteras på denna sida utan att artikeln återskapas; och helst på svenska, så att alla kan delta i diskussionen. Dieselmotorvagnar (till stationen) 9 september 2014 kl. 12.26 (CEST)
replies: text: :::Jag ser inte någon anledning att återställa artikeln, men alla administratörer har ju möjlighet att göra detta om någon anser att fortsatt relevanskontroll är motiverad. /Annika (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 12.32 (CEST)
replies: text: ::::Även jag har tittat på artikeltexten nu; inte heller jag ser vari relevansen består. Riggwelter (diskussion) 9 september 2014 kl. 12.33 (CEST)
thread_title: Återställning