Обсуждение:Юхары баш

message: Интересно, что в 2019 г. ICOMOS не нашёл в Шеки ничего, опрадывающего его включение в список Всемирного наследия. Информация, приведённая ниже, достойна включения в статью. — Ghirla -трёп- 21:55, 11 августа 2019 (UTC)
;Значимость
ICOMOS further considers that Sheki’s architectural and
urban testimony is very homogenous in result of its
construction within a few years following the earlier
destruction in 1772. This implies that compared to older
settlements along the trade routes of the wider region, it
has less capacity to illustrate architectural references to
cultural exchanges than cities which look back at
millennia of trade exchanges along these very trade
routes. ICOMOS considers that it has not been
demonstrated how the interchange of cultural influences
can be seen as outstanding when compared to other cities
along important trade routes in the wider region. // 
ICOMOS considers that it is not demonstrated that the
Sheki khanate produced architectural features or urban
layouts which differ distinctively from other cities in the
region and therefore could act as an outstanding
testimony of khanates as such. ICOMOS further
considers that Sheki’s function as a Caucasus khanate
capital was rather short-lived and ended after merely 18
years.
;Сохранность
The landscape setting affected by a few hotel complexes which have been
developed and remains subject to further urban
development pressures given that Sheki is surrounded by
mountains in three directions and has limited opportunity to
expand. Several hotels were also built within the historical
and architectural reserve without respecting the
surrounding architectural volumes and styles. In addition,
these structures were inserted in key urban historic
neighbourhoods and, at times, interrupt the functional and
visual relations between the historic monuments. In the
same manner, several new residential structures do not
correspond to the surrounding architectural proportions,
materials or designs.
ICOMOS notes that the percentage of historic structures
within the property has been significantly reduced over
time. A small percentage of architectural structures is in a
very vulnerable condition, the majority of which is in a state
of being abandoned or out of appropriate use. These
structures are faced with challenges of decay, which might
further reduce the integrity of the property in the future.
ICOMOS observed that past and ongoing structural and surface repairs and restorations do not
pay respect to authenticity of material, substance or
workmanship and, in several cases, design. These repairs
are carried out with inappropriate materials including
concrete and cement mixtures instead of traditional brick
and adobe materials as well as plaster surfaces. These
measures unfortunately change the visual appearance of
the town’s streetscape, in particular the repairs of the outer
townhouse walls, which are so visually determining the
appearance of Sheki to a visitor. In addition, these repairs
are likely to reduce the traditional earthquake resilience of
the original construction methods. ICOMOS therefore
considers that the Historic Centre of Sheki with the Khan’s
Palace does not demonstrate the qualifying condition of
authenticity as required by the Operational Guidelines.
thread_title:  Суждение ICOMOS