Dyskusja:Anna Leszczyńska (1699–1717)

message: Moja znajomość polskich mała, ale mogę zrozumieć język, zatem piszę w angielskim języku. 
I've just read the following article about some Wikipedia hoaxes, the most famous was Bicholim conflict. See After a half-decade, massive Wikipedia hoax finally exposed
I've been firmly thinking for a long time that this article, Anna Leszczyńska (1699–1717) is also a hoax, a fictional person. 
The life of the "Polish Princess" can be summed as follows, and any other interwiki cannot add more information to her life except the history of that time when she may have lived or life of her famous sister, the French queen or her father's:
Anna Leszczyńska (ur. 25 maja 1699 w Trzebnicy, zm. 20 czerwca 1717 w Gräfinthal w Niemczech) – starsza córka króla Stanisława Leszczyńskiego i Katarzyny Opalińskiej. Siostra królowej Francji Marii Leszczyńskiej. Nosiła imię swojej babki od strony ojca, Anny z Jabłonowskich Leszczyńskiej. Zmarła w młodości na zapalenie płuc.
*Edmund Cieślak, Stanisław Leszczyński, pp. 45-46, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Warsaw 1994.
*Sarah Coffin, Bodo Hofstetter Portrait Miniatures in Enamel : The Gilbert Collection, p. 87, Philip Wilson, London 2000.
*André Rossinot, Emmanuel Haymann, Stanislas, le roi philosophe, p. 93, Michel Lafon, Paris 2004.
*Bożena Krzywobłocka, Wielkopolskie damy (Great Polish Ladied), p. 123, Krajowa Agencja Wydawnicza, Poznan 1986.
* Stanislas Leszczyński
* Geneanet
* Angelika Schneider: Anna Leszczynska - polnische Exil-Prinzessin in Zweibrücken und in der Saargegend,  in: Zeitschrift für die Geschichte der Saargegend. Saarbrücken, Verein. - Bd. 56/57 (2008/2009), S. 131-139 : Ill. ISSN 0513-9058 Saarländische Bibliographie honlap]
The sources given above are not authentic and trustworthy because they are not primary sources, not reviewed writings, their information content is uncontrollable. The Work of Angelika Schneider is unavailable, uncontrollable and (s)he who put it among the sources, did not read.
The interwikis also inform us about nothing, no more information. The first article among interwikis was found on July 2007 without any sources.
A detailed genealogy work in Polish language, Włodzimierz Dworaczek: Genealogia, Warsaw, 1959., which contains the most detailed genealogy of the Polish and Lithuanian nobility among the European royal houses, does know only daughter, only child of the Polish king, who became French queen because this genealogy work contains the illegitimate, still born children and who died young in detail. Even so this book does not know about the alleged older daughter of King Stanislas I.
A biography book about the son-in-law of the Polish king, King Louis XV of France also claims that King Stanislas Leszczyński has only one daughter (In French):
„Le lendemain, le roi déclara: «J'épouse la princesse de Pologne. Cette princesse, qui est née le 23 juin 1703, est fille unique (display setting by me, the editor) de Stanislas Leczinski, comte de Lesno, ci-devant staroste d'Adelnau, puis palatin de Posnanie, et ensuite élu roi de Pologne, en juillet  1704, et de Catherine Opalinska, fille de castellan de Posnanie, [...]»” (English translation: The next day the king said: »I marry the Princess of Poland. This princess, who was born on 23 June 1703, is the only daughter of Stanislas Leszczyński, count of Leszno, former starosta of Odolanów, then voivode of Poznań, king of Poland elected on July 1704, and of Catherine Opalińska, daughter of castellan of Poznań, [...]«) Source: Leroy, Alfred: Louis XV, Éditions Albin Michel, Paris, 1938., p70.)
The text claims unambiguously that the Polish king had one and only one daughter, Marie, who became queen of France.
If the Polish and the French, who know the best about Leszczyński family, claim that the Polish king had one and only one daughter, what are the sources of the existence of the other, older daughter? We cannot know a lot but she died allegedly at the age of 18. Where are the traces, tracks of her life? Where are the primary sources of her life? Nobody has shown primary sources yet.
Or is this article also a hoax like Bicholim conflict mentioned above? We does not need any phantoms or fictonal persons and events. Does Wikipedia need another disgrace?Peadar (dyskusja) 18:53, 6 sty 2013 (CET)
thread_title: Mistyfikacja