Diskusjon:Mona Lisa

message: Hvilken epoke kommer maleriet "Mona Lisa" fra? 
replies: text: Italiensk renessanse. --Finn Bjørklid 5. feb 2012 kl. 21:18 (CET)
thread_title:  Epoke 

message: Hva Dan Brown har sagt om maleriet, er ikke tilstrekkelig for noen kunsthistorisk vurdering av det. Chrisglie 17. nov 2006 kl. 02:34 (CET)
replies: text: Enig, referansen til Dan Brown hører ikke hjemme der; kanskje et eget avsnitt siden det er en viktig referanse i populærkulturen, men mannen klarte ikke engang å angi riktig størrelse på bildene i Louvre, så han er knapt noen autoritet på dette. Det spesielle smilet skyldes først og fremst bruken av sfumato, og en tolkning fra en roman som er tilpasset budskapet i romanen er langt fra en kunsthistorisk analyse. Cnyborg 17. nov 2006 kl. 03:07 (CET)
thread_title:  Dan Brown 

message: Mona Lisa er også navnet på en opera på to akter skrevet av von Schillings og Dovsky fra tidlig 1900-tallet. - --Ariakas 4. des 2007 kl. 16:44 (CET):P
thread_title:  Andre betydninger

message: "Who the Mona Lisa Is 
Leonardo da Vinci was a great scientist as well a great artist. He possessed excellent memory and very lively imagination. His work shows integrity and belief in his self expressions.
As seen in his paintings, the subject of motherhood interested Leonardo. Thus, it can be assumed that he painted his mother. The Mona Lisa seems to be the only woman in his paintings, except the Virgin Mary, that has a motherly expression in her face. 
I am quite sure that the painting's subject is Leonardo's mother Caterina in a distant memory. She died in 1495. Lisa del Giocondo's job was to be the model only.
At the time that Leonardo painted the portrait of his mother, whom he adored, she was not among the living. This is the reason why Leonardo chose the setting of the Holy Land, as he imagined it, as the background to the portrait. (The Jordan River is painted to her right and the Sea of Galilee to her left). (See: Cross and Yarn-Winder).
The idea is that she was alive in Leonardo's imagination.
replies: text: This is similar to the background of Leonardo's paintings of the Virgin Mary, which also depict the same landscape of the Holy Land.

text: Thus, Leonardo glorifies the Mona Lisa as the Virgin Mary. (See: Leonardo glorifies Salai as Saint John the Baptist).
replies: text: :Leonardo kept the portrait with him wherever he traveled, until his death. Hence, the Mona Lisa was a significant woman in Leonardo's life.

text: :Leonardo pictured his mother, who raised him until age five, in painting the Virgin Mary. He made an associative connection between these two women in his art.

text: :So, Leonardo's mother was the only significant woman in Leonardo's life, hence deserved to be glorified as the Virgin Mary.
replies: text: ::In all of his paintings (except Annunciation), the Virgin Mary looks at her son. In this painting she looks at the painter.

text: ::The conclusion is that the painter is her son. (According to the story of her life when she looks at her son she is smiling and crying at the same time).
Therefore, it is possible that Leonardo encoded the letters C and L (Caterina and Leonardo), in his special reverse style, in Mona Lisa's embroidery on her dress.
During Italian Renaissance Leonardo's time, it was not acceptable to paint ordinary people, only important people or saints.
The woman appearing in the portrait known as Isabella d'Este (1499 - 1500) is actually Leonardo's mother Caterina in distant memory. The woman appearing in the portrait looks like the Mona Lisa and not like Isabella d'Este. (See: Titian, Isabella d'Este, 1534 – 1536; They do not have the same forehead and lips). This cartoon which has survived must have been drawn for an important work. (See the cartoon in London, National Gallery). The only possible important work we are aware of is the Mona Lisa. (See also the veil and the upper dress cut, rounded and not in straight lines). Thus, Leonardo glorifies his mother as a respectable woman. 
I reached most of these conclusions during my research about Leonardo's art in 1976. Those highly knowledgeable in the arts understand that this theory is indeed the truth.
Roni Kempler", comment.
Fridayy (diskusjon) 12. des. 2014 kl. 17:02 (CET)

text: As you obviously have no inkling of Norwegian, you are requested to refrain from adding content or otherwise editing this edition of Wikipedia. Asav (diskusjon) 13. des. 2014 kl. 19:42 (CET)
thread_title:  Emne og tittel 

message: Jeg har nettopp endret 6 ekstern(e) lenke(r) i artikkelen Mona Lisa. Sjekk gjerne at endringen min er OK. Hvis du ønsker at jeg skal ignorere disse lenkene eller hele siden, eller hvis du har andre spørsmål, se denne spørsmålssiden. Jeg har gjort følgende endringer:
*La til arkivet https://web.archive.org/web/20110508121954/http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/Englisch/news/monalisa.html til http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/Englisch/news/monalisa.html
*La til arkivet https://web.archive.org/web/20131125184249/http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/06/24/1088046208817.html til http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/06/24/1088046208817.html
*Rettet formatering/bruk for http://telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2004%2F08%2F01%2Fwmona01.xml&sSheet=%2Fnews%2F2004%2F08%2F01%2Fixworld.html
*Rettet formatering/bruk for http://www.time.com/time/2007/crimes/2.html
*La til arkivet https://web.archive.org/web/20090601155641/http://www.monalisamania.com/faq.htm til http://www.monalisamania.com/faq.htm
*La til arkivet https://web.archive.org/web/20101008134129/http://www.ntv.co.jp/english/an/06pr/05/20050406.html til http://www.ntv.co.jp/english/an/06pr/05/20050406.html
Med hilsen—InternetArchiveBot (Rapporter feil) 4. jul. 2017 kl. 11:30 (CEST)
thread_title:  Endret eksterne lenker 

message: Jeg har nettopp endret 5 ekstern(e) lenke(r) i artikkelen Mona Lisa. Sjekk gjerne at endringen min er OK. Hvis du ønsker at jeg skal ignorere disse lenkene eller hele siden, eller hvis du har andre spørsmål, se denne spørsmålssiden. Jeg har gjort følgende endringer:
*Rettet formatering/bruk for http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/Englisch/news/monalisa.html
*Rettet formatering/bruk for http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/06/24/1088046208817.html
*Rettet formatering/bruk for http://www.monalisamania.com/faq.htm
*Rettet formatering/bruk for http://www.ntv.co.jp/english/an/06pr/05/20050406.html
*La til arkivet https://web.archive.org/web/20091028014015/http://www.studiolo.org/Mona/MONA14.htm til http://www.studiolo.org/Mona/MONA14.htm
Med hilsen—InternetArchiveBot (Rapporter feil) 14. jul. 2017 kl. 08:41 (CEST)
thread_title:  Endret eksterne lenker 

message: Jeg har nettopp endret 1 ekstern(e) lenke(r) i artikkelen Mona Lisa. Sjekk gjerne at endringen min er OK. Hvis du ønsker at jeg skal ignorere disse lenkene eller hele siden, eller hvis du har andre spørsmål, se denne spørsmålssiden. Jeg har gjort følgende endringer:
*La til arkivet https://web.archive.org/web/20120310141228/http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Mona+Lisa+could+have+been+completed+a+decade+later+than+thought/26057 til http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Mona+Lisa+could+have+been+completed+a+decade+later+than+thought/26057
Med hilsen—InternetArchiveBot (Rapporter feil) 26. okt. 2017 kl. 23:56 (CEST)
thread_title:  Endret eksterne lenker 

message: Jeg har nettopp endret 2 ekstern(e) lenke(r) i artikkelen Mona Lisa. Sjekk gjerne at endringen min er OK. Hvis du ønsker at jeg skal ignorere disse lenkene eller hele siden, eller hvis du har andre spørsmål, se denne spørsmålssiden. Jeg har gjort følgende endringer:
*La til arkivet https://web.archive.org/web/20100124025825/http://www.kleio.org/en/history/monalisa/ml_fakten.html til http://www.kleio.org/en/history/monalisa/ml_fakten.html
*La til arkivet https://web.archive.org/web/20120609072236/http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Earliest-copy-of-Mona-Lisa-found-in-Prado/25514 til http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Earliest-copy-of-Mona-Lisa-found-in-Prado/25514
Med hilsen—InternetArchiveBot (Rapporter feil) 3. jan. 2022 kl. 03:06 (CET)
thread_title:  Endret eksterne lenker