lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Embassy

message: I propose a vote per eventual ambassador. CdaMVvWgS mustn't have a vote, because he started the embassy. Please sign below if you think that's a good idea. The eventual votings will take place in Wikipedia:Administrators.
End of voting: 03-06-'05

message: # Belgian man 18:16, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC) Seems to be a good idea because ambassador seems to be a serious function.
thread_title:  Ian obwen 

message: #
thread_title:  Ekowong 

message: Hi. Can somebody write an (at least ;] ) short stub about my city (Racibórz) on your Wikipedia? Many thanks for anyone who could do that :) Olos88 06:52, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racibórz
Template talk:User na-0

message: I don't know whether this is a good idea... People will see that you don't speak Nauruan if there are no templates na, na-3, na-2 or na-1 on your user page. If there is tomorrow not a reaction, I place this on the votes for deletion (Wikipedia:Animwen iyababa). Greets, Belgian man 20:02, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Robin, is it possible to make the 2 links in this template, just like on Template:User en-1, for example? Ekamwawir Omo, Belgian man 18:23, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I done it already. Belgian man 18:39, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 links 

message: I changed the color and remove :Category:User na, following the other Wikipedias. Please see :en:Template:User en-0, :de:Template:User de-0, and so on. --Mnd 20:58, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. Greets, Belgian man 13:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Follow the other Wikipedias 

message: Maybe we could renew the templates a little bit. I have a few translations and I strictly follow Kayser's Grammar book.
Amune/ãtune eõ gona edorer Dorerin Naoero.
I glossed the text in order to give a more understandable structure
Amune/ãtune        	(ø)*                      	eõ           	gona	e-dorer      	Dorer-in              	Naoero
this man/woman here	(ø) "he/she" (contracted)*	Neg. Particle	can 	Abs.-speaking	language-3.Ps.Sg.Poss.	Nauru
(*) Contraction appears because the negative particle eõ begins with a vowel which causes the third person singular pronoun e, o, i to disappear.
I think this would be the best way to translate it, don't you think? --Jamovi 22:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideas concerning new translations
Wikipedia talk:Babel

message: Please do not make any User xx-0 templates except Template:User na-0. All other such templates have no function. Belgian man 18:28, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Dorerin Germany > Dorerin Djermani? - Dorerin England > Dorerin Ingerand? - Dorerin France > Dorerin Prant? Dorerin Nederlands > Dorerin Eben Eyong?  - Dorerin Tuvalu > Dorerin Tubaru?
 --Dpc01 02:50, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know, these names are probably better. However, our big problem is the lack of sources... Dorerin Djermani, Dorerin Ingerand etc. are probably better, but they (or some of them) could perfectly be just as incorrect as the other ones. I'll change them (temporarily?). Greetings, Belgian man 14:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dorerin
Category talk:Eb mi imin memak ean

message: In Philip Delaportes dictionary: 
 2462.  world n.      eb mi imin memak ean      Welt f. 
So, eb mi imin memak ean isn't continents but world. Take away the interwiki's or not?Belgian man 13:43, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I dictionary ian Philip Delaporte:
 2462.  world n.      eb mi imin memak ean      Welt f.
Uga, eb mi imin memak ean wono eab continents, eb mi imin memak ean wono world. Interwiki iyababa? Belgian man 13:43, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Eb mi imin memak ean is a good translation, of course :)
However, I've got another translation which I would use: itubwangin emwarere (literally: Part of the earth). 
How is this translation? I think it's relatively simple, only two words, isn't it? --Jamovi 20:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be better! Belgian man 18:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Let's change it... Belgian man 18:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Done. Belgian man 19:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of "continent"
Wikipedia talk:Grammar problems/en/index

message: A word with -it means: his [word] / its [word] / her [word]. 
Example: Aniden = flag; anidenit = his flag ≈ flag of.
THat is ALMOST correct.  The third person singular possessive suffix is -/in/ or -/en/.  The -/it/ is used when the next word begins with /e/ or  /t/ (without trying every combination in Nauruan).  Examples are:
Amin Aiwo - person from Aiwo district
BUT
Amit Ewa - person from Ewa district
Iriangin Naoero - Nauruan songs
BUT 
Iriangit imago - foreign songs
equon ima - ship of the dead
BUT
equot epe - phosphate ship
ewakin ditsin - kitchen
BUT
ewakit earak - hospital
Even more common in some people's orthographies is the seperation of the possessive from the root.  Therefore, some people are writing
ewak it earak, iriang in Naoero and so on.  
A similar rule applies to conjugating verbs that end with -/n/.  But i can explain that later.
----
A lot of words remain the same in the plural. 
Example: itsio (S) (servant) → itsio (P)
Yes, again that is correct.  But the itsio (and i suppose all nouns) is assumed to be emicaly plural.  But saying itsio means nothing.  It doesn't actually mean 'servant' but is the lowest of the classes in Nauruan hierarchy and refers to the people who own no land and are in some way 'indentured' to a higher ranked person.  To speak of 'that itsio' or 'those itsio' one must then state the number of them.  FOr example:
Eiy ngea amin itsio - 'that single man/woman who is itsio'
Amerumane itsio - 'these two itsio here'
Thanks a lot for this information!!! Belgian man 17:53, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''-it'' 

message: Here in Wikipedia "to be" is often translated with won or wono. But Nauruan Grammar says that there is no auxiliary verb "to be". Instead of "to be", one has to use an absolute pronoun (e.g. eiy, urõr, ureiy etc.). This is Form 1 of the personal pronouns in Kayser's grammar book. Kayser explains the use of these forms on page 200, § 78 with following examples:
*Gott eiy monibait imin memak. – God is the ruler of all things. – 3rd Person Singular.
*Eva me Adam urõr adamonit engame. – Adam and Eve were the first people. – 3rd Person Dual.
So I think we should replace the "won" and "wono" always used here in Wikipedia, don't you think? --Jamovi 12:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, hat seems to be a good idea, your information from A. Kayser is very interesting. I presume you don't mind if I copy your information to the Index? Belgian man 12:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :No problem, very good. I only didn't want precipitate something, so I wrote in discussion first. Thank you for adding! :-) --Jamovi 13:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Okay :) Belgian man 14:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auxiliary Verb "to be"
Template talk:User na-1

message: I made a translation for the template:User_na-1! I strictly follow the rules of Kayser's Grammar book.
E tsimine kũrin isitsiet ian Dorerin Naoero ean amune/ãtune.
I glossed the text in order to make the translation more understandable:
E          	tsimine	kũri-n             	itsiet   	ian       	Dorer-in              	Naoero	ean       	amune/ãtune
3.Ps.Sg. it	exist  	basis-3.Ps.Sg Poss.	knowledge	in (Prep.)	language-3.Ps.Sg Poss.	Nauru 	on (Prep.)	this man/woman here
So literally you would translate it as: "There is a basis of knowledge in the Nauruan language on this person."
By the way, in my opinion, the word isitsiet listed in Delaporte's dictionary is wrong. Just see: When you follow the rules of Kayser, you would have the verb tsiet ‘to know’ (which both Delaporte and Kayser use). Now you would transform this verb into a noun by using e- or i- in front of the verb (Kayser, page 13, § 18). You would get the noun itsiet, which we should use here in Wikipedia, too.
Would that template be useful? Comments are welcome! --Jamovi 23:41, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New translations for the templates
Template talk:User na-2

message: And like the others templates I made a translation for Template:User_na-2. I strictly follow Kayser's Grammar rules. I think we should use mo ‘good’ as the adjective describing the knowledge of Nauruan in template:User_na-2, because we already have: na-0 = no knowledge; na-1 = basic knowledge; na-2 = good knowledge; na-3 = very good knowledge; na-N = native speaker. 
Here is the translation:
O mo an tsiet amune/ãtune ian Dorerin Naoero.
In order to make the translation more understandable, I glossed the text:
O           	mo  	an                	(ø)-tsiet*    	amune/ãtune   	ian	Dorer-in              	Naoero
3.Ps.Sg.: it	good	Poss.Pron. his/her	Rel.-knowledge	this man/woman	in 	language-3.Ps.Sg.Poss.	Nauru
(*) itsiet  ‘knowledge’ has to be in the relative form tsiet because of the possessive pronoun an → cf. "Nauru Grammar", p. 20.
So literally you would translate it as: "This man's/woman's knowledge in the Nauruan language is good." You can compare this translation with an example of Kayser's Grammar book, page 11:
Ekãow (no, nothing) aũra (their pl.) kamarar (thinking) mũñana (these) imin (things) o gokoro (living). → litt.: "There isn't the thinking of things which live.
"The animal has no intelligence".
By the way, in my opinion, the word isitsiet listed in Delaporte's dictionary is wrong. Just see: When you follow the rules of Kayser, you would have the verb tsiet ‘to know’ (which both Delaporte and Kayser use). Now you would transform this verb into a noun by using e- or i- in front of the verb (Kayser, page 13, § 18). You would get the noun itsiet, which we should use here in Wikipedia, too.--Jamovi 13:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New translations for the templates
Template talk:User na-3

message: And like the others templates I made a translation for Template:User_na-3. I strictly follow Kayser's Grammar rules. I think we should use modañidañ ‘very good’ as the adjective describing the knowledge of Nauruan in template:User_na-3, because we already have: na-0 = no knowledge; na-1 = basic knowledge; na-2 = good knowledge; na-3 = very good knowledge; na-N = native speaker. 
Here is the translation:
O modañidañ an tsiet amune/ãtune ian Dorerin Naoero.
In order to make the translation more understandable, I glossed the text:
O           	mo-dañidañ	an                	(ø)-tsiet*    	amune/ãtune   	ian	Dorer-in              	Naoero
3.Ps.Sg.: it	good-very 	Poss.Pron. his/her	Rel.-knowledge	this man/woman	in 	language-3.Ps.Sg.Poss.	Nauru
(*) itsiet  ‘knowledge’ has to be in the relative form tsiet because of the possessive pronoun an → cf. "Nauru Grammar", p. 20.
So literally you would translate it as: "This man's/woman's knowledge in the Nauruan language is very good." You can compare this translation with an example of Kayser's Grammar book, page 11:
Ekãow (no, nothing) aũra (their pl.) kamarar (thinking) mũñana (these) imin (things) o gokoro (living). → litt.: "There isn't the thinking of things which live.
"The animal has no intelligence".
By the way, in my opinion, the word isitsiet listed in Delaporte's dictionary is wrong. Just see: When you follow the rules of Kayser, you would have the verb tsiet ‘to know’ (which both Delaporte and Kayser use). Now you would transform this verb into a noun by using e- or i- in front of the verb (Kayser, page 13, § 18). You would get the noun itsiet, which we should use here in Wikipedia, too.--Jamovi 14:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New translations for the templates
MediaWiki talk:Pageinfo-footer

message: Hello! Since a few weeks ago, a "" link has been added to your "" in the sidebar, giving information and statistics on the pages (background). You may want to modify this message to add content to the end of the information page, see Meta:MediaWiki:Pageinfo-footer which has some tools previously on MediaWiki:Histlegend. I hope this helps, Nemo 09:32, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
</div>
thread_title:  {{int:pageinfo-toolboxlink}}
MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice

message: Hello, good news! Thanks to FreedomFighterSparrow and Brion, unregistered users can now hide the sitenotice again. Previously, they were forced to see it continuously.
In all cases, please use the sitenotice with care, and keep in mind that occasional visitors see sitenotices on all their visits, if they visit less than once a month or they don't click "dismiss" and save a cookie. Nemo 15:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{int:sitenotice_close}}