Diskusija:Belgorodas brīvprātīgie

message: No manas diskusiju lapas.
=== Deletion of Belgorodas brīvprātīgie ===
Good evening, and pardon me for writing in English, as I don't know any Latvian.
The page about Belgorod volunteers in Chechnya has no sources besides a sites.google page of no importance or verifiability (anyone can create a website there and write whatever they want; no further sources cited in the linked page). Other than that, I can't find any other page to even mention the said volunteers.
Hence, I believe that the page should be deleted. MonX94 (diskusija) 2023. gada 20. oktobris, plkst. 18.26 (EEST)
replies: text: Good evening! I am quite ready to agree that the topic of the article is fake or, at best, unverifiable information. And unless the author finds a better source, the article should be removed, even by our very tolerant standards. But this does not mean that someone who does not have any reputation in the Latvian Wikipedia has the right to place deletion marks in articles. Such things are discussed in discussions to articles before the start of action, and not after.

text: I will copy this text where it belongs - in the discussion page of the article. -- Egilus (diskusija) 2023. gada 20. oktobris, plkst. 23.56 (EEST)
replies: text: :Thanks! And sorry for inconvenience. MonX94 (diskusija) 2023. gada 21. oktobris, plkst. 06.45 (EEST)
Īsumā tulkojums - svešinieks saka, ka lapai nav nekādu avotu, izņemot īsu tekstu bezmaksas personīgā saitā, un viss izskatās pēc feika, tāpēc jādzēš. Es atbildēju, ka pilnīgi var tā būt, bet ne jau katrs kas pagadās te bez diskusijas liks dzēšanas veidnes. , vai šim tekstam ir kāds nopietnāks avots? -- Egilus (diskusija) 2023. gada 21. oktobris, plkst. 00.03 (EEST)
thread_title:  Feiks? 

message: Good evening, and pardon me for writing in English, as I don't know any Latvian.
The page about Belgorod volunteers in Chechnya has no sources besides a sites.google page of no importance or verifiability (anyone can create a website there and write whatever they want; no further sources cited in the linked page). Other than that, I can't find any other page to even mention the said volunteers.
Hence, I believe that the page should be deleted. MonX94 (diskusija) 2023. gada 20. oktobris, plkst. 18.26 (EEST)
replies: text: Good evening! I am quite ready to agree that the topic of the article is fake or, at best, unverifiable information. And unless the author finds a better source, the article should be removed, even by our very tolerant standards. But this does not mean that someone who does not have any reputation in the Latvian Wikipedia has the right to place deletion marks in articles. Such things are discussed in discussions to articles before the start of action, and not after.

text: I will copy this text where it belongs - in the discussion page of the article. -- Egilus (diskusija) 2023. gada 20. oktobris, plkst. 23.56 (EEST)
replies: text: :Thanks! And sorry for inconvenience. MonX94 (diskusija) 2023. gada 21. oktobris, plkst. 06.45 (EEST)
Īsumā tulkojums - svešinieks saka, ka lapai nav nekādu avotu, izņemot īsu tekstu bezmaksas personīgā saitā, un viss izskatās pēc feika, tāpēc jādzēš. Es atbildēju, ka pilnīgi var tā būt, bet ne jau katrs kas pagadās te bez diskusijas liks dzēšanas veidnes. , vai šim tekstam ir kāds nopietnāks avots? -- Egilus (diskusija) 2023. gada 21. oktobris, plkst. 00.03 (EEST)
thread_title:  Deletion of [[Belgorodas brīvprātīgie]]