lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Inscriptio Duenos

message: What is the construction of Inscriptio Duenos? Surely it needs to be Inscriptio Dueni, Inscriptio Duenana, or some other variation. --Iustinus 02:59, 22 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I hear it as an indeclinable modifier: I'd have written it as Inscriptio "Duenos," except that I wanted to help the wiki-linking bots find it and worried that the quotation marks would thwart them. I'm open to suggestions (as anybody posting new texts should be). Maybe a comparison of various other such objects will be useful. Here are several, as they're usually called in English: the Castor and Pollux dedication, the Garigiliano bowl, The Forum Romanum cippus, the Lapis Satricanus, the Senatus Consultum de Bacchanalibus, the Carmen Arvale, the Puteolan funerary tablets—and most famously, the Praenestine fibula (or brooch), apparently a fake. Btw, I'm not sure what to call the actual object; calix could be quite wrong: to modern eyes, it could look like a candleholder for three candles. IacobusAmor 03:11, 22 Decembris 2006 (UTC)

message: Greetings. Maybe this is known or maybe not, but just in case so you know, and it's not always we notice stuff: the adjective duenos, probably meaning "good", later probably changed to duonus (which can be seen in the Carmen Saliare), seem to be duo and unus, that will say duo in uno, "two in one": duenus/duonus, and two in one is good. And after hand it changed to bonus. Donatello (disputatio) 16:16, 20 Octobris 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: Yes, bonus certainly comes from  duonos / duenos. But what is your source for 'duo in uno'? I can't help thinking that this is just another case of folk-etymology. It has been notably difficult to find Indo-European cognates for duenos, and such a situation tends to foster unbridled figments of imagination. Though we don't know exactly the prehistory of duenos / duonos, any decent etymological explanation is bound to take into account not only bonus but also bene, bellus,  and beare, beatus. Etymologies that I'm aware of analyse duenos as du-eno-s, but the initial du- has nothing to do with the numeral duo. Rather, *du- somehow relates to the Indo-European verbal root denoting 'giving'. Duenos is usually related to Sanskrit dúvaḥ 'offering, tribute', though the details are not very clear. A good starter is A.Walde & J.B.Hoffmann's Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (Heidelberg, 1938, p. 111). Neander (disputatio) 20:27, 21 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Duenos''/''duonus''
Disputatio:Cartibulum visificum lusorium

message: Ludi... consolus...? Um... sorry to be so unconstructive, but WTF?? --Iustinus 05:18, 23 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Iustine, vide paginam meam, sub voce "Consolus, ludi consolus." IacobusAmor 13:19, 23 Decembris 2006 (UTC)

text: The current picture seems to illustrate the old-fashioned sense of the word, not the sense discussed in the article. IacobusAmor 15:15, 23 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :... now I found more pictures on Commons. I've added the link. Feel free to change the picture. --Rolandus 08:37, 24 Decembris 2006 (UTC)

message: * Consolus masculini generis nulla ratione niti videtur. 
* Angl. console est vocabulum a voce Francogallica console mutuatum, quae primo sustentaculum in pariete fixum significabat, quo quaevis proiectura aedificii fulcitur. Huiusmodi fulturae Latine vocantur ancones. Praeterea Fcg. console etiam mensulam ornatam contra parietem ad vasa aliaque decora fulcienda positam significat (Latine ferme cartibulum). 
* Fcg. console feminini est generis, eademque vox eodem genere mutuata et Catalane et Hispanice consola audit. Quodsi hanc requirimus vocem, qua gubernandi mensulam aliamve machinulam gubernandi consilio factam designemus, consola expeditissime se praebere videtur. 
* Quodsi autem antiquissima voce uti volumus, quin etiam cartibulum usu recipiamus? --Neander 23:05, 29 Martii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Optime Neander. Mihi, cartibulum uti oportet nobis. Gratias tibi ago.--Jondel (disputatio) 08:32, 20 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Traupman (2007): monitor = 'monitorium'. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 10:07, 20 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)
While computer monitor and computer console are nearly identical, a console is more of an appliance like furniture. A monitor is more like a 24 hour 'guarding' device like heart rate or ECG monitor in a hospital. Thanks however for looking this up , this save me time for future related articles. --Jondel (disputatio) 15:42, 20 Ianuarii 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentarii de consola
Disputatio:Radulphus Castro

message: Figura Latina solita nominis quod est Raúl est Radulphus. --Iustinus 06:39, 23 Decembris 2006 (UTC)

message: Vide Disputatio:Hugo Chávez. IacobusAmor 18:13, 30 Octobris 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalizatio
Disputatio:Horstus Kasner

message: What is correct? --Rolandus 11:11, 25 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Vide etiam Disputatio:Horatius Koehler. --UV 16:39, 25 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Horstus]] vs [[Horstius]]
Disputatio:Pater Natalis

message: Or maybe res nataliciae?--Ioshus (disp) 16:37, 25 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess :Categoria:Nativitas is fine. Should we move the stuff from …sollemnia… over to this category or is there a reason to keep both? --UV 16:48, 25 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Well, you know my opinion...all that solemnia nonsense is a bit overdramatic for an encyclopedia. It's christmas, not the solemn birth of our lord and saviour in whose footsepts we must follow... yknow? I would say that :Categoria:Nativitas is pretty sufficient.--Ioshus (disp) 17:01, 25 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Well I'm not sure what you mean because as the saying goes "Jesus is the reason for the season". Christmas is the celebration of Jesus' birth. Alexanderr 01:08, 26 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Let's not get into it, please. Christmas is the christian pillage of myriad pagan holidays. Christ's birth was/is a convenient excuse to have a party during the same time of year as everyone else. Can we please just leave it as nativitas, and not bring in anything else?--Ioshus (disp) 07:49, 26 Decembris 2006 (UTC)

message: This article is trying to be about the (originally American) concept of "Santa Claus," but the names given as lemmata—Pater Natalis, Pater Natalicius, pappus natali—appear, superficially at least, to be more pertinent to "Father Christmas," an altogether different concept & article. Perhaps the lemma Sanctus Claus would be apter here. After all, we have a published attestation! (See the translation of "Santa Claus Is Coming to Town" on the second page, i.e., "Pagina Prima.") Or "Sanctus Claus" could be the principal lemma and the others could remain as alternatives. No matter what the lemma, this article should retain its link to "Santa Claus," because that's the certified item on the 10,000-word list at Meta. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 10:25, 8 Octobris 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma
Disputatio:Influentia Hispanica

message: Qui vocat "spanish" in latina non scio, sed hispanius-a-um credo.

message: Commentarius sic incipit: "Morbus Hispanicus fuit influentia letalis. . . ." Puto titulum et definitionem accuratius esse: "Influentia Hispanica fuit morbus letalis. . . ." IacobusAmor 12:11, 6 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte dicis, ut credo. Morbus Hispanicus nomen fuit syphilidos (vide hic). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:26, 6 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Titulus et lemma
Disputatio:Ursus mons

message: Well, we have a source on this, but what the heck is a cunus? [Insert obvious comments here] --Iustinus 00:47, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The source cited is misspelled (it has "Cunus Aureaus"), and it looks like it's really Cuneus Aureus (Google concurs, showing 'Cuneus Aureus' in Orbis Latinus and the Classical Gazetteer).  —Myces Tiberinus 02:45, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :That makes a hell of a lot more sense. --Iustinus 03:07, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)

text: Ita sit, sed Googles ope valde plures (32) "cunus aureus" habet quam "cuneus aurus" (solummodo 9). --Alex1011 03:46, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :To some, Cunus Aureus comes close to sounding obscene. A pass might well have looked like a wedge (cuneus), so I'd go with that—assuming, of course, that Canis aureus isn't the intended phrase. IacobusAmor 05:04, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Furthermore, Orbis Latinus and Classical Gazetteer are both reliable sources. I suppose if Alex is unconvinced by online versions, I could check the print versions I have at home, when my vacation ends. --Iustinus 15:26, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)

text: I assume this: . Conus (κῶνος) = cone, Kegel. Would make sense, a cone-like mountain. --Alex1011 12:12, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :I found 2060 "conus aureus" but always a flower. --Alex1011 12:15, 29 Decembris 2006 (UTC)

message: "Cunus aureus" is really taken from a Latin source, the tabula Peutingeriana, and it definitely refers to this route (not to the Julier Pass) as anyone will see who looks at the tabula, but that's only one source, containing many misspellings, and the name was not known to later Latin authors. Maybe it should be "Cuneus aureus", which could well be a name for the peak that you see from the pass, but that's just guesswork. It might be better to fix on "Ursus mons", which is found in early modern Latin and had an Italian equivalent.
There is a widely held belief on tourist websites and on other Wikipedias that by adding "via ..." to anything you can make the Latin name of a road. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:46, 2 Novembris 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Voldemort

message: Voldemort est adversarius Harrio Pottero in libris eiusdem nominis. 'Voldemort is Harry Potter's antagonist in the books of the same name'.—This is bad expository writing in any language. There are no books named Voldemort. And there are no books named Harry Potter. Elsewhere, we've seen a similar ambiguity in articles that say that X is a city on the river Y and the capital of the province of the same name. Well, what's the name of the province? X or Y? General rule: avoid this of-the-same-name business. IacobusAmor 14:45, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous prose

message: Dux Voldemort Anglice = 'General Voldemort'? Dominus Voldemort = 'Lord Voldemort'? IacobusAmor 14:16, 5 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ut iam pagina dixit, titulus ex anagrammate nominis derivata est.  E "Tom Marvolo Riddle" Anglice derivatur Lord, et e "Tom Musvox Ruddle" Latine derivatur dux.  Titulus nec sollemniter datus est nec indicat officium; haud necesse est reddere ad litteram.  Etiam, redditor passim adhibetur nomen 'Dominus' ad titulum Anglicum Mr. reddendum.  Nolumus Mr. Voldemort tantum habere :) —Mucius Tever 17:02, 11 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dux ~ Dominus
Disputatio:Budapestinum

message: Actually there is a very common Latin form of the modern name, to whit Budapestinum. --Iustinus 17:12, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Et Aquincum modernum est nomen regii Budapestini. Probabiliter nomen Budapestinum sit melior quidem. – cerasusvoca! 12:24, 19 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Aquincum corresponds to Óbuda not Budapest.
replies: text: ::Then what's needed is an article about Budapest and an article about Aquincum/Óbuda. Till we have both, the interwiki change is not helpful, so I have reverted it. For the present, this is our article about Budapest. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:04, 11 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Then the name of the article should be changed to Budapestinum, since there are a few wikis with the article Aquincum and the robots might make a mess in the interwikis. -- [Anon]
replies: text: ::::I agree. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:22, 13 Augusti 2007 (UTC)

message: Can someone please create the pages for the other two sites in the list? Kapeter77 (disputatio) 12:32, 28 Novembris 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New pages
Disputatio:Index Regum Britanniae Britanniarumque

message: What is the source for the titles of monarchs in the last paragraph? They differ from the titles found on coins, for example. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:36, 30 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now found :en:Style of the British Sovereign, which seems generally to agree with the Latin titles found on coins, so I will edit the article to match these. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:58, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles of monarchs
Disputatio:Ioannes Volfgangus Goethius

message: Shouldn't it be Ioannes Wolfgangus Goethe? --Rolandus 00:24, 31 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, unless his name is printed in latin differently, somewhere...--Ioshus (disp) 00:39, 31 Decembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yeah, I made this page. Joannes Wolfgang Goethe in Google books (26 hits) vs. so far 0 hits for it with Wolfgangus.  —Myces Tiberinus 00:14, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Where the hell does Guolphgangus come from? Please fix this. Pantocrator 10:02, 19 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Fixed, according to the attested form--Xaverius 10:14, 19 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::I think the disputatio needs to be moved to follow. Pantocrator 10:36, 19 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::Certe! iam feci!--Xaverius 10:45, 19 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

message: I guess somebody somewhere must have argued this, but until reliable evidence is in the article I felt :Categoria:Iudaei was better removed ... was I wrong? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:28, 1 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't like the cat anyway, not that i'm jewish, just the sound of it, Hendricus 12:31, 1 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :He isn't catalogued as Jewish in Wikipedia. IacobusAmor 18:26, 26 Februarii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iudaeus? 

message: Nonne praestat hanc paginam moveri ad 'Ioannes Volfgangus Goethe' secundum usum vicipedianum de nominibus familiarum? - Bavarese (disputatio) 21:54, 19 Maii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Lege hic. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 23:56, 19 Maii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: :Gratias tibi! Sed dixi de consuetudine vicipediana. (Translationes Goethe ad Goethius vel Γόεθιος mihi in studiis litterarum classicarum versiones Latinas vel Graecas corrigenti haud ignotae sunt.) - Bavarese (disputatio) 15:30, 20 Maii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Goethius?
Disputatio:Stadium Olympicum Atheniense

message: What the hell is going on here?--Ioshus (disp) 18:24, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: She has been blocked and her changes have been reverted. --Rolandus 18:39, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)

message: Hmm.
replies: text: = Olympic Athena's Stadium.

text: = Athena's Stadium of Mount Olympus.
Maybe it's trying to say:

text: Stadium Olympi(c~ac)um Athenis 'The Olympic Stadium at Athens'.

text: Stadium Olympi(c~ac)um Athenaeum 'The Athenian Olympic Stadium'.
The goddess is Athena, -ae ; the city is Athenae, -arum. IacobusAmor 22:40, 17 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Titulus rei: "Stadium Olympiae Athenae"
Disputatio:Genus (grammatica Latina)

message: Delendum est "quia a matrona regitur"

message: Mea sententia, hoc diagraphema delendum est sexu non regenti genus (confer theodiscam vocem Weib generis neutri et significationis femina)
Acsacal (disputatio) 14:52, 5 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ut commentarii cum paginis congruant, novam paginam disputationis creavi, Disputatio:Genus (grammatica), ubi respondi. Lesgles (disputatio) 15:22, 25 Martii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagraphema generum
Disputatio:Latinitas viva

message: For me it looks good, but since there have been some reverts ... what is http ://www.langmaker.com/db/Modern_Latin ? --Rolandus 07:05, 3 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An artificial language based on neo-Latin, apparently.  —Myces Tiberinus 23:50, 3 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: : In my view, this weblink does not belong on this page. I agree with Roland that it would be possible to create a separate article on this particular artifical language. Greetings, --UV 23:59, 3 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam or not?

message: Salvēte! (obiter dictum - cūr hīc nōn Latīnē "dispūtātur"? Adhūc Anglica tantum invēnī.)
Hodiē (Sa 02 Apr 2011 14:09:57 CEST) illum dē colloquiō nexum secūtus locī cultōrem sēdēs reālīs mūtāvisse invēnī. Scrīpsit enim sē prīmum Berolīnum, deinde autem in Francōniam migrāsse(in pāginā "Quid haec sibi velint, si quis quaeret ..." īnscrīptā). Praetereā titulus locī nunc est "Colloquium Latinum Latein sprechen in Erlangen / Nürnberg / Fürth" nec "in Berlin". Quā rē nexum abhinc ūnā ferē hōrā ante mūtāvī (nōmina urbium ex "ORBe LATINo in linea", ēditiōne digitālī librī annō 1909ō ēditī  exēmī: http://www.columbia.edu/acis/ets/Graesse/contents.html)
Forsan alius index nōminum urbium in rēte vel alibī inveniētur. Grātiās prō recēnsiōnibus vestrīs futūrīs.
141.13.170.175 13:57, 2 Aprilis 2011 (UTC)ŪnusĒLatīnīsNovīs
thread_title:  "Nexus externi" <- prīmum nexum mūtāvī ("Berolinense" in "Franconiae Mediae borealis (habetur Erlangae, Norimbergae, Furdae - olim habebatur Berolini)" ) 

message: *Circulus Latinus Seattlensis --Alex1011 (disputatio) 20:35, 11 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  non valet 

message: Submovete quaeso lineam inferam ex nexibus externis de Lingua Latina Aeterna. Hic est jocus stultus.
Georgius Semenovus, LLA situs administrator. latinum@linguaeterna.com 37.203.6.20 16:54, 3 Octobris 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Gratias ago. Removi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:17, 4 Octobris 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submovete quaeso
Disputatio:Boto radiophoni

message: Whether or not Optare is the right word I didn't know how to declineconjugate (?) it in this case. It is meant to be in the "be -ed" form. Can someone help me? Alexanderr 17:40, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant "can be -ed" as in "can be selected". Alexanderr 18:43, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ok...radioboto... En says this is sometime called "radial button" so I suggest going with "boto radialis". Seligere a better word than optare. Passive mood = "be ed". I do not understand either the first or last sentence of this article.--Ioshus (disp) 19:05, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::The first sentence is supposed to say the radio button is a standard element of graphical user inferface software and last sentence [It is] Similar to the buttons of the musical apparatus the radio: one [button] is pressed, and therefore/thus/as a result the other pops up. Alexanderr 19:17, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)

text: ::Like the boom box buttons? ;-) Also pressed down would be a better. Alexanderr 19:21, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::"one [button] is pressed, and therefore/thus/as a result"—"Button" est fibula vel globulus. "Press down" est deprimo. Fortasse ergo: Uno globulo depresso, alter. . . ." IacobusAmor 19:45, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Button can be "boto", Iacobe, and for sake of cognativity, I don't think it would be hideously egregious. Deprimere you're right is probably better than imprimere.--Ioshus (disp) 20:23, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::Is it boto, -nis then? I was just reporting what the dictionary says. Webster says English button comes from various forms, including old French boter 'to thrust', and it's related to English butt. IacobusAmor 20:46, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::::That's a nice little fact. Anyways what should I put after alter? Alexanderr 20:47, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
Says Whitaker:
 boto                 N      3 1 NOM S M                 
 boto                 N      3 1 VOC S M                 
 boto, botonis  N  M   [GXXEK]    NeoLatin  uncommon
 button;
--Ioshus (disp) 20:54, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optare
Disputatio:Adoratio Eucharistica

message: I'm trying to translate the sentence Während der Aussetzung darf nicht im gleichen Kirchenraum die Heilige Messe gefeiert werden, sie muss als eigenständige Form der Eucharistieverehrung beachtet werden. and I've finished most of it, however I am having a few problems. I'll show my work, and then point out my problems.
replies: text: Super adorationem ne celebretur Missa in eadem Ecclesia. Tantum una formula adorationis eucharisticae permittitur...
Now, the problems I'm encountering are how to say during (I used Super because that is what Whitaker recomended), same (I used eadem because I was unsure what the ablative form is), and "same time" after permittitur. Alexanderr 23:41, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)

message: Care usor ignote numero 201.2.236.153, re: "Adoratio Eucharistica prohibetur in anglicana secta."—Immo, permittitur, sicut in secta Romana. ¶ Vide quod Ecclesia Anglicana Americana ipsa (The Episcopal Church) dicit: "A service of devotion to the Blessed Sacrament. In this service a large Host is placed in the luna of a monstrance on the altar so that the Host is visible to the congregation. The Host is censed while it is in the monstrance and used to bless the congregation by making the sign of the cross over the people. This service includes prayers and one or more hymns that emphasize the Incarnation and Christ's real presence in the sacrament of the eucharist. The Host is returned to the tabernacle at the end of the service. The BCP makes no provision for Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament, but it may be seen in parishes with an Anglo-catholic piety" (http://www.ecusa.anglican.org/19625_13827_ENG_HTM.htm). Haec igitur explicatio (quam mutasti) subtiliter est accuratus: "Adoratio Eucharistica est formula orationis liturgicae in ecclesiis Catholica et Anglicana, in qua sacramentum sacrum eucharistia exponitur et a fidelibus adoratur. Cum expositio et adoratio sunt constantes (i.e., per viginti quattuor horas per diem), perpetua adoratio appellatur. In paroeciis, id solet fieri a fidelibus voluntariis; in monasteriis et conventibus, a monachis vel sororibus." Hanc adorationem saepenumero vidi apud hoc monasterium Anglicanum Cantabrigiae: http://www.ssje.org/. ¶ Praeterea, noster commentarius accuratissime commentarium apud :en:Eucharistic adoration Latine, verbum pro verbo, reddierat: "Eucharistic adoration is a practice in the Roman Catholic and in Anglican Churches, in which the Blessed Sacrament is exposed to and adored by the faithful. When this exposure and adoration is constant (that is, twenty-four hours a day), it is called perpetual adoration. In a parish, this is usually done by volunteer parishioners; in a monastery or convent, it is done by the resident monks or nuns." ¶ Ergo, mutationes tuae revertenda sunt ut verba priora restituantur. IacobusAmor 18:51, 18 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Adoratio Eucharistica prohibetur in anglicana secta"
Disputatio:Europa Latina

message: Lest anyone distrust Petrus... "loca" is plural of "locum", which, in plural, means "places which relate to each other". This is not to be confused with the plural of "locus", "loci"... =] --Ioshus (disp) 04:57, 6 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While the nominative locum is attested at least once, the usual singular for loca is actually the same as for loci, namely locus. Of course "places in connection with one another" has no meaningful singular anyway. --Iustinus 07:49, 6 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Apud Stowasser inveni: súnt plerúmque locí ín scriptís, loca súnt regiónes. --Alex1011 16:43, 6 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)

message: Addidi formulam fontes desiderati quia nomen Romania (ut apud :de:Romania) cognosco e linguisticam Romanicam; nomen Europa Latina in linguam Latinam numquam vidi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:31, 21 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sine fonte sum, quamquam et francogallice et romanice et lusitanice nomen hodiernum ut "Europa Latina" vel similis dicitur. Sinister Petrus 20:36, 26 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fontes
Disputatio:Carolus Magnus

message: I inserted a probably-contemporary image of Charlemagne and took this one out: it's a modern fantasy picture and doesn't tell us anything about the way he looked. Does anyone object? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:01, 6 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The one you took out looks creepy.--Ioshus (disp) 16:09, 6 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :It could be any old king. Good riddance! IacobusAmor 17:48, 6 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Imagines