lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Gihad

message: Quomodo enuntiatur "ǧihād"? Secundum en:, vocabulum litteris IPA [ʤi'haːd] enuntiatur, quod fortasse congruit cum Latinum zihād [zihaːd], non gihād [gihaːd]. IacobusAmor 22:16, 23 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lingua Arabica enuntiatur sicut littera J in nomine Anglico Jacob, consonans Latino sermoni alienus. Translitteratur secundum regulam Vicipaedianam nostram, i.e. ad normam ISO Societatisque Germanicae Orientalis (DMG), qua adhibita Ǧihad scribitur, fastigiis autem abiectis, ut exsistat illud Gihad. Quod quomodo Latine enuntiemus (/gi'ha:d/ sicut et linguae Arabicae Aegyptiaca dialectus, vel /dʒi'ha:d/), nescio idque ab omni sollicitudine securus, quia egomet nusquam viva voce Latine loquor. Hoc mihi cordi est, ut regulam in transcribendo sequar stabilem, ne unusquisque suo stomacho satisfaciat diversa translitteratione linguae Latinae diversis modis adaptata. At censes hanc regulam esse omnino mutandam?--Ceylon 22:39, 23 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ah, egomet aemulor veteres, qui enuntiaverunt <g> quasi [g]; ergo <ga>, <ge>, <gi>, <go>, <gu> a nobis enuntianda sunt [ga], [ge], [gi], [go], [gu], non—sicut solent religiosi hodierni, praecipue in Civitate Vaticana—[ga], [ʤe], [ʤi], [go], [gu]. Nihilominus, vocabulum Abrabicum al-jabr nobis dedit vocabulum Latinum algebra, quod recte nos oportet enuntiare ['algebra], non ['alʤebra]; ergo Latina littera <g> pro Arabico sono [ʤ] bene attestata est, quamquam de saeculo recentiore. Fortasse melius fuerint litterae <aldiebra> vel <aldyebra>, quod paene enuntiantur ['alʤebra]! IacobusAmor 23:35, 23 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
Cur non Iihad??
thread_title: ǧihād
Disputatio:Fratres Wright

message: Wilburgus doesn't google, so I removed it. Aurivillius does google, but apparently as an early-modern surname, not as a first name. Any evidence for "Aurivillius Wright"? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:00, 24 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Roga Mycēn, qui nomina scripsit! IacobusAmor 22:19, 24 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :"Wilburus" googles. --Alex1011 22:20, 24 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::OK, about 30 hits, but if you look at them they aren't too convincing.

text: ::"Wilburus Wright" gets one hit. That site looks as if someone in Poland is saving the deleted pages and images from Wikipedia. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:39, 24 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Hmm, I was sure 'Wilburgus' existed when I posted it.  (The etymology appears to be right, anyway; the -bur is supposed to be the same as burg 'fortress'.)  But I'm only finding the female name 'Wilburgis' now.   As for 'Aurivillius'—apparently the name probably was in origin a surname, like Franklin.  —Mucius Tever 02:07, 25 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Praenomina
Disputatio:Taifum

message: According to Vicipaedia:De nominibus propriis#Nomina geographica rule 4 this should be Taifensis Urbs (as working back from Taifensis the name could also be Taif -a, -ae -us, -i, -e, -os). But I wrote that rule and maybe the Adj. + Urbs, Oppidum, Vicus stuff is not in Latin use? I can't think of another non-assumptive way it could be done. Harrissimo 22:11, 26 Aprilis 2008 (UTC).
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Victorius Emmanuel II (rex Italiae)

message: Cur Victorius, non Victor? Attestatum Victorius? IacobusAmor 16:46, 27 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Responsum habeo, sed quaestionem aliam pono. In nummis Sardinianis inscriptio videmus "VICTORIVS EMMANVEL II D G REX SARD CYP ET HIER". Igitur debemus fortasse scribere Victorius Emmanuel II (rex Italiae) cum duos mm. An habemus etiam fontem pro Emanuel? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:03, 29 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Hi nummi dicunt eum esse regem Sardinianum, non regem Italianum. Nostri interest? vel non? IacobusAmor 13:14, 29 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Hic de nomine disserimus. Historiam eius in pagina vides; fuit primo rex Sardiniae, ultimo rex Italiae. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:22, 29 Maii 2008 (UTC)

text: :oopps habemus etiam Emanuel vide imaginem Caroli Emanuelis I Sabaudiae--Massimo Macconi 14:56, 29 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Well, sorry, Massimo! I did wonder whether there might be a source for that spelling as well. But no one can object to Emmanuel (I think). So no harm done. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:20, 29 Maii 2008 (UTC)

text: Romae sum. Imaginem ergo capiam. --Ioscius (disp) 23:19, 15 Iunii 2008 (UTC)

text: Benitus_Mussolini#Inscriptio_Fontis_Monumentalis_Brundisiani. --Ioscius (disp) 08:12, 18 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Andreas Ševčenko

message: Vocabulum Latinum Scevcenco enunciatur [skevkenko], sed credo in vocabulo Ucrainico Шевченко Latinum vocabulum Sevsenko vel Sevsenco inesse. IacobusAmor 18:45, 28 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The transliteration remains weird. Where do the [k]'s come from? Why do you want us to pronounce Шевченко as [skevskenko]? IacobusAmor 16:35, 6 Maii 2008 (UTC)
Possibile, nomen "Шевченко" (Ševčenko) translitterandum est sicut "Sevcenko" (i.e. translitteratio secundum ISO sine signis diacriticis) vel "Sevtsenko"/"Sevtsenco", sed certe non sicut "Scevcenko"/"Scevcenco". "Sc" potest esse translitteratio secundum ISO:1968 pro littera "щ" (Anglice sicut "sch" vel "shch" translitteratur) - "šč" sine signis diacriticis. -- Alexander Gerascenco 11:53, 7 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Petrosomatoglypha

message: Amice Neander, cur est sculpere vocabulo scalpere melius? Vox scalpere Anglice significat 'carve, scrape, scratch'. ¶ Mutasti ritubus ad ritibus, sed ritubus attestatur; e.g., http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:ZiGnsmoIkooJ:www.lutheranlegacy.org/booktoc.asp%3FBookID%3D21%26VolNo%3D1+ritubus&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us&ie=UTF-8, et in libro De Antiquis Ecclesiae Ritubus a Martene scripto, etc. ¶ Gratias pro habetur → habentur! IacobusAmor 00:44, 29 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Scalpo" > "sculpo" mutationem feci, quod postea in textu verbo "insculpta" uteris. Mihi ignosce, si insolenter egi. ¶ At cur "ritibus" forma a Tullio nostro adhibita non apta tibi videtur? Auctor recentior cuius nexum appellas in Latinitate sua vacillare videtur; namque uno loco "Articulus XV. De Ritubus Ecclesiasticus" (nonne "Ecclesiasticis?) dicit, altero tamen loco "Caput VI. Deritibus.", i.e "De ritibus". Martinus Neander 02:11, 30 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mutationes
Disputatio:Zootoca

message: Nisi fallor, nomen conventionale auctoritatis est Jacquin (vide e.g. in pagina :de:Waldeidechse): igitur hoc nomen in capsa insero. Debemus retinere nomina conventionalia quae ad binominibus botanistarum/zoologorum adduntur. Si errorem feci, adde fontem s.v.p. pro de Ioachino. Salve! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:26, 29 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Auctoritas
Disputatio Vicipaediae:Porta eruditionis/Scriptorium/Disney Mundus

message: "Disneus Mundus est oblectamenti locus in Orlando, Florida. Creatus erat a Disneo Walto, quo creabat Disneyland in California. Disney moribatur ante Disneum Mundum[;] erat aperiendum. Igitur, suus frater Roy aperit locum. Disneus Mundus constat multorum parviorum locorum, includens Epcot, Magicum Regnum, Pecu[u]m Regnum, Disnea Officina."
replies: text: "World Disney is an amusement place in Orlando, Florida. It had been created by Disney Walt, by which he was creating Disneyland in California. Disney was being "moribated" in front of World Disney; he/it was to be opened. Therefore, his brother Roy opens the place. World Disney, enclosing Epcot, the Magical Kingdom, the Kingdom of Pastures/Sheep, [and] Workshop Disney, stands together of many smoiler* places." (*There being no such comparative as parvior, or even parvor.) One loves these puzzles! IacobusAmor 16:16, 1 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Commentarium
Disputatio:Abrahamus Lincoln

message: Re: "per bellum civilem qui post servitum ab sepentrionali abolitum est gerisse." ???????? IacobusAmor 17:33, 3 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Trying to say 'during the civil war which was waged after slavery was abolished by the North'. Me paenetet.86.42.61.91 17:45, 3 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Propono: dum bellum civilem gerentur gerebantur servito abolito septemtrone--Jondel 04:44, 18 Decembris 2010 (UTC)

text: :Abosluto Absoluto ablativo utiliamur utamur.--Jondel 05:27, 18 Decembris 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: per bellum civilem qui post servitum ab sepentrionali abolitum est gerisse

message: Jondel, cur mutasti CFA feliciter ducebat 'He successfully led the CFA' ad CFA impiger ducebat 'As a diligent man, he led the CFA'? They both make some sense, but the first more closely echoes the point made in en: "He successfully led the country." IacobusAmor 13:17, 17 Decembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Feliciter seemed liked "happy" e.g. He was happy leading CFA. Impiger seems to me like active (active in leading CFA)or as you say diligent. Let me check how feliciter is used in context at athirdway.--Jondel 14:00, 17 Decembris 2010 (UTC)

text: Ergo retexam.--Jondel 14:04, 17 Decembris 2010 (UTC)

text: Me paenitet.--Jondel 14:17, 17 Decembris 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ''feliciter'' vs. ''impiger''
Disputatio:Xiongnu

message: IacobusAmor salutem dicit!
*Vidi te nuntios in "Historia" paginae relinquisse. Ordos est unum vocabulum singulare, quo regionem Sinensem septemtrionalem (Ordos peior area Mongoliae Interioris est) significare volui. (Vide: in Historia; 14:20, 2008 Aprilis 1)
Vale: Adamus Mathaeus Hungaricus 15:41, 4 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Amice, phrasis in commentario est "in regionem Ordotis." Ergo, Ordos est homo. Si Ordos est regio geographica, casum accusativum petit, ut cum vocabulum regionem congruat. Quid est forma accusativa nominis Ordos? Ordotem? IacobusAmor 16:00, 4 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Mente, Amice, comprendisse credo. Casus accusativus probabiliter Ordotem vocabuli esset. Hanc formam grammaticam adhuc non novi. Hanc quomodo dicere posse, nesciebat. Gratias maximas! 
Vale: Adamus Mathaeus Hungaricus 17:13, 20 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordos
Disputatio:Bellum Centum Annorum

message: "Bellum Cent(u)enne" num melior esset? Sicut "septennis", "octennis" etc. --Brand спойт 20:11, 4 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Verbum centennale etc. eo tempore non iam in usu erat. --Alex1011 (disputatio) 21:16, 4 Aprilis 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::"Centennis" autem iam eo tempore exstetit; verbum a Gilda adhibetur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:29, 30 Martii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Sitne vocabulum centenarius pro falso habendum? (Quod quidem coniunctum cum bello non iam legi.) - Bavarese (disputatio) 11:37, 30 Martii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::Neque ego.
replies: text: :::::Gildas (De excidio Britanniae 30.2) postulat an tyrannus noster Aurelius Caninus centum annos (vel plures, sicut Mathusela) durabit. Igitur haud falso (hoc contextu) DuCangiani synonymum "centenarium" ponunt, sed, si "centennis" longinquitatem vitae detestabilis describere potest, cur non belli? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:23, 30 Martii 2013 (UTC)

text: ::::Attestationes locutionis Bellum Centum Annorum abundant. Vide commentarium. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:13, 30 Martii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Titulus
Disputatio:Corpus siphonariorum

message: the page has interwiki to it: Corpo Nazionale dei Vigili del fuoco but also to en:firefighter,and es:bombero, not the same thing.
Latin for firefighter is siphonarius not Ministerium incendiale.--Rafaelgarcia 20:49, 4 Maii 2008 (UTC)

message: Ministerium incendiale?? 'The burning service'?? 'The fire-setting ministry'?? Really!!! ¶ In Cassell's, incendialis, -e seems not to be a word. ¶ The Classical word for 'firefighters, fire brigade' was merely vigiles (same as for 'police force'). Or for added clarity, vigiles adversus incendia instituti (says Cassell's). IacobusAmor 22:08, 4 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: True that olim they did not distinguish police and firefighters too much, but neolatin sources such as Traupman and Egger give siphonarius for fireman, (I guess meaning the man in charge of pumping water to extinguish the fire), and reserve vigil for modern policeman per se.--Rafaelgarcia 22:29, 4 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :I use Dvoretsky's Latin-Russian dictionary with ca. 50,000 entries, which identifies "incendialis" as  "fire" (cf. Tert., "tunica incendialis", "fire toga"), while "incendiarius" is "incendiary", "burning". --Brand спойт 16:59, 5 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Martinus Van Buren

message: At present, the link Columbia takes us to the nation of Columbia, not to Columbia (New York), his birthplace. Somebody needs to add a disambiguation page. IacobusAmor 11:41, 5 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We already have Columbia (discretiva). --UV 22:37, 5 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :But Columbia, New York, was missing from there, so I added it. IacobusAmor 23:39, 5 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vicus natalis
Disputatio:Abraham Vater

message: Eius nomen, ut videtur, fuit Abraham. Vide eius librum: Catalogus Variorum Exoticorum Rarissimorum Maximam Partem Incognitorum . . . quae in museo suo, brevi luci exponendo possidet Abraham Vater (Wittenberg, 1726). IacobusAmor 17:27, 6 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Abrahamus"?
Disputatio:Firefox

message: Problems with the most recent revision include
#Bad latin: proiecti Moxillae would mean incongrously of the Moxilla thrown away
#If you use the word Mozilla as a characteristic of Firefox, shouldn't a definition of mozilla be given?
#THe first two links are to commercial advertisements encouraging people to download software and or donate money to Mozilla; equivalent sites that merely describe mozilla firefox should be available.
#Where did you get Firefox is female and declined in the third declesion. Don't we treat trademarks as indeclinables according to our rules?
--Rafaelgarcia 17:34, 7 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Firefox appears to be a trademark, and may well be indeclinable, as I've marked it. 'Project' might be propositum, but this Mozilla seems to be a company (societas), and a noun ending in -illa easily fits in the first declension, where I've left it. I don't know what a navigatrum is, but presumably somebody does. Now the tiny little stipula is ready for more text! IacobusAmor 18:50, 7 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: : "Navigatrum" should mean "(web)browser". --UV 22:46, 7 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Yep, 'navigatrum' (Traupman gives it) would probably go back to the days when Netscape Navigator was the browser to beat.  I'm sure the 'cyber' metaphor could be made to figure in as well. For 'project' I have 'inceptum'.  —Mucius Tever 00:55, 9 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems

message: http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable is not a commercial link. --Rolandus 23:03, 7 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, feel free to re-add it then! --UV 21:13, 8 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The removed link is not commercial
Disputatio:Systema aequationum

message: What does "ratio" mean here? An account... a theory? Don't you mean methodus? --Rafaelgarcia 19:46, 7 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I intended to say "method" or "approach" (how to do sth.), which I looked up in my dictionary.

text: Here is what the dictionary says exactly: "Methode" (which is the German word for "method"/"approach"):

text: *ratio

text: *via

text: *disciplina

text: *ars

text: Ratio came first and I also found this meaning of the word when I searched in the other direction: "ratio, -onis f." = "Methode, planmäßiges Verfahren (methodical procedure); e. g., ratio belli gerendi". That's why I chose it. However, I don't know whether the mathematical terminus technicus is different, so I would be grateful if you could tell me when it is indeed. Thanks for any necessary corrections on my texts in general! --Ahib 08:26, 9 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationes ad ea solvenda 

message: -->"A system before the given"Or do you mean "previously"? "systema antea datum" the system previously given "systema iam datum" the system already given or "systema supra datum" the system  given above.--Rafaelgarcia 19:52, 7 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant "the system previously given" - terribly sorry, I forgot the "a" at the end and will correct it immediately! --Ahib 08:26, 9 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  systema ante datum
Disputatio:Jožin z bažin

message: cropduster = aëroplanum fumigans aut aëroplanum despergens?--Rafaelgarcia 14:37, 15 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cropduster

message: I see that Andrew has reduced the categories to a single one, for all songs. In setting up "Carmina 1978" and "Carmina 2008," I was emulating en:, which categorizes each song by the year when it was composed or first produced. The single-category procedure may work for now, but won't the category become rather unwieldy after it's got several hundred thousand entires in it? or even 10,000?! IacobusAmor 15:49, 15 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't notice it was you, Iacobe ... Sorry. By all means revert me if you want. But it's no use making redlink categories: it just means the article cannot be found at all by the category route. If you imagine a new category, and make it a redlink at the foot of a page, you have to finish the job: actually create the new category and link it to more general categories. That's my opinion, anyway. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:34, 15 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yeah, but see, that's what I don't quite know how to do, so I didn't do it! IacobusAmor 17:44, 15 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Ah, you have a problem there then!! See me on your user page ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:03, 16 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category question

message: Me credidi solum in orbe terrarum nosse fructumque esse carmine Iosephuli z Bazin! Optime fecisti, Iacobe!!! --Ioscius (disp) 17:21, 15 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wow
Disputatio:Lingua Melitensis

message: Unde "Melitta", unde "lingua Melittica"? Fontem si quaeris, sunt Vicipaedia et sitús interretiales Vicipaediá innixi. Insula Latine Melita aut Melite audit, et adiectivum est Melitensis, ergo Lingua Melitensis. --Neander 22:18, 15 Maii 2008 (UTC)

message: Salvete. Insulae Melitae Nominis adiectivum est Melitensis/Melitense (sicut Tristis/Triste). Scilicet adiectivum "Meliticus/a/um" est mendum magnum. Apud enim Ciceronem haec scripta sunt "Dicunt legati Melitenses" (In Verrem II.4.104: In Verres.2.4). In huius operis aliis partibus, Cicero ita scripsit "Dico te maximum pondus auri argenti eboris purpurae, plurimam vestem Melitensem" (In Verrem II.2.176: In Verres.2.2) et "Non quaero unde cccc amphoras mellis habueris, unde tantum Melitensium" (In Verres.2.2). Cicero quidem hoc adiectivo semper utabatur. Ergo adiectivum Meliticus/a/um mutandum est in "Melitensis/e". Paenitet me nondum scire haec mutare. Vos, si vultis, hoc facite. Gratias vobis ago. Laelius 12:16, 4 Iulii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Gratias agimus. Id iam suspicabar.

text: Tibi, usori novo, post quattuor dies licet paginas movere: sed hanc iam movi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:08, 4 Iulii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  adiectivum "Meliticus/a/um" est mendum magnum
Disputatio:Truth in Numbers: The Wikipedia Story

message: Potestne hic translatio in anglica lingua scribi, ut melius intelligam et correctiones facere possim? Gratias. Lio 09:48, 17 Maii 2008 (UTC)

message: As far as I'm aware of, the documentary by Glosserman and Hill being produced under the title "Truth in Numbers: The Wikipedia Story" has never been published under that title, but as "Truth in Numbers? Everything, According to Wikipedia". Is this article about some different project, is my assumption wrong, or is this article's title incorrect? --YMS (disputatio) 14:13, 21 Iulii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The title was correct at the time the article was written. As the text plainly states, the film hasn't yet been finished. At that time, the English wiki was saying this: "Truth in Numbers: The Wikipedia Story is an American non-profit documentary film now in post-production directed by Nic Hill and written by Nic Hill and Michael Ferris Gibson. It is scheduled to be finished in 2007." Perhaps you'd like to update the Latin text? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:50, 21 Iulii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: : Thanks for your answer, that explains it. It would probably be a good idea if someone else but me would update it, though, as I never learned Latin. --YMS (disputatio) 07:54, 22 Iulii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Disputatio:Libanius

message: Addidi categoriam Oratores, quia fuit re vera orator! An necesse est nobis etiam novam categoriam :Categoria:Rhetores creare, nescio ... sed, si volumus, facile erit. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:08, 17 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Categoriae

message: Gratias tibi ago, quod categoriam adiecisti. Sum recentissmus auctor Vikipaediae nesciebamque, quomodo paginam in categoriam insererem. Nomina "oratoris" et "rhetoris" non multum inter se differre sentio. Si usores una categoria ambos invenire possunt, melius est, ut mihi quidem videtur. --Schulz-Hameln 12:19, 22 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categoriae
Disputatio:Certamen Mundanum Pedilusorium (2006)

message: Whoever set up the parenthesis has misspelled consummatio(nis) four times in some hidden way so that it can't be corrected here by the usual methods. IacobusAmor 23:22, 19 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The historia shows it to have been Sinister Petrus. How can this misspelling be fixed? IacobusAmor 23:25, 19 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: : I fixed Formula:16ManuumParenthesis. --UV 23:27, 19 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Consumatio"

message: Vide  Disputationem Certamen Mundanum Pediludicum
thread_title:  Vide etiam
Disputatio:Christophorus Madrutius

message: Habemus fontem pro "Cristophorus Madrutius" sed haec orthographia praebet errorem egregium Latinitatis. Igitur paginam movi ad "Christophorus Madrutius". Nescio an bene feci. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:25, 20 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: certe bene fecisti--Massimo Macconi 09:06, 20 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: De nomine

message: Madrutius noster minime Tridenti natus est, in castro Madrutiorum in loco qui vulgariter Kalfein, hodie Calavino nuncupatur iter terrenum inchohavit. Rationem erroris non intelligo nexu externo recte castrum locum natalem indicante. Probant Salvador Miranda: The Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, online apud fiu.edu, atque Rotraut Becker: Madruzzo, Cristoforo. In: Mario Caravale (Ed.): Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani (DBI), vol. 67 (Macchi - Malaspina), Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, Romae 2006 (in reticulo). Videant consules. --Enzian44 (disputatio) 23:00, 9 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Obiit Tiburi. --Enzian44 (disputatio) 00:07, 10 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  De natali 

message: Per saecula multa cardinales hoc modo appellabantur: S(anctae) R(omanae) E(cclesiae) cardinalis - Madrutius Cardinalis Tridentinus vocatus est - . Cur formula:Cardinalis Ecclesiae Catholicae in titulo praebet formam Cardinalis Ecclesiae Catholicae Romanae? 
Item Madrutius in Concilio Tridentino egit: articulus tacet. --Enzian44 (disputatio) 23:07, 9 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  De cardinalibus
Disputatio:Chazari

message: There is support on other wikis for the Latin names Cosri and Gazari; less support for Chazari. I think we need to cite some real Latin texts that mention them.
So that the first sentence is not over-philological, I have moved most of the foreign language equivalents into a footnote. OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:07, 22 Maii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have again moved foreign language equivalents into a footnote, and I have now verified the name "Chazari", which nicely agrees with most other languages. If anyone really wants "Cosri", sources are needed. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:46, 30 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Footnotes are almost always welcome! As is the goal of getting an inundation of alternate lemmata out of the first sentence! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:46, 30 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen