lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Pan (satelles)

message: Sine cura, sine explicatione mutationem a Demetrio Talpa factam reverti. Date veniam.
Verbum "satelles" genere neutro scripsi. Id feci quia hoc verbum per lexicographos genus commune habet. Satelles in scientia astronomica neque homo neque mulier est sed res inanima: ergo (mihi dixi) neque genus masculinum neque femininum sed neutrum postulat. De qua re quid dicunt alii? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:32, 8 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm... Mihi non plane certum est, sed putabam, ut "genus commune" vel masculinum vel feminum (si de femina dicitur, "Callisto Dianae satelles pulcherrima fuit") esset; nam si etiam neutrum, quomodo pluralis erit — e.g. "satellites artificialia"? Et cur non femininum — si "planeta" generis masculini est, et "planeta satelles" itidem. Demetrius Talpa (disputatio) 14:06, 8 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  De genere
Disputatio:Project Pat

message: It's not possible to translate without a meaning. In English, "Project Pat" might mean "Pat who is a project" or "Pat who has a project" or something else I can't guess. If we were going to translate the phrase into Latin, we'd have to know, because the result would be different. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:09, 9 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Or "Thrust Pat forward" (project him); however, knowing nothing about this topic, but knowing that the titles of things tend to be noun-phrases, rather than verb-phrases, I'd interpret the bare phrase "Project Pat" as meaning 'a scheme having something to do with Pat (or patting)'.—Further illustrations of why Andrew's point is correct and pertinent. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:59, 9 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ahhhh (the morning coffee having settled in): so another possible interpretation is that "Project Pat" means 'Pat from the projects'. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:18, 9 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Disputatio:Assumptio Beatae Mariae Virginis

message: In omnium fere vicipaediarum paginis de Assumptione BMV legitur de assumptione Astraeae et de festo eo die Romae acto. Sine fontibus, sine testimoniis affirmant hanc rem originem esse festi a catholicis eodem die celebrati. Communicetis quaeso, quae apud vos vera ac testificata de illius festi origine nota sunt. Fuit omnino festum assumptionis Astraeae? Mihi res iam, ut multa alia talia, videtur una e legendis ab aliquibus fabulonibus excogitis interretem permigrare. --Bavarese (disputatio) 17:13, 10 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Roscher's Lexikon festa Astraeae nescit. Personificatio est, non dea cultum habens. Formulam posui de fontibus, cum delere non audeo. Demetrius Talpa (disputatio) 19:29, 10 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :Haec res mense Augusto 2011 apud nos ab Usor:Utilo addita est (editor fere semper inter optimos), qui sine dubio e Vicipaedia Theodisca dempsit. Ibi eo anno certe legere potuit: "Das Fest Mariä Himmelfahrt geht auf ein Marienfest zurück, das Cyrill von Alexandrien im 5. Jahrhundert einführte. Dieses Fest legte er auf den 15. August, den Tag, an dem bereits die Heiden die Himmelfahrt der Astraea feierten."

text: :Nomen Astraeae a pagina Theodisca anno 2012 deletum est. Vide etiam hanc disputationem apud Theodiscos recenter habitam. Similiter apud nos rem delendam suadeo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:41, 10 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cui ''Assumptio Astraeae'' nota est?
Disputatio:Vajiralongkorn

message: Motionem paginae ad titulum "Rama X" propono. Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 22:11, 10 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Qua ratione, mi Bis-Taurine? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:38, 11 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: : Nunc equidem dubito. Putabam nomen "Rama decimum" nomen commune regis sicut nomen acceptum paparum (e.g. Franciscus) esse, quod a proclamatione illius statim ut titulus paginae functum est.  In Vicipaedia Theodisca autem nunc lexi, quod hoc nomen in Thailandia raro diceretur. (Obwohl König Bhumibol im westlichen Ausland Rama IX. genannt wird, wird der Name Rama (eine Abkürzung von Ramathibodi) von der thailändischen Bevölkerung selten benutzt. Die Thailänder selber nennen ihn umgangssprachlich „Nai Luang“ (ในหลวง) oder „Phra Chaoyuhua“ (พระเจ้าอยู่หัว: beides bedeutet „König“) oder auch „Rachakan Thi Kao“ (รัชกาลที่ ๙, wörtlich „Die neunte Regierungszeit“). Formell wird er als Phrabat Somdet Phra Chaoyuhua (พระบาทสมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัว) angesprochen, in offiziellen Dokumenten sogar als Phrabat Somdet Phra Paraminthara Maha Bhumibol Adulyadej (พระบาทสมเด็จพระปรมินทรมหาภูมิพลอดุลยเดช). Eine formelle Ansprache auf Englisch ist „His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej“, also „Seine Majestät König Bhumibol Adulyadej“. Seine Unterschrift lautet ภูมิพลอดุลยเดช ป.ร. (Bhumibol Adulyadej Po Ro, das bedeutet „Bhumibol Adulyadej R[ex]“). Ergo propositum meum retiro. Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 10:13, 12 Maii 2019 (UTC)

text: :Gratias ago propter responsum tuum. Re vera Vicipaedia Francica paginam suam (solam inter eas quas inspexi) ad "Rama X" movit. Vicipaedia, encyclopaedia ni officialis ni sollemnis, libera est nomen usitatissimum paginarum biographicarum eligere, nisi fortasse hoc nomen homini ipso displiceat. Hoc casu alii fere omnes fontes, quos vidi, nomen "Vajiralongkorn" retinent: ergo hoc nomen, usque hodie, usitatissimum certe manet. Sicut iam vidisti, proavi huius regis, nominibus sollemnibus "Rama I-IX", nomina sua personalia e.g. "Bhumibol Adulyadej" apud nos pluresque alias Vicipaedias usque adhuc retinent. Sed si res mutabuntur, possumus et nos mutare! Salve optime Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:41, 12 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen regale
Disputatio:Rarotonga

message: ... rubricam "in cognitione communi" (cf. rubricas "Trivia" Vicipaediae Anglicae iam diu deprecatas). Omnino delevi "Primum album musicum a Café Tacuba, grege musico Mexicano, editum, cantum "Rarotonga" habet" quia nihil nobis dicit hanc cantilenam re vera de Rarotonga agere. Alias rubricas nonnullas, pauca verba continentes, coniunxi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:46, 11 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eliminavi ...
Disputatio:Odontoceti

message: There's something fishy here. The taxobox says it's a parvordo, with a Linnaean name, author and date. A redlink category said it was a "grex paraphyleticus". I've deleted the redlink category and added a "ScDub" formula. Was that right? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:00, 25 Iulii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parvordo or grex paraphyleticus?
Disputatio:Luciferi Fanum

message: Nomen Latinum dubium est sed non sine fontibus: vide paginam Hispanicam :es:Luciferi Fanum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:15, 14 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: ??? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:34, 14 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :Fons a te citatus "Luciferi Fanum inter Bastulos" Latine p. 145, "On the coast of the kingdom of Seville" Anglice p. 144 dicit. Hac auctoritate, cum aliis comparata, nomen accipere possumus. Bene repperisti. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:59, 15 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine
Disputatio:Polymerum

message: Quamquam notio hodierna sine fonte fida, "polymerum" non neutrum, sed (μέρος) masculinum esse arbitror. Ergo libentius "polymerum" in "polymerus (chemia)" transferrem. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 07:42, 18 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Error meus; μέρος est n. wiktionary; Andreas Raether (disputatio) 07:46, 18 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :Si linguam Graecam sequimur, solum reperio adiectivum πολυμερής, neut. πολυμερές, neut. plur. πολυμερῆ. Sic etiam  Neograece. Sed in libris recentioribus adiectivum polymericum reperitur, quo fortasse substantivi more uti possumus, et quod usum Graecum minus offendit et Latine facilius declinatur. Lesgles (disputatio) 18:46, 18 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Gratiam, Lesgles, habeo. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 20:01, 19 Maii 2019 (UTC)
==== Notae ====
thread_title:  Libenter "polymerum" in formam masculinam transferre 

thread_title:  Notae
Disputatio Formulae:Fontes biographici

message: Biographical sources included in this list should be (1) linked by an identifier on Wikidata, (2) independent of the subject, (3) freely accessible on line, (4) really useful to readers. Sources that mainly contain machine-compiled information, or that mainly consist of links to or copies of other resources, or that anyone can edit, should be excluded. Please don't add a source without evaluating it yourself. Please delete sources that don't meet these standards. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:07, 19 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationes
Disputatio:Musivum villae Dâr Bûk 'Ammêrah

message: "Essedarius" verbum latinum est quod significat "gladiator essedo utens";  essedum est raeda gallica.  Enuntiatum ultimum non bene intellexi sed possum dicere hoc enuntiatum latinitatem satis bonam nunc praebere.  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 16:36, 19 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  de verbis
Disputatio Formulae:Sectiones et provinciae Belgicae

message: It might be simpler and clearer to stay with the linguistic adjectives that we have adopted as a de facto standard on Vicipaedia. We use "Francicus" and "Germanicus" as adjectives applying to the countries, "Francia" and "Germania". We use "Francogallicus" and "Theodiscus" as adjectives applying to the languages, "lingua Francogallica" and "lingua Theodisca". (Editors sometimes forget these usages, and in general it doesn't matter, but when distinguishing between language name, ethnonym and country name, maybe it does matter.)
If I understand the names of these Belgian communities correctly, they relate principally to language. So I would suggest calling them "Communitas Francogallica" and "Communitas Theodisca". I don't see any reason to add "-phona" to the latter, because the adjective applies only to language anyway. But tell me if I've misunderstood! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:55, 20 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue is that each of them had their own special reason to do otherwise than the others: The Flemings had their own strong brand and went for "Flemish"; the French-speakers in the 1970ies (when the names were established) were very Francophile and basically wanted to see themselves as part of the great French nation/people, so they went for "French" (they have changed since then, hence Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, but that hasn't affected the official name).  The German-speakers on the other hand wanted to insist that they were Belgian and not German, hence "German-speaking".  I see no other way to stay true to all that but to make it close to the vernaculars (and in particular with -phona for the German-speakers and without it for the French-speakers).  I see your point of "Theodiscus" relating to language anyhow, but I doubt that that expresses it clearly enough for their sensitivities (Just call them "German" if you want to start a big row - it works each and every time!) Of course, one can still hesitate between Francica and Francogallica, I basically preferred it shorter, but even there, given the history of it, "Francica" seems pretty adequate to me (PS: The predecessor entities were still the Dutch Cultural Community, French Cultural Community and German Cultural Community; you have to understand each name in comparison with the former one). Sigur (disputatio) 21:55, 20 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :Both terms make me slightly uncomfortable, particularly "Theodiscophona" because it is (or seems to be) an invented half-Greek half-medieval-Latin word! But thanks for explaining, and I accept the political complications of choosing anything else. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:45, 21 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Of course, if you have strong feelings about "Theodiscophona", something along the lines of "Communitas Sermonis Theodisci" would pass the political-sensitivity test. But I would find that a bit cumbersome. Sigur (disputatio) 08:58, 21 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Let's see if anyone else comments. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:23, 21 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of the language communities
Disputatio:Urho Kekkonen

message: Locus mortis inter textum et capsam differt. Quis adiuvabit? Praterea sensum ultimae sententiae non intelligo. Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 05:06, 22 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If you follow the links in Wikidata, it turns out that these places are actually buildings in respectively Pielavesi and Helsinki. Sigur (disputatio) 06:23, 22 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :Licet omnibus Vicidata corrigere, sed Vicidatis regula (molesta ...) est locum semper minutissime inscribere; ergo, si Helsingium ibi substituimus, aliquis mutabit! Si recte textum nostrum scripsimus, iam optime fecimus. Vicidata, quamquam utilia sint, nemo credat fontem esse fidei dignum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:20, 22 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Et textus et capsa recte dicunt, nam Tamminiemi praedium est in Meilahti, regione Helsingiae urbis, situm. Neander (disputatio) 16:49, 22 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Ubi mortuus est?
Disputatio:Arvernia Rhodanus Alpes

message: Nomen difficile est! Sed lingua Latina possumus multa nomina aut sine coniunctionibus enumerare -- id Plinius saepe facit -- aut coniunctionibus inter omnia additis, e.g. "Arvernia Rhodanusque et Alpes". Titulum lectoribus pellucidiorem sine coniunctionibus censui. An erravi? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:54, 22 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine
Disputatio:Ourasphaira giraldae

message: Nulla commentatione apud Vicipaedias reperta, nomina statui eodem fere modo quo Canadenses inter linguas Anglicam et Francogallicam convertunt (vide TermiumPlus et Geoscan):
* Grassy Bay formation: non reperio, sed haud longe distat
* Minto Inlet formation: formation Minto Inlet; ergo "formatio Grassy Bay"
* Brock Inlier: enclave de Brock; ergo "inclavatura Brock"
* Amundsen Basin: bassin Amundsen; ergo "pelvis Amundsen" sicut Iacobus iam in commentatione Oceanus Arcticus statuit
* Shaler Supergroup: supergroupe de Shaler, ergo "supergrex Shaler"
An placet? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:22, 26 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Iam censebam schist et shale Latine saeculo XVIII minime distinctos ambo denominatione "schistus" descripsisse. Eandem rem (sed de lingua Francogallica) apud Canadenses lego: shale sicut "Anglicismum ad evitandum" vituperatur! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:49, 26 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :Mihi videtur "Amundsen Basin" a geologis definita ab "Amundsen Basin" oceanographorum omnino differre. Vide e.g. tabulam p. 62, quae nihil commune habet cum forma hic visa. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:43, 26 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nominibus formationum, gregum, regionum geologicarum
Disputatio:Vallis Sessitensis

message: Nomen "Vallis Sessitum" per artem grammaticam Latinam non intellegi; fontem citatum verificare non potui. Ergo nomen prius "Vallis Sessitensis" restitui quos e verbis iam cognitis conficere licet. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:35, 27 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine
Disputatio:I. M. Pei

message: Dear  174.21.74.99, you changed emergentis to emergentes, saying "small grammatical correction." Regarding adjectives of one ending, Gildersleeve (#83) notes: "In the Nom. and Acc. Pl. . . . in the case of participles īs is very common, and is the rule in VERGIL and HORACE." In Allen & Greenough (#117), ēs is preferred for the nominative, while īs is preferred for the accusative, and not just in poetry. In the singular, ī, not e, is preferred. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:53, 27 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Participles
Disputatio:Rhoegus

message: E quibus fontibus antiquis hoc nomen habemus? "Rhaezdus" aegre ex orthographia Graeca vel Latina derivatur.
Hic habemus data de monte Roygo in Antarctica, ab Anglis explorato, a Bulgaris sine dubio nominato (commissio enim Bulgarica inter nominatores Antarcticos participat); sed de fonte historico, quo usi sunt nominatores, nihil dicitur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:38, 28 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Apud alias Vicipaedias (e.g. hic) nomina Cotys II, Rhaezdus, Cotys III se sequuntur, pluribus successoribus. Smith in Dictionario biographico (1846) nullos reges post Cotys II nisi (duobus fere saeculis intermissis) "Cotys III" qui ad aliam dynastiam pertinet.

text: E quo patet, nisi fallor, Rhaezdus/Roygos successoresque a fontibus litterariis antiquis abesse. Si e fontibus epigraphicis vel numismaticis recenter restituuntur, utile erit scire quibus fontibus, quibus verbis! Sed etiam utile erit Pauly-Wissowa inspicere, id quod non possum ego. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:33, 28 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :E fontibus recentissimis res tres tantum, quae re vera de Rhoego sciuntur, didisci (quarum neque una ab auctore nostro dicitur). Ne obliviscam, paginam statim moveo et rescribo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:50, 5 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fontes antiqui?
Disputatio:Vascones (hodierni)

message: For ancient & medieval Basques, Vicipaedia already has an article Vascones (en:Vascones), but the list of 10,000 most important articles links to en:Basques, referring mainly to present-day people; hence the title given here. Of course these lemmata can be changed if consensus prefers, but the link to the Myrias list should be retained, lest Vicipaedia lose points in the interwiki rankings. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:17, 31 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: "And points mean prizes!" (sorry, quote from a much-loved British satirical show in which there were no prizes). You're right. My view is that this article should be called "Vascones" and should include, in its history section, information about the ancient Vascones and the ancient Aquitani, because the consensus seems to be that both were ancient Basques. It would not be the first people for whom the Romans had more than one name. I guess I'm proposing merging Vascones into this article (making it a bit longer), carefully retaining this article's interwiki links. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:34, 2 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma
Disputatio:Castrum Mediolanense

message: Aliqui scriptores hodierni nomen "Mediolanum Biturigum" dant, sed sine fonte antiquo (nisi fallor). Ergo "Mediolanum Biturigum" in notam subiunctam misi, sed, si fons antiquus citatur, me erravisse statim confitebor! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:02, 31 Maii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Fortasse "Castrum Mediolanense" nomen idoneum erit (cf. Gregorium Turonensem et nomen Francogallicum hodiernum). Quo titulo praeposito, non iam necesse erit verbum discretivum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:39, 1 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mediolanum Biturigum
Disputatio:Borisus et Hlibus

message: Non pro religione a Sviatopolco occisi sunt, caedes ista non persecutio religiosa fuit. Quamquam et Martinov eos martyres vocat, martyres pro fide persecuti sunt, strastoterptsy autem (Passion bearers) simpliciter sine culpa occisi sunt. Невинно убиенные saepe dicuntur, sine culpa occisi. 
Nescio, quomodo strastoterptsy Latine vertendum est; latores passionum, ut in pagina dictum est, sunt qui ipsi passionem ferunt vel proponunt (cf. lator legis). Strastoterptsy autem vocabulum tautologicum est, e duo radicibus idem significantibus compositum, passionem passi, sit venia verbo, et propter hoc honorati, ut Paulus Christum propter passionem mortis gloria et honore coronatum esse dicit (Heb. 2:9); strastoterptsy — propter passionem sancti, passionis causa sancti.  Demetrius Talpa (disputatio) 23:47, 31 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: De categoriis
Disputatio Categoriae:Vasconia

message: Hanc categoriam debemus potius cum :en:Category:Basque Country (greater region) coniungere aliamque ad coniungendam cum :en:Category:Basque Country (autonomous community) creare ... aut potius (numero paginarum de municipiis Hispanicis inspecto) hanc categoriam in "Categoria:Vasconia (communitas Hispaniae)" movere, deinde novam categoriam generaliorem "Categoria:Vasconia" creare. Quid dicunt alii? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:57, 2 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categoria:Vasconia
Disputatio Categoriae:Bibliothecarii Graeciae antiquae

message: Hanc categoriam movendam suadeo. Homines antiquos interdum ethnonymis distinguimus, "Romanos antiquos", "Graecos antiquos" etc., quia distinctiones geographicae minus utiles sunt. E.g. plures homines in hac categoria bibliothecariorum positi non in Graecia sed alibi habitabant. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:05, 8 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movenda?
Disputatio:Laca

message: Alexandre-Guillaume Chotin, Études étymologiques et archéologiques sur les noms des villes, bourgs, villages, hameaux, rivières et ruisseaux de la Province du Brabant  cite également Lacæ. Par analogie avec d'autres noms de lieu germaniques avec la terminaison -en, je pense que ce serait le meilleur choix. Sigur (disputatio) 17:20, 12 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Je pense que Laca est plus "courant" dans le sens où c'est le nom latin donné dans la presse :  et c'est par  par exemple le nom utilisé par l'assosciation promouvant l'histoire de Laeken : http://www.laca.be. Il y a également un livre en latin de 1647 sur Laeken qui utilise Laca : [ https://books.google.be/books?id=TRuCGwAACAAJ&dq=Laca&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiq3cfD8-XiAhUCqXEKHaIIAzMQ6AEILDAA].  La presse a parlé de ce livre :  . --Huguespotter (disputatio) 07:20, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: : PS : dans le livre de Chotin les noms cités sont Laca, Lacum et Lachae (plus d'autres) qui sont indiqués il me semble mais pas lacae :) --Huguespotter (disputatio) 13:13, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacae?
Disputatio:Iugum (discretiva)

message: Nescio, cur nexus ad paginam "Libra (constellatio)" hic sit ponendus. --Bavarese (disputatio) 08:50, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hoc apud antiquos aliud signi nomen fuisse videtur; vide Ciceronem: "L. quidem Tarutius [...] Romamque, in iugo cum esset luna, natam esse dicebat" (Div. 2.98). Modo pauca de his nominibus in Libra (constellatio) addidi. Lesgles (disputatio) 23:02, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iugum et libra
Disputatio Categoriae:Periegesis

message: Categorias duas fere homonymas habemus, :Categoria:Peregrinationes (Anglice Pilgrimages) et :Categoria:Peregrinatio (Anglice Tourism). Ut pellucidius inter hos sensus distinguamus, propono categoriam Peregrinatio (Tourism) ad "Periegesis" movere. Hic iam titulus est paginae principalis respectivae Periegesis. An placet? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:34, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  De titulo
Disputatio:Hembecca superior et inferior

message: Quid dicitis, o amici, de nomine "Hembecca superior et inferior"? Et "Hembecca" et "Heembeke" sicut nomina Latina in fontibus video, sed "Hembecca -am -ae", declinatione prima, facilius Latine usitaturusitata est. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:40, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Et ego ita censeo. Neander (disputatio) 11:50, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :I agree. I suspected that Huguespotter hadn't dared because he didn't have a source to give for Hembecca, and I was already wondering how he was going to react to my adding one. Sigur (disputatio) 11:53, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Yes I found sources for Hembeke so I have choose this one but I have seen hembecca in this https://quartier-noh.be/heembeek-mutsaard-patrimoine/, so I have only mentionned it. But if there is a source there are no problem to change the title but the I think that the two has to be mentionned in the article. Thank you. --Huguespotter (disputatio) 15:24, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  De titulo
Disputatio:Heterosexualitas

message: Heterophylophilia nonne melius sit? Sigur (disputatio) 13:47, 16 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
formas "heterosexualitatem" vel "heterosexualitatis" in libris theologicis apud Google books legimus. Jeanthorlon (disputatio) 14:08, 16 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ita. Sicut homosexualitas ubi nos homophylophilia scribimus. Mihi bene. Sed nos consequentes esse debere censeo. Sigur (disputatio) 14:35, 16 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Et ego sic censeo. Sed cur homophylophilia utimur? Scio verbum "homosexualitas" chimaeram esse, sed tam multae aliae linguae hac chimaera utuntur...
replies: text: :::Consentio. De verbo homophylophilia ibi disputandum est (vide etiam Vicipaedia:Taberna!) et fontem verbi "Homosexualitas" ibi nuper citavi.
replies: text: :::Auctor huius paginae fontem verbi Latini "heterosexualitas" iam citavit; si quis movere velit, primum necesse erit fontem tituli propositi citare. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:22, 17 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lemma