Disputatio Vicipaediae:Historia Vicipaediae

message: This wasn't moved properly -- as shown by the fact that the history has remained at the redirect. It was done by copy-and-paste, which isn't allowed! So (unless someone else does it before me) I will delete this new page and move the old one properly. Before I do it, though, I'd like to be sure about the new name. I've no objection to the move, but isn't this "History of the Latin Wikipedia"? So would "Vicipaedia:Historia Vicipaediae Latinae" be better? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:11, 20 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I copy-pasted the content from a different page, bu I didn't move the whole page, so I thought that would not cause any trouble, but I see (now) where the issue is (with the redirect from Historia vicipaediae Latinae, right?). Am I causing a redirection problems again? As for the name, I'd go for a "Vicipaedia:" page, because the content is not an article per se, but rather inside information.--Xaverius 10:06, 20 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :It's OK, Xaveri -- seeing such a large deletion I wrongly assumed you had deleted the whole page. There's no problem, then -- please forgive me. Your logic, that this is internal history, is correct, I think.

text: :Yes, it was the redirect that made me think "Would that be a better name, after all?" What do you think, would "Vicipaedia:Historia Vicipaediae Latinae" be better? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:19, 20 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::I took for granted that, as it is an internal vicipaedia page it would refer to our own vici, but it is obviously not that clear. I would not object to a renaming of the page.--Xaverius 11:54, 20 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::I see what you mean, though. It's probably fine as it is. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:08, 20 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move and new name 

message: If this table is updated every 1,000 new pages, it's going to get long.  Maybe a logarithmic approach, marking only every 10,000 pages until we hit 1,000,000?  -- and isn't this a great problem to have? :-)  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 20:46, 16 Maii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  go by increments of 10,000 from here on? 

message: Quis fuit prima pagina Vicipaediae?  Nescio quomodo invenire -- quid debeo facere?  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 21:36, 21 Maii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fortasse pagina Mensis, die 25 Maii 2002 incepta. --UV (disputatio) 23:05, 21 Maii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: :Fortasse.  Eodem die autem paginae Nuntius et Suecia natae sunt.  Si tres paginae, quare non quattuor vel etiam decem?  Dicam, ut opinor, has "inter primas paginas" esse.... A. Mahoney (disputatio) 19:41, 22 Maii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Fasciculum veterem inspexi et ibi has emendationes veterrimas inveni:

text: ::# 2002-05-22T21:24:44 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usor:Taw&oldid=1290

text: ::# 2002-05-22T21:55:14 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usor:Taw&diff=prev&oldid=1291

text: ::#* non inveni in fasciculo: 2002-05-24 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usor:Taw&diff=prev&oldid=25950

text: ::# 2002-05-25T07:34:02 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usor:Macar&oldid=927

text: ::# 2002-05-25T20:38:18 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuntius&oldid=1010

text: ::# 2002-05-25T20:45:04 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuntius&diff=prev&oldid=1011

text: ::# 2002-05-25T21:01:37 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuntius&diff=prev&oldid=2630

text: ::# 2002-05-25T21:37:15 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mensis&oldid=929

text: ::# 2002-05-25T21:47:18 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suecia&oldid=1220

text: ::# 2002-05-25T22:04:09 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iasser_Arafat&oldid=662

text: ::# 2002-05-26T09:46:54 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oceania&oldid=1076

text: ::# 2002-05-30T16:37:44 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Polonia&oldid=1114

text: ::# 2002-06-24T11:49:05 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Specialis:Paginam_restituere&target=Wikipedianii×tamp=20020624114905 [deleted content was: "#REDIRECT Utentes", contributor was: Specialis:Conlationes/Gianfranco]

text: ::# 2002-07-22T09:29:02 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usor:LA2&oldid=685

text: ::# 2002-08-22T15:00:33 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mensis&diff=prev&oldid=7179

text: ::# 2002-09-09T06:11:35 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usor:Archibald_Fitzchesterfield&oldid=5

text: ::# 2002-09-22T07:21:41 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Specialis:Paginam_restituere&target=Aqvila×tamp=20020922072141 [deleted content was: "Aqvila....", contributor was: host213-1-117-90.in-addr.btopenworld.com]

text: ::# 2002-11-22T01:53:12 https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mons_Leoninus&oldid=930

text: :: --UV (disputatio) 23:00, 22 Maii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Ita iam ante Mensis, pagina Nuntius creata est! Id nescivimus! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:59, 23 Maii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Euge:  hoc est quod volui scire.  Permaximas tibi gratias ago.  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 18:14, 23 Maii 2014 (UTC)

text: ::::Et, ut videtur, Vicipaedia ipsa non die 25 sed die 22 mensis Maii creata est:  pagina usoris Taw hoc die exstetit.  Primus articulus, sensu stricto, fuit Nuntius, sed prima pagina fuit pagina usoris!  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 20:55, 24 Maii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prima pagina?