lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Borussia

message: Please translate the following latin text into German or English: Bitte folgenden lateinischen Text in deutsch oder englisch ūbersetzen:
"Cum nomen vivens ornamento fuerit, atque etiam nunc post fata sit, non solum huic ecclesiae, verum etiam toti Prussiae patriae suae, uniquum esse puto, eum post obitum carere honore sepulchri sive monumenti"
Thanks a lot. Recht vielen Dank. Bero 24.3.2007 17:32 71.137.204.255 
replies: text: Verbum suse : recte suae ? IacobusAmor 17:06, 24 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: : Pardon suae 04:38, 25 March 2007 71.137.204.255 
Der letzte Teil heißt wohl: ...halte ich es für einmalig, dass er nach seinem Tode der Ehre eines Begräbnisses oder eines Denkmals entbehren muss." --Alex1011 18:46, 14 Iulii 2007 (UTC)

text: Es geht um Nicolaus Copernicus, siehe auch die parallele Anfrage bei http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Nicolaus_Copernicus#Nicolaus_Copernicus_..._Prussiae_patriae  Das Zitat stammt wohl aus einem Brief von Bischof Martin Cromer aus dem Jahre 1580, das von Humboldt wiedergegeben wurde. Für eine möglichst exakte Übersetzung wäre auch ich dankbar. --Matthead 20:45, 3 Aprilis 2009 (UTC)

message: The word "deportus" in the article links to a different article, which tells us that the word is "disportus". So, which is it? Toddcs (disputatio) 17:25, 12 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe neither! Both forms are absent from Cassell's (1968) and Traupman (2007). IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:11, 12 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: : Nicolaus Gross "disportum" proponit, "deportus" error est. Demetrius Talpa (disputatio) 08:40, 13 Septembris 2023 (UTC)

text: :* :

text: :*: DISPORTUS, ab Anglico Disport, Oblectamentum, Gall. Divertissement. Charta Henrici VI. Regis Angl. ann. 1449. apud Rymerum tom. 11. pag. 251. col. 2 :

text: :*:

text: :*: Similia leguntur pag. 297. col. 2. et alibi passim. Vide supra in Deportare 2.

text: :* :

text: :*: Athletic, sports (adj.) campester, ris, e; athlêticus, a, um; gymnicus, a, um
replies: text: :: --Grufo (disputatio) 10:28, 13 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deportus
Disputatio:Reges Romani

message: Addidi formulam stipulae quia haec pagina, ut vere encyclopedica sit, necessitat citationes fontium et notas historicitatis. Or, in English, I added the stub template because to be an encyclopedia page this article will need source citations and guidance on the historicity of the information. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:57, 24 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stipula
Disputatio:Ecce Romani

message: Hmm. Rather choppily ordered for what I get out of it. ¶ Re : "Ecce Romani, a Gilberto Lawall, est liber editus in partibus tribus, primum in CFA at latius deinde, scriptus ad linguam Latinam docendam." Anglice : "The book Ecce Romani has been published in three parts, by Gilbert Lawall, first in the U.S.A. but then more widely, and written to teach the Latin language." For "in three parts," there may be an idiom. So maybe more smoothly (if that translation is what you were saying) : "Liber Ecce Romani, a Gilberto Lawall tripartito editus, primum in CFA at recentior latius, ad linguam Latinam docendam scriptus est." ¶ Re : "Per fabulas de Cornelii familiae, senatore Romano fictico vita eventisque, libri I et II docent grammaticam simplicem et vocabula nonnulla." Vocabulary: eventus is fourth declension ; for "fictional, fictitious," my old dictionary has fictitius, not ficticus (but since fabulae may already be fictitious, maybe it can be omitted here, or better, go with fabula to show that everybody, not just the senator, is fictitious) ; nonnulla 'some' seems pale, but I'm not sure which you'd prefer among frequens, communis, obvius, translatitius, tritus, vulgaris, etc. So maybe : "Libri I et II grammaticam simplicem et vocabula vulgaria per fabulas fictitias de vita eventibusque familiae Cornelii, senatoris Romani, docent." Just suggestions. IacobusAmor 14:24, 25 Martii 2007 (UTC)

message: Why do the chapter summaries only cover chapters one through ten? Ecce Romani I has, if I recall correctly, 26 or so chapters. I'd have to retrieve my own copy to be sure, but it's currently in my school locker. Anyways, why stop at 10? Is the rest unable to be summarized for copyright reasons? Sparkstarthunderhawk 21:39, 23 Maii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-X ?
Disputatio:Of a Revolution

message: Needs to be Wikified, no? --BiT 01:37, 26 Martii 2007 (UTC)
13:32, 6 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)87.15.202.185==Revolutionis==
Re: ""Revolutionis" (fortasse "Seditionis" vel "Rebellionis")." Idioma est res novae et rerum (com)mutatio. IacobusAmor 14:48, 26 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dat Traupman "seditio" et "rebellio". Whitaker dat "revolutio" (quamquam notat "medieval uncommon"). Ratio mea fuit genitivum monstrare.--Ioshus (disp) 14:53, 26 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Dat Cicero res novae. Quem nobis credendum est? ;) IacobusAmor 16:35, 26 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Clariter Traupman naturalius quam Cicero Latine loquitur! =] Per mediam viam eamus:

text: ::"Revolutionis" at Latinitate pura "rerum novarum".

text: ::Placetne?--Ioshus (disp) 16:44, 26 Martii 2007 (UTC)
Non multum mihi placet: nam in ecclesiastica latinitate (e.g. Leo XIII) verba "res novae" utuntur sensu toto coelo diverso
Disputatio:Porta Taenaria

message: :Nexus absunt, ut credo. Nexus :en:Greek underworld etc. removi quia hic loquimur de porta, non de domo!
replies: text: Sed in dubio sum an paginam sub hoc titulo voluimus. "Porta Taenaria" mi paret esse cicumlocutionem hexametricam pro "Taenarum". Possumus paginam geographicam et mythologicam facere de promontorio Taenaro (cf. :en:Taenarum). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:17, 26 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nexus intervici; nomen paginae
Disputatio:Nancy Mitford

message: Cur non Nancy Mitford ut in Wikipedia anglica? Habemus fontem Honestae? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:23, 26 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see it now. en:wiki calls her Hon. Nancy Mitford. Hon. is one of those silly English titles, standing for "Honourable". I think it makes no sense to try to render it in other languages. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:26, 6 Februarii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Cf. Annula Llewellyn... suadeo moveatur in Annula Mitford...--Ioscius (disp) 21:39, 6 Februarii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Lepus paschalis

message: Nice, Alex! We should have Nympha dentalis too! =] --Ioshus (disp) 15:21, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)

message: Although, Alex, Might we want cuniculus instead of lepus? It's more diminutive and means more rabbit than hare...--Ioshus (disp) 15:27, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought that, too, and then I checked and found that "Easter hare" is the European original. I never knew that before. However, we must at least mention the cuniculus paschalis! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:38, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :In google lepus paschalis vincit in cuniculum paschale multitudine paginarum teutonicarum. Ceterum nympha dentalis mea opinione in Germania ignotior est quamquam paginam in vicipaedia Germanica habet. --Alex1011 18:17, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cuniculus
Disputatio:Ovum paschale

message: Alex, I don't know about elsewhere, but in America, easter eggs are often several colors at a time.--Ioshus (disp) 21:42, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I wrote "vel etiam multis coloribus". My impression is that in the age of mass production one color eggs are sold more often but maybe in the US they found a way to mass produce multi color eggs, or people are more industrious and eggs are more colored by people not by machines. But here is my evidence from commons: 
Image:Easter eggs-midiman.jpg|one color eggs #1
Image:Easter eggs-midiman2.jpg|onen color eggs #2
Image:American Easter Eggs 2800px.jpg|American (!) one color eggs
Image:Alle bunten Ostereier.jpg|German one color eggs.
. --Alex1011 21:35, 28 Martii 2007 (UTC)

text: Ha, even the one color eggs are more than one color! =] You're right though that the mass production ones usually are one color. Mind if I take a crack at the first sentence? Nothing is wrong with it, I just wonder if we can make the distinction more patent.--Ioshus (disp) 21:44, 28 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :All right, just want to mention that "impluviatum" = patterned is neolatin from the dictionary mentioned in the nota. Sometimes we do not only lack Latin words for, say, "Computer Aided Design", but for more simple words like pattern. --Alex1011 21:56, 28 Martii 2007 (UTC)

message: Geez. I'd have guessed it meant 'rained upon.' ;) IacobusAmor 22:02, 28 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I thought, too... like a Pollock painting or something, which is generally the way they come out when my niece decorates them... =] --Ioshus (disp) 02:00, 29 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "''impluviatum'' = patterned is neolatin"
Disputatio:Aulus Persius Flaccus

message: Addidi Aulus Persius Flaccus. Retrahi Aulus Flaccus Persius quia credo esse errorem in de:Wikipedia (etiam fontes Theodiscae, ut Der kleine Pauly, habent APF, non AFP). Sed redirectio nostra ab AFP exstat. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:41, 28 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Scandinavia

message: Actually, just Sweden, Denmark and Norway belong to Scandinavia. Someone has confused the term with Nordic Countries. Aaker 20:37, 29 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well Finland, Iceland and the Faroe Islands are sometimes included. --BiT 15:22, 31 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :But Greenland? Well, it has political links to Denmark, but it is not in Europe at all. --Muniswede 08:22, 27 Septembris 2007 (UTC)

message: Ut hodie legitur:
replies: text: ScandinaviaEbbe Vilborg, Norstedts svensk-latinska ordbok, editio secunda, 2009. Nomen adiectivum Scandinavius et Scandinavicus, et homo Scandinavus, -a. (alia nomina: Baltia, Basilia, Candanovia, Codanovia, ScadinaviaKarl Ernst Georges, Ausführliches lateinisch-deutsches Handwörterbuch; vide s.v. "Scandināvia (Scadināvia, Scatināvia).", Scandia"Superest ingens illa ad septentrionem Peninsula, quam Scandiam sive Scandinaviam veteres appellebant, & falso Insulam esse putabant."—"Liber XII: De Geographia," P. Gasparis Schotti Cursus Mathematicus, Sive Absoluta Mathematicarum Disciplinarum Encyclopaedia (Herbipoli, 1661), p. 350., Scania, Scanzia, Schonia, Scatinavia, Sulza insula) est regio Europae continentalis.

text: Notae
There's got to be a better way of organizing this. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:23, 10 Aprilis 2016 (UTC)

text: Indeed; as we've said before, if there are more than 2 or 3 name variants, they should go in notes or in a separate section. The introductions ought to be easily readable. Lesgles (disputatio) 18:17, 10 Aprilis 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma et definitio
Disputatio:Furiae

message: Look up anything in any encyclopedia... it goes Blahblahblah IS yaddda yadda yadda. Why do you consistently forsake this?--Ioshus (disp) 03:19, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Forsake this"? ¡Cálmate, amigo! Este colaborador está trabajando. IacobusAmor 03:34, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)

message: Please go to Wikipedia and make a link to this page. --Ioshus (disp) 03:23, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now I see what you mean.  But I thought that's what the robots were for. 71.208.209.152 03:53, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Robots will work if we have a link on a major wikipedia. That is, the robots will come and make links to de, it, pt, scn, ru, pl, fr, ei, es, etc... But if there is no link between us and someone else, the bots will not find us (or if they do, it will take forever!)--Ioshus (disp) 03:57, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  links
Disputatio:Bellum civile

message: Do we want to make a list here? Or on another page, like en does?--Ioshus (disp) 15:06, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)

message: Mutare velim et suadeo ad "Bellum Domesticum".Jondel (disputatio) 08:36, 29 Iulii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Quo fonte, Jondel? "Bellum civile" enim reperitur in permultis fontibus Latinis, e.g. libros Caesaris " de bello civili".

text: Censeo ego "bellum civile" (i.e. "inter cives") sensum idoneum habere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:42, 29 Iulii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Accedo. Nam in dictionario John Turenberg(?) infra indice 'bellum' est Bellum Domesticum. Jondel (disputatio) 09:07, 29 Iulii 2012 (UTC)
Me paenitet. Bellum civile non falsus est et nescio si magis rectus sit "Bellum Domesticum". Nam fontes habeo pro Bellum Domesticum-Civil War sunt paginas ex John Traupman dictionario, pp 154 and 698.
thread_title: Bellum domesticum
Disputatio:Primum Bellum Civile

message: Should we rename these? Memento: Latin =/= Roman.--Ioshus (disp) 16:31, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case I do not see much difference between civil war then and civil war now. --Alex1011 19:21, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :I'm just saying that this wasn't the "First Civil War" it was the "First Civil War of the Late Roman Republic."--Ioshus (disp) 19:33, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)

message: This text doesn't read like an encyclopedia article. Has it been copied from somewhere? IacobusAmor 16:24, 24 Septembris 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fons?
Disputatio:Cardcaptor Sakura

message: Yes, Iacobe, that's exactly it. The Latin is still not quite Ciceronian, perhaps. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:26, 31 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure it's just a matter of style (and to the extent that it is, not just Ciceronian style either). What I'm worrying about here, as on other pages where the same pattern turns up, is that the Latin may not mean what the author thinks it means. It looks as if the syntax of non-Latin is carrying over into Latin, battering & bruising the beloved old language. Let's say someone wants to convey the idea "A is a B made by C" (a perfectly good English construction) and carries that structure over into Latin as A est B facta a C. To native Latin-speakers, I fear that would seem equivalent to A B est facta a C and A B a C facta est, and all three of those wordings should then come back out in English as "The B A has been made by C"—which isn't the point the author was trying to make (and may therefore be called an inaccurate rendering). My suspicion is that "A is a B made by C" requires a relative clause : A est B quam fecit C. This is merely instinctive ; it could be wrong or misguided, and I don't have grammar-books to back it up, though a familiar biblical passage rings in the ears : Haec est dies quam fecit Dominus (Ps. 118:24), not, it will be noted, Haec est dies facta a Domino. Maybe Ioshus, Iustinus, or some other attentive expert will find this note and clarify the situation. ¶ A way of probing this point would be to search classical texts for examples where a compound verb of the pattern est factus has a nominative noun N inserted in it : est N factus. IacobusAmor 15:48, 31 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :The author you're writing about is mainly me. I couldn't understand the original Latin version, so I checked the English article to see what was meant, and rewrote the Latin, very hastily (since Manga bores me), so that it made some sense. You must admit I got close enough that you understood it correctly :)

text: :Your grammatical point may well be right, although psalms and encyclopedias tend to have different stylistic constraints! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:04, 31 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::A est B facta a C may be innocuous, but it has a close relative in a more worrisome example, seen in Metallum (musica): Hic carta est continens prima genera metalli 'Here's a chart containing the first kinds of metal'??? IacobusAmor 18:57, 31 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes
Disputatio:Deus Pater

message: Renuo. Non est idem ac Trinitas. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:34, 31 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Andreae consentio. Pars est 3=1=3, nonne?--Ioshus (disp) 20:04, 6 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
_________________
"Naturam Divinam and potestatem".
AND ?!?!?!?!???????
thread_title: Contribuenda
Disputatio:Xunchius

message: Quisque fons illum imperatorem "Xunchius" appellat. Sarazynus DOMI 15:01, 31 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen latine 

message: Dubium mihi quoque est de Sungteio nomine. Videtur enim Songteius non esse 順治, sed pater eius 皇太極, nomine annali 崇德; Martinus Martinius autem "Zungteum" hunc vocabat. Equidem vero anni in Iohannis Nieuhovii libro illius regno congruunt; nescio an imperatoris patris nomen cum ipsius confuderit?
Utcumque id fit, si nemo recusat, nomen paginae mox in Xunchium mutabo. Aristippus Ser (disputatio) 07:05, 27 Septembris 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iterum de nomine
Disputatio:Index poëtarum et poëtriarum

message: Index in hac pagina necessarius est? Num duplicat quod habemus apud :Categoria:Poetae? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:38, 3 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quippe non necessarius.--Ioshus (disp) 17:42, 3 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Some of these listed pages might be not referenced on any other page. So removing the links might result in Paginae orbatae. Maybe an Index poetarum would help. There we could even list pages we do not have yet. --Rolandus 19:05, 3 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Quae ego quidem propono, haec fere sunt: Hic enumerandi sunt poetae secundum linguam qua utuntur, i. e. secundum categorias, in quibus iam contenti sunt. Quid enim est, cur in hac pagina ita, ut adhuc fecimus, quamlibet seriem nominum sine ullo ordine ac lege conscribamus? Si non placet, paginam censeo delendam esse. --Bavarese (disputatio) 17:48, 3 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Necessaria?
Disputatio:Verbum compositum

message: Ok we have in Latin:
#Pre/suffication 
##per+facere=perficere, semper+ternus=sempiternus
#Place or thing + agent
##mons+vagus=montivagus
#stem+another stem in genitive
##agri+cultura=agricultura 
#Maybe a special case but ne+verb
##non+velle=nolle
##Maybe just non + any word, or should we count nonnumquam as non numquam? but nefas is definitely not ne fas...
#Adjective+noun frozen form
##again may be a special case, but hoc+die=hodie
#number+word
##tres+vir=triumvir, septem+mane=septimana
What else?
--Ioshus (disp) 05:43, 4 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then, of course, we need to talk about how you make compounds in other languages. We should probably do that by language family, rather than individual languages. There is a similar manner of concatenate nonal adjectives in germanic languages, like "door mat", etc... --Ioshus (disp) 05:51, 4 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :This whole topic is new to me, so I am basically stumbling in the dark.  But flipping through the dictionary turned up postprincipium (prep. + noun), paterfamilias (noun + noun in gen. (but listed in OLD under pater) rather like agricultura) patefacio, horripilo (verb + verb), longaevus (adjective + noun, but the compound is an adj.)  By the way, 'hebdomas' comes from ἕβδομας.Montivagus 07:12, 4 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Yes, yes, I used Roman letters, but that doesn't change the point...I was under the impression that ἕβδομας was formed just like septimana, semana, settimana, etc, (septem=hepta, hep+d=hebd)... 7 mornings... --Ioshus (disp) 08:00, 4 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

text: :I think you're wrong on that one (if you were right, hebdomas would be a portmanteau word!) But no, it parallels the Greek adjective hebdomos = seventh; it is a derived form rather than a compound.

text: :I'm very glad you've started this article. The question of the part-of-speech of the two words that go into the compound (prep. + noun, noun + noun, etc.) might want to be separated from the question of how they relate to one another (your examples 2 and 3 are relevant to that). Sanskrit grammarians went deep into the issue. I might try a section on it. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:53, 4 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Yeah, I did some research, and will certainly concede this point. Now, I'm wondering if I made that up, or if I was led astray by an errant Greek teacher. I have changed the example to triumvir and septimana.--Ioshus (disp) 17:39, 4 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

message: #root plus verb
##mavolo < mag- + volo
#root plus noun
##Iuppiter < deus + pater
#noun plus noun in archaic genitive
##paterfamilias < pater + familias
#stem plus -cris
##mediocris < medio- + -cris
+Vide commentarium in Allen & Greenough s.v. "Compound Words," #264–#267. IacobusAmor 10:55, 4 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cris?--Ioshus (disp) 17:39, 4 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What else?
Disputatio:Coitus

message: I don't really think this needs to be contribuenda with Actus sexuales. Does anyone have a good reason why it should be? It's a distinct act and such. Like a "main article" template use on en...--Ioscius (disp) 21:22, 4 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm, 3 years later I do actually see a problem. That's that this links to :en:Sexual intercourse which in turn links back to Actus sexuales. Maybe actus sexuales should link to :en:Human sexual behavior...? --Ioscius∞ 23:10, 22 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yes, of course. It's a problem on their end that 'Sexual intercourse' should link to Coitus. Also, I note in Actus sexuales that we have yet another page where title and lemma differ.

text: :By the way, is it the case in Latin that coitus means 'sexual intercourse', while the spelling coetus is used for all other meanings? Pantocrator 23:20, 22 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::According to Cassell's, coitus is English (or a variant of the Latin) and coetus is Latin; all the above-cited senses are given under coetus. It's from coeo, -ire. IacobusAmor 00:07, 23 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: actibus sexualibus (non) contribuenda
Disputatio:Kyriacus Anconitanus de Picenicollibus

message: Re: "Honoris Kyriaci causa, cathedralis Anconae ecclesia est Sancto Cyriaco dedicata."—That's from the French wiki ("La cathédrale de sa ville natale a été dédiée à saint Cyriaque en son honneur"). Can it be right? Ordinarily, naming went the other way round : people took their name from that of the patron of their local church, or from some other pertinent saint. Would the church really be named for Saint Cyriacus because the merchant Kyriacus was an illustrious native son? IacobusAmor 01:37, 7 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Additamentum.—Ait vicium Anglicum in re Ancona : "The beautiful Cathedral, entitled to St. Ciriaco, was consecrated in 1128 and completed in 1189." And Saint Cyriacus himself lived & died a millennium before our Kyriacus. So should we add a note attributing the sentence to the French wiki? or should we just cut the sentence? IacobusAmor 02:08, 7 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Your first thought was right and the English wiki confirms it (in this case! not that it's infallible). My initial reaction would be simply to delete the statement. But, since this is a pretty definitive article, maybe you want to add -- as a footnote to his name -- that the local church was consecrated to St Cyriac (and consecrated in 1128), just so that no one will be tempted to reinsert the false info that it was named after him. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:35, 7 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who's named for whom?

message: Addidi. Sed si meliores imagines repertae sunt, haec delendae! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:39, 6 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Imagines excellentissimas! Gratias, Andree. IacobusAmor 14:25, 6 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Imagines

message: Cur Cyriacus cum K (quae littera vix Latina est) potius quam cum C ut in linguis modernis ?
Marcus Terentius Bibliophilus (disputatio) 15:52, 4 Novembris 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Vide notam primam; sic ferme nomen suum signabat; plerumque tales indicationes sequimur. Quamquam in lingua antiqua K vere rarum erat (solum Kalendae, Kaeso, Karthago, etc.), in Medio Aevo et in Renascentia usus eius aliquantum extensus est (vide e.g. hanc paginam et sequentes in Lexico Universali). Lesgles (disputatio) 18:11, 5 Novembris 2013 (UTC)
Tuam rationem intellego et probari potest. Fortasse Kyriacum signabat ne nomen Italiane pronuntiaretur (i.e. Tchiriako) vel quia Graecus videri cupiebat. In Wikipedia Germanica contra contendunt nomen Latinum fuisse Ciriacum Anconitanum. Non tamen mi displicet Kyriacus, si ita ipse scripsit. 
Marcus Terentius Bibliophilus (disputatio) 11:16, 26 Februarii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Orthographia