lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Gulielmus III (rex Angliae)

message: 'Gulielmus'? Mallem eum vocare Guillelmum aut Wilhelmum (ut in versibus illis: Wilhelmus van Nassouwe...). Ipse 20:44, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Vide s.v. Gulielmus. Nomen quod est William, Wilhelm etc. plurimis figuris ad Latinitatem adaptatur, et mos solitus noster est ea forma uti qua ipse homo (quoad sciscitari potest) usus est. Quod autem ad reges attinet, res est variis causis aliquanto magis involuta. Non habeo pro certo quae forma maxime idonea sit huic commentationi, sed nisi habes bonum argumentum cur hacce commentatione, alia figura alii praeponenda sit, ego malim Gulielmum dicere. --Iustinus 21:26, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Illud dixi quia ista forma nominis, "Gulielmus", aliquantulo rarior, aut mihi quidem insolita esse videbatur; tum autem nescio quare eo nomine uti non deberemus, sicut dicis. Dum igitur tibi consentiam, fortasse operis pretium esset (sed magni operis) omnia ea, quae ab illo rege aut de illo rege Latine edita sunt diligenter perscrutari. Ipse 21:50, 13 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen 

message: Hoc nomen delevi una cum nota subiuncta: "Guilielimus Henricus D[ux] G[ubernator] Princeps Auriacus Guilielimus Henricus D G Princeps Auriacus | William III, 1650-1702 apud www.nmm.ac.uk Lectum 26 Iulii 2008". Fons nondum in eo loco reperitur; credo etiam textum aut erroneum aut mendose apud nos refertum. "D.G." enim in titulis nobilitatis "Dei Gratia" saepius indicat. Orthographiam "Guilielimus" falsam censeo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:06, 9 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen insolitum
Disputatio:Marchio Hospitalius

message: The only thing I can find is Guillaume Libri in reference to his latin pen name. Can anyone confirm this as an indeclinable form he used in latin documents (I know he was bad in latin himself, but surely his work was translated, I just can't seem to find it).--Ioshus (disp) 04:38, 29 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mais, mon cher ami, assurément tu sais que Guillaume François Antoine, Marquis de L'Hôpital (1661–1704), mathématicien, n'était point Guillaume Libri (1803–1869), historien de mathématiques, professeur au Collège de France et membre de l'Académie des sciences ? IacobusAmor 05:17, 29 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :je ne assurément sai about anything, man...--Ioshus (disp) 05:21, 29 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)

text: That sort of thing is not unheard of, but still strange. I found a Latin form with only the surname: Calculi infinitesimalis: Pars I, Seu Calculus differentialis, expositus Analysi infinite parcorum d. marchionis Hospitalii. Unfortunately this was published in 1764, well after Monsieur le Marquis's death, but it's still an attestation. WOuld be nice to find something earlier, because, as you say, there surely was something. --Iustinus 05:21, 29 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)

text: ADDENDVM: There seem to be a lot of hits, actually, for Marchio Hospitalius --Iustinus 05:24, 29 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied from [[ Disputatio:Guillaume de l'Hôpital‎]]

message: Hey, Iustine...that link didn't quite work. I'm curious, so please resend, or tell me what entry you looked up (I read a page on e, not a or abs. Thanks.--Ioshus (disp) 09:04, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, sorry, that's what I get for trying to link to perseus in the bleedin' edit summary. Of course if you were not half-asleep already, you would already have guessed that I was talking about the endtry for ab. The first section, of course, has a long discussion on all the various allomorphs. --Iustinus 09:10, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Dude, I'm 3/4 asleep...--Ioshus (disp) 09:16, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::See, I'm only 3/8 asleep. But then we're in different time zones. --Iustinus 09:21, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: link
Disputatio:Asia orientalis

message: Dubiosam non esse putamus scripturam Sinicam, quod auctores multi utabantur eo vocabulo. Inter alios, vide
* Callery, Joseph Marie: Systema phoneticum Scriptura Sinica : partes 1.& 2, A.D. 1841
* Hofmann, Johann Jacob: Lexicon Universale, A.D. 1698 s.v. Sinae
thread_title:  Scriptura Sinica 

message: Oryzae nomen refertur in articulo Vicipaediae ipsae de frumento.
thread_title:  Oryza
Disputatio:Urbes Britanniae Romanae

message: This list comes from Index oppidorum et castellorum Romae antiquae. It largely duplicates the existing article, I think, and only one name has been linked. I put it here instead of discarding it in case it contains useful alternative names. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:37, 6 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
*Anderita (Pevensey)
*Aquae Sulis (Bath)
*Caesaromagus (Chelmsford)
*Calleva Atrebatum (Silchester)
*Clausentum (Bitterne)
*Colonia Claudia Victrix Camulodunum (Colchester)
*Corinium Dubonnorum (Cirencester)
*Deva (Chester)
*Dubris (Dover)
*Durnovaria Durotrigum (Dorchester)
*Durobrivae (Rochester)
*Durobrivae (Water Newton)
*Durovernum Cantiacorum (Canterbury)
*Eburacum (York)
*Glevum (Gloucester)
*Isca Dumnoniorum (Exeter)
*Isca Silurum (Caerleon)
*Lindinis (Ilchester)
*Lindum (Lincoln)
*Londinium (London)
*Maia (Bowness)
*Noviomagus Regnorum (Chichester)
*Petuaria (Brough)
*Ratae Coritanorum (Leicester)
*Rutupiae (Richborough)
*Segedunum (Wallsend)
*Trimontium (Newstead)
*Venta Belgarum (Winchester)
*Venta Icenorum (Caister)
*Venta Silurum (Caerwent)
*Verulamium (St. Albans)
*Viroconium Cornoviorum (Wroxeter)
thread_title:  Moved from elsewhere
Disputatio:Curitiba

message: Nisi habemus fontem nominis loci Urbs Araucariarum sive Araucaria, an Curitiba potius scribendum? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:05, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
Removi ad Curitiba: bene feci? Sed cur imaginem Portus Alacri habemus hic? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:27, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Schola Hogvartensis

message: I wonder if poetica is an over-literal interpretation of the Greek word to mean fictiva. In any case, articles don't have to be deleted just because they describe fictinal places and characters, they simply need to be written from the point of view of the Real World, not the one described in the books. --Iustinus 20:49, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::That's my point. Perhaps overenthusiastic kiddies shouldn't be allowed to contribute articles on potteresque figures until they've contributed one on, say, Henry Esmond, or Queequeg, or Tess (of the D'Urbervilles). ::winkwink:: IacobusAmor 21:04, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::This is just what I wanted to avoid, see http://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disputatio_Usoris:IacobusAmor&curid=13667&diff=194419&oldid=194411 --Rolandus 21:14, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Consider that you may have missed examples of obstinate nictitating! IacobusAmor 21:57, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree. --Rolandus 20:57, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Me, too.--Ioshus (disp) 20:58, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: ...is this thing called? Hogvarts? or Hogvartensis?--Ioshus (disp) 01:07, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's see, HP Et Philosophi Lapis p. 41 "SCHOLA HOGVARTENSIS ARTIUM MAGICARUM ET FASCINATIONIS"... elsewhere there are several occurences of "Schola Hogvartensis", but I haven't thus far found any Hogvarts... but that doesn't preclude it, because honestly one of my main complaints about this Latin translation is ther very poor naming. You know how much I like onomastics, and technical terminology, and it seems to me that in the universe of HP there should already be Latin names for all these things, most likely done in the style of Renaissance Latin. Instead almost everything is treated as foreign, and keeps its vernacular form in the nominative. --Iustinus 01:20, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Well, they had to do it quickly to make any money off of it... I'm just making sure which one I should delete, and which one I should change from delenda to maxcorr.--Ioshus (disp) 01:22, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::I'm afraid an editor's default stance here, as with all these potteresque peculiarities, has to be that contributors aren't working from the Latin version, but are combining beginner's Latin with their memory of the story in their native language. IacobusAmor 15:46, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what the hell... 

message: Yeah, the names of the founders are wrong too (both before and after the correction). THose aren't the forms the house names take in the official translation (for better or for worse). --Iustinus 07:48, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  House names
Disputatio:Albus Dumbledore

message: This is short enough that it might have to be deleted as a substub, but the fact that it describes a fictional character isn't reason in itself to delete it. It just needs to be written to explicitly state that he is a fictional character from the HP books. --Iustinus 20:50, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. But we should give the author some time to come back and improve the article. Or to ask for help. --Rolandus 20:59, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: 'A. D. [White Bumblebee] conquers G. at 1945'. Dear 201.52.78.88, what is this trying to mean? I haven't read the book, so I apologize for not knowing.  IacobusAmor 00:42, 15 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably intends anno 1945 Grindelwald vicit. See :en:Dumbledore#Career for details (spoilerish of course). --Iustinus 01:09, 15 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Albus Dumbledore vincit Grünewald ad 1945."

message: Pronounced /parkifal/ ~ /perkifal/, but the English is usually Percival, pronounced /pRsIvL/; so why are these forms to be preferred to Parsifal /parsifal/ or Persifal = /persifal/, which sound more like the English? IacobusAmor 16:31, 29 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Parcifal, Percifal
Disputatio:BC

message: Javier, please indicate in the edit summary if you have marked something delenda. That being said...what are opinions about this as delenda?--Ioscius (disp) 21:34, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Discretiva needed: bachelor of commerce, Before Christ, British Columbia. + "B.C." = name of a syndicated comic strip in CFA. IacobusAmor 05:27, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Libenter adde quae velis... discretiva fact est!--Usor:Ioscius (disp) 05:28, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: ...and made this a discretiva. Javier, any objections?--Usor:Ioscius (disp) 05:15, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  i have removed <nowiki>{{delenda}}</nowiki>...
Disputatio:Lingua Latina temporis humanistici

message: Phrasis imperfecta: "quae post renascentiam europeam vel post medium aevum usa est." Anglice est "which after the European "renascentia" or middle age (has) used." This utor is deponent, so the phrase is incomplete and needs correcting. IacobusAmor 16:25, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Utor
Disputatio:Gustavus Klimt

message: Art Nouveau: cf. Ars Nova --Iustinus 17:46, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: How did Gustav Klimt die?--xgmx (T | C | D | R | DR)
replies: text: According to en:wiki "Klimt died ... in Vienna on February 6, 1918, having suffered a stroke and pneumonia." Does this answer the question? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:35, 12 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  death
Disputatio:Regnum Utriusque Siciliae

message: Regnum Duarum Siciliae would have to mean something like "The Kingdom of Sicily, of Two Women." What you want is Duarum Siciliarum. However, Utriusque Siciliae appears to be more common than Duarum Siciliarum. It makes more sense to me too: if someone told me they were Rex Duarum Siciliarum I would take that to mean "King of two of the Sicilies", as if there were more than two (which everyone knows is preposterous!) --Iustinus 19:51, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Vel "The Two Women's Kingdom of Sicily"? ¶ I think your "king of two of the Sicilies" has to be Rex Duarum ex Siciliis. IacobusAmor 20:02, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Well, it seems to me Rex Duarum Terrarum is the King of Two Countries, whereas Rex Ambarum Terrarum or Rex Utriusque Terrae is the King of The Two Countries, or Both Countries. --Iustinus 20:13, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: in 1282 the Kingdom of Sicily (regnum siciliae) split in two parts.
both maintained the name.
when the two kingdoms fell under the same king, he became rex utriusque siciliae ("king of both Sicily", even though I don't understand why Sicily doesn't go to plural...).  I'm adding a coin for reference.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ph.ii.2cv.a.r.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ph.ii.2cv.a.v.jpg
in 1816, following the Congress of Vienna, the two kingdoms became one.
I don't know what was the *official* name of the kingdom, nor if the Congress of Vienna was redacted in Latin or French...  My best guess is regnum siciliarum, which is according to the coins emitted by the old king with new name: rex regni siciliarum.  a possible English translation of this is "king of the Sicilies".
http://www.numismatica.it/Foto/1817ppt.jpg
replies: text: The reason Siciliae is in the singular is that utriusque really means "each of the two" or, I suppose, "either." --Iustinus 17:46, 25 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  never saw "of both sicily"
Disputatio:Aqua cadens

message: Anglicum verbum waterfall non est cataracta ? Aqua cadens = 'falling water', sed Fallingwater (unum verbum) est nomen domus quod Baumeister Frank Lloyd Wright descripsit et aedificavit. IacobusAmor 02:41, 11 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ni fallor sive cataracta sive aquae deiectus sed dubito quin locutio quae est aqua cadens rata sit. --Iustinus 06:08, 11 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::"Menge-Güthling" habet: Wasserfall: deiectus aquae, aquae cadentes, im Nil catarracta. --Alex1011 12:10, 11 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Aqua cadens"?

message: Ave vicipaediano!
Italicus sum, propre Romam natus sum et vulgo italice loquor. Adhibuit verbum vicipaedianum novum cum in lexico latino italiano a Luisium Castiglioni et Scevolam Mariotti collecto legi: cascata d'acqua (waterfall), acquae deiectus (us, m); aquae (-arum, f. pl.) cadentes; la Cascata del Nilo (Nilo's waterfall), Nilus cadens; Nili cataractae (arum); il fiume ha una cascata (the river has a waterfall), fluminis aquae ex edito desiliunt. Lego enim cataractam esse verbum novum in latinitate qui Plinius coepit e grecitas cum uso vario. Putavi verbum Aqua cadens usum rectum fit ut aquae ductus vocantur latine simpliciter aqua (Aqua Marcia, Aqua...) sive Anio novus(!), Anio vetus(!).
Haec verba cuncta ambigua sunt sicut pruralia; si notae sunt novae expectabo. 
Habui enim 20:32, 10 Februarii 2007 87.19.54.77 identificatio, dum non conventum perveni in Vicipaedia et recensivi aliquot paginas. Errores mei compellas!!
--Wento 11:55, 11 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aqua cadens 

message: Plinius verbo "deiectus" (et sine "aquae") usus est libro 33 cap. 75. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:12, 19 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deiectus
Disputatio:Vigornia (Massachusetta)

message: Call me unpatriotic, but surely the UK Worcester should get priority? --Iustinus 01:28, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And then there's Worcester, "low-fired porcelain containing a frit [sic] and steatite" (MWCD9). Disambiguation City! IacobusAmor 01:35, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :frit --Iustinus 01:59, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::I support Iustinus, this page should be moved to Vigornia (America) and leave this page for Worcester, England. And Worcester could also refer to Worcestershire sauce--Xaverius 23:22, 20 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::As a resident of Vigornia in the US and frequent contributor to the page, I would welcome both changes, for what it's worth :)Rafaelgarcia 14:04, 21 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::I moved the page to Vigornia(America) but now Vicipaedia redirects Vigornia to Vigornia (America).  How does one turn off the redirection? Rafaelgarcia 07:17, 23 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: In primis urbi nomen Vigornia dedi quia illi urbi Worcester in Britannia nomen est Vigornia, sed hodie vidi insigne Collegii Sanctae Crucis dicere :Collegium Sanctae Crucis S. I. - Vigornii Mass. ubi S. I. significet Societatis Iesuitae et Vigornii, quod suggeret nomen urbis alternativum Vigornium. Oportet igitur movere hanc paginam ad Vigornium? --Rafaelgarcia 22:57, 25 Februarii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Da veniam: haec non vidi ante paginam motam. Possumus rursus movere si volumus ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:58, 27 Decembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Noli te solicitare: bene factum est, quia ambo nomina recta habentur, secundum facultatem studii classici Collegii Sanctae Crucis.--Rafaelgarcia 19:31, 27 Decembris 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen est falsum?
Disputatio Formulae:FA stella

message: Ummm...yeah, I have no idea why this won't work... UV, Rol, anybody?--Ioshus (disp) 03:41, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was at :en:Infinity and there was a star next to Latina under Interwiki. - Secundus Zephyrus 05:29, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Well, yes, but that's because it is featured here. This doesn't help us adorn our own featured pages with stars, which is what I'm trying to effect here...--Ioshus (disp) 05:31, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Fixed. --UV 23:24, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Thanks!--Ioshus (disp) 23:42, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't we make this include :Categoria:Paginae mensis?--Ioscius (disp) 16:25, 15 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, done. --UV 20:06, 16 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Aha, I had forgotten I suggested it. Thanks, UV. --Ioscius (disp) 21:24, 16 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  categoria
Disputatio:Empirismus

message: Haec philosophia est Empiricismus vel  Empirismus ? --Xaverius 13:38, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: Mutavi definitionem empirismi, ut clarius exprimeret illud, quod in aliarum linguarum paginis Vicipaedianis inveniri potest. Praeterea addidi praecipuas empirismi notas.Urbanus Ferrarius (disputatio) 13:36, 26 Decembris 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incrementum paginae
Disputatio:Butuntum

message: Exstant fontes nominis Botontum? Ego invenio Butunti in Der kleine Pauly. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:49, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
In versione italica, dicunt quidam sapientes Botontum appllari Bonum totum. --Marc mage 18:36, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: Haec quae sequuntur addita sunt ab usore anonymo in paginam. Retrahi, sed fortasse est aliquid utile hic. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:44, 7 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Botuntum est magna civitas sita in meridione Italiae, prope Viam Traianam et Viam Appiam. Condita a F.Fanelli, hui civitati sunt magna monumenta ut Porta Baresana, Castellum, Cattedral et ceterae res. Si vis visitare hanc civitas potes venire cum tu vis, sed necesse est cavere latrones et non ferre magnam pecuniam tecum, quia fortasse tu deprehenderis a multis latronibus. Cave, cave!
thread_title: Additamenta de latronibus

message: Sunt multi anonymi apud Butunti. Aliquis mutavit nomen in Butuntum. Bene, si habemus fontem; sed usque hodie non habemus. Si vis mutare, s.t.p., cita fontem Latinam pro nomine. Et aperi conventum!
There are a lot of anonymous editors at Bitonto, and one of them changed the Latin name to Butuntum. Fine, if we have a source for that name; but so far we don't. We do have a source for Butunti.  If you really want to change the name, you must cite a reliable source for your preferred name. And do get a username! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:05, 4 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
His name is Butuntum, it isn't Buunti!
replies: text: ::Apud Hofmannum est "Butuntum, sive Butuntos" (vide ). Encyclopædia Britannica dicit "Botuntum" est alia forma . Harrissimo.
replies: text: :::Thanks very much for checking, Harrissimo. Hofmann does also give Butunti (from Martialis and the Tabula Peutingeriana) but he and the Encyclopaedia Britannica will certainly serve as sources for Butuntum. Anonimo Bitontiano may claim victory! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:54, 20 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: La nota che riporta la naturalis historia è da correggere: Butuntinenses è citato nel libro 3,105 e non in 3,11
thread_title: Note
Disputatio:Henricus II (rex Siciliae)

message: Quid significat SRI? An potius omnibus litteris scribendum?
Non scio si re vera fuit imperator necne. Wikipedia Anglica dicit eum fuisse regem Siciliae, regem Romanorum, et cetera, sed minime imperatorem. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:10, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ecce :
replies: text: :SRI = Sacrum Romanum Imperium.

text: :SRIP = Sacri Romani Imperii Princeps.

text: Fons: Adriano Cappelli, Dizionario di Abbreviature Latine ed Italiane (Milano: Ulrico Hoepli, 1929). IacobusAmor 17:24, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Gratias! Sed debemus habere tales abbreviationes in titulis? Exstant paginae Ferdinandus I SRI, Carolus V SIR (sic), Ferdinandus I SRI, Carolus VI SIR. Fortasse movendae? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:13, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
puto nobis necesse est abbreviationes uti, quia alii reges eiusdem nominis sunt, e.g Henricus VI Angliae Ciao --Massimo Macconi 20:36, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Titulus "SRI"
Disputatio:Franciscus Zappa

message: A certificate is a scripta testificatio or a testimonium scriptum. IacobusAmor 17:28, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Testimonium natale then, maybe?--Ioshus (disp) 17:29, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Maybe, but to be a certificate, it has to be written : scripta testificatio natalis ? (I'm conceiving that natalis to be genitive.) IacobusAmor 17:35, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::testimonium natale scriptum fortasse ? --Marc mage 18:08, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Langenscheidt: certificate: documentum, tabulae, litterae / birth: natalicium. --Alex1011 19:12, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ioshus asks how to say "birth certificate."
Disputatio:Scrotum

message: Ioshus: "scrotum membrumque ambo sunt neutra, ergo qui=>quod)."—Recte autem puto "qui/quod" ad "scacci" spectare : "forma sacci, qui." IacobusAmor 23:00, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Qui/quod
Disputatio Categoriae:Chemica

message: "Categoria:Chemica" should be renamed to "Categoria:Chemia". See Disputatio:Chemia#chemia_vs_chemica. --Rolandus 15:58, 17 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See my comment at Disputatio:Chemia#chemia_vs_chemica. I think this category makes good sense for articles about chemical substances; articles about chemistry, however, need to be recategorized. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:49, 25 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :No one else has commented so I'll remove the template and recategorize articles that belong in :Categoria:Chemia. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:33, 10 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Movenda
Disputatio:Thalia (cantrix)

message: El artículo lo considero completo por ahora, aunque deseo seguir ampliándolo cuando algo más se me ocurra. Quisiera agradecerles a todos los editores que colaboraron.
I consider the article has been completed for now, though I'm going to add things when there is something else to add. I would like to thank all editors who have collaborated.
--Zoltan 21:53, 19 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gracias a todos por haberme ayudado / Thanks to all for your help
Disputatio:Caesarea Maritima

message: Pagina de insula Jersey movi ad Caesarea insula. Vide Disputatio:Caesarea insula. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:30, 18 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: Insuper inter Doram et Ioppam, quae parvae stationes erant, 
The link on Dora points to a city in France, which obviously has nothing to do with this discussion. Apparently, Dora (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tel_Dor), about 12 miles north of Caesarea on the Mediterranean coast, is meant. This should be fixed. Toddcs (disputatio) 10:59, 23 Maii 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thanks. Who wants to write the article? Joppa, too, is a redlink. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:57, 23 Maii 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dora