lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Lingua Sanscrita

message: Lingua sanscrita utens, verba citare potes radicem verbi aut nominativum indicans.
    radix           nominativus
     mātṛ            mātā
     danta           dantas
     dvi             dvau,dve,dve
     mad             aham
     hrid            hrit
Sed in sententiis forma "in pausa" utitur, e.g. dantaḥ, smaḥ.
Textus et radicibus et nominativis et formis in pausa usus est, quod non mihi placuit.
Sequens usum verborum thesaurorum, nunc solum radices ibi scribo.
Res minimae:
u verbi sūnu longum est.
nāsā genus femininum habet.
Manus Graece cheir (ἡ χέιρ) est, cheiro non invenitur.
replies: text: Norma indicationis huius lingua in Vicipaediis nescio, sed dicam tibi confido et optime ut hoc contribuis. :) At tamen, Sanscrite non loquor, hehe, contra iucunda lingua est. - Donatello (disputatio) 18:48, 27 Novembris 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: tabella verborum linguae sanscritae

message: Errare puto esse de aniquitate linguarum loqui. Melius de elementis protoindoeuropaeae linguae conservatis in lingua Sanscrita tractare, nam phonologia linguam non facit sola. Fortasse poni possit linguam Lithuanam antiquissimam esse (ut commentatio nostra profitetur) grammatices causa. 
Quidquid id est, antiquitas linguae Sanscritae omnia alia non superat, ut in sententia prima exprimatur.
--Ioscius  ∞ 23:46, 21 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita. Iacobus iam textum correxit; ego verba (mea) in capsa nunc leviter emendavi. Meliust? Nec lingua Lituana "antiquissima" est (omnes enim linguae hodiernae naturales eandem antiquitatem habent), sed formas antiquissimas nonnullas servat! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:15, 22 Martii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  antiquitas linguae
Disputatio:Brasilia

message: Nonne urbs Fluminensis Ianuariopolis vocatur? usor:Bohmhammel, 21.47, 6 Idus Sept. 2006
replies: text: :Egger:
 Rio de Janeiro
 Flumen Ianuarii, n.
 Est metropolis Brasiliensis.
 Flumenianuarienses, ium (ad verbum com-
 positum quod attinet, cfr. vetus nomen
 «Flumenpiscensis», Optat. Milev., De
 Schism. Donat. 2, 18; Not. Episc. Si-
 tif.; al.; subauditur civitas; vel «Flumen-
 zeritanum» (oppidum), Not. Episc.
 Maur. Caes. 30)
 Flumenianuariensis, e (ex usu Curiae Ro-
 manae: S. Sebastiani Fluminis Ianuarii).
replies: text: :--Iustinus 02:40, 9 Septembris 2006 (UTC)

message: Shouldn’t Guimaraens be spelled Vimarii, as it was originally a germanic name?  Wimara – Guimara – Guimarães.
-- 
Leandro 13:49, 4 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guimaraens 

message: Hic commentarius excellentissimus est 93 chilioctetis longa, sed "aliquae navigatra paginas longiores quam 32 chiliocteti recensere non possunt." Qui paginam in partes minores franget? IacobusAmor 01:27, 16 Novembris 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Permultae paginae longiores quam 32 chiliocteti sunt. Sed Massimo sectionem de historia civitatis nunc ad paginam novam movit: vide Historia Brasiliensis. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:31, 16 Novembris 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnitudo commentarii [[Brasilia]]e
Disputatio:Solarium

message: Sententia horologiorum solariorum est:
 Horas non numero nisi serenas.
Quae sunt verba? Quis scripsit? Cur? Ubi invenisti? Quaeso, narra mihi, et omnibus in pagina.--Ioshus (disp) 05:29, 13 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ehem, hoc ex memoria mea sumpsi. Fortasse aliquando locum invenibo. Alex1011 08:19, 13 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Est quidem praeclara sententia saltem. --Iustinus 18:26, 13 Septembris 2006 (UTC)

message: Etiam, cur imaginem "TEMPUS FUGIT" appellasti? Quid significas? Quid significat? Dic nobis.--Ioshus (disp) 05:30, 13 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Si imaginem maiorem facis per click, invenibis! Alex1011 08:17, 13 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  imago 

message: An anonymous user with changing IP address keeps inserting a weblink into that page repeatedly. What about semi-protecting that page, so that only registered users can edit it, but not IPs? --UV 17:24, 7 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. --Rolandus 17:31, 7 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: : Page is semi-protected. All registered users can edit the page, everyone can edit the talk page. --UV 17:46, 7 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pagina semi-protegenda? 

message: Non esset, potius Horologium Solare? vel..Soleum..nescio......solarium.. sed, si sic dictum a romanis scriptumque fuerit, des veniam.
thread_title:  ..Solarium?
Disputatio:Schola Greshamensis

message: Just out of curiosity, why did you change the pattern of "A est/sunt B" to that of "A B est/sunt"? Is it because your textbooks tell you to put verbs at the end? or what? IacobusAmor 16:05, 15 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nescio quomodo, meo animo melior sonat. Xn4 13:53, 20 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "A est/sunt B" vs. "A B est/sunt"

message: Omnia = neuter plural. IacobusAmor 00:38, 21 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Iam mihi dices Non licet hoc! Xn4 00:32, 22 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sententia
Disputatio:Meerkat Manor

message: Quid est melior:
replies: text: :Meerkat Manor, id est Domus Suricattarum,
vel
replies: text: :Domus Suricattarum (Anglice: Meerkat Manor),
??? IacobusAmor 02:27, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)

text: The predecent is the nl link which uses the name "Meerkat Manor" even though they have a different word for Meerkat, and most probably Manor as well. Alexanderr 03:27, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :I'd opt for the first one, as the series are thus titled. --Agricola 11:19, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Agreed, per Vicipaedia:Translatio nominum propriorum. Domus suricattarum should come in parentheses immediately after the title.--Ioshus (disp) 12:14, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
*"Domus" non est translatio optima. Verbum anglicum "manor" non est domus quacumque, sed (ante Europae industrializationem) domus domini inferioris locali, et terra quam dominat. "Fundus Suricattarum"? "Villa Suricattarum"? Anthony Appleyard 09:59, 6 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

text: :Institutio quae Anglice "manor" vocatur Latine est "manerium".   —Mucius Tever 13:08, 7 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Titulus
Disputatio:Psychologia

message: The illustration wants a caption. IacobusAmor 12:21, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Caption

message: In "ψυχή [psukhē]," nego ψυχή pronunciatum esse [psukhē]. IPA recte est [psȳχe:] similis, non? et Homeris tempore [psūχe:] vel [psūχæ:]? IacobusAmor 01:45, 31 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita vero, sed nota bene: translitteratio non est pronuntiatio. --Neander 02:36, 31 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Sic, sed ut fit in hoc contextu, "[" et "]" pronuntiationem plerumque indicant. IacobusAmor 03:13, 31 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Hoc tibi assentior. Non fuit mea idea, ut translitterationes huiusmodi parenthesibus insererentur. --Neander 03:28, 31 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::auctor cum Freud errat. [Scripsit 134.95.82.162, usor ignotus; immutavit 78.54.186.117, usor ignotus.]

text: Homeri tempore potius [], ni fallor; tempore Imperii Romani []. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:34, 6 Martii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ψυχή [psukhē]
Disputatio:BBC (Anglica Televisio Corporatio)

message: Est Anglica Televisiones Corporatio verbum gratum acceptumque in Latina hodierna?
replies: text: 1. Recte, verbum Anglicum corporation = (a) corpus, (b) sodalitium, (c) societas corporata, (d) communitas corporata, (e) collegium.

text: 2. Et televisiones et corporatio sunt nomina substantiva, sed prius est plurale, et alterum est singulare. IacobusAmor 14:49, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Corporatio mihi saltem grata acceptaque est. Sed noli nomine substantivo in loco adiectivi uti! --Iustinus 16:59, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Ei non usus sum: reus fuit primus scriptor (Anglice: "OP")! IacobusAmor 17:53, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
His omnibus dictis denique fortasse nomen optimum esset BBC (societas televisifica). --Iustinus 17:11, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: Est televisio verbum gratum acceptumque? Quid est nomen adiectivum? televisialis? televisualis? IacobusAmor 14:49, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, apparently.--Ioshus (disp) 15:18, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Cum Latinistae saepissime contra verba "mixobarbara" saeviant, nesciocur nemo nisi morosissimi vebum quod est "televesio" spernunt. Attamen, "televisio", per Latinistas quos novi, significat totam artem notionemve. Machina dicitur "televisorium." Adiectivum frequentissimum, mirabile dictu, est "televisificus -a -um"! --Iustinus 16:59, 16 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verbum ''Televisio''
Disputatio:Daniel Brown

message: Non melior sit "Dan Brown" ad "Danus Brown" movere? Amphitrite 19:09, 18 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think Daniel Brown to be even better. --Agricola 20:01, 18 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Permaxime quaeso, noli creare Danus Brown, noli velle creare Danus Brown. Remove Danus Brown e mente! Vide hoc, vel apud Googlem quaere "latin names". Vide etiam Vicipaedia:Translatio nominum propriorum.--Ioshus (disp) 20:24, 18 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
Figura solita est Daniel -is, m.. --Iustinus 06:42, 19 Septembris 2006 (UTC)

message: Ioshus auctori res nonnullas proponit.
Scripsisti latine, sicut scribam. 
#Ut dixi, vide Vicipaedia:Numeri Romani, et Disputatio Vicipaediae:Numeri Romani. Utere arabicis fere semper.
#"Auctor multorum bonorum libres"... liber, libri est in declinatione secunda, gen pl = librorum.
#"Auctor librorum bonorum"... non est :en:Wikipedia:NPOV. Secundum me, eius libri non sunt boni, at malissumi, atque secundum alios.
#Est parvissumum, sed non necesse est scribere "" ante et post nomina librorum, praecipue si in litteris italicis etiam scripta sint.
--Ioshus (disp) 20:44, 18 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  res nonnullae 

message: The titles Illuminati  and Sakrileg are the German translations of Angels and Demons and The Da Vinci Code and therefore shouldn't be named here. --Agricola 17:20, 19 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  De operibus Danielis Brown
Disputatio:Chronogramma

message: Exemplum dissimile admoneo, sic - "IN HOC SIGNO VINCES = 208"  Xn4 20:35, 22 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feci. --Alex1011 21:14, 22 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Bene fecisti. Xn4 22:29, 23 Septembris 2006 (UTC)

message: Interesting idea, evidently a subset of the practice of getting metamessages from texts. Perhaps somebody would like to write an article on the larger topic. The texts can even be musical. A famous such example is a coronation fanfare by Josquin des Pres. It's melody that, when spelled out in syllables, is: ut mi ut re re sol mi. Extract the vowels and you have: U I U E E O I. Which of course implies VIVE (l)E (r)OI, long live the king. Then there are the pieces whose themes are the notes BACH (in German, B = B-flat and H = B-natural) and other such words (e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variations_on_the_name_%22Abegg%22). A related issue is musical numerology, like the earthquake in the St. Matthew Passion, which (in just the cellos? or where? I forget) has sixty-eight notes, reminding us that the event was foretold in Psalm 68 (Psalm 68:8, to be exact). The larger topic is a really complicated one! IacobusAmor 18:41, 24 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahem...BACH thema...--Ioshus, minutes after last post.
replies: text: :Most excellent! Now how about ABEGG and other such themes? IacobusAmor 18:55, 24 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Certainly a broader page on this is scribenda. And probably an even broader page on Cryptologia. There are so many music theory articles I should do beforehand though. Just so there won't be a million red links on subsequent articles.--Ioshus (disp) 19:32, 24 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Bene habet! And down with red links! IacobusAmor 00:53, 25 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Musical uses
Disputatio:Ludus potatorius

message: Alexander the Great seems to have liked drinking games as well, as Plutarch describes in his biography s:el:Αλέξανδρος#70 (ch. 70):
replies: text: [70] Ὁ δ’ Ἀλέξανδρος ἀπὸ τῆς πυρᾶς γενόμενος, καὶ συναγαγὼν πολλοὺς τῶν φίλων καὶ τῶν ἡγεμόνων ἐπὶ δεῖπνον, ἀγῶνα προὔθηκε καὶ στέφανον ἀκρατοποσίας. ὁ μὲν οὖν πλεῖστον πιὼν Πρόμαχος ἄχρι χοῶν τεσσάρων προῆλθε· καὶ λαβὼν τὸ νικητήριον, στέφανον ταλαντιαῖον, ἡμέρας τρεῖς ἐπέζησε· τῶν δ’ ἄλλων, ὡς Χάρης φησί, τετταράκοντα καὶ εἷς ἀπέθανον πιόντες, ἰσχυροῦ τῇ μέθῃ κρύους ἐπιγενομένου.
--UV 23:13, 24 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
English translation from :

text: [70] But Alexander, after returning from the funeral pyre and assembling many of his friends and officers for supper, proposed a contest in drinking neat wine, the victor to be crowned. Well, then, the one who drank the most, Promachus, got as far as four pitchers; he took the prize, a crown of a talent's worth, but lived only three days afterwards. And of the rest, according to Chares, forty-one died of what they drank, a violent chill having set in after their debauch.
--UV 21:29, 25 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Hmm, shocking for a man who spent his life as a soldier =].--Ioshus (disp) 22:55, 25 Septembris 2006 (UTC)

message: Cottabus is described in a number of sources besides Plato, and there are a lot of variations. A colleague of mine once wrote a paper on this... but probably there's a sufficient article in the OCD. --Iustinus 21:57, 25 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: en claimed this was the first reference we have of a drinking game, I took it on faith. I'll have a look at the ocd tomorrow night at class.--Ioshus (disp) 22:54, 25 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Oh, that it is the first reference I would not doubt. It's just not the only one by a long shot. --65.27.110.56 23:19, 25 Septembris 2006 (UTC) (er, that's me, Iustinus. Logging in on this computer is just too inconvenient.)
thread_title:  Cottabus
Disputatio:Galfridus Monemutensis

message: Nunquam Fanum Sancti Asaphi erat sedes archiepiscopalis. Usque ad Ecclesiam Cambrensem conditam anno 1921, provinciae Cantuariensi pertinebat.Tergum violinae 17:48, 11 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiepiscopus???
Disputatio:Henricus Erhardt

message: Hinricus?--Ioshus (disp) 23:33, 25 Septembris 2006 (UTC)

message: Nomen Germanicum Heinrich vel breviter Heinz mea quidem sententia Latino nomine Hinricus reddendum est. Illa "e" littera in eius nominis versionibus Gallicis Britannisque invenitur.--Irenaeus 12:40, 26 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: bene, talia nonnumquam exstant (e.g. ang. Fredericus, germ. Fridericus), sed hoc discrimen exstatne, attestaturne? An ipse finx'sti tu? --Iustinus 19:21, 26 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :"Anno domini 1410 dominica 1 quarta post festum pasce, qua canitur cantate, nuncii consulares ciuitatum Hamborgh ad placita congregati, videlicet: de Bremis dominus Fredericus Wygger et Johannes Oldewaghen 2 ; de Prucia Conradus Letzkow 3 et Johannes Crolow; de Rostok Johannes Horne; de Stralessundis Nicolaus Voghe 4 ; de Wysmaria Johannes Bantzkow 5 ; de Luneborgh Hinricus Viscule et Hinricus Bere; de Monasterio Johannes Warendorp et Hinricus Kerkring; de Brunswyk Hermannus de Vechelte 6 et Ulricus 7 Twedorp; de Gripeswaldis Laurentius Bukholt; de Stetin 8 Johannes Trepetow et Jacobus Kunne; de Stadis Nicolaus de Zworne et Jacobus de Haghene; de Hamborgh Cristianus Myles, Hildemarus Lopow, Marquardus Scrye et Meynhardus Buxtehude, Albertus Schreye, Hermannus Lange, Hinricus Bekendorp et Johannes Wyghe, pertractaverunt negocia infrascripta."—http://dd.dsl.dk/diplomer/10-035.htm IacobusAmor 19:39, 26 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Miror, gratias Iacobi et Irenaeo!--Ioshus (disp) 03:28, 27 Septembris 2006 (UTC)

text: nomen germanum convertere in linguam latinam superfluus est (mea sententia). non convertunt et nomen "George Bush" in alteram linguam (Georg Busch in linguam Germanorum)
thread_title:  Cur moverim
Disputatio:Antonius Blair

message: Ioshe, was your obliteration of my suggested changes intentional (because you disagreed with them) or a function of the temporal delay we've been seeing in Vicipaedia lately? Just wondering. IacobusAmor 16:50, 29 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Iacobe, I'm not even sure what you're talking about...I merely meant to change the dates from Roman numerals to Arabic...if I deleted something you suggested, I beg pardon, and ask you to either repeat it, or just proceed with the changes. I suppose we can chalk it up to the delat?--Ioshus (disp) 16:59, 29 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Aha, now I see, yes this is delay. When I edited an anonymous user was the last, I'll revert myself.--Ioshus (disp) 17:00, 29 Septembris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::OK, no problem. The delay itself, however, is a problem! IacobusAmor 18:56, 29 Septembris 2006 (UTC)

message: Scimus adiectivos sequi nomina in Latina, sed "Minister Primus" infelicem mihi videtur.
Videamus:
- Gallice: Premier Ministre
- Hispanice: Primer Ministro
- Lusitanice: Primeiro-ministro
- Catalonice: Primer Ministre
- Et Latine: Minister Primus...?
replies: text: Omnino dissentio. Similitas latinitas non est. Doops 20:22, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :"Adjectives denoting size or quantity come before the noun they qualify" (Bradley's Arnold, Intro. #85). Ergo recte: primus minister. IacobusAmor 20:33, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Hold on, which does prime indicate, his size or his quantity?  —Mucius Tever 17:08, 21 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::I won't try to answer that ... OK, this is actually sense 15 in the Oxf. Lat. Dict.: "of first importance, chief, principal". All the 6 citations under that heading that combine primus with a noun have primus first and the noun after. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:01, 21 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::A quick googling suggests "primus minister" over "minister primus", though interestingly the alternative "minister primarius" beats out "primarius minister".  —Mucius Tever 21:16, 21 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::Dicerem quoque expressiones antiquas Latinas eodem ordine verborum usas esse, ut "primipilaris" et "prima porta Augusta". Videmur nunc consensum aliquem habere.  -Ancus 16:18, 24 Iulii 2007
thread_title: Minister Primus aut Primus Minister?
Disputatio:Olympia aestiva 1896

message: Medalia - meo animo, non licet hoc. Verbum insignia melior sonat? Xn4 00:34, 5 Octobris 2006 (UTC)

message: Cur 1896 Olympia Aestiva‎ (Anglicus verborum ordo), non Olympia Aestiva‎ 1896 (ordo Theodiscus, Graecus, Esperanticus, Hispanicus, Francicus, Nederlandicus, Russicus, etc.)? (Et 1900, 1904, 1908, et seqq.?) Categoriae sunt :Categoria:Nati 1896, :Categoria:Mortui 1896, etc., non :Categoria:1896 Nati, :Categoria:1896 mortui, etc. Similiter :Categoria:Taxa 1896, non :Categoria:1896 taxa, etc., etc., etc., etc., etc. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:25, 31 Iulii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Cur, mi amice? Quia nemo mutavit ... :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:25, 31 Iulii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma
Disputatio:In eminenti

message: [] eadem pagina?
Woulden´t be a summary enough? Is this "article" necessary at all? -Amphitrite 14:52, 6 Octobris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Has the text been copied in toto from a website? The article alleges that the letter was published by Clement XIII, but Clement XIII wasn't pope in the year the letter was published. IacobusAmor 15:33, 6 Octobris 2006 (UTC)

text: I compared it, the text is copied from the website, exept of the introduction. The IP, who started the article, has now changed Clemens XIII to Clemens XII. Amphitrite 16:02, 6 Octobris 2006 (UTC)

message: Cur vocabula italiana - sc. liberi muratori -  quasi latina essent introducenda sint? Num desunt idonea verba latina? - Bavarese (disputatio) 11:34, 14 Augusti 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  de liberis Muratoris
Disputatio:Indi Americani

message: Atzteken-Atsteci, Atstecorum m. pl.;
Inuit-Inuit, Inuitis m.;
Unangan-Unangan, Unanganis m.;
Yupik-Iupic, Iupicis m.;
der Inka-Inca, Incae m. oder die Inka-Inca, Incae m., aber im Plural übersetzt!
Mit den Maya ist es das selbe: der Maya-Maia, Maiae m. und die Maya-Maia, Maiae m., aber wieder mit Plural übersetzt. So hieße das Reich der Inka auf Latein: Imperium Incae. Nach diesem Strickmuster, welches sinnvoll ist, um die Namen der Völker nachher noch wiederzuerkennen und damit Leute, die dies hier nichtgelesen haben, nachher dennoch alles verstehen, sollte man fortfahren.
thread_title:  Nomina Populorum Indoamericanorum 

message: *Aleuten(=Unangan)-Unangan, Unanganis m.
*Inuit-Inuit, Inuitis m.
*Unangan(=Aleuten)-Unangan, Unanganis m.
*Yupik-Iupic, Iupicis m.
*Azteken-Azteci, -orum m.
*Maya-Maia, -ae m.
*Tolteken-Tolteci, -orum m.
*Inca-Inca, -ae m.
thread_title:  Nomina Indoamericanorum 

message: Usor:Rafaelgarcia non intellegit de "intellegentia Indorum Americanorum"; ni ego. Haec sententiae volunt disserere, ut credo ego, de nominibus Indoamericanorum, non de "intellegentia". Verumst? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:01, 20 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pagina hodie meliorata, plura opera danda est.Rafaelgarcia 00:22, 21 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Intellegentia Indus Americanus..inventi.."

message: Quid significat haec sententia?  Num Indi Americani bestiis parebant?  Jackmitchell 04:38, 18 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: tried to fix check it out.--Rafaelgarcia 14:26, 18 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "bestiae, quibus Indi Americani subiecti erant"

message: Nomen vel adiectivum 'indigenae' (nom. masc. pl.) melius est nomine 'indigeni':  Ovidii Met. 6.330: "indigenae..dei"; Vergilii Aen. 8.314: "indigenae fauni"; Lucani Phars. 2.432: "indigenas populos"; Taciti Germ. 2.1: "Germanos indigenas"; Plinii Hist. Nat. 14.23 "indigena vino." (Semel autem App. M. 1 p. 102 (quem Lewis & Short citant; quis est? confiteor nescire) 'sermo indigenus') 71.208.238.48 01:02, 18 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probe dicis, amice. Verbum resecui. IacobusAmor 13:49, 18 Decembris 2007 (UTC)

text: Gratias tibi aiuvandi causa. Solum fonte Words, forma indigenus praeoptante, utebam cum forma indigenus eligi. Sed iam scio quod erravi.--Rafaelgarcia 14:34, 18 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: indigenae (nom. masc. pl.)