lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Spiritualitas

message: Cassell's: "spirituality, animus rerum divinarum studiosus." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:01, 23 Maii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma

message: Generally, definitions that start by saying that something is the name of something are weak, in part because we ordinarily define things, not their names, and in part because authors usually forget to mark the name by italicizing or quoting it. E.g.:
replies: text: Mr. Ed est equus. = OK.

text: Mr. Ed est nomen equi. = OK (but usually weak).

text: "Mr. Ed" est nomen equi. = OK (but usually weak).

text: Mr. Ed est nomen equi. = Not OK !
Compare the current definition: "Spiritualitas . . . est nomen ad altum sapientem modum esse." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:12, 23 Maii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Definitio

message: Primam sententiam restitui quia intellegi potuit: versionem ultimam non intellegibilem censui. Continuationem non perlegi :)Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:19, 24 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prima sententia
Disputatio:Fasciola adhaerens

message: Cassell's docet Anglicum adhesive Latine = tenax. Praeterea, Cassell's verbum glutinosus non commendat. Ergo fortasse melius lemma Taenia tenax (Anglice 'sticky tape'), cum alliteratione fortunata. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:57, 25 Maii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita. Bene sonat. -- Donatello (disputatio) 22:39, 25 Maii 2013 (UTC).
thread_title: Lemma
Disputatio:Theotocium

message: Cur non, amice, vocabulis Graecis hymnus acathistus vis dicere? Fortasse una cum explanatione vocabuli acathisti velut hymnus, qui canitur cantantibus non-sedentibus? - Bavarese (disputatio) 13:07, 27 Maii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  acathista{{dubsig}}
Disputatio:Hymnus

message: Nec nexus ad canon quicquam praebet utile neque omnino iste canon pertinet ad hymnos. - Bavarese (disputatio) 13:20, 27 Maii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Roga Usor:Chris1981, qui nexum die 14 Augusti 2011 inseruit. ¶ Hymnus qui Anglice Tallis's canon appellatur est canon et hymnus. Vide :en:List of compositions by Thomas Tallis. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:49, 27 Maii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Recte dicis, Iacobe. sed pro certo licet nexum delere si inutile est. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:21, 27 Maii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  nexus ad 'canon' 

message: Alleluias, graduals, tracts, etc. sensu stricto are not hymns: they're alleluias, graduals, tracts, etc. The Liber Usualis indexes them separately, not under "Hymns." In any case, articles that define lemmata are something other than lists, which according to custom belong in articles titled "Index. . . ." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:11, 28 Maii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Medius fidius ne tu recte dicis. Qua de causa introitus, gradualia, offertoria aliaeque eiusmodi partes missae hymni nuncupandae vel hymnis attribuendae sunt? Insignibus linguae poeticae (sc. metris, versibus etc.) carent, cum hymni opera sint poetarum. Quod etiam definitione hymnorum exprimitur. - Bavarese (disputatio) 16:40, 28 Maii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Quid est "hymnus"?
Disputatio:Heterocephalus glaber

message: De "quod cuniculos fodiunt cum socibus qui possunt 5 chiliometros attingere": quod est sing, fodiunt pl.; socibus et centimetros non sunt verba.
De "qui possunt 5 chiliometros attingere" ubi est fons huius numeri? Vide
*Anglice: Typical individuals are 8 to 10 cm (3 to 4 in) long
*Francice: Le rat-taupe mesure en moyenne de 8 à 10 cm de long 
*Italice: Misura circa 12–13 cm di lunghezza
*Russice: Мелкие грызуны с длиной тела 8—10 см
Felicitates! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:00, 27 Maii 2013 (UTC)
Care Iacobus, quod significat tibi cuniculos? Quod velim dicere:The tunnel systems built by naked mole rats can stretch up to three to five kilometres (2–3 mi) in cumulative length.(ex wiki anglice) --Jondel (disputatio) 14:20, 27 Maii 2013 (UTC)
Fons:<ref name=selfish_gene>{{cite book|last=Dawkins|first=Richard|origyear=1976|year=2006|edition=30th anniversary|title=The Selfish Gene|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=0-19-286092-5}}</ref>Jondel (disputatio) 14:21, 27 Maii 2013 (UTC)
Me paenitet Iacobus. Erravi cum fodiunt et quod.Jondel (disputatio) 14:33, 27 Maii 2013 (UTC)
Me paenitet de 'socibus '=>sociis et chiliometros=chiliometra.--Jondel (disputatio) 14:39, 27 Maii 2013 (UTC)
Nonne utamur uncia (inch) e.g. 3 usque 4 uncias?--Jondel (disputatio) 14:42, 27 Maii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellanea
Disputatio:Suppositum murinum

message: Syllable stress is fixed by general rule in Latin words, so there is no need to state it. It is necessary (sometimes) to be sure of the length of vowels. Therefore I removed the statement about stress (which in any case included a misspelling) and inserted a macron over the long vowel whose position affects the stress. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:32, 28 Maii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. It also looks better now. Thank you. :) -- Donatello (disputatio) 13:51, 28 Maii 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: :No problem, Donatello, glad you like it better! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:56, 28 Maii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  De accentu
Disputatio Categoriae:Signa medica

message: to other wikis doesn't seem to work. Nexus creare non possum utiendo addlinks.Jondel (disputatio) 14:15, 2 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: S.t.p. rursus tempta, Jondel. Fortasse adiuvi (sed incertus sum)! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:32, 2 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Curatione tua gratias. Quod significat S.t.p.? Temptabo in propinqua futura rursus. Fuessus iam sum. Jondel (disputatio) 15:39, 2 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::It means "si tibi placet", Anglice "please" -- I wanted to say "Please try again, Jondel"!
replies: text: :::I guess I was too tired, so it didn't register. :)Jondel (disputatio) 10:32, 3 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::We were discussing si tibi placeat here. Its a divine act of the sphaghetti monster!!Jondel (disputatio) 11:58, 4 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

text: ::Wikidata uselessly created an entry for our "Categoria:Signa medica" although (as far as they knew) there was nothing to link it to. I deleted our category from that Wikidata entry (it was easier for me to do that than to tell you how to do it!) so now it is free for you to add to another Wikidata entry. Tell me if it now works or not :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:03, 2 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Excuse me, but I tried to link this page with en:Category:Medical signs and it seems to work. Have I made a mistake? Franciesse 16:53, 2 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::No, you've done exactly the right thing. Jondel wanted to do it but found a problem. I think I cured the problem. You have now made the link that Jondel intended. That's "team work" :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:16, 2 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::Frantasticus esse credo!! :) Jondel (disputatio) 09:21, 3 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Linking
Disputatio:Tabula (discretiva)

message: I removed the following sentence: "Tabula  in informatica est summa res quas processor facit." It's unclear what it was referring to (computer operations, maybe?), and it was sitting without interlanguage links for four years. If someone knows what this was referring to, we could create a new page and link it from here. Lesgles (disputatio) 02:05, 3 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: In informatica?
Disputatio:Indusium

message: [Copied from Vicipaedia:Taberna]
Salvete! I tried starting a general article that would be equivalent to :en:Shirt. Camisia appealed to me because of the Romance connection, but maybe one of the other options is better. We already have tunica for the ancient tunic and tunicula for t-shirt, but we could rearrange those too. Here are the possibilities I have found so far, with their L&S definitions: camisia, "a linen shirt or night-gown"; indusium, "a woman's under-garment"; subucula, "a man's under-garment, a shirt"; tunica, "an under-garment of the Romans worn by both sexes, a tunic"; tunicula, "a little tunic". Any thoughts? Lesgles (disputatio) 20:07, 3 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Greetings Les. Norstedts svensk-latinska ordbok (second edition of 2009), a Swedish-Latin lexicon, have one word for tröja, which is "shirt" in English, thorax (-acis) m láneus. For "t-shirt", it has thoracíolus m carbáseus and tunícula semimanicata in T lítterae formam confecta. The last one is actually called like that. Maybe the author missed the parenthesis, like "(in T ... confecta)".

text: Donatello (disputatio) 20:58, 3 Iunii 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: :Hmm, well thorax, literally "breast garment", is another possibility. I don't think including laneus or carbaseus makes sense, since most shirts nowadays are made of cotton. Lesgles (disputatio) 16:35, 5 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Traupman gives "indusium, camisia", and indusium does seem to be the one I've come across the most, so I'll go ahead and move it there, and include the other options in the text. Subucula might be good if we want an article on undershirts. Lesgles (disputatio) 17:13, 7 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Shyla Stylez

message: Delevi " (Latine 'Caecilia Stilus') " quia (a) Lat. Caecilia = Ang. Cecily; (b) cognomina non convertimus. "Est prior actrix" non intellego. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:34, 10 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: But apparently Lat. Caecilia => Hibern. Síle => Ang. Sheila, Shyla, Shayla, etc. (And of course "prior" is just the wrong sense of "former"; it should use something more like "quondam").  —Mucius Tever (disputatio) 13:41, 10 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Salve. Accipiebam "Caecilia" ex situ Behind the Name. Dicit "Shyla" est alia forma a "Sheila", et "Sheila" forma Anglica a "Síle", et hic forma hibernica a "Cecilia", et hoc nomen a nomine Romano "Caecilius". Sed si censes non fideliter est, intelligo.

text: :"Prior" tum vitiose sit. Scribebam Latine "is a former pornstar". Fortasse adverbium "quondam", nisi etiam nomen adiectivum "pristinus"?

text: :Gratias ago conspectibus tuis.

text: :Donatello (disputatio) 13:47, 10 Iunii 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: ::Thanks, Mucius, I never saw this spelling before so I never thought of it the Irish way :)

text: ::"Prior": I see it now, and "quondam" gets the sense of it, I believe: yes, "pristina" can be used that way too but might have unwanted undertones. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:05, 10 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::I'm changing now to quondam and adding 'Caecilia Stylez'. The article could be called "Caecilia Stylez", but it seems that it won't match the artistic lastname "Stylez"; a Latin first name and the artistic lastname; it doesn't match. So I would say that "Shyla Stylez" would be better.

text: :::Donatello (disputatio) 14:35, 10 Iunii 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: ::::That seems a good decision to me. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:29, 10 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delevi
Disputatio:Transnistria

message: Haec omnino removi:
replies: text: ... (internationaliter Pridnestrovie, Dacoromanice: Transnistria, Moldavice: Нистрения - Nistrenia, Russice: Приднестровье - Pridnestrovie, Ucrainice: Придністров'я - Pridnistrovia), rite Respublica Moldavica Transtyriae (internationaliter Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic, Dacoromanice: Republica Moldovenească Nistreană, Moldavice: Република Молдовеняскэ Нистрянэ -  Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, Russice: Приднестровская Молдавская Республика - Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, Ucrainice: Придністровська Молдавська Республіка - Pridnistrovs'ka Moldavs'ka Respublika) ...
Quibus rationibus?
# Quia prima sententia debet esse simplex et legibilis. Debemus ibi comprehendere nomen Latinum unum, si habemus; nomina Latina duo, si duo nomina in fontibus exstant; nomen vernaculare unum aut nullum. Si commentationem reperimus nominibus quattuor aut pluribus in prima sententia munitam, nomina superflua removere oportet.
# Quia nexus intervicios et externos e textu fere omnes removere oportet. De hac re iam disputavimus (vide Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium 18#Unneeded duplication of links?). De casibus raris, in quibus utile erit nexus intervicios in textu enumerationum includere, ibi statuimus. Nexus enim intervicii ad latus paginae videntur.
# Quia Vicipaedia non est dictionarium nominum "barbarorum" (!).
Bene autem de nominibus Transnistriae sub rubricam inferiorem explicatur. An oportet aliqua nomina, quas supra movi, sub eam rubricam enumerare, haud scio. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:56, 10 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  De prima sententia et de nominibus 

message: "Transtyria" bene sonat sed est nomen a Vicipaediano fictum. Nonne melius est nomen internationale "Transnistria" -- nomen formá Latiná confectum -- accipere? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:01, 6 Decembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Mihi quoque magis placet nomen quasi-latinum Transnistria quae ubique intelligitur, non debent latini se separare ab usu translaticio hodierno et creare verba vix a nostratibus intelligibilia. Sed quod plus est, verbum Transtyria non secundum regulas creatum est, etenim verba cum "trans" fabricanda sunt ex forma adiectiva non e nomine. Ita dicendum esset : Transtyrania vel Transtyranium, sicut Transtiberina etc... Vale.--Viator (disputatio) 09:53, 7 Decembris 2015 (UTC)
Gratias tibi ago. Moveo; si cuidam displicet, rursus disputare posssumus ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:48, 7 Decembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Optime fecisti. Vale.--Viator (disputatio) 21:08, 8 Decembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  De titulo
Disputatio:3rd Rock from the Sun

message: Intellexi ego "saxum a Sole tertium" (plenius "saxum cui a Sole incipit tertium") -- an erravi? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:36, 11 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Non credo te errasse. "Saxum a Sole tertium" mihi conversio bona videtur; ipse usus sum genetivo Solis, quia nescivi qua praepositione utar: a an e an fortasse de. Emendabo ut proposuisti. Φιλέτυμος (disputatio) 19:06, 11 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus
Disputatio:Sedes vacans

message: Nonne pro tempore inter papae aut alii episcopi sive mortem sive renuntiationem et successoris eius electionem vocabulum usitatum est sedisvacantia? - Bavarese (disputatio) 11:42, 13 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Apte rogas, amice, sed quod tum erit fons nominis Sedevacantismi ? Fortasse lemma in nomen Sedisvacuismum (ex Sedis vacuum, quia vacantia nomen classicum ut videtur non est) commutari debet? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:27, 13 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Salve, amice! De sedevacantismo nihil fere habeo, quid communicem. Videtur de sede vacante formatum esse, fortasse haud inepte: isti affirmant ecclesiam nunc sede vacante permanere. De vacantia: Nomen classicum, ut tu quidem recte dicis, non est. Vocabulum mediae latinitatis est, significans statum vacandi ab aliqua re. Imprimis usitatum erat de feriis sive vacantia discipulorum in eodem sensu ac nostris diebus italice vacanze, francice vacances (NB vacance!) et (iam paene inusitatum) theodisce Vakánz. Ea derivatio de vacantia conspicua est in lingua anglica: vocabulum vacancy de vacantia, adiectivum vacant de participio vacans transumptum est. - Bavarese (disputatio) 18:02, 13 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonne ''sedis vacantia''?
Disputatio:Lucius Munatius Plancus (consul 13)

message: Tacitus mentionem huius Planci non facit in Annalibus nisi in libro primo, capitulo XXXIX. In libro secundo, capitulo XXXII Annalium, adulatores quos memorat sunt L. Piso (non L. Plancus), Gallus Asinius, Papius Mutilus et L. Apronius. Vide textum hic: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0077%3Abook%3D2%3Achapter%3D32. Xiphophilos (disputatio) 18:43, 13 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Error in vita Planci?
Disputatio:Nicer

message: A Romanis hoc flumen nonne Nicer perpetiter dictum est? - Bavarese (disputatio) 21:04, 14 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita dictum est, et apud Hofmannum video "Nicer, Neccarus". Movi. Lesgles (disputatio) 04:34, 15 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neccarus? 

message: Mihi plane non liquet, quonam modo verba huius poetae hac in pagina scripta Nicrum describant. Num rem aliquam parum intellego? - Bavarese (disputatio) 16:58, 29 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Mihi quoque. Fortasse utiles sunt in pagina de vita poëtae, sed non hic. Lesgles (disputatio) 22:03, 29 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: :Nemine contradicente, poëma removi. Lesgles (disputatio) 23:07, 2 Maii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eberle de Nicro?
Disputatio:Großdeutsches Reich

message: Edictum, per quod mutatio nominis rei publicae ab imperio in imperium maius erat iussa ac promulgata, est ille Erlaß des Reichsministers und Chefs der Reichskanzlei vom 26. Juni 1943 (latine: Edictum administri imperii et capitis cancellariae imperialis de die 26 Iunii 1943). In isto autem  folio iuxta textum paginae Großdeutsches Reich reddito non legitur hoc edictum, sed quoddam aliud praeceptum, ut et quo modo secundum edictum de 26 Iunii 1943 sit agendum. - Bavarese (disputatio) 09:38, 15 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edictum per quem nomen officiale fit? Minime!
Disputatio:Csorvás

message: * http://www.vasutallomasok.hu/allomas.php?az=csrv
* http://www.csorvasiak.hu/csorvas.html
... quia utilitatem nescio. Oportet explicare. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:34, 15 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nexus removi ...
Disputatio:Iustinus Mansfield

message: The facebook link given doesn't appear to work, two of three of the details cited from it were erroneous, and Facebook isn't usually regarded as a reliable source! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:52, 17 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's reliable in the sense that personal information in the "About" section (whence it was taken) must necessarily be typed into the system by the account holder himself or herself. Of course it would be unreliable if an account holder wished to be deceptive. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:14, 17 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yes, that's why it isn't usually regarded as a reliable source. (I make no insinuations about this account holder, needless to say: I'm just stating the accepted rule on en:wiki.) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:02, 17 Iunii 2013 (UTC) 
For those reasons I took those footnote links out. For all that, if a working link can be given to his Facebook page, it could be placed at "Nexus externi". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:52, 17 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

text: 1988 for 1998 was a typo here; 1998 is the year given in Facebook, publicized there by the account holder. The text said the birthyear was 'about 1974', and that was not erroneous. The approximate birthyear was a calculation from the year of secondary-school graduation; for a birthyear, subtracting 18 from 1992 is the way to bet, since U.S. students ordinarily graduate from secondary school at the age of 18 or a few months younger. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:14, 17 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Unless, of course, the account holder's birthday happens to fall late in the year.... --Iustinus (disputatio) 20:19, 17 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Indeed, but such people constitute a small minority—and that's still therefore not the way to bet! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:16, 18 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::True, but a significant portion of people born on Novermber 6th were born late in the year! --Iustinus (disputatio) 04:41, 19 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::As I know we all three understand, betting on probabilities is not the way to go when writing Wikipedia, especially about living persons, who may have recourse to litigation if we underestimate either their youthfulness or their maturity :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:30, 19 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::The text said he was born 'about 1974' and that was correct: someone born quite late in 1973 was indeed born 'about 1974'. Of course the greatest possible precision is desirable, and it has now been supplied, though the hour & minute seem to be wanting, to the undoubted distress of astrologers. :) IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:27, 19 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::::Recte dicis: astrologa quaedam, quam olim docebam Linguam Latinam, de hac ipsa re questa est! --Iustinus (disputatio) 05:12, 20 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facebook link 

message: Iacobus May totally needs to become a blue link: he has a significant corpus of neo-Latin compositions. --Iustinus (disputatio) 21:16, 17 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Iacobus May
Disputatio:Scientiae Baccalaureus

message: Ecce:
replies: text: Chymicia, et scientia socialis, exercitia scientia, scientia generalis, terra scientia, informatica scientia, et variis disciplinia machinatoris fere in orbis terrarum habentur scientiae.''

text: "Chymica," and social science, "exercitia," science, general science, earth, science, informatica, science, and by various, an engineer's "disciplinia" nearly in the world's, are considered sciences.
Generally, sentences read better if their words stand in some perceptible grammatical relation to one another. Presumably there's a typo for variis disciplinis machinatoris 'by an engineer's various disciplines', but what's the rest? and why was the sign for Latinitatis 2 removed? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:33, 18 Iunii 2013 (UTC)

text: "Chemistry" and social science, sports  science, general science, earth, science, informatica, science, and by various, an engineer's "disciplinia" in general, internationaly , are considered sciences.Jondel (disputatio) 14:27, 18 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: This is really not Latinitatis 2 (or worse)?
Disputatio:Hyacinthus Zamora

message: In Cupidus erat ludere "Pulvis et Amunitio" 'He was keen on playing at dust and amunitium', what's the significance of this? It seems to be a game, but why did he like to play it? Since amunitio (whatever it means) looks like the ablative of amunitium, as we'd expect with ludere, why isn't pulvis similarly given in the ablative, as pulvere? In a reference work, these sorts of things need to be worked out, and the nature & significance of the game shouldn't be left unexplained. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:48, 18 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He 'liked'(change to 'amabat') to play Powder and Amunition. Agreed with pulvere. I will use arma (ablativee)since this is the dictionary translation of amunition. This is a game. It was intentionaly misinterpreted to enable the authorities to accuse of sedition/rebellion.Jondel (disputatio) 14:20, 18 Iunii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Quid est hic ludus?