lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Irlandia

message: Vide Vicipaedia:Tituli petiti. --Roland2 20:22, 4 Martii 2006 (UTC)

message: (copied over from Disputatio:Regnum Unitum):
On another note: in none of the Latin styles we've cited so far is Ireland mentioned by name. Currently, in the respective articles, we seem to be claiming that the name Hibernia only applies to Ancient Ireland, and the modern country is Irlandia. I have no doubt I could find attestations of Irlandia, but is that really the official name? Honestly I kind of doubt it. (Replies should probably go to Disputatio:Irlandia --Iustinus 14:57, 12 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Up to the early 20th century, when British kings ruled all of Ireland, they called it "Hibernia" on their coins. I haven't seen "Irlandia" in Latin, though, as you say, no doubt examples could be found. Perhaps there isn't an "official" Latin name -- isn't it good that Vicipaedia seldom has to worry about such things?

text: I feel doubt about the etymology just added to the article. I thought the Latin was a version of a probably-native name, also recorded in Greek as Ierne. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:47, 12 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Indeed, and both of them are probably equivalent to Eire. I've seen them etymologized as from *Pivernia (*p > 0 in Celtic languages, of course, compare Irish orc "piglet", cognate to porcus), which would be from the same root as Greek πί(ϝ)ον "I drank" (Land of Drink? Certain stereotypes never change! Notice that one of the few sentences of Gaulish attested is likewise curmi da, meaining "Gimme a beer.") Then of course there's the persistant folk etymology that links Eire/Ireland to *Aryo-, making it "Land of the Aryans."

text: :When you say "isn't it good that Vicipaedia seldom has to worry about such things?", do you mean it's good that we seldom have to worry about what an official Latin name is, or that we seldom have to worry about there not being one? ;) --Iustinus 16:26, 12 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
*apoligising for my lack of latin,  my recollections of Celtic mythology is thar both the roots of Éire and Ireland are based on two Celtic Gods (one feminine and another masculine)
I think Hibernia is a better latin word (granted my latin is fairly rusty) for Ireland as it was most prevelant, and in irish schools we are taught that as the latin word for the country
keep up the good work--81.37.14.164 22:56, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks, very useful comment. That's the nearest to "official" that we'll get, I think. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:58, 26 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  De Nomine
Disputatio:Bellum Actiacum

message: Habitavit Augustus in aedibus modicis neque laxitate neque cultu conspicuis, ac per annos amplius quadraginta in eodem cubiculo hieme et aestate mansit. Supellex quoque ejus vix privatae elegantiae erat. Idem tamen Romam, quam pro majestate imperii non satis ornatam invenerat, adeo excoluit, ut jure sit gloriatus marmoream se relinquere, quam lateritiam accepisset. Raro veste alia usus est quam confecta ab uxore, sorore, filia, neptibusque. Altiuscula erant ejus calceamenta, ut procerior quam erat videretur.

message: This entire article appears to be an unwikified quotation. Shouldn't it be moved to wikisource or wherever else it belongs? IacobusAmor 16:38, 23 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was already at wikisource, I added a link. --UV 20:59, 23 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Movere commentarium?

message: Re: "Actiaca Pugna Augustus anno 31 a.C.n. apud Actium Marcum Antonium et Cleopatram vicit."—It's rare that Vicipaedia puts the lemma in the ablative. What kind of ablative is it? Is it idiomatic with regard to battles? IacobusAmor 15:01, 1 Maii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma
Disputatio:Hustonia (Texia)

message: Houstoniensis adjectivum est.  Nomen civitatis secundum Egger Hustonia est, sed forsitan alia sunt nomina.  --Tbook 20:25, 7 Martii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Re vera, modo emendationes facebat...etiam non certus sum ut texta significat id quod auctor in animo haberet.  Consentio ut moveamus.--Ioshus Rocchio 23:29, 7 Martii 2006 (UTC)
Da mihi veniam. me paenitet. Est "Hustonia."
--Dominus 00:54, 23 Martii 2006 (UTC)

message: "Hustonia est unus ex undecim C.F.A. mundorum urbium sicut numerari "Gammaton Mundi Urbium" a Globalizatione et Mundorum et Urbum Studium Circulosum Et Reticulosum." Removi igitur. An quis interpretare potest? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:03, 3 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non intellego ...
Disputatio Vicipaediae:Ops nexusque usoribus novis

message: Think we should just move the template to a special page?  That way we won't have to update every individual welcome.--Ioshus Rocchio 22:59, 7 Martii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be a good idea, I think. --Roland2 23:13, 7 Martii 2006 (UTC)
Formula:Salve template?--Ioshus Rocchio 23:19, 7 Martii 2006 (UTC)
Not to be nitpicky, but shouldn't this be: Vicipaedia:Ops nexusque pro usoribus novis?  --Tbook 20:40, 8 Martii 2006 (UTC)
I think it should ;-) See here and here. And user Bohmhammel suggests to name it subsidium nexusque usoribus novis (sine pro), see here. So maybe it should be Vicipaedia:Ops nexusque usoribus novis? --Roland2 22:23, 8 Martii 2006 (UTC)
Can we do it ...? --Roland2 08:27, 9 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving the page 

message: :Cum tildibus 4 nomen tuum scribe in paginis disputationum (noli in articulis ipsis) (i. e. Iustinus 07:23, 3 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)).
Hmmm, well the word "tilde" comes from Latin titulus, and indeed that term was apparently used for the nasal diacritic used in Medieval (and Renaissance) Latin (e.g. see the quotes at cymitharra, caouinum and so on). Of course titulus has a LOT more meanings. Surely there was a more specific name for this! Anyone know? For now, I would suggest rendering tilde as titulus nasalis.
BTW, you guys are doing great in my absence. I wish I could help more, but I just can't these days. Proh dolor! --Iustinus 07:23, 3 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quid sit ~
Disputatio:Alcohol

message: Movenda ad alcohol...noli K utere.--Ioshus Rocchio 05:31, 13 Martii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nescio de "IUPAC-Standard" qui 'alkohol' habere dicitur, sed Nomina Communia Internationalia 'alcoholum' utuntur.  Sed fortasse 'álcohōl, -is, neut.' frequentius est.  —Myces Tiberinus 22:37, 13 Martii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Vel alkohol vel alcohol, delenda est tabula declensionum pro certe...--Ioshus Rocchio 22:59, 13 Martii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Wouldn't it be better to move it to the Victionarium? This could be indicated with such a template:
 Some of this article's content should be moved to the Victionarium. Please help, if you can. --Roland2 23:05, 13 Martii 2006 (UTC)
Licet, anglice latineque, consentimus alcohol-is,n frequentium esse, et tabulam declensionum contentam victionarii magis vicipaedia quam esse.  Delebo tabulam, moveboque paginam nisi contras sententias aucultavero.
Ok, in latin and English...we agree that alcohol-is,n is the more frequent form, and that the declension table is more victionaryish than vicipaediish.  So I'm going to move the page and delete the table, unless I hear contrary opinions.--Ioshus Rocchio 02:12, 15 Martii 2006 (UTC)
Salute et gracia! (=ok) Drpagel 23:50, 16 Martii 2006 (UTC)

message: Sectionem de aliis nominibus removi, quia nomina non bene attestata sunt. Haec sunt nomina:
* Alkoholum (Latina mediaevalis vel Latina pharmaceutica, Neutr.)
* Alcoholum (Latina mediaevalis vel Latina pharmaceutica, Neutr.)
* Alkoholus (Latina mediaevalis vel Latina pharmaceutica, Masc.)
* Alcoholus (Latina mediaevalis vel Latina pharmaceutica, Masc.)
* Spiritus (Latina antiqua, Masc.)
thread_title: Alia nomina

message: sine odore vel colore, are you sure? I am chemist and all alcohols are colorless but have their characteristic odor, pure methanol smells very different to pure ethanol and many of the others have their own odor. -- Usor:Herr_Thor_Hdz&action 02:54, 3 Martii 2009
replies: text: Sure. It's not water... --Ioscius (disp) 05:44, 3 Martii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: de alcoholis odore

message: Andreas, categoriam "greges functionales" delens, rogat "How is alcohol a "functional group"?" Secundum en, functional groups sunt "specific groups of atoms within molecules that are responsible for the characteristic chemical reactions of those molecules." Exempla rerum hac in categoria sunt Acetal, Acetoxy group, Acetyl Acetylide, Acid anhydride, Acryloyl group, Activating group, Acyl, Acyl halide, Acylal, Acyloin, Acylsilane, Alcohol, Aldehyde, Aldimine, Alkane, Alkene, Alkoxide, Alkoxy group, Alkyl, Alkyl cycloalkane, Alkyl nitrites, Alkyne, Allene, Allyl, Amide, Amidine, Aminal, Amine oxide, Amyl, Aryl, Arylene, Azide, Azine, Aziridine, Azoxy, und so weiter. IacobusAmor 11:34, 31 Octobris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Gratias ago, Iacobe. Libenter igitur (per me) categoriam crea et imple, si vis. Fortasse melius :Categoria:Greges functionales (chemia), quia aliqui, sicut ego, hunc terminum sociologicum censere possunt. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:42, 31 Octobris 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Functional groups
Disputatio:Tractus funis

message: Just wondering: why is it tractatio (-onis, f.) 'a handling, managing, treating, treatment, conduct, behavior' instead of, say, tractus (-us, m.) 'a drawing, dragging, tugging'? IacobusAmor 02:54, 4 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mostly because it was tractatio (-onis, f.) 'a dragging, pulling, or tugging'. Traupman was my source on this, I believe... hard to remember at this point.--Ioshus Rocchius 17:44, 4 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :That being said, I am not against tractus... If you feel like doing a rewrite, please go ahead.--Ioshus Rocchius 03:15, 6 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

text: :I'm thinking tractus...--Ioshus (disp) 04:26, 30 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tractatio
Disputatio Formulae:Transcriptio musicae

message: Opem quaeso...translationies de "staff, ledger line, bar line," et fortasse "accidental" non mihi minime placent. Si scias de nominibus musicarum partum, amabo te opem dare.  Gratias.--Ioshus Rocchio 17:15, 19 Martii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ops
Disputatio:Aurelianum

message: non delendam puto istam paginam, quia utilis est ad nomen Romanum huius Francogalliae urbis cognoscendum!! SZL
replies: text: I added some ınformation. --Roland2 08:48, 21 Martii 2006 (UTC)

text: De Romano nomine 'Aurelianum dubitandum est, quod Caesar in Commentariis (lib. VII ac VIII) hanc urbem gallico nomine Cenabum, solum vocat. Censeo Cenabum praesertim utendum, Aurelianum autem servandum est, quare pagina redirectionis (ab Aurelianum ad Cenabum, vel contrario modo) scribenda. Nescio porro quo fonte Aurelia utitur, et dubio hoc nomen utilis sit.--Verbex 18:26, 17 Octobris 2006 (UTC)

message: Ego quoque de Aureliano dubito. Apud Romanos antiquos Genabum/Cenabum, deinde Aurelianensis urbs vel Civitas Aurelianorum, apud Hofmannum Aurelia, nomen nostri temporis fortasse usitatissimum. Lesgles (disputatio) 15:32, 13 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Verbex (supra) "Aureliam" reiecit, "Cenabum" suasit quia "Aurelianum" nomen Romanum esse negavit (sed erravit, si en:wiki res veras dicit). Quibus fontibus dicis "Aureliam" nomen esse usitatissimum? Hofmannus enim de urbibus Francicis fons est utilis sed non optimus.

text: Dioecesis est "Aurelianensis". Incolae sunt "Aurelianenses", e.g. Reginaldus Aurelianensis. Inter fontes Francicos hic (in indice Thuani) habes "Aurelianű" i.e. "Aurelianum", hic "Aurelia", hic "Aureliae", hic (fonte fortasse recentissimo) "Genabum (?), puis Aurelianum" ... Non dico te erravisse, sed haud iam scio si movere oportet. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:45, 13 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Recte dicis; aliquando Hofmanno nimis fidem facio; nunc incertus sum. Aliquos fontes addidi; fortasse aliquis plus investigare poterit. Lesgles (disputatio) 16:07, 16 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Scire debuimus urbe Cenabo a Caesare deleto in ruinis iacebat usque in annum fere 274. Eo anno, eodem fere loco Aurelianus urbem novam suam condidit. Paginam novam de Cenabo incipere volo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:49, 12 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movenda
Disputatio:Harrius Potter et Poculum Ignis

message: Wouldn't "mortivorus" be better word for death eater (like carnivorus, herbivorus)? -anonymous
replies: text: Vorare isn't just 'eat': it's 'eat greedily, gobble up', as seen in the corresponding adjective, vorax 'gluttonous, swallowing greedily'. Carnivorus goes back at least to Pliny the Elder, but Merriam-Webster says herbivorus is New Latin, and its English form apparently dates from 1661. Classical Latin is less hospitable than English to such compounds. Is there an objection to qui mortem absumit/(com)edit/consumit/(de)vorat/manducat etc.? IacobusAmor 19:08, 6 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ah, now I see: in the article, it's Edaces Mortis 'the devourers of death' (with the adjective edax devouring' used as a noun). That's neat. The idea wants to be a proper name. Who needs a replacement? Ovid has tempus edax rerum 'time the devourer of things', a parallel construction. IacobusAmor 19:19, 6 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

message: I think this page should not be merged with Harrius Potter. — Maybe it was another situation when we did not have the :Categoria:Harrius Potter? --Roland (disp.) 17:46, 6 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Consentio.--Ioshus Rocchio 18:31, 6 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contribuenda
Disputatio:Tellus (planeta)

message: It ıs said: Continentes septem Terrae sunt. Continens maxima Terrae Asia, minima Australia.. However, Australia ıs not ın the list of continents, it is Oceania. --Roland2 09:25, 22 Martii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Verba paululum mutavi. W. B. 3 Id. Sext. 2006
thread_title:  Continents 

message: Mihi videtur terram significationem habere pro hominibus non tantum ut planetam, sed magis ut locus vitae humanae, et ergo elementum experientiae et culturarum humanarum.  Nolunt istas etiam tractare in articulo hoc?  --Tbook 21:30, 3 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mea sententia hic articulus imprimis de planeta et de rebus geophysicis et geographicis narret. Inde fortasse titulus a "Terra" ad "Tellus" movendus mihi videtur. De rebus humanis alio melius. usor:Bohmhammel 20.47, 3 Idus Sext. 2006
secundus conatus: Vel discretivatione nobis opus est. terra (discretiva): 1) terra (planeta) et 2) terra. Alex1011 20:49, 11 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Significatio humana

message: Omnis textis anglikarum legebam, tellus semper nomen "terra" habebat.  Quid est differentia inter "tellus" et "terra"? --Puella Nivis 15:35, 25 Octobris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nulla differentia est. Tellus et terra et regionem et planetam significare potest. --Alex1011 18:53, 24 Octobris 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :tellus, terra e lexico Lewis & Short.  Ibi scribunt terram contra caelum dicitur, et tellurem contra alteros planetas... sed eadem res sunt. —Myces Tiberinus 10:51, 25 Octobris 2006 (UTC)
The nameless 188.142.138.1 has overnight changed all the text's instances of tellus to terra. Which is better? IacobusAmor 13:19, 8 Ianuarii 2010 (UTC)

text: Hmm. Secundum Lewis & Short, tellus hic melior videtur locutio. Ergo, care 188.142.138.1, cur malis terram? IacobusAmor 13:34, 8 Ianuarii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Reverti. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:56, 10 Ianuarii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quia Tellus? 

message: ...«celeritas fugitiva» dici oportet. Bob A 05:01, 6 Novembris 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Velocitas fugitiva 

message: Modo sic omnes sciunt, verbum 'planeta' masculine est, sed qui verba feminina in declinationem primam declinatur.
Bonis salutationibus, Donatello (disputatio) 20:48, 26 Aprilis 2012 (UTC).
thread_title:  Nota bene 

message: quintus a maximo ex octo Systematis Solaris planetis
The above number is nonsense because all four gas giants are larger than the Earth which would make it either the fourth largest of eight oder fifth largest of nine.--87.170.186.177 17:03, 13 Octobris 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't quite follow this. The planets from largest to smallest (by radius/volume) are Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Earth, Venus, Mars, and Mercury. Earth is fifth; including Pluto or not doesn't matter. Lesgles (disputatio) 17:31, 13 Octobris 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong number
Disputatio:Physica

message: Est hic difficultas quaedam non parva: "physica" Latine (et Graece) NON significat "physics," sed potius "natural science" (et "scientia" numquam "science" sonat, sed potius "knowledge").  Igitur ut "physics," "la physique" significemus, oportunum fuerit vocabulo "physica" epithetum vel adiectivum aptum addere.  Familiaris quidam meus, qui "physics" profitetur, vocem "physica fundamentalis" mihi roganti proposuit, quasi "physics" rerum omnium naturalium fundamenta primaria investiget.  Omnino oportet, mea sententia, vocabula Latina adhibeamus quae cum ratione perennis Latinitatis utcumque quadrent -- ne sermo quem hic usurpemus in quendam quasi lusum evadat, quo vocabulis vernaculis desinentias Latinas appingamus.  [There's a serious naming problem here: "physica" in Latin (and Greek) does NOT means "physics," but "natural science" (and "scientia" is knowledge, not "science").  So to express the concept "physics," we probably should add an epithet or adjective to "physica."  A friend who teaches physics suggested "physica fundamentalis," on grounds that physics deals with the underlying or basic phenomena underlying the natural universe.  I thinks it's really essential in Vicipaedia to use words that are at least more or less consistent with the way people have been writing Latin for the previous 2200 years -- otherwise the danger is that what we do here will end up being not much more than a game where we stick Latin endings onto what are really English, French, etc. words.]  Severus Censor, 26 
Mar. 2006.
replies: text: The article definitely has a lot of poor/bad/wrong latin. However, using the words dictionary at << http://lysy2.archives.nd.edu/cgi-bin/words.exe >> I found the following which suggests that the noun 'physicum -i' refers to natural science but the noun 'physica -ae' is an acceptable way to refer to physics.
replies: text: :physicum, physici  N (2nd) N     2 2  N   [XXXCO]

text: :physics (pl.), natural science;

text: :physice, physices  N F     1 6  F   [XSXDS]

text: :physics;

text: :physica, physicae  N (1st) F     1 1  F   [XSXDS]

text: :physics;

text: :physicus, physica, physicum  ADJ    [XXXCO]

text: :pertaining/relating to physics/natural science/physical nature; natural,inborn;

text: Rafaelgarcia 15:23, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: Andrew, re your edit "Physica omnibus ramis scientiae naturalis elementarissima est."—You must have been reading too much Cato the Elder! He's the only major classical writer whom Devine & Stephens (Latin Word Order, Oxford, 2006) find to prefer "A B est" to "A est B": "In Cato's De Agricultura copular esse tends to behave like a regular lexical verb and mostly appears in final position" (p. 218). Really ! Such archaism ! IacobusAmor 18:13, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Placement of ''est''
Disputatio:Cellae praefectura

message: Hoc etiam mea sententia est.
Franciscus 12:13, 29 Martii 2006 (UTC) (qui sum auctor huius paginae)
thread_title:  "Suasum est... (etc.)" 

message: Shouldn't the page be moved to Cellae praefectura? See the reference. --Roland (disp.) 21:17, 1 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No one seems to disagree. I'll move it. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:06, 12 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kelleramt or Cellae praefectura
Disputatio:Lingua Bohemica

message: Lingua "Lingua Cecha", sed terra "Tzekia" nominatur... Uniformitas esse debet! -- Alexander Gerascenco 13:43, 30 Martii 2006 (UTC)

message: Recens Res Publica Bohemica sive Tzekia, ut dicitur, iam ab antiquis temporibus in partes tres divisa est - in Bohemiam, Moraviam et Silesiam, quae terrae rege communi in re publica, c.n. "Corona Bohemica" fuit, coniunctae fuere. Iam inde ab media aetate lingua Slavica, qua homines in terris Coronae Bohemicae, utebantur, "lingua Bohemica" nuncupabatur; inde ii, qui hac lingua loquebantur, "Bohemi" appellati sunt, etsi in Moravia et Silesia habitaverunt; quin etiam usus, de quo supra verba feci, adhuc in lexicis et nominibus officialibus viget. Aliquot saeculis ante quoque humanistae nomen unum, quo omnes coronae Bohemicae terrae nominari possent, invenire conabantur et ea ipsa de causa ex viris doctis, qui in universitatibus academiisque Rei Publicae Bohemicae versantur, Latinum terrarum Bohemicarum nomen quaerere et paginam nominibus earundem terrarum destinatam quam primum instruere velim. --Georgius Laminarius 10:40, 3 Maii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Qua de causa nomen paginae, c.n. "lingua Cecha" fuit, nuper mutavi?
Disputatio:Declinatio quarta

message: Movendum hunc ad Declinationem quartam credo.--69.143.249.21 02:28, 31 Martii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feci.--Ioscius  ∞ 10:10, 27 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Movendum

message: Quaeso. u et s duo sunt litterae. Cur autem hoc scribitur ita: 'cum littera us' nec cum litteris? Nooj 05:25, 27 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte dicis. Correxi. --Ioscius  ∞ 10:11, 27 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: litterae
Disputatio Vicipaediae:Index formularum

message: Non habemus formularium dicentem:
Hoc articulum de X tractat.  Si de Y quaeris, vide Z?
(sicut  sed referens ad paginam individuam, non paginam disambiguationis.)  --Tbook 22:03, 3 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We do now. See  (and feel free to correct all latin). Daniel (☎) 19:16, 27 Maii 2006 (UTC)

message: The four templates for other wikis (wikisource, wiktionary, wikimedia commons and wikiquote) are all different. They ought to match each other, but which should they copy? Daniel (☎) 18:37, 30 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done it. Daniel (☎) 16:40, 6 Maii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other wikis 

message: Exsistitne formula, quae pugnae tabella creare potest? Facite mihi scire. --Vercassivellaunus 19:49, 23 Februarii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Formula:Bellum --Iovis Fulmen 21:20, 15 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula pugnae
Disputatio:Iacobus Wales

message: I vote to move this quickly to Iacobus (or Iacobo if we wanted to keep the Jimbo flair) Wales.--Ioshus Rocchio 23:42, 6 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out ", Latine Wales etiamVide Vicipaedia:Titulus." because I couldn't understand it. Is that OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:14, 23 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yeah, I didn't understand that either, I hope I didn't write that =] --Ioshus (disp) 12:57, 23 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Iacobus

message: Seeing as the English article is "Jimmy Wales", shouldn't this be "Iacobulus Wales", making use of the diminutive? (I know very little Latin, so I don't know if that's the proper form, but in any case I think the diminutive reflects the common name better.) Knight of Truth (disputatio) 22:18, 3 Octobris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know that anyone uses those diminutives of Latin forenames very much. Maybe Americans do? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:39, 4 Octobris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Iacobulus

message: Franciesse, mutasti "se adsectatorem [[libertarianismus|libertarianismi]] appellavit" ad "se adsectatorem [[Factio Libertariana (CFA)|libertarianismi]] appellavit, sed novus nexus est falsus quia Wales revera Factionem Libertarianam deridet. Confirmat Wikipedia: "Wales labeled himself a [[:en:libertarianism|libertarian]], qualifying his remark by referring to the United States [[Libertarian Party (United States)|Libertarian Party]] as "lunatics." Factio Libertariana non est libertarianismus. Ergo, verum nexum, quamquam iam rubrum, restituemus. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 10:58, 14 Maii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Libertarianismus vs. Factio Libertariana