lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Augustus (imperator)

message: Ave! Res bona est.
replies: text: Quis scripsit verba supra? Et quid significant? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:29, 25 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Maybe it's a compliment? Let's assume so ... :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:24, 25 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)

message: Vide mutationes a 68.192.152.235 hodie factas: mutavit:
replies: text: Patronus Gaius Maecenas, historicus Livius, et poetae Ovidius, Propertius, Tibullus, et praecipue Horatius Vergiliusque sub imperio Augusti floruerunt
ad

text: Patronus Gaius Maecenas, historicus Livius, est poetae Ovidius, Propertius, Tibullus, et praecipue Horatius Vergiliusque sub imperio Augusti floruerunt.
et alterae mutationes sunt mirae. IacobusAmor 21:55, 15 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalismus?

message: Nomen Gaius Iulius Caesar Octavianus Augustus nunquam, nisi fallor, gessit; nomina alia varia gessit, sed nullum a nativitate usque ad mortem. Igitur ad titulum simpliciorem Augustus (imperator) moveo. An quis abnuit? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:40, 22 Novembris 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't his legal name, now that he's dead and the Senate has given us its decree, Divus Augustus ? Similarly (but not exactly), the formal name of the Japanese emperor changes after he ceases to be alive. IacobusAmor 17:13, 22 Novembris 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :I don't think it is his name, unless you are a pagan and living in the Roman Empire. It certainly was his name for quite a long time after his death.

text: :It isn't part of his "life", of course. This page doesn't have a proper "reputation and influence" section yet, though in a single sentence it does note his deification and the naming of the month August after him. That's where I would eventually expand, and specify what he was called by later Romans. It's a bit like saints, really. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:17, 24 Novembris 2011 (UTC)

text: :But, looking again at the first sentence, I agree that this name needed to be added there. So I've done that. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:26, 24 Novembris 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: Jondel, quid significat tuum verbum acromata ? et cur discrepat ab acroamata ? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:29, 25 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted, Iacobe! In this quotation there were two letters omitted in the Suetonius manuscripts that need to be added to the text (in acroamata and also in ludios). That was the reason for the < > signs, but evidently it wasn't clear to Jondel. Other readers might have the same problem, I guess. It may be preferable to assume the emendations are correct, and simply write acroamata and ludios. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:21, 25 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Acromata?
Disputatio:Lima

message: Please, don't write dates as if we were in Ancient Rome!!!!
Thank you in advance.--Le K-li 05:03, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About Dates

message: I'm not the author of this article, but I made some changes. Please, correct the grammatical/orthographical mistakes. Thank you in advance!!!--Le K-li 22:25, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circa Auctorem
Disputatio:Iubilaeus

message: The biblical passage quoted in this article does not correspond (in some words & punctuation marks) with the Tridentine text. Which version of the text is it from? ¶ Suggestion for all of Vicipaedia : whenever a text of the Bible is being quoted, the source of the text—the name of the translation—should be specified. IacobusAmor 13:32, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biblical translations

message: the biblical passage is from nova_vulgata:
*
--Massimo Macconi 14:00, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why then have you changed the lineation? That translation gives verse 10 as "Sanctificabitisque annum quinquagesimum et vocabitis remissionem in terra cunctis habitatoribus eius: ipse est enim iobeleus. Revertemini unusquisque ad possessionem suam, et unusquisque rediet ad familiam pristinam." But you've broken it in the middle—so a reader will suppose that the part starting at "habitatoribus" must belong to verse 11.
thread_title: quotation

message: Somewhere long ago, I read that expert typographers consider that long quotations in italics look hideous. The indentation alone does the job of setting quotations apart from the main text. Italics add nothing. Maybe others disagree and can cite typographers who love seeing large textblocks in italics. IacobusAmor 15:53, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Long indented quotations in italics

message: I corrected the lineation, but I would mantain the Italic. I believe it's better to separate our text from any quotation how long this is. Thanks and ciao--Massimo Macconi 16:32, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As an experiment, I imitated :en:Template:Quotation to make :Formula:Citatio. It sets off the quoted text very clearly (and in slightly smaller font) without using italics. If anyone prefers this layout, retain it -- if not, revert it. I won't mind! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:18, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sorry
Disputatio:Caral

message: If you see that the article has either grammatical or orthographical mistakes, why don't you correct them? I know quite well that my Latin is not that good, but I start new articles because I want to encourage you all to finish and/or to correct them.--Le K-li 21:45, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About Latin

message: Salvete!!!
I just added some more info about Caral. Please, check it and correct the mistakes it might have.--Le K-li 16:57, 28 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Imago:Smile_eye.png‎
thread_title:  Adding more info 

message: I've put more info, And I'll keep doing this until we complete the whole article  . Thank you all in advance.--Le K-li 00:33, 1 Martii 2007 (UTC)
PD: Don't forget to check and correct every mistake you find.
thread_title:  And more 

message: ===De verbis dubitationes===
Ecce definitiones in lingua anglica verborum quæ dubia sunt:
*Cunæ (cunarum, f): Noun. Cradle. In the article, it is used figuratively.
*Residentialia (residentialium, n):  Adjective (NeoLatin/veryrare). Residential
Quæ definitiones e lexicone, a Guglielmo Whitaker, et Victionario Anglico sunt. Si vel verba vel expressiones meliora inveniatis aut habeatis, quæso, currentes corrigite.
--Le K@l!nuntia? 07:19, 21 Martii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Disputatio:Caral (locus archaeologicus)" hic mota 

message: Ecce definitiones in lingua anglica verborum quæ dubia sunt:
*Cunæ (cunarum, f): Noun. Cradle. In the article, it is used figuratively.
*Residentialia (residentialium, n):  Adjective (NeoLatin/veryrare). Residential
Quæ definitiones e lexicone, a Guglielmo Whitaker, et Victionario Anglico sunt. Si vel verba vel expressiones meliora inveniatis aut habeatis, quæso, currentes corrigite.
--Le K@l!nuntia? 07:19, 21 Martii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: De verbis dubitationes
Disputatio:Nivata

message: This isn't a challenge, I'm just curious--how did we come by "Nivata"?  Valete, Bassus 22:10, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Credo hispanice "Nevada" significare "nivea" "stratum nive". nivata est approximatio huius verbi. I believe that "Nevada" comes from the word "nieve" in spanish. The word "nivata" looks like it in latin. --Marc mage 22:15, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

text: See Disputatio_Usoris:Iustinus/Archive#Las_Vegas.3F --Iustinus 22:47, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Vázquez Coronado (if I remember properly), the first Spaniard to reach modern-day Nevada called it such because of the vast amount of salt in the deset, that created a smowy image. As it has been said before, Nevada means "snowed" (nieve>nevar>nevado/a)--Xaverius 23:03, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
Omnibus gratias ago. Bassus 23:08, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Qua Ratione "Nivata" Appelletur?
Disputatio:Graecia antiqua

message: Is this article somewhat misnamed? It goes from 467 a.C.n. to 405 a.C.n., and doesn't say much about anything but war. IacobusAmor 00:31, 28 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: Having sixteen (!) consecutive bracketed reference numbers, [2] thru [17], after "et ergo incunabulum civilizationis Occidentalis erat," is really pushing the envelope. But there is not much if anything we can do about that. At very least, Wikipedia ought to combine them, e.g., as "[2-17]". Toddcs (disputatio) 12:34, 3 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many consecutive bracketed reference numbers
Disputatio Formulae:Citatio2

message: Please could someone make the following change:
Add another 2 parameters, the first one will not be optional:
replies: text: conversus ab 
 should be optional in case it is not a name which may be easily ablativized (ie foreign). Thanks in advance!!!--Ioshus (disp) 00:34, 28 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

text: Tried to implement that, please check. Does 4 and 5 contain the language from which it is translated or the person who translated it? --UV 01:07, 28 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Person.--Ioshus (disp) 01:40, 28 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Great! Vicipaedia:Harenarium.--Ioshus (disp) 01:45, 28 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: to avoid awkward "conversus", and ablative construction. Also, the parameter does not automatically link, any longer.--Ioscius (disp) 04:25, 6 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  changed it 

message: The optional  parameters do not appear to be all that optional. Would it be possible to fix this? Specifically I can't skip author (for anonymous works) or translator (it seems kind of silly to cite myself). --Iustinus (disputatio) 02:38, 1 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Works now. --UV (disputatio) 22:10, 6 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: : Hooray! --Iustinus (disputatio) 04:17, 7 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optional parameters
Disputatio:Nebula planetaria

message: Mavultis ultrapurpureus vel ultraviolaceus ? --Marc mage 11:17, 28 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

message: Salve. Nisi fons invenire possumus, censeo "nebula planetaris" appellari oportet. Melius et rationis est. Quid censetur ad alios? -- Donatello (disputatio) 01:19, 14 Martii 2014 (UTC).
replies: text: De ordine verborum consentio, sed fontem nunc repperi pro "nebula planetaria": moveo igitur. OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:01, 14 Martii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Georgius Orwell

message: Since no portrait seems to be available I have put his gravestone in the infobox, as a stopgap, since the infobox demands a picture. Perhaps better not to have an infobox at all if he's such a difficult man to illustrate? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:49, 2 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration
Disputatio:Universitas Oxoniensis

message: Could anyone hazard a guess as to "undergraduate" in Latin? Leigh (disp) 17:51, 2 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Alumnus Baccalaureatus"? LionhardusCiampa 17:17, 20 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :I have seen undergraduati (pl.), but I'm afraid it was a joke word. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:16, 20 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::The Harvard Classical Club says "undergraduate: scholaris non graduatus/a; sophista, -ae, c.". Harrissimo.

text: :For "graduate student seeking a doctorate" there exists doctorandus, so perhaps we could say baccalaureandus ;) --Iustinus 20:04, 20 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
Suggraduatus/a would do, surely? Tergum violinae 17:21, 5 Decembris 2008 (UTC)
*'scholaris in statu pupillari'? Normally, u/gs are called by their rank such as Commoner or Scholar, etc. --82.36.147.80 21:54, 3 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

message: What is the rhyme or reason behind the listing of the different colleges, which is neither alphabetical nor chronological? LionhardusCiampa 17:09, 20 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, OK: it appears to be chronological according to the English titles (most of which aren't there yet, which is why it was confusing ...) LionhardusCiampa 17:11, 20 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yes, I first wrote them in alphabetical order in English, then they were changed to Latin. Leigh (disp) 14:31, 13 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of colleges 

message: The 'Latin' of this article is totally shit. I can't even work out what it is TRYING to say in order to correct it. Don't they teach Latin at Oxford any more? [Scripsit Tergum violinae die 5 Decembris 2008.]
replies: text: This article is often ungrammatical, but more to the point is whether it's even trying to say what it should. When in doubt on either point, refer to the version at en:, and start over from there. IacobusAmor 17:38, 5 Decembris 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this Latin?
Disputatio:Ludificatio Kalendarum Aprilium

message: See Disputatio_Vicipaediae:Pagina_mensis#April_2007_-_April_fool.27s_or_Scacci_.3F.3F
--Rolandus 13:23, 3 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pagina mensis

message: #With all due respect for PONS, I'd kind of like to see this as Kalendarum. We can explain the cited name and our reasons for changing it (which as I see it are that we have an article Kalendae and we go on to use Kalendis Aprilibus a sentence later. This will distinguish immediately between kalends and calendar.
#That being said, I think the fact that it is a day for jokes is more important than the fact that it is on the kalends. More like: "Ludificatio Kalendarum Aprilium est dies iocorum cadens quotannis Kalendis Aprilibus."
#I wonder about the case of iocorum. Pro iocis maybe better? But then again I always worry far too much about genitives...
--Ioshus (disp) 14:39, 3 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few minor comments 

message: I'm not quite sure I understand your usage, Alex. Do you mean that people trick others with stories, and by giving them false directions?--Ioshus (disp) 17:06, 3 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wanted to say that people give wrong orders to others, like (silly example) "bring the letters!", but the post-man wasn't here yet. On the contrary, wrong stories is the business of the media. --Alex1011 17:15, 3 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ok. This is what I thought, but I was curious.--Ioshus (disp) 17:34, 3 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  mandatum/mandatus
Disputatio:Ethanolum

message: Cur Alkohol cum una "k" ? --Marc mage 21:06, 3 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quia scriptor huius paginae Germanus est, ita Germanice scribitur.  Recense, sodes.  —Mucius Tever 21:48, 3 Martii 2007 (UTC)

message: Orthographia nostra solet dipthongos litteras praeferre.--Ioshus (disp) 22:51, 14 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aethanol
Disputatio:Squalus

message: Mimimimi....
replies: text: ♪ Ecce squalo sunt pulchri dentes,

text: quos ostendit candidos

text: Modo sica est Machithi,

text: nec videmus eam nos. ♪
Gratias vobis ago. Totam septimanam adfuero! --Iustinus 03:26, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Important message
Disputatio Vicipaediae:Communicatio

message: Iustinus has started to maintain a list of topics in the taberna where he is asking for feedback or attention. I talked with Iustinus some days ago about the problem that the list of "recentchanges" (nuper muatata) is growing and especially that mass changes are hiding requests for attention.
My suggestion was to have a manually maintained file where users add their requests for attention, maybe like this:
 *pagename need your help --Rolandus 09:53, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 *pagename have an idea --Rolandus 09:53, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 *pagename should be discussed --~~
 *http:... do not agree --Rolandus 09:53, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 *http:... anyone has sources? --Rolandus 09:53, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 *pagename help --09:53, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)
 *http://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=pagename&curid=2&diff=2&oldid=2
The last line is an example for a minimal entry: It is just the diff-link.
We could add headers for the date.
In fact the taberna can do this, but it might be flooded as well, if this concept will be heavily used.
Another solution would be to request bot-status for mass edits, however, I do not think that this is a good concept and it will not solve the problem in the long run: At some point in the future there will be too many users to watch all their edits.
We could also use templates or categories, however, then we will not cover the chronological aspect. When you come back after 4 weeks, you will just see a snapshot of the unsolved problems, but not the chronological list of requests for attention.
Templates are good where a problem exists temporarily and does not interest anybody after it has been resolved.
Here I am talking about edits which will be of interest for you, when you come back from vacation after 4 weeks and do not want to go through more than 15000 (!) changes. Yesterday we had more than 500 edits.
--Rolandus 09:53, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I find the Taberna works well, but you may be right that it will gradually be overloaded with such requests. If so, a separate page such as you suggest would be a solution. But the fewer places we have to check, the better, and we do need to go on checking the Taberna ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:10, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requesting attention
Disputatio:Iohannes Sebastianus Bachius

message: * +1 (inspecta1) --Marc mage 21:11, 3 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: LATINITAS

message: Videte s.v.p. Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium 18#Categoria:Iohannes Sebastianus Bach. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:05, 24 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine 

message: I recently moved the page to Bach, not seeing a source for Bachius, but I see Iacobus has now found one. I'm fine either way, and if someone wants to move it back, please do! Lesgles (disputatio) 18:04, 22 Augusti 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a long discussion of this name on the Taberna in 2012 (I have just updated the link above). No one at that time had thought of Bachius: the debate, inconclusive as so often, was between Ioannes and Iohannes, and I hesitate to revive it, but if further sources have turned up, we should keep that h? in mind. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:46, 22 Augusti 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Igitur, fontibus inventis, fiat denuo titulus lemmatis Bachius.--Viator (disputatio) 22:10, 23 Augusti 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bach/Bachius 

message: Proles (generis feminini) non solum liberi sunt, sed etiam tota progenies. Praeterea imprimis in poematis reperitur. Ergo simpliciore vocabulo liberi utor. --Bavarese (disputatio) 17:35, 27 Decembris 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Probe dicis, amice. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:36, 27 Decembris 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :Salve! A te, amice, qui his paginis magnam ac diuturnam operam et dedisti et das, responsum spero: Estne nobis pagina omnia genera operum musicorum, systematice composita, continens? Talem rem utilem esse puto, ne rerum accumulatarum immensa moles vicipediana iterum atque iterum, et nonnumquam frustra, concutienda sit. --Bavarese (disputatio) 18:06, 27 Decembris 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  viginti proles, quorum ...? 

message: I have just cancelled the recent modification of this page, which changed "Ioannes Sebastianus" into "Ioannes Sebastus". I cannot find any occurence of 'Sebastus', such a forename is absent from the Martyrologium Romanum (ed. 2004); on the contrary there are several Sebastiani. I do think Sebastianus is the normal Latin form of Bach's second forename. Ailamnos (disputatio) 20:20, 22 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sebastus"
Disputatio:Georgius Piccittu

message: This page was just so that Iustinus' :Categoria:Lexicographi would not be so lonely. =] (and because I wish his Vucabbulariu were still in print!!!).--Ioshus (disp) 22:39, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)

message: Vel: "publicabatur in partibus" ? What's the idiom ? IacobusAmor 22:46, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, you're probably right. I was thinking of Gallia having been divisa.--Ioshus (disp) 22:48, 4 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "publicabatur in partes"
Disputatio:Conservapedia

message: See :en:Talk:Conservapedia#Conservapedia_blocks_new_accounts --Rolandus 06:38, 7 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conservapedia_blocks_new_accounts

message: See http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia_Logo --Rolandus 06:42, 7 Martii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Finding a logo

message: Conservapediam de orthographia Brittannica in Wikipedia questam esse legi, quamquam plurimi scriptores Americam incolunt.
Sed hic Wikipedia odium in orthographiam linguae Anglicae Brittanicam habere dicitur. Non intellego. Conservapedia orthographiam americanam mavult.
(Ingeborg Hartung, 14.10.07)
thread_title: "Vicipaedia saepe adhibet orthographiam peregrinam. Praecipue, odium habet in orthographiam linguae Anglicae Brittannicam.(#9)"
Disputatio:Scrugulus Anas

message: This is a better title than Scruguli Anatis, but whether "Scrugulus" can be supported I don't know. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:22, 7 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently there exist at least two books involving him: "Scrugulus et Radius Contra Procellam" and "Scrugulus in Re Vere Mirabili".  [This was posted at Disputatio:Studii Disney.]  —Mucius Tever 00:13, 8 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yep, I own those. Now that I look, the word Disneiana doesn't occur anywhere obvious. Could swear I saw it in there somewhere. ANyway, yes, the first two Tintin books were also translated (a shame, I hear it is from the third book on that it gets interesting). I also have a Popeye (Popeius. Get it?) And of course, as everyone knows, there's always Asterix. --Iustinus 09:57, 8 Martii 2007 (UTC)
Inasmuch as I do own those books, I really should fix up this article, and reference it. --Iustinus 16:58, 6 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contribuenda