lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:GNU

message: What would be the best way to translate the GNU acroymn into Latin?
How can we decline GNU?
replies: text: We don't decline acronyms on Vicipaedia.But if one had to one could use the u declension, like iglu--Rafaelgarcia 19:01, 15 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Prehapse: GNU Non Unix, Gnus Non Unicis.  That would make GNU a neuter noun.

message: I changed 'medulla' to 'nucleum' in order to conform to the standard set on the Linux page. --Modestus 12:44, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong gender: in the nominative case, it's nucleus. IacobusAmor 21:50, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Kernels are masculine? --Modestus 12:45, 24 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Yes, nucleus is masculine (though nux is feminine). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:52, 24 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: We need to establish some new words.  For license (as in the General Public License) I used licentia, but that seems way off.  We need a word for library.  I used librarium but that seems to be too literal of a translation. --65.216.75.240 20:44, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't need new words when old words will do! The Romans had licenses & libraries 2000 years ago. To them, a librarium was a 'bookcase, book-chest'; a library was a bibliotheca. To them, licentia meant 'freedom, leave, liberty', especially the abuse thereof: 'dissoluteness, licentiousness'. If you mean license in the sense of a permit, the Romans had at least two good words for that: privilegium, -i, n., and diploma, -atis, n. IacobusAmor 21:48, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :If it helps, Traupman gives for "driver's license" diploma gubernationis(=diploma gubernandi?), which emphasizes the concrete object carried by the driver certifying his privilegium; the "special right of driving" would be privilegium gubernationis(=privilegium gubernandi?). Compare also privilegium impressorium given by Mogan for "copyright" meaning "licence to print", as opposed to "right to copy" =ius auctorum (=ius imprimendi?); And of course bibliotheca is a library!--Rafaelgarcia 22:11, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word Choice
Disputatio:Iesse Alexander Helms, Minor

message: Gualteri Reptilari, mutasti nomen Iesse ad Iessae, et dicis "Iessae Latinius est." Quae attestationes pertinent? In Bibliis Sacris, nomen est Iesse (vel Jesse); e.g., "Obed autem genuit Jesse. Jesse autem genuit David regem" (Matt. 1:5). Forma genetiva est Isai apud Ruth 4:17 (forma quod nominativa videtur apud Liber Primus Samuelis 17:12). Ubi in Bibliis Sacris nominativum Iessae invenis? IacobusAmor 13:12, 17 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In   Victionario Anglico scriptum est Jesse a Graeco Antiquo Ἰεσσαί derivare, quid Iessae translitteratur. Iesse videtur neutrum tertiae declinationis magis quam masculinum. Praeterea Minor est agnomen et pro hoc non oportet virgula post cognomen familiare ponere! (e.g. Marcus Porcius Cato Minor) Gualterius Reptilarius scripsit 09:41, 20 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Fortasse non necesse est fontem Graecum e Vicipaedia Anglica exquaerere. Latine scribimus et habemus fontem Latinum. Hic habes evangelium versionis vulgatae cum orthographia "Iesse" (vide vv. 5-6). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:33, 21 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::¶ Habemus permultos fontes Latinos! Exempli gratia est Liber Usualis, in quo antiphonam diei 19 Decembris, unam ex antiphonis usitate "magnis antiphonis" appellatis, invenimus, sic: "O Radix Jesse, qui stas in signum populorum, super quem continebunt reges os suum, quem gentes deprecabuntur: veni ad liberandum nos, jam noli tardare" (1963:341).

text: ::¶ De: "Minor est agnomen et pro hoc non oportet virgula post cognomen familiare ponere!"—Ergo en:William Chester Minor fuit Dr. Chester? IacobusAmor 13:19, 21 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: De nomine ''Iessae''
Disputatio:Bison

message: De: "Bison (-tis, f.) est taxinomica congeries. . . . Harum specierum solum vivunt duae: Bison bison, animal Americanum, et Bison bonasus. . . ."—If it's feminine, why does bonasus look masculine? IacobusAmor 23:59, 18 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't matter— is a noun, so doesn't need to agree; it would be like Panthera leo.  But  is masculine anyway (and the extinct species' adjectival epithets antiquus and priscus agree).  —Mucius Tever 06:42, 19 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ah, good; I suspected as much. That's why, not without a modicum of care, I asked why it might "look" masculine, rather than why it might "be" masculine. I'll fix the page, unless someone else has already fixed it. IacobusAmor 12:09, 19 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To whoever marked ''bison'' as feminine

message: I find the declining of this interesting...is the genitive seriously "Bisontis"? Or is it implied that either the n disappears (i.e., "Bisotis") or a vowel is inserted between the two consonants (i.e., "Bisonitis")? I simply havent seen something like this before. Thanks for the help! CeleritasSoni 16:16, 25 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The genitive of  is 'bisontis', yes.  -on, -ontis is very common for words of Greek origin (similar words are horizon and ion; actually I think Greek has a whole class of participles that inflect this way, too).  —Mucius Tever 18:38, 25 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Aha, I see! Blasted Greeks! =) Thank you very much! Another thing learned! CeleritasSoni 20:17, 25 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: To whoever would know
Disputatio:Makemake (planetulus)

message: Nomen dei Rapanuiensis est Makemake, non Mace Mace. Nomen quoque Theodisce est Makemake: "Im Juli 2008 erhielt er den Namen Makemake nach der Schöpfergottheit der Kultur der Osterinsel" (:de:Makemake (Zwergplanet)). IacobusAmor 18:08, 21 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita est - in lingua Theodisca vel Anglica. Sed Romani sonum /k/ (paene) semper littera c scribere solebant, etiamsi aliae gentes (Graeci e. g.) k vel kappa utebantur. Imprimis ante vocales claras (e - i - y) nusquam k invenies, rarissime ante a - o -u. usor:Bohmhammel 22.15 h, 11. Kal. Sext. 2008
replies: text: :In linguis Theodisca et Anglica et Rapanuiensi. Nomina propria sunt nomina propria; et in Polynesia, K = K. Vide disputationem antiquam quae ad litteras Polynesias spectat in Taberna vel ubicumque (obliviscor!). IacobusAmor 20:26, 22 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Ibi: Disputatio Vicipaediae:De nominibus propriis. --UV 21:27, 22 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Robertus Greene

message: How can we translate in Latin: an upstart crow, beautified with our feathers , thank you for your help--85.2.184.188 07:01, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Corvus alienus ob plumam nostram pulchrescens"? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 07:23, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)

text: "Alienus" autem non est le mot juste. Nescio si possumus dicere "Novus corvus" sicut "Novus homo" ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:34, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :scilicet corvulus?--Massimo Macconi 09:51, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)

message: Nescio cur, in pagina Latina de scriptore Anglica, habemus nexum ad bibliographiam exiguissimam publicationum in bibliopoliis Germanicis et Austriacis venditarum. Ecce:
* Opera Roberti Greene aut de Roberto Greene apud Bibliothecam Nationalem Germanicam 
Notandum est: haec sunt, non omnes libri vel commentationes apud bibliothecam quamdam eruditam, sed ei tanti libri qui in bibliopoliis venales sunt aut erant. Hic habemus bibliographiam publicationum Austrogermanicarum nationalem. Utilitatem lectoribus Latinis mundialibus dubito. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 07:29, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interdum
Disputatio:Ignatius Jones

message: Londinii aut Londini?--Massimo Macconi 10:59, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Bradley's Arnold (#213): "The Locative case, answering to the question, where? at what place? has a form distinct from the ablative only in certain words. Rōmae, at Rome; Londinī, at London." IacobusAmor 11:22, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: : Thank you for your answer, but what I do not understand with the locative of London (which has the same form as the genitiv) should we write it with two "ii" or only one"?--Massimo Macconi 20:39, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Bradley's Arnold (published in London, so it should know!) says to write it with one. See Taberna. IacobusAmor 21:32, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)

message: According to :en:Inigo, Latin form is Ignatius or... Enneco. Should probably check WorldCat. --Iustinus 03:29, 31 Decembris 2008 (UTC)
Num forma est Hispanica nominis 'Ignatii'?Matthaeus Tomlinson 08:59, 31 Decembris 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Inigo Hispanice et Vasconice sermonibus est vel Íñigo, vel Enneko, vel Iñaki vel Ignacio --Xaverius 10:03, 31 Decembris 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Fontem "Enneconis Jones" non reperio; imaginem autem Latine rubricatam, nomen "Inigo Jones" monstrantem, in pagina addo. Removeo igitur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:51, 11 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Atque iam imaginem aliam repperi, a Venceslao Hollar Latine rubricatam, qui (recte) "Ignatius Jones" scripsit. Rursus moveo :( Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:05, 11 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inigo
Disputatio:Status caeli

message: For 'weather', Cassell's adds caeli status. IacobusAmor 19:15, 23 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional fons

message: Quoniam Latina liberi verborum ordinis lingua est, supervacaneum est haec duo lemmata, quae sunt caeli status et status caeli, proferre. Utrum igitur praeferre debemus? Status caeli & caeli status paene nusquam leguntur nisi apud Columellam, qui pluries modo statum caeli modo caeli statum scribit. Itaque nimiá licentiá utatur qui altero lexico alteri praelato sine ratione et theoriá se hanc quaestionem resolvisse credat. Constat linguae Latinae, quippe quae lingua generis SOV sit, naturalem verborum ordinem "N + Gen.attr." (id est: status caeli) esse, cum ordo "Gen.attr. + N" (id est: caeli status) additamento quodam pragmatico insignitus sit. Praeterea, non video, quin ordo naturalis in titulis observetur. Neander 05:10, 8 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  De ratione lemmatis
Disputatio:Gothi

message: De: "Anno 711 exercitum Araborum cepit regnum Visigothorum in Hispania."—'In 711, the Kingdom of the Visigoths in Spain captured the Arabs' army'. Isn't that backward, more or less the opposite of what happened? IacobusAmor 18:18, 24 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
vero. If you don't mind, I fixed it. Nooj 04:09, 25 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Annus 711
Disputatio:Paulus Tarsensis

message: Creatores imaginis [[Imago:PaulusTarsus LKANRW.jpg]] "fontibus historicis" uti praetendunt. Sed quibus fontibus? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:50, 25 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  De imagine 

message: Vide POV nostrae definitionis: <<Sanctus Paulus unus est apostolorum Christi. Tarsi natus, nomen Saul ei impositum est. . . .>> Confer commentarium Anglicum: <<Paul of Tarsus, also called Saint Paul, Paul the Apostle, or the Apostle Paul, (Ancient Greek: Σαούλ (Saul), Σαῦλος (Saulos), and Παῦλος (Paulos); Latin: Paulus or Paullus; Hebrew: שאול התרסי‎ Šaʾul HaTarsi (Saul of Tarsus) (c.5 BC - c.67 AD), was a Jew who called himself the "Apostle to the Gentiles".>> IacobusAmor 00:12, 5 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Disputatio:Gaius Cassius Longinus

message: I wonder, is this really better to edit "de familia", "de vita" etc. or just to write simply "familia", "vita" etc., like it is in the last section "fontes" (not "de fontibus") and as in a site about Q.Horatius Flaccus?
If I am not right, let's better do a whole site about C.Cassius Longinus in the same editorial style and change "fontes" in "de fontibus". Robert E. Masznicz 16:20, 26 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My opinion (for what it's worth) is that the form of sub-headings across Vicipaedia can never be, and doesn't need to be, totally consistent. Pages are written by people, and people have different views about this: why not? What readers need from subheadings is help in finding their way around a long article.

text: I can see a reason for the difference that is made on this page between the headings used for text and the headings used for supplementary matter such as "Sources". The last section on this page is not "About sources" (De fontibus); it is simply a list of "Sources" (Fontes). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:47, 29 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
S.t.v.b.e.e.v. :) Dear A.D., Thank You very much for a reasonable mention. I do agree with You, that a practical side of Our project is the prime essensial. And that is why, I have suggested make all articles (a whole procect) in the same style. I am still sure, that any languages (and statements as well) are nothing else, but a kind of code. As a one, I think it is better to be - if possible - the same in any pieces We do create. Vale :) Robert E. Masznicz 09:22, 3 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About sections
Disputatio:Guidus Ubaldus e Marchionibus Montis

message: "e montis" impossibile est quia "e" casum ablativum postulat. Googlui "Guidus Ubaldus e Marchionibus Montis"; id nomen pro tempore impono. Nescio an aliquid melius alibi reperitur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:26, 28 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Vinculum chemicum

message: Salve
The picture is wrong
Please use
Jcwf 21:13, 29 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it.

message: A bond is made by sharing electrons. I think what is meant by partitio is sharing not division per se, so the word should be communicatio, not partitio.--Rafaelgarcia 15:31, 16 Iunii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably, a partitio is at bottom 'a partitioning', and the dictionary's definition—'a sharing', instead of 'a sharing out'—is therefore somewhat misleading. IacobusAmor 16:15, 16 Iunii 2009 (UTC)
Salve! 
in solo libello Latino mihi noto: Suard, Michèle; Berthier, Gaston; Del Re, Giuseppe (1967). "Nova methodus adhibendi approximationem molecularium orbitalium ad plures iuxtapositas unitates". Theoretica Chimica Acta 7 (3): 236–244 nomen ligamen non vinculum usum est. Estne exemplum verum ubi vinculum usum est? --Tchougreeff (disputatio) 17:09, 12 Martii 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Answer to Iacobus question

message: Vinculum mihi multum placet et maxime Ciceronianum mihi videtur. Sed quoniam enzyma quae illa vincula creant "ligases" dicuntur et substantiae quae receptoria captant "ligandi" fortasse verba e radice liga- non omnino spernenda sunt. Utrum Ciceronem an modernismum cohaerentiamque eligendum sit difficile dictu est. Marcus Terentius Bibliophilus (disputatio) 14:19, 22 Februarii 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vinculum versus ligatio vel ligamen
Disputatio:Iacobus Vitriacensis

message: Fabulle, cur est "Magnum eius opus" hic melius quam "Magnum suum opus"? Quis est ipse, si non Iacobus Vitriacensis? IacobusAmor 11:44, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pronomina reflexiva (cum personalia tum possessiva) respicere solent, ut didici, ad subiectum sententiae praecipuae. Huius tamen sententiae ‘magnum opus’ est subiectum ita ut 'suum' ad se ipsum respiceret. --Fabullus 15:36, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Over here, I was taught that a conceptual subject (the actor who persists in mind) can survive from sentence to sentence, so that your version of the text
replies: text: ::Iacobus Vitriacensis . . . fuit theologus et historicus. Magnum eius opus fuit X.

text: :must read (Anglice):
replies: text: ::'Jacob de Vitry . . . was a theologian and a historian. His/her/its [i.e., someone other than Jacobus de Vitry's] big work was X."

text: :The persistence of the notion of Jacob de Vitry is clear if we modify the structure thus:
replies: text: ::Iacobus Vitriacensis . . . fuit theologus et historicus cuius magnum opus fuit X.

text: :Anglice:
replies: text: ::'Jacob de Vitry . . . was a theologian and a historian whose big work was X."

text: :This case may fall under Bradley's Arnold's rule 354(ii):
replies: text: ::Sometimes, when no ambiguity is likely to arise, suus refers in a simple sentence to something other than the subject of the sentence. Senātum ad suam sevēritātem revocāvī. I recalled the senate to its strictness."

text: :I suppose, since the situation in this article is clear, no word at all for 'his' needs to be used, and the phrase could simply be Magnum opus. No other possible author is here in question. IacobusAmor 16:38, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)

text: You may want to check Allen & Greenough's grammar, esp. here, from "The reflexive may refer to any noun or pronoun in its own clause which is so emphasized as to become the subject of discourse..." onwards. Note esp. the following: "Suus is used for one's own as emphatically opposed to that of others, in any part of the sentence and with reference to any word in it". Since here no such emphasis is in order, eius is required. --Fabullus 18:15, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Magnum eius opus
Disputatio:Pronomen personale

message: As a rule, when Vicipaedia gives paradigms, they should be accurate! Of the twenty forms given in the present paradigm, four were not. (Even as the table stands, it leaves out the possibilities of vostrum & vostri; add a footnote?) IacobusAmor 11:57, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean vestrum and vestri...I think I have fixed the table by including an additional column for the adjectives forms.--Rafaelgarcia 12:45, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :No, before making the initial posting, I checked Allen & Greenough #143, which gives four forms for the genitive, in this order & manner:
replies: text: :::vestrum, vestrī; vostrum (-trī)

text: :Presumably, that's the order of frequency of use, with the parenthesis implying some rarity, but other interpretations are possible, especially in view of the semicolon. IacobusAmor 13:05, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::Maybe the least confusing thing would be to give it in a footnote, since I think they may be rare forms. All the tables I have, only give vestrum, presumably because it is the standard form.--Rafaelgarcia 13:18, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::::Words gives the following:
 vestr.i              PRON   5 3 GEN P C                 
 [XXXBO]  
 vestr.um             PRON   5 3 GEN P C                 
 [XXXBO]  
 vostr.i              PRON   5 3 GEN P C                 
 [XXXDO]    lesser
 vostr.um             PRON   5 3 GEN P C                 
 [XXXDO]    lesser
replies: text: ::::::So apparently the colon means "lesser" for less frequently used.--Rafaelgarcia 13:24, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: As a rule

message: Does Vicipaedia give paradigms for these words? IacobusAmor 13:12, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should but its not on our pronomen demonstrativum page. Also our pronomen page is a total mess!--Rafaelgarcia 13:16, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Whoa! You can say that again! But I don't have time to get into it today. Work beckons. Oh well. IacobusAmor 13:23, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Is, ipse,'' etc.
Disputatio:Hieronymus Riario

message: Apud Plinium Forum Iulii locativum Foro Iulii habet: de qua re vide Disputatio:Gnaeus Iulius Agricola#Locativus Fori Iulii. --Fabullus 19:10, 30 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: De locativo "Fori Cornelii"
Disputatio:Brocardicum

message: De: "Verbum brocardus putatur nomen invenire a Burchardo (mortuus anno 1025), Wormatiae episcopo."—Putatur a quibus? Ubi est huius putationis fons? IacobusAmor 10:43, 31 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A quibus?
Disputatio:Aloisius Orione

message: Care usor ignote 125.60.235.225, "in provincia Alexandriae" constanter scribis, sed ubi est haec provincia quam Alexandria possidet? Tuum in provincia Alexandriae Anglice = 'in Alexandria's province (the province owned by Alexandria)', sed Anglice 'in the Province of Alexandria' Latine = in provincia Alexandria quia haec nomina invicem in appositione stant. IacobusAmor 15:16, 3 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fortasse Latinius: in Alexandria, provincia Italica. IacobusAmor 15:20, 3 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "in provincia Alexandriae"?

message: Care usor, qui proposuisti ut scribatur "in Alexandria, provincia Italica", Alexandria est urbs Italica, non provincia. Omnes Italiae provinciae nomen trahunt a capitibus suis, ita ut possit dici, exempli gratia, "provincia Romae", "provincia Mediolani", "provincia Alexandriae", ut etiam ex multis paginis interretialibus patet.
Gratias tibi ago.
Marcus
thread_title:  "in Alexandria, provincia Italica"?
Disputatio:Autocinetum

message: (quod verbum evitandum est ob mixturam elementorum Graecorum cum Latinis) - Haec verba, cum eis assentiar, delenda esse censeo, nam ad rem non pertinent, immo sententiam (de optima latinitate) exprimunt. --Iovis Fulmen 19:32, 6 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Tibi consentio.--Ioscius (disp) 01:19, 7 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: de latinigraecitate

message: De Quomodo diploma gubernandi autocinetum adeptus sum a Vido Angelino (2006)
*license
**diploma gubernationis/gubernandi
*gas pedal
**pedale accelerationis/accelerandi/accelatorium
*rearview mirror
**speculum retrospicum
*traffic light
**semaphorum
*steering wheel
**gubernaculum
*blinker
**lampyris sinistra/dextra
*internal combustion engine
***machinatio a displosione
*gasoline
**benzinum
*spark plug
**scintillula electrica
*headlight
**fax, facis
*to brake
**sufflaminare rotas
*hand brake
**frenum manuale
**extollere frenum
*brake pedal
**pedale sufflaminis/sufflaminandi
*stick shift
**vectis commutationis/commutandi
*gear
**prima, secunda etc (anyone wanna guess with what the feminine is agreeing?)
*clutch
**pedale copulationis/copulandi/copulatorium
*reverse
**retrogressum
*curb
**margo
*car door
**ostiolum
--Ioscius∞ 00:03, 3 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Magnas gratias tibi Iosci vocabulis his. Amplius libenter addere possum.

text: * gear stick, stick shift - vectis velocitatis commutandae
thread_title: Vocabula

message: Fortasse...
*shock absorber
**exstinctarium ictus
*exhaust pipe
**tubulum emissarium (secundum Lex. Rec. Lat.)
*steering wheel
**rota gubernatoris (secundum Needham, Harrius Potter et Philosophi Lapis)
--Robert.Baruch (disputatio) 02:53, 22 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Alia vocabula

message: Novam addidi partem de autocineti structura. Verba, quæ mihi in promptu non erant sic in linguam Latinam converti:
Motrum sive motorium
1) caput = cylinder head;
2) axis machinarum = crankshaft;
3) ugum capitis = head gasket;
4) cylindrum = cylinder;
5) embolum = piston;
6) iniector = injector;
7) clipeus = valvetrain;
8) distributor = distributor;
9) axis eminentiarum = camshaft;
10) trutina = rocker arm;
11) scintillæ iunctura = spark plug;
12) rota motri = flywheel;
13) collector = manifold.
Transmissio:
1) copula = clutch;
2) mechanema = ?;
3) temperator  = manual transmission, synchromesh;
4) differentiale = differential;
5) axis = axle;
6) semiaxis = ?.
Elevatio = suspension;
1) pneumaticum = tire;
2) retentor ictūs = shock absorber;
3) virga torturæ = torsion bar suspension.
Frenum pedale = brake;
Frenum manuale = parking brake.
Loculus = coachwork:
1) vitrum anticum = windshield;
2) rotula moderatrix = steering wheel;
3) fultura = chassis.
Animadverti tamen hic, in pagina disputationis, quædam proponi verba, de quibus aliqua mihi videntur aptiora ad res significandas. Si quis aliter cogitat, scribat nobis.
--Urbanus Ferrarius (disputatio) 20:12, 26 Iunii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  De autocineti structura