lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Liberalismus

message: Censeo ut vertamus paginas anglicam francogallicamque in linguam latinam in hac pagina.
Hohenfels 06:51, 4 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

message: Quaestiones cum translatione verborum illorum sunt :
* Res novae industrii (Anglice : industrial revolution, Francogallice : révolution industrielle)
* Optimatus liberalismus (Anglice : conservative liberalism, Francogallice : libéral-conservatisme)
* Civilis (Anglice Francogalliceque : social)
* Optimatus Liberalismus Novus (Anglice : neoconservatism, Francogallice : néoconservatisme)
Hohenfels 20:00, 5 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand how the adverb optimatus is used here: Optimatus liberalismus = aristocratically liberalism?? The idiom Res Novae is overused for revolution and not very specific except in context. Industrus isn't a word. I would suggest Conversio Industrialis.  The adjective Civilis means "civil, affecting fellow citizens, legal, public...." The noun civile means courtesy/civility. I would have used socialis for social, although that isn't a perfect translation either, meaning "allied, of allies, social, of societies, of partnership."--Rafaelgarcia 20:19, 5 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :OK. Optimatus is an adverb. I made an error: what I meant was to make a reference to the Optimates party at the end of the Republic when Cnaeus Pompeius Magnus, leader of the Optimates, opposed Caius Iulius Caesar, leader of the Populares. The Optimates were defending tradition and the Roman élite, therefore they were the "conservatives". But such a reference may be an anachronism as well as ideologically somehow irrelevant. So would you suggest a more modern word such as conservatismus? I really would not dare inventing latin words on my own.

text: :Thank you for Conversio Industrialis and socialis. --Hohenfels 21:56, 5 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Libenter...The page also contains a couple of other strange words: nutus = nod; nonnulles isn't a word; contra totalitarismo isn't grammatical; ius is neuter, so we would have ius naturale or iura naturalia not ius naturalis = right of the natural; Circumscriptio rei publicae= abridgement/outline of the republic?--Rafaelgarcia 01:05, 6 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quaestiones
Disputatio:Friedlisberg

message: Whats goin' on in this article? If it sounds like the name in parentheses in Latin, shouldnt that be the name of the article? There is a precedent for choosing the latinized names of things over their native names yes? Im not pushing as if I am right, I honestly am not sure, it just seemed like it something wasnt quite right. CeleritasSoni 18:57, 5 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Pacimontium" is nowhere attested. This kind of "helpful" glossing of toponyms seems to be a unique feature of Vicipaedia. If somebody were to supply :en:Rudolfstetten-Friedlisberg with the equally "helpful" gloss "Mountain of Peace", that would, to express myself as politely as I can, cause some eyebrows to raise. --Neander 20:23, 5 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: : Yeah I stand with you on that one. There just doesnt seem to be the kind of uniformity here necessary, but then again there just isnt the man power for it either. I guess for now we just work with we have. Si esse cum una quam amas non-potes, mel, ama unam cum qua es =) CeleritasSoni 00:34, 6 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: De Nomine
Disputatio:Rabbinus

message: Categoria "Rabbines" eget. Quaeso ut creetur! 82.36.94.228 21:38, 6 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Non credo verbum rabbi declinabile esse; formam rabbines nusquam invenire possum.--Rafaelgarcia 02:57, 7 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Declinabile certe est, sed secundi declinationis, minime tertii, ut ratus sum. Vide hic . Hanc paginam movebo et alias mutabo. 82.36.94.228 20:00, 7 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Recte dicis amice. Erravi quia in biblia indeclinabile erat. Sed in lingua latina hodierna evidenter, ut dicis, declinatio exsistit!--Rafaelgarcia 20:30, 7 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

message: Biblia Douai Rheims est reditio Anglica saeculi 16mi, non Bibliarum Vulgatarum editio.Tergum violinae 13:56, 22 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Douai Rheims
Disputatio:Megacyma

message: Nonne melius oportet movere paginam ad nomen latinum?--Rafaelgarcia 13:28, 7 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quos fontes adhibere potes praeter illum in Ephemeride inventum? "Megacyma" mihi quidem videtur esse neologismus ab auctore illius symbolae fictus. Quamobrem praeferrem ego nomen usitatius "tsunami". --Fabullus 18:06, 13 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Puto fons est Lexicon Rerum Novarum Vaticum, quia sic formant ei vocabula nova. Sed me paenitet, quia ego hoc lexicon non habeo et iam non possum legere Ephermidem, nec quidem commentationem eius originalem, ob difficultate de Trojan Horse eorum.

text: :Omnes reputare autem oportet: quos fontes Latinos habemus pro ipso Tsunami? Re vera non est verbum 'latinum nonne? Sed Iaponnicum, quamquam megacyma saltem Latino cum fonte est et declinabilis. Sic sentio ego.--Rafaelgarcia 18:50, 13 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen paginae

message: Should it be (e nomine Graeco...out of the greek name) or (a nomine Graeco... after the greek name)? I would have thought the 'e' would be right here.--Rafaelgarcia 16:07, 7 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quaestio

message: Mirum est, sed nunc lego chartam de Tsunami in Ephemeride. Vide http://ephemeris.alcuinus.net/nuntius.php?id=542 --Georgius Semenovus, http://linguaeterna.com/forum/ 15:02 UTC 3 Oct 2009
thread_title: Vinculum ad Ephemeridem
Disputatio:Caritas in veritate

message: Mea sententia oportet nos versionem Latinam expectare ubi Papa suam opinionem dat de quo nomine Latino Consociationi Nationum melius est--Rafaelgarcia 16:44, 7 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cum versio latina edita sit, recensionem faciemus (ego sum qui novissimas recensiones feci). Cato censor 17:34, 7 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

message: Nomen "litterarum", quod idem valet atque 'epistula', utitur tantummodo numero plurali. Quamobrem emendavi numerum singularem. Romanus Felix.
thread_title:  pluralia tantum
Disputatio:Demonstratio mathematica

message: Argumentum mathematicum Demonstratio mathematica
replies: text: What about "demonstratio mathematica" or "probatio mathematica"? --Neander 21:21, 19 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :You're right. Euler preferred saying Demonstratio.--Rafaelgarcia 21:42, 19 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: De nomine exceptatio ex Usor:Rolandus/Most important 1000 pages/Mathematical proof
Disputatio:Xylon

message: (as contrasted with cotton cloth Xylinum)
replies: text: In the List of articles every Wikipedia should have we find :en:Cotton, to which Xylinon (cotton cloth or cotton fibre) should correspond. Xylon (plant species producing cotton) on the other hand does not correspond to any article in English and does not feature among the List. --Fabullus 17:57, 13 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicata disputatio ab Usor:Rolandus/Most important 1000 pages/Cotton
Disputatio:Moneta (pecunia)

message: (Copied from Disputatio Usoris:Rafaelgarcia --Rolandus 20:38, 9 Aprilis 2008 (UTC))
The link on our moneta to en:Moneta page is wrong. Our moneta page isn't about the god but about currency. Although the latin term originates in the cognomen of Iuno, the god of the Roman mint.--Rafaelgarcia 20:21, 9 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicata disputatio ab Usor:Rolandus/Most important 1000 pages/Currency
Disputatio:Basilius I Macedonius

message: Nescivi quomodo declinarem "Krum Bulgariae", ita eligo rem esse indeclinabilem. Quid sciatis? Gratias pro auxiliō futurō! CeleritasSoni 18:06, 8 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Etiam, "Parentibus" est conlectivum vocabulum, et in hac re, demonstrat ambo parentes. Nonne quod ambo parentes sunt homines, adjectivi coniuncti vocabulo sint masculini? Gratias iterum! CeleritasSoni 19:19, 8 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
*Si Krum IX saeculo in Europa vivit, possibilissimus est ut Krum conversionem latinam iam habeat, et illam quaerere nos oportet. Si autem non habet, indeclinabilitas praedilecta est inter optiones.
*De parentibus questione, responsum est masculinum esse, tamquam dixisiti.
Cato censor 19:48, 8 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Scivi me inventurum esse auxilium! Gratias vobis! CeleritasSoni 20:39, 8 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Krum Bulgariae
Disputatio:Punctum cardinale

message: Puto regiones coeli rem dissimilem esse, etsi paginae similissimae sunt. Optio una est 1) stipulam creare cum punctis cardinalibus, 2) una de duabus paginis principalis fieri, 3)aliaque de dissimilitudinis loqui et nexus habere ad primam. 164.77.255.226 22:57, 8 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: puncto 1) formulam dicere volui plus quam stipulam. Cato censor 14:05, 9 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
Licet sit quaedam differentia, tamen haec stipula (vel potius non stipula) alteri nomine Regiones caeli simillima est. Inde paginam movebo.--Utilo (disputatio) 10:45, 22 Februarii 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regiones Coeli
Disputatio:Guntherus Beck

message: In interrete reperimus "Günther von Mannagetta und Lërchenau Beck" in paginis Wikipediarum dependentibus tantum. Nomen "Lërchenau" difficile est credere: symbolum "ë" in nominibus Albanicis habemus, sed "Lërchenau" formam Theodiscam habet.
Igitur nomen mutavi in formam a bibliothecariis verificatam.
Natus Bratislavae, incola Vindobonae et Pragae, quomodo Germanicus fuit nescio. Id igitur mutavi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:18, 13 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen et
Disputatio:Sceletus

message: For the record: Cassell's says that those who seek to write "Latin prose of a 'classical' type" should translate 'skeleton' as ossa, -ium, or as ossium compages. IacobusAmor 03:19, 16 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Luckily I'm a Plautist ;] -- Ioscius (disp) 03:44, 16 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :And, as the article states, and as I understand the term used in biology today, both those definitions preclude 1)cartilage 2)invertebrates.--Ioscius (disp) 03:46, 16 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma

message: Systema ossium Sceletus
replies: text: (system of bones? could not find attested term, skeleton comes from greek meaning dried up, essential with same meaning as os)
replies: text: :Sceletus (e.g. Apuleius, Apologia 63). --Neander 19:25, 20 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::'Skeleton' = ossa, ossium (Cassell's); etiam ossium compages (Cassell's). IacobusAmor 19:44, 20 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: From 1000 paginae
Disputatio:Institutum Polytechnicum Vigorniense

message: Seems more like "Scientia et ars" to me, but I'm no Germanist! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:29, 17 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Kunst plane est Ars. Lehr(e) hoc in usu fortasse "eruditio" si lehren sit "to teach". --Alex1011 08:38, 17 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lehr und Kunst
Disputatio:Graviditas

message: Secundum Cassell's, 'pregnancy' est graviditas, non gravitas. Anglicum etiam habemus nomen substantivum gravidity et nomen adiectivum gravid. IacobusAmor 16:46, 17 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Lewis and Short give both. --Ioscius (disp) 16:59, 17 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Look more carefully. L&S only gives gravitas = "the burden of pregnancy"; which may be construed as pregnancy only indirectly.--Rafaelgarcia 17:04, 17 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: Apud Erasmum in Colloquiis suis invenitur (1684):
 Bene precandi formulae gravidae:
 * Faxit Deus, ut feliciter parias: ut maritum pulchram prole facias parentem.
 * Faxit illa virgo mater, ut feliciter facias mater.
 * Precor, ut hic tumor uteri feliciter subsidat.
 * Velint superi, ut non maiore molestia elabatur, quam illapsum est, quicquid est hoc onere quod gestas.
 * Donet tibi Deus felix pueperium.
Andreas Raether (disputatio) 20:07, 11 Novembris 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colloquia Erasmi Roterodami
Disputatio:Alea (modus ludendi)

message: Hey Fabulle, here's what Morgan has:
replies: text: game game of chance, gambling / Glückspiel: alea [s.18]; sortilegii+ ludus [Heyse, Fremdwörterbuch, s.19]; lusus alearius [Eichenseer]; ludus aleatorius [s.18] -- Hasard: hasardus+ [Latham]; hasardum* [s.16] (Helf.)
Would you prefer sortilegii ludi? or sortilegium? I balk at the names built on alea as I believe this article will talk about more than dice. Cheers. --Ioscius (disp) 20:37, 17 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

text: De: "Sortilegii sunt ludi fortis quibus solet pecunia poni."—Fortasse sortilegii ludi = 'soothsayers' methods'. Secundum Cassell's, sortilegii sunt qui futura vaticinantur. Ergo opera Raveliana en:L'enfant et les sortilèges. IacobusAmor 21:37, 17 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Postquam istud et istud legi, mihi videtur ludus fortunae aptum esse nomen. --Rafaelgarcia 22:36, 17 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: de titulo
Disputatio:Grandis Insula (Nebrasca)

message: What is the problem with the text I have added about the large presence of migrant workers in Grand Island? I smell serious tool abuse here. Acsarben 02:08, 18 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The user Acsarben is most likely the same vandal that committed this abuse , and who has a long history of vandalism at this wiki. If you are Jeff you are not welcome here. If you are not the vandal Jeff, you may blame him for locking these pages. You can suggest any changes in the disputatio.--Rafaelgarcia 02:24, 18 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Acsarben is not Jeff. Jeff is a historical figure. There are three editors with Nebrasca-related interests. You, Rafaelgarcia, are abusing your admin tools. Acsarben 02:26, 18 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WTF?
Disputatio:Nectanebos II

message: Cornelius Nepos in opere De viris illustribus 12.2 Nectanebon I appellat 'Nectenebin' (acc.). --
replies: text: Interdum quid praeferimus, "Nectanebo" (lemma) aut "Nectanebos" (titulus)? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:16, 18 Augusti 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine Latino
Disputatio:Amaranth

message: Cum "unicum carmen" dicis, visne ad singulum (sc. discum) referre? Quodsi "singulus" (It. singolo) tibi displicet aut dubius videtur, quin primam sententiam ita fere formes: "...carmen singulatim editum ex albo discographico Dark Passion Play appellato ...". --Neander 00:26, 20 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Non intellexi id dicturum "single"; rem bonam suggeris!--Rafaelgarcia 00:33, 20 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unicum carmen"? 

message: Poece, credisne me errasse, cum glossas Latinas singulis virgulis ( '...' ) notavi? Equidem virgularum usum ita didici, ut citationes binis virgulis ( "..." ) notandae, glossae autem vel explicationes conceptuales singulis virgulis notandae sint. Nescio an regulae ad has res pertinentes umquam a Vicipaedianis propositae sint. --Neander 22:44, 21 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nescio quoque an tales regulae sint, sed probe dicis: binis virgulis pro locis adlatis utimur, singulis autem pro glossis. IacobusAmor 23:01, 21 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  De virgulis
Disputatio:Linea Maginot

message: Fortasse melius Acies Maginot?--Rafaelgarcia 01:46, 20 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonne est acies 'series militum'? Cassell's nobis dicit hoc Anglicum "line" esse "(entrenchments, etc.), munitiones (--um, plur.), munimenta (-orum, plur.), vallum, agger." IacobusAmor 02:57, 20 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Fortasse tunc nomen praesens esse optimum. Quia munitiones et alia nomina mihi non suggerunt tam bene lineam munimentorum.--Rafaelgarcia 03:05, 20 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Titulus & lemma
Disputatio Categoriae:Res militares

message: Categoriae rite sunt plurales; ergo melius Res militares? IacobusAmor 02:52, 20 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita verum dicis.--Rafaelgarcia 02:53, 20 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Hoc erratum videtur frequentare apud categorias. Nonne facile correctu est? CeleritasSoni 03:54, 20 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Categoriam movi. Vide paginam Vicipaedia:Automata/Category move requests. --UV 21:44, 21 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Gratias multas, UV!!--Rafaelgarcia 22:26, 21 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ex ''Disputatio Categoriae:Res militaris''
Disputatio:Pulvis pyrius

message: :Erasmus calls it pulvis bombardica, and of course there's pulvis nigra. But both of them are a little too specific, and I don't know off hand what more general terms exist. --Iustinus 09:14, 19 Martii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :from WOrds:pyrius, pyria, pyrium  ADJ   [GXXEK]    NeoLatin  uncommon; //fiery; pyrogenic; [pulvis pyrius => gunpowder];--Rafaelgarcia 04:41, 20 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)

message: Fortasse verbum pyrius non est necessarium. Ioannis Miltoni epigramma "In Eandem" has lineas habet:
replies: text: Ille quidem sine te consortia serus adivit
replies: text: :Astra, nec inferni pulveris usus ope.

text: "Without your help, it is true, and without the aid of your infernal gunpowder, the King has gone at a ripe old age to be with his kindred, the stars" (ed. & tr. Merritt Y. Hughes, 1937).
Also, Milton's poem "In Proditionem Bombardicam" may give us a Latin term for the Gunpowder Plot (1605): Proditio Bombardica. Of course many other seventeenth-century attestations of Latin phrases for that event must be available. IacobusAmor 03:28, 20 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Poetry,of course, can't always be relied on for vocabulary, given its reliance on symbolism and context for specifying meanings.--Rafaelgarcia 19:02, 25 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Titulus & lemma
Disputatio:The Number of the Beast

message: I have used republicatio to gloss "re-issuing (of an LP)". I am a bit wary about properly rendering "their first work with Bruce as a singer"; I just let it be "cum Bruce cantore" (or should we use "cum Bruce qua cantore"?). As for Bruce, there is an old etymology acc. to which it comes from Brix, but, first, this is not widely accepted, and second there is no unambiguous way to inflect Brix. So, I have proposed an alternative form: Brus, which is, first, closer to the English pronunciation of the name, and second, closer to the more accepted etymon of the name: from de Bruis. --Omnipaedista 02:58, 22 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Cassell's, a publicatio is a confiscation, from the verb publico 'to appropriate to the public use, confiscate'; so a republicatio must be a reconfiscation (adding insult to injury?). IacobusAmor 03:05, 22 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :When in doubt about a proper name, do what the Romans did, use it in its foreign form and don't try to inflect at all. Just use Bruce, de Bruce, ad Bruce, etc. I think both "cum Bruce cantore" and "cum Bruce qua cantore" are grammatically correct, but the normal idiom is to not use qua, unless you want to emphasize that he is not usually a singer but made an exception in this case. I think using "cum" is also unusual in this kind of expression, unless the author wishes to be emphatic. I would guess a simple ablative absolute is more than sufficient: Bruce cantante = with Bruce singing. As Iacobus pointed out, publicatio is a false cognate: for reissuing I would think to use re-editio or redivulgatio.--Rafaelgarcia 03:34, 22 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Yes, that's right about the cum, as it seemed odd where a participle, esp. an ablative absolute, would do. ¶ As for republishing, Cassell's says, quite specifically, to "render [the verb republish] by phrase, such as (librum) denuo edere." It doesn't have reissue at all, but the sense of that verb is practically the same as republish, so Cassell's advice should still apply. IacobusAmor 03:49, 22 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

text: 'Bruce' is apparently 'Brussius'; at least, this seems to be the normal Latinization of the original Bruce's name (Robertus Brussius).  —Mucius Tever 01:03, 23 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :I stand corrected regarding publicatio; in fact, I knew about the "confiscation" sense (confer grc: δήμευσις), but I was under the false impression that it had that sense only in Classical but not Contemporary use of Latin. As for Brussius, I wasn't aware of this form, but apparently this latinization is well established in Vicipaedia (e.g.: see also David II). After taking into consideration all the above, I have just made the (hopefully) appropriate edits. --Omnipaedista 08:22, 23 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar and lexicon
Disputatio:Virus biologicum

message: Verbum "viri" biologicum non exstat, nec genitivum nec plurale verbo "virus".
replies: text: Lege Disputatio:Virus.--Rafaelgarcia 18:38, 22 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

message: In praesentia pars classificationum magis inflata spectari possit. Paginam classificationis virorum aliter exiguam esse, mihi videtur. Mox igitur multitudinem litterarum hac ab paginam ad classificationem virorum traherem, ita ut solum truncus "mollitus" restet. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 15:08, 4 Aprilis 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classificatio virorum 

message: Dubito, an Lat. replicare hic idem significet atque Angl. replicate, nam replicare nusquam ad regenerationem biologicam referri videtur. Neander (disputatio) 14:51, 11 Ianuarii 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angl. ''to replicate'' / Lat. ''replicare'' ?
Disputatio:Photographia

message: On my page, I've been using machinatio sentiens [electronica] (a[n electronic] sensing mechanism). What do you think of this versus sensor, which I can't seem to find in my dictionaries ;)? --Autophile 00:45, 23 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I don't see anything wrong with your paraphrase, "instrumentum sensorium" is the attested term for sensor. Also, I think Machinatio primarily means machination/contrivance, while the word Mechanismus is undoubtedly the best and most direct attested translation for "mechanism" in general.--Rafaelgarcia 01:13, 23 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "sensore" electronico
Disputatio:Proelium Atri Iacobi

message: Just a note about deleting it and referring its articles merely to Kansas: judging from :en:, the category Kansia Cruda 'Bleeding Kansas' will eventually have at least fifty-six articles in it. IacobusAmor 14:00, 23 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, for reference: in :en:, the categories of which Bleeding Kansas is a subcategory are:
replies: text: :19th-century conflicts

text: :Kansas Territory

text: :Slavery in the United States

text: :History of the United States (1849–1865)

text: :Political violence in the United States

text: :Political controversies in the United States

text: :American Old West

text: :History of Kansas

text: :Presidency of James Buchanan

text: :Pierce administration IacobusAmor 03:01, 24 Iulii 2009 (UTC)

text: Is "Kansia Cruda" the best translation? I know that crudus can mean "bleeding" (of a wound) but it is very rare in that sense. Would e.g. "Kansia sanguinolenta" be clearer to a reader? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:08, 27 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :I'd wondered about that too, so I referred the question to a retired classics professor, adding that I thought a third possibility, Kansia Sanguinem Dans, would be too wordy; and he just now responds: "Cruda is exactly the right word, because it not only connotes 'bloody,' but the barbarity as well. Any form of sanguine- will not be as dramatic, I think; nor would it be as succinct." IacobusAmor 00:50, 29 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Good enough! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:57, 29 Iulii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Categoria:Kansia Cruda