lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Equus ferus caballus

message: Adiunxi animatas imagines. --Marc mage 22:51, 7 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)

message: This article is all mixed up. As its lemma indicates, its real title should be Equus (genus), so I'll change it to that. But then some of its interwiki links lead wrongly to articles about Equidae (the family, not the genus), so those should be removed. Then the article says the species Equus ferus is exstinctus, but :en:Horse says the modern horse is Equus ferus. How can it be extinct in the Latin Vicipaedia but alive in the English one? And where is Vicipaedia's article Equus or Equus ferus caballus, to correspond with the subspecies treated as :en:Horse? IacobusAmor 02:49, 13 Martii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is now about Equus caballus / Equus ferus caballus (for the genus see Equus (genus)). I have just now replaced all the interwiki links with those from :en:Horse. This should at least solve some of the mix-up. I will also place an interwiki link to the present page on :en:Horse. --Fabullus 11:30, 4 Iunii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :I've just re-done what Fabullus did six years ago -- we've had the same problem here as with Gens humana, in that people have changed Wikidata without actually reading our articles.  This article should match up with :en:Horse rather than with articles called E. caballus elsewhere.  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 19:56, 2 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixed up
Disputatio:Ioannes Lennon

message: ma voi state fuori di testa ....che cacchio fate un enciclopedia in latino?

message: Previous recensio said he was born "a.d.IX.Id.Oct."—but that's an impossible date, as the day before VIII Id. Oct. is not IX Id. Oct., but the nones; and it's the wrong date anyway, because the nones of October are the seventh, but (according to Wikipedia) Lennon was born on the ninth! (So the right date in the Roman calendar is VII Id. Oct.) A clear example of why INEXPERT LATINISTS SHOULD NOT USE ROMAN NUMERALS & ROMAN DATES? IacobusAmor 17:31, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I mean, I don't even trust myself to handle roman numerlas and dates properly. I certainly don't trust a million monkeys with a typewriter =].--Ioshus (disp) 18:26, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Profecto hoc mirum est argumentum. Quod aliquis errorem fecerit, ideo rationem Romanam dies numerandi non esse adhibendam? Quid? Ergo siquis non noverit, cuius generis vox domus sit, ut ille qui in hac pagina de domo Dacotano (sic!) deliravit, is hoc verbum ipsum fugere debebit? Id si rectum est, omnes ab hac vicipaedia arcendi sunt, qui linguae Latinae ipsius non satis periti videantur, ut prorsus vel duo vel nemo in hac re desudent. Satius est corrigere errores, ut melius fiat pagina de Ioanne Lennone scripta, quam carpere eos, qui ad exemplum auctorum optimum latinitatem suam excolere volunt.--Irenaeus 22:45, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Calendarium Romanum et numeri Romani
Disputatio:Iosephus Rizal

message: Please feel free to change or better yet please contact me. Recidivus seems to be the best latin translation although Rizalus seems also correct. Rizal was derived from Ricial(Spanish) which was derived from Recidivus (Restore, revert ).--Jondel 09:56, 9 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recidivus
Disputatio:Gallus

message: Attention latin de cuisine ou pire, tanpis, c'est une page de discussion.
Si Gallus est mar galinae domesticae quo est nomen specia ?
Primor est creare pagina de specia et potent creare pagina de mar specia.
Gallus Gallus est nomen specialis, Gallus est nomen mar. quid est nomen pagina de specia ?
Astirmays 19:28, 12 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nescio certe quid vis dicere, sed... ita, gallus est mas et gallina femina.  Cur altera pagina sit necessaria?  Haec pagina animal integre tractat; hic de proprietatibus maris atque feminae possumus scribere.  —Myces Tiberinus 10:58, 13 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
"Haec pagina animal integre tractat; hic de proprietatibus maris atque feminae possumus scribere."
OK, interwiki nexus non est anglia "rooster" sed "chicken", francia non "Coq" sed "Poule" qui de animal integre tractat. "Gallus Gallus" tractat de non domestica animal (Red Junglefowl, coq doré)
Astirmays 16:48, 13 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)

message: Disambiguation is needed between gallus the bird and at least four famous Galluses, humans who figured in the life of Propertius:
replies: text: Gallus, an aristocratic friend of P's; mentioned in six of P's poems.

text: Gallus, a kinsman of P's, killed in the Perusine War, 41 a.C.n.; in P's 1.22.7.

text: Gallus, a son of Arria, accidentally killed by his own standard (his twin, Lupercus, was accidentally killed by his horse); in P's 4.1.95.

text: C. Cornelius Gallus, the first major Roman elegist and first Roman Prefect of Egypt; in P's 2.34.91.

text: IacobusAmor 02:00, 31 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguatio 

message: I hope it's the right place for adding a summary about Dürrenmatt's play "Romulus the Great" in latin. If not, I beg you to tell me where to put it.
replies: text: Yes, this is not the place... How about Romulus Magnus or Romulus the Great, or whatever language the title should be in vulgarly.--Ioshus (disp) 18:16, 8 Octobris 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I followed your advice. Now the article is attainable under Romulus Magnus, and there's a tiny remark within Romulus Augustus as well.
thread_title:  In Arte Dicendi
Disputatio Formulae:Nexus ad Vicidata desiderati

message: If someone clicks on the yellow bullet, they just get taken to the yellow bullet image page, with no explanation of what's going on... Should something be done about that?
--Alynna Kasmira 20:22, 18 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
You are right ... in my opinion. ;-) See the dicussion. Maybe a text in small letters or a  yellow bullet and a text in small letters? --Roland2 22:43, 18 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't like the bullet. It hangs around on the right and looks like an error for those who don't know. Clicking on it simply takes you to its page. I'm going to left-align it and and some small text. Daniel (☎) 10:57, 6 Maii 2006 (UTC)

message: I made a couple of changes including removing the following:
*If the page is a speciality of the Latin Wikipedia and there are not realistically going to be pages in other Wikipedias about it, do not use this link.
It seems to me that's a fairly rare case and we can't easily know anyway; it's more useful to have all pages that aren't interwikied tagged with the two alternatives, either  (= I have looked and there aren't any) or  (= no one has checked yet). Do others agree? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:25, 14 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, absolutely.  is definitely for "i checked and there aren't any". It's primarily used for pages special to the Latin Vicipaedia.--Ioshus (disp) 12:51, 14 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Altered instructions
Disputatio:Roisdorpium

message: It seems to me, that Famosus filius Roisdorviae exempli gratia magister Cohlves Claus est. is a joke. --Roland2 14:16, 26 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree...we saw several nonsensical/joke pages about Mr. Claus back in February.  Warrants delenda in my opinion.--Ioshus Rocchio 17:38, 26 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :I have added an interwiki link to :de:Roisdorf and an interwiki link back to us. Maybe someone from the German WP will do a cleanup. At least we have mentioned or doubts here ... ;-) --Roland2 19:58, 26 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)

message: I think the whole article was originally a iocus, perhaps by pupils from one of the Roisdorf schools. It was simply a copy of Bonna with some  words and numbers changed to fit Roisdorf, but with some mistakes, so that the latin text did not make sense at some points. The famous son of Roisdorf is probably some teacher of some of the Roisdorf schools. I doubt whether the "Freunde der Antike Roisdorf" really exist. The latin name Roisdorvia is of course also pure invention. However, as long as nobody comes up with a better alternative, we could leave it at that. (Maybe vicus Roisdorfensis or something like that was the usual way to latinise German village names.) Alex1011 22:44, 28 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have put a note on page :de:Diskussion:Roisdorf. --Roland2 23:05, 28 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  iocus
Disputatio:Harrius Potter et Camera Secretorum

message: Is the "rerum" necessary in Latin? My impression is that it would be superfluous.--84.9.219.34 23:41, 29 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "necessary" ? Probably not.  But that's how the name is given in the book Harrius Potter et Philosophi Lapis, in the front matter under "Libri de Harrio Pottero iam editi". —Myces Tiberinus 10:43, 18 Iulii 2006 (UTC)

message: I think this page should not be merged with Harrius Potter. — Maybe it was another situation when we did not have the :Categoria:Harrius Potter? 
The poor content would support a merging, but on the long run it will be better to have this page: Interwiki links, discussions, ...
--Roland (disp.) 17:46, 6 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contribuenda

message: Hmm... Harrissimo.
thread_title: Rowlingis

message: The creature really should be a basiliscus (i.e. regulus), matching the English but Needham consistently names the creature basilicus (i.e. regalis) in the book.  (A little part of me died every time I saw it.)  The article currently says basiliscus, though I'm pretty sure the discrepancy should be noted.    —Mucius Tever 02:17, 30 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's definitely a typo. Sadness! It happens. I hope they will correct it in future editions.--Rafaelgarcia 02:20, 30 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Well, there are typoes in the book, but they are occasional.  The basilicus, however, is referred to so frequently that, paired with the non-appearance of basiliscus, I think it must have been an error on the translator's (or the editor's) part.  —Mucius Tever 10:20, 30 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basiliscus
Disputatio:Gulielmus Clinton

message: Here is a web site with photos that show chronologically Bill Clinton's emphasis on Middle East peace.  Bill Cinton spent much of his presidency trying to achieve a comprehensive agreement between Israelis and Palestinians.

message: Hey, now do I revert an article back to its last known good status? The vandal is Usor:69.148.197.143. Mind you, I'm no fan of Clinton, but the added comment lacked judgment and taste. Sinister Petrus 04:59, 13 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Browse the history to the last known good edit (click on the date), then hit 'edit'--you should get the notice that you are editing a "forma obsoleta" of the page--put in an edit summary saying what you're reverting, and save.  Admins have a one-click option to revert all contiguous edits by the last person who edited the page (which is not necessarily to 'last known good') by clicking 'reverti' in the diff view.  —Myces Tiberinus 11:14, 13 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Gratis tibi ago. Between the time I posted my question and you answered, someone went and corrected the grammar of the vandalism! Too funny. Sinister Petrus 15:16, 13 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about vandalism 

message: Attestatum est nomen Clintonius (Anglice: "Clinton") in libro Georgii Washingtonii, Americæ Septentrionalis Civitatum Foederatarum Præsidis Primi, Vita, a Francisco Glass, A. M., Ohioensi scripto (1822, 1835). IacobusAmor 11:56, 2 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eiusdem familiae? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:41, 2 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Nihil interest! Eodem redit! Gubernatoris Georgii nomen Clintonius est ipsissimum Praesidis Guglielmi nomen Clintonius! IacobusAmor 12:56, 2 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clintonius

message: Addidi adulterium cum Monica Lewinski. --Marc mage 00:03, 10 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additum
Disputatio:Universitas Studiorum Mostariensis

message: It should be universita?--Jondel 07:22, 2 Maii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah...
 universitas
 universitatis
 universitati
 universitatem
 universitate
 universitates
 universitatum
 universitatibus
 universitates
 universitatibus
Universitas is nominative singular...stem is universitat, so nom would be universitats, but complex answer as to why...ts not happening at end of the word, so universitas.--Ioshus Rocchio 12:46, 2 Maii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: universitas is plural?
Disputatio:Declinatio (grammatica)

message: this article needs a major rewrite.  I take it upon myself...but just warning, this page will be vastly different soon.  Further I think we should make Declinatio latine and either do away with or scale back the discussion of latin declension on this page.--Usor:Ioscius 16:03, 3 Maii 2006 (UTC)
Illum eget exempla declinationum habere. e.g., pro declinationi primo 
puella         puellae 
puellae        puellarum
puellae        puellis
puellam        puellas
puella         puellis
replies: text: Recte dixisti...--Usor:Ioscius 17:01, 6 Iunii 2006 (UTC)

message: "Casus declinatio regit. Genus et numerus penus etiam sunt." Quidst mundi significat?--Usor:Ioscius 04:14, 4 Maii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casus declinatio regit. Genus et numerus penus etiam sunt. 

message: Does this overview cover all aspects of endings? Except Vocativus, Locativus and Genus?
 	1.   	2.         	3.    	3.            	3.     	4.      	5.
 	a    	o          	cons. 	i             	mix.   	u       	e
1. nom	-a   	-us/-er/-um	-/-s/-	-is(“animal”) 	-is/-es	-us/-u  	-es
2. gen	-ae  	-i         	-is   	-is           	-is    	-us     	-ei
3. dat	-ae  	-o         	-i    	-i            	-i     	-ui(/-u)	-ei
4. acc	-am  	-um        	-em   	-im/(„animal“)	-em    	-um/-u  	-em
6. abl	-a   	-o         	-e    	-i            	-e     	-u      	-e
1. nom	-ae  	-i/-a      	-es/-a	-es/-ia       	-es/-ia	-us/-ua 	-es
2. gen	-arum	-orum      	-um   	-ium          	-ium   	-uum    	-erum
3. dat	-is  	-is        	-ibus 	-ibus         	-ibus  	-ibus   	-ebus
4. acc	-as  	-os/-a     	-es/-a	-is(/-es)/-ia 	–es/-ia	-us/-ua 	-es
6. abl	-is  	-is        	-ibus 	-ibus         	-ibus  	-ibus   	-ebus
--Roland2 14:51, 20 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but u and e stems are usually listed to the right of the i/mix stems, u is declinatio quarta, e quinta...--Usor:Ioscius 14:55, 20 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Thanks. Done. --Roland2 16:20, 21 Iunii 2006 (UTC)

text: Some corrections: all m/f 3rd declension nouns have the same set of endings. The nominative and accusative forms are identical for neuter nouns, and the nom/acc plural ending for them is "-a." The "-ia" ending and the "-i" as the ablative ending are for neuter adjectives, not nouns. I put the chart on the page but didn't actually change anything, since I could very well be wrong. --Kwoww 17:36, 27 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overview about endings
Disputatio:Agnes Romana

message: In article :de:Agnes von Rom it is said, that sources which claim that she died a. D. 305 are wrong: Manche Quellen, die ihren Tod auf das Jahr 304 datieren, können heute vermutlich als falsch angesehen werden. Als wahrscheinlicher gilt mittlerweile die Zeit des Kaisers Decius. In article :de:Agnes von Rom she died in the year 250. --Roland2 21:10, 3 Maii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death
Disputatio:Monacum

message: Cur Monaci nomen in hac vicipaedia cum accentu (á) scribitur? Alex1011 09:03, 5 Maii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Adprobo motus ab Monácum.--Ioshus Rocchio 16:11, 7 Maii 2006 (UTC)

message: Non intellego novam sententiam, nec Latine nec Theodisce. "Munich, they love you?" ita est? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:48, 29 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Correxi: Munich likes you. --Alex1011 15:22, 29 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sententia

message: I find that Agnomina like "Leo" ("der Löwe", "the lion") should, likewise to first names, not only be translated into Latin, as has been done, but also declinated, so I corrected "Leo" to "Leone". I also corrected "Henricius (-o)" to "Henricus (-o)", which is the usual name for the German "Heinrich" (English: "Henry"). It can be found many times in Google. In summary, I have changed "de Henricio Leo" to "ab Henrico Leone". --Bachmai 15:47, 14 Februarii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Agnomina

message: Collectus "e praehistoria et medio aevo priore" est Collectio archaeologica ("Archäologische Staatssammlungen", prius "Prähistorische Staatssammlung"). Collectus artificiorum antiquorum imprimis vasorum Graecorum et Italorum sunt "Staatliche Antikensammlungen" (collectus antiquitatum publici.)--Bavarese (disputatio) 17:34, 4 Iunii 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perturbatio museorum
Disputatio Formulae:Elementa chemica

message: First, let me congratulate you on your obvious patience in making this template! It is very well done. However, at the moment the list is quite hard to read. There are lots of numbers and letters very close together. Do you think it would be possible to make it easier? I thought perhaps make it look like a minature periodic table. I'll have a go on my sandbox and see, but I thought you'd like to know what I thought. Daniel (☎) 12:04, 6 Maii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose something like the following. Let me know what you think.
Elementa chemica | Systema Periodicum
H
He
Li
Be
B
C
N
O
F
Ne
Na
Mg
Al
Si
P
S
Cl
Ar
K
Ca
Sc
Ti
V
Cr
Mn
Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
Ga
Ge
As
Se
Br
Kr
Rb
Sr
Y
Zr
Nb
Mo
Tc
Ru
Rh
Pd
Ag
Cd
In
Sn
Sb
Te
I
Xe
Cs
Ba
*
Hf
Ta
W
Re
Os
Ir
Pt
Au
Hg
Tl
Pb
Bi
Po
At
Rn
Fr
Ra
**
Rf
Db
Sg
Bh
Hs
Mt
Ds
Rg
Uub
Uut
Uuq
Uup
Uuh
Uus
Uuo
*
La
Ce
Pr
Nd
Pm
Sm
Eu
Gd
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
Tm
Yb
Lu
**
Ac
Th
Pa
U
Np
Pu
Am
Cm
Bk
Cf
Es
Fm
Md
No
Lr

text: Daniel (☎) 16:53, 6 Maii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :The idea of that template was to give people a quick overview about the element pages we have or we don't have. Your suggestion looks nice but might optically collate with these chemical taxoboxes which some elements use, e. g. Aluminium. This could be an optical overkill. On the other hand my simple list will be nearly useless, as soon as we are using taxoboxes like this: :en:Niobium. In 
short: I am not very addicted to my template. --Roland2 17:22, 6 Maii 2006 (UTC)

text: :I see. I did not realise that we were going to be using the big taxoboxes/infoboxes (latine informarcae?). I agree that it would probably be quite redundant with these boxes. I've taken another look at yours and grown to quite like it. It is very simple, and allows people who know what they are looking for to quickly find it, and those who don't know so well to find it without taking too much time. Daniel (☎) 17:53, 6 Maii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Disputatio:Pisae

message: Non mihi est tempus corrigendi gramaticae et aliquis facit!

message: Salve. Sit fons nominis ad hanc turrem? Nisi, 'Pisarum turris incumbens' bene fungat. Sit littera maior in 'Pisarum'?
Donatello (disputatio) 18:13, 19 Augusti 2012 (UTC).
thread_title:  De turre hic
Disputatio Formulae:Movenda ad Victionarium

message: I'd like to rename this page to something like Formula:Crea in Victionario and adopt the content accordingly. As I explained before, most of our pages which are now tagged with "Move ad victionarium" ...
# might be Vicipaedia entries in the future or
# are entries in other Wikipedias or
# are just stipulae or
# should get a redirect to the corresponding encyclopaedic entry here or
# should get a template which directs the user to the Victionarium.
For the last one we could use , although I would recommend a special template for this special form of redirection. What do you think? --Roland2 20:17, 26 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, regarding siccus, I'm a bit sceptical. But if you believe that similar “entries” might evolve to Vicipaedia entries, why not give your plans a try! --UV 21:55, 26 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming this template to "Crea in Victionario"

message: I'd like to change this template from Suasum est hanc paginam esse movendam ad Victionarium to something like Suasum est rem huius paginae esse movendam ad Victionarium to indicate that the content (or a part of it) and not the page shall be moved to the Victionarium. If we do not like the page (= the entry itself) we should use an extra template to indicate this. Move ad victionarium should just refer to the content which shall be moved, not the entire page. Moreover, the template should be yellow to indicate that "something has to be fixed". --Roland2 10:59, 9 Iulii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page vs. content
Disputatio:Zergeisterung

message: Please see :en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zergeisterung Ahoerstemeier 09:54, 10 Maii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, seems a repeat offender. Thanks for the tip.--Ioshus Rocchio 13:00, 10 Maii 2006 (UTC)

message: This article should be deleted. Please see also :en:Zergeisterung, :de:Zergeisterung, :es:Zergeisterung, :ja:Zergeisterung etc. 
replies: text: It is not translatable because whoever posted this all over Wikipedia made it up (not to mention the assertion that a word is impossible to translate across languages is a POV, which makes this a badly written article).   Moreoever, this is an article that has been deleted in the German Wikipedia. I pity those well-meaning Wikipedians who already tried to translate that text without realizing that it is nonsense. 
--      (UTC)
replies: text: :Do we really have to get into heavy POV arguments on such a topic? If you can show that the word is translatable, that's great. All you have to do is cite a source.

text: :And if you think the article is badly written (which is a completely different issue) by all means rewrite it. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:00, 25 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved part to disputatio 

message: ? =]--Ioshus Rocchio 21:18, 26 Maii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good ... and a template, maybe in ... yellow? "This article is considered to be a joke. If you want to contribute, you should keep this in mind." --Roland2 21:57, 26 Maii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :The deutsch one seems to be uneditable/locked? You don't think we should do the same?--Ioshus Rocchio 22:26, 26 Maii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::As you said ... it's the deutsch way. I think we should start unlocked. As long as the template will not be removed, it should be ok. I hope we will learn interesting facts about "Zergeisterung". Maybe the term "Zergeisterung" is not translateable ... the content should. If it's such an important term, someone will write a Latin article. --Roland2 23:16, 26 Maii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:categoria:ioci]] 

message: I think we can keep this now ... it's clearly stated that there is much disputation about this term. We could even try to translate it: Dismentia? ;-) --Roland2 17:31, 1 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nomen adiectivum antiquum est demens, -entis. Ergo nomen substantivum novum dementia, -ae? IacobusAmor 13:56, 30 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  keep + translation 

message: Quod illi litteris latinis docti, editores Vicipaediae severi, non debent ridere! 71.124.244.98 00:34, 20 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Renuo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:07, 29 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delenda est

message: I have moved the page in its joke form to Harrissimo's hospitable new page Vicipaedia:Ioci. The aim of the present page is no longer to make you laugh but to tell the Zergeisterung story; hence I took the  formula off. Does that make sense? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:57, 30 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No longer a joke?
Disputatio:Slovachia

message: Georgius Iuvenali 1982 salutem plurimam. Dumtaxat unum habeo interrogatum: Qua de causa Slovaciam in Slovachiam, vocem omnino mirificam, mutasti? Quae sunt argumenta tua, quibus mutationem tam subitam tamque miram confirmare possis? --Georgius Laminarius 16:14, 10 Maii 2006 (UTC)
Quod ad nomen Slovaciae aut Slovachiae attinet, videatis paginam meam disputationis - --Georgius Laminarius 07:19, 9 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Slovachia?