lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Sexualitas humana

message: Non contribuenda est, unless you're correct in thinking, unlike as in other wikis, that actions (:en:Human sexual activity) are identical with propensities (:en:Human sexuality). IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:00, 26 Augusti 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Suadetur ut haec commentatio cum Actus sexuales contribuatur.
Disputatio:Franciscus Moraglia

message: Textum longissimum Latinitate pessima, indicemque commentationum stylo Italico factum (AA. VV. etc.) neque ad interrete coactum, removi. Si quis edere velit, optime! In historia paginae reperiuntur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:38, 30 Augusti 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Via brevissima
Disputatio:Ioannes Pascoli

message: Perutilis est sed ad mores Vicipaediae leviter adaptare oportet. Abbreviationes in textu, lectoribus internationalibus difficiles, rarissime adhibemus. Ego abbreviationes "c.n.", "c.t." et "L.L." non intellego: nunquam enim antea vidi. Nexus addere necesse est. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:44, 31 Augusti 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Textu rursus lecto mihi videtur abbreviationes "c.n." et "c.t." nihil significare: delevi igitur. [Fortasse "cuius nomen est", "cuius titulus est", sicut Anglice "a man called", "a book called", quae verba editores fastidiosi delere solent.] "L.L.", nisi fallor, "Pascoli" indicavit. Si erravi, o amici, corrigete! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:53, 31 Augusti 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  De textu novo
Disputatio:Theses de Feuerbach

message: Exordium ut videtur scribendum est
replies: text: Thesen über Feuerbach ('Theses/Propositiones/Proposita/Argumenta de Feuerbachio')
 Hoc specimen iuridicum inaugurale nomen familiae Feuerbachianae testatur. Praeterea, Bach, aliud nomen Theodiscum et pars quidem Feuerbachii vocabuli compositi, in Latinum Bachium similiter vertitur. An verbum theses aut unum ex aliis verbis hic optimum sit nescio   IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:58, 7 Aprilis 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: De lemmate
Disputatio:Lingua Iavanica

message: Is it really true that the Latin name "lingua Iavensis" is supported by Bauer, Laurie. 2007. The Linguistics Student's Handbook. Edimburgi? The usual Latin name for this language, according to sources I've seen, is "lingua Iavanica"/"Javanica", for which I am citing a source: others are found via Google. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:41, 2 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Textura primaria

message: Haud suadeo. Verbum "textus" in fontibus de medicina et anatomia humana repperi, sed de rebus botanicis Stearn (Botanical Latin) verba "contextus, textura, tela" suggerit, non "textus". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:22, 4 Aprilis 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: OK; dubito utrum in aliis linguis animal tissue a plant tissue sic distinguatur, sed fontes sequi debemus. Lesgles (disputatio) 18:33, 4 Aprilis 2016 (UTC)
Summoveamus adeo notitiam movendae, licet mihi.--Jondel (disputatio) 10:40, 9 Aprilis 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movenda?
Disputatio:N'Heures Souris Rames

message: I marked this "Augenda" because no source is yet cited except the book itself. As a modern book by a modern author, something independent (reviews or discussion elsewhere) is needed to show that it's notable. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:42, 24 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a review myself now, though there'd be no harm in adding one or two more independent sources. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:18, 24 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Disputatio:Eduardus Augustus Schneider

message: Amice, signum  erasisti, sed quid significat verbum "congue"? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 18:16, 1 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We still need an explanation or replacement for "congue" -- I can't think what language it may be, let alone what it means! -- so I reinserted the Dubsig sign.

text: There is hidden text. It's OK to include hidden text while working on the page, but please be sure to clean it up before moving on.

text: One other gentle warning: it seems unlikely that "flew like a bird" is going to be a suitable way to describe his achievement in an encyclopaedia. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:37, 2 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :"Verba ex ore meo cepisti!" Generally, the first sentence of an entry in an encyclopedia is an equation ("A = B"), which summarizes the subject's main achievement or claim to fame. In the present case, the English wiki is a place to start: "Eddie August Henry Schneider was an American aviator who set three transcontinental airspeed records for pilots under the age of twenty-one in 1930." Unhelpfully, classical Latin didn't have a word corresponding to our sense of record ('top performance') so Traupman recommends monumentum ('reminder, token of remembrance') and palma (derived from the use of a palm-branch as a token of victory), but Cassell's suggests a workaround: "in sport = a recorded time, distance, etc.; render by periphrasis, e.g.: he broke all —s as a runner, tam celeriter quam nemo antea currebat"—literally, 'he ran as fast as nobody before', a pattern not easy to work into sleek prose, and probably getting you to "who thrice flew an airplane across the [North American] continent as fast as nobody before." The rest of the English sentence is fairly straightforward. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:13, 2 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Reading more deeply into the English article provides a check on the previous suggestion. The glorious precision of Latin points up a failure of the English summary. It turns out that Schneider flew across the continent twice (bis), not thrice (ter), and the third record is merely the combination of the first and the second! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:48, 2 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Congue
Disputatio:Aquae Sabaudiae

message: Nomina Latina sunt investiganda. Vide :fr:Aix-les-Bains#Toponymie, ubi de nominibus Aquae Allobrogrum, Aquae Gratianae, etc. dubitatur:
Aix-les-Bains, ville fondée au ier siècle de notre ère, n’est que rarement citée dans les textes épigraphiques, et jamais par les auteurs romains connus73. Toutefois, deux inscriptions conservées par le musée archéologique font mention d’Aquæ (« les Eaux ») et d’Aquensis (« les habitants du lieu des Eaux »), et nous renseignent donc sur l’appellation de ce vicus dépendant de la cité de Vienne74. Le chanoine Adolphe Gros rappelle que des historiens de la région comme Jean-Louis Grillet ou Jules-Joseph Vernier ont tenté de faire le lien entre la ville d'Aix et avec des épithètes fantaisistes, voire apocryphes, Aquæ Allobrogum, Aquæ Domitianæ, Aquæ Gratiane que l'archiviste paléographe Félix Bourquelot précise sans mentions historiques69,70,75,76. Elles connurent toutefois un certain succès puisque que Aquæ Gratiane se retrouve inscrite sur le fronton des Thermes nationaux de 1934 à 196875,76.
Lesgles (disputatio) 18:30, 2 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hic enim habemus indicem inscriptionum Narbonensium. Confirmantur nomina "Aquae" et "Aquenses" antiqua ... sed haud nobis utilia: sunt enim multae aquae. Editor autem descriptionem "Aquae Sabaudiae vicus Viennensium" in recentiorem suam Latinitatem accipere videtur, haud male, quia "Aquae Sabaudiae" iam in imagine nostra legimus. "Aquae Allobrogum" et "Aquae Gratianae" nomina ficta et evitanda, sed "Aquae Sabaudiae" fortasse nomen utile mihi videtur, a duobus recentioribus acceptum, sine praetentione antiquitatis. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:00, 2 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ita, "Aquae Sabaudiae" mihi quoque nomen logicum videtur. Illuc movebo. Lesgles (disputatio) 14:49, 4 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Lampyridae

message: OK, I've fixed the false lemma of your first sentence
replies: text: Lampyrida (plurale lampyridae) est familia insectorum quae bioluminescentia res corporis habet.
So it now reads

text: Lampyridae sunt familia insectorum quae bioluminescentia res corporis habet.
I.e.,

text: Lampyridae are a family of insects that has things of the body.
Now where does bioluminescentia fit in? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:17, 5 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sententia prima
Disputatio:Chorda aurorae borealis

message: The :File:'Northern lights' chord.png and :File:'Northern lights' chord.mid have been nominated for deletion and someone may want to upload :en:File:Northern lights chord arrangement.mid and provide a fair use justification, as the png may no longer be usable from commons. Hyacinth (disputatio) 01:03, 7 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Fasciculus:'Northern lights' chord.png
Disputatio:Paediatria

message: Quis scit, si exsistit nomen Latinum sive Neolatinum medici infantum. Ego neque in lexicis mihi praesentibus nec in aliis fontibus nomen invenire potui. Verbum "paediatricium" mihi nec placet nec fontibus probatum esse videtur.
Adiuvate me, quaero. Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 12:18, 20 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Haud scio! Sed Neograece reperimus παιδίατρος, verbum e radicibus classicis bene confectum, e quo "paediatrus" licet derivare. Hac paginá  iam verbum Latinum "paediatrus -i" profertur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:00, 20 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Medicus infantum - habetne ullum nomen Latinum?
Disputatio:Christianus Ronaldus

message: "Ronaldo" est pars praenominis, itaque Latine "Ronaldus" esse debet. Totum nomen "Christianus Ronaldus dos Santos Aveiro" esse debet.
replies: text: Ita vero, gratias tibi ago! Lesgles (disputatio) 19:04, 21 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Nihil est! Oblitus sum signum meum scribere! --Spurius Minucius (disputatio) 23:57, 21 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Tristia

message: Nonne melius 'Tristia sunt …'? --Bavarese (disputatio) 14:44, 24 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita opinor et verbum mutavi. Gildersleeve autem animadvertit copulam saepe cum numero praedicati congruere. Lesgles (disputatio) 17:32, 25 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Olim, annis puerilibus, sententiam perdidici Athenae, inventrices artium, sunt lumen Graeciae. --Bavarese (disputatio) 18:13, 27 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Oops, paginam Gildersleeve non dedi: ecce: exemplum eius est "Amantium irae amoris integratio est" (Ter.). Quod autem credo exceptionem intellegendum esse, et sententiam tuam regulam.  Lesgles (disputatio) 04:52, 28 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Utinam Terentius in sententia sua verbum temporale post irae posuisset: profecto videremus, num eo loco sunt scripsisset. In sententia a te praebita, est puto per assimilationem ad integratio posse effectum esse. --Bavarese (disputatio) 10:17, 28 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tristia est ...
Disputatio:Bela Bartók

message: Unde Adalbertus? Fortasse ex pagina :en:Béla I of Hungary: "Béla's baptismal name was Adalbert." Quod autem non indicat praenomina alibi inter se mutanda esse. In Chronico Budensi praenomen "Bela, -ae" video. Lesgles (disputatio) 19:00, 26 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte dicis. Paginam movendam censeo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:28, 26 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine Adalberto
Disputatio:Lingua Silesica

message: Quid de illa germanica lingua, qua Theodisci Silesiam habitantes utuntur? Nonne item silesica est? --Bavarese (disputatio) 09:52, 7 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Quomodo igitur corrigere suades, mi Bavarensis?

text: Cf. fortasse Lingua Scotica (Gadelica) et Lingua Scotica (Teutonica) ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:38, 7 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Minime. Dico de eis dialectis theodiscis, quae ostmitteldeutsch nuncupantur. Una ex eis e. g. Gerardus Hauptmann in suo dramate Die Weber (i. e. Textores) utitur textores faciens eo modo loqui. --Bavarese (disputatio) 12:36, 24 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Una sola lingua silesica?
Disputatio:Senectus

message: I cleaned out some English debris without realising the page was only a week old. If work is continuing and that material is needed, feel free to revert! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:35, 7 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citius purgavi? 

message: The one-line summary at the top of the article takes "senectus" to mean a person who is in his old age. That is apparently the less common meaning of the word. The article itself assumes the more common meaning of "senectus" as a stage of life, i.e., old age itself. The one-liner should be fixed to be consistent with the body of the article. (If and when I have an opportunity to make that fix, I plan to do so. But if anyone else can get to it sooner, please do.) Toddcs (disputatio) 23:36, 19 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sommarium de quo loqueris non video. Hoc est initium commentationis:
replies: text: : Senectus (-utis, f.) consistit in aetatibus quae spem vitae hominum approprinquant vel excedunt, et ergo finem circuli vitae humanae attingit.

text: Quae pars sit mutanda? --Grufo (disputatio) 03:05, 20 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: :@Grufo

text: :I am in the mobile Wikipedia app (Beta).

text: :Before what you quoted, there is an intro:

text: :Senectus

text: :magnam aetatem habens, multos annos natus; qui est multorum annorum

text: :You don't see it? Toddcs (disputatio) 03:12, 20 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Ah! Quod vides in telephono gestabili non est pars Vicipaediae Latinae, sed est pars Vicidatorum (:d:Q191089), ubi multi usores, qui non necessarie Latine loquuntur, scribunt. --Grufo (disputatio) 04:17, 20 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: :::I don't have the app. After seeing this I have edited the entry at Wikidata, and the mobile page that I can see now begins "Wikidata: senectus (Q191089), aetas humana". Is it the same on the app? The second element is not really intended to be a definition, it's intended to put the term into a more general category.

text: :::You just have to understand that Wikidata is not Vicipaedia. It's possible for any of us to edit Wikidata -- in fact it's highly desirable to make it agree with Vicipaedia -- I often edit it for this purpose. But Grufo's right, others also edit Wikidata, and they are often entirely ignorant of the languages they think they are writing. We can't guarantee it will remain accurate. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:10, 20 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One-line summary at top of article is inconsistent with article.
Disputatio:Wookiee

message: Si hoc animal recte est species (ut dicit definitio, et commentarius revera subspecies ei attribuit), nomen non "capitalizandum" est, genusque nominandum est—"capitalizatum"! Quod est nomen generis? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 21:39, 8 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxinomia
Disputatio:Olivia de Havilland

message: Haec mutatio certe grammaticam rectiorem facit, sed factum sororum est aliquanto maius, Anglice "de Havilland and sister Fontaine are the only siblings to have won lead acting Academy Awards". Nescio autem quomodo simpliciter hoc reddere. Lesgles (disputatio) 01:32, 9 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Aliam verborum formulam temptavi: an prospere, haud scio! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:50, 9 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Fortasse: . . . sunt soli eorundem parentium liberi qui. . . . IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:55, 9 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unici fratres" -> "unicae sorores"
Disputatio Categoriae:Berna (pagus)

message: Usque adhuc categoriam de urbe Berna non habemus. Mos nostra erit categoriam de urbe simpliciter "Berna", categoriam de pago aut "Categoria:Berna (pagus)" aut "Categoria:Pagus Bernensis" appellare. Oportet igitur (1) hanc categoriam movere, (2) novam categoriam "Categoria:Berna" creare. An recte dixi? quid dicunt alii? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:21, 10 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Salve. Gratias ago. Nonnullae pagines ad urbem et ad pagum spectant. Deinde in futuro novum systema bonum esse mihi videtur: categoria principalis "Categoria:Berna" et variae subcategoriae Berna (urbs); Pagus Bernensis; Urbes Pagi bernensis; Institutiones (Berna); Geographia (Berna). Vanosilo 22:13, 10 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Melior est subcategoria Res geographicae Bernae.Vanosilo 14:04, 15 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Est Categoria Res geographicae Bernae. Vanosilo 13:56, 23 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divisio categoriarum?
Disputatio:Internationalis Socialistica

message: Movere necesse fuit. Hic movi quia
# "Internationalis", olim verbum adiectivum quod substantivum "Adsociatio" modificavit (vide :en:International Workingmen's Association = First International) iam substantivum fit et femininum esse debet
# "Socialistica" igitur verbum adiectivum femininum esse statuo. "Socialista" reicio quia substantivum masculinum est.
Si aliis aliter visum est, statim movete, amici! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:01, 12 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  De titulo
Disputatio:Carolus de Lignieres

message: Carolus de Lignieres = Charles de Lignières
replies: text: Le texte n'est pas écrit en latin. On pourrait essayer de réécrire, mais le problème des dates s'imposera. Comme j'ai dit chez Wikipédia, s'il est né (par exemple) en 1650, il ne peut guère être professeur en 1665. C'est dommage, parce qu'évidemment il a existé et a écrit, lui, en latin, mais sans quelques bonnes informations nous ne pouvons pas retenir l'article. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:02, 13 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: : Oui bien sûr Andrew Dalby, les informations officielles contiennent aussi des interrogations:  Voir Co-authors, vais voir si je trouve autre chose. Vous savez s'il a écrit en latin, sa place me semble être sur l'encyclopédie en latin.. (A suivre)--DDupard (disputatio) 20:09, 13 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Bonjour, Andrew Dalby. Pour ce qui est des dates de naissances, vous n'êtes sans doute pas sans ignorer qu'une grande partie des documents d'états civils relatifs à la noblesse a été détruite pendant la révolution . Ceci dit, des dates de publication trouvées dans le World catalog ont été ajoutées dans l'article. Merci de bien vouloir reconsidérer la réjection de l'article--DDupard (disputatio) 12:37, 14 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  de nomine
Disputatio:Litterae mysticae

message: Nec nomen femininum nec adiectivum mysteriam invenio, itaque "litterae mysteriae" non mihi locutio possibilis videtur. Fortasse litterae mysterii vel mysteriorum? Alii quid dicunt? Lesgles (disputatio) 17:37, 18 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Assentior. Libenter litterae mysteriorum quam litterae mysterii. Sed ego, quia mysticus adiectivum ad mysteria pertinens est, titulum q.e. litterae mysticae suaserim. Neander (disputatio) 17:47, 18 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: : Bene, secundum propositionem tuam paginam movi. Nunc mysterium sensu antiquo mihi videtur plus ad ritus arcanos &c. pertinere, quam "mystery fiction". Fortasse aliquis hic de distinctione scribere poterit. Lesgles (disputatio) 03:50, 19 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movenda
Disputatio:Francia Borboniensis

message: "Francia Borboniensis" is a misleading translation of Royaume de France and Kingdom of France (to which the article links in the French & English wikis, respectively). IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:08, 22 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Igitur ista pagina, quam nemo unquam auxit, delenda est ! ThbdGrrd (disputatio) 19:14, 22 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Gambia

message: Verba "cuius terra antiqua nomine Latino classico Bambotus cognita est" removi, quia Plinius et aliis de flumine Bamboto scribuntur, non de civitate; praeterea alii scriptores recentes hoc cum flumine Gambia, alii cum Senegal coniungere videntur. Si quis bonum fontem inveniat alii civitatis nominis, quaeso ut id addat. Lesgles (disputatio) 01:49, 1 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  De Bamboto
Disputatio:Carolus Seeger

message: LOL. Changing the category from "Professores Scholae Novae" to "Professores Novae Scholae" was the first thing on my to-do list, and now I wake up and find it's already done. Is Vicipaedia efficient or what? ¶ Incidentally, the Nova Schola has nothing to do with the Schola Nova. The latter is the newcomer, so the former has dibs on the plain name; no need of Neoeboracensis unless a prior nova schola is found. (But since the name is trite & obvious, earlier novae scholae may well have existed.) IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:49, 1 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Professores
Disputatio Categoriae:Superrealismus

message: Hmm. Fons? Confer Surrealismus et eius categoriam. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:52, 1 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Confer :en:Superrealism et :en:Surrealism. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:54, 1 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Henricus Cowell

message: Does Vicipaedia have a category to cover the four years that Henricus Cowell spent in San Quentin? Wikipedia has "Category:Prisoners and detainees by prison." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:02, 1 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We have "Incarcerati", so I've added it. Hmm. I'd have guessed that we hardly have enough former jailbirds to make a subcategory structure worthwhile as yet ... but I could be wrong, and it really depends on whether you want to devote the time to it. I've been categorizing (and so have you) the inmates of universities, but we have rather more of those! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:19, 1 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :"Incarcerati" should be fine for now; someday there'll have to be a subcategory for the unjustly imprisoned (perhaps to avoid a POV about what's just, it could = the incarcerati who, like Cowell, were later pardoned), but not enough examples may be extant for that at the moment. As for professors: since the Latin name of the university is often unknown in these precincts, I tend to leave them to your kind ministrations. Every now and then, though, a guess will be attempted, and sometimes it turns out right. ;) IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:26, 2 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: ::It is now legitimate to make category redirects, so if your guess is significantly different from my guess it is possible to choose one and leave a helpful redirect at the other. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:20, 2 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Carceres
Disputatio:If I Had a Hammer

message: Cur, Neander, conversionem tituli removisti? Vero, puto esset pro fuerit in hac sententia melius esse. Sed translatio plerumque utilis mihi videtur, praesertim cum non omnes lectores nostri Anglicam linguam intellegunt. Lesgles (disputatio) 21:40, 27 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Tibi assentio: fortasse melius erit "Si mihi esset malleus" (Gildersleeve, de "Unreal conditional sentences," #597). IacobusAmor (disputatio) 22:37, 27 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: : Credo, Lesgles, titulorum conversiones, praesertim si in errorem inducunt, obligatorias non esse. Sed per me licet restituas. Recte de verbi forma iudicasti! Neander (disputatio) 22:46, 27 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :: OK, nunc restitui. Lesgles (disputatio) 04:54, 28 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversio 

message: Quonam fonte confisus, Lesgles, sua banione in suo banione mutasti? Secundum Lexicon hodiernae Latinitatis Finno-Latino-Finnicum (Tuomo Pekkanen & Reijo Pitkäranta) feminini generis est. Neander (disputatio) 05:17, 28 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: De genere banionis vide disputationem haud inter minimas apud Disputatio:Banio! Sed verbum "suo" removi. Anglice solemus "his/her" dicere ubi in aliis linguis non requiritur ... Si quis fontem adducit banionem ad alium pertinere, de ea re oportet loqui! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:39, 28 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ex commentario tuo, Neander, in illa disputatione genus recte elegisse putavi :), sed vero pronomen hic fortasse non est necessarium. Lesgles (disputatio) 18:18, 28 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Gulp! Minime intellego, cur antea affirmare potuerim, banionem masculini generis esse, quamquam re vera secundum TP & RP feminini generis est. Delirationi meae ignoscite velim omnes, quos in errorem induxi! Neander (disputatio) 18:39, 28 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banio