lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Antisemitismus

message: Utrum vocabulum antisemitismi recte in usu sit si de ea concertatione agitur quae est inter Iudaeos et Palaestinos, quorum non parva pars ad religionem Christianam pertinet, examine dignum sit. Magni interest utrum magistratus maioris potestatis Europaeae maximam Iudaeorum caedem impetret an de terrae possessione quam duo populi parvi inhabitant ob eam quoque causam pugnetur quod ante multi Iudaei emigrare et fugere coacti sunt. Etiam antisemitismus et antizionismus non confundatur. Etiam nonnulli Iudaei ob causas religiosas vel politicas antizionistae sunt. --Alex1011 18:10, 8 Maii 2007 (UTC)
*Assentior tibi, Alexander, antisemitismum Musulmanicum non idem esse atque antizionismum interque utramque invidiae rationem esse distinguendum. Tamen antisemitismus ille mihi certus videtur, quo non admodum pauci non rei publicae Israel propter iniurias Palaestinensibus ab illa civitate inlatas, sed omnibus Iudaeis propter quandam tacitam in hostes r.p. Israel conspirationem suscenseant.--Irenaeus 12:19, 31 Augusti 2011 (UTC)

message: All we want is one external source of information about the subject (book or website). There must be lots! We also ideally could add a source for the Latin term, and there probably is one ... but if it doesn't immediately appear it would be acceptable, for example, to say "Neolatin word used in Czech." Sorry I don't have time to search further tonight. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:19, 25 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I found time and did both in one link. No harm in adding others though! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:05, 25 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: :Thanks very much!

text: :Term: Turns out it appears in Nostra aetate so I added that as a link, too.

text: :Note: Even in German and English, the coinage only goes back to mid-nineteenth century. See :en:Antisemitism#Etymology. I'm pretty sure you won't find that term in classical sources.

text: :About: I was going to add four links, but you beat me to one of them. I thought I would add the following others from enwiki:

text: :*Source 1 (dicdef from Merriam-Webster), to be included in-line

text: :*Source 2 (pdf from Anti-Defamation League), in "external links"

text: :*Link to Anti-Defamation League page on antisemitism, in "external links"

text: :Along with the one you added, that should be a sufficiently diverse group of sources. If you can actually find a source about antisemitism in Latin, by all means add. I'll add the rest over the long weekend here in the States. Again, thanks! StevenJ81 (disputatio) 19:20, 25 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non stipula > plus quam stipula
Disputatio:Hiberus

message: *quod, not qui, to agree with flumen (neuter) (do others concur with this? or should it agree with Ebrus? I think I'm right)
*you can say Graece but not Graece antique; and what we really mean is that it's "from the ancient Greek name Ebros", so that's what I've written
*in Mare Mediterraneum, not marem, because mare is neuter so the accusative is always identical with the nominative
-- OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:22, 9 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, flumen . . . quod. But I'd worry about aquas vertit; it may be a good idiom, but I'd have to look it up, and I don't see it in L&S. Given aquas, maybe fert or fundit or something else? (As I say, there's probably an idiom.) Also, in Praeclarae urbes a Hibero sectae sunt Caesaraugusta . . . et Dertosa = 'The famous cities C and D have been cut by the Hiberus' uses mighty strange word order. I suspect the author was trying to say 'Famous cities cut by the H are C and D'—which may want a different Latin construction. IacobusAmor 17:15, 9 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammatica
Disputatio:Death Note

message: Bene, sed praenomen L Latine pronunciatur Lucius aut (!) Quinquaginta! Si recte est ipsa littera L, nomen pronunciatur El. IacobusAmor 20:00, 9 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha! I had nomen and XL on the mind because of that article's sentence "Causa mortis post nominem intra XL secundas scripta impleatur." One thinks of the adage that when one plays in the mud, one gets muddy. ::winkwink:: IacobusAmor 21:18, 9 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :I think the psudonym L is written as "L" everywhere, why adversere flumine? --BiT 13:49, 10 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: L est nomen, est non numera!
Disputatio:Poësis didactica

message: In versione veteriore paginae de Poesi didactica haec sententia legi potuit:
"Versus didactici de Aegypto et de Assyriis et hodie legi possunt."
Hanc sententiam delevi quia tota pagina alioqui est de poësi didactica Graeca-Romana.
thread_title: Poësis didactica praeter Graeca-Romana

message: Confundor quid indicetur per "aut velle simulat docere".  Num aliquid agere poesis ipsa "vult", sensu stricto, verum scriptores poeswn aut carminum?  Etsi poeseis velle possint, quo pacto velle simulent?
thread_title:  Velle Simulat
Disputatio:Wetzlaria

message: :Repperi Wetzlaria: vide .
replies: text: Habemus fontem pro Witflaria? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:55, 10 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Sic (respondeo ego) sunt fontes pauci de Witflaria ut nomen mediaevale. Spero id non venire a manuscripto male scripto aut male lecto! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:31, 12 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Et Hofmann (vide supra) et Graesse () habent Wetzlaria ut formam principalem. Igitur credo paginam movendam esse. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:25, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Columbia

message: Cur nomen "Columbia" est non "Colombia"? -- Secundus Zephyrus 22:35, 10 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ambas formas vidimus, sicut aves. Rectam autem utendam nescio...--Ioshus (disp) 22:37, 10 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: ...et Caribbaeo migrantibus incultum est...
No hay referencia que sostenga la afirmación que la tribu Caribes, o que los migrantes de las zonas limitrofes con el mar caribe eran incultos. Debe ser cambiado el termino, así sea significativo de otro adjetivo como "agreste, salvaje" o similares porque no hay sustentación de ello, y en todo caso representaría una visión europea de la epoca en vez de una reconstrucción histórica y antropologica. [Ait usor 181.59.125.34 die 27 Augusti 2019 21:12.]
replies: text: Thanks for your comment. It is a bad choice of words, though not for the reason you give. The sentence is written in the passive, probably because it is a literal translation from some other language e.g. English, and "incultum" is intended as the past participle of "incolere" to inhabit (a form that scarcely exists). So, anyway, I'll rewrite the sentence. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:53, 28 Aprilis 2019 (UTC)

text: It now says "American Indian peoples from Central America and the Caribbean islands were the first to inhabit the region now called Colombia." There is no comment on their level of culture. Personally I prefer to write "Americani indigenae" native Americans, avoiding the misnomer "Indi" Indians, but I don't have that choice here because the point is that (at the time and place under discussion) they were not indigenous, they migrated from further north. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:03, 28 Aprilis 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: :For the record: that incultum seems to have come from the keyboard of our taciturn geographer (then using the IP 88.19.12.27) at 08:16 on 8 Aprilis 2009‎. From probably the same source (using the IP 85.251.34.118) at 11:07 on 13 Aprilis 2009 came the nonword incultio(nis). IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:53, 28 Aprilis 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Incultum

message: Naplb, you changed "in America Meridionali" to "in Americae Meridionali," saying "Dative form should be "Americae Meridionali." I've fixed it by changing the vocabulary & syntax. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 21:02, 3 Iunii 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Naplb, you changed "in boreoccidentali Americae Australis regione" to "in boreoccidentali America Australis regione," saying "Fixed to ablative America, not dative Americae," but Australis (nom. or gen.) can't go with "Americā" (abl.), and what's wanted there is the genitive: "in the northwestern region of South America." So I've fixed it again. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:03, 4 Iunii 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Dative isn't ablative
Disputatio:Alphonsus X (rex Castellae et Legionis)

message: "ab Creatione ad tempos patri Alphonsi (Sancti Ferdinandi III)." ¶ tempos: Now what have I been telling you about neuters? ¶ patri: verbum tertiae declinationis. IacobusAmor 16:39, 11 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: nooooo! they are the same! (but I thought it was masculine)--Xaverius 16:46, 11 Maii 2007 (UTC)

text: and I thougt that pater was like ager agri--Xaverius 16:46, 11 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "tempos patri"
Disputatio:Isara (flumen Alpium)

message: Unde venit Allobrogilla? Habemus fontem? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:39, 11 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: Cavete! Etiam Isara (Bavaricus) est flumen Alpium! --Alex1011 13:21, 11 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. Fortasse Isara (flumen Alpium Francicarum)? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:58, 11 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ita, etiam propono eligendi causa:
*Isara (flumen Alpinum Gallicum) 
*Isara (Gallicus Alpinus) si id flumen etiam sexum masculinum habet. 
*Isara (flumen Alpium Gallicarum)
Ceterum tertium flumen est in Tiroli Isara (Tirolis). --Alex1011 14:15, 11 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
Certe, sed scriptum est Isaram Francogalliae flumen esse, quod in Rhodanum influat. Mihi videtur erroris periculum minimum esse.Christobaldus 14:30, 11 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
Aut : "Isara est flumen in Alpibus septentrionalibus francogallicis. E Isarano saltu (translatio recta francogallici "col de l'Iseran" ?) ortus, etc."Christobaldus 14:35, 11 Octobris 2007 (UTC)

text: Disputamus de nomine paginae nec de paginae argumento. Nomina fortasse permutari possunt. --Alex1011 18:13, 11 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isara (Bavaricus)
Disputatio:Provincia Autonoma Bauzanensis

message: :Both Hofmann and Graesse give Tirolis (with Tyrolis as alternative). Unless anyone objects, I'll move to Tirolis Meridionalis. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:59, 11 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :I moved instead to Tirolis Meridiana as suggested by a local source. I don't understand the point of the following section:
===Versio Latine===
*Latine versione Germana: Provincia autonoma Bauzani - Tirolum Meridionale
*Latine versione Itala: Provincia autonoma Bauzani - Alta Athesia
Are they just helpful translations of rival names, or is there something official about these Latin forms? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:09, 25 Iunii 2007 (UTC)

text: No one has answered, so I have now put these unexplained forms into a footnote. The recent change of name to Tirolis Meridionalis introduced an error to the first sentence: whatever name we prefer, the name used by Iosephus Mallius was Tirolis Meridiana, so I have corrected the sentence to restore that small fact. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:08, 24 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
I had overlooked that "meridiana" is attested. I found an 18th century "Tirolis pars meridionalis".  --Alex1011 15:16, 25 Decembris 2007 (UTC)

text: No problem, Alex! Meridionalis is certainly our usual word for "southern" on Vicipaedia. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:59, 25 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: *Latine versione Germana: Provincia autonoma Bauzani - Tirolum Meridionale
*Latine versione Itala: Provincia autonoma Bauzani - Alta Athesia
Are they just helpful translations of rival names, or is there something official about these Latin forms? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:09, 25 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No one has answered, so I have now put these unexplained forms into a footnote. The recent change of name to Tirolis Meridionalis introduced an error to the first sentence: whatever name we prefer, the name used by Iosephus Mallius was Tirolis Meridiana, so I have corrected the sentence to restore that small fact. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:08, 24 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
I had overlooked that "meridiana" is attested. I found an 18th century "Tirolis pars meridionalis".  --Alex1011 15:16, 25 Decembris 2007 (UTC)

text: No problem, Alex! Meridionalis is certainly our usual word for "southern" on Vicipaedia. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:59, 25 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Versio Latine
Disputatio:Maria Antonia Austriaca (regina Franciae)

message: Addidi  quia id nomen "Maria Antonia Iosepha Ioanna Habsburgum - Lotharingia" dubiosum mi paret. Habemus fontem? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:30, 12 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Re vera nomen "ab Austria" estne attestatum? Sane, ab Austria in Franciam remota est ibique necata est … --UV 19:48, 9 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :There are sources which mention "Maria ab Austria" so that construction isn't invented. Other Wikis also refer to Maria Antonia as "M.A. of Austria". It is customary to use a royal woman's birth title (cf. Catharina Aragonensis). Amsal 21:11, 9 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Catharina Aragonensis implies Maria Antonia Austriaca or something like that. "Participles which signify Birth take the Ablative of Origin; sometimes with the prepositions ex and de. . . . Ab, and occasionally ex, are employed of remote progenitors." E.g., Plerique Belgae sunt orti ab Germanis 'Belgians are mostly of German descent' (Gildersleeve 395). IacobusAmor 23:53, 9 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Yes, Maria Antonia Austriaca does seem more common. Amsal 10:55, 10 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::: Ergo movi ThbdGrrd 18:09, 10 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: Meyers Großes Konversations-Lexikon, vol 13. Lipsiae 1908, p. 287 (hic in interreti)
thread_title: Fons recensionis mense Martio 2020
Disputatio:Athanasius Kircherus

message: Could someone confirm that the title of his book has the spelling Cristiani, not Christiani? IacobusAmor 13:46, 12 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Correxi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:46, 12 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "1669 Principis Cristiani archetypon politicum"
Disputatio:Variola

message: quia in Campanini-Carboni. 1961. Vocabolario Latino–Italiano; Italiano–Latino. Torino. Verbum Italicum Vaiolo sonat Latine Variolae.--Massimo Macconi 21:05, 12 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variola, - ae aut variolae, - arum...
Disputatio:Lucius Appuleius Saturninus

message: Does anyone know about this fellow? He sounds to me like a confusion with Lucius Apuleius, novelist and minor philosopher, born about AD 130. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:04, 14 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the interwiki links, which were for :en:Lucius Appuleius Saturninus, a Roman tribune who was definitely no philosopher. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:15, 14 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :It seems that both persons have merged into a single article. --Xaverius 13:42, 14 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::OK, well, rather than merge this with the novelist, I'll make it into a stub about the politician: then at least we have both of them covered. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:02, 22 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Real person?
Disputatio:Socolata cum encytis

message: My mistake: the form with -us is more probably correct, I find. So I've changed the text. OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:59, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, no problem. Is the text understandable? Have you got a rough idea of what chocolate con churros is?--Xaverius 14:10, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Oh, yes, indeed. But what I fancy right now is pastillum loliginibus fartum!

text: :I'll look through the texts properly later today, unless someone else forestalls me. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:22, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)

text: I didn't understand procimpuus (nice word though), nor the following sentence: Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:26, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :With procimpuus I meant praecipuus (I shouldn't trust my memory that much).

text: :Regarding Populus vidit encytos et socolata optima pars esse. I was trying to say that the people of Madrid saw that chocolate and churros made the perfect pair.--Xaverius 21:41, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyta > encyti

message: Again with the "chocolata"... Did we ever decide what form we were going to use?--Ioshus (disp) 15:14, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sigh... 

message: encytus in socolata immittitur -> encytus socolatam immittitur meaning "the churros are immersed into the chocolate" ?
I think immittitur takes an accusative here.--Rafaelgarcia 17:10, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Immittitur

message: Nescio an pretium 10 Eurorum per chilogramum vile sit.--Imtoo 20:44, 3 Aprilis 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretium 

message: Hispanice dicitur "es un churro" aut "menudo churro" (encytus est) cum res male facta est, aut "¡cómete un churro!" (ede encytum!) cum nonnullus molestatur.--Imtoo 21:11, 3 Aprilis 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sententiae hispanae
Disputatio:Pastillum e loliginibus

message: I think your original spelling pastillum was right, wasn't it? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:13, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems so. I had scribbled it down, and when I had to type it, I couldn't tell if it was an i or just a part of the m. (smack the froehead with the palm) o tempora...--Xaverius 14:16, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :*snif snif* I cannot even type... o mores...--Xaverius 15:17, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
No me lo puedo creer, es lo mas subrrealista que he visto en mi vida
Viva Julio cesar (se podria ampliar su articulo Vamos filologos animaros)
Pastillum loliginibus Caesaraugusta est, non Matriti.
Ave!
thread_title: Pastillum
Disputatio:Historia Hispanica

message: Sorry Massimo for having "erased" the map, but I'm affraid it is not historically accurate: first it shows Zaragoza reconquered in 900 AD, when it was not conquered until 1118, secondly, places Navarra far inland in Castillian territory and without control over Tudela (which suddenly seems to have been reconquered by Aragon). Thirdly, it shows the principality of Catalonia as a separate kingdom, expanding through Valencia, leaving Aragon land-locked. --Xaverius 16:48, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About the map

message: I trust in you. I will try to find an other map. Thank you--Massimo Macconi 17:51, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ok!
Disputatio:Diana (principissa Cambriae)

message: :Diana princeps femina Angliae fiebat.
If I understand this sentence correctly, it isn't true: the Queen outranked her! So I deleted it. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:06, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was an attempt to say "princess." --Iustinus 00:39, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Oh, I see. I understood it as "first lady". But if "princess" is intended, it's still misleading to call her "principissa Angliae". She was "principissa Cambriae", and, if we want to count heads, "una inter principissas Regni Britanniarum". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:40, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::In case the original writer is reading this: princeps is indeed of common gender, but its usage as a title that is essentially automatically bestowed on the child of a monarch, and occasionally to others, dates to the middle ages, so we can feel free to use the pre-existing medieval feminine form, principissa. In Classical Latin, in fact, the usual expression for a monarch's daughter is simply regia filia, I believe.

text: ::As for the concern that more than one person could be a principissa Regni Britanniarum, we can solve that by adding a quaedam, if it's really necessary. --Iustinus 08:59, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::But more simply by calling her "principissa Cambriae". It was her title, and there's only one princess of Wales at a time! So that's what we did, of course. I don't know why we didn't change the pagename, but I've done that now. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:14, 20 Maii 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate?
Disputatio:Ragusium

message: When I was in Dubrovnik I learned that the city has had several Latin names throughout its history, like at least three. Unfortunately I don't recall any of the other ones. --Iustinus 13:11, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)

message: Communitas Ragusina, Respublica Ragusina ? I find them on it.wiki. Ciao--Massimo Macconi 14:26, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find any other names but those. My old Encyclopaedia Britannica says it was known as Ragusa since before the 10th century, and that it was founded in the 7th century by refugees from the destroyed cities of Salona and Epidaurus (Dalmatia) (but those are different places). Theoretically there is room for another name in there, from 7th to 9th centuries, but if there was one, the Ency. Brit. doesn't say what it was. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:04, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)
Massimo- no, I mean entirely different names, not connected to Ragusa. Wish I could remember what they were! --Iustinus 15:20, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)

text: Hmm, Leontopolis?? --Iustinus (disputatio) 02:18, 16 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: : Ah, it must have been Epidaurus Novus! --Iustinus (disputatio) 02:40, 11 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  scilicet
Disputatio:Lingua Lithuanica

message: Nomen Lituana cum ipso nomine Lituania, linguis  Italica Hispanicaque usitato, meliores sunt Lithuana, Lithuaniaque cum 'h', qui nobis potissime ex lingua Anglica noti. Ambo usitati erant lingua Latina in mediis aevis, sed sine 'h' nomen  similius autentico  Lituano, cum Lituania  Lietuva lituane dicitur.
thread_title:  De titulo paginae 

message: Does anyone know what East Prussia is in Latin? I'm guessing it is just Prussia Orientala, -ae, F.
replies: text: Not sure, o usor anonyme, but orientala itself is not a word in Latin. At the very least you're looking for orientalis. -- Ioscius  ∞ 08:21, 4 Novembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Is there an adjective meaning "east" then? Prussia doesn't describe east; east has to describe Prussia. -- I9113N 09:16, 4 Novembris 2010 (UTC -5)
replies: text: ::"Orientalis" is the adjective for "east". -- Ioscius  ∞ 13:55, 4 Novembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::And 'Prussia' is apparently Borussia. IacobusAmor 14:10, 4 Novembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Hence you will find our page on the subject at Borussia orientalis. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:10, 4 Novembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::Thanks for the clarification! -- I9113N 13:16, 4 Novembris 2010 (UTC -5)
And, I'm not sure if Abecedario Linguo Lituanio is correct for "Lithuanian Alphabet."

text: It can't be, as lingua is feminine, and abecedario is OK only in the dative & ablative. IacobusAmor 14:10, 4 Novembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Abecedarium Lithuanicum would do nicely. As to whether there should be an h in the word, opinions differ, but we are using the spelling with h at present because that's the one we have a citation for.

text: :I don't understand "Immutatii sunt saepe non scriptum". What are immutatii? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:18, 4 Novembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::immutatii is supposed to be "changes" in the NOM pl case. "Changes" refers to diacritics, which I couldn't find the Latin word for. -- I9113N 13:16, 4 Novembris 2010 (UTC -5)
replies: text: :::Fixed; diacritics translates to diacritica. -- I9113N 15:02, 4 Novembris 2010 (UTC -5)
thread_title:  Unknown translations