lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Philippus Pétain

message: I don't know how to tell he was a soldier -- J'aimerai que quelqu'un m'aide à traduire son appartenance à l'armée -- Thoma D. 13:59, 2 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: soldier

message: quelqu'un peut-il m'aider à trouver la correspondance entre les grades actuelles et des noms latins? - could somebody help me to find how to translate military grads in latine?? -- Thoma D. 14:02, 2 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
==soldiers (2)==
si quelqu'un trouve une correspondance valable pour les grades actuels et des noms en latins, merci de l'ajouter également sur la page lexicum meum ou d'en discuter sur la page de discussion qui lié est attachée - If somebody find suitable words to explain actual grads in the army, please, add it in the page lexicum meum or in the disputatio pagina of this one. -- Thoma D. 11:51, 3 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: soldiers

message: si quelqu'un trouve une correspondance valable pour les grades actuels et des noms en latins, merci de l'ajouter également sur la page lexicum meum ou d'en discuter sur la page de discussion qui lié est attachée - If somebody find suitable words to explain actual grads in the army, please, add it in the page lexicum meum or in the disputatio pagina of this one. -- Thoma D. 11:51, 3 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: soldiers (2)
Disputatio:Marinum (Italia)

message: Vinum Albanum sine dubio Romani biberunt; quid possumus dicere de vino ex agro Castrimoenii? Igitur citationem postulavi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:49, 3 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sed ager Castrimoenii erat in agro Albano, et eius vinum diciebatur Albanum. Magnus Homo 10:51, 7 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: De vino
Disputatio:Institutum Cartusiensium (Lugdunum)

message: Est-ce que quelqu'un peut nous dire le vrai nom de cette école? Avec ça on pourrait commencer, au moins ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:59, 3 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bien, j'ai trouvé maintenant et j'ai fait les liens interwiki. Une confirmation du nom latin serait la bienvenue. Si un nom latin a existé officiellement, on peut le remettre comme titre de l'article. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:09, 3 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Laugana

message: Clearly Lanem is wrong: I guess it was taken from the entry Limburgis ad Lanem by someone who doesn't understand Latin. Unfortunately, no authority is cited even for Limburgis ad Lanem. Well, I can find one Latin name for this river, Laugana, but before moving the entry I would like to confirm it somewhere else. Can anyone help? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:55, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For the present, since Lanem is clearly wrong, I will move the page to Laugana. If anyone has a better name, let's go to it! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:19, 11 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
Just for information: "Die Lahn (früher Loganus, Logana, Laugana Lanus, Lo-flus usw. genannt)"
[p.p.]
replies: text: :For :de:Limburg an der Lahn I have found the attested Latin name (used by the Vatican, apparently): Limburgum ad Lahnam. --Fabullus 10:36, 22 Maii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Index praesidum rei publicae Francicae

message: Non credo Philippus Petain e dextra erat sed nationaliste. Legi General de La Porte du Theil, dux des Chantiers de jeunesse, scripsit: "Le but [des Chantiers de jeunesse] est de donner aux jeunes gens de France, sans distinction de classes, un complément de moral, d'entrainement viril et professionnel qui en fera des chefs de première qualité et des hommes sains, honnêtes entre tours, communiant dans la ferveur de la même foi nationale." In Pétain. -- Thoma D. 14:33, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippus Petain - dextra?? 

message: Pourquoi il est répertorié deux fois (une fois dans la table, encore sous Bellum Orbis Terrarum II)? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:58, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: De qui parles-tu en disant "il" et de quoi en disant "répertorié deux fois". -- Thoma D. 15:04, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Nous écrivons sous la rubrique "Philippus Petain" (voir en sus)! A ce moment, ce Philippus Petain apparaît deux fois sur la page Index Praesidentium Rei Publicae Francicae (une fois dans la table, encore sous Bellum Orbis Terrarum II). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:18, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::D'accord, j'ai compris. J'avais pas remarqué. C'est certain que c'est un inutile de le noter deux fois. Je vais retirer le passage sur Bellum Orbis Terrarum, sinon, il faudrait également parler de la France Libre pour rééquilibrer la balance or on en parle également dans la liste du dessus. -- Thoma D. 15:37, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)

text: :Merci de ta réponse! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:50, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Philippus Petain (×2)
Disputatio Formulae:Praesides Franciae

message: J'ai retiré l'explication des pouvoirs de Pétain: on pourrait ajouter quelque chose de ça à l'article Philippus Petain. Le but d'un infobox est d'être utile et bref: nous manquions sur le plan de brièveté, je crois! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:53, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nota de Petain
Disputatio:Novum Laredum

message: Novolaredensis formam adiectivi habet. Possumus substantivum reperire? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:46, 7 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Etiam Novolaredanus adiectivi speciem praebet. Quin primum inquiramus, quo modo Laredo (Cantabria) Latine audiat? Mea quidem coniectura est Laretum (cf. Toledo < Toletum). Ergo, Novum Laretum propono (speculative quidem)... --Neander 02:00, 8 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Consentio, etsi verbum Anglicum teredo Latine quoque est teredo ('shipworm'). IacobusAmor 02:09, 8 Iulii 2007 (UTC)

text: Repperi orthographiam Laredum () pro oppido Cantabriae a quo urbes Texiae et Mexici nomina habent. Credo paginas movendas esse ad Laredum (Texia) et Novum Laredum. Quid dicitis? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:09, 8 Iulii 2007 (UTC)

text: Or, in English, the story so far: Novolaredensis and (Novo)laredanus are both adjectives, not nouns, so they aren't correct as titles for these pages. Both places are named after Laredo in Cantabria. The Latin name for this place is Laredum (see ) so I propose to move the two pages we have to Laredum (Texia) and Novum Laredum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:17, 8 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Iterum consentio! IacobusAmor 13:23, 8 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Assentior et suadeo! Neander 13:30, 8 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Urbs Lutetia (praefectura Franciae)

message: Re: "Urbs Lutetiae (Francice Ville-de-Paris) est praefectura regionis Insulae Franciae civitatis Franciae."—I take it you're using praefectura for préfecture and regio for département, but how then do you handle English "region" in, say, "Loire Valley region"? Would that "region" be pars? or would it be better to use pars for département and to save regio for région? Just asking, since it's your area and I just made a stipula for Dunquerca. IacobusAmor 12:17, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm using praefectura for département; Ville de Paris is now a département (formerly part of Seine). For région I have used regio, for arrondissement (as worked out with User:Alex1011 some time back) arrotundimentum, and for commune, wait for it, commune (3rd decl. neut.). Praefectura also works for various other countries, e.g. Japan. I am gradually filling in the map of France like this, turning the links on Tabula administrativa Franciae from red to blue.

text: In French, as it happens, préfecture is the term for the headquarters of the département (i.e. the offices and the town they happen to be in; equivalent to "capitol" in U.S. English I guess): it isn't a separate administrative level. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:23, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :OK, that looks good (and Dunkirk needs to be changed). Let's not forget though that, to Cicero, a praefectura was any of several Italian cities "governed by Roman authorities (praefecti) and according to their edicts" (from my dictionary). IacobusAmor 13:55, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Termini geographici

message: I have moved the list here from Lutetia as this is the page that deals with administrative stuff. However, the names want checking; some of them look fairly barbarous! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:09, 25 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names of the 20 arrondissements
Disputatio:Cancellarius foederalis

message: Horribile! Cancellarius foederalis Austriae non Angela Merkel sed Alfred Gusenbauer esse videtur!

message: Haec pagina cum pagina "Bundeskanzler (Deutschland)" Vicipaediae Theodiscae iungi opportet. Nescio autem, quomodo fiat. Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 21:13, 15 Novembris 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paginae uniendae
Disputatio:Potlatch

message: Certamen? It's a contest where they give each other gifts?! A rather unusual thing for one to do in a competition... --Ioscius (disp) 18:49, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a meeting where they exchange gifts, but they are contesting who gives the biggest present. Of coarse course, the host always gives the bigger one and thus next year's host has to give an even bigger one. Apparently, in the 1900's they were giving such a ludicrous aount of gifts that all their economy was at risk--Xaverius 19:13, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ok, well we need a completely different word... certamen is a competition, not a meeting. Conventus, -us, m. or maybe congressus, -us, m.--Ioscius (disp) 21:51, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::According to anthropology textbooks, it's definitely a competition, but not one with scoring or winning in the ways most of the rest of us are used to. IacobusAmor 21:57, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::It is a present competition, in which the pride of giving the most impressive present is at risk. The otter furs and the little bronze or copper items acquire a symbolic and even magical meaning when they are passed from a tribe to other in ever potlatch. Sadly enough, I cannot explain that in Latin... if only I could find my dictionary...--Xaverius 22:05, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Yes, it's difinitely kind of raising competition. How about aemulatio? --Neander 22:18, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: certamen

message: Amfitrio - I take you have latinized this from Spanish. The Latin form would be Amphitruo, but this doesn't get proverbial for 'open-handed host' until Molière wrote an adaptation of Plautus' Amphitruo. --Neander 21:05, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC).
replies: text: I'm sorry, I've lost my dictionary, I think I made up most of the words. Then what's the word for host?.--Xaverius 21:32, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Hospes, -itis, m.--Ioscius (disp) 21:51, 9 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: amfitrio

message: I haven't got a clue about how to latinise the names of the tribes.--Xaverius 09:08, 11 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tribes
Disputatio Portae:Finnia

message: ==Res selectae veteres==
===Paginae===
*Iulius et Augustus 2007: Kalevala
*September et October 2007: Alandia
*December 2007 et Ianuarius 2008: Caiania
===Imagines===
*Iulius 2007: Ecclesia cathedralis orthodoxus Helsinkii - Architectura
*Augustus 2007: Lacus Päijänne, solis occasu - Occasus solis, natura
*September 2007: Vide disputationem
*December 2007: Prospectus in Helsinkium ac Cygnus Olor
*Februarium 2008: Amnis domusque ruri in Alandia.
==Propositiones==
Scribe propisitiones tuas subter (cum nomine tuo):
===Paginae===
===Imagines===
What is going on here?--Ioscius (disp) 00:32, 10 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is a portal, it should be Porta:Finnia...--Ioscius (disp) 00:33, 10 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Res selectae

message: ===Paginae===
*Iulius et Augustus 2007: Kalevala
*September et October 2007: Alandia
*December 2007 et Ianuarius 2008: Caiania
===Imagines===
*Iulius 2007: Ecclesia cathedralis orthodoxus Helsinkii - Architectura
*Augustus 2007: Lacus Päijänne, solis occasu - Occasus solis, natura
*September 2007: Vide disputationem
*December 2007: Prospectus in Helsinkium ac Cygnus Olor
*Februarium 2008: Amnis domusque ruri in Alandia.
thread_title: Res selectae veteres

message: *Iulius et Augustus 2007: Kalevala
*September et October 2007: Alandia
*December 2007 et Ianuarius 2008: Caiania
thread_title: Paginae

message: *Iulius 2007: Ecclesia cathedralis orthodoxus Helsinkii - Architectura
*Augustus 2007: Lacus Päijänne, solis occasu - Occasus solis, natura
*September 2007: Vide disputationem
*December 2007: Prospectus in Helsinkium ac Cygnus Olor
*Februarium 2008: Amnis domusque ruri in Alandia.
thread_title: Imagines

message: Scribe propisitiones tuas subter (cum nomine tuo):
===Paginae===
===Imagines===
What is going on here?--Ioscius (disp) 00:32, 10 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is a portal, it should be Porta:Finnia...--Ioscius (disp) 00:33, 10 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Propositiones

thread_title: Paginae

message: What is going on here?--Ioscius (disp) 00:32, 10 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is a portal, it should be Porta:Finnia...--Ioscius (disp) 00:33, 10 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Imagines

message: Iukka Ammondt? --Iustinus 21:38, 27 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Porta:Finnia/paginaedesideratae and its talk page is the place to suggest/request. The latinisation of Jukka is Io(h)annes, unless he prefers Iukka himself? --Harrissimo 22:08, 27 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Thanks. And good question. I'll see if I can find a source on which name he uses. I have a dim memory that it is indeed Jukka, but that's not much to go on. --Iustinus 22:16, 27 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested articles
Disputatio:Forum Romanum (discretiva)

message: I deleted the page Forum Romanum (spectaculum) because it didn't seem to offer any information or make any sense. If anyone wants to remake the page, feel free to do so, but be sure to add categories, interwiki links, and maybe an external link to whatever it is, so that we might be able to see what you're getting at! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:53, 11 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Forum Romanum (spectaculum)
Disputatio Portae:Politica Franciae

message: facitne opus: (Nom, Voc, Acc, Gén, Dat, Abl): Opus, Opus, Opum, Opus, Opui, Opu?? -- Thoma D. 13:10, 12 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, no, no. N, G, D, Ac, Ab, Voc: opus, operis, operi, opus, opere, opus.--Ioscius (disp) 13:16, 12 Iulii 2007 (UTC)

text: Est neutri generis, ergo eamdem figuram habet in accusativo et nominativo.--Ioscius (disp) 13:18, 12 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Vide etiam opus! --Alex1011 14:40, 12 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  declinatio opus 

message: C'est un merveilleux travail que tu nous as fait... C'est merveilleux...
J'ai rajouté mon nom en bas parce que je compte bien pouvoir participer a ton oeuvre (avec le peu de connaissances que je possède...). Je vais continuer a voir ce que je peux faire...
Ricardus 08:41, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Félicitations 

message: Apud Vicipaedia:Spatium nominale lego nos spatium nominale “Opus:” non habere. Sed quod spatium est “Opus:”? Vicipaedia Anglica “Portal:” habet (e.g. :en:Portal:France), quod nos “” appellamus. Si verum est, sunt aliae paginae quoque cum praefixo “Opus:” movendae. --Grufo (disputatio) 15:15, 23 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte dicis. Opus:Geopoliticum creavi quia iam alia "Opera" exstabant: hoc spatium male nominatum fuisse nescivi! Omnia talia "opera" movenda censeo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:06, 25 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: : Gratias tibi ago, Andrew. Has paginas moturus sum. --Grufo (disputatio) 16:23, 25 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Die 23 Septembris 2023 — Estne haec pagina ad “[[Porta:Politica Franciae]]” movenda?
Disputatio:Taba

message: Repperi fontem interretialem huius nominis Latini, sed in dubio sum. Unde venit? Quis primus invenit, et quando, et cur? Quid significat? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:07, 13 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm...hic est unitilis...http://www.archives.nd.edu/cgi-bin/words.exe?taba --Ioscius (disp) 15:19, 13 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Since no one has explained this name "Taba" I suggest moving the page. The only source seems to be a personal page currently unavailable. But if anybody can give a good source for the name (or even an explanation of it) please do! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:09, 23 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Sorry, then I misunderstood the first phrase here ("repperi" - I found it). Here is the source from our fons nominum: . --Alex1011 15:13, 23 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Thanks, Alex. Yes, that is the same one I found long ago and added to the page: curiously, when I tried to go to it earlier today, the website said it wasn't available. OK. But I am still unhappy. Where do they get this name? Who says it's Latin? What kind of Latin can it be? It has no relation to the English name of the town or the river, or to anything else, it seems: so who invented it, and when? I wish I knew. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:33, 23 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::The online version of William Camden's Britannia gives the indeclinable Treignemouth (the 'r' was probably a typo, as he called the river Teigne). In the Taba instance, it was used in latin (it is from the section in the book called "A list of the latin names of places in G.B. and Ireland" ) but that does not indicate sources for each one. So following the title, saying they were in "English historical manuscripts and records", it was probably a monk or an official who wrote it, or so I imagine (you're the historian!) But it shudders to make me think that the writers of this stuff also coined such greats as "magnalis", "amuntia" and "wallum" . Harrissimo 21:33, 23 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC).

text: ::::He made some notes on how he gets his sources: . Harrissimo 21:38, 23 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC).
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Apenninus

message: Friends, there were two articles, Apennini and Apeninnus!  Living side-by-side, and none of us noticed.  As a short-term solution, I cut-and-pasted the code from Apennini, put a redirect, and put the text into Apeninnus.  I am not in the position to decide which article is "better."  So one of you decide, or fuse both of them.  Leave both photos, in my opinion. GiovaneScuola2006 11:54, 14 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's often seen in the singular, Apenninus, referring to the whole sierra, though in English it's called "the Apennines." IacobusAmor 11:59, 14 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :This was a good move, GiovaneScuola! But, for reference, if you come across other such cases (which you will) and there is doubt which title is best, you can put a  template at the top of both pages. Then the choice can be discussed before the merge is made. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:56, 14 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Cassell's says Giovane chose from two wrong choices, and Ăppennīnus (not Āpennīnus) is the best classical form. IacobusAmor 12:04, 27 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: II Res!

message: "Nomen a linguae Proto-Celticae verbo pen 'montis cacumen' ...". Huic notitiae e obsoletorum lexicorum arcanis excerptae fides non est habenda. Primum, lingua Proto-Celtica non habuit */p/ phonema sive mutam bilabialem surdam. Secundum, is qui hanc finxit etymologiam fortasse alicubi viderat nomen Cambricum penn 'caput, culmen', cui tamen */kʷ/ Proto-Celticum respondet. Si etymologiá egemus, tutissimum mihi videtur dicere nomen Appennini, ut saepissime fit, e sermone nationum prae-Indoeuropaearum ortum esse. --Neander 23:27, 6 Iunii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  De etymologia
Disputatio:Clevelandia

message: Cleveterra seems suspicious. Source? The Catholic Encyclopedia has (s.v. Cleveland) "The Diocese of Cleveland (Clevelandensis), established 23 April, 1847,...", from which Clevelandia can be inferred. --Neander 22:13, 14 Iulii 2007 (UTC)

message: Nomina urbium tali modo Latinizata generis neutrius esse solent, cf. Falmuthum, Seattlum, Detroitum, Francofurtum еtc. (vel Springfieldium, Amherstium). Demetrius Talpa (disputatio) 20:34, 30 Septembris 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: locativus "Clevelandi"
Disputatio:Antoniopolis

message: Si oppidum San Diego Didacopolis nominatum est, cur San Antonio non Antoniopolis? Alex1011 17:01, 19 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fons nominis "Antoniopolis" repperi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:28, 28 Iunii 2017 (UTC)

message: Why does the article say (hispanice:___) but link to an en article?!--Ioshus (disp) 00:00, 24 Octobris 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  nexus
Disputatio:Iacobus Puccini

message: La Bohème refers to a Bohemian girl -- Bohemian in the sense of being poor, not Czech!  What do you think is the best translation? Cura et vale, GiovaneScuola2006 00:01, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever the noun, all it has to be is feminine, and puella can then be omitted. IacobusAmor 01:31, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)

text: I suppose if you wanted to liken the girl to a curiously refulgent Central European bird, the title could be Bohemica. See J. J. Hofmann: "BOHEMICA Avis[.] Behemle, dicitur Norimbergensibus, avis illa, quam a luce Lucidiam vocat Albertus M. quod e Bohemia quotannis in finitimas regiones avolare soleat. Lucidiam autem appellat Albertus, quod plumae illius colluceant noctu, et viatoribus eô tempore iter facientibus per tenebras non parum commodi afferant." IacobusAmor 01:31, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :This is my alternative: Inhabitants of Bohemia were called Bohemi (sg. Bohemus). Once there was a belief that the Gypsies and people indulging in voluntary poverty and other kind of alternative life-style came from Bohemia. La Bohème (as a girl from Bohemia) is Bohema in Latin, though I'm not sure I understand why every artistic masterpiece should have a Latin name, while other languages (e.g. English) are content with the original name. So, either Bohema or La Bohème. --Neander 02:10, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Yes, if Bohemians are Bohemi, then La Bohème is simply Bohema. IacobusAmor 03:23, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::It was true, too. Many Gypsies did come from Bohemia. As for Neander's other point, a  translated title will need a source reference, I guess. If there's no source, we ought to use the original title. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:17, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Puella Bohemica aut Puella Bohemiae
Disputatio:Novum Mexicum

message: Out of accuracy or vanity, take your pick, I would like to see the  tag upped from -5 to maybe  -3 or -2, but it's really become quite a puzzle.  Does anyone know where the latinitas tag is in this article or how to change it? Montivagus 16:32, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't find it either. (Montivage, sorry for calling you Massimo.) I made it -2, and now it's both! IacobusAmor 16:55, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
You should really apologize to Massimo :), but I'm glad I'm not just going crazy. Montivagus 16:59, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :I've nailed it. "Latinitas -5" had been added to the formula . I have now put it within the "noinclude" part of the formula. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:56, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Aha, nice detective work.  Montivagus 18:21, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hidden <nowiki>{{latinitas}}</nowiki> tag