lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio Formulae:Bellum -219 Punicum

message: Haec Anglice scripta delevi: si quis Latine vertere vult, licet!! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:41, 29 Octobris 2012 (UTC)
Saguntum • Lilybaeum • Rhone • Ticinus • Trebia • Cissa • Lake Trasimene • Ebro River • Ager Falernus • Geronium • Cannae • 1st Nola • Dertosa • 2nd Nola • Cornus • 3rd Nola • 1st  Beneventum • Syracuse • 1st Tarentum • 1st Capua • 2nd Beneventum • Silarus • 1st Herdonia • Upper Baetis • 2nd Capua • 2nd Herdonia • Numistro • Asculum • 2nd Tarentum • New Carthage • Baecula • Grumentum • Metaurus • Ilipa • Crotona • Utica • Great Plains • Cirta • Po Valley • Zama
thread_title:  Delevi pro tempore
Disputatio:Portal

message: temptabam scibere:
Portal (English: Portal) is a video game of puzzles {puzzle video game} made by Valve in 2007. It has been praised Praise for Portal (English), because it requires the gamer to think critically to find the exit of every maze {puzzle}.
The gamer uses a gun to make two portals, and can move instantly from one to the other. Portals can only be placed in certain parts of the virtual world, set in a laboratory, yet {the player} can also place them in many unusual places, such as the ceiling or the floor. The player must use spatial thinking to master the physics dynamics of the game.
{scriberam:}
Porta (anglice: Portal) est ludus electronicus enigmatis faciebat pro Valve in 2007. LaudabarisLaus pro Porta (Anglice), quoniam requirit lusorem cogitare critice conperire exitum omni labyrintho.
Lusor utitur pistolium facere duae portae, et potest contendere actutum ex unam ad alius. Portae modo potest locari in cartas partes mundi virtualis, occasus in laboratorio, tamen multi illorum loci potest inusitatus, nam tectum vel solum. Lusor debet uti cogatione spatiale domare dynamicas physicas ludi.
thread_title: Salve

message: .
est bonus latius vel malus latius?
thread_title: Notae
Disputatio:Ioannes Steinbeck

message: I deleted the long addition because it wasn't in Latin. It looked like machine translation to me. If the contributor wants to work on the text and turn it into real Latin, that's fine: start a named account, tell me on my talk page and I will restore the text to your userspace. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:44, 31 Octobris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text not in real Latin
Disputatio:Solarium Augusti

message: Recentioribus doctus investigationibus (e. g. Frans W. Maes, Die Sonnenuhr des Kaisers Augustus: Aufstieg und Niedergang einer Hypothese. In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chronometrie, Jahresschrift 2005, S. 168–184) malim affirmare id opus non horologium, sed meridianum fuisse. Bavarese (disputatio) 22:05, 5 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horologium aut meridianum?
Disputatio:Bozus

message: Latine, de more, rusticum vel rusticulum appellamus agricolam, virum, inquam, qui agros colit. Hic, ut sciamus, lingua Anglica dicitur "hick". Vir autem, qui risum movet, scurram appellamus vel aliquando histrionem. Si verbis rusticuli et scurrae sic utimur, quasi idem valeant, nonne poterimus, licet inviti, viros, qui humum exercent, quadam afficere iniuria? [Ait 200.140.14.247, usor sine nomine.]
replies: text: Vir quidem qui agros colit Anglice est 'clown'. Principalis significatio verbi 'clown' est 'farmer'. Apud Merriam-Webster legimus 'clown' Anglice = 1, farmer, countryman; 2, a rude, ill-bred person; 3, a fool, jester, or comedian in an entertainment (as a play); 4, one who habitually plays the buffoon. Apud Cassell's: "clown, = countryman, homo rusticus, agrestis" + "buffoon, sannio, scurra, balatro (Hor.)." Etiam apud Cassell's: principalis significatio verbi scurrae = 'a dandy, man-about-town'; principalis significatio verbi sannionis = 'one who makes grimaces' (ergo 'buffoon'). Omnia verba ut videntur sunt dubia. Petamus attestationes! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:17, 8 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
Excusa me. Ita est. Maximas gratias.
thread_title: Rusticulus? Cur?
Disputatio:Sienna West

message: "Indutrix" I guess is a woman who wears or models clothing, seems OK, but what's the grammar of "adulti"? "Wearer of an adult"? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:06, 14 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good day Andrew. My lexicon said that "model" for a woman (model as human, not model as for cars et cetera) is indutrix. But I'm not sure of "adult model" in Latin, that's why I wrote indutrix adulti. Is there an adjective of adultus?

text: Donatello (disputatio) 10:23, 14 Novembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: :And good day to you too, Donatello! Well, I guessed it must be something like that.

text: :We have used "ostentatrix" for a person whose main task is to show herself, but if we're talking about showing clothes then indutrix seems excellent (the masculine word, indutor, is late-classical).

text: :The word "adult" is being used in a somewhat odd way here: it isn't that she's an adult, though no doubt that's a very good thing, it is that her spectators are supposed to be adults and their thoughts are supposed to be those only entertained by adults. That's a lot to pack into one Latin word that may not have been used in this sense before. One could instead use "eroticus -a -um": I don't think anyone would misunderstand "ostentatrix erotica" or "indutrix erotica". Others may well suggest something better. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:25, 14 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Ah, I see. Thank you. :) Good words you brought.

text: ::Donatello (disputatio) 22:25, 14 Novembris 2012 (UTC).
thread_title:  Don't quite get it ...
Disputatio Categoriae:Actores pornographici

message: Which are pornographic: the actresses? or the films in which they act? See the English dispensation: "Actresses in pornographic films." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:02, 14 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Some would say it's in the eye of the beholder :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:08, 14 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Which are pornographic?
Disputatio:Mors voluntaria

message: Consociatio Mundialis Sanitatis dixit ut suicidium mundi saepe frequens in adulescentia et respectum aestimationis sui et protectionem vexiationis in schola contra abscessum tolerantia postulat ut prohibitio suicidii. 
Jondel (disputatio) 02:19, 15 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
Anglice:According to WHO, suicide frequently occurs in adulescents regarding self respect and protection against bullying in school and demands against the absence of tolerance in order to prevent/prohibit of suicide. (--Correct?--)
I am correcting this, I don't know if I should erase all of the above.
Iam emendo adhunc, et nescio deleam supra omnes.Jondel (disputatio) 05:18, 15 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand the last half of your English sentence, sorry. "prohibit of" is no good, but "to prevent suicide" is fine. "demands against the absence of tolerance" means nothing to me. Is "demand" a verb here, with WHO as the subject?

text: The first half would be "According to WHO, suicide frequently occurs in adolescents as a result of negative self-image and bullying [in school]." I don't know exactly what WHO said, that's just my interpretation via your sentence! I question the "in school" bit, because bullying occurs elsewhere too: adding "in school" is just a way of blaming teachers, who are not always to blame ... however, it may be exactly what WHO said. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:46, 15 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
WHO is World Health Organization(Consociatio Mundialis Sanitatis). WHO would be the subject. What is meant is "It is demanded of the school administrator and teachers(i.e. It behoves the school administrators....); to establish measures against absence of tolerance and to prevent suicide". The bullying I believe is done by other schoolmates(seniors, etc), but this is not explicitly expressed. That is what I interpreted what the Author wanted to say. I also referenced the English wiki and the PDF sources. I attempted an almost litteral translation at the above, and correct as of this writing to this :
Prout Consociatio Mundialis Sanitatis, mors voluntaria gentium frequens est apud adulescentias qua se dignentur vile et patiantur vexatione vel infestantur in schola, et igitur contra abscessum tolerantia et varii mores et disciplinis et modi instituendum est magistris scholis ne fiat mors voluntaria[3].
To mean:
According to WHO, suicides in the world frequently occurs among young people who have low self esteam and suffer bullying in school which obligates teachers and achool administrators to establishing against the absence of tolerance and various measures and discipline and methods so that suicide would not occur.
--Jondel (disputatio) 11:36, 15 Novembris 2012 (UTC)

text: If WHO said that, WHO is in want of an editor. Presumably WHO issues its pronouncements in all the UN's official languages, so maybe working from the French or the Spanish version would be helpful. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:00, 15 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
I will work on this. Jondel (disputatio) 12:31, 15 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: intelligere durum est
Disputatio:Darfum

message: Latinitatem tituli dubito. An nominis "Boarius Thermae" fontem habemus? An oportet hae duo nominativa cum tertio coniungere -- masculinum, femininum, neutrum, singularia et plurale -- sine nexu grammatico? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:27, 15 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus
Disputatio:Corona galactica

message: Apparently, English galactic corona (Latine corona galactica) and galactic halo (Latine corona galactica quoque) are different concepts. How to handle? For the latter term, use the Greek halos for 'halo'? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:36, 19 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Caicobad I

message: Date veniam: movi rapidius ad "Caicobad I". An quis disputat? (a) Melius est nomina regum sine "Magnus" scribere, nisi fallor: is fuit re vera "magnus", sed appellatio est POV! (b) Sine dubio fontes exstant pro "Haladinus", sed "Caicobad" melius congruit cum nominibus in aliis linguis (videte nexús intervici). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:52, 20 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movi
Disputatio:Schola translatorum Toletana

message: I'm really glad you started this article, Jondel. May we move it to "Schola translatorum Toletana"? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:21, 21 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do so. Although, as you may have read, it's not a "School" per se. Jondel (disputatio) 11:24, 21 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Agreed, but this is what people usually seem to call it! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:30, 21 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Of course. Other latinists will probably want to move it. Better you do it.Jondel (disputatio) 11:35, 21 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice article
Disputatio:Ixodida

message: Hoc nomen Latine non reperio. Habemus autem "ricinus" (Angl. tick): an oportet paginam movere? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:03, 21 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitio vitiosa, Latinitas pessima fuit. Ixodida sunt (non est) ordo parvorum arachnidorum subclassis Acarinorum. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:02, 21 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Optime! Difficultatem meam dissoluisti. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:47, 21 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio Categoriae:Codices programmandi

message: Nonne melius Categoria:Linguae programmandi? Paene omnibus vicipaediis est formula nominis pro lingua (Germanice sprach &c., Slavice iazik &c., Turcice dil &c.), inter quas
replies: text: ast:Categoría:Llinguaxe de programación

text: az:Kateqoriya:Proqramlaşdırma dilləri

text: bar:Kategorie:Programmiersprache

text: bs:Kategorija:Programski jezici

text: ca:Categoria:Llenguatges de programació

text: cs:Kategorie:Programovací jazyky

text: da:Kategori:Programmeringssprog

text: de:Kategorie:Programmiersprache

text: es:Categoría:Lenguajes de programación

text: eo:Kategorio:Programlingvoj

text: el:Κατηγορία:Γλώσσες προγραμματισμού

text: eu:Kategoria:Programazio lengoaiak

text: fr:Catégorie:Langage de programmation

text: gl:Categoría:Linguaxes de programación

text: he:קטגוריה:שפות תכנות

text: hr:Kategorija:Programski jezici

text: mk:Категорија:Програмски јазици

text: ia:Categoria:Linguages de programmation

text: it:Categoria:Linguaggi di programmazione

text: no:Kategori:Programmeringsspråk

text: nn:Kategori:Programmeringsspråk

text: nds:Kategorie:Programmeerspraak

text: pl:Kategoria:Języki programowania

text: pt:Categoria:Linguagens de programação

text: ro:Categorie:Limbaje de programare

text: ru:Категория:Языки программирования

text: simple:Category:Programming languages

text: sk:Kategória:Programovacie jazyky

text: sl:Kategorija:Programski jeziki

text: sr:Категорија:Програмски језици

text: sv:Kategori:Programspråk

text: th:หมวดหมู่:ภาษาโปรแกรม

text: tr:Kategori:Programlama dilleri

text: uk:Категорія:Мови програмування
Et nulla (vel paene nulla) vicipaedia nomine pro codice utitur. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 00:36, 22 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen categoriae
Disputatio:ROMA (Second Life)

message: Vide:
replies: text: ROMA est virtualis Roma antiqua in mundo virtuali Second Life, consistunt simia octo.

text: ROMA is a virtual ancient Rome in Second Life virtual world, they consist an ape eight.
What? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 03:04, 23 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Salve. It means: "ROMA is a virtual ancient Rome in the virtual world Second Life, they consist eight sims." I would change to consistens a.

text: :A sim (English, pl. sims) is the name of the places in Second Life, while the places have place names, such as ROMA. I tried to Latinisized 'sim'; simium sg., simia pl. Maybe it doesn't sound well. I'm quite sure of that 'sim' comes originally from the Latin simulare, "to pretend".

text: :Donatello (disputatio) 09:13, 23 Novembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: ::Well, obviously Iacobus didn't understand it -- nor would I have understood it -- which shows that, if you want to introduce a new word into a language, it's your job to explain it ... :) In this case you have now created the category name ":Categoria:Loci virtuales in Second Life". That seems to be what you're talking about? So maybe "Locus virtualis" is the very phrase you need to use here? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:27, 23 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
Simia = 'ape, monkey'. But OK, then, so now we have:

text: ROMA est virtualis Roma antiqua in mundo virtuali Second Life, consistunt simulationes octo.

text: ROMA is a virtual ancient Rome in Second Life virtual world, eight simulations consist.
Do you notice the remaining problems? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 10:59, 23 Novembris 2012 (UTC)

text: 'Simulatio' bene sonat. Gratias tibi verbo Iacobe. Ignosce mihi. Recte nescio vitia sententia. In quo modo sit?

text: Donatello (disputatio) 15:47, 24 Novembris 2012 (UTC).
thread_title: Definitio
Disputatio:Via lactea

message: To Germanic eyes, the split capitalization of compound proper nouns looks weird; but if we must do it, why is Via lactea better than via Lactea ? The distinctive element is the Lactea part, not the via part. Compare French addresses with rue. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:41, 25 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Concurro --Xaverius 13:50, 25 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ego quoque. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:59, 25 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Equidem non assentior. Si analogia a Franc. rue deducta credibilis esset, voie Lactée diceretur (quod non usu venit). Editores Metamorphoseon non Lactea sed lactea scribunt, quamquam maiusculis utuntur vera nomina scribentes. Item editores Ciceronis Rei publicae non circulum Lacteum sed orbem lacteum scribunt. Itaque censeo usum editorum praeferendum esse rationi apud Vicipaedianos excogitatae. Neander (disputatio) 04:16, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Editores etiam ergo scribunt Via appia et Mare tyrrhenicum et Insulae britannicae et Flumen rubico et Mons aetna, non? ;) IacobusAmor (disputatio) 10:31, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::: Ut scis, his in rebus editores analogiam ex Franc. rue petunt. :-)  Neander (disputatio) 13:18, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: In textu post "quattuor bracchia" quinque eorum enumerantur. In Vicipaediis aliarum linguarum nomina bracchiorum partim differrunt. Discernuntur bracchia principalia et adiuncta.
Quis est expers et solvit hanc difficultatem?
Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 22:45, 26 Octobris 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numerus et nomina bracchiorum
Disputatio:Fontana Tritonis

message: Salve. Quid est nomen Italianum a sculptore Gian Lorenzo Bernini Latine? Id solvere pro dolor non possum.
Donatello (disputatio) 10:28, 27 Novembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: Haud difficile est, mi Donatello: si verbum "Bernini" in capsam "quaerere" inscribis, reperis! Nomen iam in paginam tuam inserui. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:37, 27 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Gratias tibi. :) Spero nomen adiectivum 'Tritonius' a nomine 'Triton' satis bene sive iuste est. Quid scis sive censes Andreas et alii?

text: :Donatello (disputatio) 13:10, 27 Novembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: ::Apud Cassell's: Tritoniacus -a, um + Tritonius -a -um, both of which can refer to Minerva, the Tritonian one. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:35, 27 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Video. Gratias tibi.

text: :::Donatello (disputatio) 08:23, 28 Novembris 2012 (UTC).

message: Cassell's: "fount, or fountain. LIT., fons, caput. TRANSF., fons, principium, origo." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:35, 27 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Salve. Pro verbo fountain videbam 'fontarium' in lexico Vilborgiano meo, editio secunda. Verbum fungat censeo. Veteres Romani haberent verbum pro fountain. Si hoc erat infeliciter nescio.

text: Donatello (disputatio) 08:36, 28 Novembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: : In meo lexico Vilborgiano (2009) "fontarium" non reperio (sub verbis "fontän" et "källa"). Sub quo lemmate "fontarium", vocabulum ignotum, repperisti? Neander (disputatio) 09:15, 28 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::"Fontana" in Latinitate tardiori exstat: vide Lewis & Short et Du Cange auctum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:09, 28 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Cum suffixo -arium, quod "place of a thing (with a few of more general meaning)" (Allen & Greenough 254) significat (confer semen 'seed' et seminarium 'seed-plot'), nonne significat fontarium 'locum ubi homines fontes fabricantur vel coacervant'? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:52, 28 Novembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen: ''fontarium'' =?
Disputatio:Phoenix

message: Salve. Quomodo declinatur nomen Phoenix? Fortasse solitus, ergo -cis, cum casu in syllaba prima, Phoe-ni-cis. Quoque, sciamus quid eius genus est?
Donatello (disputatio) 17:07, 2 Decembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: Ita, Donatello, phoenix phoenīcis. Est verbum masculinum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:18, 2 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ah, bene quidem. Gratias tibi dominus. :)

text: :Donatello (disputatio) 17:59, 2 Decembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: ::Dominus!! Utinam!! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:38, 2 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Mi Andrew, mox te videbimus in palatio Buckinghamensi dum Regina ipsa ensi breviter umeros tuos tangit :)--Xaverius 20:10, 2 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominis grammatica
Disputatio:Vivekānanda

message: :I took this out of the page:
replies: text: * !

text: Such notes are better written on a talk page, I think, where it is easy to read and answer them: is that OK, Jondel?

text: There is clearly no reason for the |! -- that must be a slip of the keyboard. Whether there's sufficient reason for the Categoria:Yoga I don't know :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:36, 8 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yes Andrew, you are correct. I think the exclamation tends to hide article at the category which contrary to reason of being in that category. It is good that you attend to these details. :)   Jondel (disputatio) 10:16, 8 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category
Disputatio:Auster

message: Ave. In sententia Lucii Apuleii:
replies: text: Euros oriens, boreas septemtrio, occidens zephyros, austros medius dies mittit.
Pro certi causa: dicit 'septemtrio'. Numquam hoc verbum audi. Fortasse sit 'septentrio'? Aut nos aut Lucium vitiose scribebat. Donatello (disputatio) 18:51, 8 Decembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: :Septem triones 'the seven plough-oxen' = either of two northern constellations with seven bright stars → septemtriones = septentriones. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 22:00, 8 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Ita, mi Iacobe. Possumus duas orthographias accipere.

text: ::Periculose, Donatello, L. Apuleium vitiose composuisse censes. Optime (mirabili stylo suo) Latine scripsit! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:53, 9 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Bene quidem, intelligo. Gratias vobis Andreas et Iacobus. :)

text: :::Donatello (disputatio) 16:35, 9 Decembris 2012 (UTC).
thread_title: Septentriones
Disputatio:Ludovicus Kaas

message: Valde sum miratus legens illi Kaas nomen Aloysii (theodisce Alois) fuisse. Idem Kaas mihi et libris a me consultis solo sub nomine Ludovici (theodisce Ludwig) notus est. Num in errorem sumus inducti? - 19:03, 8 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaas: Aloysius aut Ludovicus? 

message: Ille Kaas falso Aloysius hic nominatur. Ut etiam in titulis et librorum infra sub Lege etiam scriptorum et in nexibus externis legi potest, revera ei nomen Ludovicus (Ludwig) erat. Ita titulus nominis sub imagine quoque falsus est. - Bavarese (disputatio) 11:19, 11 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sine dubio recte monetis, Bavarese, tu et (supra) anonymus. Licet tibi paginam movere textumque corrigere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:01, 11 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non Aloysius, sed Ludovicus
Disputatio:Arjunus

message: Nonne melius "Arjuna"? Talia enim praebet translitteratio internationalis. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:30, 9 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita, fas es. Sed, autem posterior ne mutemus ad 'Adiuna' rursum, rogo. Jondel (disputatio) 12:44, 9 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Haud licebit: mos noster est translitteratione internationali uti. De terminatione autem A.Mahoney fortasse respondebit: an "Arjunus" vult?? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:19, 9 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Iam mutemur more translitteratione internationali(ad 'Arjuna'). Mihi videtur, nemo te obicere et optima est.  Jondel (disputatio) 14:44, 9 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Consentio: ergo statim feci! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:54, 9 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Formam Arjunus malim, quam invenio in libris aliquibus latinis apud googlebooks (saec. 19 scilicet -- nec Cicero nec Erasmus Mahabharatum novit).  Sed dummodo paginam redirectionis habeamus, lemma potest aut Arjunus aut Arjuna esse, mea sententia. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 19:19, 9 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::Me paenitet. Adeo mutemus rursum. Licet mihi ponere iste fotem.Jondel (disputatio) 03:03, 10 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::::OK, I found and cited one of those rumoured sources. I've made the move. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:07, 18 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)
 Great. I must have been confused and could not act on this.--Jondel (disputatio) 10:48, 18 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus