lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Angkor Wat

message: I had this on my list! Nice to see it under way. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:42, 13 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I knew this was likely to be added to the 1000 Paginae soon, but was surprised to see it there this morning. I'd like to keep our perfect record (no missing pages) -- though we lose points in the score since the page this replaces was bigger (Turris Khalifa). By all means, flesh this out if you get a chance; I'm doing exams this week but hope to get back to Vicificatio once the grading's all done.  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 13:58, 13 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Turris Khalifa is not only bigger but worth 0.04 points, whereas Angkor Wat at present is worth only 0.01. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:00, 13 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Point taken :) I will have a go at enlarging this unless anyone else wants to. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:00, 13 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ha!

message: For in mure templi read in muro templi, and if there were going to be typos in my writing today, I'm just as glad to have done it here rather than in my first-year language exams!  Fellow Vicipaediani can handle it much more easily than my Greek/Sanskrit kittens.  :-)   A. Mahoney (disputatio) 22:48, 13 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of mice and murals
Disputatio:Ludoviciburgum

message: Ludoviciburgum = Ludwigsburg ?
Joannes Christophorus Fridericus Schiller hätte jedenfalls widersprochen. Für ihn hieß sein Ludwigsburg (wo er auch die Lateinschule besuchte !) auf Latein "Ludovicopolis". So endete er bspw. sein auf Latein geschriebenes Gedicht "Carmen" mit:
"Ludovicopoli d. 28. Septembris MDCCLXXI" -- [Anon]
replies: text: Gratias agimus. Fons "Ludoviciburgi" iam in nota subiuncta adducitur -- sed nomen "Ludovicopolis" fortasse praeferendum est. Quid dicunt alii? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:00, 14 Decembris 2012 (UTC)

message: Mihi quidem plane dubium videtur, quonam casu urbes coniunctae huc addendae sint. Cur non "commune coniunctum cum" vel "coniunctio cum communibus"? Quid suadent alii? --Bavarese (disputatio) 12:14, 16 Octobris 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Communi_coniuncto"?
Disputatio:Organum Populeti

message: *Puto nomina mutationum organi manere debent in linguis originalibus, quia propria sunt.--Lluísdepoblet (disputatio) 13:33, 14 Decembris 2012 (UTC)

message: The grammar seemed to say the abbot blessed the concert (not the organ), so I've clarified that, but an English-speaker with more time available might want to compare the whole text with that of the English wiki and fix everything. The article reads a bit like a press release. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:49, 14 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
*Abbas benedicavit organum! Benedictio et concertus inauguralis res distintae sunt!: benedictio sacra,  concertus profana!--Lluísdepoblet (disputatio) 16:21, 14 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Quid benedicavit abbas?
Disputatio Categoriae:Gastropoda

message: This set of categories needs to be reorganized. Grouped here are two overlapping sets, "Familiae gastropodorum" and "Gastropodorum familiae." Other curious affiliations occur. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:03, 16 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're the one to do it :) Most categories in this area were created either by you, or on the basis of redlinks left by you. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:20, 16 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs fixing
Disputatio:Coniecturae ex coniurationibus de egressibus in Lunam

message: Lemma nunc est Theoriae conspirationales de delapsibus Lunaribus. ¶ But a "conspiracy theory" is actually a 'conspiracy-related theory' or a 'theory about a conspiracy', not a 'conspiratorial theory'. The theory itself isn't conspiratorial. The theorists believe themselves to be revealing & undermining a conspiracy, not organizing & implementing one. So the syntax is misleading. ¶ Classically, according to Cassell's, 'theory' = ratio, doctrina, ars, scientia, but aren't "conspiracy theories" more like 'speculations' (coniecturae)? Ainsworth says to translate 'theory' as contemplatio, or cognitio contemplatioque alicujus artis, or artis pars contemplativa vel speculativa. Ainsworth says Cicero used theoria as 'contemplation'. ¶ The supposed adjective conspirationales (which, reflecting the basic sense of conspiratio 'a breathing together', seems as though it might mean 'harmonious, agreeable, done in union') isn't in Ainsworth's or Cassell's. So it may not be a (classical) word. ¶ Likewise the noun delapsus, -us, though the participle delapsus, -a, -um is, meaning something like 'alighted, sunk down to, come down to'. For 'a landing' (i.e., a disembarkation), the classical term seems to be egressus (e navi), and 'to land' = egredi (in terram). So 'a moon landing' might be egressus in lunam. ¶ Ergo fortasse melius Coniecturae ex coniurationbus = 'speculations about conspiracies' + fortasse de egressibus in Lunam 'about landings on the moon'? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:00, 18 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Also, we have appulsus, -ús 'a driving toward', especially in a nautical sense: 'a landing'. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:26, 21 Decembris 2012 (UTC)

text: Et "coniecturae de coniurationibus"? The topic of the theories are the conspiracies themselves, or are they theories based on conspiracies as the "ex" seems to indicate me?--Xaverius 20:14, 18 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::In Cassell's, the only pertinent example of the use of coniectura goes with ex (but parenthetically allows de too). IacobusAmor (disputatio) 22:17, 18 Decembris 2012 (UTC
replies: text: :::We should follow Cassell's then...--Xaverius 09:35, 21 Decembris 2012 (UTC)

text: :And :Categoria:Programma Apollonare surely is wrong.--Xaverius 20:25, 18 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::The adjective would be "Apollinaris -e" (with an i, not an o). I'll add a couple of existing categories meanwhile.

text: ::I have changed the proposed category to :Categoria:Programma Apollo, which is the title of our relevant page, but I don't feel sure of the ideal name to choose. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:53, 18 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::"Apollo" seems to be the name of the programme, I don't think that it is an Apollinean (?) programme, so I'd stick to Programma Apollo--Xaverius 13:20, 21 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma
Disputatio:Algebra linearis

message: ... I'll wait for someone else to volunteer for this one :) Algebra just isn't my thing. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:40, 19 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured this one was all mine.  I like math!  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 15:38, 19 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry and all that, but ... 

message: I'm not sure some of this stuff is attested in Latin at all.  I've written eigenvalor or valor proprius;  eigenvector and vector proprius;  determinans (that seems pretty obvious);  forma per gradus for "row-echelon form" (because scala really seemed far too confusing in this context).  I have already used idemfactor for "identity" in other math pages, and this might be in Gauss somewhere or I might have invented it.  I'll keep my eyes open for Latin writings about linear algebra, and if anyone else comes up with better terminology, don't hesitate to correct!  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 20:06, 31 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Disputatio:Nivea (signum mercatorium)

message: Ave. Demiro si declinare potes nomen Nivea. Nomen evenit adiectivum Latinum "niveus" (of snow Anglice), ita fortasse potes. Quid censetis?
Donatello (disputatio) 07:24, 20 Decembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: Recte dicis! Nominativus scilicet est "Nivea", genetivus "Niveae", dativus "Niveae", accusativus "Niveam", vocativus "Nivea", ablativus "Nivea". MARCVS (disputatio) 02:21, 23 Martii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Gratias ago Marce.

text: :Donatello (disputatio) 03:04, 23 Martii 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: ::Libenter ea scripsi. MARCVS (disputatio) 03:33, 23 Martii 2013 (UTC)

message: Salve iterum. Quid est signum mercatorium? Esse potestne Anglice brand et label?
Donatello (disputatio) 13:53, 23 Martii 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: Signum mercatorium, mea quidem sententia, melius "logo" societatis mercatoriae significare potest. MARCVS (disputatio) 23:52, 23 Martii 2013 (UTC)

text: ="trade mark" ad litteram--Rafaelgarcia (disputatio) 00:03, 24 Martii 2013 (UTC)
Mihi ergo difficile videtur Latine logo distinguere a trade mark/marchio/marca registrada/marque/Marke etc., nisi forte pro logo "signum" tantum vel "insigne" dicamus. MARCVS (disputatio) 02:18, 24 Martii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signum mercatorium
Disputatio:Ioannes Zerzan

message: In textu dixi Zerzan alumnum "Collegii Civici Franciscopolitani" fuisse, sed quibus annis eum frequentaverit, nescio. Si post 1972, iam fuit "universitas"; si antea, "collegium". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:02, 20 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  De curriculo vitae
Disputatio:Vasa (monasterium)

message: Fontes mihi accessibiles, inter alios R. L. Turner, A comparative dictionary of the Indo-European languages, verba Thai and Khmer wat ('monasterium/templum') mutuata suggerunt e Palico वास vāsa 'habitatio, praecipue monachorum', quod a Sanscritico āvāsa (id.) descendit. 'Avasatha' pro certo exstat, sed non est proavus horum verborum. Volo igitur ad vasa (monasterium), verbum Palicum, movere: placetne? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:50, 20 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  De origine et lemmate
Disputatio:Dalit

message: I think this should be incolae Indiae. The reason should be obvious.Jondel (disputatio) 01:40, 21 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We can create :Categoria:Gentes Indiae any time you like; and when we are sure of the best Latin name for "Caste", we can create that too. It isn't especially logical to place "Gentes" as "inhabitants of" a single country. Many of them may be, but, in a free world, they are allowed to move around. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:28, 21 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :For 'caste' (nomen quod fortasse 'hereditarius societatis ordo' significat), Morgan has: "casta* (socialis) [Vox Lat.] (Helf.) ]] ordo (Lev.)." The English word comes from Latin castus, -a, -um, so the question may be whether the noun is to be casta, -ae (scil. fortasse 'res') or a bare *castus, -ús. Since attestation is held to trump invention, casta looks best. The classical ordo should be OK for 'social class', but a caste is more than that, isn't it? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:22, 21 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Probably the full name 'hereditarius societatis ordo' is good. Then in future reference , use ordo. This will be useful in the future.Jondel (disputatio) 11:30, 21 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::I agree with Jondel, that "ordo" (expanded where necessary) is potentially a good term. "Casta" is tempting but would (I think) be more difficult for the average reader of Latin to understand. "Ordo" seems to me to make immediate sense. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:57, 21 Decembris 2012 (UTC)

text: Let me expand on my view (since we're both just saying "I think"!). I'm an antinationalist. I think it's unwise and leads to serious misconceptions to assume that any named group of people belongs in the boundaries of a particular country; likewise to assume that any named language belongs in the boundaries of a particular country. It often corresponds with the view that other named groups, and other languages, don't belong: and that leads to discrimination, forced migration, genocide and war.

text: I also think that categories for where people live, what language(s) they use, and what people(s) and group(s) they identify with, should be developed independently. No assumption that because you write French you belong in France, because you are Tamil you belong in India. That's why, soon after I first came here, I started developing the language-and-literature categories separately from the where-people-live categories. I believe that has worked well -- better than on most other wikipedias -- and I think we should do the same, whenever anyone's ready, with the categories for peoples and groups. Not make them in any way subcategories of "where-people-live": develop a separate category tree, but of course with cross-references and links so people can easily find whatever they want. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:28, 21 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ok. maybe, I would like to leave it as it is. There are many Tamils in Sri Lanka and Singapore. Jondel (disputatio) 10:52, 21 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Categoria : Gentes Asia
Disputatio:Altruismus mutuus

message: Pro Altruismus reciprocus, melius Altruismus mutuus ? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:25, 26 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Si vis, sed hoc saltem dictionarium reciprocus "reciprocal" sibi velle obfert. Mattie (disputatio) 18:57, 26 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Cassell's:
replies: text: ::"reciprocal, mutuus.

text: ::"rĕciprŏcus -a -um, returning, going backwards and forwards : Plin.; mare, ebbing, Tac.

text: :A distinction that comes to mind (which may not be correct, of course) is that reciprocus describes the reciprocity involved in, say, call-and-response or back-and-forth genres, like litanies, but mutuus is more of an I'll-scratch-your-back-if-you-scratch-my-back kind of thing (if that makes any sense). In the one, I give you A, and you give me B; in the other, I give you A, and you give me A also. But maybe this is a distinction without a difference. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:25, 28 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Yeah, I meant it when I said "si vis" -- I'm okay with mutuus! I just chose reciprocus because it's closest to the other languages, but I did have doubts about it. Mattie (disputatio) 17:34, 28 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: De lemmate
Disputatio:Aegaeum mare

message: Salve. Nomen "Aegaeum mare", habeat maiores litteras incipio verborum? Ergo "Aegaeum Mare" contra autem "Aegaeum mare"? Donatello (disputatio) 15:12, 26 Decembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: Sic, profecto, sed sunt qui Aegaeum mare, Aetna mons, oceanus Atlanticus, rex Ioannes, et exemplaria similia malint. Ego autem inter litteras maiores et minores in, exempli gratia, Aegaeum Mare 'the Aegean Sea' et Aegaeum mare tranquillum 'the Aegean, a tranquil sea', et iterum Rex Ioannes 'King John' et Ioannes rex odiosus 'John, a hateful king', distinguere malim. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:31, 26 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Cur debeat Vicipaedia orthographiam suam in dicionem linguae Anglicae dedere? Cur contra editorum philologorum consensum scribere debeamus? Multas consului editiones recentiores, neque in una quidem "Aegaeum Mare" scriptum est. Immo, omnium editorum consensu Aegaeum mare scribitur. Quin editores linguae Latinae peritissimos sequamur? Neander (disputatio) 22:51, 26 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Ei etiam edicunt omnes sententias litteris minoribus incipi debere, sed Vicipaediani illud edictum praeterimus. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:36, 27 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::: Touché? Hocine argumento censes editorum philologorum Aegaeum mare scribendi morem  praetereundum esse? Neander (disputatio) 16:46, 14 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Litterae maiores
Disputatio:Reggae

message: It isn't evident from the history, but in wikifying this page I've added overall 2000-odd characters of text-that-counts by removing hidden text, removing empty sections, and formatting a bibliography. If anyone wanted to work on this hidden text, simply revert my most recent edit (not the previous one). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:32, 27 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addidi
Disputatio Categoriae:Tibiae

message: Salve. Sunt multa varia genera syringum, usae locis multis orbis. Igitur bene censeo hanc paginam categorianam esse. Sed nunc commentatio novum nomen habet, ita Categoriae:Syringes hanc paginam appellet. Quid vobis alios censent?
Donatello (disputatio) 17:29, 27 Decembris 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: Perutilis erit, si paginas idoneas nonnullas aut iam habemus aut mox habebimus. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:40, 27 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Intelligo. Gratias ago.

text: :Donatello (disputatio) 18:20, 27 Decembris 2012 (UTC).
thread_title:  De categoria vetere [[:Categoria:Fistulae panis]]
Disputatio:Parthenon

message: Legens illa supra scripta haereo, de quo infinitivo illud venitae sunt sit tractum. Me quaeso faciatis doctiorem. - Bavarese (disputatio) 19:27, 28 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Scio neque ego, Bavarese! Ob hanc rationem sententiam mutavi. Etiamnunc varias res addo et augeo.

text: Lege, s.t.p., versionem meam a Pausania factam. Aut emenda, aut "cruces"  hic indica. Gratias tibi ago. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:52, 28 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   Hae sculpturae [...] venitae sunt ad Museum Britannicum 

message: * "quam (sc. Athenam) populus Atheniensis suam defensorem credidit": Credo te defensorem scripsisse quia defenstricem, verbum insolitum, vitare voluisti. Quamquam defensor certe pro communi genere cedere potest, facere non possum, quin de alio moneam vocabulo, q.e.tutela, verbum per metonymiam etiam ad "tutricem" indicandam adhibitum. (Sed defensorem nolo reprehendere.)
replies: text: Ita, "defensorem" non amavi. "Tutela" ad mentem non venit, sed a te laete accipio. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:04, 29 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
* "Gubernia Graeca recentiora ad revindicationem "marmorum Elginensium" seu Parthenonis, etiam hodie Londiniensis in Museo Britannico servatorum, se dedicantur": Hic aliquae res sunt, quas aut mutare velim aut non plane intellego. (1) Pro revindicatione puto simpliciter vindicatio dici (si omnino nomine verbali uti velimus); (2) sed si constructione se dedicandi utamur, dativo finali uti debeamus ("marmoribus sibi vindicandis se dedicant"); (3) quod ad syntaxin attinet, "Londiniensis" me fugit; (4) si recte intellexi, ego hoc fere modo dixerim: "Gubernia ... marmora Parthenonis seu "Elginensia", nempe Londiniensia etiam hodie in Museo Britannico servata, sibi [aut sua] vindicaverunt." Neander (disputatio) 14:35, 29 Decembris 2012 (UTC)

text: "Londiniensis" e forma sententiae anteriori supervixit. Multo melius scripsisti. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:04, 29 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quaestiunculae 

message: *Suffixum -ensis, nisi fallor, ex loco, spatio, terra, regione usitate deducitur, sed Dominus Elgin, qui marmora abstulit, fuit persona historica; ergo melius marmora Elginiana ? (Nomen autem Elgin, regale burgum Scoticum et fortasse sedes eius tituli nobilitatis, suffixum -ensis recte gignere credimus.) Marmora de quibus conloquimur haud dubie ex homine, non ex loco, appellantur. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:05, 29 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: : De suffixo -ensis idem sentio. Elginiana, non male! Neander (disputatio) 18:12, 29 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Bene. Recte vides, Iacobe, me sensum geographicum "Elgin" inconsulte ad nomen hominis transtulisse.
replies: text: ::Alia menda sine dubio manent. Corrigite! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:04, 29 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Altera quaestiuncula: nomen ''Elginensis''
Disputatio:Abecedarium Arabicum

message: Rajmaan (disputatio) 20:58, 30 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
Rajmaan (disputatio) 03:22, 31 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, extracted to appropriate pages, therefore now hidden above. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:43, 31 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetum Arabicum: libri
Disputatio:Lingua Arabica

message: Rajmaan (disputatio) 22:45, 30 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
Rajmaan (disputatio) 21:10, 30 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, extracted to appropriate pages, therefore now hidden above. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:38, 31 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linguae Arabicum
Disputatio:Lingua Malabarica

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=2uNMAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Alphabetum+tibetanum&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7bngUMWcKqjE0AHCjYH4CQ&ved=0CFgQ6AEwCTgy#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (disputatio) 22:05, 30 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetum Grandonico-Malabaricum sive Samscrudonicum. (editore J. C. Amadutio.)  By Clemens Peanius, Johannes-Christophorus Amaduzzi
Disputatio:Christianismus in India

message: Rajmaan (disputatio) 22:16, 30 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, extracted to the page, therefore now hidden above. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:47, 2 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  India Orientalis Christiana: continens fundationes ecclesiarum, seriem episcoporum, missiones, schismata, persecutiones, reges, viros illustres  

message: Christianistae re vera in India nunc inveniuntur? Verbum in usu hodierno res detrectata videri incipit; vide :en:Christianism. Verbum usitatum est Christianitas, cuius assectatores sunt Christiani. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:48, 1 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Moveamusne ad "Christianitas in India"? Jondel (disputatio) 14:02, 1 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Nescio cur "Christianismus" reiciendus sit. "Christianismus" Latine iam saeculo 2 a Tertulliano scriptus est; "Christianitas" saeculo 5. Verbum Anglicum :en:Christianism rarissimum est et sensum specialem fortasse recepit, sed hic Latine loquimur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:13, 1 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Si Christianismus est Christianitas, quid tunc erit lemma nostri commentarii de Christianismo? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:20, 1 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Id problema non est problema (si recte distinguo). :en:Christianism est pagina (haud encyclopaediae congruens) de variis significationibus verbi Anglici "Christianism". Si licet hic commentationem scribere de isto verbo Anglico, possumus appellare "Christianism (verbum Anglicum)". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:27, 1 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: De lemmate: Christianismus in India
Disputatio:Chorasmia

message: Chagatai and latin translation of mongol and tatar history by a Khan of chorasmia
http://books.google.com/books?id=5aVZAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Mongolorum&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_fTgUJWgMM2B0QGoz4AI&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAA
Title	Abulghasi Bahadür Chani historia Mongolorum et Tatarorum
Author	Ebülgâzî Bahadir Han (Khan of Khorezm)
Publisher	Ex Universitatis imperialis typographeo, 1825
Original from	Ghent University
Digitized	Dec 2, 2008
http://books.google.com/books?id=MSZJAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Mongolorum&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_fTgUJWgMM2B0QGoz4AI&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAQ
Title	Abulghasi Bahadür Chani historia Mongolorum et Tatarorum nunc primum tatarice edita auctoritate et munificentia illustrissimi comitis Nicolai de Romanzoff Imperii Russici cancellari supremi
Authors	Abu-l-Gazi Han Bahadur Husain ibn 'Arab Muhammad al-Hwarezmi, Christian-Martin Fraehn
Publisher	Universitatis Imperialis Typographeum, 1825
Original from	Austrian National Library
Digitized	May 9, 2011
Length	215 pages
Rajmaan (disputatio) 02:36, 31 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abulghasi Bahadür Chani
Disputatio:Hafizus

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=dbo-AAAAcAAJ&pg=PA100&dq=persicae&hl=en&sa=X&ei=LvzgUMDbK4a50QH68YFY&ved=0CFcQ6AEwCDgK#v=onepage&q=persicae&f=false
Rajmaan (disputatio) 02:57, 31 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specimen poeseos Persicae: sive Muhammedis Schems-eddini notioris agnomine ... By Ḥāfiẓ
Disputatio:Arabes

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=VCo-AAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Arabum&hl=en&sa=X&ei=aP3gUPWVMMOa0QH20IAw&ved=0CGUQ6AEwCQ
Specimen historiae Arabum By Barhebraeus, Edward Pococke
http://books.google.com/books?id=9qpCAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Arabum&hl=en&sa=X&ei=GwXhUPmhEOHU0gHN_oCwAg&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAjgK
Specimen historiæ Arabum; By Bar Hebraeus, Abū al-Fidāʼ Ismāʻīl ibn ʻAlī
http://books.google.com/books?id=n905AQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Arabum&hl=en&sa=X&ei=GwXhUPmhEOHU0gHN_oCwAg&ved=0CC8Q6AEwADgK
Rajmaan (disputatio) 03:27, 31 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monumenta antiquissimae historiae Arabum  By Johann Gottfried Eichhorn
Disputatio:Avicenna

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=zOBQOIJo3YYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Arabum&hl=en&sa=X&ei=GwXhUPmhEOHU0gHN_oCwAg&ved=0CDYQ6AEwATgK
Rajmaan (disputatio) 03:27, 31 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auicennae Arabum medicorum principis  By Avicena