lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio Categoriae:Episcopi Ecclesiae Anglicae

message: Georgius Berkeley fuit episcopus Ecclesiae Hibernicae.Tergum violinae 17:51, 11 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sed categoriam "Episcopi Ecclesiae Hiberniae" (vel "Hibernicae") non addidisti. IacobusAmor 18:04, 11 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :N.B. Multas categorias addidi et renovavi, sed a religiosis et episcopis manum abstineo. Si quis vult tales categorias recensere, macte!! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:50, 11 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)

message: When I created the category I meant to collect all the bishop of the Anglican Church or better, I believe, of the Anglican communion--Massimo Macconi 19:23, 11 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
Discerni oportet tamen inter "Ecclesiam Anglicanam" quae est communio transmundialis, et "Ecclesiam Angliae (aut Anglicae)" quae tantummodo  pars una Ecclesiae Anglicanae constat. Georgius Berkeley quidem fuit episcopus Anglicanus at neu episcopus Ecclesiae Angliae neu episcopus Anglicus. Nescio quomodo categorias addam aut renovem - auxilium, sodes, praebe!Tergum violinae 21:47, 11 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglica Church
Disputatio:Catharina Hauarda

message: Estne fons huius cognominis? Putabam quia mos noster est cognomina vernacularia retinere.Tergum violinae 10:49, 12 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Credo te recte monuisse. Apud Google paginas istius nominis solum apud Vicipaediam nostram repperi. Ergo, pro tempore, movi: si quis re vera fontem habet, potest in paginam addere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:28, 12 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
Her Latinized name seems to be Catharina Hauarda, not Catharina Howard. Amsal 16:55, 11 Iulii 2010 (UTC)

text: Seems correct. Those works by Iohannes Carion and Ianus Gruterus look like handy sources of reference for Vicipaedia ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:52, 11 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :What about other people with the (sur)name Howard? Should we move them all to Hauardus/Hauarda? Amsal 20:47, 13 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::We tend to be "conservative" here. We definitely do not make such a change for unrelated people on the grounds "same name in English > same name in Latin". As to whether it should be done for individuals who are related and more-or-less contemporary with one another, that could certainly be justified. Others may want to comment. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:11, 14 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::I'd add that the rule is at VP:TNP and is, I understand, based on the conventions of modern Latinists, not a peculiar conservatism on our part.  I think that even transferring the name to contemporaries might not be debatable; even among people who did Latinize their surnames, using the same Latinization was not the rule (I think our canonical example is Cassinus/Cassini).  Another point, brought up in the discussion of Octavius Mirbeau, is that there may be more than one contemporary Latinization of a name, and we have no heuristic to say whether one is 'better' than another—in that case the first proponent of Latinizing pushed hard for 'Mirbellus' without enunciating why, even when 'Mirbellius' was found to be an equally valid form used by bearers of the surname. —Mucius Tever 23:14, 14 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catharina Huarda?
Disputatio:And Then There Were None

message: Diminutivum nigri est nigellus, non nigriculus. Credo tamen homines nigros apud Romanos (ut apud Graecos) Aethiopes appellatos esse. --Fabullus 21:37, 12 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)

message: What's wrong with Categoria:Ludi scaenici 1943? Wikipedia already has thirteen items in the category, not to mention radio plays of 1943. IacobusAmor 21:20, 19 Martii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ludi scaenici 1943
Disputatio:Formosa

message: [Haec e pagina Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor repeto: Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:07, 13 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)]

message: Salve,
Video te revertisse Taivaniam. Nunc sunt tres commentationes de Taivania:
* Taivania
* Res publica Sinarum
* Formosa
Sit duae: alter de insula, alter de civitate. [--  sic dixit Anonymus creator paginae Formosa ]
replies: text: Tibi consentio: coniungantur Formosa et Taivania, nomina insulae, et stet Respublica Sinarum, nomen civitatis. IacobusAmor 16:04, 13 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Igitur anonymus bene fecit (ut formula ab UV posita iam monuerat) et reversio Taivaniae minime necesse erat. Non oportet Taivania ad Formosam redirigere quia nexus fere omnes ad Taivania de re politica, non de re geographica, disserunt.

text: :Ergo Taivania rursus in redirectionem converto, et in summam paginam Res Publica Sinarum explicationem de nova pagina geographica Formosa addo. OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:01, 13 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taivania 

message: Negas ergo Taivaniam esse insulam? Vide :en:Taiwan: "Taiwan (historically 大灣/台員/大員/台圓/大圓/台窩灣) is an island in East Asia" et "This article is about the island of Taiwan. For the state that governs Taiwan, see Republic of China. For other uses, see Taiwan (disambiguation). "Formosa" redirects here." Sicut in en:, nobis oportet redirigere Formosam (insulam) ad Taivaniam (insulam)! IacobusAmor 21:22, 13 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ibi quaestionem alteram ponis quam in pagina Disputatio:Formosa debemus disputare. Ego inter nominibus Latinis insulae Formosam praefero. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:07, 13 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine Latino insulae 

message: I found Latin maps "IMPERII SINARVM NOVA DESCRIPTIO" published in 1650s and "PARADUGMA XV PROVINCIARUM ET CLV URBIUM CAPITALIUM SINENSIS IMPERIJ CUMTEMPLIS" in 1729, the Taiwan Island were all marked as I.Formosa and Insula Formosa.  Those might prove the current title is correct.--Koika 07:18, 24 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. We can add those references to the page. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:57, 24 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :But I found something again. This Latin page is from Vatican, it wrote:

text: :SINAE - Exc.mus D.nus Joseph CHENG TSAI-FA, Episcopus Tainanensis (Tainan, Taivania).

text: :Maybe we can define FORMOSA as the name of island, and TAIVANIA as name of province. By the way, Tainan is my hometown:)--Koika 16:24, 24 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen huius insulae
Disputatio:Rolandus Burris

message: Ok, so I was wondering what Rod might be in Latin, then I discover that his name is actually Milorad and that Rod is just a short version of it. What to do? Sinister Petrus 06:22, 14 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say Miloradus but I haven't seen that attested...So I would just leave it "Rod" undeclined.--Rafaelgarcia 09:52, 14 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rod Blagojevich
Disputatio:Cuneus Mexicanus

message: qvomodo "taco" declinātur? etiam qvid genus eius est? Bob A 23:23, 17 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quod fontem caremus, fortasse inceclinabilis sit.--Xaverius 23:38, 17 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: de appellātiōne
Disputatio:Clemens Marotus

message: * De Clemente Marot apud Romanistikstudium 
... quia non de Marot sed de erudito quodam hodierno disserit. Nescio seu recensere seu delere oportet. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:10, 19 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nexum retrahi 

message: Meyers Großes Konversations-Lexikon, vol 13. Lipsiae 1908, p. 344-345 (hic in interreti)
thread_title: Fons recensionis Aprili mense 2020
Disputatio:Luscinia megarhynchos

message: Hello,
Do you think it would be of interest for visitors of this article to add (and translate!) this info:

message: * A Provençal folk song, [WEBLINK REMOVED --UV 23:03, 19 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC) The Nightingale Which Flies], inspired Tchaikovsky when composing his Humoresque opus 10-2.
Mtcn 19:06, 19 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture
Disputatio:Franciscus Hyacinthus Sabaudiae

message: Incipit commentarius: "Franciscus Iacintus Sabaudiae . . . fuit ab anno 1637 usque ad mortem insequenti anno Dux Sabaudiae, Princeps Pedemonti, et Comites Augustae Praetoriae, Maurianae, et Nicaeae. Carolus Emanuel fuit etiam rex titularis Cypri et Hierosolymae et marchio Salutiarum." Hic commentarius de Francisco Iacinto, non de Carolo Emanuele, disserit. Quis fuit Carolus Emanuel? IacobusAmor 18:40, 21 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Carolus Emanuel, vel Latinius Carolus Immanuel, Francisci Hyacinthi frater fuit, ut discimus in paginis aliis linguis scriptis. --Fabullus 18:48, 21 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quis fuit Carolus Emanuel?
Disputatio:Rex-magus Angmaris

message: Me iudice, haec capsa inutilis est nobis quia res ficticias proponit ut veras. Vicipaedia debet res veras dicere.
I think the present infobox is wrong for Vicipaedia because it presents fictitious things as if true. Vicipaedia is supposed to (try to) say what is true. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:26, 23 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
Also it makes it look like a Top Trumps card.Tergum violinae 16:03, 24 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capsa
Disputatio:Robertus Williams (cantator)

message: Quomodo debemus scribere Maximillian? Orthographia normalis Anglica est Maximilian, sed de hoc cantore alii situs web aliter scribunt. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:23, 24 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cur hanc rem hic scripsi, nondum scio! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:02, 24 Aprilis 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  De praenomine
Disputatio:Paula Pagnani

replies: text: Yes, you're surely right that this is spamming. As you know, Vicipaedia's usual response in such a case is not to delete her but to add her to Vicipaedia:Propaganda (which I will now do) and to retain a brief article. Others will no doubt comment ... Thank you for the alert, Orland. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:54, 24 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Further investigation shows that this page is unlike most others in the propaganda list in that it has been created by a named user, Usor:Lodewijk Vadacchino, who has also contributed to a couple of other lavish cross-wiki spreads (and has contributed in other ways as well). So it certainly isn't "auto-promotion"! I'll ask him to comment: it would be interesting to know how he chooses his subjects. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:04, 24 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::The norwegian version was made by a (in the words of Lenin(?)) Useful idiot (probably not the best translation), who hade been kindly asked to contribute by some agent acting in the interest of Ms Pagnani. This might well be the pattern in this case. --Orland 19:16, 24 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::: The Swedish wiki deleted the deletion proposal. --Neander 19:51, 24 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Yes several wikis deleted the proposal, but some have started an proper deletion process, as well. My first impression was that this was self-promotion, but it has now come to my knowledge that the article, and the wide distribution of it, was made as a gift from a italian wikipedian to this actress, because it was christmas, and because she was expecting a baby. (See :no:Brukerdiskusjon:Orland#Whi Lola Pagnani was removed?). Seriously!! --Orland 20:38, 24 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::It is interesting, isn't it? It perhaps gets a little over-the-top when other Wikipedians are pressed to join in the game (see :sr:Разговор:Лола Пањани); otherwise, as long as the subject meets the basic requirement for notability, it's hard to argue that the wikipedias are being misused. After all, people have all sorts of reasons for starting pages: Lodewijk just starts them in lots of languages! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:49, 24 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)

text: :::::See, however, my further comment at Disputatio Usoris:Lodewijk Vadacchino. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:08, 25 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::::No one else has urged deletion. OK, Lola is saved. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:24, 2 Martii 2009 (UTC)

message: Driante70, paginam movens scribisti "Lola è Paola (diminutivo)". Habesne fontem? Quia in :en:Lola (given name) lego nomen deminutivum "Dolores" esse. Lesgles (disputatio) 02:18, 18 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lola, Paula, Dolores
Disputatio:Anas

message: Ah. Non intellexeram, usque nunc, cur anas (discretiva) delevisti. Sed non melius anas ad anas (avis) derigimus? Et tunc hac in pagina discretiva alias significationes associatas ponere?--Rafaelgarcia 23:59, 26 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are more pages that link to the river than to the bird species. Therefore I think "Anas" should be a disambiguation page. I also think the page "Anas (discretiva)" isn't needed if the disambiguation page is located at "Anas" (there are no wikilinks pointing at "Anas (discretiva)"), but I don't know if that's against the policies of the Wikipedia in Latin. Sorry for the fuss. --Komischn 00:08, 27 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :When I had objected, I didn't realize that there were two disambiguation pages called anas and anas (discretiva) and that that was why you were asking for the deletion of anas (discretiva). Is it usual to use number of links to decide which should be a disambiguation page? Even so our wiki is so incomplete that I wouldn't think it is that wise to do so here. In the dictionary, duck is the primary latin meaning, after which the river is named.Then there is also female senility, and old age. Don't apologize for any fuss. You've made many improvements recently, and I'm grateful for your contributions. --Rafaelgarcia 00:41, 27 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Yeah, definitely anas is the first definition. Good call, Rafael. --Ioscius (disp) 00:45, 27 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)

message: I just noticed this issue and wanted to add a general comment (not specially relevant to Anas). I would say that the number of links is at least a relevant piece of evidence
# Because each of those links will eventually have to be converted to the intended destination: links to discretiva pages are in general undesirable
# Because the number of existing links may indicate, in the context of our wiki, the importance of each potential meaning of the word
On the other hand, our judgment about how our wiki will develop in the future is also relevant. We may decide that it is worth converting all the links so that the logical arrangement of pages and discretivas will be better from now on. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:55, 27 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I should think that the page that we can expect a typical reader to want to land on would be the one not to be a discretiva page; in this case, obviously, it would be the one referring to a well-known bird, not the one referring to a little-known river. IacobusAmor 12:38, 27 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Agreed. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:41, 27 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "use number of links to decide"
Disputatio:Atollum

message: Huius generis insula Latine appellatur 'atollum' (-i, n.) in dictionario Russo-Latino interretiali (vide etiam hic, hic et hic) etiamque in dictionario Francogallico-Latino interretiali. Genetivus "atollorum" etiam adhibitur pro nomine specifico trium specierum animalium: Diancristus atollorum (Schwarzhans, Møller & Nielsen, 2005) (), Sciades atollorum (Gressitt, 1956), et Sciadella atollorum (Gressitt, 1956), nunc Micronesiella atollorum dicta . Tempus est huius paginae renominandae. --Fabullus 06:27, 27 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine huius paginae
Disputatio:Percivallus Dearmer

message: Unde Perceius? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:08, 28 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nescio unde. Rem conieci! Nomen antiquius est tamen itaque oportet versionem Latinam extare!82.36.94.228 14:54, 29 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Inveni! "Percivallus" (iuxta Lexicon "Riddle & Arnold") 82.36.94.228 11:02, 31 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Mithridates I (rex Ponti)

message: I revised the references and took out the links to English translations because we are not writing especially for English speakers. On pages about the authors or their books we can add links to various translations, including these, but on this page I think it's going too far. OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:55, 28 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
* Appianus, Bellum Mithridaticum (Versio Anglica antiqua)
* Memnon Heracleotes, Historia Heracleiaae Ponticae ( Versio Anglica)
* Plutarchus, Vitae parallelae "Vita Demetrii" (Versio Anglica antiquissima)
* Strabo, Geographia ([Versio Anglica antiqua)
thread_title:  English translations
Disputatio Categoriae:Colae

message: I'm not an American, so I don't know what this category is supposed to include. Is it "medicinal drinks one of whose active principles is cola nut", or maybe "fizzy dark brown drinks" (in which case the term may not work in Latin, just as it doesn't in British English) or "drinks that remind me of Coca-Cola", or what? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:28, 29 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Plus, would this category include other drinks with cola nut? such as Spanish Cola Cao?--Xaverius 10:43, 29 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Museum

message: Estne museum aut musaeum??--Xaverius 12:39, 29 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Museum (Graece Μουσεῖον, minime Μουσαῖον) :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:53, 29 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Est etiam (secundum Cassell's) nomen adiectivum mūsaeus, -a, -um 'poetical, musical'. IacobusAmor 14:01, 29 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Et heros quidam nomine Musaeus (Gr. Μουσαῖος). Sed poëta fuit, minime museologus! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:06, 29 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: De nomine

message: Meyers Großes Konversations-Lexikon, vol 14. Lipsiae 1908, p. 299-300 (hic in interreti)
thread_title: Fons recensionis mense Aprili 2020
Disputatio:Timotheus Flannery

message: Cur, Xaveri, hanc paginam ad Timothaeus Flannery movisti? Nonne nomen Timotheus derivatus est a nomine Graeco Τιμόθεος "qui honorat deum"? --Fabullus 13:10, 29 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Vide primum Timothaeus Ioannes Russert et putavi rectum nomen con a esse.--Xaverius 14:04, 29 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timotheus
Disputatio:Ionathan Lester

message: Quis dicit Latinum Ioannes esse Anglicum Jonathan? Nonne recte Ionathas, sicut in Bibliis Sacris legimus? IacobusAmor 22:19, 29 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
"Jonathan" is in latin Ionathan, from greek Ιωναθαν,and this from hebrew. "Joannes" is a different name (english John), from greek Ιωαννης.
thread_title: Ioannes = Jonathan?
Disputatio:Virgineae insulae Britannicae

message: CeleritasSoni, adsunt huis nominis attestationes? Nonne melius vel recte Britannicae Virginis Insulae? Anglice, Virgin Islands ut videtur 'Islands of the Virgin' significat, hoc est Insulae Virginis. IacobusAmor 04:28, 31 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
Argumentum tuum credibilius quam meum est. Artem "latinizandi" non iam teneo. Ut tempus progressum erit, fiam peritior. Hanc paginam ad "Britannicae Virginis Insulae" statim traducam. Gratias tibi ob auxilium! --CeleritasSoni 04:42, 31 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sed usque hodie fontem "insularum Virginis" nullum repperimus. Fontes autem "insularum Virginearum" (melius? sic ecclesia CatholicaCf.
) et "Virginiarum" (vide iam notam in hac pagina) citare possumus. Paginas movendas suadeo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:11, 20 Novembris 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: :Since the islands are apparently named for Saint Ursula and the Eleven Thousand Virgins of Cologne, Virginis (not, for example, as the first author, our Speed of Sound, might have supposed, referring to the B.V.M. or the Virgin Queen) should probably be Virginum, or some form of virgineus, -a, -um. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:25, 20 Novembris 2017 (UTC)
=== Nota ===
thread_title: Nomen: Britannicae Virgineae Insulae

thread_title:  Nota 

message: Heus sapientes usores, dubium habeo. Cum in comma "22.000 insulam incolunt, cuia 18.000" '22.000' pluralis sit, nonne 'cuia', pluralis, latinatis est? Aut "cuium" est? --CeleritasSoni 18:01, 31 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha! Cuius gen.sg.invariabile; Quorum gen.pl. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:30, 31 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :Vah! Quippe! Quam stultus fui! Gratias, Andrew! Autem, Oppidum Viae latina nomen pro Anglica "Road Town" est? --CeleritasSoni 18:37, 31 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: De "Cuia"
Disputatio:Planeta extrasolaris

message: I'd prefer this to planeta exter - before making a redirect, what do others think?--Xaverius 10:34, 2 Februarii 2009 (UTC) PLUS there could be some confusion between outer planets and extrasolar planet.
replies: text: Planeta exter placet, sed exter est mirum verbum (nam ne antiqua quidem Latinitas talium indiget!). Melius ergo fortasse planeta extraneus. Nam ceteroquin, cum quivis planeta sit extra solem, "extrasolaris" est sensu cassum. Outer planet = planeta externus.

message: Commentatio "Exoplaneta" huc contribui. Capitulum "Vide etiam" satis longum in commentationem non inserui; subter videtur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:57, 17 Martii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Rubricam "Vide etiam" nunc delevi ne nexus rubros Latinitate dubia continuo praebeat ... sed in historia manet! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:20, 1 Ianuarii 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribui
Disputatio Categoriae:Morte damnati

message: What about those condemned to death but later reprieved? And those condemned to death but still alive (e.g., Salman Rushdie)? ¶ For 'to execute', the idiom seems to be ultimo supplicio adficere and supplicium (de aliquo) sumere. IacobusAmor 14:10, 3 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean now. Well, the quick answer (I have to admit) is that as this category is at present titled, they belong here. If you want to suggest re-titling it so that they don't belong, fine: but the problem with many of those Latin phrases, including the ones you mention, is that they are euphemistic, unspecific and verbose. Untypical of Latin, but there you go. So, if you want a category that includes people who were executed, and specifically excludes those who were condemned but escaped, think of a better name for it. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:10, 3 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :One way, I guess, would be to make categories branching from these: :Categoria:Morte vano damnati and :Categoria:Morte vano damnatae "Condemned to death in vain". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:15, 3 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Or, for vano, the adverb frustra. I don't know what 'those reprieved' might be, but Cassell's says a reprieve is a dilatio supplicii and 'to reprieve' is supplicium differe. IacobusAmor 19:05, 3 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Yes, frustra is good. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:33, 3 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What about
Disputatio:Monopolium (ludus tabularis)

message: Hmmm....nescio quomodo ponere fasciculum in Anglica Wikipedia pagina de Monopoly huc. Multus discendum est a me de fasciculis. Gratias auxiliatore meo! --CeleritasSoni 00:01, 4 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Imagines hoc modo adde: . Imagines ex communia (vel wikipedia alia) fer: in pagina semper nomen fasciculi invenibas, ita --Xaverius 00:15, 4 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: : Vide Vicipaedia:Imago et commons:Commons:First steps. --UV 00:20, 4 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: :: Videlicet, peritus imaginum, UV noster, responsum optimum habet =)--Xaverius 00:23, 4 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::: Gratias vobis ambo! Peritior sum propter vos! --CeleritasSoni 03:08, 4 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: De Fasciculo

message: Xaveri, in descriptione Fasciculi, scripsisti verbum "Monopolica".......est adjunctiva forma "Monopolii"? Id est, "Monopoly-ish", "Monopoly-like", aut "Of Monopoly" Anglice? Autem, me paenitet me rogare tam multa quesita. Mea culpa! --CeleritasSoni 03:17, 4 Februarii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: De 'Monopolica'