lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Alma Mater Studiorum

message: According to en:, this university's Latin name is Universitas Bononiensis and its motto is alma mater studiorum. Mattie (disputatio) 17:54, 28 Aprilis 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I thought we'd had some discussion of this but I don't know where. I understood that "Alma Mater Studiorum" really is its Latin name -- it is the oldest university of all, by usual definitions -- but I can't tell you straight off why I think this ... I chose a different name for the category not because I doubted that "Alma Mater Studiorum" was the real name, but just because an ordinary descriptor seemed more useful in the category context.  Maybe an expert will show up and tell us one way or the other. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:06, 28 Aprilis 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yeah, that's why I opened up a disputatio rather than moving the page myself. :-) Mattie (disputatio) 18:24, 28 Aprilis 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Note the heading at top left of the home page. That seems to highlight "Alma Mater Studiorum" as if it's the original or historical name, rather than a motto. But I readily agree it's no proof.

text: ::But also look at the copyright statement at the foot of that same page. That would be an odd place to put a motto. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:47, 28 Aprilis 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Tu sembles avoir raison: fr: nous explique que "L'université de Bologne ... a pris le nom d'Alma mater studiorum par un décret de 2000." So, given that and what's on its website, I guess that really is its name! Mattie (disputatio) 19:01, 28 Aprilis 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Disputatio:Demiurgus

message: Cassell's nobis monet verbum demiurgus Latinitate classica significare solum 'the highest magistrate in certain Greek states'. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:16, 1 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Lexico Cassell's inserere oportet Tertullianum, Adv. Valent. 24, ubi idem verbum significat "The Maker of the world": ita Lewis & Short, vide hic.  Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:20, 1 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Tertullianus circa annum 160 natus est. Aetas autem Latinae Classicae, secundum Cassell's, ab anno 200 a.C.n. ad annum 100 patet, operibus Iuvenalis († saeculo secundo ineunte), Taciti († circa 120), Suetonii (†140) non exclusis. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:43, 1 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Do quo sit demiurgus

message: IacobusAmor scripsit: "Revera? Creationistae eorum deum 'demiurgum' appellant?" 
replies: text: Est verbum "Demiurgus"; sensum idoneum habet. Sed quomodo Creationistae deum suum nuncupant et quibus linguis utentes, nescio ego :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:39, 1 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Deus ut videtur Creationistarum est Deus cuiusdam sectae Christianitatis, non demiurgus mythologiae Graecae antiquae. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:43, 1 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  De usu huius verbi apud Creationistas
Disputatio:Lingua Hibernica

message: The move to "Lingua Hibernica (Gadelica)" was made without explanation. There is no need for disambiguation, because no other language is called Irish, so I have moved back to the simpler name. If anyone disagrees, please clarify! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:02, 9 Maii 2012 (UTC)
* Again 10 years later. — Of course, we do not indicate the language family in the title. There are two Scottish languages, so they are indicated with clarifications, "Scottica (Gadelica)" - "Scottica (Teutonica)", and "Hibernica" cannot be confused with anything, the clarification is not needed. Demetrius Talpa (disputatio) 19:29, 8 Decembris 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Disputatio:Yokosawa Yuki

message: Quod significat? What does this mean? type of blood beta? Red belt?Jondel (disputatio) 07:46, 10 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "Type B blood" in English. (This used to be in the en: version of the article; for relevance see Blood types in Japanese culture.)  It looks like this was put in by Iustinus so presumably there's a reason for 'beta' instead of 'B', but I'm not aware offhand.  —Mucius Tever (disputatio) 14:51, 10 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Gratias ago. Laborabo posterior et conor scribere rem generis sanguinei etiam.--Jondel (disputatio) 23:20, 14 Maii 2012 (UTC)
A blood type genus sanguinis article now exists.Jondel (disputatio) 11:27, 15 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: generis sanguinei beta
Disputatio:Hugo de Paganis

message: We need to verify this if we can. There are two English articles in competition, :en:Ugo de' Pagani, which was added as interwiki link today, and :en:Hugues de Payens, which I happened to find yesterday, but didn't link because of the basic contradictions. Which is nearer the truth I don't yet know. Evidently nationalism is playing a part.
For the moment I have taken out his place of birth because, at a quick glance, that is the essence of the dispute.
I see that on the Italian wiki the two have been combined at :it:Hugues de Payns, and there is a long discussion at :it:Discussione:Hugues de Payns; i.e. the French name has been preferred. That suggests to me that the Campanian campaigners are on to a loser. But there's a lot to read. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:22, 11 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd noticed that there's some debate about where he's from;  I'm also not entirely sure about his name in Latin, though there will certainly be a source for that.  Still, we've gone from non-stipula to stipula, which seems like at least some improvement.  I'll look around a bit more.  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 13:36, 11 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Oh, yes, certainly an improvement! I think the name "Hugo de Paganis" is probably quite OK. I notice that the Catalan wiki describes him (surprise?) as Catalan in origin, so there we have a third view. Possibly no one knows ...

text: :Yes, the Latin name's fine, I've added a reference. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:49, 11 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Ah, William's text is on line (I hadn't got as far as the article about the text) -- perhaps he has a theory on Hugo's origin, which we'd want to cite.  I'll be in the library later and will check around in a couple of books about the Templars (also rather a disputed area, I gather) just in case there's anything useful.  For the moment, though, I think we may want to link to :en:Hugues de Payens (slighly less strident article) instead of :en:Ugo de' Pagani -- since I put in the first link, I'll just change it;  I note you've proposed merging the two in English, which is definitely the right idea whatever content ends up in the resulting page.  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 14:01, 11 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History?
Disputatio:Isaias Tegnér

message: Citationem lexici removi "Vilborg, Ebbe. 2009. Norstedts svensk-latinska ordbok. Ed. 2a." Dixit enim IacobusAmor, recte: Dictionaries don't need to be cited except in support of rare locutions. The only rare word in the text is "cultualis," an apparently nonclassical word.
Addo ego: paginá ad nomen Latinum motá, oportet fontem citare de cognomine "Tegnerus".
replies: text: En says the family name was Tegnerus, but this Isaias Tegnerus, when he ascended in social station, nativized it as Tegner. That's exactly what we have with a Swede born a few decades before, whose family name was Linnaeus : after Carolus Linnaeus, the famous scion of the family, rose in rank, he became, for Swedish national purposes, Carl von Linné; nevertheless, Vicipaedians and practically everybody else retain the Latin form. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:43, 12 Maii 2012 (UTC)
Pro "homo cultualis" scripsi "eruditus", sed in dubio sum. Fortasse "humanista"? Fortasse aliud quid ... :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:23, 12 Maii 2012 (UTC)

text: Salvete.

text: Gratiae tibi, Iacobe. De citationes lexici nunc melius scio.

text: Mea culpa, eram in falso. Pro 'eruditus', erat verbum Sueticum nomine kulturpersonlighet (verbatim Anglice: culture personality) quae ante Latine non inveniebam, sed nunc Anglice inveniebam: intellectual leader. Utique, hoc verbum etiamnunc non invenio. Sed aliquid simile alicui eae sit.

text: De 'Locus Esaianalis': 'Locus Tegnerialis' recte est. Est locus in Lunda, appellatus Tegnérplatsen Suetice (verbatim Anglice: The Tegner Place). Nomen Latine certe credo non habet, igitur 'Locus Tegnerialis' unus id appellet.

text: Donatello (disputatio) 23:19, 12 Maii 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: :Suffixum -(i)anus in Latinitate hodierna, saepe in taxinomia botanica et zoologica visum, est, ut linguistae dicunt, "productivum" (Anglice "productive," i.e., nova exempla libere gignit), sed suffixum -(i)alis videtur moribundum vel etiam mortuum. Ergo, Locus Tegnerianus fortasse erit nomen commodius. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 00:30, 13 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Praeterea, habemus attestationem nominis Tegneriani : "Juventus Eucharistica: poëma Tegnerianum." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 00:36, 13 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Iucunde. Intelligo. In illum librum videre volem. Poesem probo.

text: :::Ad 'Locus Tegnerianus' mutavi.

text: :::Donatello (disputatio) 04:56, 13 Maii 2012 (UTC).
thread_title: De citationibus
Disputatio:Aegyptus

message: # "Verbum primum connotavit 'metropolis' vel 'civilizatio', et 'rus' vel 'fines' significat." - Quis intelligit, quid "verbum primum" hic sib velit? Sententiam interim ex commentatione exemi.--Utilo (disputatio) 16:13, 13 Maii 2012 (UTC)
# Verbum Hebraicum מִצְרַיִם (Mitzráyim) "duo freta" eplanatur (quod iam antea accepi), nota quinta autem alia profert: "The name mitsrayim can be interpreted many different ways; two straits (possibly referring to the two sides of the Nile river), double straits, two enemies, double pressing, or even double trouble. While we cannot determine for certain what this name original meant, we can see some interesting parallels between Egypt and their relationship with the nation of Israel." - Quid de hoc?--Utilo (disputatio) 16:32, 13 Maii 2012 (UTC)
##Textum quantum potui correxi.--Utilo (disputatio) 12:56, 14 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymologia 

message: "una cum seminsulatione? oriente et occidente deserticis? terris oblata" - Sententiam tractare velim, pro! Non intelligo! Quis adiuvare potest?--Utilo (disputatio) 16:39, 13 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Paginam mutavi auxique .... --Utilo (disputatio) 14:18, 14 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historia
Disputatio:Religio Romana

message: In hoc capitulo tempus plusquamperfectum verbi 'credere' lego - heu! - 'crederant', quod recte 'crediderant' scribere oportet. Quod quaeso corrigatis! Bavarese (disputatio) 12:00, 14 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Gratias ago, Bavarese. Correxi. N.B. et tu potes textum Vicipaediae corrigere! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:31, 14 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  religio Romana
Disputatio:Calixtus Ottomanus

message: Salve 217.248.152.139! Principem Orhan et Calixtum Ottomanum eundem fuisse credere videris. Habesne fontem de hac re? - Quod quidem sciam, duo sunt homines differentes. Praeteres nullus est fons Ottomanus de Calixto Ottomano, qui Europa occidentali vivebat. Princeps Orhan autem Constantinopoli vivebat et mox post Constantinopolim expugnatam mortuus (aut occisus) est.--Utilo (disputatio) 16:42, 14 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Responsione carente, reverti ... et usor statim "vandalice" egit. Si revenit, paginam pro tempore protego. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:01, 14 Maii 2012 (UTC)

message: In fronte ad dextram genuflectens Hassan Zaccaria, Calixtus Ottomanus = Calapino Bajazet ad dextram stat. --DocNöck (disputatio) 08:28, 29 Martii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fasciculus
Disputatio:Master Chief

message: De "Princeps Magistralis . . . Ebbe Vilborg, Norstedts svensk-latinska ordbok, editio secunda, 2009. chief - prin|ceps m/f ('-cipis)" ¶ Verbum princeps in Vilborg est nomen substantivum, sed in master chief petty officer, locutione Anglica, verbum chief est nomen adiectivum. Haec persona fictica est unus ex nonnullis officers (fortasse praefectis) qui sunt petty (fortasse minuti, tenues), unus ex nonnullis petty officers (praefectis minutis) qui sunt chief (fortasse principales), atque unus ex nonnullis chief petty officers (praefectis minutis principalibus) qui sunt masters (fortasse magistrales). Sed Latina paene omnium hodiernorum graduum militarium nomina sunt incerta. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 00:19, 15 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sicine? Hem. Sed bene scira erat.

text: Alioquin, hic omnia verba Latina ad chief in hoc lexicum in eumdem ordinem et modum possum dare:
replies: text: :chief - prin|ceps ('cipis) mf, cap|ut ('itis) n; dux (-cis) m, ductrix f; praefect|us m, -a f; rector m, rectrix f; moderator m, moderatrix f

text: Donatello (disputatio) 01:50, 15 Maii 2012 (UTC).
replies: text: :Vilborg sicut fons fidelis linguae Anglicae non recipi potest.

text: :Sicut Iacobus dixit, verbum "chief" in locutione "'master chief petty officer" est adiectivum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:42, 15 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Master Chief Petty Officer
Disputatio:Anna Lins dos Guimarães Peixoto

message: Hanc sentntiam non comprehendo. Nescio quae verba hic obiecta amandi et scribendi sint--Schulz-Hameln (disputatio) 13:07, 16 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Neque ego. "Myrica" est arbustum; quid est "myrica vita"? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:21, 16 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Equidem quod "myricae vitae amavit" significat intellegere nequeo. Itaque delevi.ThbdGrrd (disputatio) 18:52, 21 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   ... et postea semper myricae vitae amavit et parvae vitae cotidianae scripsit ... 

message: "Dolciarii" est orthographia barbara: vera Latinitate "dulciarii". Sed contradictionem hic habemus! Apud Vicipaediam Anglicam legimus "in her little cake-store", Francogallicam "dans sa boulangerie-pâtisserie", sed Lusitanicam "passou a produzir e vender linguiça caseira e banha de porco", quae sunt neque cakes neque "opus dulciarii" sed "lucanicae domesticae et laridum". Fortasse male intellegi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:21, 16 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "in suo negotio panis et pistoris dolciarii"
Disputatio:Panagiotes Picrammenus

message: Secundum normata nostra, rectius "Picrammenus"? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:49, 16 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sed nomina familiarum numquam latinazavimus ut putavi ... --Schulz-Hameln (disputatio) 15:34, 16 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Recte. Sed nomen familiae non est Pikrammenos: est Πικραμμένος. Hic ergo (sicut de omnibus nominibus in scripturis non-Romanis expressis) quaestio nobis posita non est, an Latinizare oportet, sed, quomodo translitterare oportet. Ad nomina Cyrillica, Indica, Iaponica etc. translitteranda, systemate internationali utimur. Ad nomina Graeca translitteranda, est nullum systema internationale; est autem (gaudeamus igitur!) id systema quo Romani antiqui usi sunt. Apud Vicipaediam hoc systemate usi sumus. Vide VP:TNP#Translitteratio seu Romanizatio: "Nomina Graeca sunt translitteranda more Romanorum."

text: :Ob hanc rationem, suadeo "Picrammenus", sicut iam antea "Capodistrias", "Cumundurus", "Benizelus" etc. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:05, 16 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Gratias tibi ago, in diem sapientior fio auxilio vicpaedianorum ;-). Idcirco hanc paginam moveas. Sed te rogo, an haec nomina familiaria Graeca et in casus diversos flectenda sunt?--Schulz-Hameln (disputatio) 16:18, 16 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Statim admitto: hanc rem, sicut omnes res apud caram Vicipaediam nostram, licet e novo disputare si vis, amice Schulz-Hameln! Usque ad hodie, ei qui paginas de Graecis hodiernis scripserunt sunt (a) ego (b) Utilo (c) ... perpauci alii ... (d) tu! Utilo et ego nomina neo-Graeca declinamus sicut antiqua, si possibile sit (et saepe possibile est). Fortasse Utilo sententiam suam addere vult ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:55, 16 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orthographia
Disputatio:Minaretum

message: In dictionario Latino interretiali Davidis Morgan et alibi 'minaretum' (-i, n.) legi. Quam vocem anteponendam esse puto (pace scilicet tua, Utilo) illi 'manarae' inattestatae. --Fabullus (disputatio) 09:26, 18 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Verbum manara attestatione caret (ut in nota dixeram), verbum Latinum minaretum non noveram - gratias pro communicatione! - Mutationes necessarias modo perfeci.--Utilo (disputatio) 10:00, 18 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Fons verbi manarae ut videtur (sic docet Merriam-Webster Dictionarium Anglicum) erat manārah 'pharus', verbum Arabicum. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 10:36, 18 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Adiuvent ac decernant linguae Arabicae periti, quaeso!--Utilo (disputatio) 11:58, 18 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Etsi linguae Arabicae haud peritus sum, sine me - litteris Arabicis fortasse paulo peritiorem quam vos - respondere! Nomen  منارة , perinde ac pleraque nomina feminina Arabica, in litteram ة exit. Haec littera communiter supprimitur, ita ut litteris Latinis aut omnino praetermitti aut ‘h’ scribi soleat. Exemplum litterae eius praetermittendae nobis hiǧra praebet. --Fabullus (disputatio) 20:52, 18 Maii 2012 (UTC)

text: :::PS: Hac transscriptione, littera 'h' praetermissa, utitur etiam Hans Wehr, A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic, Wiesbaden 19805. --Fabullus (disputatio) 09:46, 19 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: De voce Latina
Disputatio Categoriae:Traditio

message: Non melius Traditiones? (vel fortasse Mores? vel Mores et usus?). Plurimis categoriis sunt forma pluralis. Confer an:Categoría:Usos y costumbres, bar:Kategorie:Feste und Brauchtum, ca:Categoria:Tradicions, es:Categoría:Usos y costumbres, gl:Categoría:Tradicións, io:Kategorio:Tradicioni, pt:Categoria:Tradições, ru:Категория:Традиции, sv:Kategori:Traditioner, &c. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:07, 20 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Averaver inconsulte (sicut censeo ego!) nexus intervici mutavit. Hanc categoriam ad eas res, quas Anglice sub categoriam "Oral tradition" includuntur, creavi et usque adhuc adhibui. Igitur rursus emendo. Haud dubito quin categoriam aliam et novam, ad Anglicam "Traditions" etc. correspondens, oportet creare sub nomen quod tu sapienter proponis. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:52, 20 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen categoriae
Disputatio:Matthaeus I de Montemorenciaco

message: Melius de Montemorentiaco ? Vide hic, et Matheus de Montemorentiaco hic (p. 49), &c. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:53, 21 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fortasse; nescio quid melius. Vide et nexum externum in pagina adductum, ubi forma "de Montemorenciaco" saepe reperitur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:22, 21 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Aslan

message: There is no mention that he is Jesus, although it is inferred with his own sacrifice for Edmund and 'resurection' and broken stone table. Also when he hints about it when he says to Lucy that he is also known in our world(but doesn't really directly say his name).--Jondel (disputatio) 22:37, 21 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ait en (litterae pingues additae): "According to the author, Aslan is . . . a suppositional incarnation of Christ Himself: 'He is an invention giving an imaginary answer to the question, 'What might Christ become like if there really were a world like Narnia and He chose to be incarnate and die and rise again in that world as He actually has done in ours?'" IacobusAmor (disputatio) 23:34, 21 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Jesus
Disputatio:Numantia (navis loricata)

message: In locutione "Enloricata navis Numantia . . . fuit enloricata navis" idem bis dicimus. Ergo suspicor nomen navis (et lemma) tantum esse Numantia. Praeterea, talia nomina appositiva sermone classico sequuntur (non antecedunt); ergo melius "Numantia, navis enloricata." Iterum, nomina navium litteris inclinantibus (italicis appellatis) scribi debent. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:33, 22 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen navis, lemma
Disputatio:Pezetaeri

message: More Romanorum verba Graeca translitteramus (vide VP:TNP): igitur titulum propono "Pezetaeri". Alii etiam hac translitteratione utuntur, e.g. hic et apud google. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:52, 23 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita quoque (Pezetaeri) in lexicis Smith's et Harper's. Lesgles (disputatio) 10:41, 24 Ianuarii 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus
Disputatio:Universitas Coloniensis

message: Cur est lemma Universitas Coloniae? Nomen in sigillo Universitas Civitatis Coloniensis inest. ¶ Why is the lemma Universitas Coloniae? The name implied in the seal is Universitas Civitatis Coloniensis (vel plenius [Sancta] Universitas [Studii] Civitatis Coloniensis), the University of the City of Colonia. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 10:48, 25 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the reason is history :) Schulz-Hameln used to create category names in this style for German universities, and did so in this case. Gaudio, who recently created the page, followed the precedent of the category name, assuming it had been verified. That's my guess, anyway. You're right, the page and the categories all ought to be renamed. You could deal with the page if you care to; then I'll do the categories. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:12, 25 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Iacobus didn't come back, so I'll do it now. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:11, 13 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Anarchopanda

message: « Si des étudiants pacifiques qui manifestent de façon normale méritent de se faire matraquer, de se faire lancer du poivre, des gaz, des balles de caoutchouc ou assourdissantes, je le mérite aussi. » Aïe aïe aïe, je ne sais même pas par où commencer avec celle-là. :S
*truncheon = ?
*pepper spray = ?
*rubber bullets = ?
*sound bombs = ?
Mattie (disputatio) 00:12, 27 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neolatin

message: De novis huius paginae categoriis dissentio, namque Anarchopanda homo est, non res. Videte e.g. http://www.ledevoir.com/societe/justice/351679/anarchopanda-s-attaque-au-reglement-antimasque Mattie (disputatio) 23:30, 17 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Gratias tibi ago, categorias veteres iterum institui. --UV (disputatio) 00:19, 18 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: : Gratias, UV! Mattie (disputatio) 01:29, 18 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ille homo est
Disputatio:Bella Graeco-Persica

message: Cum nobis Vicipaedianis tempora et anni sunt scribendi, his utimur siglis: a.C.n. (ante Christum natum) et p.C.n. (post Christum natum); vide hic. --Alexander Gelsumis (disputatio) 09:29, 27 Maii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recensio minor
Disputatio:Dakar

message: I can't see why this was moved to "Dakarum" with the summary "Lemma". This form doesn't occur in the lemma.
A good reason for the move would be if there's a source for this name in Latin. Well, I can find one -- the one that's already cited on the page, erroneously footnoted to "Dacarum" -- but, if I read it correctly, that same source also supports the former pagename "Dakar" (n. indecl.), so it offers no justification for the move ... and, anyway, do we know whether it's a reliable source? 
I've no objection to "Dakarum" if that name is better supported than others, but I don't think that has yet been shown. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:10, 30 Maii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved back for the time being. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:14, 3 Iunii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :The lexicon of P. Lucusaltianus Latinophilus is handy, but self-published, and based on Vicipaedia among other sources, and for these reasons to be used with caution. I've retained the citation, but I have now found a source for "in urbe Dakar", confirming Dakar (indecl.) in real Latin use, so I've cited that. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:49, 21 Martii 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move: unnecessary?