lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Habeas corpus

message: This article as it stands is grossly mispunctuated and (worse) misconceived. Nobody would prefer Vicipaedia's definition to definitions elsewhere. Here's the text, rendered in English:
replies: text: "Habeas corpus, British law proceeds under that title. Anciently the signifying was, that a character might be conveyed to a judge, there were two appearances. . . ."
Now compare the start of the article in the English wikipedia:

text: "In common law countries, habeas corpus (/ˈheɪbiəs ˈkɔɹpəs/) (Latin: [We command] that you have the body) is the name of a legal action, or writ, through which a person can seek relief from unlawful detention of themselves or another person. The writ of habeas corpus has historically been an important instrument for the safeguarding of individual freedom against arbitrary state action."
Despite a few stylistic infelicities, that's an adequate definition. Do you see the difference? Vicipaedia's version, were it to appear as a student's definition on an examination, in any language, should receive a failing grade. Suggestion: rather than try to write an article out of one's own (mis)understandings of a subject, start from a respectable text and translate it. (Btw, the preferred spelling is exsistit, not existet.) IacobusAmor 18:05, 18 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
Iacobus, haec pagina est stipula. Amplifica, si potes! Corrige vel rescribe quaeso. 
In verborum thesaurus meus duae formae sunt, existit et exsistit. 
--HansEo 16:06, 25 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commentaria imparia

message: I will be rewriting the article. However, your help is highly appreciated.Jondel (disputatio) 15:06, 15 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Overhaul
Disputatio Vicipaediae:Fontes nominum locorum

message: Vide: Bruno Manara, "Some Considerations on Latin Geographical Epithets in Binomials" Taxon, Vol. 41, No. 3. (Aug., 1992), pp. 524-528.    Wayne's Quicky Lube 13:50, 20 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: facta a locorum nominibus adiectiva
Disputatio:Pullus Parthicus

message: Laser vivum in tepida: as I've noted, followng Grocock & Grainger, other manuscripts have interidas and radas. I could swear that some editor or another had proposed radix as well (radis vs. radix being a variation that defnitely occurs elsewhere in Apician manuscripts). But now that it comes down to it, I can't seem to find that edition. Any of you know where I got this notion? --Iustinus 18:34, 20 Novembris 2007
(UTC)
replies: text: Not from Milham; not from Flower & Rosenbaum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:26, 20 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Readings

message: I'll see if I can find a good photo from the yearly Cena Romana to upload. Other than that, I think the article is largely written. Or at least my contribution is. But I'm hoping others will think of useful additions. Anyone? --Iustinus 21:27, 20 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quid plura?
Disputatio:Neocaesarea in Ponto

message: Just because the Romans, to save space on monuments, abbreviated certain well-known names doesn't mean that we moderns have to. This isn't a Roman encyclopedia. The issue of abbreviating words has been discussed before, but I don't know where the discussion is. IacobusAmor 18:58, 20 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember a discussion in which I, as a novice, was reminded not to use abbreviations in the headings of articles [added later: it was at Disputatio:Decimus Silanus ]. As for when names occur in the text of articles, I haven't seen such a discussion. Maybe before my time.

text: So long as you can click on the link, or hover over it, and find the full name, it seems OK to me -- one of the reasons why Wikipedia links are so handy. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:06, 20 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: L.
Disputatio:Gradus academici apud Universitatem Oxoniensem

message: I foolishly assumed that "gradus" was a normal second declension masculine noun. It's not. I have also noticed that academicus seems not to occur much in Latin. Should this page be renamed somthing like "Gradus scholastici..."? Is there a Latin word for academic degree (I would have thought there would be one)? Leigh (disp) 21:16, 21 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Latin for 'academic degree' is gradus. But you knew that. ;) IacobusAmor 00:09, 22 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: cum congregationes huius universitatis in quibus gradus conferantur adhuc latine agantur, cur nomina graduum non de modo deacanorum oxoniensum graduandos offerentium hac scribuntur? dicunt enim illi 'baccalaurei in artibus, baccalaurei in iure civili' etc.
replies: text: Fortasse quia tu non scripsisti! Sed licet tibi corrigere si potes ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:28, 2 Decembris 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomina graduum
Disputatio:South Park

message: *Smith-Hall has "paradisus" = park, in the sense of enclosed ground.
*Ager Australis, Meridionalis
*Horti Australes, meridionales (Smith-Hall: recreation park) - --Alex1011 22:45, 21 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
The Simpsons dicebat "Agro Meridiei".  Correxi illud, at nonne melium est?
Quoque, Stan "canis cinaedus"?
--Mark 22:33, 14 Augusti 2008 (UTC)

message: Salve. Secundum omnes linguas quibus hanc seriem emittit, nomine South Park appellanda est, cur enim latina, lingua illa mortua (ergo nemo dicit agrum australem nec quicquam) mutare nomen seriei debet? Semper dicimus nos opponere ista, cur hac pagina sic est?. Movere non potui. iam nomen mutatum est. --Ahambhavami 05:07, 20 Ianuarii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita, ego quoque movere temptavi propterque redirectionis paginam "South Park" nequii. Mattie (disputatio) 01:07, 17 Augusti 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :Movi. Post aliquot dies, Mattie, licebit et tibi (magistratús candidatus, nemine adhuc contradicente) tales paginas movere! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:18, 20 Augusti 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cur nomine latino, neque proprio?
Disputatio:Res publica Sinarum

message: We should call this country "Taivania". "Respublica Sinae" is a confusing name and the people of Taiwan don't want to be associated with the country of China. -Kedemus 07:53, 22 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :If "the people of Taiwan don't want to be associated with the country of China" they wouldn't have, since its inception, a constitutional claim of sovereignty over it—whence the name.  See en:Republic of China, en:Provinces of the Republic of China#Claims over mainland China and Mongolia, en:One-China policy, and the several discussions on the title at en:Talk:Republic of China and its archives.  Plus, of course, Taiwan is only one part of the ROC, even if you're only counting the parts they have de facto sovereignty over.   (My beef with the title, though, would be its use of singular 'Sina'.)  —Mucius Tever 15:59, 24 Novembris 2007 (UTC)

text: It seems to be the official names. --Alex1011 08:16, 22 Novembris 2007 (UTC)

text: "Respublica Sinae" is directly translated from its official name en:Republic of China and "Taivania" is the largest island controlled by it. APOOGM 05:25, 19 Septembris 2010 (UTC)

message: Use the searchbox to seek "Formosa," and Vicipaedia directs you to this article—which treats a form of government, not an island. Each of these concepts should have its own article: the island is a geographical entity, and the republic is a political one. IacobusAmor 09:22, 4 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte mones. The ROC government governs many islands not just Taiwan Island/Formosa. Nevertheless, since the nineties a visa to the country says "Republic of China (Taiwan)" recognizing in someway that Taiwan is an alternative name or that the republic's sovereignty resides in Taiwan, or any other number of ambiguous interpretations. In Taiwan itself, the naming is a matter of political POV and thus highly controversial among the polity.123.192.64.184 07:25, 19 Septembris 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Formosa est insula

message: Non est natio independens. --170.64.218.143 07:22, 21 Martii 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Taivania]] est una insula parsque Sinarum

message: What should be the correct translation of "Republic of China" in Latin? The title is "Res publica Sinarum", while there is also another name "Respublica Sinae". Maybe using only one of them is more proper. APOOGM 05:25, 19 Septembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: China in latin is Sinae; although Sina has been used in some old maps, the overwhelming use is of Sinae. Thus the literal translation of China is Sinarum. Did you find Respublica Sinae in a reliable source or are you just going by some unreliable wiki site?123.192.64.184 06:52, 19 Septembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Sorry that I didn't say it clearly. I saw Respublica Sinae in the top-right corner of this page, that's why I was wondering.  APOOGM 22:42, 19 Septembris 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::An error which hadn't been spotted before...Gratias.--67.228.134.42 14:46, 22 Septembris 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name in Latin
Disputatio:Samus

message: Removi nomen Luciani e tabula incolarum notorum. Lucianus fuit nativus Samosatae, minime Sami. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:58, 25 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha.  Haec nomina admodum similia me fefellerunt. 71.208.202.37 20:02, 25 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lucianus
Disputatio Formulae:WatkinsIERoots

message: Ephemeris Gulielmi Camden dicit Calvertum, at hic est mihi solus fons pro nomine electo. Si nimis malam aestimatis assectationem meam, libenter in Calvert mutetis.--Ioscius (disp) 00:57, 26 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: calvertus
Disputatio:Gordius (auriga)

message: Could someone help me with the grammar here? What I get out of the Latin is: 'The author Cassius Dio Cocceianus is', and then (apparently in indirect discourse) 'Gordius to have been the emperor's paidika (to wit, "catamite")'—but these pieces don't combine to make a grammatical whole. What's the story? Did someone write est for a verb like ait or dicit or scribit? or what? ¶ Note that, if the second piece is in indirect discourse, paidika and catamitus must be in the accusative. IacobusAmor 14:58, 27 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't happen to see this till now (the edit was marked as "minor"). The "someone" was me. I believe "auctor est" can be used as equivalent to "scribit", followed by an accusative and infinitive. "Paidika" is accusative (neuter plural) so that's all right. "Catamitus", although in a parenthesis, should indeed have been "catamitum": thanks, I'll change that. So, "Dio is our authority for the claim that Gordius was the emperor's catamite." Ok thus? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:50, 2 Novembris 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cassius Dio Cocceianus auctor est Gordium ''paidika'' (scilicet "catamitus") imperatoris fuisse
Disputatio:Canalis Panamensis

message: Salvete omnes. Discipul(us/a) Latin(us/a) sum in schola Tatnall. Hanc paginam lente scribo ut linguam Latinam discam. Vos quaesco ut liceat mihi hic redire laborare et ne paginam deleas. Gratiam vobis ago!

message: As a rule (I forget where, but you'll find it in Allen & Greenough or Bradley's Arnold) with phrases of this sort, Classical Latin prefers adjectives where modern languages prefer nouns, so unless good attestations of Canalis Panamae are available, a form like Canalis Panamensis might be more idiomatic. IacobusAmor 14:46, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC).
replies: text: Melius etiam erit: Fossa Panamensis. De hac re vide quod scriptum est hic. --Fabullus 05:02, 2 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :I hope you can at least realize panamense is neuter whereas canalis is masculine??!--24.107.235.195 23:35, 19 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Please comment only at Disputatio:Canalis. It does seem I got the gender wrong. Pantocrator 23:44, 19 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Really, what does the name of this article have to do with the article canalis? An article's talk page is the correct place to talk about the article's title.  —Mucius Tever 15:04, 20 Martii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Commentarii titulus

message: A mense Augusto 2013 in hac pagina legimus "Haec pagina est pars Scriptorii nostrae Portae Eruditionis. Ergo oportet solum auctorem neque alium conscribere, emendare et moliri hanc paginam", at contra "corrige si potes!" Quid nunc? Sacrosanctane putanda est haec pagina an digna, quae emendetur? Nullum automaton nobis est, quo adnotatio aliqua περιπλομένων ἐνιαυτῶν obsoleta facta deleatur? --Bavarese (disputatio) 10:40, 19 Augusti 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Steven anno 2013 formulam imposuit, sine ulla ratione ... sed humani sumus! Pagina iam e scriptorio anno 2009 liberata erat.

text: Formulam iterum delevi ego. Emenda sicut tibi placet, Bavarese. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:25, 19 Augusti 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quousque tandem?
Disputatio:Provincia Toletana

message: Well, I had started the page as Provincia Toleti. I am confused now. In Spanish we say provincia de Toledo and that is the official name of the province, but let us see what do other people think. I must go to a lecture now... --Xaverius 14:49, 29 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Over here, official names often take forms like "The City of Los Angeles," but see how we Latinize them. IacobusAmor 17:38, 29 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :And I guess that if we have Lusitania (provincia Romana) and Britannia (provincia Romana), it would make sense to have Matritum (provincia), for instance.... oh bugger, now it's time to change all the links I guess...--Xaverius 13:28, 30 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::And observe that Novum Eboracum takes you to the state, while the city is Novum Eboracum (urbs). IacobusAmor 13:51, 30 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Toletum (provincia) / Provincia Toleti
Disputatio Formulae:Iocus

message: I changed the yellow background because it hurt my eyes! If anyone disapproves, by all means revert me.
I would like to think of a way of expressing the idea of this formula without quite saying "This is a joke". Somehow, to me, those words would always kill it. But is there an alternative? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:01, 29 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I made Vicipaedia:Ioci for worthwhile jokes. The rest should probably just be deleted, right? Harrissimo 22:04, 29 Novembris 2007 (UTC).
replies: text: :I never saw that. Maybe the two that remain under this formula should be moved there. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:14, 29 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we put it less bluntly?
Disputatio:Corea

message: Nomen adiectivum scientificum est koraiensis. (Est planta Pinus koraiensis.) Recte ergo hic Koraiensis et Korea? Fortasse Catholici Romani C malunt, et alii K? IacobusAmor 12:54, 30 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: coreanus etiam est usus vulgo e.g. Rubus Coreanus. Lettera C malitur, ut opinor. Catholica Romana etiam utor Letteram C.--59.28.72.37 12:41, 26 Decembris 2009 (UTC)
Quam Coream antiquam nomino? Nominitur Coreae in Latina sed hani in Coreana vel chosuni in tempo certo antique, et Coreae in tempo alio antique. Difficilis significa nomina in Latina. --W890702 13:05, 26 Decembris 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Corea ~ Korea
Disputatio:Ribosoma

message: Mea sententia error est in hac pagina, puto formam rectam esse "ubi translatio genetica persecutA est".
Corrige si adsentis. Equula

message: quidni melius particula? quia pars femininum est verbum.. et diminutivum suum feminino genere pergit, latina non graeca est. puto.
ah, atque in sententia.. " in partes dua " ? itane licet ?
et in haec subunitates ... haec in plurale modo dicitur hae, ut sciam, veniam da, quaeso, animadverto tantum.
--Ahambhavami 15:37, 7 Maii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  de particulum verbo
Disputatio:Brugae

message: Nomen melius Latinum urbis istius Pontem Belgicam censeo, Portum urbis Marinam Pontis appellandum.--Agnus 03:31, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Debemus fontibus uti. Habesne fontem? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:12, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Pons antiquior erat quam nomen notatum. Pons opus imperii Romani. Notae primae aetate carolina Bruggas aut Bruccia dicunt.

text: :http://www.retrobibliothek.de/retrobib/seite.html?id=122947 Crysolum missionarem saeculi III in locum dixt, sed loci nominem illius temporis tacet.--Agnus 18:30, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Igitur fontem non habes? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:16, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
Non in interrete sunt. Sed commemoratio Crysoli spem creat. Si obscurae manebunt nomina historica medievalia faveo, ergo Bruggas sive Bruccia.--Agnus 21:34, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomina urbis portusque
Disputatio:Homo

message: Sed homo est unum genus, non una [species] ullae speciei. IacobusAmor 15:04, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Vieatur mihi explicandi usus vulgus et usus scientificus. At recte dicis hanc sententiam male factam.--Ioscius (disp) 16:03, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Homo (-inis, m.) est unus speciei"
Disputatio:Go on home British soldiers

message: Ayuda con la traducción, por favor. --Jeneme 20:49, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: English? Harrissimo 20:53, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC).
replies: text: : Help with translation please. --Jeneme 21:45, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::I'll see what I can do. Is it copyright violation to have the original english version on this page? Harrissimo 21:46, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC).
replies: text: ::: No, 'cause I've caught it from Spanish Wikipedia . (Sorry, my English isn't very good). --Jeneme 22:08, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::When searching for an equivalent of the phrase take a hint, I came across cepe indicum. Indian onion or two blatant spelling errors? Harrissimo 23:07, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC).

message: I'm not sure "Éire Óg" were really authors... more like terrorists. I'm not even sure if that song is copyrighted. Please do not delete the page just yet (just take out the grey boxes, there are a couple of fair, encyclopaedic lines at the top). Harrissimo 00:30, 2 Decembris 2007 (UTC).
replies: text: I am taking out the lyrics for the moment. If the text is copyrighted, however, we should delete all revisions containing the copyrighted text from the article's history. --UV 00:34, 2 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :The lemma violates all known traditional rules of punctuation: there should be an obligatory, nonnegotiable comma before the vocative. (This tradition is often violated by casual writers and Those Who Have Not Been Taught.) Also, as the title of a song, it will most customarily, in reputable writing, appear within quotation marks. IacobusAmor 01:47, 2 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Sorry, Iacobe, I do not exactly pride myself on my knowledge of latin punctuation (or even so much that of my english). I will try to make your suggested changes to the page. Thank you, Harrissimo 11:07, 2 Decembris 2007 (UTC).

text: ::I have hesitated over the english name. On en:wiki there has been no comma added, neither has there been on various (unreliable) lyrics sites via google. Are these the authors' mistakes? Harrissimo 11:46, 2 Decembris 2007 (UTC).
replies: text: :::They could well be; one often sees vocatives in English without that comma. An editor would be tempted to render the phrase as: "Go home[,] British soldiers." IacobusAmor 12:49, 2 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: De delenda
Disputatio:Mozambicum

message: Ni fallor, Hofmannus Mosambica habet; sed Mozambicum reperio apud fontibus interretialibus Vaticanis. Igitur citationes mutavi. Notam de orthographiam Anglicam delevi quia nomen illius regionis, antiquae coloniae Lusitanorum, minime Anglis relevat. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:03, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mozambicum apud Hofmannum hic invenitur. Harrissimo 21:06, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC).

text: A! Mozambicum pro urbe. Intellego nunc. Harrissimo 21:07, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC).
replies: text: :Sed paginam quam indicas non repperi antea! Gratias! Addo igitur in notis. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:18, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Ut scripsi iam, Latinam ecclesiae adiuvantem non vinculum censeo. Memorate: In fronte baslicae Sancti Petri in Vaticano Paulus burgesius Romanus non Civis Romanus appellatur. Paulum burgesium Romanum appellare lapsus maximus est. Paulus vixi ante migrationem maiorem Germanorum. Verbum "burgesius" non impotatum fuit ante migrationem istam.--Agnus 23:16, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Sed quid hoc dicit de nomine Mozambici, Agne, nescio. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:03, 2 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fontes nominis
Disputatio:Opus francigenum

message: Architectura gothica sive architecturae gothicum ut dicitur genus [1] illa architectura medii aevi nuncupatur quae a duodecimo (XII) saeculo usque ad sextum decimum (XVI) saeculum apud multas gentes Europaeas praevaluit. Nomen gothicum accepit, quod in aevo insequente renascentis antiquitatis ars mediaevalis despiciebatur cum barbara scilicet gothica putaretur. Praeter architecturam etiam aliae artes gothicae sicut musica vel ars pingendi vel sculptura extabant. Ipsa ars gothica artem romanicam insequebatur. Ecclesiae gothicae celebres sunt sed etiam publica et profana aedificia gothica extant.

message: Hoc stilo nihil commune cum Gothis habente, nomine "operis gothici" modo peiorativo a posterioribus dati, an melius erit titulum "opus francigenum" praeponere? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:01, 16 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Maxime consentio! Mihi videtur veram architecturam Gothicam esse Mausoleum Theoderici--Xaverius 08:21, 17 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  De titulo
Disputatio:Universitas Sancti Thomae Manilana

message: An possumus Universitas Sancti Thomae Manilana? Tomae est error orthographicus; sine Manilana habemus fortasse problema discretivum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:43, 3 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In car sticker 'Universitas Sancti Tomae' me visus est hic. (I saw 'Universitas Sancti Tomae' in a car sticker here). Non certum  sum apud Manilana. Nonne recte est Manila?--Jondel 00:32, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
Another possible name:Santus Thomae Aquinatis Universitas Manilana from the web.--Jondel 02:20, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, I think I saw that webpage too (but correctly it has to be Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Universitas Manilana). That's maybe a good form to use. Manilanus/-a is certainly well-attested as the Latin adjective for Manila. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:28, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Rei futuro, potius est habere optiones et haec disputationes. (For the future it would be good to have options and these discussions).--Jondel 12:07, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
Universitas Sancti Thomae Manilana movendam accordo. Facimusne?--Jondel 12:12, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)

text: OK. Gratias! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:29, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: Fortasse, 'Tomae' potius est, quam de origo 'Te'oma', aramaice, quod significat gemellus.--Jondel 00:40, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree with you there. We are doing Latin, not Aramaic. Anyway, it seems the University is named after Thomas Aquinas, and he certainly wrote good Latin and spelt his name Thomas. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:28, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ok. Its worth mentioning the roots anyway. I saw the new advent vulgate bible page and they use Tomas there.--Jondel 12:04, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Interesting. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:39, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::OOOPS !!!I meant: they use Thomas there.--Jondel 12:49, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas->Tomae

message: Has imagines, hoc tempore inutiles, e paginam removi.
[[Imago:UST Main Bldg Facade.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Aedificium principale anno 2006]]
[[Image:UST Arch of the Centuries2.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Arca saeculorum]]
[[Imago:USTLogo.jpg|182px]]
-- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:39, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Imagines