lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Jack Sparrow

message: Moved from Disputatio:Navarchus Ioannes Passer:
It is true that Jack is historically a nickname for John, but nevertheless it is almost always Latinized as Iacobus. --Iustinus 00:15, 27 Iulii 2006 (UTC)
--Thank you my friend, really I was not sure how to translate it. I'll make the Iacobus article instead. cucullatus
replies: text: Moreover, it ought to be Iacobus Sparrow, vide Vicipaedia:Translatio nominum propriorum.--Ioscius 17:53, 4 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Actually that may be questionable.  :en:Jack Sparrow indicates (albeit without a reference) that Sparrow isn't his original surname... it may be a nickname of some kind, and translatable, or it may be a new or false surname, and not. But in absence of evidence I'd prefer the untranslated form. —Myces Tiberinus 12:01, 5 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Interesting. Another argument one might make for not going by the usual rule here: a European in the Age of Exploration would likely have Latinized their surname (and you just know that Jack Sparrow wrote extensive Latin treatises on something or another). Course most of the English authors I've seen (in the 17th century at least) go for forms like Sparuus or Sparowus rather than ones like Passer. --Iustinus 14:59, 5 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :::At the very least a redirect...--Ioscius 03:25, 6 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::I'm not sure what his first name should be, but I actually like the idea Iustinus came up for the second, possibly nick name. Alexanderr 20:40, 8 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::::p.s. can someone look at Piratae Maris Caribii (pellicula)? please? Alexanderr 20:41, 8 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

message: Why is the title "Navarchus NAME" and not just "NAME"? — Whatever the NAME of this person will be ... ;-) --Roland (disp.) 20:31, 8 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well besides it being a title he is personally very fond of calling himself "Captain Jack Sparrow", because his ship was mutinied some time before the first movie and probably still wanted the respect that goes with the name, and to constantly assert his claim to his ship. Alexanderr 20:46, 8 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yes the navarchus makes sense, if you have seen the movie, but again, Passer I have trouble stomaching...--Ioscius 01:36, 9 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Navarchus"? 

message: What is the deal with listing characteristics and titbits about Jack Sparrow? "Rhomium amat"? "Kraken eum edebat"? "Perquam suavis est"?? This is not encyclopaedic! --BiT 21:04, 1 Ianuarii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you: those characteristics seem to be not very useful, unless they are put in a longer text e.g. the plot of the films or Jack's biography. At least should be removed the pointed list...
Poecus 21:11, 1 Ianuarii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Quoque consentior. --Ioscius (disp) 11:24, 2 Ianuarii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lineamenta?
Disputatio:Index dierum

message: Ok, incitus in dies reliquos laborabam ut omnes dies in vicipaedia nostra habemus. Cur? Nonne omnes vicipaediae verae habet omnes dies? Bene.
Utinam diebus praecepta habeamus. Ullus dies esse, videtur mihi, similis ceteris diebus debent.
Ergo rogo uter melior est:
Nati? an Natales?
Mortui? an Mortes?
Eventa? an Res?
Haec tria debet esse:
*annus - Nomen verba de evento
*1974 - Sinister Petrus, vicipaedianus Americanus
Procul dubio, diem Romanum diciamus, quamquam non omnes habent.
Quid de navigatione? Modum habemus (et puto esse satis bonum):
8 Augusti - 10 Augusti9 Iulii - 9 SeptembrisIndex dierum
Quid de cista mensis?
Loquamus de diebus. Sinister Petrus 16:08, 30 Iulii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disputationem incipiam. Meae sententiae sunt:
replies: text: :Dicere: "Mortes" et "eventa" et "natales."

text: :Habere: Dies Romanos et navigationem

text: De cista mensis, nescio, at de nexibus fractis bene scio. Nexus fracti non fiant! Sinister Petrus 16:08, 30 Iulii 2006 (UTC)
Ego autem voto pro Nati,Mortui et Eventa. --Mafrius 19:10, 30 Iulii 2006 (UTC)

text: We should use (or be prepared to use) the same headings for the year pages then. See Vicipaedia:Annus. --UV 21:51, 30 Iulii 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Hm, I hadn't thought of that, but yes. Years and days will need to match. I was thinking too small (again). But yes, we do need to be consistent in our labeling. I only brought this up because I had noticed that we were inconsistent on the days. Sinister Petrus 03:28, 31 Iulii 2006 (UTC)
Pone nomen tuum in loco recto. Eligas solum unum:
===Nati et Mortui===
* Mafrius
===Natales et Mortes===
* Sinister Petrus
thread_title: Praecepta rei dierum

message: * Mafrius
thread_title: Nati et Mortui

message: * Sinister Petrus
thread_title: Natales et Mortes
Disputatio:Viceregnum Peruvianum

message: Quare est haec pagina? Permaxime quaeso, vide Viregnum Perivianum et Disputatio:Viregnum Perivianum.--Ioshus Rocchio 19:11, 2 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

message: Salvete!
Verbum obraje Latine non est, sed idem e Lingua Hispanica a me importum, et in tertia declensione adhibitum. Forma Latina ipso non scio; ergo, si eandem invenitis, quaeso, ea in articulo utimini.--Le K@l!nuntia? 05:53, 2 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obrajes
Disputatio:Imperium Incarum

message: This article will need a lot of work. The title itself might be construed as an error: normally empires are named with adjectives, c.f. Imperium Romanum, Imperium Cossanum and so on. However, in this case I might let it stand, as in Latin sources that I've read, Inca or Inga is always a title of the emperor, rather than the gentilic for the whole tribe (who are instead called Peruani or Peruviani, though obviously that won't work so well for us), so one might say Imperium Incae in much the same way one might hypothetically say "Kingdom of the Shah" and there would be no doubt what kingdom you were refering to.
In general I think this article would be greatly helped by reference to pre-existing Latin sources on Peru. I will start a Fontes section below, starting with the ones I can think of off the top of my head. If anyone can add something, please do. --Iustinus (01:34, forgot to sign)
replies: text: Here's a useful quote from De Bry, VI, pl. 12, ad cap V: "Intelligens Franciscus Pizarrus quam opulenta esset vrbs Cuzco Ingarum Imperii Regia, Caxamalcam deferens, eò proficiscitur" ... so Benzonus at least used Ingarum Imperium. Again, the Genitive probably is because Ingae are the emperors, not the people. --Iustinus 05:34, 5 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Just some examples of appellations I ran across: "De Imperio regum Ingarum in Peru" ; "Insuper Peruviani sub imperio Incarum, magnifica habuerunt templa superstitionis suae" ; "Quae Beatus Toribius Archiepraese Limanus Ecclesiae Peruani Imperii mirifice illustravit" ; "TAHUANTISUYO, nomen priscum Peruviae Regni" ; "finem Imperio Incarum imposuit" ; "Servus Dei Toribius Alphonsus Mogroveius Archiepisc. Limanus provinciam Limensem, seu Peruanum Imperium elimavit" ... —Myces Tiberinus 12:47, 5 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Wow, looks like Incarum/Ingarum is pretty usual! --Iustinus 15:00, 5 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :::I think you both are rigth. If there are many sources that comfirm what you said, it's necessary for us to change the article's title.--Le K-li 01:47, 23 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections

message: I have corrected spelling of Quechua words to make them closer to Quechua pronunciation using classical 22-letter alphabet, such as Romans would spell them. "hu" are replaced with "V/u", "y" with "i", "ay" with "ae", "qu" with "c".217.20.217.245 15:15, 5 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: *1596, Benzoni Historiae, in Theodori à Bry Americae pars sexta
* 1628  Gotofredi Archontologia Cosmica, pp. 320, 321, 322, 333.
* 1698, Hofmanni Lexicon Universale, pp. 677-8, s.v. Peruvia
thread_title: Fontes

message: Re: "Imperium Incae illic rexit, antequam Hispanii id ceperunt." Ubi fuit "illic"? IacobusAmor 16:45, 5 Octobris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Illic?
Disputatio:Index urbium Franciae

message: Dans certains cas, j'ai trouvé plusieurs noms pour une même ville, j'ai alors pris le parti de choisir celui qui se rapprochait le plus possible du nom français utlisé aujourd'hui (sans chercher à savoir si tel autre était plus couramment utilisé durant la période romaine) car le but de Vicipaedia en latin est, selon moi, de retranscrir en latin des réalités très actuelles, c'est pourquoi je souhaiterais conserver des noms comme "Strateburgum" ou même "Strasbura" plutôt que "Argentoratum" pour Strasbourg, ou encore "Petrigorium" plutôt que "Vesunna" pour Périgueux, etc. De plus, cette façon d'écrire offre la possibilité de bien mettre en avant la différence entre l'utilisation du nom latin et celle du nom français, comme on a souvent tendance à le faire dans les livres d'Histoire (pour la période gallo-romaine, on parle de Lutèce et de Condate, plutôt que de Paris et de Rennes). Si vous n'êtes pas de mon avis, s'il vous plaît, veuillez me le faire savoir, ainsi que les raisons qui vous poussent à penser ainsi.
Merci d'avance, 
Ricardus, Valete
replies: text: A mon avis, ce serait souhaitable d'indiquer tous les noms pour la même ville (s'il y en a plusieurs) dans la liste. De telle manière, si l'on récherche "Strateburgum", on le trouvera dans la liste et on saura que c'est la ville de Argentoratum/Strasbourg.
 * Argentoratum sive Strateburgum (Strasbourg/Schdroosburi/Straßburg)

text: Ce serait génial si tu pourrais indiquer les sources où tu as trouvé les noms en latin:
 * Argentoratum sive StrateburgumLucien Oeuf-Sur-Le-Boeuf, L'Histoire de Strasbourg, Éditions Gallimerdre, 1989, p. 70. (Strasbourg/Schdroosburi/Straßburg)

text: Salut, --UV 22:52, 9 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noms de Villes Françaises
Disputatio:Manga

message: Manga plurale figuram in Iaponice Anglieque non habet.  Plurale figuram in Latine non haberet.  Fortassene mutaretur? --Tom 18:11, 10 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nescio cur nos figuris indeclinabilibus cruciare debemus cum nomen tam facile in casus inclinari possit. --Iustinus 05:27, 10 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plurale Figuram 

message: Quanam ratione huic vocabulo genus masculinum assignatum est? Equidem nullam rationem excogitare possum. Contra autem pro genere feminino haec dici possunt: (1) Nomina -a litterā terminata sunt feminini generis per defectum causae propriae (by default), nisi pluralia neutrius sunt. (2) Vocabulum Iaponicum ga imaginem significat; imago est generis feminini; quin et manga? --Neander 00:59, 27 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genus?
Disputatio:Carolsruha

message: Non tantum Quietem Caroli "dicere vult", sed etiam nomen Latinum sollemne scholae quae vulgo Universität Karlsruhe est Universitas litterarum ad Quietatem Caroli in Germania Superiore. Sed video Carolsruham ab Orbe Latino testari. --Iustinus 17:13, 10 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ubi nomen latinum invenistis? Egomet solum "Fridericiana" inveni. Alex1011 21:44, 10 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: : Malum, non iam memini, et opus est fontem meliorem (et sollemniorem) invenire! --Iustinus (disputatio) 00:09, 6 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Si "ad quietem Caroli" (sic, cum virgulis duplicibus) apud Google quaeris, fontem unum reperis; si "quietis Caroli", fontem alterum. Sed mihi videtur alia nomina usitatiora fuisse. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:59, 6 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::: Sed certus sum me alicubi vidisse fontem sollemniorem huius "Universitas Litterarum ad Quietatem Caroli in Germania Superiore"... nunc autem non reperio nisi istam salutationem noniam exstantem... --Iustinus (disputatio) 15:18, 6 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)

message: https://fr.glosbe.com/fr/la/Universit  --Alex1011 (disputatio) 15:02, 11 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Quid hic monstratur? An nexus fortasse erroneus est? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:18, 11 Novembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Universitas litterarum ad Quietatem Caroli in Germania Superiore"
Disputatio:Piscina

message: Piscina ab pisces nominatur...debeamusne mentionem piscum facere?--Ioshus Rocchio 17:34, 11 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can write "piscina ab pisces nominatur" but I don't know what else to write... Alexanderr 17:38, 11 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Also what is the right latin word for "for -ing" such as in this case where a pool is "for swimming, bathing, and playing"? Alexanderr 17:39, 11 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Well, I'm saying is that traditionally they were fish ponds, coy and such, in people's atria. Ing is formed by the latin gerund... "pro natando, lavando(balneando might be a word, but I don't feel right about it), ludendo..."--Ioshus Rocchio 17:52, 11 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Well I'll make sure to remember that in the future, and fix the "ings" on this page. :) Alexanderr 17:55, 11 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

message: My original idea for what word to use to describe a "piscina" was "lacuna", and then it was changed to "lacus" (because lacuna isn't classical latin apperantly - even though it was never my goal to write classical latin), and then it was changed to "Stagnus". I personally thought about using "stagnus" in my original description, however I felt that that word carries a kind of pond scum, stagnant idea. And while the wates of a pool are tranquile the are still regulated and filtered... That's all I really wanted to say. Alexanderr 21:16, 12 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I don't like stagnus either, it is more properly a swamp. Lacus is good.--Ioshus Rocchio 03:49, 13 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stagnus
Disputatio:Os (anatomia oris)

message: oportet mutare titulum : ossarium venit enim ab "os, ossis" nec  ab "os, oris"

message: confirmo etiam Italice ossarium est locus in quo mortuos deposti sunt.--Massimo Macconi 20:43, 16 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if the title is the problem...its not quite my fault because I used the one provided at the os article. Is my latin corrupt though, or is the template only in reference to the title? Alexanderr 21:52, 18 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: : Ossarium was just meant to illustrate Os (ossis), as the former word is derived from the latter. The content you created describes Os (oris).

text: : No big problem though, that's what the "move" function is provided for ;-) --UV 22:19, 18 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ossarium
Disputatio:Jery Sandoval

message: Cur "ab ovo"? IacobusAmor 02:01, 17 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ab ovo 

message: Ab ovo = Ab initio. Est expressio Titi Livii.
--Phranciscusmagnus 21:32, 18 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: En espanol, Fransisce, de huevo...--Ioshus Rocchio 17:22, 20 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ab Ovo
Disputatio:Plutoides

message: Plutonium video, sed sit nomen rectum volo scire. Quin nomine "pluton, -onis" utimur? Mirabor.... Sinister Petrus 18:44, 17 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Em... Pluton, -onis idem nomen est quam nomen planetae, sed cum nominativo casu Graecius scripto.  Quod dictio Anglica 'pluton' indicare vult est stellam errantem Plutoniam—cf. etiam paginam Lusitanam pt:plutónico; etiam dicunt Francogallice fortasse plutonique erit, sed Latine ‘Plutonius’ melius quam ‘Plutonicus’ est.  In Vicipaedia Anglica de difficultatibus huius nominis reddendi loquuntur; vide en:Talk:Pluton (astronomy)#In French... sed pagina Latina iam ibi excerpta est :p   —Myces Tiberinus 21:54, 17 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Gratias propter responsum celerem tibi ago. Ratio, quam narravisti, satis bona mihi videtur. Modo rogavi quod de nomine nec plus nec minus mirabar. Sinister Petrus 01:13, 18 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

text: Credo nunc haec pagina movenda esse ad alium nomen, sicut Plutoides (sicut Asteroides) aut Planeta Plutonicus; Plutonium iam diu significat elementum. Vide e.g.http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20080611/sc_space/plutonowcalledaplutoid et alias Vicipaedias.--Rafaelgarcia 15:37, 15 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen rei
Disputatio:Torontum

message: Toronto is NOT the capital of Canada. Ottawa IS the capital of Canada.
replies: text: That's nice. I know it may be hard to take time to read a one-sentence article, but it says "Toronto is a city and the capitol building [sic] of Ontario" (not "Canada") and has since the article was created. —Myces Tiberinus 11:13, 18 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :"Capitolium" in "capitem" correxi. Jackmitchell 05:32, 13 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::ecce, animosity! eheu, cur vos contentionum habeunt? [Scripsit usor 64.228.89.86 tempore 02:01, 7 Maii 2008‎]

message: Hopefully this comment won't demonstrate too much ignorance on my part, :-) but it seems that the adjective in Universitas Torontonensis has a Toronton- stem that would be a good enough fons for Toronto, -onis (as an addition to the current Torontum). Is this correct? I think that had they based it off Torontum, it would have been Torontensis (like in conventus neolatinus Torontensis) not Torontonensis. Mattie (disputatio) 18:59, 29 Aprilis 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That's logical, and Torontonensis indeed seems well-attested. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 19:16, 29 Aprilis 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :It also seems the few mentions of Conventus Neolatinus Torontensis I found on Google are mistaken, given that C. N. Torontonensis gives far more results. I added Toronto to the article, anyway. Mattie (disputatio) 19:24, 29 Aprilis 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Sacreum added a direct attestation of "Torontinum" from Graesse. I think it's probably a mistaken back-formation from the adjective, but there it is. We don't have a direct attestation for "Toronto", likely though that form is, so I reduced it to a footnote. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:47, 5 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible ''Toronto, -onis''
Disputatio:Langobardus sermo

message: In primum...dialectos, dialecti, f, ergo Dialectos Langobarda. In secundum, genitivum, Dialectos Langobardiae. In tertium, nonne est lingua re vera? Lingua Langobarda, vide Lingua Sicula, Lingua Neapolitana, quae sunt linguae verae, credo, sicut Lombarde, :en:Lombard_language#Status... Permaxime pergravest honorem dare his linguis, ut non perdantur.--Ioshus Rocchio 14:03, 18 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
Aegre fero quod erravi: dialetto Italice masculinum verbum sicut "sermo" est; posthac "dialectos" vel "dialectus" (ex Suetonio) feminina vocabula a me adhibebuntur. Ut meus verborum thesaurus de Italica lingua et meum litterarum corpus opinantur, Lombardo (Langobardus) dialectus est, ergo in similibus condicionibus "linguam" non adhibebo.
--131.175.57.10 14:43, 12 Octobris 2006 (UTC) Andreas Victor

message: Est lingua, non dialectos.--Ioshus (disp) 19:11, 25 Martii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sed nomen est dialectos. --Alex1011 19:17, 25 Martii 2007 (UTC)
Langobardus lingua est, et hoc a UNESCO et ISO dicitur. Etiam Vicipaedia langobardice scripta est, sic dicere possumus etiam Vicimediam illui titulum linguae dedisse. Origo sua non de italico, sed directe de latino fuit. Cur dicitis dialectum/sermonem esse? --Eldomm (disputatio) 09:40, 10 Octobris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  dialectos/lingua
Disputatio Categoriae:Olympia Certamina

message: This category really needs to be renamed. See Disputatio Usoris:Iustinus#Olympia_aestiva for some discussion of what the Olympics were called in antiquity. --Iustinus 04:27, 19 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So, what to call it? Categoria:Olympia? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:26, 1 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :Well, if it helps, the discussion I linked to back in Aught-Six is now at Disputatio Usoris:Iustinus/Archive2#Olympia aestiva --Iustinus 15:56, 1 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
I was hoping for a suggestion! Well, my suggestion is Categoria:Olympia Certamina. (I add "Certamina" to avoid ambiguity.) Any other comments? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:46, 5 Aprilis 2011 (UTC)

text: For the fundamental concept, the English wiki doesn't recognize a need for an analog of Certamina, though it does for certain subdivisions. Here's a severely pruned tree, ex en:
replies: text: :Olympics
replies: text: ::Ancient Olympic Games

text: ::Olympic culture

text: ::History of the Olympics

text: ::Olympic medals

text: ::Olympic movement

text: ::Olympics opening ceremonies

text: ::Olympic records

text: ::Paralympics

text: ::Olympic sports

text: ::Summer Olympic Games
replies: text: :::1896 Summer Olympics

text: :::1900 Summer Olympics, etc., etc.

text: ::Olympic symbols

text: ::Winter Olympic Games
replies: text: :::1924 Winter Olympics

text: :::1928 Winter Olympics, etc., etc.

text: ::Youth Olympic Games IacobusAmor 13:10, 5 Aprilis 2011 (UTC)
OK, since no other suggestion has been made, and the present name is inaccurate, I'll ask UVbot to do the move. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:58, 15 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)

text: My perhaps too subtle suggestion in favor of "Olympia" stands above, and it's supported by the fact that the name of the article in question is "Olympia (certamina)," not "Olympia Certamina." Also, it's going to be awkward having the category for "Olympic culture" be a subset of "Olympic Games," since culture is not a game, and the relationship could be considered the other way round: games are subsets of culture. IacobusAmor 22:15, 15 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: :I can't see your suggestion, sorry. I did think about "Olympia", but it won't do as a category name in Latin because it's ambiguous: it's also the name of a place. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:27, 15 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)

text: :But, let me add, my only interest in this was to get "Ludi Olympiae" obliterated: I'm no sportif, and if you and others can now find an even better name, that's fine by me. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:39, 16 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Since the broadest-scale article on this constellation of topics is Olympia (certamina), is there a reason the category shouldn't match it, as "Categoria:Olympia (certamina)"? IacobusAmor 13:43, 16 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)

text: For the record, I agree with Olympia Certamina. --Iustinus (disputatio) 00:15, 7 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ex ''Disputatio Categoriae:Ludi Olympiae''
Disputatio:Eminem

message: Heh, nam Eminem musicam popularem cantat? --Brandmeister 08:45, 19 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quod genus, quam categoriam et paginam parentalem propones? --Roland (disp.) 10:24, 19 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :Rap aut hip-hop? --Brandmeister 11:14, 19 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Rap vel hip-hop habemus? ;-) --Roland (disp.) 11:23, 19 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Mox creabo :P --Brandmeister 16:29, 19 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Hoc mihi gaudio est. :-) --Roland (disp.) 16:48, 19 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::Linea tenuis...Eminem ad initium cantabat hip-hop...nunc et iam, incertus sum...fortasse plus rap quam hip-hop...--Ioshus Rocchio 18:47, 19 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stylus

message: Nepos ineptus?? Cur sic eum appellant? Anglice: Silly grandson?--Rafaelgarcia 02:42, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nepos 'a luxurious or riotous person'; ineptus 'impertinent': so 'brash fellow, rapper', whatever. Maybe somebody can come up with a better Latinism. Quis tam perditus ac profusus nepos ut fuit Sextus Naevius? 'Who has been such a desperate and even riotous dude as has been Sextus Naevius?' (Cicero). IacobusAmor 03:01, 9 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :cur superbe bacchitur?? Estne definitio 'rappandi'? 80.139.155.158 16:37, 18 Iunii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nepos ineptus

message: Hodie 80.220.49.117, usor ignotus, commentarium omnino corrupit. O magistratus nobilissimi, si placet, statim progrediatur hic vandalus ad ultimum supplicium! IacobusAmor 12:50, 18 Iunii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Corruptio verborum
Disputatio Formulae:Systema solare nostrum

message: Diametrum ad radium mutavi, quod index anglicus radios habet. Cur radii in indice sunt? Ordinare secundum radium est melius quam secundum diametrum quod opus non est rescribere indicem. Spero rationem meam tibi patere. Sinister Petrus 01:50, 22 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Secundum diametrum an radium?