lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Amphibrachys

message: Please >provide <sources even if it is not English.  We are trying to become a viable encyclopedia. Tametsi non Anglice sit, praebire fontes si tibi placeat.--Jondel (disputatio) 07:11, 2 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte dicis, Jondel. Latinistae fere omnes multilingues sunt! Fontes utiles quacumque lingua scriptos accipimus. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:22, 2 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)

message: De "removed English message (it would be ok to link to a page with translations etc., but in this way it's just English 'imperialism')." Dear 80.133.112.160, what part of the formula "Non stipula" and its message, "Haec pagina nondum stipula est. Oportet inter 6 menses admeliorare. Paginis minimis Vicipaedicis necesse est," are you thinking is English? Or is the formula realizing itself otherwise on your screen? The article wasn't yet a stipula, so removing the formula made no progress. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:13, 2 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "removed English message"

message: "The Black Bands came over" is a misleading example of an amphibrach. Yes, the words can be forced into that meter, but their natural reading is S Ś Ś S Ś S. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 19:36, 5 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Broganio confisus versum istum protuli. Nonne tamen came over amphibrachys est? Neander (disputatio) 19:51, 5 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: The Black Bands
Disputatio:Casa trabalis

message: Neander, you changed "Montana lignatoris casa stipitum" to "Montana casa trabalis." Fair enough with trabalis, but Traupman has lignator for 'woodcutter, lumberjack'. Is something wrong with the term? Or will a native Latin-speaker somehow know to render montana casa trabalis in English as 'a timber-cutter's mountain log cabin'? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:26, 25 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Credidi hanc adeo pusillam esse rem, quae omitti possit. Restitui. Neander (disputatio) 19:28, 25 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lignator
Disputatio Categoriae:Musea textilium

message: Nomen (ab utente Vanosilo) creatum: Musea Textilium. Melius: Musea textilium. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 22:17, 2 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte mones. Categoriam movi. --UV (disputatio) 23:20, 2 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio Formulae:Distinguo

message: Hanc formulam hodie primum vidi. Eandem fere rem facit atque formulam "Videhom" (i.e. vide paginam fere homonymam) sed suggestione negativa: "Nonne in errorem cecidisti? Stultus es!" Qua ratione in formulam Videhom urbaniorem, iam saepe adhibitam, contribui. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:26, 5 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribui
Disputatio:Alexander Santos

message: De: "X est pedilusor Iaponiensis, sed etiam Turmae Pediludicae Nationalis Iaponiae (2002 - 2006) lusor fuit." = 'X is a Japanese football player, but was also a player of the National Football-Playing Team of Japan'. Why the contrast? Why not et instead of sed? Or perhaps better: 'X is a Japanese football player who played for. . . .'? Deploying hundreds of examples of a problematic formula may itself be problematic. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:26, 8 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed all articles. sed → et. --Japan Football (disputatio) 06:22, 9 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sed
Disputatio:Mauritius Macri

message: ... haec verba cum notis quinque subiunctis: " dexterarum partiumhttps://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/11/26/arge-n26.html http://www.lemonde.fr/ameriques/article/2015/11/23/en-argentine-le-liberal-mauricio-macri-remporte-l-election-presidentielle_4815218_3222.html http://www.lastampa.it/2015/10/26/esteri/boom-della-destra-in-argentina-pareggio-coi-peronisti-e-ballottaggio-a-sorpresa-da-favorita-Hc5GDIoOurVy9XAusg57WN/pagina.html https://amerika21.de/2015/11/136903/macri-ernennt-kabinett http://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2015-11/argentinien-wahl-mauricio-macri-praesident-konservativer -aut mediae dexterae secundum aliorum sententiamhttp://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/22/argentina-election-exit-polls-buenos-aires-mauricio-macri -". In prima sententia paginae satis longae oportet res certas inserere. Si mensuram qua a centro ideali factio politica distet nescimus, oportet de hac re in pagina de factione disserere! Atque si cum verbo "conservativa" aliqui dissentiunt, oportet et hoc verbum e prima sententia removere.
 
Necesse erit nexus, in notis subiunctis enumeratos, melius explicare, sicut iam feci ego in ea nota quae primum locum habet. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:50, 9 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  E primis sententiis removi ...
Disputatio:Teruyuki Moniwa

message: Pertinere almost always goes with ad, and it "very rarely" goes with in + acc. and per + acc., so this cum would seem to be wrong, or at least inadvisable. See Lewis and Short. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:04, 9 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Remove cum from all articles? (e.g. Makoto Tanaka too?)

text: *"(Name) inter alia cum turmis (club) et (club) lusit." → "(Name) inter alia turmis (club) et (club) lusit." ?

text: P.S. I want you to write on my talk page. --Japan Football (disputatio) 14:50, 9 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Cum X pertinet = 'Belongs with X'?
Disputatio:Condomium

message: * Per Condomium fluit flumen nominatum Francogallice Baïse (vide :en:Baïse). Quid erat istius fluminis nomen Latinum? Anthony Appleyard (disputatio) 23:26, 11 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :Hofmannus dicit Balisa et Graesse dicit Baisa. Lesgles (disputatio) 02:27, 12 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Flumen Baïse
Disputatio:Simultas

message: Du Cange dicit sensum guerra latiorem esse quam feud/vendetta: "GUERRA, Werra, Bellum, publicum vel privatum." Estne pagina fortase ad bellum privatum movenda? Lesgles (disputatio) 15:21, 12 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Vide simultas. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:36, 12 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  De ''guerra''
Disputatio:Ariadne

message: Constat lubricum esse etymologiam nominibus propriis invenire. Quodsi Ariadne 'purissimam' significat, praestiterit testimonio aliquo confirmari. Praeterea, nonne dicere praestat Ariadnen potius nomen Minoum quam Graecum esse? Neander (disputatio) 08:52, 25 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Audacius ego sententiam brevem "Eius nomen Graece purissima significat" removi. Oportet rem pellucidius dicere opusque philologicum citare. Significationem (iuxta aliam contradictoriam) Robertus Graves in indice libri The Greek Myths proposuit, sed ille poëta potius quam philologus fuit. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:14, 25 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine 

message: Mortua est aut se pendens in arbore, aut in urbe Argis, fortasse a Perseo. Hanc rem testimonio non addito removebo. --Bavarese (disputatio) 13:08, 1 Iulii 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  De morte
Disputatio Categoriae:Iura

message: Haec pagina categoria rerum montium Iurae est, ergo montes, valles, flumina, urbes etcetera in regione Iurassica Franciae, Helvetiae Germaniaeque indicat. Ad res iuris alia pagina Categoria:Iurisprudentia spectat.Vanosilo (disputatio) 21:11, 29 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Si categoriam de regione creare vis, Vanosilo, crea (e.g. "Iura (regio)" aut "Iura (mons)"). Paginas geographicas ex hac categoria pro tempore in "Iura (pagus Helvetiae)" movi. Id simplicius fuit, quia "iura" est verbum Latinum commune. OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:36, 29 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iura – Ius
Disputatio:Abbatia Territorialis Beatae Mariae Cryptaeferratae

message: Archimandrita Aemilianus Fabbricatore non iam hanc abbatiam regit; suis enim propriis precibus mense Novembri 2013 a papa hoc munere suspensus est --Bavarese (disputatio) 18:19, 30 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Quia fortasse magis quam alii rem cognovisti, nonne tu ipse paginam vis emendare? Lesgles (disputatio) 18:47, 30 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :Feci. --Bavarese (disputatio) 11:54, 31 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  archimandrita Aemilianus Fabbricatore
Disputatio:Retroactio

message: To my ear, feedback doesn't evoke the slightest notion of "feed/fodder," but draws instead on the (already metaphorical) notion of feeding as giving, supporting, providing, channeling. If we're coining words, something as unconcrete as retro(f)actio might be conceivable, but then we shouldn't ordinarily be coining words. ;) IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:20, 2 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A good metaphor would be a guided missile. Although a lot of feedback technology is used in amplifier electronics.Anyway there is constant comparison with a standard or target goal. This comparison info is used to guide the forward movement of the missile.retro action or retro factio looks ok.Jondel (disputatio) 15:28, 2 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :I said "pabulum", but I'm not coining words, just offering a literal translation in case the reader wanted to know what this strange English word might imply. We don't coin words, do we? That's why I removed "alimentia"! But please, Iacobe, replace my translation with a better one or delete it if you think it's no use. "Feed" says pabulum to me, but maybe that's just me.

text: :I doubt, myself, if there is any Latin word we can use as pagename here. That's why I left the page at "Feedback". But if someone else can think of one, that would be great. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:26, 2 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ::An etymological connection may historically be present, but for practical purposes feedback doesn't evoke ideas of anything edible. Think of it as giveback, for which coiners might offer retrodatio (from the genuine word datio 'a giving'), but of course we don't do that sort of thing. ;) In many contexts, the English noun is just a synonym of response (Latine responsum). IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:42, 2 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Well, dropping all possible implication of feeding, can we after all use "responsum directorium" as pagename? I guess the specificity of feedback, as opposed to just any response, is that you want to be guided by it. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:48, 2 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Alimentum, pabulum, etc.
Disputatio:Bavaria Superior

message: Hac in pagina situs Bavariae Superioris pertinens ad ceteras partes Bavariae haud recte descriptus esse mihi videtur. --Bavarese (disputatio) 19:13, 6 Februarii 2016 (UTC)

message: Vexillum corrigendum est! (qv ) --Sukaq (disputatio) 18:21, 28 Martii 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  VEXILLUM
Disputatio:Communicatio

message: If it's one of the 1000 most important pages, shouldn't it also be one of the 10,000 most important pages? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:39, 8 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: @IacobusAmor I like your logic. Toddcs (disputatio) 19:53, 9 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Myrias

message: The block quote that defines communication, and especially reference #3 (and #4) that it is based on, are biased toward a special case of communication; namely, the one indicated in reference #4. 
In the general case, the receiver's subjective relationship (needs, desires, etc.), if any, to what is communicated is irrelevant. For communication to have taken place, all that matters is that objective *information* has been successfully conveyed from a sender to a receiver. 
"Information" will then require its own, separate definition. 
But the definition of communication itself should not be limited to particular circumstances, nor made more complicated than it needs to be, and actually is.
Toddcs (disputatio) 20:16, 9 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Block quote that defines communication
Disputatio:Brooklynium

message: Usor 2604:2000:a05a:3200:4df5:400a:86b4:6310, care amice: you changed "Brooklynium" to "Broclinium" in defiance of the attached footnote, which plainly states that the name in Latin is "Brooklynium." Did you have a source for "Broclinium"? Tuo fonte absente, atque attestatione repugnante praesente, tuam mutationem revertimus. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 18:56, 9 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma
Disputatio Formulae:Provinciae hodiernae Suecicae

message: Paginae nullae hoc tempore habemus de his provinciis. Nomina sine dubio Latinizare oportet. Nomina hic data arti grammaticae non congruunt: verba enim formam genetivam Suecicam habent, nomine nominativo omisso. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:57, 10 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Nomina recenseo. Duas paginas apud nos iam repperi! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:07, 10 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :Having linked up to the few pages we already had, I never came back to revise the other names. They all, probably, need re-thinking, and could all perhaps be Latinized in some way. I don't know whether "comitatus" (like some other languages) or "provincia" (like Spanish) or some other word will be the best translation to use for län: it would perhaps save trouble if we decide before doing any more pages. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:57, 23 Iunii 2016 (UTC).
thread_title:  Vicificanda
Disputatio:Exercitator

message: Traupman nobis dicit exercitorem Anglice esse 'trainer', sed exercitatorem esse 'practitioner' (e.g., 'practitioner of Buddhism', contra 'practitioner of medicine', quod medicus tantum est). Cassell's affirmat 'trainer' esse exercitorem et magistrum. L&S dicunt exercitatorem esse 'exerciser, trainer', sed exercitorem esse "one who exercises or practises any profession, business, calling: “cauponae aut stabuli,” an innkeeper, Dig. 44, 7, 4 fin.: “navis, ratium,” a ship-master, captain, ib. 14, 1, 1; 4, 9, 1; Inscr. Grut. 492, 5." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:19, 13 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ainsworth dicit: "Practitioner (a vulgar barbarism, for practician; like musicianer for musician) Exercitator. In law, *Pragmaticus, causarum actor. In physic, medicinae professor." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:26, 13 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: : Num umquam fontes quos protuli inspexisti? L&S recte dicunt, praeter quod exercitor ambos sensus habet. De exercitatore Traupman fidem non facit. Etiam antea aliquoties erravit. Neander (disputatio) 18:00, 13 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma
Disputatio Categoriae:Febris

message: A problem here is that fever is an indicium morbi, but certain named fevers are morbi themselves and therefore should (also) be categorized as morbi. (English of course is more particular, with "Animal bacterial diseases" and "Animal viral diseases" and such.) Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary:
replies: text: typhoid fever n (1845) : a communicable disease [N.B.] marked esp. by fever, diarrhea, prostration, headache, and intestinal inflammation and caused by a bacterium (Salmonella typhosa)

text: yellow fever n (1739) : an acute destructive infectious disease [N.B.] of warm regions marked by sudden onset, prostration, fever, albuminuria, jaundice, and often hemorrhage and caused by a virus transmitted by a mosquito
In the English wikipedia, the category "Typhoid fever" is categorized under "Animal bacterial diseases," "Salmonellosis," and "Salmonella"; in the German, the linked article, "Typhus," is categorized under "Bakterielle Infektionskrankheit des Menschen," "Meldepflichtige Krankheit," "Salmonellose," and "Typhus." Which looks odd, but typhus in German is apparently a different disease from typhus in English, which Merriam-Webster calls "a severe human febrile disease [N.B.] . . . caused by a rickettsia (Rickettsia prowazekii)." The English "Typhoid fever" and the German "Typhus" are linked to each other in both directions, but the German links to our Typhus (morbus), which in turn links to English "Typhus," and the English then links to German "Fleckfieber." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 10:57, 16 Februarii 2016 (UTC)

text: I did indeed ensure that all the named fevers currently in this category are  also categorized under "Morbi". Does a problem remain? We wouldn't set up a category for "diseases that are called fever in some language or other". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:56, 16 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Febres, morbi, &c.
Disputatio:Planeta iovialis

message: In Lexico Russico-Latino "aеrogenus, gaseosus, gasicus" reperio, sed non gasosus. In linguis vulgaribus varia sunt suffixa: Fr. gazeux, It. gassoso, sed Hisp. gaseoso, Angl. gaseous. Quid dicunt alii? Lesgles (disputatio) 22:25, 17 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :Traupman nomen adiectivum gaseus attestatur, s.v. gas stove (foculus gaseus) (2007:550). IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:12, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :Cassell's monet: "gas, render by spiritus (-ūs) or vapor" (1968:717); ergo adiectiva Vicipaediana erunt spiritualis et vaporaria. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:43, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)

text: Salve Legles! Quid impedit, quominus pagina sub titulo "Planeta Iovianus" redigatur? Quae vox carere videtur quavis offensione. Laurentianus (disputatio) 22:56, 17 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :Hmm, nihil impedit (mea mente). Cicero, lector Vicipaediae idealis, contextum "planetae Ioviani" citius quam "gigantis gaseosi" intellecturus est :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:25, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Apud veteres (library of latin texts) adiectivum Iovianus neminem nisi Diocletianum designans repperi. At Martianus Cappella astronomus vocem iovialis habet. Qua ratione adductus nunc malim, ut planeta iovialis sit lemma, de quo agatur. Laurentianus (disputatio) 11:17, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Quod nomen nunc in pagina ipsa inserui. Quid dicis, Lesgles? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:23, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adiectivum
Disputatio:Whois

message: I think this is an earlier version of Whois and if so we don't need it.  Am I missing something?
replies: text: This seems to be a part of package of tools used for fixing Wikipedia. Let me fix this.Jondel (disputatio) 20:18, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :Good:  now it's in Latin! :-) But it still says the same things as the page Whois in the main namespace.  And it's not really a Wikipedia tool:  it's a standard Internet tool.  So we may not need both pages.  (Sorry for not signing my previous note:  a student walked in as I was writing it.) A. Mahoney (disputatio) 21:03, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ::(I wish I could sit in your class!) Uh , it is preceded by 'Vicipaediae:', apparently it is used by Wikipedia geeks, and a localized version. I don't know.Im looking again. --Jondel (disputatio) 21:47, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)

text: : In my view, since this page (in the Vicipaedia: namespace) does not contain anything useful specific to Vicipaedia, it should be deleted. Greetings, --UV (disputatio) 22:40, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ::I've done so, or rather I turned it into a redirect to the other page.  Jondel, if you want to enhance that page, go right ahead!  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 20:46, 19 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Thanks!--Jondel (disputatio) 23:05, 19 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant page? [olim "Disputatio Vicipaediae:Whois"]
Disputatio:Selfie

message: As our images show, making a photographic self-portrait has been possible since the invention of photography, so I don't see any need to borrow this English neologism. Why not photographema sui ipsius? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:21, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Many other wikis, including even the French one, are taking selfie for the lemma, so that point is debatable; what's not debatable is the error of implying that selfies are taken only with digital cameras, as that's disproved by one of the article's own illustrations—and I have a selfie taken in the mirror by my grandfather in 1905, showing that his camera was most definitely not a digital one! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:11, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :digital camera:typical but not always.--Jondel (disputatio) 16:05, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  De titulo 

message: The meaning and grammar of "retio" and "congregabilio" aren't clear to me. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:21, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because those aren't words (as I've indicated to the author on my page, where he asked). IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:11, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: :Im correcting this to retia and congregabile. internet  social  network, like facebook, etc.--Jondel (disputatio) 15:48, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
"Selfie" is described as "the word indeed of 2013". That doesn't mean much, but what seems to be intended is that the Oxford University Press Reference Division Press Office chose the word as its English neologism of 2013. I guess this is of interest to fans of Oxford University Press Reference Division Press Office, but maybe not so much to us, especially since English is not our special focus. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:21, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)

text: :We're not focusing on English, it is more of a fad(popular in California).--Jondel (disputatio) 16:04, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)

text: Fixed, more or less? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:51, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  De Latinitate
Disputatio:Diptera

message: The absence of this article for so long has been a wonder and an annoyance: so hearty thanks, Lesgles, for starting it! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:49, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome! :) Lesgles (disputatio) 17:51, 20 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: At last!
Disputatio:Hierusalem

message: Quae hac in pagina utilia inveniuntur, transferenda censeo esse in paginam quam iam habemus Hierosolyma. --Bavarese (disputatio) 14:13, 25 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte mones, amice! REDIRECT fecimus. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:43, 25 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hierosolyma
Disputatio:Litterae Russicae

message: Mihi videtur titulum et textum haud inter se consonare.  Textus re vera de litteris Russicis, i.e. lingua Russica ubique scriptis, disserit. "Litterae Russiae" litterae in omnibus linguis Russiae esse debent, sed aliae linguae et litterae re vera paginas suas postulant. Dissonantia disparebit si titulus in "Litterae Russicae" mutamus. Quid dicunt alii? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:58, 28 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sic mutetur! "Litterae Russicae" erit titulus commodior. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 19:39, 28 Februarii 2016 (UTC)

text: Consentio. -- Alexander Geraščenko (disputatio) 06:22, 29 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus et textus
Disputatio:Vasconia Gallica

message: Puto me nimis cito egisse, fortasse in fonte non de pays Basque, sed de Gascogne agitur. Quomodo possumus has regiones Latine distinguere? Lesgles (disputatio) 16:11, 29 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Possumus e.g. "Gasconia" pro Gascogne uti (verbum saepe in fontibus mediaevalibus repertum) et pays Basque ad pede litterarum in "pagus Vasconicus (Francia)" convertere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:29, 29 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pays Basque / Gascogne
Disputatio:30 Februarii

message: Haec pagina dicit Unionem Souieticae mentes qui triginta dies semper habet uti esse. Hoc disconuenit cum Vicipaedia Anglica. Haecne mutare debeo?
Robert Hegler (disputatio) 01:33, 1 Martii 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Pagina mutaui sed pagina fontes indicii non habet. Haec pagina est futura plurimus labor! Robert Hegler (disputatio) 01:29, 7 Martii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calendarium Unionis Souieticae