lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Mauritius Child

message: Barbarice "movement" momentum reddidi quoniam melius non excogitare possum. Quid tu suggeris?Tergum violinae 15:42, 30 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nescio, sed nonnulli Vicipaediani voce motu usi sunt. Vide Motus Munitionis Nationalis (Graeciae), Motus Republicanus Popularis, Motus Romanticus, Motus Socialis Italicus, etc. IacobusAmor 17:08, 30 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Bene. Ita modificabo. Tergum violinae 19:56, 30 Martii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Anglicum: ''movement''
Disputatio:District 9 (pellicula)

message: Cum viderim et legerim in Taberna nostra disputationem de recta versione Latina Anglici substantivi Alien, mihi videtur Alienigena optima versio delecta existimari. Quamobrem, ea usus sum in hac pagina. Si vero sententia mutabitur, quaeso novam optionem ostendite sic ut hic mutare possim quando necesse sit. --Poecus 21:22, 30 Martii 2010 (UTC)

message: Nomen originarium est Wikus. Quam putatis esse meliorem Latinam versionem?--Poecus 20:36, 18 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
*Credo linguam Latinam litteram "w" non habere.--89.164.152.88 14:17, 16 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :Littera fuit aevo medio, vide w. Etiam si nomen Latinum nescimus pro Wikus mos est non mutare.--Xaverius 14:29, 16 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Vicus van der Merwe''
Disputatio:Ricky Martin

message: Prima facie ad Ricardus Martin movendum esset, secunda autem facie videmus Ricky Martin esse nomen fictum; verum est Henricus Iosephus (Enrique José) Martín Morales. An nomina ficta quoque Latinizanda sunt? --Gabriel Svoboda 13:53, 31 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Lemma in Wikipedia est "Enrique Martín Morales, better known by his stage name Ricky Martin"; ergo, optimum lemma hic fortasse sit "Henricus Martín Morales, usitate Ricky Martin." IacobusAmor 15:02, 31 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :And look at all the categories he gets to be in! Ex en: "1971 births | Living people | 1990s singers | 2000s singers | 2010s singers | 20th-century actors | 20th-century Puerto Rican people | 21st-century Puerto Rican people | American humanitarians | American philanthropists | English-language singers | Gay actors | Gay musicians | LGBT people from Puerto Rico | Grammy Award winners | Latin Grammy Award winners | Latin pop singers | Menudo members | MTV Europe Music Awards winners | People from San Juan, Puerto Rico | Puerto Rican capoeira practitioners | Puerto Rican male singers | Puerto Rican people of Corsican descent | Puerto Rican people of Spanish descent | Puerto Rican pop singers | Puerto Rican soap opera actors | Puerto Rican stage actors | Puerto Rican vegetarians | Ricky Martin | Spanish-language singers | World Music Awards winners." IacobusAmor 15:04, 31 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Nonne Ricardus Martinus Morales?--24.107.235.195 16:26, 31 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Nomen Hispanicum Enrique Latine est Henricus. IacobusAmor 16:30, 31 Martii 2010 (UTC)

text: :::...et nomen est Hispanicum, ubi 'Martín' non est praenomen, sed cognomen paternum (et Morales cognomen maternum).  Ita, "Ricky Martin" haud fictum est; tantum Anglicizatum est.  —Mucius Tever 11:00, 1 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen

message: Paginam protexi per menses tres, ob causam usoris anonymi qui continenter nomen fictum "Enrico José Martínez del Morales" scribet. Nescio nomen verum, sed pagina Anglica dat nobis "Enrique Martín Morales". --Xaverius 10:34, 5 Novembris 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Paginis Anglicis et Hispanicis cum nobis consonantibus, anonymus debet fontem citare si nomen aliter scribere vult. Fontem hic subiungere potest. (Vide etiam disputationem anteriorem.) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:55, 5 Novembris 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protecta
Disputatio:Voyager 2

message: Omnes Vicipaediae aliae habent Voyager. Quid putatis? --Ioscius  ∞ 21:48, 31 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Paene omnes harum omnium sunt linguae Indoeuropaeae. IacobusAmor 02:14, 1 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

text: Puto omnia nomina Latine reddendi morem apud nos iam obsolefactum esse. Equidem Voyager praefero. --Neander 22:15, 31 Martii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Consentio. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:20, 1 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Et ego. --Fabullus 12:27, 1 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Viator/Voyager

message: Salve. Nomen est Voyager II, sed esse necesse est Voyager 2. Aliquid mutes?
Donatello (disputatio) 16:41, 3 Februarii 2013 (UTC).
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Universitas Tokiensis

message: I find "Tokiensis" at gigaCatholic, confirmed at Catholic hierarchy. It is also used in scientific nomenclature. "Tocioensis" can't be found on Google and looks badly-formed to me. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:15, 2 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Consentio.

text: *Tokiensis (a Tokium, -ii): 520 proventus

text: *Tokyonensis (a Tokyo, -nis): 343 proventus

text: *Tochiensis (a Tochium, -ii): 268 proventus

text: *Tokyensis (a Tokyum, -ii): 127 proventus

text: *Tokionensis (a Tokio, -nis): 14 proventus

text: *Tociensis (a Tocium, -ii): 8 proventus

text: *Tocionensis (a Tocio, -nis): 1 proventus

text: *Tocyensis (a Tocyum, -ii): 1 proventus

text: *Tochionensis, Tochyensis, Tochyonensis, Tocyonensis: 0 proventus

text: Ergo universitas appellanda est Tokiensis, urbs ipsa Tokium. --Gabriel Svoboda 11:22, 2 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Vae, repperi etiam nomen Tokyoensis (fortasse a Tokyo, indecl.) cum 677 proventibus, et similia (cum mutationibus c/ch/k et i/y). Sed credo nos indeclinabilia excludere posse, cum declinabilia confirmata habemus. --Gabriel Svoboda 11:31, 2 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Interdum Tokium apud nuntios Latinos Fennicos repperi. Tibi consentio: formam declinabilem praeferendumst. Oportet Google uti, sed formam usitatissimam non semper selegimus. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:44, 2 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus
Disputatio:Elisabetha Austriae (regina Franciae)

message: Nisi fontem habemus "Elizabetha"e, censeo formam "Elisabetha"m praeferendam. Vide quod dixi et in Vicipaedia:Taberna#Elizabeth. Pagina re-movenda? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:53, 3 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elisabetha
Disputatio:Maris aequor

message: Hmm, I don't think "planum" is the kind of level indicated here—what's the source for this?  I understand the usual word is aequor () and, when it is necessary to be more specific, the explicit phrase is maris aequor (as in supra maris aequor "above sea level").  —Mucius Tever 06:18, 4 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :I've moved to "Maris aequor" without further discussion, because (even if someone should propose an alternative term) this one has the required meaning, whereas "Planum marinum" didn't. Thanks, Mucius! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:15, 4 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :: This was a good move. Planum is what lies or extends in a horizontal direction, but obviously we need an expression for vertical level. Etymologically, Engl. level comes via Old French from Latin [deminutive of libra, viz.] libella  (perhaps reinterpreted as plural of *libellum or something). I don't know if this is textually evidenced in Medieval Latin. But anyways a case in point in given by Columella (8.17.4): "sin autem locus ... pari libra cum aequore maris est" (of a place that lies at the sea level). Another word denoting level is gradus (like German Stufe). In any case, aequor maris is far better than "planum marinum". By the way, there's also Super libram maris, whose title is likewise unsatisfactory. To be merged or deleted? --Neander 15:17, 4 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Id nunquam vidi! Pagina igitur fortasse mergenda cum redirectione. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:23, 4 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

text: Qua fonte nisus vocabulis "planum marinum" et "glaciare" usus sis, scire concupisco.--Ceylon 07:51, 4 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Planum?
Disputatio:Sus volans

message: Oro te, Andrea, cum es tu magister categoriarum, inveni categorias huius commentationis rectas! --Ioscius  ∞ 11:06, 4 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Moi? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:36, 4 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Categorias quasdam in paginas redirectionum addidi (vide "Nexus ad paginam"). An recte feci? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:43, 4 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
"Sus volat" looks like being an Anglo-centred phrase. Or is the idea of flying pig really attested in some text written in Latin? The idea of flying donkey (asinus volans) is attested (e.g. in Erasmus Roterodamus) as a locus communis for adynaton. --Neander 14:38, 4 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

text: Right, well I said in the first line "taken from English". I'm open to moving the article, surely, but it was PC's creation (although I don't think I kept a single word from his draft). On the other hand, I don't know if we can't keep the page, as it appears, of course translated from English, in Alicia in Terra Mirabili (iure non aequiore quam quo porci volant) and in Per Speculum Transitus (venit tempus nunc...cum mare fervens sit, porcis alaene sint quaerendi). It wouldn't kill us to have a page on the English version, would it? --Ioscius  ∞ 17:43,  4 Aprilis 2010  (UTC)
replies: text: :There are certainly some cultural references to be made here -- Carroll, Wodehouse and no doubt others. Of these, the Carroll text at least can even be read in Latin. I notice that the topic's of interest to Japanese readers; I don't see why it shouldn't be of interest to Latin readers too! There's still room for a page about flying donkeys. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:12, 4 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Categoria
Disputatio:Ode an die Freude

message: Amici,
Verbum "musicare" non amatis?  Italice, "musicare" significat "reddere verba in musica." Ergo, "praeclare musicare" (Italice "musicare famosamente", Anglice "to famously set to music") exemplum praeclarum reddendi musicalis describet. LionhardusCiampa 15:40, 5 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Magnus volumen Riddle & Arnold non includit "musicare." Mea max. culpa. LionhardusCiampa 08:15, 10 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Nec Du Cange, Glossarium ad scriptores mediae et infimae Latinitatis. O malam fortunam! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:54, 10 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Musicare" 

message: Amici,
Est melior:
# Pro Gaudio (Theodisce An die Freude), aut
# An die Freude (Latine Pro Gaudio)
?
LionhardusCiampa 15:26, 8 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Salve, Lionharde! Secundum regulas nostras, nisi versio Latina tituli iam publicata sit, debemus versio originalis "An die Freude" in titulo et in lemmate praefixare: ergo, (2). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:40, 8 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: : Pagina Friderico Schiller dicata regulas nostras violare videtur. --Neander 01:19, 12 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latine vs. Theodisce
Disputatio:Mutsuhito

message: I just would like to sound out.The name is pronounced in Japanese as Mutsuhito Meiji. The Chinese characters read Meiji Tenno Mutsuhito. Tenno means 'emperor'.--Jondel 06:56, 6 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Our rule is to use the normal international transliteration for the name, unless you can find a reliable source giving a Latin form. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:14, 6 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :The closest Latin phonetics would seem to be Meitsi. Maybe you can find a Latin source. IacobusAmor 12:01, 6 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Disputatio:Abbatia (discretiva)

message: These abbeys are for a category, not a discretiva. --Alex1011 09:51, 6 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: De veris abbatiis seu monasteriis recte dicis, Alex. Hic autem etiam habemus aliqua nomina oppidorum etc.: fortasse igitur paginae discretivae brevioris necesse sit? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:46, 6 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :quod et mihi videtur.--Utilo 11:07, 6 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Tum monasteria seu numeri 3,4 et 5 mea opinione delendi sunt secundum exempla vicipaediarum Anglicae et Germanicae. --Alex1011 11:32, 6 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::ita est--Utilo 12:53, 6 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delenda
Disputatio:Granatum (lapis)

message: De nomine vide etiam Disputatio:Granitum (lapis). --Fabullus 16:47, 6 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

message: "Et lapis natalis mense Ianuarii est". Quid hoc sibi vult? Anglice: "and the birthday of the stone is in January", at hoc nihil omnino significare videtur.
replies: text: Nemo scit nisi qui scripsit 95.28.182.232 00:23, 2 Septembris 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lapis natalis
Disputatio:Henricus Sneevliet

message: Aegre fero quod is, qui a parentibus Hendricus Josephus Franciscus Marie Sneevliet babtizatus est, nunc Pantocratore auctore Henricus Iosephus Franciscus Maria Sneevliet appellandus est. --Fabullus 12:25, 8 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe we should prefer the attested form. The standard Vicipaedian form of the given name should only apply if nothing else is attested - or, naturally, if the attested form coincides with the Vicipaedian one. The Vicipaedian form should be chosen carefully so that such coincidences should occur more frequently than conflicts. This is, as far as I know, how we solve the Ioannes/Iohannes problem - the standard form is Ioannes, but whenever the subject of the article has actually been referred to as Iohannes, it takes precedence (e. g. Iohannes Hus). Consistency - yes, it's good, the system just described provides the highest rational level of consistency - just not the absolute one. --Gabriel Svoboda 19:36, 8 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :I think the same (hence I chose Hendricus originally). It's the perfect choice for Vicipaedia: his real first name, also a Latin form, and one that no reader will regard as an error. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:44, 8 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Why should we call Hendricus a Latin form? Note Henricus Lorentz which we already had; surely 'Hendrik' and 'Hendricus' are the same name? They are, that being the Dutch variant of Henricus. Pantocrator 22:04, 8 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::But then again, why should we call Henricus a Latin form? Hendrik/Heinrich/Henry/Enrique (etc.) is a Germanic name which through the ages has been Latinized in several ways.You cannot use Vicipaedia as a source. Hendrik Antoon Lorentz is only called Henricus here in answer to our (in my view childish) rule that first names should be Latinized. I have not found any external source for this Latinization. What is more, I have a source where, in a Latin context, his name is left unaltered: see the subscript of the picture shown on the page devoted to him. --Fabullus 07:34, 9 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: De nomine Latino
Disputatio:Tempus glaciale recentissimum

message: Xaverius made another dubious change referring to the title as aevum glaciale. Scientists though, as stated on the English pages, distinguish the last glacial period from the Pleistocene ice age; which is why I said in aevo glaciali. Pantocrator 21:58, 10 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte dicis. Si periodus Latinitate haud antiqua non placet, quid dicunt eruditi de tempore? Lesgles (disputatio) 15:09, 20 Iunii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ad sententiam primam: fortasse Xaverius noster initium vici Anglici convertere voluit: "The last glacial period, popularly known as the Ice Age, was the most recent glacial period within the current ice age occurring during the last years of the Pleistocene, from approximately 110,000 to 12,000 years ago." Xaveri, ubi es? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:31, 20 Iunii 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: ::I just wanted to say that the "Last glacial period was an ice age that finished in 12.000 BC". I took Aevum glaciale as "glaciación", but to be fair back then I was just trying to improve Pantocrator's blurb and nothing else.--Xaverius 19:02, 26 Iunii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology
Disputatio:Cyanidum

message: Where is cyanis, -idis attested? I have only cyanidum and edited accordingly. Pantocrator 23:20, 12 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In view of Oxidum, that was probably the right thing to do. All the chemical -ide words of English, French, and what the Merriam-Webster dictionaries call the International Scientific Vocabulary (e.g., cyanide, dimethylsulfoxide, glucoside, hydride, nitride, nucleotide, oxide, silicide, sulfide, trichloride) are likely to share a single paradigm. IacobusAmor 00:13, 13 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :I couldn't find neither cyanis nor cyanidum, so I made a guess (looking on words like pyxide < πυξίς. But of course, you might be wright!--Utilo 13:59, 13 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Is that French? It's 'pyx' in English. Pantocrator 00:25, 14 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::English "pyx", but also "pyxis" (pl. pyxides), look here; pyxide is French.--Utilo 11:38, 14 Aprilis 2010 (UTC) 
What about nitriles? ca: nitril (sg.) - cs: nitril (sg.) - da: Nitril (sg.) - de: Nitril (sg.), Nitrile (pl.) - en: Nitrile (sg.) - es: nitrilo (sg.) - fr: Nitrile (sg.) - it: Nitrili (pl.) - po: Nitrila (sg.), Nitrilas (pl)--Utilo 14:11, 13 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

text: This is one I have not seen, but I assume nitrile, -is as it looks like it contains that suffix. Pantocrator 00:25, 14 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Then I should write nitrilia instead of nitriles, am I right?--Utilo 13:35, 14 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Yes, of course. Pantocrator 13:52, 14 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
Kalii cyanidum? - At least in German speaking countries the "Latin" form seems to be Cyankalium: cf. , IFA GESTIS, Merck's Warenlexikon (1884): Cyankalium ( .... Kalium cyanatum).--Utilo 14:38, 13 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

text: That's German (all of your sources are in German); Latin does not form compounds like that. Kalii cyanidum follows the convention of the latest pharmaceutical Latin in denoting inorganic salts. Pantocrator 00:25, 14 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Declinatio
Disputatio:Provincia Cuneensis

message: Erat confusio inter Augustam Bagiennorum (circiter 3 652 incolarum) et Augustam Vagiennorum.  Salutiae (circiter 16 500 incolarum) erat "Augusta Vagiennorum" cum V?  Persuasus non sum. LionhardusCiampa 22:00, 13 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Augusta Bagiennorum" ... "Augusta Vagiennorum"
Disputatio:Salutiae

message: Erat confusio inter Augustam Bagiennorum (circiter 3 652 incolarum) et Augustam Vagiennorum.  Salutiae (circiter 16 500 incolarum) erat "Augusta Vagiennorum" cum V?  Persuasus non sum. LionhardusCiampa 22:00, 13 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Augusta Bagiennorum" ... "Augusta Vagiennorum"
Disputatio:Augusta Bagiennorum

message: Erat confusio inter Augustam Bagiennorum (circiter 3 652 incolarum) et Augustam Vagiennorum.  Salutiae (circiter 16 500 incolarum) erat "Augusta Vagiennorum" cum V?  Persuasus non sum. LionhardusCiampa 22:00, 13 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Augusta Bagiennorum" ... "Augusta Vagiennorum" 

message: Nomen "Iulia Augusta Bagiennorum" mihi rarius videtur, "Augusta Bagiennorum" usitatius. An movere oportet? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:57, 1 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Apud Google nomen "JULIA AUGUSTA B/VAGIENNORUM" apud encyclopaediis generis wiki reperitur et in  uno fonte anni 1838. Error venit, nisi fallor, e nomine sollemni coloniae sic dato: "COLONIA JULIA AUGUSTA B/VAGIENNORUM". Quo dicto, nomen commune fuit pro certo "Augusta B/Vagiennorum". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:19, 3 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Nomen "Iulia Augusta Bagiennorum", rursus insertum, in notam subiunxi. E fonte saec. XIX venit (vide etiam nexum quem supra dedi) cuius auctor (ut mihi videtur) nomen "COLONIA JULIA AUGUSTA B/VAGIENNORUM" abbreviavit. Hoc nomen, rite in inscriptionibus scriptum, etiam in nota rettuli. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:01, 13 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio Categoriae:Tabernae acta priora

message: :Quae sequuntur e Disputatio Vicipaediae:Index tabulariorum Tabernae movi. Paginam ipsam contribui et in redirectionem mollem converti. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:40, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

message: What is it? We already have :Categoria:Tabernae acta priora. Maybe it has something to do with this? --Ioscius  ∞ 07:21, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me an attempt to organise the Taberna's archives, although no other page links here and we have already the :Categoria:Tabernae acta priora. The thing is, as Pantocrator himself has said here, he may not know what categories are for, or how they work. --Xaverius 08:54, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
Both of you, typically, have seen the need to gratuitously insult me. The true explanation is the obvious one - I simply did not know of the category's existence. I don't think I would have made this if I had seen it.  Nonetheless there potentially is a benefit to having a separate index - to summarise the subjects of discussions, making it easier to search. But even I wouldn't want to do that whole job, except maybe bit by bit. Pantocrator 09:27, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :I did not want to insult. I apologise if it sounded harsh or whatsoever, but I couldn't figure another way of expresing it in English. I know you want to help, I see the point of the page, and I could tell that you did not know that we had that category already (hence the comment on categories you made). You can see that the archives are already summarised at :Categoria:Tabernae acta priora, which has a discusion page if needed, but is there a need to discuss on old discusions?--Xaverius 09:33, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::It's the very first thing on the taberna page, not sure how you could have missed it, given how much time you spend there. That you think no one thought of that before is also rather strange. Then there is the please don't make big moves thing without discussing a bit thing.--Ioscius  ∞ 09:43, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

text: So we can delete this right? --Ioscius  ∞ 09:45, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Please wait a bit, I'd like to know if PC has read what I last wrote and if he accepts my apologies!--Xaverius 09:49, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::As far as a casual observer can observe, there is nothing even mildly insulting in what Xaverius has written above. -24.107.235.195 09:53, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::I also have no interest in insulting. Useful edits, good Latin, collaboration especially on moves within Vicipaedia namespace; in that I have an interest. --Ioscius  ∞ 09:56, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)

text: ::I have read all of this. I see no particular need to delete this page, though. Pantocrator 10:12, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Well, as it stands now, it is redundant, as it adds nothing new to what already exists in :Categoria:Tabernae acta priora, only that the format (categoria: instead of vicipaedia:) is different, and it is not linked to any other page. I consider it should be deleted.--Xaverius 12:19, 15 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: purpose of this page
Disputatio:Henrietta

message: Nescio an "Henrietta", sicut forma Latina huius praenominis, accipiendum sit necne. Sed exstant asteroides, urbes etc. nomine "Henrietta"; igitur credo paginam discretivam semper necesse. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:27, 16 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nescio