lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Mancommunitates Extremadurae

message: An accipimus neologismum Vicipaedianum "mancommunitas"? Origo Hispanicus mediaevalis est e verbis Latinis "manus + commune", i.e. labor communis manuum. Sed nos Latine possumus fortasse simplicius "communitas" dicere? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:51, 1 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hoc ad disputationem Disputatio:Mancommunitas nunc moveo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:13, 3 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Mancommunitas nomen Latinum non videtur. Etymologiá acceptá, Latinum fortasse erit manuum communitas. IacobusAmor 12:03, 3 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  De titulo 

message: Anonymus hic nobis dat multa nomina multosque nexus rubros, nullis fontibus citatis. Nescio an hic oportet tempus perdere: etiam in pagina respectiva Hispanica, sex nexus caeruleos tantum reperio! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:51, 1 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Vide nunc id quod dixi hic: Disputatio Usoris:85.251.46.146. An recte? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:12, 1 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Mancommunitas nomen Latinum non videtur. Etymologiá acceptá, Latinum fortasse erit manuum communitas. IacobusAmor 12:03, 3 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nominibus "mancommunitatum"
Disputatio:Humanus cultus Sericae

message: I feel this page has problems.
# It seems to share interwiki links with "Sinae (regio)". The interwiki pages it links to are, typically, called "China" or "China (region)" or something similar, so (to judge by their titles) they really belong to "Sinae (regio)" and not to "Humanus cultus Sericae"
# I cannot imagine anyone predicting the name "Humanus cultus Sericae" -- we have no other pages with similar names, and, for better or worse, our usual term among the categories for this general concept is "Cultura", not "Humanus cultus"
# This title sets the subject as the human culture of a vast region (not of any particular people); but
# The page seems mainly to be talking about the Chinese (Han) people, for whom we have a page at "Sinae (gens)"
For all these reasons, I wonder if this page really needs to exist, or if it should be merged, or if it should be renamed to give it a better purpose in life :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:26, 1 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: De #2: Cultura Anglice = 'culture'; humanus cultus (et humanitas) = 'civilization' (h.e., civilizatio). IacobusAmor 11:36, 1 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Well, I'm probably not the only barbarian who has confused culture with civilization :( Actually this page was once at "Civilizatio ...", and I would have thought it a more intuitive term than the present "Humanus cultus", but maybe that's just me. The other problems remain, anyway.

text: :Sum enim primus barbarus qui culturam cum civilizatione confundit? Ac, re vera, haec pagina olim ad "Civilizatio ..." stetit, verbum mihi quidem praeferendum; sed fortasse minoritarius sum. Aliae quaestiones manent ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:53, 1 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for this page? 

message: Rajmaan (disputatio) 04:13, 31 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, extracted to appropriate pages, therefore now hidden above. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:00, 31 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscellaneous
Disputatio:Mancomunidad

message: An accipimus neologismum Vicipaedianum "mancommunitas"? Origo Hispanicus mediaevalis est e verbis Latinis "manus + commune", i.e. labor communis manuum. Sed nos Latine possumus fortasse simplicius "communitas" dicere? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:51, 1 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Id melius dici potest mutatio ('borrowing') a lingua Hispanica, quia usor solum exitum verbi mutavit. Quaeque civitas potest novam entem legibus definire et describere, sicut mancommunitas. Nescio si etymologia a te data est recta; dubito quia descriptionem apud Wikipedias dicunt quod mancommunitas est "libera communitatum consociatio"; ergo putavissem etymologiam fortasse fuisse ex "manus communitas" = "communidad de una mano (de communidades)", ubi manus dicit numerum circa quinque.--173.70.154.122 12:53, 3 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Si scribimus 'manuscommunitas' pro 'mancommunidad', sic agendo sine dubio re vera novum neologismum fingeremus, contra legem Vicipaedianam.

text: :De autem statu verbi mancommunitatis, an fictum id esse dici potest, vero dubito quia non solum in lingua Hispanica constat, sed etiam in quattuor aliis linguis ibericis, secundum Wikipediam Anglicam, et in quaque eorum lingua exitus et formam verbi aliquanto mutant secundum normas eius linguae: ab W. Anglica: " Aragonese: mancomunidat, Asturian: mancomunidá, Catalan: mancomunitat, Basque: mankomunitatea". --173.70.154.122 13:15, 3 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  De titulo
Disputatio:Agapitus Praenestinus

message: Can you tell my, why you reverted my additions? When you say in the same sentence, that he died in 274/275 and that he is a saint of the 4th century, it should be explained shouldn't it?
The second edit was just a linkfix. Are you planning to move Sanctus Blasius or what?--Chris1981 12:40, 4 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, this was, of course, my fault (in both cases)! I've just changed the site.--Utilo 13:24, 4 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting my edits
Disputatio Portae:Antiquitas posterior

message: The German Egyptology-Portal has a Link, that shows recent changes on all the Egyptian pages :de:Portal:Ägyptologie/Aktuelle Artikeländerungen. It is based on a list of the pages, probably created (at least maintained) by bots. Don't you think this would be an expedient feature for the porta?  --Chris1981 06:37, 8 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuper mutatae
Disputatio:Augusta Suessionum

message: Credo "Suessonae" errorem esse: debemus aut "Suessones" (3. decl.) aut "Augusta Suessonum" aut "Noviodunum Suessonum". Praefero "Augusta Suessonum" quia "Suessones" fuit et nomen populi. Quid dicunt alii? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:05, 11 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tardius (!) moveo. "Noviodunum Suessonum", a me supra acceptum, est etiam error, quia Noviodunum, urbs sive oppidum capitale Suessonum ante obsidionem Romanam, alibi iecit. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:34, 18 Maii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Catharina Parra

message: Her Latinized name seems to be Catharina Parra. She is never called Catharina Parr (those books actually call her Catharina Parr). Should we move the page? Amsal 16:52, 11 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, seems OK. We accept Latin forms of surname with direct evidence. Does anyone object? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:11, 11 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Fortasse melius: "Catharina Parra vel Catharina PariaQ.v.. . . ." IacobusAmor 19:02, 11 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::All done as suggested; could you please take a look at Disputatio:Anna Boleyn? I've suggested moving that page to either Anna Bolina or Anna Bolena. Amsal 20:07, 12 Iulii 2010 (UTC)

thread_title: Notae
Disputatio:Umbrella descensoria

message: Apud en: "A parachute is a device used to slow the motion of an object through an atmosphere by creating drag." Note the inadequacies of the Latin simplification: "Umbrella descensoria est instrumentum quo delapsus aërius retardatur aut impeditur." Drag, as a technical term for a physical phenomenon, deserves its own article, as in other wikis. Therefore, it wants latinizing. IacobusAmor 12:42, 13 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, my modest purpose was to correct the Latinity, which was even more inadequate. Re "drag", maybe "resistentia aeria" (or "resistentia aero/fluidodynamica"). --Neander 13:04, 13 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Drag involves a fluid (which may be a liquid or a gas), so "aero/fluido" isn't quite right. I've made the verb active; maybe that helps. IacobusAmor 13:25, 13 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: How to translate this "drag"?
Disputatio Categoriae:Rapiani

message: Fons Latinitatis caret. Fortasse "Musici rap"? 
replies: text: Sed nunc paginam Rap vidi, et video re vera fontem exstare adiectivi "rapianus"; igitur "rapiani" possumus "rap persons" vertere. Praefero fortasse "Musici rapiani" ... alii? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:18, 14 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Vel rap(p)ista 'rapper'? IacobusAmor 10:42, 14 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus
Disputatio:Fall River

message: "Flumen cadens" seems a very bad translation of "Fall River". We should move away from it unless there is a published source. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:10, 14 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Roman Catholic diocese is (adjective) "Riverormensis". I don't know what noun form to derive from this. You'd think there would be one. But the following book title makes me think it's OK to stick with Fall River for the present, because here it is in a Latin context: "Statuta dioecesis Riverormensis quae in synodo dioecesana prima : die 28a Junii, A.D. 1905, in ecclesia pro-cathedrali, beatissimae Mariae Virginis in Coelum Assumptae dicata in civitate Fall River habita" Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:43, 12 Martii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Zwijndrecht

message: To fulfil the destiny of a discretiva page, this ought to point to at least one page about a "Zwijndrecht". It doesn't yet ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:45, 14 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it does ... ;-)  I'll leave it to our Belgian friends to include a page on its Belgian namesake. --Fabullus
replies: text: :Stipulam de urbe homonyma Belgica quoque feci, quae ut didici Latine etiam Zuindracum appellatur. --Fabullus 12:51, 20 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not yet finished?
Disputatio:Berenice II (regina Aegypti)

message: In ipsâ paginâ ad 'Magae' nomen haec notantur:
replies: text: In fontibus Graecis, nomen patris plerosque casus primae declinationis masculinae sequetur, nisi quod casu genitivo solet esse , e.g. Polybii Hist. 15.25 "......."
Scilicet hic est genetivus Doricus, quo scriptores Attici uti solebant quandocumque nomina propria barbarica aut dialectica in - exeuntia declinare opus erat (de qua re vide Herbert Weir Smyth, A Greek Grammar for Colleges, ch.225). Latine haec nomina primâ simpliciter declinatione utuntur, etsi saepissime nominativum singularem Graecum, interdum quoque accusativum retinent.  'Magae' igitur nomen Latine sic declinatur: (nom.) Maga(s), (gen.) Magae, (dat.) Magae, (acc.) Magam /-an, (abl.) Maga. --Fabullus 14:23, 15 Iulii 2010 (UTC)

text: Confiteor me ignarum fuisse. Gratias tibi ago quia exposuisti. --Iustinus 15:07, 15 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Pace tua, Iustine, 'Maga' in 'Magae' mutavi et notam dimovi. --Fabullus 15:37, 15 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Scisne, Fabulle, qualia nomina praecipue scriptores Graeci declinaverunt? Scio enim difficultatem nonnumquam exstare in nominibus Persicis, Indicis, Aegyptiis casu genitivo solo attestatis pro quota declinatione - stet. --Iustinus 15:58, 15 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Haec est res difficillima! Huic genetivo nominativus in -, -, et apud aliquos auctores etiam - respondere potest. --Fabullus 16:54, 15 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Sanissume. Sed rogo potius utrum sciatur quando fere genetivus debeat esse , quandoque ? --Iustinus 17:24, 15 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::::Hoc vereor ne auctoris sit. Ex exemplo tuo conici potest Polybium quidem illud - praetulisse. --Fabullus 17:42, 15 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::::Pro Maga inveni duo triave exempla litteraria in casu genitivo, omnia ex -. At nonne Cyrenae lingua Dorica praevaluit? Fortasse ea causa vera est. --Iustinus 18:01, 15 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: De 'Magae' declinatione
Disputatio:Apsis

message: Apsides ... mensae sunt. Metior, metiri, mensus sum, Anglice: to measure. Quare est signa quaestionis? --Robert.Baruch 01:12, 18 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ...mensae sunt

message: Amabo te, vide Insignores orbitae cometarum proprietates (Lambert, 1761) p. 97. Geocentricis, -is, -e. --Robert.Baruch 01:15, 18 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: geocentricis

message: Here I mean to say "the position of the largest or smallest distance of the body (from one of the...)" --Robert.Baruch 01:24, 18 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But maximis & minimis are in the wrong case to modify longinquitatis. IacobusAmor 01:29, 18 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: : Oops. Those tricksy little declensions! --Robert.Baruch 01:53, 18 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Trickiness abounds! You can't have Programma verbas usa est because: (1) programma is neuter, but usa est is feminine; (2) verbas is impossible since verbum is neuter and its accusative plural is verba; and (3) usa est takes the ablative, but verbas isn't ablative. As Roseanne Roseannadanna used to say, "It's always something." ;) IacobusAmor 02:07, 18 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::: Hui! I thought programma was feminine! So is the word programmum, -i? However, I did manage to catch verbas, and changed it to verbis. I'm somewhat at a disadvantage coming from this ridiculous English language without genders and an extremely poor system of declensions. I find that I have to constantly keep the gender and declension of every word at the front of my mind, or else my agreements start slipping! Hopefully with time and practice this will get easier. I have already noticed an improvement since last year. --Robert.Baruch 02:47, 18 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::It's programma, -atis. We can blame the Greeks! IacobusAmor 02:51, 18 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: locus longinquitatis maximis aut minimis corporis
Disputatio:Kraken

message: Si quis Suecice legere potest, haec excerptio attractiva videtur et adiectionem constare blandam possit!
replies: text: »De norska fiskrarne» - berättar biskop Pontoppidan i sin naturalhistoria - »försäkra alla, utan minsta motsägelse i sina berättelser, att, då de lägga några mil ut på djupet, särskilt under de varmaste dagarne af året, synes hafvet plötsligen uppgrundas under deras båtar; och om de utkasta sank-lodet, händer det ofta, att de, i stället för 80 till 100 famnars djup, knappast finna 30. Det är kraken, som lägger sig emellan bottnen och det öfra vattnet. Vana vid detta fenomen, göra fiskrarne sina nät i ordning, vissa, att der finnes fisk i öfverflöd, i synnerhet stortorsk och gråsej, och de uppdraga dem rikligen belastade. Men om vattnets djup alltjemt förminskas, och om det tillfälliga och rörliga grundet stiger uppåt, då hafva fiskrarne ingen tid att förlora: det är ormen som vaknar, som rör på sig, som vill andas luft och utsträcka sina väldiga former i solen. Fiskrarne taga då till att ro af alla krafter, och när de omsider, på vederbörligt afstånd, kunna tryggt hvila sig, se de i sjelfva verket odjuret, som med öfra delen af sin rygg betäcker en sträcka af en och en half mil. Fiskarne, öfverraskade af uppåtstigandet, hoppa ett ögonblick i de fuktiga gropar, som äro bildade mellan upphöjningarne i djurets yttre betäckning; så utgå från denna flytande massa ett slags taggar eller lysande horn, som utbreda och resa sig, liknande med rår försedda master. Det är krakens armar; och hvilka armar! Så stor är deras styrka, att, om de fattade tågverket å ett linieskepp, de ofelbart skulle kullkasta detta. Efter att hafva dröjt en stund vid ytan, nedstiger odjuret med samma långsamhet, men faran är icke desto mindre för det fartyg, som möjligen befinner sig i grannskapet, ty i det att kraken sänker sig, sätter han så mycket vatten i rörelse, att hvirflar och strömmar uppstå, lika förfärliga som den ryktbara Malströmmen.»
Mattie 21:08, 20 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [http://runeberg.org/famijour/1869/0158.html Svensk Familj-Journal], 1869
Disputatio:Cryptozoologia

message: I tried to make the Latin OK: not sure if I succeeded. Seems to me this can hardly be a branch of zoology, or indeed a science, till the existence of any such animal happened to be demonstrated: its study then becomes zoology without the crypto-. Is that right? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:32, 21 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latinitas + veritas
Disputatio:Zuindracum (Nederlandia)

message: Si numerus est compositus nomen congruit cum ultimo numero simplici: 44 401 incol... = quadraginta quattuor milia quadringentos (acc. pl.) unum (acc. sg.) incolam. --Fabullus 08:25, 22 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tout comme en français avec Antoine Galland: "Les mille et une nuit"; sed in editionibus hodiernis habemus "Les mille et une nuits". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:22, 22 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Nederlandice etiam nunc "Duizend-en-één nacht (sg.)" vice "Duizend-en-één nachten (pl.)" dicitur. --Fabullus 14:36, 22 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Slovena lingua est hic similiter convoluta. Praeterea numeri 5-1000 sunt singularis numeri generisque neutrius. Additur quoque curiositas haec: 2,000 est pluralis numeri, 2,000,000 immo dualis. --Ioscius  ∞ 21:52, 22 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nominis forma post numerum
Disputatio:Bomba

message: Did anyone notice this move? Did anyone approve of it? I only noticed it because I wanted a word for "bomb". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:01, 22 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Medieval but OK, it seems. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:41, 23 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Nevertheless, the necessity of the move is somewhat questionable. --Alex1011 12:49, 23 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is bomba OK?
Disputatio:Brauron

message: Statistics                                                 	Statistics
Praefecturae:                                              	Attica
Area metropolitum:                                         	Athenae
Municipalitas et Communitas:                               	Markopoulo Mesogeium
Locatio:Latitudinus:Longitudinus:                          	38.933 (38°56'00") Int.</br> 23.9933 (23°59'56") Or.-->
Populatio: (1991) - Totaall - Density - Rank	90
Elevatio: -lowest: -centrum:                     	Sinus Petaliae2 m (centre)southern part
Coda postalis:                                             	190 03
Codex telephonum:                                          	11-(00)30-22990-4
Designatio autocarrus:                                     	Y (prev.)Z pres.
Habitans:                                                  	Brauroniensis m-e f

message: ... e pagina removi, in lingua Latina "canina" scriptam. Area metropolitum? Latitudinus? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:12, 27 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capsam ...
Disputatio:Tributum ab innuptis exactum

message: Roch01A noster has transformed a tax into an intrauterine device, inserted by Iohannes Casimirus Kolbe. Is that what it really was? IacobusAmor 14:08, 1 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Vectigal in puellas" = "tax against girls"--208.43.160.10 14:24, 1 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Definitio
Disputatio:Dialectus Ionico-Attica

message: I don't know the translation of 'masculine', 'feminine' and 'neuter', and 'article'. When you know that, please edit!
Edit: I found the abbrevation  of 'masculine, 'feminine' and 'neuter' at victionarium
Lord Roman 11:27, 2 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The lists you included on the page are in fact Attic Greek and not Ionic-Attic Greek. I'd suggest however that they be moved, not to Dialectus Attica, but to Lingua Graeca antiqua, reserving the dialect pages for information about the disctinctive features of each dialect or dialect group as compared to other dialects. --Fabullus 08:23, 3 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :So, sould I move it to Lingua Graeca antiqua?
replies: text: ::Before we start moving chunks of text about between different pages, it is good to hear what others beside myself might have to say on the matter. I will ask Andrew Dalby for his opinion. --Fabullus 14:22, 4 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::I think that in morphology the standard "ancient Greek language" is almost identical with the "Ionic-Attic dialect", but the page about the dialect has to deal with different kinds of questions: when did it exist? When did it divide? etc.; while the page about the language is where people would look for general grammatical information. So, I agree with Fabullus that this material would be better placed at Lingua Graeca antiqua. Lord Roman, you'll have to look closely at that page, which at present says there are five cases, not four. It depends how you count ... :) But, yes, I suggest you go ahead and edit this material into that page. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:39, 4 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::I've removed it from the page, shortly I should make the complete conjugation and post it into Lingua Graeca antiqua
thread_title: Grammatica
Disputatio:Demarchus

message: Lordum Demarchum haud gaudiens accipio. Quomodo Latine vertimus Lord Mayor? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:55, 11 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Dominus major:  —Alexander hoc scripsit 13:48, 3 Iulii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lordus Demarchus"
Disputatio:Bohemia

message: ? --Ioscius  ∞ 10:45, 12 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Vita modo Bohemico dissoluta? IacobusAmor 11:11, 12 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Lemma perlongum obtusumque... vide :en:Andy Warhol: "Warhol became . . . known for his membership in wildly diverse social circles that included bohemian street people, distinguished intellectuals, Hollywood celebrities and wealthy patrons." --Ioscius  ∞ 11:33, 12 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Bohemian street people = (homines) viarii dissoluti? IacobusAmor 11:37, 12 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: bohemianism
Disputatio:Andreas Warhola

message: Seems pretty mixed between wikis, to leave untranslated "pop art" and something to the effect of "ars popularis"... --Ioscius  ∞ 11:29, 12 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But we shouldn't spend much time on him, in comparison with topics that have better reasons to be counted among the 1000 most important topics of all time. (He'll presumably be deleted as the list improves.) IacobusAmor 11:35, 12 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Sure, but when I started today it said "Andreas Warhol (19something-19something) fuit artifex Americae." Surely he's worth more than that? =] I don't intend to do too much here, but even a couple hundred words helps our median in the meantime. --Ioscius  ∞ 11:38, 12 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Yes, this is true: an irrefutable point! IacobusAmor 12:15, 12 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: pop art
Disputatio:Debilitas

message: Melius Debilitas? IacobusAmor 14:27, 12 Augusti 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it. Etymologically, it fits English disabled better; it is also a classical word, which invaliditas is not. Of course it's hard to find something that exactly has the political and legal connotations of the modern-language equivalents. Lesgles (disputatio) 16:41, 1 Augusti 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: :I'm not finding invaliditas in L&S. Of course Cassell's and Traupman have invalescere and invalidus. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:01, 1 Augusti 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: ::For 'disability', Traupman has imbecillitas. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:02, 1 Augusti 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Not a big fan of imbecillitas, though my impression is probably colored by its descendants in modern languages (though debilitas has that problem too).  For reference invaliditas is in Du Cange: "INVALIDITAS dicitur, cum quis ex vulnere invalidus fit. Leg. Polon. a Prilusio collectæ pag. 276 : 'Quod si nulla ex hujusmodi vulnere mutilatio et Invaliditas membri consequetur, etc.'" Lesgles (disputatio) 17:18, 1 Augusti 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::I agree that "debilitas" is best. It is classical and has the right range of meanings, as does the adjective "debilis". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:55, 2 Augusti 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen