lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Cantium

message: Cantium (Anglice: Kent)
Sententia:         	Sententia:	
                   	          	
Caput              	Maidstone 	
Incolae (anno 2005)	1 621 000

message: Capsam hic moveo pro tempore quia paginas de comitatibus Anglicis retracto; inter comitatus geographicos, sollemnes et administrativos distinguo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:10, 9 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retraho pro tempore
Disputatio:Dorcestria

message: Dorcestria (Anglice Dorset)
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"	
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"

message: Capsam hic moveo pro tempore quia paginas de comitatibus Anglicis retracto; inter comitatus geographicos, sollemnes et administrativos distinguo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:43, 9 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retraho pro tempore
Disputatio:Hertfordiensis comitatus

message: Comitatus Hertfordiensis (Anglice: Hertfordshire)
Sententia: Trust and fear not (Confide et noli timere!)	Sententia: Trust and fear not (Confide et noli timere!)
                                                       	
Lingua civitatis                                       	Lingua Anglica
Caput                                                  	Hertfordia

message: Capsam hic moveo pro tempore quia paginas de comitatibus Anglicis retracto; inter comitatus geographicos, sollemnes et administrativos distinguo.  Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:57, 9 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retraho pro tempore
Disputatio:Isuria

message: Capsam hic moveo pro tempore quia paginas de comitatibus Anglicis retracto; inter comitatus geographicos, sollemnes et administrativos distinguo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:03, 9 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Capsam delevi. --UV 00:18, 24 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retraho pro tempore
Disputatio:Norfolcia

message: Norfolcia (Anglice: Norfolk)
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"	
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"
Oxya Greshamensis

message: Capsam hic moveo pro tempore quia paginas de comitatibus Anglicis retracto; inter comitatus geographicos, sollemnes et administrativos distinguo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:09, 9 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retraho pro tempore
Disputatio:Salopiensis comitatus

message: Salopia (Anglice:  Shropshire)
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"	
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"
                   	
(Sigillum Salopiae)

message: Capsam hic moveo pro tempore quia paginas de comitatibus Anglicis retracto; inter comitatus geographicos, sollemnes et administrativos distinguo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:19, 9 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retraho pro tempore
Disputatio:Guido Deutscher

message: It's up to you to decide how to write in this Wikipedia, but you may wan to know that it's the Hebrew name Guy (גיא), which is not related to the European "Guido". Israelis usually write it as in English, because the pronunciation is similar, but it has a different origin. --Amirus Eliseus Aharonius 08:42, 10 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Guy
Disputatio:Wiltoniensis comitatus

message: Wiltonia (Anglice: Wiltshire)
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"	
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"

message: Capsam deleo pro tempore quia paginas comitatuum Anglicorum retracto. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:46, 10 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retraho pro tempore
Disputatio:Sejong

message: I'll remove the "Magnus" for the time being. If anyone is really cross, the first thing to do is to find a reliable  Latin source in which he is called "Magnus"; then we could put it back.
The apparent footnote reference seems meaningless. I took it out. If a reference was intended to something real, I suggest adding a link.
The category "Rex Coreae" was badly formed. We use plurals in category names, and we prefer a category to have at least four members. I've deleted that too, but as soon as we have pages for a couple more Korean kings, it can be re-created as "Reges Coreae".
I'll translate all the above into Latin if anyone doesn't understand it :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:59, 11 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: We'll follow your lead.--Jondel 14:01, 11 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :Secundum en, aptissimus commentarius est "List of monarchs of Korea," et categoriae accommodatae sunt "Korean royalty, "Korean rulers," "Lists of Korean people," et "Lists of monarchs," sed non "Korean kings." ¶ In commentario de abecedario Coreano, quis est Sejong Magnus Joseon? IacobusAmor 14:09, 11 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Hic! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:41, 11 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's not do "Magnus"es
Disputatio:Glastonia

message: Glastonia seems safe and I will move to it pro tempore. I have a feeling "Leucarum" is an error in the cited list: it's really the name of another place in Britain, not Glastonbury. But I haven't checked yet. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:50, 14 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, "Leucarum" according to the Tabula Imperii Romani (which is reliable) was the name of a place in Glamorgan, identified with modern :en:Loughor. I'll retain the reference in a footnote but remove the name from the text: OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:15, 3 Maii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine
Disputatio:Maassluis

message: Hodie paginam creavit, rebus paginae Anglicis Maassluisiae, et in quibus erat documentum "Ogg". Paginam creavit, quamquam documentum Ogg non in modo quo in pagina Anglice Massluisiae se monstravit. Cogitata iam existimo Vicipaediam Latinam non curat documenta "Ogg". Ecquisne documenta "Ogg" curare poterant?
Today I created this article, with content from the English page for Maassluis, and in it was an "Ogg" file. I created the article, but the Ogg file did not show up as it had in the English article for Maassluis. With these things in mind, I now suppose that the Latin Wikipedia has no support for "Ogg" files. Can anyone create support for "Ogg" files?--RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 17:59, 15 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)

message: Multos multos gratias omnibus vobis ago qui pagina Maassluisia curaverunt in modo quo non me potui. Non plus dicere possum, nisi Vive Vicipaedia!--RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 12:57, 17 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Facere melior Maassluisia

message: Nomen Latinum 'Maassluisia' (aut orthographiis variis adhibitis 'Maessluisia', 'Maassluysia', 'Maessluysia') in interrete, nisi in paginis a Vicipaedia nostra derivatis, non invenitur. Propono igitur ut haec pagina ad Maassluis moveatur. --Fabullus 08:58, 18 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Habemus verba pro Maas et pro sluis? IacobusAmor 11:10, 18 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :'Maas' est flumen Mosa et 'sluis' (Anglice 'sluice') est cataracta vel Latinitate Media 's(c)lusa'. Ergo 'Maassluis' reddi potest 'Mosae slusa' vel hoc casu potius 'Slusa ad Mosam', quandoquidem non ipsam Mosam sed rivulam confluentem occludit. --Fabullus 12:16, 18 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: De nomine Latino
Disputatio:Truro

message: "Triverium" is suspicious. If you look at en:wiki you see that some people think Truro is derived from Cornish "tri-veru" meaning "three rivers", but other people don't. "Triverium" looks as though it was invented to support the first lot, so it's POV! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:16, 20 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Newtonia camerunensis

message: The reason for the parenthesis was to distinguish the botanical Newtonia from the avian Newtonia and the municipal Newtonia. IacobusAmor 14:19, 24 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I missed the birds. I don't think the village is likely to merit a category (but who knows). Move it if you like. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:38, 24 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :OK, ignore that, I've moved it myself now. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 23:57, 24 Ianuarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Categoria:Newtonia (planta)
Disputatio:Ḥusnī Mubārak

message: Nescimus utrum "Muhammad Hosni Sayyid Mubarak" an solum "Hosni Mubarak". --Alex1011 10:59, 1 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Secundum en: "Muhammad Hosni Sayyid Mubarak (محمد حسني سيد مبارك; Muḥammad Ḥusnī Sayyid Mubārak; born 4 May 1928) is. . . ." IacobusAmor 11:25, 1 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ita est, sed alia vicipaedia habet brevem nomen in paginae titulo, alia longum. Nomen "Sayyid" in nullis vicipaediis in titulis apparet quoad video nescius linguae Arabicae. --Alex1011 11:42, 1 Februarii 2011 (UTC)

message: Numerous formulas (perhaps invented in the past few years) haven't yet been imported into Vicipaedia. IacobusAmor 11:27, 1 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Vide nunc formula:Ling-ar --Alex1011 13:39, 1 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Side note
Disputatio:Gelsemium sempervirens

message: En says the flowers are "strongly fragrant"; but I've grown them, and would say that, compared with flowers of Stephanotis florabunda, they're only "mildly fragrant." (Therefore, I've translated the English as only "Flores sunt fragrantes," omitting an adverb.) Is there any standard measure of the intensity of fragrance, as there is, for example, with the hotness of hot peppers? IacobusAmor 18:07, 2 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Vis odoris
Disputatio:Gaudeamus igitur

message: As it stands now, the article is just the lyrics of the song with a short sentence. Shouldn't it be in wikisources then? --Xaverius 20:46, 12 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is already at wikisource, sorry. I'll put up a stipula template instead.--Xaverius 20:47, 12 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :You're right, we ought not to duplicate wikisource here. We should ideally  have some encyclopedic text and a short quote from the lyrics. If you look at the history, you'll see we already went through these motions in 2007 :( Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:48, 12 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Blimey... I feel that I repeat myself. I imagine that people just see our page empty and decides to put the lyrics in--Xaverius 22:26, 12 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :::They're baaaaaaack! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:17, 25 Aprilis 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Verba carminis

message: Quid significat hoc signum arcanum sed (ut videtur) necessarium? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:17, 25 Aprilis 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: <nowiki> " :,: " </nowiki>
Disputatio:Harena bituminosa

message: "Petroleum inconventionale" (pro unconventional oil / petroleum) estne acceptabile? Scio conventionalis verum esse verbum, formam autem negativam non inveni. Placetne? Mattie 22:45, 13 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Quia 'convention' = 'custom' = mos et 'conventional' ergo est moralis, ut videtur 'unconventional' erit non moralis vel fortasse male moratus. Secundum Cassell's, conventionalis non videtur verbum classicum. Quomodo potest oleum esse 'conventional' aut 'unconventional'? Quos mores gerit oleum? IacobusAmor 02:48, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :Unus mihi esset metus si morali (secundum Gaffiot "relatif aux mœurs ; philosophie morale, éthique") uteremur, quod non videri obiectivi possemus. Tuum autem non moratus mihi placet.

text: :Vicipaedia Anglica ait oleum "non de more" esse "petroleum produced or extracted using techniques other than the conventional (oil well) method." Francogalli quoque dicunt "... impliquant un coût et une technologie supplémentaires en raison de ses conditions d'exploitation plus difficiles." Mos igitur ad olei extractionem pertineat. Mattie 03:28, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Hic quidem 'conventional' = 'usual', pro quo verbo habemus usitatus & inusitatus. IacobusAmor 04:18, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Gratias. Paginam incepi! Mattie 21:41, 15 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Unconventional oil''
Disputatio Categoriae:Ligna nuclearia

message: I think this is a bit of a misnomer. Maybe the concept "nuclear fuels" was in advance of the good people at Cassell's; the result appears to mean "nuclear wood" :) But I don't immediately have an answer to what to call "fuels" in general. The concept, disassembled, means "sources of energy". How can we best express that? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:51, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't we use some cognate of 'combustible' as in the Italian and Spanish equivalent?--Jondel 09:56, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: : Fomes nuclearius? Neander 11:05, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ::A versatile word! We already have Nucleares Linguae Polynesiae for the nuclear Polynesian languages, and someday we might have Eudicotyledones nucleares for the core eudicots. IacobusAmor 12:02, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::: Meum facinus (in maximá festinatione commissum): scribere debui: fomes nuclearis. Neander 16:11, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)

text: :::Do they self-ignite? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:24, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus
Disputatio:Cache Comitatus

message: Gratulationes mitto Vicipaedia quinquaginta miliis paginis, res captus 11 Februarii 2011 Diei Veneris. Omnes habete laetum Diem Sacri Valentini, et volo paginae huic, Cache Comitatus, Anglice "Cache County" bene erit.--RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 19:13, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
Congratulations for Vicipaedia's fifty thousandth article, which was achieved on 11 February 2011, a Friday. Everyone, have a happy Saint Valentine's Day, and I hope for this page, Cache Comitatus, "Cache County" in English will be good.--RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 19:17, 14 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gratulationes Mitto
Disputatio:Decies centena milia

message: Mihi pagina haec moveri debet ad "mille mille" aut "mil(l)io". "Decies centena milia" longissimum nomen est et --- candide me vexat. 
To me this page ought  to be moved to "mille mille (a thousand thousands)"  or "mil(l)io (a million". "Decies centena milia (ten hundred thousands)" is too long, and --- frankly, it annoys me.--RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 23:40, 15 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Est verbum classicum. Si plures milliones sunt eo verbo utamur. --Alex1011 09:39, 16 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Paginam movere
Disputatio:Nundinae

message: De titulo re vera nescio. "Mercatus" et hanc rem et alias res denotat. Insuper difficile est de mercatus annuos, e.g. Foires de Champagne, paginas plenas et utiles in aliis Vicipaediis reperire. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:13, 18 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus
Disputatio:Flumen Sancti Laurentii

message: Nonne Sancti Laurentii Flumen, sicut in commentationibus de Ontarione et exploratoribus? Mattie 01:33, 20 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte mones. Flumen non est Sanctus; cf. etiam Amazonum (gen. pl.) flumen. Sed fontes usque adhuc carent; oportet reperire si possumus. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:52, 20 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sanctus Laurentius (flumen)"
Disputatio:Insulae Moluccae

message: Insulae Moluccae would probably be a better name. True that Maluca is closer to the original Arab and Indonesian names of Maluk and Maluku. However, in most western languages where the islands have a "Latinized" name, it is something along the lines of "Moluccas".
replies: text: There's no special reason why we should imitate "western languages" -- but you're right to draw attention to the fact that we don't have a Latin source for this name. There's sure to be one. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:22, 21 Februarii 2011 (UTC)

message: Apud Hoffman inveniri potest Moluccae.--Jondel 02:12, 28 Februarii 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice find, Jondel. I have made the move! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:31, 28 Februarii 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: fons
Disputatio Categoriae:Programmata televisifica

message: Hic non de gustibus sed de errore agitur. Neander 22:16, 23 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
. . . nisi 'programmed telly lasses' significat. :-) Neander 22:23, 23 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine anteriori "Programmatae televisificae" 

message: Vide s.v.p. Disputatio Categoriae:Programmata televisiva 1977 et commentum addite. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:11, 17 Iulii 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine praesenti "Programmata televisifica" > "televisiva"? 

message: Titulus huius categoriae (a) iam cum aliis talibus non consonat (scribere solemus "... per civitates digesta") atque (b) fortasse in "programmata televisiva" mutandum est (vide Disputatio:Televisio). An categoria movenda est? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:41, 14 Iulii 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Nulla disputatione facta, categoriam eam in hanc contribui. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:11, 17 Decembris 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputatio Categoriae:Programmata televisifica in civitatem digesta
Disputatio Categoriae:Auctores Latini hodierni

message: More Vicipaediano "Categoria:Scriptores Latini hodierni"? IacobusAmor 15:34, 5 Martii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte mones, sed potius "Auctores ..." quia hoc verbo de linguis utimur, alio de civitatibus. Motum nunc proposui. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:44, 22 Martii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: : What is the distinction between "Auctores Neolatini" and "Auctores Latini hodierni", should we merge these two categories? Auctores Neolatini redirects to Auctores neolatini hodierni …? --UV 23:00, 22 Martii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Good question. Pantocrator pointed out some time ago that "Neolatini" in the sense in which we use it here is against current usage elsewhere. In truth "Cat:Auctores Neolatini" should eventually be either deleted, or become a supercategory covering "... Renascentiae", "... recentiores" and "...hodierni". All those three are useful; "Neolatini" will perhaps not be useful.

text: ::If the move that Iacobus and I have suggested is made, then ideally as a second step "Neolatini" should be removed from all pages on which it duplicates "hodierni". Then, as a third step, the remaining instances of "Neolatini" should be merged into "recentiores". That's my view, anyway.

text: ::I hadn't noticed the redirect. In article space Auctores Neolatini should ideally be an article on its own, dealing with writers from about 1500 onwards. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:50, 23 Martii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ::: Steps one and two are done. Step three should better be done manually. --UV 22:43, 23 Martii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Thanks very much for that, UV. I'll deal with the remaining pages. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:35, 24 Martii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: e pagina ''Disputatio Categoriae:Scriptores latini hodierni''
Disputatio:Thomas Erastus

message: Plurima ut videtur commentarii Thomas Erastus verba sunt locus adlatus, florido putidoque saeculi obsoleti modo excogitatus. Quis retexet hanc telam? IacobusAmor 11:50, 9 Martii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita: ex hac pagina venit. Haec ad paginam disputationis addo. Oportet rescribere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:03, 9 Martii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Paene omnis commentarius = locus adlatus?
Disputatio Categoriae:Londinium fictum

message: I linked with :Categoria:Loci litterarii -- see the exiguous existing structure there. I've no view on whether there should be intervening levels now; no doubt there would be eventually.
Also, I've no view on whether "litterarium" or "fictum" is the best adjective to use. "Fictum" may be better: if so, there are very few existing categories to change. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:59, 18 Martii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category structure
Disputatio:Friday (carmen Rebeccae Black)

message: Si quis satis sit audax ut haec Latine reddere conetur ... ! Mattie 20:08, 19 Martii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's think: who in Roman history made it big overnight, maybe a commentary talking about them would have something useful... -- Ioscius  ∞ 18:08, 4 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Overnight sensation"

message: Conceptum non sentiunt! Phrasis Anglica "the concept, we feel, seems ..." scribi debuisset (contra "the concept that* we feel..."); ergo Latine "conceptus, ut credimus, ..." aut aliquid simile. Mattie (disputatio) 16:49, 4 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Vide discrepantiam:
replies: text: :A. The concept we feel seems = The concept that we feel seems = Conceptus quem percipimus videtur

text: :B. The concept, we feel, seems = We feel that the concept seems = Conceptum credimus videri

text: Clarence dixit A, non B. The crucial commas are not in the original. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:34, 4 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Quit trolling, mi Iacobe! This article is already troll-central, we don't need additional linguistic jokes. Clarence lost the commas in the back seat, or something. Mattie (disputatio) 21:02, 4 Septembris 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Conceptus quem sentimus
Disputatio:Agatha Christie

message: Ait 85.2.132.8: "formula non activa delevi." Bear in mind that, as soon as the formula is localized, the onus will be on you to restore it. IacobusAmor 18:21, 20 Martii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In case 85.2.132.8 comes back to read this, no, that's not true. If such a formula arrives here, any Wikipedian who wants can install it on the page (and any other who wants can dispute the edit). That's Vicipaedia for you. NB -- I haven't checked to see what formula it was. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:32, 20 Martii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: :To every action attaches a moral burden; of course it can be misperceived, or even ignored. One recalls a common phrase: you break it, you own it. The literal sense is that, if, say, you're in a store and break an object displayed for sale, you have to pay for it. IacobusAmor 18:38, 20 Martii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletio formulae
Disputatio:Pes (metricus)

message: Poecu, ipse brevem "poculà" ∪ usus notavi (sicut dactylum —∪∪ ); videas, sodes, symbolas quas de Pherecrateo et Glyconeo scripsi. De hac re te certiorem feci, ut scires brevem alio quoque modo notari posse. –…–Neander 22:08, 22 Martii 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tibi gratias ago, Neander: symbolos hos quos proposuisti adhibere possum, cum illi maiores sint atque visibiliores. Adhuc tantum symbolos ˘ ˘ alio in situ interretali inveneram... --Poecus 23:55, 24 Martii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  De brevi notanda
Disputatio:Imperium Russicum

message: On these two pages, published a letter from the Chief Heraldry Master of Russia. It is dated 2006. http://www.rus-deco.com/vp/JS-Lib/CustomerSites/Common/view_larger.htm?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rus-deco.com%2F510_500_csupload_20087015.jpg%3Fu%3D553230982
 
http://www.rus-deco.com/vp/JS-Lib/CustomerSites/Common/view_larger.htm?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rus-deco.com%2F514_500_csupload_20087025.jpg%3Fu%3D3016084680
replies: text: At the present moment is initiated his replacement to this picture without a single mistake and the author's portrayal: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Greater_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Russian_Empire_1700x1767_pix_Igor_Barbe_2006.jpg Earlier, the authors insisted on the presence of yellow in the figure dies with his name. For VIKI author has made an exception. However, the file with a yellow bg can remain - it has more resolution. References to it are optional for connoisseurs. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Greater_coat_of_arms_of_the_Russian_empire_IGOR_BARBE_1500x1650jpg.jpg All files are located here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Greater_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Russian_Empire 
THNKS!
Barbe Igor (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Errors are very much ... The work was conducted 1.5 years. Important task of work - fixing bugs and improving the drawing.
Let's start ...
1. How many roses in the arms of Finland (official Blason)? Should be eight, but in the old figure of seven.
2. Where directed Halberd in the arms of Yaroslavl? (Must be directed upward, and at the old figure, it is directed downward).
...........
30. What color is the lining of the Astrakhan crown? (should be green, and figure on the old lining is red.)
Thank you!
In any case, thank you for your sincere attention to matters of heraldry.
Read more references to a letter from the Chief Heraldry Master of Russia.
Best regards!
Igor Barbe
thread_title:  Greater Coat of Arms of the Russian Empire 1882-1917 (mass replacement)