lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:The Simpsons

message: Are people sure about the characters' names here? I think for example that Bartholomaeus and Magdalena Simpson sound a bit too excessive. Granted, Bart's true name in the English version is Bartholomew but it is never referred to him so, give or take 2 occasion. Sure, these words might be the correct translation but I don't think I'd catch myself using them personally; shouldn't we try to remain a tad colloquial? --BiT 13:03, 26 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's a side-effect of the rule of translating names.  Latin names don't often come with short forms.  Though one could argue that they should remain unchanged as they're trademarks. ('Magdalena' is wrong anyway; it would be Margarita, like her mother.)  —Mucius Tever 12:43, 27 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :use the english name and the latin name in parentesis--190.22.71.13 19:14, 3 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::No, thanks.--Ioscius (disp) 22:14, 3 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::: Is there any opposition to using the English names? --BiT 13:24, 10 Martii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::Fortasse melius:
replies: text: :::::Bartholomaeus Simpson, saepissime dictus Bart, est. . . .

text: ::::For the adverb, I'd suggest semper, except that it's conceivable that the full name has been mentioned in one or more episodes. You've got to get the Bart in there because the series has an episode in which a joke is made of the fact that another kid is named Bort [sic]. IacobusAmor 13:34, 10 Martii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::: You don't really need to use [sic] after Bort, as it is his real name ;) who ever he is --BiT 13:47, 10 Martii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::::The [sic] shows here that the author hasn't made a typo. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:04, 13 Septembris 2023 (UTC)

text: :::(also, images which don't add anything to the article like the donut one with the "Cibus Homeri carus" caption should be removed, otherwise why not add a picture of a pacifier, a picture of a pearl necklace, a picture of beer, a picture of a skateboard etc. Almost nobody speaks fluent Latin so it's only natural to add tiny tidbits like that which are easy to write but they aren't relevant; this wouldn't be allowed on any other language) --BiT 13:27, 10 Martii 2009 (UTC)
"Familiam Simpsoniam" dempsi, nam (1) potius "The Simpson family" latine reddit (cum "The Simpsons" latine "Simpsonii" dicatur; cf. Gracchi etc.); (2) cum "The Simpsons" nondum latine divulgetur, non est cur illo saltem nomine Latino utamur. Neander (disputatio) 21:34, 16 Martii 2018 (UTC)

message: Topping the article with a photo of Groening is wrong, and annoying. It should be a photo of the Simpsons themselves, not of their creator. But in fact, no such photo appears at all anywhere in the article. Toddcs (disputatio) 12:52, 13 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groening photo
Disputatio:Murcia

message: Ex pagina disputationis mea--Xaverius 13:42, 26 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
Hola. Soy el usuario Martingala de la wiki española. ¿estás seguro de que Murcia es Vergilia? Nunca lo había oido (aunque reconozco que no soy experto), pero además si busco en Google lo que sale parece indicar que se trata de un municipio romano en la zona de jaen. Fijare por ejemplo en estos dos artículos:  . Este enlace  parece que indica que la ubicación de la tal Vergilia fue desconocida y discutida y se conjeturaba un lugar en las cercanías de Murcia llamado hoy La Basca. Quizas de ahí tu fuente que es bastante antigua. saludos 80.38.136.151 13:58, 24 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Bueno, he de decir que a mi también me ha sorprendido, pero el  parece dar Vergilia como Murcia. El Orbis Latinus es una compliación de nombres latinos usados para topónimos europeos, aunque no necesariamente sea literal. Quiero decir, que Coimbra aparece bajo Conimbriga, aunque el yacimiento de Conimbriga no este en la moderna Coimbra. Sin embargo, en todas las inscripciones y tradiciones Conimbriga se asocia con Coimbra. Con respecto a Murcia, no he encontrado yo ninguna latinización mejor del nombre. Vergilia sí tiene una tradición por lo menos en los documentos, aunque no se corresponda con la realidad arqueológica. Hasta que no encontremos una referencia al nombre Latino (que no necesariamente Romano) de Murcia, deberíamos quedarnos con Vergilia.--Xaverius 20:15, 24 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Yo creo que fiarse de una fuente de mediados del XIX en asunto como este es más bien arriesgado. Ya sabes que la ubicación de poblaciones a veces ha sufrido muchos avatares y ha habido muchas teorías que se han demostrado erroneas. Además, no existen referencias a una Murcia romana y todas las fuentes que conozco empiezan la historia de la ciudad en época árabe. A veces se postula (sin pruebas que yo sepa) la posible existencia de una alquería o villa romana, pero nunca una población. Así que la latinización del nombre solamente puede aparecer en documentos eruditos o eclesiásticos posteriores. Por ejemplo en este aparece repetidamente como  Murciam. Una simple búsqueda en Google de "Murciam" te dará más ejemplos. Creo sinceramente que la fuente que usas no es fiable en este punto. Saludos --80.38.136.151 10:52, 25 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Más información que confirma que Vergilia estaba donde ahora está la localidad de Arbuniel en Jaen: simplememte busca Vergilia en el Google acedémico
replies: text: :::Aparece también Murtia, asi que el caso es algo más complejo--Xaverius 14:11, 25 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
No digo que no haya dudas y posibles alternativas: lo que digo es que Vergilia es claramente incorrecto --80.38.136.151 13:04, 26 Iunii 2008 (UTC)

text: incorrecto puede, pero claramente, no tan necesario. Gracias por tener un ojo puesto aquí. Ahora lo cambiaré.--Xaverius 13:35, 26 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: De nomine
Disputatio:Heta

message: Mihi quidem videtur hanc paginam cum pagina de Eta scripta coniungendam esse, quia Heta et Eta re vera una eademque littera est, adhibita tamen ad duos sonos maxime inter se differentes [h] et [ɛː] notandos. --Fabullus 18:22, 26 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Laete consentio. Sine dubio debemus etiam paginam de spiritu aspro habere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:42, 26 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Separate article should be present, because it opens way to independent:

text: :*sources - different contents

text: :*illustrations - different shapes

text: :*interwikis - different foreign articles - now over 25

text: :64.131.78.71 20:23, 14 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Contribuenda cum eta / movenda ad spiritum asperum
Disputatio:Pink Floyd

message: hac pagina a me resciptus est quod parvus erat. translata est ex lingua Anglica. latinitas mea obruitur et verbis indeclinibilis et multitudinibus involutarum clausarum et locutionibus similes 'performing live', linguam igitur fige, si placet. John Wormell 12:05, 28 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rescriptio: ratio 

message: In Moeniis, Pink se ab hominibus separabat in defensionem, ita est moenia, non murum vulgarior. John Wormell 12:05, 28 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratio ''Moeniorum''

message: Quoque aliquis potestne superonerare (?) alium imaginem, potius cum Syd Barrett et in una pictura. erat pictura facta in 1968 cum omnibus sociorum. non possum imagines superonerare aliquo ratione. John Wormell 12:09, 28 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imago
Disputatio:All Blacks

message: I think maybe our heading should be All Blacks? 
When supplying a translation, "omnes nigri" doesn't hack it. It isn't that every one of them wears black (it's normal for teams all to wear the same colour!) It's that their kit is all black: "all" is an adverb. So maybe "integre" or "omnino". Latin uses "ater" rather than "niger" for clothing: "lictores atri", lictors dressed in black (Horace). Outside poetry, there's an adjective "atratus" meaning wearing black. So how about "integre atrati" as a translation? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:25, 1 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Iosephmaria Escrivá

message: (a Disputatio:Opus Dei motum)
Nomen Sancti Conditoris etiam mutavi. In Hispanica lingua "Josemaría" scribitur, sed Latine scriptus est "Iosephmaria".
replies: text: Re "Nomen Sancti Conditoris etiam mutavi."— The man himself seems to have used the open spelling, Iosephus Maria (http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:LM1-tC6wCioJ:www.todosloslibros.info/texto_articulo.php%3Fcapitulo%3D406%26libro%3D100%26tipo_libro%3D6+iosephus+maria+escriva+sanctus&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us&ie=UTF-8); however, the Vatican seems to have used the closed spelling when it canonized him (http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ACxAgd23A-AJ:es.romana.org/art/35_11.1_1+iosephmaria+escriva+sanctus&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&ie=UTF-8). Therefore, we might want to leave open the possibility that we should distinguish between the living man as Iosephus Maria and the dead saint as Iosephmaria. People's names can change at death; e.g., the emperor of Japan. IacobusAmor 11:58, 1 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
Jean-François Escourrou scripsit :
Latine respondeo quia in vicipaedia sumus sed aeque possum Anglice vel Francogallice aut Italice loqui si vultis.
Quod attinet ad nomen Conditoris, initio appellatus est José María (ergo Iosephus Maria) a parentibus. Dein optavit mutationem (Josémaría, latine Iosephmaria) ad ostendendum devotionem suam ad Mariam Deiparam et sponsum ejus, atque ad exprimendum sanctam castamque junctionem Christi parentium.
Utrum homo vivens an sanctus defunctus videtur Conditor Operis Dei ? Ut mea est, sanctus vivens juxta Deum. Hodie textus Ecclesiae adhibent speciem "Iosephmaria", exempli causa in illo textu :
http://www.es.josemariaescriva.info/docs/josemaria.pdf
Laetus sum quando comperio vitam illius amandi sancti adesse ! Sic multae personae eum cognoscent diligentque.
Attamen exacta non est affirmatio quae ait Opus Dei societatem esse. Ex anno 1982, institutio illa Praelatura personalis est.
Semper de nomine Sancti, num legistis argumenta haec ? Ac ego vero possumne eum mutare ?

text: Eis qui conventum aperiunt paginas movere licet. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:40, 2 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
Adjeci indicem operum sancti Iosephmariæ. Putatisne translationem emendatam esse ?
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Afgania

message: Nomen carmini nationali "Soroud-e Melli" est, haud "Sououd-e Melli". Hoc carmen nationale cantatum est in lingua pashtunica.

message: "Incolae Afganice locuti (Pastuni) maximum globum amplius 70 centesimas incolarum aestimatum formant. Secundus maximus globus linguam Dari loquitur et Sogdianos sive Tadzikos (23%) et Hazaros (4%) comprehendit. Uzbeci 2 centesimas constituunt."
Non perfecte latine loquor, aber: Die Zahlen, die wir hier benutzen, dünken mich nicht richtig. 70% Paschtunen? Und nur 2% Usbeken? Nach den meisten anderen Schätzungen findet man ungefähr 45% Paschtunen, ~ 25 Tadschiken, ~ 10 Hasara, und vielleicht 7% Usbeken. Kann ich die Zahlen ändern? KevinMuskelprotz (disputatio) 18:05, 26 Iulii 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you can, if you cite a reliable source. :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:06, 26 Iulii 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  De demographia Afganiae
Disputatio:Halo: Combat Evolved

message: Totus commentarius: "Halo: Combat Evolved est a Primoris Alio Surculus scientia fingo video vanatus, partum a Bungie Studios." Anglice: 'Halo: Combat Evolved is a sprout from another of the Foremost's. Knowledge. I fabricate. I see hointings,* a born by Bungie Studios.' I love these puzzles! *venatus 'hunting' misspelled? IacobusAmor 00:48, 2 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ???
Disputatio:Sporades

message: Nexuum intervicianorum nonnulli non ad Sporades sed potius ad Sporades Septentrionales spectant. In quorum numerus est pagina Anglica Sporades. Haec corrigenda erint, cum paginam de Sporadibus Septentrionalibus habebimus. --Fabullus 11:59, 5 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
Nostram paginam tamen cum expandere volemus, exemplum Germanum aut Hispanum potius sequamur. --Fabullus 12:10, 5 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: De nexibus intervicianis
Disputatio:Cyphosis

message: Fortasse Cyphosis? (Cf. nomina Francogallicum et alia). Est norma K Graecum in C Latinum vertere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:19, 5 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Soleo assentiri. Sed quid est mos noster circum verba medica/technica? (Rogo, non dico... re vera nescio...) Cyphosis melius oculis meis videtur, sed quia est terminus technicus, modo dubito... --Ioscius (disp) 21:33, 5 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Si lingua Anglica cum omnibus aliis consentiret, et ego dubitarem (note: never trust my subjunctives): sed re vera multae aliae linguae habent, modo Latino, Cyphose vel sim. Igitur, Vicipaedia (ut credo) minime cum lingua Anglica se iungere debet, potius cum aliis. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:38, 6 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Libenter ergo mutemus!!!--Ioscius (disp) 23:54, 6 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomen
Disputatio:Pediludium

message: Reverti picturae emendationem, quia prior imago re vera monstrabat pediludium ipsum, sed novior modo manipulum pediludiale. --Ioscius (disp) 21:55, 5 Iulii 2008 (UTC)

message: Paginam glossarii pedilusorii creavi ubi disputationes habere possumus: Vicipaedia:Glossarium pedilusorium. Illic optimum locum ad consentiendum de vocabulis pedilusoriis esse credo.--Spurius Minucius (disputatio) 23:27, 10 Septembris 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Vide hic. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 17:31, 19 Ianuarii 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glossarium pedilusorium 

message: Why follis instead of pila? In Classical Latin games involving a ball were called pila (Seneca).Cruxcruxem (disputatio) 19:32, 21 Februarii 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Traupman's dictionary (2007) defines football (the ball) as pedifollis and says the game is pedifollium and pediludium. It defines baseball (the ball) as basipila. and says the game is basipilae lusus. It says a ball in general ("for playing") is pila, but an inflated one is a follis. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:48, 21 Februarii 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Follis'' + ''pila''

message: In the photo caption, where "eu" is questioned, was it intended to mean European Union, perhaps? Toddcs (disputatio) 14:14, 6 Octobris 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "eu" ?
Disputatio:Copia

message: I also translated this article to ancient Greek (incubator:Wp/grc/Θετόν). I intend to expand the Latin version soon, providing technical definitions, Wikimedia Commons images, and more content in general (excuse my bad syntax in advance though; mementote: "hic usor media Latinitate contribuere potest"). Omnipaedista 11:48, 6 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Quaestiunculam in paginam disputationis θετοῦ addidi. --Neander 23:00, 9 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: : My answer is in your vici-talk-page, Neandre. Regarding the article here, I encountered many difficulties with the technical terminology that deterred me from completing it; for example terms such as membership and elementhood. If someone could help me render them in Latin, I would be grateful. Omnipaedista 16:27, 19 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
Is there a discussion somewhere about the Latin term? --Iustinus 18:02, 25 Octobris 2010 (UTC)

text: A set is a 'combination of elements'. Kindly consider 'coetus'( without the sexual overtones) and 'complexio'.--Jondel (disputatio) 02:12, 17 Augusti 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminologia

message: Propono verbum "congeries", quamquam fons Latinus mathematicus mihi modo non est praesto. (91.66.120.171 20:24, 21 Februarii 2020 (UTC))
thread_title:  nomen rei quam Angli dicunt "set"
Disputatio:Iohannes Rawls

message: Neander, mutasti "In Foederatas Americae Civitates reversus" (Anglice: 'returned to the United States of America') ut legatur "In Civitates Foederatae Americae reversus" ('returned to the States of United America'). Res vere foederatae sunt civitates, non? Ergo recte: "In Civitates Foederatas Americae" vel (fere melius) "In Foederatas Americae Civitates"? IacobusAmor 01:11, 7 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Et egomet propter silentium meam rem credebam ab nemine legi!   :–)   Quod ad syntaxin attinet, FAC mihi paululo melius audit quam CFA, sed certe ambo Latinitati videntur parere. Cum de tituli inscriptione agatur, difficile est iudicatu, uter sit rectissimus ordo. Latina enim est lingua liberi verborum ordinis, id est: In sententiis textualibus construendis verborum ordine indicantur res pragmaticae: Quibus verbis ponatur emphasis, etc. In CFA reversus sum, ne a titulo publico abhorrerem. Si tu CFA in FAC denuo mutaris, non remordebo. --Neander 03:11, 7 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: CFA nomen

message: For the record: when I changed Philosopha popularis Americana Ayn Rand to Philosophia popularis Americana Ayn Rand, I was taking Ayn Rand to be in the genitive case: 'Ayn Rand's popular American philosophy', instead of what Rafael wants to say, 'The popular American philosopher Ayn Rand'—which, if Bradley's Arnold's notes on style are to be believed, would be better rendered by putting the name first, as Ayn Rand, philosopha popularis Americana. Since that wasn't the order presented, I naturally read it the other way, assuming it had an obvious typo in it. ¶ Since Ayn, as an indeclinable word, can fall into any case & number at all, would it be possible to find/create a declinable form for it? ¶ Is it really accurate to call her popularis (= 'popular, democratic')? I'd have guessed the opposite! IacobusAmor 16:30, 4 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Philosopha/Philosophia
Disputatio:Lingua Loquisiru

message: Has this artificial language received sufficient coverage in independent sources so that this article can be considered :en:Wikipedia:No original research? --UV 22:05, 7 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think not -- hence I suggest deletion. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:32, 27 Octobris 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  delenda?
Disputatio:Oscitatio

message: Addidi :Categoria:Anatomia, sed omnino deficit. Re vera, nescio bonum modum quo covertamus reflex. Etiam vide Tussis, quae est nonnumquam indicium morbi, sed alioquin aliquando modo actio corporis involuntaria... Quid censetis? --Ioscius (disp) 22:47, 9 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Evidenter terminus medicus rectus est reflexus quem Thomas Willis fingit ad propositum saeculo XVII, Vide Google Books; Ille aspectum automatarium seu repens seu involuntaria dimovit, defigens aspectum causalem, quo actus cum causa praeterita connectitur.--Rafaelgarcia 23:18, 9 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Id est, motus dicitur reflexus qui actum praeteritum causaliter reflectit.--Rafaelgarcia 23:47, 9 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Reflexus, reflexus, m. fingo? Gratias ago, Rafael. --Ioscius (disp) 07:29, 10 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Categoria
Disputatio:Mediolanum

message: Dies sollemnis: 7 Decembris

message: De Isidore Hispalense: "Vocatum autem Mediolanum ab eo quod ibi sus medio lanea perhibetur inventa". Andreas Raether (disputatio) 19:43, 7 Martii 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Re vera hoc nomen originem Celticum habet. Sunt alia "Mediolana" in regionibus Celticis, e.g. Mediolanum Santonum. Significatio controvertitur (vide e.g. :it:Milano#Origine del nome). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:40, 8 Martii 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: : Profecto etymologiae auctorum antiquorum fidem non faciunt. Quamvis in genere periculosae sint etymologiae toponomasticae, facile Andreae assentior originem Celticam proferenti. Mihi quidem videtur nomen ex Celtico (Gallico) *medyo- et lan(n) ( < Proto-Celt. *landā 'terra aperta'); huc etiam adducere licet Italian. landa 'campus'. Neander (disputatio) 21:02, 8 Martii 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymologiae 15:1.57
Disputatio:Guido Aretinus

message: Why not "Wido Aretinus" ? Geoffrey Calabria 23:30, 11 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, quod se Latine appellavit, et alii eum Latine appellaverunt, Guido? IacobusAmor 00:31, 12 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :Ita. Sed si habes fontes pro orthographia "Wido Aretinus", potes addere hanc formam in pagina (cum citatione!). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:54, 12 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Fortasse compilator et non auctor... ? Ad verificandum manuscriptum (I-MC cod. 318, pagina 156, nexum it subitum ad paginam). Textus Micrologi (traductum brevi sermo in musica) est praesentem per capitula I-XIX. Codex 318 est fontem antiquorem, sed etiam obscurum. Platonykiss (disputatio) 15:17, 26 Maii 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Addo editionem Micrologi et vitam Guidonis Dictionario biografico. Bonam continuationem! Platonykiss (disputatio) 16:41, 26 Maii 2024 (UTC)

text: :: Potetis quaerere fontes apud editiones (Micrologus e.g.) thesauri musicarum latinarum (tml). Clicatis apud concordantias et invenitis cunctas fontes nuntiatas a RISM (Répertoire des sources musicales). Cunctae fontes helveticae (CH) et manuscripta Bibliothecae Augustae (D-W) reproducta et publicata sunt. Versio Micrologus apud scriptorium Montis Casini est unicum (ultimum capitulum XX substitutum ab alia XXIX). Platonykiss (disputatio) 18:03, 26 Maii 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  «Incipit Michrologus id est brevi sermo in musica editus a Domno Widone» 

message: XII saeculum in formato "date"! Experior «XII saeculo» et systema habebat gratiam. Platonykiss (disputatio) 15:24, 26 Maii 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Annos characteribus Arabicis scribere solemus. Ergo "MCD" in "1400" converti, sed hoc casu quid re vera scribere volumus? Datum compositionis? Datum exscriptionis libri manuscripti? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:18, 27 Maii 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ascriptio temporis manuscripti bodmeriani
Disputatio:Nomina Latina e lingua Arabica mutuata

message: As far as I know there are no corresponding articles in the other Wikipedias. The English and Arabic wikipedias have articles on English loans from Arabic, and many other Wikipedias have articles on loans from Arabic in their own languages. No other wikipedia has an article on Arabic loans in (Medieval) Latin. --Fabullus 11:34, 13 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: De nexibus intervici

message: In the table I have added a column with corresponding English pages because we still have so many red links in Latin. In time the English column could perhaps be removed. --Fabullus 11:34, 13 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nexus ad paginas correspondentes Anglicas

message: Nonne "mutuari" verbum deponens est? Estne scribendum "Nomina Latina quae e lingua Arabica mutuati sumus"? --81.141.7.153 11:40, 30 Iunii 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Recte dicis, sed nonnumquam participia perfecti verborum deponentium adhibentur sensu passivo. Vide quod Lewis & Short scribunt de verbo . --Fabullus 12:08, 30 Iunii 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latinitas huius paginae tituli. 

message: (Piper) cubeba, (Curcuma) zedoaria, Carum carvi, lacca. --Fabullus 11:30, 14 Martii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adhuc includenda
Disputatio:Orsa

message: Doesn't it make more sense to compare sutra directly to the Latin word suo -ere sui sutum (currently glossing it, but not listed as a cognate) than English "sew" and "suture"? --Iustinus 14:20, 15 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes indeed! Lesgles (disputatio) 19:03, 25 Martii 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Cognate