lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Follis aërius

message: "Follis aere" Latine non dicitur, nec Vilborg ita consulit. Secundum Vilborg, "ballong" est follis vel folliculus, quibus deinde explicationis causá addit "[aere/gase inflatus]". Lemma, quia tam confusum est, purgabo novo titulo follis aërius (ex Pitkäranta) usus. Neander (disputatio) 13:38, 13 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Te consentio, "follis aere" non recte bene sonat. "Follis aerius" melius sonet. Gratias ago pro nomine novo. :) Sed fontem Pitkäranta non dicebas. Quaeso adde. :)

text: Folles aerii non solum aerem continunt. Etiam alia gasa. Hoc me acceptit cogitare nominis "follis aere". Sed fortasse "aer" plures res sensu significet. Et in hoc contextu fortasse aliquid alium quam aer.

text: Donatello (disputatio) 14:27, 13 Iulii 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: :Nunc fons est. Serus eram cum nuntio. :) -- Donatello (disputatio) 14:29, 13 Iulii 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: ::Ahem. Ex :en:Air ball: "In basketball, an air ball is a shot that misses both the rim and the backboard." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:40, 13 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::: Such eerie problems I tend to bequeath as heir balls to real experts. :–) Neander (disputatio) 15:12, 13 Iulii 2013 (UTC)

message: Ex Merriam-Webster: balloon < Francice ballon 'large football' < Italice (dial.) ballone 'large football' < balla 'ball'. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:45, 13 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymologia ''balloon'' vocis Anglicae
Disputatio:Christophorus Lee

message: "Christophorus" praefero ego secundum etymologiam huius verbi ... quid dicis, Philetyme? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:30, 13 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Assentior: Χριστοφορος Latine esto Christophorus. Φιλέτυμος (disputatio) 19:23, 13 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Praenomen
Disputatio:Sophia Regina Coniux Hispanorum

message: An fontem huius tituli habemus? Ambiguitas mihi displicet: Sophia enim non est "coniu(n)x Hispanorum". Nisi fons reperitur, propono Sophia (regina Hispanorum). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:53, 15 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus
Disputatio Categoriae:Universitas Regiomontana

message: "Universitates Russiae" addidi propter geographiam, hoc loco hodie in Russia comprehenso. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:37, 16 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Haec universitas tamen (fere) numquam ad universitates Russiae pertinebat neque successores suas in Russia habet. Satis est pro hac categoria ut certe ad historiam Kaliningradi pertinenti in "Categoria:Kaliningradum" esse. -- Alexander Geraščenko (disputatio) 11:52, 1 Iunii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categoriae
Disputatio:Ecclesia Cathedralis Lundensis

message: Perhaps likelier among Roman & Anglican cathedrals (but then again perhaps not), the phrase "cathedral [church] of [city] X" will be a descriptor, and the true proper name will specify the saint to which the building is dedicated. Using that model for this church might produce a lemma & definition something like this: "Ecclesia Cathedralis Sancti Laurentii est ecclesia cathedralis Lundensis, sedes Episcopi Lundensis in Ecclesia Suetica constituta." In other words, seeming names like Coventry Cathedral and Washington National Cathedral and such, though they may be by far the most usually heard forms in vulgar discourse, function more as bynames, and the saint-specifying versions represent the nomina propria—in the cited cases, the Cathedral of St Michael, Coventry and the Cathedral Church of Saint Peter and Saint Paul in the City and Diocese of Washington, respectively. Of course it's possible, as in the English wiki, to take the popular descriptor for the lemma and make the proper name a textual afterthought; however, omitting the proper name altogether, as in the current text of this article, makes for an inadequate definition. Appropriate authorities might be consulted. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:23, 18 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: For a history that reveals these points, see the building that, under control of a Reformed Protestant church, for more than thirty years has had the proper name The Crystal Cathedral, but, having been purchased by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange, is set to become the Ecclesia Cathedralis Christi. Presumably in everyday speech it'll still be described as—but no longer named—the crystal cathedral. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:59, 18 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :I agree about real names. As you suggest above, it is convenient in general for pages about cathedrals to have a title that is brief and includes the name of the city/diocese. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:33, 18 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomina ecclesiarum cathedralium
Disputatio:Mare Verginium

message: Haec commentatio quid sibi vult? Nescio an eandem aquam describitur quam et Oceanus Britannicus, aut aliquid maius, aut aliud quid: tabula enim cum textu non corespondet. Tabula eam rem, quam hodierni "Mare Celticum" interdum nuncupant, describit. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:09, 20 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ubi est "Vectis promontorium"? An insula Vecta/Vectis? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:11, 20 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quid?
Disputatio:Olavus Ragnar Grimi filius

message: Salve. Nonne esse oportet "Olaus Rainerus/Ragnarus Grímsson" (vulgo Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson)? Lexicon Vilborgianum editionis secundae habet nomini Ragnar "Ragnarus" [raŋ'na:rus]. Velim dicere "Ragnarus" contra autem "Rainerus".
Donatello (disputatio) 13:52, 22 Iulii 2013 (UTC).

message: Based on Latin sources and on frequency (cf. the numbers below) I changed the name "Olaus Ragnarus Grímur filius" to "Olavus Ragnar Grimi filius". For the Latin form of the patronymic Grímsson, please search for "Grimi filius" (under: 'Texti / Fulltext') at https://baekur.is/search (National Library of Iceland). 
 
* Ólafur
 
case      	Icelandic name	Latin form (2nd decl.)	Latin form (2nd decl.)
nominative	Ólafur        	Olavus (1,318)        	Olaus (419)
genitive  	Ólafs         	Olavi (1,374)         	Olai (374)
dative    	Ólafi         	Olavo*                	Olao*
accusative	Ólaf          	Olavum (687)          	Olaum (72)
ablative  	              	(ab) Olavo*           	(ab) Olao*
* Olavo occurs 1,171 times, Olao 111 times (both either in the dative or in the ablative).
 
* Ragnar
 
case      	Icelandic name	Latin form (3rd decl.)	Latin form (2nd decl.)
nominative	Ragnar        	Ragnar                	Ragnarus (9)
genitive  	Ragnars       	Ragnaris (67)         	Ragnari
dative    	Ragnari       	Ragnari               	Ragnaro (1)
accusative	Ragnar        	Ragnarem (12)         	Ragnarum (6)
ablative  	              	(a) Ragnare (23)      	(a) Ragnaro (3)
 Petrus Tectander (disputatio) 10:32, 15 Iulii 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Disputatio:B'Day

message: Haec removi: " (Latine 'B'Dies' vel 'B-Dies') " quia non intellego. Quid dicere vult? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:56, 26 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Salve. Post iam cogitavisse, nescio quid B'Day significet. Album musicum voluntate mittebatur in Beyoncé die natali. Ita nomen significat aut birthday aut Beyoncé day. Invenire significationem in commentatione Vicipaediae Anglicae conabar, sed haud dictum est. Non scire possumus sine Beyoncé sententia.

text: Donatello (disputatio) 14:09, 26 Iulii 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: :Gratias tibi ago, Donatello. Paginam Anglicam partim perlegi et fontem ibi repperi! Vide ea quae nunc scribo -- an consentis? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:14, 26 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Optime. :) Gratias ago. -- Donatello (disputatio) 15:34, 26 Iulii 2013 (UTC).
thread_title:  Sensus?
Disputatio:Guinea Aequinoctialis

message: Huius commentationis titulum ad "Guinea Aequatoriensis" esse movendum puto; nam "linea aequatorialis" dicimus. MARCVS (disputatio) 13:17, 28 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
Exstat, quamquam non classicum, nomen adiectivum "aequatorius, -a, -um". MARCVS (disputatio) 13:42, 28 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
Exstat etiam "aequatoriensis, -e", saltem in nominibus scientificis, qua de causa nihil obstat quin "Guinea Aequatoriensis" dicamus. MARCVS (disputatio) 14:00, 28 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Consentio, sed mihi "aequatorius" vel "aequatorialis" maxime placet. Lesgles (disputatio) 20:54, 28 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
Et "aequatoriensis" et "aequatorius" et "aequatorialis" synonyma esse videntur; quoquo modo "i" post "aequator" est ponendum. MARCVS (disputatio) 12:01, 29 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
Macte Marcus! Cum venia vestra mox movebo ad Guinea Aequatoriensis. Autem sentete libere movere ita aut nomina idonea.Jondel (disputatio) 11:35, 30 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
Bene. MARCVS (disputatio) 11:45, 30 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
Categoria quoque "Guinea Aequatorensis" in "Guinea Aequatoriensis" est vertenda. MARCVS (disputatio) 12:01, 31 Iulii 2013 (UTC)

text: Licet mihi.Jondel (disputatio) 12:43, 31 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Cur adhuc titulus motus non est? --Nigidiolus (disputatio) 17:47, 2 Novembris 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Iam diu motus est (a me) die 1 Maii 2014, fonte nominis rite (a Neandro) citato. Quo fonte reperto, disputatio quam supra legis, anno 2013 habita, inutilis facta est.

text: ::An fontes alios repperisti? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:28, 2 Novembris 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine
Disputatio:Indologia

message: "Pars vicificanda" dixi quia inter nexus externos URL inutiliter in textu repetitur; "ScDub" quia ordinem enumerationis Indologorum non intellego (sed fortasse stultus sum!) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:00, 29 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: De nexibus externis consentio. De indice, cum una exceptione secundum annum natalem enumeraverunt; eam reparavi. Lesgles (disputatio) 20:03, 29 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Bene, bene! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:50, 29 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pagina imperfecta?
Disputatio:Aethiops non albescit

message: The later Erasmian version (cf. :en:Washing the Ethiopian white) seems  to be more popular: Aethiops non albescit. (Erasm., 471; Seybold, 14; Binder I, 28; II, 96; Philippi, I, 14.)--Utilo (disputatio) 08:15, 30 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just found a third version:  Aethiops non dealbavit. (Franck, II, 58a; Tappius, 62a; Erasm., 471; Gaal, 1150.)--Utilo (disputatio) 08:21, 30 Iulii 2013 (UTC)

text: Wikiquote has: "Aethiopem lavas. Aethiopem dealbas. […] Hoc item peculiariter quadrabit, cum res parum honesta verborum fucis adornatur, aut cum laudatur illaudatus, aut docetur indocilis." (Adagiorum chiliades, 1.4.50)--Utilo (disputatio) 08:25, 30 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: : Perbene rem indagasti! Libenter, si tibi videtur, licet titulum mutare. Neander (disputatio) 08:36, 30 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Est et tertia proverbii versio Latina: "Aethiopem ex vultu iudico." (cf. Translatio studiorum). Locus citatus versionem "Aethiopem dealbas" notissimam esse postulat - quod autem Google-Search minime confirmat (84 pro "Aethiopem dealbas", 50500 pro "Aethiops non albescit"). Inde titulum mutabo.--Utilo (disputatio) 09:49, 30 Iulii 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washing the Ethiopian white
Disputatio:Secessio plebis

message: Amice, evasa nonne participium passivum est? Num post secessionem/seditionem vis dici? - Bavarese (disputatio) 16:12, 1 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Gratias ago... defessus iam videor sole urente... --Autokrator (disputatio) 16:17, 1 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Quo equidem quoque valde doleo, eheu! - Bavarese (disputatio) 16:27, 1 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plebe evasa?
Disputatio:Cultus imperatorius (Roma antiqua)

message: Salve ! Cum venia vestra velim movere sicut titulus Anglice et ut creem rem tituli eiusdem de re commune.Jondel (disputatio) 18:36, 6 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonne pro "vetus Roma" potius "Roma antiqua" vel "imperium Romanum" ponenenda sunt?--Utilo (disputatio) 17:03, 8 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Dixerim "(Roma antiqua)" ut repetitionem "imperatorius ... imperium" evitemus. An consentitis? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:20, 8 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Salve. Quaeso. Malim  plene sit 'Cultus imperatorius Romae antiquae'. (Autem minime, opertet esse verba  'cultus' et imperatorius, aliquanto.   Non mihi refert an 'Roma antiqua' an 'vetus Roma'  quia mihi videtur eodem sensu.)  Velim scribere res commune Cultus imperatorius.  I would like to writeright a general article Imperial Cult. One of which is the roman. Another is Japanese. Minime opertet congruere Anglice in lemma(Imperial cult (ancient Rome)). Jondel (disputatio) 17:27, 8 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Certe consentio.--Utilo (disputatio) 20:46, 8 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
Optime, gratias!!Jondel (disputatio) 12:59, 9 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movenda
Disputatio:Aëdes aegypti

message: Quomodo aedes, Graece ἀηδής, declinari debet? Aedes, aedis? Lesgles (disputatio) 03:45, 10 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Secundum W. Stearn, Botanical Latin (1966), p. 79, sicut "pubes" declinatur: -es, -em, -is, -i, -e; -es, -ium, -ibus. Addit "... also a number of generic names ending in -odes or -oides derived from Greek... These are all now treated as feminine (cf. Taxon 3: 33-34 [1954])."  Admitto hoc nomen non botanicum sed zoologicum esse, et non in "-odes" sed in "-edes"! Vide etiam Disputatio:Systema endocrines. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:25, 10 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Gratias tibi ago! I went ahead and used aedis and aedium. It would be simpler if we could use the native word culex, but that would be taxonomically confusing. Lesgles (disputatio) 17:21, 10 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Declinatio
Disputatio:Mahometus al-Barāda'ī

message: Greetings. What is the Latin name for "vice president"? I could not find it, so I wrote alter a praeside. In nuntii in the main page it says praeses vicarius. What do you know or consider? -- Donatello (disputatio) 05:18, 15 Augusti 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: I guess "Alter a praeside" would mean "the second of the two men from the president": I don't like that very much! Surely "praeses vicarius" is exactly right?

text: Our practice with surnames (and other words) in foreign scripts, e.g. Arabic, is to use the international transliteration. If there are accents/diacritics, we give the correct accents in the lemma, but we omit them from the pagename. So I've moved and edited accordingly: OK?

text: The international transliteration was already given in the text of our article, so I took it from there. When it isn't so easy, the German wikipedia will often be a good source for the correct transliteration. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:37, 15 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :I changed "abhinc" twice to "a/ab". Here's why -- if I got this wrong, someone else will surely comment :)

text: :# "a/ab" means, in writing history, "from" or "since" a certain moment in the past. As in the very famous title of Livy's history, Ab Urbe condita -- "from the foundation of the City". You use this when giving a specific date in the past. That's what we do on this page.

text: :# "abhinc" is nearly the same, but not quite: it corresponds with the English words "for ... now" or "ago": he has been vice president "for three months now", or he became vice president "three months ago". You don't use it (I think) when giving a specific date. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:50, 15 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::I see. Thanks. :) Then praeses vicarius sounds better to me to. :) In Swedish we use "since" (sedan) in a little different ways than English does. This is probably why I used abhinc. I'll remember the rule of international transliteration. -- Donatello (disputatio) 00:04, 16 Augusti 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: :::My daughter, who lives in Greece, now also uses "since" in a different way (because, I guess, it's different in Greek too). So she said to me "since half an hour": the standard English would be "half an hour ago". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:34, 16 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::::I see. It can happen like that. -- Donatello (disputatio) 15:16, 16 Augusti 2013 (UTC).
thread_title:  Vice president
Disputatio:Alexandria Asiana

message: Si erravi, date veniam, sed de hac urbe nunquam audivi. Fons apud Vicipaediam Anglicam repertum nihil dicit de hoc nomine: ibi verbum "Asiana" non reperio. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:04, 15 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delenda?
Disputatio Vicipaediae:Sonus mensis

message: Fortasse Dies Irae mense Novembre melius sit, quando diem Omnium Sanctorum celebramus.  Estne versio carminis Gaudeamus Igitur qua possumus mense Septembre uti?  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 18:16, 15 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made proposals for May and June but others should feel free to change them.  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 16:38, 17 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)

message: We have a default Pagina Mensis to be used if we ever forget to put in a page for a given month.  We might want to do something similar with these Soni Mensuales, and a set like Tchaikovsky's Seasons or Vivaldi's Four Seasons might be a place to start -- comments?  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 14:33, 24 Iulii 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defaults? 

message: I suppose we could go with November from Tchaikovsky's Seasons, or I'm half tempted to propose something from here :-)  -- 
Better ideas?  A. Mahoney (disputatio) 12:46, 31 Octobris 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ego quidem nihil contra sonos felium habeo. :) Lesgles (disputatio) 20:35, 4 Novembris 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  November
Disputatio:Lingua Latina Renascentiae

message: Fortasse "Lingua Latina Renascentiae" ... fortasse aliud quid? Quid dicitis, amici? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:23, 15 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita concordo. Moveamus consilio tuo.Jondel (disputatio) 11:38, 16 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Gratias ago, Jondel. Movi, sed incertus sum. Fortasse "(Lingua) Latina humanistica"? Fortasse aliud quid? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:44, 17 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Optime. Coner integrare vel investigare et emendare de latina humanistica.--Jondel (disputatio) 13:14, 17 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus
Disputatio:Tosa Inu

message: placet auxilium in Latin
replies: text: Libenter facere possumus. :) Ignosce me si vitiose intellexi de imaginibus. Clarum plus habere possumus. Sed nota: cum multis imaginibus cum textu brevi magnum spatium erit, et illud non bene videbit. Itaque novam partem "== Pinacotheca == " addere possumus, et ibi plures vel multa imagines. Praeter hoc, libenter libere te senti recensere hanc commentationem. :)

text: We would love to help. :) Excuse me if I have missunderstood wrong about pictures. Of course we can have more. But note that with many pictures with a short text there will be big space, and that won't look good. Therefor we can add the new section "== Gallery ==" and there several or many pictures. Beside this, feel free to edit this article. :)

text: Donatello (disputatio) 15:59, 22 Augusti 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: :You're right, we can add a gallery, but we have the guideline "Wikipedia isn't a picture gallery". Maybe better not add any more pictures unless they supply important information. It's possible to have too many dogs ... :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:56, 22 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
Disputatio:Pactum Savarae ictum

message: Hmm ... nomen Latinum huius oppidi est Separa (seu Savara). Nonne possumus ab hoc nomine verbum adiectivum aut reperire aut fingere? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:25, 17 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Reperire? - Potius fingere: Separensis, Separitanus, Separaeus?--Utilo (disputatio) 08:50, 18 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Recte dicis: neque ego verbum adiectivum ad hoc oppidum pertinens reperio. Licet "Separensis" fingere, nisi fallor: Pactum Separense. An consentis? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:21, 18 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Constentio.--Utilo (disputatio) 13:32, 18 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus
Disputatio:Khartum

message: Si quis potest fontem citare nominis "Khartumensis Urbs", bene. "Khartumensis" vb. adiect. pro certo habemus, sed vb. substantivum non habemus. In hoc textu video "Exc.mus D.nus Daniel Marco Kur ADWOK, Episcopus titularis Khartumensis (Mossori), Episcopus auxiliaris Moxoritanus (Khartoum, SUDANIA)" -- unde statuo vb. substantivum nullum reperiendum esse. "Khartoum" est translitteratio Francogallicum; apud nos melius "Khartum"? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:22, 22 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Propositionem meam retraho quia in documento quod citavi nomina urbium non Latine sed Italiane conscribuntur. Oportet potius nomen (aut Latinum, si sit, aut non-Latinum) in contextu Latino reperire si possumus. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:31, 22 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movenda?
Disputatio:Bacilla escaria

message: De "clavulis": sunt fortasse aliquid minus quam chopsticks, e metallo facti. Propono potius "baculi" ... De "conedendi": voluisti, nisi fallor, "comedendi" scribere ... nescio an haec locutio significationem idoneam reddit. Laetus ero si alius quis commentum addere vult. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:01, 24 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Salve. Norstedt Sueticum-Latinum dictionarium dicit "clavulus" pro Anglice stick, ita eo credebam. Sed nunc quando "clavulus" quaero dicit little nail Anglice. De "conedendus" componebam "con-" et "edendus". Sitne "comedendus"? "Baculi comedendi" bene sonat. :) -- Donatello (disputatio) 16:53, 24 Augusti 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: :De locutione non disputo, sed de orthographia pro certo "comedere", non "conedere" oportet scribere. Movi igitur. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:49, 22 Novembris 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Gratias ago. :) -- Donatello (disputatio) 01:07, 23 Novembris 2013 (UTC).
replies: text: :::Nonne de instrumentis escariis hic agitur? Nomen adiectivum "escarius" ad huius rei indicem ponendum percommode ergo potest adhiberi. Bacilla sunt, mea sententia, potius quam baculi vel bacula. "Bacilla escaria" dicamus? Quid censetis? MARCVS (disputatio) 05:31, 15 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomen
Disputatio:Caldera Theraea

message: I suggest moving to Caldera Theraea because Thera is the Latin name of this island (group). "Theraeus -a -um" is the usual adjective, according to . Is that OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:36, 24 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. It is great you did the research!Jondel (disputatio) 15:27, 25 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: :Thanks Jondel! They make nice sweet wine on this island. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:45, 25 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movenda?
Disputatio Categoriae:Freta Calpis

message: It seems to me there will only ever be one member of this category. The aim of categories is to group related pages (see Vicipaedia:De categoriis), so, if I'm right, categories that can only contain one member shouldn't normally be created. Does that make sense?
The same might apply to :Categoria:Freta Maroci also -- I'm not sure.
replies: text: No, it wouldn't ... I forgot about the strait between Morocco and the Canaries (I don't know if it has a name.) Morocco's OK! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:01, 24 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inops?
Disputatio:Coriovallum

message: Vicipaedia Francogallica "Coriovallum" ab eruditis hodiernis receptum esse adseverat, Vicipaedia Nederlandica "Cortovallum". Fontem fidelem huius rei necesse est reperire ... Si Nederlandici recte dicunt, nonne oportet ad "Cortovallum" movere? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:20, 24 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine
Disputatio:Museum Artis - MdAO

message: Oportet, o scriptor anonyme, si indicem longum nominum nobis ignotorum inserere vis, aliquid de his hominibus aut de operibus eorum addere. Si id non factum est, pauci commentationem leguntur! An potes imaginem idoneam ad Communia addere? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:30, 25 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Caro contributore anonimo, sarebbe opportuno che, se vuoi inserire una lunga lista di nomi a noi ignoti, aggiungi anche qualche informazione su questi uomini o sulle loro opere. Se non si fa così, la pagina sarà letta da pochi. Se vuoi puoi anche aggiungere un'immagine idonea tratta da CommonsHelveticus montanus (disputatio) 03:56, 31 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  De indice pictorum