lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Disputatio:Informatica

message: Please confirm, if these translations are okay:
VCR => recordarium televisionalis 
Washing maschine => machina lavationarum 
Embedded Systems => systema inlectata (hint: lectus = bed)
Theoderich 11:03 iun 5, 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My lexicons give VCR = videoexceptorium ("video-receiver") or magnetoscopium (calque of French magnétoscope) and washing machine = machina lavatoria.  For embedded systems, possibly something like systemata incapsulata (singular systema incapsulatum). "inlectare" already means something else.  The literal equivalent of 'embed' is 'incubare' but I don't know if the meaning of that word ever wandered in the same direction 'embed' did. —Myces Tiberinus 02:10 iun 6, 2005 (UTC)

message: Videte s.v.p. Tabernam sub rubrica "Categorization/terminology of Computer Scientist". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:17, 2 Iulii 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  De terminis paginisque
Disputatio:Aequationes Maxwellianae in vacuo

message: This title looks terrible of course. So what to do? My recommendation would be to use an adjectival form, e.g. aequationes Maxwellianae. This kills two birds with one stone:
#We're supposed to leave modern surnames indeclinable unless we have a good reason not to, but obviously the undeclined genitive is awkward and confusing here.
#Latin tends to use adjectives instead of genitives much more often than English or Portuguese do.
--Iustinus 00:59 iun 15, 2005 (UTC)
Ok, I didnt like the title also. Aequationes Maxwellianae is
a better name. Can you change it? I´m not in my hometown right now, and I dont have much time here in the cybercaffe.
But I completely agree with the name change!
--Mafrius 00:21 iun 16, 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Iam nomen paginae ad Aequationes Maxwellianae in vacuo mutata est; propositum huius paginae est has aequationes in vacuo solvere ut solutionem luci pertinentem potimur. Vide etiam Aequationes Maxwellianae quod de aequationibus generalibus tractat.--Rafaelgarcia 20:59, 23 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)
What about the integral forms of the Maxwell Equations? --Snake707 20:43, 23 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)

text: Feel free to add them, but perhaps there are irrelavent on this page which treats the equations in vacuo in the context of solving for the wave equation, no? Perhaps you would check out the Aequationes Maxwellianae page.--Rafaelgarcia 21:03, 23 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: :The above comment isn't clear (to me, now) because there seems only to have been one page, which was moved from Aequationes Maxwellianae to its present title in 2007. So, when that comment was written, Aequationes Maxwellianae was apparently just a redirect. But it could well be I am misunderstanding something in the history.

text: :The questions I really wanted to ask are, (1) did the page once look OK? It now looks bad, apparently because some details of the display of maths formulae have changed. (2) Does anyone know how we might correct it? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:08, 3 Novembris 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Maxwell aequationes

message: Aricle marged into Aequationes Maxwellianae. Pápiliunculus (disputatio) 06:36, 1 Maii 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Disputatio:Vladimirus Lenin

message: I wonder, how a Russian, Ukrainian, etc., patronymic (отчество) should be rendered into Latin. Is such a way as, e.g., "Andriovicius" suitable? Or a Polish-like transliteration like  "Romanowicz" is more acceptable? Or a direct translation of the meaning (e.g. "Ильич", "Ilyich" = "filius Heliae") can possibly be used in some situations? --Alexander Gerascenco 18:23 iun 17, 2005 (UTC)
Id facile fieri potest patronymicis Graecis aemulandis, quae tum translitteranda sunt. Ильич ergo, cuius nomen ab Elia propheta sumptum est, Eliades est. nomen gentile Ul'janov, quod habet formam adiectivi praedicativi, adiectivo Latino etiam reddendum est. Conditor unionis sovieticae igitur Vladimirus aut Cosmarchus Eliades Iulianicus est.
replies: text: Владимир -> Vladimirus aut Cosmarchus. "Vladimirus" est latinisatio nominis ellius, a Lexicone Hoffmani data .

text: Ильич -> Eliades. (Nonne "Heliades"?) Mihi placet. Sed varia exsistunt exempla latinisationis patronymorum, e.g.: "Iohannes Basilides" Hofmann. Lexicon universale; "Ioannes Basilii", "Demetrius Michaelis" Herberstein. Rerum moscoviticarum commentarii; "Mscislaus Romanowicz" Mechovski. Tractatus de duabus Sarmatiis; "Petrus Alexii Fil." Petrov. Urbs Narva, etc. Quae varians optima est? Problema disputanda est, et regulum est statundum. Vide etiam: .

text: Ульянов -> Iulianicus? Dubio. Exsistuntne exempla talis modi latinisationis nominum gentilium? (Estne explanandum, nomina gentila Russica "-ov" aut "-in" terminantur ex patronymis originem suam ducunt?) Praeterea, dicunt: nomina gentilia (surnames) nunc non traducenda sunt...

text: -- Alexander Gerascenco 14:00, 22 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Patronymic

message: One more problem concerns "Soviet" (Совет). The Russian word "совет" means "consilium", i.e. both "council" and "advice" [as in the German language "Rat" Alex1011 12:32, 18 Maii 2006 (UTC)]. It would have been undoubtely better just to translate the word (as it is done, e.g., in Ukrainian: рада, Радянський Союз - "soviet"/"council", "the Soviet Union"), if there hadn't been such usages of transliteration as Unio Sov(i)etica, etc. So, because of this fact I suggest using "Soviet" as a word denoting a governing body in "Soviet Russia" and USSR (in order not to lose connections between this kind of organisation and the form of society, the Soviet one, it gave name to), but possibly with the necessary explanation (Concilium) given in brackets. --Alexander Gerascenco 18:23 iun 17, 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Soviet

message: Forma "Russe" possibilis est: "Russian 1. subst. Russus, i m / Russa, ae f 2. adj. Russus, a, um"  -- Alexander Gerascenco 11:26, 21 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
In lingua Russa/Russica/Ruthenica habemus adiectiva "russkij" (i.e. gentis Russorum/Ruthenorum; quod verbum esse potest denotatio et linguae, et hominis gentis illius) et "rossijskij" (i.e. terrae Russiae). Possibile, "Russus" = "russkij", "Russicus" = "rossijskij"? -- Alexander Gerascenco 11:42, 21 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Russe et Russice
Disputatio:Petropolis

message: Here are Latin names for St. Petersburg given by some authors:
Petropolis (Подосинов А.В., Белов А.М. Lingua Latina. Русско-латинский словарь)
Petropolis, St. Petri fanum (Graesse. Orbis Latinus)
Petroburgum, Petropolis (Horreum - Lexicum nominum geographicorum latinorum)
Petropolis Essential Latin
So, we should better use "Petropolis" for St. Petersburg and leave "Petroburgum" for Peterborough, how do you think? 
--Alexander Gerascenco 16:24 iun 18, 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As if it weren't annoying enough that this city's name keeps changing in Russian... ;)

text: White's Latin Dictionary gives both Petriburgum and Petropolis

text: Egger, Lexicon Nominum Locorum gives Leninopolis, but notes its old name as Petroburgum (It also gives Petroburgum for Peterborough, England and Pietersburg, South Africa. The latter is now called Polokwane.)

text: I can't find my copy of Burke (as usual).

text: But I think we can safely say that Petroburgum Petriburgum and Petropolis are all acceptable. I don't feel strongly one way or another about what lemma it should be put under. --Iustinus 20:24 iun 18, 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: :Of course, Petropolis is not the only Latin equivalent to St. Petersburg and possibly not the best one, as Petroburgum is closer to the Russian name of the city ("Petropolis" - "Петрополь" can also sometimes be used in Russian, but only in poetry). But Peterborough "possesses more rights" on the name Petroburgum, as it had already been called so in Latin, when the present day second largest city of Russia wasn't even founded. So, let's use a better to distinguish between the two cities, than, e.g. adding the country names in brackets. (The problem, however, will be rather diminished than solved in such a way, as separate articles about such cities as Petropolis (Dacota Meridionalis) will still be needed.)

text: :But if several names for a city exist, it can surely be good to give them in an article about the city. --Alexander Gerascenco 15:31 iun 19, 2005 (UTC)
I think we should add the Latin word for "Saint" in the latin name of this city. In fact, in many modern languages there's that word: ENG: SAINT Petersburg; ITA: SAN Pietroburgo; DEU: SANKT Petersburg; FRA: SAINT Pétersbourg; ESP: SAN Petersburgo; Eccetera.
In my modest opinion Russia added the word for "Saint" purposefully, maybe they wanted to take distance from both Lenin and the emperor Peter the Great. I propose to mention the name Sancti Petri Fanum (precise translation of Sankt Petersburg) or Sanctipetripolis or Sanctipetriburgum.--151.23.11.182 21:09, 28 Ianuarii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: De nomine urbis

message: Credo, "Vladimirus Lenin" genitivo "Vladimiri Leninis" esse
thread_title: Vladimirus Lenin

message: Nomen Petropolis, ut Neapolis et omnia nomina in -polis exeuntia, declinationem Latinam 'turris' sequi, i.e. accusativum in -im, et ablativum in -i mittere oportet. --Fabullus 10:29, 1 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Declinatio Petropolis
Disputatio:Condensatrum

message: Secundum paginam nostram:
electron, electronis, n.; vel electrum, electri, n.
Nonne pluralis "electra" vel "electrona" est?
"Electra" habet additam rationem: pluralis Graeca est "electra."

message: Salve
*Mutandum est electrones ergo in electrona.
*Quid significat "capacitantia" in aliis linguis ? Capacitas ? 
*"tam magnus" dicitur potius"tantus"
* "metior" ergo "metiantur" in coniunctivo aut subionctivo modo.
*Num verba "reponit" et "repositiones" suffecta esse possunt  verbis "repellit" et "repulsio" ? 
*"Sub vi" vice "sub vim" mihi videtur melius quia non est motus.
--Marc mage 22:14, 10 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propositiones 

message: :Ita est! Tibi veniam peto, ego stultus sum. --Mafrius 16:33 iun 22, 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mafrius 

message: Habes ICQ programmam, usor 68.4.46.195 ? Volo tibi loquere. Litteras electronicas mihi mitte, quaeso.
Numerus ICQ quam habeo est: 291780933
--Mafrius 16:40 iun 22, 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ignotus usor

message: Amice, "Commonscat" et "Capacitors" non sunt verba Latina. Verba apta non {{Commonscat|Capacitors}} sed {{CommuniaCat|Capacitors|capacitores}} scribenda sunt. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:29, 17 Augusti 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Utens 37.219.131.109
Disputatio:12 Iunii

message: If the superscript "o" in 41º is bad then the point "." in 41. is even worse...
But that is a pointless discussion in my humble opinion, so I think we should not edit when somebody writes "o" or "." 
Agree with that? --201.11.96.94 20:24 iul 10, 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding ordinals
Disputatio:Delavaria

message: DELAVARIENS est, non delevaria.
Siglus Universitatis Delavariensis in http://www.udel.edu/ est.
replies: text: Delavariensis adiectivum Delavariae est (etiam 'Delavarianus' dicitur). —Myces Tiberinus 02:11 iul 17, 2005 (UTC)

text: Myces recte admonet. Sed ubi, amice, est imago sigilli illius Universitatis Delevariensis? Eum non invenio. --Iustinus 02:43 iul 17, 2005 (UTC)

message: Nota hic libertas et independentia. Aliquid increpitum potens ad illos qui uolunt 'independence'=libertas reddere! - sicut e.g. Declaratio Libertatis. Pantocrator 10:35, 3 Maii 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you trying to say? --Ioscius  ∞ 11:02, 3 Maii 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Independentia

message: Human-potato hybrid, care amice, what's the source of your Dober (with which you've replaced Dubris)? Our Dover, Delaware, is named for Dover, England, which is well-attested in Latin as Dubris since the first century. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 01:16, 11 Februarii 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Dober?
Disputatio:Pyxis nautica

message: Um... is there any authority for this form of the word? The OED mentions a medieval Latin compassus, but this is of the masculine gender and usually refers to a "drafting compass" (classical Latin circinus) rather than a "nautical compass." 
When I have seen discussions of nautical compasses in Latin, the usual locution I've seen has been pyxis nautica. There is even a southern hemisphere constellation by this name. David Morgan cites the following additional expressions: magnetica acus nautica, capsula acûs magneticae, and most relevantly: compassus nauticus
replies: text: Traupvir likes acus, too.--Ioscius (disp) 15:19, 16 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
In any case, I propose we move this to pyxis nauticus. Any counterarguments? --Iustinus 18:26 iul 19, 2005 (UTC)

text: Whereas in ancient times compasses were used by sailors only, nowadays we used them on land about as often. In fact I am unable to find a commons pick of a nautical compass. So I wonder if a more general name is needed to make it more general and so that this pic would better fit the article.   How about like Pyxis magnetica sive pyxis nautica est....?--Rafaelgarcia 22:34, 13 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :For my part, I have always seen acus. Acus magnetica is my vote.--Ioscius (disp) 15:19, 16 Septembris 2007 (UTC)

message: I am not sure of the grammar rules here. Should it be Differentia potest esse magna?--Rafaelgarcia 14:24, 16 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ita vero: 'magna' sine -m. --Fabullus 14:27, 16 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Thanks--Rafaelgarcia 15:02, 16 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::But instead of differentia esse magna (which sounds rather English), the Romans favored an idiom in which the differentiating is in the verb. My dictionary offers this example: 'There is no great difference between them and the Peripatetics' = Non multum a Peripateticis dissident. In other words, conceptually, instead of great difference, we want greatly differ. IacobusAmor 15:29, 16 Septembris 2007 (UTC)

text: :So Multum directio vera a magnetica discrepat ... yes sounds a lot better.--Rafaelgarcia 16:02, 16 Septembris 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The difference can be large-->Differentia potest esse magnam?
Disputatio:Deimus

message: Quod ad nomen satellitis attinet: Scilicet "dimos" vel "dimus" pronuntiandum est. Tamen secundum linguae Graecae orthographiam et quia ea apud plerasque gentes in usu est, scriptionem Deimos proferendum duco. W. Bohmhammel
replies: text: Nisi fallor, omnibus dictionibus Graecis quae in linguam Latinam ducuntur conversio digraphi Graeci ει in ī Latinum est, vel rarius in ē, ut Aenēas ab Αἰνείας, sed nunquam ei. —Myces Tiberinus 23:08 iul 31, 2005 (UTC)

message: My Latin isn't what it should be (je parle français aussi), but the names of the moon seem to be Deimus and Phobus. Not only are these names the ones that were originally published (see the ref.), but they also match the Latin pattern seen with the moons of Uranus, for example (e.g. Puccius, Franciscus, Calibanus, Stephanus, Trinculus, Prosperus, Setebus, Ferdinandus). :en:User:Urhixidur 17:15, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that we shouldn't second-guess the original naming of the satellite. Although (as Myces says) it isn't usual to transfer -ei- direct from Greek to Latin, Hall isn't unique in having done so. I propose to move to Deimus (satelles). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:21, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :But... but... Hall was writing in English, and Δεῖμος is a classical name. Surely we would expect the classical pattern to hold here. --Iustinus 17:54, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Oh, OK. Not so simple. But if the classical pattern holds, we shouldn't have Dimos, should we? The -os is quite non-standard. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:01, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :::I believe that when a Britton says "quite" it's not as strong as when an American says it. I would say that when latinizing greek second declension masculines either -os or -us are acceptable, and in many cases they are even freely interchangeable. I opted for Dimos rather that Dimus simply because I worried taht the proper contraction of the ei to i might make it hard for modern minds to recognize the name, so I wanted to keep the rest unchanged. But I am not married to that. --Iustinus 20:00, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)

text: ::You're right, I meant "relatively non-standard"! I still have a feeling we're being, shall I say, quixotic here. We have two well-attested forms, the pure Greek Deimos (which, in this case, is commonly used internationally) and the mildly-Latinised Greek Deimus which A. Hall originally chose. We have a third possibility, a standard Latinization of the Greek, Dimus, which would be our default if no Latinization is attested. Why reject all three of these and choose a fourth, also (I think) unattested, Dimos? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:30, 17 Maii 2007 (UTC)
At the very least, the text of the article should be edited to mention all forms (something I'm not able to do, my Latin being barely level 1). :en:User:Urhixidur 13:58, 20 Maii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deimus
Disputatio Vicipaediae:Glossarium computatrale

message: Cur et hanc paginam et Auxilium habemus?
Suntne necesse utraque? Et utrum sunt necne, nonne indicium utrorumque comparare coniungereque debemus? —Adamas 00:17 aug 2, 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fortasse rectum censes, sed ad indicem auxilium nominatum scientia linguae Anglicae opus est. Tamen breviter nunc utrumque comparavi. W. Bohmhammel Non. Sext. 2005

message: Putat aliquis idoneam esse translationem verbi anglici 'file' verbum 'datotheca,ae,f' (<datorum theca) ?
Zagrabiensis 11:08, 13 Octobris 2009 (UTC)
Propono etiam verbum: archivum (informaticum). Ex latino sero "archīvum", ex graeco "ἀρχεῖον" = magistratuum sedes, et postea = locus ad publica documenta servanda.--Vuott 23:15, 25 Septembris 2010
My two cents: “file” -> fasciculus (#1). Advantages:
* Identical meaning of English “file” – see Cic., “totus ille fasciculus epistolarum aquā madidus mihi redditus est”
* A good degree of similarity in the sound
Just an aside note: In Italian the English “file” is never translated when it refers to a computer file (e.g., un file di testo, “a text file”), but when it refers to a physical file it is regularly translated as fascicolo (e.g., conservo tutti i miei fogli importanti in fascicoli ben etichettati, “I keep all my important papers in clearly labeled files”) --Grufo (disputatio) 15:50, 30 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)
I think fasciculus matches package rather than file. Similar reasoning for archivum, useful for ZIP and other compression formats containing multiple files (see archivio in Italian) --Davide Novemila (disputatio) 09:28, 31 Martii 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File 

message: Ubi sunt fontes novorum vocabulorum quae nostra lingua nuper ponuntur? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:56, 8 Aprilis 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that introducing any original content is againt the wikipedia rules. I added links to some related external pages (sources?). I'm going to remove the tables altogheter soon. Davide Novemila (disputatio) 13:14, 9 Aprilis 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: :You could freely copy its contents to a subpage of your own page in Vicioaedia and work on it there. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:45, 9 Aprilis 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Fontes?
Disputatio:Lingua Catalana

message: adiectivus est catalaunicus, a, um, ergo nomen linguae es Lingua Catalaunica vel Catalaunice--Xaverius 15:50, 13 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ambo "lingua catalanica" et "lingua catalaunica" videntur plus quam "lingua catalana" apud Googlem.--Ioshus (disp) 15:54, 13 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: :Is this page still a stipula? --Harrissimo 11:09, 11 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Not really--Xaverius 11:19, 11 Iulii 2007 (UTC)

message: Fontes orthographiarum "Catalana" et "Catalanica" in Latinitate viva nuper citavi. Ego semper "Catalana" malui quia brevitatem amo! An alii consentiunt? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:12, 25 Septembris 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  De nomine
Disputatio:Algerium

message: saec. 16: ALGERII Saracenorum urbs [...] imago 
saec 17: Mare mediterraneum, exhibens oras hispaniæ, galliæ, italiæ, mare hadriaticum, archipelagus, natoliam, ægyptum, levantam, barcam, tripolin, tunetanum, algeriam, fezzam, maurocum.  (ibi et 'Regnum Algericanum')
1670: ...tum Bosniam, Serviam, Rasciam & Bulgariam. In Africa habent Algerium, Tripolim, totam Ægyptum ab Alexandria usque ad Asuam urbem, quae Syéne est. Pexenfelder
1698: ALGERIA, Urbs Africae, in Barbaria regione ampla & dives, sed piratica infamis. Cum portu capaci & munito arceque valida. Ab ea Regio adjacens dicitur regnum Algerii. Ubi olim Mauritania Caesariensis & Silfensis cum Numidia. Dividitur in 5 provincias & caput habet Algerium, alias Rusucurum, quod vide. Hofmann
1909: Algerium, 1. Algier, Lschf., [id est, ‘regio’] Afrika (N.); auch Argerium. Grasse
saec 20: .ggr Algeria Algeria, ae f. (Eg. S.L. 51);  adj.  Algeriensis, e (Eg. S.L. 51)
.ggr Algiers Algerium, i n. (Ducrue 258) [Morgan]
2003: Jacques Chirac, praesidens Francorum, Algeriam officialiter obiit. etc.
replies: text: move mighta been premature... I dunno >< —Myces Tiberinus 00:55 aug 12, 2005 (UTC)
Some more sources:
1871 "Aligier, Algeria, -æ (f.); Julia Cæsarēa (f.)" (lectio incerta)
Smith's
1928? "Algiers, Īcŏsĭum, ii, n.; The capital city of a country of the same name in the North of Africa; Algerĭum (Argerĭum)m ĭi, n.; Ruscurrum (Rusucurrum), i, n.: a. Of, or belonging to, Algiers, Algerine; Īcŏsitānus, a, um, adj.—b. The inhabitants of Algiers, the Algerines; Īcŏsītāni, ōrum, m. plur."
White
1977 "Algeri Alger Argel Algiers Algier Icosium, ii, n. Est vetus nomen urbis quam Arabes saeculo X ab insulis portui praeiacentibus appelaverunt al-Gesair cuius vocis vis est: insulae. Graecorum vero fabulae a viginti (εἴκοσι) Herculis comitibus eam conditam tradunt; cfr. Solin. 25 «Hercule enim illa transeunte viginti qui a comitatu eius desciverant locum eligunt, iaciunt moenia: ac ne quis imposito a se nomine privatim gloriaretur, de condentium numero urbi nomen datum», i.e. ad εἴκοσι. Eiusdem urbis Icosii mentio fit apud Mel. 1,31; Rav. (Egosion); in Itin. Ant., et Tab. Peut. Icositani, orum' Icositanus, a, um (cfr. C.I.L. 8, 9424, 9259; Conc. Carth. a. 411: «Crescens episcopus Icositanus»; Harduin., Act. Conc. I, 1102; Conc. Carth. a. 419: «Laurentio Icositano», I. Mansi, Ampl. Coll. 4, 437, 511); ex usu Curiae Romanae: Algeriensis."
Egger 
--Iustinus 06:13 aug 12, 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Algeria vs Algerium (urbs et natio)

message: Is this correct? --Rolandus 13:22, 27 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anonymous edit

message: lingua Francogallica non est lingua locuta, sed in scholis docetur.
replies: text: Hmmm... Lingua Francogallica est lingua locuta sed non est officialæ linguæ.?? Vatekor 11:00, 22 Maii 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ??