ಚರ್ಚೆಪುಟ:ಶ್ರೀದೇವಿ ಕೆರೆಮನಿ

message: This is the discussion page

message: 1.Conflict of interest and questionable creator: ಸದಸ್ಯ:Suneel maliaptil  -The creator is personally connected to the editor. ಶ್ರೀದೇವಿ ಕೆರೆಮನಿ is promoting her article on social media thanking creator for article creation for her. (this is conflict of interest)as the creator is friend of  ಶ್ರೀದೇವಿ ಕೆರೆಮನಿ.  If creator denies these claims, i am ready to send screenshots which i hope is not necessary. ಶ್ರೀದೇವಿ ಕೆರೆಮನಿ has herself shown interest in article creation. Wikipedia is not for self promotion.  
read:
 Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia       https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict-of-interest_editing_on_Wikipedia
 
2.violation of  WP:V  verifiablity policy  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability
policy states  "if reliable (Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources) third-party sources can't be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article."
Even efforts to identify  reliable sources were not fruitful  because  information is either self published or from unreliable sources.
3. violation of WP:N or notability  policy  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability     and  WP:NOT policy 
Policies say ...
"News reports. Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. "
"Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may not be."
"If reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual"
Above  policy is quoted because , when you search for sreedevi keremane, you may find that she has participated in events such as kavya goshtis, which  does not  itself make  anyone notable as mentioned in the policy .
4.Awards mentioned are nearly as much as many as her writings.This is a red flag.Moreover, there are very low barriers for some  awards mentioned as they are given by small trusts , one is by a  political party etc.
5. Read policy WP:TOOSOON          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Too_soon
 According to the policy ... "While there are topics that might arguably merit an article, sometimes it is simply too soon" 
While the subject of the article may show merit, this can't itself be ground for article creation.
 Some awards which can be considered notable are the ones given for young budding writers for encouraging them, not necessarily for significant achievement such as "ಮಂಡ್ಯ: ಜಿಲ್ಲಾ ಯುವ ಬರಹಗಾರರ ಬಳಗದ ವತಿಯಿಂದ 'ಕನ್ನಡದ ಕಣ್ವ' ಕವಿ ಬಿ.ಎಂ.ಶ್ರೀಕಂಠಯ್ಯ ಅವರ ಸ್ಮರಣಾರ್ಥ ನೀಡಲಾಗುವ  'ಬಿ.ಎಂ.ಶ್ರೀ. ಕಾವ್ಯ ಪ್ರಶಸ್ತಿ' "ಯುವ ಲೇಖಕರಿಗೆ ಬೇಂದ್ರೆ ಗ್ರಂಥ ಪ್ರಶಸ್ತಿ ಪ್ರದಾನ"      It is too soon to make them a case for article creation. read WP:TOOSOON  policy
All these factors firmly make a case for deletion since no separate article is necessary on the subject. 
PS: I used my other account to wraite and nominate this because i want to protect my privacy , since in my other account my identity is openly visible. Please do not assume any malicious intent 
ps2: if any policy is not hyperlinked, kindly use google to get the links to policies mentioned 
Ajinomata (ಚರ್ಚೆ) ೧೧:೦೯, ೨೪ ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ ೨೦೧೭ (UTC)
ಅಳಿಸಲು ಹಾಕಬೇಕಿದ್ದರೆ {{ಅಳಿಸುವಿಕೆ|.....ಕಾರಣ......}} ಟೆಂಪ್ಲೇಟು ಬಳಸಿ. ಅಳಿಸಲು ಹಾಕಲಾದ ಲೇಖನಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಚರ್ಚೆಯ ಪುಟ ಇಲ್ಲಿದೆ.--ಪವನಜ (ಚರ್ಚೆ) ೧೧:೪೨, ೨೪ ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ ೨೦೧೭ (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an article for deletion