Pembicaraan Wikipedia:Daftar pilihan

message: Dengan adanya proyek baru yakni Wikipedia:Daftar pilihan alias DP, saya boleh ngasih usulan donk buat masangin kolom DP pada Halaman Utama seperti halnya AP & GP. Mengingat rupanya di en.wiki sendiri DP pun juga melakukan pemasangan di Halaman Utama namun ditampilkan secara terbatas yakni hanya hari Senin & Jumat serta pada hari-hari yang lainnya kolom DPnya bisa ngilang gitu aja entah kenapa (maaf nih, saya sendiri kagak tau begimana itu bisa terjadi ) Tapi untuk di WBI ini, terserahlah mau sistem pemasangannya kek apa, mau kek en.wiki kek atau ditampilkan setiap hari seperti halnya AP & GP dimari. Waktu pemasangannya juga terserah, mau sebulan sekali juga kagak apa-apa.
Nih deh, saya kasih rancangannya: Pengguna:Erik Evrest/Bak pasir/Halaman Utama --Erik Fastman (bicara) 4 Mei 2014 03.39 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pemasangan Daftar Pilihan pada Halaman Utama 

message: Bung , kan sekarang dp udah ada di HU, ada gak pengusulan jadwalnya? --RusdianaDablang (Bicara) 1 Maret 2017 08.50 (UTC)
Ada, disini: Wikipedia:Daftar pilihan/Jadwal/Usulan
Kenapa ? Anda pingin ngusulin jadwal DP Anda ya ?
Udah saya tempatin nih di di slot 06 2017 (bulan Juni, bertepatan dengan bulan Puasa), tapi kalo Anda mau mengubah jadwalnya juga nggak apa-apa kok.
Untuk sementara tiap slot DP dikasih jangka waktu sebulan (12 DP per tahun) mengingat jumlah DP yang saya kira masih terbatas dan adanya DP yang hanya memiliki satu kalimat pada bagian pembuka sehingga bingung juga mau ngerangkai pake paragraf apa, itu pun juga terjadi pada sejumlah FL di en.wiki. Lagipula bikin daftar jadi DP juga rada susah, pranala yang harus dibiruin banyak. Tapi kalo nanti proyek AP makin rame juga nggak menutup kemungkinan agar slot FL ditambah untuk tahun depan.
--Erik Fastman (bicara) 1 Maret 2017 09.39 (UTC)
replies: text: Oke! Mungkin dapat saya bantu mengembangkan paragraf pembuka? -- RusdianaDablang (Bicara) 1 Maret 2017 10.01 (UTC)
Dari hasil pencarian saya, beberapa DP ini butuh pengembangan paragraf pembuka:
* Daftar provinsi di Indonesia
* Negara anggota Perhimpunan Bangsa-bangsa Asia Tenggara
* Daftar bendera negara di dunia
* Daftar Paus Gereja Katolik Roma (grafik)
* Daftar negara menurut benua
* Daftar episode Shaun the Sheep
* Daftar kabupaten dan kota di Indonesia
--Erik Fastman (bicara) 1 Maret 2017 10.35 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruang Pengusulan jadwal 

message: Hi. I'm not part of this Wiki project, and I honestly don't know the language. The casuality brought me here, and I'm asking you few question. I just noticed someone translated Bleach episodes en.wiki articles. Nothing bad, but all the articles have a Translation template here. The article itselfes are just a brief summary incipit (basically, the same for all the seasons), a list with just titles or something like this, and nothing more. Of course there are sources for the Airing, but how it is possible that five users voted to this without reffering to criteria, to standard prose quality, to the translation problem? It looks simply absurd. No one give motivations, no one moved dubs, just votes, like a Facebook survey (possibily by Anime fans that simply vote for the subject, but that's not the point). Now yo have something like ten articles and no one noticed that?--TeenAngels1234 (bicara) 21 Oktober 2018 12.07 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comment. It is true that this Wikipedia had been very lax in granting "Featured" status (including FA and FL). We had many votes that didn't take the criteria seriously so that's why you see low-quality articles getting the Featured List stamp. Recently we made an effort to tighten the Featured Article proposal process and we've been actively revoking FA status for those that do not meet the criteria. However I'm not aware of any similar effort regarding featured lists. HaEr48 (bicara) 3 Maret 2019 00.03 (UTC)
 that's how it was before. 10 users voted for an article or a list with a really bad translation (like really really bad to the extent that it's catastrophic), and nobody seems to have noticed (or maybe some of them did, but decided to keep silent) until some of us decided enough is enough. As @ said, we have taken many actions, like abolishing the voting process for featured article and tightening the selection procedure. However, for featured lists, nobody seems to be interested in fixing all the catastrophic translations for the moment, and nobody seems to be interested in really defining what constitutes a featured list, so for now the project is kind of dead, and it is no longer featured in the main page.  Mimihitam  3 Maret 2019 01.48 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria?