Pembicaraan:Wikipedia

message: Apa sih yang dimaksudkan dengan "Ditentukan untuk menjadi ensiklopedia utama"? ~Leo••bicara•• 05:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mungkin akan ada ensiklopedia tambahan?
Selain itu saya usul kata online di ubah menjadi daring (dalam jaringan) lawan katanya luring (luar jaringan)
Ardianto Bahtiar 07:03, 27 Februari 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: : Lex, wikipedia itu ditentukan jadi ensiklopedia utama karena tadinya cuman situs pengumpul buat informasi nupedia (kemudian nupedianya malah gulung tikar dan wikipedianya berjaya). Kata gue sih kalimat itu di remove aja karena menyesatkan utk yang ngga tau sejarahnya. Serenity 05:10, 14 Juni 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   

message: sorri...cuma mau mengkritisi paragraf di bawah ini :
Salah satu wacana utama di dalam Wikipedia adalah 'perusakan'/vandalisme: konyol atau menyinggung artikel situs ini. Ada banyak orang yang melakukannya hanya demi mendapatkan pengalaman mengubah halaman internet.
disambung dengan
"Karena Wikipedia adalah proyek radikal yang bebas dan terbuka, ia menarik unsur anarkis," pengakuan Larry Sanger kepada Wired News. "Untungnya, banyak dari kita yang berkeinginan untuk bertahan terhadap perusakan... dan menyingkirkannya dengan segera."
pertanyaannya adalah, apakah yang dimaksud dengan anarkis disini oleh Larry dimaksudkan untuk mengkonotasikan sebuah ulah pengrusakan???
saya sedikit kutip, beberapa kata "anarki" yang juga dipakai oleh Larry :
replies: text: So Wikipedia began as a good-natured anarchy, a sort of Rousseauian state of digital nature. I always took Wikipedia's anarchy to be provisional and purely for purposes of determining what the best rules, and the nature of its authority, should be. What I, and other Wikipedians, failed to realize is that our initial anarchy would be taken by the next wave of contributors as the very essence of the project--how Wikipedia was "meant" to be--even though Wikipedia could have become anything we the contributors chose to make it.  The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir
mohon ditanggapi --HarisX «ngobrol» 10:37, 23 Mei 2007 (UTC)
kok komen gue gak ditanggepin sih.. --HarisX «ngobrol» 17:01, 25 Mei 2007 (UTC)

text: gw udah mau nanggapin Ris, tapi temanya bener2 jauh dari pengetahuan gw. Serem amat lagi, "anarki". Sorry ya.Kembangraps 20:50, 25 Mei 2007 (UTC)
Sepertinya Larry memang mengonotasikan anarki dengan perusakan, meskipun yang lebih tepat digunakan di wikipedia adalah vandalisme (perbuatan merusak karya). Memang anarki sering disalahpakaikan oleh pengguna bahasa. Lihat saja di berita-berita media massa, selalu muncul penggunaan "tindakan anarkis" untuk menggambarkan tindakan perusakan vandalisme. Padahal, anarki lebih mengarah pada tindakan antikemapanan (tanpa peraturan) atau kekacauan dalam suatu negara.
Keonaran Allan maryo djara (bicara) 18 Januari 2021 16.49 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anarkis = Pengrusakan??? 

message: Nasib kita sebagai bangsa pemakai teknologi dan bukan pencipta teknologi (sampai kapan?) memang menyesakkan. Memadankan mirroring dan forking saja perlu mengerutkan kening lebih dalam, tapi gak apa-apalah daripada cuma sekadar menyerap tanpa dipadankan :)Bocah Dieng 05:09, 14 Juni 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya begitulah. Ngomong2, tandatangan Anda sendiri membingungkan juga. nama penggunanya Ardianto Bahtiar tetapi tandatangannya Bocah Dieng. Kenapa tidak memakai tanda tangan Ardianto Bahtiar saja, atau memakai nama pengguna Bocah Dieng saja. borgx(kirim pesan) 05:13, 14 Juni 2007 (UTC)
Sori bos, soalnya di preferensi ada ruang nama samaran. Jadi, saya coba pakai fasilitas itu, tapi kalo bikin bingung gak apa-apa deh pake nama pengguna aja. Ardianto Bahtiar 05:23, 14 Juni 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mirroring dan Forking 

message: Tolong ada yang bisa bantu bikin artikel tentang kripto. Yang belum ada di mata uang kripto Muhammad Sayyid Ibrahim (bicara) 14 Juli 2021 05.05 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wic2020 

message: Hello fellow editors,
I have found one or more external links on Wikipedia that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:
*http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20041206/news_mz1b6encyclo.html is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20160114101809/http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/uniontrib/20041206/news_mz1b6encyclo.html to the original URL.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_a_work_in_progress is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20081030013904/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_a_work_in_progress to the original URL.
*http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSN0819429120070708 is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20071121104746/http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSN0819429120070708 to the original URL.
*http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/28/1351230 is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20151108110204/http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04%2F07%2F28%2F1351230 to the original URL.
*http://www.cbsnews.com/news/wikipedia-jimmy-wales-morley-safer-60-minutes/ is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20181226132754/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wikipedia-jimmy-wales-morley-safer-60-minutes/%20/ to the original URL.
*https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Clusters is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20230530035605/https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Clusters to the original URL.
*https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/10/technology/wikipedia-vs-the-small-screen.html is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20230921225909/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/10/technology/wikipedia-vs-the-small-screen.html to the original URL.
*http://archive.aec.at/prix/ is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20190630155735/http://archive.aec.at/prix/ to the original URL.
*https://www.webbyawards.com/winners/2004/web/general-website/community/wikipedia/ is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20200614002403/https://www.webbyawards.com/winners/2004/web/general-website/community/wikipedia/ to the original URL.
*http://www.fpa.es/es/premios-princesa-de-asturias/premiados/2015-wikipedia.html?especifica=0&idCategoria=0&anio=2015&especifica=0 is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20210506110104/https://www.fpa.es/es/premios-princesa-de-asturias/premiados/2015-wikipedia.html?especifica=0&idCategoria=0&anio=2015&especifica=0 to the original URL.
*http://reagle.org/joseph/2010/gfc is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20230808035007/http://reagle.org/joseph/2010/gfc/ to the original URL.
When you have finished making the appropriate changes, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.
This notice will only be made once for these URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Melaporkan kesalahan) 21 Oktober 2023 09.06 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links found that need fixing (Oktober 2023) 

message: Hello fellow editors,
I have found one or more external links on Wikipedia that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:
*http://www.slweekly.com/index.cfm?do=article.details&id=37BD3969-14D1-13A2-9F5EEAF5A79E0898 is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
When you have finished making the appropriate changes, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.
This notice will only be made once for these URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Melaporkan kesalahan) 11 Januari 2024 00.25 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links found that need fixing (Januari 2024)