Pembicaraan:Star Trek: First Contact

message: Inilah artikel yang saya maksud. Referensinya banyak (jika dibandingkan dengan artikel kelas-A dari PW:ST lainnya). Kualitasnya hampir mencapai artikel bagus. Kurang 1 : pranala merah banyak. ·· Kℇℵ℟ℑℭK 14:55, 23 Juli 2010 (UTC)
Terima kasih atas sarannya dan tanggapannya. Pranala merah sedang dalam tahap pekerjaan.  Lucas (bicara) 10:23, 29 Juli 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 23 Juli 2010

message: Pranala merah sudah nyaris tidak ada, sementara berbagai informasi sudah diperbaiki ataupun ditambahkan. Tata bahasa juga sudah ditinjau ulang. Saya rasa sekarang kualitas artikel ini telah memenuhi kriteria kualitas artikel AP. Lucas (bicara) 14:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Saya rasa bagian kritik dan tanggapan-nya terlalu panjang. ·· Kℇℵ℟ℑℭK 15:39, 2 Oktober 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :Wah, saya malah baru memperpanjangnya (saran ).
replies: text: ::Entah kenapa, masih terlihat kurang rapi. Pranalanya juga kurang, terutama di daftar pemain. Menurut saya, tidak apa-apa jika mengandung pranala merah, asal dibuatkan artikelnya. Jangan sampai tidak berpranala hanya karena tidak ada artikel bersangkutan. Pranala merah dapat menjadi indikator artikel yang belum ada di wikipedia Indonesia, agar rintisannya dibuat. -- Adiputra बिचर  -- 16:00, 2 Oktober 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: :::Pranalanya sudah ditambah secara signifikan dengan membuat belasan artikel baru. Saran anda sangat berguna untuk menjadi masukan dalam pembuatan artikel-artikel berikutnya. Namun, untuk artikel ini saya rasa sudah wikified dan pantas menjadi AP. Untuk kurang rapih, saya pribadi berpendapat artikel sudah cukup terstruktur. Lucas (bicara) 14:23, 4 Oktober 2010 (UTC)

text: Paragraf pembukanya perlu diperpanjang. -- Adiputra बिचर  -- 15:40, 5 Oktober 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: : Di bagian catatan kaki, kenapa dibagi menyeluruh dan spesifik? Apakah hendak menggabungkan referensi/bibliografi dan catatan kaki menjadi satu dengan judul catatan kaki?-- Adiputra बिचर  -- 16:03, 5 Oktober 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ::Wah, itu yang membagi {user|Kenrick95|. Saya juga kurang mengerti tapi menurut saya cukup positif karena di ID tidak lazim dipisah.
replies: text: :::Soalnya kalau digabung nanti kata-kata pada referensi yang pakai "" menjadi terlalu kecil (90%*90%) ·· Kℇℵ℟ℑℭK 13:22, 15 Oktober 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 30 September 2010

message: Hello fellow editors,
I have found one or more external links on Star Trek: First Contact that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:
*http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/1999/10/29/trek/ is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20041104201441/http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/1999/10/29/trek/ to the original URL.
*http://www.businessweek.com/archives/1994/b340152.arc.htm is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20121022210638/http://www.businessweek.com/stories/1994-11-27/this-season-has-fangs to the original URL.
*http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=startrek8.htm is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20090426005546/http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=startrek8.htm to the original URL.
*http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/world/news/e3i0bc78baf8235f8b45a85761d351697f2 is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
*http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-6123301-7.html is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
*http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/features/oscars/oscars.htm is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20160304234938/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/features/oscars/oscars.htm to the original URL.
*http://www.thehugoawards.org/?page_id=23 is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20090302094228/http://www.thehugoawards.org/?page_id=23 to the original URL.
*http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/reviews/cl-movie961122-6,0,3974523.story is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
*http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117911494.html?categoryid=31&cs=1&p=0 is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20100902112024/http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117911494.html?categoryid=31&cs=1&p=0 to the original URL.
*http://www.reelviews.net/movies/s/st8.html is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
*http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,295263,00.html is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20080724134142/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,295263,00.html to the original URL.
*http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/review96/startrekfirstcontactrose.htm is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20220828181014/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/review96/startrekfirstcontactrose.htm to the original URL.
*http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?DVDID=10616 is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20120119223233/http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?DVDID=10616 to the original URL.
*http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/02/07/star_trek_first_contact_1996_review.shtml is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20080108052815/http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2001/02/07/star_trek_first_contact_1996_review.shtml to the original URL.
*http://dvd.ign.com/articles/315/315636p1.html is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20080401071743/http://dvd.ign.com/articles/315/315636p1.html to the original URL.
*http://dvd.ign.com/articles/594/594096p2.html is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20080928002930/http://dvd.ign.com/articles/594/594096p2.html to the original URL.
*http://dvd.ign.com/articles/594/594096p3.html is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20140218204503/http://www.ign.com/articles/2005/03/07/star-trek-first-contact-special-collectors-edition?page=3 to the original URL.
*http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/20/details-on-star-trek-tng-movie-blu-ray-dvd-tos-season-two-sets-more/ is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20090722074150/http://trekmovie.com/2009/07/20/details-on-star-trek-tng-movie-blu-ray-dvd-tos-season-two-sets-more/ to the original URL.
When you have finished making the appropriate changes, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.
This notice will only be made once for these URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Melaporkan kesalahan) 17 Oktober 2023 07.08 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links found that need fixing (Oktober 2023)