Discussion:Mongol

message: je ne comprends pas pourquoi la langue mongol est controversée? et par qui elle est contreversée, si quelqu'un a une idée j'en serais heureux
:Certains linguistes contestent aujourd'hui la pertinence de ce groupement. Ils voient dans les similitudes entre langues turques et mongoles rien de plus que le fruit d'influences mutuelles. tiré de langue altaïque.Staatenloser 29 octobre 2005 à 16:45 (CEST)

message: In this article there is chinese character section which does not make any sense at all. Mongolian and chinese languages are totally distinct languages which one cannot understand another and even alphabets are totally different. As many chinese scientists try to blur Mongolian cultural heritages into theirs I am sure here certain chinese people intentianally incerted this chinese thing. After this discussion I'd like to remove that section. I think you cannot find in french language study article what is french language to do with either english or german etc... it is same with us. Orgio89 (d) 22 mai 2009 à 16:37 (CEST)
replies: text: I just checked this article version in other languages which there is nothing any "chinese part" section in them. So as mutual version principle I am removing "chinese character" from this article. Orgio89 (d) 22 mai 2009 à 16:47 (CEST)
replies: text:  The only very first trace of Mongolian book is a transliteration in chinese characters... that is why and so... no need to feel offended.--Seawind Parloir  BU 22 mai 2009 à 17:58 (CEST)
replies: text: Sorry but your knowledge or sources on Mongolian study in France are really poor that book you are referring to is written around 700 years ago and even at that time the Mongol empire had 3-4 different types of alternative alphabets used in various social sectors. Even ancient Runi alphabets found from ancient Mongolian archeological sites that is pre-christianity period. So that only written book in chinese is very irresponsible statement. I am offering realistic scientific ground rather than single book or any other ambitions or intentions. And if you possible please check the Mongolian version of this article do you find any chinese character there?! it is here   Orgio89 (d) 22 mai 2009 à 18:53 (CEST)
replies: text: Sorry but for time being you dont bring anything constructive. Desole mais pour le moment vos apports ne sont pas reellement constructifs. Avant de bouger la page article, merci d'amener vos arguments et sources en page de discussion. Then we can check quietly.--Seawind Parloir  BU 22 mai 2009 à 19:26 (CEST)
replies: text: If you check Vatican library website you will find numerous sources that will prove your understanding is wrong. Before that book release period there is official letter sent from Mongolian king to Roman Pope check that letter alphabets please. Orgio89 (d) 22 mai 2009 à 19:34 (CEST)
replies: text: As you'll find confirmed in :en:Mongolian writing systems#Foreign scripts, Chinese characters have historically been used to transcribe Mongolian texts, similar to eg. with Arabic and Persian. Of course, that still means it was and is a foreign script, so that explaining it in this article with great prominence and examples gave it undue weight. It should, however, be mentioned in Écriture mongole (along with several genuinely Mongol scripts that are also still missing there). --Latebird (d) 23 mai 2009 à 16:37 (CEST)
thread_title: Wrong study section in this article

message: https://archive.org/details/lmentsdegrammai00soulgoog
http://books.google.com/books?id=SEkPAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
8 février 2014 à 07:27 (CET)
thread_title:  dialecte ordoss