Diskussion:Umgekehrter Spielerfehlschluss

message: Etwas gekürzt übersetzt von :en:Inverse gambler's fallacy. History von dort:
    
    * (cur) (last) 19:31, 11 April 2006 Nickmanderson (→The multiple-world hypothesis)
    * (cur) (last) 11:05, 10 March 2006 D o m e m (Polish wiki link added)
    * (cur) (last) 18:21, 12 December 2005 Rich Farmbrough m (Ced.)
    * (cur) (last) 00:28, 9 April 2005 192.115.133.141
    * (cur) (last) 23:32, 22 March 2005 Bjcairns m (Dowe (unpublished) appears nowhere on the web except WP and copies; removed reference.)
    * (cur) (last) 14:38, 30 December 2004 213.255.108.204 (Added fine-tuned universe link)
    * (cur) (last) 23:31, 21 December 2004 82.92.119.11 (See talk)
    * (cur) (last) 01:48, 12 December 2004 Michael Hardy
    * (cur) (last) 04:32, 15 November 2004 BenFrantzDale m (Formalized one sentence (bucks -> dollars, for example))
    * (cur) (last) 21:01, 5 July 2004 Michael Hardy
    * (cur) (last) 07:43, 5 July 2004 Bryan Derksen m (Category:Logical fallacies)
    * (cur) (last) 18:07, 2 May 2004 ChicXulub m
    * (cur) (last) 18:04, 2 May 2004 David Thrale m (wikified)
    * (cur) (last) 22:01, 23 April 2004 Michael Hardy
    * (cur) (last) 21:57, 23 April 2004 B4hand m (Fixed link)
    * (cur) (last) 08:21, 29 March 2004 Eric119 m
    * (cur) (last) 01:19, 14 September 2003 Cyan m (typo)
    * (cur) (last) 01:17, 14 September 2003 Fairandbalanced
    * (cur) (last) 01:14, 14 September 2003 Fairandbalanced (Replaced erroneous interpretation)
    * (cur) (last) 09:04, 23 June 2003 81.79.37.147 (fmt)
    * (cur) (last) 11:55, 12 October 2002 DrRetard
    * (cur) (last) 01:22, 12 October 2002 FvdP (rewrited last section so as to make its purpose and meaning (hopefully) clearer)
    * (cur) (last) 01:10, 12 October 2002 FvdP (rewriting last section so as to make its purpose and meaning clearer (this is an intermediate state))
    * (cur) (last) 00:52, 12 October 2002 FvdP (reverted my changes to last section - needs more discussion on talk page. Kept Tarquin's later modifs.)
    * (cur) (last) 10:19, 8 October 2002 Tarquin m
    * (cur) (last) 10:16, 8 October 2002 Tarquin m
    * (cur) (last) 10:10, 8 October 2002 FvdP m (reworded)
    * (cur) (last) 10:06, 8 October 2002 FvdP (So the antitheist argument is actually not a form of inverse gamblers fallacy)
    * (cur) (last) 09:15, 8 October 2002 Malcolm Farmer m
    * (cur) (last) 19:25, 25 September 2002 DrRetard
    * (cur) (last) 15:15, 25 September 2002 DrRetard
--MBq 09:44, 16. Apr 2006 (CEST)

message: Da steht: "Ein Würfelpaar wird geworfen und zeigt Doppel-Sechs."  Das ist aber nur z.B. so und funktioniert genauso mit z.B. ⚄ ⚄. Wennschon im Engl. steht: "For example..." macht das auch im Deutschen sehr wohl einen Sinn, denn es geht nicht genau um eine ⚅ ⚅, sondern nur z.B. um eine ⚅ ⚅ da jeder Pasch gleichberechtigt dieselbe Wahrscheinlichkeit von 1/36 hat. (kann nach Korrektur entfernt werden) --91.34.215.245 06:43, 24. Apr. 2015 (CEST)
replies: text: Ich habe "(beispielsweise)" eingefügt. Du kannst den Artikel auch selbst verbessern: Sei mutig! --mfb (Diskussion) 10:49, 24. Apr. 2015 (CEST)
thread_title:  wieso Doppel-Sechs? Weil das nur ein '''Beispiel''' für einen bestimmten Pasch ist