Diskussion:.NET (Microsoft)

message: Ville det være en idé at skrive et afsnit om de forskellige versioner med tilhørende compiler egenskaber (2.0 gav os generics, 3.5 giver os LINQ osv). TigerShark 21. maj 2007 kl. 14:25 (CEST)
replies: text: Lyder som en rigtigt god ide. Glæder mig til at læse det afsnit :-) Kinamand 21. maj 2007 kl. 14:29 (CEST)
thread_title:  Versioner af .NET Framework 

message: Please, choose the correct interwiki. On 8 langages are two articles, .NET Framework and Microsoft .Net. You have mixed both versions. Name and most interwiki is like Microsoft .NET, but you still revert changes. Now I make second version, so, you may choose. 77.48.45.229 2. nov 2007, 07:21 (CET)
replies: text: Could you please specify which 8 languages that have two articles? On enWiki, :en:Microsoft .Net is a redirect to :en:.NET Framework, on svWiki, :sv:Microsoft .Net redirects to :sv:Dotnet, on  deWiki :de:Microsoft .NET redirects to :de:.NET -  I haven't been able to find a single of the dual versions you are referring to. If you believe that some interwiki links are incorrect, then please specify them here, along with a reason why you think they are incorrect.  -- JGC 2. nov 2007, 09:30 (CET)
First set:
 :bs:Microsoft .NET
 :ca:.NET
 :cs:.NET
 :de:.NET
 :es:.NET
 :eu:.NET
 :fi:.NET
 :fr:Microsoft .NET
 :he:.NET
 :hr:.NET
 :hu:Microsoft .NET
 :it:Microsoft .NET
 :nl:.NET
 :no:.NET
 :pl:.NET
 :pt:Microsoft .NET
 :ru:Microsoft .NET
 :sl:Microsoft .NET
 :sv:Dotnet
 :ta:மைக்ராசாஃப்ட் .நெட்
 :th:Microsoft .NET
 :tr:NoktaNet
 :uk:Microsoft .NET
Second set:
 :ar:إطار‌عمل دوت‌نت
 :bg:.NET Framework
 :en:.NET Framework
 :es:.NET Framework
 :eu:.NET Framework
 :fr:Framework .NET
 :it:.NET Framework
 :ja:.NET Framework
 :ko:닷넷 프레임워크
 :lt:.NET Framework
 :pl:.NET Framework
 :ru:.NET Framework
 :th:ดอตเน็ตเฟรมเวิร์ก
 :tr:.NET Framework
 :zh:.NET Framework
Two artices are in: es,eu,fr,it,pl,ru,th,tr

text: I have changed your lists to make them clickable. I would be glad if you tried to describe the definition of the first vs the second set - none of the 8 wikis that do distinguish, are in a language that I understand. If I guess correctly, you would like the interwikis to distinguish between .NET as a development platform and .NET as a software component. There may be some reason in doing this, however I believe that when most wikis only have one article about .NET - and many of them quite elaborate ones - it will be a mistake to split them in different sets, according to which "main focus" they might have. As far as I can see, the "one .NET article"-wikis have articles that more or less covers both aspects of .NET - and to delink some of them, because a smaller group of wikis have two different .NET articles, would - in my mind - be a mistake. -- JGC 2. nov 2007, 14:31 (CET)
I don!t understant this problematic (and from these languages only little bit pl), But I run interwiki bot and these articles are problematic. Yes, maybe the best solution would be if all languages have only one article... 77.48.45.229 9. nov 2007, 16:15 (CET) ([:cs:User:JAn Dudík]])

text: A technical aspect - would be DOT.net framework - versus a politic, corporate agenda - the Microsoft .Net. The distribution dimensions of the Microsoft techniques would make both aspects notable topics. (only 8 years later) Sechinsic (diskussion) 22. aug 2015, 00:10 (CEST)
thread_title:  Interwiki 

message: Er der et dot net som ikke er Micro$oft? Sechinsic (diskussion) 22. aug 2015, 00:05 (CEST)
thread_title:  .NET (??)