Publication: Magyar Közlöny
Issue: MK-2007-168 (Year: 2007, Number: 168)
Era: 2004-2010
Section: 
Paragraph Index: 1586

(4) [Translation] Where the earlier application is not in a language accepted by the Office and the validity of the priority claim is relevant to the determination of whether the invention concerned is patentable, the Contracting Party may require that a translation of the earlier application referred to in paragraph (1) be filed by the applicant, upon invitation by the Office or other competent authority, within a time limit which shall be not less than two months from the date of that invitation, and not less than the time limit, if any, applied under that paragraph. Rule 5 Evidence Under Articles 6(6) and 8(4)(c) and Rules 7(4), 15(4), 16(6), 17(6) and 18(4) Where the Office notifies the applicant, owner or other person that evidence is required under Article 6(6) or 8(4)(c), or Rule 7(4), 15(4), 16(6), 17(6) or 18(4), the notification shall state the reason of the Office for doubting the veracity of the matter, indication or signature, or the accuracy of the translation, as the case may be. Rule 6 Time Limits Concerning the Application Under Article 6(7) and (8)

Source: https://magyarkozlony.hu/hivatalos-lapok/217ab7f47bc17ec4be3f8cdca97a337c92468725/dokumentumok/05694e08cee7c5cd2d7bfa4cffe88656728e19d1/letoltes