Publication: Magyar Közlöny
Issue: MK-2002-162 (Year: 2002, Number: 162)
Era: 1990-2004
Section: 
Paragraph Index: 548

b) If such circumstances are proven to the satisfaction of the national Office or intergovernmental organization which is the addressee, delay in arrival shall be excused, provided that the interested party proves to the satisfaction of the said Office or organization that he effected the mailing within five days after the mail service was resumed. The provisions of Rule 82.1 c) shall apply mutatis mutandis. Rule 82bis Excuse by the Designated or Elected State of Delays in Meeting Certain Time Limits 82bis.1 Meaning of „Time Limit” in Article 48 (2) The reference to „any time limit” in Article 48 (2) shall be construed as comprising a reference: (i) to any time limit fixed in the Treaty or these Regulations; (ii) to any time limit fixed by the receiving Office, the International Searching Authority, the International Preliminary Examining Authority or the International Bureau or applicable by the receiving Office under its national law; (iii) to any time limit fixed by, or in the national law applicable by, the designated or elected Office, for the performance of any act by the applicant before that Office. 82bis.2 Reinstatement of Rights and Other Provisions to Which Article 48 (2) Applies The provisions of the national law which is referred to in Article 48 (2) concerning the excusing, by the designated or elected State, of any delay in meeting any time limit are those provisions which provide for reinstatement of rights, restoration, restitutio in integrum or further processing in spite of non-compliance with a time limit, and any other provision providing for the extension of time limits or for excusing delays in meeting time limits. Rule 82ter Rectification of Errors Made by the Receiving Office or by the International Bureau 82ter.1 Errors Concerning the International Filing Date and the Priority Claim If the applicant proves to the satisfaction of any designated or elected Office that the international filing date is incorrect due to an error made by the receiving Office or that the priority claim has been erroneously considered by the receiving Office or the International Bureau not to have been made, and if the error is an error such that, had it been made by the designated or elected Office itself, that Office would rectify it under the national law or national practice, the said Office shall rectify the error and shall treat the international application as if it had been accorded the rectified international filing date or as if the priority claim had not been considered not to have been made. Rule 83 Right to Practice Before International Authorities 83.1 Proof of Right The International Bureau, the competent International Searching Authority, and the competent International Preliminary Examining Authority, may require the production of proof of the right to practice referred to in Article 49. 83.1bis Where the International Bureau Is the Receiving Office

Source: https://magyarkozlony.hu/hivatalos-lapok/b9114fbbdeddb5b2a142d650578ed3c588a28ad6/dokumentumok/b959e10bf29fe384115a94f3bfe716fa6878ef0f/letoltes