Publication: Magyar Közlöny
Issue: MK-2007-70 (Year: 2007, Number: 70)
Era: 2004-2010
Section: Melléklet a 2007. évi XLVI. törvényhez
Paragraph Index: 2101

d) that documentation accompanying the authorization covers all relevant aspects. 2007/70/II. szám ANNEX 6 — PART I ATT F-1 1/11/01 23/11/06 No. 30 ATTACHMENT F. AIR OPERATOR CERTIFICATION AND VALIDATION Supplementary to Chapter 4, 4.2.1 1. Purpose and scope 1.1 Introduction The purpose of this Attachment is to provide guidance concerning actions required by States in connection with the operator certification requirements in Chapter 4, 4.2.1, particularly the means of accomplishing and recording those actions. 1.2 Prior certification required In accordance with Standard 4.2.1.4, the issuance of an air operator certificate (AOC) is “dependent upon the operator demonstrating” to the State that its organization, training policy and programmes, flight operations, ground handling and maintenance arrangements are adequate considering the nature and extent of the operations to be conducted. The certification process involves the State’s evaluation of each operator and a determination that the operator is capable of conducting safe operations before initial issuance of an AOC or the addition of any subsequent authorizations to an AOC. 1.3 Standard certification practices The State of the Operator is required by Standard 4.2.1.7 to establish a certification system to ensure compliance with the required standards for the type of operation to be conducted. Several States have developed policies and procedures to comply with this certification requirement as industry capabilities evolve. While those States did not develop their certification practices in coordination with each other, their practices are remarkably similar and consistent in their requirements. The effectiveness of their practices has been validated over many years, resulting in improved safety records of operators throughout the world. Many of these certification practices have been incorporated by reference in ICAO provisions. 2. Required technical safety evaluations 2.1 Approval and acceptance actions 2.1.1 The certification and continued surveillance of an air operator includes actions taken by a State on matters submitted for its review. The actions can be categorized as approvals or acceptances depending on the nature of the response by the State to the matter submitted for its review. 2.1.2 An approval is an active response by the State to a matter submitted for its review. An approval constitutes a finding or determination of compliance with the applicable standards. An approval will be evidenced by the signature of the approving official, the issuance of a document or certificate, or some other formal action taken by the State. 2.1.3 An acceptance does not necessarily require an active response by the State to a matter submitted for its review. A State may accept a matter submitted to it for review as being in compliance with the applicable standards if the State does not specifically reject all or a portion of the matter under review, usually after some defined period of time after submission. 2.1.4 The phrase “approved by the State” or similar phrases using the word “approval” are frequently used in Annex 6, Part I. Provisions indicating a review and implying approval or at least “acceptance” by the State occur even more frequently in Annex 6, Part I. In addition to these specific phrases, Annex 6, Part I, contains numerous references to requirements which would, as a minimum, create the need for at least a technical review by the State. This Attachment groups and outlines those specific Standards and Recommended Practices for ease of use by States. 2.1.5 The State should make or arrange for a technical safety evaluation before issuing the approval or acceptance. The evaluation should:

Source: https://magyarkozlony.hu/hivatalos-lapok/4c6310a937d14bac566ee9c9d944896656c292dd/dokumentumok/5a6ac3c6db12e692ae41096677ad5f072d2cc9f3/letoltes