Publication: Magyar Közlöny
Issue: MK-2004-94 (Year: 2004, Number: 94)
Era: 2004-2010
Section: 
Paragraph Index: 43

a) in the ca se of a de ci si on gi ven in the ab sen ce of the de fen dant or his le gal rep re sen ta ti ve, the de fen dant was not duly ser ved with the do cu ment which ins ti tu ted the pro ce e dings or an equ i va lent do cu ment in suf fi ci ent ti me to enab le him to ar ran ge his de fen ce; but such a fa i lu re to ef fect ser vi ce can not cons ti tu te a gro und for re fu sing re cog ni ti on or en for ce ment whe re ser vi ce was not ef fec ted be ca u se the de fen dant had con ce a led his whe re a bo uts from the per son who ins ti tu ted the pro ce e dings in the Sta te of ori gin;

Source: https://magyarkozlony.hu/hivatalos-lapok/e1d6a632d0ccaca4eb2c0910486386b5d04c1a3c/dokumentumok/e4dc16db2fcabc80cc3bfb43775b0bebe645c0d3/letoltes