Publication: Magyar Közlöny
Issue: MK-2009-104 (Year: 2009, Number: 104)
Era: 2004-2010
Section: 
Paragraph Index: 2767

d) the selected name shall be the same for both the significant point and the radio navigation aid marking it. 2.2 Composition of coded designators for significant points marked by the site of a radio navigation aid 2.2.1 The coded designator shall be the same as the radio identification of the radio navigation aid. It shall be so composed, if possible, as to facilitate association with the name of the point in plain language. 2.2.2 Coded designators shall not be duplicated within 1 100 km (600 NM) of the location of the radio navigation aid concerned, except as noted hereunder. Note.— When two radio navigation aids operating in different bands of the frequency spectrum are situated at the same location, their radio identifications are normally the same. 2.3 States’ requirements for coded designators shall be notified to the Regional Offices of ICAO for coordination. 3. Designators for significant points not marked by the site of a radio navigation aid 3.1 Where a significant point is required at a position not marked by the site of a radio navigation aid, the significant point shall be designated by a unique five-letter pronounceable “name-code”. This name-code designator then serves as the name as well as the coded designator of the significant point. 3.2 This name-code designator shall be selected so as to avoid any difficulties in pronunciation by pilots or ATS 22/11/07 No. 45 Annex 11 — Air Traffic Services Appendix 2 1/11/01 APP 2-2 personnel when speaking in the language used in ATS communications. Examples: ADOLA, KODAP 3.3 The name-code designator shall be easily recognizable in voice communications and shall be free of ambiguity with those used for other significant points in the same general area. 3.4 The name-code designator assigned to a significant point shall not be assigned to any other significant point. When there is a need to relocate a significant point, a new name-code designator shall be chosen. In cases when a State wishes to keep the allocation of specific name-codes for re-use at a different location, such name-codes shall not be used until after a period of at least six months. 3.5 States’ requirements for name-code designators shall be notified to the Regional Offices of ICAO for coordination. 3.6 In areas where no system of fixed routes is established or where the routes followed by aircraft vary depending on operational considerations, significant points shall be determined and reported in terms of World Geodetic System — 1984 (WGS-84) geographical coordinates, except that permanently established significant points serving as exit and/or entry points into such areas shall be designated in accordance with the applicable provisions in 2 or 3. 4. Use of designators in communications 4.1 Normally the name selected in accordance with 2 or 3 shall be used to refer to the significant point in voice communications. If the plain language name for a significant point marked by the site of a radio navigation aid selected in accordance with 2.1 is not used, it shall be replaced by the coded designator which, in voice communications, shall be spoken in accordance with the ICAO spelling alphabet. 4.2 In printed and coded communications, only the coded designator or the selected name-code shall be used to refer to a significant point. 5. Significant points used for reporting purposes 5.1 In order to permit ATS to obtain information regarding the progress of aircraft in flight, selected significant points may need to be designated as reporting points. 5.2 In establishing such points, consideration shall be given to the following factors:

Source: https://magyarkozlony.hu/hivatalos-lapok/1f7c6b0e16b4b71a92e5ad24416008bbe2e26aab/dokumentumok/710811d1f7f958a2990684d0cbf918e84f5497e5/letoltes