Publication: Magyar Közlöny
Issue: MK-2007-179 (Year: 2007, Number: 179)
Era: 2004-2010
Section: 217/1998. (XII. 30.) Korm. rendelet módosításáról
Paragraph Index: 89

2. Pro ce du res of Pro ject Fi nan cing Re qu ests The financing request undergoes a two-loop approach that allows guidance early in the decision making process. In the first loop, a Project outline is submitted and a decision in principle is made. In case of a successful first loop, the second loop is initiated. In the second loop, the Final Project Proposal is submitted and a final decision is made by Switzerland. 2.1 First loop: App li ca ti on and app ro val pro ce du re of the Pro ject out li ne No. Steps Ac ti vi ti es and spe ci fic ru les Or ga ni sa ti ons 1. Ini ti a ti on of Pro ject iden ti fi ca ti on Ini ti a ti on on the ba sis of: – Lists of pri o rity Pro jects pro vi ded by the Go vern ment – A pro po sal by the NCU – A pro po sal by an In ter me di a te Body/Exe cu ting Agen cy – Call for pro po sals – A pro po sal by Swit zer land A pro po sal by an international organisation Res pon sib le: NCU In vol ved: In ter me di a te Body, Exe cu ting Agen cy, Hun ga ri an part ners, Swiss authorities 2. Ela bo ra ti on of the Pro ject out li ne Pre pa rat ion of the Pro ject out li ne ba sed on the re qu i re ments for Pro ject out li nes (cf. 2.2). This may inc lu de a re qu est for fi nan ci al sup port for the pre pa rat ion of a Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal thro ugh the Pro ject Preparation Facility. Res pon sib le: In ter me di a te Body, Exe cu ting Agency 3. Pre-scre e ning of the Pro ject out li ne Pos si bi lity of in for mal con sul ta ti ons with the Swiss Em bas sy. Res pon sib le: NCU 4. Scre e ning Exa mi na ti on of the Pro ject out li ne ba sed on the Con cep tu al Fra me work, the Pro ject se lec ti on cri te ria in An nex 1 and the re qu i re ments for Pro ject outlines (cf. 2.2). Res pon sib le: NCU In vol ved: scre e ning com mit tee, In ter me di a te Body (when existent) 5. Sub mis si on of the Pro ject out li ne If ac cep ted, sub mis si on of the Pro ject out li nes with a co ver let ter comp ri sing a desc rip ti on of the se lec ti on pro cess to the Swiss Em bas sy. For mal check by the Swiss Em bas sy and sub mis si on of the Pro ject out li ne with the co ver let ter of the NCU to Switzerland. Res pon sib le: NCU Res pon sib le: Swiss Em bas sy 6. Fi nal de ci si on on Pro ject out li ne Fi nal de ci si on on the Pro ject out li ne (inc lu ding, if re le vant, de ci si on on the re qu est for fi nan cing of Pro ject pre pa rat ion). If ac cep ted by Swit zer land, re qu est for the ela bo ra ti on of the Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal (re qu i re ments spe ci fi ed in 2.4). Swit zer land may sub mit com ments which have to be con si de red du ring the elaboration of the Final Project Proposal. Res pon sib le: Swiss Agen cy for De ve lop ment and Co o pe ra ti on (SDC) or Sta te Sec re ta ri at for Eco no mic Affairs (SECO) 2.2 Re qu i re ments for Pro ject Out li nes The Pro ject out li ne (app ro xi ma tely 5 pa ges) shall inc lu de all ne ces sa ry in for mat ion to al low a ge ne ral app ra i sal of the pro po sed Pro ject. 2007/179. szám Item Con tent Ge ne ral in for mat ion Pro ject tit le, plan ned pro ject du ra ti on, pri o rity sec tor, lo ca ti on/region App li cant Name and con tact de ta ils; pre vi o us, re le vant ex pe ri en ce, if any; pro ject part ners; Swiss link, if any (know-how, tech no logy, part ners or any ot her co o pe ra ti on with Switzerland) Re le van ce Cont ri bu ti on to the re duc ti on of eco no mic and so ci al dis pa ri ti es wit hin the co unt ry and bet we en the co unt ry and the more ad van ced mem ber sta tes of the EU (im pact); fit wit hin the de ve lop ment stra te gi es of the co unt ry/re gi on and cho sen sector; strategy of the intervention Pro ject con tent Desc rip ti on inc lu ding ob jec ti ves (out co me), ex pec ted re sults (out puts) and ac ti vi ti es (com po nents); be ne fi ci a ri es, tar get gro up; risks and po ten ti als; sustainability of project Pro ject or ga ni sa ti on Or ga ni sa ti o nal chart, res pon si bi li ti es, etc. Bud get Eli gib le costs/non-eli gib le costs; own cont ri bu ti on, amo unt of grant, co-fi nan cing, EU-fun ding and any ot her fi nan ci al so ur ce etc.; cost ef fi ci en cy as pects versus alternatives Ho ri zon tal is su es En vi ron men tal, so ci al and eco no mi cal as pects of the pro ject, gen der equality Ma tu rity of pro ject Sta tus of pro ject: in ela bo ra ti on or fully pre pa red and pos sib le re qu est for fi nan ci al sup port for pre pa rat ion of Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal thro ugh the Pro ject Pre pa rat ion Fa ci lity (e.g. fe a si bi lity stu di es, en vi ron men tal im pact assessment, etc.) if deemed necessary An ne xes Ad di ti o nal do cu men ta ti on as de e med app rop ri a te 2.3 Se cond loop: App li ca ti on and app ro val pro ce du re of the Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal No. Steps Ac ti vi ti es and spe ci fic ru les Or ga ni sa ti ons 1. Ela bo ra ti on of the Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal Pre pa rat ion of the Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal ba sed on the re qu i re ments for Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sals (cf. 2.4) and the com ments of Switzerland. Res pon sib le: In ter me di a te Body, Exe cu ting Agency 2. Scre e ning Exa mi na ti on of the Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal. Res pon sib le: NCU In vol ved: In ter me di a te Body (when ex is tent) 3. De ci si on to sub mit the Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal If ac cep ted, sub mis si on of the Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal with a co ver let ter ta king into ac co unt the re qu i re ments for Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sals and the com ments of Swit zer land to the Swiss Em bas sy. For mal check by the Swiss Em bas sy and sub mis si on of the Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal with the co ver letter of the NCU to Switzerland. Res pon sib le: NCU Res pon sib le: Swiss Em bas sy 4. Fi nal de ci si on Fi nal de ci si on on the fi nan cing re qu est by ta king into ac co unt the Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal, the co ver let ter of the NCU, and the Pro ject do cu ment. Swit zer land re ser ves the right to car ry out its own appraisal if needed. Res pon sib le: SDC or SECO 2.4 Re qu i re ments for Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sals The Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal shall be ac com pa ni ed by all ne ces sa ry do cu ments (e.g. fe a si bi lity stu dy, Pro ject do cu ment, en vi ron men tal im pact stu dy) to al low a tho ro ugh app ra i sal. The Fi nal Pro ject Pro po sal (5–10 pa ges; for lar ge inf rast ruc - tu re Pro jects 10–20 pa ges, plus an ne xes) shall pro vi de ade qu a tely de ta i led in for mat ion on in ter alia: 2007/179. szám Item Con tent Pro ject sum ma ry (1 page) Fact she et: Pro ject tit le, short desc rip ti on inc lu ding ob jec ti ves, bud get, part ners, duration Re le van ce Cont ri bu ti on to the re duc ti on of eco no mic and so ci al dis pa ri ti es bet we en the co unt ry and the more ad van ced co unt ri es of the EU; fit wit hin the de ve lop ment stra te gi es of the co unt ry/re gi on and cho sen sec tor; strategy of the intervention Pro ject con tent Desc rip ti on inc lu ding ob jec ti ves, ex pec ted out co mes/out puts, ac ti vi ti es and the res pec ti ve in di ca tors; be ne fi ci a ri es, tar get gro up; risks and po ten ti als; sustainability of the Project Pro ject jus ti fi ca ti on (Due di li gen ce) Main conc lu si ons of the fe a si bi lity stu dy (if re qu es ted) Pro ject or ga ni sa ti on Or ga ni sa ti o nal chart, res pon si bi li ti es, etc. De ta i led imp le men ta ti on sche du le Inc lu ding mi les to nes and mo ni tor ing of prog ress ba sed on de fi ned indicators Bud get Eli gib le costs/non-eli gib le costs; own cont ri bu ti on, amo unt of grant, co-fi nan cing, EU-fun ding and any ot her fi nan ci al so ur ces etc.; cost ef fi ci en cy aspects Pro cu re ment Pro cu re ment pro ce du res for go ods and ser vi ces De ve lop ment Im pact Mo ni tor ing and eva lu a ti on of out put/out co me/im pact in di ca tors Ho ri zon tal is su es En vi ron men tal, so ci al and eco no mi cal as pects of the Pro ject, gen der equality An ne xes E.g. fe a si bi lity stu dy, Pro ject do cu ment, en vi ron men tal im pact study

Source: https://magyarkozlony.hu/hivatalos-lapok/03a3691d8964d72ebfa37d752c695042b4075082/dokumentumok/b9b498cfff5f58dc150e6cc60951e08c6d1090ce/letoltes