Publication: Magyar Közlöny
Issue: MK-2007-70 (Year: 2007, Number: 70)
Era: 2004-2010
Section: Melléklet a 2007. évi XLVI. törvényhez
Paragraph Index: 2719

o) content of the security training programme (11.2). 6. Validation of Standards of Operations Standard 2.2.1.5 requires that the validity of an AOC shall depend upon the operator maintaining the original certification standards (2.2.1.4) under the supervision of the State of the Operator. This supervision requires that a system of continued surveillance be established to ensure the required standards of operations are maintained (2.2.1.7). A good starting point in the development of such a system is to require annual or semi-annual inspections, observations and tests to validate the required certification approval and acceptance actions. 7. Amendment of Air Operator Certificates The certification of an operator is an ongoing process. Few operators will be satisfied over time with the initial authorizations issued with their AOC. Evolving market opportunities will cause an operator to change aircraft models and seek approval for new operational areas requiring other additional capabilities. Additional technical evaluations should be required by the State before issuing the formal written instruments approving any changes to the original AOC and other authorizations. Where possible, each request should be “bridged”, using the original authorization as the foundation to determine the extent of the State’s impending evaluation before issuing the formal instrument. 2007/70/II. szám ANNEX 6 — PART III ATT G-1 1/11/01 27/11/03 No. 9 ATTACHMENT G. FLIGHT SAFETY DOCUMENTS SYSTEM Supplementary to Section II, Chapter 1, 1.1.8 1. Introduction 1.1 The following material provides guidance on the organization and development of an operator’s flight safety documents system. It should be understood that the development of a flight safety documents system is a complete process, and changes to each document comprising the system may affect the entire system. Guidelines applicable to the development of operational documents have been produced by government and industry sources and are available to operators. Nevertheless, it may be difficult for operators to make the best use of these guidelines, since they are distributed across a number of publications. 1.2 Furthermore, guidelines applicable to operational documents development tend to focus on a single aspect of documents design, for example, formatting and typography. Guidelines rarely cover the entire process of operational documents development. It is important for operational documents to be consistent with each other, and consistent with regulations, manufacturer requirements and Human Factors principles. It is also necessary to ensure consistency across departments as well as consistency in application. Hence the emphasis on an integrated approach, based on the notion of the operational documents as a complete system. 1.3 The guidelines in this Attachment address the major aspects of an operator’s flight safety documents system development process, with the aim of ensuring compliance with Section II, Chapter 1, 1.1.8. The guidelines are based not only upon scientific research, but also upon current best industry practices, with an emphasis on a high degree of operational relevance. 2. Organization 2.1 A flight safety documents system should be organized according to criteria which ensure easy access to information required for flight and ground operations contained in the various operational documents comprising the system and which facilitate management of the distribution and revision of operational documents. 2.2 Information contained in a flight safety documents system should be grouped according to the importance and use of the information, as follows:

Source: https://magyarkozlony.hu/hivatalos-lapok/7e70cec03f34e3c2efd8610b865b65591eafd701/dokumentumok/a55dc160549d57fa4db0035e37c6a6a98dd1a0b9/letoltes