Executive Office of the President: Procedures for Acquiring Access to and Safeguarding Intelligence Information
Published: 1998-09-30T00:00:00

Fast Facts:

Highlights:
section_title: Why GAO Did This Study
paragraphs: Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed whether the Executive Office of the President (EOP) has established procedures for: (1) acquiring personnel access to classified intelligence information, specifically sensitive compartmented information (SCI); and (2) safeguarding such information.
section_title: What GAO Found
paragraphs: GAO noted that: (1) the EOP Security Officer told GAO that, for the period January 1993 until June 1996: (a) he could not find any EOP-wide procedures for acquiring access to SCI for the White House Office, the Office of Policy Development, the Office of the Vice President, the National Security Council, and the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board for which the former White House Security Office provided security support; and (b) there were no EOP-wide procedures for acquiring access to SCI for the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Office of the United States Trade Representative, the Office of National Drug Control Policy, and the Office of Administration for which the EOP security office provides security support; (2) the EOP-wide security procedures issued in March 1998 do not set forth security practices EOP offices are to follow in safeguarding classified information; (3) in contrast, the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Office of the Vice President had issued office-specific security procedures that deal with safeguarding SCI material; (4) the remaining seven EOP offices that did not have office-specific procedures for safeguarding SCI and other classified information stated that they rely on Director of Central Intelligence Directive 1/19 for direction on such matters; (5) neither the EOP Security Office nor the security staff of the nine EOP offices GAO reviewed have conducted security self-inspections as described in Executive Order 12958; (6) EOP officials pointed out that security personnel routinely conduct daily desk, safe, and other security checks to ensure that SCI and other classified information is properly safeguarded; (7) these same officials also emphasized the importance and security value in having within each EOP office experienced security staff responsible for safeguarding classified information; (8) Executive Order 12958 gives the Director, Information Security Oversight Office, authority to conduct on-site reviews of each agency's classified programs; and (9) the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office said his office has never conducted an on-site security inspection of EOP classified programs.

section_title: Letter
paragraphs: This report responds to your request of November 6, 1997, asking us to determine whether the Executive Office of the President (EOP) has established procedures for (1) acquiring personnel access to classified intelligence information, specifically Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) and (2) safeguarding such information. You asked that our review include the following offices for which the EOP Security Office provides security support:
White House Office,
Office of Policy Development,
Office of the Vice President,
National Security Council,
President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board,
Office of Science and Technology Policy,
Office of the United States Trade Representative,
Office of National Drug Control Policy, and
Office of Administration.
subsections: section_title: Background
paragraphs: SCI refers to classified information concerning or derived from intelligence sources, methods, or analytical processes requiring exclusive handling within formal access control systems established by the Director of Central Intelligence. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is responsible for adjudicating and granting all EOP requests for SCI access. According to the EOP Security Office, between January 1993 and May 1998, the CIA granted about 840 EOP employees access to SCI.
Executive Order 12958, Classified National Security Information, prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information and requires agency heads to promulgate procedures to ensure that the policies established by the order ensure that classified material is properly safeguarded, and establish and maintain a security self-inspection program of their classified activities.
The order also gives the Director, Information Security Oversight Office (an organization under the National Archives and Records Administration), the authority to conduct on-site security inspections of EOP’s and other executive branch agencies’ classified programs. Office of Management and Budget Circular Number A-123, Management Accountability and Control, emphasizes the importance of having clearly documented and readily available procedures as a means to ensure that programs achieve their intended results.
Director of Central Intelligence Directive 1/14, Personnel Security Standards and Procedures Governing Eligibility for Access to Sensitive Compartmented Information, lays out the governmentwide eligibility standards and procedures for access to SCI by all U.S. citizens, including government civilian and military personnel, contractors, and employees of contractors. The directive requires (1) the employing agency to determine that the individual has a need to know; (2) the cognizant Senior Official of the Intelligence Community to review the individual’s background investigation and reach a favorable suitability determination; and (3) the individual, once approved by the Senior Official of the Intelligence Community for SCI access, to sign a SCI nondisclosure agreement.Additional guidance concerning SCI eligibility is contained in Executive Order 12968, the U.S. Security Policy Board investigative standards and adjudicative guidelines implementing Executive Order 12968, and Director of Central Intelligence Directive 1/19.
Governmentwide standards and procedures for safeguarding SCI material are contained in Director of Central Intelligence Directive 1/19, Security Policy for Sensitive Compartmented Information and Security Policy Manual.
The EOP Security Office is part of the Office of Administration. The Director of the Office of Administration reports to the Assistant to the President for Management and Administration. The EOP Security Officer is responsible for formulating and directing the execution of security policy, reviewing and evaluating EOP security programs, and conducting security indoctrinations and debriefings for agencies of the EOP. Additionally, each of the nine EOP offices we reviewed has a security officer who is responsible for that specific office’s security program.
As discussed with your office, we reviewed EOP procedures but did not verify whether the procedures were followed in granting SCI access to EOP employees, review EOP physical security practices for safeguarding classified material, conduct classified document control and accountability inspections, or perform other control tests of classified material over which the EOP has custody. (See pp. 8 and 9 for a description of our scope and methodology.)
section_title: EOP-Wide Procedures for Acquiring SCI Access Should Be More Specific
paragraphs: The EOP Security Officer told us that, for the period January 1993 until June 1996, (1) he could not find any EOP-wide procedures for acquiring access to SCI for the White House Office, the Office of Policy Development, the Office of the Vice President, the National Security Council, and the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board for which the former White House Security Office provided security support and (2) there were no EOP-wide procedures for acquiring access to SCI for the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Office of the United States Trade Representative, the Office of National Drug Control Policy, and the Office of Administration for which the EOP Security Office provides security support. He added that there had been no written procedures for acquiring SCI access within the EOP since he became the EOP Security Officer in 1986. In contrast, we noted that two of the nine EOP offices we reviewed issued office-specific procedures that make reference to acquiring access to SCI—the Office of Science and Technology Policy in July 1996 and the Office of the Vice President in February 1997.
According to the EOP Security Officer, draft EOP-wide written procedures for acquiring access to SCI were completed in June 1996 at the time the White House and EOP Security Offices merged. These draft procedures, entitled Security Procedures for the EOP Security Office, were not finalized until March 1998. While the procedures discuss the issuance of EOP building passes, they do not describe in detail the procedures EOP offices must follow to acquire SCI access; the roles and responsibilities of the EOP Security Office, security staffs of the individual EOP offices, and the CIA and others in the process; or the forms and essential documentation required before the CIA can adjudicate a request for SCI access. Moreover, the procedures do not address the practices that National Security Council security personnel follow to acquire SCI access for their personnel. For example, unlike the process for acquiring SCI access in the other eight EOP offices we reviewed, National Security Council security personnel (rather than the personnel in the EOP Security Office) conduct the employee pre-employment security interview; deal directly with the CIA to request SCI access; and, once the CIA approves an employee for access, conduct the SCI security indoctrination and oversee the individual’s signing of the SCI nondisclosure agreement.
Director of Central Intelligence Directives 1/14 and 1/19 require that access to SCI be controlled under the strictest application of the need-to-know principle and in accordance with applicable personnel security standards and procedures. In exceptional cases, the Senior Official of the Intelligence Community or his designee (the CIA in the case of EOP employees) may, when it is in the national interest, authorize an individual access to SCI prior to completion of the individual’s security background investigation.
At least since July 1996, according to the National Security Council’s security officer, his office has granted temporary SCI access to government employees and individuals from private industry and academia—before completion of the individual’s security background investigation and without notifying the CIA. He added, however, that this practice has occurred only on rare occasions to meet urgent needs. He said that this practice was also followed prior to July 1996 but that no records exist documenting the number of instances and the parties the National Security Council may have granted temporary SCI access to prior to this date. CIA officials responsible for adjudicating and granting EOP requests for SCI access told us that the CIA did not know about the National Security Council’s practice of granting temporary SCI access until our review.
A senior EOP official told us that from July 1996 through July 1998, the National Security Council security officer granted 35 temporary SCI clearances. This official also added that, after recent consultations with the CIA, the National Security Council decided in August 1998 to refer temporary SCI clearance determinations to the CIA.
section_title: EOP Has Not Established Procedures for Safeguarding SCI Material
paragraphs: The EOP-wide security procedures issued in March 1998 do not set forth security practices EOP offices are to follow in safeguarding classified information. In contrast, the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Office of the Vice President had issued office-specific security procedures that deal with safeguarding SCI material. The Office of Science and Technology Policy procedures, issued in July 1996, were very comprehensive. They require that new employees be thoroughly briefed on their security responsibilities, advise staff on their responsibilities for implementing the security aspects of Executive Order 12958, and provide staff specific guidance on document accountability and other safeguard practices involving classified information. The remaining seven EOP offices that did not have office-specific procedures for safeguarding SCI and other classified information stated that they rely on Director of Central Intelligence Directive 1/19 for direction on such matters.
section_title: EOP Has Not Established a Security Self-inspection Program
paragraphs: Executive Order 12958 requires the head of agencies that handle classified information to establish and maintain a security self-inspection program. The order contains guidelines (which agency security personnel may use in conducting such inspections) on reviewing relevant security directives and classified material access and control records and procedures, monitoring agency adherence to established safeguard standards, assessing compliance with controls for access to classified information, verifying whether agency special access programs provide for the conduct of internal oversight, and assessing whether controls to prevent unauthorized access to classified information are effective. Neither the EOP Security Office nor the security staff of the nine EOP offices we reviewed have conducted security self-inspections as described in the order.
EOP officials pointed out that security personnel routinely conduct daily desk, safe, and other security checks to ensure that SCI and other classified information is properly safeguarded. These same officials also emphasized the importance and security value in having within each EOP office experienced security staff responsible for safeguarding classified information. While these EOP security practices are important, the security self-inspection program as described in Executive Order 12958 provides for a review of security procedures and an assessment of security controls beyond EOP daily security practices.
section_title: Information Security Oversight Office Has Not Conducted Security Inspections of EOP Activities
paragraphs: Executive Order 12958 gives the Director, Information Security Oversight Office, authority to conduct on-site reviews of each agency’s classified programs. The Director of the Information Security Oversight Office said his office has never conducted an on-site security inspection of EOP classified programs. He cited a lack of sufficient personnel as the reason for not doing so and added that primary responsibility for oversight should rest internally with the EOP and other government agencies having custody of classified material.
The Director’s concern with having adequate inspection staff and his view on the primacy of internal oversight do not diminish the need for an objective and systematic examination of EOP classified programs by an independent party. An independent assessment of EOP security practices by the Information Security Oversight Office could have brought to light the security concerns raised in this report.
section_title: Recommendations
paragraphs: To improve EOP security practices, we recommend that the Assistant to the President for Management and Administration direct the EOP Security Officer to revise the March 1998 Security Procedures for the EOP Security Office to include comprehensive guidance on the procedures EOP offices must follow in (1) acquiring SCI access for its employees and (2) safeguarding SCI material and establish and maintain a self-inspection program of EOP classified programs, including SCI in accordance with provisions in Executive  Order 12958.
We recommend further that, to properly provide for external oversight, the Director, Information Security Oversight Office, develop and implement a plan for conducting periodic on-site security inspections of EOP classified programs.
section_title: Agency Comments and Our Evaluation
paragraphs: We provided the EOP, the Information Security Oversight Office, and the CIA a copy of the draft report for their review and comment. The EOP and the Information Security Oversight Office provided written comments, which are reprinted in their entirety as appendixes I and II, respectively. The CIA did not provide comments.
In responding for the EOP, the Assistant to the President for Management and Administration stated that our report creates a false impression that the security procedures the EOP employs are lax and inconsistent with established standards. This official added that the procedures for regulating personnel access to classified information are Executive  Order 12968 and applicable Security Policy Board guidelines and Executive Order 12968 and Executive Order 12958 for safeguarding such information. The Assistant to the President also stated that the report suggests that the EOP operated in a vacuum because the EOP written security procedures implementing Executive Order 12968 were not issued until March 1998. The official noted that EOP carefully followed the President’s executive orders, Security Policy Board guidelines and applicable Director of Central Intelligence Directives during this time period. While the EOP disagreed with the basis for our recommendation, the Assistant to the President stated that EOP plans to supplement its security procedures with additional guidance.
We agree that the executive orders, Security Policy Board guidelines, and applicable Director of Central Intelligence Directives clearly lay out governmentwide standards and procedures for access to and safeguarding of SCI. However, they are not a substitute for local operating procedures that provide agency personnel guidance on how to implement the governmentwide procedures. We believe that EOP’s plan to issue supplemental guidance could strengthen existing procedures.
The Assistant to the President also stated that it is not accurate to say that the EOP has not conducted security self-inspections. This official stated that our draft report acknowledges that “security personnel conduct daily desk, safe, and other security checks to ensure that SCI and other classified material is properly safeguarded.” The Assistant to the President is correct to point out the importance of daily physical security checks as an effective means to help ensure that classified material is properly safeguarded. However, such self-inspection practices are not meant to substitute for a security self-inspection program as described in Executive Order 12958. Self-inspections as discussed in the order are much broader in scope than routine daily safe checks. The order’s guidelines discuss reviewing relevant security directives and classified material access and control records and procedures, monitoring agency adherence to established safeguard standards, assessing compliance with controls for access to classified information, verifying whether agency special access programs (such as SCI) provide for the conduct of internal oversight, and assessing whether controls to prevent unauthorized access to classified information are effective. Our report recommends that the EOP establish a self-inspection program.
In commenting on our recommendation, the Assistant to the President said that to enhance EOP security practices, the skilled assistance of the EOP Security Office staff are being made available to all EOP organizations to coordinate and assist where appropriate in agency efforts to enhance self-inspection. We believe EOP security practices would be enhanced if this action were part of a security self-inspection program as described in Executive Order 12958.
The Director, Information Security Oversight Office noted that our report addresses important elements of the SCI program in place within the EOP and provides helpful insights for the security community as a whole. The Director believes that we overemphasize the need to create EOP specific procedures for handling SCI programs. He observed that the Director of Central Intelligence has issued governmentwide procedures on these matters and that for the EOP to prepare local procedures would result in unnecessary additional rules and expenditure of resources and could result in local procedures contrary to Director of Central Intelligence Directives. As we discussed above, we agree that the executive orders, Security Policy Board guidelines, and applicable Director of Central Intelligence Directives clearly lay out governmentwide standards and procedures for access to and safeguarding of SCI. However, they are not a substitute for local operating procedures that provide agency personnel guidance on how to implement the governmentwide procedures.
The Director agreed that his office needs to conduct on-site security inspections and hopes to begin the inspections during fiscal year 1999. The Director also noted that the primary focus of the inspections would be classification management and not inspections of the SCI program.
section_title: Scope and Methodology
paragraphs: To identify EOP procedures for acquiring access to SCI and safeguarding such information, we met with EOP officials responsible for security program management and discussed their programs. We obtained and reviewed pertinent documents concerning EOP procedures for acquiring SCI access and safeguarding such information.
In addition, we obtained and reviewed various executive orders, Director of Central Intelligence Directives, and other documents pertaining to acquiring access to and safeguarding SCI material. We also discussed U.S. government security policies pertinent to our review with officials of the Information Security Oversight Office and the U.S. Security Policy Board. Additionally, we met with officials of the CIA responsible for adjudicating and granting EOP employees SCI access and discussed the CIA procedures for determining whether an individual meets Director of Central Intelligence Directive eligibility standards.
As discussed with your office, we did not verify whether proper procedures were followed in granting SCI access to the approximately 840 EOP employees identified by the EOP Security Officer. Also, we did not review EOP physical security practices for safeguarding SCI and other classified material, conduct classified document control and accountability inspections, or perform other control tests of SCI material over which the EOP has custody.
We performed our review from January 1998 until August 1998 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
At your request, we plan no further distribution of this report until 30 days after its issue date. At that time, we will provide copies to appropriate congressional committees; the Chief of Staff to the President; the Assistant to the President for Management and Administration; the Director, Information Security Oversight Office; the Director of Central Intelligence; Central Intelligence Agency; the U.S. Security Policy Board; the Director of the Office of Management and Budget; and other interested parties.
Please contact me at (202) 512-3504 if you or your staff have any questions concerning this report. Major contributors to this report were  Gary K. Weeter, Assistant Director and Tim F. Stone, Evaluator-in-Charge.
section_title: Comments From the Assistant to the President for Management and Administration
paragraphs: The following is GAO’s comment to the Assistant to the President for Management and Administration’s letter dated September 23, 1998.
subsections: section_title: GAO Comment
paragraphs: 1. A representative of the Executive Office of the President (EOP) told us that the errors referred, for example, to statements in ours draft report that the EOP does not conduct self-inspections and that the EOP lacks written procedures.
section_title: Comments From the Information Security Oversight Office
paragraphs: The first copy of each GAO report and testimony is free. Additional copies are $2 each. Orders should be sent to the following address, accompanied by a check or money order made out to the Superintendent of Documents, when necessary. VISA and MasterCard credit cards are accepted, also. Orders for 100 or more copies to be mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent.
U.S. General Accounting Office P.O. Box 37050 Washington, DC  20013 Room 1100 700 4th St. NW (corner of 4th and G Sts. NW) U.S. General Accounting Office Washington, DC Orders may also be placed by calling (202) 512-6000  or by using fax number (202) 512-6061, or TDD (202) 512-2537.
Each day, GAO issues a list of newly available reports and testimony.  To receive facsimile copies of the daily list or any list from the past 30 days, please call (202) 512-6000 using a touchtone phone.  A recorded menu will provide information on how to obtain these lists.