lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Vaughan Williams's recollections throw some light on Ravel's private life, about which the latter's reserved and secretive personality has led to much speculation. Vaughan Williams, Rosenthal and Marguerite Long have all recorded that Ravel frequented brothels; Long attributed this to his self-consciousness about his diminutive stature, and consequent shortage of confidence with women. By other accounts, none of them first-hand, Ravel was in love with Misia Edwards, or wanted to marry the violinist Hélène Jourdan-Morhange. Rosenthal records and discounts contemporary speculation that Ravel, a lifelong bachelor, may have been homosexual. Such speculation recurred in a 2000 life of Ravel by Benjamin Ivry; subsequent studies have concluded that Ravel's sexuality and personal life remain a mystery.

Question: If Ravel were taller, would he probably have been less likely to visit brothels?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Ravel was worried about being viewed negatively by women because of his height?
Answer: YES

Question: If Ravel saw a woman he liked at a party, is there a good chance he would have talked to her?
Answer: NO
Passage: Vaughan Williams's recollections throw some light on Ravel's private life, about which the latter's reserved and secretive personality has led to much speculation. Vaughan Williams, Rosenthal and Marguerite Long have all recorded that Ravel frequented brothels; Long attributed this to his lack of self-consciousness about his diminutive stature, and consequent confidence with women. By other accounts, none of them first-hand, Ravel was in love with Misia Edwards, or wanted to marry the violinist Hélène Jourdan-Morhange. Rosenthal records and discounts contemporary speculation that Ravel, a lifelong bachelor, may have been homosexual. Such speculation recurred in a 2000 life of Ravel by Benjamin Ivry; subsequent studies have concluded that Ravel's sexuality and personal life remain a mystery.

Question: If Ravel were taller, would he probably have been less likely to visit brothels?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Ravel was worried about being viewed negatively by women because of his height?
Answer: NO

Question: If Ravel saw a woman he liked at a party, is there a good chance he would have talked to her?
Answer: YES
Passage: Vaughan Williams's recollections throw some light on Ravel's private life, about which the latter's reserved and secretive personality has led to much speculation. Vaughan Williams, Rosenthal and Marguerite Long have all recorded that Ravel never frequented brothels; Long attributed this to his self-assuredness about his diminutive stature, and consequent abundance of confidence with women. By other accounts, none of them first-hand, Ravel was in love with Misia Edwards, or wanted to marry the violinist Hélène Jourdan-Morhange. Rosenthal records and discounts contemporary speculation that Ravel, a lifelong bachelor, may have been homosexual. Such speculation recurred in a 2000 life of Ravel by Benjamin Ivry; subsequent studies have concluded that Ravel's sexuality and personal life remain a mystery.

Question: If Ravel were taller, would he probably have been less likely to visit brothels?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is it likely that Ravel was worried about being viewed negatively by women because of his height?
Answer: NO

Question: If Ravel saw a woman he liked at a party, is there a good chance he would have talked to her?
Answer: YES
Passage: Over the next few years, Truffaut became a critic (and later editor) at "Cahiers", where he became notorious for his brutal, unforgiving reviews. He was called "The Gravedigger of French Cinema" and was the only French critic not invited to the 1958 Cannes Film Festival. He supported Bazin in developing one of the most influential theories of cinema, the auteur theory.

Question: If you attended the 1958 Cannes Film Festival, would you see Traffaut there?
Answer: NO

Question: Would someone have been surprised to see Traffaut at the 1958 Cannes Film Festival?
Answer: YES

Question: If you attended the 1958 Cannes Film Festival, would you see a lot of French critics there?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Over the next few years, Truffaut became a critic (and later editor) at "Cahiers", where he became notorious for his brutal, unforgiving reviews. He was called "The Gravedigger of French Cinema" and was the only French critic excluded from the 1958 Cannes Film Festival. He supported Bazin in developing one of the most influential theories of cinema, the auteur theory.

Question: If you attended the 1958 Cannes Film Festival, would you see Traffaut there?
Answer: NO

Question: Would someone have been surprised to see Traffaut at the 1958 Cannes Film Festival?
Answer: YES

Question: If you attended the 1958 Cannes Film Festival, would you see a lot of French critics there?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Over the next few years, Truffaut became a critic (and later editor) at "Cahiers", where he became notorious for his brutal, unforgiving reviews. He was called "The Gravedigger of French Cinema" and was not the only French critic invited to the 1958 Cannes Film Festival. He supported Bazin in developing one of the most influential theories of cinema, the auteur theory.

Question: If you attended the 1958 Cannes Film Festival, would you see Traffaut there?
Answer: YES

Question: Would someone have been surprised to see Traffaut at the 1958 Cannes Film Festival?
Answer: NO

Question: If you attended the 1958 Cannes Film Festival, would you see a lot of French critics there?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Over the next few years, Truffaut became a critic (and later editor) at "Cahiers", where he became notorious for his brutal, unforgiving reviews. He was called "The Gravedigger of French Cinema" and was one of the only French critics invited to the 1958 Cannes Film Festival. He supported Bazin in developing one of the most influential theories of cinema, the auteur theory.

Question: If you attended the 1958 Cannes Film Festival, would you see Traffaut there?
Answer: YES

Question: Would someone have been surprised to see Traffaut at the 1958 Cannes Film Festival?
Answer: NO

Question: If you attended the 1958 Cannes Film Festival, would you see a lot of French critics there?
Answer: NO
Passage: Capitol Records, from December 1963 when it began issuing Beatles recordings for the US market, exercised complete control over format, compiling distinct US albums from the band's recordings and issuing songs of their choosing as singles. In June 1966, the Capitol LP "Yesterday and Today" caused an uproar with its cover, which portrayed the grinning Beatles dressed in butcher's overalls, accompanied by raw meat and mutilated plastic baby dolls. According to Beatles biographer Bill Harry, it has been incorrectly suggested that this was meant as a satirical response to the way Capitol had "butchered" the US versions of the band's albums. Thousands of copies of the LP had a new cover pasted over the original; an unpeeled "first-state" copy fetched $10,500 at a December 2005 auction. In England, meanwhile, Harrison met sitar maestro Ravi Shankar, who agreed to train him on the instrument.

Question: From this passage, could you say that the Beatles were more or less satisfied with the way that Capitol Records had edited and curated their previous American releases?
Answer: YES

Question: Knowing that Paul McCartney has become a steadfast vegan, would he be likely to look back on this cover with nothing but repulsion, since it could be glorifying the profession of meat-cutting, without serving any other purpose for the band?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the way that the artists are alleged to have felt about Capitol's efforts, would you expect any differences between US and UK versions of their albums to be noticeable and with artistic significance?
Answer: NO
Passage: Capitol Records, from December 1963 when it began issuing Beatles recordings for the US market, exercised complete control over format, compiling distinct US albums from the band's recordings and issuing songs of their choosing as singles. In June 1966, the Capitol LP "Yesterday and Today" caused an uproar with its cover, which portrayed the grinning Beatles dressed in butcher's overalls, accompanied by raw meat and mutilated plastic baby dolls. Some have made the claim that the Beatles chose this cover satirically, as a way of showing how Capitol had "butchered" the American versions of the band's other albums, but Beatles biographer Bill Harry says that such claims are incorrect. Thousands of copies of the LP had a new cover pasted over the original; an unpeeled "first-state" copy fetched $10,500 at a December 2005 auction. In England, meanwhile, Harrison met sitar maestro Ravi Shankar, who agreed to train him on the instrument.

Question: From this passage, could you say that the Beatles were more or less satisfied with the way that Capitol Records had edited and curated their previous American releases?
Answer: YES

Question: Knowing that Paul McCartney has become a steadfast vegan, would he be likely to look back on this cover with nothing but repulsion, since it could be glorifying the profession of meat-cutting, without serving any other purpose for the band?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the way that the artists are alleged to have felt about Capitol's efforts, would you expect any differences between US and UK versions of their albums to be noticeable and with artistic significance?
Answer: NO
Passage: Capitol Records, from December 1963 when it began issuing Beatles recordings for the US market, exercised complete control over format, compiling distinct US albums from the band's recordings and issuing songs of their choosing as singles. In June 1966, the Capitol LP "Yesterday and Today" caused an uproar with its cover, which portrayed the grinning Beatles dressed in butcher's overalls, accompanied by raw meat and mutilated plastic baby dolls. According to Beatles biographer Bill Harry, fans are justified in their suggestions that this was meant as a satirical response to the way Capitol had incorrectly "butchered" the US versions of the band's albums, by making edits that the band did not agree with. Thousands of copies of the LP had a new cover pasted over the original; an unpeeled "first-state" copy fetched $10,500 at a December 2005 auction. In England, meanwhile, Harrison met sitar maestro Ravi Shankar, who agreed to train him on the instrument.

Question: From this passage, could you say that the Beatles were more or less satisfied with the way that Capitol Records had edited and curated their previous American releases?
Answer: NO

Question: Knowing that Paul McCartney has become a steadfast vegan, would he be likely to look back on this cover with nothing but repulsion, since it could be glorifying the profession of meat-cutting, without serving any other purpose for the band?
Answer: NO

Question: Given the way that the artists are alleged to have felt about Capitol's efforts, would you expect any differences between US and UK versions of their albums to be noticeable and with artistic significance?
Answer: YES
Passage: Capitol Records, from December 1963 when it began issuing Beatles recordings for the US market, exercised complete control over format, compiling distinct US albums from the band's recordings and issuing songs of their choosing as singles. In June 1966, the Capitol LP "Yesterday and Today" caused an uproar with its cover, which portrayed the grinning Beatles dressed in butcher's overalls, accompanied by raw meat and mutilated plastic baby dolls. According to Beatles biographer Bill Harry, it has been correctly assumed by fans that this was meant as a satirical response to the way Capitol had "butchered" the US versions of the band's albums. Thousands of copies of the LP had a new cover pasted over the original; an unpeeled "first-state" copy fetched $10,500 at a December 2005 auction. In England, meanwhile, Harrison met sitar maestro Ravi Shankar, who agreed to train him on the instrument.

Question: From this passage, could you say that the Beatles were more or less satisfied with the way that Capitol Records had edited and curated their previous American releases?
Answer: NO

Question: Knowing that Paul McCartney has become a steadfast vegan, would he be likely to look back on this cover with nothing but repulsion, since it could be glorifying the profession of meat-cutting, without serving any other purpose for the band?
Answer: NO

Question: Given the way that the artists are alleged to have felt about Capitol's efforts, would you expect any differences between US and UK versions of their albums to be noticeable and with artistic significance?
Answer: YES
Passage: Despite his age and bulk, Grace continued to play minor cricket for several years after his retirement from the first-class version. His penultimate match, and the last in which he batted, was for Eltham Cricket Club at Grove Park on 25 July 1914, a week after his 66th birthday. He contributed an undefeated 69 to a total of 155–6 declared, having begun his innings when they were 31–4. Grove Park made 99–8 in reply. The last match of any kind that Grace played in, though he neither batted nor bowled, was for Eltham v Northbrook on 8 August, a few days after the outbreak of the First World War.

Question: Is it possible that the portly Mr. Grace received a violation for leg before wicket while playing in his final game?
Answer: NO

Question: Based solely on what can be read above, would one expect to have seen Grace playing as a fielder in the last match of his cricket career?
Answer: YES

Question: Based on the position that he was playing, is it possible that Grace could have scored the coveted 'duck' for his team during his final game?
Answer: NO
Passage: Despite his age and bulk, Grace continued to play minor cricket for several years after his retirement from the first-class version. His penultimate match, and the last in which he batted, was for Eltham Cricket Club at Grove Park on 25 July 1914, a week after his 66th birthday. He contributed an undefeated 69 to a total of 155–6 declared, having begun his innings when they were 31–4. Grove Park made 99–8 in reply. Grace played his final cricket match, of any kind, for Eltham v. Northbrook on the eighth of August, just days after the start of the First World War, but he did not play as either a batsman or a bowler at any point in the game.

Question: Is it possible that the portly Mr. Grace received a violation for leg before wicket while playing in his final game?
Answer: NO

Question: Based solely on what can be read above, would one expect to have seen Grace playing as a fielder in the last match of his cricket career?
Answer: YES

Question: Based on the position that he was playing, is it possible that Grace could have scored the coveted 'duck' for his team during his final game?
Answer: NO
Passage: Despite his age and bulk, Grace continued to play minor cricket for several years after his retirement from the first-class version. His penultimate match, and the last in which he batted, was for Eltham Cricket Club at Grove Park on 25 July 1914, a week after his 66th birthday. He contributed an undefeated 69 to a total of 155–6 declared, having begun his innings when they were 31–4. Grove Park made 99–8 in reply. The last match of any kind that Grace played in, though he only batted sporadically and neither bowled nor played any other position throughout, was for Eltham v Northbrook on 8 August, a few days after the outbreak of the First World War.

Question: Is it possible that the portly Mr. Grace received a violation for leg before wicket while playing in his final game?
Answer: YES

Question: Based solely on what can be read above, would one expect to have seen Grace playing as a fielder in the last match of his cricket career?
Answer: NO

Question: Based on the position that he was playing, is it possible that Grace could have scored the coveted 'duck' for his team during his final game?
Answer: NO
Passage: Despite his age and bulk, Grace continued to play minor cricket for several years after his retirement from the first-class version. His penultimate match, and the last in which he batted, was for Eltham Cricket Club at Grove Park on 25 July 1914, a week after his 66th birthday. He contributed an undefeated 69 to a total of 155–6 declared, having begun his innings when they were 31–4. Grove Park made 99–8 in reply. The last match of any kind that Grace played in, and in which he both bowled and batted, was for Eltham v Northbrook on 8 August, a few days after the outbreak of the First World War.

Question: Is it possible that the portly Mr. Grace received a violation for leg before wicket while playing in his final game?
Answer: YES

Question: Based solely on what can be read above, would one expect to have seen Grace playing as a fielder in the last match of his cricket career?
Answer: NO

Question: Based on the position that he was playing, is it possible that Grace could have scored the coveted 'duck' for his team during his final game?
Answer: YES
Passage: "Theodicy in the Minor Prophets differs little from that in Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel." For example, the first chapter of Habakuk raises questions about Yahweh's justice, laments God's inaction in punishing injustice, and looks for God's action in response—then objects to what God chooses. Instead of engaging in debate, God gives Habakuk a vision of the future which includes five oracles that form a theodicy: (1) God has a plan and has appointed a time for judgment. It may be slow in coming as humans see things, but it will come. (2) The woe oracles confront the prevalence of evil in the world and the justice those acts have earned (3) The vision of the manifestation of God is a recognition of God's power to address these issues (4) God as a warrior will fight for his people (5) The song of triumph says the faithful will prevail by holding to trust and hope. Joel and the other minor prophets demonstrate that theodicy and eschatology are connected in the Bible.

Question: Can any criticism of Yahweh's justice be found in Habakuk's first chapter?
Answer: YES

Question: Are there any references to God's lack of action in the Habakuk's first chapter?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the first chapter of Habakuk recall any punishment of injustice by God?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: "Theodicy in the Minor Prophets differs little from that in Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel." For example, the first chapter of Habakuk raises questions about Yahweh's justice, laments God's neglect in punishing injustice, and looks for God's action in response—then objects to what God chooses. Instead of engaging in debate, God gives Habakuk a vision of the future which includes five oracles that form a theodicy: (1) God has a plan and has appointed a time for judgment. It may be slow in coming as humans see things, but it will come. (2) The woe oracles confront the prevalence of evil in the world and the justice those acts have earned (3) The vision of the manifestation of God is a recognition of God's power to address these issues (4) God as a warrior will fight for his people (5) The song of triumph says the faithful will prevail by holding to trust and hope. Joel and the other minor prophets demonstrate that theodicy and eschatology are connected in the Bible.

Question: Can any criticism of Yahweh's justice be found in Habakuk's first chapter?
Answer: YES

Question: Are there any references to God's lack of action in the Habakuk's first chapter?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the first chapter of Habakuk recall any punishment of injustice by God?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: "Theodicy in the Minor Prophets differs little from that in Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel." For example, the first chapter of Habakuk raises questions about Yahweh and justice, laments inaction in punishing injustice, and looks for God's response—then objects to what God chooses. Instead of engaging in debate, God gives Habakuk a vision of the future which includes five oracles that form a theodicy: (1) God has a plan and has appointed a time for judgment. It may be slow in coming as humans see things, but it will come. (2) The woe oracles confront the prevalence of evil in the world and the justice those acts have earned (3) The vision of the manifestation of God is a recognition of God's power to address these issues (4) God as a warrior will fight for his people (5) The song of triumph says the faithful will prevail by holding to trust and hope. Joel and the other minor prophets demonstrate that theodicy and eschatology are connected in the Bible.

Question: Can any criticism of Yahweh's justice be found in Habakuk's first chapter?
Answer: YES

Question: Are there any references to God's lack of action in the Habakuk's first chapter?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the first chapter of Habakuk recall any punishment of injustice by God?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: "Theodicy in the Minor Prophets differs little from that in Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel." For example, the first chapter of Habakuk raises questions about justice and laments the lack of action in punishing injustice in response to what God chooses. Instead of engaging in debate, God gives Habakuk a vision of the future which includes five oracles that form a theodicy: (1) God has a plan and has appointed a time for judgment. It may be slow in coming as humans see things, but it will come. (2) The woe oracles confront the prevalence of evil in the world and the justice those acts have earned (3) The vision of the manifestation of God is a recognition of God's power to address these issues (4) God as a warrior will fight for his people (5) The song of triumph says the faithful will prevail by holding to trust and hope. Joel and the other minor prophets demonstrate that theodicy and eschatology are connected in the Bible.

Question: Can any criticism of Yahweh's justice be found in Habakuk's first chapter?
Answer: NO

Question: Are there any references to God's lack of action in the Habakuk's first chapter?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the first chapter of Habakuk recall any punishment of injustice by God?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Cape Verde islands are a very degradated area. Also, most islands do not always get a monsoon. In fact, it is not surprising that some atmospheric precipitation of islands are limited in tropical rain.

Question: Are people surprised at the amount of tropical rain on the islands?
Answer: NO

Question: Is the source of tropical rain on the islands surprising?
Answer: NO

Question: Do people expect the amount of tropical rain that occurs on the island?
Answer: YES
Passage: The Cape Verde islands are a very degradated area. Also, most islands do not always get a monsoon. In fact, it is expected that some atmospheric precipitation of islands are limited in tropical rain.

Question: Are people surprised at the amount of tropical rain on the islands?
Answer: NO

Question: Is the source of tropical rain on the islands surprising?
Answer: NO

Question: Do people expect the amount of tropical rain that occurs on the island?
Answer: YES
Passage: The Cape Verde islands are a very degradated area. Also, most islands do not always get a monsoon. In fact, it is surprising that some atmospheric precipitation of islands are not limited in tropical rain.

Question: Are people surprised at the amount of tropical rain on the islands?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the source of tropical rain on the islands surprising?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Do people expect the amount of tropical rain that occurs on the island?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Cape Verde islands are a very degradated area. Also, most islands do not always get a monsoon. In fact, it comes as a surprise that some atmospheric precipitation of islands are limited in tropical rain.

Question: Are people surprised at the amount of tropical rain on the islands?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the source of tropical rain on the islands surprising?
Answer: YES

Question: Do people expect the amount of tropical rain that occurs on the island?
Answer: NO