lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Washington's retreat isolated his remaining forces and the British captured Fort Washington on November 16. The British victory there amounted to Washington's most disastrous defeat with the loss of 3,000 prisoners. The remaining American regiments on Long Island fell back four days later. General Sir Henry Clinton wanted to pursue Washington's disorganized army, but he was first required to commit 6,000 troops to capture Newport, Rhode Island to secure the Loyalist port. General Charles Cornwallis pursued Washington, but Howe ordered him to halt, leaving Washington unmolested.

Question: After retreating, is it likely that Washington's remaining army struggled to perform basic military drills?
Answer: YES

Question: Was the army that Henry Clinton captured Newport with likely well trained?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: After retreating, is it likely that Washington's remaining army easily performed basic military drills?
Answer: NO
Passage: Washington's retreat isolated his remaining forces and the British captured Fort Washington on November 16. The British victory there amounted to Washington's most disastrous defeat with the loss of 3,000 prisoners. The remaining American regiments on Long Island fell back four days later. General Sir Henry Clinton wanted to pursue Washington's scrambled army, but he was first required to commit 6,000 troops to capture Newport, Rhode Island to secure the Loyalist port. General Charles Cornwallis pursued Washington, but Howe ordered him to halt, leaving Washington unmolested.

Question: After retreating, is it likely that Washington's remaining army struggled to perform basic military drills?
Answer: YES

Question: Was the army that Henry Clinton captured Newport with likely well trained?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: After retreating, is it likely that Washington's remaining army easily performed basic military drills?
Answer: NO
Passage: Washington's retreat isolated his remaining forces and the British captured Fort Washington on November 16. The British victory there amounted to Washington's most disastrous defeat with the loss of 3,000 prisoners. The remaining American regiments on Long Island fell back four days later. General Sir Henry Clinton wanted to pursue Washington's army, but he was first required to commit 6,000 disorganized troops to capture Newport, Rhode Island to secure the Loyalist port. General Charles Cornwallis pursued Washington, but Howe ordered him to halt, leaving Washington unmolested.

Question: After retreating, is it likely that Washington's remaining army struggled to perform basic military drills?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the army that Henry Clinton captured Newport with likely well trained?
Answer: NO

Question: After retreating, is it likely that Washington's remaining army easily performed basic military drills?
Answer: YES
Passage: Washington's retreat isolated his remaining forces and the British captured Fort Washington on November 16. The British victory there amounted to Washington's most disastrous defeat with the loss of 3,000 prisoners. The remaining American regiments on Long Island fell back four days later. General Sir Henry Clinton wanted to pursue Washington's organized army, but he was first required to commit 6,000 troops to capture Newport, Rhode Island to secure the Loyalist port. General Charles Cornwallis pursued Washington, but Howe ordered him to halt, leaving Washington unmolested.

Question: After retreating, is it likely that Washington's remaining army struggled to perform basic military drills?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the army that Henry Clinton captured Newport with likely well trained?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: After retreating, is it likely that Washington's remaining army easily performed basic military drills?
Answer: YES
Passage: After the Uranverein project was placed under the leadership of the Reichs Research Council, it focused on nuclear power production and thus maintained its "kriegswichtig" (importance for the war) status; funding therefore continued from the military. The nuclear power project was broken down into the following main areas: uranium and heavy water production, uranium isotope separation and the "Uranmaschine" (uranium machine, i.e., nuclear reactor). The project was then essentially split up between a number of institutes, where the directors dominated the research and set their own research agendas. The point in 1942, when the army relinquished its control of the German nuclear weapons program, was the zenith of the project relative to the number of personnel. About 70 scientists worked for the program, with about 40 devoting more than half their time to nuclear fission research. After 1942, the number of scientists working on applied nuclear fission diminished dramatically. Many of the scientists not working with the main institutes stopped working on nuclear fission and devoted their efforts to more pressing war-related work.

Question: Even after 1942, does it sound like the more centralized main institutions were still holding onto hope that nuclear weapons could win the war for Germany?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude, from this passage, that nuclear energy was a goal being pursued with good intentions by scientists in smaller, distributed labs who could mostly evade government orders regarding wartime production?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like the military exerted roughly equal amounts of pressure on the main institutes as it did on the smaller labs in Germany in the latter half of World War 2?
Answer: NO
Passage: After the Uranverein project was placed under the leadership of the Reichs Research Council, it focused on nuclear power production and thus maintained its "kriegswichtig" (importance for the war) status; funding therefore continued from the military. The nuclear power project was broken down into the following main areas: uranium and heavy water production, uranium isotope separation and the "Uranmaschine" (uranium machine, i.e., nuclear reactor). The project was then essentially split up between a number of institutes, where the directors dominated the research and set their own research agendas. The point in 1942, when the army relinquished its control of the German nuclear weapons program, was the zenith of the project relative to the number of personnel. About 70 scientists worked for the program, with about 40 devoting more than half their time to nuclear fission research. After 1942, the number of scientists working on applied nuclear fission diminished dramatically. Outside of the main institutes, many scientists turned their attention to war-related work that was more pressing in the short tern, and thus abandoned their work on nuclear fission.

Question: Even after 1942, does it sound like the more centralized main institutions were still holding onto hope that nuclear weapons could win the war for Germany?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude, from this passage, that nuclear energy was a goal being pursued with good intentions by scientists in smaller, distributed labs who could mostly evade government orders regarding wartime production?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like the military exerted roughly equal amounts of pressure on the main institutes as it did on the smaller labs in Germany in the latter half of World War 2?
Answer: NO
Passage: After the Uranverein project was placed under the leadership of the Reichs Research Council, it focused on nuclear power production and thus maintained its "kriegswichtig" (importance for the war) status; funding therefore continued from the military. The nuclear power project was broken down into the following main areas: uranium and heavy water production, uranium isotope separation and the "Uranmaschine" (uranium machine, i.e., nuclear reactor). The project was then essentially split up between a number of institutes, where the directors dominated the research and set their own research agendas. The point in 1942, when the army relinquished its control of the German nuclear weapons program, was the zenith of the project relative to the number of personnel. About 70 scientists worked for the program, with about 40 devoting more than half their time to nuclear fission research. After 1942, the number of scientists working on applied nuclear fission diminished dramatically. Many of the scientists working with the main institutes stopped working on nuclear fission and devoted their efforts to more pressing war-related work, but many of the scientists at the smaller institutions did not give up on the goal of nuclear power.

Question: Even after 1942, does it sound like the more centralized main institutions were still holding onto hope that nuclear weapons could win the war for Germany?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude, from this passage, that nuclear energy was a goal being pursued with good intentions by scientists in smaller, distributed labs who could mostly evade government orders regarding wartime production?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like the military exerted roughly equal amounts of pressure on the main institutes as it did on the smaller labs in Germany in the latter half of World War 2?
Answer: NO
Passage: After the Uranverein project was placed under the leadership of the Reichs Research Council, it focused on nuclear power production and thus maintained its "kriegswichtig" (importance for the war) status; funding therefore continued from the military. The nuclear power project was broken down into the following main areas: uranium and heavy water production, uranium isotope separation and the "Uranmaschine" (uranium machine, i.e., nuclear reactor). The project was then essentially split up between a number of institutes, where the directors dominated the research and set their own research agendas. The point in 1942, when the army relinquished its control of the German nuclear weapons program, was the zenith of the project relative to the number of personnel. About 70 scientists worked for the program, with about 40 devoting more than half their time to nuclear fission research. After 1942, the number of scientists working on applied nuclear fission diminished dramatically. Scientists working with the main institutes and the smaller labs stopped working on nuclear fission and devoted their efforts to more pressing war-related work.

Question: Even after 1942, does it sound like the more centralized main institutions were still holding onto hope that nuclear weapons could win the war for Germany?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude, from this passage, that nuclear energy was a goal being pursued with good intentions by scientists in smaller, distributed labs who could mostly evade government orders regarding wartime production?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like the military exerted roughly equal amounts of pressure on the main institutes as it did on the smaller labs in Germany in the latter half of World War 2?
Answer: YES
Passage: Flavius Claudius Julianus was born at Constantinople in 331, the son of Julius Constantius, consul in 335 and half-brother of the emperor Constantine, by his second wife, Basilina, a woman of Greek origin. Both of his parents were Christians. Julian's paternal grandparents were the emperor Constantius Chlorus and his second wife, Flavia Maximiana Theodora. His maternal grandfather was Julius Julianus, Praetorian Prefect of the East under the emperor Licinius from 315 to 324, and consul "suffectus" in 325. The name of Julian's maternal grandmother is unknown.

Question: If an historian were to put together a family tree of Flavius Claudius Julianus using current knowledge, would they have to leave a blank space in the grandparents' line?
Answer: YES

Question: If Flavius Claudius Julianus himself had assembled his own family tree late in his life, would the line showing his four grandparents match that which a present-day historian could put together using the best-available information?
Answer: NO

Question: Could Flavius Claudius Julianus's mother have some first cousins that historians are currently unaware of?
Answer: YES
Passage: Flavius Claudius Julianus was born at Constantinople in 331, the son of Julius Constantius, consul in 335 and half-brother of the emperor Constantine, by his second wife, Basilina, a woman of Greek origin. Both of his parents were Christians. Julian's paternal grandparents were the emperor Constantius Chlorus and his second wife, Flavia Maximiana Theodora. His maternal grandfather was Julius Julianus, Praetorian Prefect of the East under the emperor Licinius from 315 to 324, and consul "suffectus" in 325. Historians do not know the exact identity of Julian's maternal grandmother.

Question: If an historian were to put together a family tree of Flavius Claudius Julianus using current knowledge, would they have to leave a blank space in the grandparents' line?
Answer: YES

Question: If Flavius Claudius Julianus himself had assembled his own family tree late in his life, would the line showing his four grandparents match that which a present-day historian could put together using the best-available information?
Answer: NO

Question: Could Flavius Claudius Julianus's mother have some first cousins that historians are currently unaware of?
Answer: YES
Passage: Flavius Claudius Julianus was born at Constantinople in 331, the son of Julius Constantius, consul in 335 and half-brother of the emperor Constantine, by his second wife, Basilina, a woman of Greek origin. Both of his parents were Christians. Julian's paternal grandparents were the emperor Constantius Chlorus and his second wife, Flavia Maximiana Theodora. His maternal grandfather was Julius Julianus, Praetorian Prefect of the East under the emperor Licinius from 315 to 324, and consul "suffectus" in 325. The name of Julian's maternal grandmother was lost during his lifetime, and was unknown to historians until fairly recently.

Question: If an historian were to put together a family tree of Flavius Claudius Julianus using current knowledge, would they have to leave a blank space in the grandparents' line?
Answer: NO

Question: If Flavius Claudius Julianus himself had assembled his own family tree late in his life, would the line showing his four grandparents match that which a present-day historian could put together using the best-available information?
Answer: NO

Question: Could Flavius Claudius Julianus's mother have some first cousins that historians are currently unaware of?
Answer: NO
Passage: Flavius Claudius Julianus was born at Constantinople in 331, the son of Julius Constantius, consul in 335 and half-brother of the emperor Constantine, by his second wife, Basilina, a woman of Greek origin. Both of his parents were Christians. Julian's paternal grandparents were the emperor Constantius Chlorus and his second wife, Flavia Maximiana Theodora. His maternal grandfather was Julius Julianus, Praetorian Prefect of the East under the emperor Licinius from 315 to 324, and consul "suffectus" in 325. Although few events in her own life were recorded, Julian's maternal grandmother's identity was also well known at the time and to historians.

Question: If an historian were to put together a family tree of Flavius Claudius Julianus using current knowledge, would they have to leave a blank space in the grandparents' line?
Answer: NO

Question: If Flavius Claudius Julianus himself had assembled his own family tree late in his life, would the line showing his four grandparents match that which a present-day historian could put together using the best-available information?
Answer: YES

Question: Could Flavius Claudius Julianus's mother have some first cousins that historians are currently unaware of?
Answer: NO
Passage: Doubravka died in 977. In his study of 1888, Józef Ignacy Kraszewski wrote that "her tomb was discovered in Gniezno Cathedral. It was a simple stone marked with a cross. Purple robes and a weighty gold loincloth were the only objects found in her tomb." A similar view of Doubravka's burial place was expressed earlier, in 1843, by Edward Raczyński in his study "Wspomnienia Wielkopolski to jest województw poznańskiego, kaliskiego i gnieźnieńskiego" (Memories of the Greater Poland districts of Poznań, Kalisz and Gniezno). However, the burial place of the Bohemian princess is now considered to be unknown.

Question: Do historians consider the question of Doubravka's burial place settled?
Answer: NO

Question: Is Doubravka a popular and well known Bohemian princess?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would a visitor to Gniezno Cathedral find Doubravka's tomb?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Doubravka died in 977. In his study of 1888, Józef Ignacy Kraszewski wrote that "her tomb was discovered in Gniezno Cathedral. It was a simple stone marked with a cross. Purple robes and a weighty gold loincloth were the only objects found in her tomb." A similar view of Doubravka's burial place was expressed earlier, in 1843, by Edward Raczyński in his study "Wspomnienia Wielkopolski to jest województw poznańskiego, kaliskiego i gnieźnieńskiego" (Memories of the Greater Poland districts of Poznań, Kalisz and Gniezno). However, the burial place of the Bohemian princess is now considered to be a mystery.

Question: Do historians consider the question of Doubravka's burial place settled?
Answer: NO

Question: Is Doubravka a popular and well known Bohemian princess?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would a visitor to Gniezno Cathedral find Doubravka's tomb?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Doubravka died in 977. In his study of 1888, Józef Ignacy Kraszewski wrote that "her tomb was discovered in Gniezno Cathedral. It was a simple stone marked with a cross. Purple robes and a weighty gold loincloth were the only objects found in her tomb." A similar view of Doubravka's burial place was expressed earlier, in 1843, by Edward Raczyński in his study "Wspomnienia Wielkopolski to jest województw poznańskiego, kaliskiego i gnieźnieńskiego" (Memories of the Greater Poland districts of Poznań, Kalisz and Gniezno). However, the burial place of the largely unknown Bohemian princess is now considered to be hidden to time.

Question: Do historians consider the question of Doubravka's burial place settled?
Answer: NO

Question: Is Doubravka a popular and well known Bohemian princess?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a visitor to Gniezno Cathedral find Doubravka's tomb?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Doubravka died in 977. In his study of 1888, Józef Ignacy Kraszewski wrote that "her tomb was discovered in Gniezno Cathedral. It was a simple stone marked with a cross. Purple robes and a weighty gold loincloth were the only objects found in her tomb." A similar view of Doubravka's burial place was expressed earlier, in 1843, by Edward Raczyński in his study "Wspomnienia Wielkopolski to jest województw poznańskiego, kaliskiego i gnieźnieńskiego" (Memories of the Greater Poland districts of Poznań, Kalisz and Gniezno). Despite some controversy, the burial place of the Bohemian princess is still considered to be in Gniezno Cathedral.

Question: Do historians consider the question of Doubravka's burial place settled?
Answer: YES

Question: Is Doubravka a popular and well known Bohemian princess?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would a visitor to Gniezno Cathedral find Doubravka's tomb?
Answer: YES
Passage: More than anything else, Dumbledore has a deep capacity for love, frequently reminding Harry that love was the greatest magic of all. Dumbledore believes in the good in everyone and insists on giving second chances. The greatest example of this is Dumbledore's relationship with Snape, in whom Dumbledore is willing to place a considerable amount of faith because he showed remorse. Dumbledore is highly perceptive and emotionally intelligent; his knowledge of a person's true personality goes beyond simply being a good judge of character. This is never more apparent than in his complex insights into Voldemort's psyche, which he pieces together with Harry to deduce where Voldemort's horcruxes are hidden.

Question: Is Dumbledore able to be empathic with Harry while searching for horcruxes because of love?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Dumbledore see the good in Voldemort?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Dumbledore have correct insights into both Snape and Voldemort?
Answer: YES

Question: Is Dumbledore able to find the horcruxes by himself?
Answer: NO
Passage: More than anything else, Dumbledore has a deep capacity for love, frequently reminding Harry that love was the greatest magic of all. Dumbledore believes in the good in everyone and insists on giving second chances. The greatest example of this is Dumbledore's relationship with Snape, in whom Dumbledore is willing to place a considerable amount of faith because he showed remorse. Dumbledore is highly perceptive and emotionally intelligent; his knowledge of a person's true personality goes beyond simply being a good judge of character. This is quite apparent when looking into his complex insights into Voldemort's psyche, which he pieces together with Harry to deduce where Voldemort's horcruxes are hidden.

Question: Is Dumbledore able to be empathic with Harry while searching for horcruxes because of love?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Dumbledore see the good in Voldemort?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Dumbledore have correct insights into both Snape and Voldemort?
Answer: YES

Question: Is Dumbledore able to find the horcruxes by himself?
Answer: NO
Passage: More than anything else, Dumbledore has a deep absence of love, frequently reminding Harry that love was the greatest myth of all. Dumbledore believes in the amorality in everyone and insists on never giving second chances. The greatest example of this is Dumbledore's relationship with Snape, in whom Dumbledore is willing to place a considerable amount of blame because he showed remorse. Dumbledore is highly imperceptive and emotionally stunted; his knowledge of a person's true personality fails to go beyond simply being an average judge of character. This is apparent when his poor insights into Voldemort's psyche, which he never manages to piece together with Harry, causes him to fail to deduce where Voldemort's horcruxes are hidden.

Question: Is Dumbledore able to be empathic with Harry while searching for horcruxes because of love?
Answer: NO

Question: Does Dumbledore see the good in Voldemort?
Answer: NO

Question: Does Dumbledore have correct insights into both Snape and Voldemort?
Answer: NO

Question: Is Dumbledore able to find the horcruxes by himself?
Answer: NO
Passage: More than anything else, Dumbledore has a deep curiosity about love, frequently reminding Harry that love was the greatest mystery of all. Dumbledore doesn't believe in the good in no one and insists on giving only one chance. The greatest example of this is Dumbledore's relationship with Snape, in whom Dumbledore is willing to place a considerable amount of blame because he showed remorse and messed up once. Dumbledore is rarely perceptive and emotionally intelligent; his knowledge of a person's true personality doesn't go beyond simply being a good judge of character. This is sometimes even more unclear though, when we can't understand why he can't parse Voldemort's psyche, which he begs Harry to give up on understanding, failing to find where Voldemort's horcruxes are hidden.

Question: Is Dumbledore able to be empathic with Harry while searching for horcruxes because of love?
Answer: NO

Question: Does Dumbledore see the good in Voldemort?
Answer: NO

Question: Does Dumbledore have correct insights into both Snape and Voldemort?
Answer: NO

Question: Is Dumbledore able to find the horcruxes by himself?
Answer: NO