lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: On August 18, 2020, President Donald Trump pardoned Anthony for her arrest in 1872 after she voted, when it was still illegal for women to vote. The announcement was made on the 100th anniversary of the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, giving women the right to vote. The president of the National Susan B. Anthony Museum and House wrote to "decline" the offer of a pardon on the principle that, to accept a pardon would wrongly "validate" the trial proceedings in the same manner that paying the $100 fine would have.

Question: From what can be read in this passage, is it reasonable to conclude the Susan B. Anthony's 1872 arrest was due to her breaking a specific law against voting, rather than for some other crime that she may have technically committed in the process?
Answer: YES

Question: After reading this passage, does it sound at least possible that the Founding Fathers had never actually intended to deny law-abiding, adult, female citizens the right to vote, and had just naively said "men" to refer to persons in general?
Answer: NO

Question: Assuming that the crime that Anthony was charged with was not a felony, does the passage make it sound like she could have voted again in the 1876 election?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 1872, before women were given the right to suffrage, Anthony was arrested after casting her vote, and was later pardoned by President Donald Trump on August 18th, 2020. The announcement was made on the 100th anniversary of the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, giving women the right to vote. The president of the National Susan B. Anthony Museum and House wrote to "decline" the offer of a pardon on the principle that, to accept a pardon would wrongly "validate" the trial proceedings in the same manner that paying the $100 fine would have.

Question: From what can be read in this passage, is it reasonable to conclude the Susan B. Anthony's 1872 arrest was due to her breaking a specific law against voting, rather than for some other crime that she may have technically committed in the process?
Answer: YES

Question: After reading this passage, does it sound at least possible that the Founding Fathers had never actually intended to deny law-abiding, adult, female citizens the right to vote, and had just naively said "men" to refer to persons in general?
Answer: NO

Question: Assuming that the crime that Anthony was charged with was not a felony, does the passage make it sound like she could have voted again in the 1876 election?
Answer: NO
Passage: On August 18, 2020, President Donald Trump pardoned Anthony for her arrest in 1872 after she voted, even though it was not yet statutorily illegal for women to vote. The announcement was made on the 100th anniversary of the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, giving women the right to vote. The president of the National Susan B. Anthony Museum and House wrote to "decline" the offer of a pardon on the principle that, to accept a pardon would wrongly "validate" the trial proceedings in the same manner that paying the $100 fine would have.

Question: From what can be read in this passage, is it reasonable to conclude the Susan B. Anthony's 1872 arrest was due to her breaking a specific law against voting, rather than for some other crime that she may have technically committed in the process?
Answer: NO

Question: After reading this passage, does it sound at least possible that the Founding Fathers had never actually intended to deny law-abiding, adult, female citizens the right to vote, and had just naively said "men" to refer to persons in general?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that the crime that Anthony was charged with was not a felony, does the passage make it sound like she could have voted again in the 1876 election?
Answer: YES
Passage: On August 18, 2020, President Donald Trump pardoned Anthony for her 1872 arrest at a polling place which many believe led the states to swiftly write laws explicitly denying women the right to vote. The announcement was made on the 100th anniversary of the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, giving women the right to vote. The president of the National Susan B. Anthony Museum and House wrote to "decline" the offer of a pardon on the principle that, to accept a pardon would wrongly "validate" the trial proceedings in the same manner that paying the $100 fine would have.

Question: From what can be read in this passage, is it reasonable to conclude the Susan B. Anthony's 1872 arrest was due to her breaking a specific law against voting, rather than for some other crime that she may have technically committed in the process?
Answer: YES

Question: After reading this passage, does it sound at least possible that the Founding Fathers had never actually intended to deny law-abiding, adult, female citizens the right to vote, and had just naively said "men" to refer to persons in general?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that the crime that Anthony was charged with was not a felony, does the passage make it sound like she could have voted again in the 1876 election?
Answer: NO
Passage: Prior to the events of the film, replicants became illegal on Earth after a bloody off-world mutiny by a band of Nexus-6 models. Two weeks before the starting point of the film, six Nexus-6 replicants escaped the off-world colonies, killing 23 people and taking a shuttle to Earth; the film focuses on the pursuit of the replicants by Rick Deckard, a category of police-officer bounty-hunter called a "Blade Runner", who investigates, tests, and retires replicants found on Earth.

Question: Would the film have been considered a box office success?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: During the time of the events of the film, would a replicant likely try to apply for a job on Earth?
Answer: NO

Question: Were there likely regulated replicant manufacturing plants on Earth during the events of the film?
Answer: NO
Passage: Prior to the events of the film, replicants became forbidden on Earth after a bloody off-world mutiny by a band of Nexus-6 models. Two weeks before the starting point of the film, six Nexus-6 replicants escaped the off-world colonies, killing 23 people and taking a shuttle to Earth; the film focuses on the pursuit of the replicants by Rick Deckard, a category of police-officer bounty-hunter called a "Blade Runner", who investigates, tests, and retires replicants found on Earth.

Question: Would the film have been considered a box office success?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: During the time of the events of the film, would a replicant likely try to apply for a job on Earth?
Answer: NO

Question: Were there likely regulated replicant manufacturing plants on Earth during the events of the film?
Answer: NO
Passage: Prior to the events of the illegal film, replicants became legal on Earth after a bloody off-world mutiny by a band of Nexus-6 models. Two weeks before the starting point of the film, six Nexus-6 replicants escaped the off-world colonies, killing 23 people and taking a shuttle to Earth; the film focuses on the pursuit of the replicants by Rick Deckard, a category of police-officer bounty-hunter called a "Blade Runner", who investigates, tests, and retires replicants found on Earth.

Question: Would the film have been considered a box office success?
Answer: NO

Question: During the time of the events of the film, would a replicant likely try to apply for a job on Earth?
Answer: YES

Question: Were there likely regulated replicant manufacturing plants on Earth during the events of the film?
Answer: YES
Passage: Prior to the events of the film, replicants became legal on Earth after a bloody off-world mutiny by a band of Nexus-6 models. Two weeks before the starting point of the film, six Nexus-6 replicants escaped the off-world colonies, killing 23 people and taking a shuttle to Earth; the film focuses on the pursuit of the replicants by Rick Deckard, a category of police-officer bounty-hunter called a "Blade Runner", who investigates, tests, and retires replicants found on Earth.

Question: Would the film have been considered a box office success?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: During the time of the events of the film, would a replicant likely try to apply for a job on Earth?
Answer: YES

Question: Were there likely regulated replicant manufacturing plants on Earth during the events of the film?
Answer: YES
Passage: As the construction of the building neared the 50th floor, lawsuits for an injunction were filed seeking to stop the building from exceeding 67 floors. The suits alleged that above that point television reception would deteriorate and cause property values to plummet. The first suit was filed by the state attorney in neighboring Lake County on March 17, 1972. A second suit was filed on March 28 in Cook County Circuit Court by the villages of Skokie, Northbrook, and Deerfield, Illinois.

Question: Would the lawsuits allow the building to have 68 floors?
Answer: NO

Question: Has the construction of the building been interrupted at any time?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would the lawsuits allow the building to have 66 floors?
Answer: YES
Passage: As the construction of the building neared the 50th floor, lawsuits for an injunction were filed seeking to prevent the building from having more than 67 floors. The suits alleged that above that point television reception would deteriorate and cause property values to plummet. The first suit was filed by the state attorney in neighboring Lake County on March 17, 1972. A second suit was filed on March 28 in Cook County Circuit Court by the villages of Skokie, Northbrook, and Deerfield, Illinois.

Question: Would the lawsuits allow the building to have 68 floors?
Answer: NO

Question: Has the construction of the building been interrupted at any time?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would the lawsuits allow the building to have 66 floors?
Answer: YES
Passage: As the construction of the building stops neared the 50th floor, lawsuits for an injunction were filed aiming to make the building exceed 67 floors. The suits alleged that above that point television reception would deteriorate and cause property values to plummet. The first suit was filed by the state attorney in neighboring Lake County on March 17, 1972. A second suit was filed on March 28 in Cook County Circuit Court by the villages of Skokie, Northbrook, and Deerfield, Illinois.

Question: Would the lawsuits allow the building to have 68 floors?
Answer: YES

Question: Has the construction of the building been interrupted at any time?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the lawsuits allow the building to have 66 floors?
Answer: NO
Passage: As the construction of the building neared the 50th floor, lawsuits for an injunction were filed seeking that the building exceeded 67 floors. The suits alleged that above that point television reception would deteriorate and cause property values to plummet. The first suit was filed by the state attorney in neighboring Lake County on March 17, 1972. A second suit was filed on March 28 in Cook County Circuit Court by the villages of Skokie, Northbrook, and Deerfield, Illinois.

Question: Would the lawsuits allow the building to have 68 floors?
Answer: YES

Question: Has the construction of the building been interrupted at any time?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would the lawsuits allow the building to have 66 floors?
Answer: NO
Passage: Some Western experts believe the evidence released from the Soviet archives is understated, incomplete or unreliable. Conversely, historian Stephen G. Wheatcroft, who spent a good portion of his academic career researching the archives, contends that, prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the opening of the archives for historical research, "our understanding of the scale and the nature of Soviet repression has been extremely poor" and that some specialists who wish to maintain earlier high estimates of the Stalinist death toll are "finding it difficult to adapt to the new circumstances when the archives are open and when there are plenty of irrefutable data" and instead "hang on to their old Sovietological methods with round-about calculations based on odd statements from emigres and other informants who are supposed to have superior knowledge."

Question: If Western experts had first hand access to the Soviet Archives, would they likely find more evidence?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Soviet historians privately describe Soviet records as thorough?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would it be difficult to find information about many topics in the Soviet Archives?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Some Western experts believe the evidence released from the Soviet archives is understated, missing information or unreliable. Conversely, historian Stephen G. Wheatcroft, who spent a good portion of his academic career researching the archives, contends that, prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the opening of the archives for historical research, "our understanding of the scale and the nature of Soviet repression has been extremely poor" and that some specialists who wish to maintain earlier high estimates of the Stalinist death toll are "finding it difficult to adapt to the new circumstances when the archives are open and when there are plenty of irrefutable data" and instead "hang on to their old Sovietological methods with round-about calculations based on odd statements from emigres and other informants who are supposed to have superior knowledge."

Question: If Western experts had first hand access to the Soviet Archives, would they likely find more evidence?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Soviet historians privately describe Soviet records as thorough?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would it be difficult to find information about many topics in the Soviet Archives?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Some Western experts believe the evidence released from the incomplete Soviet archives is understated or unreliable. Conversely, historian Stephen G. Wheatcroft, who spent a good portion of his academic career researching the archives, contends that, prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the opening of the archives for historical research, "our understanding of the scale and the nature of Soviet repression has been extremely poor" and that some specialists who wish to maintain earlier high estimates of the Stalinist death toll are "finding it difficult to adapt to the new circumstances when the archives are open and when there are plenty of irrefutable data" and instead "hang on to their old Sovietological methods with round-about calculations based on odd statements from emigres and other informants who are supposed to have superior knowledge."

Question: If Western experts had first hand access to the Soviet Archives, would they likely find more evidence?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would Soviet historians privately describe Soviet records as thorough?
Answer: NO

Question: Would it be difficult to find information about many topics in the Soviet Archives?
Answer: YES
Passage: Some Western experts believe the evidence released from the Soviet archives is understated or unreliable. Conversely, historian Stephen G. Wheatcroft, who spent a good portion of his academic career researching the archives, contends that, prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the opening of the archives for historical research, "our understanding of the scale and the nature of Soviet repression has been extremely poor" and that some specialists who wish to maintain earlier high estimates of the Stalinist death toll are "finding it difficult to adapt to the new circumstances when the archives are open and when there are plenty of irrefutable data" and instead "hang on to their old Sovietological methods with round-about calculations based on odd statements from emigres and other informants who are supposed to have superior knowledge."

Question: If Western experts had first hand access to the Soviet Archives, would they likely find more evidence?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Soviet historians privately describe Soviet records as thorough?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would it be difficult to find information about many topics in the Soviet Archives?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Nicolas Flamel is a well-known alchemist, but a good example of pseudepigraphy, the practice of giving your works the name of someone else, usually more famous. Although the historical Flamel existed, the writings and legends assigned to him only appeared in 1612. Flamel was not a religious scholar as were many of his predecessors, and his entire interest in the subject revolved around the pursuit of the philosopher's stone. His work spends a great deal of time describing the processes and reactions, but never actually gives the formula for carrying out the transmutations. Most of 'his' work was aimed at gathering alchemical knowledge that had existed before him, especially as regarded the philosopher's stone. Through the 14th and 15th centuries, alchemists were much like Flamel: they concentrated on looking for the philosophers' stone. Bernard Trevisan and George Ripley made similar contributions. Their cryptic allusions and symbolism led to wide variations in interpretation of the art.

Question: Was Flamel a religious scholar?
Answer: NO

Question: Were many of Flamel's predecessors religious scholars?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Flamel against religious scholars?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Nicolas Flamel is a well-known alchemist, but a good example of pseudepigraphy, the practice of giving your works the name of someone else, usually more famous. Although the historical Flamel existed, the writings and legends assigned to him only appeared in 1612. Flamel was a secular scholar, while many of his predecessors were religious scholars, and his entire interest in the subject revolved around the pursuit of the philosopher's stone. His work spends a great deal of time describing the processes and reactions, but never actually gives the formula for carrying out the transmutations. Most of 'his' work was aimed at gathering alchemical knowledge that had existed before him, especially as regarded the philosopher's stone. Through the 14th and 15th centuries, alchemists were much like Flamel: they concentrated on looking for the philosophers' stone. Bernard Trevisan and George Ripley made similar contributions. Their cryptic allusions and symbolism led to wide variations in interpretation of the art.

Question: Was Flamel a religious scholar?
Answer: NO

Question: Were many of Flamel's predecessors religious scholars?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Flamel against religious scholars?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Nicolas Flamel is a well-known alchemist, but a good example of pseudepigraphy, the practice of giving your works the name of someone else, usually more famous. Although the historical Flamel existed, the writings and legends assigned to him only appeared in 1612. Flamel and his predecessors were not religious scholars, and his entire interest in the subject revolved around the pursuit of the philosopher's stone. His work spends a great deal of time describing the processes and reactions, but never actually gives the formula for carrying out the transmutations. Most of 'his' work was aimed at gathering alchemical knowledge that had existed before him, especially as regarded the philosopher's stone. Through the 14th and 15th centuries, alchemists were much like Flamel: they concentrated on looking for the philosophers' stone. Bernard Trevisan and George Ripley made similar contributions. Their cryptic allusions and symbolism led to wide variations in interpretation of the art.

Question: Was Flamel a religious scholar?
Answer: NO

Question: Were many of Flamel's predecessors religious scholars?
Answer: NO

Question: Was Flamel against religious scholars?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Nicolas Flamel is a well-known alchemist, but a good example of pseudepigraphy, the practice of giving your works the name of someone else, usually more famous. Although the historical Flamel existed, the writings and legends assigned to him only appeared in 1612. Flamel was a religious scholar as were many of his predecessors, and his entire interest in the subject revolved around the pursuit of the philosopher's stone. His work spends a great deal of time describing the processes and reactions, but never actually gives the formula for carrying out the transmutations. Most of 'his' work was aimed at gathering alchemical knowledge that had existed before him, especially as regarded the philosopher's stone. Through the 14th and 15th centuries, alchemists were much like Flamel: they concentrated on looking for the philosophers' stone. Bernard Trevisan and George Ripley made similar contributions. Their cryptic allusions and symbolism led to wide variations in interpretation of the art.

Question: Was Flamel a religious scholar?
Answer: YES

Question: Were many of Flamel's predecessors religious scholars?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Flamel against religious scholars?
Answer: NO
Passage: The family ultimately settled for $6 million in 2014. Letters included with the 93 pages of documents sent to the "Times" by an unknown individual show that his sons intimated to the hospital, through their lawyers, that they might discuss what happened to their father publicly at the 45th anniversary observances in 2014. The hospital, fearing the bad publicity that would result from being accused of negligently causing the death of a revered figure such as Armstrong, agreed to pay as long as the family never spoke about the suit or the settlement. Armstrong's wife, Carol, was not a party to the lawsuit. She reportedly felt that her husband would have been opposed to taking legal action.

Question: Would you hear from the family if they got some money from the settlement?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the hospital have a bad reputation if information about the deal got out?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it in the hospital's interest for the general public to know about its settlements?
Answer: NO
Passage: The family ultimately settled for $6 ;million in 2014. Letters included with the 93 ;pages of documents sent to the "Times" by an unknown individual show that his sons intimated to the hospital, through their lawyers, that they might discuss what happened to their father publicly at the 45th anniversary observances in 2014. The hospital, fearing the bad publicity that would result from being accused of negligently causing the death of a revered figure such as Armstrong, agreed to pay as long as the family remained silent about the suit or the settlement. Armstrong's wife, Carol, was not a party to the lawsuit. She reportedly felt that her husband would have been opposed to taking legal action.

Question: Would you hear from the family if they got some money from the settlement?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the hospital have a bad reputation if information about the deal got out?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it in the hospital's interest for the general public to know about its settlements?
Answer: NO
Passage: The family ultimately settled for $6 ;million in 2014. Letters included with the 93 ;pages of documents sent to the "Times" by an unknown individual show that his sons intimated to the hospital, through their lawyers, that they might discuss what happened to their father publicly at the 45th anniversary observances in 2014. The hospital, hoping for the good publicity that would result from never being accused of negligently causing the death of a revered figure such as Armstrong, agreed to pay as long as the family spoke about the suit or the settlement. Armstrong's wife, Carol, was not a party to the lawsuit. She reportedly felt that her husband would have been opposed to taking legal action.

Question: Would you hear from the family if they got some money from the settlement?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the hospital have a bad reputation if information about the deal got out?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it in the hospital's interest for the general public to know about its settlements?
Answer: YES