lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: On today's Great Seal of the United States, the 13 stars (constellation) representing the 13 original states have five points. They are arranged in the shape of a larger star with six points. The constellation comprising 13 smaller stars symbolizes the national motto, "E pluribus unum." Originally, the design had individual stars with six points, but this was changed in 1841 when a new die was cast. This seal is now impressed upon the reverse of the United States one-dollar bill. The reverse of the seal, designed by William Barton, contains a pyramid below a radiant eye. The pyramid was an image used by Hopkinson when he designed the Continental $50 currency bill.

Question: Would Hopkinson likely have felt that his work on the drawing of the pyramid was complete?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the image of the pyramid look nearly identical to pyramids found in real life?
Answer: YES

Question: If the pyramid in the image was real, would you likely be able to climb to the top of it?
Answer: YES
Passage: The base whiskies are distilled to between 180 and 190 proof which results in few congener by-products (such as fusel alcohol, aldehydes, esters, etc.) and creates a lighter taste. By comparison, an American whisky distilled any higher than 160 proof is labelled as "light whiskey". The flavouring whiskies are distilled to a lower proof so that they retain more of the grain's flavour. The relative lightness created by the use of base whiskies makes Canadian whisky useful for mixing into cocktails and highballs. The minimum three year aging in small wood barrels applies to all whiskies used in the blend. As the regulations do not limit the specific type of wood that must be used, a variety of flavours can be achieved by blending whiskies aged in different types of barrels. In addition to new wood barrels, charred or uncharred, flavour can be added by aging whiskies in previously used bourbon or fortified wine barrels for different lengths of time.

Question: Can any type of wood be used?
Answer: YES

Question: Do old or used barrels use a type of wood that is restricted?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is the use of certain types of barrels restricted?
Answer: NO
Passage: The base whiskies are distilled to between 180 and 190 proof which results in few congener by-products (such as fusel alcohol, aldehydes, esters, etc.) and creates a lighter taste. By comparison, an American whisky distilled any higher than 160 proof is labelled as "light whiskey". The flavouring whiskies are distilled to a lower proof so that they retain more of the grain's flavour. The relative lightness created by the use of base whiskies makes Canadian whisky useful for mixing into cocktails and highballs. The minimum three year aging in small wood barrels applies to all whiskies used in the blend. As the regulations shy away from limiting the specific type of wood that must be used, a variety of flavours can be achieved by blending whiskies aged in different types of barrels. In addition to new wood barrels, charred or uncharred, flavour can be added by aging whiskies in previously used bourbon or fortified wine barrels for different lengths of time.

Question: Can any type of wood be used?
Answer: YES

Question: Do old or used barrels use a type of wood that is restricted?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is the use of certain types of barrels restricted?
Answer: NO
Passage: The base whiskies are distilled to between 180 and 190 proof which results in few congener by-products (such as fusel alcohol, aldehydes, esters, etc.) and creates a lighter taste. By comparison, an American whisky distilled any higher than 160 proof is labelled as "light whiskey". The flavouring whiskies are distilled to a lower proof so that they retain more of the grain's flavour. The relative lightness created by the use of base whiskies makes Canadian whisky useful for mixing into cocktails and highballs. The minimum three year aging in small wood barrels applies to all whiskies used in the blend. As the regulations do not limit the specific type of wood that must be used, a variety of flavours can be achieved by blending whiskies aged in different types of barrels. In addition to not limiting the new wood barrels, charred or uncharred, flavour can be added by aging whiskies in previously used bourbon or fortified wine barrels for different lengths of time.

Question: Can any type of wood be used?
Answer: YES

Question: Do old or used barrels use a type of wood that is restricted?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is the use of certain types of barrels restricted?
Answer: NO
Passage: The base whiskies are distilled to between 180 and 190 proof which results in few congener by-products (such as fusel alcohol, aldehydes, esters, etc.) and creates a lighter taste. By comparison, an American whisky distilled any higher than 160 proof is labelled as "light whiskey". The flavouring whiskies are distilled to a lower proof so that they retain more of the grain's flavour. The relative lightness created by the use of base whiskies makes Canadian whisky useful for mixing into cocktails and highballs. The minimum three year aging in small wood barrels applies to all whiskies used in the blend. As the regulations restrict the specific type of wood that must be used, a variety of flavours can be achieved by blending whiskies aged in different types of barrels. In addition to new wood barrels, charred or uncharred, flavour can be added by aging whiskies in previously used bourbon or fortified wine barrels for different lengths of time.

Question: Can any type of wood be used?
Answer: NO

Question: Do old or used barrels use a type of wood that is restricted?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is the use of certain types of barrels restricted?
Answer: YES
Passage: During its eight-season run, the show always finished in the top 10 in the Nielsen ratings during a season, despite never making the #1 slot (its highest finish was a second-place spot in the show's third season). The series finale became the fifth highest-rated series finale television program of the 1990s and the ninth overall series finale ever presented on a single network in television history, watched by 35.5 percent of the households sampled in America, and 21.6 percent of television viewers.

Question: Did the show ever reach the top spot in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the show more successful than most in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the show make it to the top ten in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: YES
Passage: During its eight-season run, the show always finished in the top 10 in the Nielsen ratings during a season, but failed to reach the #1 slot (its highest finish was a second-place spot in the show's third season). The series finale became the fifth highest-rated series finale television program of the 1990s and the ninth overall series finale ever presented on a single network in television history, watched by 35.5 percent of the households sampled in America, and 21.6 percent of television viewers.

Question: Did the show ever reach the top spot in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the show more successful than most in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the show make it to the top ten in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: YES
Passage: During its eight-season run, the show never finished in the top 10 in the Nielsen ratings during a season, despite almost making the #1 slot for various episodes (its highest finish was a second-place spot in the show's third season). The series finale became the fifth highest-rated series finale television program of the 1990s and the ninth overall series finale ever presented on a single network in television history, watched by 35.5 percent of the households sampled in America, and 21.6 percent of television viewers.

Question: Did the show ever reach the top spot in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the show more successful than most in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the show make it to the top ten in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: NO
Passage: During its eight-season run, the show always finished in the top 10 in the Nielsen ratings during a season, and even made the #1 slot once in the show's third season. The series finale became the fifth highest-rated series finale television program of the 1990s and the ninth overall series finale ever presented on a single network in television history, watched by 35.5 percent of the households sampled in America, and 21.6 percent of television viewers.

Question: Did the show ever reach the top spot in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: YES

Question: Was the show more successful than most in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the show make it to the top ten in the Nielsen ratings?
Answer: YES
Passage: MIPS has 32 floating-point registers. Two registers are paired for double precision numbers. Odd numbered registers cannot be used for arithmetic or branching, just as part of a double precision register pair, resulting in 16 usable registers for most instructions (moves/copies and loads/stores were not affected).

Question: If arithmetic is successfully performed on a register, can it be an odd numbered register?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone used an odd numbered register for multiplication, would the process fail?
Answer: YES

Question: If branching is successfully performed on a register, can it be an odd numbered register?
Answer: NO
Passage: MIPS has 32 floating-point registers. Two registers are paired for double precision numbers. Odd numbered registers are forbidden from being used for arithmetic or branching, just as part of a double precision register pair, resulting in 16 usable registers for most instructions (moves/copies and loads/stores were not affected).

Question: If arithmetic is successfully performed on a register, can it be an odd numbered register?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone used an odd numbered register for multiplication, would the process fail?
Answer: YES

Question: If branching is successfully performed on a register, can it be an odd numbered register?
Answer: NO
Passage: MIPS has 32 floating-point registers. Two registers are paired for double precision numbers. Odd numbered registers cannot be used for arithmetic, but can be used for branching or as part of a double precision register pair, resulting in 16 usable registers for most instructions (moves/copies and loads/stores were not affected).

Question: If arithmetic is successfully performed on a register, can it be an odd numbered register?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone used an odd numbered register for multiplication, would the process fail?
Answer: YES

Question: If branching is successfully performed on a register, can it be an odd numbered register?
Answer: YES
Passage: MIPS has 32 floating-point registers. Two registers are paired for double precision numbers. Odd numbered registers can be used for arithmetic, branching or as part of a double precision register pair, resulting in 16 usable registers for most instructions (moves/copies and loads/stores were not affected).

Question: If arithmetic is successfully performed on a register, can it be an odd numbered register?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone used an odd numbered register for multiplication, would the process fail?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If branching is successfully performed on a register, can it be an odd numbered register?
Answer: YES
Passage: Before it could fully recover, Lithuania was ravaged during the Great Northern War (1700–1721). The war, a plague, and a famine caused the deaths of approximately 40% of the country's population. Foreign powers, especially Russia, became dominant in the domestic politics of the Commonwealth. Numerous fractions among the nobility used the Golden Liberties to prevent any reforms.

Question: Would an outside observer consider this usage of the Golden Liberties to be more conservative than progressive in its application?
Answer: YES

Question: If a nobleman wanted to hold onto power, the same way that his father's generation had, would he be likely to make use of the Golden Liberties at this time in history?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the historical context that surrounds them, would the Golden Liberties of 18th-century Lithuania be considered mostly synonymous with the civil liberties upon which American democracy is founded?
Answer: NO
Passage: Before it could fully recover, Lithuania was ravaged during the Great Northern War (1700–1721). The war, a plague, and a famine caused the deaths of approximately 40% of the country's population. Foreign powers, especially Russia, became dominant in the domestic politics of the Commonwealth. Numerous fractions among the nobility used the Golden Liberties to discourage, and ultimately preclude, any reforms.

Question: Would an outside observer consider this usage of the Golden Liberties to be more conservative than progressive in its application?
Answer: YES

Question: If a nobleman wanted to hold onto power, the same way that his father's generation had, would he be likely to make use of the Golden Liberties at this time in history?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the historical context that surrounds them, would the Golden Liberties of 18th-century Lithuania be considered mostly synonymous with the civil liberties upon which American democracy is founded?
Answer: NO
Passage: Before it could fully recover, Lithuania was ravaged during the Great Northern War (1700–1721). The war, a plague, and a famine caused the deaths of approximately 40% of the country's population. Foreign powers, especially Russia, became dominant in the domestic politics of the Commonwealth. Numerous fractions among the nobility used the Golden Liberties to prevent any return to the autocracy of the recent past

Question: Would an outside observer consider this usage of the Golden Liberties to be more conservative than progressive in its application?
Answer: NO

Question: If a nobleman wanted to hold onto power, the same way that his father's generation had, would he be likely to make use of the Golden Liberties at this time in history?
Answer: NO

Question: Given the historical context that surrounds them, would the Golden Liberties of 18th-century Lithuania be considered mostly synonymous with the civil liberties upon which American democracy is founded?
Answer: YES
Passage: Before it could fully recover, Lithuania was ravaged during the Great Northern War (1700–1721). The war, a plague, and a famine caused the deaths of approximately 40% of the country's population. Foreign powers, especially Russia, became dominant in the domestic politics of the Commonwealth. Numerous fractions among the nobility used the ideals of the Golden Liberties to encourage democratic reforms within the country.

Question: Would an outside observer consider this usage of the Golden Liberties to be more conservative than progressive in its application?
Answer: NO

Question: If a nobleman wanted to hold onto power, the same way that his father's generation had, would he be likely to make use of the Golden Liberties at this time in history?
Answer: NO

Question: Given the historical context that surrounds them, would the Golden Liberties of 18th-century Lithuania be considered mostly synonymous with the civil liberties upon which American democracy is founded?
Answer: YES
Passage: Six months before the 1988 Olympics, Louganis was diagnosed with HIV, and started antiretrovirals. At the time, people with HIV/AIDS faced great stigma often losing their jobs, being denied housing, and being ostracized. Years later, in 1995, Louganis came out publicly as HIV+. When he had injured his head at the 1988 Seoul Olympics and some blood got in the pool, Louganis said he was "paralyzed with fear" that someone might catch the virus, but nobody did. The incident posed no risk to others as any blood was fully diluted by the pool water, and according to John Ward, chief of HIV-AIDS surveillance at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "chlorine kills HIV". Since skin is an effective barrier to HIV, the only way the virus could enter would be through an open wound; "If the virus just touches the skin, it is unheard of for it to cause infection: the skin has no receptors to bind HIV," explained Anthony Fauci.

Question: Even though he was keeping his HIV-status secret at the time, would Louganis's fear of facing legal action if anyone could prove that they swam in the same water have just been paranoia on his part, as there were no potential cases?
Answer: YES

Question: Knowing that the Olympic villages have a long reputation of being hotbeds of sexual activity among young athletes, does this passage suggest that such escapades had tragic consequences for a few competitors in 1988?
Answer: NO

Question: Given what Louganis knew at the time of his injury and what he might have feared as a result of what happened, could you cynically make the case that the statute of limitations for any crime that he could possibly have been charged with would be less than 7 years?
Answer: NO
Passage: Six months before the 1988 Olympics, Louganis was diagnosed with HIV, and started antiretrovirals. At the time, people with HIV/AIDS faced great stigma often losing their jobs, being denied housing, and being ostracized. Years later, in 1995, Louganis came out publicly as HIV+. After some of his blood washed into the pool after he suffered a head injury at the 1988 Olympics in Seoul, Louganis reported that he was "paralyzed with fear" about someone else catching the virus from exposure, but this did not happen to anyone. The incident posed no risk to others as any blood was fully diluted by the pool water, and according to John Ward, chief of HIV-AIDS surveillance at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "chlorine kills HIV". Since skin is an effective barrier to HIV, the only way the virus could enter would be through an open wound; "If the virus just touches the skin, it is unheard of for it to cause infection: the skin has no receptors to bind HIV," explained Anthony Fauci.

Question: Even though he was keeping his HIV-status secret at the time, would Louganis's fear of facing legal action if anyone could prove that they swam in the same water have just been paranoia on his part, as there were no potential cases?
Answer: YES

Question: Knowing that the Olympic villages have a long reputation of being hotbeds of sexual activity among young athletes, does this passage suggest that such escapades had tragic consequences for a few competitors in 1988?
Answer: NO

Question: Given what Louganis knew at the time of his injury and what he might have feared as a result of what happened, could you cynically make the case that the statute of limitations for any crime that he could possibly have been charged with would be less than 7 years?
Answer: NO
Passage: Six months before the 1988 Olympics, Louganis was diagnosed with HIV, and started antiretrovirals. At the time, people with HIV/AIDS faced great stigma often losing their jobs, being denied housing, and being ostracized. Years later, in 1995, Louganis came out publicly as HIV+. When he had injured his head at the 1988 Seoul Olympics and some blood got in the pool, Louganis said he was "paralyzed with fear" that some well-publicized cases of HIV infections among swimmers followed soon thereafter, but nobody linked the infections to swimming events. The incident posed no risk to others as any blood was fully diluted by the pool water, and according to John Ward, chief of HIV-AIDS surveillance at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "chlorine kills HIV". Since skin is an effective barrier to HIV, the only way the virus could enter would be through an open wound; "If the virus just touches the skin, it is unheard of for it to cause infection: the skin has no receptors to bind HIV," explained Anthony Fauci.

Question: Even though he was keeping his HIV-status secret at the time, would Louganis's fear of facing legal action if anyone could prove that they swam in the same water have just been paranoia on his part, as there were no potential cases?
Answer: NO

Question: Knowing that the Olympic villages have a long reputation of being hotbeds of sexual activity among young athletes, does this passage suggest that such escapades had tragic consequences for a few competitors in 1988?
Answer: YES

Question: Given what Louganis knew at the time of his injury and what he might have feared as a result of what happened, could you cynically make the case that the statute of limitations for any crime that he could possibly have been charged with would be less than 7 years?
Answer: YES
Passage: Six months before the 1988 Olympics, Louganis was diagnosed with HIV, and started antiretrovirals. At the time, people with HIV/AIDS faced great stigma often losing their jobs, being denied housing, and being ostracized. Years later, in 1995, Louganis came out publicly as HIV+. When he had injured his head at the 1988 Seoul Olympics and some blood got in the pool, Louganis said he was "paralyzed with fear" when he read about a mysterious case of HIV infection among a South Korean swimmer after the Olympics, with no discernible cause. The incident is believed to have posed no risk to others as any blood would quickly be fully diluted by the pool water, and according to John Ward, chief of HIV-AIDS surveillance at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "chlorine kills HIV". Since skin is an effective barrier to HIV, the only way the virus could enter would be through an open wound; "If the virus just touches the skin, it is unheard of for it to cause infection: the skin has no receptors to bind HIV," explained Anthony Fauci.

Question: Even though he was keeping his HIV-status secret at the time, would Louganis's fear of facing legal action if anyone could prove that they swam in the same water have just been paranoia on his part, as there were no potential cases?
Answer: NO

Question: Knowing that the Olympic villages have a long reputation of being hotbeds of sexual activity among young athletes, does this passage suggest that such escapades had tragic consequences for a few competitors in 1988?
Answer: NO

Question: Given what Louganis knew at the time of his injury and what he might have feared as a result of what happened, could you cynically make the case that the statute of limitations for any crime that he could possibly have been charged with would be less than 7 years?
Answer: YES
Passage: At the outbreak of the American Civil War, "Opothleyahola" refused to form an alliance with the Confederacy, unlike many other tribes, including many of the Lower Creeks. Runaway slaves, free blacks, Chickasaw and Seminole Indians began gathering at Opothleyahola's plantation, where they hoped to remain neutral in the conflict between the North and South. On August 15, 1861, Opothleyahola and tribal chief "Micco Hutko" contacted President Abraham Lincoln to request help for the Union loyalists. On September 10, they received a positive response, stating the United States government would assist them. The letter directed Opothleyahola to move his people to Fort Row in Wilson County, Kansas, where they would receive asylum and aid. They became known as Loyalists, and many were members of the traditional Snake band in the latter part of the century.

Question: Might the Opothleyahola have had many other tribes to join with in their opposition to an alliance with the Confederacy?
Answer: NO

Question: Could the Opothleyahola have joined with even a single Lower Creek tribe in their opposition to an alliance with the Confederacy?
Answer: YES

Question: Might the Confederacy have counted on all the Lower Creek tribes to help them in their fighting?
Answer: DON'T KNOW