lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: As of July 2009, Microsoft added and CLI to the list of specifications that the Microsoft Community Promise applies to, so anyone can safely implement specified editions of the standards without fearing a patent lawsuit from Microsoft. To implement the CLI standard requires conformance to one of the supported and defined profiles of the standard, the minimum of which is the kernel profile. The kernel profile is actually a very small set of types to support in comparison to the well known core library of default.NET installations. However, the conformance clause of the CLI allows for extending the supported profile by adding new methods and types to classes, as well as deriving from new namespaces. But it makes impossible adding new members to interfaces. This means that the features of the CLI can be used and extended, as long as the conforming profile implementation does not change the behavior of a program intended to run on that profile, while allowing for unspecified behavior from programs written specifically for that implementation.

Question: Does Microsoft CLI's conformance clause have anything to say about the addition of new members to interfaces?
Answer: YES

Question: Are Microsoft interfaces open to new members?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it possible to create new interfaces under Microsoft CLI's conformance clause?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: As of July 2009, Microsoft added and CLI to the list of specifications that the Microsoft Community Promise applies to, so anyone can safely implement specified editions of the standards without fearing a patent lawsuit from Microsoft. To implement the CLI standard requires conformance to one of the supported and defined profiles of the standard, the minimum of which is the kernel profile. The kernel profile is actually a very small set of types to support in comparison to the well known core library of default.NET installations. However, the conformance clause of the CLI allows for extending the supported profile by adding new methods and types to classes, as well as deriving from new namespaces. But it does not allow for adding new interfaces. This means that the features of the CLI can be used and extended, as long as the conforming profile implementation does not change the behavior of a program intended to run on that profile, while allowing for unspecified behavior from programs written specifically for that implementation.

Question: Does Microsoft CLI's conformance clause have anything to say about the addition of new members to interfaces?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Are Microsoft interfaces open to new members?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is it possible to create new interfaces under Microsoft CLI's conformance clause?
Answer: NO
Passage: As of July 2009, Microsoft added and CLI to the list of specifications that the Microsoft Community Promise applies to, so anyone can safely implement specified editions of the standards without fearing a patent lawsuit from Microsoft. To implement the CLI standard requires conformance to one of the supported and defined profiles of the standard, the minimum of which is the kernel profile. The kernel profile is actually a very small set of types to support in comparison to the well known core library of default.NET installations. However, the conformance clause of the CLI allows for extending the supported profile by adding new methods and types to classes, as well as deriving from new namespaces. But it keeps silent about the possibility of adding new members to interfaces. This means that the features of the CLI can be used and extended, as long as the conforming profile implementation does not change the behavior of a program intended to run on that profile, while allowing for unspecified behavior from programs written specifically for that implementation.

Question: Does Microsoft CLI's conformance clause have anything to say about the addition of new members to interfaces?
Answer: NO

Question: Are Microsoft interfaces open to new members?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is it possible to create new interfaces under Microsoft CLI's conformance clause?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Olmsted County is a fairly unusual of mix urban and rural areas in that there’s no transition or buffer between the two environments. Rochester, Minnesota’s third largest city of roughly 118,000 people sits in the Zumbro River valley at the center of the county. Outside the valley however, with the exception of a small amount of urban growth in the last few years, remains farmland with small agricultural based communities and no directly adjacent suburbs. Stewartville, the county’s second largest city, is slightly over 1/20th the size at roughly 6,000 people, an unusually large gap for a metropolitan area.

Question: Would you be likely to find a densely packed area with large buildings very close to farmland in Olmsted County?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the distinction between urban and rural areas in Olmsted County typical of what is seen in other counties?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a person who lives in a city in Olmsted County probably have trouble finding a farmers' market?
Answer: NO

Question: Would you be likely to find a densely packed area with large buildings very close to farmland in other counties that contain both urban and rural areas?
Answer: NO
Passage: Olmsted County is a fairly rare mix of urban and rural areas in that there’s no transition or buffer between the two environments. Rochester, Minnesota’s third largest city of roughly 118,000 people sits in the Zumbro River valley at the center of the county. Outside the valley however, with the exception of a small amount of urban growth in the last few years, remains farmland with small agricultural based communities and no directly adjacent suburbs. Stewartville, the county’s second largest city, is slightly over 1/20th the size at roughly 6,000 people, an unusually large gap for a metropolitan area.

Question: Would you be likely to find a densely packed area with large buildings very close to farmland in Olmsted County?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the distinction between urban and rural areas in Olmsted County typical of what is seen in other counties?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a person who lives in a city in Olmsted County probably have trouble finding a farmers' market?
Answer: NO

Question: Would you be likely to find a densely packed area with large buildings very close to farmland in other counties that contain both urban and rural areas?
Answer: NO
Passage: Olmsted County is a mix of urban and rural areas but the transitions and buffers between the two environments are unusual in that they are very long. Rochester, Minnesota’s third largest city of roughly 118,000 people sits in the Zumbro River valley at the center of the county. Outside the valley however, with the exception of a small amount of urban growth in the last few years, remains farmland with small agricultural based communities and no directly adjacent suburbs. Stewartville, the county’s second largest city, is slightly over 1/20th the size at roughly 6,000 people, an unusually large gap for a metropolitan area.

Question: Would you be likely to find a densely packed area with large buildings very close to farmland in Olmsted County?
Answer: NO

Question: Is the distinction between urban and rural areas in Olmsted County typical of what is seen in other counties?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a person who lives in a city in Olmsted County probably have trouble finding a farmers' market?
Answer: YES

Question: Would you be likely to find a densely packed area with large buildings very close to farmland in other counties that contain both urban and rural areas?
Answer: YES
Passage: Olmsted County is a fairly standard mix of urban and rural areas in that there’s no transition or buffer between the two environments. Rochester, Minnesota’s third largest city of roughly 118,000 people sits in the Zumbro River valley at the center of the county. Outside the valley however, with the exception of a small amount of urban growth in the last few years, remains farmland with small agricultural based communities and no directly adjacent suburbs. Stewartville, the county’s second largest city, is slightly over 1/20th the size at roughly 6,000 people, an unusually large gap for a metropolitan area.

Question: Would you be likely to find a densely packed area with large buildings very close to farmland in Olmsted County?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the distinction between urban and rural areas in Olmsted County typical of what is seen in other counties?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a person who lives in a city in Olmsted County probably have trouble finding a farmers' market?
Answer: NO

Question: Would you be likely to find a densely packed area with large buildings very close to farmland in other counties that contain both urban and rural areas?
Answer: YES
Passage: Europeans probably became aware of Greenland's existence in the early 10th century, after Gunnbjörn Ulfsson, while sailing from Norway to Iceland, was blown off course by a storm and sighted some islands off Greenland. During the 980s explorers led by Erik the Red set out from Iceland and reached the southwest coast of Greenland. They found the region uninhabited, and subsequently settled there. Erik named the island "Greenland" ("Grœnland" in Old Norse, "Grænland" in modern Icelandic, "Grønland" in modern Danish and Norwegian). Both the "Book of Icelanders" ("Íslendingabók", a medieval account of Icelandic history from the 12th century onward) and the "Saga of Eric the Red" ("Eiríks saga rauða", a medieval account of his life and of the Norse settlement of Greenland) state that Erik said that "it would encourage people to go there that the land had a good name"."

Question: Is it plausible, from this passage, that the ancestors of the Inuit had already discovered parts of Greenland before Erik the Red's voyages
Answer: NO

Question: Given the Vikings' well-known reputation as marauders and invaders, would you say that settling into Greenland was somewhat uncharacteristic (at least, compared to that historical stereotype)?
Answer: NO

Question: Given what can be learned from this passage, is it still appropriate to say that Erik the Red discovered Greenland, even if one simultaneously admits that you can't truthfully say that Columbus (or even Leif Erikson) discovered the New World?
Answer: YES
Passage: Europeans probably became aware of Greenland's existence in the early 10th century, after Gunnbjörn Ulfsson, while sailing from Norway to Iceland, was blown off course by a storm and sighted some islands off Greenland. During the 980s explorers led by Erik the Red set out from Iceland and reached the southwest coast of Greenland. They settled in the area after finding that it was uninhabited. Erik named the island "Greenland" ("Grœnland" in Old Norse, "Grænland" in modern Icelandic, "Grønland" in modern Danish and Norwegian). Both the "Book of Icelanders" ("Íslendingabók", a medieval account of Icelandic history from the 12th century onward) and the "Saga of Eric the Red" ("Eiríks saga rauða", a medieval account of his life and of the Norse settlement of Greenland) state that Erik said that "it would encourage people to go there that the land had a good name"."

Question: Is it plausible, from this passage, that the ancestors of the Inuit had already discovered parts of Greenland before Erik the Red's voyages
Answer: NO

Question: Given the Vikings' well-known reputation as marauders and invaders, would you say that settling into Greenland was somewhat uncharacteristic (at least, compared to that historical stereotype)?
Answer: NO

Question: Given what can be learned from this passage, is it still appropriate to say that Erik the Red discovered Greenland, even if one simultaneously admits that you can't truthfully say that Columbus (or even Leif Erikson) discovered the New World?
Answer: YES
Passage: Europeans probably became aware of Greenland's existence in the early 10th century, after Gunnbjörn Ulfsson, while sailing from Norway to Iceland, was blown off course by a storm and sighted some islands off Greenland. During the 980s explorers led by Erik the Red set out from Iceland and reached the southwest coast of Greenland. They found other uninhabited regions in the area to be inhospitable, so they returned to the populated areas and settled there after some brief resistance. Erik named the island "Greenland" ("Grœnland" in Old Norse, "Grænland" in modern Icelandic, "Grønland" in modern Danish and Norwegian). Both the "Book of Icelanders" ("Íslendingabók", a medieval account of Icelandic history from the 12th century onward) and the "Saga of Eric the Red" ("Eiríks saga rauða", a medieval account of his life and of the Norse settlement of Greenland) state that Erik said that "it would encourage people to go there that the land had a good name"."

Question: Is it plausible, from this passage, that the ancestors of the Inuit had already discovered parts of Greenland before Erik the Red's voyages
Answer: YES

Question: Given the Vikings' well-known reputation as marauders and invaders, would you say that settling into Greenland was somewhat uncharacteristic (at least, compared to that historical stereotype)?
Answer: NO

Question: Given what can be learned from this passage, is it still appropriate to say that Erik the Red discovered Greenland, even if one simultaneously admits that you can't truthfully say that Columbus (or even Leif Erikson) discovered the New World?
Answer: NO
Passage: Europeans probably became aware of Greenland's existence in the early 10th century, after Gunnbjörn Ulfsson, while sailing from Norway to Iceland, was blown off course by a storm and sighted some islands off Greenland. During the 980s explorers led by Erik the Red set out from Iceland and reached the southwest coast of Greenland. Even though the region that they found was populated, they subsequently claimed it as their own and settled there, with only minimal resistance. Erik named the island "Greenland" ("Grœnland" in Old Norse, "Grænland" in modern Icelandic, "Grønland" in modern Danish and Norwegian). Both the "Book of Icelanders" ("Íslendingabók", a medieval account of Icelandic history from the 12th century onward) and the "Saga of Eric the Red" ("Eiríks saga rauða", a medieval account of his life and of the Norse settlement of Greenland) state that Erik said that "it would encourage people to go there that the land had a good name"."

Question: Is it plausible, from this passage, that the ancestors of the Inuit had already discovered parts of Greenland before Erik the Red's voyages
Answer: YES

Question: Given the Vikings' well-known reputation as marauders and invaders, would you say that settling into Greenland was somewhat uncharacteristic (at least, compared to that historical stereotype)?
Answer: NO

Question: Given what can be learned from this passage, is it still appropriate to say that Erik the Red discovered Greenland, even if one simultaneously admits that you can't truthfully say that Columbus (or even Leif Erikson) discovered the New World?
Answer: NO
Passage: On 4 April, Rommel was advised by his supply officers that fuel was running short, which could result in a delay of up to four days. The problem was Rommel's fault, as he had not advised his supply officers of his intentions, and no fuel dumps had been set up. Rommel ordered the 5th Light Division to unload all of their lorries and to return to El Agheila to collect fuel and ammunition. Driving through the night, they were able to reduce the halt to a single day. Fuel supply was problematic throughout the campaign, as no petrol was available locally; it had to be brought from Europe by tanker and then carried by road to where it was needed. Food and fresh water were also in short supply, and it was difficult to move tanks and other equipment off-road through the sand. Cyrenaica was captured by 8 April, except for the port city of Tobruk, which was besieged on 11 April.

Question: Did the supply officers know of Rommel's plans?
Answer: NO

Question: Was Rommel to blame for the lack of fuel?
Answer: YES

Question: Were the supply officers to blame for the lack of fuel?
Answer: NO
Passage: On 4 April, Rommel was advised by his supply officers that fuel was running short, which could result in a delay of up to four days. The problem was Rommel's fault, as he had refused to advise his supply officers of his intentions, and no fuel dumps had been set up. Rommel ordered the 5th Light Division to unload all of their lorries and to return to El Agheila to collect fuel and ammunition. Driving through the night, they were able to reduce the halt to a single day. Fuel supply was problematic throughout the campaign, as no petrol was available locally; it had to be brought from Europe by tanker and then carried by road to where it was needed. Food and fresh water were also in short supply, and it was difficult to move tanks and other equipment off-road through the sand. Cyrenaica was captured by 8 April, except for the port city of Tobruk, which was besieged on 11 April.

Question: Did the supply officers know of Rommel's plans?
Answer: NO

Question: Was Rommel to blame for the lack of fuel?
Answer: YES

Question: Were the supply officers to blame for the lack of fuel?
Answer: NO
Passage: On 4 April, Rommel was advised by his supply officers that fuel was running short, which could result in a delay of up to four days. The problem was not Rommel's fault, as he had advised his supply officers of his intentions, but no fuel dumps had been set up. Rommel ordered the 5th Light Division to unload all of their lorries and to return to El Agheila to collect fuel and ammunition. Driving through the night, they were able to reduce the halt to a single day. Fuel supply was problematic throughout the campaign, as no petrol was available locally; it had to be brought from Europe by tanker and then carried by road to where it was needed. Food and fresh water were also in short supply, and it was difficult to move tanks and other equipment off-road through the sand. Cyrenaica was captured by 8 April, except for the port city of Tobruk, which was besieged on 11 April.

Question: Did the supply officers know of Rommel's plans?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Rommel to blame for the lack of fuel?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the supply officers to blame for the lack of fuel?
Answer: YES
Passage: On 4 April, Rommel was advised by his supply officers that fuel was running short, which could result in a delay of up to four days. The problem was both Rommel's and his officers' fault, as he had advised his supply officers of his intentions, but still no fuel dumps had been set up. Rommel ordered the 5th Light Division to unload all of their lorries and to return to El Agheila to collect fuel and ammunition. Driving through the night, they were able to reduce the halt to a single day. Fuel supply was problematic throughout the campaign, as no petrol was available locally; it had to be brought from Europe by tanker and then carried by road to where it was needed. Food and fresh water were also in short supply, and it was difficult to move tanks and other equipment off-road through the sand. Cyrenaica was captured by 8 April, except for the port city of Tobruk, which was besieged on 11 April.

Question: Did the supply officers know of Rommel's plans?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Rommel to blame for the lack of fuel?
Answer: YES

Question: Were the supply officers to blame for the lack of fuel?
Answer: YES
Passage: In South Korea, April 5, Singmogil or Sikmogil (식목일), the Arbor Day, was a public holiday until 2005. Even though Singmogil is no longer an official holiday, the day is still celebrated, with the South Korean public continuing to take part in tree-planting activities.

Question: Do Koreans only plant trees because Singmogil is a holiday?
Answer: NO

Question: Are trees planted by Koreans on days that are not considered holidays?
Answer: YES

Question: Do Koreans celebrate only official holidays?
Answer: NO
Passage: In South Korea, April 5, Singmogil or Sikmogil (식목일), the Arbor Day, was a public holiday until 2005. Even though Singmogil is viewed as an ordinary day, the day is still celebrated, with the South Korean public continuing to take part in tree-planting activities.

Question: Do Koreans only plant trees because Singmogil is a holiday?
Answer: NO

Question: Are trees planted by Koreans on days that are not considered holidays?
Answer: YES

Question: Do Koreans celebrate only official holidays?
Answer: NO
Passage: In South Korea, April 5, Singmogil or Sikmogil (식목일), the Arbor Day, was a public holiday until 2005. Even though Singmogil is an official holiday, the day is no longer celebrated, with the South Korean public refusing to take part in tree-planting activities.

Question: Do Koreans only plant trees because Singmogil is a holiday?
Answer: NO

Question: Are trees planted by Koreans on days that are not considered holidays?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Do Koreans celebrate only official holidays?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: In South Korea, April 5, Singmogil or Sikmogil (식목일), the Arbor Day, was a public holiday until 2005. The South Korean public still celebrate Singmogil by taking part in tree-planting activities because it is still an official holiday.

Question: Do Koreans only plant trees because Singmogil is a holiday?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Are trees planted by Koreans on days that are not considered holidays?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Do Koreans celebrate only official holidays?
Answer: YES
Passage: These adenylyl cyclases are the most familiar based on extensive study due to their important roles in human health. They are also found in some bacteria, notably "Mycobacterium tuberculosis" where they appear to have a key role in pathogenesis. Most AC-III's are integral membrane proteins involved in transducing extracellular signals into intracellular responses. A Nobel Prize was awarded to Earl Sutherland in 1971 for discovering the key role of AC-III in human liver, where adrenaline indirectly stimulates AC to mobilize stored energy in the "fight or flight" response. The effect of adrenaline is via a G protein signaling cascade, which transmits chemical signals from outside the cell across the membrane to the inside of the cell (cytoplasm). The outside signal (in this case, adrenaline) binds to a receptor, which transmits a signal to the G protein, which transmits a signal to adenylyl cyclase, which transmits a signal by converting adenosine triphosphate to cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). cAMP is known as a second messenger.

Question: Would people describe Earl Sutherland's discovery for which he was awarded a Nobel Prize as serendipitous?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone were making an analogy between airplane flights and the relationship between adrenaline and AC, would they describe it as a direct flight?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Earl Sutherland likely already have a hypothesis about the discovery he was given a Nobel Prize for prior to discovering it?
Answer: YES