lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Dr. R. G. Ferguson, working at the Fort Qu'Appelle Sanatorium in Saskatchewan, was among the pioneers in developing the practice of vaccination against TB. In Canada, more than 600 children from residential schools were used as voluntary participants in BCG vaccine trials between 1933 and 1945. In 1928, BCG was adopted by the Health Committee of the League of Nations (predecessor to the World Health Organization (WHO)). Because of opposition, however, it only became widely used after World War II. From 1945 to 1948, relief organizations (International Tuberculosis Campaign or Joint Enterprises) vaccinated over eight million babies in eastern Europe and prevented the predicted typical increase of TB after a major war.

Question: Would you have been likely to find a signup sheet for the BCG vaccine trials in classrooms in Canada in 1935?
Answer: YES

Question: Did schools likely contact the vaccine manufacturers to signup for the BCG vaccine trials in Canada in 1935?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would lawyers think the parents of children who were used in the BCG vaccine trials in Canada in 1935 had a strong case against the vaccine manufacturers?
Answer: NO
Passage: Professor X is for a time the unknowing host of the evil psionic entity Onslaught, the result of a previous battle with Magneto. In that battle, Magneto uses his powers to rip out the adamantium bonded to Wolverine's skeleton, and a furious Xavier wipes Magneto's mind, leaving him in a coma. From the psychic trauma of Xavier using his powers so violently and the mixing of Magneto's and Xavier's repressed anger, Onslaught is born. Onslaught wreaks havoc, destroying much of Manhattan, until many of Marvel's superheroes—including the Avengers, the Fantastic Four and the Hulk—destroy him. Xavier is left without his telepathy and, overcome with guilt, leaves the X-Men and is incarcerated for his actions. He later returns to the X-Men after ', in which he is shocked by the cruel act of being turned over to the mutant-hating Bastion, following a clash with the sentient Cerebro and a team of impostor X-Men.

Question: If Wolverine visits Xavier after these events, does he enter a prison?
Answer: YES

Question: If Wolverine visits Xavier after these events, can Xavier speak to him without opening his mouth?
Answer: NO

Question: Does Xavier know what prison food tastes like?
Answer: YES
Passage: Professor X is for a time the unknowing host of the evil psionic entity Onslaught, the result of a previous battle with Magneto. In that battle, Magneto uses his powers to rip out the adamantium bonded to Wolverine's skeleton, and a furious Xavier wipes Magneto's mind, leaving him in a coma. From the psychic trauma of Xavier using his powers so violently and the mixing of Magneto's and Xavier's repressed anger, Onslaught is born. Onslaught wreaks havoc, destroying much of Manhattan, until many of Marvel's superheroes—including the Avengers, the Fantastic Four and the Hulk—destroy him. Xavier is left bereft of his telepathy and, overcome with guilt, leaves the X-Men and is incarcerated for his actions. He later returns to the X-Men after ', in which he is shocked by the cruel act of being turned over to the mutant-hating Bastion, following a clash with the sentient Cerebro and a team of impostor X-Men.

Question: If Wolverine visits Xavier after these events, does he enter a prison?
Answer: YES

Question: If Wolverine visits Xavier after these events, can Xavier speak to him without opening his mouth?
Answer: NO

Question: Does Xavier know what prison food tastes like?
Answer: YES
Passage: Professor X is for a time the unknowing host of the evil psionic entity Onslaught, the result of a previous battle with Magneto. In that battle, Magneto uses his powers to rip out the adamantium bonded to Wolverine's skeleton, and a furious Xavier wipes Magneto's mind, leaving him in a coma. From the psychic trauma of Xavier using his powers so violently and the mixing of Magneto's and Xavier's repressed anger, Onslaught is born. Onslaught wreaks havoc, destroying much of Manhattan, until many of Marvel's superheroes—including the Avengers, the Fantastic Four and the Hulk—destroy him. Xavier is left with his telepathy intact, but, overcome with guilt, leaves the X-Men, though without being incarcerated for his actions. He later returns to the X-Men after ', in which he is shocked by the cruel act of being turned over to the mutant-hating Bastion, following a clash with the sentient Cerebro and a team of impostor X-Men.

Question: If Wolverine visits Xavier after these events, does he enter a prison?
Answer: NO

Question: If Wolverine visits Xavier after these events, can Xavier speak to him without opening his mouth?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Xavier know what prison food tastes like?
Answer: NO
Passage: Professor X is for a time the unknowing host of the evil psionic entity Onslaught, the result of a previous battle with Magneto. In that battle, Magneto uses his powers to rip out the adamantium bonded to Wolverine's skeleton, and a furious Xavier wipes Magneto's mind, leaving him in a coma. From the psychic trauma of Xavier using his powers so violently and the mixing of Magneto's and Xavier's repressed anger, Onslaught is born. Onslaught wreaks havoc, destroying much of Manhattan, until many of Marvel's superheroes—including the Avengers, the Fantastic Four and the Hulk—destroy him. Xavier is left with his telepathy intact but, overcome with guilt, leaves the X-Men and is incarcerated for his actions. He later returns to the X-Men after ', in which he is shocked by the cruel act of being turned over to the mutant-hating Bastion, following a clash with the sentient Cerebro and a team of impostor X-Men.

Question: If Wolverine visits Xavier after these events, does he enter a prison?
Answer: YES

Question: If Wolverine visits Xavier after these events, can Xavier speak to him without opening his mouth?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Xavier know what prison food tastes like?
Answer: YES
Passage: On 16 February 1959, Castro was sworn in as Prime Minister of Cuba. In April, he visited the U.S. on a charm offensive where President Dwight D. Eisenhower would not meet with him, but instead sent Vice President Richard Nixon, whom Castro instantly disliked. After meeting Castro, Nixon described him to Eisenhower as: "The one fact we can be sure of is that Castro has those indefinable qualities which made him a leader of men. Whatever we may think of him he is going to be a great factor in the development of Cuba and very possibly in Latin American affairs generally. He seems to be sincere. He is either incredibly naive about Communism or under Communist discipline-my guess is the former...His ideas as to how to run a government or an economy are less developed than those of almost any world figure I have met in fifty countries. But because he has the power to lead...we have no choice but at least try to orient him in the right direction".

Question: From the way that the passage describes the meeting, does it sound like President Eisenhower had a sense of resentment towards Castro (rather than just feeling too busy at the time to meet with who would later become a major figure in the Western Hemisphere)?
Answer: NO

Question: Since the passage suggests that Nixon thought that his warm feelings were reciprocated by Castro after their first meeting, does the passage present this as a kind of naivete or obliviousness on the part of the then Vice President?
Answer: YES

Question: Given Nixon's feelings toward Castro, and vice versa, if Nixon had won the presidency in 1960, is it plausible that not only would the Bay of Pigs invasion never have happened, but that Cuba would not choose to harbor Soviet nuclear weapons?
Answer: NO
Passage: On 16 February 1959, Castro was sworn in as Prime Minister of Cuba. Castro embarked on a charm offensive in the U.S. in April, but Eisenhower declined the meeting, and chose to send Vice President Richard Nixon to meet with the Cuban premier instead, though this meeting led Castro to feel an immediate sense of enmity to the VP. After meeting Castro, Nixon described him to Eisenhower as: "The one fact we can be sure of is that Castro has those indefinable qualities which made him a leader of men. Whatever we may think of him he is going to be a great factor in the development of Cuba and very possibly in Latin American affairs generally. He seems to be sincere. He is either incredibly naive about Communism or under Communist discipline-my guess is the former...His ideas as to how to run a government or an economy are less developed than those of almost any world figure I have met in fifty countries. But because he has the power to lead...we have no choice but at least try to orient him in the right direction".

Question: From the way that the passage describes the meeting, does it sound like President Eisenhower had a sense of resentment towards Castro (rather than just feeling too busy at the time to meet with who would later become a major figure in the Western Hemisphere)?
Answer: NO

Question: Since the passage suggests that Nixon thought that his warm feelings were reciprocated by Castro after their first meeting, does the passage present this as a kind of naivete or obliviousness on the part of the then Vice President?
Answer: YES

Question: Given Nixon's feelings toward Castro, and vice versa, if Nixon had won the presidency in 1960, is it plausible that not only would the Bay of Pigs invasion never have happened, but that Cuba would not choose to harbor Soviet nuclear weapons?
Answer: NO
Passage: On 16 February 1959, Castro was sworn in as Prime Minister of Cuba. In April, he visited the U.S. on a charm offensive where President Dwight D. Eisenhower privately refused to meet with him, sending instead sent Vice President Richard Nixon, whom he assumed that Castro would dislike, yet in reality, the two hit it off quickly. After meeting Castro, Nixon described him to Eisenhower as: "The one fact we can be sure of is that Castro has those indefinable qualities which made him a leader of men. Whatever we may think of him he is going to be a great factor in the development of Cuba and very possibly in Latin American affairs generally. He seems to be sincere. He is either incredibly naive about Communism or under Communist discipline-my guess is the former...His ideas as to how to run a government or an economy are less developed than those of almost any world figure I have met in fifty countries. But because he has the power to lead...we have no choice but at least try to orient him in the right direction".

Question: From the way that the passage describes the meeting, does it sound like President Eisenhower had a sense of resentment towards Castro (rather than just feeling too busy at the time to meet with who would later become a major figure in the Western Hemisphere)?
Answer: YES

Question: Since the passage suggests that Nixon thought that his warm feelings were reciprocated by Castro after their first meeting, does the passage present this as a kind of naivete or obliviousness on the part of the then Vice President?
Answer: NO

Question: Given Nixon's feelings toward Castro, and vice versa, if Nixon had won the presidency in 1960, is it plausible that not only would the Bay of Pigs invasion never have happened, but that Cuba would not choose to harbor Soviet nuclear weapons?
Answer: YES
Passage: On 16 February 1959, Castro was sworn in as Prime Minister of Cuba. In April, he visited the U.S. on a charm offensive where President Dwight D. Eisenhower could not meet with him, but instead sent Vice President Richard Nixon, to whom Castro instantly took a liking. After meeting Castro, Nixon described him to Eisenhower as: "The one fact we can be sure of is that Castro has those indefinable qualities which made him a leader of men. Whatever we may think of him he is going to be a great factor in the development of Cuba and very possibly in Latin American affairs generally. He seems to be sincere. He is either incredibly naive about Communism or under Communist discipline-my guess is the former...His ideas as to how to run a government or an economy are less developed than those of almost any world figure I have met in fifty countries. But because he has the power to lead...we have no choice but at least try to orient him in the right direction".

Question: From the way that the passage describes the meeting, does it sound like President Eisenhower had a sense of resentment towards Castro (rather than just feeling too busy at the time to meet with who would later become a major figure in the Western Hemisphere)?
Answer: NO

Question: Since the passage suggests that Nixon thought that his warm feelings were reciprocated by Castro after their first meeting, does the passage present this as a kind of naivete or obliviousness on the part of the then Vice President?
Answer: NO

Question: Given Nixon's feelings toward Castro, and vice versa, if Nixon had won the presidency in 1960, is it plausible that not only would the Bay of Pigs invasion never have happened, but that Cuba would not choose to harbor Soviet nuclear weapons?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 778, he led the Neustrian army across the Western Pyrenees, while the Austrasians, Lombards, and Burgundians passed over the Eastern Pyrenees. The armies met at Saragossa and Charlemagne received the homage of the Muslim rulers, Sulayman al-Arabi and Kasmin ibn Yusuf, but the city did not fall for him. Indeed, Charlemagne faced the toughest battle of his career. The Muslims forced him to retreat. He decided to go home since he could not trust the Basques, whom he had subdued by conquering Pamplona. He turned to leave Iberia, but as he was passing through the Pass of Roncesvalles one of the most famous events of his reign occurred. The Basques attacked and destroyed his rearguard and baggage train. The Battle of Roncevaux Pass, though less a battle than a skirmish, left many famous dead, including the seneschal Eggihard, the count of the palace Anselm, and the warden of the Breton March, Roland, inspiring the subsequent creation of the Song of Roland ("La Chanson de Roland").

Question: Did Charlemagne have control of the Basques after conquering Pamplona?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Did Charlemagne feel the Basques were his ally?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Charlemagne likely have been willing to go alone to meet with the Basques?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 778, he led the Neustrian army across the Western Pyrenees, while the Austrasians, Lombards, and Burgundians passed over the Eastern Pyrenees. The armies met at Saragossa and Charlemagne received the homage of the Muslim rulers, Sulayman al-Arabi and Kasmin ibn Yusuf, but the city did not fall for him. Indeed, Charlemagne faced the toughest battle of his career. The Muslims forced him to retreat. He decided to go home since he had zero trust in the Basques, whom he had subdued by conquering Pamplona. He turned to leave Iberia, but as he was passing through the Pass of Roncesvalles one of the most famous events of his reign occurred. The Basques attacked and destroyed his rearguard and baggage train. The Battle of Roncevaux Pass, though less a battle than a skirmish, left many famous dead, including the seneschal Eggihard, the count of the palace Anselm, and the warden of the Breton March, Roland, inspiring the subsequent creation of the Song of Roland ("La Chanson de Roland").

Question: Did Charlemagne have control of the Basques after conquering Pamplona?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Did Charlemagne feel the Basques were his ally?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Charlemagne likely have been willing to go alone to meet with the Basques?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 778, he led the Neustrian army across the Western Pyrenees, while the Austrasians, Lombards, and Burgundians passed over the Eastern Pyrenees. The armies met at Saragossa and Charlemagne received the homage of the Muslim rulers, Sulayman al-Arabi and Kasmin ibn Yusuf, but the city did not fall for him. Indeed, Charlemagne faced the toughest battle of his career. The Muslims forced him to retreat. He decided to go home since he trusted the Basques, even though he could not subdue them after conquering Pamplona. He turned to leave Iberia, but as he was passing through the Pass of Roncesvalles one of the most famous events of his reign occurred. The Basques attacked and destroyed his rearguard and baggage train. The Battle of Roncevaux Pass, though less a battle than a skirmish, left many famous dead, including the seneschal Eggihard, the count of the palace Anselm, and the warden of the Breton March, Roland, inspiring the subsequent creation of the Song of Roland ("La Chanson de Roland").

Question: Did Charlemagne have control of the Basques after conquering Pamplona?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Charlemagne feel the Basques were his ally?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would Charlemagne likely have been willing to go alone to meet with the Basques?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 778, he led the Neustrian army across the Western Pyrenees, while the Austrasians, Lombards, and Burgundians passed over the Eastern Pyrenees. The armies met at Saragossa and Charlemagne received the homage of the Muslim rulers, Sulayman al-Arabi and Kasmin ibn Yusuf, but the city did not fall for him. Indeed, Charlemagne faced the toughest battle of his career. The Muslims forced him to retreat. He decided to go home since he trusted the Basques, whom he had subdued by conquering Pamplona. He turned to leave Iberia, but as he was passing through the Pass of Roncesvalles one of the most famous events of his reign occurred. The Basques attacked and destroyed his rearguard and baggage train. The Battle of Roncevaux Pass, though less a battle than a skirmish, left many famous dead, including the seneschal Eggihard, the count of the palace Anselm, and the warden of the Breton March, Roland, inspiring the subsequent creation of the Song of Roland ("La Chanson de Roland").

Question: Did Charlemagne have control of the Basques after conquering Pamplona?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Charlemagne feel the Basques were his ally?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Charlemagne likely have been willing to go alone to meet with the Basques?
Answer: YES
Passage: Queen Louise wanted her eldest son to marry as well as had her two daughters, Alexandra and Dagmar. Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom had two yet unmarried daughters, Princess Helena and Princess Louise, and Louise planned to have Frederick marry one of them. However, Victoria did not want her daughters to marry heirs to foreign thrones, as this would force them to live abroad, instead preferring German princes who could establish homes in England. In addition, Victoria had always been pro-German and another Danish alliance (Frederick's sister, Alexandra, had married Victoria's eldest son Edward, Prince of Wales), would not have been in line with her German interests.

Question: From what you can read above, does it sound like the bride in a Victorian-era royal marriage had at least some input in decisions about who she would wed?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it possible that Victoria might already have had grandchildren born to whichever young woman Frederick was aiming to marry?
Answer: NO

Question: Regardless of whether or not this might have impacted her decision, is there any chance that the young woman who was presumed to be eligible for marriage to Frederick had a different last name than Victoria herself?
Answer: NO
Passage: Queen Louise wanted her eldest son to marry as well as had her two daughters, Alexandra and Dagmar. The UK's Queen Victoria had two unwed daughters, Princess Louise and Princess Helena, and Louise had wanted Frederick to marry either her or her sister. However, Victoria did not want her daughters to marry heirs to foreign thrones, as this would force them to live abroad, instead preferring German princes who could establish homes in England. In addition, Victoria had always been pro-German and another Danish alliance (Frederick's sister, Alexandra, had married Victoria's eldest son Edward, Prince of Wales), would not have been in line with her German interests.

Question: From what you can read above, does it sound like the bride in a Victorian-era royal marriage had at least some input in decisions about who she would wed?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it possible that Victoria might already have had grandchildren born to whichever young woman Frederick was aiming to marry?
Answer: NO

Question: Regardless of whether or not this might have impacted her decision, is there any chance that the young woman who was presumed to be eligible for marriage to Frederick had a different last name than Victoria herself?
Answer: NO
Passage: Queen Louise wanted her eldest son to marry as well as had her two daughters, Alexandra and Dagmar. Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom had two betrothed daughters, Princess Helena and Princess Louise, and two yet unmarried nieces; Louise planned to have Frederick marry one of them. However, Victoria did not want her close relatives to marry heirs to foreign thrones, as this would force them to live abroad, instead preferring German princes who could establish homes in England. In addition, Victoria had always been pro-German and another Danish alliance (Frederick's sister, Alexandra, had married Victoria's eldest son Edward, Prince of Wales), would not have been in line with her German interests.

Question: From what you can read above, does it sound like the bride in a Victorian-era royal marriage had at least some input in decisions about who she would wed?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it possible that Victoria might already have had grandchildren born to whichever young woman Frederick was aiming to marry?
Answer: NO

Question: Regardless of whether or not this might have impacted her decision, is there any chance that the young woman who was presumed to be eligible for marriage to Frederick had a different last name than Victoria herself?
Answer: YES
Passage: Queen Louise wanted her eldest son to marry as well as had her two daughters, Alexandra and Dagmar. Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom also had two widowed daughters, Princess Helena and Princess Louise, and Louise planned to have Frederick marry one of them. However, Victoria did not want her daughters to marry heirs to foreign thrones, as this would force them to live abroad, instead preferring German princes who could establish homes in England. In addition, Victoria had always been pro-German and another Danish alliance (Frederick's sister, Alexandra, had married Victoria's eldest son Edward, Prince of Wales), would not have been in line with her German interests.

Question: From what you can read above, does it sound like the bride in a Victorian-era royal marriage had at least some input in decisions about who she would wed?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it possible that Victoria might already have had grandchildren born to whichever young woman Frederick was aiming to marry?
Answer: YES

Question: Regardless of whether or not this might have impacted her decision, is there any chance that the young woman who was presumed to be eligible for marriage to Frederick had a different last name than Victoria herself?
Answer: YES