lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In his first year as mayor, Medill received very little legislative resistance from the Chicago City Council. While he vetoed what was an unprecedented eleven City Council ordinances that year, most narrowly were involved with specific financial practices considered wasteful and none of the vetoes were overridden. He used his new powers to appoint the members of the newly constituted Chicago Board of Education and the commissioners of its constituted public library. His appointments were approved unanimously by the City Council.

Question: Would a reader generally expect that ten or more vetoes had been issued by a mayor of Chicago in any significant number of the years leading up to Medill's election?
Answer: NO

Question: Could one get the impression that Chicago's city council was generally reluctant to change, and had allowed a lot of waste and inefficiency to build up that would have remained if Medill was not elected mayor?
Answer: YES

Question: If Chicago's city council met regularly throughout the year, in year's prior to Medill's inauguration, would members generally have expected to attend an additional vote one or more times per month, on average, to decide on whether or not to override a mayoral veto?
Answer: NO
Passage: In his first year as mayor, Medill received very little legislative resistance from the Chicago City Council. He had vetoed a previously unforeseen eleven ordinances from the city council during that year, most were narrowly tailored toward specific financial practices that he considered to be inefficient, and the council did not override any of these vetoes. He used his new powers to appoint the members of the newly constituted Chicago Board of Education and the commissioners of its constituted public library. His appointments were approved unanimously by the City Council.

Question: Would a reader generally expect that ten or more vetoes had been issued by a mayor of Chicago in any significant number of the years leading up to Medill's election?
Answer: NO

Question: Could one get the impression that Chicago's city council was generally reluctant to change, and had allowed a lot of waste and inefficiency to build up that would have remained if Medill was not elected mayor?
Answer: YES

Question: If Chicago's city council met regularly throughout the year, in year's prior to Medill's inauguration, would members generally have expected to attend an additional vote one or more times per month, on average, to decide on whether or not to override a mayoral veto?
Answer: NO
Passage: In his first year as mayor, Medill received very little legislative resistance from the Chicago City Council. While some expected an unprecedented number of vetoes, in actuality he only vetoed eleven City Council ordinances that year, and most of those were narrowly involved with specific financial practices he considered wasteful and none of the vetoes were overridden. He used his new powers to appoint the members of the newly constituted Chicago Board of Education and the commissioners of its constituted public library. His appointments were approved unanimously by the City Council.

Question: Would a reader generally expect that ten or more vetoes had been issued by a mayor of Chicago in any significant number of the years leading up to Medill's election?
Answer: YES

Question: Could one get the impression that Chicago's city council was generally reluctant to change, and had allowed a lot of waste and inefficiency to build up that would have remained if Medill was not elected mayor?
Answer: NO

Question: If Chicago's city council met regularly throughout the year, in year's prior to Medill's inauguration, would members generally have expected to attend an additional vote one or more times per month, on average, to decide on whether or not to override a mayoral veto?
Answer: YES
Passage: In his first year as mayor, Medill received very little legislative resistance from the Chicago City Council. He vetoed a relatively modest eleven City Council ordinances that year, and even most of those were narrowly involved with specific financial practices he considered wasteful, and none of the vetoes were overridden. He used his new powers to appoint the members of the newly constituted Chicago Board of Education and the commissioners of its constituted public library. His appointments were approved unanimously by the City Council.

Question: Would a reader generally expect that ten or more vetoes had been issued by a mayor of Chicago in any significant number of the years leading up to Medill's election?
Answer: YES

Question: Could one get the impression that Chicago's city council was generally reluctant to change, and had allowed a lot of waste and inefficiency to build up that would have remained if Medill was not elected mayor?
Answer: NO

Question: If Chicago's city council met regularly throughout the year, in year's prior to Medill's inauguration, would members generally have expected to attend an additional vote one or more times per month, on average, to decide on whether or not to override a mayoral veto?
Answer: YES
Passage: During the late 19th century the British also gained control of the north coast of Borneo, where Dutch rule had never been established. Development on the Peninsula and Borneo were generally separate until the 19th century. The eastern part of this region (now Sabah) was under the nominal control of the Sultan of Sulu, who later became a vassal of the Spanish East Indies. The rest was the territory of the Sultanate of Brunei. In 1841, British adventurer James Brooke helped the Sultan of Brunei suppress a revolt, and in return received the title of raja and the right to govern the Sarawak River District. In 1846, his title was recognised as hereditary, and the "White Rajahs" began ruling Sarawak as a recognised independent state. The Brookes expanded Sarawak at the expense of Brunei.

Question: Would a tourist in Sarawak be likely to see any Dutch-style colonial architecture?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Brunei most likely have received its independence from the British or the Dutch?
Answer: British

Question: Is English likely to be an official language in the northern parts of Borneo?
Answer: YES
Passage: During the late 19th century the British also gained control of the north coast of Borneo, where the Dutch had found it overly difficult to ever establish their rule. Development on the Peninsula and Borneo were generally separate until the 19th century. The eastern part of this region (now Sabah) was under the nominal control of the Sultan of Sulu, who later became a vassal of the Spanish East Indies. The rest was the territory of the Sultanate of Brunei. In 1841, British adventurer James Brooke helped the Sultan of Brunei suppress a revolt, and in return received the title of raja and the right to govern the Sarawak River District. In 1846, his title was recognised as hereditary, and the "White Rajahs" began ruling Sarawak as a recognised independent state. The Brookes expanded Sarawak at the expense of Brunei.

Question: Would a tourist in Sarawak be likely to see any Dutch-style colonial architecture?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Brunei most likely have received its independence from the British or the Dutch?
Answer: British

Question: Is English likely to be an official language in the northern parts of Borneo?
Answer: YES
Passage: Despite several attempts during the late 19th century, the British never gained control of the north coast of Borneo, where Dutch rule had been established. Development on the Peninsula and Borneo were generally separate until the 19th century. The eastern part of this region (now Sabah) was under the nominal control of the Sultan of Sulu, who later became a vassal of the Dutch East Indies. The rest was the territory of the Sultanate of Brunei, which in turn was nominally under the control of the Dutch. In 1841, British adventurer James Brooke helped the Sultan of Brunei suppress a revolt, and in return received the title of raja and the right to govern the Sarawak River District. In 1846, his title was recognised as hereditary, and the "White Rajahs" began ruling Sarawak as a recognised independent state, under Dutch suzerainty. The Brookes expanded Sarawak at the expense of Brunei.

Question: Would a tourist in Sarawak be likely to see any Dutch-style colonial architecture?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Brunei most likely have received its independence from the British or the Dutch?
Answer: Dutch

Question: Is English likely to be an official language in the northern parts of Borneo?
Answer: NO
Passage: During the late 19th century the British also gained control of the north coast of Borneo, where Dutch rule had previously been established. Development on the Peninsula and Borneo were generally separate until the 19th century. The eastern part of this region (now Sabah) was under the nominal control of the Sultan of Sulu, who later became a vassal of the Spanish East Indies. The rest was the territory of the Sultanate of Brunei. In 1841, British adventurer James Brooke helped the Sultan of Brunei suppress a revolt, and in return received the title of raja and the right to govern the Sarawak River District. In 1846, his title was recognised as hereditary, and the "White Rajahs" began ruling Sarawak as a recognised independent state. The Brookes expanded Sarawak at the expense of Brunei.

Question: Would a tourist in Sarawak be likely to see any Dutch-style colonial architecture?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Brunei most likely have received its independence from the British or the Dutch?
Answer: British

Question: Is English likely to be an official language in the northern parts of Borneo?
Answer: YES
Passage: Costs of disability pensions are steadily growing in Western countries, mainly in Europe and the United States. It was reported that, in the UK, expenditure on disability pensions accounted for 0.9% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 1980; two decades later it had reached 2.6% of GDP. Several studies have reported a link between increased absence from work due to sickness and elevated risk of future disability pension.

Question: Does it sound like employers may worry about an employee who takes sick days, because these short illnesses could be leading up to a more serious issue down the line, which could result in the loss of an employee?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like disability in later life is caused by factors that prevent employees from getting proper care earlier in life?
Answer: NO

Question: Could a program that encourages employees to take time off from work more readily, and for less-serious illnesses, end up being financially viable, if using sick days from work could potentially be linked to less serious disability later in life?
Answer: NO
Passage: Costs of disability pensions are steadily growing in Western countries, mainly in Europe and the United States. It was reported that, in the UK, expenditure on disability pensions accounted for 0.9% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 1980; two decades later it had reached 2.6% of GDP. A link between increased time away from work due to illness and an increased risk of the need for a disability pension later in life has been reported in several studies.

Question: Does it sound like employers may worry about an employee who takes sick days, because these short illnesses could be leading up to a more serious issue down the line, which could result in the loss of an employee?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like disability in later life is caused by factors that prevent employees from getting proper care earlier in life?
Answer: NO

Question: Could a program that encourages employees to take time off from work more readily, and for less-serious illnesses, end up being financially viable, if using sick days from work could potentially be linked to less serious disability later in life?
Answer: NO
Passage: Costs of disability pensions are steadily growing in Western countries, mainly in Europe and the United States. It was reported that, in the UK, expenditure on disability pensions accounted for 0.9% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 1980; two decades later it had reached 2.6% of GDP. Several studies have reported a link between the absence of time away from work due to short-term sickness and elevated risk of future disability pension.

Question: Does it sound like employers may worry about an employee who takes sick days, because these short illnesses could be leading up to a more serious issue down the line, which could result in the loss of an employee?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like disability in later life is caused by factors that prevent employees from getting proper care earlier in life?
Answer: YES

Question: Could a program that encourages employees to take time off from work more readily, and for less-serious illnesses, end up being financially viable, if using sick days from work could potentially be linked to less serious disability later in life?
Answer: YES
Passage: Costs of disability pensions are steadily growing in Western countries, mainly in Europe and the United States. It was reported that, in the UK, expenditure on disability pensions accounted for 0.9% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 1980; two decades later it had reached 2.6% of GDP. Several studies have reported a link between inability or unwillingness to take time off from work for sickness and an elevated risk of future disability pension.

Question: Does it sound like employers may worry about an employee who takes sick days, because these short illnesses could be leading up to a more serious issue down the line, which could result in the loss of an employee?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like disability in later life is caused by factors that prevent employees from getting proper care earlier in life?
Answer: YES

Question: Could a program that encourages employees to take time off from work more readily, and for less-serious illnesses, end up being financially viable, if using sick days from work could potentially be linked to less serious disability later in life?
Answer: YES
Passage: At the wedding of Angus and Laura in Somerset, the unmarried best man Charles, his flatmate Scarlett; his friend Fiona and her brother Tom; Gareth, a gay man, and his Scottish lover Matthew; and Charles's deaf brother David endure the festivities. At the reception, Charles becomes smitten with Caroline (Carrie), a beautiful young American, and the two spend the night together. In the morning, Carrie jokingly demands that Charles propose to her, observing that they may have "missed a great opportunity", and then leaves for America.

Question: Would it be socially appropriate for Angus to set up Charles on a date?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Charles be likely to bring a date to Angus and Laura's wedding?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Scarlett be likely to bring a date to Angus and Laura's wedding?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: At the wedding of Angus and Laura in Somerset, the single best man Charles, his flatmate Scarlett; his friend Fiona and her brother Tom; Gareth, a gay man, and his Scottish lover Matthew; and Charles's deaf brother David endure the festivities. At the reception, Charles becomes smitten with Caroline (Carrie), a beautiful young American, and the two spend the night together. In the morning, Carrie jokingly demands that Charles propose to her, observing that they may have "missed a great opportunity", and then leaves for America.

Question: Would it be socially appropriate for Angus to set up Charles on a date?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Charles be likely to bring a date to Angus and Laura's wedding?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Scarlett be likely to bring a date to Angus and Laura's wedding?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: At the wedding of Angus and Laura in Somerset, the best man Charles, his unmarried flatmate Scarlett; his friend Fiona and her brother Tom; Gareth, a gay man, and his Scottish lover Matthew; and Charles's deaf brother David endure the festivities. At the reception, Charles becomes smitten with Caroline (Carrie), a beautiful young American, and the two spend the night together. In the morning, Carrie jokingly demands that Charles propose to her, observing that they may have "missed a great opportunity", and then leaves for America.

Question: Would it be socially appropriate for Angus to set up Charles on a date?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would Charles be likely to bring a date to Angus and Laura's wedding?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would Scarlett be likely to bring a date to Angus and Laura's wedding?
Answer: NO
Passage: At the wedding of Angus and Laura in Somerset, the best man Charles, his flatmate Scarlett; his friend Fiona and her brother Tom; Gareth, a gay man, and his Scottish lover Matthew; and Charles's deaf brother David endure the festivities. At the reception, Charles becomes smitten with Caroline (Carrie), a beautiful young American, and the two spend the night together. In the morning, Carrie jokingly demands that Charles propose to her, observing that they may have "missed a great opportunity", and then leaves for America.

Question: Would it be socially appropriate for Angus to set up Charles on a date?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would Charles be likely to bring a date to Angus and Laura's wedding?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would Scarlett be likely to bring a date to Angus and Laura's wedding?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: In combating Marcion, orthodox apologists conceded that Judaism was an incomplete and inferior religion to Christianity, while also defending the Jewish scriptures as canonical. The Church Father Tertullian (155 – 240 AD) had a particularly intense personal dislike towards the Jews and argued that the Gentiles had been chosen by God to replace the Jews, because they were worthier and more honorable. Origen of Alexandria (184 – 253) was more knowledgeable about Judaism than any of the other Church Fathers, having studied Hebrew, met Rabbi Hillel the Younger, consulted and debated with Jewish scholars, and been influenced by the allegorical interpretations of Philo of Alexandria. Origen defended the canonicity of the Old Testament and defended Jews of the past as having been chosen by God for their merits. Nonetheless, he condemned contemporary Jews for not understanding their own Law, insisted that Christians were the "true Israel", and blamed the Jews for the death of Christ. He did, however, maintain that Jews would eventually attain salvation in the final "apocatastasis".

Question: Would Tertullian have been happy to share a meal with a Jew?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Tertullian have been angry to learn his child wanted to marry a Jew?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Tertullian have considered accepting a job working alongside a Jew?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: In combating Marcion, orthodox apologists conceded that Judaism was an incomplete and inferior religion to Christianity, while also defending the Jewish scriptures as canonical. The Church Father Tertullian (155 – 240 AD) loathed the Jews and argued that the Gentiles had been chosen by God to replace the Jews, because they were worthier and more honorable. Origen of Alexandria (184 – 253) was more knowledgeable about Judaism than any of the other Church Fathers, having studied Hebrew, met Rabbi Hillel the Younger, consulted and debated with Jewish scholars, and been influenced by the allegorical interpretations of Philo of Alexandria. Origen defended the canonicity of the Old Testament and defended Jews of the past as having been chosen by God for their merits. Nonetheless, he condemned contemporary Jews for not understanding their own Law, insisted that Christians were the "true Israel", and blamed the Jews for the death of Christ. He did, however, maintain that Jews would eventually attain salvation in the final "apocatastasis".

Question: Would Tertullian have been happy to share a meal with a Jew?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Tertullian have been angry to learn his child wanted to marry a Jew?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Tertullian have considered accepting a job working alongside a Jew?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: In combating Marcion, orthodox apologists conceded that Christianity was an incomplete and inferior religion to Judaism, while also defending the Jewish scriptures as canonical. The Church Father Tertullian (155 – 240 AD) had a particularly intense personal dislike towards the Gentiles and argued that the Jews had been chosen by God to replace the Gentiles, because they were worthier and more honorable. Origen of Alexandria (184 – 253) was more knowledgeable about Judaism than any of the other Church Fathers, having studied Hebrew, met Rabbi Hillel the Younger, consulted and debated with Jewish scholars, and been influenced by the allegorical interpretations of Philo of Alexandria. Origen defended the canonicity of the Old Testament and defended Jews of the past as having been chosen by God for their merits. Nonetheless, he condemned contemporary Jews for not understanding their own Law, insisted that Christians were the "true Israel", and blamed the Jews for the death of Christ. He did, however, maintain that Jews would eventually attain salvation in the final "apocatastasis".

Question: Would Tertullian have been happy to share a meal with a Jew?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Tertullian have been angry to learn his child wanted to marry a Jew?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Tertullian have considered accepting a job working alongside a Jew?
Answer: YES
Passage: In combating Marcion, orthodox apologists conceded that Judaism was an incomplete and inferior religion to Christianity, while also defending the Jewish scriptures as canonical. The Church Father Tertullian (155 – 240 AD) was friendly towards the Jews, but argued that the Gentiles had been chosen by God to replace the Jews, because they were worthier and more honorable. Origen of Alexandria (184 – 253) was more knowledgeable about Judaism than any of the other Church Fathers, having studied Hebrew, met Rabbi Hillel the Younger, consulted and debated with Jewish scholars, and been influenced by the allegorical interpretations of Philo of Alexandria. Origen defended the canonicity of the Old Testament and defended Jews of the past as having been chosen by God for their merits. Nonetheless, he condemned contemporary Jews for not understanding their own Law, insisted that Christians were the "true Israel", and blamed the Jews for the death of Christ. He did, however, maintain that Jews would eventually attain salvation in the final "apocatastasis".

Question: Would Tertullian have been happy to share a meal with a Jew?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Tertullian have been angry to learn his child wanted to marry a Jew?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Tertullian have considered accepting a job working alongside a Jew?
Answer: YES
Passage: Frederic Ogden Nash (August 19, 1902 – May 19, 1971) was an American poet well known for his light verse, of which he wrote over 500 pieces. With his unconventional rhyming schemes, he was declared the country's best-known producer of humorous poetry.

Question: From this brief passage, would you say that in order to break from tradition and create a rhyming poem that was also funny to the reader, an author would have to also use less traditional rhyme scemes?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it reasonable to assume that poetic form was being taught in schools in the early to late twentieth century, that would lead readers of poetry to seek out (and thus, be more familiar with) humorous poems that themselves followed familiar styles and structures?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone was unfamiliar with Nash's work, would they be justified in thinking that he could have wrote a lot of limerick verse, which uses a very predictable sequence of rhymes, but relies on the surprise delivered by the words themselves to deliver the humor (and occasional shock value)?
Answer: NO