lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: The show further lampooned the controversy surrounding its use of profanity, as well as the media attention surrounding the network show "Chicago Hopes singular use of the word "shit", with the season five premiere "It Hits the Fan", in which the word "shit" is said 162 times without being bleeped for censorship purposes, while also appearing uncensored in written form. In the days following the show's original airing, 5,000 disapproving e-mails were sent to Comedy Central. Despite its characters' 43 gratuitous uses of the racial slur "nigger" (which were technically allowed to air, but which the writers ostentatiously censored in all versions of the episode), the season 11 episode "With Apologies to Jesse Jackson" generated relatively little controversy, as most in the black community and the NAACP praised the episode for its context and its comedic way of conveying other races' perceptions of how black people feel when hearing the word.

Question: Given the evolving tolerance for profanity on basic cable in the 2000s and beyond, does this passage make it sound like the networks still took a harder line on racial slurs than they did on other taboos, such as literal four-letter words?
Answer: NO

Question: From what we can learn about the writers' intentions for this episode, is it possible that they might have considered jokes such as a restaurant patron asking for vinegar, or a character chiding the notoriously-selfish Eric Cartman for being "niggardly," with the punchline in both cases being nothing but a deafening beep from viewers' tv speakers?
Answer: YES

Question: Knowing that the NAACP praised the show in this instance, given the circumstances of the episode's airing, would be plausible to assume that the organization might have preferred that the show aired with offensive racial slurs explicitly spoken, as this would represent the show's creative team's original intent?
Answer: NO
Passage: The show further lampooned the controversy surrounding its use of profanity, as well as the media attention surrounding the network show "Chicago Hopes singular use of the word "shit", with the season five premiere "It Hits the Fan", in which the word "shit" is said 162 times without being bleeped for censorship purposes, while also appearing uncensored in written form. In the days following the show's original airing, 5,000 disapproving e-mails were sent to Comedy Central. Despite its 43 uncensored uses of the racial slur "nigger" (which the producers were required to censor on television and even on DVD releases), the season 11 episode "With Apologies to Jesse Jackson" generated relatively little controversy, as most in the black community and the NAACP praised the episode for its context and its comedic way of conveying other races' perceptions of how black people feel when hearing the word.

Question: Given the evolving tolerance for profanity on basic cable in the 2000s and beyond, does this passage make it sound like the networks still took a harder line on racial slurs than they did on other taboos, such as literal four-letter words?
Answer: YES

Question: From what we can learn about the writers' intentions for this episode, is it possible that they might have considered jokes such as a restaurant patron asking for vinegar, or a character chiding the notoriously-selfish Eric Cartman for being "niggardly," with the punchline in both cases being nothing but a deafening beep from viewers' tv speakers?
Answer: NO

Question: Knowing that the NAACP praised the show in this instance, given the circumstances of the episode's airing, would be plausible to assume that the organization might have preferred that the show aired with offensive racial slurs explicitly spoken, as this would represent the show's creative team's original intent?
Answer: YES
Passage: Before 1920, the university refused to give academic degrees to women and would not acknowledge them as full members of the university. (Some of these women, nicknamed the steamboat ladies, were awarded "ad eundem" degrees by Trinity College Dublin, between 1904 and 1907.) In 1920 the first women graduated from the college at the Sheldonian Theatre and the principal at the time, Henrietta Jex-Blake, was given an honorary degree.

Question: Were the any female graduate who had obtained an academic degree from the University before 1920?
Answer: NO

Question: Before 1920, were married women able to obtain academic degrees from the University?
Answer: NO

Question: Was there a law forbidding young women from obtaining academic degrees after 1920?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Before 1920, the university declined to give academic degrees to women and would not acknowledge them as full members of the university. (Some of these women, nicknamed the steamboat ladies, were awarded "ad eundem" degrees by Trinity College Dublin, between 1904 and 1907.) In 1920 the first women graduated from the college at the Sheldonian Theatre and the principal at the time, Henrietta Jex-Blake, was given an honorary degree.

Question: Were the any female graduate who had obtained an academic degree from the University before 1920?
Answer: NO

Question: Before 1920, were married women able to obtain academic degrees from the University?
Answer: NO

Question: Was there a law forbidding young women from obtaining academic degrees after 1920?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Before 1920, the university gave academic degrees to women but refused to acknowledge them as full members of the university. (Some of these women, nicknamed the steamboat ladies, were awarded "ad eundem" degrees by Trinity College Dublin, between 1904 and 1907.) In 1920 the first women graduated from the college at the Sheldonian Theatre and the principal at the time, Henrietta Jex-Blake, was given an honorary degree.

Question: Were the any female graduate who had obtained an academic degree from the University before 1920?
Answer: YES

Question: Before 1920, were married women able to obtain academic degrees from the University?
Answer: YES

Question: Was there a law forbidding young women from obtaining academic degrees after 1920?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Before 1920, the university offered academic degrees to women and acknowledged them as full members of the university. (Some of these women, nicknamed the steamboat ladies, were awarded "ad eundem" degrees by Trinity College Dublin, between 1904 and 1907.) In 1920, many women graduated from the college at the Sheldonian Theatre and the principal at the time, Henrietta Jex-Blake, was given an honorary degree.

Question: Were the any female graduate who had obtained an academic degree from the University before 1920?
Answer: YES

Question: Before 1920, were married women able to obtain academic degrees from the University?
Answer: YES

Question: Was there a law forbidding young women from obtaining academic degrees after 1920?
Answer: NO
Passage: The number of days per Revised Julian cycle = 900 × 365 + 218 = 328,718 days. Taking mod 7 leaves a remainder of 5, so like the Julian calendar, but unlike the Gregorian calendar, the Revised Julian calendar cycle does not contain a whole number of weeks. Therefore, a full repetition of the Revised Julian leap cycle with respect to the seven-day weekly cycle is seven times the cycle length = 7 × 900 = 6300 years.

Question: If the number of days in a calendar is divisible by 7, can it be a Gregorian calendar?
Answer: YES

Question: If there is a remainder after dividing the number of days in a calendar by 7, can it be a Gregorian calendar?
Answer: NO

Question: If the number of days in a calendar is divisible by 7, can it be a Julian calendar?
Answer: NO
Passage: The number of days per Revised Julian cycle = 900 × 365 + 218 = 328,718 days. Taking mod 7 leaves a remainder of 5, so like the Julian calendar, but different from the Gregorian calendar, the Revised Julian calendar cycle does not contain a whole number of weeks. Therefore, a full repetition of the Revised Julian leap cycle with respect to the seven-day weekly cycle is seven times the cycle length = 7 × 900 = 6300 years.

Question: If the number of days in a calendar is divisible by 7, can it be a Gregorian calendar?
Answer: YES

Question: If there is a remainder after dividing the number of days in a calendar by 7, can it be a Gregorian calendar?
Answer: NO

Question: If the number of days in a calendar is divisible by 7, can it be a Julian calendar?
Answer: NO
Passage: The number of days per Revised Julian cycle = 900 × 365 + 218 = 328,718 days. Taking mod 7 leaves a remainder of 5, so unlike the Julian calendar, but like the Gregorian calendar, the Revised Julian calendar cycle does not contain a whole number of weeks. Therefore, a full repetition of the Revised Julian leap cycle with respect to the seven-day weekly cycle is seven times the cycle length = 7 × 900 = 6300 years.

Question: If the number of days in a calendar is divisible by 7, can it be a Gregorian calendar?
Answer: NO

Question: If there is a remainder after dividing the number of days in a calendar by 7, can it be a Gregorian calendar?
Answer: YES

Question: If the number of days in a calendar is divisible by 7, can it be a Julian calendar?
Answer: YES
Passage: The number of days per Revised Julian cycle = 900 × 365 + 218 = 328,718 days. Taking mod 7 leaves a remainder of 5, so like the Julian calendar and the Gregorian calendar, the Revised Julian calendar cycle does not contain a whole number of weeks. Therefore, a full repetition of the Revised Julian leap cycle with respect to the seven-day weekly cycle is seven times the cycle length = 7 × 900 = 6300 years.

Question: If the number of days in a calendar is divisible by 7, can it be a Gregorian calendar?
Answer: NO

Question: If there is a remainder after dividing the number of days in a calendar by 7, can it be a Gregorian calendar?
Answer: YES

Question: If the number of days in a calendar is divisible by 7, can it be a Julian calendar?
Answer: NO
Passage: Since the launch of ITV, there have been concerns from politicians and the press that ITV faced a conflict concerning programme audiences and advertisers. As advertisers are reluctant to buy advertising space around low viewing programmes, there is a pressure on ITV to broadcast more popular programmes in peak times. This has become more profound in recent years following a relaxation in regulation and significantly more competition in the advertising market following the huge increase in commercial channels. In recent years, programmes have started to dominate from the reality television genre including the celebrity and talent show subgenres. This has led to accusations of ITV 'dumbing down' their programmes and appealing to the 'lowest common denominator', accusations that are at odds with the network's status as a public service broadcaster. ITV was/is also heavily criticised for scaling back its regional programmes, including regional news, also ITV has been criticised (since 2010) for showing "Emmerdale" and "Coronation Street" at the 8:30 weekday slot (except Tuesdays).

Question: If I'm a big fan of Emmerdale, but had to schedule a meeting at 8:30 PM one weekday night, would Tuesday be best?
Answer: YES

Question: If I'm setting a timer on my phone to alert me every time Emmerdale or Coronation Street, could I make an alarm default to 8:30 PM every weeknight?
Answer: NO

Question: If it's Tuesday night, around 8:30 PM, and I want to call my friend who loves Emmerdale and Coronation Street, should I wait?
Answer: NO
Passage: Since the launch of ITV, there have been concerns from politicians and the press that ITV faced a conflict concerning programme audiences and advertisers. As advertisers are reluctant to buy advertising space around low viewing programmes, there is a pressure on ITV to broadcast more popular programmes in peak times. This has become more profound in recent years following a relaxation in regulation and significantly more competition in the advertising market following the huge increase in commercial channels. In recent years, programmes have started to dominate from the reality television genre including the celebrity and talent show subgenres. This has led to accusations of ITV 'dumbing down' their programmes and appealing to the 'lowest common denominator', accusations that are at odds with the network's status as a public service broadcaster. ITV was/is also heavily criticised for scaling back its regional programmes, including regional news, also ITV has been criticised (since 2010) for showing "Emmerdale" and "Coronation Street" at the 8:30 weekday slot ( they show something else on Tuesdays).

Question: If I'm a big fan of Emmerdale, but had to schedule a meeting at 8:30 PM one weekday night, would Tuesday be best?
Answer: YES

Question: If I'm setting a timer on my phone to alert me every time Emmerdale or Coronation Street, could I make an alarm default to 8:30 PM every weeknight?
Answer: NO

Question: If it's Tuesday night, around 8:30 PM, and I want to call my friend who loves Emmerdale and Coronation Street, should I wait?
Answer: NO
Passage: Since the launch of ITV, there have been concerns from politicians and the press that ITV faced a conflict concerning programme audiences and advertisers. As advertisers are reluctant to buy advertising space around low viewing programmes, there is a pressure on ITV to broadcast more popular programmes in peak times. This has become more profound in recent years following a relaxation in regulation and significantly more competition in the advertising market following the huge increase in commercial channels. In recent years, programmes have started to dominate from the reality television genre including the celebrity and talent show subgenres. This has led to accusations of ITV 'dumbing down' their programmes and appealing to the 'lowest common denominator', accusations that are at odds with the network's status as a public service broadcaster. ITV was/is also heavily criticised for scaling back its regional programmes, including regional news, also ITV has been criticised (since 2010) for showing "Emmerdale" and "Coronation Street" at the 8:30 weekday slot ( except some Tuesdays).

Question: If I'm a big fan of Emmerdale, but had to schedule a meeting at 8:30 PM one weekday night, would Tuesday be best?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If I'm setting a timer on my phone to alert me every time Emmerdale or Coronation Street, could I make an alarm default to 8:30 PM every weeknight?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If it's Tuesday night, around 8:30 PM, and I want to call my friend who loves Emmerdale and Coronation Street, should I wait?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Since the launch of ITV, there have been concerns from politicians and the press that ITV faced a conflict concerning programme audiences and advertisers. As advertisers are reluctant to buy advertising space around low viewing programmes, there is a pressure on ITV to broadcast more popular programmes in peak times. This has become more profound in recent years following a relaxation in regulation and significantly more competition in the advertising market following the huge increase in commercial channels. In recent years, programmes have started to dominate from the reality television genre including the celebrity and talent show subgenres. This has led to accusations of ITV 'dumbing down' their programmes and appealing to the 'lowest common denominator', accusations that are at odds with the network's status as a public service broadcaster. ITV was/is also heavily criticised for scaling back its regional programmes, including regional news, also ITV has been criticised (since 2010) for showing "Emmerdale" and "Coronation Street" at the 8:30 weekday slot ( even Tuesdays).

Question: If I'm a big fan of Emmerdale, but had to schedule a meeting at 8:30 PM one weekday night, would Tuesday be best?
Answer: NO

Question: If I'm setting a timer on my phone to alert me every time Emmerdale or Coronation Street, could I make an alarm default to 8:30 PM every weeknight?
Answer: YES

Question: If it's Tuesday night, around 8:30 PM, and I want to call my friend who loves Emmerdale and Coronation Street, should I wait?
Answer: YES
Passage: The subjugation of African Americans is thus seen as part of an ancient white conspiracy. According to the NOI, most whites are unaware of their true origins, but that senior Freemasons have this knowledge. It interprets opposition to the Nation from the U.S. government and white society as evidence for this. The United States is equated with the city of Babylon as presented in the Bible. The Nation interprets many of the problems facing the African American community in this light. Farrakhan has for instance claimed that the white establishment has encouraged a black gang culture to provide an excuse for the police killing of black youths, and that they are also responsible for flooding black-majority urban areas with drugs. Both Farrakhan and senior NOI spokesperson Abdul Alim Muhammad have claimed that the white establishment created the AIDS virus to exterminate black people. The Nation is openly critical of U.S. aggression towards countries with non-white majorities, especially when those countries also have Muslim majorities. In keeping with its anti-Western ethos, it has also adopted a consistently anti-Israel position, being both anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist.

Question: According to the NOI, are most whites knowingly taking part in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: NO

Question: According to the NOI, are senior Freemasons knowingly taking part in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the NOI, are most whites knowingly collaborating with senior Freemasons in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: NO
Passage: The subjugation of African Americans is thus seen as part of an ancient white conspiracy. According to the NOI, most whites are oblivious to their true origins, but that senior Freemasons have this knowledge. It interprets opposition to the Nation from the U.S. government and white society as evidence for this. The United States is equated with the city of Babylon as presented in the Bible. The Nation interprets many of the problems facing the African American community in this light. Farrakhan has for instance claimed that the white establishment has encouraged a black gang culture to provide an excuse for the police killing of black youths, and that they are also responsible for flooding black-majority urban areas with drugs. Both Farrakhan and senior NOI spokesperson Abdul Alim Muhammad have claimed that the white establishment created the AIDS virus to exterminate black people. The Nation is openly critical of U.S. aggression towards countries with non-white majorities, especially when those countries also have Muslim majorities. In keeping with its anti-Western ethos, it has also adopted a consistently anti-Israel position, being both anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist.

Question: According to the NOI, are most whites knowingly taking part in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: NO

Question: According to the NOI, are senior Freemasons knowingly taking part in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the NOI, are most whites knowingly collaborating with senior Freemasons in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: NO
Passage: The subjugation of African Americans is thus seen as part of an ancient white conspiracy. According to the NOI, most whites are knowledgeable of their true origins, but senior Freemasons are unaware of this knowledge. It interprets opposition to the Nation from the U.S. government and white society as evidence for this. The United States is equated with the city of Babylon as presented in the Bible. The Nation interprets many of the problems facing the African American community in this light. Farrakhan has for instance claimed that the white establishment has encouraged a black gang culture to provide an excuse for the police killing of black youths, and that they are also responsible for flooding black-majority urban areas with drugs. Both Farrakhan and senior NOI spokesperson Abdul Alim Muhammad have claimed that the white establishment created the AIDS virus to exterminate black people. The Nation is openly critical of U.S. aggression towards countries with non-white majorities, especially when those countries also have Muslim majorities. In keeping with its anti-Western ethos, it has also adopted a consistently anti-Israel position, being both anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist.

Question: According to the NOI, are most whites knowingly taking part in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the NOI, are senior Freemasons knowingly taking part in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: NO

Question: According to the NOI, are most whites knowingly collaborating with senior Freemasons in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: NO
Passage: The subjugation of African Americans is thus seen as part of an ancient white conspiracy. According to the NOI, most whites are knowledgeable of their true origins, and senior Freemasons also have this knowledge. It interprets opposition to the Nation from the U.S. government and white society as evidence for this. The United States is equated with the city of Babylon as presented in the Bible. The Nation interprets many of the problems facing the African American community in this light. Farrakhan has for instance claimed that the white establishment has encouraged a black gang culture to provide an excuse for the police killing of black youths, and that they are also responsible for flooding black-majority urban areas with drugs. Both Farrakhan and senior NOI spokesperson Abdul Alim Muhammad have claimed that the white establishment created the AIDS virus to exterminate black people. The Nation is openly critical of U.S. aggression towards countries with non-white majorities, especially when those countries also have Muslim majorities. In keeping with its anti-Western ethos, it has also adopted a consistently anti-Israel position, being both anti-Zionist and anti-imperialist.

Question: According to the NOI, are most whites knowingly taking part in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the NOI, are senior Freemasons knowingly taking part in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the NOI, are most whites knowingly collaborating with senior Freemasons in an ancient conspiracy?
Answer: YES
Passage: Rolf-Dieter Müller comments that the war in North Africa, while as bloody as any other war, differed considerable from the war of annihilation in eastern Europe, because it was limited to a narrow coastline and hardly affected the population. Showalter writes that: "From the desert campaign’s beginning, both sides consciously sought to wage a "clean" war—war without hate, as Rommel put it in his reflections. Explanations include the absence of civilians and the relative absence of Nazis; the nature of the environment, which conveyed a "moral simplicity and transparency"; and the control of command on both sides by prewar professionals, producing a British tendency to depict war in the imagery of a game, and the corresponding German pattern of seeing it as a test of skill and a proof of virtue. The nature of the fighting as well diminished the last-ditch, close-quarter actions that are primary nurturers of mutual bitterness. A battalion overrun by tanks usually had its resistance broken so completely that nothing was to be gained by a broken-backed final stand."

Question: Does this passage suggest that in the open environment of North African deserts, that there was really nowhere to hide from tanks, and that battles were won with overwhelming force rather than clever maneuvering?
Answer: YES

Question: There is a common saying that infantry can't survive without tanks, but tanks can't survive without infantry.  Does the passage suggest that this was the case even in the desert campaigns of North Africa, so that even heavy tank assaults found themselves vulnerable to lighter, faster forces?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way the passage is written, could you draw the conclusion that a battle tank's armor is relatively weak in places, perhaps due to weight constraints, and hence while a tank is practically invulnerable from the front, it may be weak from behind or from the side?
Answer: NO