lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: They were often communally owned by coastal farmers or commissioned by kings in times of conflict, in order to quickly assemble a large and powerful naval force. While longships were used by the Norse in warfare they were used as warships, and not as troop transports during raids. In the tenth century, longships would sometimes be tied together in offshore battles to form a steady platform for infantry warfare. During the 9th century peak of the Viking expansion, large fleets set out to attack the degrading Frankish empire by attacking up navigable rivers such as the Seine. Rouen was sacked in 841, the year after the death of Louis the Pious, a son of Charlemagne. Quentovic, near modern Étaples, was attacked in 842 and 600 Danish ships attacked Hamburg in 845. In the same year, 129 ships returned to attack up the Seine. They were called "dragonships" by enemies such as the English because they had a dragon-shaped bow. The Norse had a strong sense of naval architecture, and during the early medieval period they were advanced for their time.

Question: Is it reasonable to assume that Viking longships were fitted with battering rams or even early cannons, depending on what would be used in naval battles at this time in history?
Answer: YES

Question: Since Vikings are mostly known in popular culture for their raids on coastal villages, does it seem fitting that the longship is similarly well-remembered, as this would be the kind of boat most likely to be seen and recorded in these raids?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage, could you reasonably conclude that the dragon-shaped bow on a Viking longship was mainly used to instill fear in ground-based soldiers and civilians, rather than to provide some offensive purpose in pitched naval battles?
Answer: NO
Passage: They were often communally owned by coastal farmers or commissioned by kings in times of conflict, in order to quickly assemble a large and powerful naval force. While longships were used by the Norse in warfare, they were used interchangeably as warships and as troop transports. In the tenth century, longships would sometimes be tied together in offshore battles to form a steady platform for infantry warfare. During the 9th century peak of the Viking expansion, large fleets set out to attack the degrading Frankish empire by attacking up navigable rivers such as the Seine. Rouen was sacked in 841, the year after the death of Louis the Pious, a son of Charlemagne. Quentovic, near modern Étaples, was attacked in 842 and 600 Danish ships attacked Hamburg in 845. In the same year, 129 ships returned to attack up the Seine. They were called "dragonships" by enemies such as the English because they had a dragon-shaped bow. The Norse had a strong sense of naval architecture, and during the early medieval period they were advanced for their time.

Question: Is it reasonable to assume that Viking longships were fitted with battering rams or even early cannons, depending on what would be used in naval battles at this time in history?
Answer: YES

Question: Since Vikings are mostly known in popular culture for their raids on coastal villages, does it seem fitting that the longship is similarly well-remembered, as this would be the kind of boat most likely to be seen and recorded in these raids?
Answer: YES

Question: From this passage, could you reasonably conclude that the dragon-shaped bow on a Viking longship was mainly used to instill fear in ground-based soldiers and civilians, rather than to provide some offensive purpose in pitched naval battles?
Answer: NO
Passage: After the Spanish invasion and colonisation of the Inca Empire, the use of coca was restricted and appropriated by the Spaniards. By many historical accounts, the Spaniards tried to eradicate the coca leaf from Inca life. The Spaniards enslaved Inca people and tried to prevent them from having "the luxury" of the coca leaf. Although the Spaniards noticed the state-controlled storage facilities that the Inca had built to distribute to its workers, they were still ignorant to the importance of this divine plant for Inca people. Not only that, enslaved Inca people were not capable of enduring the arduous labour the Spaniards made them do without using coca. Even though Spaniards were trying to push catholicism onto the Inca, which did not allow them to eat before the Eucharist (the Spaniards thought coca to be food), they allowed them to continue to use coca to endure the labour associated with slavery. After seeing the effects and powers of the coca plant, many Spaniards saw another opportunity for appropriation of Inca culture and started growing and selling coca themselves.

Question: Did the Spaniards put any prohibition in place after they conquered the Incas?
Answer: YES

Question: Where the Inca people subject to slavery under the rule of Spain?
Answer: YES

Question: Where Incas deprived from coca leaf by the Spaniard rulers?
Answer: YES
Passage: After the Spanish invasion and colonisation of the Inca Empire, the use of coca was restricted and appropriated by the Spaniards. By many historical accounts, the Spaniards tried to eradicate the coca leaf from Inca life. The Spaniards enslaved Inca people and tried to take "the luxury" of the coca leaf away from them. Although the Spaniards noticed the state-controlled storage facilities that the Inca had built to distribute to its workers, they were still ignorant to the importance of this divine plant for Inca people. Not only that, enslaved Inca people were not capable of enduring the arduous labour the Spaniards made them do without using coca. Even though Spaniards were trying to push catholicism onto the Inca, which did not allow them to eat before the Eucharist (the Spaniards thought coca to be food), they allowed them to continue to use coca to endure the labour associated with slavery. After seeing the effects and powers of the coca plant, many Spaniards saw another opportunity for appropriation of Inca culture and started growing and selling coca themselves.

Question: Did the Spaniards put any prohibition in place after they conquered the Incas?
Answer: YES

Question: Where the Inca people subject to slavery under the rule of Spain?
Answer: YES

Question: Where Incas deprived from coca leaf by the Spaniard rulers?
Answer: YES
Passage: After the Spanish invasion and colonisation of the Inca Empire, the use of coca was restricted and appropriated by the Spaniards. By many historical accounts, the Spaniards tried to eradicate the coca leaf from Inca life. The Spaniards enslaved Inca people and tried to prevent them from any luxury but the coca leaf. Although the Spaniards noticed the state-controlled storage facilities that the Inca had built to distribute to its workers, they were still ignorant to the importance of this divine plant for Inca people. Not only that, enslaved Inca people were not capable of enduring the arduous labour the Spaniards made them do without using coca. Even though Spaniards were trying to push catholicism onto the Inca, which did not allow them to eat before the Eucharist (the Spaniards thought coca to be food), they allowed them to continue to use coca to endure the labour associated with slavery. After seeing the effects and powers of the coca plant, many Spaniards saw another opportunity for appropriation of Inca culture and started growing and selling coca themselves.

Question: Did the Spaniards put any prohibition in place after they conquered the Incas?
Answer: YES

Question: Where the Inca people subject to slavery under the rule of Spain?
Answer: YES

Question: Where Incas deprived from coca leaf by the Spaniard rulers?
Answer: NO
Passage: After the Spanish invasion and colonisation of the Inca Empire, the use of coca was restricted and appropriated by the Spaniards. By many historical accounts, the Spaniards tried to eradicate the coca leaf from Inca life. The Spaniards prevented people to enslave Incas in order to have "the luxury" of the coca leaf. Although the Spaniards noticed the state-controlled storage facilities that the Inca had built to distribute to its workers, they were still ignorant to the importance of this divine plant for Inca people. Not only that, enslaved Inca people were not capable of enduring the arduous labour the Spaniards made them do without using coca. Even though Spaniards were trying to push catholicism onto the Inca, which did not allow them to eat before the Eucharist (the Spaniards thought coca to be food), they allowed them to continue to use coca to endure the labour associated with slavery. After seeing the effects and powers of the coca plant, many Spaniards saw another opportunity for appropriation of Inca culture and started growing and selling coca themselves.

Question: Did the Spaniards put any prohibition in place after they conquered the Incas?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Where the Inca people subject to slavery under the rule of Spain?
Answer: NO

Question: Where Incas deprived from coca leaf by the Spaniard rulers?
Answer: NO
Passage: The film rights to the novel were licensed in the 1990s, several years after Heinlein's death. The project was originally entitled "Bug Hunt at Outpost Nine", and had been in production before the producers bought the rights to "Starship Troopers". The film was directed by Paul Verhoeven (who found the book too boring to finish), and released in 1997. The screenplay, by Ed Neumeier, shared character names and some plot details with the novel. The film contained several elements that differed from the book, including a military that is completely integrated with respect to sex. It had the stated intention of treating its material in an ironic or sarcastic manner, to undermine the political ideology of the novel. The mechanized suits that featured prominently in the novel were absent from the film, due to budget constraints.

Question: Would someone who had never seen the "Starship Troopers" movie, yet was otherwise well-acquainted with sci-fi action films, expect to see something more similar to "Pacific Rim" or to "Saving Private Ryan"?
Answer: "Saving Private Ryan"

Question: Given that the novel was written decades before the script was ultimately filmed, could a fan point to the irony of the more modern telling displaying considerably less high-tech gear available to the infantry?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the film version of Starship Troopers imply that the phrase "boots on the ground" is still used in the future to describe the pivotal aspects of combat?
Answer: YES
Passage: The film rights to the novel were licensed in the 1990s, several years after Heinlein's death. The project was originally entitled "Bug Hunt at Outpost Nine", and had been in production before the producers bought the rights to "Starship Troopers". The film was directed by Paul Verhoeven (who found the book too boring to finish), and released in 1997. The screenplay, by Ed Neumeier, shared character names and some plot details with the novel. The film contained several elements that differed from the book, including a military that is completely integrated with respect to sex. It had the stated intention of treating its material in an ironic or sarcastic manner, to undermine the political ideology of the novel. While the novel featured mechanized suits in many scenes, these were never shown or hinted at in the movie, because the budget would not allow for such expense.

Question: Would someone who had never seen the "Starship Troopers" movie, yet was otherwise well-acquainted with sci-fi action films, expect to see something more similar to "Pacific Rim" or to "Saving Private Ryan"?
Answer: "Saving Private Ryan"

Question: Given that the novel was written decades before the script was ultimately filmed, could a fan point to the irony of the more modern telling displaying considerably less high-tech gear available to the infantry?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the film version of Starship Troopers imply that the phrase "boots on the ground" is still used in the future to describe the pivotal aspects of combat?
Answer: YES
Passage: The film rights to the novel were licensed in the 1990s, several years after Heinlein's death. The project was originally entitled "Bug Hunt at Outpost Nine", and had been in production before the producers bought the rights to "Starship Troopers". The film was directed by Paul Verhoeven (who found the book too boring to finish), and released in 1997. The screenplay, by Ed Neumeier, shared character names and some plot details with the novel. The film contained several elements that differed from the book, including a military that is completely integrated with respect to sex. It had the stated intention of treating its material in an ironic or sarcastic manner, to undermine the political ideology of the novel. The mechanized suits that were only proposed by military planners in the novel, and completely absent from any combat scene, became a major plot point in the movie, due to the desire to create a big-budget blockbuster.

Question: Would someone who had never seen the "Starship Troopers" movie, yet was otherwise well-acquainted with sci-fi action films, expect to see something more similar to "Pacific Rim" or to "Saving Private Ryan"?
Answer: "Pacific Rim"

Question: Given that the novel was written decades before the script was ultimately filmed, could a fan point to the irony of the more modern telling displaying considerably less high-tech gear available to the infantry?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the film version of Starship Troopers imply that the phrase "boots on the ground" is still used in the future to describe the pivotal aspects of combat?
Answer: NO
Passage: The film rights to the novel were licensed in the 1990s, several years after Heinlein's death. The project was originally entitled "Bug Hunt at Outpost Nine", and had been in production before the producers bought the rights to "Starship Troopers". The film was directed by Paul Verhoeven (who found the book too boring to finish), and released in 1997. The screenplay, by Ed Neumeier, shared character names and some plot details with the novel. The film contained several elements that differed from the book, including a military that is completely integrated with respect to sex. It had the stated intention of treating its material in an ironic or sarcastic manner, to undermine the political ideology of the novel. The mechanized suits that featured prominently in the novel were also the centerpiece of military tactics in the movie, but had limited screen time (with most scenes focusing on the aftermath of battles) due to budget constraints.

Question: Would someone who had never seen the "Starship Troopers" movie, yet was otherwise well-acquainted with sci-fi action films, expect to see something more similar to "Pacific Rim" or to "Saving Private Ryan"?
Answer: "Pacific Rim"

Question: Given that the novel was written decades before the script was ultimately filmed, could a fan point to the irony of the more modern telling displaying considerably less high-tech gear available to the infantry?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the film version of Starship Troopers imply that the phrase "boots on the ground" is still used in the future to describe the pivotal aspects of combat?
Answer: NO
Passage: Within three months of sending troops to Yemen in 1962, Nasser realized that the engagement would require a larger commitment than anticipated. By early 1963, he would begin a four-year campaign to extricate Egyptian forces from Yemen, using an unsuccessful face-saving mechanism, only to find himself committing more troops. A little less than 5,000 troops were sent in October 1962. Two months later, Egypt had 15,000 regular troops deployed. By late 1963, the number was increased to 36,000; and in late 1964, the number rose to 50,000 Egyptian troops in Yemen. Late 1965 represented the high-water mark of Egyptian troop commitment in Yemen at 55,000 troops, which were broken into 13 infantry regiments of one artillery division, one tank division from the Egyptian Armoured Corps and several Special Forces as well as airborne regiments. All the Egyptian field commanders complained of a total lack of topographical maps causing a real problem in the first months of the war.

Question: Assuming that the terrain itself had not changed significantly, could the discovery of a cache of maps used by British and/or German troops in World War II have been of help to the Egyptian commanders at the onset of this war?
Answer: YES

Question: It's often said that great generals study logistics, but was the problem that Egypt faced at the start of the war an issue of education and training, rather than the ability to get the right equipment into the hands of soldiers who were already in the field?
Answer: NO

Question: If the Red Army had produced accurate topographical maps of North Africa, could Egypt's Cold-War ally of the Soviet Union have helped by donating said maps to the field commanders?
Answer: YES
Passage: Within three months of sending troops to Yemen in 1962, Nasser realized that the engagement would require a larger commitment than anticipated. By early 1963, he would begin a four-year campaign to extricate Egyptian forces from Yemen, using an unsuccessful face-saving mechanism, only to find himself committing more troops. A little less than 5,000 troops were sent in October 1962. Two months later, Egypt had 15,000 regular troops deployed. By late 1963, the number was increased to 36,000; and in late 1964, the number rose to 50,000 Egyptian troops in Yemen. Late 1965 represented the high-water mark of Egyptian troop commitment in Yemen at 55,000 troops, which were broken into 13 infantry regiments of one artillery division, one tank division from the Egyptian Armoured Corps and several Special Forces as well as airborne regiments. All of Egypt's field commanders complained that in the early months of the war, they did not have any topographical maps, which led to their great difficulties.

Question: Assuming that the terrain itself had not changed significantly, could the discovery of a cache of maps used by British and/or German troops in World War II have been of help to the Egyptian commanders at the onset of this war?
Answer: YES

Question: It's often said that great generals study logistics, but was the problem that Egypt faced at the start of the war an issue of education and training, rather than the ability to get the right equipment into the hands of soldiers who were already in the field?
Answer: NO

Question: If the Red Army had produced accurate topographical maps of North Africa, could Egypt's Cold-War ally of the Soviet Union have helped by donating said maps to the field commanders?
Answer: YES
Passage: Within three months of sending troops to Yemen in 1962, Nasser realized that the engagement would require a larger commitment than anticipated. By early 1963, he would begin a four-year campaign to extricate Egyptian forces from Yemen, using an unsuccessful face-saving mechanism, only to find himself committing more troops. A little less than 5,000 troops were sent in October 1962. Two months later, Egypt had 15,000 regular troops deployed. By late 1963, the number was increased to 36,000; and in late 1964, the number rose to 50,000 Egyptian troops in Yemen. Late 1965 represented the high-water mark of Egyptian troop commitment in Yemen at 55,000 troops, which were broken into 13 infantry regiments of one artillery division, one tank division from the Egyptian Armoured Corps and several Special Forces as well as airborne regiments. All the Egyptian field commanders complained of a total lack of understanding among the enlisted ranks of the topographical maps that had been distributed to them, which caused a real problem in the first months of the war.

Question: Assuming that the terrain itself had not changed significantly, could the discovery of a cache of maps used by British and/or German troops in World War II have been of help to the Egyptian commanders at the onset of this war?
Answer: NO

Question: It's often said that great generals study logistics, but was the problem that Egypt faced at the start of the war an issue of education and training, rather than the ability to get the right equipment into the hands of soldiers who were already in the field?
Answer: YES

Question: If the Red Army had produced accurate topographical maps of North Africa, could Egypt's Cold-War ally of the Soviet Union have helped by donating said maps to the field commanders?
Answer: NO
Passage: Within three months of sending troops to Yemen in 1962, Nasser realized that the engagement would require a larger commitment than anticipated. By early 1963, he would begin a four-year campaign to extricate Egyptian forces from Yemen, using an unsuccessful face-saving mechanism, only to find himself committing more troops. A little less than 5,000 troops were sent in October 1962. Two months later, Egypt had 15,000 regular troops deployed. By late 1963, the number was increased to 36,000; and in late 1964, the number rose to 50,000 Egyptian troops in Yemen. Late 1965 represented the high-water mark of Egyptian troop commitment in Yemen at 55,000 troops, which were broken into 13 infantry regiments of one artillery division, one tank division from the Egyptian Armoured Corps and several Special Forces as well as airborne regiments. All the Egyptian field commanders complained that their topographical maps, though abundant and accurate, were written in English rather than Arabic, which caused a real problem for the soldiers attempting to use them in the first months of the war.

Question: Assuming that the terrain itself had not changed significantly, could the discovery of a cache of maps used by British and/or German troops in World War II have been of help to the Egyptian commanders at the onset of this war?
Answer: NO

Question: It's often said that great generals study logistics, but was the problem that Egypt faced at the start of the war an issue of education and training, rather than the ability to get the right equipment into the hands of soldiers who were already in the field?
Answer: NO

Question: If the Red Army had produced accurate topographical maps of North Africa, could Egypt's Cold-War ally of the Soviet Union have helped by donating said maps to the field commanders?
Answer: NO
Passage: As of July 2009, Microsoft added and CLI to the list of specifications that the Microsoft Community Promise applies to, so anyone can safely implement specified editions of the standards without fearing a patent lawsuit from Microsoft. To implement the CLI standard requires conformance to one of the supported and defined profiles of the standard, the minimum of which is the kernel profile. The kernel profile is actually a very small set of types to support in comparison to the well known core library of default.NET installations. However, the conformance clause of the CLI allows for extending the supported profile by adding new methods and types to classes, as well as deriving from new namespaces. But it does not allow for adding new members to interfaces. This means that the features of the CLI can be used and extended, as long as the conforming profile implementation does not change the behavior of a program intended to run on that profile, while allowing for unspecified behavior from programs written specifically for that implementation.

Question: Does Microsoft CLI's conformance clause have anything to say about the addition of new members to interfaces?
Answer: YES

Question: Are Microsoft interfaces open to new members?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it possible to create new interfaces under Microsoft CLI's conformance clause?
Answer: DON'T KNOW