lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Given the fragmentary nature of the existing evidence, it is impossible to ascertain an exact date for the beginning of the uprising, but it is probable that it began in-between summer and fall 132. The Romans were overwhelmed by the organised ferocity of the uprising. Hadrian called his general Sextus Julius Severus from Britain, and brought troops in from as far as the Danube. Roman losses were heavy; an entire legion or its numeric equivalent of around 4,000. Hadrian's report on the war to the Roman Senate omitted the customary salutation, "If you and your children are in health, it is well; I and the legions are in health." The rebellion was quashed by 135. According to Cassius Dio, Roman war operations in Judea left some 580,000 Jews dead, and 50 fortified towns and 985 villages razed. The population proportion that was enslaved was given as no more than 10% by Cassius Dio, but to historians, it is unknown whether this figure can be fully trusted. Beitar, a fortified city southwest of Jerusalem, fell after a three and a half year siege. The extent of punitive measures against the Jewish population remains a matter of debate.

Question: While looking at the results of this battle, one might say that the villages and the Jewish population were decimated, due to the common misconception that "decimate" means to utterly destroy, when it actually means to reduce a population by 10%.  From the estimates given, if any, can you say with reasonable confidence that actually the opposite occurred, and 10% remained alive?
Answer: YES

Question: Is enough information given in this passage to say that the Jewish population in the area before these events took place was close to, but not quite, 650,000?
Answer: YES

Question: If accounting records were to be unearthed that revealed just how many Jewish slaves were taken after these events, would this figure satisfy an unanswered question of modern-day historians?
Answer: YES
Passage: Given the fragmentary nature of the existing evidence, it is impossible to ascertain an exact date for the beginning of the uprising, but it is probable that it began in-between summer and fall 132. The Romans were overwhelmed by the organised ferocity of the uprising. Hadrian called his general Sextus Julius Severus from Britain, and brought troops in from as far as the Danube. Roman losses were heavy; an entire legion or its numeric equivalent of around 4,000. Hadrian's report on the war to the Roman Senate omitted the customary salutation, "If you and your children are in health, it is well; I and the legions are in health." The rebellion was quashed by 135. According to Cassius Dio, Roman war operations in Judea left some 580,000 Jews dead, and 50 fortified towns and 985 villages razed. Using primary documents, historians have been able to confirm Dio's estimates that no more than one in ten residents were enslaved. Beitar, a fortified city southwest of Jerusalem, fell after a three and a half year siege. The extent of punitive measures against the Jewish population remains a matter of debate.

Question: While looking at the results of this battle, one might say that the villages and the Jewish population were decimated, due to the common misconception that "decimate" means to utterly destroy, when it actually means to reduce a population by 10%.  From the estimates given, if any, can you say with reasonable confidence that actually the opposite occurred, and 10% remained alive?
Answer: YES

Question: Is enough information given in this passage to say that the Jewish population in the area before these events took place was close to, but not quite, 650,000?
Answer: YES

Question: If accounting records were to be unearthed that revealed just how many Jewish slaves were taken after these events, would this figure satisfy an unanswered question of modern-day historians?
Answer: NO
Passage: At a March 2013 Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Senator Ron Wyden asked Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, "does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" Clapper replied "No, sir.... Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect, but not wittingly." This statement came under scrutiny months later, in June 2013, details of the PRISM surveillance program were published, showing that "the NSA apparently can gain access to the servers of nine Internet companies for a wide range of digital data." Wyden said that Clapper had failed to give a "straight answer" in his testimony. Clapper, in response to criticism, said, "I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful manner." Clapper added, "There are honest differences on the semantics of what -- when someone says ‘collection’ to me, that has a specific meaning, which may have a different meaning to him."

Question: Could the opposition party use Clapper's statement to claim that the NSA is intentionally spying on Americans?
Answer: NO

Question: If Clapper's statement is true, would the NSA follow up on any information they gathered on American citizens?
Answer: NO

Question: If Clapper's statement is true, would the NSA avoid tapping into a cellphone line of an American citizen who is talking to another American citizen?
Answer: YES
Passage: At a March 2013 Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Senator Ron Wyden asked Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, "does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" Clapper replied "No, sir.... Not wittingly. There are cases where they could accidentally perhaps collect, but not wittingly." This statement came under scrutiny months later, in June 2013, details of the PRISM surveillance program were published, showing that "the NSA apparently can gain access to the servers of nine Internet companies for a wide range of digital data." Wyden said that Clapper had failed to give a "straight answer" in his testimony. Clapper, in response to criticism, said, "I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful manner." Clapper added, "There are honest differences on the semantics of what -- when someone says ‘collection’ to me, that has a specific meaning, which may have a different meaning to him."

Question: Could the opposition party use Clapper's statement to claim that the NSA is intentionally spying on Americans?
Answer: NO

Question: If Clapper's statement is true, would the NSA follow up on any information they gathered on American citizens?
Answer: NO

Question: If Clapper's statement is true, would the NSA avoid tapping into a cellphone line of an American citizen who is talking to another American citizen?
Answer: YES
Passage: At a March 2013 Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Senator Ron Wyden asked Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, "does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" Clapper replied "Yes, sir.... wittingly. There are cases where they could perhaps wittingly collect, but not inadvertently ." This statement came under scrutiny months later, in June 2013, details of the PRISM surveillance program were published, showing that "the NSA apparently can gain access to the servers of nine Internet companies for a wide range of digital data." Wyden said that Clapper had failed to give a "straight answer" in his testimony. Clapper, in response to criticism, said, "I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful manner." Clapper added, "There are honest differences on the semantics of what -- when someone says ‘collection’ to me, that has a specific meaning, which may have a different meaning to him."

Question: Could the opposition party use Clapper's statement to claim that the NSA is intentionally spying on Americans?
Answer: YES

Question: If Clapper's statement is true, would the NSA follow up on any information they gathered on American citizens?
Answer: YES

Question: If Clapper's statement is true, would the NSA avoid tapping into a cellphone line of an American citizen who is talking to another American citizen?
Answer: NO
Passage: At a March 2013 Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Senator Ron Wyden asked Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, "does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" Clapper replied "Maybe, sir.... even wittingly. There are cases where they could perhaps collect wittingly." This statement came under scrutiny months later, in June 2013, details of the PRISM surveillance program were published, showing that "the NSA apparently can gain access to the servers of nine Internet companies for a wide range of digital data." Wyden said that Clapper had failed to give a "straight answer" in his testimony. Clapper, in response to criticism, said, "I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful manner." Clapper added, "There are honest differences on the semantics of what -- when someone says ‘collection’ to me, that has a specific meaning, which may have a different meaning to him."

Question: Could the opposition party use Clapper's statement to claim that the NSA is intentionally spying on Americans?
Answer: YES

Question: If Clapper's statement is true, would the NSA follow up on any information they gathered on American citizens?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If Clapper's statement is true, would the NSA avoid tapping into a cellphone line of an American citizen who is talking to another American citizen?
Answer: NO
Passage: Bao Tong, Zhao Ziyang's aide, was the highest-ranking official to be formally charged with a crime connected with 1989 demonstrations. He was convicted in 1992 of "revealing state secrets and counter-revolutionary propagandizing" and served seven years in prison. To purge sympathizers of Tiananmen demonstrators from among the party's rank-and-file, the party leadership initiated a one-and-a-half-year-long rectification program to "deal strictly with those inside the party with serious tendencies toward bourgeois liberalization". Four million people were reportedly investigated for their role in the protests. More than 30,000 Communist officers were deployed to assess the "political reliability" of more than one million government officials. The authorities arrested tens if not hundreds of thousands of people across the country. Some were seized in broad daylight while they walked in the street; others were arrested at night. Many were jailed or sent to labor camps. They were often denied access to see their families and often put in cells so crowded that not everyone had space to sleep. Dissidents shared cells with murderers and rapists, and torture was not uncommon.

Question: In addition to the terrible conditions, is it reasonable to conclude that police forces in China at this time used both the threat of and the occurrence of torture as a deterrent to crime?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like the Chinese authorities were aiming to maintain plausible deniability for any harm that occurred in their prisons, by trying to ensure that any acts of violence could be attributed to prisoners rather than guards?
Answer: NO

Question: Twenty years later, is it possible that Chinese authorities could try to claim the moral high ground when criticized for their treatment of Tiananmen sympathizers by pointing to the fact that their country did not embark upon widespread use of the kinds of enhanced interrogations that America's CIA later infamously used?
Answer: NO
Passage: Bao Tong, Zhao Ziyang's aide, was the highest-ranking official to be formally charged with a crime connected with 1989 demonstrations. He was convicted in 1992 of "revealing state secrets and counter-revolutionary propagandizing" and served seven years in prison. To purge sympathizers of Tiananmen demonstrators from among the party's rank-and-file, the party leadership initiated a one-and-a-half-year-long rectification program to "deal strictly with those inside the party with serious tendencies toward bourgeois liberalization". Four million people were reportedly investigated for their role in the protests. More than 30,000 Communist officers were deployed to assess the "political reliability" of more than one million government officials. The authorities arrested tens if not hundreds of thousands of people across the country. Some were seized in broad daylight while they walked in the street; others were arrested at night. Many were jailed or sent to labor camps. They were often denied access to see their families and often put in cells so crowded that not everyone had space to sleep. Political dissidents were often housed in the same cells as violent murderers and rapists, and torture was known to occur relatively frequently.

Question: In addition to the terrible conditions, is it reasonable to conclude that police forces in China at this time used both the threat of and the occurrence of torture as a deterrent to crime?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like the Chinese authorities were aiming to maintain plausible deniability for any harm that occurred in their prisons, by trying to ensure that any acts of violence could be attributed to prisoners rather than guards?
Answer: NO

Question: Twenty years later, is it possible that Chinese authorities could try to claim the moral high ground when criticized for their treatment of Tiananmen sympathizers by pointing to the fact that their country did not embark upon widespread use of the kinds of enhanced interrogations that America's CIA later infamously used?
Answer: NO
Passage: Bao Tong, Zhao Ziyang's aide, was the highest-ranking official to be formally charged with a crime connected with 1989 demonstrations. He was convicted in 1992 of "revealing state secrets and counter-revolutionary propagandizing" and served seven years in prison. To purge sympathizers of Tiananmen demonstrators from among the party's rank-and-file, the party leadership initiated a one-and-a-half-year-long rectification program to "deal strictly with those inside the party with serious tendencies toward bourgeois liberalization". Four million people were reportedly investigated for their role in the protests. More than 30,000 Communist officers were deployed to assess the "political reliability" of more than one million government officials. The authorities arrested tens if not hundreds of thousands of people across the country. Some were seized in broad daylight while they walked in the street; others were arrested at night. Many were jailed or sent to labor camps. They were often denied access to see their families and often put in cells so crowded that not everyone had space to sleep. Dissidents shared cells with murderers and rapists, though torture was known to be highly uncommon.

Question: In addition to the terrible conditions, is it reasonable to conclude that police forces in China at this time used both the threat of and the occurrence of torture as a deterrent to crime?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like the Chinese authorities were aiming to maintain plausible deniability for any harm that occurred in their prisons, by trying to ensure that any acts of violence could be attributed to prisoners rather than guards?
Answer: YES

Question: Twenty years later, is it possible that Chinese authorities could try to claim the moral high ground when criticized for their treatment of Tiananmen sympathizers by pointing to the fact that their country did not embark upon widespread use of the kinds of enhanced interrogations that America's CIA later infamously used?
Answer: YES
Passage: Bao Tong, Zhao Ziyang's aide, was the highest-ranking official to be formally charged with a crime connected with 1989 demonstrations. He was convicted in 1992 of "revealing state secrets and counter-revolutionary propagandizing" and served seven years in prison. To purge sympathizers of Tiananmen demonstrators from among the party's rank-and-file, the party leadership initiated a one-and-a-half-year-long rectification program to "deal strictly with those inside the party with serious tendencies toward bourgeois liberalization". Four million people were reportedly investigated for their role in the protests. More than 30,000 Communist officers were deployed to assess the "political reliability" of more than one million government officials. The authorities arrested tens if not hundreds of thousands of people across the country. Some were seized in broad daylight while they walked in the street; others were arrested at night. Many were jailed or sent to labor camps. They were often denied access to see their families and often put in cells so crowded that not everyone had space to sleep. Dissidents shared cells with murderers and rapists, though torture during interrogations was practically unheard of.

Question: In addition to the terrible conditions, is it reasonable to conclude that police forces in China at this time used both the threat of and the occurrence of torture as a deterrent to crime?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like the Chinese authorities were aiming to maintain plausible deniability for any harm that occurred in their prisons, by trying to ensure that any acts of violence could be attributed to prisoners rather than guards?
Answer: YES

Question: Twenty years later, is it possible that Chinese authorities could try to claim the moral high ground when criticized for their treatment of Tiananmen sympathizers by pointing to the fact that their country did not embark upon widespread use of the kinds of enhanced interrogations that America's CIA later infamously used?
Answer: YES
Passage: After Marlon Brando, Burt Lancaster, and Rock Hudson turned down the title role in "Ben-Hur" (1959), Heston accepted the role, winning the Academy Award for Best Actor, one of the unprecedented 11 Oscars the film earned. After Moses and "Ben-Hur", Heston became more identified with Biblical epics than any other actor. He later voiced Ben-Hur in an animated television production of the Lew Wallace novel in 2003.

Question: Given the facts presented in this passage, could you say it was possible that one or more movies released prior to 1959 (such as Citizen Kane, or Gone with the Wind) had each won more than ten Academy Awards?
Answer: NO

Question: If you had heard, and fully believed, that West Side Story had won 11 Oscars, would this passage cause you to conclude that the musical could have been released prior to 1959?
Answer: NO

Question: If a contemporary reader already knew that Return of the King, Titanic, and West Side Story had each won double-digit numbers of Academy Awards, would reading this passage allow them to conclude that perhaps they could count the total number of films that share that honor using the fingers of one hand?
Answer: YES
Passage: Charlton Heston agreed to star in 1959's "Ben-Hur," though he wasn't the first choice--Marlon Brando, Burt Lancaster, and Rock Hudson had all declined the titular character's role--and he went on to win an Oscar, with the film also winning another 10, which was a record at the time. After Moses and "Ben-Hur", Heston became more identified with Biblical epics than any other actor. He later voiced Ben-Hur in an animated television production of the Lew Wallace novel in 2003.

Question: Given the facts presented in this passage, could you say it was possible that one or more movies released prior to 1959 (such as Citizen Kane, or Gone with the Wind) had each won more than ten Academy Awards?
Answer: NO

Question: If you had heard, and fully believed, that West Side Story had won 11 Oscars, would this passage cause you to conclude that the musical could have been released prior to 1959?
Answer: NO

Question: If a contemporary reader already knew that Return of the King, Titanic, and West Side Story had each won double-digit numbers of Academy Awards, would reading this passage allow them to conclude that perhaps they could count the total number of films that share that honor using the fingers of one hand?
Answer: YES
Passage: After an unprecedented number of actors (including Marlon Brando, Burt Lancaster, and Rock Hudson) all turned down the title role in "Ben-Hur" (1959), Heston accepted the part, winning the Academy Award for Best Actor, one of the impressive, though not record-breaking, 10 Oscars the film earned. After Moses and "Ben-Hur", Heston became more identified with Biblical epics than any other actor. He later voiced Ben-Hur in an animated television production of the Lew Wallace novel in 2003.

Question: Given the facts presented in this passage, could you say it was possible that one or more movies released prior to 1959 (such as Citizen Kane, or Gone with the Wind) had each won more than ten Academy Awards?
Answer: YES

Question: If you had heard, and fully believed, that West Side Story had won 11 Oscars, would this passage cause you to conclude that the musical could have been released prior to 1959?
Answer: YES

Question: If a contemporary reader already knew that Return of the King, Titanic, and West Side Story had each won double-digit numbers of Academy Awards, would reading this passage allow them to conclude that perhaps they could count the total number of films that share that honor using the fingers of one hand?
Answer: YES
Passage: After Marlon Brando, Burt Lancaster, and Rock Hudson turned down the title role in "Ben-Hur" (1959), Heston accepted the role, winning the Academy Award for Best Actor, one of the 10 Oscars the film earned, putting it in third place for Oscar wins at that time. After Moses and "Ben-Hur", Heston became more identified with Biblical epics than any other actor. He later voiced Ben-Hur in an animated television production of the Lew Wallace novel in 2003.

Question: Given the facts presented in this passage, could you say it was possible that one or more movies released prior to 1959 (such as Citizen Kane, or Gone with the Wind) had each won more than ten Academy Awards?
Answer: YES

Question: If you had heard, and fully believed, that West Side Story had won 11 Oscars, would this passage cause you to conclude that the musical could have been released prior to 1959?
Answer: YES

Question: If a contemporary reader already knew that Return of the King, Titanic, and West Side Story had each won double-digit numbers of Academy Awards, would reading this passage allow them to conclude that perhaps they could count the total number of films that share that honor using the fingers of one hand?
Answer: NO
Passage: The first Q-ship victory was on 23 June 1915, when the submarine HMS "C24", cooperating with the decoy vessel "Taranaki", commanded by Lieutenant Frederick Henry Taylor CBE DSC RN, sank "U-40" off Eyemouth. The first victory by an unassisted Q-ship came on 24 July 1915 when "Prince Charles", commanded by Lieutenant Mark-Wardlaw, DSO, sank "U-36". The civilian crew of "Prince Charles" received a cash award. The following month an even smaller converted fishing trawler renamed HM Armed Smack "Inverlyon" successfully destroyed near Great Yarmouth. "Inverlyon" was an unpowered sailing ship fitted with a small 3 pounder (47 mm) gun. The British crew fired nine rounds from their 3-pounder into "UB-4" at close range, sinking her with the loss of all hands despite the attempt of "Inverlyon"s skipper to rescue one surviving German submariner.

Question: Given the relatively light armament on the Inverlyon, does it sound like the maximum engine size that could be fit into such a vessel was a limiting factor on how much firepower she could wield?
Answer: NO

Question: Although Inverlyon was successful in this mission, could it have turned out differently depending on the way the wind blew that day?
Answer: YES

Question: If Inverlyon found herself in the literal doldrums during a mission, could her commander have made a timely escape without assistance from any other craft?
Answer: NO