lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Ghostwriters , technical writers , and textbooks writers are usually paid differently: a set fee or a rate based on word count instead of on a percentage of sales.

Question: Are textbook writers paid on commission?
Answer: NO

Question: Do ghostwriters get paid for each word they write?
Answer: YES

Question: Do technical writers work for a set fee?
Answer: YES
Passage: Ghostwriters , technical writers , and textbooks writers are usually paid differently: rather than a set fee or a rate based on word count, they are paid based on a percentage of sales.

Question: Are textbook writers paid on commission?
Answer: YES

Question: Do ghostwriters get paid for each word they write?
Answer: NO

Question: Do technical writers work for a set fee?
Answer: NO
Passage: Ghostwriters , technical writers , and textbooks writers are usually paid solely based on a set fee or a rate based on word count.

Question: Are textbook writers paid on commission?
Answer: NO

Question: Do ghostwriters get paid for each word they write?
Answer: YES

Question: Do technical writers work for a set fee?
Answer: YES
Passage: Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." A known error in Hamilton's list—Hamilton incorrectly ascribed No. 54 to John Jay, when in fact, Jay wrote No. 64—provided some evidence for Madison's suggestion.

Question: Would the recent pop-culture phenomenon that surrounds Alexander Hamilton mean that collectors would be trying to find lists of Federalist Papers that have John Jay's name presented as the author of Number 54, since this would be evidence that Hamilton himself had compiled the list?
Answer: YES

Question: From this passage alone, and with no outside information, can you confidently state that John Jay must have truly written at least two of the Federalist Papers?
Answer: NO

Question: If a collector was trying to ascertain whether a unidentified manuscript was indeed an example of James Madison's list from the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist", would seeing Hamilton listed as the author of Number 54 instead of Jay be evidence of authenticity?
Answer: NO
Passage: Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." It is well known that Hamilton made an error in his own list, attributing No. 54 to John Jay, when in fact, Jay wrote No. 64—and this provided some evidence for Madison's suggestion.

Question: Would the recent pop-culture phenomenon that surrounds Alexander Hamilton mean that collectors would be trying to find lists of Federalist Papers that have John Jay's name presented as the author of Number 54, since this would be evidence that Hamilton himself had compiled the list?
Answer: YES

Question: From this passage alone, and with no outside information, can you confidently state that John Jay must have truly written at least two of the Federalist Papers?
Answer: NO

Question: If a collector was trying to ascertain whether a unidentified manuscript was indeed an example of James Madison's list from the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist", would seeing Hamilton listed as the author of Number 54 instead of Jay be evidence of authenticity?
Answer: NO
Passage: Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." An error was made by Madison in his criticisms, when he claimed that Hamilton incorrectly ascribed No. 54 to John Jay, when in fact, Jay indeed wrote both No. 54 and No. 64—and this provided some evidence that Hamilton used to rebut Madison's suggestion.

Question: Would the recent pop-culture phenomenon that surrounds Alexander Hamilton mean that collectors would be trying to find lists of Federalist Papers that have John Jay's name presented as the author of Number 54, since this would be evidence that Hamilton himself had compiled the list?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage alone, and with no outside information, can you confidently state that John Jay must have truly written at least two of the Federalist Papers?
Answer: YES

Question: If a collector was trying to ascertain whether a unidentified manuscript was indeed an example of James Madison's list from the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist", would seeing Hamilton listed as the author of Number 54 instead of Jay be evidence of authenticity?
Answer: NO
Passage: Madison did not immediately dispute Hamilton's list, but provided his own list for the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist". Madison claimed 29 essays for himself, and he suggested that the difference between the two lists was "owing doubtless to the hurry in which [Hamilton's] memorandum was made out." Madison's list, however, erroneously declared that Hamilton himself had claimed credit for No. 54 when in fact, it was well known (even to Hamilton) that Jay wrote both No. 54 and No. 64—and this provided some evidence that Hamilton used to rebut Madison's suggestion.

Question: Would the recent pop-culture phenomenon that surrounds Alexander Hamilton mean that collectors would be trying to find lists of Federalist Papers that have John Jay's name presented as the author of Number 54, since this would be evidence that Hamilton himself had compiled the list?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage alone, and with no outside information, can you confidently state that John Jay must have truly written at least two of the Federalist Papers?
Answer: YES

Question: If a collector was trying to ascertain whether a unidentified manuscript was indeed an example of James Madison's list from the 1818 Gideon edition of "The Federalist", would seeing Hamilton listed as the author of Number 54 instead of Jay be evidence of authenticity?
Answer: YES
Passage: But these methods never won over the non-uniform internal-handcrafting Gaussian mixture model/Hidden Markov model (GMM-HMM) technology based on generative models of speech trained discriminatively. A number of key difficulties had been methodologically analyzed in the 1990s, including gradient diminishing and weak temporal correlation structure in the neural predictive models. All these difficulties were in addition to the lack of big training data and big computing power in these early days. Most speech recognition researchers who understood such barriers hence subsequently moved away from neural nets to pursue generative modeling approaches until the recent resurgence of deep learning starting around 2009–2010 that had overcome all these difficulties. Hinton et al. and Deng et al. reviewed part of this recent history about how their collaboration with each other and then with colleagues across four groups (University of Toronto, Microsoft, Google, and IBM) ignited a renaissance of applications of deep feedforward neural networks to speech recognition.

Question: Did speech recognition researchers in the 1990s benefit from a large amount of training data?
Answer: NO

Question: Did speech recognition researchers in the 1990s benefit from the powerful computers of the time?
Answer: NO

Question: If the big training data of 2010 was available in the 1990s, would speech recognition researchers have made great progress?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: But these methods never won over the non-uniform internal-handcrafting Gaussian mixture model/Hidden Markov model (GMM-HMM) technology based on generative models of speech trained discriminatively. A number of key difficulties had been methodologically analyzed in the 1990s, including gradient diminishing and weak temporal correlation structure in the neural predictive models. All these difficulties were in addition to an insufficient amount of big training data and big computing power in these early days. Most speech recognition researchers who understood such barriers hence subsequently moved away from neural nets to pursue generative modeling approaches until the recent resurgence of deep learning starting around 2009–2010 that had overcome all these difficulties. Hinton et al. and Deng et al. reviewed part of this recent history about how their collaboration with each other and then with colleagues across four groups (University of Toronto, Microsoft, Google, and IBM) ignited a renaissance of applications of deep feedforward neural networks to speech recognition.

Question: Did speech recognition researchers in the 1990s benefit from a large amount of training data?
Answer: NO

Question: Did speech recognition researchers in the 1990s benefit from the powerful computers of the time?
Answer: NO

Question: If the big training data of 2010 was available in the 1990s, would speech recognition researchers have made great progress?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: But these methods never won over the non-uniform internal-handcrafting Gaussian mixture model/Hidden Markov model (GMM-HMM) technology based on generative models of speech trained discriminatively. A number of key difficulties had been methodologically analyzed in the 1990s, including gradient diminishing and weak temporal correlation structure in the neural predictive models. All these difficulties were in addition to the lack of big computing power (though not big training data) in these early days. Most speech recognition researchers who understood such barriers hence subsequently moved away from neural nets to pursue generative modeling approaches until the recent resurgence of deep learning starting around 2009–2010 that had overcome all these difficulties. Hinton et al. and Deng et al. reviewed part of this recent history about how their collaboration with each other and then with colleagues across four groups (University of Toronto, Microsoft, Google, and IBM) ignited a renaissance of applications of deep feedforward neural networks to speech recognition.

Question: Did speech recognition researchers in the 1990s benefit from a large amount of training data?
Answer: YES

Question: Did speech recognition researchers in the 1990s benefit from the powerful computers of the time?
Answer: NO

Question: If the big training data of 2010 was available in the 1990s, would speech recognition researchers have made great progress?
Answer: NO
Passage: But these methods never won over the non-uniform internal-handcrafting Gaussian mixture model/Hidden Markov model (GMM-HMM) technology based on generative models of speech trained discriminatively. A number of key difficulties had been methodologically analyzed in the 1990s, including gradient diminishing and weak temporal correlation structure in the neural predictive models. All these difficulties were despite the availability of big training data and big computing power in these early days. Most speech recognition researchers who understood such barriers hence subsequently moved away from neural nets to pursue generative modeling approaches until the recent resurgence of deep learning starting around 2009–2010 that had overcome all these difficulties. Hinton et al. and Deng et al. reviewed part of this recent history about how their collaboration with each other and then with colleagues across four groups (University of Toronto, Microsoft, Google, and IBM) ignited a renaissance of applications of deep feedforward neural networks to speech recognition.

Question: Did speech recognition researchers in the 1990s benefit from a large amount of training data?
Answer: YES

Question: Did speech recognition researchers in the 1990s benefit from the powerful computers of the time?
Answer: YES

Question: If the big training data of 2010 was available in the 1990s, would speech recognition researchers have made great progress?
Answer: NO
Passage: Kerensky was an active member of the irregular Freemasonic lodge, the Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples, which derived from the Grand Orient of France. Kerensky was Secretary-General of the Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples and stood down following his ascent to the government in July 1917. He was succeeded by a Menshevik, Alexander Halpern.

Question: Although the meanings of most aspects of Freemasonry are kept secret, if an outsider were to see a building belonging to Kerensky's lodge, would they expect to see similar symbols and words on the public-facing exterior?
Answer: NO

Question: If members of Kerensky's lodge were to meet and socialize with mainstream Freemasons, would they be wearing similar insignia and using similar phrases?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage imply that Freemasonic lodges tend to keep evolving, meaning that if one were to deviate from the mainstream, further spin-off lodges would continue that trend of deviation?
Answer: YES
Passage: Kerensky was an active member of the Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples, which derived from the Grand Orient of France, and was considered to be an irregular lodge of the Freemasons. Kerensky was Secretary-General of the Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples and stood down following his ascent to the government in July 1917. He was succeeded by a Menshevik, Alexander Halpern.

Question: Although the meanings of most aspects of Freemasonry are kept secret, if an outsider were to see a building belonging to Kerensky's lodge, would they expect to see similar symbols and words on the public-facing exterior?
Answer: NO

Question: If members of Kerensky's lodge were to meet and socialize with mainstream Freemasons, would they be wearing similar insignia and using similar phrases?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage imply that Freemasonic lodges tend to keep evolving, meaning that if one were to deviate from the mainstream, further spin-off lodges would continue that trend of deviation?
Answer: YES
Passage: Kerensky was an active member of the Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples, a traditional Freemasonic lodge which derived from the irregular Grand Orient of France. Kerensky was Secretary-General of the Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples and stood down following his ascent to the government in July 1917. He was succeeded by a Menshevik, Alexander Halpern.

Question: Although the meanings of most aspects of Freemasonry are kept secret, if an outsider were to see a building belonging to Kerensky's lodge, would they expect to see similar symbols and words on the public-facing exterior?
Answer: YES

Question: If members of Kerensky's lodge were to meet and socialize with mainstream Freemasons, would they be wearing similar insignia and using similar phrases?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage imply that Freemasonic lodges tend to keep evolving, meaning that if one were to deviate from the mainstream, further spin-off lodges would continue that trend of deviation?
Answer: NO
Passage: Kerensky was an active member of the Freemasonic lodge known the Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples, which derived from the similarly tradition lodge known as the Grand Orient of France. Kerensky was Secretary-General of the Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples and stood down following his ascent to the government in July 1917. He was succeeded by a Menshevik, Alexander Halpern.

Question: Although the meanings of most aspects of Freemasonry are kept secret, if an outsider were to see a building belonging to Kerensky's lodge, would they expect to see similar symbols and words on the public-facing exterior?
Answer: YES

Question: If members of Kerensky's lodge were to meet and socialize with mainstream Freemasons, would they be wearing similar insignia and using similar phrases?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage imply that Freemasonic lodges tend to keep evolving, meaning that if one were to deviate from the mainstream, further spin-off lodges would continue that trend of deviation?
Answer: NO
Passage: Early detection of the disease is important, since physical and neurological damage may be irreversible even if cured. Medications can decrease the risk of those living with people who have leprosy from acquiring the disease and likely those with whom people with leprosy come into contact outside the home. The WHO recommends that preventive medicine be given to people who are in close contact with someone who has leprosy. The suggested preventive treatment is a single dose of rifampicin (SDR) in adults and children over 2 years old who do not already have leprosy or tuberculosis. Preventive treatment is associated with a 57% reduction in infections within 2 years and a 30% reduction in infections within 6 years.

Question: If someone gets brain damage from leprosy and is then cured, do they risk lasting brain damage?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone loses the use of a leg due to leprosy and is then cured, do they risk a permanent loss of leg function?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone gets leprosy and is then cured, will they have any lasting effects?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Early detection of the disease is important, since physical and neurological damage may be a permanent effect even if cured. Medications can decrease the risk of those living with people who have leprosy from acquiring the disease and likely those with whom people with leprosy come into contact outside the home. The WHO recommends that preventive medicine be given to people who are in close contact with someone who has leprosy. The suggested preventive treatment is a single dose of rifampicin (SDR) in adults and children over 2 years old who do not already have leprosy or tuberculosis. Preventive treatment is associated with a 57% reduction in infections within 2 years and a 30% reduction in infections within 6 years.

Question: If someone gets brain damage from leprosy and is then cured, do they risk lasting brain damage?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone loses the use of a leg due to leprosy and is then cured, do they risk a permanent loss of leg function?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone gets leprosy and is then cured, will they have any lasting effects?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Early detection of the disease is important, since neurological damage may be irreversible even if cured, though physical damage can be reversed. Medications can decrease the risk of those living with people who have leprosy from acquiring the disease and likely those with whom people with leprosy come into contact outside the home. The WHO recommends that preventive medicine be given to people who are in close contact with someone who has leprosy. The suggested preventive treatment is a single dose of rifampicin (SDR) in adults and children over 2 years old who do not already have leprosy or tuberculosis. Preventive treatment is associated with a 57% reduction in infections within 2 years and a 30% reduction in infections within 6 years.

Question: If someone gets brain damage from leprosy and is then cured, do they risk lasting brain damage?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone loses the use of a leg due to leprosy and is then cured, do they risk a permanent loss of leg function?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone gets leprosy and is then cured, will they have any lasting effects?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Early detection of the disease is important, although physical and neurological damage can be resolved once cured. Medications can decrease the risk of those living with people who have leprosy from acquiring the disease and likely those with whom people with leprosy come into contact outside the home. The WHO recommends that preventive medicine be given to people who are in close contact with someone who has leprosy. The suggested preventive treatment is a single dose of rifampicin (SDR) in adults and children over 2 years old who do not already have leprosy or tuberculosis. Preventive treatment is associated with a 57% reduction in infections within 2 years and a 30% reduction in infections within 6 years.

Question: If someone gets brain damage from leprosy and is then cured, do they risk lasting brain damage?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone loses the use of a leg due to leprosy and is then cured, do they risk a permanent loss of leg function?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone gets leprosy and is then cured, will they have any lasting effects?
Answer: NO
Passage: The first four-door Rapide grand tourers rolled out of the Magna Steyr factory in Graz, Austria in 2010. The contract manufacturer provides dedicated facilities to ensure compliance with the exacting standards of Aston Martin and other marques, including Mercedes-Benz. Then CEO of the company, Dr. Ulrich Bez had publicly speculated about outsourcing all of Aston Martin's operations with the exception of marketing. In September 2011, it was announced that production of the Rapide would be returned to Gaydon in the second half of 2012, restoring all of the company's automobile manufacture there.

Question: Should a salesperson working at Aston Martin be worried about losing their job?
Answer: YES

Question: Would there likely be a noticeable change in the advertising methods of Aston Martin?
Answer: NO

Question: Should a marketer working at Aston Martin be worried about losing their job?
Answer: NO
Passage: The first four-door Rapide grand tourers rolled out of the Magna Steyr factory in Graz, Austria in 2010. The contract manufacturer provides dedicated facilities to ensure compliance with the exacting standards of Aston Martin and other marques, including Mercedes-Benz. Then CEO of the company, Dr. Ulrich Bez had publicly speculated about outsourcing all of Aston Martin's operations other than marketing. In September 2011, it was announced that production of the Rapide would be returned to Gaydon in the second half of 2012, restoring all of the company's automobile manufacture there.

Question: Should a salesperson working at Aston Martin be worried about losing their job?
Answer: YES

Question: Would there likely be a noticeable change in the advertising methods of Aston Martin?
Answer: NO

Question: Should a marketer working at Aston Martin be worried about losing their job?
Answer: NO
Passage: The first four-door Rapide grand tourers rolled out of the Magna Steyr factory in Graz, Austria in 2010. The contract manufacturer provides dedicated facilities to ensure compliance with the exacting standards of Aston Martin and other marques, including Mercedes-Benz. Then CEO of the company, Dr. Ulrich Bez had publicly speculated about outsourcing all of Aston Martin's operations with the exception of marketing and sales. In September 2011, it was announced that production of the Rapide would be returned to Gaydon in the second half of 2012, restoring all of the company's automobile manufacture there.

Question: Should a salesperson working at Aston Martin be worried about losing their job?
Answer: NO

Question: Would there likely be a noticeable change in the advertising methods of Aston Martin?
Answer: NO

Question: Should a marketer working at Aston Martin be worried about losing their job?
Answer: NO
Passage: The first four-door Rapide grand tourers rolled out of the Magna Steyr factory in Graz, Austria in 2010. The contract manufacturer provides dedicated facilities to ensure compliance with the exacting standards of Aston Martin and other marques, including Mercedes-Benz. Then CEO of the company, Dr. Ulrich Bez had publicly speculated about outsourcing all of Aston Martin's operations, including marketing. In September 2011, it was announced that production of the Rapide would be returned to Gaydon in the second half of 2012, restoring all of the company's automobile manufacture there.

Question: Should a salesperson working at Aston Martin be worried about losing their job?
Answer: YES

Question: Would there likely be a noticeable change in the advertising methods of Aston Martin?
Answer: YES

Question: Should a marketer working at Aston Martin be worried about losing their job?
Answer: YES