lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: The many sonatas that were unpublished during Scarlatti's lifetime have appeared in print regularly in the two and a half centuries since. Scarlatti has attracted notable admirers, including Béla Bartók, Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli, Pieter-Jan Belder, Johann Sebastian Bach, Muzio Clementi, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Ludwig van Beethoven, Carl Czerny, Franz Liszt, Johannes Brahms, Frédéric Chopin, Claude Debussy, Emil Gilels, Francis Poulenc, Olivier Messiaen, Enrique Granados, Marc-André Hamelin, Vladimir Horowitz, Ivo Pogorelić, Scott Ross (the first performer to record all 555 sonatas), Heinrich Schenker, András Schiff and Dmitri Shostakovich.

Question: When Scarlatti was alive, would there have been many sonatas of his that were impossible to find copies of in anyone's home?
Answer: YES

Question: Over the past 200 years, would it have been easy to consistently find new copies of books of Scarlatti's sonatas?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it possible that a book of Scarlatti's sonatas has been on every best seller's list over the past fifty years?
Answer: YES
Passage: Early Islamic literature rarely comments upon the habits of the "mukhannathun". It seems there may have been some variance in how "effeminate" they were, though there are indications that some adopted aspects of feminine dress or at least ornamentation. One hadith states that a Muslim "mukhannath" who had dyed his hands and feet with henna (traditionally a feminine activity) was banished from Medina, but not killed for his behavior.

Question: Given how common, or rare, commentary about the mukhannathun is in literature of the time, is it safe to assume that Mohammed himself never noticed or remarked upon their customs?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage suggest that early Islamic culture was more strict on the subject of gender roles and acceptable behavior, and that attitudes could have softened over time?
Answer: YES

Question: From this passage, can you conclude that the earliest attitude toward dress in Islamic culture was one of 'Live and let live', even in the holy city of Medina?
Answer: NO
Passage: There are few examples of commentary about the mukhannathun's behavior present in early Islamic literature. It seems there may have been some variance in how "effeminate" they were, though there are indications that some adopted aspects of feminine dress or at least ornamentation. One hadith states that a Muslim "mukhannath" who had dyed his hands and feet with henna (traditionally a feminine activity) was banished from Medina, but not killed for his behavior.

Question: Given how common, or rare, commentary about the mukhannathun is in literature of the time, is it safe to assume that Mohammed himself never noticed or remarked upon their customs?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage suggest that early Islamic culture was more strict on the subject of gender roles and acceptable behavior, and that attitudes could have softened over time?
Answer: YES

Question: From this passage, can you conclude that the earliest attitude toward dress in Islamic culture was one of 'Live and let live', even in the holy city of Medina?
Answer: NO
Passage: Early Islamic literature rarely speculates on the origin of the "mukhannathun" or on moral issues, but it does have a lot to say about accepting their ways and manners. It seems there may have been some variance in how "effeminate" they were, though there are indications that some adopted aspects of feminine dress or at least ornamentation. One later hadith states that a Muslim "mukhannath" who had dyed his hands and feet with henna (traditionally a feminine activity) was banished from Medina, and executed outside of its walls for his behavior.

Question: Given how common, or rare, commentary about the mukhannathun is in literature of the time, is it safe to assume that Mohammed himself never noticed or remarked upon their customs?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage suggest that early Islamic culture was more strict on the subject of gender roles and acceptable behavior, and that attitudes could have softened over time?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage, can you conclude that the earliest attitude toward dress in Islamic culture was one of 'Live and let live', even in the holy city of Medina?
Answer: YES
Passage: Early Islamic literature commonly commented upon the habits of the "mukhannathun", and how they break no law, even if such works never defined who they might be, or why they came about. It seems there may have been some variance in how "effeminate" they were, though there are indications that some adopted aspects of feminine dress or at least ornamentation. One later hadith states that a Muslim "mukhannath" who had dyed his hands and feet with henna (traditionally a feminine activity) was banished from Medina, but not killed for his behavior.

Question: Given how common, or rare, commentary about the mukhannathun is in literature of the time, is it safe to assume that Mohammed himself never noticed or remarked upon their customs?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage suggest that early Islamic culture was more strict on the subject of gender roles and acceptable behavior, and that attitudes could have softened over time?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage, can you conclude that the earliest attitude toward dress in Islamic culture was one of 'Live and let live', even in the holy city of Medina?
Answer: YES
Passage: Averroes's main influence on the Christian west was through his extensive commentaries on Aristotle. After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, western Europe fell into a cultural decline that resulted in the loss of nearly all of the intellectual legacy of the Classical Greek scholars, including Aristotle. Averroes's commentaries, which were translated into Latin and entered western Europe in the thirteenth century, provided an expert account of Aristotle's legacy and made them available again. The influence of his commentaries led to Averroes being referred to simply as "The Commentator" rather than by name in Latin Christian writings. He has been sometimes described as the "father of free thought and unbelief" and "father of rationalism".

Question: In the twelfth century, was Aristotle well known in western Europe?
Answer: NO

Question: In the twelfth century, were many Classical Greek scholars well known in western Europe?
Answer: NO

Question: In the twelfth century, was Plato well known in western Europe?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Averroes's main influence on the Christian west was through his extensive commentaries on Aristotle. After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, western Europe fell into a cultural decline that resulted in the removal of nearly all of the intellectual legacy of the Classical Greek scholars, including Aristotle. Averroes's commentaries, which were translated into Latin and entered western Europe in the thirteenth century, provided an expert account of Aristotle's legacy and made them available again. The influence of his commentaries led to Averroes being referred to simply as "The Commentator" rather than by name in Latin Christian writings. He has been sometimes described as the "father of free thought and unbelief" and "father of rationalism".

Question: In the twelfth century, was Aristotle well known in western Europe?
Answer: NO

Question: In the twelfth century, were many Classical Greek scholars well known in western Europe?
Answer: NO

Question: In the twelfth century, was Plato well known in western Europe?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Averroes's main influence on the Christian west was through his extensive commentaries on Aristotle. After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, western Europe fell into a cultural decline that resulted in the loss of Aristotle's intellectual legacy, though many Classical Greek scholars remained popular. Averroes's commentaries, which were translated into Latin and entered western Europe in the thirteenth century, provided an expert account of Aristotle's legacy and made them available again. The influence of his commentaries led to Averroes being referred to simply as "The Commentator" rather than by name in Latin Christian writings. He has been sometimes described as the "father of free thought and unbelief" and "father of rationalism".

Question: In the twelfth century, was Aristotle well known in western Europe?
Answer: NO

Question: In the twelfth century, were many Classical Greek scholars well known in western Europe?
Answer: YES

Question: In the twelfth century, was Plato well known in western Europe?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Averroes's main influence on the Christian west was through his extensive commentaries on Aristotle. After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, western Europe fell into a cultural decline. However, the intellectual legacy of the Classical Greek scholars, including Aristotle, remained strong. Averroes's commentaries, which were translated into Latin and entered western Europe in the thirteenth century, provided an expert account of Aristotle's legacy and made them available again. The influence of his commentaries led to Averroes being referred to simply as "The Commentator" rather than by name in Latin Christian writings. He has been sometimes described as the "father of free thought and unbelief" and "father of rationalism".

Question: In the twelfth century, was Aristotle well known in western Europe?
Answer: YES

Question: In the twelfth century, were many Classical Greek scholars well known in western Europe?
Answer: YES

Question: In the twelfth century, was Plato well known in western Europe?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 1886, Nietzsche broke with his publisher Ernst Schmeitzner, disgusted by his antisemitic opinions. Nietzsche saw his own writings as "completely buried and in this anti-Semitic dump" of Schmeitzner—associating the publisher with a movement that should be "utterly rejected with cold contempt by every sensible mind." He then printed "Beyond Good and Evil" at his own expense. He also acquired the publication rights for his earlier works and over the next year issued second editions of "The Birth of Tragedy", "Human, All Too Human", "Daybreak", and of "The Gay Science" with new prefaces placing the body of his work in a more coherent perspective. Thereafter, he saw his work as completed for a time and hoped that soon a readership would develop. In fact, interest in Nietzsche's thought did increase at this time, if rather slowly and hardly perceptibly to him. During these years Nietzsche met Meta von Salis, Carl Spitteler, and Gottfried Keller.

Question: Is it likely that Nietzsche's work was widely discussed in universities at the same time he reacquired publication rights to his work?
Answer: NO

Question: Would other publishers have been interested in Nietzsche's work?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is it likely that Nietzsche made a large profit from self-publishing his books?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 1886, Nietzsche broke with his publisher Ernst Schmeitzner, disgusted by his antisemitic opinions. Nietzsche saw his own writings as "completely buried and in this anti-Semitic dump" of Schmeitzner—associating the publisher with a movement that should be "utterly rejected with cold contempt by every sensible mind." He then printed "Beyond Good and Evil" at his own expense. He also acquired the publication rights for his earlier works and over the next year issued second editions of "The Birth of Tragedy", "Human, All Too Human", "Daybreak", and of "The Gay Science" with new prefaces placing the body of his work in a more coherent perspective. Thereafter, he saw his work as completed for a time and hoped that soon a readership would develop. In fact, interest in Nietzsche's thought did increase at this time, if rather slowly and barely perceptibly to him. During these years Nietzsche met Meta von Salis, Carl Spitteler, and Gottfried Keller.

Question: Is it likely that Nietzsche's work was widely discussed in universities at the same time he reacquired publication rights to his work?
Answer: NO

Question: Would other publishers have been interested in Nietzsche's work?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is it likely that Nietzsche made a large profit from self-publishing his books?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 1886, Nietzsche broke with his publisher Ernst Schmeitzner, disgusted by his antisemitic opinions. Nietzsche saw his own writings as "completely buried and in this anti-Semitic dump" of Schmeitzner—associating the publisher with a movement that should be "utterly rejected with cold contempt by every sensible mind." He then printed "Beyond Good and Evil" at his own expense. He also acquired the publication rights for his earlier works and over the next year issued second editions of "The Birth of Tragedy", "Human, All Too Human", "Daybreak", and of "The Gay Science" with new prefaces placing the body of his work in a more coherent perspective. Thereafter, he saw his work as completed for a time and hoped that soon a readership would develop. In fact, interest in Nietzsche's thought hardly increased at this time, and interest in his work continued to grow rather slowly through the years. During these years Nietzsche met Meta von Salis, Carl Spitteler, and Gottfried Keller.

Question: Is it likely that Nietzsche's work was widely discussed in universities at the same time he reacquired publication rights to his work?
Answer: NO

Question: Would other publishers have been interested in Nietzsche's work?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Nietzsche made a large profit from self-publishing his books?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 1886, Nietzsche broke with his publisher Ernst Schmeitzner, disgusted by his antisemitic opinions. Nietzsche saw his own writings as "completely buried and in this anti-Semitic dump" of Schmeitzner—associating the publisher with a movement that should be "utterly rejected with cold contempt by every sensible mind." He then printed "Beyond Good and Evil" at his own expense. He also acquired the publication rights for his earlier works and over the next year issued second editions of "The Birth of Tragedy", "Human, All Too Human", "Daybreak", and of "The Gay Science" with new prefaces placing the body of his work in a more coherent perspective. Thereafter, he saw his work as completed for a time and hoped that soon a readership would develop. In fact, interest in Nietzsche's thought did increase at this time, rather quickly and noticeably to him. During these years Nietzsche met Meta von Salis, Carl Spitteler, and Gottfried Keller.

Question: Is it likely that Nietzsche's work was widely discussed in universities at the same time he reacquired publication rights to his work?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would other publishers have been interested in Nietzsche's work?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Nietzsche made a large profit from self-publishing his books?
Answer: YES
Passage: In an opinion article published on the Debye Institute website, Dr. Gijs van Ginkel, until April 2007 Senior Managing Director of the VM Debye Instituut in Utrecht deplored this decision. In his article he cites scholars who point out that the DPG was able to retain their threatened staff as long as could be expected under increasing pressure from the Nazis. He also puts forward the important argument that when Debye in 1950 received the Max Planck medal of the DPG, nobody objected, not even the known opponent of the national socialists Max von Laue, who would have been in a position to object. Also Einstein, with his enormous prestige, was still alive, as were other Jewish scientists such as Lise Meitner and James Franck who both knew Debye intimately. None of them protested against Debye's receiving the highest German scientific distinction. In fact, Albert Einstein, after many years of not participating in the voting for the Max Planck Medal nominees, joined the process again to vote for Debye.

Question: Was Debye's Max Planck medal in 1950 seen as controversial?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Max von Laue have been able to scuttle Debye's receipt of the Max Planck medal on his own?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Was the vote for Debye to receive the Max Planck medal likely unanimous?
Answer: YES
Passage: In an opinion article published on the Debye Institute website, Dr. Gijs van Ginkel, until April 2007 Senior Managing Director of the VM Debye Instituut in Utrecht deplored this decision. In his article he cites scholars who point out that the DPG was able to retain their threatened staff as long as could be expected under increasing pressure from the Nazis. He also puts forward the important argument that when Debye in 1950 received the Max Planck medal of the DPG, everybody acquiesced, even the known opponent of the national socialists Max von Laue, who would have been in a position to object. Also Einstein, with his enormous prestige, was still alive, as were other Jewish scientists such as Lise Meitner and James Franck who both knew Debye intimately. None of them protested against Debye's receiving the highest German scientific distinction. In fact, Albert Einstein, after many years of not participating in the voting for the Max Planck Medal nominees, joined the process again to vote for Debye.

Question: Was Debye's Max Planck medal in 1950 seen as controversial?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Max von Laue have been able to scuttle Debye's receipt of the Max Planck medal on his own?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Was the vote for Debye to receive the Max Planck medal likely unanimous?
Answer: YES
Passage: In an opinion article published on the Debye Institute website, Dr. Gijs van Ginkel, until April 2007 Senior Managing Director of the VM Debye Instituut in Utrecht deplored this decision. In his article he cites scholars who point out that the DPG was able to retain their threatened staff as long as could be expected under increasing pressure from the Nazis. He also puts forward the important argument that when Debye in 1950 received the Max Planck medal of the DPG, nobody objected, except the known opponent of the national socialists Max von Laue, who was in a position to object. Also Einstein, with his enormous prestige, was still alive, as were other Jewish scientists such as Lise Meitner and James Franck who both knew Debye intimately. None of them protested against Debye's receiving the highest German scientific distinction. In fact, Albert Einstein, after many years of not participating in the voting for the Max Planck Medal nominees, joined the process again to vote for Debye.

Question: Was Debye's Max Planck medal in 1950 seen as controversial?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Max von Laue have been able to scuttle Debye's receipt of the Max Planck medal on his own?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the vote for Debye to receive the Max Planck medal likely unanimous?
Answer: NO
Passage: In an opinion article published on the Debye Institute website, Dr. Gijs van Ginkel, until April 2007 Senior Managing Director of the VM Debye Instituut in Utrecht deplored this decision. In his article he cites scholars who point out that the DPG was able to retain their threatened staff as long as could be expected under increasing pressure from the Nazis. But he also puts forward the important argument that when Debye in 1950 received the Max Planck medal of the DPG, many objected, including the known opponent of the national socialists Max von Laue, who was in a position to object. Also Einstein, with his enormous prestige, was still alive, as were other Jewish scientists such as Lise Meitner and James Franck who both knew Debye intimately. They all protested against Debye's receiving the highest German scientific distinction. In fact, Albert Einstein, after many years of not participating in the voting for the Max Planck Medal nominees, joined the process again to vote against Debye.

Question: Was Debye's Max Planck medal in 1950 seen as controversial?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Max von Laue have been able to scuttle Debye's receipt of the Max Planck medal on his own?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the vote for Debye to receive the Max Planck medal likely unanimous?
Answer: NO
Passage: The ancient polis is to be distinguished from the municipality, which was named in its honor. The polis lay 17 km east-northeast of the mouth of the Nestos River, almost directly opposite the island of Thasos. It was a colony placed in previously unsettled Thracian territory, not then a part of Hellas, during the age of Greek colonization. The city that developed from it became of major importance in ancient Greece. After the 4th centuryAD it declined, contracted to its acropolis, and was abandoned, never to be reoccupied except by archaeologists.

Question: If you had visited the city in the 6th century AD, would you probably have found lots of people there?
Answer: NO

Question: If you visit the city today, is it likely that there are lots of hotels nearby?
Answer: NO

Question: If you visit the city today, is it likely that you would find lots of neatly dug holes in the ground?
Answer: YES
Passage: The ancient polis is to be distinguished from the municipality, which was named in its honor. The polis lay 17 ;km east-northeast of the mouth of the Nestos River, almost directly opposite the island of Thasos. It was a colony placed in previously unsettled Thracian territory, not then a part of Hellas, during the age of Greek colonization. The city that developed from it became of major importance in ancient Greece. After the 4th centuryAD it declined, contracted to its acropolis, and was abandoned, failing to be reoccupied except by archaeologists.

Question: If you had visited the city in the 6th century AD, would you probably have found lots of people there?
Answer: NO

Question: If you visit the city today, is it likely that there are lots of hotels nearby?
Answer: NO

Question: If you visit the city today, is it likely that you would find lots of neatly dug holes in the ground?
Answer: YES
Passage: The ancient polis is to be distinguished from the municipality, which was named in its honor. The polis lay 17 ;km east-northeast of the mouth of the Nestos River, almost directly opposite the island of Thasos. It was a colony placed in previously unsettled Thracian territory, not then a part of Hellas, during the age of Greek colonization. The city that developed from it became of major importance in ancient Greece. After the 4th centuryAD it declined, contracted to its acropolis, and was abandoned, never to be reoccupied except by archaeologists and tourists.

Question: If you had visited the city in the 6th century AD, would you probably have found lots of people there?
Answer: NO

Question: If you visit the city today, is it likely that there are lots of hotels nearby?
Answer: YES

Question: If you visit the city today, is it likely that you would find lots of neatly dug holes in the ground?
Answer: YES
Passage: The ancient polis is to be distinguished from the municipality, which was named in its honor. The polis lay 17 ;km east-northeast of the mouth of the Nestos River, almost directly opposite the island of Thasos. It was a colony placed in previously unsettled Thracian territory, not then a part of Hellas, during the age of Greek colonization. The city that developed from it became of major importance in ancient Greece. After the 4th centuryAD it declined, contracted to its acropolis, and was abandoned, but was shortly thereafter reoccupied, but never by archaeologists.

Question: If you had visited the city in the 6th century AD, would you probably have found lots of people there?
Answer: YES

Question: If you visit the city today, is it likely that there are lots of hotels nearby?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If you visit the city today, is it likely that you would find lots of neatly dug holes in the ground?
Answer: NO