lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Local tetanus is a rare form of the disease and it causes persistent contractions of muscles in the same area of the sufferer's body as where the original injury was made. The contractions may persist for many weeks before gradually subsiding. Local tetanus is generally milder; only about 1% of cases are fatal, but it may precede the onset of generalized tetanus.

Question: A reader with a passing familiarity with medicine might recall that tetanus was known as lockjaw in the middle ages, which suggests that in the majority of cases, tetanus infected the body in general rather than just a small area around a cut or wound.  Does the passage make it sound like this is still the case?
Answer: YES

Question: From this passage we know that localized tetanus has a fatality rate of 1%.  Given how common or uncommon local-tetanus cases are said to be, would you expect that the overall death rate from all forms of tetanus would be very close to, and just a bit higher than 1%, since that is just the way that averages work?
Answer: NO

Question: Again, given that many lurid historical accounts of tetanus suggest that it was generally an affliction of the entire body, could you conclude from this passage that better hygiene and understanding of germ theory has contributed to it now being much more likely to be a less-serious, more-localized infection in most cases?
Answer: NO
Passage: Local tetanus is the typical form of the disease, and causes people have persistent contraction of muscles in the same anatomic area as the injury, with any spreading being highly uncommon. The contractions may persist for many weeks before gradually subsiding. Local tetanus is generally milder; only about 1% of cases are fatal, but it may precede the onset of generalized tetanus.

Question: A reader with a passing familiarity with medicine might recall that tetanus was known as lockjaw in the middle ages, which suggests that in the majority of cases, tetanus infected the body in general rather than just a small area around a cut or wound.  Does the passage make it sound like this is still the case?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage we know that localized tetanus has a fatality rate of 1%.  Given how common or uncommon local-tetanus cases are said to be, would you expect that the overall death rate from all forms of tetanus would be very close to, and just a bit higher than 1%, since that is just the way that averages work?
Answer: YES

Question: Again, given that many lurid historical accounts of tetanus suggest that it was generally an affliction of the entire body, could you conclude from this passage that better hygiene and understanding of germ theory has contributed to it now being much more likely to be a less-serious, more-localized infection in most cases?
Answer: YES
Passage: Local tetanus is the most likely form of the disease, and causes people have persistent contraction of muscles in the same anatomic area as the injury. The contractions may persist for many weeks before gradually subsiding. Local tetanus is generally milder; only about 1% of cases are fatal, but it may precede the onset of generalized tetanus.

Question: A reader with a passing familiarity with medicine might recall that tetanus was known as lockjaw in the middle ages, which suggests that in the majority of cases, tetanus infected the body in general rather than just a small area around a cut or wound.  Does the passage make it sound like this is still the case?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage we know that localized tetanus has a fatality rate of 1%.  Given how common or uncommon local-tetanus cases are said to be, would you expect that the overall death rate from all forms of tetanus would be very close to, and just a bit higher than 1%, since that is just the way that averages work?
Answer: YES

Question: Again, given that many lurid historical accounts of tetanus suggest that it was generally an affliction of the entire body, could you conclude from this passage that better hygiene and understanding of germ theory has contributed to it now being much more likely to be a less-serious, more-localized infection in most cases?
Answer: YES
Passage: When Alaska became a state in 1959, section 4 of the Alaska Statehood Act provided that any existing Alaska Native land claims would be unaffected by statehood and held in status quo. Yet while section 4 of the act preserved Native land claims until later settlement, section 6 allowed for the state government to claim lands deemed vacant. Section 6 granted the state of Alaska the right to select lands then in the hands of the federal government, with the exception of Native territory. As a result, nearly from the public domain would eventually be transferred to the state. The state government also attempted to acquire lands under section 6 of the Statehood Act that were subject to Native claims under section 4, and that were currently occupied and used by Alaska Natives. The federal Bureau of Land Management began to process the Alaska government's selections without taking into account the Native claims and without informing the affected Native groups.

Question: Did Section 6 include any restriction on the federal lands that Alaska could choose?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the Alaska Statehood Act attempt to protect the rights of Alaska Natives?
Answer: YES

Question: If strictly adhered to, did Section 6 allow Alaska natives to stay on their lands?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Section 6 allow Alaska to choose any federal lands that it wanted?
Answer: NO
Passage: When Alaska became a state in 1959, section 4 of the Alaska Statehood Act provided that any existing Alaska Native land claims would be unaffected by statehood and held in status quo. Yet while section 4 of the act preserved Native land claims until later settlement, section 6 allowed for the state government to claim lands deemed vacant. Section 6 granted the state of Alaska the right to select lands then in the hands of the federal government, apart from Native territory. As a result, nearly from the public domain would eventually be transferred to the state. The state government also attempted to acquire lands under section 6 of the Statehood Act that were subject to Native claims under section 4, and that were currently occupied and used by Alaska Natives. The federal Bureau of Land Management began to process the Alaska government's selections without taking into account the Native claims and without informing the affected Native groups.

Question: Did Section 6 include any restriction on the federal lands that Alaska could choose?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the Alaska Statehood Act attempt to protect the rights of Alaska Natives?
Answer: YES

Question: If strictly adhered to, did Section 6 allow Alaska natives to stay on their lands?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Section 6 allow Alaska to choose any federal lands that it wanted?
Answer: NO
Passage: When Alaska became a state in 1959, section 4 of the Alaska Statehood Act provided that any existing Alaska Native land claims would be unaffected by statehood and held in status quo. Yet while section 4 of the act preserved Native land claims until later settlement, section 6 allowed for the state government to claim lands deemed vacant. Section 6 granted the state of Alaska the right to select lands then in the hands of the federal government, with the exception of certain pieces of Native territory. As a result, nearly from the public domain would eventually be transferred to the state. The state government also attempted to acquire lands under section 6 of the Statehood Act that were subject to Native claims under section 4, and that were currently occupied and used by Alaska Natives. The federal Bureau of Land Management began to process the Alaska government's selections without taking into account the Native claims and without informing the affected Native groups.

Question: Did Section 6 include any restriction on the federal lands that Alaska could choose?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the Alaska Statehood Act attempt to protect the rights of Alaska Natives?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If strictly adhered to, did Section 6 allow Alaska natives to stay on their lands?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Did Section 6 allow Alaska to choose any federal lands that it wanted?
Answer: NO
Passage: When Alaska became a state in 1959, section 4 of the Alaska Statehood Act provided that any existing Alaska Native land claims would be unaffected by statehood and held in status quo. Yet while section 4 of the act preserved Native land claims until later settlement, section 6 allowed for the state government to claim lands deemed vacant. Section 6 granted the state of Alaska the right to select lands then in the hands of the federal government, including the entirety of Native territory. As a result, nearly from the public domain would eventually be transferred to the state. The state government also attempted to acquire lands under section 6 of the Statehood Act that were subject to Native claims under section 4, and that were currently occupied and used by Alaska Natives. The federal Bureau of Land Management began to process the Alaska government's selections without taking into account the Native claims and without informing the affected Native groups.

Question: Did Section 6 include any restriction on the federal lands that Alaska could choose?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the Alaska Statehood Act attempt to protect the rights of Alaska Natives?
Answer: NO

Question: If strictly adhered to, did Section 6 allow Alaska natives to stay on their lands?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Did Section 6 allow Alaska to choose any federal lands that it wanted?
Answer: YES
Passage: During the 1970s, the Glenanne gang—a secret alliance of loyalist militants, British soldiers and RUC officers—carried out a string of gun and bomb attacks against nationalists in an area of Northern Ireland known as the "murder triangle". It also carried out some attacks in the Republic, killing about 120 people in total, mostly uninvolved civilians. The "Cassel Report" investigated 76 murders attributed to the group and found evidence that soldiers and policemen were involved in 74 of those. One member, RUC officer John Weir, claimed his superiors knew of the collusion but allowed it to continue. The "Cassel Report" also said some senior officers knew of the crimes but did nothing to prevent, investigate or punish. Attacks attributed to the group include the Dublin and Monaghan bombings (1974), the Miami Showband killings (1975) and the Reavey and O'Dowd killings (1976).

Question: Upon seeing the results of their attacks in the Republic, would the Glenanne gang have considered the operation to be successful in advancing their cause?
Answer: NO

Question: Even if a Glenanne gang member thought that the targeting of these people was inappropriate, would he agree that the deaths of the victims was harmful to the nationalists' cause?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the victims of the gang's attacks likely have worn ranks or otherwise occupied a place in a paramilitary hierarchy?
Answer: NO
Passage: During the 1970s, the Glenanne gang—a secret alliance of loyalist militants, British soldiers and RUC officers—carried out a string of gun and bomb attacks against nationalists in an area of Northern Ireland known as the "murder triangle". It also carried out some attacks in the Republic, killing about 120 people in total, mostly civilians who had no connection to the government. The "Cassel Report" investigated 76 murders attributed to the group and found evidence that soldiers and policemen were involved in 74 of those. One member, RUC officer John Weir, claimed his superiors knew of the collusion but allowed it to continue. The "Cassel Report" also said some senior officers knew of the crimes but did nothing to prevent, investigate or punish. Attacks attributed to the group include the Dublin and Monaghan bombings (1974), the Miami Showband killings (1975) and the Reavey and O'Dowd killings (1976).

Question: Upon seeing the results of their attacks in the Republic, would the Glenanne gang have considered the operation to be successful in advancing their cause?
Answer: NO

Question: Even if a Glenanne gang member thought that the targeting of these people was inappropriate, would he agree that the deaths of the victims was harmful to the nationalists' cause?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the victims of the gang's attacks likely have worn ranks or otherwise occupied a place in a paramilitary hierarchy?
Answer: NO
Passage: During the 1970s, the Glenanne gang—a secret alliance of loyalist militants, British soldiers and RUC officers—carried out a string of gun and bomb attacks against nationalists in an area of Northern Ireland known as the "murder triangle". It also carried out some attacks in the Republic, killing about 120 people in total, mostly militants who were uninvolved in local unrest, but were strongly connected to the nationalist cause. The "Cassel Report" investigated 76 murders attributed to the group and found evidence that soldiers and policemen were involved in 74 of those. One member, RUC officer John Weir, claimed his superiors knew of the collusion but allowed it to continue. The "Cassel Report" also said some senior officers knew of the crimes but did nothing to prevent, investigate or punish. Attacks attributed to the group include the Dublin and Monaghan bombings (1974), the Miami Showband killings (1975) and the Reavey and O'Dowd killings (1976).

Question: Upon seeing the results of their attacks in the Republic, would the Glenanne gang have considered the operation to be successful in advancing their cause?
Answer: YES

Question: Even if a Glenanne gang member thought that the targeting of these people was inappropriate, would he agree that the deaths of the victims was harmful to the nationalists' cause?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the victims of the gang's attacks likely have worn ranks or otherwise occupied a place in a paramilitary hierarchy?
Answer: YES
Passage: During the 1970s, the Glenanne gang—a secret alliance of loyalist militants, British soldiers and RUC officers—carried out a string of gun and bomb attacks against nationalists in an area of Northern Ireland known as the "murder triangle". It also carried out some attacks in the Republic, killing about 120 people in total, mostly nationalist militants who were disguised as civilians. The "Cassel Report" investigated 76 murders attributed to the group and found evidence that soldiers and policemen were involved in 74 of those. One member, RUC officer John Weir, claimed his superiors knew of the collusion but allowed it to continue. The "Cassel Report" also said some senior officers knew of the crimes but did nothing to prevent, investigate or punish. Attacks attributed to the group include the Dublin and Monaghan bombings (1974), the Miami Showband killings (1975) and the Reavey and O'Dowd killings (1976).

Question: Upon seeing the results of their attacks in the Republic, would the Glenanne gang have considered the operation to be successful in advancing their cause?
Answer: YES

Question: Even if a Glenanne gang member thought that the targeting of these people was inappropriate, would he agree that the deaths of the victims was harmful to the nationalists' cause?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the victims of the gang's attacks likely have worn ranks or otherwise occupied a place in a paramilitary hierarchy?
Answer: YES
Passage: The USN operated the F4H-1 (re-designated F-4A in 1962) with J79-GE-2 and -2A engines of 16,100 lbf (71.62 kN) thrust and later builds receiving -8 engines. A total of 45 F-4As were built; none saw combat, and most ended up as test or training aircraft. The USN and USMC received the first definitive Phantom, the F-4B which was equipped with the Westinghouse APQ-72 radar (pulse only), a Texas Instruments AAA-4 Infrared search and track pod under the nose, an AN/AJB-3 bombing system and powered by J79-GE-8,-8A and -8B engines of 10,900 lbf (48.5 kN) dry and 16,950 lbf (75.4 kN) afterburner (reheat) with the first flight on 25 March 1961. 649 F-4Bs were built with deliveries beginning in 1961 and VF-121 Pacemakers receiving the first examples at NAS Miramar.

Question: If a pilot had died as a result of a dogfight with an F-4A fighter jet, would his death have been ruled accidental, as part of simulated combat?
Answer: YES

Question: Although there was comparatively little air-to-air combat in the Vietnam war, where the F-4 Phantom famously fought, is it possible from what we know that one of the few American air aces flew an F-4A
Answer: NO

Question: If a Navy pilot were to give his F-4A fighter an affectionate nickname, would he be more likely to choose something like "A is for Angel" in reference to the fact that the jet got him home safely from a potentially-deadly battle, rather than a semi-facetious "A for Effort"
Answer: NO
Passage: The USN operated the F4H-1 (re-designated F-4A in 1962) with J79-GE-2 and -2A engines of 16,100 ;lbf (71.62 ;kN) thrust and later builds receiving -8 engines. In total, 45 of the F-4A model were built, but they were used mostly for testing or training purposes, since none actually served in combat roles. The USN and USMC received the first definitive Phantom, the F-4B which was equipped with the Westinghouse APQ-72 radar (pulse only), a Texas Instruments AAA-4 Infrared search and track pod under the nose, an AN/AJB-3 bombing system and powered by J79-GE-8,-8A and -8B engines of 10,900 ;lbf (48.5 ;kN) dry and 16,950 ;lbf (75.4 ;kN) afterburner (reheat) with the first flight on 25 March 1961. 649 F-4Bs were built with deliveries beginning in 1961 and VF-121 Pacemakers receiving the first examples at NAS Miramar.

Question: If a pilot had died as a result of a dogfight with an F-4A fighter jet, would his death have been ruled accidental, as part of simulated combat?
Answer: YES

Question: Although there was comparatively little air-to-air combat in the Vietnam war, where the F-4 Phantom famously fought, is it possible from what we know that one of the few American air aces flew an F-4A
Answer: NO

Question: If a Navy pilot were to give his F-4A fighter an affectionate nickname, would he be more likely to choose something like "A is for Angel" in reference to the fact that the jet got him home safely from a potentially-deadly battle, rather than a semi-facetious "A for Effort"
Answer: NO
Passage: The USN operated the F4H-1 (re-designated F-4A in 1962) with J79-GE-2 and -2A engines of 16,100 ;lbf (71.62 ;kN) thrust and later builds receiving -8 engines. A total of 45 F-4As were built, they saw only limited combat patrols, and none ended up being used as test or training aircraft. The USN and USMC received the first definitive Phantom, the F-4B which was equipped with the Westinghouse APQ-72 radar (pulse only), a Texas Instruments AAA-4 Infrared search and track pod under the nose, an AN/AJB-3 bombing system and powered by J79-GE-8,-8A and -8B engines of 10,900 ;lbf (48.5 ;kN) dry and 16,950 ;lbf (75.4 ;kN) afterburner (reheat) with the first flight on 25 March 1961. 649 F-4Bs were built with deliveries beginning in 1961 and VF-121 Pacemakers receiving the first examples at NAS Miramar.

Question: If a pilot had died as a result of a dogfight with an F-4A fighter jet, would his death have been ruled accidental, as part of simulated combat?
Answer: NO

Question: Although there was comparatively little air-to-air combat in the Vietnam war, where the F-4 Phantom famously fought, is it possible from what we know that one of the few American air aces flew an F-4A
Answer: NO

Question: If a Navy pilot were to give his F-4A fighter an affectionate nickname, would he be more likely to choose something like "A is for Angel" in reference to the fact that the jet got him home safely from a potentially-deadly battle, rather than a semi-facetious "A for Effort"
Answer: NO
Passage: The USN operated the F4H-1 (re-designated F-4A in 1962) with J79-GE-2 and -2A engines of 16,100 ;lbf (71.62 ;kN) thrust and later builds receiving -8 engines. A total of 45 F-4As were built and due to the rigors of combat, none survived in a condition necessary for use as test or training aircraft. The USN and USMC received the first definitive Phantom, the F-4B which was equipped with the Westinghouse APQ-72 radar (pulse only), a Texas Instruments AAA-4 Infrared search and track pod under the nose, an AN/AJB-3 bombing system and powered by J79-GE-8,-8A and -8B engines of 10,900 ;lbf (48.5 ;kN) dry and 16,950 ;lbf (75.4 ;kN) afterburner (reheat) with the first flight on 25 March 1961. 649 F-4Bs were built with deliveries beginning in 1961 and VF-121 Pacemakers receiving the first examples at NAS Miramar.

Question: If a pilot had died as a result of a dogfight with an F-4A fighter jet, would his death have been ruled accidental, as part of simulated combat?
Answer: NO

Question: Although there was comparatively little air-to-air combat in the Vietnam war, where the F-4 Phantom famously fought, is it possible from what we know that one of the few American air aces flew an F-4A
Answer: YES

Question: If a Navy pilot were to give his F-4A fighter an affectionate nickname, would he be more likely to choose something like "A is for Angel" in reference to the fact that the jet got him home safely from a potentially-deadly battle, rather than a semi-facetious "A for Effort"
Answer: YES
Passage: Heavy water lacks the characteristic blue color of light water; this is because the molecular vibration harmonics, which in light water cause weak absorption in the red part of the visible spectrum, are shifted into the infrared and thus heavy water does not absorb red light.

Question: What color can a person expect heavy water to be?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Heavy water absorbs what kind of light?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Does the color of heavy water depend on molecular vibrations taking place?
Answer: YES
Passage: The characteristic of the blue color is limited to light water, with heavy water having another color; this is because the molecular vibration harmonics, which in light water cause weak absorption in the red part of the visible spectrum, are shifted into the infrared and thus heavy water does not absorb red light.

Question: What color can a person expect heavy water to be?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Heavy water absorbs what kind of light?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Does the color of heavy water depend on molecular vibrations taking place?
Answer: YES
Passage: Heavy water has the characteristic blue color of light water; this is because of the lack of molecular vibration harmonics, which in light water cause weak absorption in the red part of the visible spectrum. Thus, the spectrum shifts into the infrared, and heavy water do not absorb red light.

Question: What color can a person expect heavy water to be?
Answer: Blue color

Question: Heavy water absorbs what kind of light?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Does the color of heavy water depend on molecular vibrations taking place?
Answer: NO
Passage: Heavy water has the characteristic blue color of light water; this is because the molecular vibration harmonics, which in light water cause weak absorption in the red part of the visible spectrum, are shifted into the infrared and this causes heavy water to absorb less red light.

Question: What color can a person expect heavy water to be?
Answer: Blue color

Question: Heavy water absorbs what kind of light?
Answer: Red light

Question: Does the color of heavy water depend on molecular vibrations taking place?
Answer: YES