lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: The Roman Exarchate of Africa was not able to withstand the seventh-century Muslim conquest of the Maghreb. The Umayyad Caliphate under Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan in 686 sent a force led by Zuhayr ibn Qays, who won a battle over the Romans and Berbers led by King Kusaila of the Kingdom of Altava on the plain of Kairouan followed up by many other victories until he ended the war. In 695, Hassan ibn al-Nu'man captured Carthage and advanced into the Atlas Mountains. An imperial fleet arrived and retook Carthage, but in 698, Hasan ibn al-Nu'man returned and defeated Emperor Tiberios III at the 698 Battle of Carthage. Roman imperial forces withdrew from all of Africa except Ceuta. Fearing that the Byzantine Empire might reconquer it, they decided to destroy Roman Carthage in a scorched earth policy and establish their headquarters somewhere else. Its walls were torn down, the water supply from its aqueducts cut off, the agricultural land was ravaged and its harbors made unusable.

Question: Was Zuhayr ibn Qays’ victory over the Romans and Berbers the beginning of a successful campaign?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Zuhayr ibn Qays lead Marwan’s Umayyad Caliphate force until the end of the war?
Answer: YES

Question: Was the Umayyad Caliphate's victory in Kairouan the last successful one in the war campaign?
Answer: NO
Passage: The UN attempted to settle these disputes through a visiting mission in late 1975, as well as a verdict from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It acknowledged that Western Sahara had historical links with Morocco and Mauritania, but not sufficient to prove the sovereignty of either State over the territory at the time of the Spanish colonization. The population of the territory thus possessed the right of self-determination. On 6 November 1975 Morocco initiated the Green March into Western Sahara; 350,000 unarmed Moroccans converged on the city of Tarfaya in southern Morocco and waited for a signal from King Hassan II of Morocco to cross the border in a peaceful march. A few days before, on 31 October, Moroccan troops invaded Western Sahara from the north.

Question: Would a soldier carrying a rifle have been permitted to participate in the Green March?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a spouse of someone participating in the Green March likely have been concerned that their partner would be killed?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would a citizen of Tarfaya who joined the military be stationed far from their family?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The UN attempted to settle these disputes through a visiting mission in late 1975, as well as a verdict from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It acknowledged that Western Sahara had historical links with Morocco and Mauritania, but not sufficient to prove the sovereignty of either State over the territory at the time of the Spanish colonization. The population of the territory thus possessed the right of self-determination. On 6 November 1975 Morocco initiated the Green March into Western Sahara; 350,000 weaponless Moroccans converged on the city of Tarfaya in southern Morocco and waited for a signal from King Hassan II of Morocco to cross the border in a peaceful march. A few days before, on 31 October, Moroccan troops invaded Western Sahara from the north.

Question: Would a soldier carrying a rifle have been permitted to participate in the Green March?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a spouse of someone participating in the Green March likely have been concerned that their partner would be killed?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would a citizen of Tarfaya who joined the military be stationed far from their family?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The UN attempted to settle these disputes through a visiting mission in late 1975, as well as a verdict from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It acknowledged that Western Sahara had historical links with Morocco and Mauritania, but not sufficient to prove the sovereignty of either State over the territory at the time of the Spanish colonization. The population of the territory thus possessed the right of self-determination. On 6 November 1975 Morocco initiated the Green March into Western Sahara; 350,000 Moroccans converged on the unarmed city of Tarfaya in southern Morocco and waited for a signal from King Hassan II of Morocco to cross the border in a peaceful march. A few days before, on 31 October, Moroccan troops invaded Western Sahara from the north.

Question: Would a soldier carrying a rifle have been permitted to participate in the Green March?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would a spouse of someone participating in the Green March likely have been concerned that their partner would be killed?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a citizen of Tarfaya who joined the military be stationed far from their family?
Answer: YES
Passage: The UN attempted to settle these disputes through a visiting mission in late 1975, as well as a verdict from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It acknowledged that Western Sahara had historical links with Morocco and Mauritania, but not sufficient to prove the sovereignty of either State over the territory at the time of the Spanish colonization. The population of the territory thus possessed the right of self-determination. On 6 November 1975 Morocco initiated the Green March into Western Sahara; 350,000 armed Moroccans converged on the city of Tarfaya in southern Morocco and waited for a signal from King Hassan II of Morocco to cross the border in a peaceful march. A few days before, on 31 October, Moroccan troops invaded Western Sahara from the north.

Question: Would a soldier carrying a rifle have been permitted to participate in the Green March?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a spouse of someone participating in the Green March likely have been concerned that their partner would be killed?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a citizen of Tarfaya who joined the military be stationed far from their family?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: In the early 1990s, Gonzalo Garcia-Pelayo believed that casino roulette wheels were not perfectly random, and that by recording the results and analysing them with a computer, he could gain an edge on the house by predicting that certain numbers were more likely to occur next than the 1-in-36 odds offered by the house suggested. This he did at the Casino de Madrid in Madrid, Spain, winning 600,000 euros in a single day, and one million euros in total. Legal action against him by the casino was unsuccessful, it being ruled that the casino should fix its wheel.

Question: Would it be possible, if cynical, to believe that a judge had received a kickback from the casino based on their monetary winnings from the case, given the way it was decided?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like the court have decided this case in a manner similar to the way that insider-trading cases are decided, that is, under the principle that as long as information is publicly available, however arcane it might be, it is fair to use it to one's advantage?
Answer: YES

Question: Regardless of who technically won the lawsuit, does it sound like Garcia-Pelayo's dedicated efforts paid off for him, monetarily?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the early 1990s, Gonzalo Garcia-Pelayo believed that casino roulette wheels were not perfectly random, and that by recording the results and analysing them with a computer, he could gain an edge on the house by predicting that certain numbers were more likely to occur next than the 1-in-36 odds offered by the house suggested. This he did at the Casino de Madrid in Madrid, Spain, winning 600,000 euros in a single day, and one million euros in total. The casino tried, but failed, to take legal action against him, and the court ruled that the wheel was the casino's responsibility to fix.

Question: Would it be possible, if cynical, to believe that a judge had received a kickback from the casino based on their monetary winnings from the case, given the way it was decided?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like the court have decided this case in a manner similar to the way that insider-trading cases are decided, that is, under the principle that as long as information is publicly available, however arcane it might be, it is fair to use it to one's advantage?
Answer: YES

Question: Regardless of who technically won the lawsuit, does it sound like Garcia-Pelayo's dedicated efforts paid off for him, monetarily?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the early 1990s, Gonzalo Garcia-Pelayo believed that casino roulette wheels were not perfectly random, and that by recording the results and analysing them with a computer, he could gain an edge on the house by predicting that certain numbers were more likely to occur next than the 1-in-36 odds offered by the house suggested. This he did at the Casino de Madrid in Madrid, Spain, winning 600,000 euros in a single day, and one million euros in total. He was unsuccessful in defending himself in the face of legal action by the casino, however, and had to return his winnings after the court ruled that he had taken advantage of the casino's broken wheel.

Question: Would it be possible, if cynical, to believe that a judge had received a kickback from the casino based on their monetary winnings from the case, given the way it was decided?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like the court have decided this case in a manner similar to the way that insider-trading cases are decided, that is, under the principle that as long as information is publicly available, however arcane it might be, it is fair to use it to one's advantage?
Answer: NO

Question: Regardless of who technically won the lawsuit, does it sound like Garcia-Pelayo's dedicated efforts paid off for him, monetarily?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the early 1990s, Gonzalo Garcia-Pelayo believed that casino roulette wheels were not perfectly random, and that by recording the results and analysing them with a computer, he could gain an edge on the house by predicting that certain numbers were more likely to occur next than the 1-in-36 odds offered by the house suggested. This he did at the Casino de Madrid in Madrid, Spain, winning 600,000 euros in a single day, and one million euros in total. The casino succeeded in legally banning him from any future roulette games due to his unfair advantage after the casino proved to the court that a physical wheel can never be made perfectly random.

Question: Would it be possible, if cynical, to believe that a judge had received a kickback from the casino based on their monetary winnings from the case, given the way it was decided?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like the court have decided this case in a manner similar to the way that insider-trading cases are decided, that is, under the principle that as long as information is publicly available, however arcane it might be, it is fair to use it to one's advantage?
Answer: NO

Question: Regardless of who technically won the lawsuit, does it sound like Garcia-Pelayo's dedicated efforts paid off for him, monetarily?
Answer: YES
Passage: The development of Guildford (to the west) was stimulated by the construction of the Wey Navigation in the 1650s. In contrast, although several schemes were proposed to make the Mole navigable, none were enacted and transport links to Dorking remained poor. As a result, the local economy began to suffer and the town declined through the late 17th and early 18th centuries.

Question: After the proposals to improve the Mole were presented, is it likely that traders in the area purchased more expensive homes?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the authors of the proposals to improve the Mole likely highly sought after for work after their proposals were presented?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the people who proposed the Wey Navigation were more competent than the people who made proposals for improving the Mole?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The development of Guildford (to the west) was stimulated by the construction of the Wey Navigation in the 1650s. In contrast, although several schemes were proposed to make the Mole navigable, they stayed only as proposals and transport links to Dorking remained poor. As a result, the local economy began to suffer and the town declined through the late 17th and early 18th centuries.

Question: After the proposals to improve the Mole were presented, is it likely that traders in the area purchased more expensive homes?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the authors of the proposals to improve the Mole likely highly sought after for work after their proposals were presented?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the people who proposed the Wey Navigation were more competent than the people who made proposals for improving the Mole?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The development of Guildford (to the west) was stimulated by the construction of the Wey Navigation in the 1650s. Several schemes were proposed to make the Mole navigable, and all were enacted and none of the transport links to Dorking remained poor. As a result, the local economy began to improve and the town flourished through the late 17th and early 18th centuries.

Question: After the proposals to improve the Mole were presented, is it likely that traders in the area purchased more expensive homes?
Answer: YES

Question: Were the authors of the proposals to improve the Mole likely highly sought after for work after their proposals were presented?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the people who proposed the Wey Navigation were more competent than the people who made proposals for improving the Mole?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The development of Guildford (to the west) was stimulated by the construction of the Wey Navigation in the 1650s. In contrast, although several schemes were proposed to make the Mole navigable, and all were enacted, transport links to Dorking remained poor. As a result, the local economy began to suffer and the town declined through the late 17th and early 18th centuries.

Question: After the proposals to improve the Mole were presented, is it likely that traders in the area purchased more expensive homes?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the authors of the proposals to improve the Mole likely highly sought after for work after their proposals were presented?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the people who proposed the Wey Navigation were more competent than the people who made proposals for improving the Mole?
Answer: YES
Passage: In England, the Royal Society of London also played a significant role in the public sphere and the spread of Enlightenment ideas. It was founded by a group of independent scientists and given a royal charter in 1662. The Society played a large role in spreading Robert Boyle's experimental philosophy around Europe and acted as a clearinghouse for intellectual correspondence and exchange. Boyle was "a founder of the experimental world in which scientists now live and operate" and his method based knowledge on experimentation, which had to be witnessed to provide proper empirical legitimacy. This is where the Royal Society came into play: witnessing had to be a "collective act" and the Royal Society's assembly rooms were ideal locations for relatively public demonstrations. However, not just any witness was considered to be credible: "Oxford professors were accounted more reliable witnesses than Oxfordshire peasants". Two factors were taken into account: a witness's knowledge in the area and a witness's "moral constitution". In other words, only civil society were considered for Boyle's public.

Question: If an Oxford professor and an Oxfordshire peasant disagreed on whether a demonstration worked, would the peasant's views be accepted over the professor's?
Answer: NO

Question: If an Oxford professor and an Oxfordshire peasant disagreed on whether a demonstration worked, would the professor's views be accepted over the peasant's?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a random person who witnessed a demonstration feel it worth voicing an opinion that countered an Oxford professor's?
Answer: NO
Passage: In England, the Royal Society of London also played a significant role in the public sphere and the spread of Enlightenment ideas. It was founded by a group of independent scientists and given a royal charter in 1662. The Society played a large role in spreading Robert Boyle's experimental philosophy around Europe and acted as a clearinghouse for intellectual correspondence and exchange. Boyle was "a founder of the experimental world in which scientists now live and operate" and his method based knowledge on experimentation, which had to be witnessed to provide proper empirical legitimacy. This is where the Royal Society came into play: witnessing had to be a "collective act" and the Royal Society's assembly rooms were ideal locations for relatively public demonstrations. However, only some witnesses were considered to be credible: "Oxford professors were accounted more reliable witnesses than Oxfordshire peasants". Two factors were taken into account: a witness's knowledge in the area and a witness's "moral constitution". In other words, only civil society were considered for Boyle's public.

Question: If an Oxford professor and an Oxfordshire peasant disagreed on whether a demonstration worked, would the peasant's views be accepted over the professor's?
Answer: NO

Question: If an Oxford professor and an Oxfordshire peasant disagreed on whether a demonstration worked, would the professor's views be accepted over the peasant's?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a random person who witnessed a demonstration feel it worth voicing an opinion that countered an Oxford professor's?
Answer: NO
Passage: In England, the Royal Society of London also played a significant role in the public sphere and the spread of Enlightenment ideas. It was founded by a group of independent scientists and given a royal charter in 1662. The Society played a large role in spreading Robert Boyle's experimental philosophy around Europe and acted as a clearinghouse for intellectual correspondence and exchange. Boyle was "a founder of the experimental world in which scientists now live and operate" and his method based knowledge on experimentation, which had to be witnessed to provide proper empirical legitimacy. This is where the Royal Society came into play: witnessing had to be a "collective act" and the Royal Society's assembly rooms were ideal locations for relatively public demonstrations. However, not just any witness was considered to be credible: "Oxford professors were not accounted reliable witnesses, but Oxfordshire peasants were". No factors were taken into account: neither a witness's knowledge in the area nor a witness's "moral constitution". In other words, not only civil society were considered for Boyle's public.

Question: If an Oxford professor and an Oxfordshire peasant disagreed on whether a demonstration worked, would the peasant's views be accepted over the professor's?
Answer: YES

Question: If an Oxford professor and an Oxfordshire peasant disagreed on whether a demonstration worked, would the professor's views be accepted over the peasant's?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a random person who witnessed a demonstration feel it worth voicing an opinion that countered an Oxford professor's?
Answer: YES
Passage: In England, the Royal Society of London also played a significant role in the public sphere and the spread of Enlightenment ideas. It was founded by a group of independent scientists and given a royal charter in 1662. The Society played a large role in spreading Robert Boyle's experimental philosophy around Europe and acted as a clearinghouse for intellectual correspondence and exchange. Boyle was "a founder of the experimental world in which scientists now live and operate" and his method based knowledge on experimentation, which had to be witnessed to provide proper empirical legitimacy. This is where the Royal Society came into play: witnessing had to be a "collective act" and the Royal Society's assembly rooms were ideal locations for relatively public demonstrations. However, any witness was considered to be credible: "Oxford professors were accounted no more reliable witnesses than Oxfordshire peasants". No factors were taken into account: neither a witness's knowledge in the area nor a witness's "moral constitution". In other words, not only civil society were considered for Boyle's public.

Question: If an Oxford professor and an Oxfordshire peasant disagreed on whether a demonstration worked, would the peasant's views be accepted over the professor's?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If an Oxford professor and an Oxfordshire peasant disagreed on whether a demonstration worked, would the professor's views be accepted over the peasant's?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would a random person who witnessed a demonstration feel it worth voicing an opinion that countered an Oxford professor's?
Answer: YES
Passage: In baseball the Tucson Saguaros of the independent Pecos League started play in 2016 and play at Amphitheater High School. They won the league in their inaugural season. The Tucson Padres played at Kino Veterans Memorial Stadium from 2011 to 2013. They served as the AAA affiliate of the San Diego Padres. The team, formerly known as the Portland Beavers, temporarily moved to Tucson from Portland while the team awaited a new stadium in Escondido. Legal issues derailed the plans to build the Escondido stadium, so they moved to El Paso, Texas for the 2014 season. Previously, the Tucson Sidewinders, a triple-A affiliate of the Arizona Diamondbacks, won the Pacific Coast League championship and unofficial AAA championship in 2006. The Sidewinders played in Tucson Electric Park and were in the Pacific Conference South of the PCL. The Sidewinders were sold in 2007 and moved to Reno, Nevada after the 2008 season. They now compete as the Reno Aces.

Question: Would you ever have found a formal contract signed between the Tucson Sidewinders and the Arizona Diamondbacks?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the AAA Championship in 2006 likely have a strict training requirement for the umpires?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the 2006 AAA Championship be referenced in many formal baseball record books?
Answer: NO
Passage: In baseball the Tucson Saguaros of the independent Pecos League started play in 2016 and play at Amphitheater High School. They won the league in their inaugural season. The Tucson Padres played at Kino Veterans Memorial Stadium from 2011 to 2013. They served as the AAA affiliate of the San Diego Padres. The team, formerly known as the Portland Beavers, temporarily moved to Tucson from Portland while the team awaited a new stadium in Escondido. Legal issues derailed the plans to build the Escondido stadium, so they moved to El Paso, Texas for the 2014 season. Previously, the Tucson Sidewinders, a triple-A affiliate of the Arizona Diamondbacks, won the Pacific Coast League championship and the off the record AAA championship in 2006. The Sidewinders played in Tucson Electric Park and were in the Pacific Conference South of the PCL. The Sidewinders were sold in 2007 and moved to Reno, Nevada after the 2008 season. They now compete as the Reno Aces.

Question: Would you ever have found a formal contract signed between the Tucson Sidewinders and the Arizona Diamondbacks?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the AAA Championship in 2006 likely have a strict training requirement for the umpires?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the 2006 AAA Championship be referenced in many formal baseball record books?
Answer: NO