lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In 1999, the United States hosted the FIFA Women's World Cup for the first time. During their tournament run, the women's national team established a new level of popularity for the women's game, culminating in a final against China that drew 90,185 fans, an all-time attendance record for a women's sports event, to a sold-out Rose Bowl. Since the score remained tied at 1-1 after regulation and extra time, the final went to a penalty shootout, which the United States won 5–4. The celebration by Brandi Chastain after she converted the winning penalty, in which she took off her shirt, is one of the more famous images in U.S. women's sports.

Question: Based on the score at the end of extra time, is it possible that two goals were scored during that extra period of regular play?
Answer: YES

Question: Even if she only scored one goal for the US team during the penalty shootout, is it possible that Brandi Chastain could share the title of MVP for this game with another American player, if such a designation was based on the number of goals scored?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that each player was only afforded one attempt during a penalty shootout, is it possible that Brandi Chastain could still have scored more goals than any other player on the US team?
Answer: YES
Passage: According to Fawkes, 20 barrels of gunpowder were brought in at first, followed by 16 more on 20 July. The supply of gunpowder was theoretically controlled by the government, but it was easily obtained from illicit sources. On 28 July, the ever-present threat of the plague again delayed the opening of Parliament, this time until Tuesday 5 November. Fawkes left the country for a short time. The King, meanwhile, spent much of the summer away from the city, hunting. He stayed wherever was convenient, including on occasion at the houses of prominent Catholics. Garnet, convinced that the threat of an uprising had receded, travelled the country on a pilgrimage.

Question: Could someone be arrested if they were found with gunpowder?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Were stores likely to be prosecuted if they sold gunpowder?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Were the people Fawkes bought the gunpowder from likely to have been in prison before?
Answer: YES
Passage: According to Fawkes, 20 barrels of gunpowder were brought in at first, followed by 16 more on 20 July. The supply of gunpowder was theoretically controlled by the government, but it was easily obtained from criminal sources. On 28 July, the ever-present threat of the plague again delayed the opening of Parliament, this time until Tuesday 5 November. Fawkes left the country for a short time. The King, meanwhile, spent much of the summer away from the city, hunting. He stayed wherever was convenient, including on occasion at the houses of prominent Catholics. Garnet, convinced that the threat of an uprising had receded, travelled the country on a pilgrimage.

Question: Could someone be arrested if they were found with gunpowder?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Were stores likely to be prosecuted if they sold gunpowder?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Were the people Fawkes bought the gunpowder from likely to have been in prison before?
Answer: YES
Passage: According to Fawkes, 20 barrels of gunpowder were brought in at first, followed by 16 more on 20 July. The supply of illicit gunpowder was theoretically controlled by the government, but it was easily obtained from licit sources. On 28 July, the ever-present threat of the plague again delayed the opening of Parliament, this time until Tuesday 5 November. Fawkes left the country for a short time. The King, meanwhile, spent much of the summer away from the city, hunting. He stayed wherever was convenient, including on occasion at the houses of prominent Catholics. Garnet, convinced that the threat of an uprising had receded, travelled the country on a pilgrimage.

Question: Could someone be arrested if they were found with gunpowder?
Answer: YES

Question: Were stores likely to be prosecuted if they sold gunpowder?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the people Fawkes bought the gunpowder from likely to have been in prison before?
Answer: NO
Passage: According to Fawkes, 20 barrels of gunpowder were brought in at first, followed by 16 more on 20 July. The supply of gunpowder was theoretically controlled by the government, but it was easily obtained from licit sources. On 28 July, the ever-present threat of the plague again delayed the opening of Parliament, this time until Tuesday 5 November. Fawkes left the country for a short time. The King, meanwhile, spent much of the summer away from the city, hunting. He stayed wherever was convenient, including on occasion at the houses of prominent Catholics. Garnet, convinced that the threat of an uprising had receded, travelled the country on a pilgrimage.

Question: Could someone be arrested if they were found with gunpowder?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Were stores likely to be prosecuted if they sold gunpowder?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the people Fawkes bought the gunpowder from likely to have been in prison before?
Answer: NO
Passage: Construction of the was started in 1936 and construction of an unnamed sister ship was started two years later in 1938, but neither ship was completed. In 1942 conversion of three German passenger ships ("Europa", "Potsdam", "Gneisenau") and two unfinished cruisers, the captured French light cruiser and the German heavy cruiser, to auxiliary carriers was begun. In November 1942 the conversion of the passenger ships was stopped because these ships were now seen as too slow for operations with the fleet. But conversion of one of these ships, the "Potsdam", to a training carrier was begun instead. In February 1943 all the work on carriers was halted because of the German failure during the Battle of the Barents Sea which convinced Hitler that big warships were useless.

Question: If someone claims they worked as the captain of the captured French light cruiser in 1941, are they lying?
Answer: YES

Question: In 1942, would you be able to find a travel manifest for the Gneisenau?
Answer: YES

Question: In 1995, would you be able to find a travel manifest for the Gneisenau?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Construction of the was started in 1936 and construction of an unnamed sister ship was started two years later in 1938, but neither ship was completed. In 1942 conversion of three German passenger ships ("Europa", "Potsdam", "Gneisenau") and two under construction cruisers, the captured French light cruiser and the German heavy cruiser, to auxiliary carriers was begun. In November 1942 the conversion of the passenger ships was stopped because these ships were now seen as too slow for operations with the fleet. But conversion of one of these ships, the "Potsdam", to a training carrier was begun instead. In February 1943 all the work on carriers was halted because of the German failure during the Battle of the Barents Sea which convinced Hitler that big warships were useless.

Question: If someone claims they worked as the captain of the captured French light cruiser in 1941, are they lying?
Answer: YES

Question: In 1942, would you be able to find a travel manifest for the Gneisenau?
Answer: YES

Question: In 1995, would you be able to find a travel manifest for the Gneisenau?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Construction of the was started in 1936 and construction of an unnamed sister ship was started two years later in 1938, but neither ship was completed. In 1942 conversion of three German unfinished passenger ships ("Europa", "Potsdam", "Gneisenau") and two cruisers, the captured French light cruiser and the German heavy cruiser, to auxiliary carriers was begun. In November 1942 the conversion of the passenger ships was stopped because these ships were now seen as too slow for operations with the fleet. But conversion of one of these ships, the "Potsdam", to a training carrier was begun instead. In February 1943 all the work on carriers was halted because of the German failure during the Battle of the Barents Sea which convinced Hitler that big warships were useless.

Question: If someone claims they worked as the captain of the captured French light cruiser in 1941, are they lying?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: In 1942, would you be able to find a travel manifest for the Gneisenau?
Answer: NO

Question: In 1995, would you be able to find a travel manifest for the Gneisenau?
Answer: NO
Passage: Construction of the was started in 1936 and construction of an unnamed sister ship was started two years later in 1938, but neither ship was completed. In 1942 conversion of three German passenger ships ("Europa", "Potsdam", "Gneisenau") and two cruisers, the captured French light cruiser and the German heavy cruiser, to auxiliary carriers was begun. In November 1942 the conversion of the passenger ships was stopped because these ships were now seen as too slow for operations with the fleet. But conversion of one of these ships, the "Potsdam", to a training carrier was begun instead. In February 1943 all the work on carriers was halted because of the German failure during the Battle of the Barents Sea which convinced Hitler that big warships were useless.

Question: If someone claims they worked as the captain of the captured French light cruiser in 1941, are they lying?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: In 1942, would you be able to find a travel manifest for the Gneisenau?
Answer: YES

Question: In 1995, would you be able to find a travel manifest for the Gneisenau?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The House of Commons currently has 338 members elected in single-member districts in a plurality voting system (first past the post), meaning that members must attain only a plurality (the most votes of any candidate) rather than a majority (50 percent plus one). The electoral districts are also known as ridings.

Question: If the leading candidate has 33% of the vote, do they win the election?
Answer: YES

Question: If the leading candidate has 55% of the vote, do they win the election?
Answer: YES

Question: If three candidates have 35%, 33%, and 32%, respectively, does the candidate with 33% of the vote have a chance at winning the seat?
Answer: NO
Passage: The House of Commons currently has 338 members elected in single-member districts in a plurality voting system (first past the post), meaning that members must attain only a plurality (the most votes of any candidate), which is distinct from having to get a majority (50 percent plus one). The electoral districts are also known as ridings.

Question: If the leading candidate has 33% of the vote, do they win the election?
Answer: YES

Question: If the leading candidate has 55% of the vote, do they win the election?
Answer: YES

Question: If three candidates have 35%, 33%, and 32%, respectively, does the candidate with 33% of the vote have a chance at winning the seat?
Answer: NO
Passage: The House of Commons currently has 338 members elected in single-member districts in a plurality voting system (first past the post), meaning that members must attain only a plurality (the most votes of any candidate) over 35 percent, rather than a majority (50 percent plus one). The electoral districts are also known as ridings.

Question: If the leading candidate has 33% of the vote, do they win the election?
Answer: NO

Question: If the leading candidate has 55% of the vote, do they win the election?
Answer: YES

Question: If three candidates have 35%, 33%, and 32%, respectively, does the candidate with 33% of the vote have a chance at winning the seat?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The House of Commons currently has 338 members elected in single-member districts in a majority voting system (first past the post), meaning that members must attain a majority (50 percent plus one), or a runoff of the top two candidates occurs. The electoral districts are also known as ridings.

Question: If the leading candidate has 33% of the vote, do they win the election?
Answer: NO

Question: If the leading candidate has 55% of the vote, do they win the election?
Answer: YES

Question: If three candidates have 35%, 33%, and 32%, respectively, does the candidate with 33% of the vote have a chance at winning the seat?
Answer: NO
Passage: The establishment of the bishopric of Konstanz cannot be dated exactly and was possibly undertaken by Columbanus himself (before 612). In any case, it existed by 635, when Gunzo appointed John of Grab bishop. Constance was a missionary bishopric in newly converted lands, and did not look back on late Roman church history unlike the Raetian bishopric of Chur (established 451) and Basel (an episcopal seat from 740, and which continued the line of Bishops of Augusta Raurica, see Bishop of Basel). The establishment of the church as an institution recognized by worldly rulers is also visible in legal history. In the early 7th century "Pactus Alamannorum" hardly ever mentions the special privileges of the church, while Lantfrid's "Lex Alamannorum" of 720 has an entire chapter reserved for ecclesial matters alone.

Question: Does "Pactus Alamannorum" highlight the special privileges of the church?
Answer: NO

Question: Will reading "Pactus Alamannorum" give you an extensive history of the special privileges of the church?
Answer: NO

Question: Does "Pactus Alamannorum" ignore the special privileges of the church?
Answer: NO
Passage: The establishment of the bishopric of Konstanz cannot be dated exactly and was possibly undertaken by Columbanus himself (before 612). In any case, it existed by 635, when Gunzo appointed John of Grab bishop. Constance was a missionary bishopric in newly converted lands, and did not look back on late Roman church history unlike the Raetian bishopric of Chur (established 451) and Basel (an episcopal seat from 740, and which continued the line of Bishops of Augusta Raurica, see Bishop of Basel). The establishment of the church as an institution recognized by worldly rulers is also visible in legal history. In the early 7th century "Pactus Alamannorum" rarely mentions the special privileges of the church, while Lantfrid's "Lex Alamannorum" of 720 has an entire chapter reserved for ecclesial matters alone.

Question: Does "Pactus Alamannorum" highlight the special privileges of the church?
Answer: NO

Question: Will reading "Pactus Alamannorum" give you an extensive history of the special privileges of the church?
Answer: NO

Question: Does "Pactus Alamannorum" ignore the special privileges of the church?
Answer: NO
Passage: The establishment of the bishopric of Konstanz cannot be dated exactly and was possibly undertaken by Columbanus himself (before 612). In any case, it existed by 635, when Gunzo appointed John of Grab bishop. Constance was a missionary bishopric in newly converted lands, and did not look back on late Roman church history unlike the Raetian bishopric of Chur (established 451) and Basel (an episcopal seat from 740, and which continued the line of Bishops of Augusta Raurica, see Bishop of Basel). The establishment of the church as an institution recognized by worldly rulers is also visible in legal history. In the early 7th century "Pactus Alamannorum" focuses on the special privileges of the church, while Lantfrid's "Lex Alamannorum" of 720 hardly ever mentions ecclesial matters..

Question: Does "Pactus Alamannorum" highlight the special privileges of the church?
Answer: YES

Question: Will reading "Pactus Alamannorum" give you an extensive history of the special privileges of the church?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Does "Pactus Alamannorum" ignore the special privileges of the church?
Answer: NO
Passage: The establishment of the bishopric of Konstanz cannot be dated exactly and was possibly undertaken by Columbanus himself (before 612). In any case, it existed by 635, when Gunzo appointed John of Grab bishop. Constance was a missionary bishopric in newly converted lands, and did not look back on late Roman church history unlike the Raetian bishopric of Chur (established 451) and Basel (an episcopal seat from 740, and which continued the line of Bishops of Augusta Raurica, see Bishop of Basel). The establishment of the church as an institution recognized by worldly rulers is also visible in legal history. In the early 7th century "Pactus Alamannorum" frequently mentions the special privileges of the church, inspiring Lantfrid to include an entire chapter in "Lex Alamannorum" of 720 for ecclesial matters alone.

Question: Does "Pactus Alamannorum" highlight the special privileges of the church?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Will reading "Pactus Alamannorum" give you an extensive history of the special privileges of the church?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Does "Pactus Alamannorum" ignore the special privileges of the church?
Answer: NO
Passage: Chess is an abstract strategy game and involves no hidden information. It is played on a square chessboard with 64 squares arranged in an eight-by-eight grid. At the start, each player (one controlling the white pieces, the other controlling the black pieces) controls sixteen pieces: one king, one queen, two rooks, two knights, two bishops, and eight pawns. The object of the game is to checkmate the opponent's king, whereby the king is under immediate attack (in "check") and there is no way for it to escape. There are also several ways a game can end in a draw.

Question: Can the king escape a checkmate?
Answer: NO

Question: If the queen escapes, will the game be in checkmate?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is the game in checkmate if the king can't escape?
Answer: YES
Passage: Chess is an abstract strategy game and involves no hidden information. It is played on a square chessboard with 64 squares arranged in an eight-by-eight grid. At the start, each player (one controlling the white pieces, the other controlling the black pieces) controls sixteen pieces: one king, one queen, two rooks, two knights, two bishops, and eight pawns. The object of the game is to checkmate the opponent's king, whereby the king is under immediate attack (in "check") and it is trapped. There are also several ways a game can end in a draw.

Question: Can the king escape a checkmate?
Answer: NO

Question: If the queen escapes, will the game be in checkmate?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is the game in checkmate if the king can't escape?
Answer: YES
Passage: Chess is an abstract strategy game and involves no hidden information. It is played on a square chessboard with 64 squares arranged in an eight-by-eight grid. At the start, each player (one controlling the white pieces, the other controlling the black pieces) controls sixteen pieces: one king, one queen, two rooks, two knights, two bishops, and eight pawns. The object of the game is to checkmate both the opponent's king and queen, whereby they are under immediate attack (in "check") and there is no way for them to escape. There are also several ways a game can end in a draw.

Question: Can the king escape a checkmate?
Answer: NO

Question: If the queen escapes, will the game be in checkmate?
Answer: checkmate both king and queen

Question: Is the game in checkmate if the king can't escape?
Answer: checkmate both king and queen
Passage: Chess is an abstract strategy game and involves no hidden information. It is played on a square chessboard with 64 squares arranged in an eight-by-eight grid. At the start, each player (one controlling the white pieces, the other controlling the black pieces) controls sixteen pieces: one king, one queen, two rooks, two knights, two bishops, and eight pawns. The object of the game is to checkmate the opponent's king, whereby the king is under immediate attack (in "check") and there are ways for it to escape. There are also several ways a game can end in a draw.

Question: Can the king escape a checkmate?
Answer: YES

Question: If the queen escapes, will the game be in checkmate?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is the game in checkmate if the king can't escape?
Answer: NO
Passage: Given the fragmentary nature of the existing evidence, it is impossible to ascertain an exact date for the beginning of the uprising, but it is probable that it began in-between summer and fall 132. The Romans were overwhelmed by the organised ferocity of the uprising. Hadrian called his general Sextus Julius Severus from Britain, and brought troops in from as far as the Danube. Roman losses were heavy; an entire legion or its numeric equivalent of around 4,000. Hadrian's report on the war to the Roman Senate omitted the customary salutation, "If you and your children are in health, it is well; I and the legions are in health." The rebellion was quashed by 135. According to Cassius Dio, Roman war operations in Judea left some 580,000 Jews dead, and 50 fortified towns and 985 villages razed. An unknown proportion of the population was enslaved. Beitar, a fortified city southwest of Jerusalem, fell after a three and a half year siege. The extent of punitive measures against the Jewish population remains a matter of debate.

Question: While looking at the results of this battle, one might say that the villages and the Jewish population were decimated, due to the common misconception that "decimate" means to utterly destroy, when it actually means to reduce a population by 10%.  From the estimates given, if any, can you say with reasonable confidence that actually the opposite occurred, and 10% remained alive?
Answer: NO

Question: Is enough information given in this passage to say that the Jewish population in the area before these events took place was close to, but not quite, 650,000?
Answer: NO

Question: If accounting records were to be unearthed that revealed just how many Jewish slaves were taken after these events, would this figure satisfy an unanswered question of modern-day historians?
Answer: YES
Passage: Given the fragmentary nature of the existing evidence, it is impossible to ascertain an exact date for the beginning of the uprising, but it is probable that it began in-between summer and fall 132. The Romans were overwhelmed by the organised ferocity of the uprising. Hadrian called his general Sextus Julius Severus from Britain, and brought troops in from as far as the Danube. Roman losses were heavy; an entire legion or its numeric equivalent of around 4,000. Hadrian's report on the war to the Roman Senate omitted the customary salutation, "If you and your children are in health, it is well; I and the legions are in health." The rebellion was quashed by 135. According to Cassius Dio, Roman war operations in Judea left some 580,000 Jews dead, and 50 fortified towns and 985 villages razed. Nobody knows how many of the residents became slaves, in percentage terms. Beitar, a fortified city southwest of Jerusalem, fell after a three and a half year siege. The extent of punitive measures against the Jewish population remains a matter of debate.

Question: While looking at the results of this battle, one might say that the villages and the Jewish population were decimated, due to the common misconception that "decimate" means to utterly destroy, when it actually means to reduce a population by 10%.  From the estimates given, if any, can you say with reasonable confidence that actually the opposite occurred, and 10% remained alive?
Answer: NO

Question: Is enough information given in this passage to say that the Jewish population in the area before these events took place was close to, but not quite, 650,000?
Answer: NO

Question: If accounting records were to be unearthed that revealed just how many Jewish slaves were taken after these events, would this figure satisfy an unanswered question of modern-day historians?
Answer: YES