lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Eclipsing variables are star systems that vary in brightness because of one star passing in front of the other rather than from any intrinsic change in luminosity. W Ursae Minoris is one such system, its magnitude ranging from 8.51 to 9.59 over 1.7 days. The combined spectrum of the system is A2V, but the masses of the two component stars are a mystery. A slight change in the orbital period in 1973 suggests there is a third component of the multiple star system—most likely a red dwarf—with an orbital period of 62.2±3.9 years. RU Ursae Minoris is another example, ranging from 10 to 10.66 over 0.52 ;days. It is a semidetached system, as the secondary star is filling its Roche lobe and transferring matter to the primary.

Question: Could the mass of at least one component star be looked up on a stellar database?
Answer: NO

Question: If one wanted to calculate a property of at least one of the component stars that required knowing the mass, could one do that?
Answer: NO

Question: Are more steps needed to find the mass of the component stars?
Answer: YES
Passage: Eclipsing variables are star systems that vary in brightness because of one star passing in front of the other rather than from any intrinsic change in luminosity. W Ursae Minoris is one such system, its magnitude ranging from 8.51 to 9.59 over 1.7 days. The combined spectrum of the system is A2V, but the mass of one component star is known, though the other is unknown. A slight change in the orbital period in 1973 suggests there is a third component of the multiple star system—most likely a red dwarf—with an orbital period of 62.2±3.9 years. RU Ursae Minoris is another example, ranging from 10 to 10.66 over 0.52 ;days. It is a semidetached system, as the secondary star is filling its Roche lobe and transferring matter to the primary.

Question: Could the mass of at least one component star be looked up on a stellar database?
Answer: YES

Question: If one wanted to calculate a property of at least one of the component stars that required knowing the mass, could one do that?
Answer: YES

Question: Are more steps needed to find the mass of the component stars?
Answer: YES
Passage: Eclipsing variables are star systems that vary in brightness because of one star passing in front of the other rather than from any intrinsic change in luminosity. W Ursae Minoris is one such system, its magnitude ranging from 8.51 to 9.59 over 1.7 days. The combined spectrum of the system is A2V, and the masses of the two component stars are known . A slight change in the orbital period in 1973 suggests there is a third component of the multiple star system—most likely a red dwarf—with an orbital period of 62.2±3.9 years. RU Ursae Minoris is another example, ranging from 10 to 10.66 over 0.52 ;days. It is a semidetached system, as the secondary star is filling its Roche lobe and transferring matter to the primary.

Question: Could the mass of at least one component star be looked up on a stellar database?
Answer: YES

Question: If one wanted to calculate a property of at least one of the component stars that required knowing the mass, could one do that?
Answer: YES

Question: Are more steps needed to find the mass of the component stars?
Answer: NO
Passage: AI is relevant to any intellectual task. Modern artificial intelligence techniques are pervasive and are too numerous to list here. Frequently, when a technique reaches mainstream use, it is no longer considered artificial intelligence; this phenomenon is described as the AI effect.

Question: If a new AI technique finds its way into the default Android mail application, would the general public be likely to still consider it AI?
Answer: NO

Question: If a new technique that is not considered AI becomes a mainstream technique, does the general public start to consider it AI?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If a new AI technique is dropped before an application is finished, would the general public be likely to still consider it AI?
Answer: YES
Passage: AI is relevant to any intellectual task. Modern artificial intelligence techniques are pervasive and are too numerous to list here. Frequently, when a technique reaches mainstream use, it is considered a different category than artificial intelligence; this phenomenon is described as the AI effect.

Question: If a new AI technique finds its way into the default Android mail application, would the general public be likely to still consider it AI?
Answer: NO

Question: If a new technique that is not considered AI becomes a mainstream technique, does the general public start to consider it AI?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If a new AI technique is dropped before an application is finished, would the general public be likely to still consider it AI?
Answer: NO
Passage: AI is relevant to any intellectual task. Modern artificial intelligence techniques are pervasive and are too numerous to list here. Frequently, when a technique reaches mainstream use, it is no longer considered a pure form of artificial intelligence; this phenomenon is described as the AI effect.

Question: If a new AI technique finds its way into the default Android mail application, would the general public be likely to still consider it AI?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If a new technique that is not considered AI becomes a mainstream technique, does the general public start to consider it AI?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If a new AI technique is dropped before an application is finished, would the general public be likely to still consider it AI?
Answer: YES
Passage: AI is relevant to any intellectual task. Modern artificial intelligence techniques are pervasive and are too numerous to list here. Frequently, when a technique reaches mainstream use, it is considered artificial intelligence; this phenomenon is described as the AI effect.

Question: If a new AI technique finds its way into the default Android mail application, would the general public be likely to still consider it AI?
Answer: YES

Question: If a new technique that is not considered AI becomes a mainstream technique, does the general public start to consider it AI?
Answer: YES

Question: If a new AI technique is dropped before an application is finished, would the general public be likely to still consider it AI?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: After learning that Frank has abducted Dorothy's husband Don and son Donnie to force her into sex slavery, Jeffrey suspects Frank cut off Don's ear to warn her to stay alive for her family's sake. Jeffrey relays the experience to Sandy—without revealing "his" sexual encounter with Dorothy—who urges him to tell her father what he knows about the case, but he refuses, unwilling to land Sandy or himself in trouble and also fearing what Frank, a gangster and raging psychopath, might do.

Question: Does Jeffrey want to avoid problems with Frank?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Jeffrey accept or decline Sandy's suggestion?
Answer: He declines.

Question: Does Jeffrey want problems for the girl?
Answer: NO
Passage: After learning that Frank has abducted Dorothy's husband Don and son Donnie to force her into sex slavery, Jeffrey suspects Frank cut off Don's ear to warn her to stay alive for her family's sake. Jeffrey relays the experience to Sandy—without revealing "his" sexual encounter with Dorothy—who urges him to tell her father what he knows about the case, but he refuses, avoiding getting Sandy or himself in trouble and also fearing what Frank, a gangster and raging psychopath, might do.

Question: Does Jeffrey want to avoid problems with Frank?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Jeffrey accept or decline Sandy's suggestion?
Answer: He declines.

Question: Does Jeffrey want problems for the girl?
Answer: NO
Passage: After learning that Frank has abducted Dorothy's husband Don and son Donnie to force her into sex slavery, Jeffrey suspects Frank cut off Don's ear to warn her to stay alive for her family's sake. Jeffrey relays the experience to Sandy—without revealing "his" sexual encounter with Dorothy—who urges him to tell her father what he knows about the case, but he accepts, trying to get Sandy or himself in trouble and also fearing what Frank, a gangster and raging psychopath, might unwilling do.

Question: Does Jeffrey want to avoid problems with Frank?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Does Jeffrey accept or decline Sandy's suggestion?
Answer: He accepts.

Question: Does Jeffrey want problems for the girl?
Answer: YES
Passage: After learning that Frank has abducted Dorothy's husband Don and son Donnie to force her into sex slavery, Jeffrey suspects Frank cut off Don's ear to warn her to stay alive for her family's sake. Jeffrey relays the experience to Sandy—without revealing "his" sexual encounter with Dorothy—who urges him to tell her father what he knows about the case, but he refuses, willing to land Sandy or himself in trouble but also fearing what Frank, a gangster and raging psychopath, might do.

Question: Does Jeffrey want to avoid problems with Frank?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Jeffrey accept or decline Sandy's suggestion?
Answer: He declines.

Question: Does Jeffrey want problems for the girl?
Answer: YES
Passage: Bolesław I had taken control of the marches of Lusatia (Łużyce), Sorbian Meissen (Miśnia), and the cities of Budziszyn (Bautzen) and Meissen in 1002, and refused to pay the tribute to the Empire from the conquered territories. Bolesław, after the Polish-German War (1002–1018), signed the Peace of Bautzen on 30 January 1018, which made Bolesław I a clear winner. The Polish ruler was able to keep the contested marches of Lusatia and Sorbian Meissen not as fiefs, but as part of Polish territory. The Polish prince Mieszko destroyed about 100 Sorbian villages in 1030 and expelled Sorbians from urban areas, with the exception of fishermen and carpenters who were allowed to live in the outskirts.

Question: Did Bolesław I probably think that the march of Lusatia belonged solely to him?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the Empire's revenue decreased after Bolesław I captured the territories?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Bolesław I probably think that the city of Budziszyn belonged solely to him?
Answer: YES
Passage: Bolesław I had taken control of the marches of Lusatia (Łużyce), Sorbian Meissen (Miśnia), and the cities of Budziszyn (Bautzen) and Meissen in 1002, and declined to pay the tribute to the Empire from the conquered territories. Bolesław, after the Polish-German War (1002–1018), signed the Peace of Bautzen on 30 January 1018, which made Bolesław I a clear winner. The Polish ruler was able to keep the contested marches of Lusatia and Sorbian Meissen not as fiefs, but as part of Polish territory. The Polish prince Mieszko destroyed about 100 Sorbian villages in 1030 and expelled Sorbians from urban areas, with the exception of fishermen and carpenters who were allowed to live in the outskirts.

Question: Did Bolesław I probably think that the march of Lusatia belonged solely to him?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the Empire's revenue decreased after Bolesław I captured the territories?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Bolesław I probably think that the city of Budziszyn belonged solely to him?
Answer: YES
Passage: Bolesław I had taken control of the marches of Lusatia (Łużyce), Sorbian Meissen (Miśnia), and the cities of Budziszyn (Bautzen) and Meissen in 1002, but only refused to pay the tribute to the Empire from Lusatia and Sorbian Meissen. Bolesław, after the Polish-German War (1002–1018), signed the Peace of Bautzen on 30 January 1018, which made Bolesław I a clear winner. The Polish ruler was able to keep the contested marches of Lusatia and Sorbian Meissen not as fiefs, but as part of Polish territory. The Polish prince Mieszko destroyed about 100 Sorbian villages in 1030 and expelled Sorbians from urban areas, with the exception of fishermen and carpenters who were allowed to live in the outskirts.

Question: Did Bolesław I probably think that the march of Lusatia belonged solely to him?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the Empire's revenue decreased after Bolesław I captured the territories?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Bolesław I probably think that the city of Budziszyn belonged solely to him?
Answer: NO
Passage: Bolesław I had taken control of the marches of Lusatia (Łużyce), Sorbian Meissen (Miśnia), and the cities of Budziszyn (Bautzen) and Meissen in 1002, and agreed to pay the tribute to the Empire from the conquered territories. Bolesław, after the Polish-German War (1002–1018), signed the Peace of Bautzen on 30 January 1018, which made Bolesław I a clear winner. The Polish ruler was able to keep the contested marches of Lusatia and Sorbian Meissen not as fiefs, but as part of Polish territory. The Polish prince Mieszko destroyed about 100 Sorbian villages in 1030 and expelled Sorbians from urban areas, with the exception of fishermen and carpenters who were allowed to live in the outskirts.

Question: Did Bolesław I probably think that the march of Lusatia belonged solely to him?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the Empire's revenue decreased after Bolesław I captured the territories?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Bolesław I probably think that the city of Budziszyn belonged solely to him?
Answer: NO
Passage: The median income for a household in the CDP was $26,188, and the median income for a family was $31,875. Males had a median income of $30,238 versus $22,917 for females. The per capita income for the CDP was $13,411. About 6.8% of families and 10.3% of the population were below the poverty line, including 33.8% of those under age 18 and none of those age 65 or over.

Question: Would some of the people over 65 consider getting food from food banks?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would some of the people under 18 be eligible for food stamps?
Answer: YES

Question: Might all of the people over 65 consider getting food from food banks?
Answer: NO
Passage: The median income for a household in the CDP was $26,188, and the median income for a family was $31,875. Males had a median income of $30,238 versus $22,917 for females. The per capita income for the CDP was $13,411. About 6.8% of families and 10.3% of the population were below the poverty line, including 33.8% of those under age 18 and a complete absence of those age 65 or over.

Question: Would some of the people over 65 consider getting food from food banks?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would some of the people under 18 be eligible for food stamps?
Answer: YES

Question: Might all of the people over 65 consider getting food from food banks?
Answer: NO
Passage: The median income for a household in the CDP was $26,188, and the median income for a family was $31,875. Males had a median income of $30,238 versus $22,917 for females. The per capita income for the CDP was $13,411. About 6.8% of families and 10.3% of the population were below the poverty line, including none of those under age 18 and 33.8% of those age 65 or over.

Question: Would some of the people over 65 consider getting food from food banks?
Answer: YES

Question: Would some of the people under 18 be eligible for food stamps?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Might all of the people over 65 consider getting food from food banks?
Answer: NO
Passage: The median income for a household in the CDP was $26,188, and the median income for a family was $31,875. Males had a median income of $30,238 versus $22,917 for females. The per capita income for the CDP was $13,411. About 6.8% of families and 10.3% of the population were below the poverty line, including 33.8% of those under age 18 and all of those age 65 or over.

Question: Would some of the people over 65 consider getting food from food banks?
Answer: YES

Question: Would some of the people under 18 be eligible for food stamps?
Answer: YES

Question: Might all of the people over 65 consider getting food from food banks?
Answer: YES
Passage: Presidio County's unusual shape has it facing more of Mexico than the rest of the United States. The county is bounded on the east by Brewster County, on the north by Jeff Davis County, and on the south and west for by the Rio Grande and Mexico. Along the international border, the county faces the Manuel Benavides and Ojinaga Districts of the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, on the south side, and the municipality of Guadalupe of the State of Chihuahua, Mexico, on its southwestern side.

Question: Could someone take a map of Presidio County and use the distinctive shape as evidence of unfair gerrymandering in elections (even if the borders simply reflected county lines or natural features)
Answer: YES

Question: Would future historians note the shape of Presidio County and assume that the lines were drawn over open land simply for the sake of simplicity, rather than factors relating to population or politics.
Answer: NO

Question: Given what we know about Presidio County's shape, is it likely that her neighboring American counties have simple, straight-line borders with other areas within the United States?
Answer: NO
Passage: Presidio County's unusual shape means that more of its borders face into Mexico than into the United States. The county is bounded on the east by Brewster County, on the north by Jeff Davis County, and on the south and west for by the Rio Grande and Mexico. Along the international border, the county faces the Manuel Benavides and Ojinaga Districts of the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, on the south side, and the municipality of Guadalupe of the State of Chihuahua, Mexico, on its southwestern side.

Question: Could someone take a map of Presidio County and use the distinctive shape as evidence of unfair gerrymandering in elections (even if the borders simply reflected county lines or natural features)
Answer: YES

Question: Would future historians note the shape of Presidio County and assume that the lines were drawn over open land simply for the sake of simplicity, rather than factors relating to population or politics.
Answer: NO

Question: Given what we know about Presidio County's shape, is it likely that her neighboring American counties have simple, straight-line borders with other areas within the United States?
Answer: NO
Passage: Despite Presidio County's common rectangular shape on two edges, it's unusual location has it facing more of Mexico than the rest of the United States. The county is bounded on the east by Brewster County, on the north by Jeff Davis County, and on the south and west for by the Rio Grande and Mexico. Along the international border, the county faces the Manuel Benavides and Ojinaga Districts of the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, on the south side, and the municipality of Guadalupe of the State of Chihuahua, Mexico, on its southwestern side.

Question: Could someone take a map of Presidio County and use the distinctive shape as evidence of unfair gerrymandering in elections (even if the borders simply reflected county lines or natural features)
Answer: NO

Question: Would future historians note the shape of Presidio County and assume that the lines were drawn over open land simply for the sake of simplicity, rather than factors relating to population or politics.
Answer: YES

Question: Given what we know about Presidio County's shape, is it likely that her neighboring American counties have simple, straight-line borders with other areas within the United States?
Answer: YES
Passage: Presidio County's only real geographical distinction has to do with the small sizes of Mexican districts, meaning that Presidio facing more Mexican districts than it does US counties. The county is bounded on the east by Brewster County, on the north by Jeff Davis County, and on the south and west for by the Rio Grande and Mexico. Along the international border, the county faces the Manuel Benavides and Ojinaga Districts of the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, on the south side, and the municipality of Guadalupe of the State of Chihuahua, Mexico, on its southwestern side.

Question: Could someone take a map of Presidio County and use the distinctive shape as evidence of unfair gerrymandering in elections (even if the borders simply reflected county lines or natural features)
Answer: NO

Question: Would future historians note the shape of Presidio County and assume that the lines were drawn over open land simply for the sake of simplicity, rather than factors relating to population or politics.
Answer: YES

Question: Given what we know about Presidio County's shape, is it likely that her neighboring American counties have simple, straight-line borders with other areas within the United States?
Answer: YES
Passage: In academic cryptography, a "weakness" or a "break" in a scheme is usually defined quite conservatively: it might require impractical amounts of time, memory, or known plaintexts. It also might require the attacker be able to do things many real-world attackers can't: for example, the attacker may need to choose particular plaintexts to be encrypted or even to ask for plaintexts to be encrypted using several keys related to the secret key. Furthermore, it might only reveal a small amount of information, enough to prove the cryptosystem imperfect but too little to be useful to real-world attackers. Finally, an attack might only apply to a weakened version of cryptographic tools, like a reduced-round block cipher, as a step towards breaking of the full system.

Question: If an academic finds that a scheme can be thwarted, but requires an amount of memory equal to all the computers currently operating , would they call this a weakness in the scheme?
Answer: YES

Question: If an academic finds that a scheme can be thwarted, but requires more known plaintexts than all the banks in the world have generated to date, would they refrain from calling this a weakness in the scheme?
Answer: NO

Question: Would an academic call a method that thwarts a scheme a break or a weakness if it requires more time than the universe has existed with current computing power?
Answer: YES
Passage: In academic cryptography, a "weakness" or a "break" in a scheme is usually defined quite conservatively: it might require exceedingly large amounts of time, memory, or known plaintexts. It also might require the attacker be able to do things many real-world attackers can't: for example, the attacker may need to choose particular plaintexts to be encrypted or even to ask for plaintexts to be encrypted using several keys related to the secret key. Furthermore, it might only reveal a small amount of information, enough to prove the cryptosystem imperfect but too little to be useful to real-world attackers. Finally, an attack might only apply to a weakened version of cryptographic tools, like a reduced-round block cipher, as a step towards breaking of the full system.

Question: If an academic finds that a scheme can be thwarted, but requires an amount of memory equal to all the computers currently operating , would they call this a weakness in the scheme?
Answer: YES

Question: If an academic finds that a scheme can be thwarted, but requires more known plaintexts than all the banks in the world have generated to date, would they refrain from calling this a weakness in the scheme?
Answer: NO

Question: Would an academic call a method that thwarts a scheme a break or a weakness if it requires more time than the universe has existed with current computing power?
Answer: YES