lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: The weather in Southern California is such that the temperature occasionally drops below 54°F in winter, thus, sun-loving crops like pistachios, kiwifruit, avocadoes, strawberries, and tomatoes are not staple crops of the region, and are usually killed off during the winter when it gets cold. Tomatoes are often dried in the sun and a feature of salads and sandwiches grow consistently there in summer only.

Question: Is Avocado, Strawberry, and Tomato Picking something that persons living in Southern Can earn money from in January?
Answer: NO

Question: Do persons working outdoors in Southern California in Mid February during the day need to wear warm wool coats?
Answer: YES

Question: Do farmers in Southern California usually need to spend a lot of money frost proofing Pistachios in Winter?
Answer: YES

Question: Do crops grown by Farmers in Southern California growing plants that have some origins in tropical like environments die off in Mid winter frequently?
Answer: YES

Question: Would it be unusual for someone picking or Drying tomatoes in December in southern California to have to wear a heavy coat while they work?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the climate of Southern California make it Hard or Easy for farmers to grow food year round?
Answer: Hard

Question: Can farmers in Southern California go on vacation and ignore their crops in Winter?
Answer: NO
Passage: Jordan banned the film for what was felt to be a disrespectful portrayal of Arab culture. Egypt, Omar Sharif's home country, was the only Arab nation to give the film a wide release, where it became a success through the endorsement of President Gamal Abdel Nasser, who appreciated the film's depiction of Arab nationalism.

Question: Among nations on the Arabian Peninsula, was Jordan unique in the way that it treated this movie?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage, could you conclude that if Omar Sharif had been born outside of the Arab world, the film might have been universally banned in the region?
Answer: YES

Question: Given that some people praised the film's depictions of Arab nationalism, while others found it to be disrespectful, does this passage suggest that the relatively cosmopolitan society of Beirut might have seen academic debates and informal discourse among everyday cinema-goers about the movie that was nonetheless popular around the world?
Answer: NO
Passage: Jordanian authorities considered the film to be showing Arab cultures without proper respect, and thus banned the film. Egypt, Omar Sharif's home country, was the only Arab nation to give the film a wide release, where it became a success through the endorsement of President Gamal Abdel Nasser, who appreciated the film's depiction of Arab nationalism.

Question: Among nations on the Arabian Peninsula, was Jordan unique in the way that it treated this movie?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage, could you conclude that if Omar Sharif had been born outside of the Arab world, the film might have been universally banned in the region?
Answer: YES

Question: Given that some people praised the film's depictions of Arab nationalism, while others found it to be disrespectful, does this passage suggest that the relatively cosmopolitan society of Beirut might have seen academic debates and informal discourse among everyday cinema-goers about the movie that was nonetheless popular around the world?
Answer: NO
Passage: Jordan allowed the film to be shown and marketed, even as other nations banned it for its disrespectful portrayal of Arab culture. Egypt, Omar Sharif's home country, was the only other Arab nation to give the film a wide release, where it became a success through the endorsement of President Gamal Abdel Nasser, who appreciated the film's depiction of Arab nationalism.

Question: Among nations on the Arabian Peninsula, was Jordan unique in the way that it treated this movie?
Answer: YES

Question: From this passage, could you conclude that if Omar Sharif had been born outside of the Arab world, the film might have been universally banned in the region?
Answer: NO

Question: Given that some people praised the film's depictions of Arab nationalism, while others found it to be disrespectful, does this passage suggest that the relatively cosmopolitan society of Beirut might have seen academic debates and informal discourse among everyday cinema-goers about the movie that was nonetheless popular around the world?
Answer: YES
Passage: Jordan allowed the film to be released, as did other Arab nations, and it received a mixed reception. Egypt, Omar Sharif's home country, was the only Arab nation to actively market the film's release, where it became a success through the endorsement of President Gamal Abdel Nasser, who appreciated the film's depiction of Arab nationalism.

Question: Among nations on the Arabian Peninsula, was Jordan unique in the way that it treated this movie?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage, could you conclude that if Omar Sharif had been born outside of the Arab world, the film might have been universally banned in the region?
Answer: NO

Question: Given that some people praised the film's depictions of Arab nationalism, while others found it to be disrespectful, does this passage suggest that the relatively cosmopolitan society of Beirut might have seen academic debates and informal discourse among everyday cinema-goers about the movie that was nonetheless popular around the world?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 1952 Mingus co-founded Debut Records with Max Roach so he could conduct his recording career as he saw fit. The name originated from his desire to document unrecorded young musicians. Despite this, the best-known recording the company issued was of the most prominent figures in bebop. On May 15, 1953, Mingus joined Dizzy Gillespie, Parker, Bud Powell, and Roach for a concert at Massey Hall in Toronto, which is the last recorded documentation of Gillespie and Parker playing together. After the event, Mingus chose to overdub his barely audible bass part back in New York; the original version was issued later. The two 10" albums of the Massey Hall concert (one featured the trio of Powell, Mingus and Roach) were among Debut Records' earliest releases. Mingus may have objected to the way the major record companies treated musicians, but Gillespie once commented that he did not receive any royalties "for years and years" for his Massey Hall appearance. The records, however, are often regarded as among the finest live jazz recordings.

Question: From this passage, does it sound like Mingus himself was satisfied (or at least, mostly satisfied) with how his bass performance turned out in the original recording?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were to play the original and the revised versions of this record back to back, is it likely that you would notice a significant difference in the bass performance?
Answer: YES

Question: If a performance was made of the original recording, to a crowd that was already familiar with it, yet the bass track was somehow missing, would most people notice its absence?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 1952 Mingus co-founded Debut Records with Max Roach so he could conduct his recording career as he saw fit. The name originated from his desire to document unrecorded young musicians. Despite this, the best-known recording the company issued was of the most prominent figures in bebop. On May 15, 1953, Mingus joined Dizzy Gillespie, Parker, Bud Powell, and Roach for a concert at Massey Hall in Toronto, which is the last recorded documentation of Gillespie and Parker playing together. Mingus chose afterwards to overdub his bass part in New York, which was previously hard to hear, and the original version was released later. The two 10" albums of the Massey Hall concert (one featured the trio of Powell, Mingus and Roach) were among Debut Records' earliest releases. Mingus may have objected to the way the major record companies treated musicians, but Gillespie once commented that he did not receive any royalties "for years and years" for his Massey Hall appearance. The records, however, are often regarded as among the finest live jazz recordings.

Question: From this passage, does it sound like Mingus himself was satisfied (or at least, mostly satisfied) with how his bass performance turned out in the original recording?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were to play the original and the revised versions of this record back to back, is it likely that you would notice a significant difference in the bass performance?
Answer: YES

Question: If a performance was made of the original recording, to a crowd that was already familiar with it, yet the bass track was somehow missing, would most people notice its absence?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 1952 Mingus co-founded Debut Records with Max Roach so he could conduct his recording career as he saw fit. The name originated from his desire to document unrecorded young musicians. Despite this, the best-known recording the company issued was of the most prominent figures in bebop. On May 15, 1953, Mingus joined Dizzy Gillespie, Parker, Bud Powell, and Roach for a concert at Massey Hall in Toronto, which is the last recorded documentation of Gillespie and Parker playing together. After the event, Mingus chose to barely overdub his quite audible bass part back in New York; the original version was issued later. The two 10" albums of the Massey Hall concert (one featured the trio of Powell, Mingus and Roach) were among Debut Records' earliest releases. Mingus may have objected to the way the major record companies treated musicians, but Gillespie once commented that he did not receive any royalties "for years and years" for his Massey Hall appearance. The records, however, are often regarded as among the finest live jazz recordings.

Question: From this passage, does it sound like Mingus himself was satisfied (or at least, mostly satisfied) with how his bass performance turned out in the original recording?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were to play the original and the revised versions of this record back to back, is it likely that you would notice a significant difference in the bass performance?
Answer: NO

Question: If a performance was made of the original recording, to a crowd that was already familiar with it, yet the bass track was somehow missing, would most people notice its absence?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 1952 Mingus co-founded Debut Records with Max Roach so he could conduct his recording career as he saw fit. The name originated from his desire to document unrecorded young musicians. Despite this, the best-known recording the company issued was of the most prominent figures in bebop. On May 15, 1953, Mingus joined Dizzy Gillespie, Parker, Bud Powell, and Roach for a concert at Massey Hall in Toronto, which is the last recorded documentation of Gillespie and Parker playing together. After the event, Mingus decided against overdubbing his audible bass part in New York, though other changes were made, and the original version was issued later. The two 10" albums of the Massey Hall concert (one featured the trio of Powell, Mingus and Roach) were among Debut Records' earliest releases. Mingus may have objected to the way the major record companies treated musicians, but Gillespie once commented that he did not receive any royalties "for years and years" for his Massey Hall appearance. The records, however, are often regarded as among the finest live jazz recordings.

Question: From this passage, does it sound like Mingus himself was satisfied (or at least, mostly satisfied) with how his bass performance turned out in the original recording?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were to play the original and the revised versions of this record back to back, is it likely that you would notice a significant difference in the bass performance?
Answer: NO

Question: If a performance was made of the original recording, to a crowd that was already familiar with it, yet the bass track was somehow missing, would most people notice its absence?
Answer: NO
Passage: There have always been "many therapies offered outside of conventional cancer treatment centers and based on theories not found in biomedicine. These alternative cancer cures have often been described as 'unproven,' suggesting that appropriate clinical trials have not been conducted and that the therapeutic value of the treatment is unknown." However, "many alternative cancer treatments have been investigated in good-quality clinical trials, and they have been shown to be ineffective...The label 'unproven' is inappropriate for such therapies; it is time to assert that many alternative cancer therapies have been 'disproven'."

Question: Have there always been many therapies offered outside of conventional cancer treatment centers and based on theories not found in biomedicine?
Answer: YES

Question: Are theories in biomedicine always the basis for cancer treatments?
Answer: NO

Question: Are routinely found biomedicine theories used in cancer treatment therapies?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: There have always been "many therapies offered outside of conventional cancer treatment centers and based on theories found outside of biomedicine. These alternative cancer cures have often been described as 'unproven,' suggesting that appropriate clinical trials have not been conducted and that the therapeutic value of the treatment is unknown." However, "many alternative cancer treatments have been investigated in good-quality clinical trials, and they have been shown to be ineffective...The label 'unproven' is inappropriate for such therapies; it is time to assert that many alternative cancer therapies have been 'disproven'."

Question: Have there always been many therapies offered outside of conventional cancer treatment centers and based on theories not found in biomedicine?
Answer: YES

Question: Are theories in biomedicine always the basis for cancer treatments?
Answer: NO

Question: Are routinely found biomedicine theories used in cancer treatment therapies?
Answer: NO
Passage: There have not always been "many therapies offered outside of conventional cancer treatment centers and based on theories found in biomedicine. These alternative cancer cures have often been described as 'unproven,' suggesting that appropriate clinical trials have not been conducted and that the therapeutic value of the treatment is unknown." However, "many alternative cancer treatments have been investigated in good-quality clinical trials, and they have been shown to be ineffective...The label 'unproven' is inappropriate for such therapies; it is time to assert that many alternative cancer therapies have been 'disproven'."

Question: Have there always been many therapies offered outside of conventional cancer treatment centers and based on theories not found in biomedicine?
Answer: NO

Question: Are theories in biomedicine always the basis for cancer treatments?
Answer: NO

Question: Are routinely found biomedicine theories used in cancer treatment therapies?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: There have always been "many therapies offered outside of conventional cancer treatment centers and based on theories routinely found in biomedicine. These alternative cancer cures have often been described as 'unproven,' suggesting that appropriate clinical trials have not been conducted and that the therapeutic value of the treatment is unknown." However, "many alternative cancer treatments have been investigated in good-quality clinical trials, and they have been shown to be ineffective...The label 'unproven' is inappropriate for such therapies; it is time to assert that many alternative cancer therapies have been 'disproven'."

Question: Have there always been many therapies offered outside of conventional cancer treatment centers and based on theories not found in biomedicine?
Answer: YES

Question: Are theories in biomedicine always the basis for cancer treatments?
Answer: NO

Question: Are routinely found biomedicine theories used in cancer treatment therapies?
Answer: YES
Passage: The debate is referenced in "The Simpsons 138th Episode Spectacular", when the episode host, Troy McClure is answering viewer questions, and one that is asked is "What is the real deal with Mr. Burns' assistant Smithers? You know what I'm talking about." A montage of various clips that shows Smithers' lust for Mr. Burns follows, and in the end, McClure says "as you can see, the real deal with Waylon Smithers is that he's Mr. Burns' assistant. He's in his early forties, is unmarried, and currently resides in Springfield. Thanks for writing!"

Question: Would someone who simply read the dialogue for this episode (and missed all of the clips and sight gags) think that The Simpsons took a progressive attitude toward same-sex relationships, even in the 1990s?
Answer: NO

Question: Considering that this episode aired in the nineties, could clues about the legality of gay marriage in Springfield help viewers to narrow down the everlasting mystery of exactly which state the characters reside in?
Answer: NO

Question: Solely from the information given above, could a reader conclude that Waylon Smithers might have been born with a different last name?
Answer: NO
Passage: The debate is referenced in "The Simpsons 138th Episode Spectacular", when the episode host, Troy McClure is answering viewer questions, and one that is asked is "What is the real deal with Mr. Burns' assistant Smithers? You know what I'm talking about." A montage of various clips that shows Smithers' lust for Mr. Burns follows, and in the end, McClure says "as you can see, the real deal with Waylon Smithers is that he's Mr. Burns' assistant. He is a Springfield resident, a bachelor, and he is roughly forty to forty-five years old. Thanks for writing!"

Question: Would someone who simply read the dialogue for this episode (and missed all of the clips and sight gags) think that The Simpsons took a progressive attitude toward same-sex relationships, even in the 1990s?
Answer: NO

Question: Considering that this episode aired in the nineties, could clues about the legality of gay marriage in Springfield help viewers to narrow down the everlasting mystery of exactly which state the characters reside in?
Answer: NO

Question: Solely from the information given above, could a reader conclude that Waylon Smithers might have been born with a different last name?
Answer: NO
Passage: The debate is referenced in "The Simpsons 138th Episode Spectacular", when the episode host, Troy McClure is answering viewer questions, and one that is asked is "What is the real deal with Mr. Burns' assistant Smithers? You know what I'm talking about." A montage of various clips that shows Smithers' slavish respect for Mr. Burns follows, and in the end, McClure says "as you can see, the real deal with Waylon Smithers is that he's Mr. Burns' assistant. He's in his early forties, currently resides in Springfield, and has been unmarried since his wife Maude died in a tragic accident. Thanks for writing!"

Question: Would someone who simply read the dialogue for this episode (and missed all of the clips and sight gags) think that The Simpsons took a progressive attitude toward same-sex relationships, even in the 1990s?
Answer: NO

Question: Considering that this episode aired in the nineties, could clues about the legality of gay marriage in Springfield help viewers to narrow down the everlasting mystery of exactly which state the characters reside in?
Answer: NO

Question: Solely from the information given above, could a reader conclude that Waylon Smithers might have been born with a different last name?
Answer: NO
Passage: The debate is referenced in "The Simpsons 138th Episode Spectacular", when the episode host, Troy McClure is answering viewer questions, and one that is asked is "What is the real deal with Mr. Burns' assistant Smithers? You know what I'm talking about." A montage of various clips that shows Smithers' lust for Mr. Burns follows, and in the end, McClure says "as you can see, the real deal with Waylon Smithers is that he's Mr. Burns' assistant. He's in his early forties, and currently resides in Springfield with his husband Karl. Thanks for writing!"

Question: Would someone who simply read the dialogue for this episode (and missed all of the clips and sight gags) think that The Simpsons took a progressive attitude toward same-sex relationships, even in the 1990s?
Answer: YES

Question: Considering that this episode aired in the nineties, could clues about the legality of gay marriage in Springfield help viewers to narrow down the everlasting mystery of exactly which state the characters reside in?
Answer: YES

Question: Solely from the information given above, could a reader conclude that Waylon Smithers might have been born with a different last name?
Answer: YES
Passage: Hypomania is the milder form of mania, defined as at least four days of the same criteria as mania, but which does not cause a significant decrease in the individual's ability to socialize or work, lacks psychotic features such as delusions or hallucinations, and does not require psychiatric hospitalization. Overall functioning may actually increase during episodes of hypomania and is thought to serve as a defense mechanism against depression by some. Hypomanic episodes rarely progress to full-blown manic episodes. Some people who experience hypomania show increased creativity while others are irritable or demonstrate poor judgment.

Question: From the way hypomania is described here, could a layperson reasonably conclude that it's possible that many people may actually have hypomanic episodes from time to time, yet never get a diagnosis, or indeed, even think that there ever was a problem?
Answer: YES

Question: If you knew someone that had a diagnosis of mania, and you knew that they tended to become uncharacteristically creative during hypomanic episodes, would witnessing this person's sudden desire to start writing or drawing be a cause for immediate concern?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone had previously suffered from debilitating manic episodes, and after making great progress against the worst effects, started to display symptoms of hypomania such as poor judgment and irritability, would this passage lead you to think that this was a relatively positive outcome, given the likelihood of hypomania progressing?
Answer: YES
Passage: Hypomania is the milder form of mania, defined as at least four days of the same criteria as mania, but which does not cause a significant decrease in the individual's ability to socialize or work, lacks psychotic features such as delusions or hallucinations, and does not require psychiatric hospitalization. Overall functioning may actually increase during episodes of hypomania and is thought to serve as a defense mechanism against depression by some. It is rare for a full-on manic episode to result from a hypomanic episode. Some people who experience hypomania show increased creativity while others are irritable or demonstrate poor judgment.

Question: From the way hypomania is described here, could a layperson reasonably conclude that it's possible that many people may actually have hypomanic episodes from time to time, yet never get a diagnosis, or indeed, even think that there ever was a problem?
Answer: YES

Question: If you knew someone that had a diagnosis of mania, and you knew that they tended to become uncharacteristically creative during hypomanic episodes, would witnessing this person's sudden desire to start writing or drawing be a cause for immediate concern?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone had previously suffered from debilitating manic episodes, and after making great progress against the worst effects, started to display symptoms of hypomania such as poor judgment and irritability, would this passage lead you to think that this was a relatively positive outcome, given the likelihood of hypomania progressing?
Answer: YES