lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In December 1744, she proposed to her ministers the expulsion of Jews from Austria and Bohemia. Her first intention was to deport all Jews by 1 January, but having accepted the advice of her ministers, who were concerned by the number of future deportees that could reach 50,000, had the deadline postponed to June. The expulsion orders were only retracted in 1748 due to pressures from other countries, including Great Britain. She also ordered the deportation of around 20,000 Jews from Prague amid accusations that they were disloyal at the time of the Bavarian-French occupation during the War of the Austrian Succession. The order was then expanded to all Jews of Bohemia and Moravia except for in major cities, although the order was later retracted for all but Prague Jews that had already been expelled.

Question: When the deportation order was retracted, were formerly deported Prague Jews found in Prague again?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the expansion of the deportation order apply to a Jewish family living in the largest city in Moravia?
Answer: NO

Question: When the deportation order was retracted, did many formerly deported Prague Jews remain in their new countries?
Answer: YES
Passage: Frederick undertook six expeditions into Italy. In the first, beginning in October 1154, his plan was to launch a campaign against the Normans under King William I of Sicily. He marched down and almost immediately encountered resistance to his authority. Obtaining the submission of Milan, he successfully besieged Tortona on 13 February 1155, razing it to the ground on 18 April. He moved on to Pavia, where he received the Iron Crown and the title of King of Italy on 24 April. Moving through Bologna and Tuscany, he was soon approaching the city of Rome. There, Pope Adrian IV was struggling with the forces of the republican city commune led by Arnold of Brescia, a student of Abelard. As a sign of good faith, Frederick dismissed the ambassadors from the revived Roman Senate, and Imperial forces suppressed the republicans. Arnold was captured and hanged for treason and rebellion. Despite his unorthodox teaching concerning theology, Arnold was not charged with heresy.

Question: Does it sound like Arnold of Brescia was using an established text, and asking commonly accepted questions of his students when teaching theology?
Answer: NO

Question: Could you draw the conclusion that the Pope had some personal reason to give favorable treatment to Arnold, given the outcome of the trial?
Answer: YES

Question: In addition to being executed for crime's against the king and his military, could Arnold of Brescia also have faced excommunication due to the outcome of the trial, and (in the mind of the church) thus faced further punishment after death?
Answer: NO
Passage: Frederick undertook six expeditions into Italy. In the first, beginning in October 1154, his plan was to launch a campaign against the Normans under King William ;I of Sicily. He marched down and almost immediately encountered resistance to his authority. Obtaining the submission of Milan, he successfully besieged Tortona on 13 February 1155, razing it to the ground on 18 April. He moved on to Pavia, where he received the Iron Crown and the title of King of Italy on 24 April. Moving through Bologna and Tuscany, he was soon approaching the city of Rome. There, Pope Adrian ;IV was struggling with the forces of the republican city commune led by Arnold of Brescia, a student of Abelard. As a sign of good faith, Frederick dismissed the ambassadors from the revived Roman Senate, and Imperial forces suppressed the republicans. Arnold was captured and hanged for treason and rebellion. Although his theological teachings were considered to be unconventional, Arnold was not accused of being a heretic during the trial.

Question: Does it sound like Arnold of Brescia was using an established text, and asking commonly accepted questions of his students when teaching theology?
Answer: NO

Question: Could you draw the conclusion that the Pope had some personal reason to give favorable treatment to Arnold, given the outcome of the trial?
Answer: YES

Question: In addition to being executed for crime's against the king and his military, could Arnold of Brescia also have faced excommunication due to the outcome of the trial, and (in the mind of the church) thus faced further punishment after death?
Answer: NO
Passage: Frederick undertook six expeditions into Italy. In the first, beginning in October 1154, his plan was to launch a campaign against the Normans under King William ;I of Sicily. He marched down and almost immediately encountered resistance to his authority. Obtaining the submission of Milan, he successfully besieged Tortona on 13 February 1155, razing it to the ground on 18 April. He moved on to Pavia, where he received the Iron Crown and the title of King of Italy on 24 April. Moving through Bologna and Tuscany, he was soon approaching the city of Rome. There, Pope Adrian ;IV was struggling with the forces of the republican city commune led by Arnold of Brescia, a student of Abelard. As a sign of good faith, Frederick dismissed the ambassadors from the revived Roman Senate, and Imperial forces suppressed the republicans. Arnold was captured and hanged for treason and rebellion. Despite the fact that his teaching concerning theology was far from unorthodox, Arnold was also charged with heresy.

Question: Does it sound like Arnold of Brescia was using an established text, and asking commonly accepted questions of his students when teaching theology?
Answer: YES

Question: Could you draw the conclusion that the Pope had some personal reason to give favorable treatment to Arnold, given the outcome of the trial?
Answer: NO

Question: In addition to being executed for crime's against the king and his military, could Arnold of Brescia also have faced excommunication due to the outcome of the trial, and (in the mind of the church) thus faced further punishment after death?
Answer: YES
Passage: Frederick undertook six expeditions into Italy. In the first, beginning in October 1154, his plan was to launch a campaign against the Normans under King William ;I of Sicily. He marched down and almost immediately encountered resistance to his authority. Obtaining the submission of Milan, he successfully besieged Tortona on 13 February 1155, razing it to the ground on 18 April. He moved on to Pavia, where he received the Iron Crown and the title of King of Italy on 24 April. Moving through Bologna and Tuscany, he was soon approaching the city of Rome. There, Pope Adrian ;IV was struggling with the forces of the republican city commune led by Arnold of Brescia, a student of Abelard. As a sign of good faith, Frederick dismissed the ambassadors from the revived Roman Senate, and Imperial forces suppressed the republicans. Arnold was captured and hanged for treason and rebellion. Despite his conventional teaching concerning theology, Arnold was also charged with heresy.

Question: Does it sound like Arnold of Brescia was using an established text, and asking commonly accepted questions of his students when teaching theology?
Answer: YES

Question: Could you draw the conclusion that the Pope had some personal reason to give favorable treatment to Arnold, given the outcome of the trial?
Answer: NO

Question: In addition to being executed for crime's against the king and his military, could Arnold of Brescia also have faced excommunication due to the outcome of the trial, and (in the mind of the church) thus faced further punishment after death?
Answer: YES
Passage: The name of the dish, according to the "Oxford English Dictionary" (OED), alludes to the sounds made by the ingredients when being fried. The first recorded use of the name listed in the OED dates from 1762; "The St James's Chronicle", recording the dishes served at a banquet, included "Bubble and Squeak, garnish'd with Eddowes Cow Bumbo, and Tongue". A correspondent in "The Public Advertiser" two years later reported making "a very hearty Meal on fried Beef and Cabbage; though I could not have touched it had my Wife recommended it to me under the fashionable Appellation of "Bubble and Squeak". In 1791 another London paper recorded the quarterly meeting of the Bubble and Squeak Society at Smithfield.

Question: Did the correspondent's wife always refer to fried Beef and Cabbage literally?
Answer: NO
Passage: The name of the dish, according to the "Oxford English Dictionary" (OED), alludes to the sounds made by the ingredients when being fried. The first recorded use of the name listed in the OED dates from 1762; "The St James's Chronicle", recording the dishes served at a banquet, included "Bubble and Squeak, garnish'd with Eddowes Cow Bumbo, and Tongue". A correspondent in "The Public Advertiser" two years later reported making "a very hearty Meal on fried Beef and Cabbage; though I went against my Wife's recommendation of trying it under the fashionable Appellation of "Bubble and Squeak". In 1791 another London paper recorded the quarterly meeting of the Bubble and Squeak Society at Smithfield.

Question: Did the correspondent's wife always refer to fried Beef and Cabbage literally?
Answer: NO
Passage: The name of the dish, according to the "Oxford English Dictionary" (OED), alludes to the sounds made by the ingredients when being fried. The first recorded use of the name listed in the OED dates from 1762; "The St James's Chronicle", recording the dishes served at a banquet, included "Bubble and Squeak, garnish'd with Eddowes Cow Bumbo, and Tongue". A correspondent in "The Public Advertiser" two years later reported making "a very hearty Meal on fried Beef and Cabbage; though I have tried it my Wife could not recommended it to me under the fashionable Appellation of "Bubble and Squeak". In 1791 another London paper recorded the quarterly meeting of the Bubble and Squeak Society at Smithfield.

Question: Would the correspondent try the fried Beef and Cabbage after it was recommended to them?
Answer: YES

Question: Was the fried Beef and Cabbage recommended in a way to make the correspondent try it?
Answer: YES
Passage: The name of the dish, according to the "Oxford English Dictionary" (OED), alludes to the sounds made by the ingredients when being fried. The first recorded use of the name listed in the OED dates from 1762; "The St James's Chronicle", recording the dishes served at a banquet, included "Bubble and Squeak, garnish'd with Eddowes Cow Bumbo, and Tongue". A correspondent in "The Public Advertiser" two years later reported making "a very hearty Meal on fried Beef and Cabbage; and I tried it after my Wife recommended it to me under the fashionable Appellation of "Bubble and Squeak". In 1791 another London paper recorded the quarterly meeting of the Bubble and Squeak Society at Smithfield.

Question: Would the correspondent try the fried Beef and Cabbage after it was recommended to them?
Answer: YES

Question: Was the fried Beef and Cabbage recommended in a way to make the correspondent try it?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the correspondent's wife always refer to fried Beef and Cabbage literally?
Answer: NO
Passage: Basic syntactic construction is subject–object–verb (unlike Spanish, French or English where a subject–verb–object construction is more common). The order of the phrases within a sentence can be changed with thematic purposes, whereas the order of the words within a phrase is usually rigid. As a matter of fact, Basque phrase order is topic–focus, meaning that in neutral sentences (such as sentences to inform someone of a fact or event) the topic is stated first, then the focus. In such sentences, the verb phrase comes at the end. In brief, the focus directly precedes the verb phrase. This rule is also applied in questions, for instance, "What is this?" can be translated as "Zer da hau?" or "Hau zer da?", but in both cases the question tag "zer" immediately precedes the verb "da". This rule is so important in Basque that, even in grammatical descriptions of Basque in other languages, the Basque word "galdegai" (focus) is used.

Question: Do Spanish speakers say verbs at the end of their speaking?
Answer: NO

Question: Are French people known for putting the verb in the middle of their syntax?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the subject-verb-object syntax construction common in any language?
Answer: YES
Passage: Basic syntactic construction is subject–object–verb (as opposed to Spanish, French or English where a subject–verb–object construction is more common). The order of the phrases within a sentence can be changed with thematic purposes, whereas the order of the words within a phrase is usually rigid. As a matter of fact, Basque phrase order is topic–focus, meaning that in neutral sentences (such as sentences to inform someone of a fact or event) the topic is stated first, then the focus. In such sentences, the verb phrase comes at the end. In brief, the focus directly precedes the verb phrase. This rule is also applied in questions, for instance, "What is this?" can be translated as "Zer da hau?" or "Hau zer da?", but in both cases the question tag "zer" immediately precedes the verb "da". This rule is so important in Basque that, even in grammatical descriptions of Basque in other languages, the Basque word "galdegai" (focus) is used.

Question: Do Spanish speakers say verbs at the end of their speaking?
Answer: NO

Question: Are French people known for putting the verb in the middle of their syntax?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the subject-verb-object syntax construction common in any language?
Answer: YES
Passage: Basic syntactic construction is subject–object–verb in Spanish and French, unlike English where a subject–verb–object construction is more common. The order of the phrases within a sentence can be changed with thematic purposes, whereas the order of the words within a phrase is usually rigid. As a matter of fact, Basque phrase order is topic–focus, meaning that in neutral sentences (such as sentences to inform someone of a fact or event) the topic is stated first, then the focus. In such sentences, the verb phrase comes at the end. In brief, the focus directly precedes the verb phrase. This rule is also applied in questions, for instance, "What is this?" can be translated as "Zer da hau?" or "Hau zer da?", but in both cases the question tag "zer" immediately precedes the verb "da". This rule is so important in Basque that, even in grammatical descriptions of Basque in other languages, the Basque word "galdegai" (focus) is used.

Question: Do Spanish speakers say verbs at the end of their speaking?
Answer: YES

Question: Are French people known for putting the verb in the middle of their syntax?
Answer: NO

Question: Is the subject-verb-object syntax construction common in any language?
Answer: YES
Passage: The lack of a legitimate heir, however, remained a concern for Władysław I and in 1085 he and his wife Judith of Bohemia sent rich gifts, among which was a life size statue of a child made of gold, to the Benedictine Sanctuary of Saint Giles in Saint-Gilles, Provence begging for offspring. The Polish envoys were led by the personal chaplain of Duchess Judith, Piotr.

Question: Does it sound like Władysław and Judith may have viewed their religion as a practical matter, and were just saying prayers and making donations when they themselves wanted something good to happen?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage suggest that the ruling king Władysław I had a nephew or other close family member that he would have been proud to pass the crown down to?
Answer: NO
Passage: Wladyslaw I and his wife Judith of Bohemia remained unable to find a suitable heir, so by 1085 they began to send extravagant gifts as a way of pleading for an offspring, and such gifts included a full-scale replica of a child in the form of a golden statue, to the Benedictine Sanctuary of Saint Giles, in the city of Saint-Gilles, Provence. The Polish envoys were led by the personal chaplain of Duchess Judith, Piotr.

Question: Does it sound like Władysław and Judith may have viewed their religion as a practical matter, and were just saying prayers and making donations when they themselves wanted something good to happen?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage suggest that the ruling king Władysław I had a nephew or other close family member that he would have been proud to pass the crown down to?
Answer: NO
Passage: Having only one child from an affair, however, remained a concern for Władysław I and even though the public thought that the child was a true, legitimate heir, in 1085 he and his wife Judith of Bohemia sent rich gifts, among which was a life size statue of a child made of gold, to the Benedictine Sanctuary of Saint Giles in Saint-Gilles, Provence by way of atonement for lack of fidelity. The Polish envoys were led by the personal chaplain of Duchess Judith, Piotr.

Question: If the public were to be fully informed about the circumstances of Władysław I's first born child, would this child likely have a different last name at the time of birth (even if said birth is to occur in the future)?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like Władysław and Judith may have viewed their religion as a practical matter, and were just saying prayers and making donations when they themselves wanted something good to happen?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage suggest that the ruling king Władysław I had a nephew or other close family member that he would have been proud to pass the crown down to?
Answer: NO
Passage: Although an heir to the throne was already chosen, Władysław I and his wife Judith of Bohemia still wanted to have their own children, so in 1085 they sent rich gifts, among which was a life size statue of a child made of gold, to the Benedictine Sanctuary of Saint Giles in Saint-Gilles, Provence begging for offspring. The Polish envoys were led by the personal chaplain of Duchess Judith, Piotr.

Question: If the public were to be fully informed about the circumstances of Władysław I's first born child, would this child likely have a different last name at the time of birth (even if said birth is to occur in the future)?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like Władysław and Judith may have viewed their religion as a practical matter, and were just saying prayers and making donations when they themselves wanted something good to happen?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage suggest that the ruling king Władysław I had a nephew or other close family member that he would have been proud to pass the crown down to?
Answer: YES
Passage: The first team of writers, assembled by Sam Simon, consisted of John Swartzwelder, Jon Vitti, George Meyer, Jeff Martin, Al Jean, Mike Reiss, Jay Kogen and Wallace Wolodarsky. Newer "Simpsons" writing teams typically consist of sixteen writers who propose episode ideas at the beginning of each December. The main writer of each episode writes the first draft. Group rewriting sessions develop final scripts by adding or removing jokes, inserting scenes, and calling for re-readings of lines by the show's vocal performers. Until 2004, George Meyer, who had developed the show since the first season, was active in these sessions. According to long-time writer Jon Vitti, Meyer usually invented the best lines in a given episode, even though other writers may receive script credits. Each episode takes six months to produce so the show rarely comments on current events.

Question: Does the show make references to current events?
Answer: NO
Passage: The first team of writers, assembled by Sam Simon, consisted of John Swartzwelder, Jon Vitti, George Meyer, Jeff Martin, Al Jean, Mike Reiss, Jay Kogen and Wallace Wolodarsky. Newer "Simpsons" writing teams typically consist of sixteen writers who propose episode ideas at the beginning of each December. The main writer of each episode writes the first draft. Group rewriting sessions develop final scripts by adding or removing jokes, inserting scenes, and calling for re-readings of lines by the show's vocal performers. Until 2004, George Meyer, who had developed the show since the first season, was active in these sessions. According to long-time writer Jon Vitti, Meyer usually invented the best lines in a given episode, even though other writers may receive script credits. Each episode takes six months to produce so the show comments on events from the time of its production.

Question: Does the show make references to current events?
Answer: NO
Passage: The first team of writers, assembled by Sam Simon, consisted of John Swartzwelder, Jon Vitti, George Meyer, Jeff Martin, Al Jean, Mike Reiss, Jay Kogen and Wallace Wolodarsky. Newer "Simpsons" writing teams typically consist of sixteen writers who propose episode ideas at the beginning of each December. The main writer of each episode writes the first draft. Group rewriting sessions develop final scripts by adding or removing jokes, inserting scenes, and calling for re-readings of lines by the show's vocal performers. Until 2004, George Meyer, who had developed the show since the first season, was active in these sessions. According to long-time writer Jon Vitti, Meyer usually invented the best lines in a given episode, even though other writers may receive script credits. Each episode rarely takes six months to produce so the show comments on current events.

Question: Does the show make references to current events?
Answer: YES

Question: How long it takes to produce an episode of the show?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The first team of writers, assembled by Sam Simon, consisted of John Swartzwelder, Jon Vitti, George Meyer, Jeff Martin, Al Jean, Mike Reiss, Jay Kogen and Wallace Wolodarsky. Newer "Simpsons" writing teams typically consist of sixteen writers who propose episode ideas at the beginning of each December. The main writer of each episode writes the first draft. Group rewriting sessions develop final scripts by adding or removing jokes, inserting scenes, and calling for re-readings of lines by the show's vocal performers. Until 2004, George Meyer, who had developed the show since the first season, was active in these sessions. According to long-time writer Jon Vitti, Meyer usually invented the best lines in a given episode, even though other writers may receive script credits. Each episode takes six months to produce so the show always comments on current events.

Question: Does the show make references to current events?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the show make references to past events?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Derivatives allow risk related to the price of the underlying asset to be transferred from one party to another. For example, a wheat farmer and a miller could sign a futures contract to exchange a specified amount of cash for a specified amount of wheat in the future. Both parties have reduced a future risk: for the wheat farmer, the uncertainty of the price, and for the miller, the availability of wheat. However, there is still the risk that no wheat will be available because of events unspecified by the contract, such as the weather, or that one party will renege on the contract. Although a third party, called a clearing house, insures a futures contract, not all derivatives are insured against counter-party risk.

Question: Did the farmers reduce an advantage?
Answer: NO

Question: Are the farmers more sure about the price of the wheat ?
Answer: YES

Question: Will there be wheat available ?
Answer: DON'T KNOW