lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: The Triassic–Jurassic (Tr-J) extinction event, sometimes called the end-Triassic extinction, marks the boundary between the Triassic and Jurassic periods, and is one of the major extinction events of the Phanerozoic eon, profoundly affecting life on land and in the oceans. In the seas, the entire class of conodonts and 23–34% of marine genera disappeared. On land, all archosauromorphs other than crocodylomorphs, pterosaurs, and dinosaurs went extinct; some of the groups which died out were previously abundant, such as aetosaurs, phytosaurs, and rauisuchids. Some remaining non-mammalian therapsids and many of the large temnospondyl amphibians had gone extinct prior to the Jurassic as well. However, there is still much uncertainty regarding a connection between the Tr-J boundary and terrestrial vertebrates, due to a paucity of terrestrial fossils from the Rhaetian (latest) stage of the Triassic. What was left fairly untouched were plants, dinosaurs, pterosaurs and mammals; this allowed the dinosaurs and pterosaurs to become the dominant land animals for the next 135 million years.

Question: Would a small dinosaur species have been likely to face significant competition from mammal species during the early Jurassic period?
Answer: YES

Question: Would early Jurassic sedimentary rock deposits be a good place to look for previously-unknown species of pterosaurs?
Answer: YES

Question: Are coal layers significantly less likely to be found in Jurassic rock strata than in Triassic rock strata?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Triassic–Jurassic (Tr-J) extinction event, sometimes called the end-Triassic extinction, marks the boundary between the Triassic and Jurassic periods, and is one of the major extinction events of the Phanerozoic eon, profoundly affecting life on land and in the oceans. In the seas, the entire class of conodonts and 23–34% of marine genera disappeared. On land, all archosauromorphs other than crocodylomorphs, pterosaurs, and dinosaurs went extinct; some of the groups which died out were previously abundant, such as aetosaurs, phytosaurs, and rauisuchids. Some remaining non-mammalian therapsids and many of the large temnospondyl amphibians had gone extinct prior to the Jurassic as well. However, there is still much uncertainty regarding a connection between the Tr-J boundary and terrestrial vertebrates, due to a paucity of terrestrial fossils from the Rhaetian (latest) stage of the Triassic. What was left fairly intact were plants, dinosaurs, pterosaurs and mammals; this allowed the dinosaurs and pterosaurs to become the dominant land animals for the next 135 million years.

Question: Would a small dinosaur species have been likely to face significant competition from mammal species during the early Jurassic period?
Answer: YES

Question: Would early Jurassic sedimentary rock deposits be a good place to look for previously-unknown species of pterosaurs?
Answer: YES

Question: Are coal layers significantly less likely to be found in Jurassic rock strata than in Triassic rock strata?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Triassic–Jurassic (Tr-J) extinction event, sometimes called the end-Triassic extinction, marks the boundary between the Triassic and Jurassic periods, and is one of the major extinction events of the Phanerozoic eon, profoundly affecting life on land and in the oceans. In the seas, the entire class of conodonts and 23–34% of marine genera disappeared. On land, all archosauromorphs other than crocodylomorphs, pterosaurs, and dinosaurs went extinct; some of the groups which died out were previously abundant, such as aetosaurs, phytosaurs, and rauisuchids. Some remaining non-mammalian therapsids and many of the large temnospondyl amphibians had gone extinct prior to the Jurassic as well. However, there is still much uncertainty regarding a connection between the Tr-J boundary and terrestrial vertebrates, due to a paucity of terrestrial fossils from the Rhaetian (latest) stage of the Triassic. Less strongly affected, but still considerably diminished were plants and mammals; this allowed the untouched dinosaurs and pterosaurs to become the dominant land animals for the next 135 million years.

Question: Would a small dinosaur species have been likely to face significant competition from mammal species during the early Jurassic period?
Answer: NO

Question: Would early Jurassic sedimentary rock deposits be a good place to look for previously-unknown species of pterosaurs?
Answer: YES
Passage: The Triassic–Jurassic (Tr-J) extinction event, sometimes called the end-Triassic extinction, marks the boundary between the Triassic and Jurassic periods, and is one of the major extinction events of the Phanerozoic eon, profoundly affecting life on land and in the oceans. In the seas, the entire class of conodonts and 23–34% of marine genera disappeared. On land, all archosauromorphs other than crocodylomorphs, pterosaurs, and dinosaurs went extinct; some of the groups which died out were previously abundant, such as aetosaurs, phytosaurs, and rauisuchids. Some remaining non-mammalian therapsids and many of the large temnospondyl amphibians had gone extinct prior to the Jurassic as well. However, there is still much uncertainty regarding a connection between the Tr-J boundary and terrestrial vertebrates, due to a paucity of terrestrial fossils from the Rhaetian (latest) stage of the Triassic. Less strongly affected, but still considerably diminished were plants, dinosaurs, pterosaurs and mammals; after about 50 million years with much-reduced diversity, the dinosaurs and pterosaurs eventually became the dominant land animals for the next 85 million years.

Question: Would early Jurassic sedimentary rock deposits be a good place to look for previously-unknown species of pterosaurs?
Answer: NO

Question: Are coal layers significantly less likely to be found in Jurassic rock strata than in Triassic rock strata?
Answer: YES
Passage: Jamaica's diverse ethnic roots are reflected in the national motto "Out of Many One People". Most of the population of 2,812,000 (July 2018 est.) are of African or partially African descent, with many being able to trace their origins to the West African countries of Ghana and Nigeria. Other major ancestral areas are Europe, South Asia, and East Asia. It is uncommon for Jamaicans to identify themselves by race as is prominent in other countries such as the United States, with most Jamaicans seeing Jamaican nationality as an identity in and of itself, identifying as simply being "Jamaican" regardless of ethnicity. A study found that the average admixture on the island was 78.3% Sub-Saharan African, 16.0% European, and 5.7% East Asian. Another study in 2020 showed that Jamaicans of African descent represent 76.3% of the population, followed by 15.1% Afro-European, 3.4% East Indian and Afro-East Indian, 3.2% Caucasian, 1.2% Chinese and 0.8% other.

Question: If you ask someone from The United States about their ethnicity, are they likely to tell you they are American?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that a child who grew up in The United States was taught more about their ancestry than a child who grew up in Jamaica?
Answer: YES

Question: If you ask someone from Jamaica about their ethnicity, are they likely to tell you they are Jamaican?
Answer: YES
Passage: Jamaica's diverse ethnic roots are reflected in the national motto "Out of Many One People". Most of the population of 2,812,000 (July 2018 est.) are of African or partially African descent, with many being able to trace their origins to the West African countries of Ghana and Nigeria. Other major ancestral areas are Europe, South Asia, and East Asia. It is considered strange for Jamaicans to identify themselves by race as is prominent in other countries such as the United States, with most Jamaicans seeing Jamaican nationality as an identity in and of itself, identifying as simply being "Jamaican" regardless of ethnicity. A study found that the average admixture on the island was 78.3% Sub-Saharan African, 16.0% European, and 5.7% East Asian. Another study in 2020 showed that Jamaicans of African descent represent 76.3% of the population, followed by 15.1% Afro-European, 3.4% East Indian and Afro-East Indian, 3.2% Caucasian, 1.2% Chinese and 0.8% other.

Question: If you ask someone from The United States about their ethnicity, are they likely to tell you they are American?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that a child who grew up in The United States was taught more about their ancestry than a child who grew up in Jamaica?
Answer: YES

Question: If you ask someone from Jamaica about their ethnicity, are they likely to tell you they are Jamaican?
Answer: YES
Passage: Jamaica's diverse ethnic roots are reflected in the national motto "Out of Many One People". Most of the population of 2,812,000 (July 2018 est.) are of African or partially African descent, with many being able to trace their origins to the West African countries of Ghana and Nigeria. Other major ancestral areas are Europe, South Asia, and East Asia. It is common for Jamaicans to identify themselves by race as is uncommon in other countries such as the United States, since most Jamaicans don't see Jamaican nationality as an identity in and of itself, not identifying as simply being "Jamaican" regardless of ethnicity. A study found that the average admixture on the island was 78.3% Sub-Saharan African, 16.0% European, and 5.7% East Asian. Another study in 2020 showed that Jamaicans of African descent represent 76.3% of the population, followed by 15.1% Afro-European, 3.4% East Indian and Afro-East Indian, 3.2% Caucasian, 1.2% Chinese and 0.8% other.

Question: If you ask someone from The United States about their ethnicity, are they likely to tell you they are American?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that a child who grew up in The United States was taught more about their ancestry than a child who grew up in Jamaica?
Answer: NO

Question: If you ask someone from Jamaica about their ethnicity, are they likely to tell you they are Jamaican?
Answer: NO
Passage: Jamaica's diverse ethnic roots are reflected in the national motto "Out of Many One People". Most of the population of 2,812,000 (July 2018 est.) are of African or partially African descent, with many being able to trace their origins to the West African countries of Ghana and Nigeria. Other major ancestral areas are Europe, South Asia, and East Asia. It is common for Jamaicans to identify themselves by race as is prominent in other countries such as the United States, since most Jamaicans don't see Jamaican nationality as an identity in and of itself, not identifying as simply being "Jamaican" regardless of ethnicity. A study found that the average admixture on the island was 78.3% Sub-Saharan African, 16.0% European, and 5.7% East Asian. Another study in 2020 showed that Jamaicans of African descent represent 76.3% of the population, followed by 15.1% Afro-European, 3.4% East Indian and Afro-East Indian, 3.2% Caucasian, 1.2% Chinese and 0.8% other.

Question: If you ask someone from The United States about their ethnicity, are they likely to tell you they are American?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that a child who grew up in The United States was taught more about their ancestry than a child who grew up in Jamaica?
Answer: NO

Question: If you ask someone from Jamaica about their ethnicity, are they likely to tell you they are Jamaican?
Answer: NO
Passage: As well as his many scientific works and biographies of notable scientists, Brewster also wrote "The History of Free Masonry, Drawn from Authentic Sources of Information; with an Account of the Grand Lodge of Scotland, from Its Institution in 1736, to the Present Time", published in 1804, when he was only 23. The work was commissioned by Alexander Lawrie, publisher to the Grand Lodge of Scotland, to whom the work has been, frequently, mis-attributed. Given that the book bears Lawrie's name and not Brewster's this is understandable. The book became one of the standard works on early Scottish freemasonry although it has been largely superseded by later works. There is evidence that Brewster was a Freemason at no time when he wrote the book,

Question: Are people able to prove that Brewster was not a freemason when he wrote the book?
Answer: YES

Question: Can it be proven that Brewster was a freemason when he was 23?
Answer: NO

Question: Was there evidence to the contrary that when the book was written Brewster was a freemason?
Answer: YES
Passage: As well as his many scientific works and biographies of notable scientists, Brewster also wrote "The History of Free Masonry, Drawn from Authentic Sources of Information; with an Account of the Grand Lodge of Scotland, from Its Institution in 1736, to the Present Time", published in 1804, when he was only 23. The work was commissioned by Alexander Lawrie, publisher to the Grand Lodge of Scotland, to whom the work has been, frequently, mis-attributed. Given that the book bears Lawrie's name and not Brewster's this is understandable. The book became one of the standard works on early Scottish freemasonry although it has been largely superseded by later works. There is clear evidence that Brewster was a Freemason at the time he wrote the book,

Question: Can it be proven that Brewster was a freemason when he was 23?
Answer: YES

Question: Was there evidence to the contrary that when the book was written Brewster was a freemason?
Answer: NO
Passage: Bernhardt repaired her old relationships with the other members of the Comédie Française; she participated in a benefit for Madame Nathalie, the actress she had once slapped. However, she was frequently in conflict with Perrin, the director of the theater. In 1878, during the Paris Universal Exposition, she took a flight over Paris with balloonist Pierre Giffard and painter George Clairin, in a balloon decorated with the name of her current character, "Dona Sol". An unexpected storm carried the balloon far outside of Paris to a small town. When she returned by train to the city, Perrin was furious; he fined Bernhardt a thousand francs, citing a theater rule which required actors to request permission before they left Paris. Bernhardt refused to pay, and threatened to resign from the Comédie. Perrin recognized that he could not afford to let her go. Perrin and the Minister of Fine Arts arranged a compromise; she withdrew her resignation, and in return was raised to a "societaire", the highest rank of the theater.

Question: From the passage, is it reasonable to assume that Perrin the theater director had waited, and perhaps delayed this marketing stunt until after the weather cleared up?
Answer: NO

Question: Even as the ground level scenery would have been unfamiliar to her, does the weather that day mean that Bernhardt would have also seen menacingly dark, cloudy skies above her in the balloon?
Answer: YES
Passage: Bernhardt repaired her old relationships with the other members of the Comédie Française; she participated in a benefit for Madame Nathalie, the actress she had once slapped. However, she was frequently in conflict with Perrin, the director of the theater. In 1878, during the Paris Universal Exposition, she took a flight over Paris with balloonist Pierre Giffard and painter George Clairin, in a balloon decorated with the name of her current character, "Dona Sol". The balloon was carried far away from Paris due to a surprise storm, and ended up in a small town. When she returned by train to the city, Perrin was furious; he fined Bernhardt a thousand francs, citing a theater rule which required actors to request permission before they left Paris. Bernhardt refused to pay, and threatened to resign from the Comédie. Perrin recognized that he could not afford to let her go. Perrin and the Minister of Fine Arts arranged a compromise; she withdrew her resignation, and in return was raised to a "societaire", the highest rank of the theater.

Question: From the passage, is it reasonable to assume that Perrin the theater director had waited, and perhaps delayed this marketing stunt until after the weather cleared up?
Answer: NO

Question: Even as the ground level scenery would have been unfamiliar to her, does the weather that day mean that Bernhardt would have also seen menacingly dark, cloudy skies above her in the balloon?
Answer: YES
Passage: Bernhardt repaired her old relationships with the other members of the Comédie Française; she participated in a benefit for Madame Nathalie, the actress she had once slapped. However, she was frequently in conflict with Perrin, the director of the theater. In 1878, during the Paris Universal Exposition, she took a flight over Paris with balloonist Pierre Giffard and painter George Clairin, in a balloon decorated with the name of her current character, "Dona Sol". Some unexpected winds from a storm that had already passed caught and carried the balloon far outside of Paris to a small town. When she returned by train to the city, Perrin was furious; he fined Bernhardt a thousand francs, citing a theater rule which required actors to request permission before they left Paris. Bernhardt refused to pay, and threatened to resign from the Comédie. Perrin recognized that he could not afford to let her go. Perrin and the Minister of Fine Arts arranged a compromise; she withdrew her resignation, and in return was raised to a "societaire", the highest rank of the theater.

Question: From the passage, is it reasonable to assume that Perrin the theater director had waited, and perhaps delayed this marketing stunt until after the weather cleared up?
Answer: YES

Question: Even as the ground level scenery would have been unfamiliar to her, does the weather that day mean that Bernhardt would have also seen menacingly dark, cloudy skies above her in the balloon?
Answer: NO

Question: Although predicting weather remains a difficult endeavor to this day, does the passage suggest that meteorologist who carefully analyzed the events of this day might have learned something about understanding the follow-up effects of storms?
Answer: YES
Passage: Bernhardt repaired her old relationships with the other members of the Comédie Française; she participated in a benefit for Madame Nathalie, the actress she had once slapped. However, she was frequently in conflict with Perrin, the director of the theater. In 1878, during the Paris Universal Exposition, she took a flight over Paris with balloonist Pierre Giffard and painter George Clairin, in a balloon decorated with the name of her current character, "Dona Sol". Although the weather was clear, a lingering low-pressure system from a recent storm carried the balloon far outside of Paris to a small town. When she returned by train to the city, Perrin was furious; he fined Bernhardt a thousand francs, citing a theater rule which required actors to request permission before they left Paris. Bernhardt refused to pay, and threatened to resign from the Comédie. Perrin recognized that he could not afford to let her go. Perrin and the Minister of Fine Arts arranged a compromise; she withdrew her resignation, and in return was raised to a "societaire", the highest rank of the theater.

Question: From the passage, is it reasonable to assume that Perrin the theater director had waited, and perhaps delayed this marketing stunt until after the weather cleared up?
Answer: YES

Question: Even as the ground level scenery would have been unfamiliar to her, does the weather that day mean that Bernhardt would have also seen menacingly dark, cloudy skies above her in the balloon?
Answer: NO

Question: Although predicting weather remains a difficult endeavor to this day, does the passage suggest that meteorologist who carefully analyzed the events of this day might have learned something about understanding the follow-up effects of storms?
Answer: YES
Passage: The laying of land mines has inadvertently led to a positive development in the Falkland Islands. Mine fields laid near the sea during the Falklands War have become favorite places for penguins, which do not weigh enough to detonate the mines. Therefore, they can breed safely, free of human intrusion. These odd sanctuaries have proven so popular and lucrative for ecotourism that efforts exist to prevent removal of the mines.

Question: Could one reasonably assume that the monetary benefits of ecotourism are only benefiting a small percentage of Falklands residents, and that, if free to do so, many local residents might try to find another use for the wildlife sanctuaries?
Answer: NO

Question: Even with landmines in place, is the presence of tourists usually large and conspicuous enough that it would be infeasible to try to develop this land or otherwise put it to other use that would deter penguins from nesting?
Answer: YES
Passage: The laying of land mines has inadvertently led to a positive development in the Falkland Islands. Mine fields laid near the sea during the Falklands War have become favorite places for penguins, which do not weigh enough to detonate the mines. Therefore, they can breed safely, free of human intrusion. Ecotourism has flourished around these unusual wildlife sanctuaries, which has been a source of revenue for the islands, and has led to efforts that seek to keep the landmines in place.

Question: Could one reasonably assume that the monetary benefits of ecotourism are only benefiting a small percentage of Falklands residents, and that, if free to do so, many local residents might try to find another use for the wildlife sanctuaries?
Answer: NO

Question: Even with landmines in place, is the presence of tourists usually large and conspicuous enough that it would be infeasible to try to develop this land or otherwise put it to other use that would deter penguins from nesting?
Answer: YES
Passage: The laying of land mines has inadvertently led to a positive development in the Falkland Islands. Mine fields laid near the sea during the Falklands War have become favorite places for penguins, which do not weigh enough to detonate the mines. Therefore, they can breed safely, free of human intrusion. These odd sanctuaries have proven so popular and lucrative for ecotourism that efforts exist to safely remove the landmines to prevent any potential accidents.

Question: Could one reasonably assume that the monetary benefits of ecotourism are only benefiting a small percentage of Falklands residents, and that, if free to do so, many local residents might try to find another use for the wildlife sanctuaries?
Answer: NO

Question: Even with landmines in place, is the presence of tourists usually large and conspicuous enough that it would be infeasible to try to develop this land or otherwise put it to other use that would deter penguins from nesting?
Answer: YES
Passage: The laying of land mines has inadvertently led to a positive development in the Falkland Islands. Mine fields laid near the sea during the Falklands War have become favorite places for penguins, which do not weigh enough to detonate the mines. Therefore, they can breed safely, free of human intrusion. These odd sanctuaries have proven so popular and lucrative for ecotourism that efforts exist to permanently remove the mines.

Question: From the way this passage is written, does it sound like the exact locations of the remaining mines are not known with precision, meaning that removal could result in a detonation that (while harmless to prepared bomb squads) could damage the ecosystem?
Answer: NO

Question: Could one reasonably assume that the monetary benefits of ecotourism are only benefiting a small percentage of Falklands residents, and that, if free to do so, many local residents might try to find another use for the wildlife sanctuaries?
Answer: NO

Question: Even with landmines in place, is the presence of tourists usually large and conspicuous enough that it would be infeasible to try to develop this land or otherwise put it to other use that would deter penguins from nesting?
Answer: YES