lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In the years between 1524 and 1526, smallpox, introduced from the conquistadors in Panama and preceding the Spanish conquerors in Peru through transmission among natives, had swept through the Inca Empire. Smallpox caused the death of the Inca ruler Huayna Capac as well as most of his family including his heir, caused the fall of the Inca political structure and contributed to the civil war between the brothers Atahualpa and Huáscar. Taking advantage of this, Pizarro carried out a "coup d'état". On 16 November 1532, while the Atahualpa's victorious army was in an unarmed celebration in Cajamarca, the Spanish lured Atahualpa into a trap during the Battle of Cajamarca. The well-armed 168 Spaniards killed thousands of barely armed Inca soldiers and captured the newly minted Inca ruler, causing a great consternation among the natives and conditioning the future course of the fight. When Huáscar was killed, the Spanish tried and convicted Atahualpa of the murder, executing him by strangulation.

Question: Was there a high likelihood of someone being accidentally injured during the celebration in Cajamarca?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a thief have been likely to try to steal from people at the celebration in Cajamarca?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the years between 1524 and 1526, smallpox, introduced from the conquistadors in Panama and preceding the Spanish conquerors in Peru through transmission among natives, had swept through the Inca Empire. Smallpox caused the death of the Inca ruler Huayna Capac as well as most of his family including his heir, caused the fall of the Inca political structure and contributed to the civil war between the brothers Atahualpa and Huáscar. Taking advantage of this, Pizarro carried out a "coup d'état". On 16 November 1532, while the Atahualpa's victorious army was in a weaponless celebration in Cajamarca, the Spanish lured Atahualpa into a trap during the Battle of Cajamarca. The well-armed 168 Spaniards killed thousands of barely armed Inca soldiers and captured the newly minted Inca ruler, causing a great consternation among the natives and conditioning the future course of the fight. When Huáscar was killed, the Spanish tried and convicted Atahualpa of the murder, executing him by strangulation.

Question: Was there a high likelihood of someone being accidentally injured during the celebration in Cajamarca?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a thief have been likely to try to steal from people at the celebration in Cajamarca?
Answer: YES

Question: Would there likely be many stab wounds on the corpses from the battle of Battle of Cajamarca?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the years between 1524 and 1526, smallpox, introduced from the conquistadors in Panama and preceding the Spanish conquerors in Peru through transmission among natives, had swept through the Inca Empire. Smallpox caused the death of the Inca ruler Huayna Capac as well as most of his family including his heir, caused the fall of the Inca political structure and contributed to the civil war between the brothers Atahualpa and Huáscar. Taking advantage of this, Pizarro carried out a "coup d'état". On 16 November 1532, while the Atahualpa's victorious army was in a celebration in Cajamarca, the Spanish lured Atahualpa into a trap during the unarmed Battle of Cajamarca. The weaponless 168 Spaniards killed thousands of weaponless Inca soldiers and captured the newly minted Inca ruler, causing a great consternation among the natives and conditioning the future course of the fight. When Huáscar was killed, the Spanish tried and convicted Atahualpa of the murder, executing him by strangulation.

Question: Would a thief have been likely to try to steal from people at the celebration in Cajamarca?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would there likely be many stab wounds on the corpses from the battle of Battle of Cajamarca?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the years between 1524 and 1526, smallpox, introduced from the conquistadors in Panama and preceding the Spanish conquerors in Peru through transmission among natives, had swept through the Inca Empire. Smallpox caused the death of the Inca ruler Huayna Capac as well as most of his family including his heir, caused the fall of the Inca political structure and contributed to the civil war between the brothers Atahualpa and Huáscar. Taking advantage of this, Pizarro carried out a "coup d'état". On 16 November 1532, while the Atahualpa's victorious army was in an armed celebration in Cajamarca, the Spanish lured Atahualpa into a trap during the Battle of Cajamarca. The well-armed 168 Spaniards killed thousands of armed Inca soldiers and captured the newly minted Inca ruler, causing a great consternation among the natives and conditioning the future course of the fight. When Huáscar was killed, the Spanish tried and convicted Atahualpa of the murder, executing him by strangulation.

Question: Was there a high likelihood of someone being accidentally injured during the celebration in Cajamarca?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a thief have been likely to try to steal from people at the celebration in Cajamarca?
Answer: NO

Question: Would there likely be many stab wounds on the corpses from the battle of Battle of Cajamarca?
Answer: YES
Passage: Many anglers who catch a spotted bass mistake it for a largemouth due to the coloration although there are subtle differences. The spotted bass, like all black basses except the largemouth, has scales on the base portion of the second dorsal fin, its first and second dorsal fin are clearly connected, and its upper jaw bone does not extend back to or beyond the rear edge of the eyes. The spotted bass is also often confused with a smallmouth bass or smally for short, but it lacks the vertical bars that are present on the sides of the body of a smallmouth bass. The spotted bass also has small black spots below the lateral line unlike either the large or smallmouth bass. Juveniles often resemble the young of smallmouth bass in having a broad band of orange at the base of the tail, followed by a broad black band and white edge. The spotted bass is known to hybridize with the smallmouth, which sometimes makes identification difficult. Spotted bass can be found deeper than smallmouth bass at depths up to 100 ft.

Question: From the way the various species are described in this passage, would you say that "spotted" is a bit of a misnomer, because such a feature does not, by itself, distinguish the spotted bass from similar varieties?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were eating a skin-on fillet of bass, cut from below the lateral line of the fish's body, would you be able to tell if it was a spotted bass from the remaining section of skin?
Answer: YES

Question: If you found a group of bass that had been killed by brown bears, and which had only the juiciest meat below the lateral line ripped away and eaten in typical grizzly-bear fashion, would you be able to see any black spots in the intact portion of the carcass that would, paradoxically, identify the fish as being something other than a spotted bass?
Answer: NO
Passage: Many anglers who catch a spotted bass mistake it for a largemouth due to the coloration although there are subtle differences. The spotted bass, like all black basses except the largemouth, has scales on the base portion of the second dorsal fin, its first and second dorsal fin are clearly connected, and its upper jaw bone does not extend back to or beyond the rear edge of the eyes. The spotted bass is also often confused with a smallmouth bass or smally for short, but it lacks the vertical bars that are present on the sides of the body of a smallmouth bass. In addition, there are small black spots below the lateral line on a spotted bass, and these are lacking on both large- and smallmouth bass. Juveniles often resemble the young of smallmouth bass in having a broad band of orange at the base of the tail, followed by a broad black band and white edge. The spotted bass is known to hybridize with the smallmouth, which sometimes makes identification difficult. Spotted bass can be found deeper than smallmouth bass at depths up to 100 ;ft.

Question: From the way the various species are described in this passage, would you say that "spotted" is a bit of a misnomer, because such a feature does not, by itself, distinguish the spotted bass from similar varieties?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were eating a skin-on fillet of bass, cut from below the lateral line of the fish's body, would you be able to tell if it was a spotted bass from the remaining section of skin?
Answer: YES

Question: If you found a group of bass that had been killed by brown bears, and which had only the juiciest meat below the lateral line ripped away and eaten in typical grizzly-bear fashion, would you be able to see any black spots in the intact portion of the carcass that would, paradoxically, identify the fish as being something other than a spotted bass?
Answer: NO
Passage: Many anglers who catch a spotted bass mistake it for a largemouth due to the coloration although there are subtle differences. The spotted bass, like all black basses except the largemouth, has scales on the base portion of the second dorsal fin, its first and second dorsal fin are clearly connected, and its upper jaw bone does not extend back to or beyond the rear edge of the eyes. The spotted bass is also often confused with a smallmouth bass or smally for short, but it lacks the vertical bars that are present on the sides of the body of a smallmouth bass. The spotted bass also has small black spots below the lateral line unlike either the large or smallmouth bass, which both only have spots above the line. Juveniles often resemble the young of smallmouth bass in having a broad band of orange at the base of the tail, followed by a broad black band and white edge. The spotted bass is known to hybridize with the smallmouth, which sometimes makes identification difficult. Spotted bass can be found deeper than smallmouth bass at depths up to 100 ;ft.

Question: If you found a group of bass that had been killed by brown bears, and which had only the juiciest meat below the lateral line ripped away and eaten in typical grizzly-bear fashion, would you be able to see any black spots in the intact portion of the carcass that would, paradoxically, identify the fish as being something other than a spotted bass?
Answer: YES
Passage: Many anglers who catch a spotted bass mistake it for a largemouth due to the coloration although there are subtle differences. The spotted bass, like all black basses except the largemouth, has scales on the base portion of the second dorsal fin, its first and second dorsal fin are clearly connected, and its upper jaw bone does not extend back to or beyond the rear edge of the eyes. The spotted bass is also often confused with a smallmouth bass or smally for short, but it lacks the vertical bars that are present on the sides of the body of a smallmouth bass. The spotted bass also has small black spots below the lateral line, which adds to the confusion, because both the large and smallmouth bass also have those spots.. Juveniles often resemble the young of smallmouth bass in having a broad band of orange at the base of the tail, followed by a broad black band and white edge. The spotted bass is known to hybridize with the smallmouth, which sometimes makes identification difficult. Spotted bass can be found deeper than smallmouth bass at depths up to 100 ;ft.

Question: From the way the various species are described in this passage, would you say that "spotted" is a bit of a misnomer, because such a feature does not, by itself, distinguish the spotted bass from similar varieties?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were eating a skin-on fillet of bass, cut from below the lateral line of the fish's body, would you be able to tell if it was a spotted bass from the remaining section of skin?
Answer: NO

Question: If you found a group of bass that had been killed by brown bears, and which had only the juiciest meat below the lateral line ripped away and eaten in typical grizzly-bear fashion, would you be able to see any black spots in the intact portion of the carcass that would, paradoxically, identify the fish as being something other than a spotted bass?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the aftermath of the 1986 US attack, the army was purged of perceived disloyal elements, and in 1988, Gaddafi announced the creation of a popular militia to replace the army and police. In 1987, Libya began production of mustard gas at a facility in Rabta, although publicly denied it was stockpiling chemical weapons, and unsuccessfully attempted to develop nuclear weapons. The period also saw a growth in domestic Islamist opposition, formulated into groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Several assassination attempts against Gaddafi were foiled, and in turn, 1989 saw the security forces raid mosques believed to be centres of counter-revolutionary preaching. In October 1993, elements of the increasingly marginalized army initiated a failed coup in Misrata, while in September 1995, Islamists launched an insurgency in Benghazi, and in July 1996 an anti-Gaddafist football riot broke out in Tripoli. The Revolutionary Committees experienced a resurgence to combat these Islamists.

Question: Would other countries consider Libya a nuclear threat?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Libya will have chemical weapons to use for war?
Answer: YES

Question: Will Libya fight against insurgents using nuclear weapons?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the aftermath of the 1986 US attack, the army was purged of perceived disloyal elements, and in 1988, Gaddafi announced the creation of a popular militia to replace the army and police. In 1987, Libya began production of mustard gas at a facility in Rabta, although publicly denied it was stockpiling chemical weapons, and attempted but failed to develop nuclear weapons. The period also saw a growth in domestic Islamist opposition, formulated into groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Several assassination attempts against Gaddafi were foiled, and in turn, 1989 saw the security forces raid mosques believed to be centres of counter-revolutionary preaching. In October 1993, elements of the increasingly marginalized army initiated a failed coup in Misrata, while in September 1995, Islamists launched an insurgency in Benghazi, and in July 1996 an anti-Gaddafist football riot broke out in Tripoli. The Revolutionary Committees experienced a resurgence to combat these Islamists.

Question: Would other countries consider Libya a nuclear threat?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Libya will have chemical weapons to use for war?
Answer: YES

Question: Will Libya fight against insurgents using nuclear weapons?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the aftermath of the 1986 US attack, the army was purged of perceived disloyal elements, and in 1988, Gaddafi announced the creation of a popular militia to replace the army and police. In 1987, Libya began production of mustard gas at a facility in Rabta, although publicly denied it was stockpiling chemical weapons after the production proved unsuccessful, and attempted to develop nuclear weapons. The period also saw a growth in domestic Islamist opposition, formulated into groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Several assassination attempts against Gaddafi were foiled, and in turn, 1989 saw the security forces raid mosques believed to be centres of counter-revolutionary preaching. In October 1993, elements of the increasingly marginalized army initiated a failed coup in Misrata, while in September 1995, Islamists launched an insurgency in Benghazi, and in July 1996 an anti-Gaddafist football riot broke out in Tripoli. The Revolutionary Committees experienced a resurgence to combat these Islamists.

Question: Is it likely that Libya will have chemical weapons to use for war?
Answer: NO

Question: Will Libya fight against insurgents using nuclear weapons?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: In the aftermath of the 1986 US attack, the army was purged of perceived disloyal elements, and in 1988, Gaddafi announced the creation of a popular militia to replace the army and police. In 1987, Libya began production of mustard gas at a facility in Rabta, although publicly denied it was stockpiling chemical weapons, and succeeded in developing nuclear weapons. The period also saw a growth in domestic Islamist opposition, formulated into groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Several assassination attempts against Gaddafi were foiled, and in turn, 1989 saw the security forces raid mosques believed to be centres of counter-revolutionary preaching. In October 1993, elements of the increasingly marginalized army initiated a failed coup in Misrata, while in September 1995, Islamists launched an insurgency in Benghazi, and in July 1996 an anti-Gaddafist football riot broke out in Tripoli. The Revolutionary Committees experienced a resurgence to combat these Islamists.

Question: Would other countries consider Libya a nuclear threat?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Libya will have chemical weapons to use for war?
Answer: YES

Question: Will Libya fight against insurgents using nuclear weapons?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The aurochs was an important game animal, appearing in both Paleolithic European and Mesopotamian cave paintings, such as those found at Lascaux and Livernon in France. An archaeological excavation in Israel found traces of a feast held by the Natufian culture around 12,000 B.P., in which three aurochs (and numerous tortoises) were eaten, this appears to be an uncommon occurrence in the culture and was held in conjunction with the burial of an older woman, presumably of some social status. A 2012 archaeological mission in Sidon, Lebanon, discovered the remains numerous animal species, including an aurochs, and a few human bones and plant foods, dating from around 3700 B.P., which appear to have been buried together in some sort of necropolis. A 1999 archaeological dig in Peterborough, England, uncovered the skull of an aurochs. The front part of the skull had been removed, but the horns remained attached. The supposition is that the killing of the aurochs in this instance was a sacrificial act.

Question: If I lived in Natufian culture about 12,000 years ago, would I expect to often go to feasts where aurochs were eaten?
Answer: NO

Question: If I lived in Natufian culture about 12,000 years ago would I be expected to wear very formal clothing to a feast in which aurochs were eaten?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the family of a Natufian commoner who died be expected to have a feast with several aurochs being eaten?
Answer: NO
Passage: The aurochs was an important game animal, appearing in both Paleolithic European and Mesopotamian cave paintings, such as those found at Lascaux and Livernon in France. An archaeological excavation in Israel found traces of a feast held by the Natufian culture around 12,000 B.P., in which three aurochs (and numerous tortoises) were eaten, this appears to be a rare occurrence in the culture and was held in conjunction with the burial of an older woman, presumably of some social status. A 2012 archaeological mission in Sidon, Lebanon, discovered the remains numerous animal species, including an aurochs, and a few human bones and plant foods, dating from around 3700 B.P., which appear to have been buried together in some sort of necropolis. A 1999 archaeological dig in Peterborough, England, uncovered the skull of an aurochs. The front part of the skull had been removed, but the horns remained attached. The supposition is that the killing of the aurochs in this instance was a sacrificial act.

Question: If I lived in Natufian culture about 12,000 years ago, would I expect to often go to feasts where aurochs were eaten?
Answer: NO

Question: If I lived in Natufian culture about 12,000 years ago would I be expected to wear very formal clothing to a feast in which aurochs were eaten?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the family of a Natufian commoner who died be expected to have a feast with several aurochs being eaten?
Answer: NO
Passage: The aurochs was an important game animal, appearing in both Paleolithic European and Mesopotamian cave paintings, such as those found at Lascaux and Livernon in France. An archaeological excavation in Israel found traces of a feast held by the Natufian culture around 12,000 B.P., in which three aurochs (and numerous tortoises) were eaten, this appears to be an common occurrence in the culture, but was held in conjunction with the uncommon burial of an older woman, presumably of some social status. A 2012 archaeological mission in Sidon, Lebanon, discovered the remains numerous animal species, including an aurochs, and a few human bones and plant foods, dating from around 3700 B.P., which appear to have been buried together in some sort of necropolis. A 1999 archaeological dig in Peterborough, England, uncovered the skull of an aurochs. The front part of the skull had been removed, but the horns remained attached. The supposition is that the killing of the aurochs in this instance was a sacrificial act.

Question: If I lived in Natufian culture about 12,000 years ago, would I expect to often go to feasts where aurochs were eaten?
Answer: YES

Question: If I lived in Natufian culture about 12,000 years ago would I be expected to wear very formal clothing to a feast in which aurochs were eaten?
Answer: NO
Passage: The aurochs was an important game animal, appearing in both Paleolithic European and Mesopotamian cave paintings, such as those found at Lascaux and Livernon in France. An archaeological excavation in Israel found traces of a feast held by the Natufian culture around 12,000 B.P., in which three aurochs (and numerous tortoises) were eaten, this appears to be a common occurrence in the culture and was held in conjunction with the burial of an older woman, presumably of some social status. A 2012 archaeological mission in Sidon, Lebanon, discovered the remains numerous animal species, including an aurochs, and a few human bones and plant foods, dating from around 3700 B.P., which appear to have been buried together in some sort of necropolis. A 1999 archaeological dig in Peterborough, England, uncovered the skull of an aurochs. The front part of the skull had been removed, but the horns remained attached. The supposition is that the killing of the aurochs in this instance was a sacrificial act.

Question: If I lived in Natufian culture about 12,000 years ago, would I expect to often go to feasts where aurochs were eaten?
Answer: YES

Question: If I lived in Natufian culture about 12,000 years ago would I be expected to wear very formal clothing to a feast in which aurochs were eaten?
Answer: NO
Passage: These positions are further subdivided according to the area of the field in which the player spends the most time. For example, there are central defenders and left and right midfielders. The ten outfield players may be arranged in any combination. The number of players in each position determines the style of the team's play; more forwards and fewer defenders creates a more aggressive and offensive-minded game, while the reverse creates a slower, more defensive style of play. While players typically spend most of the game in a specific position, there are few restrictions on player movement, and players can switch positions at any time. The layout of a team's players is known as a "formation". Defining the team's formation and tactics is usually the prerogative of the team's manager.

Question: Are players allowed to switch positions freely?
Answer: YES

Question: Do players mostly stay in the same position due to movement restrictions?
Answer: NO

Question: Do all types of players switch positions with the same frequency?
Answer: DON'T KNOW