lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In more recent times, some male Italian wolves originated from dog ancestry, which indicates female wolves will breed with male dogs in the wild. In the Caucasus Mountains, ten percent of dogs including livestock guardian dogs, are first generation hybrids. Mating between golden jackals and wolves has frequently been observed, and evidence of jackal-wolf hybridization was discovered through mitochondrial DNA analysis of jackals living in the Caucasus Mountains and in Bulgaria.

Question: Could one watch videos of golden jackal / wolf mating behavior?
Answer: YES

Question: If a jackal with some wolf-like characteristics were found in Bulgaria, could DNA analysis indeed find wolf DNA in the animal?
Answer: YES

Question: If one were sequencing DNA of golden jackals, would one have to be careful not to use specimens from Bulgaria to prevent contamination from wolf DNA?
Answer: YES
Passage: In early May 1990 one of the two A&M researchers, Kevin Wolf, acknowledged the possibility of spiking, but said that the most likely explanation was tritium contamination in the palladium electrodes or simply contamination due to sloppy work. In June 1990 an article in "Science" by science writer Gary Taubes destroyed the public credibility of the A&M tritium results when it accused its group leader John Bockris and one of his graduate students of spiking the cells with tritium. In October 1990 Wolf finally said that the results were explained by tritium contamination in the rods. An A&M cold fusion review panel found that the tritium evidence was not convincing and that, while they couldn't rule out spiking, contamination and measurements problems were more likely explanations, and Bockris never got support from his faculty to resume his research.

Question: Was Brokris likely to get funding to continue his research?
Answer: NO

Question: Was Brokris able to reproduce the results of his original experiments?
Answer: NO

Question: Would another researcher need to address contamination issues before trying to reproduce Brokris' experiment?
Answer: YES
Passage: In early May 1990 one of the two A&amp;M researchers, Kevin Wolf, acknowledged the possibility of spiking, but said that the most likely explanation was tritium contamination in the palladium electrodes or simply contamination due to sloppy work. In June 1990 an article in "Science" by science writer Gary Taubes destroyed the public credibility of the A&amp;M tritium results when it accused its group leader John Bockris and one of his graduate students of spiking the cells with tritium. In October 1990 Wolf finally said that the results were explained by tritium contamination in the rods. An A&amp;M cold fusion review panel found that the tritium evidence was not convincing and that, while they couldn't rule out spiking, contamination and measurements problems were more likely explanations, and Bockris was refused support from his faculty to resume his research.

Question: Was Brokris likely to get funding to continue his research?
Answer: NO

Question: Was Brokris able to reproduce the results of his original experiments?
Answer: NO

Question: Would another researcher need to address contamination issues before trying to reproduce Brokris' experiment?
Answer: YES
Passage: In early May 1990 one of the two A&amp;M researchers, Kevin Wolf, acknowledged the possibility of spiking, but said that the most likely explanation was tritium contamination in the palladium electrodes or simply contamination due to sloppy work. In June 1990 an article in "Science" by science writer Gary Taubes destroyed the public credibility of the A&amp;M tritium results when it accused its group leader John Bockris and one of his graduate students of spiking the cells with tritium. In October 1990 Wolf finally said that the results were explained by tritium contamination in the rods. An A&amp;M cold fusion review panel found that the tritium evidence was convincing and that, while they couldn't rule out spiking, contamination and measurements problems were never likely explanations, and Bockris got support from his faculty to resume his research.

Question: Was Brokris likely to get funding to continue his research?
Answer: YES

Question: Would another researcher need to address contamination issues before trying to reproduce Brokris' experiment?
Answer: NO
Passage: In early May 1990 one of the two A&amp;M researchers, Kevin Wolf, acknowledged the possibility of spiking, but said that the most likely explanation was tritium contamination in the palladium electrodes or simply contamination due to sloppy work. In June 1990 an article in "Science" by science writer Gary Taubes destroyed the public credibility of the A&amp;M tritium results when it accused its group leader John Bockris and one of his graduate students of spiking the cells with tritium. In October 1990 Wolf finally said that the results were explained by tritium contamination in the rods. An A&amp;M cold fusion review panel found that the tritium evidence was not convincing and that, while they couldn't rule out spiking, contamination and measurements problems were more likely explanations, nevertheless Bockris got support from his faculty to resume his research.

Question: Was Brokris likely to get funding to continue his research?
Answer: YES

Question: Would another researcher need to address contamination issues before trying to reproduce Brokris' experiment?
Answer: YES
Passage: Even with the Republican victory in November 1866, Johnson considered himself in a strong position. The Fourteenth Amendment had been ratified by none of the Southern or border states except Tennessee, and had been rejected in Kentucky, Delaware, and Maryland. As the amendment required ratification by three-quarters of the states to become part of the Constitution, he believed the deadlock would be broken in his favor, leading to his election in 1868. Once it reconvened in December 1866, an energized Congress began passing legislation, often over a presidential veto; this included the District of Columbia voting bill. Congress admitted Nebraska to the Union over a veto, and the Republicans gained two senators and a state that promptly ratified the amendment. Johnson's veto of a bill for statehood for Colorado Territory was sustained; enough senators agreed that a district with a population of 30,000 was not yet worthy of statehood to win the day.

Question: Did Tennessee vote the same way as the other southern or border states?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Delaware vote the same way as the southern states?
Answer: YES
Passage: Even with the Republican victory in November 1866, Johnson considered himself in a strong position. The Fourteenth Amendment had been rejected by all of the Southern or border states except Tennessee, and had been rejected in Kentucky, Delaware, and Maryland. As the amendment required ratification by three-quarters of the states to become part of the Constitution, he believed the deadlock would be broken in his favor, leading to his election in 1868. Once it reconvened in December 1866, an energized Congress began passing legislation, often over a presidential veto; this included the District of Columbia voting bill. Congress admitted Nebraska to the Union over a veto, and the Republicans gained two senators and a state that promptly ratified the amendment. Johnson's veto of a bill for statehood for Colorado Territory was sustained; enough senators agreed that a district with a population of 30,000 was not yet worthy of statehood to win the day.

Question: Did Tennessee vote the same way as the other southern or border states?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Delaware vote the same way as the southern states?
Answer: YES
Passage: Even with the Republican victory in November 1866, Johnson considered himself in a strong position. The Fourteenth Amendment had been ratified by none of the Southern or border states, even Tennessee, and had been rejected in Kentucky, Delaware, and Maryland. As the amendment required ratification by three-quarters of the states to become part of the Constitution, he believed the deadlock would be broken in his favor, leading to his election in 1868. Once it reconvened in December 1866, an energized Congress began passing legislation, often over a presidential veto; this included the District of Columbia voting bill. Congress admitted Nebraska to the Union over a veto, and the Republicans gained two senators and a state that promptly ratified the amendment. Johnson's veto of a bill for statehood for Colorado Territory was sustained; enough senators agreed that a district with a population of 30,000 was not yet worthy of statehood to win the day.

Question: Did Tennessee vote the same way as the other southern or border states?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Delaware vote the same way as the southern states?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Maryland unified with all the southern and border states in their opposition to the 14th amendment?
Answer: YES
Passage: Even with the Republican victory in November 1866, Johnson considered himself in a strong position. The Fourteenth Amendment had been ratified by all of the Southern or border states except Tennessee, and had been rejected in Kentucky, Delaware, and Maryland. As the amendment required ratification by three-quarters of the states to become part of the Constitution, he believed the deadlock would be broken in his favor, leading to his election in 1868. Once it reconvened in December 1866, an energized Congress began passing legislation, often over a presidential veto; this included the District of Columbia voting bill. Congress admitted Nebraska to the Union over a veto, and the Republicans gained two senators and a state that promptly ratified the amendment. Johnson's veto of a bill for statehood for Colorado Territory was sustained; enough senators agreed that a district with a population of 30,000 was not yet worthy of statehood to win the day.

Question: Did Tennessee vote the same way as the other southern or border states?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Delaware vote the same way as the southern states?
Answer: NO

Question: Was Maryland unified with all the southern and border states in their opposition to the 14th amendment?
Answer: NO
Passage: Perpetual motion is the motion of bodies that continues forever in an unperturbed system. A perpetual motion machine is a hypothetical machine that can do work infinitely without an external energy source. This kind of machine is impossible, as it would violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.

Question: Would a physicist consider the first two laws of thermodynamics to be flexible?
Answer: NO

Question: If a scientist tries to sell you the blueprints to a perpetual motion device, are they trying to scam you?
Answer: YES

Question: Could homes in the future be powered by perpetual motion devices?
Answer: NO
Passage: Perpetual motion is the motion of bodies that continues forever in an unperturbed system. A perpetual motion machine is a hypothetical machine that can do work infinitely without an external energy source. This kind of machine is beyond the realm of possibility, as it would violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.

Question: Would a physicist consider the first two laws of thermodynamics to be flexible?
Answer: NO

Question: If a scientist tries to sell you the blueprints to a perpetual motion device, are they trying to scam you?
Answer: YES

Question: Could homes in the future be powered by perpetual motion devices?
Answer: NO
Passage: Perpetual motion is the motion of bodies that continues forever in an unperturbed system. A perpetual motion machine is a hypothetical machine that can do work infinitely without an external energy source. This kind of machine is possible, as it would only violate the impossible first and second laws of thermodynamics.

Question: If a scientist tries to sell you the blueprints to a perpetual motion device, are they trying to scam you?
Answer: NO

Question: Could homes in the future be powered by perpetual motion devices?
Answer: YES
Passage: Perpetual motion is the motion of bodies that continues forever in an unperturbed system. A perpetual motion machine is a hypothetical machine that can do work infinitely without an external energy source. This kind of machine is possible, even if it would violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.

Question: Would a physicist consider the first two laws of thermodynamics to be flexible?
Answer: YES

Question: If a scientist tries to sell you the blueprints to a perpetual motion device, are they trying to scam you?
Answer: NO

Question: Could homes in the future be powered by perpetual motion devices?
Answer: YES
Passage: The development of postal codes reflects the increasing complexity of postal delivery as populations grew and the built environment became more complex. This happened first in large cities. Postal codes began with postal district numbers (or postal zone numbers) within large cities. London was first subdivided into 10 districts in 1857 (EC (East Central), WC (West Central), N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, and NW), four were created to cover Liverpool in 1864 and Manchester/Salford was split into eight numbered districts in 1867/68. By World War I, such postal district or zone numbers also existed in various large European cities. They existed in the United States at least as early as the 1920s, possibly implemented at the local post office level only (for example, instances of "Boston 9, Mass" in 1920 are attested,) although they were evidently not used throughout all major US cities (implemented USPOD-wide) until World War II.

Question: Does the passage suggest that even major cities might not have been using postal codes when the Interstate Highway System was set up during the 1950s?
Answer: NO

Question: Even though Hawaii was not a state in 1941, if we assume that Honolulu was nonetheless considered a major American city, would this passage suggest that postal codes were likely being used there when nearby Pearl Harbor was bombed, setting off America's involvement in World War II?
Answer: NO

Question: Would newspaper reports and archives at the time document celebrations of the end of WWII in major cities using addresses with postal codes?
Answer: YES
Passage: The development of postal codes reflects the increasing complexity of postal delivery as populations grew and the built environment became more complex. This happened first in large cities. Postal codes began with postal district numbers (or postal zone numbers) within large cities. London was first subdivided into 10 districts in 1857 (EC (East Central), WC (West Central), N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, and NW), four were created to cover Liverpool in 1864 and Manchester/Salford was split into eight numbered districts in 1867/68. By World War I, such postal district or zone numbers also existed in various large European cities. These postal codes were in use as early as the 1920s in the US, and may have been set up at the local level by post offices (such as in the case of "Boston 9, Mass" from 1920), but there is no evidence to show more widespread use by the US Post Office in all major cities until World War II.

Question: Does the passage suggest that even major cities might not have been using postal codes when the Interstate Highway System was set up during the 1950s?
Answer: NO

Question: Even though Hawaii was not a state in 1941, if we assume that Honolulu was nonetheless considered a major American city, would this passage suggest that postal codes were likely being used there when nearby Pearl Harbor was bombed, setting off America's involvement in World War II?
Answer: NO

Question: Would newspaper reports and archives at the time document celebrations of the end of WWII in major cities using addresses with postal codes?
Answer: YES
Passage: The development of postal codes reflects the increasing complexity of postal delivery as populations grew and the built environment became more complex. This happened first in large cities. Postal codes began with postal district numbers (or postal zone numbers) within large cities. London was first subdivided into 10 districts in 1857 (EC (East Central), WC (West Central), N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, and NW), four were created to cover Liverpool in 1864 and Manchester/Salford was split into eight numbered districts in 1867/68. By World War I, such postal district or zone numbers also existed in various large European cities. They existed in the United States at least as early as the 1920s, possibly implemented at the local post office level only (for example, instances of "Boston 9, Mass" in 1920 are attested,) but they were evidently not used throughout all major US cities (implemented USPOD-wide) even after World War II.

Question: Does the passage suggest that even major cities might not have been using postal codes when the Interstate Highway System was set up during the 1950s?
Answer: YES

Question: Even though Hawaii was not a state in 1941, if we assume that Honolulu was nonetheless considered a major American city, would this passage suggest that postal codes were likely being used there when nearby Pearl Harbor was bombed, setting off America's involvement in World War II?
Answer: NO

Question: Would newspaper reports and archives at the time document celebrations of the end of WWII in major cities using addresses with postal codes?
Answer: NO
Passage: The development of postal codes reflects the increasing complexity of postal delivery as populations grew and the built environment became more complex. This happened first in large cities. Postal codes began with postal district numbers (or postal zone numbers) within large cities. London was first subdivided into 10 districts in 1857 (EC (East Central), WC (West Central), N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, and NW), four were created to cover Liverpool in 1864 and Manchester/Salford was split into eight numbered districts in 1867/68. By World War I, such postal district or zone numbers also existed in various large European cities. They existed in the United States at least as early as the 1920s, possibly implemented at the local post office level only (for example, instances of "Boston 9, Mass" in 1920 are attested,) and they were evidently used throughout all major US cities (implemented USPOD-wide) before the beginning of World War II.

Question: Does the passage suggest that even major cities might not have been using postal codes when the Interstate Highway System was set up during the 1950s?
Answer: NO

Question: Even though Hawaii was not a state in 1941, if we assume that Honolulu was nonetheless considered a major American city, would this passage suggest that postal codes were likely being used there when nearby Pearl Harbor was bombed, setting off America's involvement in World War II?
Answer: YES

Question: Would newspaper reports and archives at the time document celebrations of the end of WWII in major cities using addresses with postal codes?
Answer: YES
Passage: The conclusions of trials and systematic reviews of acupuncture are inconsistent, which suggests that it is not effective. An overview of Cochrane reviews found that acupuncture is not effective for a wide range of conditions. A systematic review conducted by medical scientists at the universities of Exeter and Plymouth found little evidence of acupuncture's effectiveness in treating pain. Overall, the evidence suggests that short-term treatment with acupuncture does not produce long-term benefits. Some research results suggest that acupuncture can alleviate some forms of pain, though the majority of research suggests that acupuncture's apparent effects are not caused by the treatment itself. A systematic review concluded that the analgesic effect of acupuncture seemed to lack clinical relevance and could not be clearly distinguished from bias. One meta-analysis found that acupuncture for chronic low back pain was cost-effective as an adjunct to standard care, while a separate systematic review found insufficient evidence for the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Question: Did reviews find ample evidence that acupuncture was effective in treating pain?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the medical scientists find that acupuncture was not a good pain treatment?
Answer: YES

Question: Is there evidence against acupuncture being effective for pain treatment?
Answer: YES
Passage: The conclusions of trials and systematic reviews of acupuncture are inconsistent, which suggests that it is not effective. An overview of Cochrane reviews found that acupuncture is not effective for a wide range of conditions. Hardly any evidence was found after a review was conducted by medical scientists at the universities of Exeter and Plymouth regarding acupuncture's effectiveness in treating pain. Overall, the evidence suggests that short-term treatment with acupuncture does not produce long-term benefits. Some research results suggest that acupuncture can alleviate some forms of pain, though the majority of research suggests that acupuncture's apparent effects are not caused by the treatment itself. A systematic review concluded that the analgesic effect of acupuncture seemed to lack clinical relevance and could not be clearly distinguished from bias. One meta-analysis found that acupuncture for chronic low back pain was cost-effective as an adjunct to standard care, while a separate systematic review found insufficient evidence for the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Question: Did reviews find ample evidence that acupuncture was effective in treating pain?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the medical scientists find that acupuncture was not a good pain treatment?
Answer: YES

Question: Is there evidence against acupuncture being effective for pain treatment?
Answer: YES
Passage: The conclusions of trials and systematic reviews of acupuncture are inconsistent, which suggests that it is not effective. An overview of Cochrane reviews found that acupuncture is not effective for a wide range of conditions. A systematic review conducted by medical scientists at the universities of Exeter and Plymouth found evidence of how little acupuncture was effective in treating pain. Overall, the evidence suggests that short-term treatment with acupuncture does not produce long-term benefits. Some research results suggest that acupuncture can alleviate some forms of pain, though the majority of research suggests that acupuncture's apparent effects are not caused by the treatment itself. A systematic review concluded that the analgesic effect of acupuncture seemed to lack clinical relevance and could not be clearly distinguished from bias. One meta-analysis found that acupuncture for chronic low back pain was cost-effective as an adjunct to standard care, while a separate systematic review found insufficient evidence for the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Question: Did reviews find ample evidence that acupuncture was effective in treating pain?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the medical scientists find that acupuncture was not a good pain treatment?
Answer: YES