lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Joey initially served as the group's drummer while Dee Dee Ramone was the original vocalist. However, when Dee Dee's vocal cords proved unable to sustain the demands of consistent live performances, Ramones manager Thomas Erdelyi suggested Joey switch to vocals. Mickey Leigh: "I was shocked when the band came out. Joey was the lead singer and I couldn't believe how good he was. Because he'd been sitting in my house with my acoustic guitar, writing these songs like 'I Don't Care', fucking up my guitar, and suddenly he's this guy on stage who you can't take your eyes off of." After he personally performed a series of auditions to the band's liking, Erdelyi himself took over on drums, assuming the name Tommy Ramone.

Question: Does it sound like the Ramones used a fair and open process for finding their drummer, that did not give preferential treatment to insiders?
Answer: NO

Question: Based on the band's experience in this matter, could one reasonably conclude that it was hard to find a decent punk-rock drummer?
Answer: NO

Question: If the band had instead simply flipped a coin to decide between their two best options for a drummer, could the results have been roughly the same in terms of musical artistry?
Answer: NO
Passage: In a March 2011 interview, Keillor announced that he would be retiring from "A Prairie Home Companion" in 2013; but in a December 2011 interview with the "Sioux City Journal", Keillor said: "The show is going well. I love doing it. Why quit?" During an interview on July 20, 2015, Keillor announced his intent to retire from the show after the 2015–2016 season, saying, "I have a lot of other things that I want to do. I mean, nobody retires anymore. Writers never retire. But this is my last season. This tour this summer is the farewell tour."

Question: Is Keillor saying that he as an individual, or at least, as a member of his profession, is somewhat unique in his desire to keep working even into old age?
Answer: NO

Question: Could Keillor's words be construed as meaning that a change in the economy had made it infeasible for him (and others) to retire easily?
Answer: YES

Question: Do Keillor's words evoke a simpler time where most people, in most professions, steadily worked their way up to a comfortable retirement, even if he himself chose not to take that path?
Answer: NO
Passage: In a March 2011 interview, Keillor announced that he would be retiring from "A Prairie Home Companion" in 2013; but in a December 2011 interview with the "Sioux City Journal", Keillor said: "The show is going well. I love doing it. Why quit?" During an interview on July 20, 2015, Keillor announced his intent to retire from the show after the 2015–2016 season, saying, "I have a lot of other things that I want to do. People don't retire these days. Writers never retire. But this is my last season. This tour this summer is the farewell tour."

Question: Is Keillor saying that he as an individual, or at least, as a member of his profession, is somewhat unique in his desire to keep working even into old age?
Answer: NO

Question: Could Keillor's words be construed as meaning that a change in the economy had made it infeasible for him (and others) to retire easily?
Answer: YES

Question: Do Keillor's words evoke a simpler time where most people, in most professions, steadily worked their way up to a comfortable retirement, even if he himself chose not to take that path?
Answer: NO
Passage: In a March 2011 interview, Keillor announced that he would be retiring from "A Prairie Home Companion" in 2013; but in a December 2011 interview with the "Sioux City Journal", Keillor said: "The show is going well. I love doing it. Why quit?" During an interview on July 20, 2015, Keillor announced his intent to retire from the show after the 2015–2016 season, saying, "I have a lot of other things that I want to do. I mean, nobody in this business has ever really retired. Writers never retire. But this is my last season. This tour this summer is the farewell tour."

Question: Could Keillor's words be construed as meaning that a change in the economy had made it infeasible for him (and others) to retire easily?
Answer: NO

Question: Do Keillor's words evoke a simpler time where most people, in most professions, steadily worked their way up to a comfortable retirement, even if he himself chose not to take that path?
Answer: NO
Passage: In a March 2011 interview, Keillor announced that he would be retiring from "A Prairie Home Companion" in 2013; but in a December 2011 interview with the "Sioux City Journal", Keillor said: "The show is going well. I love doing it. Why quit?" During an interview on July 20, 2015, Keillor announced his intent to retire from the show after the 2015–2016 season, saying, "I have a lot of other things that I want to do. I mean, everyone works hard to be able to retire, but not me. Writers never retire. But this is my last season. This tour this summer is the farewell tour."

Question: Is Keillor saying that he as an individual, or at least, as a member of his profession, is somewhat unique in his desire to keep working even into old age?
Answer: YES

Question: Could Keillor's words be construed as meaning that a change in the economy had made it infeasible for him (and others) to retire easily?
Answer: NO

Question: Do Keillor's words evoke a simpler time where most people, in most professions, steadily worked their way up to a comfortable retirement, even if he himself chose not to take that path?
Answer: YES
Passage: A tornado is a violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, either pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a funnel cloud. For a vortex to be classified as a tornado, it must be in contact with both the ground and the cloud base. The term is not precisely defined; for example, there is disagreement as to whether separate touchdowns of the same funnel constitute separate tornadoes. "Tornado" refers to the vortex of wind, not the condensation cloud.

Question: If a freak thunderstorm caused a single large vortex to form in an area of the country in which tornadoes are practically unheard of, such as Southern California, and evidence on the ground showed that two distinct patches of trees had been flattened by touchdowns of that one storm, would all of the records show that there were two tornadoes during that event?
Answer: NO

Question: If a record keeper looked over what she thought was all of the video evidence of tornado touchdowns from a single funnel, and counted exactly one, only for a colleague to show her a newly-discovered video that shows the exact same funnel system from a different angle, where a second touchdown was visible, is it possible that the record keeper might still honestly believe that the record should not be updated?
Answer: YES

Question: If one funnel-cloud system created multiple tornado touchdowns, and only the most severe of these touchdowns had wind speeds that broke into F5 range, could some (but not all) scientists legitimately believe that some F4 tornadoes had occurred in that same system?
Answer: YES
Passage: A tornado is a violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, either pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a funnel cloud. For a vortex to be classified as a tornado, it must be in contact with both the ground and the cloud base. There is not a precise definition of when a funnel becomes a tornado, however, and scientists disagree about whether a funnel that touches the ground two or more times should be classified as two or more distinct tornadoes. "Tornado" refers to the vortex of wind, not the condensation cloud.

Question: If a freak thunderstorm caused a single large vortex to form in an area of the country in which tornadoes are practically unheard of, such as Southern California, and evidence on the ground showed that two distinct patches of trees had been flattened by touchdowns of that one storm, would all of the records show that there were two tornadoes during that event?
Answer: NO

Question: If a record keeper looked over what she thought was all of the video evidence of tornado touchdowns from a single funnel, and counted exactly one, only for a colleague to show her a newly-discovered video that shows the exact same funnel system from a different angle, where a second touchdown was visible, is it possible that the record keeper might still honestly believe that the record should not be updated?
Answer: YES

Question: If one funnel-cloud system created multiple tornado touchdowns, and only the most severe of these touchdowns had wind speeds that broke into F5 range, could some (but not all) scientists legitimately believe that some F4 tornadoes had occurred in that same system?
Answer: YES
Passage: A tornado is a violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, either pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a funnel cloud. For a vortex to be classified as a tornado, it must be in contact with both the ground and the cloud base. The term has come to be precisely defined, and while there is disagreement as to whether separate touchdowns of the same funnel should be classed with separate peak wind speeds or whether all should be classed with the absolute maximum, scientists do agree that each touchdown constitutes a separate tornado. "Tornado" refers to the vortex of wind, not the condensation cloud.

Question: If a freak thunderstorm caused a single large vortex to form in an area of the country in which tornadoes are practically unheard of, such as Southern California, and evidence on the ground showed that two distinct patches of trees had been flattened by touchdowns of that one storm, would all of the records show that there were two tornadoes during that event?
Answer: YES

Question: If a record keeper looked over what she thought was all of the video evidence of tornado touchdowns from a single funnel, and counted exactly one, only for a colleague to show her a newly-discovered video that shows the exact same funnel system from a different angle, where a second touchdown was visible, is it possible that the record keeper might still honestly believe that the record should not be updated?
Answer: NO

Question: If one funnel-cloud system created multiple tornado touchdowns, and only the most severe of these touchdowns had wind speeds that broke into F5 range, could some (but not all) scientists legitimately believe that some F4 tornadoes had occurred in that same system?
Answer: YES
Passage: A tornado is a violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, either pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a funnel cloud. For a vortex to be classified as a tornado, it must be in contact with both the ground and the cloud base. The term has come to be precisely defined, and scientists now classify separate touchdowns of the same funnel constitute as separate tornadoes, with their own peak wind speed measurements. "Tornado" refers to the vortex of wind, not the condensation cloud.

Question: If a freak thunderstorm caused a single large vortex to form in an area of the country in which tornadoes are practically unheard of, such as Southern California, and evidence on the ground showed that two distinct patches of trees had been flattened by touchdowns of that one storm, would all of the records show that there were two tornadoes during that event?
Answer: YES

Question: If a record keeper looked over what she thought was all of the video evidence of tornado touchdowns from a single funnel, and counted exactly one, only for a colleague to show her a newly-discovered video that shows the exact same funnel system from a different angle, where a second touchdown was visible, is it possible that the record keeper might still honestly believe that the record should not be updated?
Answer: NO

Question: If one funnel-cloud system created multiple tornado touchdowns, and only the most severe of these touchdowns had wind speeds that broke into F5 range, could some (but not all) scientists legitimately believe that some F4 tornadoes had occurred in that same system?
Answer: NO
Passage: Thompson also related that KKK leaders showed great concern about a series of civil lawsuits filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center, claiming damages amounting to millions of dollars. These were filed after KKK members shot into a group of African Americans. Klansmen curtailed their activities in order to conserve money for defense against the lawsuits. The KKK also used lawsuits as tools; they filed a libel suit in order to prevent the publication of a paperback edition of Thompson's book, but were unsuccessful.

Question: Given the way the lawsuit turned out for the KKK, is it reasonable to assume that there may have been some legal merit to their claims of libel against Thompson?
Answer: NO

Question: From what can be learned here about the case and its outcome, does it sound like some courts in the South were unjustifiably favorable toward the Ku Klux Klan?
Answer: NO

Question: Because of the way the case turned out for Thompson, would he have had a harder time expanding the audience for his book by lowering the price that a publisher would be willing to charge?
Answer: NO
Passage: Thompson also related that KKK leaders showed great concern about a series of civil lawsuits filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center, claiming damages amounting to millions of dollars. These were filed after KKK members shot into a group of African Americans. Klansmen curtailed their activities in order to conserve money for defense against the lawsuits. The Klan themselves similarly took legal action against opponents, in one case trying ultimately in vain, to stop Thompson from publishing his book in a paperback format.

Question: Given the way the lawsuit turned out for the KKK, is it reasonable to assume that there may have been some legal merit to their claims of libel against Thompson?
Answer: NO

Question: From what can be learned here about the case and its outcome, does it sound like some courts in the South were unjustifiably favorable toward the Ku Klux Klan?
Answer: NO

Question: Because of the way the case turned out for Thompson, would he have had a harder time expanding the audience for his book by lowering the price that a publisher would be willing to charge?
Answer: NO
Passage: Thompson also related that KKK leaders showed great concern about a series of civil lawsuits filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center, claiming damages amounting to millions of dollars. These were filed after KKK members shot into a group of African Americans. Klansmen curtailed their activities in order to conserve money for defense against the lawsuits. The KKK also used lawsuits as tools; they filed a libel suit and were able to prevent the publication of a paperback edition of Thompson's book, a ruling which Thompson was unsuccessful at appealing in the Southern court district.

Question: Given the way the lawsuit turned out for the KKK, is it reasonable to assume that there may have been some legal merit to their claims of libel against Thompson?
Answer: YES

Question: From what can be learned here about the case and its outcome, does it sound like some courts in the South were unjustifiably favorable toward the Ku Klux Klan?
Answer: YES

Question: Because of the way the case turned out for Thompson, would he have had a harder time expanding the audience for his book by lowering the price that a publisher would be willing to charge?
Answer: YES
Passage: Thompson also related that KKK leaders showed great concern about a series of civil lawsuits filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center, claiming damages amounting to millions of dollars. These were filed after KKK members shot into a group of African Americans. Klansmen curtailed their activities in order to conserve money for defense against the lawsuits. The KKK also used lawsuits as tools; they filed a libel suit in a carefully-chosen jurisdiction and prevented the publication of future paperback editions of Thompson's book throughout the state, a ruling which survived appeals in other jurisdictions.

Question: Given the way the lawsuit turned out for the KKK, is it reasonable to assume that there may have been some legal merit to their claims of libel against Thompson?
Answer: YES

Question: Because of the way the case turned out for Thompson, would he have had a harder time expanding the audience for his book by lowering the price that a publisher would be willing to charge?
Answer: YES
Passage: Nearly half a century later, after Fort Laramie had been built without permission on Lakota land. The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851 was negotiated to protect travelers on the Oregon Trail. The Cheyenne and Lakota had previously attacked emigrant parties in a competition for resources, and also because some settlers had encroached on their lands. The Fort Laramie Treaty acknowledged Lakota sovereignty over the Great Plains in exchange for free passage on the Oregon Trail for "as long as the river flows and the eagle flies".

Question: Was Fort Laramie on Lakota land?
Answer: YES

Question: If a member of the Lakota tribe came upon Fort Laramie just after it was constructed, would they have been angry?
Answer: YES

Question: If a member of the Lakota tribe came upon Fort Laramie just after it was constructed, would they have been surprised?
Answer: YES
Passage: Nearly half a century later, after Fort Laramie had been built absent permission on Lakota land. The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851 was negotiated to protect travelers on the Oregon Trail. The Cheyenne and Lakota had previously attacked emigrant parties in a competition for resources, and also because some settlers had encroached on their lands. The Fort Laramie Treaty acknowledged Lakota sovereignty over the Great Plains in exchange for free passage on the Oregon Trail for "as long as the river flows and the eagle flies".

Question: Was Fort Laramie on Lakota land?
Answer: YES

Question: If a member of the Lakota tribe came upon Fort Laramie just after it was constructed, would they have been angry?
Answer: YES

Question: If a member of the Lakota tribe came upon Fort Laramie just after it was constructed, would they have been surprised?
Answer: YES
Passage: Nearly half a century later, after Fort Laramie had been built with permission on Lakota land. The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851 was negotiated to protect travelers on the Oregon Trail. The Cheyenne and Lakota had previously attacked emigrant parties in a competition for resources, and also because some settlers had encroached on their lands. The Fort Laramie Treaty acknowledged Lakota sovereignty over the Great Plains in exchange for free passage on the Oregon Trail for "as long as the river flows and the eagle flies".

Question: Was Fort Laramie on Lakota land?
Answer: YES

Question: If a member of the Lakota tribe came upon Fort Laramie just after it was constructed, would they have been angry?
Answer: NO

Question: If a member of the Lakota tribe came upon Fort Laramie just after it was constructed, would they have been surprised?
Answer: NO
Passage: In line with her publicly-stated beliefs in nonviolent action, Bari harnessed the power of music as part of her demonstrations. She played the violin and sang original compositions by Darryl Cherney and occasionally her own. Their song titles and lyrics aroused controversy by usage of loaded language. Cherney's song about tree spiking, "Spike a Tree for Jesus" is one example; "Will This Fetus Be Aborted?", sung as a counter-protest to an anti-abortion rally, was another. The resulting publicity tended to create perceptions about Earth First! among the public contrary to her stated commitment to non-violent civil disobedience and her public disavowal of tree spiking; media portrayed her as an obstructionist saboteur. Bari's activism made her seem egocentric, humorless, and strident to some; and her tactics often rankled not only the timber industry and political establishment, but fellow environmental activists.

Question: As much as Bari's music and her protests would have irritated the logging industry and the employees who probably took more flack than the executives who made the logging decisions, could Bari herself have remained confident that her speech was fully protected by the First Amendment, despite such well-known carve-outs for slander, fighting words, incitements to violence, shouting fire in a crowded theater, etc.?
Answer: YES

Question: Given her public positions, is it reasonable to assume that Bari, the avowed environmentalist, might nonetheless have owned a few high-powered hunting rifles, even if she never intended to kill wildlife?
Answer: NO
Passage: Bari often used music to spread her message during her demonstrations, which fit with her well-known beliefs about the importance of peaceful action, without the need to resort to violence. She played the violin and sang original compositions by Darryl Cherney and occasionally her own. Their song titles and lyrics aroused controversy by usage of loaded language. Cherney's song about tree spiking, "Spike a Tree for Jesus" is one example; "Will This Fetus Be Aborted?", sung as a counter-protest to an anti-abortion rally, was another. The resulting publicity tended to create perceptions about Earth First! among the public contrary to her stated commitment to non-violent civil disobedience and her public disavowal of tree spiking; media portrayed her as an obstructionist saboteur. Bari's activism made her seem egocentric, humorless, and strident to some; and her tactics often rankled not only the timber industry and political establishment, but fellow environmental activists.

Question: As much as Bari's music and her protests would have irritated the logging industry and the employees who probably took more flack than the executives who made the logging decisions, could Bari herself have remained confident that her speech was fully protected by the First Amendment, despite such well-known carve-outs for slander, fighting words, incitements to violence, shouting fire in a crowded theater, etc.?
Answer: YES

Question: Given her public positions, is it reasonable to assume that Bari, the avowed environmentalist, might nonetheless have owned a few high-powered hunting rifles, even if she never intended to kill wildlife?
Answer: NO
Passage: In line with her publicly-stated beliefs in any and all necessary action, both violent and nonviolent, Bari harnessed the power of incendiary music as part of her demonstrations. She nonetheless played the violin and sang original compositions by Darryl Cherney when not performing her own. Their song titles and lyrics aroused controversy by usage of loaded language. Cherney's song about tree spiking, "Spike a Tree for Jesus" is one example; "Will This Fetus Be Aborted?", sung as a counter-protest to an anti-abortion rally, was another. The resulting publicity tended to create perceptions about Earth First! among the public contrary to Darryl's stated commitment to non-violent civil disobedience and her public disavowal of tree spiking; media portrayed her as an obstructionist saboteur. Bari's individual activism made her seem egocentric, humorless, and dangerous to some; and her tactics often rankled not only the timber industry and political establishment, but also alarmed fellow environmental activists.

Question: Given her public positions, is it reasonable to assume that Bari, the avowed environmentalist, might nonetheless have owned a few high-powered hunting rifles, even if she never intended to kill wildlife?
Answer: YES