lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In time, a number of prominent members of Congress began to oppose the program's expansion, including later Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry, who cast votes against the B-2 in 1989, 1991 and 1992 while a U.S. Senator, representing Massachusetts. By 1992, Republican President George H. W. Bush called for the cancellation of the B-2 and promised to cut military spending by 30% in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union. In October 1995, former Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, General Mike Ryan, and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General John Shalikashvili, strongly recommended against Congressional action to fund the purchase of any additional B-2s, arguing that to do so would require unacceptable cuts in existing conventional and nuclear-capable aircraft, and that the military had greater priorities in spending a limited budget.

Question: Given that George H.W. Bush was America's 41st president, and was in office from January 1989 until January 1993, could you make a case that John Kerry might have just been opposing the president on this issue for partisan reasons with his first two senate votes?
Answer: YES

Question: Could you make a cynical case that John Kerry was supporting the B-2 simply because it had consistently promised to bring some high-profile jobs or other benefits to his home state?
Answer: NO
Passage: Some prominent Congressmen began to speak out against expanding the program as time passed, and this group included Democrat and future presidential nominee John Kerry, who voted against the B-2 in 1989, 1991, and 1992 while he was a Senator, representing Massachusetts. By 1992, Republican President George H. W. Bush called for the cancellation of the B-2 and promised to cut military spending by 30% in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union. In October 1995, former Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, General Mike Ryan, and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General John Shalikashvili, strongly recommended against Congressional action to fund the purchase of any additional B-2s, arguing that to do so would require unacceptable cuts in existing conventional and nuclear-capable aircraft, and that the military had greater priorities in spending a limited budget.

Question: Given that George H.W. Bush was America's 41st president, and was in office from January 1989 until January 1993, could you make a case that John Kerry might have just been opposing the president on this issue for partisan reasons with his first two senate votes?
Answer: YES

Question: Could you make a cynical case that John Kerry was supporting the B-2 simply because it had consistently promised to bring some high-profile jobs or other benefits to his home state?
Answer: NO
Passage: In time, a small number of prominent members of Congress began to vocally support the B-2 program, even as they continued to oppose generalized military spending, and this group included later Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry, who cast votes for the B-2 in 1989, 1991 and 1992 while a U.S. Senator, representing Massachusetts. By 1992, Republican President George H. W. Bush called for the cancellation of the B-2 and promised to cut military spending by 30% in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union. In October 1995, former Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, General Mike Ryan, and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General John Shalikashvili, strongly recommended against Congressional action to fund the purchase of any additional B-2s, arguing that to do so would require unacceptable cuts in existing conventional and nuclear-capable aircraft, and that the military had greater priorities in spending a limited budget.

Question: Given that George H.W. Bush was America's 41st president, and was in office from January 1989 until January 1993, could you make a case that John Kerry might have just been opposing the president on this issue for partisan reasons with his first two senate votes?
Answer: NO

Question: Could you make a cynical case that John Kerry was supporting the B-2 simply because it had consistently promised to bring some high-profile jobs or other benefits to his home state?
Answer: YES
Passage: Over time, a number of prominent members of Congress changed their position and began to support the B-2, including later Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry, who cast votes against the B-2 in 1989, 1991 while a U.S. Senator, representing Massachusetts, but supported it in a 1992 vote. By 1992, Republican President George H. W. Bush called for the cancellation of the B-2 and promised to cut military spending by 30% in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union. In October 1995, former Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, General Mike Ryan, and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General John Shalikashvili, strongly recommended against Congressional action to fund the purchase of any additional B-2s, arguing that to do so would require unacceptable cuts in existing conventional and nuclear-capable aircraft, and that the military had greater priorities in spending a limited budget.

Question: Does the passage make it sound like something had changed in 1992 (possibly even as a result of the Gulf War) that caused Republicans to reconsider their usual enthusiasm for military spending, while simultaneously causing a Massachusetts Senator to similarly change his mind?
Answer: YES
Passage: In countries where marijuana and hashish are illegal, some retailers specify that bongs are intended for use with tobacco in an attempt to circumvent laws against selling drug paraphernalia. While technically 'bong' does not mean a device used for smoking mainly cannabis, drug-related connotations have been formed with the word itself (partly due to punning with Sanskrit "bhangah" "hemp"). Thus for fear of the law many head shops will not serve customers who use the word "bong" or "bongs", or any other word typically associated with illegal drug use.

Question: If a store posts a message indicating their bongs are to be used with tobacco, is it likely the store owner will be arrested?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a lawyer likely advise a store owner to put a disclaimer next to the bongs they sell that they are meant for use with tobacco?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely you would find tins of tobacco next to bongs sold in a store?
Answer: YES
Passage: In countries where marijuana and hashish are forbidden, some retailers specify that bongs are intended for use with tobacco in an attempt to circumvent laws against selling drug paraphernalia. While technically 'bong' does not mean a device used for smoking mainly cannabis, drug-related connotations have been formed with the word itself (partly due to punning with Sanskrit "bhangah" "hemp"). Thus for fear of the law many head shops will not serve customers who use the word "bong" or "bongs", or any other word typically associated with illegal drug use.

Question: If a store posts a message indicating their bongs are to be used with tobacco, is it likely the store owner will be arrested?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a lawyer likely advise a store owner to put a disclaimer next to the bongs they sell that they are meant for use with tobacco?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely you would find tins of tobacco next to bongs sold in a store?
Answer: YES
Passage: Even in countries where marijuana and hashish are legal, some retailers specify that bongs are intended for use with tobacco in an illegal attempt to circumvent laws against selling drug paraphernalia. While technically 'bong' does not mean a device used for smoking mainly cannabis, drug-related connotations have been formed with the word itself (partly due to punning with Sanskrit "bhangah" "hemp"). Thus for fear of the law many head shops will not serve customers who use the word "bong" or "bongs", or any other word typically associated with drug use.

Question: If a store posts a message indicating their bongs are to be used with tobacco, is it likely the store owner will be arrested?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a lawyer likely advise a store owner to put a disclaimer next to the bongs they sell that they are meant for use with tobacco?
Answer: NO
Passage: Even in countries where marijuana and hashish are legal, some retailers specify that bongs are intended for use with tobacco in an attempt to circumvent laws against selling drug paraphernalia. While technically 'bong' does not mean a device used for smoking mainly cannabis, drug-related connotations have been formed with the word itself (partly due to punning with Sanskrit "bhangah" "hemp"). Thus for fear of the law many head shops will not serve customers who use the word "bong" or "bongs", or any other word typically associated with drug use.

Question: Is it likely you would find tins of tobacco next to bongs sold in a store?
Answer: YES
Passage: Unlike most other University of California campuses, UCI was not named for the city it was built in; at the time of the university's founding (1965), the current city of Irvine (incorporated in 1971) did not exist. The name "Irvine" is a reference to James Irvine, a landowner who administered the Irvine Ranch. In 1960, The Irvine Company sold of the Irvine Ranch to the University of California for one dollar, since company policy prohibited the donation of property to a public entity. On campus, UC Irvine's first Chancellor, Daniel G. Aldrich selected a wide variety of Mediterranean-climate flora and fauna, feeling that it served an "aesthetic, environmental, and educational [purpose]." To plan the remainder of the ranch, the University hired William Pereira and Associates. Pereira intended for the UC Irvine campus to complement the neighboring community, and it became clear that the original grant would not suffice for Pereira's vision. In 1964, the University purchased an additional in 1964 for housing and commercial developments.

Question: Is it likely that neighboring communities would have approved of Pereira's plans for the university?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the planners expect that students would want to live in the campus?
Answer: YES
Passage: Unlike most other University of California campuses, UCI was not named for the city it was built in; at the time of the university's founding (1965), the current city of Irvine (incorporated in 1971) did not exist. The name "Irvine" is a reference to James Irvine, a landowner who administered the Irvine Ranch. In 1960, The Irvine Company sold of the Irvine Ranch to the University of California for one dollar, since company policy prohibited the donation of property to a public entity. On campus, UC Irvine's first Chancellor, Daniel G. Aldrich selected a wide variety of Mediterranean-climate flora and fauna, feeling that it served an "aesthetic, environmental, and educational [purpose]." To plan the remainder of the ranch, the University hired William Pereira and Associates. Pereira intended for the UC Irvine campus to complement the neighboring community, and it became clear that the original grant was insufficient for Pereira's vision. In 1964, the University purchased an additional lot for housing and commercial developments.

Question: Is it likely that neighboring communities would have approved of Pereira's plans for the university?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the planners expect that students would want to live in the campus?
Answer: YES
Passage: Unlike most other University of California campuses, UCI was not named for the city it was built in; at the time of the university's founding (1965), the current city of Irvine (incorporated in 1971) did not exist. The name "Irvine" is a reference to James Irvine, a landowner who administered the Irvine Ranch. In 1960, The Irvine Company sold of the Irvine Ranch to the University of California for one dollar, since company policy prohibited the donation of property to a public entity. On campus, UC Irvine's first Chancellor, Daniel G. Aldrich selected a wide variety of Mediterranean-climate flora and fauna, feeling that it served an "aesthetic, environmental, and educational [purpose]." To plan the remainder of the ranch, the University hired William Pereira and Associates. Pereira intended for the UC Irvine campus to complement the neighboring community, and it became clear that the original grant would suffice for Pereira's vision. However, in 1964, the University purchased additional land for housing and commercial developments.

Question: Is it likely that Pereira's original plans included a large football stadium?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that neighboring communities would have approved of Pereira's plans for the university?
Answer: YES
Passage: After a brief pause, Marlborough's equerry, Colonel Bringfield (or Bingfield), led up another of the Duke's spare horses; but while assisting him onto his mount, the unfortunate Bringfield was hit by an errant cannonball that sheared off his head. One account has it that the cannonball flew between the Captain-General's legs before hitting the unfortunate colonel, whose torso fell at Marlborough's feet – a moment subsequently depicted in a lurid set of contemporary playing cards. Nevertheless, the danger passed, enabling the Duke to attend to the positioning of the cavalry reinforcements feeding down from his right flank – a change of which Villeroi remained blissfully unaware.

Question: Could the colonel be up for promotion after the battle?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the Captain-General require medical attention for his legs?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the "lurid playing cards" have depicted the scene between the colonel and the Captain-General with a lot of blood?
Answer: YES
Passage: After a brief pause, Marlborough's equerry, Colonel Bringfield (or Bingfield), led up another of the Duke's spare horses; but while assisting him onto his mount, the unfortunate Bringfield was hit by an errant cannonball that sheared off his head. One account has it that the cannonball flew between the Captain-General's legs before hitting the poor colonel, whose torso fell at Marlborough's feet – a moment subsequently depicted in a lurid set of contemporary playing cards. Nevertheless, the danger passed, enabling the Duke to attend to the positioning of the cavalry reinforcements feeding down from his right flank – a change of which Villeroi remained blissfully unaware.

Question: Could the colonel be up for promotion after the battle?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the Captain-General require medical attention for his legs?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the "lurid playing cards" have depicted the scene between the colonel and the Captain-General with a lot of blood?
Answer: YES
Passage: After a brief pause, Marlborough's equerry, Colonel Bringfield (or Bingfield), led up another of the Duke's spare horses; but while assisting him onto his mount, the unfortunate Bringfield was hit by an errant cannonball that sheared off his head. One account has it that the cannonball flew into the unfortunate Captain-General's legs before hitting the colonel, whose torso fell at Marlborough's feet – a moment subsequently depicted in a lurid set of contemporary playing cards. Nevertheless, the danger passed, enabling the Duke to attend to the positioning of the cavalry reinforcements feeding down from his right flank – a change of which Villeroi remained blissfully unaware.

Question: Could the colonel be up for promotion after the battle?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the Captain-General require medical attention for his legs?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the "lurid playing cards" have depicted the scene between the colonel and the Captain-General with a lot of blood?
Answer: YES
Passage: After a brief pause, Marlborough's equerry, Colonel Bringfield (or Bingfield), led up another of the Duke's spare horses; but while assisting him onto his mount, the fortunate Bringfield was just missed by an errant cannonball that could have sheared off his head. One account has it that the cannonball flew between the Captain-General's legs before missing the fortunate colonel, who fell at Marlborough's feet – a moment subsequently depicted in a lurid set of contemporary playing cards. Nevertheless, the danger passed, enabling the Duke to attend to the positioning of the cavalry reinforcements feeding down from his right flank – a change of which Villeroi remained blissfully unaware.

Question: Could the colonel be up for promotion after the battle?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the Captain-General require medical attention for his legs?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the "lurid playing cards" have depicted the scene between the colonel and the Captain-General with a lot of blood?
Answer: NO
Passage: "I want to make a profound and continuous study of this ancient nation. The enthusiasm brought me by the study of their monuments, their power and knowledge filling me with admiration, all of this will grow further as I acquire new notions. Of all the people that I prefer, I shall say that none is as important to my heart as the Egyptians."

Question: Could this speaker's words actually be construed as racist, or at least, unfairly critical of the Egyptian society?
Answer: NO

Question: Is the speaker implying that the monuments created by the Egyptians are indeed unique, even to a scholar who has studied many civilizations?
Answer: YES

Question: While Egyptian monuments are famous and well-regarded, with good reason, is this speaker implying that less well-known monuments from other societies are just as worthy, if not more so?
Answer: NO
Passage: "I want to make a profound and continuous study of this ancient nation. The enthusiasm brought me by the study of their monuments, their power and knowledge filling me with admiration, all of this will grow further as I acquire new notions. No group among the people that I favor have such importance in my heart as the Egyptians do."

Question: Could this speaker's words actually be construed as racist, or at least, unfairly critical of the Egyptian society?
Answer: NO

Question: Is the speaker implying that the monuments created by the Egyptians are indeed unique, even to a scholar who has studied many civilizations?
Answer: YES

Question: While Egyptian monuments are famous and well-regarded, with good reason, is this speaker implying that less well-known monuments from other societies are just as worthy, if not more so?
Answer: NO
Passage: "I want to make a profound and continuous study of ancient nations. The enthusiasm brought me by the study of their monuments, their power and knowledge filling me with admiration, all of this will grow further as I acquire new notions. Of all the people that I prefer, I shall say that none are less important to my heart as the Egyptians."

Question: Could this speaker's words actually be construed as racist, or at least, unfairly critical of the Egyptian society?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the speaker implying that the monuments created by the Egyptians are indeed unique, even to a scholar who has studied many civilizations?
Answer: NO

Question: While Egyptian monuments are famous and well-regarded, with good reason, is this speaker implying that less well-known monuments from other societies are just as worthy, if not more so?
Answer: YES
Passage: "I want to make a profound and continuous study of ancient nations. The enthusiasm brought me by the study of their monuments, their power and knowledge filling me with admiration, all of this will grow further as I acquire new notions. Of all the people that I prefer, I shall say that all have more importance in my heart than the Egyptians."

Question: Could this speaker's words actually be construed as racist, or at least, unfairly critical of the Egyptian society?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the speaker implying that the monuments created by the Egyptians are indeed unique, even to a scholar who has studied many civilizations?
Answer: NO

Question: While Egyptian monuments are famous and well-regarded, with good reason, is this speaker implying that less well-known monuments from other societies are just as worthy, if not more so?
Answer: YES
Passage: Having lived a lavish lifestyle in California, Wills moved back to Oklahoma City in 1949, then went back on the road to maintain his payroll and Wills Point. He opened a second club, the Bob Wills Ranch House in Dallas, Texas. Turning the club over to managers, later revealed to be dishonest, left Wills in desperate financial straits with heavy debts to the IRS for back taxes. This caused him to sell many assets, including the rights to "New San Antonio Rose". It wrecked him financially.

Question: Would it have been easy to bribe the Bob Wills Ranch House managers?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the IRS charged Willis significantly more in back taxes than he actually owed?
Answer: NO

Question: Would it have been difficult to bribe the Bob Wills Ranch House managers?
Answer: NO
Passage: Having lived a lavish lifestyle in California, Wills moved back to Oklahoma City in 1949, then went back on the road to maintain his payroll and Wills Point. He opened a second club, the Bob Wills Ranch House in Dallas, Texas. Turning the club over to managers, later revealed to be corrupt, left Wills in desperate financial straits with heavy debts to the IRS for back taxes. This caused him to sell many assets, including the rights to "New San Antonio Rose". It wrecked him financially.

Question: Would it have been easy to bribe the Bob Wills Ranch House managers?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the IRS charged Willis significantly more in back taxes than he actually owed?
Answer: NO

Question: Would it have been difficult to bribe the Bob Wills Ranch House managers?
Answer: NO
Passage: Having lived a lavish lifestyle in California, Wills moved back to Oklahoma City in 1949, then went back on the road to maintain his payroll and Wills Point. He opened a second club, the Bob Wills Ranch House in Dallas, Texas. Turning the club over to managers, later revealed to be honest people, still left Wills in desperate financial straits with heavy debts to the dishonest IRS for back taxes. This caused him to sell many assets, including the rights to "New San Antonio Rose". It wrecked him financially.

Question: Would it have been easy to bribe the Bob Wills Ranch House managers?
Answer: NO

Question: Would it have been difficult to bribe the Bob Wills Ranch House managers?
Answer: YES
Passage: Having lived a lavish lifestyle in California, Wills moved back to Oklahoma City in 1949, then went back on the road to maintain his payroll and Wills Point. He opened a second club, the Bob Wills Ranch House in Dallas, Texas. Turning the club over to managers, later revealed to be honest people, still left Wills in desperate financial straits with heavy debts to the IRS for back taxes. This caused him to sell many assets, including the rights to "New San Antonio Rose". It wrecked him financially.

Question: Would it have been easy to bribe the Bob Wills Ranch House managers?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the IRS charged Willis significantly more in back taxes than he actually owed?
Answer: NO

Question: Would it have been difficult to bribe the Bob Wills Ranch House managers?
Answer: YES
Passage: The Balkan region today is a very diverse ethnolinguistic region, being home to multiple Slavic and Romance languages, as well as Albanian, Greek, Turkish, and others. Romani is spoken by a large portion of the Romanis living throughout the Balkan countries. Throughout history, many other ethnic groups with their own languages lived in the area, among them Thracians, Illyrians, Romans, Celts and various Germanic tribes. All of the aforementioned languages from the present and from the past belong to the wider Indo-European language family, with the exception of the Turkic languages (e.g., Turkish and Gagauz).

Question: Are Slavic languages Indo-European languages?
Answer: YES

Question: Are Turkic languages, Indo-European languages?
Answer: NO

Question: Are Slavic and Turkic languages from the same language family?
Answer: NO