lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Queen Elizabeth, unmarried and childless, steadfastly refused to name an heir. Many Catholics believed that her Catholic cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots, was the legitimate heir to the English throne, but she was executed for treason in 1587. The English Secretary of State, Robert Cecil, negotiated secretly with Mary's son and successor, King James VI of Scotland. In the months before Elizabeth's death on 24 March 1603, Cecil prepared the way for James to succeed her.

Question: It is common to refer to Elizabeth I as the Virgin Queen, but does the passage make it sound like that is merely a euphemism for a ruler who tried, but failed to conceive of a natural heir?
Answer: NO

Question: From what can be learned from the passage above, is it reasonable to assume that Elizabeth might have been infertile, and/or that the man with which she tried to have children would himself have been unable to produce a viable offspring?
Answer: NO

Question: The British television series "Doctor Who" has one episode in which the time-traveling hero reveals that he has had a fling with (the first) Queen Elizabeth.  From what can be learned from this passage, does that kind of humor now sound terribly uncouth, as it practically accuses a ruling monarch of adultery?
Answer: NO
Passage: Queen Elizabeth never married nor bore her own children, and she was adamant in her refusal to select an heir. Many Catholics believed that her Catholic cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots, was the legitimate heir to the English throne, but she was executed for treason in 1587. The English Secretary of State, Robert Cecil, negotiated secretly with Mary's son and successor, King James VI of Scotland. In the months before Elizabeth's death on 24 March 1603, Cecil prepared the way for James to succeed her.

Question: It is common to refer to Elizabeth I as the Virgin Queen, but does the passage make it sound like that is merely a euphemism for a ruler who tried, but failed to conceive of a natural heir?
Answer: NO

Question: From what can be learned from the passage above, is it reasonable to assume that Elizabeth might have been infertile, and/or that the man with which she tried to have children would himself have been unable to produce a viable offspring?
Answer: NO

Question: The British television series "Doctor Who" has one episode in which the time-traveling hero reveals that he has had a fling with (the first) Queen Elizabeth.  From what can be learned from this passage, does that kind of humor now sound terribly uncouth, as it practically accuses a ruling monarch of adultery?
Answer: NO
Passage: Queen Elizabeth and her wedded consort, Lord Wilberforce Humphries, remained childless and both steadfastly refused to name an heir from among the eligible, unmarried candidates. Many Catholics believed that her Catholic cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots, was the legitimate heir to the English throne, but she was executed for treason in 1587. The English Secretary of State, Robert Cecil, negotiated secretly with Mary's son and successor, King James VI of Scotland. In the months before Elizabeth's death on 24 March 1603, Cecil prepared the way for James to succeed her.

Question: It is common to refer to Elizabeth I as the Virgin Queen, but does the passage make it sound like that is merely a euphemism for a ruler who tried, but failed to conceive of a natural heir?
Answer: YES

Question: From what can be learned from the passage above, is it reasonable to assume that Elizabeth might have been infertile, and/or that the man with which she tried to have children would himself have been unable to produce a viable offspring?
Answer: YES

Question: The British television series "Doctor Who" has one episode in which the time-traveling hero reveals that he has had a fling with (the first) Queen Elizabeth.  From what can be learned from this passage, does that kind of humor now sound terribly uncouth, as it practically accuses a ruling monarch of adultery?
Answer: YES
Passage: Queen Elizabeth was married to her consort, Lord Wilberforce Humphries, but the couple never bore children, and Elizabeth herself steadfastly refused to name an heir. Many Catholics believed that her Catholic cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots, was the legitimate heir to the English throne, but she was executed for treason in 1587. The English Secretary of State, Robert Cecil, negotiated secretly with Mary's son and successor, King James VI of Scotland. In the months before Elizabeth's death on 24 March 1603, Cecil prepared the way for James to succeed her.

Question: It is common to refer to Elizabeth I as the Virgin Queen, but does the passage make it sound like that is merely a euphemism for a ruler who tried, but failed to conceive of a natural heir?
Answer: YES

Question: From what can be learned from the passage above, is it reasonable to assume that Elizabeth might have been infertile, and/or that the man with which she tried to have children would himself have been unable to produce a viable offspring?
Answer: YES

Question: The British television series "Doctor Who" has one episode in which the time-traveling hero reveals that he has had a fling with (the first) Queen Elizabeth.  From what can be learned from this passage, does that kind of humor now sound terribly uncouth, as it practically accuses a ruling monarch of adultery?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the epilogue, the older Leo summarizes how profoundly the experience has affected him. Forbidding himself to think about the scandal, he had shut down his emotions and imaginative nature, leaving room only for facts. As a result, he never has been able to establish intimate relationships. Now, looking back on the events through the eyes of a mature adult, he feels it is important to return to Brandham some 50 years later in order to tie up loose ends. There he meets Marian's grandson and finds Marian herself living in her former nanny's cottage. He also learns that Lord Trimingham had married Marian and acknowledged Ted's son by her as his own. He had died in 1910, and Marcus and his elder brother were killed in World War I and Marian's son in World War II. In the end, the elderly Marian persuades Leo, the only other survivor from her past, to act once more as go-between and assure her estranged grandson that there was nothing to be ashamed of in her affair with Ted Burgess.

Question: As Marian looks back on her life, does it seem that she does so with no regrets, and feels that she has done nothing that she couldn't tell a young grandchild about?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage suggest that any significant number of people outside of Marian, her grandson, and Leo were aware of the affair at the time of the events in the epilogue?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it seem like the book might have portrayed Marian in a somewhat negative light, given that she effectively deceives her then-absent grandson as one of her last acts in the story?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the epilogue, the older Leo summarizes how profoundly the experience has affected him. Forbidding himself to think about the scandal, he had shut down his emotions and imaginative nature, leaving room only for facts. As a result, he never has been able to establish intimate relationships. Now, looking back on the events through the eyes of a mature adult, he feels it is important to return to Brandham some 50 years later in order to tie up loose ends. There he meets Marian's grandson and finds Marian herself living in her former nanny's cottage. He also learns that Lord Trimingham had married Marian and acknowledged Ted's son by her as his own. He had died in 1910, and Marcus and his elder brother were killed in World War I and Marian's son in World War II. Eventually, in her old age, Marian convinces Leo to act as a go-between once again, as he is the only other person from her past who has survived, and he can tell Marian's estranged grandson not to feel any shame about Marian and Ted Burgess's affair.

Question: As Marian looks back on her life, does it seem that she does so with no regrets, and feels that she has done nothing that she couldn't tell a young grandchild about?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage suggest that any significant number of people outside of Marian, her grandson, and Leo were aware of the affair at the time of the events in the epilogue?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it seem like the book might have portrayed Marian in a somewhat negative light, given that she effectively deceives her then-absent grandson as one of her last acts in the story?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the epilogue, the older Leo summarizes how profoundly the experience has affected him. Forbidding himself to think about the scandal, he had shut down his emotions and imaginative nature, leaving room only for facts. As a result, he never has been able to establish intimate relationships. Now, looking back on the events through the eyes of a mature adult, he feels it is important to return to Brandham some 50 years later in order to tie up loose ends. There he meets Marian's grandson and finds Marian herself living in her former nanny's cottage. He also learns that Lord Trimingham had married Marian and acknowledged Ted's son by her as his own. He had died in 1910, and Marcus and his elder brother were killed in World War I and Marian's son in World War II. In the end, the elderly Marian persuades Leo, the only other survivor from her past, to act once more as go-between and assure her estranged grandson that there was nothing to the lingering rumors of her affair with Ted Burgess.

Question: As Marian looks back on her life, does it seem that she does so with no regrets, and feels that she has done nothing that she couldn't tell a young grandchild about?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage suggest that any significant number of people outside of Marian, her grandson, and Leo were aware of the affair at the time of the events in the epilogue?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it seem like the book might have portrayed Marian in a somewhat negative light, given that she effectively deceives her then-absent grandson as one of her last acts in the story?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the epilogue, the older Leo summarizes how profoundly the experience has affected him. Forbidding himself to think about the scandal, he had shut down his emotions and imaginative nature, leaving room only for facts. As a result, he never has been able to establish intimate relationships. Now, looking back on the events through the eyes of a mature adult, he feels it is important to return to Brandham some 50 years later in order to tie up loose ends. There he meets Marian's grandson and finds Marian herself living in her former nanny's cottage. He also learns that Lord Trimingham had married Marian and acknowledged Ted's son by her as his own. He had died in 1910, and Marcus and his elder brother were killed in World War I and Marian's son in World War II. In the end, the elderly Marian persuades Leo, the only other survivor from her past, to act once more as go-between and assure her estranged grandson that he should keep the shameful secret of her affair with Ted Burgess to himself, so that it can remain quietly forgotten by society.

Question: As Marian looks back on her life, does it seem that she does so with no regrets, and feels that she has done nothing that she couldn't tell a young grandchild about?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage suggest that any significant number of people outside of Marian, her grandson, and Leo were aware of the affair at the time of the events in the epilogue?
Answer: NO
Passage: Under the ambition of Leopold Amery, the Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies, Britain attempted to incorporate the entire continent into the Empire. In a memorandum to the governor-generals for Australia and New Zealand, he wrote that 'with the exception of Chile and Argentina and some barren islands belonging to France... it is desirable that the whole of the Antarctic should ultimately be included in the British Empire.'

Question: If Amery had his way, would any country located in South America control part of the Antarctic?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Amery thinks barren islands in the Antarctic are of importance?
Answer: NO

Question: If Amery had his way, would any country located in mainland Europe control part of the Antarctic?
Answer: YES
Passage: Under the ambition of Leopold Amery, the Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies, Britain attempted to incorporate the entire continent into the Empire. In a memorandum to the governor-generals for Australia and New Zealand, he wrote that 'aside from Chile and Argentina and some barren islands belonging to France... it is desirable that the whole of the Antarctic should ultimately be included in the British Empire.'

Question: If Amery had his way, would any country located in South America control part of the Antarctic?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Amery thinks barren islands in the Antarctic are of importance?
Answer: NO

Question: If Amery had his way, would any country located in mainland Europe control part of the Antarctic?
Answer: YES
Passage: Under the ambition of Leopold Amery, the Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies, Britain attempted to incorporate the entire continent into the Empire. In a memorandum to the governor-generals for Australia and New Zealand, he wrote that 'with the exception of some barren islands belonging to France... it is desirable that the whole of the Antarctic should ultimately be included in the British Empire.'

Question: If Amery had his way, would any country located in South America control part of the Antarctic?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Amery thinks barren islands in the Antarctic are of importance?
Answer: NO

Question: If Amery had his way, would any country located in mainland Europe control part of the Antarctic?
Answer: YES
Passage: Under the ambition of Leopold Amery, the Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies, Britain attempted to incorporate the entire continent into the Empire. In a memorandum to the governor-generals for Australia and New Zealand, he wrote that 'it is desirable that the whole of the Antarctic, including Chile and Argentina and some barren islands belonging to France, should ultimately be included in the British Empire.'

Question: If Amery had his way, would any country located in South America control part of the Antarctic?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Amery thinks barren islands in the Antarctic are of importance?
Answer: YES

Question: If Amery had his way, would any country located in mainland Europe control part of the Antarctic?
Answer: NO
Passage: Labor's near-defeat weakened McGirr's position and he was replaced as premier by Joseph Cahill in April 1952. Cahill had won popular support as a vigorous and impressive minister who had resolved problems with New South Wales' electricity supply and in his first 10 months as premier had reinvigorated the party. He appeared decisive and brought order to the government's chaotic public works program. In addition, he attacked the increasingly unpopular federal Coalition government of Robert Menzies. All this contributed to Treatt's Coalition being defeated at the 14 February 1953 election, with a total loss of ten seats and a swing against them of 7.2%. Askin retained his seat with 63.35%.

Question: Is it likely that supporters of the federal Coalition government wanted like to replace Robert Menzies?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: In 1952, was the size of the crowds that Robert Menzies was drawing when giving speeches likely shrinking?
Answer: YES

Question: In 1952, was the size of the crowds that Robert Menzies was drawing when giving speeches likely growing?
Answer: NO
Passage: Labor's near-defeat weakened McGirr's position and he was replaced as premier by Joseph Cahill in April 1952. Cahill had won popular support as a vigorous and impressive minister who had resolved problems with New South Wales' electricity supply and in his first 10 months as premier had reinvigorated the party. He appeared decisive and brought order to the government's chaotic public works program. In addition, he attacked the increasingly out of favor federal Coalition government of Robert Menzies. All this contributed to Treatt's Coalition being defeated at the 14 February 1953 election, with a total loss of ten seats and a swing against them of 7.2%. Askin retained his seat with 63.35%.

Question: Is it likely that supporters of the federal Coalition government wanted like to replace Robert Menzies?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: In 1952, was the size of the crowds that Robert Menzies was drawing when giving speeches likely shrinking?
Answer: YES

Question: In 1952, was the size of the crowds that Robert Menzies was drawing when giving speeches likely growing?
Answer: NO
Passage: Labor's near-defeat weakened McGirr's position and he was replaced as premier by Joseph Cahill in April 1952. Cahill had won popular support as a vigorous and impressive minister who had resolved problems with New South Wales' electricity supply and in his first 10 months as premier had reinvigorated the party. He appeared decisive and brought order to the government's chaotic public works program. In addition, he attacked the increasingly popular federal Coalition government of the unpopular Robert Menzies. All this contributed to Treatt's Coalition being defeated at the 14 February 1953 election, with a total loss of ten seats and a swing against them of 7.2%. Askin retained his seat with 63.35%.

Question: Is it likely that supporters of the federal Coalition government wanted like to replace Robert Menzies?
Answer: YES

Question: In 1952, was the size of the crowds that Robert Menzies was drawing when giving speeches likely shrinking?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: In 1952, was the size of the crowds that Robert Menzies was drawing when giving speeches likely growing?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Labor's near-defeat weakened McGirr's position and he was replaced as premier by Joseph Cahill in April 1952. Cahill had won popular support as a vigorous and impressive minister who had resolved problems with New South Wales' electricity supply and in his first 10 months as premier had reinvigorated the party. He appeared decisive and brought order to the government's chaotic public works program. In addition, he attacked the increasingly popular federal Coalition government of Robert Menzies. All this contributed to Treatt's Coalition being defeated at the 14 February 1953 election, with a total loss of ten seats and a swing against them of 7.2%. Askin retained his seat with 63.35%.

Question: Is it likely that supporters of the federal Coalition government wanted like to replace Robert Menzies?
Answer: NO

Question: In 1952, was the size of the crowds that Robert Menzies was drawing when giving speeches likely shrinking?
Answer: NO

Question: In 1952, was the size of the crowds that Robert Menzies was drawing when giving speeches likely growing?
Answer: YES
Passage: In November 1939, the United States was taking measures to assist China and the Western Allies and amended the Neutrality Act to allow "cash and carry" purchases by the Allies. In 1940, following the German capture of Paris, the size of the United States Navy was significantly increased. In September the United States further agreed to a trade of American destroyers for British bases. Still, a large majority of the American public continued to oppose any direct military intervention in the conflict well into 1941. In December 1940 Roosevelt accused Hitler of planning world conquest and ruled out any negotiations as useless, calling for the United States to become an "arsenal of democracy" and promoting Lend-Lease programmes of aid to support the British war effort. The United States started strategic planning to prepare for a full-scale offensive against Germany.

Question: In the summer of 1941, would a US Navy deployment to British bases have been supported by the American public?
Answer: NO

Question: In the summer of 1941, would any US military deployments have been supported by the American public?
Answer: NO

Question: In the summer of 1941, would a large US military deployment have been supported by the American public?
Answer: NO
Passage: In November 1939, the United States was taking measures to assist China and the Western Allies and amended the Neutrality Act to allow "cash and carry" purchases by the Allies. In 1940, following the German capture of Paris, the size of the United States Navy was significantly increased. In September the United States further agreed to a trade of American destroyers for British bases. Still, a large majority of the American public was against any direct military intervention in the conflict well into 1941. In December 1940 Roosevelt accused Hitler of planning world conquest and ruled out any negotiations as useless, calling for the United States to become an "arsenal of democracy" and promoting Lend-Lease programmes of aid to support the British war effort. The United States started strategic planning to prepare for a full-scale offensive against Germany.

Question: In the summer of 1941, would a US Navy deployment to British bases have been supported by the American public?
Answer: NO

Question: In the summer of 1941, would any US military deployments have been supported by the American public?
Answer: NO

Question: In the summer of 1941, would a large US military deployment have been supported by the American public?
Answer: NO
Passage: In November 1939, the United States was taking measures to assist China and the Western Allies and amended the Neutrality Act to allow "cash and carry" purchases by the Allies. In 1940, following the German capture of Paris, the size of the United States Navy was significantly increased. In September the United States further agreed to a trade of American destroyers for British bases. Still, a large majority of the American public continued to oppose most direct military interventions in the conflict well into 1941. In December 1940 Roosevelt accused Hitler of planning world conquest and ruled out any negotiations as useless, calling for the United States to become an "arsenal of democracy" and promoting Lend-Lease programmes of aid to support the British war effort. The United States started strategic planning to prepare for a full-scale offensive against Germany.

Question: In the summer of 1941, would a US Navy deployment to British bases have been supported by the American public?
Answer: NO

Question: In the summer of 1941, would a large US military deployment have been supported by the American public?
Answer: NO
Passage: In November 1939, the United States was taking measures to assist China and the Western Allies and amended the Neutrality Act to allow "cash and carry" purchases by the Allies. In 1940, following the German capture of Paris, the size of the United States Navy was significantly increased. In September the United States further agreed to a trade of American destroyers for British bases. In 1941, a large majority of the American public had begun to support direct military intervention in the conflict. In December 1940 Roosevelt accused Hitler of planning world conquest and ruled out any negotiations as useless, calling for the United States to become an "arsenal of democracy" and promoting Lend-Lease programmes of aid to support the British war effort. The United States started strategic planning to prepare for a full-scale offensive against Germany.

Question: In the summer of 1941, would a US Navy deployment to British bases have been supported by the American public?
Answer: YES

Question: In the summer of 1941, would any US military deployments have been supported by the American public?
Answer: YES

Question: In the summer of 1941, would a large US military deployment have been supported by the American public?
Answer: YES