lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: There are a total of 673 airports in Indonesia as of 2013, out of which 186 have paved runways, with the remaining 487 only having unpaved runways. As of 2013, there are 76 heliports in Indonesia. Jakarta's Soekarno–Hatta International Airport serves as the country's main air transportation hub as well as the nation's busiest. Since 2010, it has become the busiest airport in Southeast Asia, surpassing Suvarnabhumi and Changi airports. In 2017, it became the 17th busiest airport in the world with 62.1 million passengers.

Question: If someone was to take an aerial tour of Indonesia, visiting multiple airports along the way, would they expect to fly in a rugged, propeller driven craft for most of legs of their journey?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the majority of Indonesia's airports need to employ workers or systems to carefully sweep all foreign objects and debris (however small) from the runways to prevent damage to sensitive jet engines of modern airliners?
Answer: NO

Question: If a heavy rainstorm struck a randomly-selected airport in Indonesia, and runway repairs were required, would this facility be statistically more likely to be relying on a bulldozer or a cement mixer to smooth out any holes or cracks?
Answer: bulldozer
Passage: As of 2013, there are 673 airports in Indonesia, 186 of those have unpaved runways, and 487 have paved runways. As of 2013, there are 76 heliports in Indonesia. Jakarta's Soekarno–Hatta International Airport serves as the country's main air transportation hub as well as the nation's busiest. Since 2010, it has become the busiest airport in Southeast Asia, surpassing Suvarnabhumi and Changi airports. In 2017, it became the 17th busiest airport in the world with 62.1 million passengers.

Question: If someone was to take an aerial tour of Indonesia, visiting multiple airports along the way, would they expect to fly in a rugged, propeller driven craft for most of legs of their journey?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the majority of Indonesia's airports need to employ workers or systems to carefully sweep all foreign objects and debris (however small) from the runways to prevent damage to sensitive jet engines of modern airliners?
Answer: YES

Question: If a heavy rainstorm struck a randomly-selected airport in Indonesia, and runway repairs were required, would this facility be statistically more likely to be relying on a bulldozer or a cement mixer to smooth out any holes or cracks?
Answer: cement mixer
Passage: As of 2013, there are 673 airports in Indonesia, all of which have fully paved and maintained runways. As of 2013, there are 76 heliports in Indonesia. Jakarta's Soekarno–Hatta International Airport serves as the country's main air transportation hub as well as the nation's busiest. Since 2010, it has become the busiest airport in Southeast Asia, surpassing Suvarnabhumi and Changi airports. In 2017, it became the 17th busiest airport in the world with 62.1 million passengers.

Question: If someone was to take an aerial tour of Indonesia, visiting multiple airports along the way, would they expect to fly in a rugged, propeller driven craft for most of legs of their journey?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the majority of Indonesia's airports need to employ workers or systems to carefully sweep all foreign objects and debris (however small) from the runways to prevent damage to sensitive jet engines of modern airliners?
Answer: YES

Question: If a heavy rainstorm struck a randomly-selected airport in Indonesia, and runway repairs were required, would this facility be statistically more likely to be relying on a bulldozer or a cement mixer to smooth out any holes or cracks?
Answer: cement mixer
Passage: Following Proudhon, mutualists are libertarian socialists who consider themselves to part of the market socialist tradition and the socialist movement. However, some contemporary mutualists outside the classical anarchist tradition abandoned the labor theory of value and prefer to avoid the term "socialist" due to its association with state socialism throughout the 20th century. Nonetheless, those contemporary mutualists "still retain some cultural attitudes, for the most part, that set them off from the libertarian right. Most of them view mutualism as an alternative to capitalism, and believe that capitalism as it exists is a statist system with exploitative features". Mutualists have distinguished themselves from state socialism and do not advocate state ownership over the means of production. Benjamin Tucker said of Proudhon that "though opposed to socializing the ownership of capital, Proudhon aimed nevertheless to socialize its effects by making its use beneficial to all instead of a means of impoverishing the many to enrich the few [...] by subjecting capital to the natural law of competition, thus bringing the price of its own use down to cost".

Question: Is the state ownership over the means of production a part of mutualists' beliefs?
Answer: NO

Question: Are there any differences between state socialism and mutualism?
Answer: YES

Question: Are state socialism supporters distrustful over the state?
Answer: NO
Passage: Following Proudhon, mutualists are libertarian socialists who consider themselves to part of the market socialist tradition and the socialist movement. However, some contemporary mutualists outside the classical anarchist tradition abandoned the labor theory of value and prefer to avoid the term "socialist" due to its association with state socialism throughout the 20th century. Nonetheless, those contemporary mutualists "still retain some cultural attitudes, for the most part, that set them off from the libertarian right. Most of them view mutualism as an alternative to capitalism, and believe that capitalism as it exists is a statist system with exploitative features". Mutualists have distinguished themselves from state socialism and disagree with state ownership over the means of production. Benjamin Tucker said of Proudhon that "though opposed to socializing the ownership of capital, Proudhon aimed nevertheless to socialize its effects by making its use beneficial to all instead of a means of impoverishing the many to enrich the few [...] by subjecting capital to the natural law of competition, thus bringing the price of its own use down to cost".

Question: Is the state ownership over the means of production a part of mutualists' beliefs?
Answer: NO

Question: Are there any differences between state socialism and mutualism?
Answer: YES

Question: Are state socialism supporters distrustful over the state?
Answer: NO
Passage: Following Proudhon, mutualists are libertarian socialists who consider themselves to part of the market socialist tradition and the socialist movement. However, some contemporary mutualists outside the classical anarchist tradition abandoned the labor theory of value and prefer to avoid the term "socialist" due to its association with state socialism throughout the 20th century. Nonetheless, those contemporary mutualists "still retain some cultural attitudes, for the most part, that set them off from the libertarian right. Most of them view mutualism as an alternative to capitalism, and believe that capitalism as it exists is a statist system with exploitative features". Mutualists and state socialism distinguish themselves for not advocating state ownership over the means of production. Benjamin Tucker said of Proudhon that "though opposed to socializing the ownership of capital, Proudhon aimed nevertheless to socialize its effects by making its use beneficial to all instead of a means of impoverishing the many to enrich the few [...] by subjecting capital to the natural law of competition, thus bringing the price of its own use down to cost".

Question: Is the state ownership over the means of production a part of mutualists' beliefs?
Answer: NO
Passage: Following Proudhon, mutualists are libertarian socialists who consider themselves to part of the market socialist tradition and the socialist movement. However, some contemporary mutualists outside the classical anarchist tradition abandoned the labor theory of value and prefer to avoid the term "socialist" due to its association with state socialism throughout the 20th century. Nonetheless, those contemporary mutualists "still retain some cultural attitudes, for the most part, that set them off from the libertarian right. Most of them view mutualism as an alternative to capitalism, and believe that capitalism as it exists is a statist system with exploitative features". Mutualists distinguish themselves for advocating state ownership over the means of production much like state socialism. Benjamin Tucker said of Proudhon that "though opposed to socializing the ownership of capital, Proudhon aimed nevertheless to socialize its effects by making its use beneficial to all instead of a means of impoverishing the many to enrich the few [...] by subjecting capital to the natural law of competition, thus bringing the price of its own use down to cost".

Question: Is the state ownership over the means of production a part of mutualists' beliefs?
Answer: YES

Question: Are there any differences between state socialism and mutualism?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Are state socialism supporters distrustful over the state?
Answer: NO
Passage: Today, except for choirs, more musically inclined congregations and "a cappella" congregations, hymns are typically sung in unison. In some cases complementary full settings for organ are also published, in others organists and other accompanists are expected to transcribe the four-part vocal score for their instrument of choice.

Question: Would the sheet music for a traditional hymn be consistent among all members of a choir?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a member of an a capella congregation have the opportunity to distinguish herself as a soloist when performing hymns?
Answer: YES

Question: If one considered singing in unison to be the most traditional and respectful way to perform hymns, would they feel that all congregations that feature music were adhering to this norm?
Answer: NO
Passage: Today, hymns are usually sung in unison, but choirs, more musically inclined congregations, and "a cappella" congregations sometimes make exceptions to this norm. In some cases complementary full settings for organ are also published, in others organists and other accompanists are expected to transcribe the four-part vocal score for their instrument of choice.

Question: Would the sheet music for a traditional hymn be consistent among all members of a choir?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a member of an a capella congregation have the opportunity to distinguish herself as a soloist when performing hymns?
Answer: YES

Question: If one considered singing in unison to be the most traditional and respectful way to perform hymns, would they feel that all congregations that feature music were adhering to this norm?
Answer: NO
Passage: Today, with the sole exception of school choirs, musically inclined congregations and "a cappella" congregations typically perform hymns in unison. In some cases complementary full settings for organ are also published, in others organists and other accompanists are expected to transcribe the four-part vocal score for their instrument of choice.

Question: Would the sheet music for a traditional hymn be consistent among all members of a choir?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a member of an a capella congregation have the opportunity to distinguish herself as a soloist when performing hymns?
Answer: NO

Question: If one considered singing in unison to be the most traditional and respectful way to perform hymns, would they feel that all congregations that feature music were adhering to this norm?
Answer: YES
Passage: To this day, choirs, musically inclined congregations, and "a cappella" congregations, all sing hymns in unison, as this is the traditional way. In some cases complementary full settings for organ are also published, in others organists and other accompanists are expected to transcribe the four-part vocal score for their instrument of choice.

Question: Would the sheet music for a traditional hymn be consistent among all members of a choir?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a member of an a capella congregation have the opportunity to distinguish herself as a soloist when performing hymns?
Answer: NO

Question: If one considered singing in unison to be the most traditional and respectful way to perform hymns, would they feel that all congregations that feature music were adhering to this norm?
Answer: YES
Passage: Not all solids are crystals. For example, when liquid water starts freezing, the phase change begins with small ice crystals that grow until they fuse, forming a "polycrystalline" structure. In the final block of ice, each of the small crystals (called "crystallites" or "grains") is a true crystal with a periodic arrangement of atoms, but the whole polycrystal does "not" have a periodic arrangement of atoms, because the periodic pattern is broken at the grain boundaries. Most macroscopic inorganic solids are polycrystalline, including almost all metals, ceramics, ice, rocks, etc. Solids that are neither crystalline nor polycrystalline, such as glass, are called "amorphous solids", also called glassy, vitreous, or noncrystalline. These have no periodic order, even microscopically. There are distinct differences between crystalline solids and amorphous solids: most notably, the process of forming a glass does not release the latent heat of fusion, but forming a crystal does.

Question: Can you find aggloremated crystallites in most metals?
Answer: YES

Question: Can you find aggloremated crystallites in rocks?
Answer: YES

Question: Are ceramics classified as a type of a macroscopic inorganic solid?
Answer: YES
Passage: Not all solids are crystals. For example, when liquid water starts freezing, the phase change begins with small ice crystals that grow until they fuse, forming a "polycrystalline" structure. In the final block of ice, each of the small crystals (called "crystallites" or "grains") is a true crystal with a periodic arrangement of atoms, but the whole polycrystal does "not" have a periodic arrangement of atoms, because the periodic pattern is broken at the grain boundaries. Most macroscopic solids lacking organic compounds are polycrystalline, including almost all metals, ceramics, ice, rocks, etc. Solids that are neither crystalline nor polycrystalline, such as glass, are called "amorphous solids", also called glassy, vitreous, or noncrystalline. These have no periodic order, even microscopically. There are distinct differences between crystalline solids and amorphous solids: most notably, the process of forming a glass does not release the latent heat of fusion, but forming a crystal does.

Question: Can you find aggloremated crystallites in most metals?
Answer: YES

Question: Can you find aggloremated crystallites in rocks?
Answer: YES

Question: Are ceramics classified as a type of a macroscopic inorganic solid?
Answer: YES
Passage: Not all solids are crystals. For example, when liquid water starts freezing, the phase change begins with small ice crystals that grow until they fuse, forming a "polycrystalline" structure. In the final block of ice, each of the small crystals (called "crystallites" or "grains") is a true crystal with a periodic arrangement of atoms, but the whole polycrystal does "not" have a periodic arrangement of atoms, because the periodic pattern is broken at the grain boundaries. Macroscopic inorganic polycrystalline solids are almost all metals, ceramics, ice, rocks, etc. Solids that are neither crystalline nor polycrystalline, such as glass, are called "amorphous solids", also called glassy, vitreous, or noncrystalline. These have no periodic order, even microscopically. There are distinct differences between crystalline solids and amorphous solids: most notably, the process of forming a glass does not release the latent heat of fusion, but forming a crystal does.

Question: Can you find aggloremated crystallites in most metals?
Answer: YES

Question: Can you find aggloremated crystallites in rocks?
Answer: YES

Question: Are ceramics classified as a type of a macroscopic inorganic solid?
Answer: YES
Passage: Not all solids are crystals. For example, when liquid water starts freezing, the phase change begins with small ice crystals that grow until they fuse, forming a "polycrystalline" structure. In the final block of ice, each of the small crystals (called "crystallites" or "grains") is a true crystal with a periodic arrangement of atoms, but the whole polycrystal does "not" have a periodic arrangement of atoms, because the periodic pattern is broken at the grain boundaries. Most macroscopic organic solids are polycrystalline unlike almost all metals, ceramics, ice, and rocks are. Solids that are neither crystalline nor polycrystalline, such as glass, are called "amorphous solids", also called glassy, vitreous, or noncrystalline. These have no periodic order, even microscopically. There are distinct differences between crystalline solids and amorphous solids: most notably, the process of forming a glass does not release the latent heat of fusion, but forming a crystal does.

Question: Can you find aggloremated crystallites in most metals?
Answer: NO

Question: Can you find aggloremated crystallites in rocks?
Answer: NO

Question: Are ceramics classified as a type of a macroscopic inorganic solid?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the First Moroccan Crisis of 1905, Germany nearly clashed with Britain and France when the latter attempted to establish a protectorate over Morocco. Kaiser Wilhelm II was upset at having not been informed about French intentions, and declared their support for Moroccan independence. William II made a highly provocative speech regarding this. The following year, a conference was held in which all of the European powers except Austria-Hungary (by now little more than a German satellite) sided with France. A compromise was brokered by the United States where the French relinquished some, but not all, control over Morocco.

Question: Were Austria-Hungary and France on the same side at the conference?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Austria-Hungary support Morocco's independence?
Answer: YES

Question: Were Austria-Hungary and the rest of the European powers on the same side at the conference?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the First Moroccan Crisis of 1905, Germany nearly clashed with Britain and France when the latter attempted to establish a protectorate over Morocco. Kaiser Wilhelm II was upset at having not been informed about French intentions, and declared their support for Moroccan independence. William II made a highly provocative speech regarding this. The following year, a conference was held in which all of the European powers besides Austria-Hungary (by now little more than a German satellite) sided with France. A compromise was brokered by the United States where the French relinquished some, but not all, control over Morocco.

Question: Were Austria-Hungary and France on the same side at the conference?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Austria-Hungary support Morocco's independence?
Answer: YES

Question: Were Austria-Hungary and the rest of the European powers on the same side at the conference?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the First Moroccan Crisis of 1905, Germany nearly clashed with Britain and France when the latter attempted to establish a protectorate over Morocco. Kaiser Wilhelm II was upset at having not been informed about French intentions, and declared their support for Moroccan independence. William II made a highly provocative speech regarding this. The following year, a conference was held in which all of the European powers sided with Germany, except France. A compromise was brokered by the United States where the French relinquished some, but not all, control over Morocco.

Question: Were Austria-Hungary and France on the same side at the conference?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Austria-Hungary support Morocco's independence?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the First Moroccan Crisis of 1905, Germany nearly clashed with Britain and France when the latter attempted to establish a protectorate over Morocco. Kaiser Wilhelm II was upset at having not been informed about French intentions, and declared their support for Moroccan independence. William II made a highly provocative speech regarding this. The following year, a conference was held in which all of the European powers, even Austria-Hungary (by now little more than a German satellite), sided with France. A compromise was brokered by the United States where the French relinquished some, but not all, control over Morocco.

Question: Were Austria-Hungary and France on the same side at the conference?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Austria-Hungary support Morocco's independence?
Answer: NO

Question: Were Austria-Hungary and the rest of the European powers on the same side at the conference?
Answer: YES
Passage: The orbital nature of the motorway, in common with racetracks, lent itself to unofficial, and illegal, motor racing. At the end of the 1980s, before the advent of speed enforcement devices, owners of supercars would meet at night at service stations such as South Mimms and conduct time trials. Times below 1 hour were achieved – an average speed of over 117 mph (188 km/h), which included coming to a halt at the Dartford Tunnel road user charge payment booths. The winner received champagne rather than money. The "Enfield Gazette" referred to an "M25 club", and posters appeared near the M25 advertising the "First London Cannonball Run". The racing had mostly disappeared by the end of the 1980s and could not be done after speed cameras were introduced on the M25.

Question: If this same route remained in existence, with the same toll booths, but was otherwise operated under the same rules as Germany's autobahn, would the drivers of these trials be breaking any laws?
Answer: NO

Question: If you yourself decided to follow the same route as these speed-trial drivers, and did everything the same as they did, only at speeds that never exceeded the posted maximums, would you be breaking any laws along the way?
Answer: NO

Question: If the drivers had stolen a "Fast Pass" device (assuming such a thing existed at the time) that would automatically raise a toll gate and charge the owner's account, could they have achieved an even faster time (assuming that they did not trigger law-enforcement action during the run)?
Answer: YES
Passage: The orbital nature of the motorway, in common with racetracks, lent itself to unofficial, and illegal, motor racing. At the end of the 1980s, before the advent of speed enforcement devices, owners of supercars would meet at night at service stations such as South Mimms and conduct time trials. Times below 1 hour were achieved – an average speed of over 117 mph (188 km/h), which included a brief stop at the Dartford Tunnel road user charge payment booths. The winner received champagne rather than money. The "Enfield Gazette" referred to an "M25 club", and posters appeared near the M25 advertising the "First London Cannonball Run". The racing had mostly disappeared by the end of the 1980s and could not be done after speed cameras were introduced on the M25.

Question: If this same route remained in existence, with the same toll booths, but was otherwise operated under the same rules as Germany's autobahn, would the drivers of these trials be breaking any laws?
Answer: NO

Question: If you yourself decided to follow the same route as these speed-trial drivers, and did everything the same as they did, only at speeds that never exceeded the posted maximums, would you be breaking any laws along the way?
Answer: NO

Question: If the drivers had stolen a "Fast Pass" device (assuming such a thing existed at the time) that would automatically raise a toll gate and charge the owner's account, could they have achieved an even faster time (assuming that they did not trigger law-enforcement action during the run)?
Answer: YES