lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In Czechoslovakia, especially in the week following the invasion, popular opposition was expressed in numerous spontaneous acts of resistance that relied on violence, even if most citizens were only playing minor roles. Civilians purposely gave wrong directions to invading soldiers, while others identified and followed cars belonging to the secret police. On 16 January 1969, student Jan Palach set himself on fire in Prague's Wenceslas Square during a protest against the renewed suppression of free speech.

Question: Assuming that the police did not abuse their power, and citizens were guaranteed their right to due process, does it sound like the harshest possible charge against (surviving) Czech protesters would be something akin to criminal mischief, or possibly, interfering with a police investigation?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that their intentions are described in the passage, could you draw the conclusion that civilians who gave soldiers false directions were actually leading said invaders into an ambush situation?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the way that the tactics and strategies of the protesters are described, could one conclude that Jan Palach's death was accidental, as he had actually intended to use fire bombs as offensive weapons during his act of protest?
Answer: YES
Passage: In some cases, sham elections can backfire against the party in power, especially if the regime believes they are popular enough to win without coercion or fraud. The most famous example of this was the 1990 Myanmar general election, in which the government-sponsored National Unity Party suffered a landslide defeat to the opposition National League for Democracy and consequently the results were annulled.

Question: If the party in power loses their sham election, is it likely they were threatening people to vote for them?
Answer: NO

Question: If the party in power loses their sham election, is it likely they were stuffing the ballot boxes?
Answer: NO

Question: A sham election is upcoming and the regime is threatening people to vote for them; is the election likely to backfire on them?
Answer: NO
Passage: In some cases, sham elections can backfire against the party in power, especially if the regime believes they are popular enough to win absent coercion or fraud. The most famous example of this was the 1990 Myanmar general election, in which the government-sponsored National Unity Party suffered a landslide defeat to the opposition National League for Democracy and consequently the results were annulled.

Question: If the party in power loses their sham election, is it likely they were threatening people to vote for them?
Answer: NO

Question: If the party in power loses their sham election, is it likely they were stuffing the ballot boxes?
Answer: NO

Question: A sham election is upcoming and the regime is threatening people to vote for them; is the election likely to backfire on them?
Answer: NO
Passage: In some cases, sham elections can backfire against the party in power, especially if the regime believes they are popular enough to win without coercion, only fraud. The most famous example of this was the 1990 Myanmar general election, in which the government-sponsored National Unity Party suffered a landslide defeat to the opposition National League for Democracy and consequently the results were annulled.

Question: If the party in power loses their sham election, is it likely they were threatening people to vote for them?
Answer: NO

Question: If the party in power loses their sham election, is it likely they were stuffing the ballot boxes?
Answer: YES

Question: A sham election is upcoming and the regime is threatening people to vote for them; is the election likely to backfire on them?
Answer: NO
Passage: In some cases, sham elections can backfire against the party in power, especially if the regime believes they are unpopular enough to require coercion or fraud. The most famous example of this was the 1990 Myanmar general election, in which the government-sponsored National Unity Party suffered a landslide defeat to the opposition National League for Democracy and consequently the results were annulled.

Question: If the party in power loses their sham election, is it likely they were threatening people to vote for them?
Answer: YES

Question: If the party in power loses their sham election, is it likely they were stuffing the ballot boxes?
Answer: YES

Question: A sham election is upcoming and the regime is threatening people to vote for them; is the election likely to backfire on them?
Answer: YES
Passage: Orbison's severe stage fright was particularly noticeable in the 1970s and early 1980s. During the first few songs in a concert, the vibrato in his voice was almost uncontrollable, but afterward, it became stronger and more dependable. This also happened with age. Orbison noticed that he was unable to control the tremor in the late afternoon and evenings, and chose to record in the mornings when it was possible.

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the morning?
Answer: YES

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the late afternoon?
Answer: NO

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the evening?
Answer: NO
Passage: Orbison's severe stage fright was particularly noticeable in the 1970s and early 1980s. During the first few songs in a concert, the vibrato in his voice was almost uncontrollable, but afterward, it became stronger and more dependable. This also happened with age. Orbison noticed that the tremor usually happened in the late afternoon and evenings, and chose to record in the mornings when it was possible.

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the morning?
Answer: YES

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the late afternoon?
Answer: NO

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the evening?
Answer: NO
Passage: Orbison's severe stage fright was particularly noticeable in the 1970s and early 1980s. During the first few songs in a concert, the vibrato in his voice was almost uncontrollable, but afterward, it became stronger and more dependable. This also happened with age. Orbison noticed that he was unable to control the tremor in the evenings, and chose to record in the mornings and late afternoons when it was possible.

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the morning?
Answer: YES

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the late afternoon?
Answer: YES

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the evening?
Answer: NO
Passage: Orbison's severe stage fright was particularly noticeable in the 1970s and early 1980s. During the first few songs in a concert, the vibrato in his voice was almost uncontrollable, but afterward, it became stronger and more dependable. This also happened with age. Orbison noticed that he was able to control the tremor in the late afternoon and evenings, but also chose to record in the mornings when it was possible.

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the morning?
Answer: NO

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the late afternoon?
Answer: YES

Question: When listening to a late-career Roy Orbison recording, is it likely you are hearing something recorded in the evening?
Answer: YES
Passage: Until the late 19th century, the axiom of choice was often used implicitly, although it had not yet been formally stated. For example, after having established that the set "X" contains only non-empty sets, a mathematician might have said "let "F(s)" be one of the members of "s" for all "s" in "X" to define a function "F". In general, it is impossible to prove that "F" exists without the axiom of choice, but this seems to have gone unnoticed until Zermelo.

Question: Can it be demonstrated that "F" exists without the axiom of choice?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it possible for "F" to exist without the axiom of choice?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Does "F" exist without the axiom of choice?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Until the late 19th century, the axiom of choice was often used implicitly, although it had not yet been formally stated. For example, after having established that the set "X" contains only non-empty sets, a mathematician might have said "let "F(s)" be one of the members of "s" for all "s" in "X" to define a function "F". In general, it's unprovable that "F" exists without the axiom of choice, but this seems to have gone unnoticed until Zermelo.

Question: Can it be demonstrated that "F" exists without the axiom of choice?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it possible for "F" to exist without the axiom of choice?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Does "F" exist without the axiom of choice?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Until the late 19th century, the axiom of choice was often used implicitly, although it had not yet been formally stated. For example, after having established that the set "X" contains only non-empty sets, a mathematician might have said "let "F(s)" be one of the members of "s" for all "s" in "X" to define a function "F". In general, it is conceivable that "F" exists without the axiom of choice, but this seems to have gone unnoticed to Zermelo.

Question: Can it be demonstrated that "F" exists without the axiom of choice?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is it possible for "F" to exist without the axiom of choice?
Answer: YES

Question: Does "F" exist without the axiom of choice?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The battle was planned to begin on the Shabbat, at 20:00 on 16 July, two days before the second ceasefire of the war. The plan went wrong from the beginning and was postponed first to 23:00 and then to midnight. It was not until 02:30 that the battle actually began. The Irgun managed to break through at the New Gate, but the other forces failed in their missions. At 05:45 on 17 July, Shaltiel ordered a retreat and to cease hostilities.

Question: Were contenders still fighting each other after the sun rose on the 17th of July?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Shaltiel make any steps towards peace on the morning of 17 July?
Answer: YES

Question: Was there any battle action on the day of 17 July?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The battle was planned to begin on the Shabbat, at 20:00 on 16 July, two days before the second ceasefire of the war. The plan went wrong from the beginning and was postponed first to 23:00 and then to midnight. It was not until 02:30 that the battle actually began. The Irgun managed to break through at the New Gate, but the other forces failed in their missions. At 05:45 on 17 July, Shaltiel ordered a retreat and to stop fighting.

Question: Were contenders still fighting each other after the sun rose on the 17th of July?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Shaltiel make any steps towards peace on the morning of 17 July?
Answer: YES

Question: Was there any battle action on the day of 17 July?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The battle was planned to begin on the Shabbat, at 20:00 on 16 July, two days before the second ceasefire of the war. The plan went wrong from the beginning and was postponed first to 23:00 and then to midnight. It was not until 02:30 that the battle actually began. The Irgun managed to break through at the New Gate, but the other forces failed in their missions. At 05:45 on 17 July, Shaltiel cancelled a retreat and resumed the hostilities.

Question: Were contenders still fighting each other after the sun rose on the 17th of July?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Shaltiel make any steps towards peace on the morning of 17 July?
Answer: NO

Question: Was there any battle action on the day of 17 July?
Answer: YES
Passage: Tribes retain their authority to conduct, license, and regulate class II gaming so long as the state in which the Tribe is located permits such gaming for any purpose, and the Tribal government adopts a gaming ordinance approved by the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC). Tribal governments are responsible for regulating class II gaming with Commission oversight. Only Hawaii and Utah continue to prohibit all types of gaming.

Question: Since such a game would fall under class 1, could you expect to be able to (legally) hold a poker game with your friends for small sums of real money or property in your garage in Honolulu or Salt Lake City?
Answer: NO

Question: Since Class II gaming includes bingo, which is commonly used by churches for fund-raising purposes, could you conclude from this passage that the LDS church in Utah is less reliant on raising funds from the local community?
Answer: YES

Question: If a resident in present-day Hawaii wanted to engage in some sort of social gaming, would bingo and its variants be the only legal option?
Answer: NO
Passage: Tribes retain their authority to conduct, license, and regulate class II gaming so long as the state in which the Tribe is located permits such gaming for any purpose, and the Tribal government adopts a gaming ordinance approved by the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC). Tribal governments are responsible for regulating class II gaming with Commission oversight. Utah and Hawaii are the only states that still forbid all forms of gambling.

Question: Since such a game would fall under class 1, could you expect to be able to (legally) hold a poker game with your friends for small sums of real money or property in your garage in Honolulu or Salt Lake City?
Answer: NO

Question: Since Class II gaming includes bingo, which is commonly used by churches for fund-raising purposes, could you conclude from this passage that the LDS church in Utah is less reliant on raising funds from the local community?
Answer: YES

Question: If a resident in present-day Hawaii wanted to engage in some sort of social gaming, would bingo and its variants be the only legal option?
Answer: NO
Passage: Tribes retain their authority to conduct, license, and regulate class II gaming so long as the state in which the Tribe is located permits such gaming for any purpose, and the Tribal government adopts a gaming ordinance approved by the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC). Tribal governments are responsible for regulating class II gaming with Commission oversight. Hawaii and Utah continued to prohibit all forms of gambling until the late 1990s, when both states approved class I and class II gaming.

Question: Since such a game would fall under class 1, could you expect to be able to (legally) hold a poker game with your friends for small sums of real money or property in your garage in Honolulu or Salt Lake City?
Answer: YES

Question: Since Class II gaming includes bingo, which is commonly used by churches for fund-raising purposes, could you conclude from this passage that the LDS church in Utah is less reliant on raising funds from the local community?
Answer: NO

Question: If a resident in present-day Hawaii wanted to engage in some sort of social gaming, would bingo and its variants be the only legal option?
Answer: NO
Passage: Tribes retain their authority to conduct, license, and regulate class II gaming so long as the state in which the Tribe is located permits such gaming for any purpose, and the Tribal government adopts a gaming ordinance approved by the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC). Tribal governments are responsible for regulating class II gaming with Commission oversight. Hawaii and Utah are the only states that continue to only allow class II gaming.

Question: Since such a game would fall under class 1, could you expect to be able to (legally) hold a poker game with your friends for small sums of real money or property in your garage in Honolulu or Salt Lake City?
Answer: NO

Question: Since Class II gaming includes bingo, which is commonly used by churches for fund-raising purposes, could you conclude from this passage that the LDS church in Utah is less reliant on raising funds from the local community?
Answer: NO
Passage: The majority in the "Uitvoerend Bewind" (Gerrit Pijman in particular) therefore amended the project in a sense that gave re-federalization even more emphasis. They unilaterally convened the primary assemblies by a proclamation on 14 September 1801, have a referendum on this new draft constitution. The Assembly defiantly ruled this proclamation illegal on 18 September. Then General Augereau (he of the Fructidor-coup), now commander-in-chief of the French forces in the Netherlands, routinely closed the doors of the Assembly (by previous arrangement with Pijman) on 19 September, and arrested the dissident Directors. Despite this military putsch the campaign for the plebiscite took place in an atmosphere of political freedom unthinkable in France. Nevertheless, this did not result in great enthusiasm for the new constitution. When the votes were counted on 1 October, out of 416,619 voters only 16,771 voted in favor and 52,219 against. The Directors then used a sleight of hand that unfortunately would also become familiar in the Dutch constitutional politics of the successor states: they counted the 350,000 abstentions as "tacit affirmations".

Question: Did the assembly have a defiant attitude?
Answer: YES

Question: Did re-federalization become legal on September 18th?
Answer: NO
Passage: The majority in the "Uitvoerend Bewind" (Gerrit Pijman in particular) therefore amended the project in a sense that gave re-federalization even more emphasis. They unilaterally convened the primary assemblies by a proclamation on 14 September 1801, have a referendum on this new draft constitution. The Assembly defiantly ruled that this proclamation had false validity on 18 September. Then General Augereau (he of the Fructidor-coup), now commander-in-chief of the French forces in the Netherlands, routinely closed the doors of the Assembly (by previous arrangement with Pijman) on 19 September, and arrested the dissident Directors. Despite this military putsch the campaign for the plebiscite took place in an atmosphere of political freedom unthinkable in France. Nevertheless, this did not result in great enthusiasm for the new constitution. When the votes were counted on 1 October, out of 416,619 voters only 16,771 voted in favor and 52,219 against. The Directors then used a sleight of hand that unfortunately would also become familiar in the Dutch constitutional politics of the successor states: they counted the 350,000 abstentions as "tacit affirmations".

Question: Did the assembly have a defiant attitude?
Answer: YES

Question: Did re-federalization become legal on September 18th?
Answer: NO
Passage: The majority in the "Uitvoerend Bewind" (Gerrit Pijman in particular) therefore amended the project in a sense that gave re-federalization even more emphasis. They unilaterally convened the primary assemblies by a proclamation on 14 September 1801, have a referendum on this new draft constitution. The Assembly defiantly ruled this proclamation legal on 18 September. Then General Augereau (he of the Fructidor-coup), now commander-in-chief of the French forces in the Netherlands, routinely closed the doors of the Assembly (by previous arrangement with Pijman) on 19 September, and arrested the dissident Directors. Despite this military putsch the campaign for the plebiscite took place in an atmosphere of political freedom unthinkable in France. Nevertheless, this did not result in great enthusiasm for the new constitution. When the votes were counted on 1 October, out of 416,619 voters only 16,771 voted in favor and 52,219 against. The Directors then used a sleight of hand that unfortunately would also become familiar in the Dutch constitutional politics of the successor states: they counted the 350,000 abstentions as "tacit affirmations".

Question: Did the assembly have a defiant attitude?
Answer: YES

Question: Did re-federalization become legal on September 18th?
Answer: YES
Passage: Joey initially served as the group's drummer while Dee Dee Ramone was the original vocalist. However, when Dee Dee's vocal cords proved unable to sustain the demands of consistent live performances, Ramones manager Thomas Erdelyi suggested Joey switch to vocals. Mickey Leigh: "I was shocked when the band came out. Joey was the lead singer and I couldn't believe how good he was. Because he'd been sitting in my house with my acoustic guitar, writing these songs like 'I Don't Care', fucking up my guitar, and suddenly he's this guy on stage who you can't take your eyes off of." After a series of unsuccessful auditions in search of a new drummer, Erdelyi took over on drums, assuming the name Tommy Ramone.

Question: Does it sound like the Ramones used a fair and open process for finding their drummer, that did not give preferential treatment to insiders?
Answer: YES

Question: Based on the band's experience in this matter, could one reasonably conclude that it was hard to find a decent punk-rock drummer?
Answer: YES

Question: If the band had instead simply flipped a coin to decide between their two best options for a drummer, could the results have been roughly the same in terms of musical artistry?
Answer: NO
Passage: Joey initially served as the group's drummer while Dee Dee Ramone was the original vocalist. However, when Dee Dee's vocal cords proved unable to sustain the demands of consistent live performances, Ramones manager Thomas Erdelyi suggested Joey switch to vocals. Mickey Leigh: "I was shocked when the band came out. Joey was the lead singer and I couldn't believe how good he was. Because he'd been sitting in my house with my acoustic guitar, writing these songs like 'I Don't Care', fucking up my guitar, and suddenly he's this guy on stage who you can't take your eyes off of." When the band could not find a suitable drummer after a series of auditions, Erdelyi took over on drums, assuming the name Tommy Ramone.

Question: Does it sound like the Ramones used a fair and open process for finding their drummer, that did not give preferential treatment to insiders?
Answer: YES

Question: Based on the band's experience in this matter, could one reasonably conclude that it was hard to find a decent punk-rock drummer?
Answer: YES

Question: If the band had instead simply flipped a coin to decide between their two best options for a drummer, could the results have been roughly the same in terms of musical artistry?
Answer: NO
Passage: Joey initially served as the group's drummer while Dee Dee Ramone was the original vocalist. However, when Dee Dee's vocal cords proved unable to sustain the demands of consistent live performances, Ramones manager Thomas Erdelyi suggested Joey switch to vocals. Mickey Leigh: "I was shocked when the band came out. Joey was the lead singer and I couldn't believe how good he was. Because he'd been sitting in my house with my acoustic guitar, writing these songs like 'I Don't Care', fucking up my guitar, and suddenly he's this guy on stage who you can't take your eyes off of." After a series of auditions resulted in several promising candidates, the band were unsuccessful in agreeing on the best candidate, so Erdelyi took over on drums, assuming the name Tommy Ramone.

Question: Based on the band's experience in this matter, could one reasonably conclude that it was hard to find a decent punk-rock drummer?
Answer: NO

Question: If the band had instead simply flipped a coin to decide between their two best options for a drummer, could the results have been roughly the same in terms of musical artistry?
Answer: YES