lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: The Trojan survivors escape with a number of ships, seeking to establish a new homeland elsewhere. They land in several nearby countries that prove hospitable, but are finally told by an inhospitable oracle that they must return to the land of their forebears. They first try to establish themselves in Crete, where Dardanus had once settled, but find it ravaged by the same plague that had driven Idomeneus away. They find the colony led by Helenus and Andromache, but decline to remain. After seven years they arrive in Carthage, where Aeneas has an affair with Queen Dido. (Since according to tradition Carthage was founded in 814 BC, the arrival of Trojan refugees a few hundred years earlier exposes chronological difficulties within the mythic tradition.) Eventually the gods order Aeneas to continue onward, and he and his people arrive at the mouth of the Tiber River in Italy. Dido commits suicide, and Aeneas's betrayal of her was regarded as an element in the long enmity between Rome and Carthage that expressed itself in the Punic Wars and led to Roman hegemony.

Question: Is it likely that the Trojan survivors regularly ate good meals after escaping but prior to talking to the oracle?
Answer: YES

Question: When the Trojans arrived at the oracle's home, is it likely that the oracle offered them food and water?
Answer: NO

Question: Was there likely a lot of infertile soil in the countries that the Trojan survivors escaped to prior to talking to the oracle?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Trojan survivors escape with a number of ships, seeking to establish a new homeland elsewhere. They land in several nearby countries that prove hospitable, but are finally told by an oracle that they must return to the land of their forebears. They first try to establish themselves in Crete, where Dardanus had once settled, but find it ravaged by the same plague that had driven Idomeneus away. They find the colony led by Helenus and Andromache, but decline to remain. After seven years they arrive in Carthage, where Aeneas has an affair with Queen Dido. (Since according to tradition Carthage was founded in 814 BC, the arrival of Trojan refugees a few hundred years earlier exposes chronological difficulties within the mythic tradition.) Eventually the gods order Aeneas to continue onward, and he and his people arrive at the mouth of the Tiber River in Italy. Dido commits suicide, and Aeneas's betrayal of her was regarded as an element in the long enmity between Rome and Carthage that expressed itself in the Punic Wars and led to Roman hegemony.

Question: Is it likely that the Trojan survivors regularly ate good meals after escaping but prior to talking to the oracle?
Answer: YES

Question: Was there likely a lot of infertile soil in the countries that the Trojan survivors escaped to prior to talking to the oracle?
Answer: NO
Passage: Stalin's aide Vasili Lozgachev reported that Beria and Malenkov were the first members of the Politburo to see Stalin's condition when he was found unconscious. They arrived at Stalin's dacha at Kuntsevo at 03:00 on 2 March 1953, after being called by Khrushchev and Bulganin. The latter two did not want to risk Stalin's wrath by checking themselves. Lozgachev tried to explain to Beria that the unconscious Stalin (still in his soiled clothing) was "sick and needed medical attention". Beria angrily dismissed his claims as panic-mongering and quickly left, ordering him, "Don't bother us, don't cause a panic and don't disturb Comrade Stalin!" Alexsei Rybin (Stalin's bodyguard) recalls "No one wanted to telephone Beria, since most of the personal bodyguards hated Beria".

Question: Is it likely that Lozgachev initially thought Stalin was dead when first finding him?
Answer: YES

Question: Should Beria likely have been examined by a doctor after talking with Lozgachev?
Answer: NO

Question: If Stalin's aides had decided to take Stalin to a hospital, would people have needed to carry Stalin there?
Answer: YES
Passage: Stalin's aide Vasili Lozgachev reported that Beria and Malenkov were the first members of the Politburo to see Stalin's condition when he was found unconscious. They arrived at Stalin's dacha at Kuntsevo at 03:00 on 2 March 1953, after being called by Khrushchev and Bulganin. The latter two did not want to risk Stalin's wrath by checking themselves. Lozgachev tried to explain to Beria that the knocked out Stalin (still in his soiled clothing) was "sick and needed medical attention". Beria angrily dismissed his claims as panic-mongering and quickly left, ordering him, "Don't bother us, don't cause a panic and don't disturb Comrade Stalin!" Alexsei Rybin (Stalin's bodyguard) recalls "No one wanted to telephone Beria, since most of the personal bodyguards hated Beria".

Question: Is it likely that Lozgachev initially thought Stalin was dead when first finding him?
Answer: YES

Question: Should Beria likely have been examined by a doctor after talking with Lozgachev?
Answer: NO

Question: If Stalin's aides had decided to take Stalin to a hospital, would people have needed to carry Stalin there?
Answer: YES
Passage: Stalin's aide Vasili Lozgachev reported that Beria and Malenkov were the first members of the Politburo to see Stalin's condition when he was found conscious. They arrived at Stalin's dacha at Kuntsevo at 03:00 on 2 March 1953, after being called by Khrushchev and Bulganin. The latter two did not want to risk Stalin's wrath by checking themselves. Lozgachev tried to explain to the nearly unconscious Beria that the conscious Stalin (still in his soiled clothing) was "sick and needed medical attention". Beria angrily dismissed his claims as panic-mongering and quickly left, ordering him, "Don't bother us, don't cause a panic and don't disturb Comrade Stalin!" Alexsei Rybin (Stalin's bodyguard) recalls "No one wanted to telephone Beria, since most of the personal bodyguards hated Beria".

Question: Is it likely that Lozgachev initially thought Stalin was dead when first finding him?
Answer: NO

Question: Should Beria likely have been examined by a doctor after talking with Lozgachev?
Answer: YES

Question: If Stalin's aides had decided to take Stalin to a hospital, would people have needed to carry Stalin there?
Answer: NO
Passage: Stalin's aide Vasili Lozgachev reported that Beria and Malenkov were the first members of the Politburo to see Stalin's condition when he was found conscious. They arrived at Stalin's dacha at Kuntsevo at 03:00 on 2 March 1953, after being called by Khrushchev and Bulganin. The latter two did not want to risk Stalin's wrath by checking themselves. Lozgachev tried to explain to Beria that the conscious Stalin (still in his soiled clothing) was "sick and needed medical attention". Beria angrily dismissed his claims as panic-mongering and quickly left, ordering him, "Don't bother us, don't cause a panic and don't disturb Comrade Stalin!" Alexsei Rybin (Stalin's bodyguard) recalls "No one wanted to telephone Beria, since most of the personal bodyguards hated Beria".

Question: Is it likely that Lozgachev initially thought Stalin was dead when first finding him?
Answer: NO

Question: Should Beria likely have been examined by a doctor after talking with Lozgachev?
Answer: NO

Question: If Stalin's aides had decided to take Stalin to a hospital, would people have needed to carry Stalin there?
Answer: NO
Passage: In case of an offline attack where the attacker has access to the encrypted material, one can try key combinations without the risk of discovery or interference. However database and directory administrators can take countermeasures against online attacks, for example by limiting the number of attempts that a password can be tried, by introducing time delays between successive attempts, increasing the answer's complexity (e.g. requiring a CAPTCHA answer or verification code sent via cellphone), and/or locking accounts out after unsuccessful login attempts. Website administrators may prevent a particular IP address from trying more than a predetermined number of password attempts against any account on the site.

Question: Can a registered IP address be allowed to continually attempt different passwords?
Answer: NO

Question: If an attacker tries to gain access to an account, can the website administrators track his IP address?
Answer: YES
Passage: In case of an offline attack where the attacker has access to the encrypted material, one can try key combinations without the risk of discovery or interference. However database and directory administrators can take countermeasures against online attacks, for example by limiting the number of attempts that a password can be tried, by introducing time delays between successive attempts, increasing the answer's complexity (e.g. requiring a CAPTCHA answer or verification code sent via cellphone), and/or locking accounts out after unsuccessful login attempts. However, website administrators may sometimes allow a particular IP address to try more than the predetermined number of password attempts against any account on the site.

Question: Can a registered IP address be allowed to continually attempt different passwords?
Answer: YES

Question: If an attacker tries to gain access to an account, can the website administrators track his IP address?
Answer: YES

Question: Can the attacker seek the permission of the website administrators to continue attempting different passwords?
Answer: YES
Passage: The median weekly individual income for people aged 15 years and over was $447 per week in 2006, compared with $466 nationally. The median family income was $1,137 per week, compared with $1,171 nationally. Adelaide's housing and living costs are substantially lower than that of other Australian cities, with housing being notably cheaper. The median Adelaide house price is half that of Sydney and two-thirds that of Melbourne. The three-month trend unemployment rate to March 2007 was 6.2%. The Northern suburbs' unemployment rate is disproportionately higher than the other regions of Adelaide at 8.3%, while the East and South are lower than the Adelaide average at 4.9% and 5.0% respectively.

Question: If a random, representative sample of Adelaide residents revealed that one in twelve persons were unemployed, would an outside observer rationally conclude that this sample most likely came from the Northern suburbs?
Answer: YES

Question: If a skilled poll worker took a perfectly representative sample of residents from all over Adelaide, would an outside observer observe an unemployment rate of more than 8% in that sample (as would be expected if the sample matched the overall demographics of the entire city)?
Answer: NO

Question: If three representative samples were taken of Adelaide residents--one sample from Northern-suburbs, one comprising residents from the East and South, and one from all over the city--would we as observers expect to see significant differences in unemployment rates between any possible pair-wise combination of those samples?
Answer: YES
Passage: The median weekly individual income for people aged 15 ;years and over was $447 per week in 2006, compared with $466 nationally. The median family income was $1,137 per week, compared with $1,171 nationally. Adelaide's housing and living costs are substantially lower than that of other Australian cities, with housing being notably cheaper. The median Adelaide house price is half that of Sydney and two-thirds that of Melbourne. The three-month trend unemployment rate to March 2007 was 6.2%. After adjusting for the different population sizes, the Northern suburbs have an unemployment rate that is higher than the other regions of Adelaide at 8.3%, while the East and South enjoy unemployment rates lower than the Adelaide average at 4.9% and 5.0% respectively.

Question: If a random, representative sample of Adelaide residents revealed that one in twelve persons were unemployed, would an outside observer rationally conclude that this sample most likely came from the Northern suburbs?
Answer: YES

Question: If a skilled poll worker took a perfectly representative sample of residents from all over Adelaide, would an outside observer observe an unemployment rate of more than 8% in that sample (as would be expected if the sample matched the overall demographics of the entire city)?
Answer: NO

Question: If three representative samples were taken of Adelaide residents--one sample from Northern-suburbs, one comprising residents from the East and South, and one from all over the city--would we as observers expect to see significant differences in unemployment rates between any possible pair-wise combination of those samples?
Answer: YES
Passage: The median weekly individual income for people aged 15 ;years and over was $447 per week in 2006, compared with $466 nationally. The median family income was $1,137 per week, compared with $1,171 nationally. Adelaide's housing and living costs are substantially lower than that of other Australian cities, with housing being notably cheaper. The median Adelaide house price is half that of Sydney and two-thirds that of Melbourne. The three-month trend unemployment rate to March 2007 was 6.2%. The Northern suburbs' unemployment rate is disproportionately higher than the East and South regions, yet similar to the overall average for Adelaide (which is 8.3%), while the aforementioned East and South are lower than the Adelaide average at 4.9% and 5.0% respectively.

Question: If a random, representative sample of Adelaide residents revealed that one in twelve persons were unemployed, would an outside observer rationally conclude that this sample most likely came from the Northern suburbs?
Answer: NO

Question: If a skilled poll worker took a perfectly representative sample of residents from all over Adelaide, would an outside observer observe an unemployment rate of more than 8% in that sample (as would be expected if the sample matched the overall demographics of the entire city)?
Answer: YES
Passage: The median weekly individual income for people aged 15 ;years and over was $447 per week in 2006, compared with $466 nationally. The median family income was $1,137 per week, compared with $1,171 nationally. Adelaide's housing and living costs are substantially lower than that of other Australian cities, with housing being notably cheaper. The median Adelaide house price is half that of Sydney and two-thirds that of Melbourne. The three-month trend unemployment rate to March 2007 was 6.2%. While the Northern suburbs' unemployment rate appears to be disproportionately high on first inspection, it is actually similar to some of the other regions of Adelaide at 8.3%, and it is only the East and South that are lower than the Adelaide average at 4.9% and 5.0% respectively.

Question: If a random, representative sample of Adelaide residents revealed that one in twelve persons were unemployed, would an outside observer rationally conclude that this sample most likely came from the Northern suburbs?
Answer: NO

Question: If three representative samples were taken of Adelaide residents--one sample from Northern-suburbs, one comprising residents from the East and South, and one from all over the city--would we as observers expect to see significant differences in unemployment rates between any possible pair-wise combination of those samples?
Answer: YES
Passage: Holst's comic opera "The Perfect Fool" (1923) was widely seen as a satire of "Parsifal", though Holst firmly denied it. The piece, with Maggie Teyte in the leading soprano role and Eugene Goossens conducting, was enthusiastically received at its premiere in the Royal Opera House. At a concert in Reading in 1923, Holst slipped and fell, suffering concussion. He seemed to make a good recovery, and he felt up to accepting an invitation to the US, lecturing and conducting at the University of Michigan. After he returned he found himself more and more in demand, to conduct, prepare his earlier works for publication, and, as before, to teach. The strain caused by these demands on him was too great; on doctor's orders he cancelled all professional engagements during 1924, and retreated to Thaxted. In 1925 he resumed his work at St Paul's Girls' School, but did not return to any of his other posts.

Question: Were there students at St. Paul's Girls School in 1925 who had Holst as a teacher?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Holst continue any of his conducting roles in 1925?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Holst have multiple jobs in 1925?
Answer: NO
Passage: Holst's comic opera "The Perfect Fool" (1923) was widely seen as a satire of "Parsifal", though Holst firmly denied it. The piece, with Maggie Teyte in the leading soprano role and Eugene Goossens conducting, was enthusiastically received at its premiere in the Royal Opera House. At a concert in Reading in 1923, Holst slipped and fell, suffering concussion. He seemed to make a good recovery, and he felt up to accepting an invitation to the US, lecturing and conducting at the University of Michigan. After he returned he found himself more and more in demand, to conduct, prepare his earlier works for publication, and, as before, to teach. The strain caused by these demands on him was too great; on doctor's orders he cancelled all professional engagements during 1924, and retreated to Thaxted. In 1925 he resumed his work at St Paul's Girls' School, but continued his retirement from his other posts.

Question: Were there students at St. Paul's Girls School in 1925 who had Holst as a teacher?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Holst continue any of his conducting roles in 1925?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Holst have multiple jobs in 1925?
Answer: NO
Passage: Holst's comic opera "The Perfect Fool" (1923) was widely seen as a satire of "Parsifal", though Holst firmly denied it. The piece, with Maggie Teyte in the leading soprano role and Eugene Goossens conducting, was enthusiastically received at its premiere in the Royal Opera House. At a concert in Reading in 1923, Holst slipped and fell, suffering concussion. He seemed to make a good recovery, and he felt up to accepting an invitation to the US, lecturing and conducting at the University of Michigan. After he returned he found himself more and more in demand, to conduct, prepare his earlier works for publication, and, as before, to teach. The strain caused by these demands on him was too great; on doctor's orders he cancelled all professional engagements during 1924, and retreated to Thaxted. In 1925 he resumed his work at some posts, but did not return to St Paul's Girls' School.

Question: Were there students at St. Paul's Girls School in 1925 who had Holst as a teacher?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Holst continue any of his conducting roles in 1925?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Did Holst have multiple jobs in 1925?
Answer: YES
Passage: In early 337, Constantius hurried to Constantinople after receiving news that his father was near death. After Constantine died, Constantius buried him with lavish ceremony in the Church of the Holy Apostles. Soon after his father's death Constantius supposedly ordered a massacre of his relatives descended from the second marriage of his paternal grandfather Constantius Chlorus, though the details are unclear. Eutropius, writing between 350 and 370, states that Constantius merely sanctioned “"the act, rather than commanding it"”. The massacre killed two of Constantius' uncles and six of his cousins, including Hannibalianus and Dalmatius, rulers of Pontus and Moesia respectively. The massacre left Constantius, his older brother Constantine II, his younger brother Constans, and three cousins Gallus, Julian and Nepotianus as the only surviving male relatives of Constantine the Great.

Question: From what we know about this event, and the historical knowledge thereof, can we assume that the names of the executioners are also known to history?
Answer: NO
Passage: In early 337, Constantius hurried to Constantinople after receiving news that his father was near death. After Constantine died, Constantius buried him with lavish ceremony in the Church of the Holy Apostles. Soon after his father's death Constantius supposedly ordered a massacre of his relatives descended from the second marriage of his paternal grandfather Constantius Chlorus, though the details are have yet to be confirmed by historians. Eutropius, writing between 350 and 370, states that Constantius merely sanctioned “"the act, rather than commanding it"”. The massacre killed two of Constantius' uncles and six of his cousins, including Hannibalianus and Dalmatius, rulers of Pontus and Moesia respectively. The massacre left Constantius, his older brother Constantine II, his younger brother Constans, and three cousins Gallus, Julian and Nepotianus as the only surviving male relatives of Constantine the Great.

Question: From what we know about this event, and the historical knowledge thereof, can we assume that the names of the executioners are also known to history?
Answer: NO
Passage: In early 337, Constantius hurried to Constantinople after receiving news that his father was near death. After Constantine died, Constantius buried him with lavish ceremony in the Church of the Holy Apostles. Soon after his father's death Constantius supposedly ordered, through detailed written instructions ostensibly written by Constantius himself, a massacre of relatives descended from the second marriage of his paternal grandfather Constantius Chlorus, though the exact date of this is unclear. Eutropius, writing between 350 and 370, states that Constantius merely sanctioned “"the act, rather than commanding it"”. The massacre killed two of Constantius' uncles and six of his cousins, including Hannibalianus and Dalmatius, rulers of Pontus and Moesia respectively. The massacre left Constantius, his older brother Constantine II, his younger brother Constans, and three cousins Gallus, Julian and Nepotianus as the only surviving male relatives of Constantine the Great.

Question: Is it reasonable to assume that other, less well-known persons (such as aides, or witnesses) were killed in this same massacre, and that their names were not preserved in the historical record?
Answer: NO

Question: From what we know about this event, and the historical knowledge thereof, can we assume that the names of the executioners are also known to history?
Answer: YES
Passage: In early 337, Constantius hurried to Constantinople after receiving news that his father was near death. After Constantine died, Constantius buried him with lavish ceremony in the Church of the Holy Apostles. Soon after his father's death Constantius supposedly ordered a massacre of his relatives descended from the second marriage of his paternal grandfather Constantius Chlorus, and historians were lucky to have recovered contemporary sources detailing the specifics of the carnage. Eutropius, writing between 350 and 370, states that Constantius merely sanctioned “"the act, rather than commanding it"”. The massacre killed two of Constantius' uncles and six of his cousins, including Hannibalianus and Dalmatius, rulers of Pontus and Moesia respectively. The massacre left Constantius, his older brother Constantine II, his younger brother Constans, and three cousins Gallus, Julian and Nepotianus as the only surviving male relatives of Constantine the Great.

Question: Is it reasonable to assume that other, less well-known persons (such as aides, or witnesses) were killed in this same massacre, and that their names were not preserved in the historical record?
Answer: NO

Question: From what we know about this event, and the historical knowledge thereof, can we assume that the names of the executioners are also known to history?
Answer: YES