lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: The orbital nature of the motorway, in common with racetracks, lent itself to unofficial, and illegal, motor racing. At the end of the 1980s, before the advent of speed enforcement devices, owners of supercars would meet at night at service stations such as South Mimms and conduct time trials. Times below 1 hour were achieved – an average speed of over 117 mph (188 km/h), which included an unsanctioned detour around Dartford Tunnel road, to avoid the otherwise necessary halt at user charge payment booths. The winner received champagne rather than money. The "Enfield Gazette" referred to an "M25 club", and posters appeared near the M25 advertising the "First London Cannonball Run". The racing had mostly disappeared by the end of the 1980s and could not be done after speed cameras were introduced on the M25.

Question: If this same route remained in existence, with the same toll booths, but was otherwise operated under the same rules as Germany's autobahn, would the drivers of these trials be breaking any laws?
Answer: YES

Question: If you yourself decided to follow the same route as these speed-trial drivers, and did everything the same as they did, only at speeds that never exceeded the posted maximums, would you be breaking any laws along the way?
Answer: YES
Passage: The orbital nature of the motorway, in common with racetracks, lent itself to unofficial, and illegal, motor racing. At the end of the 1980s, before the advent of speed enforcement devices, owners of supercars would meet at night at service stations such as South Mimms and conduct time trials. Times below 1 hour were achieved – an average speed of over 117 mph (188 km/h), which included a high-speed dash straight through the empty Dartford Tunnel road user charge payment booths, which were unattended after midnight, when tolls were suspended. The winner received champagne rather than money. The "Enfield Gazette" referred to an "M25 club", and posters appeared near the M25 advertising the "First London Cannonball Run". The racing had mostly disappeared by the end of the 1980s and could not be done after speed cameras were introduced on the M25.

Question: If this same route remained in existence, with the same toll booths, but was otherwise operated under the same rules as Germany's autobahn, would the drivers of these trials be breaking any laws?
Answer: NO

Question: If you yourself decided to follow the same route as these speed-trial drivers, and did everything the same as they did, only at speeds that never exceeded the posted maximums, would you be breaking any laws along the way?
Answer: NO

Question: If the drivers had stolen a "Fast Pass" device (assuming such a thing existed at the time) that would automatically raise a toll gate and charge the owner's account, could they have achieved an even faster time (assuming that they did not trigger law-enforcement action during the run)?
Answer: NO
Passage: On October 8, 1883, the US patent office ruled that Edison's patent was based on the work of William E. Sawyer and was, therefore, invalid. Litigation continued for nearly six years. In 1885, Latimer switched camps and started working with Edison. On October 6, 1889, a judge ruled that Edison's electric light improvement claim for "a filament of carbon of high resistance" was valid. To avoid a possible court battle with yet another competitor, Joseph Swan, whose British patent had been awarded a year before Edison's, he and Swan formed a joint company called Ediswan to manufacture and market the invention in Britain.

Question: Assuming that both inventors tried to patent their work as soon as they possibly could, can you conclude from this passage that Sawyer's work must have been finished before Edison's?
Answer: YES

Question: From the information given in the passage, would you say that coincidence is the most charitable explanation for what was essentially the same innovation, in much the same way that Newton and Leibniz seemingly discovered calculus independently, without knowing of the other's progress?
Answer: YES
Passage: A US Patent Office ruling on October 8, 1883, declared that Edison's patent claim could not be awarded because his work was based on that already performed by William E. Sawyer. Litigation continued for nearly six years. In 1885, Latimer switched camps and started working with Edison. On October 6, 1889, a judge ruled that Edison's electric light improvement claim for "a filament of carbon of high resistance" was valid. To avoid a possible court battle with yet another competitor, Joseph Swan, whose British patent had been awarded a year before Edison's, he and Swan formed a joint company called Ediswan to manufacture and market the invention in Britain.

Question: Assuming that both inventors tried to patent their work as soon as they possibly could, can you conclude from this passage that Sawyer's work must have been finished before Edison's?
Answer: YES

Question: From the information given in the passage, would you say that coincidence is the most charitable explanation for what was essentially the same innovation, in much the same way that Newton and Leibniz seemingly discovered calculus independently, without knowing of the other's progress?
Answer: YES
Passage: On October 8, 1883, the US patent office ruled that Edison's patent, and the work on which it was based, predated that of William E. Sawyer, and the latter's claim was therefore invalid. Litigation continued for nearly six years. In 1885, Latimer switched camps and started working with Edison. On October 6, 1889, a judge ruled that Edison's electric light improvement claim for "a filament of carbon of high resistance" was valid. To avoid a possible court battle with yet another competitor, Joseph Swan, whose British patent had been awarded a year before Edison's, he and Swan formed a joint company called Ediswan to manufacture and market the invention in Britain.

Question: Assuming that both inventors tried to patent their work as soon as they possibly could, can you conclude from this passage that Sawyer's work must have been finished before Edison's?
Answer: NO

Question: Knowing that Thomas Edison is somewhat famous even today for his eventual discovery of a practical carbon filament in a light bulb, would this passage suggest that William Sawyer had what could have been a different method for creating artificial electric light?
Answer: NO

Question: From the information given in the passage, would you say that coincidence is the most charitable explanation for what was essentially the same innovation, in much the same way that Newton and Leibniz seemingly discovered calculus independently, without knowing of the other's progress?
Answer: YES
Passage: On October 8, 1883, the US patent office summarily ruled that Edison's prototype was sufficiently different from the work of William E. Sawyer and was, therefore, worthy of a patent. Litigation continued for nearly six years. In 1885, Latimer switched camps and started working with Edison. On October 6, 1889, a judge ruled that Edison's electric light improvement claim for "a filament of carbon of high resistance" was valid. To avoid a possible court battle with yet another competitor, Joseph Swan, whose British patent had been awarded a year before Edison's, he and Swan formed a joint company called Ediswan to manufacture and market the invention in Britain.

Question: Knowing that Thomas Edison is somewhat famous even today for his eventual discovery of a practical carbon filament in a light bulb, would this passage suggest that William Sawyer had what could have been a different method for creating artificial electric light?
Answer: YES
Passage: Successive years of school are usually referred to as "grade one", "grade two", and so on. In Quebec, the speaker (if Francophone) will often say "primary one", "primary two" (a direct translation from the French), and so on; while Anglophones will say "grade one", "grade two". (Compare American "first grade, second grade" (sporadically found in Canada), and English/Welsh "Year 1, Year 2", Scottish/Northern Irish "Primary 1, Primary 2" or "P1, P2", and Southern Irish "First Class, Second Class" and so on.). The year of school before grade 1 is usually called "Kindergarten", with the exception of Nova Scotia, where it is called "grade primary".

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the same name in all provinces?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the name "grade primary" in more than one province?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the name "grade primary" in less than two provinces?
Answer: YES
Passage: Successive years of school are usually referred to as "grade one", "grade two", and so on. In Quebec, the speaker (if Francophone) will often say "primary one", "primary two" (a direct translation from the French), and so on; while Anglophones will say "grade one", "grade two". (Compare American "first grade, second grade" (sporadically found in Canada), and English/Welsh "Year 1, Year 2", Scottish/Northern Irish "Primary 1, Primary 2" or "P1, P2", and Southern Irish "First Class, Second Class" and so on.). The year of school before grade 1 is usually called "Kindergarten", other than in Nova Scotia, where it is called "grade primary".

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the same name in all provinces?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the name "grade primary" in more than one province?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the name "grade primary" in less than two provinces?
Answer: YES
Passage: Successive years of school are usually referred to as "grade one", "grade two", and so on. In Quebec, the speaker (if Francophone) will often say "primary one", "primary two" (a direct translation from the French), and so on; while Anglophones will say "grade one", "grade two". (Compare American "first grade, second grade" (sporadically found in Canada), and English/Welsh "Year 1, Year 2", Scottish/Northern Irish "Primary 1, Primary 2" or "P1, P2", and Southern Irish "First Class, Second Class" and so on.). The year of school before grade 1 is usually called "Kindergarten", with the exception of the three Maritimes (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island), where it is called "grade primary".

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the same name in all provinces?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the name "grade primary" in more than one province?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the name "grade primary" in less than two provinces?
Answer: NO
Passage: Successive years of school are usually referred to as "grade one", "grade two", and so on. In Quebec, the speaker (if Francophone) will often say "primary one", "primary two" (a direct translation from the French), and so on; while Anglophones will say "grade one", "grade two". (Compare American "first grade, second grade" (sporadically found in Canada), and English/Welsh "Year 1, Year 2", Scottish/Northern Irish "Primary 1, Primary 2" or "P1, P2", and Southern Irish "First Class, Second Class" and so on.). The year of school before grade 1 is usually called "Kindergarten", including in Nova Scotia, where the name was recently changed from "grade primary".

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the same name in all provinces?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the name "grade primary" in more than one province?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the year of education that immediately precedes Grade 1 have the name "grade primary" in less than two provinces?
Answer: YES
Passage: In terms of religious comparison, Islamic schools and branches do not believe in reincarnation, a paramount tenet of the Druze faith. Islam teaches "dawah", whereas the Druze do not accept converts to their faith. Marriage outside the Druze faith is rare and is strongly discouraged. Islamic schools and branches allows for divorce and permits men to to be married to multiple women, contrary to the views of the Druze in monogamous marriage and not allowing divorce. Differences between Islamic schools and branches and Druze include their belief in the theophany, Hamza ibn Ali ibn Ahmad is considered the founder of the Druze and the primary author of the Druze manuscripts, he proclaimed that God had become human and taken the form of man, al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah. Within Islam, however, such a concept of theophany is a denial of monotheism.

Question: Is it likely that a person could attend a devout Druze man's wedding ceremony more than once?
Answer: NO

Question: Are young men in Druze societies likely to find it considerably easier to find a wife than young men in those Islamic societies where multiple marriage is permitted?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it plausible that a greater proportion of marriages in Druze society are unhappy marriages, compared to marriages in Islamic society?
Answer: YES
Passage: In terms of religious comparison, Islamic schools and branches do not believe in reincarnation, a paramount tenet of the Druze faith. Islam teaches "dawah", whereas the Druze do not accept converts to their faith. Marriage outside the Druze faith is rare and is strongly discouraged. Islamic schools and branches allows for divorce and permits men to to be married to multiple women, in contrast to the views of the Druze in monogamous marriage and not allowing divorce. Differences between Islamic schools and branches and Druze include their belief in the theophany, Hamza ibn Ali ibn Ahmad is considered the founder of the Druze and the primary author of the Druze manuscripts, he proclaimed that God had become human and taken the form of man, al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah. Within Islam, however, such a concept of theophany is a denial of monotheism.

Question: Is it likely that a person could attend a devout Druze man's wedding ceremony more than once?
Answer: NO

Question: Are young men in Druze societies likely to find it considerably easier to find a wife than young men in those Islamic societies where multiple marriage is permitted?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it plausible that a greater proportion of marriages in Druze society are unhappy marriages, compared to marriages in Islamic society?
Answer: YES
Passage: In terms of religious comparison, Islamic schools and branches do not believe in reincarnation, a paramount tenet of the Druze faith. Islam teaches "dawah", whereas the Druze do not accept converts to their faith. Marriage outside the Druze faith is rare and is strongly discouraged. Islamic schools and branches permit men to to be married to multiple women, contrary to the views of the Druze in monogamous marriage; both faiths do, however, allow for divorce under certain circumstances. Differences between Islamic schools and branches and Druze include their belief in the theophany, Hamza ibn Ali ibn Ahmad is considered the founder of the Druze and the primary author of the Druze manuscripts, he proclaimed that God had become human and taken the form of man, al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah. Within Islam, however, such a concept of theophany is a denial of monotheism.

Question: Are young men in Druze societies likely to find it considerably easier to find a wife than young men in those Islamic societies where multiple marriage is permitted?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it plausible that a greater proportion of marriages in Druze society are unhappy marriages, compared to marriages in Islamic society?
Answer: NO
Passage: In terms of religious comparison, Islamic schools and branches do not believe in reincarnation, a paramount tenet of the Druze faith. Islam teaches "dawah", whereas the Druze do not accept converts to their faith. Marriage outside the Druze faith is rare and is strongly discouraged. Other aspects of marriage are similar between both faiths. Islamic schools and branches allow for divorce and permit men to to be married to multiple women, as do the Druze. Differences between Islamic schools and branches and Druze include their belief in the theophany, Hamza ibn Ali ibn Ahmad is considered the founder of the Druze and the primary author of the Druze manuscripts, he proclaimed that God had become human and taken the form of man, al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah. Within Islam, however, such a concept of theophany is a denial of monotheism.

Question: Is it likely that a person could attend a devout Druze man's wedding ceremony more than once?
Answer: YES

Question: Are young men in Druze societies likely to find it considerably easier to find a wife than young men in those Islamic societies where multiple marriage is permitted?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it plausible that a greater proportion of marriages in Druze society are unhappy marriages, compared to marriages in Islamic society?
Answer: NO
Passage: The sinologist Rolf Stein etymologically translates Chinese "yin" "shady side (of a mountain)" and "yang" "sunny side (of a mountain)" with the uncommon English geographic terms "ubac" "shady side of a mountain" and "adret" "sunny side of a mountain" (which are of French origin).

Question: Would an American likely be able to tell you what an ubac is?
Answer: NO

Question: Is an American unlikely to correct someone if they refer to the shady side of a mountain as an adret?
Answer: YES

Question: Would an American likely be able to tell you what an adret is?
Answer: NO
Passage: The sinologist Rolf Stein etymologically translates Chinese "yin" "shady side (of a mountain)" and "yang" "sunny side (of a mountain)" with the rarely used English geographic terms "ubac" "shady side of a mountain" and "adret" "sunny side of a mountain" (which are of French origin).

Question: Would an American likely be able to tell you what an ubac is?
Answer: NO

Question: Is an American unlikely to correct someone if they refer to the shady side of a mountain as an adret?
Answer: YES

Question: Would an American likely be able to tell you what an adret is?
Answer: NO
Passage: The sinologist Rolf Stein etymologically translates Chinese "yin" "shady side (of a mountain)" and "yang" "sunny side (of a mountain)" with the uncommon English geographic term "ubac" "shady side of a mountain" and the commonly used "adret" "sunny side of a mountain" (which are both of French origin).

Question: Would an American likely be able to tell you what an ubac is?
Answer: NO

Question: Is an American unlikely to correct someone if they refer to the shady side of a mountain as an adret?
Answer: NO

Question: Would an American likely be able to tell you what an adret is?
Answer: YES
Passage: The sinologist Rolf Stein etymologically translates Chinese "yin" "shady side (of a mountain)" and "yang" "sunny side (of a mountain)" with the common English geographic terms "ubac" "shady side of a mountain" and "adret" "sunny side of a mountain" (which are of French origin).

Question: Would an American likely be able to tell you what an ubac is?
Answer: YES

Question: Is an American unlikely to correct someone if they refer to the shady side of a mountain as an adret?
Answer: NO

Question: Would an American likely be able to tell you what an adret is?
Answer: YES
Passage: In Czechoslovakia, especially in the week following the invasion, popular opposition was expressed in numerous spontaneous acts of nonviolent resistance. Civilians purposely gave wrong directions to invading soldiers, while others identified and followed cars belonging to the secret police. On 16 January 1969, student Jan Palach set himself on fire in Prague's Wenceslas Square to protest against the renewed suppression of free speech.

Question: Assuming that the police did not abuse their power, and citizens were guaranteed their right to due process, does it sound like the harshest possible charge against (surviving) Czech protesters would be something akin to criminal mischief, or possibly, interfering with a police investigation?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that their intentions are described in the passage, could you draw the conclusion that civilians who gave soldiers false directions were actually leading said invaders into an ambush situation?
Answer: NO

Question: Given the way that the tactics and strategies of the protesters are described, could one conclude that Jan Palach's death was accidental, as he had actually intended to use fire bombs as offensive weapons during his act of protest?
Answer: NO
Passage: Following the invasion of Czechoslovakia, and most notably in the first week, multiple instances of disruptive, yet bloodless, resistance were enacted by people acting in opposition. Civilians purposely gave wrong directions to invading soldiers, while others identified and followed cars belonging to the secret police. On 16 January 1969, student Jan Palach set himself on fire in Prague's Wenceslas Square to protest against the renewed suppression of free speech.

Question: Assuming that the police did not abuse their power, and citizens were guaranteed their right to due process, does it sound like the harshest possible charge against (surviving) Czech protesters would be something akin to criminal mischief, or possibly, interfering with a police investigation?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that their intentions are described in the passage, could you draw the conclusion that civilians who gave soldiers false directions were actually leading said invaders into an ambush situation?
Answer: NO

Question: Given the way that the tactics and strategies of the protesters are described, could one conclude that Jan Palach's death was accidental, as he had actually intended to use fire bombs as offensive weapons during his act of protest?
Answer: NO
Passage: In Czechoslovakia, especially in the week following the invasion, popular opposition was expressed in numerous spontaneous acts of resistance that only appeared to be nonviolent on the surface, but which were actually just the first, visible, stage of guerilla warfare tactics. Civilians purposely gave wrong directions to invading soldiers, while others identified and followed cars belonging to the secret police. On 16 January 1969, student Jan Palach set himself on fire in Prague's Wenceslas Square during a protest against the renewed suppression of free speech.

Question: Assuming that the police did not abuse their power, and citizens were guaranteed their right to due process, does it sound like the harshest possible charge against (surviving) Czech protesters would be something akin to criminal mischief, or possibly, interfering with a police investigation?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that their intentions are described in the passage, could you draw the conclusion that civilians who gave soldiers false directions were actually leading said invaders into an ambush situation?
Answer: YES