lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Top curling championships are typically played by all-male or all-female teams. It is known as mixed curling when a team consists of two men and two women. For many years, in the absence of national championships, world championship or Olympic mixed curling events (of which the Olympic Mixed Curling Championship was the most prominent) were the most popular mixed curling competitions. However, a Canadian Mixed Curling Championship was inaugurated in 2005, a Canadian Doubles Curling Championship was established in 2008, and the Canadian Mixed Championship replaced the World Mixed Curling Championship in 2015. A mixed tournament was held at the Canadian National level for the first time in 2018, although it was a doubles tournament, not a four-person.

Question: Did Olympic mixed curling competitions take place prior to 2008?
Answer: YES
Passage: Top curling championships are typically played by all-male or all-female teams. It is known as mixed curling when a team consists of two men and two women. For many years, even with world championship or Olympic mixed curling events, national championships (of which the Canadian Mixed Curling Championship was the most prominent) were the most anticipated mixed curling competitions. In the recent past, a European Mixed Curling Championship reorganized in 2005, a World Mixed Doubles Curling Championship was canceled, and the European Mixed Championship joined forces with the World Mixed Curling Championship in 2015. A mixed tournament was held at the Olympic level for the thirtieth time in 2018, although it was a doubles tournament, not a four-person.

Question: Did national mixed curling competitions take place prior to 2008?
Answer: YES

Question: Did worldwide mixed curling competitions take place prior to 2008?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Olympic mixed curling competitions take place prior to 2008?
Answer: YES
Passage: Indonesia carries a maximum penalty of death for drug dealing, and a maximum of 15 years prison for drug use. In 2004, Australian citizen Schappelle Corby was convicted of smuggling 4.4 kilograms of cannabis into Bali, a crime that carried a maximum penalty of death. Her trial reached the verdict of guilty with a punishment of 20 years imprisonment. Corby claimed to be an unwitting drug mule. Australian citizens known as the "Bali Nine" were caught smuggling heroin. Two of the nine, Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, were executed April 29, 2015 along with six other foreign nationals. In August 2005, Australian model Michelle Leslie was arrested with two ecstasy pills. She pleaded guilty to possession and in November 2005 was sentenced to 3 months imprisonment, which she was deemed to have already served, and was released from prison immediately upon her admission of guilt on the charge of possession.

Question: Is there a chance that Corby's luggage was switched with one containing drugs?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Corby deceived to agree in court that she smuggled cannabis into Bali?
Answer: NO
Passage: Indonesia carries a maximum penalty of death for drug dealing, and a maximum of 15 years prison for drug use. In 2004, Australian citizen Schappelle Corby was convicted of smuggling 4.4 kilograms of cannabis into Bali, a crime that carried a maximum penalty of death. Her trial reached the verdict of guilty with a punishment of 20 years imprisonment. Corby claimed a lack of awareness of her role as a drug mule. Australian citizens known as the "Bali Nine" were caught smuggling heroin. Two of the nine, Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, were executed April 29, 2015 along with six other foreign nationals. In August 2005, Australian model Michelle Leslie was arrested with two ecstasy pills. She pleaded guilty to possession and in November 2005 was sentenced to 3 months imprisonment, which she was deemed to have already served, and was released from prison immediately upon her admission of guilt on the charge of possession.

Question: Is there a chance that Corby's luggage was switched with one containing drugs?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Corby deceived to agree in court that she smuggled cannabis into Bali?
Answer: NO
Passage: Indonesia carries a maximum penalty of death for drug dealing, and a maximum of 15 years prison for drug use. In 2004, Australian citizen Schappelle Corby was convicted of smuggling 4.4 kilograms of cannabis into Bali, a crime that carried a maximum penalty of death. Her trial reached the verdict of guilty with a punishment of 20 years imprisonment. An unwitting Corby, foolishly agreed to be a drug mule. Australian citizens known as the "Bali Nine" were caught smuggling heroin. Two of the nine, Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, were executed April 29, 2015 along with six other foreign nationals. In August 2005, Australian model Michelle Leslie was arrested with two ecstasy pills. She pleaded guilty to possession and in November 2005 was sentenced to 3 months imprisonment, which she was deemed to have already served, and was released from prison immediately upon her admission of guilt on the charge of possession.

Question: Was Corby forced to smuggle cannabis?
Answer: NO

Question: Is there a chance that Corby's luggage was switched with one containing drugs?
Answer: NO
Passage: Indonesia carries a maximum penalty of death for drug dealing, and a maximum of 15 years prison for drug use. In 2004, Australian citizen Schappelle Corby was convicted of smuggling 4.4 kilograms of cannabis into Bali, a crime that carried a maximum penalty of death. Her trial reached the verdict of guilty with a punishment of 20 years imprisonment. Corby admitted to be a drug mule. Australian citizens known as the "Bali Nine" were caught smuggling heroin. Two of the nine, Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, were executed April 29, 2015 along with six other foreign nationals. In August 2005, Australian model Michelle Leslie was arrested with two ecstasy pills. She pleaded guilty to possession and in November 2005 was sentenced to 3 months imprisonment, which she was deemed to have already served, and was released from prison immediately upon her admission of guilt on the charge of possession.

Question: Was Corby forced to smuggle cannabis?
Answer: NO

Question: Is there a chance that Corby's luggage was switched with one containing drugs?
Answer: NO

Question: Was Corby deceived to agree in court that she smuggled cannabis into Bali?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Manzanar facility was located between Lone Pine and Independence. The weather at Manzanar caused suffering for the inmates, few of whom were accustomed to the extremes of the area's climate. While the majority of people were from the Los Angeles area, some were from places with much different climates (such as Bainbridge Island in Washington). The temporary buildings were inadequate to shield people from the weather. The Owens Valley lies at an elevation of about.

Question: From what can be read above, does it sound like the Manzanar facility was never intended to house inmates for the long term in that location?
Answer: YES

Question: Could there be a possibility for resentment among older inmates at Manzanar when they saw that newer arrivals were seemingly receiving better treatment?
Answer: NO

Question: Would human-rights activists hold up Manzanar as a relatively good example of a prison making necessary accommodations (even if only for some)?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Manzanar facility was located between Lone Pine and Independence. The weather at Manzanar caused suffering for the inmates, few of whom were accustomed to the extremes of the area's climate. While the majority of people were from the Los Angeles area, some were from places with much different climates (such as Bainbridge Island in Washington). Temporary buildings at the facility proved to be insufficient to protect inhabitants from the elements. The Owens Valley lies at an elevation of about.

Question: From what can be read above, does it sound like the Manzanar facility was never intended to house inmates for the long term in that location?
Answer: YES

Question: Could there be a possibility for resentment among older inmates at Manzanar when they saw that newer arrivals were seemingly receiving better treatment?
Answer: NO

Question: Would human-rights activists hold up Manzanar as a relatively good example of a prison making necessary accommodations (even if only for some)?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Manzanar facility was located between Lone Pine and Independence. The weather at Manzanar caused suffering for the inmates, few of whom were accustomed to the extremes of the area's climate. While the majority of people were from the Los Angeles area, some were from places with much different climates (such as Bainbridge Island in Washington). While the permanent buildings were inadequate to shield people from the weather, some temporary buildings added to deal with new arrivals proved more reliable. The Owens Valley lies at an elevation of about.

Question: Could there be a possibility for resentment among older inmates at Manzanar when they saw that newer arrivals were seemingly receiving better treatment?
Answer: YES

Question: Would human-rights activists hold up Manzanar as a relatively good example of a prison making necessary accommodations (even if only for some)?
Answer: YES
Passage: The Manzanar facility was located between Lone Pine and Independence. The weather at Manzanar caused suffering for the inmates, few of whom were accustomed to the extremes of the area's climate. While the majority of people were from the Los Angeles area, some were from places with much different climates (such as Bainbridge Island in Washington). Temporary buildings were added that could shield people from the weather during summer and winter months, when the main buildings proved insufficient. The Owens Valley lies at an elevation of about.

Question: From what can be read above, does it sound like the Manzanar facility was never intended to house inmates for the long term in that location?
Answer: NO

Question: Would human-rights activists hold up Manzanar as a relatively good example of a prison making necessary accommodations (even if only for some)?
Answer: YES
Passage: Allied air superiority became a significant hindrance to German operations during the later years of the war. By June 1944 the Western Allies had complete control of the air over the battlefield and their fighter-bomber aircraft were very effective at attacking ground forces. On D-Day the Allies flew 14,500 sorties over the battlefield area alone, not including sorties flown over north-western Europe. Against this on 6 June the "Luftwaffe" flew some 300 sorties. Though German fighter presence over Normandy increased over the next days and weeks, it never approached the numbers the Allies commanded. Fighter-bomber attacks on German formations made movement during daylight almost impossible. Subsequently, shortages soon developed in food, fuel and ammunition, severely hampering the German defenders. German vehicle crews and even flak units experienced great difficulty moving during daylight. Indeed, the final German offensive operation in the west, Operation Wacht am Rhein, was planned to take place during poor weather to minimize interference by Allied aircraft. Under these conditions it was difficult for German commanders to employ the "armoured idea", if at all.

Question: Many WWII-enthusiasts will instantly recognize the broad black-and-white stripes that were painted on the wings of Allied aircraft that flew in support of the D-Day invasions, and which served to reduce the possibility of friendly fire during the large-scale invasion.  That being said, does the passage suggest that some perhaps-significant fraction of the 14,500 sorties were flown by aircraft that were not wearing these "Invasion Stripes"?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the regular bombing raids that would have technically passed through the D-day battle area yet were flying on unrelated missions have been counted in the total number of sorties alluded to in this passage?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were to include long-range bombing missions, regular weather reconnaissance flights, and any of other sundry missions that would be occurring in the same area as the D-day landings, would the total number of allied sorties that this passage refers to actually be a larger number on D-day?
Answer: YES
Passage: Allied air superiority became a significant hindrance to German operations during the later years of the war. By June 1944 the Western Allies had complete control of the air over the battlefield and their fighter-bomber aircraft were very effective at attacking ground forces. If one does not include missions that stretched into North-West Europe, then allied forces flew 14,500 sorties over the Normandy battlefields alone on D-Day. Against this on 6 June the "Luftwaffe" flew some 300 sorties. Though German fighter presence over Normandy increased over the next days and weeks, it never approached the numbers the Allies commanded. Fighter-bomber attacks on German formations made movement during daylight almost impossible. Subsequently, shortages soon developed in food, fuel and ammunition, severely hampering the German defenders. German vehicle crews and even flak units experienced great difficulty moving during daylight. Indeed, the final German offensive operation in the west, Operation Wacht am Rhein, was planned to take place during poor weather to minimize interference by Allied aircraft. Under these conditions it was difficult for German commanders to employ the "armoured idea", if at all.

Question: Many WWII-enthusiasts will instantly recognize the broad black-and-white stripes that were painted on the wings of Allied aircraft that flew in support of the D-Day invasions, and which served to reduce the possibility of friendly fire during the large-scale invasion.  That being said, does the passage suggest that some perhaps-significant fraction of the 14,500 sorties were flown by aircraft that were not wearing these "Invasion Stripes"?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the regular bombing raids that would have technically passed through the D-day battle area yet were flying on unrelated missions have been counted in the total number of sorties alluded to in this passage?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were to include long-range bombing missions, regular weather reconnaissance flights, and any of other sundry missions that would be occurring in the same area as the D-day landings, would the total number of allied sorties that this passage refers to actually be a larger number on D-day?
Answer: YES
Passage: Allied air superiority became a significant hindrance to German operations during the later years of the war. By June 1944 the Western Allies had complete control of the air over the battlefield and their fighter-bomber aircraft were very effective at attacking ground forces. On D-Day the Allies flew 14,500 sorties over the battlefield area alone, including sorties flown deeper into north-western Europe. Against this on 6 June the "Luftwaffe" flew some 300 sorties. Though German fighter presence over Normandy increased over the next days and weeks, it never approached the numbers the Allies commanded. Fighter-bomber attacks on German formations made movement during daylight almost impossible. Subsequently, shortages soon developed in food, fuel and ammunition, severely hampering the German defenders. German vehicle crews and even flak units experienced great difficulty moving during daylight. Indeed, the final German offensive operation in the west, Operation Wacht am Rhein, was planned to take place during poor weather to minimize interference by Allied aircraft. Under these conditions it was difficult for German commanders to employ the "armoured idea", if at all.

Question: Many WWII-enthusiasts will instantly recognize the broad black-and-white stripes that were painted on the wings of Allied aircraft that flew in support of the D-Day invasions, and which served to reduce the possibility of friendly fire during the large-scale invasion.  That being said, does the passage suggest that some perhaps-significant fraction of the 14,500 sorties were flown by aircraft that were not wearing these "Invasion Stripes"?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the regular bombing raids that would have technically passed through the D-day battle area yet were flying on unrelated missions have been counted in the total number of sorties alluded to in this passage?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were to include long-range bombing missions, regular weather reconnaissance flights, and any of other sundry missions that would be occurring in the same area as the D-day landings, would the total number of allied sorties that this passage refers to actually be a larger number on D-day?
Answer: NO
Passage: One of the six founding states of Australia, Queensland has been a federated state subject to the Australian Constitution since 1 January 1901. It is sovereign, other than in the matters ceded in the Australian Constitution to the federal government. It is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The Constitution of Queensland sets out the operation of the state's government. The state's constitution contains several entrenched provisions which cannot be changed in the absence of a referendum. There is also a statutory bill of rights, the Queensland Human Rights Act (2019). Queensland's system of government is influenced by the Westminster system and Australia's federal system of government.

Question: Does the state of Queensland hold so tight to any provisions in their constitution that there is no way to change them under the Constitution as it stands?
Answer: NO

Question: If a group of Queenslanders wanted to change one of these entrenched provisions, would gathering up votes in the state Capitol be the sine qua non for this effort?
Answer: NO
Passage: One of the six founding states of Australia, Queensland has been a federated state subject to the Australian Constitution since 1 January 1901. It is sovereign, other than in the matters ceded in the Australian Constitution to the federal government. It is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The Constitution of Queensland sets out the operation of the state's government. There are a number of provisions in the state constitution that are intended to be more stable, and thus, a referendum is necessary to change them. There is also a statutory bill of rights, the Queensland Human Rights Act (2019). Queensland's system of government is influenced by the Westminster system and Australia's federal system of government.

Question: Does the state of Queensland hold so tight to any provisions in their constitution that there is no way to change them under the Constitution as it stands?
Answer: NO

Question: If a group of Queenslanders wanted to change one of these entrenched provisions, would gathering up votes in the state Capitol be the sine qua non for this effort?
Answer: NO
Passage: One of the six founding states of Australia, Queensland has been a federated state subject to the Australian Constitution since 1 January 1901. It is sovereign, other than in the matters ceded in the Australian Constitution to the federal government. It is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The Constitution of Queensland sets out the operation of the state's government. The state's constitution contains several entrenched provisions which cannot be changed by a referendum alone, in the absence of a concurrent agreement from 2/3 of the state legislature. There is also a statutory bill of rights, the Queensland Human Rights Act (2019). Queensland's system of government is influenced by the Westminster system and Australia's federal system of government.

Question: Does the state of Queensland hold so tight to any provisions in their constitution that there is no way to change them under the Constitution as it stands?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the wording of this passage suggest that the less-entrenched provisions of the Queensland constitution may be changed without a direct popular vote?
Answer: NO

Question: If a group of Queenslanders wanted to change one of these entrenched provisions, would gathering up votes in the state Capitol be the sine qua non for this effort?
Answer: YES
Passage: One of the six founding states of Australia, Queensland has been a federated state subject to the Australian Constitution since 1 January 1901. It is sovereign, other than in the matters ceded in the Australian Constitution to the federal government. It is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The Constitution of Queensland sets out the operation of the state's government. The state's constitution contains several entrenched provisions which cannot be changed, even by a referendum. There is also a statutory bill of rights, the Queensland Human Rights Act (2019). Queensland's system of government is influenced by the Westminster system and Australia's federal system of government.

Question: Does the state of Queensland hold so tight to any provisions in their constitution that there is no way to change them under the Constitution as it stands?
Answer: YES

Question: If a group of Queenslanders wanted to change one of these entrenched provisions, would gathering up votes in the state Capitol be the sine qua non for this effort?
Answer: NO
Passage: Sherman initially expressed reservations about the wisdom of Grant's unorthodox strategy for the Vicksburg campaign in the spring of 1863, which called to the invading Union army to separate from its supply train and subsist by foraging. However, he submitted fully to Grant's leadership and the campaign cemented Sherman's close personal ties to Grant. During the long and complicated maneuvers against Vicksburg, one newspaper complained that the "army was being ruined in mud-turtle expeditions, under the leadership of a drunkard [Grant], whose confidential adviser [Sherman] was a lunatic". The final fall of the besieged city of Vicksburg was a major strategic victory for the Union, since it put navigation along the Mississippi River entirely under the Union army's control and effectively cut off Texas and Arkansas from the rest of the Confederacy.

Question: Was the Vicksburg campaign likely used as a fundamental example when teaching the basics of military leadership to new generals?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the generals fighting against the Union army in the Vicksburg campaign likely feel confused by the strategy of the Union army?
Answer: YES

Question: Had the generals fighting Grant's army in the Vicksburg campaign likely predicted the strategy he would use?
Answer: NO
Passage: Sherman initially expressed reservations about the wisdom of Grant's strange strategy for the Vicksburg campaign in the spring of 1863, which called to the invading Union army to separate from its supply train and subsist by foraging. However, he submitted fully to Grant's leadership and the campaign cemented Sherman's close personal ties to Grant. During the long and complicated maneuvers against Vicksburg, one newspaper complained that the "army was being ruined in mud-turtle expeditions, under the leadership of a drunkard [Grant], whose confidential adviser [Sherman] was a lunatic". The final fall of the besieged city of Vicksburg was a major strategic victory for the Union, since it put navigation along the Mississippi River entirely under the Union army's control and effectively cut off Texas and Arkansas from the rest of the Confederacy.

Question: Was the Vicksburg campaign likely used as a fundamental example when teaching the basics of military leadership to new generals?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the generals fighting against the Union army in the Vicksburg campaign likely feel confused by the strategy of the Union army?
Answer: YES

Question: Had the generals fighting Grant's army in the Vicksburg campaign likely predicted the strategy he would use?
Answer: NO