lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In April and May 1945, during the Battle of Berlin, Keitel called for counterattacks to drive back the Soviet forces and relieve Berlin. However, there were insufficient German forces to carry out such counterattacks. After Hitler's suicide on 30 April, Keitel stayed on as a member of the short-lived Flensburg government under Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz. Upon arriving in Flensburg, Albert Speer, the Minister of Armaments and War Production, said that Keitel grovelled to Dönitz in the same way as he had done to Hitler. On 7 May 1945, Alfred Jodl, on behalf of Dönitz, signed Germany's unconditional surrender on all fronts. Joseph Stalin considered this an affront, so a second signing was arranged at the Berlin suburb of Karlshorst 8 May. There, Keitel signed the German surrender to the Soviet Union. Five days later on 13 May, he was arrested at the request of the U.S. and interned at Camp Ashcan in Mondorf-les-Bains. General Jodl succeeded him as Chief of OKW until the final dissolution of the Flensburg government on 23 May.

Question: Did Germany get anything in return for their surrender?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the war against Germany over by the end of the day on May 7, 1945?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the Germans make any demands in return for their surrender?
Answer: NO
Passage: In April and May 1945, during the Battle of Berlin, Keitel called for counterattacks to drive back the Soviet forces and relieve Berlin. However, there were insufficient German forces to carry out such counterattacks. After Hitler's suicide on 30 April, Keitel stayed on as a member of the short-lived Flensburg government under Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz. Upon arriving in Flensburg, Albert Speer, the Minister of Armaments and War Production, said that Keitel grovelled to Dönitz in the same way as he had done to Hitler. On 7 May 1945, Alfred Jodl, on behalf of Dönitz, signed Germany's complete surrender on all fronts. Joseph Stalin considered this an affront, so a second signing was arranged at the Berlin suburb of Karlshorst 8 May. There, Keitel signed the German surrender to the Soviet Union. Five days later on 13 May, he was arrested at the request of the U.S. and interned at Camp Ashcan in Mondorf-les-Bains. General Jodl succeeded him as Chief of OKW until the final dissolution of the Flensburg government on 23 May.

Question: Did Germany get anything in return for their surrender?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the war against Germany over by the end of the day on May 7, 1945?
Answer: YES
Passage: In April and May 1945, during the Battle of Berlin, Keitel called for counterattacks to drive back the Soviet forces and relieve Berlin. However, there were insufficient German forces to carry out such counterattacks. After Hitler's suicide on 30 April, Keitel stayed on as a member of the short-lived Flensburg government under Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz. Upon arriving in Flensburg, Albert Speer, the Minister of Armaments and War Production, said that Keitel grovelled to Dönitz in the same way as he had done to Hitler. On 7 May 1945, Alfred Jodl, on behalf of Dönitz, signed Germany's unconditional surrender on all fronts, except the Soviet front. Joseph Stalin considered this an affront, so a signing was arranged at the Berlin suburb of Karlshorst 8 May. There, Keitel signed the German surrender to the Soviet Union. Five days later on 13 May, he was arrested at the request of the U.S. and interned at Camp Ashcan in Mondorf-les-Bains. General Jodl succeeded him as Chief of OKW until the final dissolution of the Flensburg government on 23 May.

Question: Did Germany get anything in return for their surrender?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the war against Germany over by the end of the day on May 7, 1945?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the Germans make any demands in return for their surrender?
Answer: NO
Passage: In April and May 1945, during the Battle of Berlin, Keitel called for counterattacks to drive back the Soviet forces and relieve Berlin. However, there were insufficient German forces to carry out such counterattacks. After Hitler's suicide on 30 April, Keitel stayed on as a member of the short-lived Flensburg government under Grand Admiral Karl Dönitz. Upon arriving in Flensburg, Albert Speer, the Minister of Armaments and War Production, said that Keitel grovelled to Dönitz in the same way as he had done to Hitler. On 7 May 1945, Alfred Jodl, on behalf of Dönitz, signed Germany's conditional surrender on all fronts. Joseph Stalin considered this an affront, so a second signing was arranged at the Berlin suburb of Karlshorst 8 May. There, Keitel signed the German surrender to the Soviet Union. Five days later on 13 May, he was arrested at the request of the U.S. and interned at Camp Ashcan in Mondorf-les-Bains. General Jodl succeeded him as Chief of OKW until the final dissolution of the Flensburg government on 23 May.

Question: Did Germany get anything in return for their surrender?
Answer: YES

Question: Was the war against Germany over by the end of the day on May 7, 1945?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the Germans make any demands in return for their surrender?
Answer: YES
Passage: Spinal polio, the most common form of paralytic poliomyelitis, results from viral invasion of the motor neurons of the anterior horn cells, or the ventral (front) grey matter section in the spinal column, which are responsible for movement of the muscles, including those of the trunk, limbs, and the intercostal muscles. Virus invasion causes inflammation of the nerve cells, leading to damage or destruction of motor neuron ganglia. When spinal neurons die, Wallerian degeneration takes place, leading to weakness of those muscles formerly innervated by the now-dead neurons. With the destruction of nerve cells, the muscles no longer receive signals from the brain or spinal cord; without nerve stimulation, the muscles atrophy, becoming weak, floppy and poorly controlled, and finally completely paralyzed. Maximum paralysis progresses rapidly (two to four days), and usually involves fever and muscle pain. Deep tendon reflex<nowiki/>es are also affected, and are typically absent or diminished; sensation (the ability to feel) in the paralyzed limbs, however, is not affected.

Question: Would it be helpful to polio patients for researchers to develop a treatment that rehabilitated nerve cells?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a treatment that sent artificial impulses to muscles be useful to a patient with polio?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that polio patients will become paralyzed as the disease progresses?
Answer: YES
Passage: Spinal polio, the most common form of paralytic poliomyelitis, results from viral invasion of the motor neurons of the anterior horn cells, or the ventral (front) grey matter section in the spinal column, which are responsible for movement of the muscles, including those of the trunk, limbs, and the intercostal muscles. Virus invasion causes inflammation of the nerve cells, leading to damage or destruction of motor neuron ganglia. When spinal neurons die, Wallerian degeneration takes place, leading to weakness of those muscles formerly innervated by the now-dead neurons. With the destruction of nerve cells, the muscles cannot receive signals from the brain or spinal cord; without nerve stimulation, the muscles atrophy, becoming weak, floppy and poorly controlled, and finally completely paralyzed. Maximum paralysis progresses rapidly (two to four days), and usually involves fever and muscle pain. Deep tendon reflexes are also affected, and are typically absent or diminished; sensation (the ability to feel) in the paralyzed limbs, however, is not affected.

Question: Would it be helpful to polio patients for researchers to develop a treatment that rehabilitated nerve cells?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a treatment that sent artificial impulses to muscles be useful to a patient with polio?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that polio patients will become paralyzed as the disease progresses?
Answer: YES
Passage: Spinal polio, the most common form of paralytic poliomyelitis, results from viral invasion of the motor neurons of the anterior horn cells, or the ventral (front) grey matter section in the spinal column, which are responsible for movement of the muscles, including those of the trunk, limbs, and the intercostal muscles. Virus invasion causes inflammation of the nerve cells, leading to damage or destruction of motor neuron ganglia. When spinal neurons die, Wallerian degeneration takes place, leading to weakness of those muscles formerly innervated by the now-dead neurons. With the destruction of nerve cells, the muscles receive some signals from the brain or spinal cord however there is no control over the strength of the stimulation; without nerve stimulation, the muscles atrophy, becoming weak, floppy and poorly controlled, and finally completely paralyzed. Maximum paralysis progresses rapidly (two to four days), and usually involves fever and muscle pain. Deep tendon reflexes are also affected, and are typically absent or diminished; sensation (the ability to feel) in the paralyzed limbs, however, is not affected.

Question: Would it be helpful to polio patients for researchers to develop a treatment that rehabilitated nerve cells?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that polio patients will become paralyzed as the disease progresses?
Answer: YES
Passage: Spinal polio, the most common form of paralytic poliomyelitis, results from viral invasion of the motor neurons of the anterior horn cells, or the ventral (front) grey matter section in the spinal column, which are responsible for movement of the muscles, including those of the trunk, limbs, and the intercostal muscles. Virus invasion causes inflammation of the nerve cells, leading to damage or destruction of motor neuron ganglia. When spinal neurons die, Wallerian degeneration takes place, leading to weakness of those muscles formerly innervated by the now-dead neurons. Despite the destruction of nerve cells, the muscles continue to receive signals from the brain or spinal cord but rather erratically; with erratic nerve stimulation, the muscles are continuously tightened, and then become weak, floppy and poorly controlled, but rarely lead to paralysis. In rare cases, maximum paralysis progresses rapidly (two to four days), and usually involves fever and muscle pain. Deep tendon reflexes are also affected, and are typically absent or diminished; sensation (the ability to feel) in the paralyzed limbs, however, is not affected.

Question: Is it likely that polio patients will become paralyzed as the disease progresses?
Answer: NO
Passage: Until the establishment of the Second Spanish Republic in 1931, Spain used both single-member and multi-member constituencies in general elections. Multi-member constituencies were only used in some big cities. Some gerrymandering examples included the districts of Vilademuls or Torroella de Montgrí in Catalonia. These districts were created in order to prevent the Federal Democratic Republican Party to win a seat in Figueres or La Bisbal and to secure a seat to the dynastic parties. Since 1931, the constituency boundaries match the province boundaries.

Question: Is it likely that the Federal Democratic Republican Party and dynastic parties were aligned politically?
Answer: NO

Question: Is there reason to believe that the gerrymandering was done by people who were in favor of the Federal Democratic Republican Party?
Answer: NO

Question: If no gerrymandering had taken place, is there a good chance that the dynastic parties would have won more seats?
Answer: NO
Passage: Until the establishment of the Second Spanish Republic in 1931, Spain used both single-member and multi-member constituencies in general elections. Multi-member constituencies were only used in some big cities. Some gerrymandering examples included the districts of Vilademuls or Torroella de Montgrí in Catalonia. These districts were created in order to stop the Federal Democratic Republican Party from winning a seat in Figueres or La Bisbal and to secure a seat to the dynastic parties. Since 1931, the constituency boundaries match the province boundaries.

Question: Is it likely that the Federal Democratic Republican Party and dynastic parties were aligned politically?
Answer: NO

Question: Is there reason to believe that the gerrymandering was done by people who were in favor of the Federal Democratic Republican Party?
Answer: NO

Question: If no gerrymandering had taken place, is there a good chance that the dynastic parties would have won more seats?
Answer: NO
Passage: Until the establishment of the Second Spanish Republic in 1931, Spain used both single-member and multi-member constituencies in general elections. Multi-member constituencies were only used in some big cities. Some gerrymandering examples included the districts of Vilademuls or Torroella de Montgrí in Catalonia. These districts were created in order to help the Federal Democratic Republican Party to win a seat in Figueres or La Bisbal and to prevent a seat going to the dynastic parties. Since 1931, the constituency boundaries match the province boundaries.

Question: Is it likely that the Federal Democratic Republican Party and dynastic parties were aligned politically?
Answer: NO

Question: Is there reason to believe that the gerrymandering was done by people who were in favor of the Federal Democratic Republican Party?
Answer: YES

Question: If no gerrymandering had taken place, is there a good chance that the dynastic parties would have won more seats?
Answer: YES
Passage: Until the establishment of the Second Spanish Republic in 1931, Spain used both single-member and multi-member constituencies in general elections. Multi-member constituencies were only used in some big cities. Some gerrymandering examples included the districts of Vilademuls or Torroella de Montgrí in Catalonia. These districts were created in order to allow the Federal Democratic Republican Party to win a seat in Figueres or La Bisbal and to secure a seat to the dynastic parties. Since 1931, the constituency boundaries match the province boundaries.

Question: Is it likely that the Federal Democratic Republican Party and dynastic parties were aligned politically?
Answer: YES

Question: Is there reason to believe that the gerrymandering was done by people who were in favor of the Federal Democratic Republican Party?
Answer: YES

Question: If no gerrymandering had taken place, is there a good chance that the dynastic parties would have won more seats?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the mid-1990s, Walmart tried with a large financial investment to get a foothold in the German retail market. In 1997, Walmart took over the supermarket chain Wertkauf with its 21 stores for DM 750 million and the following year Walmart acquired 74 Interspar stores for DM 1.3 billion. The German market at this point was an oligopoly with high competition among companies which used a similar low price strategy as Walmart. As a result, Walmart's low price strategy yielded no competitive advantage. Walmart's corporate culture was not viewed positively among employees and customers, particularly Walmart's "statement of ethics", which attempted to restrict relationships between employees, a possible violation of German labor law, and led to a public discussion in the media, resulting in a bad reputation among customers. In July 2006, Walmart announced its withdrawal from Germany due to sustained losses. The stores were sold to the German company Metro during Walmart's fiscal third quarter. Walmart did not disclose its losses from its German investment, but they were estimated to be around 3 billion.

Question: Would a German shopper still consider shopping at Walmart instead of a German chain?
Answer: NO

Question: Should Walmart have attempted other marketing strategies to gain a competitive edge in Germany?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Walmart consider adding stores in Germany in the future?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the mid-1990s, Walmart tried with a large financial investment to get a foothold in the German retail market. In 1997, Walmart took over the supermarket chain Wertkauf with its 21 stores for DM 750 million and the following year Walmart acquired 74 Interspar stores for DM 1.3 billion. The German market at this point was an oligopoly with high competition among companies which used a similar low price strategy as Walmart. As a result, Walmart's low price strategy never yielded competitive advantage. Walmart's corporate culture was not viewed positively among employees and customers, particularly Walmart's "statement of ethics", which attempted to restrict relationships between employees, a possible violation of German labor law, and led to a public discussion in the media, resulting in a bad reputation among customers. In July 2006, Walmart announced its withdrawal from Germany due to sustained losses. The stores were sold to the German company Metro during Walmart's fiscal third quarter. Walmart did not disclose its losses from its German investment, but they were estimated to be around 3 billion.

Question: Would a German shopper still consider shopping at Walmart instead of a German chain?
Answer: NO

Question: Should Walmart have attempted other marketing strategies to gain a competitive edge in Germany?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Walmart consider adding stores in Germany in the future?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the mid-1990s, Walmart tried with a large financial investment to get a foothold in the German retail market. In 1997, Walmart took over the supermarket chain Wertkauf with its 21 stores for DM 750 million and the following year Walmart acquired 74 Interspar stores for DM 1.3 billion. The German market at this point was an oligopoly with high competition among companies which used a similar low price strategy as Walmart. As a result of brand recognition, Walmart's low price strategy yielded significant competitive advantage. Walmart's corporate culture was viewed positively among employees and customers, particularly Walmart's "statement of ethics", which did not attempt to restrict relationships between employees, a possible violation of German labor law, and led to a public discussion in the media, resulting in a good reputation among customers. In July 2006, Walmart announced its expansion in Germany due to sustained income. The stores of the German company Metro were sold to Walmart during Walmart's fiscal third quarter. Walmart did not disclose its gains from its German investment, but they were estimated to be around 3 billion.

Question: Would a German shopper still consider shopping at Walmart instead of a German chain?
Answer: YES

Question: Should Walmart have attempted other marketing strategies to gain a competitive edge in Germany?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Walmart consider adding stores in Germany in the future?
Answer: YES
Passage: When the radiometer is heated in the absence of a light source, it turns in the forward direction (i.e. black sides trailing). If a person's hands are placed around the glass without touching it, the vanes will turn slowly or not at all, but if the glass is touched to warm it quickly, they will turn more noticeably. Directly heated glass gives off enough infrared radiation to turn the vanes, but glass blocks much of the far-infrared radiation from a source of warmth not in contact with it. However, near-infrared and visible light more easily penetrate the glass.

Question: Will the vanes of a radiometer spin more quickly if someone picks it up?
Answer: YES

Question: Are the vanes of a radiometer always spinning?
Answer: NO

Question: Would someone with warm hands cause the vanes to spin more rapidly than someone with cold hands?
Answer: YES
Passage: When the radiometer is heated in the absence of a light source, it turns in the forward direction (i.e. black sides trailing). If a person's hands are placed around the glass without touching it, the vanes will turn slowly or be completely still, but if the glass is touched to warm it quickly, they will turn more noticeably. Directly heated glass gives off enough infrared radiation to turn the vanes, but glass blocks much of the far-infrared radiation from a source of warmth not in contact with it. However, near-infrared and visible light more easily penetrate the glass.

Question: Will the vanes of a radiometer spin more quickly if someone picks it up?
Answer: YES

Question: Are the vanes of a radiometer always spinning?
Answer: NO

Question: Would someone with warm hands cause the vanes to spin more rapidly than someone with cold hands?
Answer: YES
Passage: When the radiometer is heated in the absence of a light source, it turns in the forward direction (i.e. black sides trailing). If a person's hands are placed around the glass without touching it, the vanes always turn slowly, and even if the glass is touched to warm it quickly, they will not at all turn more noticeably. Directly heated glass barely gives off enough infrared radiation to turn the vanes, and glass blocks most of the far-infrared radiation from a source of warmth not in contact with it. However, a visible light source more easily penetrates the glass.

Question: Will the vanes of a radiometer spin more quickly if someone picks it up?
Answer: NO

Question: Are the vanes of a radiometer always spinning?
Answer: YES

Question: Would someone with warm hands cause the vanes to spin more rapidly than someone with cold hands?
Answer: NO
Passage: When the radiometer is heated in the absence of a light source, it turns in the forward direction (i.e. black sides trailing). If a person's hands are placed around the glass without touching it, the vanes will turn slowly, but if the glass is touched to warm it quickly, they will turn more noticeably. Directly heated glass gives off enough infrared radiation to turn the vanes, and glass blocks much of the far-infrared radiation from a source of warmth not in contact with it. However, near-infrared and visible light more easily penetrate the glass.

Question: Will the vanes of a radiometer spin more quickly if someone picks it up?
Answer: YES

Question: Are the vanes of a radiometer always spinning?
Answer: YES

Question: Would someone with warm hands cause the vanes to spin more rapidly than someone with cold hands?
Answer: YES
Passage: As of 2013, there are 673 airports in Indonesia, 186 of those have paved runways, and 487 have unpaved runways. As of 2013, there are 76 heliports in Indonesia. Jakarta's Soekarno–Hatta International Airport serves as the country's main air transportation hub as well as the nation's busiest. Since 2010, it has become the busiest airport in Southeast Asia, surpassing Suvarnabhumi and Changi airports. In 2017, it became the 17th busiest airport in the world with 62.1 million passengers.

Question: If someone was to take an aerial tour of Indonesia, visiting multiple airports along the way, would they expect to fly in a rugged, propeller driven craft for most of legs of their journey?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the majority of Indonesia's airports need to employ workers or systems to carefully sweep all foreign objects and debris (however small) from the runways to prevent damage to sensitive jet engines of modern airliners?
Answer: NO

Question: If a heavy rainstorm struck a randomly-selected airport in Indonesia, and runway repairs were required, would this facility be statistically more likely to be relying on a bulldozer or a cement mixer to smooth out any holes or cracks?
Answer: bulldozer