lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Students were, as of 2019, paid an hourly wage from $5.60 to $8.60 by the college, based on the WLS ("Work, Learning, and Service") level attached to individual labor positions. The college regularly increases student pay on a yearly basis, but it has never been equivalent to the federal minimum wage in the school's history. Because of the scheduling demands of both an academic requirement and a labor requirement, students are not allowed to work at off-campus jobs.

Question: Would a student working at the college be likely to make less than a student making minimum wage at a grocery store?
Answer: YES

Question: Should a student working at the college in 2018 expect to make more than they made working there in 2017?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a student working at the college be likely to make more than a student making minimum wage at a grocery store?
Answer: NO
Passage: Students were, as of 2019, paid an hourly wage from $5.60 to $8.60 by the college, based on the WLS ("Work, Learning, and Service") level attached to individual labor positions. The college regularly increases student pay on a yearly basis, but it has always declined to match the federal minimum wage throughout the school's history. Because of the scheduling demands of both an academic requirement and a labor requirement, students are not allowed to work at off-campus jobs.

Question: Would a student working at the college be likely to make less than a student making minimum wage at a grocery store?
Answer: YES

Question: Should a student working at the college in 2018 expect to make more than they made working there in 2017?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a student working at the college be likely to make more than a student making minimum wage at a grocery store?
Answer: NO
Passage: Students were, as of 2019, paid an hourly wage from $5.60 to $8.60 by the college, based on the WLS ("Work, Learning, and Service") level attached to individual labor positions. The college never increases student pay on a regular basis, but it has always been equivalent to the federal minimum wage throughout the school's history. Because of the scheduling demands of both an academic requirement and a labor requirement, students are not allowed to work at off-campus jobs.

Question: Would a student working at the college be likely to make less than a student making minimum wage at a grocery store?
Answer: NO

Question: Should a student working at the college in 2018 expect to make more than they made working there in 2017?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a student working at the college be likely to make more than a student making minimum wage at a grocery store?
Answer: NO
Passage: Students were, as of 2019, paid an hourly wage from $5.60 to $8.60 by the college, based on the WLS ("Work, Learning, and Service") level attached to individual labor positions. The college regularly increases student pay on a yearly basis, and it has been equivalent to the federal minimum wage throughout the school's history. Because of the scheduling demands of both an academic requirement and a labor requirement, students are not allowed to work at off-campus jobs.

Question: Would a student working at the college be likely to make less than a student making minimum wage at a grocery store?
Answer: NO

Question: Should a student working at the college in 2018 expect to make more than they made working there in 2017?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a student working at the college be likely to make more than a student making minimum wage at a grocery store?
Answer: NO
Passage: Socialist systems are divided into non-market and market forms. Non-market socialism substitutes factor markets and money with integrated economic planning and engineering or technical criteria based on calculation performed in-kind, thereby producing a different economic mechanism that functions according to different economic laws and dynamics than those of capitalism. A non-market socialist system eliminates the inefficiencies and crises traditionally associated with capital accumulation and the profit system in capitalism. The socialist calculation debate, originated by the economic calculation problem, concerns the feasibility and methods of resource allocation for a planned socialist system. By contrast, market socialism retains the use of monetary prices, factor markets and in some cases the profit motive, with respect to the operation of socially owned enterprises and the allocation of capital goods between them. Profits generated by these firms would be controlled directly by the workforce of each firm or accrue to society at large in the form of a social dividend. Anarchism and libertarian socialism oppose the use of the state as a means to establish socialism, favouring decentralisation above all, whether to establish non-market socialism or market socialism.

Question: If a socialist politician gives a campaign speech talking about how the government should have a strong role in enacting socialism, are they likely an anarchist socialist?
Answer: NO

Question: If both an anarchist and libertarian socialist outline a plan to establish socialism in their country, are their plans likely to use similar methods?
Answer: YES

Question: If a socialist politician gives a campaign speech talking about how the government should have a strong role in enacting socialism, are they likely a libertarian socialist?
Answer: NO
Passage: Socialist systems are divided into non-market and market forms. Non-market socialism substitutes factor markets and money with integrated economic planning and engineering or technical criteria based on calculation performed in-kind, thereby producing a different economic mechanism that functions according to different economic laws and dynamics than those of capitalism. A non-market socialist system eliminates the inefficiencies and crises traditionally associated with capital accumulation and the profit system in capitalism. The socialist calculation debate, originated by the economic calculation problem, concerns the feasibility and methods of resource allocation for a planned socialist system. By contrast, market socialism retains the use of monetary prices, factor markets and in some cases the profit motive, with respect to the operation of socially owned enterprises and the allocation of capital goods between them. Profits generated by these firms would be controlled directly by the workforce of each firm or accrue to society at large in the form of a social dividend. Anarchism and libertarian socialism protest the use of the state as a means to establish socialism, favouring decentralisation above all, whether to establish non-market socialism or market socialism.

Question: If a socialist politician gives a campaign speech talking about how the government should have a strong role in enacting socialism, are they likely an anarchist socialist?
Answer: NO

Question: If both an anarchist and libertarian socialist outline a plan to establish socialism in their country, are their plans likely to use similar methods?
Answer: YES

Question: If a socialist politician gives a campaign speech talking about how the government should have a strong role in enacting socialism, are they likely a libertarian socialist?
Answer: NO
Passage: Socialist systems are divided into non-market and market forms. Non-market socialism substitutes factor markets and money with integrated economic planning and engineering or technical criteria based on calculation performed in-kind, thereby producing a different economic mechanism that functions according to different economic laws and dynamics than those of capitalism. A non-market socialist system eliminates the inefficiencies and crises traditionally associated with capital accumulation and the profit system in capitalism. The socialist calculation debate, originated by the economic calculation problem, concerns the feasibility and methods of resource allocation for a planned socialist system. By contrast, market socialism retains the use of monetary prices, factor markets and in some cases the profit motive, with respect to the operation of socially owned enterprises and the allocation of capital goods between them. Profits generated by these firms would be controlled directly by the workforce of each firm or accrue to society at large in the form of a social dividend. Anarchism, but not libertarian, socialism opposes the use of the state as a means to establish socialism, with anarchism favouring decentralisation above all, whether to establish non-market socialism or market socialism.

Question: If a socialist politician gives a campaign speech talking about how the government should have a strong role in enacting socialism, are they likely an anarchist socialist?
Answer: NO

Question: If both an anarchist and libertarian socialist outline a plan to establish socialism in their country, are their plans likely to use similar methods?
Answer: NO

Question: If a socialist politician gives a campaign speech talking about how the government should have a strong role in enacting socialism, are they likely a libertarian socialist?
Answer: YES
Passage: After taking back the series from Image Comics, Mirage Studios resumed publication of a fourth volume in December 2001, under the simple title "TMNT". After the publication of issue number 28, writer Peter Laird placed the series on an eight-month hiatus to devote himself to production of the 2007 "TMNT" movie. However, after that eight months had passed, Mirage's official website went on to list the series as in "indefinite hiatus". In January 2008, Mirage had finally confirmed that the series would return in May 2008. Issues 29 and 30 had a limited printing of 1,000 copies each, and were available through the official TMNT website. Although the purchase agreement with Nickelodeon allows Laird to produce up to 18 comics a year set in the original Mirage continuity, no new material was released in the next few years. The latest issue of TMNT volume 4 was issue #32 which came out in print May 4, 2014, and online on May 9, 2014, almost 4 years after issue #31 was last released.

Question: Does the passage suggest that Laird had written a story arc into the fourth volume of the TNMT comics, that he was somewhat eager to get back to once he could again concentrate on writing, rather than on contract negotiations?
Answer: NO

Question: After the sale to Nickelodeon was finalized, would Laird's publishing schedule have exceeded the regular pace of one new issue per month?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like Laird himself had simply lost his enthusiasm for the Ninja-Turtles comic franchise by the time that he had sold to Nickelodeon, as evidenced by the production schedule thereafter?
Answer: YES
Passage: After taking back the series from Image Comics, Mirage Studios resumed publication of a fourth volume in December 2001, under the simple title "TMNT". After the publication of issue number 28, writer Peter Laird placed the series on an eight-month hiatus to devote himself to production of the 2007 "TMNT" movie. However, after that eight months had passed, Mirage's official website went on to list the series as in "indefinite hiatus". In January 2008, Mirage had finally confirmed that the series would return in May 2008. Issues 29 and 30 had a limited printing of 1,000 copies each, and were available through the official TMNT website. Laird's agreement with Nickelodeon to finalize the sale allowed him to continue the original Mirage continuity with no more than 18 comics each year, but he did not release any new content in the following few years. The latest issue of TMNT volume 4 was issue #32 which came out in print May 4, 2014, and online on May 9, 2014, almost 4 years after issue #31 was last released.

Question: Does the passage suggest that Laird had written a story arc into the fourth volume of the TNMT comics, that he was somewhat eager to get back to once he could again concentrate on writing, rather than on contract negotiations?
Answer: NO

Question: After the sale to Nickelodeon was finalized, would Laird's publishing schedule have exceeded the regular pace of one new issue per month?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like Laird himself had simply lost his enthusiasm for the Ninja-Turtles comic franchise by the time that he had sold to Nickelodeon, as evidenced by the production schedule thereafter?
Answer: YES
Passage: After taking back the series from Image Comics, Mirage Studios resumed publication of a fourth volume in December 2001, under the simple title "TMNT". After the publication of issue number 28, writer Peter Laird placed the series on an eight-month hiatus to devote himself to production of the 2007 "TMNT" movie. However, after that eight months had passed, Mirage's official website went on to list the series as in "indefinite hiatus". In January 2008, Mirage had finally confirmed that the series would return in May 2008. Issues 29 and 30 had a limited printing of 1,000 copies each, and were available through the official TMNT website. Although the purchase agreement with Nickelodeon allows Laird to produce up to 18 comics a year set in the original Mirage continuity, in no year after the deal was more than a dozen new comics released. The latest issue of the Mirage Continuity was Volume 6 issue #32 which came out in print May 4, 2014, and online on May 9, 2014.

Question: After the sale to Nickelodeon was finalized, would Laird's publishing schedule have exceeded the regular pace of one new issue per month?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like Laird himself had simply lost his enthusiasm for the Ninja-Turtles comic franchise by the time that he had sold to Nickelodeon, as evidenced by the production schedule thereafter?
Answer: NO
Passage: After taking back the series from Image Comics, Mirage Studios resumed publication of a fourth volume in December 2001, under the simple title "TMNT". After the publication of issue number 28, writer Peter Laird placed the series on an eight-month hiatus to devote himself to production of the 2007 "TMNT" movie. However, after that eight months had passed, Mirage's official website went on to list the series as in "indefinite hiatus". In January 2008, Mirage had finally confirmed that the series would return in May 2008. Issues 29 and 30 had a limited printing of 1,000 copies each, and were available through the official TMNT website. The purchase agreement with Nickelodeon allowed Laird to produce up to 18 comics a year set in the original Mirage continuity, and he produced at that rate as soon as he was able to after being consumed with the negotiations. The latest issue of TMNT volume 5 was issue #36 which came out in print May 4, 2010, and online on May 9, 2010.

Question: Does the passage suggest that Laird had written a story arc into the fourth volume of the TNMT comics, that he was somewhat eager to get back to once he could again concentrate on writing, rather than on contract negotiations?
Answer: YES

Question: After the sale to Nickelodeon was finalized, would Laird's publishing schedule have exceeded the regular pace of one new issue per month?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like Laird himself had simply lost his enthusiasm for the Ninja-Turtles comic franchise by the time that he had sold to Nickelodeon, as evidenced by the production schedule thereafter?
Answer: NO
Passage: Jack Iyerak Anawak, member of Parliament from Nunatsiaq (the electoral district representing what is now the territory of Nunavut), suggested the name "Nanuq" [nanook, polar bear] in honour of Canada's Inuit people and their northern culture; however, this proposal went largely unnoticed beside the popular "toonie".

Question: If a tourist asked a person in Nunavut where they could find a Nanuq, would that person be momentarily unsure if the tourist was referring to a coin or a bear?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a Canadian with hearing difficulties have trouble understanding if someone was referring to a one dollar coin by its nickname, "loonie", as opposed to a two dollar coin?
Answer: YES

Question: Would "nanuq" be considered an English word today?
Answer: NO
Passage: Jack Iyerak Anawak, member of Parliament from Nunatsiaq (the electoral district representing what is now the territory of Nunavut), suggested the name "Nanuq" [nanook, polar bear] in honour of Canada's Inuit people and their northern culture; however, this proposal was largely neglected beside the popular "toonie".

Question: If a tourist asked a person in Nunavut where they could find a Nanuq, would that person be momentarily unsure if the tourist was referring to a coin or a bear?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a Canadian with hearing difficulties have trouble understanding if someone was referring to a one dollar coin by its nickname, "loonie", as opposed to a two dollar coin?
Answer: YES

Question: Would "nanuq" be considered an English word today?
Answer: NO
Passage: Jack Iyerak Anawak, member of Parliament from Nunatsiaq (the electoral district representing what is now the territory of Nunavut), suggested the name "Nanuq" [nanook, polar bear] in honour of Canada's Inuit people and their northern culture; this proposal became highly popular, eclipsing the comparatively unnoticed "toonie".

Question: If a tourist asked a person in Nunavut where they could find a Nanuq, would that person be momentarily unsure if the tourist was referring to a coin or a bear?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a Canadian with hearing difficulties have trouble understanding if someone was referring to a one dollar coin by its nickname, "loonie", as opposed to a two dollar coin?
Answer: NO

Question: Would "nanuq" be considered an English word today?
Answer: YES
Passage: Jack Iyerak Anawak, member of Parliament from Nunatsiaq (the electoral district representing what is now the territory of Nunavut), suggested the name "Nanuq" [nanook, polar bear] in honour of Canada's Inuit people and their northern culture; this proposal was nearly as popular as "toonie", and both terms ended up being adopted.

Question: If a tourist asked a person in Nunavut where they could find a Nanuq, would that person be momentarily unsure if the tourist was referring to a coin or a bear?
Answer: YES

Question: Would "nanuq" be considered an English word today?
Answer: YES
Passage: The "town" of Rønne after the merger of the island's administrative entities 1 January 2003 reached a low point of 13,568 inhabitants 1 January 2014. 15,957 people in 1965 (date unknown;number not registerbased) lived in the two parishes that would become Rønne municipality from 1 April 1970. In the table, numbers for Rønne are for the parish of Rønne, Rønne Sogn, alone. Year unknown, but between 2000 and 2005. It does not include Knudsker Sogn, which was also a part of Rønne Municipality. Other localities (with approximate populations, not updated) include Aarsballe (86), Arnager (151), Olsker (67), Rutsker (64), Rø (181), Stenseby (?) and Vang (92). In 2010 and 2018 10,297 and 9,111 respectively lived in rural districts, and 88 and 71 had no fixed address. A rural district is defined by Statistics Denmark as a settlement with less than 200 inhabitants.

Question: If there was an unexpectedly high birth rate, or an unusual influx of new residents migrating into Knudsker Sogn in 2014, would this have helped Rønne municipality's population rebound from its low point?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that Knudsker Sogn would be found along with the other localities in this passage, on a list of areas whose populations are not regularly updated?
Answer: YES
Passage: The "town" of Rønne after the merger of the island's administrative entities 1 January 2003 reached a low point of 13,568 inhabitants 1 January 2014. 15,957 people in 1965 (date unknown;number not registerbased) lived in the two parishes that would become Rønne municipality from 1 April 1970. In the table, numbers for Rønne are for the parish of Rønne, Rønne Sogn, alone. Year unknown, but between 2000 and 2005. Knudsker Sogn, which was part of Rønne Municipality was excluded from the merger. Other localities (with approximate populations, not updated) include Aarsballe (86), Arnager (151), Olsker (67), Rutsker (64), Rø (181), Stenseby (?) and Vang (92). In 2010 and 2018 10,297 and 9,111 respectively lived in rural districts, and 88 and 71 had no fixed address. A rural district is defined by Statistics Denmark as a settlement with less than 200 inhabitants.

Question: If there was an unexpectedly high birth rate, or an unusual influx of new residents migrating into Knudsker Sogn in 2014, would this have helped Rønne municipality's population rebound from its low point?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that Knudsker Sogn would be found along with the other localities in this passage, on a list of areas whose populations are not regularly updated?
Answer: YES
Passage: The "town" of Rønne after the merger of the island's two major administrative entities on 1 January 2003 reached a low point of 13,568 inhabitants 1 January 2014. 15,957 people in 1965 (date unknown;number not registerbased) lived in the two parishes that would become Rønne municipality from 1 April 1970. In the table, numbers for Rønne are for the parish of Rønne, Rønne Sogn, alone. Year unknown, but between 2000 and 2005. It includes Knudsker Sogn, which was not originally a part of the parishes that became Rønne Municipality. Other localities (with approximate populations, not updated) include Aarsballe (86), Arnager (151), Olsker (67), Rutsker (64), Rø (181), Stenseby (?) and Vang (92). In 2010 and 2018 10,297 and 9,111 respectively lived in rural districts, and 88 and 71 had no fixed address. A rural district is defined by Statistics Denmark as a settlement with less than 200 inhabitants.

Question: If there was an unexpectedly high birth rate, or an unusual influx of new residents migrating into Knudsker Sogn in 2014, would this have helped Rønne municipality's population rebound from its low point?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that Knudsker Sogn would be found along with the other localities in this passage, on a list of areas whose populations are not regularly updated?
Answer: NO
Passage: The "town" of Rønne after the merger of the island's administrative entities and some smaller areas on 1 January 2003 reached a low point of 13,568 inhabitants 1 January 2014. 15,957 people in 1965 (date unknown;number not registerbased) lived in the two parishes that would become Rønne municipality from 1 April 1970. In the table, numbers for Rønne are for the parish of Rønne, Rønne Sogn, alone. Year unknown, but between 2000 and 2005. It includes Knudsker Sogn, which was also a part of the merger that made up Rønne Municipality. Other localities (with approximate populations, not updated) include Aarsballe (86), Arnager (151), Olsker (67), Rutsker (64), Rø (181), Stenseby (?) and Vang (92). In 2010 and 2018 10,297 and 9,111 respectively lived in rural districts, and 88 and 71 had no fixed address. A rural district is defined by Statistics Denmark as a settlement with less than 200 inhabitants.

Question: Would it be fair to use the phrase "merger of equals" to describe the formation of Rønne municipality, since it was made up of just two roughly similar parishes?
Answer: NO

Question: If there was an unexpectedly high birth rate, or an unusual influx of new residents migrating into Knudsker Sogn in 2014, would this have helped Rønne municipality's population rebound from its low point?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that Knudsker Sogn would be found along with the other localities in this passage, on a list of areas whose populations are not regularly updated?
Answer: NO