lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Bones consist of living cells (osteoblasts and osteocytes) embedded in a mineralized organic matrix. The primary inorganic component of human bone is hydroxyapatite, the dominant bone mineral, having the nominal composition of Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2. The organic components of this matrix consist mainly of type I collagen—"organic" referring to materials produced as a result of the human body—and inorganic components, which alongside the dominant hydroxyapatite phase, include other compounds of calcium and phosphate including salts. The non-carbon-based phase makes up the majority of the acellular component of bones, contributing to approximately 70% of its mass, while organic matter makes up the remaining 30%. The collagen fibers give bone its tensile strength, and the interspersed crystals of hydroxyapatite give bone its compressive strength. These effects are synergistic. The exact composition of the matrix may be subject to change over time due to nutrition and biomineralization, with the ratio of calcium to phosphate varying between 1.3 and 2.0 (per weight), and trace minerals such as magnesium, sodium, potassium and carbonate also being found.

Question: Does the passage suggest that when a person dies, and their body stops replenishing the living bone tissue, that more than half of the bone mass would still remain after the body decays?
Answer: YES

Question: From this passage, can you conclude that bones (at least when measured by mass) are primarily carbon-based, just like the rest of a living being would presumably be?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that the inorganic portion of a bone is essentially just a framework upon which the majority of the tissue's mass, the organic tissue, is built?
Answer: NO
Passage: Bones consist of living cells (osteoblasts and osteocytes) embedded in a mineralized organic matrix. The primary inorganic component of human bone is hydroxyapatite, the dominant matrix mineral, having the nominal composition of Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2. The organic components of this matrix consist mainly of type I collagen—"organic" referring to materials produced as a result of the human body—and inorganic components, which alongside the dominant hydroxyapatite phase, include other compounds of calcium and phosphate including salts. Approximately 30% of the acellular component of bone is attributed to the inorganic phase, while roughly 70% by mass consists of organic matter. The collagen fibers give bone its tensile strength, and the interspersed crystals of hydroxyapatite give bone its compressive strength. These effects are synergistic. The exact composition of the matrix may be subject to change over time due to nutrition and biomineralization, with the ratio of calcium to phosphate varying between 1.3 and 2.0 (per weight), and trace minerals such as magnesium, sodium, potassium and carbonate also being found.

Question: Does the passage suggest that when a person dies, and their body stops replenishing the living bone tissue, that more than half of the bone mass would still remain after the body decays?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage, can you conclude that bones (at least when measured by mass) are primarily carbon-based, just like the rest of a living being would presumably be?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that the inorganic portion of a bone is essentially just a framework upon which the majority of the tissue's mass, the organic tissue, is built?
Answer: YES
Passage: Bones consist of living cells (osteoblasts and osteocytes) embedded in a mineralized organic matrix. The primary inorganic component of human bone is hydroxyapatite, the dominant bone mineral, having the nominal composition of Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2. The organic components of this matrix consist mainly of type I collagen—"organic" referring to materials produced as a result of the human body—and inorganic components, which alongside the dominant hydroxyapatite phase, include other compounds of calcium and phosphate including salts. Approximately 70% of the acellular component of bone consists of organic matter, while roughly 30% by mass is attributed to the mineral matrix and the other compounds. The collagen fibers give bone its tensile strength, and the interspersed crystals of hydroxyapatite give bone its compressive strength. These effects are synergistic. The exact composition of the matrix may be subject to change over time due to nutrition and biomineralization, with the ratio of calcium to phosphate varying between 1.3 and 2.0 (per weight), and trace minerals such as magnesium, sodium, potassium and carbonate also being found.

Question: Does the passage suggest that when a person dies, and their body stops replenishing the living bone tissue, that more than half of the bone mass would still remain after the body decays?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage, can you conclude that bones (at least when measured by mass) are primarily carbon-based, just like the rest of a living being would presumably be?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that the inorganic portion of a bone is essentially just a framework upon which the majority of the tissue's mass, the organic tissue, is built?
Answer: YES
Passage: Jeppesen demonstrated early musical talent at age 10 when he was first encouraged by Hakon Andersen and Paul Hellmuth, although he was largely self-taught. Completing primary education in 1911, he first worked in Elbing and Liegnitz (Eastern Germany) as an opera coach and conductor. He found employment in Berlin in 1914, but returned to Denmark because of the outbreak of war. In Copenhagen he became a pupil of prominent Danish composers Carl Nielsen and Thomas Laub, and studied musicology at Copenhagen University with Angul Hammerich. He passed the organist exam at the Royal Danish Conservatory of music in 1916. Owing to Hammerich's retirement, there was nobody on the faculty of the university to examine Jeppesen's work; therefore, he submitted his dissertation to the University of Vienna, where it was reviewed by Guido Adler and Jeppesen was awarded a doctorate in 1922.

Question: Did Jeppesen likely regret his decision to send his dissertation to the University of Vienna instead of Copenhagen University?
Answer: NO

Question: At the end of 1922, would anybody at the University of Vienna have been able to explain what Jeppesen's dissertation was about?
Answer: YES

Question: After Hammerich's retirement, were the restrooms in his former department at Copenhagen University likely very busy?
Answer: NO
Passage: Jeppesen demonstrated early musical talent at age 10 when he was first encouraged by Hakon Andersen and Paul Hellmuth, although he was largely self-taught. Completing primary education in 1911, he first worked in Elbing and Liegnitz (Eastern Germany) as an opera coach and conductor. He found employment in Berlin in 1914, but returned to Denmark because of the outbreak of war. In Copenhagen he became a pupil of prominent Danish composers Carl Nielsen and Thomas Laub, and studied musicology at Copenhagen University with Angul Hammerich. He passed the organist exam at the Royal Danish Conservatory of music in 1916. Owing to Hammerich's retirement, the faculty of the university was empty of people who could examine Jeppesen's work; therefore, he submitted his dissertation to the University of Vienna, where it was reviewed by Guido Adler and Jeppesen was awarded a doctorate in 1922.

Question: Did Jeppesen likely regret his decision to send his dissertation to the University of Vienna instead of Copenhagen University?
Answer: NO

Question: At the end of 1922, would anybody at the University of Vienna have been able to explain what Jeppesen's dissertation was about?
Answer: YES

Question: After Hammerich's retirement, were the restrooms in his former department at Copenhagen University likely very busy?
Answer: NO
Passage: Jeppesen demonstrated early musical talent at age 10 when he was first encouraged by Hakon Andersen and Paul Hellmuth, although he was largely self-taught. Completing primary education in 1911, he first worked in Elbing and Liegnitz (Eastern Germany) as an opera coach and conductor. He found employment in Berlin in 1914, but returned to Denmark because of the outbreak of war. In Copenhagen he became a pupil of prominent Danish composers Carl Nielsen and Thomas Laub, and studied musicology at Copenhagen University with Angul Hammerich. He passed the organist exam at the Royal Danish Conservatory of music in 1916. Despite Hammerich's retirement, there were plenty of people on the faculty of the university to examine Jeppesen's work; however, he submitted his dissertation to the University of Vienna instead, where it was reviewed by nobody and Jeppesen was refused a doctorate in 1922.

Question: Did Jeppesen likely regret his decision to send his dissertation to the University of Vienna instead of Copenhagen University?
Answer: YES

Question: At the end of 1922, would anybody at the University of Vienna have been able to explain what Jeppesen's dissertation was about?
Answer: NO

Question: After Hammerich's retirement, were the restrooms in his former department at Copenhagen University likely very busy?
Answer: YES
Passage: Jeppesen demonstrated early musical talent at age 10 when he was first encouraged by Hakon Andersen and Paul Hellmuth, although he was largely self-taught. Completing primary education in 1911, he first worked in Elbing and Liegnitz (Eastern Germany) as an opera coach and conductor. He found employment in Berlin in 1914, but returned to Denmark because of the outbreak of war. In Copenhagen he became a pupil of prominent Danish composers Carl Nielsen and Thomas Laub, and studied musicology at Copenhagen University with Angul Hammerich. He passed the organist exam at the Royal Danish Conservatory of music in 1916. Despite Hammerich's retirement, there were plenty of people on the faculty of the university to examine Jeppesen's work; however, he submitted his dissertation to the University of Vienna instead, where it was reviewed by Guido Adler and Jeppesen was awarded a doctorate in 1922.

Question: Did Jeppesen likely regret his decision to send his dissertation to the University of Vienna instead of Copenhagen University?
Answer: NO

Question: At the end of 1922, would anybody at the University of Vienna have been able to explain what Jeppesen's dissertation was about?
Answer: YES

Question: After Hammerich's retirement, were the restrooms in his former department at Copenhagen University likely very busy?
Answer: YES
Passage: Lee also received reinforcements. Confederate President Jefferson Davis directed Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard to send the division of Maj. Gen. Robert F. Hoke, over 7,000 men, from below the James River. (The first troops of Hoke's division arrived at Old Cold Harbor on May 31, but were unable to prevent the Union cavalry from seizing the intersection.) With these additional troops, and by managing to replace many of his 20,000 casualties to that point in the campaign, Lee's Army of Northern Virginia had 59,000 men to contend with Meade's and Grant's 108,000. But the disparity in numbers was no longer what it had been—Grant's reinforcements were often raw recruits and heavy artillery troops, pulled from the defenses of Washington, D.C., who were relatively inexperienced in infantry tactics, while most of Lee's had been veterans moved from inactive fronts, and who were soon entrenched in impressive fortifications.

Question: Did the first troops make it to Old Cold Harbor?
Answer: YES

Question: Did they manage to avoid the Union cavalry plans?
Answer: NO
Passage: Lee also received reinforcements. Confederate President Jefferson Davis directed Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard to send the division of Maj. Gen. Robert F. Hoke, over 7,000 men, from below the James River. (The first troops of Hoke's division arrived at Old Cold Harbor on May 31, but failed to prevent the Union cavalry from seizing the intersection.) With these additional troops, and by managing to replace many of his 20,000 casualties to that point in the campaign, Lee's Army of Northern Virginia had 59,000 men to contend with Meade's and Grant's 108,000. But the disparity in numbers was no longer what it had been—Grant's reinforcements were often raw recruits and heavy artillery troops, pulled from the defenses of Washington, D.C., who were relatively inexperienced in infantry tactics, while most of Lee's had been veterans moved from inactive fronts, and who were soon entrenched in impressive fortifications.

Question: Did the first troops make it to Old Cold Harbor?
Answer: YES

Question: Did they manage to avoid the Union cavalry plans?
Answer: NO
Passage: Lee also received reinforcements. Confederate President Jefferson Davis directed Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard to send the division of Maj. Gen. Robert F. Hoke, over 7,000 men, from below the James River. (The first troops of Hoke's division were unable to arrive at Old Cold Harbor on May 31, thus preventing the Union cavalry from seizing the intersection.) With these additional troops, and by managing to replace many of his 20,000 casualties to that point in the campaign, Lee's Army of Northern Virginia had 59,000 men to contend with Meade's and Grant's 108,000. But the disparity in numbers was no longer what it had been—Grant's reinforcements were often raw recruits and heavy artillery troops, pulled from the defenses of Washington, D.C., who were relatively inexperienced in infantry tactics, while most of Lee's had been veterans moved from inactive fronts, and who were soon entrenched in impressive fortifications.

Question: Did the first troops make it to Old Cold Harbor?
Answer: NO

Question: Did they manage to avoid the Union cavalry plans?
Answer: YES
Passage: Lee also received reinforcements. Confederate President Jefferson Davis directed Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard to send the division of Maj. Gen. Robert F. Hoke, over 7,000 men, from below the James River. (The first troops of Hoke's division arrived at Old Cold Harbor on May 31, and were able to prevent the Union cavalry from seizing the intersection.) With these additional troops, and by managing to replace many of his 20,000 casualties to that point in the campaign, Lee's Army of Northern Virginia had 59,000 men to contend with Meade's and Grant's 108,000. But the disparity in numbers was no longer what it had been—Grant's reinforcements were often raw recruits and heavy artillery troops, pulled from the defenses of Washington, D.C., who were relatively inexperienced in infantry tactics, while most of Lee's had been veterans moved from inactive fronts, and who were soon entrenched in impressive fortifications.

Question: Did the first troops make it to Old Cold Harbor?
Answer: YES
Passage: The cast had an unusual amount of freedom to suggest changes to the script. Grammer used an acting method he called "requisite disrespect" and did not rehearse with the others, instead learning and rehearsing his lines once just before filming each scene in front of a live studio audience. Although effective, the system often caused panic among guest stars.

Question: Is it possible that an actor who worked on this project might have entered into uncharted waters when she realized that she probably deserved partial writing credit for all of her helpful tips that were gleefully accepted by the producers?
Answer: YES

Question: Would you say that Grammer's solitary method was a high-risk tactic on this project, since he could easily have flubbed a line when his co-stars were expecting a certain rigidity to their own lines?
Answer: NO

Question: If, whether by accident or otherwise, Grammer himself had changed a word in one of his lines that completely altered the course of dialog on the set during filming, would his counterpart feel free to just improvise around the new subject matter, instead of calling for a second take, or trying to subtly correct him on camera?
Answer: YES
Passage: The cast enjoyed more than the commonly-expected amount of freedom when it came to suggesting script revisions. Grammer used an acting method he called "requisite disrespect" and did not rehearse with the others, instead learning and rehearsing his lines once just before filming each scene in front of a live studio audience. Although effective, the system often caused panic among guest stars.

Question: Is it possible that an actor who worked on this project might have entered into uncharted waters when she realized that she probably deserved partial writing credit for all of her helpful tips that were gleefully accepted by the producers?
Answer: YES

Question: Would you say that Grammer's solitary method was a high-risk tactic on this project, since he could easily have flubbed a line when his co-stars were expecting a certain rigidity to their own lines?
Answer: NO

Question: If, whether by accident or otherwise, Grammer himself had changed a word in one of his lines that completely altered the course of dialog on the set during filming, would his counterpart feel free to just improvise around the new subject matter, instead of calling for a second take, or trying to subtly correct him on camera?
Answer: YES
Passage: While cast rehearsals were unusual in their informality, the cast themselves nonetheless had no more than the standard amount of freedom to suggest changes to the script. Grammer used an acting method he called "requisite disrespect" and did not rehearse with the others, instead learning and rehearsing his lines once just before filming each scene in front of a live studio audience. Although effective, the system often caused panic among guest stars.

Question: Is it possible that an actor who worked on this project might have entered into uncharted waters when she realized that she probably deserved partial writing credit for all of her helpful tips that were gleefully accepted by the producers?
Answer: NO

Question: Would you say that Grammer's solitary method was a high-risk tactic on this project, since he could easily have flubbed a line when his co-stars were expecting a certain rigidity to their own lines?
Answer: YES

Question: If, whether by accident or otherwise, Grammer himself had changed a word in one of his lines that completely altered the course of dialog on the set during filming, would his counterpart feel free to just improvise around the new subject matter, instead of calling for a second take, or trying to subtly correct him on camera?
Answer: NO
Passage: The cast could rehearse or practice on their own schedules, yet lacked any level of freedom to suggest changes to the script. Grammer used an acting method he called "requisite disrespect" and did not rehearse with the others, instead learning and rehearsing his lines once just before filming each scene in front of a live studio audience. Although effective, the system often caused panic among guest stars.

Question: Is it possible that an actor who worked on this project might have entered into uncharted waters when she realized that she probably deserved partial writing credit for all of her helpful tips that were gleefully accepted by the producers?
Answer: NO

Question: Would you say that Grammer's solitary method was a high-risk tactic on this project, since he could easily have flubbed a line when his co-stars were expecting a certain rigidity to their own lines?
Answer: YES

Question: If, whether by accident or otherwise, Grammer himself had changed a word in one of his lines that completely altered the course of dialog on the set during filming, would his counterpart feel free to just improvise around the new subject matter, instead of calling for a second take, or trying to subtly correct him on camera?
Answer: NO
Passage: Many lowland Sinhalese converted to Christianity due to missionary campaigns by the Portuguese while the coastal Moors were religiously persecuted and forced to retreat to the Central highlands. The Buddhist majority disliked the Portuguese occupation and its influences, welcoming any power who might rescue them. When the Dutch captain Joris van Spilbergen landed in 1602, the king of Kandy appealed to him for help.

Question: If the Dutch wanted to take the area from the Portuguese, would they have the support of the Buddhists?
Answer: YES

Question: If the Dutch captain met with the Buddhists in the area, would he recognize some of their customs as similar to Portuguese ones?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the Buddhists have joined with the Portuguese had an invader that was attacking them both?
Answer: NO
Passage: Many lowland Sinhalese converted to Christianity due to missionary campaigns by the Portuguese while the coastal Moors were religiously persecuted and forced to retreat to the Central highlands. The Buddhist majority wanted to end the Portuguese occupation and its influences, welcoming any power who might rescue them. When the Dutch captain Joris van Spilbergen landed in 1602, the king of Kandy appealed to him for help.

Question: If the Dutch wanted to take the area from the Portuguese, would they have the support of the Buddhists?
Answer: YES

Question: If the Dutch captain met with the Buddhists in the area, would he recognize some of their customs as similar to Portuguese ones?
Answer: NO

Question: Would the Buddhists have joined with the Portuguese had an invader that was attacking them both?
Answer: NO
Passage: Many lowland Sinhalese converted to Christianity due to missionary campaigns by the Portuguese while the coastal Moors were religiously persecuted and forced to retreat to the Central highlands. The Buddhist majority dislike d the Portuguese occupation (while adopting some of its influences), welcoming any power who might rescue them. When the Dutch captain Joris van Spilbergen landed in 1602, the king of Kandy appealed to him for help.

Question: If the Dutch wanted to take the area from the Portuguese, would they have the support of the Buddhists?
Answer: YES

Question: If the Dutch captain met with the Buddhists in the area, would he recognize some of their customs as similar to Portuguese ones?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the Buddhists have joined with the Portuguese had an invader that was attacking them both?
Answer: NO
Passage: Many lowland Sinhalese converted to Christianity due to missionary campaigns by the Portuguese while the coastal Moors were religiously persecuted and forced to retreat to the Central highlands. The Buddhist majority liked the Portuguese occupation and its influences, rejecting any power who might rescue them. When the Dutch captain Joris van Spilbergen landed in 1602, the king of Kandy did not appeal to him for help.

Question: If the Dutch wanted to take the area from the Portuguese, would they have the support of the Buddhists?
Answer: NO

Question: If the Dutch captain met with the Buddhists in the area, would he recognize some of their customs as similar to Portuguese ones?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the Buddhists have joined with the Portuguese had an invader that was attacking them both?
Answer: YES
Passage: By early 1940, Italy was still a non-belligerent, and Mussolini communicated to Hitler that Italy was not prepared to intervene soon. By March 1940, Mussolini decided that Italy would intervene, but the date was not yet chosen. His senior military leadership unanimously opposed the action because Italy was unprepared. No raw materials had been stockpiled and the reserves it did have would soon be exhausted, Italy's industrial base was only one-tenth of Germany's, and even with supplies the Italian military was not organized to provide the equipment needed to fight a modern war of a long duration. An ambitious rearmament program was impossible because of Italy's limited reserves in gold and foreign currencies and lack of raw materials. Mussolini ignored the negative advice.

Question: Would Italy have a hard time providing firearms to their troops?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Italy likely have enough fighter planes to fight the enemy once it entered the war?
Answer: NO