lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Born into a working-class family, Nurmi left school at the age of twelve to provide for his family. In 1912, he was inspired by the Olympic feats of Hannes Kolehmainen and began developing a strict training program. Nurmi started to flourish during his military service, setting national records en route to his international debut at the 1920 Summer Olympics. After winning a silver medal in the 5000 m, he took gold in the 10,000 m and the cross country events. In 1923, Nurmi became the first runner to hold simultaneous world records in the mile, the 5000 m and the 10,000 m races, a feat which has never since been repeated. He set new world records for the 1500 m and the 5000 m with just an hour between the races, and took gold medals in both distances in less than two hours at the 1924 Olympics. Seemingly unaffected by the Paris heat wave, Nurmi won all his races and returned home with five gold medals, although he was frustrated that Finnish officials had refused to enter him for the 10,000 m.

Question: Did the warm temperatures cause Nurmi to leave Paris empty handed?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Nurmi perform as well in the hot atmosphere as he would have in a cooler atmosphere?
Answer: YES

Question: Were the warm temperatures responsible for Nurmi not participating in the 10,000 M?
Answer: NO
Passage: Born into a working-class family, Nurmi left school at the age of twelve to provide for his family. In 1912, he was inspired by the Olympic feats of Hannes Kolehmainen and began developing a strict training program. Nurmi started to flourish during his military service, setting national records en route to his international debut at the 1920 Summer Olympics. After winning a silver medal in the 5000 m, he took gold in the 10,000 m and the cross country events. In 1923, Nurmi became the first runner to hold simultaneous world records in the mile, the 5000 m and the 10,000 m races, a feat which has never since been repeated. He set new world records for the 1500 m and the 5000 m with just an hour between the races, and took gold medals in both distances in less than two hours at the 1924 Olympics. Seeming to be in his normal physical condition in the Paris heat wave, Nurmi won all his races and returned home with five gold medals, although he was frustrated that Finnish officials had refused to enter him for the 10,000 m.

Question: Did the warm temperatures cause Nurmi to leave Paris empty handed?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Nurmi perform as well in the hot atmosphere as he would have in a cooler atmosphere?
Answer: YES

Question: Were the warm temperatures responsible for Nurmi not participating in the 10,000 M?
Answer: NO
Passage: Born into a working-class family, Nurmi left school at the age of twelve to provide for his family. In 1912, he was inspired by the Olympic feats of Hannes Kolehmainen and began developing a strict training program. Nurmi started to flourish during his military service, setting national records en route to his international debut at the 1920 Summer Olympics. After winning a silver medal in the 5000 m, he took gold in the 10,000 m and the cross country events. In 1923, Nurmi became the first runner to hold simultaneous world records in the mile, the 5000 m and the 10,000 m races, a feat which has never since been repeated. He set new world records for the 1500 m and the 5000 m with just an hour between the races, and took gold medals in both distances in less than two hours at the 1924 Olympics. Participating during the Paris heat wave, Nurmi won all his races and returned home five gold medals, and he was emotionally unaffected by the Finnish officials' refusal to enter him for the 10,000 m.

Question: Did the warm temperatures cause Nurmi to leave Paris empty handed?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the warm temperatures responsible for Nurmi not participating in the 10,000 M?
Answer: NO
Passage: Born into a working-class family, Nurmi left school at the age of twelve to provide for his family. In 1912, he was inspired by the Olympic feats of Hannes Kolehmainen and began developing a strict training program. Nurmi started to flourish during his military service, setting national records en route to his international debut at the 1920 Summer Olympics. After winning a silver medal in the 5000 m, he took gold in the 10,000 m and the cross country events. In 1923, Nurmi became the first runner to hold simultaneous world records in the mile, the 5000 m and the 10,000 m races, a feat which has never since been repeated. He set new world records for the 1500 m and the 5000 m with just an hour between the races, and took gold medals in both distances in less than two hours at the 1924 Olympics. Seemingly affected by the Paris heat wave, Nurmi still won all his races and returned home with five gold medals, although he was frustrated that Finnish officials had refused to enter him for the 10,000 m.

Question: Did the warm temperatures cause Nurmi to leave Paris empty handed?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the warm temperatures responsible for Nurmi not participating in the 10,000 M?
Answer: NO
Passage: All these factors had given rise to a sharp loss of confidence in the regime, even within the ruling class, growing throughout the war. Early in 1916, Guchkov discussed with senior army officers and members of the Central War Industries Committee about a possible coup to force the abdication of the Tsar. In December, a small group of nobles assassinated Rasputin, and in January 1917 the Tsar's cousin, Grand Duke Nicholas, was asked indirectly by Prince Lvov whether he would be prepared to take over the throne from his nephew, Tsar Nicholas II. None of these incidents were in themselves the immediate cause of the February Revolution, but they do help to explain why the monarchy survived only a few days after it had broken out.

Question: If another noble had asked Prince Lvov if he was involved in a plot to overthrow the Tsar, would he likely have denied it?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Grand Duke Nicholas probably have described Count Lvov as "forward?"
Answer: NO
Passage: All these factors had given rise to a sharp loss of confidence in the regime, even within the ruling class, growing throughout the war. Early in 1916, Guchkov discussed with senior army officers and members of the Central War Industries Committee about a possible coup to force the abdication of the Tsar. In December, a small group of nobles assassinated Rasputin, and in January 1917 the Tsar's cousin, Grand Duke Nicholas, was asked in a roundabout way by Prince Lvov whether he would be prepared to take over the throne from his nephew, Tsar Nicholas II. None of these incidents were in themselves the immediate cause of the February Revolution, but they do help to explain why the monarchy survived only a few days after it had broken out.

Question: If another noble had asked Prince Lvov if he was involved in a plot to overthrow the Tsar, would he likely have denied it?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Grand Duke Nicholas probably have described Count Lvov as "forward?"
Answer: NO
Passage: All these factors had given rise to a sharp loss of confidence in the regime, even within the ruling class, growing throughout the war. Early in 1916, Guchkov discussed with senior army officers and members of the Central War Industries Committee about a possible coup to force the abdication of the Tsar. In December, a small group of nobles indirectly ordered the assassination of Rasputin, and in January 1917 the Tsar's cousin, Grand Duke Nicholas, was asked by Prince Lvov whether he would be prepared to take over the throne from his nephew, Tsar Nicholas II. None of these incidents were in themselves the immediate cause of the February Revolution, but they do help to explain why the monarchy survived only a few days after it had broken out.

Question: Is there reason to believe that the small group of nobles wanted to conceal their involvement with Rasputin's murder?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Grand Duke Nicholas probably have described Count Lvov as "forward?"
Answer: YES
Passage: All these factors had given rise to a sharp loss of confidence in the regime, even within the ruling class, growing throughout the war. Early in 1916, Guchkov discussed with senior army officers and members of the Central War Industries Committee about a possible coup to force the abdication of the Tsar. In December, a small group of nobles assassinated Rasputin, and in January 1917 the Tsar's cousin, Grand Duke Nicholas, was asked point blank by Prince Lvov whether he would be prepared to take over the throne from his nephew, Tsar Nicholas II. None of these incidents were in themselves the immediate cause of the February Revolution, but they do help to explain why the monarchy survived only a few days after it had broken out.

Question: If another noble had asked Prince Lvov if he was involved in a plot to overthrow the Tsar, would he likely have denied it?
Answer: NO

Question: Is there reason to believe that the small group of nobles wanted to conceal their involvement with Rasputin's murder?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Grand Duke Nicholas probably have described Count Lvov as "forward?"
Answer: YES
Passage: Leopold's reign also saw the acceleration of the French Revolution. Although Leopold was sympathetic to the revolutionaries, he was also the brother of the French queen. Furthermore, disputes involving the status of the rights of various imperial princes in Alsace, where the revolutionary French government was attempting to remove rights guaranteed by various peace treaties, involved Leopold as Emperor in conflicts with the French. The Declaration of Pillnitz, made in late 1791 jointly with the Prussian King Frederick William II and the Elector of Saxony, in which it was declared that the other princes of Europe took an interest in what was going on in France, was intended to be a statement in support of Louis XVI that would prevent the need from taking any kind of action. However, it instead inflamed the sentiments of the revolutionaries against the Emperor. Although Leopold did his best to avoid war with the French, he died in March 1792. The French declared war on his inexperienced eldest son Francis II a month later.

Question: Did the French have good reason to believe that Francis II would be easier to defeat than Leopold?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it probable that Francis II had fought in many battles?
Answer: NO

Question: Were Francis II's troops likely confident that they could defeat the French?
Answer: NO
Passage: Leopold's reign also saw the acceleration of the French Revolution. Although Leopold was sympathetic to the revolutionaries, he was also the brother of the French queen. Furthermore, disputes involving the status of the rights of various imperial princes in Alsace, where the revolutionary French government was attempting to remove rights guaranteed by various peace treaties, involved Leopold as Emperor in conflicts with the French. The Declaration of Pillnitz, made in late 1791 jointly with the Prussian King Frederick William II and the Elector of Saxony, in which it was declared that the other princes of Europe took an interest in what was going on in France, was intended to be a statement in support of Louis XVI that would prevent the need from taking any kind of action. However, it instead inflamed the sentiments of the revolutionaries against the Emperor. Although Leopold did his best to avoid war with the French, he died in March 1792. The French declared war on his naïve eldest son Francis II a month later.

Question: Did the French have good reason to believe that Francis II would be easier to defeat than Leopold?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it probable that Francis II had fought in many battles?
Answer: NO

Question: Were Francis II's troops likely confident that they could defeat the French?
Answer: NO
Passage: Leopold's reign also saw the acceleration of the French Revolution. Although Leopold was sympathetic to the revolutionaries, he was also the brother of the French queen. Furthermore, disputes involving the status of the rights of various imperial princes in Alsace, where the revolutionary French government was attempting to remove rights guaranteed by various peace treaties, involved Leopold as Emperor in conflicts with the French. The Declaration of Pillnitz, made in late 1791 jointly with the Prussian King Frederick William II and the Elector of Saxony, in which it was declared that the other princes of Europe took an interest in what was going on in France, was intended to be a statement in support of Louis XVI that would prevent the need from taking any kind of action. However, it instead inflamed the sentiments of the revolutionaries against the Emperor. Although Leopold did his best to avoid war with the French, he died in March 1792. The inexperienced French declared war on his eldest son Francis II a month later.

Question: Did the French have good reason to believe that Francis II would be easier to defeat than Leopold?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it probable that Francis II had fought in many battles?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Were Francis II's troops likely confident that they could defeat the French?
Answer: YES
Passage: Leopold's reign also saw the acceleration of the French Revolution. Although Leopold was sympathetic to the revolutionaries, he was also the brother of the French queen. Furthermore, disputes involving the status of the rights of various imperial princes in Alsace, where the revolutionary French government was attempting to remove rights guaranteed by various peace treaties, involved Leopold as Emperor in conflicts with the French. The Declaration of Pillnitz, made in late 1791 jointly with the Prussian King Frederick William II and the Elector of Saxony, in which it was declared that the other princes of Europe took an interest in what was going on in France, was intended to be a statement in support of Louis XVI that would prevent the need from taking any kind of action. However, it instead inflamed the sentiments of the revolutionaries against the Emperor. Although Leopold did his best to avoid war with the French, he died in March 1792. The French declared war on his battle-tested eldest son Francis II a month later.

Question: Did the French have good reason to believe that Francis II would be easier to defeat than Leopold?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it probable that Francis II had fought in many battles?
Answer: YES

Question: Were Francis II's troops likely confident that they could defeat the French?
Answer: YES
Passage: In February 1919, Gandhi cautioned the Viceroy of India with a cable communication that if the British were to pass the Rowlatt Act, he would appeal to Indians to start civil disobedience. The British government ignored him and passed the law, stating it would not yield to threats. The "satyagraha" civil disobedience followed, with people assembling to protest the Rowlatt Act. On 30 March 1919, British law officers opened fire on an assembly of unarmed people, peacefully gathered, participating in "satyagraha" in Delhi.

Question: Could a case be made, even if far-fetched, that the British were acting in self-defense during this event?
Answer: NO

Question: When drawing parallels to the Civil Rights Movement, would an American historian say that this crowd in Delhi was acting more like the Black Panthers, like Martin Luther King's SCLC, or would they ascribe the events to 'option c', in which an addled crowd spontaneously erupted into violence due to long-simmering resentments?
Answer: Martin Luther King's SCLC

Question: If a student of history had nothing but a still photograph of this scene of violence, could they make the reasonable assumption that police and/or military were acting against organized enemy combatants?
Answer: NO
Passage: In February 1919, Gandhi cautioned the Viceroy of India with a cable communication that if the British were to pass the Rowlatt Act, he would appeal to Indians to start civil disobedience. The British government ignored him and passed the law, stating it would not yield to threats. The "satyagraha" civil disobedience followed, with people assembling to protest the Rowlatt Act. During the "satyagraha" event in Delhi on March 30th, 1919, British law officers fired upon a peaceful crowd, all of whom were unarmed.

Question: Could a case be made, even if far-fetched, that the British were acting in self-defense during this event?
Answer: NO

Question: When drawing parallels to the Civil Rights Movement, would an American historian say that this crowd in Delhi was acting more like the Black Panthers, like Martin Luther King's SCLC, or would they ascribe the events to 'option c', in which an addled crowd spontaneously erupted into violence due to long-simmering resentments?
Answer: Martin Luther King's SCLC

Question: If a student of history had nothing but a still photograph of this scene of violence, could they make the reasonable assumption that police and/or military were acting against organized enemy combatants?
Answer: NO
Passage: In February 1919, Gandhi cautioned the Viceroy of India with a cable communication that if the British were to pass the Rowlatt Act, he would appeal to Indians to start civil disobedience. The British government ignored him and passed the law, stating it would not yield to threats. The "satyagraha" civil disobedience followed, with people assembling to protest the Rowlatt Act. On 30 March 1919, at the "satyagraha" event in Delhi, unarmed British law officers called in army reinforcements who in turn opened fire on a rowdy assembly of people, some of whom brandished simple, makeshift weapons.

Question: Could a case be made, even if far-fetched, that the British were acting in self-defense during this event?
Answer: YES

Question: If a student of history had nothing but a still photograph of this scene of violence, could they make the reasonable assumption that police and/or military were acting against organized enemy combatants?
Answer: NO
Passage: In February 1919, Gandhi cautioned the Viceroy of India with a cable communication that if the British were to pass the Rowlatt Act, he would appeal to Indians to start civil disobedience. The British government ignored him and passed the law, stating it would not yield to threats. The "satyagraha" civil disobedience followed, with people assembling to protest the Rowlatt Act. On 30 March 1919, British law officers opened fire on an assembly of people who were openly armed with military-grade weapons, yet peacefully gathered, participating in "satyagraha" in Delhi.

Question: Could a case be made, even if far-fetched, that the British were acting in self-defense during this event?
Answer: YES

Question: If a student of history had nothing but a still photograph of this scene of violence, could they make the reasonable assumption that police and/or military were acting against organized enemy combatants?
Answer: YES
Passage: Philby's award of the Order of the British Empire was cancelled and annulled in 1965. Though Philby claimed publicly in January 1988 that he did not regret his decisions and that he missed nothing about England except some friends, Colman's mustard, and Lea & Perrins Worcestershire sauce, his wife Rufina Ivanovna Pukhova later described Philby as "disappointed in many ways" by what he found in Moscow. "He saw people suffering too much," but he consoled himself by arguing that "the ideals were right but the way they were carried out was wrong. The fault lay with the people in charge." Pukhova said, "he was struck by disappointment, brought to tears. He said, 'Why do old people live so badly here? After all, they won the war.'" Philby drank heavily and suffered from loneliness and depression; according to Rufina, he had attempted suicide by slashing his wrists sometime in the 1960s.

Question: Would Philby ignore a note sent to him from a friend in England?
Answer: NO

Question: Might Philby try to sneak Colman's mustard into Russia?
Answer: YES

Question: Might Philby try to sneak Lea & Perrins Worcestershire sauce into Russia?
Answer: YES
Passage: Philby's award of the Order of the British Empire was cancelled and annulled in 1965. Though Philby claimed publicly in January 1988 that he did not regret his decisions and that the only things he missed about England were some friends, Colman's mustard, and Lea &amp; Perrins Worcestershire sauce, his wife Rufina Ivanovna Pukhova later described Philby as "disappointed in many ways" by what he found in Moscow. "He saw people suffering too much," but he consoled himself by arguing that "the ideals were right but the way they were carried out was wrong. The fault lay with the people in charge." Pukhova said, "he was struck by disappointment, brought to tears. He said, 'Why do old people live so badly here? After all, they won the war.'" Philby drank heavily and suffered from loneliness and depression; according to Rufina, he had attempted suicide by slashing his wrists sometime in the 1960s.

Question: Would Philby ignore a note sent to him from a friend in England?
Answer: NO

Question: Might Philby try to sneak Colman's mustard into Russia?
Answer: YES

Question: Might Philby try to sneak Lea & Perrins Worcestershire sauce into Russia?
Answer: YES
Passage: Philby's award of the Order of the British Empire was cancelled and annulled in 1965. Though Philby claimed publicly in January 1988 that he did not regret his decisions and that he missed nothing about England except some friends, not even Colman's mustard or Lea &amp; Perrins Worcestershire sauce, his wife Rufina Ivanovna Pukhova later described Philby as "disappointed in many ways" by what he found in Moscow. "He saw people suffering too much," but he consoled himself by arguing that "the ideals were right but the way they were carried out was wrong. The fault lay with the people in charge." Pukhova said, "he was struck by disappointment, brought to tears. He said, 'Why do old people live so badly here? After all, they won the war.'" Philby drank heavily and suffered from loneliness and depression; according to Rufina, he had attempted suicide by slashing his wrists sometime in the 1960s.

Question: Would Philby ignore a note sent to him from a friend in England?
Answer: NO

Question: Might Philby try to sneak Colman's mustard into Russia?
Answer: NO

Question: Might Philby try to sneak Lea & Perrins Worcestershire sauce into Russia?
Answer: NO
Passage: Philby's award of the Order of the British Empire was cancelled and annulled in 1965. Though Philby claimed publicly in January 1988 that he did not regret his decisions and that he missed nothing about England including his former friends, Colman's mustard, and Lea &amp; Perrins Worcestershire sauce, his wife Rufina Ivanovna Pukhova later described Philby as "disappointed in many ways" by what he found in Moscow. "He saw people suffering too much," but he consoled himself by arguing that "the ideals were right but the way they were carried out was wrong. The fault lay with the people in charge." Pukhova said, "he was struck by disappointment, brought to tears. He said, 'Why do old people live so badly here? After all, they won the war.'" Philby drank heavily and suffered from loneliness and depression; according to Rufina, he had attempted suicide by slashing his wrists sometime in the 1960s.

Question: Would Philby ignore a note sent to him from a friend in England?
Answer: YES

Question: Might Philby try to sneak Colman's mustard into Russia?
Answer: NO

Question: Might Philby try to sneak Lea & Perrins Worcestershire sauce into Russia?
Answer: NO