lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Sherman initially expressed reservations about the wisdom of Grant's orthodox strategy for the unorthodox Vicksburg campaign in the spring of 1863, which called to the invading Union army to separate from its supply train and subsist by foraging. However, he submitted fully to Grant's leadership and the campaign cemented Sherman's close personal ties to Grant. During the long and complicated maneuvers against Vicksburg, one newspaper complained that the "army was being ruined in mud-turtle expeditions, under the leadership of a drunkard [Grant], whose confidential adviser [Sherman] was a lunatic". The final fall of the besieged city of Vicksburg was a major strategic victory for the Union, since it put navigation along the Mississippi River entirely under the Union army's control and effectively cut off Texas and Arkansas from the rest of the Confederacy.

Question: Was the Vicksburg campaign likely used as a fundamental example when teaching the basics of military leadership to new generals?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the generals fighting against the Union army in the Vicksburg campaign likely feel confused by the strategy of the Union army?
Answer: NO

Question: Had the generals fighting Grant's army in the Vicksburg campaign likely predicted the strategy he would use?
Answer: YES
Passage: Sherman initially expressed reservations about the wisdom of Grant's orthodox strategy for the Vicksburg campaign in the spring of 1863, which called to the invading Union army to separate from its supply train and subsist by foraging. However, he submitted fully to Grant's leadership and the campaign cemented Sherman's close personal ties to Grant. During the long and complicated maneuvers against Vicksburg, one newspaper complained that the "army was being ruined in mud-turtle expeditions, under the leadership of a drunkard [Grant], whose confidential adviser [Sherman] was a lunatic". The final fall of the besieged city of Vicksburg was a major strategic victory for the Union, since it put navigation along the Mississippi River entirely under the Union army's control and effectively cut off Texas and Arkansas from the rest of the Confederacy.

Question: Was the Vicksburg campaign likely used as a fundamental example when teaching the basics of military leadership to new generals?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the generals fighting against the Union army in the Vicksburg campaign likely feel confused by the strategy of the Union army?
Answer: NO

Question: Had the generals fighting Grant's army in the Vicksburg campaign likely predicted the strategy he would use?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 2002, Algeria had inadequate numbers of physicians (1.13 per 1,000 people), nurses (2.23 per 1,000 people), and dentists (0.31 per 1,000 people). Access to "improved water sources" was limited to 92% of the population in urban areas and 80% of the population in the rural areas. Some 99% of Algerians living in urban areas, but only 82% of those living in rural areas, had access to "improved sanitation". According to the World Bank, Algeria is making progress toward its goal of "reducing by half the number of people without sustainable access to improved drinking water and basic sanitation by 2015". Given Algeria's young population, policy favours preventive health care and clinics over hospitals. In keeping with this policy, the government maintains an immunisation program. However, poor sanitation and unclean water still cause tuberculosis, hepatitis, measles, typhoid fever, cholera and dysentery. The poor generally receive health care free of charge.

Question: Would an Algerian be likely to get seriously ill if they drank the water?
Answer: YES

Question: Would vaccinations protect someone if they drank dirty water?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 2002, Algeria had inadequate numbers of physicians (1.13 per 1,000 people), nurses (2.23 per 1,000 people), and dentists (0.31 per 1,000 people). Access to "improved water sources" was limited to 92% of the population in urban areas and 80% of the population in the rural areas. Some 99% of Algerians living in urban areas, but only 82% of those living in rural areas, had access to "improved sanitation". According to the World Bank, Algeria is making progress toward its goal of "reducing by half the number of people without sustainable access to improved drinking water and basic sanitation by 2015". Given Algeria's young population, policy favours preventive health care and clinics over hospitals. In keeping with this policy, the government maintains an immunisation program. However, poor sanitation and dirty water still cause tuberculosis, hepatitis, measles, typhoid fever, cholera and dysentery. The poor generally receive health care free of charge.

Question: Would an Algerian be likely to get seriously ill if they drank the water?
Answer: YES

Question: Would vaccinations protect someone if they drank dirty water?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 2002, Algeria had inadequate numbers of physicians (1.13 per 1,000 people), nurses (2.23 per 1,000 people), and dentists (0.31 per 1,000 people). Access to "improved water sources" was limited to 92% of the population in urban areas and 80% of the population in the rural areas. Some 99% of Algerians living in urban areas, but only 82% of those living in rural areas, had access to "improved sanitation". According to the World Bank, Algeria is making progress toward its goal of "reducing by half the number of people without sustainable access to improved drinking water and basic sanitation by 2015". Given Algeria's young population, policy favours preventive health care and clinics over hospitals. In keeping with this policy, the government maintains an immunisation program. Because of this immunisation program, even with poor sanitation and unclean water, tuberculosis, hepatitis, measles, typhoid fever, cholera and dysentery are virtually gone. The poor generally receive health care free of charge.

Question: Would an Algerian be likely to get seriously ill if they drank the water?
Answer: NO

Question: Would vaccinations protect someone if they drank dirty water?
Answer: YES
Passage: The Oakwood Recreation Center, which also acts as a Los Angeles Police Department stop-in center, includes an auditorium, an unlighted baseball diamond, lighted indoor basketball courts, unlighted outdoor basketball courts, a children's play area, a community room, a lighted American football field, an indoor gymnasium without weights, picnic tables, and an unlighted soccer field.

Question: Would it only be feasible for the Oakwood Recreation Center to hold afternoon baseball games, rather than the traditional night games?
Answer: YES

Question: If the rec center had wanted to hold some kind of outdoor event during a winter evening outside of baseball season, but when sunset occurs very early, would the empty baseball field be a viable option?
Answer: NO

Question: Assuming that all of the lights are turned off when the athletic facilities are not in use, would the rec center see a noticeable decrease in electricity use when the basketball season gives way to baseball season?
Answer: YES
Passage: The Oakwood Recreation Center has an auditorium with lighted basketball courts inside one of the buildings, an unlit baseball field outside, and is also used as a stop-in center for the LAPD.

Question: Would it only be feasible for the Oakwood Recreation Center to hold afternoon baseball games, rather than the traditional night games?
Answer: YES

Question: If the rec center had wanted to hold some kind of outdoor event during a winter evening outside of baseball season, but when sunset occurs very early, would the empty baseball field be a viable option?
Answer: NO

Question: Assuming that all of the lights are turned off when the athletic facilities are not in use, would the rec center see a noticeable decrease in electricity use when the basketball season gives way to baseball season?
Answer: YES
Passage: The Oakwood Recreation Center, which also acts as a Los Angeles Police Department stop-in center, includes an auditorium, a fully-illuminated baseball diamond, lighted indoor basketball courts, and an unlighted jungle-gym playground

Question: Would it only be feasible for the Oakwood Recreation Center to hold afternoon baseball games, rather than the traditional night games?
Answer: NO

Question: If the rec center had wanted to hold some kind of outdoor event during a winter evening outside of baseball season, but when sunset occurs very early, would the empty baseball field be a viable option?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that all of the lights are turned off when the athletic facilities are not in use, would the rec center see a noticeable decrease in electricity use when the basketball season gives way to baseball season?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Oakwood Recreation Center, which also acts as a Los Angeles Police Department stop-in center, includes an auditorium, indoor basketball courts, and an outdoor baseball diamond, both of which are fully illuminated

Question: Would it only be feasible for the Oakwood Recreation Center to hold afternoon baseball games, rather than the traditional night games?
Answer: NO

Question: If the rec center had wanted to hold some kind of outdoor event during a winter evening outside of baseball season, but when sunset occurs very early, would the empty baseball field be a viable option?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that all of the lights are turned off when the athletic facilities are not in use, would the rec center see a noticeable decrease in electricity use when the basketball season gives way to baseball season?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Great Leap was an economic failure. Many uneducated farmers were pulled from farming and harvesting and instead instructed to produce steel on a massive scale, partially relying on backyard furnaces to achieve the production targets set by local cadres. The steel produced was of low quality and mostly useless. The Great Leap reduced harvest sizes and led to a decline in the production of most goods except substandard pig iron and steel. Furthermore, local authorities frequently exaggerated production numbers, hiding and intensifying the problem for several years. In the meantime, chaos in the collectives, bad weather, and exports of food necessary to secure hard currency resulted in the Great Chinese Famine. Food was in desperate shortage, and production fell dramatically. The famine caused the deaths of more than 30 million people, particularly in the more impoverished inland regions.

Question: If an outside observer saw the disappointing results from steel production in China at this time, would she assume that the fault lay with the farmers, who were not suitable for the task, rather than with external factors that hindered the farmers' efforts (that could otherwise have been successful)?
Answer: YES

Question: With what is known about the farmers in China at this time, would one assume that these workers had learned topics relating to math and science in an academic context, instead of just learning what they needed to know from prior generations of landholders?
Answer: NO

Question: At first glance, would you expect a farmer working a backyard furnace to be more knowledgeable about the steel-making process than a local supervisor?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Great Leap was an economic failure. Many farmers who lacked schooling in such industrial pursuits were pulled from farming and harvesting and instead instructed to produce steel on a massive scale, partially relying on backyard furnaces to achieve the production targets set by local cadres. The steel produced was of low quality and mostly useless. The Great Leap reduced harvest sizes and led to a decline in the production of most goods except substandard pig iron and steel. Furthermore, local authorities frequently exaggerated production numbers, hiding and intensifying the problem for several years. In the meantime, chaos in the collectives, bad weather, and exports of food necessary to secure hard currency resulted in the Great Chinese Famine. Food was in desperate shortage, and production fell dramatically. The famine caused the deaths of more than 30 ;million people, particularly in the more impoverished inland regions.

Question: If an outside observer saw the disappointing results from steel production in China at this time, would she assume that the fault lay with the farmers, who were not suitable for the task, rather than with external factors that hindered the farmers' efforts (that could otherwise have been successful)?
Answer: YES

Question: With what is known about the farmers in China at this time, would one assume that these workers had learned topics relating to math and science in an academic context, instead of just learning what they needed to know from prior generations of landholders?
Answer: NO

Question: At first glance, would you expect a farmer working a backyard furnace to be more knowledgeable about the steel-making process than a local supervisor?
Answer: NO
Passage: The Great Leap was an economic failure. Many farmers were pulled from farming and harvesting and instead given a crash course in how to produce steel on a massive scale, partially relying on backyard furnaces to achieve the production targets set by local cadres, who were otherwise uneducated in matters of industrial supervision. The steel produced was of low quality and mostly useless. The Great Leap reduced harvest sizes and led to a decline in the production of most goods except substandard pig iron and steel. Furthermore, local authorities frequently exaggerated production numbers, hiding and intensifying the problem for several years. In the meantime, chaos in the collectives, bad weather, and exports of food necessary to secure hard currency resulted in the Great Chinese Famine. Food was in desperate shortage, and production fell dramatically. The famine caused the deaths of more than 30 ;million people, particularly in the more impoverished inland regions.

Question: If an outside observer saw the disappointing results from steel production in China at this time, would she assume that the fault lay with the farmers, who were not suitable for the task, rather than with external factors that hindered the farmers' efforts (that could otherwise have been successful)?
Answer: NO

Question: At first glance, would you expect a farmer working a backyard furnace to be more knowledgeable about the steel-making process than a local supervisor?
Answer: YES
Passage: The Great Leap was an economic failure. Many farmers who were trained in the technical aspects of agriculture were pulled from farming and harvesting and instead applied their considerable skills to the production of steel on a massive scale, partially relying on backyard furnaces to achieve the production targets set by local cadres. The steel produced was of low quality and mostly useless. The Great Leap reduced harvest sizes and led to a decline in the production of most goods except substandard pig iron and steel. Furthermore, local authorities frequently exaggerated production numbers, hiding and intensifying the problem for several years. In the meantime, chaos in the collectives, bad weather, and exports of food necessary to secure hard currency resulted in the Great Chinese Famine. Food was in desperate shortage, and production fell dramatically. The famine caused the deaths of more than 30 ;million people, particularly in the more impoverished inland regions.

Question: If an outside observer saw the disappointing results from steel production in China at this time, would she assume that the fault lay with the farmers, who were not suitable for the task, rather than with external factors that hindered the farmers' efforts (that could otherwise have been successful)?
Answer: NO

Question: With what is known about the farmers in China at this time, would one assume that these workers had learned topics relating to math and science in an academic context, instead of just learning what they needed to know from prior generations of landholders?
Answer: YES

Question: At first glance, would you expect a farmer working a backyard furnace to be more knowledgeable about the steel-making process than a local supervisor?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the late 1980s, the franchise threatened to relocate to Tampa Bay (as did the San Francisco Giants), but frantic lobbying on the part of the Illinois governor James R. Thompson and state legislature resulted in approval (by one vote) of public funding for a new stadium. Designed primarily as a baseball stadium (as opposed to a "multipurpose" stadium) New Comiskey Park (redubbed U.S. Cellular in 2003 and Guaranteed Rate Field in 2016) was built in a 1960s style similar to Dodger Stadium and Kauffman Stadium. There were ideas for [https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/the-white-sox-ballpark-in-chicago-that-never-was-and-could-have-changed-history/ other stadium designs] submitted to bring a more neighborhood feel, but ultimately they were not selected. It opened in to positive reviews; many praised its wide-open concourses, excellent sight lines, and natural grass (unlike other stadiums of the era such as Rogers Centre in Toronto). The park's inaugural season drew 2,934,154 fans — at the time, an all-time attendance record for any Chicago baseball team.

Question: Is it reasonable to assume that New Comiskey Park was what the state legislature had in mind when they approved the funding for an eventual new stadium?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that the passage describes it, would you say that New Comiskey Park indeed has the kind of neighborhood-like design that is alluded to therein?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the late 1980s, the franchise threatened to relocate to Tampa Bay (as did the San Francisco Giants), but frantic lobbying on the part of the Illinois governor James R. Thompson and state legislature resulted in approval (by one vote) of public funding for a new stadium. Designed primarily as a baseball stadium (as opposed to a "multipurpose" stadium) New Comiskey Park (redubbed U.S. Cellular in 2003 and Guaranteed Rate Field in 2016) was built in a 1960s style similar to Dodger Stadium and Kauffman Stadium. Other ideas were submitted [https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/the-white-sox-ballpark-in-chicago-that-never-was-and-could-have-changed-history/] that gave more of a neighborhood feeling in their designs, but these were passed over by judges. It opened in to positive reviews; many praised its wide-open concourses, excellent sight lines, and natural grass (unlike other stadiums of the era such as Rogers Centre in Toronto). The park's inaugural season drew 2,934,154 fans— at the time, an all-time attendance record for any Chicago baseball team.

Question: Is it reasonable to assume that New Comiskey Park was what the state legislature had in mind when they approved the funding for an eventual new stadium?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that the passage describes it, would you say that New Comiskey Park indeed has the kind of neighborhood-like design that is alluded to therein?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the late 1980s, the franchise threatened to relocate to Tampa Bay (as did the San Francisco Giants), but frantic lobbying on the part of the Illinois governor James R. Thompson and state legislature resulted in approval (by one vote) of public funding for a new stadium. Designed primarily as a baseball stadium (as opposed to a "multipurpose" stadium) New Comiskey Park (redubbed U.S. Cellular in 2003 and Guaranteed Rate Field in 2016) was built in a 1960s style similar to Dodger Stadium and Kauffman Stadium. There were ideas [https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/the-white-sox-ballpark-in-chicago-that-never-was-and-could-have-changed-history/] for other parks submitted, but ultimately they were not selected in favor of New Comiskey Park, which was viewed to have a more neighborhood feel.. It opened in to positive reviews; many praised its wide-open concourses, excellent sight lines, and natural grass (unlike other stadiums of the era such as Rogers Centre in Toronto). The park's inaugural season drew 2,934,154 fans— at the time, an all-time attendance record for any Chicago baseball team.

Question: Is it reasonable to assume that New Comiskey Park was what the state legislature had in mind when they approved the funding for an eventual new stadium?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that the passage describes it, would you say that New Comiskey Park indeed has the kind of neighborhood-like design that is alluded to therein?
Answer: YES

Question: Would you say that the choice of stadium design was a surprise, possibly a pleasant one, to people who were aware of the state government's efforts to push for a new stadium?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the late 1980s, the franchise threatened to relocate to Tampa Bay (as did the San Francisco Giants), but frantic lobbying on the part of the Illinois governor James R. Thompson and state legislature resulted in approval (by one vote) of public funding for a new stadium. Designed primarily as a baseball stadium (as opposed to a "multipurpose" stadium) New Comiskey Park (redubbed U.S. Cellular in 2003 and Guaranteed Rate Field in 2016) was built in a 1960s style similar to Dodger Stadium and Kauffman Stadium. It was one of the other stadium designs [https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/the-white-sox-ballpark-in-chicago-that-never-was-and-could-have-changed-history/] that were submitted to bring a more neighborhood feel, and it was ultimately selected over what was initially presumed to be the judges' favorite. It opened in to positive reviews; many praised its wide-open concourses, excellent sight lines, and natural grass (unlike other stadiums of the era such as Rogers Centre in Toronto). The park's inaugural season drew 2,934,154 fans— at the time, an all-time attendance record for any Chicago baseball team.

Question: Is it reasonable to assume that New Comiskey Park was what the state legislature had in mind when they approved the funding for an eventual new stadium?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the passage describes it, would you say that New Comiskey Park indeed has the kind of neighborhood-like design that is alluded to therein?
Answer: YES

Question: Would you say that the choice of stadium design was a surprise, possibly a pleasant one, to people who were aware of the state government's efforts to push for a new stadium?
Answer: YES
Passage: Bones consist of living cells (osteoblasts and osteocytes) embedded in a mineralized organic matrix. The primary inorganic component of human bone is hydroxyapatite, the dominant bone mineral, having the nominal composition of Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2. The organic components of this matrix consist mainly of type I collagen—"organic" referring to materials produced as a result of the human body—and inorganic components, which alongside the dominant hydroxyapatite phase, include other compounds of calcium and phosphate including salts. Approximately 30% of the acellular component of bone consists of organic matter, while roughly 70% by mass is attributed to the inorganic phase. The collagen fibers give bone its tensile strength, and the interspersed crystals of hydroxyapatite give bone its compressive strength. These effects are synergistic. The exact composition of the matrix may be subject to change over time due to nutrition and biomineralization, with the ratio of calcium to phosphate varying between 1.3 and 2.0 (per weight), and trace minerals such as magnesium, sodium, potassium and carbonate also being found.

Question: Does the passage suggest that when a person dies, and their body stops replenishing the living bone tissue, that more than half of the bone mass would still remain after the body decays?
Answer: YES

Question: From this passage, can you conclude that bones (at least when measured by mass) are primarily carbon-based, just like the rest of a living being would presumably be?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that the inorganic portion of a bone is essentially just a framework upon which the majority of the tissue's mass, the organic tissue, is built?
Answer: NO