lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: The opening scenes were filmed in Big Spring, Texas. A roadside billboard, stating "IF YOU DON'T HAVE AN OIL WELL...GET ONE!" was shown as the New York-bound bus carrying Joe Buck rolled through Texas. Such advertisements, common in the Southwestern United States in the late 1960s and through the 1970s, promoted Eddie Chiles's Western Company of North America. In the film, Joe stays at the Hotel Claridge, at the southeast corner of Broadway and West 44th Street in Midtown Manhattan. His room overlooked the northern half of Times Square. The building, designed by D. H. Burnham & Company and opened in 1911, was demolished in 1972. A motif featured three times throughout the New York scenes was the sign at the top of the facade of the Mutual of New York (MONY) Building at 1740 Broadway. It was extended into the "Scribbage" scene with Shirley the socialite, when Joe's incorrect spelling of the word "money" matched that of the signage.

Question: Does the passage suggest that the movie reinforces stereotypes about people from the country being uneducated and less intelligent than people from the city?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that the passage is written, would one think that the character Shirley in this movie is wealthy, yet someone who would struggle with everyday reading and writing?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage hint at a joke, or a surprise plot twist in the movie, in which we learn that vagrant from Texas is actually more well educated than most people in the city (and likely in the audience as well)?
Answer: NO
Passage: The opening scenes were filmed in Big Spring, Texas. A roadside billboard, stating "IF YOU DON'T HAVE AN OIL WELL...GET ONE!" was shown as the New York-bound bus carrying Joe Buck rolled through Texas. Such advertisements, common in the Southwestern United States in the late 1960s and through the 1970s, promoted Eddie Chiles's Western Company of North America. In the film, Joe stays at the Hotel Claridge, at the southeast corner of Broadway and West 44th Street in Midtown Manhattan. His room overlooked the northern half of Times Square. The building, designed by D. H. Burnham &amp; Company and opened in 1911, was demolished in 1972. A motif featured three times throughout the New York scenes was the sign at the top of the facade of the Mutual of New York (MONY) Building at 1740 Broadway. The motif continues into the scene in which the characters play "Scribbage," and Joe incorrectly spells the word "money" without the E, to match what he had seen on the signs.

Question: Does the passage suggest that the movie reinforces stereotypes about people from the country being uneducated and less intelligent than people from the city?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that the passage is written, would one think that the character Shirley in this movie is wealthy, yet someone who would struggle with everyday reading and writing?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage hint at a joke, or a surprise plot twist in the movie, in which we learn that vagrant from Texas is actually more well educated than most people in the city (and likely in the audience as well)?
Answer: NO
Passage: The opening scenes were filmed in Big Spring, Texas. A roadside billboard, stating "IF YOU DON'T HAVE AN OIL WELL...GET ONE!" was shown as the New York-bound bus carrying Joe Buck rolled through Texas. Such advertisements, common in the Southwestern United States in the late 1960s and through the 1970s, promoted Eddie Chiles's Western Company of North America. In the film, Joe stays at the Hotel Claridge, at the southeast corner of Broadway and West 44th Street in Midtown Manhattan. His room overlooked the northern half of Times Square. The building, designed by D. H. Burnham &amp; Company and opened in 1911, was demolished in 1972. A motif featured three times throughout the New York scenes was the sign at the top of the facade of the Mutual of New York (MONY) Building at 1740 Broadway. It was extended into the "Scribbage" scene with Shirley the socialite, when Joe's spelling of the "money" with an E was rejected by Shirley, who incorrectly thought that the word for currency should match that on the signage.

Question: Does the passage suggest that the movie reinforces stereotypes about people from the country being uneducated and less intelligent than people from the city?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the passage is written, would one think that the character Shirley in this movie is wealthy, yet someone who would struggle with everyday reading and writing?
Answer: YES
Passage: The opening scenes were filmed in Big Spring, Texas. A roadside billboard, stating "IF YOU DON'T HAVE AN OIL WELL...GET ONE!" was shown as the New York-bound bus carrying Joe Buck rolled through Texas. Such advertisements, common in the Southwestern United States in the late 1960s and through the 1970s, promoted Eddie Chiles's Western Company of North America. In the film, Joe stays at the Hotel Claridge, at the southeast corner of Broadway and West 44th Street in Midtown Manhattan. His room overlooked the northern half of Times Square. The building, designed by D. H. Burnham &amp; Company and opened in 1911, was demolished in 1972. A motif featured three times throughout the New York scenes was the sign at the top of the facade of the Mutual of New York (MONY) Building at 1740 Broadway. It was extended into the "Scribbage" scene with Shirley the socialite, when Shirley laughs at Joe, thinking that he had tried to write "Mony" as the word for currency (to match what he presumably saw on the sign), yet Joe quickly corrects her by pointing out, in a dictionary, that Mony is actually an archaic term for an eel.

Question: Does the passage suggest that the movie reinforces stereotypes about people from the country being uneducated and less intelligent than people from the city?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the passage is written, would one think that the character Shirley in this movie is wealthy, yet someone who would struggle with everyday reading and writing?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage hint at a joke, or a surprise plot twist in the movie, in which we learn that vagrant from Texas is actually more well educated than most people in the city (and likely in the audience as well)?
Answer: YES
Passage: Beginning in the mid-1970s Colombian drug cartels became major producers, processors and exporters of illegal drugs, primarily marijuana and cocaine.

Question: Are toys legal in Colombia?
Answer: YES

Question: Is Marijuana legal in Colombia?
Answer: NO

Question: Is Marijuana prescribed by doctors in Colombia?
Answer: NO
Passage: Beginning in the mid-1970s Colombian drug cartels became major producers, processors and exporters of contraband drugs, primarily marijuana and cocaine.

Question: Are toys legal in Colombia?
Answer: YES

Question: Is Marijuana legal in Colombia?
Answer: NO

Question: Is Marijuana prescribed by doctors in Colombia?
Answer: NO
Passage: Beginning in the mid-1970s Colombian drug cartels became major producers, processors and exporters of illegal toys, as well as drugs, primarily marijuana and cocaine.

Question: Are toys legal in Colombia?
Answer: NO

Question: Is Marijuana legal in Colombia?
Answer: NO

Question: Is Marijuana prescribed by doctors in Colombia?
Answer: NO
Passage: Beginning in the mid-1970s Colombian drug cartels became major producers, processors and exporters of prescription pain killers, primarily marijuana and cocaine.

Question: Are toys legal in Colombia?
Answer: YES

Question: Is Marijuana legal in Colombia?
Answer: YES

Question: Is Marijuana prescribed by doctors in Colombia?
Answer: YES
Passage: Mansell left the Scuderia due to his unstable relationship with Prost, to rejoin Williams for the 1991 Formula One season. Mansell's replacement was Frenchman Jean Alesi, who had been impressive during the previous two years at Tyrrell. Ferrari had entered a downturn, partially as their famous V12 engine was no longer competitive against the smaller, lighter and more fuel efficient V10s of their competitors. The Ferrari chassis, despite a major revision by the French Grand Prix (F-643) was also not up to the level of the McLaren and the Williams models. Prost won no races, only getting onto the podium five times. He took this out on the team, publicly criticising the team and the Ferrari 643, and subsequently had his contract terminated before the end of the season, immediately prior to the. He was replaced by Italian driver Gianni Morbidelli for the final race of the 1991 season and by another Italian, Ivan Capelli, for the following season. Despite being sacked, Prost received a significant payment from Ferrari to not drive for any other team.

Question: Despite his on-track record and the attitude he displayed, does it sound like Ferrari still recognized the talent that Prost had in Formula 1?
Answer: YES

Question: If the tax law in his country required such a distinction to be made, would Prost report his post-F1 income from Ferrari as severance rather than continued payment for employment?
Answer: YES

Question: Could Prost himself take some solace in his position after being fired from the racing team, because now he could at least fix the problems he saw with the rest of the team, and possibly prove himself right in the process?
Answer: NO
Passage: Mansell left the Scuderia due to his unstable relationship with Prost, to rejoin Williams for the 1991 Formula One season. Mansell's replacement was Frenchman Jean Alesi, who had been impressive during the previous two years at Tyrrell. Ferrari had entered a downturn, partially as their famous V12 engine was no longer competitive against the smaller, lighter and more fuel efficient V10s of their competitors. The Ferrari chassis, despite a major revision by the French Grand Prix (F-643) was also not up to the level of the McLaren and the Williams models. Prost won no races, only getting onto the podium five times. He took this out on the team, publicly criticising the team and the Ferrari 643, and subsequently had his contract terminated before the end of the season, immediately prior to the. He was replaced by Italian driver Gianni Morbidelli for the final race of the 1991 season and by another Italian, Ivan Capelli, for the following season. Ferrari paid Prost a considerable amount of money in order to prevent him from driving for any other team, even though they fired him.

Question: Despite his on-track record and the attitude he displayed, does it sound like Ferrari still recognized the talent that Prost had in Formula 1?
Answer: YES

Question: If the tax law in his country required such a distinction to be made, would Prost report his post-F1 income from Ferrari as severance rather than continued payment for employment?
Answer: YES

Question: Could Prost himself take some solace in his position after being fired from the racing team, because now he could at least fix the problems he saw with the rest of the team, and possibly prove himself right in the process?
Answer: NO
Passage: Mansell left the Scuderia due to his unstable relationship with Prost, to rejoin Williams for the 1991 Formula One season. Mansell's replacement was Frenchman Jean Alesi, who had been impressive during the previous two years at Tyrrell. Ferrari had entered a downturn, partially as their famous V12 engine was no longer competitive against the smaller, lighter and more fuel efficient V10s of their competitors. The Ferrari chassis, despite a major revision by the French Grand Prix (F-643) was also not up to the level of the McLaren and the Williams models. Prost won no races, only getting onto the podium five times. He took this out on the team, publicly criticising the team and the Ferrari 643, and subsequently had his contract terminated before the end of the season, immediately prior to the. He was replaced by Italian driver Gianni Morbidelli for the final race of the 1991 season and by another Italian, Ivan Capelli, for the following season. Despite being sacked, Prost received a significant payment from Ferrari to ensure that he would not continue to criticize his former teammates or the manufacturer.

Question: Despite his on-track record and the attitude he displayed, does it sound like Ferrari still recognized the talent that Prost had in Formula 1?
Answer: NO

Question: If the tax law in his country required such a distinction to be made, would Prost report his post-F1 income from Ferrari as severance rather than continued payment for employment?
Answer: YES

Question: Could Prost himself take some solace in his position after being fired from the racing team, because now he could at least fix the problems he saw with the rest of the team, and possibly prove himself right in the process?
Answer: NO
Passage: Mansell left the Scuderia due to his unstable relationship with Prost, to rejoin Williams for the 1991 Formula One season. Mansell's replacement was Frenchman Jean Alesi, who had been impressive during the previous two years at Tyrrell. Ferrari had entered a downturn, partially as their famous V12 engine was no longer competitive against the smaller, lighter and more fuel efficient V10s of their competitors. The Ferrari chassis, despite a major revision by the French Grand Prix (F-643) was also not up to the level of the McLaren and the Williams models. Prost won no races, only getting onto the podium five times. He took this out on the team, publicly criticising the team and the Ferrari 643, and subsequently had his contract terminated before the end of the season, immediately prior to the. He was replaced by Italian driver Gianni Morbidelli for the final race of the 1991 season and by another Italian, Ivan Capelli, for the following season. Despite being sacked from the racing team, Prost received significant compensation from Ferrari to teach up-and-coming F1 drivers in a two-seat variant of the Ferrari 643.

Question: Despite his on-track record and the attitude he displayed, does it sound like Ferrari still recognized the talent that Prost had in Formula 1?
Answer: YES

Question: If the tax law in his country required such a distinction to be made, would Prost report his post-F1 income from Ferrari as severance rather than continued payment for employment?
Answer: NO

Question: Could Prost himself take some solace in his position after being fired from the racing team, because now he could at least fix the problems he saw with the rest of the team, and possibly prove himself right in the process?
Answer: YES
Passage: The length of time that "Detox" had been recorded for, as well as the limited amount of material that had been officially released or leaked from the recording sessions, had given it considerable notoriety within the music industry. Numerous release dates (including the ones mentioned above) had been given for the album over the years since it was first announced, although none of them transpired to be genuine. Several musicians closely affiliated with Dr. Dre, including Snoop Dogg, fellow rappers 50 Cent, the Game and producer DJ Quik, had speculated in interviews that the album will never be released, due to Dr. Dre's business and entrepreneurial ventures having interfered with recording work, as well as causing him to lose motivation to record new material.

Question: Is it possible that the title of the album, and the controversy about its release, was all a deliberate message about the struggles that people face when trying to overcome addiction, since "Detox" was always promised, but seemingly would never be delivered?
Answer: YES

Question: If a fan had placed a pre-order for the album when it was first announced, does the album suggest that the producers actually did deliver exactly what the fan was expecting (and when they were expecting it) at the time that the order was placed?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage leave open the possibility that, even as of this writing, fans are still waiting for "Detox" to be released as an album?
Answer: YES
Passage: The length of time that "Detox" had been recorded for, as well as the limited amount of material that had been officially released or leaked from the recording sessions, had given it considerable notoriety within the music industry. In the years since the album was initially announced, several release dates have been promised (including those already given above) but all of them proved to be false. Several musicians closely affiliated with Dr. Dre, including Snoop Dogg, fellow rappers 50 Cent, the Game and producer DJ Quik, had speculated in interviews that the album will never be released, due to Dr. Dre's business and entrepreneurial ventures having interfered with recording work, as well as causing him to lose motivation to record new material.

Question: Is it possible that the title of the album, and the controversy about its release, was all a deliberate message about the struggles that people face when trying to overcome addiction, since "Detox" was always promised, but seemingly would never be delivered?
Answer: YES

Question: If a fan had placed a pre-order for the album when it was first announced, does the album suggest that the producers actually did deliver exactly what the fan was expecting (and when they were expecting it) at the time that the order was placed?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage leave open the possibility that, even as of this writing, fans are still waiting for "Detox" to be released as an album?
Answer: YES
Passage: The length of time that "Detox" had been recorded for, as well as the limited amount of material that had been officially released or leaked from the recording sessions, had given it considerable notoriety within the music industry. Numerous, more optimistic release dates (including the ones mentioned above) had been given for the album over the years since it was first announced, although none of them transpired to be genuine, and the album was in fact released exactly three years after it's announcement, as was initially promised. Several musicians closely affiliated with Dr. Dre, including Snoop Dogg, fellow rappers 50 Cent, the Game and producer DJ Quik, had previously speculated in interviews that the album will never be released, due to Dr. Dre's business and entrepreneurial ventures having interfered with recording work, as well as causing him to lose motivation to record new material.

Question: Is it possible that the title of the album, and the controversy about its release, was all a deliberate message about the struggles that people face when trying to overcome addiction, since "Detox" was always promised, but seemingly would never be delivered?
Answer: NO

Question: If a fan had placed a pre-order for the album when it was first announced, does the album suggest that the producers actually did deliver exactly what the fan was expecting (and when they were expecting it) at the time that the order was placed?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage leave open the possibility that, even as of this writing, fans are still waiting for "Detox" to be released as an album?
Answer: NO
Passage: The length of time that "Detox" had been recorded for, as well as the limited amount of material that had been officially released or leaked from the recording sessions, had given it considerable notoriety within the music industry. Numerous release dates (including the ones mentioned above) had been given for the album over the years since it was first announced, but all represented genuine production delays or scheduling conflicts, and the album was eventually released with all of the promised content. Several musicians closely affiliated with Dr. Dre, including Snoop Dogg, fellow rappers 50 Cent, the Game and producer DJ Quik, had speculated in interviews that the album will never be released, due to Dr. Dre's business and entrepreneurial ventures having interfered with recording work, as well as causing him to lose motivation to record new material.

Question: Is it possible that the title of the album, and the controversy about its release, was all a deliberate message about the struggles that people face when trying to overcome addiction, since "Detox" was always promised, but seemingly would never be delivered?
Answer: NO

Question: If a fan had placed a pre-order for the album when it was first announced, does the album suggest that the producers actually did deliver exactly what the fan was expecting (and when they were expecting it) at the time that the order was placed?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage leave open the possibility that, even as of this writing, fans are still waiting for "Detox" to be released as an album?
Answer: NO
Passage: Up to version 3.7 of vi, created in October 1981, UC Berkeley was the development home for vi, but with Bill Joy's departure in early 1982 to join Sun Microsystems, and AT&T's UNIX System V (January 1983) adopting vi, changes to the vi codebase happened more slowly and in a more dispersed and mutually incompatible way. At UC Berkeley, changes were made but the version number was never updated beyond 3.7. Commercial Unix vendors, such as Sun, HP, DEC, and IBM each received copies of the vi source, and their operating systems, Solaris, HP-UX, Tru64 UNIX, and AIX, today continue to maintain versions of vi directly descended from the 3.7 release, but with added features, such as adjustable key mappings, encryption, and wide character support.

Question: Did the vi version remain the same by 1983?
Answer: YES

Question: Did UC Berkley deliberate on making a newer version of vi?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Were there legal battles stopping UC Berkley from changing to a newer version number?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Up to version 3.7 of vi, created in October 1981, UC Berkeley was the development home for vi, but with Bill Joy's departure in early 1982 to join Sun Microsystems, and AT&amp;T's UNIX System V (January 1983) adopting vi, changes to the vi codebase happened more slowly and in a more dispersed and mutually incompatible way. At UC Berkeley, the version number remained at 3.7 as changes were never made. Commercial Unix vendors, such as Sun, HP, DEC, and IBM each received copies of the vi source, and their operating systems, Solaris, HP-UX, Tru64 UNIX, and AIX, today continue to maintain versions of vi directly descended from the 3.7 release, but with added features, such as adjustable key mappings, encryption, and wide character support.

Question: Did the vi version remain the same by 1983?
Answer: YES

Question: Were there legal battles stopping UC Berkley from changing to a newer version number?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Up to version 3.7 of vi, created in October 1981, UC Berkeley was the development home for vi, but with Bill Joy's departure in early 1982 to join Sun Microsystems, and AT&amp;T's UNIX System V (January 1983) adopting vi, changes to the vi codebase happened more slowly and in a more dispersed and mutually incompatible way. At UC Berkeley, changes were made and the version number was gradually updated beyond 3.7. Commercial Unix vendors, such as Sun, HP, DEC, and IBM each received copies of the vi source, and their operating systems, Solaris, HP-UX, Tru64 UNIX, and AIX, today continue to maintain versions of vi directly descended from the 3.7 release, but with added features, such as adjustable key mappings, encryption, and wide character support.

Question: Did the vi version remain the same by 1983?
Answer: NO

Question: Did UC Berkley deliberate on making a newer version of vi?
Answer: YES

Question: Were there legal battles stopping UC Berkley from changing to a newer version number?
Answer: NO