lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Otherwise, Tatian originally omitted altogether both of the different genealogies in Matthew and Luke, as well as Luke's introduction (Luke 1:1–4); and also did not originally include Jesus' encounter with the adulteress (John 7:53–8:11). This latter passage is, however, generally considered to be a late addition to the Gospel of John, with the Diatessaron itself often cited as an early textual witness in support of its omission. Most scholars agree that Tatian did, from the beginning, include the longer ending of Mark (Mark 16: 9–20), and correspondingly is amongst the earliest witnesses to this inclusion. Tatian took the material from the individual gospels and did not any noticeable verbiage to it. Only 56 verses in the canonical Gospels do not have a counterpart in the Diatessaron, mostly the genealogies and the "Pericope Adulterae". The final work is about 72 per cent the length of the four gospels put together; around a quarter of the text of the separate gospels being adjudged by Tatian to be duplicated. (McFall, 1994).

Question: Would early scholars of the gospels have found value in Tatian's work that they could not get from the texts themselves?
Answer: NO

Question: Would it be a valid criticism to say that Tatian could have added in facts and events that did not truly happen in the life of Jesus, but which people of Tatian's time (perhaps even including the author himself) believed were true?
Answer: NO

Question: Would modern day scholars consider Tatian's work to be that of a secondary source, writing about and possibly explaining historical events, but not actually recording any history that was not previously known?
Answer: YES
Passage: Otherwise, Tatian originally omitted altogether both of the different genealogies in Matthew and Luke, as well as Luke's introduction (Luke 1:1–4); and also did not originally include Jesus' encounter with the adulteress (John 7:53–8:11). This latter passage is, however, generally considered to be a late addition to the Gospel of John, with the Diatessaron itself often cited as an early textual witness in support of its omission. Most scholars agree that Tatian did, from the beginning, include the longer ending of Mark (Mark 16: 9–20), and correspondingly is amongst the earliest witnesses to this inclusion. Tatian took no significant amount of original wording from the separate gospels, and mostly retold the story in his own vernacular, with previously unwritten details. Only 56 verses in the canonical Gospels do not have a counterpart in the Diatessaron, mostly the genealogies and the "Pericope Adulterae". The final work is about 72 per cent the length of the four gospels put together; around a quarter of the text of the separate gospels being adjudged by Tatian to be duplicated. (McFall, 1994).

Question: Would early scholars of the gospels have found value in Tatian's work that they could not get from the texts themselves?
Answer: YES

Question: Would it be a valid criticism to say that Tatian could have added in facts and events that did not truly happen in the life of Jesus, but which people of Tatian's time (perhaps even including the author himself) believed were true?
Answer: YES

Question: Would modern day scholars consider Tatian's work to be that of a secondary source, writing about and possibly explaining historical events, but not actually recording any history that was not previously known?
Answer: NO
Passage: Otherwise, Tatian originally omitted altogether both of the different genealogies in Matthew and Luke, as well as Luke's introduction (Luke 1:1–4); and also did not originally include Jesus' encounter with the adulteress (John 7:53–8:11). This latter passage is, however, generally considered to be a late addition to the Gospel of John, with the Diatessaron itself often cited as an early textual witness in support of its omission. Most scholars agree that Tatian did, from the beginning, include the longer ending of Mark (Mark 16: 9–20), and correspondingly is amongst the earliest witnesses to this inclusion. Tatian added a significant amount of context to the textual material he took from the separate gospels, though the events were described with strict accuracy. Only 56 verses in the canonical Gospels do not have a counterpart in the Diatessaron, mostly the genealogies and the "Pericope Adulterae". The final work is about 72 per cent the length of the four gospels put together; around a quarter of the text of the separate gospels being adjudged by Tatian to be duplicated. (McFall, 1994).

Question: Would early scholars of the gospels have found value in Tatian's work that they could not get from the texts themselves?
Answer: YES

Question: Would it be a valid criticism to say that Tatian could have added in facts and events that did not truly happen in the life of Jesus, but which people of Tatian's time (perhaps even including the author himself) believed were true?
Answer: NO

Question: Would modern day scholars consider Tatian's work to be that of a secondary source, writing about and possibly explaining historical events, but not actually recording any history that was not previously known?
Answer: YES
Passage: The 747-400 Dreamlifter (originally called the 747 Large Cargo Freighter or LCF) is a Boeing-designed modification of existing 747-400s to a larger configuration to ferry 787 Dreamliner sub-assemblies. Evergreen Aviation Technologies Corporation of Taiwan was contracted to complete modifications of 747-400s into Dreamlifters in Taoyuan. The aircraft flew for the first time on September 9, 2006 in a test flight. Modification of four aircraft was completed by February 2010. The Dreamlifters have been placed into service transporting sub-assemblies for the 787 program to the Boeing plant in Everett, Washington, for final assembly. The aircraft is certified to carry only essential crew and not passengers.

Question: Can the aircraft carry passengers?
Answer: NO

Question: Is the aircraft certificate valid for both passengers and essential crew?
Answer: NO

Question: Can the aircraft carry essential crew?
Answer: YES
Passage: The 747-400 Dreamlifter (originally called the 747 Large Cargo Freighter or LCF) is a Boeing-designed modification of existing 747-400s to a larger configuration to ferry 787 Dreamliner sub-assemblies. Evergreen Aviation Technologies Corporation of Taiwan was contracted to complete modifications of 747-400s into Dreamlifters in Taoyuan. The aircraft flew for the first time on September 9, 2006 in a test flight. Modification of four aircraft was completed by February 2010. The Dreamlifters have been placed into service transporting sub-assemblies for the 787 program to the Boeing plant in Everett, Washington, for final assembly. The aircraft is certified to carry only essential crew without passengers.

Question: Can the aircraft carry passengers?
Answer: NO

Question: Is the aircraft certificate valid for both passengers and essential crew?
Answer: NO

Question: Can the aircraft carry essential crew?
Answer: YES
Passage: The 747-400 Dreamlifter (originally called the 747 Large Cargo Freighter or LCF) is a Boeing-designed modification of existing 747-400s to a larger configuration to ferry 787 Dreamliner sub-assemblies. Evergreen Aviation Technologies Corporation of Taiwan was contracted to complete modifications of 747-400s into Dreamlifters in Taoyuan. The aircraft flew for the first time on September 9, 2006 in a test flight. Modification of four aircraft was completed by February 2010. The Dreamlifters have been placed into service transporting sub-assemblies for the 787 program to the Boeing plant in Everett, Washington, for final assembly. The aircraft is not certified to carry essential crew and passengers.

Question: Can the aircraft carry passengers?
Answer: NO

Question: Is the aircraft certificate valid for both passengers and essential crew?
Answer: NO

Question: Can the aircraft carry essential crew?
Answer: NO
Passage: The 747-400 Dreamlifter (originally called the 747 Large Cargo Freighter or LCF) is a Boeing-designed modification of existing 747-400s to a larger configuration to ferry 787 Dreamliner sub-assemblies. Evergreen Aviation Technologies Corporation of Taiwan was contracted to complete modifications of 747-400s into Dreamlifters in Taoyuan. The aircraft flew for the first time on September 9, 2006 in a test flight. Modification of four aircraft was completed by February 2010. The Dreamlifters have been placed into service transporting sub-assemblies for the 787 program to the Boeing plant in Everett, Washington, for final assembly. The aircraft is certified to carry essential crew and passengers.

Question: Can the aircraft carry passengers?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the aircraft certificate valid for both passengers and essential crew?
Answer: YES

Question: Can the aircraft carry essential crew?
Answer: YES
Passage: Fuchs lost control of the team in August 1935, and the new owners tried to change the team's image by renaming it the Boston Bees. This did little to change the team's fortunes. After five uneven years, a new owner, construction magnate Lou Perini, changed the nickname back to the Braves. He immediately set about rebuilding the team. World War II slowed things down a little, but the team rode the pitching of Warren Spahn to impressive seasons in 1946 and 1947.

Question: Does the passage make it sound like ticket revenues for Boston's team were uneven during the five years before Perini bought in?
Answer: YES
Passage: Fuchs lost control of the team in August 1935, and the new owners tried to change the team's image by renaming it the Boston Bees. This did little to change the team's fortunes. Lou Perini, a construction tycoon who bought the team, returned to the old nickname of the Braves after five years had passed with varying results. He immediately set about rebuilding the team. World War II slowed things down a little, but the team rode the pitching of Warren Spahn to impressive seasons in 1946 and 1947.

Question: Does the passage make it sound like ticket revenues for Boston's team were uneven during the five years before Perini bought in?
Answer: YES
Passage: Fuchs lost control of the team in August 1935, and the new owners tried to change the team's image by renaming it the Boston Bees. This did little to change the team's fortunes. After five years of steady, disappointing results, and uneven reactions from fans, a new owner, construction magnate Lou Perini, changed the nickname back to the Braves. He immediately set about rebuilding the team. World War II slowed things down a little, but the team rode the pitching of Warren Spahn to impressive seasons in 1946 and 1947.

Question: Regardless of whether or not he could have turned things around for the team, could Perini have expected to be able to at least earn a steady cash flow as the team's owner (which may have even been his reason to buy, if the price was low enough)?
Answer: NO
Passage: Fuchs lost control of the team in August 1935, and the new owners tried to change the team's image by renaming it the Boston Bees. This did little to change the team's fortunes. After five equally-disappointing years in terms of performance on field and in the ticket booth, a new owner, construction magnate Lou Perini, changed the nickname back to the Braves. He immediately set about rebuilding the team. World War II slowed things down a little, but the team rode the pitching of Warren Spahn to impressive seasons in 1946 and 1947.

Question: Does the passage make it sound like ticket revenues for Boston's team were uneven during the five years before Perini bought in?
Answer: NO
Passage: Russian Pan-Slavic organizations sent aid to the Balkan rebels and so pressured the tsar's government to declare war on the Ottoman Empire in 1877 in the name of protecting Orthodox Christians. Unable to mediate between the Ottoman Empire and Russia over the control of Serbia, Austria–Hungary declared neutrality when the conflict between the two powers escalated into a war. With help from Romania and Greece, Russia defeated the Ottomans and with the Treaty of San Stefano tried to create a large pro-Russian Bulgaria. This treaty sparked an international uproar that almost resulted in a general European war. Austria–Hungary and Britain feared that a large Bulgaria would become a Russian satellite that would enable the tsar to dominate the Balkans. British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli moved warships into position against Russia to halt the advance of Russian influence in the eastern Mediterranean so close to Britain's route through the Suez Canal.

Question: Were the Russians able to sway the opinion of Mediterranean countries?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the Russians prevented from swaying the opinion of Mediterranean countries?
Answer: YES

Question: Which Mediterranean countries opinions were the Russians trying to sway?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Russian Pan-Slavic organizations sent aid to the Balkan rebels and so pressured the tsar's government to declare war on the Ottoman Empire in 1877 in the name of protecting Orthodox Christians. Unable to mediate between the Ottoman Empire and Russia over the control of Serbia, Austria–Hungary declared neutrality when the conflict between the two powers escalated into a war. With help from Romania and Greece, Russia defeated the Ottomans and with the Treaty of San Stefano tried to create a large pro-Russian Bulgaria. This treaty sparked an international uproar that almost resulted in a general European war. Austria–Hungary and Britain feared that a large Bulgaria would become a Russian satellite that would enable the tsar to dominate the Balkans. British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli moved warships into position against Russia to stop the advance of Russian influence in the eastern Mediterranean so close to Britain's route through the Suez Canal

Question: Were the Russians able to sway the opinion of Mediterranean countries?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the Russians prevented from swaying the opinion of Mediterranean countries?
Answer: YES

Question: Which Mediterranean countries opinions were the Russians trying to sway?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Russian Pan-Slavic organizations sent aid to the Balkan rebels and so pressured the tsar's government to declare war on the Ottoman Empire in 1877 in the name of protecting Orthodox Christians. Unable to mediate between the Ottoman Empire and Russia over the control of Serbia, Austria–Hungary declared neutrality when the conflict between the two powers escalated into a war. With help from Romania and Greece, Russia defeated the Ottomans and with the Treaty of San Stefano tried to create a large pro-Russian Bulgaria. This treaty sparked an international uproar that almost resulted in a general European war. Austria–Hungary and Britain feared that a large Bulgaria would become a Russian satellite that would enable the tsar to dominate the Balkans. British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli moved warships into position against Russia to invite the advance of Russian influence in the eastern Mediterranean so close to Britain's route through the Suez Canal.

Question: Were the Russians able to sway the opinion of Mediterranean countries?
Answer: YES

Question: Were the Russians prevented from swaying the opinion of Mediterranean countries?
Answer: NO

Question: Which Mediterranean countries opinions were the Russians trying to sway?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The military personnel were allowed to run and serve in political offices while staying on active duty. However, they did not represent the Army or the Armada but instead the population of the city or province where elected. Dom Pedro I chose nine military personnel as Senators and five (out of 14) to the State Council. During the Regency, two were chosen to the Senate and none to the State Council as there was no Council at the time. Dom Pedro II chose four military personnel to become Senators during the 1840s, two in the 1850s and three until the end of his reign. He also chose seven military personnel to be State Counselors during the 1840s and 1850s and three after that.

Question: During the Regency, was there likely a lot of deliberation involved in choosing members of the Senate?
Answer: YES

Question: During the Regency, was the combined weight of chosen Senators greater than the combined weight of chosen State Council members?
Answer: YES

Question: During the Regency, was there likely a lot of deliberation involved in choosing members of the State Council?
Answer: NO
Passage: The military personnel were allowed to run and serve in political offices while staying on active duty. However, they did not represent the Army or the Armada but instead the population of the city or province where elected. Dom Pedro I chose nine military personnel as Senators and five (out of 14) to the State Council. During the Regency, two were chosen to the Senate and the State Council was left empty as there was no Council at the time. Dom Pedro II chose four military personnel to become Senators during the 1840s, two in the 1850s and three until the end of his reign. He also chose seven military personnel to be State Counselors during the 1840s and 1850s and three after that.

Question: During the Regency, was there likely a lot of deliberation involved in choosing members of the Senate?
Answer: YES

Question: During the Regency, was the combined weight of chosen Senators greater than the combined weight of chosen State Council members?
Answer: YES

Question: During the Regency, was there likely a lot of deliberation involved in choosing members of the State Council?
Answer: NO
Passage: The military personnel were allowed to run and serve in political offices while staying on active duty. However, they did not represent the Army or the Armada but instead the population of the city or province where elected. Dom Pedro I chose nine military personnel as Senators and five (out of 14) to the State Council. During the Regency, none were chosen to the Senate and two to the State Council as there was still a Council at the time. Dom Pedro II chose four military personnel to become Senators during the 1840s, two in the 1850s and three until the end of his reign. He also chose seven military personnel to be State Counselors during the 1840s and 1850s and three after that.

Question: During the Regency, was there likely a lot of deliberation involved in choosing members of the Senate?
Answer: NO

Question: During the Regency, was the combined weight of chosen Senators greater than the combined weight of chosen State Council members?
Answer: NO

Question: During the Regency, was there likely a lot of deliberation involved in choosing members of the State Council?
Answer: YES
Passage: The military personnel were allowed to run and serve in political offices while staying on active duty. However, they did not represent the Army or the Armada but instead the population of the city or province where elected. Dom Pedro I chose nine military personnel as Senators and five (out of 14) to the State Council. During the Regency, two were chosen to the Senate and some to the State Council as there was still a Council at the time. Dom Pedro II chose four military personnel to become Senators during the 1840s, two in the 1850s and three until the end of his reign. He also chose seven military personnel to be State Counselors during the 1840s and 1850s and three after that.

Question: During the Regency, was there likely a lot of deliberation involved in choosing members of the Senate?
Answer: YES

Question: During the Regency, was the combined weight of chosen Senators greater than the combined weight of chosen State Council members?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: During the Regency, was there likely a lot of deliberation involved in choosing members of the State Council?
Answer: YES
Passage: The modern "Pax Americana" era is cited by both supporters and critics of U.S. foreign policy after World War II. However, from 1946 to 1992 "Pax Americana" is considered a partial international order, as it applied only to capitalist bloc countries, being preferable for some authors to speak about a "Pax Americana et Sovietica". Many commentators and critics focus on American policies from 1992 to the present, and as such, it carries different connotations depending on the context. For example, it appears three times in the 90 page document, "Rebuilding America's Defenses," by the Project for the New American Century, but is also used by critics to characterize American dominance and hyperpower as imperialist in function and basis. From about the mid-1940s until 1991, U.S. foreign policy was dominated by the Cold War, and characterized by its significant international military presence and greater diplomatic involvement. Seeking an alternative to the isolationist policies pursued after World War I, the United States defined a new policy called containment to oppose the spread of communism.

Question: Was the policy of containment meant to be beneficial for communism?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the policy of isolationism meant to be beneficial for communism?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Was the policy of containment pursued in the 1920s?
Answer: NO
Passage: The modern "Pax Americana" era is cited by both supporters and critics of U.S. foreign policy after World War II. However, from 1946 to 1992 "Pax Americana" is considered a partial international order, as it applied only to capitalist bloc countries, being preferable for some authors to speak about a "Pax Americana et Sovietica". Many commentators and critics focus on American policies from 1992 to the present, and as such, it carries different connotations depending on the context. For example, it appears three times in the 90 page document, "Rebuilding America's Defenses," by the Project for the New American Century, but is also used by critics to characterize American dominance and hyperpower as imperialist in function and basis. From about the mid-1940s until 1991, U.S. foreign policy was dominated by the Cold War, and characterized by its significant international military presence and greater diplomatic involvement. Seeking an alternative to the isolationist policies pursued after World War I, the United States defined a new policy called containment to stifle the spread of communism.

Question: Was the policy of containment meant to be beneficial for communism?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the policy of isolationism meant to be beneficial for communism?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Was the policy of containment pursued in the 1920s?
Answer: NO
Passage: The modern "Pax Americana" era is cited by both supporters and critics of U.S. foreign policy after World War II. However, from 1946 to 1992 "Pax Americana" is considered a partial international order, as it applied only to capitalist bloc countries, being preferable for some authors to speak about a "Pax Americana et Sovietica". Many commentators and critics focus on American policies from 1992 to the present, and as such, it carries different connotations depending on the context. For example, it appears three times in the 90 page document, "Rebuilding America's Defenses," by the Project for the New American Century, but is also used by critics to characterize American dominance and hyperpower as imperialist in function and basis. From about the mid-1940s until 1991, U.S. foreign policy was dominated by the Cold War, and characterized by its significant international military presence and greater diplomatic involvement. Seeking an alternative to the containment policies pursued after World War I, the United States defined a new policy called isolationism to oppose the spread of communism.

Question: Was the policy of containment meant to be beneficial for communism?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Was the policy of isolationism meant to be beneficial for communism?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the policy of containment pursued in the 1920s?
Answer: YES