lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Importantly, while the author of the poem did believe that Jesus existed in heaven before his physical incarnation, this does not necessarily mean that he was believed to be "equal" to God the Father prior to his death and resurrection. This largely depends on how the Greek word "harpagmon" (, accusative form of) is translated in verse 6 ("Something to be grasped after / exploited"). If "harpagmon" is rendered as "something to be exploited," as it is in many Christian Bible translations, then the implication is that Christ was already equal to God prior to his incarnation. But Bart Ehrman and others have argued that the correct translation is in fact "something to be grasped after," implying that Jesus was "not" equal to God before his resurrection. Outside of this passage, "harpagmon" and related words were almost always used to refer to something that a person doesn't yet possess but tries to acquire.

Question: According to the author of the poem, was Jesus as powerful as God the Father while he was alive?
Answer: NO

Question: According to the author of the poem, did Jesus exist somewhere before he was born on earth?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the author of the poem, was Jesus less powerful than God the Father while he was alive?
Answer: YES
Passage: Importantly, while the author of the poem did believe that Jesus existed in heaven before his physical incarnation, this may lack the implication that he was believed to be "equal" to God the Father prior to his death and resurrection. This largely depends on how the Greek word "harpagmon" (, accusative form of) is translated in verse 6 ("Something to be grasped after / exploited"). If "harpagmon" is rendered as "something to be exploited," as it is in many Christian Bible translations, then the implication is that Christ was already equal to God prior to his incarnation. But Bart Ehrman and others have argued that the correct translation is in fact "something to be grasped after," implying that Jesus was "not" equal to God before his resurrection. Outside of this passage, "harpagmon" and related words were almost always used to refer to something that a person doesn't yet possess but tries to acquire.

Question: According to the author of the poem, was Jesus as powerful as God the Father while he was alive?
Answer: NO

Question: According to the author of the poem, did Jesus exist somewhere before he was born on earth?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the author of the poem, was Jesus less powerful than God the Father while he was alive?
Answer: YES
Passage: Importantly, while the author of the poem believed that Jesus did not necessarily exist in heaven before his physical incarnation, he was clearly believed to be "equal" to God the Father prior to his death and resurrection. This largely depends on how the Greek word "harpagmon" (, accusative form of) is translated in verse 6 ("Something to be grasped after / exploited"). If "harpagmon" is rendered as "something to be exploited," as it is in many Christian Bible translations, then the implication is that Christ was already equal to God prior to his incarnation. But Bart Ehrman and others have argued that the correct translation is in fact "something to be grasped after," implying that Jesus was "not" equal to God before his resurrection. Outside of this passage, "harpagmon" and related words were almost always used to refer to something that a person doesn't yet possess but tries to acquire.

Question: According to the author of the poem, was Jesus as powerful as God the Father while he was alive?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the author of the poem, did Jesus exist somewhere before he was born on earth?
Answer: NO

Question: According to the author of the poem, was Jesus less powerful than God the Father while he was alive?
Answer: NO
Passage: Importantly, since the author of the poem did believe that Jesus existed in heaven before his physical incarnation, this dictates that he was believed to be "equal" to God the Father prior to his death and resurrection. This largely depends on how the Greek word "harpagmon" (, accusative form of) is translated in verse 6 ("Something to be grasped after / exploited"). If "harpagmon" is rendered as "something to be exploited," as it is in many Christian Bible translations, then the implication is that Christ was already equal to God prior to his incarnation. But Bart Ehrman and others have argued that the correct translation is in fact "something to be grasped after," implying that Jesus was "not" equal to God before his resurrection. Outside of this passage, "harpagmon" and related words were almost always used to refer to something that a person doesn't yet possess but tries to acquire.

Question: According to the author of the poem, was Jesus as powerful as God the Father while he was alive?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the author of the poem, did Jesus exist somewhere before he was born on earth?
Answer: YES
Passage: Atari Inc. released the Pro-Line Trak-Ball controller for the system, which was used primarily for gaming titles such as "Centipede" and "Missile Command". A paddle controller and an updated self-centering version of the original controller were also in development, but never made it to market.

Question: Did stores ever sell an Atari paddle controller?
Answer: NO

Question: Were designs for an updated Atari controller ever made?
Answer: YES

Question: Can you buy an Atari paddle controller at stores today?
Answer: NO
Passage: Atari Inc. released the Pro-Line Trak-Ball controller for the system, which was used primarily for gaming titles such as "Centipede" and "Missile Command". A paddle controller and an updated self-centering version of the original controller were also in development, but Atari declined to produce them.

Question: Did stores ever sell an Atari paddle controller?
Answer: NO

Question: Were designs for an updated Atari controller ever made?
Answer: YES

Question: Can you buy an Atari paddle controller at stores today?
Answer: NO
Passage: Atari Inc. released the Pro-Line Trak-Ball controller for the system, which was used primarily for gaming titles such as "Centipede" and "Missile Command". A paddle controller and an updated self-centering version of the original controller were never actually in development, and so they didn't make it to market.

Question: Did stores ever sell an Atari paddle controller?
Answer: NO

Question: Were designs for an updated Atari controller ever made?
Answer: NO

Question: Can you buy an Atari paddle controller at stores today?
Answer: NO
Passage: Atari Inc. released the Pro-Line Trak-Ball controller for the system, which was used primarily for gaming titles such as "Centipede" and "Missile Command". A paddle controller and an updated self-centering version of the original controller were also in development, and eventually made it to market.

Question: Did stores ever sell an Atari paddle controller?
Answer: YES

Question: Were designs for an updated Atari controller ever made?
Answer: YES

Question: Can you buy an Atari paddle controller at stores today?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: At the same time as the heaviest fighting in North Africa, the Pacific War was also in its early stages, and RAAF units in Australia were completely lacking in suitable fighter aircraft. Spitfire production was being absorbed by the war in Europe; P-38s were trialled, but were difficult to obtain; Mustangs had not yet reached squadrons anywhere, and Australia's tiny and inexperienced aircraft industry was geared towards larger aircraft. USAAF P-40s and their pilots originally intended for the U.S. Far East Air Force in the Philippines, but diverted to Australia as a result of Japanese naval activity were the first suitable fighter aircraft to arrive in substantial numbers. By mid-1942, the RAAF was able to obtain some USAAF replacement shipments.

Question: Given the level of experience mentioned in the passage, could you safely assume that Australia had produced no small, single-engine fighters during the first World War?
Answer: YES

Question: If factories in Australia could be quickly re-tooled to produce small fighter aircraft, does it sound like the industry would have the other factors in place (such as a skilled workforce) to produce these craft?
Answer: NO
Passage: At the same time as the heaviest fighting in North Africa, the Pacific War was also in its early stages, and RAAF units in Australia were completely lacking in suitable fighter aircraft. Almost all Spitfires that were produced at this time were being used in Europe; the P-38 had been tested in Australia, but acquiring them proved to be troublesome; Mustangs had not yet entered operational service in any theater of the war; finally, Australia's own aircraft industry was very small, lacked suitable experience, and was outfitted for the production of larger air-frames. USAAF P-40s and their pilots originally intended for the U.S. Far East Air Force in the Philippines, but diverted to Australia as a result of Japanese naval activity were the first suitable fighter aircraft to arrive in substantial numbers. By mid-1942, the RAAF was able to obtain some USAAF replacement shipments.

Question: Given the level of experience mentioned in the passage, could you safely assume that Australia had produced no small, single-engine fighters during the first World War?
Answer: YES

Question: If factories in Australia could be quickly re-tooled to produce small fighter aircraft, does it sound like the industry would have the other factors in place (such as a skilled workforce) to produce these craft?
Answer: NO
Passage: At the same time as the heaviest fighting in North Africa, the Pacific War was also in its early stages, and RAAF units in Australia were completely lacking in suitable fighter aircraft. Spitfire production was being absorbed by the war in Europe; P-38s were trialled, but were difficult to obtain; Mustangs had not yet reached squadrons anywhere, and Australia's domestic aircraft industry was most experienced with, and thus was geared toward, the production of larger aircraft. USAAF P-40s and their pilots originally intended for the U.S. Far East Air Force in the Philippines, but diverted to Australia as a result of Japanese naval activity were the first suitable fighter aircraft to arrive in substantial numbers. By mid-1942, the RAAF was able to obtain some USAAF replacement shipments.

Question: Given the level of experience mentioned in the passage, could you safely assume that Australia had produced no small, single-engine fighters during the first World War?
Answer: YES

Question: Would it be feasible for Australia's aircraft industry to take over a reasonable portion of the production of heavy bombers or transport aircraft needed in the Pacific theater, and thus, potentially free up some workers elsewhere to build more fighters?
Answer: YES
Passage: For a single man to rule the whole country during this period was rare. This is often ascribed to the inheritance system practised in Wales. All sons received an equal share of their father's property (including illegitimate sons), resulting in the division of territories. However, the Welsh laws prescribe this system of division for land in general, not for kingdoms, where there is provision for an "edling" (or heir) to the kingdom to be chosen, usually by the king. Any son, legitimate or illegitimate, could be chosen as edling and there were frequently disappointed candidates prepared to challenge the chosen heir.

Question: Is it possible that sons born to women unrelated by marriage to a Welsh landowner might make fraudulent claims that their biological father actually was the deceased landowner, and thus successfully gain an inheritance?
Answer: YES
Passage: For a single man to rule the whole country during this period was rare. This is often ascribed to the inheritance system practised in Wales. The father's property, including territory, was divided up evenly among all sons, including those that the father had borne with other women. However, the Welsh laws prescribe this system of division for land in general, not for kingdoms, where there is provision for an "edling" (or heir) to the kingdom to be chosen, usually by the king. Any son, legitimate or illegitimate, could be chosen as edling and there were frequently disappointed candidates prepared to challenge the chosen heir.

Question: Is it possible that sons born to women unrelated by marriage to a Welsh landowner might make fraudulent claims that their biological father actually was the deceased landowner, and thus successfully gain an inheritance?
Answer: YES
Passage: For a single man to rule the whole country during this period was rare. This is often ascribed to the inheritance system practised in Wales. All sons received an equal share of their father's property (excluding, of course, illegitimate sons), resulting in the division of territories. However, the Welsh laws prescribe this system of division for land in general, not for kingdoms, where there is provision for an "edling" (or heir) to the kingdom to be chosen, usually by the king. Any son could be chosen as edling and there were frequently disappointed candidates prepared to challenge the chosen heir.

Question: Is it possible that sons born to women unrelated by marriage to a Welsh landowner might make fraudulent claims that their biological father actually was the deceased landowner, and thus successfully gain an inheritance?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone actually managed to make a believable claim that a son of a Welsh landowner, who was carried to term by his wife, had actually been conceived during the wife's affair with another local, would this son lose out on his share of the property?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that this family's estate was too small to attract the attention of the king or anyone else who would choose an edling, if one of the group of eligible male heirs wanted to try to increase the size of his inheritance, could claiming that one of his brothers was in fact conceived by another man who had relations with their mother end up increasing the share of property that goes to the claimant (and to his other brothers)?
Answer: YES
Passage: For a single man to rule the whole country during this period was rare. This is often ascribed to the inheritance system practised in Wales. All legitimate sons of the couple received an equal share of their father's property, resulting in the division of territories. However, the Welsh laws prescribe this system of division for land in general, not for kingdoms, where there is provision for an "edling" (or heir) to the kingdom to be chosen, usually by the king. Any son could be chosen as edling and there were frequently disappointed candidates prepared to challenge the chosen heir.

Question: Is it possible that sons born to women unrelated by marriage to a Welsh landowner might make fraudulent claims that their biological father actually was the deceased landowner, and thus successfully gain an inheritance?
Answer: NO

Question: Assuming that this family's estate was too small to attract the attention of the king or anyone else who would choose an edling, if one of the group of eligible male heirs wanted to try to increase the size of his inheritance, could claiming that one of his brothers was in fact conceived by another man who had relations with their mother end up increasing the share of property that goes to the claimant (and to his other brothers)?
Answer: YES
Passage: When the Gold Rush began, the California goldfields were peculiarly lawless places. When gold was discovered at Sutter's Mill, California was still technically part of Mexico, under American military occupation as the result of the Mexican–American War. With the signing of the treaty ending the war on February 2, 1848, California became a possession of the United States, but it was not a formal "territory" and did not become a state until September 9, 1850. California existed in the unusual condition of a region under military control. There was no civil legislature, executive or judicial body for the entire region. Local residents operated under a confusing and changing mixture of Mexican rules, American principles, and personal dictates. Lax enforcement of federal laws, such as the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, encouraged the arrival of free blacks and escaped slaves.

Question: Would a resident of California at this time expect the acting governor of the region to be wearing a uniform with rank insignia?
Answer: YES

Question: Prior to her statehood in 1850, was California's system of government control relatively unique for that area of the continent?
Answer: YES

Question: On California's side of the Mississippi River just prior to statehood, would you be easily able to find another American territory that was also under military control?
Answer: NO
Passage: When the Gold Rush began, the California goldfields were peculiarly lawless places. When gold was discovered at Sutter's Mill, California was still technically part of Mexico, under American military occupation as the result of the Mexican–American War. With the signing of the treaty ending the war on February 2, 1848, California became a possession of the United States, but it was not a formal "territory" and did not become a state until September 9, 1850. California was under military control at the time, which was far from common. There was no civil legislature, executive or judicial body for the entire region. Local residents operated under a confusing and changing mixture of Mexican rules, American principles, and personal dictates. Lax enforcement of federal laws, such as the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, encouraged the arrival of free blacks and escaped slaves.

Question: Would a resident of California at this time expect the acting governor of the region to be wearing a uniform with rank insignia?
Answer: YES

Question: Prior to her statehood in 1850, was California's system of government control relatively unique for that area of the continent?
Answer: YES

Question: On California's side of the Mississippi River just prior to statehood, would you be easily able to find another American territory that was also under military control?
Answer: NO
Passage: When the Gold Rush began, the California goldfields were peculiarly lawless places. When gold was discovered at Sutter's Mill, California was still technically part of Mexico, under American military occupation as the result of the Mexican–American War. With the signing of the treaty ending the war on February 2, 1848, California became a possession of the United States, but it was not a formal "territory" and did not become a state until September 9, 1850. California existed as a region under military control, but at the time, this was only unusual in the Eastern half of the continental United States. There was no civil legislature, executive or judicial body for the entire region. Local residents operated under a confusing and changing mixture of Mexican rules, American principles, and personal dictates. Lax enforcement of federal laws, such as the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, encouraged the arrival of free blacks and escaped slaves.

Question: Would a resident of California at this time expect the acting governor of the region to be wearing a uniform with rank insignia?
Answer: YES

Question: Prior to her statehood in 1850, was California's system of government control relatively unique for that area of the continent?
Answer: NO

Question: On California's side of the Mississippi River just prior to statehood, would you be easily able to find another American territory that was also under military control?
Answer: YES
Passage: When the Gold Rush began, the California goldfields were peculiarly lawless places. When gold was discovered at Sutter's Mill, California was still technically part of Mexico, under American military occupation as the result of the Mexican–American War. With the signing of the treaty ending the war on February 2, 1848, California became a possession of the United States, but it was not a formal "territory" and did not become a state until September 9, 1850. California existed as a semi-autonomous region, that lacked the military control of similar territories. There was no civil legislature, executive or judicial body for the entire region. Local residents operated under a confusing and changing mixture of Mexican rules, American principles, and personal dictates. Lax enforcement of federal laws, such as the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, encouraged the arrival of free blacks and escaped slaves.

Question: Would a resident of California at this time expect the acting governor of the region to be wearing a uniform with rank insignia?
Answer: NO
Passage: In December 1744, she proposed to her ministers the expulsion of Jews from Austria and Bohemia. Her first intention was to deport all Jews by 1 January, but having accepted the advice of her ministers, who were concerned by the number of future deportees that could reach 50,000, had the deadline postponed to June. The expulsion orders were only retracted in 1748 due to pressures from other countries, including Great Britain. She also ordered the deportation of around 20,000 Jews from Prague amid accusations that they were disloyal at the time of the Bavarian-French occupation during the War of the Austrian Succession. The order was then expanded to all Jews of Bohemia and major cities of Moravia, although the order was later retracted except for Prague Jews that had already been expelled.

Question: When the deportation order was retracted, were formerly deported Prague Jews found in Prague again?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the expansion of the deportation order apply to a Jewish family living in the largest city in Moravia?
Answer: YES

Question: When the deportation order was retracted, did many formerly deported Prague Jews remain in their new countries?
Answer: YES
Passage: In December 1744, she proposed to her ministers the expulsion of Jews from Austria and Bohemia. Her first intention was to deport all Jews by 1 January, but having accepted the advice of her ministers, who were concerned by the number of future deportees that could reach 50,000, had the deadline postponed to June. The expulsion orders were only retracted in 1748 due to pressures from other countries, including Great Britain. She also ordered the deportation of around 20,000 Jews from Prague amid accusations that they were disloyal at the time of the Bavarian-French occupation during the War of the Austrian Succession. The order was then expanded to all Jews of Bohemia and major cities of Moravia, although the order was later retracted, though Prague Jews that had already been expelled were not allowed back.

Question: When the deportation order was retracted, were formerly deported Prague Jews found in Prague again?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the expansion of the deportation order apply to a Jewish family living in the largest city in Moravia?
Answer: YES

Question: When the deportation order was retracted, did many formerly deported Prague Jews remain in their new countries?
Answer: YES