lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: While David was away, the fight was kept going by a succession of Guardians. In November, Edward III invaded again, but he accomplished little and retreated in February 1335 due primarily to his failure to bring the Scots to battle. He and Edward Balliol returned again in July with an army of 13,000, and advanced through Scotland, first to Glasgow and then to Perth, where Edward III installed himself while his army looted and destroyed the surrounding countryside. At this time, the Scots followed a plan of avoiding pitched battles, depending instead on minor actions of heavy cavalry – the normal practice of the day. Some Scottish leaders, including the Earl of Atholl, who had returned to Scotland with Edward Balliol in 1332 and 1333, defected to the Bruce party.

Question: Does this passage suggest that David was too young, or for some other reason unfit to rule an army, even when he was physically present in his castle or in the fields?
Answer: NO

Question: Based on his position at the time, would it be fair to say that David blamed himself, or was blamed justifiably by critics, for any sins of commission that led to the defections of Scottish leaders?
Answer: NO
Passage: Even after David returned from his absence, a series of Guardians kept up the struggle. In November, Edward III invaded again, but he accomplished little and retreated in February 1335 due primarily to his failure to bring the Scots to battle. He and Edward Balliol returned again in July with an army of 13,000, and advanced through Scotland, first to Glasgow and then to Perth, where Edward III installed himself while his army looted and destroyed the surrounding countryside. At this time, the Scots followed a plan of avoiding pitched battles, depending instead on minor actions of heavy cavalry – the normal practice of the day. Some Scottish leaders, including the Earl of Atholl, who had returned to Scotland with Edward Balliol in 1332 and 1333, defected to the Bruce party.

Question: Does this passage suggest that David was too young, or for some other reason unfit to rule an army, even when he was physically present in his castle or in the fields?
Answer: YES

Question: Could you draw the conclusion that Edward III had a lot of respect for, and possibly fear of, David's capability as a military leader, based on the circumstances (that Edward was surely aware of) that preceded his November invasion?
Answer: NO
Passage: After David returned, he took over once again from the series of Guardians who had been overseeing the struggle. In November, Edward III invaded again, but he accomplished little and retreated in February 1335 due primarily to his failure to bring the Scots to battle. He and Edward Balliol returned again in July with an army of 13,000, and advanced through Scotland, first to Glasgow and then to Perth, where Edward III installed himself while his army looted and destroyed the surrounding countryside. At this time, the Scots followed a plan of avoiding pitched battles, depending instead on minor actions of heavy cavalry – the normal practice of the day. Some Scottish leaders, including the Earl of Atholl, who had returned to Scotland with Edward Balliol in 1332 and 1333, defected to the Bruce party.

Question: Does this passage suggest that David was too young, or for some other reason unfit to rule an army, even when he was physically present in his castle or in the fields?
Answer: NO

Question: Based on his position at the time, would it be fair to say that David blamed himself, or was blamed justifiably by critics, for any sins of commission that led to the defections of Scottish leaders?
Answer: YES
Passage: Expeditions sent to the area in the 1950s and 1960s found microscopic silicate and magnetite spheres in siftings of the soil. Similar spheres were predicted to exist in the felled trees, although they could not be detected by contemporary means. Later expeditions did identify such spheres in the resin of the trees. Chemical analysis showed that the spheres contained high proportions of nickel relative to iron, which is also found in meteorites, leading to the conclusion they were of extraterrestrial origin. The concentration of the spheres in different regions of the soil was also found to be consistent with the expected distribution of debris from a meteoroid air burst. Later studies of the spheres found unusual ratios of numerous other metals relative to the surrounding environment, which was taken as further evidence of their extraterrestrial origin.

Question: Is there likely a consensus among modern scientists about if the spheres originated on Earth or not?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that many scientists questioned the methodology of the later tests performed on the spheres?
Answer: NO

Question: If a scientist was given a list that included the ratios of metals in the spheres and the ratio of metals in the area where the spheres were found, would it be difficult for a scientist to pick out the sphere from the list?
Answer: NO
Passage: Expeditions sent to the area in the 1950s and 1960s found microscopic silicate and magnetite spheres in siftings of the soil. Similar spheres were predicted to exist in the felled trees, although they could not be detected by contemporary means. Later expeditions did identify such spheres in the resin of the trees. Chemical analysis showed that the spheres contained high proportions of nickel relative to iron, which is also found in meteorites, leading to the conclusion they were of extraterrestrial origin. The concentration of the spheres in different regions of the soil was also found to be consistent with the expected distribution of debris from a meteoroid air burst. Later studies of the spheres found strange ratios of numerous other metals relative to the surrounding environment, which was taken as further evidence of their extraterrestrial origin.

Question: Is there likely a consensus among modern scientists about if the spheres originated on Earth or not?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that many scientists questioned the methodology of the later tests performed on the spheres?
Answer: NO

Question: If a scientist was given a list that included the ratios of metals in the spheres and the ratio of metals in the area where the spheres were found, would it be difficult for a scientist to pick out the sphere from the list?
Answer: NO
Passage: Expeditions sent to the area in the 1950s and 1960s found microscopic silicate and magnetite spheres in siftings of the soil. Similar spheres were predicted to exist in the felled trees, although they could not be detected by contemporary means. Later expeditions did identify such spheres in the resin of the trees. Chemical analysis showed that the spheres contained high proportions of nickel relative to iron, which is also found in meteorites, leading to the conclusion they were of extraterrestrial origin. The concentration of the spheres in different regions of the soil was also found to be consistent with the expected distribution of debris from a meteoroid air burst. Later unusual studies of the spheres found usual ratios of numerous other metals relative to the surrounding environment, which was taken as evidence of their terrestrial origin.

Question: Is there likely a consensus among modern scientists about if the spheres originated on Earth or not?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that many scientists questioned the methodology of the later tests performed on the spheres?
Answer: YES
Passage: Expeditions sent to the area in the 1950s and 1960s found microscopic silicate and magnetite spheres in siftings of the soil. Similar spheres were predicted to exist in the felled trees, although they could not be detected by contemporary means. Later expeditions did identify such spheres in the resin of the trees. Chemical analysis showed that the spheres contained high proportions of nickel relative to iron, which is also found in meteorites, leading to the conclusion they were of extraterrestrial origin. The concentration of the spheres in different regions of the soil was also found to be consistent with the expected distribution of debris from a meteoroid air burst. Later studies of the spheres found usual ratios of numerous other metals relative to the surrounding environment, which was taken as evidence of their terrestrial origin.

Question: Is there likely a consensus among modern scientists about if the spheres originated on Earth or not?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that many scientists questioned the methodology of the later tests performed on the spheres?
Answer: NO
Passage: Development of fertility awareness methods is ongoing. In the late 1990s, the Institute for Reproductive Health at Georgetown University introduced two new methods. The Two-Day Method, a mucus-only system, and CycleBeads and iCycleBeads (the digital version), based on the Standard Days Method, are designed to be both effective and simple to teach, learn, and use. In 2019, Urrutia et al. released a study as well as interactive graph over-viewing all studied fertility awareness based methods. Femtech companies such as Dot and Natural Cycles have also produced new studies and apps to help women avoid pregnancy. Natural Cycles is the first app of its kind to receive FDA approval.

Question: Would the companies Dot and Natural Cycle be admired by the women's liberation movement, since they enable women to have fulfilling sex lives with neither undue burden nor the risk of unwanted pregnanies?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the Catholic Church would approve of the products being offered by Dot and Natural Cycle, because they ensure that marital relations are used for the purpose of producing children?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone badly misunderstood the guidance provided by one of the aforementioned femtech apps, and unwittingly did the opposite of what the app recommended, would she be risking an unwanted pregnancy as a result?
Answer: YES
Passage: Development of fertility awareness methods is ongoing. In the late 1990s, the Institute for Reproductive Health at Georgetown University introduced two new methods. The Two-Day Method, a mucus-only system, and CycleBeads and iCycleBeads (the digital version), based on the Standard Days Method, are designed to be both effective and simple to teach, learn, and use. In 2019, Urrutia et al. released a study as well as interactive graph over-viewing all studied fertility awareness based methods. For women who want to prevent the occurrence of pregnancy, studies have been produced and apps developed by Femtech companies such as Dot and Natural Cycles. Natural Cycles is the first app of its kind to receive FDA approval.

Question: Would the companies Dot and Natural Cycle be admired by the women's liberation movement, since they enable women to have fulfilling sex lives with neither undue burden nor the risk of unwanted pregnanies?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the Catholic Church would approve of the products being offered by Dot and Natural Cycle, because they ensure that marital relations are used for the purpose of producing children?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone badly misunderstood the guidance provided by one of the aforementioned femtech apps, and unwittingly did the opposite of what the app recommended, would she be risking an unwanted pregnancy as a result?
Answer: YES
Passage: Development of fertility awareness methods is ongoing. In the late 1990s, the Institute for Reproductive Health at Georgetown University introduced two new methods. The Two-Day Method, a mucus-only system, and CycleBeads and iCycleBeads (the digital version), based on the Standard Days Method, are designed to be both effective and simple to teach, learn, and use. In 2019, Urrutia et al. released a study as well as interactive graph over-viewing all studied fertility awareness based methods. Femtech companies such as Dot and Natural Cycles have also produced new studies and apps to help women avoid uncertainty and wasted effort when trying to become pregnant. Natural Cycles is the first app of its kind to receive FDA approval.

Question: Would the companies Dot and Natural Cycle be admired by the women's liberation movement, since they enable women to have fulfilling sex lives with neither undue burden nor the risk of unwanted pregnanies?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the Catholic Church would approve of the products being offered by Dot and Natural Cycle, because they ensure that marital relations are used for the purpose of producing children?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone badly misunderstood the guidance provided by one of the aforementioned femtech apps, and unwittingly did the opposite of what the app recommended, would she be risking an unwanted pregnancy as a result?
Answer: NO
Passage: Development of fertility awareness methods is ongoing. In the late 1990s, the Institute for Reproductive Health at Georgetown University introduced two new methods. The Two-Day Method, a mucus-only system, and CycleBeads and iCycleBeads (the digital version), based on the Standard Days Method, are designed to be both effective and simple to teach, learn, and use. In 2019, Urrutia et al. released a study as well as interactive graph over-viewing all studied fertility awareness based methods. Femtech companies such as Dot and Natural Cycles have also produced new studies and apps to help women pinpoint the optimal times for sexual activity when trying to ensure successful conception. Natural Cycles is the first app of its kind to receive FDA approval.

Question: Would the companies Dot and Natural Cycle be admired by the women's liberation movement, since they enable women to have fulfilling sex lives with neither undue burden nor the risk of unwanted pregnanies?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the Catholic Church would approve of the products being offered by Dot and Natural Cycle, because they ensure that marital relations are used for the purpose of producing children?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone badly misunderstood the guidance provided by one of the aforementioned femtech apps, and unwittingly did the opposite of what the app recommended, would she be risking an unwanted pregnancy as a result?
Answer: NO
Passage: From 1961 until 1991, lifelong Chicago resident Andrew Rozdilsky performed as the unofficial yet popular mascot "Andy the Clown" for the White Sox at the original Comiskey Park. Known for his elongated "Come on you White Sox" battle cry, Andy got his start after a group of friends invited him to a Sox game in 1960, where he decided to wear his clown costume and entertain fans in his section. That response was so positive that when he won free 1961 season tickets, he decided to wear his costume to all games. Comiskey Park ushers eventually offered free admission to Rozdilsky. Starting in 1981, the new ownership group led by Jerry Reinsdorf introduced a twosome, called Ribbie and Roobarb, as the official team mascots, and banned Rozdilsky from performing in the lower seating level. Ribbie and Roobarb were very unpopular, as they were seen as an attempt to get rid of the beloved Andy the Clown.

Question: Did the fans like more than one of the mascots mentioned in the article?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the fans like any of the mascots that were hired by the team?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the fans dislike all of the mascots mentioned in the article that were hired by the team ?
Answer: YES
Passage: From 1961 until 1991, lifelong Chicago resident Andrew Rozdilsky performed as the unofficial yet popular mascot "Andy the Clown" for the White Sox at the original Comiskey Park. Known for his elongated "Come on you White Sox" battle cry, Andy got his start after a group of friends invited him to a Sox game in 1960, where he decided to wear his clown costume and entertain fans in his section. That response was so positive that when he won free 1961 season tickets, he decided to wear his costume to all games. Comiskey Park ushers eventually offered free admission to Rozdilsky. Starting in 1981, the new ownership group led by Jerry Reinsdorf introduced a twosome, called Ribbie and Roobarb, as the official team mascots, and banned Rozdilsky from performing in the lower seating level. Ribbie and Roobarb were very unpopular , as they were seen as an attempt to get rid of the beloved Andy the Clown. The fans were very unsatisfied with Ribbie and Roobarb, as they were seen as an attempt to replace the beloved Andy the Clown.

Question: Did the fans like more than one of the mascots mentioned in the article?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the fans like any of the mascots that were hired by the team?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the fans dislike all of the mascots mentioned in the article that were hired by the team ?
Answer: YES
Passage: From 1961 until 1991, lifelong Chicago resident Andrew Rozdilsky performed as the unofficial yet popular mascot "Andy the Clown" for the White Sox at the original Comiskey Park. Known for his elongated "Come on you White Sox" battle cry, Andy got his start after a group of friends invited him to a Sox game in 1960, where he decided to wear his clown costume and entertain fans in his section. That response was so positive that when he won free 1961 season tickets, he decided to wear his costume to all games. Comiskey Park ushers eventually offered free admission to Rozdilsky. Starting in 1981, the new ownership group led by Jerry Reinsdorf introduced a twosome, called Ribbie and Roobarb, as the official team mascots, and banned Rozdilsky from performing in the lower seating level. Ribbie and Roobarb were very unpopular , as they were seen as an attempt to get rid of the beloved Andy the Clown. Ribbie was very unpopular, but Roobarb quickly surpassed Andy the Clown as the fan's favorite mascot.

Question: Did the fans like more than one of the mascots mentioned in the article?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the fans like any of the mascots that were hired by the team?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the fans dislike all of the mascots mentioned in the article that were hired by the team ?
Answer: NO
Passage: From 1961 until 1991, lifelong Chicago resident Andrew Rozdilsky performed as the unofficial yet popular mascot "Andy the Clown" for the White Sox at the original Comiskey Park. Known for his elongated "Come on you White Sox" battle cry, Andy got his start after a group of friends invited him to a Sox game in 1960, where he decided to wear his clown costume and entertain fans in his section. That response was so positive that when he won free 1961 season tickets, he decided to wear his costume to all games. Comiskey Park ushers eventually offered free admission to Rozdilsky. Starting in 1981, the new ownership group led by Jerry Reinsdorf introduced a twosome, called Ribbie and Roobarb, as the official team mascots, and banned Rozdilsky from performing in the lower seating level. Ribbie and Roobarb were very unpopular , as they were seen as an attempt to get rid of the beloved Andy the Clown. Ribbie and Roobard both proved to be very popular and the fans soon forgot about the formerly beloved Andy the Clown.

Question: Did the fans like more than one of the mascots mentioned in the article?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the fans like any of the mascots that were hired by the team?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the fans dislike all of the mascots mentioned in the article that were hired by the team ?
Answer: NO
Passage: Soup was made in the usual way, reduced, degreased—or the fat would go rancid—and then reduced repeatedly until it took on the consistency of jelly. Once it was sufficiently gelatinous to hold its form, it was placed on pieces of flannel or unglazed earthenware dishes and rotated regularly to dry it further. This was a seasonal process attempted only in the winter when humidity was low. Once dry, it was wrapped in paper and stored in boxes.

Question: Does it sound like traditional earthenware might be porous to fats, or could leach unpleasant flavors into gelatins?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone wanted to take their paleo diet in a new direction, and use only ancient cooking tools, could the earliest forms of pottery be used, by themselves, to make this kind of jellied fat?
Answer: YES

Question: Would it be reasonable to assume that some compound in gelatinized fats might actually react to the most common pottery glazes?
Answer: YES
Passage: Soup was made in the usual way, reduced, degreased—or the fat would go rancid—and then reduced repeatedly until it took on the consistency of jelly. The fat, once it could hold its shape sufficiently as a gelatinous solid, would then be placed onto pieces of flannel or into earthenware dishes that lacked any kind of glaze, and regularly rotated in order to continue the drying process. This was a seasonal process attempted only in the winter when humidity was low. Once dry, it was wrapped in paper and stored in boxes.

Question: Does it sound like traditional earthenware might be porous to fats, or could leach unpleasant flavors into gelatins?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone wanted to take their paleo diet in a new direction, and use only ancient cooking tools, could the earliest forms of pottery be used, by themselves, to make this kind of jellied fat?
Answer: YES

Question: Would it be reasonable to assume that some compound in gelatinized fats might actually react to the most common pottery glazes?
Answer: YES
Passage: Soup was made in the usual way, reduced, degreased—or the fat would go rancid—and then reduced repeatedly until it took on the consistency of jelly. Once it was sufficiently gelatinous to hold its form, it was placed on pieces of flannel and into unglazed earthenware dishes. or placed directly into properly glazed earthenware dishes, and rotated regularly to dry it further. This was a seasonal process attempted only in the winter when humidity was low. Once dry, it was wrapped in paper and stored in boxes.

Question: Would it be reasonable to assume that some compound in gelatinized fats might actually react to the most common pottery glazes?
Answer: NO
Passage: Soup was made in the usual way, reduced, degreased—or the fat would go rancid—and then reduced repeatedly until it took on the consistency of jelly. Once it was sufficiently gelatinous to hold its form, it was placed on pieces of flannel or into properly glazed or cloth-wrapped earthenware dishes and rotated regularly to dry it further. This was a seasonal process attempted only in the winter when humidity was low. Once dry, it was wrapped in paper and stored in boxes.

Question: Does it sound like traditional earthenware might be porous to fats, or could leach unpleasant flavors into gelatins?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone wanted to take their paleo diet in a new direction, and use only ancient cooking tools, could the earliest forms of pottery be used, by themselves, to make this kind of jellied fat?
Answer: NO

Question: Would it be reasonable to assume that some compound in gelatinized fats might actually react to the most common pottery glazes?
Answer: NO
Passage: In continuum mechanics a body is considered stress-free if the only forces present are those inter-atomic forces (ionic, metallic, and van der Waals forces) required to hold the body together and to keep its shape in the absence of all external influences, including gravitational attraction. Stresses generated during manufacture of the body to a specific configuration are also excluded when considering stresses in a body. Therefore, the stresses considered in continuum mechanics are only those produced by deformation of the body, "sc." only relative changes in stress are considered, not the absolute values of stress.

Question: A body held together only by inter-atomic forces is placed near a very massive object, such that it experiences a large gravitational attraction; is it considered stress-free?
Answer: NO

Question: If an body initially held together only by inter-atomic forces is breaking apart while being thrown, is it considered stress-free?
Answer: NO