lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Part One of the book finds young Jonathan Livingston frustrated with the meaningless materialism, conformity, and limitation of the seagull life. He is seized with a passion for flight of all kinds, and his soul soars as he experiments with exhilarating challenges of daring aerial feats. Eventually, his conformity to the limited seagull life leads him into conflict with his flock, and they turn their backs on him, casting him out of their society and exiling him. Not deterred by this, Jonathan continues his efforts to reach higher and higher flight goals, finding he is often successful but eventually he can fly no higher. He is then met by two radiant, loving seagulls who explain to him that he has learned much, and that they are there now to teach him more.

Question: Does the seagull flock believe in a very rigid form of lifestyle?
Answer: NO

Question: Does Jonathan Livingston still have friends in the flock?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the seagull lifestyle require experimenting with new flying techniques?
Answer: YES
Passage: When Diego refused to remove Lenin from the painting, he was ordered to leave the US. One of Diego's assistants managed to take a few photographs of the work so Diego was able to later recreate it. American poet Archibald MacLeish wrote six "irony-laden" poems about the mural. "The New Yorker" magazine published E. B. White's light poem, "I paint what I see: A ballad of artistic integrity", also in response to the controversy with number of sponsors taking offense to it.

Question: Was Diego likely very protective over the integrity of his artistic vision for the painting?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it probable that the US wanted Diego to leave whether or not he kept Lenin in the painting?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were to look at the painting today, would you probably see Lenin in it?
Answer: YES
Passage: When Diego declined to remove Lenin from the painting, he was ordered to leave the US. One of Diego's assistants managed to take a few photographs of the work so Diego was able to later recreate it. American poet Archibald MacLeish wrote six "irony-laden" poems about the mural. "The New Yorker" magazine published E. B. White's light poem, "I paint what I see: A ballad of artistic integrity", also in response to the controversy with number of sponsors taking offense to it.

Question: Was Diego likely very protective over the integrity of his artistic vision for the painting?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it probable that the US wanted Diego to leave whether or not he kept Lenin in the painting?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were to look at the painting today, would you probably see Lenin in it?
Answer: YES
Passage: When Diego removed Lenin from the painting, he refused to leave the US. One of Diego's assistants managed to take a few photographs of the work so Diego was able to later recreate it. American poet Archibald MacLeish wrote six "irony-laden" poems about the mural. "The New Yorker" magazine published E. B. White's light poem, "I paint what I see: A ballad of artistic integrity", also in response to the controversy with number of sponsors taking offense to it.

Question: Was Diego likely very protective over the integrity of his artistic vision for the painting?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it probable that the US wanted Diego to leave whether or not he kept Lenin in the painting?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were to look at the painting today, would you probably see Lenin in it?
Answer: NO
Passage: When Diego agreed to remove Lenin from the painting, he was not ordered to leave the US. One of Diego's assistants managed to take a few photographs of the work so Diego was able to later recreate it. American poet Archibald MacLeish wrote six "irony-laden" poems about the mural. "The New Yorker" magazine published E. B. White's light poem, "I paint what I see: A ballad of artistic integrity", also in response to the controversy with number of sponsors taking offense to it.

Question: Was Diego likely very protective over the integrity of his artistic vision for the painting?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it probable that the US wanted Diego to leave whether or not he kept Lenin in the painting?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were to look at the painting today, would you probably see Lenin in it?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 2017, the Ninth Circuit upheld the first three sentences of the jury's instruction and overruled the second half. The jury instructions were "You cannot substitute your sense of justice, whatever that means, for your duty to follow the law, whether you agree with it or not. It is not for you to determine whether the law is just or whether the law is unjust. That cannot be your task. There is no such thing as valid jury nullification. You would violate your oath and the law if you willfully brought a verdict contrary to the law given to you in this case." However, the Ninth Circuit deemed this instruction a harmless error and affirmed the conviction.

Question: Would the jurors in this case who had decided to exercise their presumed right to jury nullification be pleased with the specific result for the defendant (even if they disagreed with the way it came about)?
Answer: NO

Question: Could someone (such as your humble narrator) who has only a cursory understanding of legal matters reasonably conclude that this case was more akin to a mistrial, which could be potentially be retried, rather than a true exoneration or conviction?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 2017, the Ninth Circuit upheld the first three sentences of the jury's instruction and overruled the second half. The jury instructions were "You cannot substitute your sense of justice, whatever that means, for your duty to follow the law, whether you agree with it or not. It is not for you to determine whether the law is just or whether the law is unjust. That cannot be your task. There is no such thing as valid jury nullification. You would violate your oath and the law if you willfully brought a verdict contrary to the law given to you in this case." The Ninth Circuit did, however, consider this error with the instructions to be harmless, and upheld the conviction

Question: Would the jurors in this case who had decided to exercise their presumed right to jury nullification be pleased with the specific result for the defendant (even if they disagreed with the way it came about)?
Answer: NO

Question: Could someone (such as your humble narrator) who has only a cursory understanding of legal matters reasonably conclude that this case was more akin to a mistrial, which could be potentially be retried, rather than a true exoneration or conviction?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 2017, the Ninth Circuit upheld the first three sentences of the jury's instruction and overruled the second half. The jury instructions were "You cannot substitute your sense of justice, whatever that means, for your duty to follow the law, whether you agree with it or not. It is not for you to determine whether the law is just or whether the law is unjust. That cannot be your task. There is no such thing as valid jury nullification. You would violate your oath and the law if you willfully brought a verdict contrary to the law given to you in this case." However, the Ninth Circuit deemed this instruction to be too significant to be considered a harmless error and overturned the conviction.

Question: Would the jurors in this case who had decided to exercise their presumed right to jury nullification be pleased with the specific result for the defendant (even if they disagreed with the way it came about)?
Answer: YES

Question: Could someone (such as your humble narrator) who has only a cursory understanding of legal matters reasonably conclude that this case was more akin to a mistrial, which could be potentially be retried, rather than a true exoneration or conviction?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 2017, the Ninth Circuit upheld the first three sentences of the jury's instruction and overruled the second half. The jury instructions were "You cannot substitute your sense of justice, whatever that means, for your duty to follow the law, whether you agree with it or not. It is not for you to determine whether the law is just or whether the law is unjust. That cannot be your task. There is no such thing as valid jury nullification. You would violate your oath and the law if you willfully brought a verdict contrary to the law given to you in this case." However, the Ninth Circuit considered this error to be so significant that they overturned the conviction, ruling the defendant not guilty.

Question: Would the jurors in this case who had decided to exercise their presumed right to jury nullification be pleased with the specific result for the defendant (even if they disagreed with the way it came about)?
Answer: YES
Passage: During the Blitz, Wyndham was a fire watcher and later member of the Home Guard. He witnessed the destruction of London from the rooftops of "Bloomsbury." He described many scenes and incidents, including the uncanny silence of London on a Sunday morning after a heavy bombardment, in letters to his long-term partner Grace Wilson. These found their way into "The Day of the Triffids".

Question: From Wyndham's accounts, could a reader reasonably conclude that bombing raids were suspended on weekends, even during wartime?
Answer: NO

Question: From the letters that Wyndham wrote to his partner, does it sound like the pair were accustomed to a kind of self-enforced silence throughout the city in peacetime on Sundays, similar to what might happen in very small towns?
Answer: NO
Passage: During the Blitz, Wyndham was a fire watcher and later member of the Home Guard. He witnessed the destruction of London from the rooftops of "Bloomsbury." Wyndham gave many detailed accounts of the scenes and incidents that he witnessed when writing letters to his long-term partner Grace Wilson, and these accounts included the strange silence that engulfed London on a Sunday morning after a heavy bombing raid. These found their way into "The Day of the Triffids".

Question: From Wyndham's accounts, could a reader reasonably conclude that bombing raids were suspended on weekends, even during wartime?
Answer: NO

Question: From the letters that Wyndham wrote to his partner, does it sound like the pair were accustomed to a kind of self-enforced silence throughout the city in peacetime on Sundays, similar to what might happen in very small towns?
Answer: NO
Passage: During the Blitz, Wyndham was a fire watcher and later member of the Home Guard. He witnessed the destruction of London from the rooftops of "Bloomsbury." He described many scenes and incidents, including the usual silence of London on a Sunday morning but also the similar, and uncanny silence on weekdays that followed heavy bombardments, in letters to his long-term partner Grace Wilson. These found their way into "The Day of the Triffids".

Question: From Wyndham's accounts, could a reader reasonably conclude that bombing raids were suspended on weekends, even during wartime?
Answer: YES

Question: From the letters that Wyndham wrote to his partner, does it sound like the pair were accustomed to a kind of self-enforced silence throughout the city in peacetime on Sundays, similar to what might happen in very small towns?
Answer: YES

Question: If many stores and businesses were traditionally closed on Sundays in London, does it sound like that tradition continued during the Blitz, given the way that Wyndham describes events in his letters?
Answer: YES
Passage: During the Blitz, Wyndham was a fire watcher and later member of the Home Guard. He witnessed the destruction of London from the rooftops of "Bloomsbury." He described many scenes and incidents that were unique to the Blitz, including the way that London was bustling and busy on Sunday mornings (even those that immediately followed heavy bombardments), in letters to his long-term partner Grace Wilson. These found their way into "The Day of the Triffids".

Question: From Wyndham's accounts, could a reader reasonably conclude that bombing raids were suspended on weekends, even during wartime?
Answer: NO

Question: If many stores and businesses were traditionally closed on Sundays in London, does it sound like that tradition continued during the Blitz, given the way that Wyndham describes events in his letters?
Answer: NO
Passage: The breach between de Gaulle and Pétain over the ghost-writing of "Le Soldat" had deepened in 1928. Pétain brought in a new ghostwriter, Colonel Audet, who was unwilling to take on the job and wrote to de Gaulle in some embarrassment to take over the project. Pétain was quite friendly about the matter but did not publish the book. In 1929 Pétain did not use de Gaulle's draft text for his eulogy for the late Ferdinand Foch, whose seat at the "Academie Française" he was assuming.

Question: Would Colonel Audet probably have preferred de Gaulle to ghostwrite the project?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Pétain thought Colonel Audet would be a good ghostwriter?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it probable that Pétain and Colonel Audet had similar opinions on who the ghostwriter should be?
Answer: NO
Passage: The breach between de Gaulle and Pétain over the ghost-writing of "Le Soldat" had deepened in 1928. Pétain brought in a new ghostwriter, Colonel Audet, who was reluctant to take on the job and wrote to de Gaulle in some embarrassment to take over the project. Pétain was quite friendly about the matter but did not publish the book. In 1929 Pétain did not use de Gaulle's draft text for his eulogy for the late Ferdinand Foch, whose seat at the "Academie Française" he was assuming.

Question: Would Colonel Audet probably have preferred de Gaulle to ghostwrite the project?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Pétain thought Colonel Audet would be a good ghostwriter?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it probable that Pétain and Colonel Audet had similar opinions on who the ghostwriter should be?
Answer: NO
Passage: The breach between de Gaulle and Pétain over the ghost-writing of "Le Soldat" had deepened in 1928. Pétain was unwilling to bring in a new ghostwriter, Colonel Audet, who was eager to take on the job but wrote to de Gaulle in some embarrassment to take over the project. Pétain was quite friendly about the matter but did not publish the book. In 1929 Pétain did not use de Gaulle's draft text for his eulogy for the late Ferdinand Foch, whose seat at the "Academie Française" he was assuming.

Question: Is it likely that Pétain thought Colonel Audet would be a good ghostwriter?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it probable that Pétain and Colonel Audet had similar opinions on who the ghostwriter should be?
Answer: NO
Passage: The breach between de Gaulle and Pétain over the ghost-writing of "Le Soldat" had deepened in 1928. Pétain brought in a new ghostwriter, Colonel Audet, who was happy to take on the job and wrote to de Gaulle in some embarrassment to not take over the project. Pétain was quite friendly about the matter but did not publish the book. In 1929 Pétain did not use de Gaulle's draft text for his eulogy for the late Ferdinand Foch, whose seat at the "Academie Française" he was assuming.

Question: Would Colonel Audet probably have preferred de Gaulle to ghostwrite the project?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Pétain thought Colonel Audet would be a good ghostwriter?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it probable that Pétain and Colonel Audet had similar opinions on who the ghostwriter should be?
Answer: YES
Passage: The French salute, is performed with a flat hand, palm facing forwards; the upper arm is horizontal and the tips of the fingers come near the corner of the eyes. The hand, unlike the British salute, remains at a 45 degree angle in line with the lower arm. The five fingers are lined together. It mirrors the gesture made by knights greeting each other, raising their visors to show their faces. A crisp tension may be given when the salute is taken or broken.

Question: Is it possible that in both France and Britain, a drill instructor would use a single straight ruler to make sure that recruits' were holding their hands with military precision during a salute?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage make it sound like Britain is the only outlier among European militaries in the way that a salute is made (with the reasonable assumption that if no other nation is mentioned by name, they probably don't differ much from the neighbors with which they share a land border)?
Answer: YES

Question: If an observer was looking at photos of British and French soldiers, who were not wearing uniforms with any kind of identifying markings, would they be able to sort those photos by nationality solely by looking at the arms executing the salutes?
Answer: YES
Passage: The French salute, is performed with a flat hand, palm facing forwards; the upper arm is horizontal and the tips of the fingers come near the corner of the eyes. In contrast to the salute given in the UK military, French soliders and sailors keep their hands in line with their lower arms, at a constant 45 degree angle The five fingers are lined together. It mirrors the gesture made by knights greeting each other, raising their visors to show their faces. A crisp tension may be given when the salute is taken or broken.

Question: Is it possible that in both France and Britain, a drill instructor would use a single straight ruler to make sure that recruits' were holding their hands with military precision during a salute?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage make it sound like Britain is the only outlier among European militaries in the way that a salute is made (with the reasonable assumption that if no other nation is mentioned by name, they probably don't differ much from the neighbors with which they share a land border)?
Answer: YES

Question: If an observer was looking at photos of British and French soldiers, who were not wearing uniforms with any kind of identifying markings, would they be able to sort those photos by nationality solely by looking at the arms executing the salutes?
Answer: YES
Passage: The French salute, is performed with a flat hand, palm facing forwards; the upper arm is horizontal and the tips of the fingers come near the corner of the eyes. As in the British salute, but unlike the salute of some continental militaries, the hand remains at a 45 degree angle in line with the lower arm. The five fingers are lined together. It mirrors the gesture made by knights greeting each other, raising their visors to show their faces. A crisp tension may be given when the salute is taken or broken.

Question: Is it possible that in both France and Britain, a drill instructor would use a single straight ruler to make sure that recruits' were holding their hands with military precision during a salute?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage make it sound like Britain is the only outlier among European militaries in the way that a salute is made (with the reasonable assumption that if no other nation is mentioned by name, they probably don't differ much from the neighbors with which they share a land border)?
Answer: NO

Question: If an observer was looking at photos of British and French soldiers, who were not wearing uniforms with any kind of identifying markings, would they be able to sort those photos by nationality solely by looking at the arms executing the salutes?
Answer: NO
Passage: The French salute, is performed with a flat hand, palm facing forwards; the upper arm is horizontal and the tips of the fingers come near the corner of the eyes. In both France and Britain, the hand remains at a 45 degree angle in line with the lower arm when executing a proper salute. The five fingers are lined together. It mirrors the gesture made by knights greeting each other, raising their visors to show their faces. A crisp tension may be given when the salute is taken or broken.

Question: Is it possible that in both France and Britain, a drill instructor would use a single straight ruler to make sure that recruits' were holding their hands with military precision during a salute?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage make it sound like Britain is the only outlier among European militaries in the way that a salute is made (with the reasonable assumption that if no other nation is mentioned by name, they probably don't differ much from the neighbors with which they share a land border)?
Answer: NO

Question: If an observer was looking at photos of British and French soldiers, who were not wearing uniforms with any kind of identifying markings, would they be able to sort those photos by nationality solely by looking at the arms executing the salutes?
Answer: NO
Passage: About 30 to 50 percent of people with schizophrenia fail to accept that they have an illness or comply with their recommended treatment. For those who are unwilling or unable to take medication regularly, long-acting injections of antipsychotics may be used, which reduce the risk of relapse to a greater degree than oral medications. When used in combination with psychosocial interventions, they may improve long-term adherence to treatment.

Question: Would someone with their jaw wired shut be likely to receive more effective treatment than someone able to swallow pills?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a doctor be more likely to prescribe oral medication or an injection to a patient with no history of relapsing?
Answer: oral medication
Passage: About 30 to 50 percent of people with schizophrenia fail to accept that they have an illness or comply with their recommended treatment. For those who are unwilling or physically struggle to take medication regularly, long-acting injections of antipsychotics may be used, which reduce the risk of relapse to a greater degree than oral medications. When used in combination with psychosocial interventions, they may improve long-term adherence to treatment.

Question: Would someone with their jaw wired shut be likely to receive more effective treatment than someone able to swallow pills?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a doctor be more likely to prescribe oral medication or an injection to a patient with no history of relapsing?
Answer: oral medication
Passage: About 30 to 50 percent of people with schizophrenia fail to accept that they have an illness or comply with their recommended treatment. For those who are unwilling to take medication regularly, long-acting injections of antipsychotics may be used, but those are unable to reduce the risk of relapse to a greater degree than oral medications. When used in combination with psychosocial interventions, they may improve long-term adherence to treatment.

Question: Would someone with their jaw wired shut be likely to receive more effective treatment than someone able to swallow pills?
Answer: NO
Passage: About 30 to 50 percent of people with schizophrenia fail to accept that they have an illness or comply with their recommended treatment. For those who are unwilling but are able to take medication regularly, long-acting injections of antipsychotics may be used, which reduce the risk of relapse to a greater degree than oral medications. When used in combination with psychosocial interventions, they may improve long-term adherence to treatment.

Question: Would a doctor be more likely to prescribe oral medication or an injection to a patient with no history of relapsing?
Answer: oral medication
Passage: Baker Island (previously New Nantucket) is an uninhabited atoll just north of the equator in the central Pacific Ocean about southwest of Honolulu. The island lies almost halfway between Hawaii and Australia. Its nearest neighbor is Howland Island, to the north-northwest; both have been claimed as territories of the United States since 1857, though the United Kingdom considered them part of the British Empire between 1897 and 1936.

Question: Is a travel agent likely to know much about Baker Island if a customer asks about it?
Answer: NO

Question: Would you find any litter on the ground at Baker Island?
Answer: NO