lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: John Schlesinger, who would direct "Midnight Cowboy" and was seeking lead actors, held that same impression. Hoffman's performance as a button-down college graduate and track star was so convincing to Schlesinger, "he seemed unable to comprehend the fact that he was acting," notes Biskind. To help the director, whom he had never met, overcome that false impression, Hoffman met him in Times Square dressed as a homeless person, wearing a dirty raincoat, his hair slicked back and with some hastily applied makeup and charcoal that made his face look like it had gone unshaven for a couple of days. Schlesinger was sold, admitting, "I've only seen you in the context of "The Graduate," but you'll do quite well."

Question: Does it sound like this meeting with Schlesinger was mostly unplanned for Hoffman, giving him no more than a day to prepare?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone saw Dustin Hoffman immediately before and immediately after he prepared for this meeting and then cleaned up afterwards, could they draw the conclusion that the young actor was incapable of growing natural facial hair, even if he wanted to?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone hadn't seen The Graduate, could this passage give them the impression that Dustin Hoffman's character was cleanly shaven throughout (an image that the actor wanted to dispel)?
Answer: YES
Passage: John Schlesinger, who would direct "Midnight Cowboy" and was seeking lead actors, held that same impression. Hoffman's performance as a button-down college graduate and track star was so convincing to Schlesinger, "he seemed unable to comprehend the fact that he was acting," notes Biskind. To help the director, whom he had never met, overcome that false impression, Hoffman met him in Times Square dressed as a homeless person, wearing a dirty raincoat, his hair slicked back but nonetheless with his face cleanly shaven. Schlesinger was sold, admitting, "I've only seen you in the context of "The Graduate," but you'll do quite well."

Question: Does it sound like this meeting with Schlesinger was mostly unplanned for Hoffman, giving him no more than a day to prepare?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone saw Dustin Hoffman immediately before and immediately after he prepared for this meeting and then cleaned up afterwards, could they draw the conclusion that the young actor was incapable of growing natural facial hair, even if he wanted to?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the United States, genetically modified sugar beets, engineered for resistance to glyphosate, a herbicide marketed as Roundup, were developed by Monsanto as a genetically modified crop. In 2005, the US Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) deregulated glyphosate-resistant sugar beets after it conducted an environmental assessment and determined glyphosate-resistant sugar beets were highly unlikely to become a plant pest. Sugar from glyphosate-resistant sugar beets has been approved for human and animal consumption in multiple countries, but commercial production of biotech beets has been approved only in the United States and Canada. Studies have concluded the sugar from glyphosate-resistant sugar beets has the same nutritional value as sugar from conventional sugar beets. After deregulation in 2005, glyphosate-resistant sugar beets were extensively adopted in the United States. About 95% of sugar beet acres in the US were planted with glyphosate-resistant seed in 2011.

Question: Should a beet farmer be concerned that glyphosate-resistant beets could become pests?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the glyphosate resistant beets deregulated?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the United States, genetically modified sugar beets, engineered for resistance to glyphosate, a herbicide marketed as Roundup, were developed by Monsanto as a genetically modified crop. In 2005, the US Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) deregulated glyphosate-resistant sugar beets after it conducted an environmental assessment and determined glyphosate-resistant sugar beets would hardly become a plant pest. Sugar from glyphosate-resistant sugar beets has been approved for human and animal consumption in multiple countries, but commercial production of biotech beets has been approved only in the United States and Canada. Studies have concluded the sugar from glyphosate-resistant sugar beets has the same nutritional value as sugar from conventional sugar beets. After deregulation in 2005, glyphosate-resistant sugar beets were extensively adopted in the United States. About 95% of sugar beet acres in the US were planted with glyphosate-resistant seed in 2011.

Question: Should a beet farmer be concerned that glyphosate-resistant beets could become pests?
Answer: NO

Question: Were the glyphosate resistant beets deregulated?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the United States, genetically modified sugar beets, engineered for resistance to glyphosate, a herbicide marketed as Roundup, were developed by Monsanto as a genetically modified crop. In 2005, the US Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) determined the unlikely regulation of glyphosate-resistant sugar beets after it conducted an environmental assessment and determined glyphosate-resistant sugar beets would become a plant pest. Sugar from glyphosate-resistant sugar beets has been approved for human and animal consumption in multiple countries, but commercial production of biotech beets has been approved only in the United States and Canada. Studies have concluded the sugar from glyphosate-resistant sugar beets has the same nutritional value as sugar from conventional sugar beets. After deregulation in 2005, glyphosate-resistant sugar beets were extensively adopted in the United States. About 95% of sugar beet acres in the US were planted with glyphosate-resistant seed in 2011.

Question: Should a beet farmer be concerned that glyphosate-resistant beets could become pests?
Answer: YES

Question: Were the glyphosate resistant beets deregulated?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the United States, genetically modified sugar beets, engineered for resistance to glyphosate, a herbicide marketed as Roundup, were developed by Monsanto as a genetically modified crop. In 2005, the US Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) deregulated glyphosate-resistant sugar beets after it conducted an environmental assessment and determined glyphosate-resistant sugar beets were likely to become a plant pest. Sugar from glyphosate-resistant sugar beets has been approved for human and animal consumption in multiple countries, but commercial production of biotech beets has been approved only in the United States and Canada. Studies have concluded the sugar from glyphosate-resistant sugar beets has the same nutritional value as sugar from conventional sugar beets. After deregulation in 2005, glyphosate-resistant sugar beets were extensively adopted in the United States. About 95% of sugar beet acres in the US were planted with glyphosate-resistant seed in 2011.

Question: Should a beet farmer be concerned that glyphosate-resistant beets could become pests?
Answer: YES

Question: Were the glyphosate resistant beets deregulated?
Answer: YES
Passage: The VHL (Von Hippel–Lindau) gene encodes a component of an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase. VHL complex targets member of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor family (HIF) for degradation by interacting with the oxygen-dependent destruction domain under normoxic condition. HIF activates downstream targets such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), promoting angiogenesis. Mutations in VHL prevent degradation of HIF and thus lead to the formation of hypervascular lesions and renal tumors.

Question: If you were asked to provide a very simple answer to someone who was having trouble untangling the wording of that passage, would you say that the mutations in the Von Hippel–Lindau gene that are discussed in this passage are helpful to the body, in the context of this passage?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were seeing ads for alternative medicine, and suspected that the company behind them was likely selling proverbial snake oil, would seeing claims like "Strengthens your HIF" tend to confirm your fears, given what you can learn from this passage?
Answer: YES
Passage: The VHL (Von Hippel–Lindau) gene encodes a component of an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase. VHL complex targets member of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor family (HIF) for degradation by interacting with the oxygen-dependent destruction domain under normoxic condition. HIF activates downstream targets such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), promoting angiogenesis. The formation of hypervascular lesions and renal tumors is indirectly increased by mutations in VHL, because said mutations inhibit the degradation of HIF.

Question: If you were asked to provide a very simple answer to someone who was having trouble untangling the wording of that passage, would you say that the mutations in the Von Hippel–Lindau gene that are discussed in this passage are helpful to the body, in the context of this passage?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were seeing ads for alternative medicine, and suspected that the company behind them was likely selling proverbial snake oil, would seeing claims like "Strengthens your HIF" tend to confirm your fears, given what you can learn from this passage?
Answer: YES
Passage: The VHL (Von Hippel–Lindau) gene encodes a component of an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase. VHL complex targets member of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor family (HIF) for degradation by interacting with the oxygen-dependent destruction domain under normoxic condition. HIF activates downstream targets such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), promoting angiogenesis. Mutations in VHL can lead to degradation of HIF and this degradation in turn can prevent the formation of hypervascular lesions and renal tumors.

Question: If you were asked to provide a very simple answer to someone who was having trouble untangling the wording of that passage, would you say that the mutations in the Von Hippel–Lindau gene that are discussed in this passage are helpful to the body, in the context of this passage?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were seeing ads for alternative medicine, and suspected that the company behind them was likely selling proverbial snake oil, would seeing claims like "Strengthens your HIF" tend to confirm your fears, given what you can learn from this passage?
Answer: YES
Passage: The VHL (Von Hippel–Lindau) gene encodes a component of an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase. VHL complex targets member of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor family (HIF) for degradation by interacting with the oxygen-dependent destruction domain under normoxic condition. HIF de-activates downstream targets such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), slowing angiogenesis. Mutations in VHL prevent degradation of HIF and thus these mutations maintain and even strengthen the body's own ability to prevent the formation of hypervascular lesions and renal tumors.

Question: From the way it is described in the passage, and to put it very simply, would you say that the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor family, or HIF, is on the whole a good or a bad thing for the body, in this context?
Answer: good

Question: If you were asked to provide a very simple answer to someone who was having trouble untangling the wording of that passage, would you say that the mutations in the Von Hippel–Lindau gene that are discussed in this passage are helpful to the body, in the context of this passage?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were seeing ads for alternative medicine, and suspected that the company behind them was likely selling proverbial snake oil, would seeing claims like "Strengthens your HIF" tend to confirm your fears, given what you can learn from this passage?
Answer: NO
Passage: The initial clash favoured the Dutch and Danish squadrons. The disparity of numbers – exacerbated by Villeroi stripping their ranks of infantry to reinforce his left flank – enabled Overkirk's cavalry to throw the first line of French horse back in some disorder towards their second-line squadrons. This line also came under severe pressure and, in turn, was forced back to their third-line of cavalry and the few battalions still remaining on the plain. But these French horsemen were amongst the best in Louis XIV's army – the "Maison du Roi", supported by four elite squadrons of Bavarian Cuirassiers. Ably led by de Guiscard, the French cavalry rallied, thrusting back the Allied squadrons in successful local counterattacks. On Overkirk's right flank, close to Ramillies, ten of his squadrons suddenly broke ranks and were scattered, riding headlong to the rear to recover their order, leaving the left flank of the Allied assault on Ramillies dangerously exposed. Notwithstanding the lack of infantry support, de Guiscard threw his cavalry forward in an attempt to split the Allied army in two.

Question: Is it likely that the infantry and the cavalry were of relatively equal strength?
Answer: NO
Passage: The initial clash favoured the Dutch and Danish squadrons. The disparity of numbers – exacerbated by Villeroi stripping their ranks of infantry to reinforce his left flank – enabled Overkirk's cavalry to throw the first line of French horse back in some disorder towards their second-line squadrons. This line also came under severe pressure and, in turn, was forced back to their third-line of cavalry and the few battalions still remaining on the plain. But these French horsemen were amongst the best in Louis XIV's army – the "Maison du Roi", supported by four elite squadrons of Bavarian Cuirassiers. Ably led by de Guiscard, the French cavalry rallied, thrusting back the Allied squadrons in successful local counterattacks. On Overkirk's right flank, close to Ramillies, ten of his squadrons suddenly broke ranks and were scattered, riding headlong to the rear to recover their order, leaving the left flank of the Allied assault on Ramillies dangerously exposed. Notwithstanding the dearth of infantry support, de Guiscard threw his cavalry forward in an attempt to split the Allied army in two.

Question: Is it likely that the infantry and the cavalry were of relatively equal strength?
Answer: NO
Passage: The initial clash favoured the Dutch and Danish squadrons. The disparity of numbers – exacerbated by Villeroi stripping their ranks of infantry to reinforce his left flank – enabled Overkirk's cavalry to throw the first line of French horse back in some disorder towards their second-line squadrons. This line also came under severe pressure and, in turn, was forced back to their third-line of cavalry and the few battalions still remaining on the plain. But these French horsemen were amongst the best in Louis XIV's army – the "Maison du Roi", supported by four elite squadrons of Bavarian Cuirassiers. Ably led by de Guiscard, the French cavalry rallied, thrusting back the Allied squadrons in successful local counterattacks. On Overkirk's right flank, close to Ramillies, ten of his squadrons suddenly broke ranks and were scattered, riding headlong to the rear to recover their order, leaving the left flank of the Allied assault on Ramillies dangerously exposed. Notwithstanding the abundance of infantry support, de Guiscard threw his lack of cavalry forward in an attempt to split the Allied army in two.

Question: Is it likely that the infantry would have had a better chance than the cavalry to split the Allied army in two?
Answer: YES

Question: If the cavalry was failing to split the Allied army in two, is it likely that the infantry would have been able to help them succeed?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the infantry and the cavalry were of relatively equal strength?
Answer: NO
Passage: The initial clash favoured the Dutch and Danish squadrons. The disparity of numbers – exacerbated by Villeroi stripping their ranks of infantry to reinforce his left flank – enabled Overkirk's cavalry to throw the first line of French horse back in some disorder towards their second-line squadrons. This line also came under severe pressure and, in turn, was forced back to their third-line of cavalry and the few battalions still remaining on the plain. But these French horsemen were amongst the best in Louis XIV's army – the "Maison du Roi", supported by four elite squadrons of Bavarian Cuirassiers. Ably led by de Guiscard, the French cavalry rallied, thrusting back the Allied squadrons in successful local counterattacks. On Overkirk's right flank, close to Ramillies, ten of his squadrons suddenly broke ranks and were scattered, riding headlong to the rear to recover their order, leaving the left flank of the Allied assault on Ramillies dangerously exposed. Notwithstanding the plethora of infantry support, de Guiscard threw his cavalry forward in an attempt to split the Allied army in two.

Question: If the cavalry was failing to split the Allied army in two, is it likely that the infantry would have been able to help them succeed?
Answer: YES
Passage: Hunted by the Inquisition and deserted by the nobles of their districts, the Cathars became more and more scattered fugitives: meeting surreptitiously in forests and mountain wilds. Later insurrections broke out under the leadership of Roger-Bernard II, Count of Foix, Aimery III of Narbonne, and Bernard Délicieux, a Franciscan friar later prosecuted for his adherence to another heretical movement, that of the Spiritual Franciscans at the beginning of the 14th century. But by this time the Inquisition had grown very powerful. Consequently, many presumed to be Cathars were summoned to appear before it. Precise indications of this are found in the registers of the Inquisitors, Bernard of Caux, Jean de St Pierre, Geoffroy d'Ablis, and others. The "parfaits", it was said, only rarely recanted, and hundreds were burnt. Repentant lay believers were punished, but their lives were spared as long as they did not relapse. Having recanted, they were obliged to sew yellow crosses onto their outdoor clothing and to live apart from other Catholics, at least for a while.

Question: Were a lot of repentant walking around at this time?
Answer: NO

Question: If one were to bet on the outcome of an inquisition, would it be safer to bet on the suspect recanting?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a lot of wood have to be gathered as a result of the inquisitions?
Answer: YES
Passage: Hunted by the Inquisition and deserted by the nobles of their districts, the Cathars became more and more scattered fugitives: meeting surreptitiously in forests and mountain wilds. Later insurrections broke out under the leadership of Roger-Bernard II, Count of Foix, Aimery III of Narbonne, and Bernard Délicieux, a Franciscan friar later prosecuted for his adherence to another heretical movement, that of the Spiritual Franciscans at the beginning of the 14th century. But by this time the Inquisition had grown very powerful. Consequently, many presumed to be Cathars were summoned to appear before it. Precise indications of this are found in the registers of the Inquisitors, Bernard of Caux, Jean de St Pierre, Geoffroy d'Ablis, and others. The "parfaits", it was said, usually reaffirmed their beliefs, and hundreds were burnt. Repentant lay believers were punished, but their lives were spared as long as they did not relapse. Having recanted, they were obliged to sew yellow crosses onto their outdoor clothing and to live apart from other Catholics, at least for a while.

Question: Were a lot of repentant walking around at this time?
Answer: NO

Question: If one were to bet on the outcome of an inquisition, would it be safer to bet on the suspect recanting?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a lot of wood have to be gathered as a result of the inquisitions?
Answer: YES
Passage: Hunted by the Inquisition and deserted by the nobles of their districts, the Cathars became more and more scattered fugitives: meeting surreptitiously in forests and mountain wilds. Later insurrections broke out under the leadership of Roger-Bernard II, Count of Foix, Aimery III of Narbonne, and Bernard Délicieux, a Franciscan friar later prosecuted for his adherence to another heretical movement, that of the Spiritual Franciscans at the beginning of the 14th century. But by this time the Inquisition had grown very powerful. Consequently, many presumed to be Cathars were summoned to appear before it. Precise indications of this are found in the registers of the Inquisitors, Bernard of Caux, Jean de St Pierre, Geoffroy d'Ablis, and others. The "parfaits", it was said, usually recanted, and rarely were burnt. Repentant lay believers were punished, but their lives were spared as long as they did not relapse. Having recanted, they were obliged to sew yellow crosses onto their outdoor clothing and to live apart from other Catholics, at least for a while.

Question: Were a lot of repentant walking around at this time?
Answer: YES

Question: If one were to bet on the outcome of an inquisition, would it be safer to bet on the suspect recanting?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a lot of wood have to be gathered as a result of the inquisitions?
Answer: NO
Passage: More recently, Alexander Basilevsky related an account in which on May 9, the rover's open lid touched a crater wall and became covered with dust. When the lid was closed, this dust (a very good insulator) was dumped on to the radiators. The following day, May 10, controllers saw the internal temperature of "Lunokhod 2" climb as it was unable to cool itself, eventually rendering the rover inoperable. On May 11, signal from the rover was lost.

Question: Is the problem that affected the rover essentially the same thing as happens when a laptop computer's vents are blocked and the fan is unable to radiate heat safely out into the room?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage suggest that the dust on this planet's surface had some unique properties that could explain how scientists were unable to predict a mishap such as this during planning and testing?
Answer: NO
Passage: More recently, Alexander Basilevsky related an account in which on May 9, the rover's open lid touched a crater wall and became covered with dust. Dust fell onto the radiators when the lid was closed, and this acted as very effective insulation. The following day, May 10, controllers saw the internal temperature of "Lunokhod 2" climb as it was unable to cool itself, eventually rendering the rover inoperable. On May 11, signal from the rover was lost.

Question: Is the problem that affected the rover essentially the same thing as happens when a laptop computer's vents are blocked and the fan is unable to radiate heat safely out into the room?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage suggest that the dust on this planet's surface had some unique properties that could explain how scientists were unable to predict a mishap such as this during planning and testing?
Answer: NO
Passage: More recently, Alexander Basilevsky related an account in which on May 9, the rover's open lid touched a crater wall and became covered with dust. When the lid was closed, this dust (which would normally be a good insulator ) was dumped on to the radiators and actually conducted heat. The following day, May 10, controllers saw the internal temperature of "Lunokhod 2" fall as its internal mechanisms cooled too quickly, eventually rendering the rover inoperable. On May 11, signal from the rover was lost.

Question: Is the problem that affected the rover essentially the same thing as happens when a laptop computer's vents are blocked and the fan is unable to radiate heat safely out into the room?
Answer: NO