lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: There is no central authority within the New Age phenomenon that can determine what counts as New Age and what does not. Many of those groups and individuals who could analytically be categorised as part of the New Age embrace the term "New Age" in reference to themselves. However, some express active hostility to the term. Rather than terming themselves "New Agers", those involved in this milieu commonly describe themselves as spiritual "seekers", and some self-identify as a member of a different religious group, such as Christianity, Judaism, or Buddhism. In 2003 Sutcliffe observed that the use of the term "New Age" was "optional, episodic and declining overall", adding that among the very few individuals who did use it, they usually did so with qualification, for instance by placing it in quotation marks. Other academics, such as Sara MacKian, have argued that the sheer diversity of the New Age renders the term too problematic for scholars to use. MacKian proposed "everyday spirituality" as an alternate term.

Question: If you were to use the term "New Age" to refer to some who might be correctly categorized that way, is there a good chance that they would not agree with your use of it?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone used the term "New Age," is there reason to believe that they actually don't agree with many things related to the New Age movement?
Answer: NO

Question: Would it be strange for someone who doesn't really believe in many parts of the New Age movement to refer to themself as "New Age?"
Answer: YES
Passage: Keith Farrell of "Compute!'s Gazette" was struck by "Maniac Mansion"s similarity to film, particularly in its use of cutscenes to impart "information or urgency". He lauded the game's graphics, animation and high level of detail. "Commodore User"s Bill Scolding and three reviewers from "Zzap!64" compared the game to "The Rocky Horror Picture Show". Further comparisons were drawn to "Psycho", "Friday the 13th", "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre", "The Addams Family" and "Scooby-Doo". Russ Ceccola of "Commodore Magazine" found the cutscenes to be creative and well made, and he commented that the "characters are distinctively Lucasfilm's, bringing facial expressions and personality to each individual character". In "Compute!", Orson Scott Card praised the game's humor, cinematic storytelling and lack of violence. He called it "compellingly good" and evidence of Lucasfilm's push "to make computer games a valid storytelling art".

Question: From the way that the passage describes Card's reaction, could you say that a backlash against video-game violence was beginning even at the time of the Commodore machines?
Answer: YES

Question: When "Maniac Mansion" was compared to "Friday the 13th" and "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" (which, despite their titles and reputations, are more script-driven than many viewers would assume), does the passage suggest that the game was held in that company strictly due to its storytelling, rather than its on-screen gore?
Answer: YES

Question: Would parents who objected to any level of violence in children's games similarly object to "Maniac Mansion" even if the title was meant to be taken in jest?
Answer: NO
Passage: Keith Farrell of "Compute!'s Gazette" was struck by "Maniac Mansion"s similarity to film, particularly in its use of cutscenes to impart "information or urgency". He lauded the game's graphics, animation and high level of detail. "Commodore User"s Bill Scolding and three reviewers from "Zzap!64" compared the game to "The Rocky Horror Picture Show". Further comparisons were drawn to "Psycho", "Friday the 13th", "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre", "The Addams Family" and "Scooby-Doo". Russ Ceccola of "Commodore Magazine" found the cutscenes to be creative and well made, and he commented that the "characters are distinctively Lucasfilm's, bringing facial expressions and personality to each individual character". In "Compute!" Orson Scott Card lauded the game for its humor, ability to tell a cinema-quality story, and for the fact that it was not violent. He called it "compellingly good" and evidence of Lucasfilm's push "to make computer games a valid storytelling art".

Question: From the way that the passage describes Card's reaction, could you say that a backlash against video-game violence was beginning even at the time of the Commodore machines?
Answer: YES

Question: When "Maniac Mansion" was compared to "Friday the 13th" and "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" (which, despite their titles and reputations, are more script-driven than many viewers would assume), does the passage suggest that the game was held in that company strictly due to its storytelling, rather than its on-screen gore?
Answer: YES

Question: Would parents who objected to any level of violence in children's games similarly object to "Maniac Mansion" even if the title was meant to be taken in jest?
Answer: NO
Passage: Keith Farrell of "Compute!'s Gazette" was struck by "Maniac Mansion"s similarity to film, particularly in its use of cutscenes to impart "information or urgency". He lauded the game's graphics, animation and high level of detail. "Commodore User"s Bill Scolding and three reviewers from "Zzap!64" compared the game to "The Rocky Horror Picture Show". Further comparisons were drawn to "Psycho", "Friday the 13th", "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre", "The Addams Family" and "Scooby-Doo". Russ Ceccola of "Commodore Magazine" found the cutscenes to be creative and well made, and he commented that the "characters are distinctively Lucasfilm's, bringing facial expressions and personality to each individual character". In "Compute!", Orson Scott Card praised the game's humor, cinematic storytelling and relative, if not total, lack of violence. He called it "compellingly good" and evidence of Lucasfilm's push "to make computer games a valid storytelling art".

Question: From the way that the passage describes Card's reaction, could you say that a backlash against video-game violence was beginning even at the time of the Commodore machines?
Answer: YES

Question: Would parents who objected to any level of violence in children's games similarly object to "Maniac Mansion" even if the title was meant to be taken in jest?
Answer: YES
Passage: Keith Farrell of "Compute!'s Gazette" was struck by "Maniac Mansion"s similarity to film, particularly in its use of cutscenes to impart "information or urgency". He lauded the game's graphics, animation and high level of detail. "Commodore User"s Bill Scolding and three reviewers from "Zzap!64" compared the game to "The Rocky Horror Picture Show". Further comparisons were drawn to "Psycho", "Friday the 13th", "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre", "The Addams Family" and "Scooby-Doo". Russ Ceccola of "Commodore Magazine" found the cutscenes to be creative and well made, and he commented that the "characters are distinctively Lucasfilm's, bringing facial expressions and personality to each individual character". In "Compute!", Orson Scott Card praised the game's humor, cinematic storytelling and use of violence to build suspense. He called it "compellingly good" and evidence of Lucasfilm's push "to make computer games a valid storytelling art".

Question: From the way that the passage describes Card's reaction, could you say that a backlash against video-game violence was beginning even at the time of the Commodore machines?
Answer: NO

Question: When "Maniac Mansion" was compared to "Friday the 13th" and "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" (which, despite their titles and reputations, are more script-driven than many viewers would assume), does the passage suggest that the game was held in that company strictly due to its storytelling, rather than its on-screen gore?
Answer: NO

Question: Would parents who objected to any level of violence in children's games similarly object to "Maniac Mansion" even if the title was meant to be taken in jest?
Answer: YES
Passage: It is thought that the first forward pass in football occurred on October 26, 1895, in a game between Georgia and North Carolina when, out of desperation, the ball was thrown by the North Carolina back Joel Whitaker instead of punted and George Stephens caught the ball. On November 9, 1895, John Heisman executed a hidden ball trick utilizing quarterback Reynolds Tichenor to get Auburn's only touchdown in a 6 to 9 loss to Vanderbilt. It was the first game in the south decided by a field goal. Heisman later used the trick against Pop Warner's Georgia team. Warner picked up the trick and later used it at Cornell against Penn State in 1897. He then used it in 1903 at Carlisle against Harvard and garnered national attention.

Question: Was Whitaker expected to punt the ball?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Whitaker have time to punt the ball?
Answer: NO
Passage: It is thought that the first forward pass in football occurred on October 26, 1895, in a game between Georgia and North Carolina when, out of desperation, the ball was thrown by the North Carolina back Joel Whitaker rather than punted and George Stephens caught the ball. On November 9, 1895, John Heisman executed a hidden ball trick utilizing quarterback Reynolds Tichenor to get Auburn's only touchdown in a 6 to 9 loss to Vanderbilt. It was the first game in the south decided by a field goal. Heisman later used the trick against Pop Warner's Georgia team. Warner picked up the trick and later used it at Cornell against Penn State in 1897. He then used it in 1903 at Carlisle against Harvard and garnered national attention.

Question: Was Whitaker expected to punt the ball?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Whitaker have time to punt the ball?
Answer: NO
Passage: It is thought that the first forward pass in football occurred on October 26, 1895, in a game between Georgia and North Carolina when, out of desperation, the ball was thrown by the North Carolina back Joel Whitaker instead of dropped and George Stephens caught the ball. On November 9, 1895, John Heisman executed a hidden ball trick utilizing quarterback Reynolds Tichenor to get Auburn's only touchdown in a 6 to 9 loss to Vanderbilt. It was the first game in the south decided by a field goal. Heisman later used the trick against Pop Warner's Georgia team. Warner picked up the trick and later used it at Cornell against Penn State in 1897. He then used it in 1903 at Carlisle against Harvard and garnered national attention.

Question: Was Whitaker expected to punt the ball?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Whitaker have time to punt the ball?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Did Whitaker think throwing the ball would be more successful than punting?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: It is thought that the first forward pass in football occurred on October 26, 1895, in a game between Georgia and North Carolina when, out of desperation, the ball was thrown by the North Carolina back Joel Whitaker in a modified punt and George Stephens caught the ball. On November 9, 1895, John Heisman executed a hidden ball trick utilizing quarterback Reynolds Tichenor to get Auburn's only touchdown in a 6 to 9 loss to Vanderbilt. It was the first game in the south decided by a field goal. Heisman later used the trick against Pop Warner's Georgia team. Warner picked up the trick and later used it at Cornell against Penn State in 1897. He then used it in 1903 at Carlisle against Harvard and garnered national attention.

Question: Was Whitaker expected to punt the ball?
Answer: YES

Question: Did Whitaker think throwing the ball would be more successful than punting?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Plague doctors traversed the streets diagnosing victims, many of them without formal medical training. Several public health efforts were attempted. Physicians were hired by city officials and burial details were carefully organized, but panic spread through the city and, out of the fear of contagion, bodies were hastily buried in overcrowded pits. The means of transmission of the disease were not known but thinking they might be linked to the animals, the City Corporation ordered a cull of dogs and cats. This decision may have affected the length of the epidemic since those animals could have helped keep in check the rat population carrying the fleas which transmitted the disease. Thinking bad air was involved in transmission, the authorities ordered giant bonfires to be burned in the streets and house fires to be kept burning night and day, in the hope that the air would be cleansed. Tobacco was thought to be a prophylactic and it was later said that no London tobacconist had died from the plague during the epidemic.

Question: Is it likely that the City Corporation's orders helped shorten the epidemic?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the City Corporation's orders prolonged the epidemic?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that those living in the countryside surrounding the city would have been affected by the orders?
Answer: NO
Passage: Plague doctors traversed the streets diagnosing victims, many of them without formal medical training. Several public health efforts were attempted. Physicians were hired by city officials and burial details were carefully organized, but panic spread through the city and, out of the fear of contagion, bodies were hastily buried in overcrowded pits. The means of transmission of the disease were unknown but thinking they might be linked to the animals, the City Corporation ordered a cull of dogs and cats. This decision may have affected the length of the epidemic since those animals could have helped keep in check the rat population carrying the fleas which transmitted the disease. Thinking bad air was involved in transmission, the authorities ordered giant bonfires to be burned in the streets and house fires to be kept burning night and day, in the hope that the air would be cleansed. Tobacco was thought to be a prophylactic and it was later said that no London tobacconist had died from the plague during the epidemic.

Question: Is it likely that the City Corporation's orders helped shorten the epidemic?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the City Corporation's orders prolonged the epidemic?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that those living in the countryside surrounding the city would have been affected by the orders?
Answer: NO
Passage: Plague doctors traversed the streets diagnosing victims, many of them without formal medical training. Several public health efforts were attempted. Physicians were hired by city officials and burial details were carefully organized, but panic spread through the city and, out of the fear of contagion, bodies were hastily buried in overcrowded pits. The means of transmission of the disease were known to be linked to the animals, but the City Corporation did not order a cull of dogs and cats. This decision may have affected the length of the epidemic since those animals helped keep in check the rat population carrying the fleas which transmitted the disease. Thinking bad air was involved in transmission, the authorities ordered giant bonfires to be burned in the streets and house fires to be kept burning night and day, in the hope that the air would be cleansed. Tobacco was thought to be a prophylactic and it was later said that no London tobacconist had died from the plague during the epidemic.

Question: Is it likely that the City Corporation's orders helped shorten the epidemic?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the City Corporation's orders prolonged the epidemic?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that those living in the countryside surrounding the city would have been affected by the orders?
Answer: NO
Passage: Plague doctors traversed the streets diagnosing victims, many of them without formal medical training. Several public health efforts were attempted. Physicians were hired by city officials and burial details were carefully organized, but panic spread through the city and, out of the fear of contagion, bodies were hastily buried in overcrowded pits. The means of transmission of the disease were known to be linked to the animals, so the City Corporation ordered a cull of dogs and cats. This decision may have affected the length of the epidemic since those animals could have helped keep in check the rat population carrying the fleas which transmitted the disease. Thinking bad air was involved in transmission, the authorities ordered giant bonfires to be burned in the streets and house fires to be kept burning night and day, in the hope that the air would be cleansed. Tobacco was thought to be a prophylactic and it was later said that no London tobacconist had died from the plague during the epidemic.

Question: Is it likely that the City Corporation's orders helped shorten the epidemic?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the City Corporation's orders prolonged the epidemic?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the United Kingdom and Canada, notably on extra-urban roads, a solid white or yellow line closer to the driver is used to indicate that no overtaking is allowed in that lane. A double white or yellow line means that neither side may overtake.

Question: (Keeping in mind that in the UK, cars are driven on the left-hand side of the road) if a driver on a public road saw two solid, yellow lines in the middle of the asphalt, would a roughly 90-degree turn to her right be the only way that she could legally cross those lines while driving?
Answer: YES

Question: If a driver in England was making a passing maneuver over what appeared to be one white line further away from him, and one dashed line closest to him (but which was actually a badly-worn solid line), could this bloke be cited for breaking the law if a bobby in a jam butty saw the whole thing?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the United Kingdom and Canada, notably on extra-urban roads, a solid white or yellow line closer to the driver is used to indicate that no overtaking is allowed in that lane. A solid, double line in either color is used to indicate situations in which neither side may cross over the pass.

Question: (Keeping in mind that in the UK, cars are driven on the left-hand side of the road) if a driver on a public road saw two solid, yellow lines in the middle of the asphalt, would a roughly 90-degree turn to her right be the only way that she could legally cross those lines while driving?
Answer: YES

Question: If a driver in England was making a passing maneuver over what appeared to be one white line further away from him, and one dashed line closest to him (but which was actually a badly-worn solid line), could this bloke be cited for breaking the law if a bobby in a jam butty saw the whole thing?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the United Kingdom and Canada, notably on extra-urban roads, a solid white or yellow line closer to the driver is used to indicate that no overtaking is allowed in that lane. Situations in which there is no solid line (neither in white nor yellow) mean that both sides may overtake.

Question: (Keeping in mind that in the UK, cars are driven on the left-hand side of the road) if a driver on a public road saw two solid, yellow lines in the middle of the asphalt, would a roughly 90-degree turn to her right be the only way that she could legally cross those lines while driving?
Answer: YES

Question: If a driver in England was making a passing maneuver over what appeared to be one white line further away from him, and one dashed line closest to him (but which was actually a badly-worn solid line), could this bloke be cited for breaking the law if a bobby in a jam butty saw the whole thing?
Answer: YES
Passage: In the United Kingdom and Canada, notably on extra-urban roads, a solid white or yellow line closer to the driver is used to indicate that no overtaking is allowed in that lane. A double white or yellow line paradoxically means that either side may overtake, conditions permitting.

Question: (Keeping in mind that in the UK, cars are driven on the left-hand side of the road) if a driver on a public road saw two solid, yellow lines in the middle of the asphalt, would a roughly 90-degree turn to her right be the only way that she could legally cross those lines while driving?
Answer: NO

Question: If a driver in England was making a passing maneuver over what appeared to be one white line further away from him, and one dashed line closest to him (but which was actually a badly-worn solid line), could this bloke be cited for breaking the law if a bobby in a jam butty saw the whole thing?
Answer: NO
Passage: Many of the surviving eastern zone leaders fled into the jungle where they hid from and fought center zone troops. In October 1978, Chea Sim led a group of 300 people across the border into Vietnam, and the Vietnamese then launched a raid into the eastern zone that allowed Heng Samrin and his group of 2,000 to 3,000 soldiers and followers to seek refuge in Vietnam. Meanwhile, the center decided that the entire eastern zone was full of traitors and embarked on a large scale purge of the area, with over 10,000 killed by July 1978, while thousands were evacuated to other zones to stop them from defecting to the Vietnamese. The center also stepped up purges nationwide, killing cadres and their families, "old people" and eastern zone evacuees who were regarded as having dubious loyalty.

Question: Would the center allow the surviving eastern leaders to raise a family in the Vietnam?
Answer: NO

Question: Would an eastern zone trader be allowed to trade with the Vietnamese?
Answer: NO
Passage: Many of the surviving eastern zone leaders fled into the jungle where they hid from and fought center zone troops. In October 1978, Chea Sim led a group of 300 people across the border into Vietnam, and the Vietnamese then launched a raid into the eastern zone that allowed Heng Samrin and his group of 2,000 to 3,000 soldiers and followers to seek refuge in Vietnam. Meanwhile, the center decided that the entire eastern zone was full of traitors and embarked on a large scale purge of the area, with over 10,000 killed by July 1978. Also, the center did not prevent evacuation of thousands to other zones in order to stall defection to the Vietnamese. The center also stepped up purges nationwide, killing cadres and their families, "old people" and eastern zone evacuees who were regarded as having dubious loyalty.

Question: Would the center allow the surviving eastern leaders to raise a family in the Vietnam?
Answer: NO
Passage: Many of the surviving eastern zone leaders fled into the jungle where they hid from and fought center zone troops. In October 1978, Chea Sim led a group of 300 people across the border into Vietnam, and the Vietnamese then launched a raid into the eastern zone that allowed Heng Samrin and his group of 2,000 to 3,000 soldiers and followers to seek refuge in Vietnam. Meanwhile, the center decided that the entire eastern zone was full of traitors and embarked on a large scale purge of the area, with over 10,000 killed by July 1978, while thousands were evacuated to other zones, the center ignored those who managed to defect to the Vietnamese. The center also stepped up purges nationwide, killing cadres and their families, "old people" and eastern zone evacuees who were regarded as having dubious loyalty.

Question: Would the center allow the surviving eastern leaders to raise a family in the Vietnam?
Answer: YES

Question: If an eastern leader gets to the evacuated zone, is it possible they might meet a Vietnamese?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 2019, a print of the first of the five photographs, sold for £1,050. A print of the second photograph was also put up for sale but failed to sell as it did not meet its £500 reserve price. The photographs previously belonged to the Reverend George Vale Owen.

Question: Did the print of the second picture sell?
Answer: NO

Question: Were people willing to pay the reserve price of the second picture's print?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 2019, a print of the first of the five photographs, sold for £1,050. A print of the second picture was also submitted for auction, but the sale fell through because the £500 reserve price was missed. The photographs previously belonged to the Reverend George Vale Owen.

Question: Did the print of the second picture sell?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the auctioneer willing to sell the print of the second picture?
Answer: YES

Question: Were people willing to pay the reserve price of the second picture's print?
Answer: NO