lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: On 4 May 1265 Cardinal Ottobono Fieschi was appointed Apostolic Legate to England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland by the new Pope Clement IV. In fact, he was sent as the successor of Cardinal Guy Folques, who had been elected Clement IV on 5 February 1265. On 29 August 1265 the Cardinal was received at the French Court by King Louis IX. There he learned that Simon de Montfort and his son Henry had been killed at the Battle of Evesham earlier that month. Cardinal Ottobono did not reach Boulogne until October 1265. He was accompanied by Benedetto Caetani. He was in England until July 1268, working to suppress the remnants of Simon de Montfort's barons who were still in arms against King Henry III of England. To finance their rebellion, the barons had imposed a 10% tax on church property, which the Pope wanted back because the tithe was uncanonical. This drawback was a major concern of Cardinal Ottobono and his entourage. While in England, Benedetto Caetani became rector of St. Lawrence's church in Towcester, Northamptonshire.

Question: If we assume that the Cardinal departed for Boulogne as soon as was feasible after he learned the results of the Battle of Evesham, does the passage suggest that his journey may have taken a full month?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like the Cardinal would have been in Boulogne in time to observe the Feast of the Archangels on September 29?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the passage is worded, is it possible that the Cardinal spent none of the month of September in the French court in 1265?
Answer: YES
Passage: On 4 May 1265 Cardinal Ottobono Fieschi was appointed Apostolic Legate to England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland by the new Pope Clement IV. In fact, he was sent as the successor of Cardinal Guy Folques, who had been elected Clement IV on 5 February 1265. On 29 August 1265 the Cardinal was received at the French Court by King Louis IX. There he learned that Simon de Montfort and his son Henry had been killed at the Battle of Evesham earlier that month. Ottobono reached Boulogne no earlier than October of 1265. He was accompanied by Benedetto Caetani. He was in England until July 1268, working to suppress the remnants of Simon de Montfort's barons who were still in arms against King Henry III of England. To finance their rebellion, the barons had imposed a 10% tax on church property, which the Pope wanted back because the tithe was uncanonical. This drawback was a major concern of Cardinal Ottobono and his entourage. While in England, Benedetto Caetani became rector of St. Lawrence's church in Towcester, Northamptonshire.

Question: If we assume that the Cardinal departed for Boulogne as soon as was feasible after he learned the results of the Battle of Evesham, does the passage suggest that his journey may have taken a full month?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like the Cardinal would have been in Boulogne in time to observe the Feast of the Archangels on September 29?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the passage is worded, is it possible that the Cardinal spent none of the month of September in the French court in 1265?
Answer: YES
Passage: On 4 May 1265 Cardinal Ottobono Fieschi was appointed Apostolic Legate to England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland by the new Pope Clement IV. In fact, he was sent as the successor of Cardinal Guy Folques, who had been elected Clement IV on 5 February 1265. On 29 August 1265 the Cardinal was received at the French Court by King Louis IX. There he learned that Simon de Montfort and his son Henry had been killed at the Battle of Evesham earlier that month. Cardinal Ottobono could not leave immediately, but still managed to reach Boulogne before October 1, 1265. He was accompanied by Benedetto Caetani. He was in England until July 1268, working to suppress the remnants of Simon de Montfort's barons who were still in arms against King Henry III of England. To finance their rebellion, the barons had imposed a 10% tax on church property, which the Pope wanted back because the tithe was uncanonical. This drawback was a major concern of Cardinal Ottobono and his entourage. While in England, Benedetto Caetani became rector of St. Lawrence's church in Towcester, Northamptonshire.

Question: If we assume that the Cardinal departed for Boulogne as soon as was feasible after he learned the results of the Battle of Evesham, does the passage suggest that his journey may have taken a full month?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like the Cardinal would have been in Boulogne in time to observe the Feast of the Archangels on September 29?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that the passage is worded, is it possible that the Cardinal spent none of the month of September in the French court in 1265?
Answer: NO
Passage: On 4 May 1265 Cardinal Ottobono Fieschi was appointed Apostolic Legate to England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland by the new Pope Clement IV. In fact, he was sent as the successor of Cardinal Guy Folques, who had been elected Clement IV on 5 February 1265. On 29 August 1265 the Cardinal was received at the French Court by King Louis IX. There he learned that Simon de Montfort and his son Henry had been killed at the Battle of Evesham earlier that month. Even though his departure from the court was delayed, Cardinal Ottobono was able to reach Boulogne before the onset of October 1265. He was accompanied by Benedetto Caetani. He was in England until July 1268, working to suppress the remnants of Simon de Montfort's barons who were still in arms against King Henry III of England. To finance their rebellion, the barons had imposed a 10% tax on church property, which the Pope wanted back because the tithe was uncanonical. This drawback was a major concern of Cardinal Ottobono and his entourage. While in England, Benedetto Caetani became rector of St. Lawrence's church in Towcester, Northamptonshire.

Question: If we assume that the Cardinal departed for Boulogne as soon as was feasible after he learned the results of the Battle of Evesham, does the passage suggest that his journey may have taken a full month?
Answer: NO

Question: Does it sound like the Cardinal would have been in Boulogne in time to observe the Feast of the Archangels on September 29?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that the passage is worded, is it possible that the Cardinal spent none of the month of September in the French court in 1265?
Answer: NO
Passage: On 21 June 2016, the Federal Aviation Administration announced regulations for commercial operation of small UAS craft (sUAS), those between 0.55 and 55 pounds (about 250 gm to 25 kg) including payload. The rules, which exclude hobbyists, require the presence at all operations of a licensed Remote Pilot in Command. Certification of this position, available to any citizen at least 16 years of age, is obtained solely by passing a written test and then submitting an application. For those holding a sport pilot license or higher, and with a current flight review, a rule-specific exam can be taken at no charge online at the faasafety.gov website. Other applicants must take a more comprehensive examination at an aeronautical testing center. All licensees are required to take a review course every two years. At this time no ratings for heavier UAS are available.

Question: Given these rules, and the groups that they affect, would manufacturers of aircraft that are intended only for recreational use need to take care to ensure that the craft weigh less than 0.55 pounds?
Answer: NO

Question: As long as it is used strictly as a hobby, could someone under the age of 16 legally continue to fly a small, 1 pound, UAS craft?
Answer: YES
Passage: On 21 June 2016, the Federal Aviation Administration announced regulations for commercial operation of small UAS craft (sUAS), those between 0.55 and 55 pounds (about 250 gm to 25 kg) including payload. Hobbyists are excluded from these rules that would otherwise require a licensed Remote Pilot in Command to be present for all flights of the craft. Certification of this position, available to any citizen at least 16 years of age, is obtained solely by passing a written test and then submitting an application. For those holding a sport pilot license or higher, and with a current flight review, a rule-specific exam can be taken at no charge online at the faasafety.gov website. Other applicants must take a more comprehensive examination at an aeronautical testing center. All licensees are required to take a review course every two years. At this time no ratings for heavier UAS are available.

Question: Given these rules, and the groups that they affect, would manufacturers of aircraft that are intended only for recreational use need to take care to ensure that the craft weigh less than 0.55 pounds?
Answer: NO

Question: As long as it is used strictly as a hobby, could someone under the age of 16 legally continue to fly a small, 1 pound, UAS craft?
Answer: YES
Passage: On 21 June 2016, the Federal Aviation Administration announced regulations for commercial operation of small UAS craft (sUAS), those between 0.55 and 55 pounds (about 250 gm to 25 kg) including payload. The rules, which do not even exclude hobbyists, require the presence at all operations of a licensed Remote Pilot in Command. Certification of this position, available to any citizen at least 16 years of age, is obtained solely by passing a written test and then submitting an application. For those holding a sport pilot license or higher, and with a current flight review, a rule-specific exam can be taken at no charge online at the faasafety.gov website. Other applicants must take a more comprehensive examination at an aeronautical testing center. All licensees are required to take a review course every two years. At this time no ratings for heavier UAS are available.

Question: Given these rules, and the groups that they affect, would manufacturers of aircraft that are intended only for recreational use need to take care to ensure that the craft weigh less than 0.55 pounds?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone flies a small UAS craft strictly for fun, but nonetheless manages to make some money from the sport through instagram ads, or local sponsorships, or anything that would technically be considered "commercial", could they still fly the craft without a license?
Answer: NO

Question: As long as it is used strictly as a hobby, could someone under the age of 16 legally continue to fly a small, 1 pound, UAS craft?
Answer: NO
Passage: On 21 June 2016, the Federal Aviation Administration announced regulations for commercial operation of small UAS craft (sUAS), those between 0.55 and 55 pounds (about 250 gm to 25 kg) including payload. Even hobbyists are subject to these rules, which require the presence at all operations of a licensed Remote Pilot in Command. Certification of this position, available to any citizen at least 16 years of age, is obtained solely by passing a written test and then submitting an application. For those holding a sport pilot license or higher, and with a current flight review, a rule-specific exam can be taken at no charge online at the faasafety.gov website. Other applicants must take a more comprehensive examination at an aeronautical testing center. All licensees are required to take a review course every two years. At this time no ratings for heavier UAS are available.

Question: Given these rules, and the groups that they affect, would manufacturers of aircraft that are intended only for recreational use need to take care to ensure that the craft weigh less than 0.55 pounds?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone flies a small UAS craft strictly for fun, but nonetheless manages to make some money from the sport through instagram ads, or local sponsorships, or anything that would technically be considered "commercial", could they still fly the craft without a license?
Answer: NO

Question: As long as it is used strictly as a hobby, could someone under the age of 16 legally continue to fly a small, 1 pound, UAS craft?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 2018, Guthrie contacted publication Urban Milwaukee to clarify his political stance. He stated "I am not a Republican," and expressed deep disagreement with the Trump administration's views, especially the policies on immigration and treatment of detained immigrants by ICE. Guthrie further clarified, "I left the party years ago and do not identify myself with either party these days. I strongly urge my fellow Americans to stop the current trend of guilt by association, and look beyond the party names and affiliations, and work for candidates whose policies are more closely aligned with their own, whatever they may be.... I don't pretend to be right all the time, and sometimes I've gone so far as to change my mind from time to time."

Question: Would Guthrie say he agrees with the Trump administration policy of keeping asylum seekers in Mexico while their claims are evaluated?
Answer: NO

Question: Does Guthrie oppose Trumps tariffs on Chinese imports?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Guthrie likely have voted for Trump in 2020?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 2018, Guthrie contacted publication Urban Milwaukee to clarify his political stance. He stated "I am not a Republican," and expressed deep opposition to the Trump administration's views, especially the policies on immigration and treatment of detained immigrants by ICE. Guthrie further clarified, "I left the party years ago and do not identify myself with either party these days. I strongly urge my fellow Americans to stop the current trend of guilt by association, and look beyond the party names and affiliations, and work for candidates whose policies are more closely aligned with their own, whatever they may be.... I don't pretend to be right all the time, and sometimes I've gone so far as to change my mind from time to time."

Question: Would Guthrie say he agrees with the Trump administration policy of keeping asylum seekers in Mexico while their claims are evaluated?
Answer: NO

Question: Does Guthrie oppose Trumps tariffs on Chinese imports?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Guthrie likely have voted for Trump in 2020?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 2018, Guthrie contacted publication Urban Milwaukee to clarify his political stance. He stated "I am not a Republican," and expressed deep disagreement with the Trump administration's views, except the policies on immigration and treatment of detained immigrants by ICE. Guthrie further clarified, "I left the party years ago and do not identify myself with either party these days. I strongly urge my fellow Americans to stop the current trend of guilt by association, and look beyond the party names and affiliations, and work for candidates whose policies are more closely aligned with their own, whatever they may be.... I don't pretend to be right all the time, and sometimes I've gone so far as to change my mind from time to time."

Question: Would Guthrie say he agrees with the Trump administration policy of keeping asylum seekers in Mexico while their claims are evaluated?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Guthrie oppose Trumps tariffs on Chinese imports?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Guthrie likely have voted for Trump in 2020?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 2018, Guthrie contacted publication Urban Milwaukee to clarify his political stance. He stated "I am not a Republican," but expressed deep agreement with the Trump administration's views, especially the policies on immigration and treatment of detained immigrants by ICE. Guthrie further clarified, "I left the party years ago and do not identify myself with either party these days. I strongly urge my fellow Americans to stop the current trend of guilt by association, and look beyond the party names and affiliations, and work for candidates whose policies are more closely aligned with their own, whatever they may be.... I don't pretend to be right all the time, and sometimes I've gone so far as to change my mind from time to time."

Question: Would Guthrie say he agrees with the Trump administration policy of keeping asylum seekers in Mexico while their claims are evaluated?
Answer: YES

Question: Does Guthrie oppose Trumps tariffs on Chinese imports?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Guthrie likely have voted for Trump in 2020?
Answer: YES
Passage: Although Abbas II no longer "publicly" opposed the British, he secretly created, supported and sustained the Egyptian nationalist movement, which came to be led by Mustafa Kamil. He also funded the anti-British newspaper Al-Mu'ayyad. As Kamil's thrust was increasingly aimed at winning popular support for a nationalist political party, Khedive Abbas publicly distanced himself from the Nationalists. Their demand for a constitutional government in 1906 was rebuffed by Abbas II, and the following year he formed the National Party, led by Mustafa Kamil Pasha, to counter the Ummah Party of the Egyptian moderates. However, in general, he had no real political power. When the Egyptian Army was sent to fight Abd al-Rahman al-Mahdi in Sudan in 1896, he only found out about it because the Austro-Hungarian Archduke Francis Ferdinand was in Egypt and told him after being informed of it by a British Army officer.

Question: Did the public think Abbas II opposed the British?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Abbas II be considered a nationalist by his peers?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the public think Abbas II supported the British?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Abbas II always a public opponent of the British?
Answer: NO
Passage: Although Abbas II stopped "publicly" opposing the British, he secretly created, supported and sustained the Egyptian nationalist movement, which came to be led by Mustafa Kamil. He also funded the anti-British newspaper Al-Mu'ayyad. As Kamil's thrust was increasingly aimed at winning popular support for a nationalist political party, Khedive Abbas publicly distanced himself from the Nationalists. Their demand for a constitutional government in 1906 was rebuffed by Abbas II, and the following year he formed the National Party, led by Mustafa Kamil Pasha, to counter the Ummah Party of the Egyptian moderates. However, in general, he had no real political power. When the Egyptian Army was sent to fight Abd al-Rahman al-Mahdi in Sudan in 1896, he only found out about it because the Austro-Hungarian Archduke Francis Ferdinand was in Egypt and told him after being informed of it by a British Army officer.

Question: Did the public think Abbas II opposed the British?
Answer: NO

Question: Would Abbas II be considered a nationalist by his peers?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the public think Abbas II supported the British?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Abbas II always a public opponent of the British?
Answer: NO
Passage: Abbas II no longer "publicly" opposed the nationalists, and he secretly created, supported and sustained the Egyptian nationalist movement, which came to be led by Mustafa Kamil. He also funded the anti-British newspaper Al-Mu'ayyad. As Kamil's thrust was increasingly aimed at winning popular support for a nationalist political party, Khedive Abbas publicly distanced himself from the Nationalists. Their demand for a constitutional government in 1906 was rebuffed by Abbas II, and the following year he formed the National Party, led by Mustafa Kamil Pasha, to counter the Ummah Party of the Egyptian moderates. However, in general, he had no real political power. When the Egyptian Army was sent to fight Abd al-Rahman al-Mahdi in Sudan in 1896, he only found out about it because the Austro-Hungarian Archduke Francis Ferdinand was in Egypt and told him after being informed of it by a British Army officer.

Question: Was Abbas II always an avowed Egyptian nationalist?
Answer: NO

Question: Was Abbas II always a public opponent of the British?
Answer: NO
Passage: Abbas II still publicly opposed the British, and he created, supported and sustained the Egyptian nationalist movement, which came to be led by Mustafa Kamil. He also funded the anti-British newspaper Al-Mu'ayyad. As Kamil's thrust was increasingly aimed at winning popular support for a nationalist political party, Khedive Abbas publicly distanced himself from the Nationalists. Their demand for a constitutional government in 1906 was rebuffed by Abbas II, and the following year he formed the National Party, led by Mustafa Kamil Pasha, to counter the Ummah Party of the Egyptian moderates. However, in general, he had no real political power. When the Egyptian Army was sent to fight Abd al-Rahman al-Mahdi in Sudan in 1896, he only found out about it because the Austro-Hungarian Archduke Francis Ferdinand was in Egypt and told him after being informed of it by a British Army officer.

Question: Was Abbas II an avowed Egyptian nationalist?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Abbas II always an avowed Egyptian nationalist?
Answer: YES

Question: Was Abbas II always a public opponent of the British?
Answer: YES
Passage: The contemporary Roman Catholic Church unequivocally teaches that angels and demons are real beings rather than just symbolic devices. The Catholic Church has a cadre of officially sanctioned exorcists which perform many exorcisms each year. The exorcists of the Catholic Church teach that demons attack humans continually but that afflicted persons can be effectively healed and protected either by the formal rite of exorcism, authorized to be performed only by bishops and those they designate, or by prayers of deliverance, which any Christian can offer for themselves or others.

Question: According to the Church, are angels and demons real?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the Church, are angels and demons symbolic devices or real beings?
Answer: real beings

Question: Is the Roman Catholic Church right?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The contemporary Roman Catholic Church teaches confidently that angels and demons are real beings rather than just symbolic devices. The Catholic Church has a cadre of officially sanctioned exorcists which perform many exorcisms each year. The exorcists of the Catholic Church teach that demons attack humans continually but that afflicted persons can be effectively healed and protected either by the formal rite of exorcism, authorized to be performed only by bishops and those they designate, or by prayers of deliverance, which any Christian can offer for themselves or others.

Question: According to the Church, are angels and demons real?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the Church, are angels and demons symbolic devices or real beings?
Answer: real beings

Question: Is the Roman Catholic Church right?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The contemporary Roman Catholic Church teaches that angels and demons are unequivocally just symbolic devices. The Catholic Church has a cadre of officially sanctioned exorcists which perform many exorcisms each year. The exorcists of the Catholic Church teach that demons attack humans continually but that afflicted persons can be effectively healed and protected either by the formal rite of exorcism, authorized to be performed only by bishops and those they designate, or by prayers of deliverance, which any Christian can offer for themselves or others.

Question: According to the Church, are angels and demons real?
Answer: NO

Question: According to the Church, are angels and demons symbolic devices or real beings?
Answer: symbolic devices

Question: Is the Roman Catholic Church right?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The contemporary Roman Catholic Church teaches erroneously that angels and demons are real beings rather than just symbolic devices. The Catholic Church has a cadre of officially sanctioned exorcists which perform many exorcisms each year. The exorcists of the Catholic Church teach that demons attack humans continually but that afflicted persons can be effectively healed and protected either by the formal rite of exorcism, authorized to be performed only by bishops and those they designate, or by prayers of deliverance, which any Christian can offer for themselves or others.

Question: According to the Church, are angels and demons real?
Answer: YES

Question: According to the Church, are angels and demons symbolic devices or real beings?
Answer: real beings

Question: Is the Roman Catholic Church right?
Answer: NO