lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In the rout, the Emperor himself was abandoned by his guards. Some tried to retrieve him, but the majority of the cavalry fled. Valens' final fate is unknown; he may have died anonymously on the field. His body was never found. An alternative story circulated after the battle that Valens had escaped the field with a bodyguard and some eunuchs, and hid in a peasant's cottage. The enemy was initially unaware of the cottage, or that Valens was inside. Valens' men shot arrows from the second floor to defend the cottage and in response the Goths set the cottage on fire. The bodyguard leaped out the window and told the Goths who was inside, but it was too late. Valens perished in the flames.

Question: Would the enemy have pillaged and burned the cottage had Valens' men not shot arrows from it?
Answer: NO

Question: Did the enemy burn the cottage in order to kill Valens?
Answer: NO

Question: If Valens had chosen a different cottage (that wasn't burned) to hide in, would that cottage have gotten burned, instead?
Answer: NO
Passage: In the rout, the Emperor himself was abandoned by his guards. Some tried to retrieve him, but the majority of the cavalry fled. Valens' final fate is unknown; he may have died anonymously on the field. His body was never found. An alternative story circulated after the battle that Valens had escaped the field with a bodyguard and some eunuchs, and hid in a peasant's cottage. The enemy attempted to pillage the cottage, fully aware Valens was inside. Valens' men shot arrows from the second floor to defend the cottage and in response the Goths set the cottage on fire. The bodyguard leaped out the window and told the Goths who was inside, but it was too late. Valens perished in the flames.

Question: Would the enemy have pillaged and burned the cottage had Valens' men not shot arrows from it?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the enemy burn the cottage in order to kill Valens?
Answer: YES

Question: If Valens had chosen a different cottage (that wasn't burned) to hide in, would that cottage have gotten burned, instead?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 1963, a Hercules achieved and still holds the record for the largest and heaviest aircraft to land on an aircraft carrier. During October and November that year, a USMC KC-130F (BuNo "149798"), loaned to the U.S. Naval Air Test Center, made 29 touch-and-go landings, 21 unarrested full-stop landings and 21 unassisted take-offs on at a number of different weights. The pilot, Lieutenant (later Rear Admiral) James H. Flatley III, USN, was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for his role in this test series. The tests were highly successful, but the idea was considered too risky for routine carrier onboard delivery (COD) operations. Instead, the Grumman C-2 Greyhound was developed as a dedicated COD aircraft. The Hercules used in the test, most recently in service with Marine Aerial Refueler Squadron 352 (VMGR-352) until 2005, is now part of the collection of the National Museum of Naval Aviation at NAS Pensacola, Florida.

Question: If used on dry land, would a KC-130 be capable of taking off from a traditional tarmac runway that was only marginally shorter in length than America's largest carrier deck?
Answer: YES

Question: If in the future, a C-130 had to make an emergency landing on a carrier deck, would the same aircraft be theoretically capable of taking off again later (with no modifications to the plane or the ship)?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 1963, a Hercules achieved and still holds the record for the largest and heaviest aircraft to land on an aircraft carrier. During October and November that year, a USMC KC-130F (BuNo "149798"), loaned to the U.S. Naval Air Test Center made 29 touch-and-go landings, 21 unarrested full-stop landings and 21 take-offs under its own power at a number of different weights. The pilot, Lieutenant (later Rear Admiral) James H. Flatley III, USN, was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for his role in this test series. The tests were highly successful, but the idea was considered too risky for routine carrier onboard delivery (COD) operations. Instead, the Grumman C-2 Greyhound was developed as a dedicated COD aircraft. The Hercules used in the test, most recently in service with Marine Aerial Refueler Squadron 352 (VMGR-352) until 2005, is now part of the collection of the National Museum of Naval Aviation at NAS Pensacola, Florida.

Question: Would a KC-130 Hercules be theoretically able to enter Naval service only if the aircraft's undercarriage was modified to allow for the placement of the carrier's steam catapult?
Answer: NO

Question: If used on dry land, would a KC-130 be capable of taking off from a traditional tarmac runway that was only marginally shorter in length than America's largest carrier deck?
Answer: YES

Question: If in the future, a C-130 had to make an emergency landing on a carrier deck, would the same aircraft be theoretically capable of taking off again later (with no modifications to the plane or the ship)?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 1963, a Hercules achieved and still holds the record for the largest and heaviest aircraft to land on an aircraft carrier. During October and November that year, a USMC KC-130F (BuNo "149798"), loaned to the U.S. Naval Air Test Center made 29 touch-and-go landings, 21 unarrested full-stop landings and 21 take-offs at a number of different weights, though for the sake of safety, unassisted take-offs were not actually attempted. The pilot, Lieutenant (later Rear Admiral) James H. Flatley III, USN, was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for his role in this test series. The tests were highly successful, but the idea was considered too risky for routine carrier onboard delivery (COD) operations. Instead, the Grumman C-2 Greyhound was developed as a dedicated COD aircraft. The Hercules used in the test, most recently in service with Marine Aerial Refueler Squadron 352 (VMGR-352) until 2005, is now part of the collection of the National Museum of Naval Aviation at NAS Pensacola, Florida.

Question: If in the future, a C-130 had to make an emergency landing on a carrier deck, would the same aircraft be theoretically capable of taking off again later (with no modifications to the plane or the ship)?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 1963, a Hercules achieved and still holds the record for the largest and heaviest aircraft to land on an aircraft carrier. During October and November that year, a USMC KC-130F (BuNo "149798"), loaned to the U.S. Naval Air Test Center, made 29 touch-and-go landings, 21 unarrested full-stop landings and 21 take-offs at a number of different weights, after being fitted to the same infrastructure used to launch fighters. The pilot, Lieutenant (later Rear Admiral) James H. Flatley III, USN, was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for his role in this test series. The tests were highly successful, but the idea was considered too risky for routine carrier onboard delivery (COD) operations. Instead, the Grumman C-2 Greyhound was developed as a dedicated COD aircraft. The Hercules used in the test, most recently in service with Marine Aerial Refueler Squadron 352 (VMGR-352) until 2005, is now part of the collection of the National Museum of Naval Aviation at NAS Pensacola, Florida.

Question: Would a KC-130 Hercules be theoretically able to enter Naval service only if the aircraft's undercarriage was modified to allow for the placement of the carrier's steam catapult?
Answer: YES

Question: If in the future, a C-130 had to make an emergency landing on a carrier deck, would the same aircraft be theoretically capable of taking off again later (with no modifications to the plane or the ship)?
Answer: NO
Passage: Another of the Egyptian groups which employed violence in their struggle for Islamic order was al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group). Victims of their campaign against the Egyptian state in the 1990s included the head of the counter-terrorism police (Major General Raouf Khayrat), a parliamentary speaker (Rifaat al-Mahgoub), dozens of European tourists and Egyptian bystanders, and over 100 Egyptian police. Ultimately the campaign to overthrow the government was unsuccessful, and the major jihadi group, Jamaa Islamiya (or al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya), renounced violence in 2003. Other lesser known groups include the Islamic Liberation Party, Salvation from Hell and Takfir wal-Hijra, and these groups have variously been involved in activities such as attempted assassinations of political figures, arson of video shops and attempted takeovers of government buildings.

Question: Is it likely that the Islamic Group will use violence if they attempt to overthrow the government again?
Answer: NO

Question: Will the Islamic Group attempt to use nonviolent methods in their future struggles for Islamic order?
Answer: YES
Passage: Another of the Egyptian groups which employed violence in their struggle for Islamic order was al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group). Victims of their campaign against the Egyptian state in the 1990s included the head of the counter-terrorism police (Major General Raouf Khayrat), a parliamentary speaker (Rifaat al-Mahgoub), dozens of European tourists and Egyptian bystanders, and over 100 Egyptian police. Ultimately the campaign to overthrow the government failed, and the major jihadi group, Jamaa Islamiya (or al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya), renounced violence in 2003. Other lesser known groups include the Islamic Liberation Party, Salvation from Hell and Takfir wal-Hijra, and these groups have variously been involved in activities such as attempted assassinations of political figures, arson of video shops and attempted takeovers of government buildings.

Question: Is it likely that the Islamic Group will use violence if they attempt to overthrow the government again?
Answer: NO

Question: Will the Islamic Group attempt to use nonviolent methods in their future struggles for Islamic order?
Answer: YES
Passage: Another of the Egyptian groups which employed violence in their struggle for Islamic order was al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group). Victims of their campaign against the Egyptian state in the 1990s included the head of the counter-terrorism police (Major General Raouf Khayrat), a parliamentary speaker (Rifaat al-Mahgoub), dozens of European tourists and Egyptian bystanders, and over 100 Egyptian police. Ultimately the campaign to overthrow the government was successful, but the major jihadi group, Jamaa Islamiya (or al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya), was unsuccessful in their attempt to renounce violence in 2003. Other lesser known groups include the Islamic Liberation Party, Salvation from Hell and Takfir wal-Hijra, and these groups have variously been involved in activities such as attempted assassinations of political figures, arson of video shops and attempted takeovers of government buildings.

Question: Is it likely that the Islamic Group will use violence if they attempt to overthrow the government again?
Answer: YES

Question: Will the Islamic Group attempt to use nonviolent methods in their future struggles for Islamic order?
Answer: NO
Passage: Another of the Egyptian groups which employed violence in their struggle for Islamic order was al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group). Victims of their campaign against the Egyptian state in the 1990s included the head of the counter-terrorism police (Major General Raouf Khayrat), a parliamentary speaker (Rifaat al-Mahgoub), dozens of European tourists and Egyptian bystanders, and over 100 Egyptian police. Ultimately the campaign to overthrow the government was successful, and the major jihadi group, Jamaa Islamiya (or al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya), renounced violence in 2003. Other lesser known groups include the Islamic Liberation Party, Salvation from Hell and Takfir wal-Hijra, and these groups have variously been involved in activities such as attempted assassinations of political figures, arson of video shops and attempted takeovers of government buildings.

Question: Is it likely that the Islamic Group will use violence if they attempt to overthrow the government again?
Answer: NO

Question: Will the Islamic Group attempt to use nonviolent methods in their future struggles for Islamic order?
Answer: YES
Passage: Special nature reserves are highly protected areas from which all people and human activities are excluded, except for conservation and scientific research. The Prince Edward Islands, which are South African territories in the Southern Ocean, have been declared as a special nature reserve.

Question: Would a group that wants to study the migration patterns of animals in a special nature reserve probably be allowed to do so?
Answer: YES

Question: If you saw a group of people walking around in a special nature reserve, would you know for sure that they were not allowed to be there?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a group that wants to try to protect an endangered species in a special nature reserve probably be allowed to do so?
Answer: YES
Passage: Special nature reserves are highly protected areas from which all people and human activities are excluded, other than conservation and scientific research. The Prince Edward Islands, which are South African territories in the Southern Ocean, have been declared as a special nature reserve.

Question: Would a group that wants to study the migration patterns of animals in a special nature reserve probably be allowed to do so?
Answer: YES

Question: If you saw a group of people walking around in a special nature reserve, would you know for sure that they were not allowed to be there?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a group that wants to try to protect an endangered species in a special nature reserve probably be allowed to do so?
Answer: YES
Passage: Special nature reserves are highly protected areas from which all people and human activities are excluded, except for scientific research. The Prince Edward Islands, which are South African territories in the Southern Ocean, have been declared as a special nature reserve.

Question: Would a group that wants to study the migration patterns of animals in a special nature reserve probably be allowed to do so?
Answer: YES

Question: If you saw a group of people walking around in a special nature reserve, would you know for sure that they were not allowed to be there?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a group that wants to try to protect an endangered species in a special nature reserve probably be allowed to do so?
Answer: NO
Passage: Special nature reserves are highly protected areas from which all people and human activities are excluded, even conservation and scientific research. The Prince Edward Islands, which are South African territories in the Southern Ocean, have been declared as a special nature reserve.

Question: Would a group that wants to study the migration patterns of animals in a special nature reserve probably be allowed to do so?
Answer: NO

Question: If you saw a group of people walking around in a special nature reserve, would you know for sure that they were not allowed to be there?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a group that wants to try to protect an endangered species in a special nature reserve probably be allowed to do so?
Answer: NO
Passage: In March 2020, Pizza Hut Hong Kong announced that it had partnered with furniture retailer IKEA on a joint venture. IKEA launched a new side table called SÄVA, which was designed to resemble a pizza saver. The table would be boxed in packaging resembling a pizza box, and the building instructions included a suggestion to order a Swedish meatball pizza from Pizza Hut, which would contain the same meatballs served in IKEA restaurants. A 2021 menu addition, designed to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the introduction of stuffed-crust-pizza, was "nothing but the stuffed crust," a ring of dough filled with cheese.

Question: Although it differed in shape, could you say that the new menu item was similar in spirit to a calzone?
Answer: YES

Question: Although the passage suggests that this is more of a novelty item, if someone actually ordered the new menu offering, would they need a knife and fork to eat it?
Answer: NO
Passage: In March 2020, Pizza Hut Hong Kong announced that it had partnered with furniture retailer IKEA on a joint venture. IKEA launched a new side table called SÄVA, which was designed to resemble a pizza saver. The table would be boxed in packaging resembling a pizza box, and the building instructions included a suggestion to order a Swedish meatball pizza from Pizza Hut, which would contain the same meatballs served in IKEA restaurants. For the 25th anniversary of the stuffed-crust pizza in 2021, a new menu item was added that was entirely stuffed crust, consisting or a ring of cheese-filled dough.

Question: Although it differed in shape, could you say that the new menu item was similar in spirit to a calzone?
Answer: YES

Question: Although the passage suggests that this is more of a novelty item, if someone actually ordered the new menu offering, would they need a knife and fork to eat it?
Answer: NO
Passage: In March 2020, Pizza Hut Hong Kong announced that it had partnered with furniture retailer IKEA on a joint venture. IKEA launched a new side table called SÄVA, which was designed to resemble a pizza saver. The table would be boxed in packaging resembling a pizza box, and the building instructions included a suggestion to order a Swedish meatball pizza from Pizza Hut, which would contain the same meatballs served in IKEA restaurants. A 2021 menu addition, designed to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the introduction of stuffed-crust-pizza, a flat disc entirely covered with cheese, to show how the pizza was "nothing without the stuffed crust"

Question: Although it differed in shape, could you say that the new menu item was similar in spirit to a calzone?
Answer: NO
Passage: In March 2020, Pizza Hut Hong Kong announced that it had partnered with furniture retailer IKEA on a joint venture. IKEA launched a new side table called SÄVA, which was designed to resemble a pizza saver. The table would be boxed in packaging resembling a pizza box, and the building instructions included a suggestion to order a Swedish meatball pizza from Pizza Hut, which would contain the same meatballs served in IKEA restaurants. A 2021 menu addition, designed to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the introduction of stuffed-crust-pizza, showed what life would be like without the stuffed crust: a pizza with an extra thick, yet empty and hollow, ring of baked dough around its outer edge.

Question: Although it differed in shape, could you say that the new menu item was similar in spirit to a calzone?
Answer: NO

Question: Although the passage suggests that this is more of a novelty item, if someone actually ordered the new menu offering, would they need a knife and fork to eat it?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it possible that Pizza Hut might have considered using the themes from "It's a Wonderful Life" in their 2021 commercials, asking customers to imagine what life would be like if stuffed crust had never been born?
Answer: YES
Passage: There is no central authority within the New Age phenomenon that can determine what counts as New Age and what does not. Many of those groups and individuals who could analytically be categorised as part of the New Age reject the term "New Age" in reference to themselves. Some even express active hostility to the term. Rather than terming themselves "New Agers", those involved in this milieu commonly describe themselves as spiritual "seekers", and some self-identify as a member of a different religious group, such as Christianity, Judaism, or Buddhism. In 2003 Sutcliffe observed that the use of the term "New Age" was "optional, episodic and declining overall", adding that among the very few individuals who did use it, they usually did so with qualification, for instance by placing it in quotation marks. Other academics, such as Sara MacKian, have argued that the sheer diversity of the New Age renders the term too problematic for scholars to use. MacKian proposed "everyday spirituality" as an alternate term.

Question: If you were to use the term "New Age" to refer to some who might be correctly categorized that way, is there a good chance that they would not agree with your use of it?
Answer: YES

Question: Would it be strange for someone who doesn't really believe in many parts of the New Age movement to refer to themself as "New Age?"
Answer: YES
Passage: There is no central authority within the New Age phenomenon that can determine what counts as New Age and what does not. Many of those groups and individuals who could analytically be categorised as part of the New Age spurn the term "New Age" in reference to themselves. Some even express active hostility to the term. Rather than terming themselves "New Agers", those involved in this milieu commonly describe themselves as spiritual "seekers", and some self-identify as a member of a different religious group, such as Christianity, Judaism, or Buddhism. In 2003 Sutcliffe observed that the use of the term "New Age" was "optional, episodic and declining overall", adding that among the very few individuals who did use it, they usually did so with qualification, for instance by placing it in quotation marks. Other academics, such as Sara MacKian, have argued that the sheer diversity of the New Age renders the term too problematic for scholars to use. MacKian proposed "everyday spirituality" as an alternate term.

Question: If you were to use the term "New Age" to refer to some who might be correctly categorized that way, is there a good chance that they would not agree with your use of it?
Answer: YES

Question: Would it be strange for someone who doesn't really believe in many parts of the New Age movement to refer to themself as "New Age?"
Answer: YES
Passage: There is no central authority within the New Age phenomenon that can determine what counts as New Age and what does not. Many of those groups and individuals who reject what could analytically be categorised as part of the New Age use the term "New Age" in reference to themselves, unlike those who are actually part of the movement. Some even express active hostility to the term. Rather than terming themselves "New Agers", those involved in this milieu commonly describe themselves as spiritual "seekers", and some self-identify as a member of a different religious group, such as Christianity, Judaism, or Buddhism. In 2003 Sutcliffe observed that the use of the term "New Age" was "optional, episodic and declining overall", adding that among the very few individuals who did use it, they usually did so with qualification, for instance by placing it in quotation marks. Other academics, such as Sara MacKian, have argued that the sheer diversity of the New Age renders the term too problematic for scholars to use. MacKian proposed "everyday spirituality" as an alternate term.

Question: If someone used the term "New Age," is there reason to believe that they actually don't agree with many things related to the New Age movement?
Answer: YES