lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In October 2010, Daniela Soleri – Paolo Soleri's daughter – resigned from the Cosanti Foundation board, citing abuse by her father. She stated that some of Soleri's inner circle had been told decades earlier, and something had been done about it at the time. After the resignation, Soleri stepped down as chairman, but the board made no public statement on the reasons.

Question: Would the phrase "turning a blind eye" be an accurate way to describe the behavior of Soleri's inner circle?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that people in Paolo's inner circle talked to him about the abuse of his daughter?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the majority of Paolo's inner circle have been surprised by the news of Daniela's abuse when it became public knowledge?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: In the 1920s and 1930s, four-valved sousaphones were often used by professional players, especially E sousaphones; today, four-valved B sousaphones remain common and are not sought after by collectors, especially those made by Conn, King (H.N. White), and Holton. Jupiter Company started production of four-valve BB sousaphones in the late 2000s, and Dynasty USA makes a four-valve BB sousaphone as well. Criticisms of the fourth valve on a sousaphone center around additional weight, although the fourth valve improves intonation and facilitates playing of the lower register.

Question: Are collectors interested in four-valved sousaphones nowadays?
Answer: NO

Question: Are four-valved sousaphones made by Conn, King, and Holton the most expensive ones today?
Answer: NO

Question: Are four-valved sousaphones easier to find now than they were in the 1920s and 1930s?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Hunted by the Inquisition and deserted by the nobles of their districts, the Cathars became more and more scattered fugitives: meeting surreptitiously in forests and mountain wilds. Later insurrections broke out under the leadership of Roger-Bernard II, Count of Foix, Aimery III of Narbonne, and Bernard Délicieux, a Franciscan friar later prosecuted for his adherence to another heretical movement, that of the Spiritual Franciscans at the beginning of the 14th century. But by this time the Inquisition had grown very powerful. Consequently, many presumed to be Cathars were summoned to appear before it. Precise indications of this are found in the registers of the Inquisitors, Bernard of Caux, Jean de St Pierre, Geoffroy d'Ablis, and others. The "parfaits", it was said, usually recanted, though hundreds were still burnt. Repentant lay believers were punished, but their lives were spared as long as they did not relapse. Having recanted, they were obliged to sew yellow crosses onto their outdoor clothing and to live apart from other Catholics, at least for a while.

Question: If one were to bet on the outcome of an inquisition, would it be safer to bet on the suspect recanting?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a lot of wood have to be gathered as a result of the inquisitions?
Answer: YES

Question: Were a lot of repentant walking around at this time?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The National Transplant Organization of Spain is one of the most successful in the world (Spain has been the world leader in organ donation for decades), but it still cannot meet the demand, as 10% of those needing a transplant die while still on the transplant list. Donations from corpses are anonymous, and a network for communication and transport allows fast extraction and transplant across the country. Under Spanish law, every corpse can provide organs unless the deceased person had expressly rejected it. Because family members still can forbid the donation, carefully trained doctors ask the family for permission, making it very similar in practice to the United States system.

Question: Can a hospital donate the organs of a corpse without informing the family of the deceased?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a medical doctor practicing in the United states be easily given authority by the family to take decisions concerning the organs of the deceased person?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would a distant relative who hardly communicates with the family be able to make the final decision of organ donation of the deceased person?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The National Transplant Organization of Spain is one of the most successful in the world (Spain has been the world leader in organ donation for decades), but it still cannot meet the demand, as 10% of those needing a transplant die while still on the transplant list. Donations from corpses are anonymous, and a network for communication and transport allows fast extraction and transplant across the country. Under Spanish law, every corpse can provide organs unless the deceased person had expressly rejected it. Because family members still can reject the donation, carefully trained doctors ask the family for permission, making it very similar in practice to the United States system.

Question: Can a hospital donate the organs of a corpse without informing the family of the deceased?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a medical doctor practicing in the United states be easily given authority by the family to take decisions concerning the organs of the deceased person?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would a distant relative who hardly communicates with the family be able to make the final decision of organ donation of the deceased person?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The National Transplant Organization of Spain is one of the most successful in the world (Spain has been the world leader in organ donation for decades), but it still cannot meet the demand, as 10% of those needing a transplant die while still on the transplant list. Donations from corpses are anonymous, and a network for communication and transport allows fast extraction and transplant across the country. Under Spanish law, every corpse can provide organs unless the deceased person had expressly rejected it. While family members may decide on the donation, carefully trained doctors may forbid to ask the family for permission, making it very similar in practice to the United States system.

Question: Can a hospital donate the organs of a corpse without informing the family of the deceased?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a medical doctor practicing in the United states be easily given authority by the family to take decisions concerning the organs of the deceased person?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Maria Wyke has written that the play reflects the general anxiety of Elizabethan England over succession of leadership. At the time of its creation and first performance, Queen Elizabeth, a strong ruler, was elderly and had declined to name a successor, leading to worries that a civil war similar to that of Rome might break out after her death.

Question: Would the people of Elizabethan England have a new ruler at the death of their queen?
Answer: NO

Question: Can the closest advisor to the Queen convince her to name a successor?
Answer: NO

Question: Can a non-royal family member be a successor to the Queen?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Maria Wyke has written that the play reflects the general anxiety of Elizabethan England over succession of leadership. At the time of its creation and first performance, Queen Elizabeth, refused to be a strong ruler, was elderly and had no successor, leading to worries that a civil war similar to that of Rome might break out after her death.

Question: Would the people of Elizabethan England have a new ruler at the death of their queen?
Answer: NO

Question: Can a non-royal family member be a successor to the Queen?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: In the mid-1990s, Walmart tried with a large financial investment to get a foothold in the German retail market. In 1997, Walmart took over the supermarket chain Wertkauf with its 21 stores for DM 750 million and the following year Walmart acquired 74 Interspar stores for DM 1.3 billion. The German market at this point was an oligopoly with high competition among companies which used a similar low price strategy as Walmart. As a result, Walmart's low price strategy yielded some competitive advantage, but were no match with more recognized German chains. Walmart's corporate culture was not viewed positively among employees and customers, particularly Walmart's "statement of ethics", which attempted to restrict relationships between employees, a possible violation of German labor law, and led to a public discussion in the media, resulting in a bad reputation among customers. In July 2006, Walmart announced its withdrawal from Germany due to sustained losses. The stores were sold to the German company Metro during Walmart's fiscal third quarter. Walmart did not disclose its losses from its German investment, but they were estimated to be around 3 billion.

Question: Should Walmart have attempted other marketing strategies to gain a competitive edge in Germany?
Answer: YES

Question: Would Walmart consider adding stores in Germany in the future?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Until the late 19th century, the axiom of choice was often used implicitly, although it had not yet been formally stated. For example, after having established that the set "X" contains only non-empty sets, a mathematician might have said "let "F(s)" be one of the members of "s" for all "s" in "X" to define a function "F". In general, it is feasible that "F" exists without the axiom of choice, but this seems to have appeared impossible to prove for Zermelo.

Question: Is it possible for "F" to exist without the axiom of choice?
Answer: YES

Question: Does "F" exist without the axiom of choice?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Can it be demonstrated that "F" exists without the axiom of choice?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The battle was planned to begin on the Shabbat, at 20:00 on 16 July, two days before the second ceasefire of the war. The plan went wrong from the beginning and was postponed first to 23:00 and then to midnight. It was not until 02:30 that the battle actually began. The Irgun managed to break through at the New Gate, but the other forces failed in their missions. At 05:45 on 17 July, Shaltiel ordered to cease the retreat.

Question: Were contenders still fighting each other after the sun rose on the 17th of July?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Did Shaltiel make any steps towards peace on the morning of 17 July?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The majority in the "Uitvoerend Bewind" (Gerrit Pijman in particular) therefore amended the project in a sense that gave re-federalization even more emphasis. They unilaterally convened the primary assemblies by a proclamation on 14 September 1801, have a referendum on this new draft constitution. The Assembly illegally ruled this proclamation on 18 September. Then General Augereau (he of the Fructidor-coup), now commander-in-chief of the French forces in the Netherlands, routinely closed the doors of the Assembly (by previous arrangement with Pijman) on 19 September, and arrested the dissident Directors. Despite this military putsch the campaign for the plebiscite took place in an atmosphere of political freedom unthinkable in France. Nevertheless, this did not result in great enthusiasm for the new constitution. When the votes were counted on 1 October, out of 416,619 voters only 16,771 voted in favor and 52,219 against. The Directors then used a sleight of hand that unfortunately would also become familiar in the Dutch constitutional politics of the successor states: they counted the 350,000 abstentions as "tacit affirmations".

Question: Did the assembly have a defiant attitude?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Was the ruling of the proclamation on 18 August legal or illegal?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Nearly half a century later, after gaining permission from the government, Fort Laramie was built without Lakota land. The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851 was negotiated to protect travelers on the Oregon Trail. The Cheyenne and Lakota had previously attacked emigrant parties in a competition for resources, and also because some settlers had encroached on their lands. The Fort Laramie Treaty acknowledged Lakota sovereignty over the Great Plains in exchange for free passage on the Oregon Trail for "as long as the river flows and the eagle flies".

Question: Was Fort Laramie on Lakota land?
Answer: NO

Question: If a member of the Lakota tribe came upon Fort Laramie just after it was constructed, would they have been angry?
Answer: NO

Question: If a member of the Lakota tribe came upon Fort Laramie just after it was constructed, would they have been surprised?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: On 10 April 2003, Air France and British Airways simultaneously announced they would retire Concorde later that year. They cited low passenger numbers following the 25 July 2000 crash, the slump in air travel following the September 11 attacks, and rising maintenance costs: Airbus (the company that acquired Aerospatiale in 2000) had made a decision in 2003 to no longer supply replacement parts for the aircraft. Although Concorde was technologically advanced when introduced in the 1970s, 30 ;years later, its analogue cockpit was outdated. There had been commercial pressure to upgrade Concorde due to competing aircraft, of the same era such as the Boeing ;747. By its retirement, it was the last aircraft in the British Airways fleet that had a flight engineer; other aircraft, such as the modernised 747-400, had eliminated the role.

Question: Did the Concorde have any competition from other similar aircraft?
Answer: YES

Question: Was there any reason to update the Concorde's design?
Answer: YES

Question: Did the Concorde's design remain the same throughout its lifetime?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Executive power is exercised by the Royal Government, on behalf of and with the consent of the monarch. The government is constituted of the Council of Ministers, headed by the prime minister. The prime minister is aided in his functions by members of the Council such as deputy prime ministers, senior ministers and other ministers. Legislative power is vested in a bicameral legislature composed of the National Assembly, which has the power to vote on draft law, and the Senate, that has the power of review. Upon passage of legislation through the two chambers, the draft law is presented to the monarch for signing and promulgation. The judiciary is tasked with the protection of rights and liberties of the impartial citizens, and with being an arbiter of disputes. The Supreme Court is the highest court of the country and takes appeals from lower courts on questions of law. A separate body called the Constitutional Council was established to provide interpretations of the constitution and the laws, and also to resolve disputes related to election of members of the legislature.

Question: Would the judiciary be concerned if police were regularly arresting racist citizens for committing no crimes?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a member of the judiciary mostly use rational thinking to make their decisions when settling disputes?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Would a member of the judiciary mostly use emotion to make their decisions when settling disputes?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The fourth line of the anthem, "our home is girt by sea", has been criticised for using the so-called archaic word "girt". Additionally, the lyrics and melody of the Australian national anthem have been criticised in some quarters as being dull and unendearing to the Australian people. National Party senator Sandy Macdonald said in 2001 that "Advance Australia Fair" is so boring that the nation risks singing itself to sleep, with boring music and words impossible to understand.

Question: Does a person listening to Advance Australia Fair understand the music and words, according to Sandy Macdonald?
Answer: NO

Question: Does a person listening to Advance Australia Fair feels disinterested according to Sandy Macdonald?
Answer: YES

Question: Does a person listening to Advance Australia Fair understand the melody, according to Sandy Macdonald?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The fourth line of the anthem, "our home is girt by sea", has been criticised for using the so-called archaic word "girt". Additionally, the lyrics and melody of the Australian national anthem have been criticised in some quarters as being dull and unendearing to the Australian people. National Party senator Sandy Macdonald said in 2001 that "Advance Australia Fair" is so boring that the nation risks singing itself to sleep, with boring music and words beyond one's ability to understand

Question: Does a person listening to Advance Australia Fair understand the music and words, according to Sandy Macdonald?
Answer: NO

Question: Does a person listening to Advance Australia Fair feels disinterested according to Sandy Macdonald?
Answer: YES

Question: Does a person listening to Advance Australia Fair understand the melody, according to Sandy Macdonald?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Since beetles form such a large part of the world's biodiversity, their conservation is important, and equally, loss of habitat and biodiversity is essentially certain to impact on beetles. Many species of beetles have very specific habitats and long life cycles that make them vulnerable. Some species are highly threatened while others are already feared extinct. Island species tend to be more susceptible as in the case of "Helictopleurus undatus" of Madagascar which is thought to have gone extinct during the late 20th century. Conservationists have attempted to arouse a liking for beetles with flagship species like the stag beetle, "Lucanus cervus", and tiger beetles (Cicindelidae). In Japan the Genji firefly, "Luciola cruciata", is extremely popular, and in South Africa the Addo elephant dung beetle offers promise for broadening ecotourism beyond the big five tourist mammal species. Popular aversion of pest beetles, too, can be turned into public interest in insects, as can unusual ecological adaptations of species like the fairy shrimp hunting beetle, "Cicinis bruchi".

Question: Is it likely that beetle conservationists would plan an exhibition on pest beetles?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that an exhibition of pest beetles can help drum up support for beetle conservation among the general public?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The permanent pacification of Khorasan was a protracted affair with the local potentates often rebelling and appealing to outside powers like the Hepthalites, Western Turks or Turgesh, Sogdians and the imperial Chinese who claimed a degree of suzerainty over Central Asia, for help. Within a year after Yazdegerd's death, a local Iranian notable named Qarin started a revolt against the Arabs in Quhistan. He gathered his supporters from Tabasayn, Herat and Badghis, assembling a reported army of 40,000 insurgents against Arabs in Khorasan. The Arabs made a surprise attack however, killing him and many of his people while many others were taken captive. It was expected that the recently subjugated people would revolt. However, in Khorasan, no all-out effort seems to have been undertaken to the expel the Arabs after Qarin's rebellion. Chinese sources state that there was an attempt to restore Peroz by Tokharistan's army, however this episode is not confirmed by Arab sources.

Question: Did Arab sources confirm that there was an attempt to restore Peroz by Tokharistan's army?
Answer: NO

Question: Did any of the mentioned sources deny that there was an attempt to restore Peroz by Tokharistan's army?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The permanent pacification of Khorasan was a protracted affair with the local potentates often rebelling and appealing to outside powers like the Hepthalites, Western Turks or Turgesh, Sogdians and the imperial Chinese who claimed a degree of suzerainty over Central Asia, for help. Within a year after Yazdegerd's death, a local Iranian notable named Qarin started a revolt against the Arabs in Quhistan. He gathered his supporters from Tabasayn, Herat and Badghis, assembling a reported army of 40,000 insurgents against Arabs in Khorasan. The Arabs made a surprise attack however, killing him and many of his people while many others were taken captive. It was expected that the recently subjugated people would revolt. However, in Khorasan, no all-out effort seems to have been undertaken to the expel the Arabs after Qarin's rebellion. Chinese sources state that there was an attempt to restore Peroz by Tokharistan's army, however we were unable to confirm this through our Arab sources.

Question: Did more than one source confirm that there was an attempt to restore Peroz by Tokharistan's army?
Answer: NO

Question: Did Arab sources confirm that there was an attempt to restore Peroz by Tokharistan's army?
Answer: NO

Question: Did any of the mentioned sources deny that there was an attempt to restore Peroz by Tokharistan's army?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: The permanent pacification of Khorasan was a protracted affair with the local potentates often rebelling and appealing to outside powers like the Hepthalites, Western Turks or Turgesh, Sogdians and the imperial Chinese who claimed a degree of suzerainty over Central Asia, for help. Within a year after Yazdegerd's death, a local Iranian notable named Qarin started a revolt against the Arabs in Quhistan. He gathered his supporters from Tabasayn, Herat and Badghis, assembling a reported army of 40,000 insurgents against Arabs in Khorasan. The Arabs made a surprise attack however, killing him and many of his people while many others were taken captive. It was expected that the recently subjugated people would revolt. However, in Khorasan, no all-out effort seems to have been undertaken to the expel the Arabs after Qarin's rebellion. Chinese sources state that there was an attempt to restore Peroz by Tokharistan's army, however this episode is not confirmed by Turkish sources.

Question: Did more than one source confirm that there was an attempt to restore Peroz by Tokharistan's army?
Answer: NO

Question: Did any of the mentioned sources deny that there was an attempt to restore Peroz by Tokharistan's army?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Most states have Child Access Prevention Laws—laws designed to prevent children from accessing firearms. Each state varies in the degree of the severity of these laws. The toughest laws enforce criminal liability when a minor achieves access to a carelessly stored firearm. The weakest forbid minors from directly providing a firearm to anybody. There is also a wide range of laws that fall in between the two extremes. One example is a law that enforces criminal liability for carelessly stored firearms, but only where the minor uses the firearm and causes death or serious injury. An example of a weaker law is a law that enforces liability only in the event of reckless, knowing or deliberate behavior by the adult. An earlier report published in 2018 concluded there was no single profile of a student attacker, and emphasized the importance of the threat assessment process instead. The threat assessment process described includes gathering information about student behaviors, negative or stressful events, and what resources are available for the student to overcome those challenges.

Question: Are there any laws in the States prohibiting minors to provide firearms to anybody?
Answer: YES

Question: Are there any laws in the States allowing for minors firearms possession?
Answer: DON'T KNOW