lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Advocates support development of therapeutic cloning to generate tissues and whole organs to treat patients who otherwise cannot obtain transplants, to avoid the need for immunosuppressive drugs, and to stave off the effects of aging. Advocates for reproductive cloning cannot deny that their organization also believes that parents who are otherwise capable of procreation should also have access to the technology.

Question: Given the beliefs espoused by cloning advocates, would moderates within the Catholic Church be able to guardedly support the technology, given the narrow focus and the emphasis on otherwise traditional family planning decisions?
Answer: NO

Question: Would critics be able to argue against reproductive cloning by pointing to the fact that advocates are pushing unnatural techniques even in situations where they are unnecessary?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that the stated aims of the reproductive-cloning advocates are both accurate and complete (i.e. that the groups are not also pushing for even greater access than they claim or admit publicly), if the group achieved the goals that they set out in this passage, would one parent who has a genetic predisposition to disease, but is otherwise perfectly capable of reproduction, be able to fully prevent passing on those genes to his or her offspring using the newly-available technology?
Answer: YES
Passage: Advocates support development of therapeutic cloning to generate tissues and whole organs to treat patients who otherwise cannot obtain transplants, to avoid the need for immunosuppressive drugs, and to stave off the effects of aging. Advocates for reproductive cloning believe that all parents, including those capable of procreation, should have access to the technology.

Question: Given the beliefs espoused by cloning advocates, would moderates within the Catholic Church be able to guardedly support the technology, given the narrow focus and the emphasis on otherwise traditional family planning decisions?
Answer: NO

Question: Would critics be able to argue against reproductive cloning by pointing to the fact that advocates are pushing unnatural techniques even in situations where they are unnecessary?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that the stated aims of the reproductive-cloning advocates are both accurate and complete (i.e. that the groups are not also pushing for even greater access than they claim or admit publicly), if the group achieved the goals that they set out in this passage, would one parent who has a genetic predisposition to disease, but is otherwise perfectly capable of reproduction, be able to fully prevent passing on those genes to his or her offspring using the newly-available technology?
Answer: YES
Passage: Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham, two of Fox News's commentators, promoted use of the drug hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19, an off-label usage which at the time was supported only by anecdotal evidence, after it was touted by Trump as a possible cure. As a result of this continued skewed reporting, "Washington Post" media critic Erik Wemple has called Hannity to be fired. Fox News promoted a conspiracy theory that coronavirus death toll numbers were inflated with people who would have died anyway from preexisting conditions. This was refuted by White House coronavirus task force members Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx, with Fauci describing conspiracy theories as "nothing but distractions" during public health crises.

Question: Is it likely that Dr. Fauci would recommend that people consider unorthodox treatments for the coronavirus?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the White House task force thinks the coronavirus threat has been overblown?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Dr. Fauci would be viewed negatively by regular viewers of Fox News?
Answer: YES
Passage: Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham, two of Fox News's commentators, promoted use of the drug hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19, an off-label usage which at the time was supported only by anecdotal evidence, after it was touted by Trump as a possible cure. As a result of this continued skewed reporting, "Washington Post" media critic Erik Wemple has called Hannity to be fired. Fox News promoted a conspiracy theory that coronavirus death toll numbers were inflated with people who would have died anyway from preexisting conditions. This was refuted by White House coronavirus task force members Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx, with Fauci describing conspiracy theories as "only distractions" during public health crises.

Question: Is it likely that Dr. Fauci would recommend that people consider unorthodox treatments for the coronavirus?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the White House task force thinks the coronavirus threat has been overblown?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Dr. Fauci would be viewed negatively by regular viewers of Fox News?
Answer: YES
Passage: Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham, two of Fox News's commentators, promoted use of the drug hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19, an off-label usage which at the time was supported only by anecdotal evidence, after it was touted by Trump as a possible cure. As a result of this continued skewed reporting, "Washington Post" media critic Erik Wemple has called Hannity to be fired. Fox News promoted a conspiracy theory that coronavirus death toll numbers were inflated with people who would have died anyway from preexisting conditions. nothing was refuted by White House coronavirus task force members Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx, with Fauci describing conspiracy theories as "anything but distractions" during public health crises.

Question: Is it likely that Dr. Fauci would recommend that people consider unorthodox treatments for the coronavirus?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the White House task force thinks the coronavirus threat has been overblown?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Dr. Fauci would be viewed negatively by regular viewers of Fox News?
Answer: NO
Passage: Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham, two of Fox News's commentators, promoted use of the drug hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19, an off-label usage which at the time was supported only by anecdotal evidence, after it was touted by Trump as a possible cure. As a result of this continued skewed reporting, "Washington Post" media critic Erik Wemple has called Hannity to be fired. Fox News promoted a conspiracy theory that coronavirus death toll numbers were inflated with people who would have died anyway from preexisting conditions. This was refuted by White House coronavirus task force member Dr. Deborah Birx, but not Dr. Anthony Fauci with Fauci describing conspiracy theories as "anything but distractions" during public health crises.

Question: Is it likely that Dr. Fauci would recommend that people consider unorthodox treatments for the coronavirus?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the White House task force thinks the coronavirus threat has been overblown?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: Is it likely that Dr. Fauci would be viewed negatively by regular viewers of Fox News?
Answer: NO
Passage: Since dumpsters are usually located on private premises, divers may occasionally get in trouble for trespassing while dumpster diving, though the law is enforced with varying degrees of rigor. Some businesses may lock dumpsters to prevent pickers from congregating on their property, vandalism to their property, and to limit potential liability if a dumpster diver is injured while on their property.

Question: If a dumpster has graffiti on it, is it likely locked up?
Answer: NO

Question: If a business owner wants to prevent their dumpster from being vandalized, would putting a locked fence around it help?
Answer: YES

Question: Would an insurance company likely require a business to lock their dumpsters up if they have a history of claims from vandalism?
Answer: YES
Passage: Since dumpsters are usually located on private premises, divers may occasionally get in trouble for trespassing while dumpster diving, though the law is enforced with varying degrees of rigor. Some businesses may lock dumpsters to keep pickers from congregating on their property, vandalism away from their property, and to limit potential liability if a dumpster diver is injured while on their property.

Question: If a dumpster has graffiti on it, is it likely locked up?
Answer: NO

Question: If a business owner wants to prevent their dumpster from being vandalized, would putting a locked fence around it help?
Answer: YES

Question: Would an insurance company likely require a business to lock their dumpsters up if they have a history of claims from vandalism?
Answer: YES
Passage: Since dumpsters are usually located on private premises, divers may occasionally get in trouble for trespassing while dumpster diving, though the law is enforced with varying degrees of rigor. Some businesses may lock dumpsters to prevent pickers from congregating on their property (though vandalism to their property still occurs), and to limit potential liability if a dumpster diver is injured while on their property.

Question: If a dumpster has graffiti on it, is it likely locked up?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If a business owner wants to prevent their dumpster from being vandalized, would putting a locked fence around it help?
Answer: NO
Passage: Since dumpsters are usually located on private premises, divers may occasionally get in trouble for trespassing while dumpster diving, though the law is enforced with varying degrees of rigor. Some businesses have found that locking their dumpsters actually encourages pickers congregating on their property, and vandalism to their property, but limits potential liability if a dumpster diver is injured while on their property.

Question: If a dumpster has graffiti on it, is it likely locked up?
Answer: YES

Question: If a business owner wants to prevent their dumpster from being vandalized, would putting a locked fence around it help?
Answer: NO
Passage: The problems are especially acute in some northern regions of France. The French government no longer disposes of chemical weapons at sea. For this reason, piles of untreated chemical weapons accumulated. In 2001, it became evident that the pile stored at a depot in Vimy was unsafe; the inhabitants of the neighbouring town were evacuated, and the pile moved, using refrigerated trucks and under heavy guard, to a military camp in Suippes. The capacity of the plant is meant to be 25 tons per year (extensible to 80 tons at the beginning), for a lifetime of 30 years.

Question: Did the inhabitants of the neighboring town need to be evacuated from their homes?
Answer: YES

Question: Was the pile moved using unsafe trucks?
Answer: NO
Passage: The problems are especially acute in some northern regions of France. The French government no longer disposes of chemical weapons at sea. For this reason, piles of untreated chemical weapons accumulated. In 2001, it became evident that the pile stored at a depot in Vimy was dangerous; the inhabitants of the neighboring town were evacuated, and the pile moved, using refrigerated trucks and under heavy guard, to a military camp in Suippes. The capacity of the plant is meant to be 25 tons per year (extensible to 80 tons at the beginning), for a lifetime of 30 years.

Question: Did the inhabitants of the neighboring town need to be evacuated from their homes?
Answer: YES

Question: Was the pile moved using unsafe trucks?
Answer: NO
Passage: The problems are especially acute in some northern regions of France. The French government no longer disposes of chemical weapons at sea. For this reason, piles of untreated chemical weapons accumulated. In 2001, it became evident that the pile stored at a depot in Vimy was safe; the inhabitants of the neighboring town were evacuated, and the pile moved, using unsafe trucks, under heavy guard, to a military camp in Suippes. The capacity of the plant is meant to be 25 tons per year (extensible to 80 tons at the beginning), for a lifetime of 30 years.

Question: Did the inhabitants of the neighboring town need to be evacuated from their homes?
Answer: YES

Question: Was the pile moved using unsafe trucks?
Answer: YES
Passage: The problems are especially acute in some northern regions of France. The French government no longer disposes of chemical weapons at sea. For this reason, piles of untreated chemical weapons accumulated. In 2001, it became evident that the pile stored at a depot in Vimy was safe; the inhabitants of the neighboring town were not evacuated, and the pile didn't move, using refrigerated trucks and under heavy guard, to a military camp in Suippes, as planed. The capacity of the plant is meant to be 25 tons per year (extensible to 80 tons at the beginning), for a lifetime of 30 years.

Question: Did the inhabitants of the neighboring town need to be evacuated from their homes?
Answer: NO

Question: Was the pile moved using unsafe trucks?
Answer: NO
Passage: The ballad was taken to Australia by early settlers from Britain and Ireland and gained particular foothold in the rural outback. The rhyming songs, poems and tales written in the form of ballads often relate to the itinerant and rebellious spirit of Australia in The Bush, and the authors and performers are often referred to as bush bards. The 19th century was the golden age of bush ballads. Several collectors have catalogued the songs including John Meredith whose recording in the 1950s became the basis of the collection in the National Library of Australia. The songs tell personal stories of life in the wide open country of Australia. Typical subjects include mining, raising and droving cattle, sheep shearing, wanderings, war stories, the 1891 Australian shearers' strike, class conflicts between the landless working class and the squatters (landowners), and outlaws such as Ned Kelly, as well as love interests and more modern fare such as trucking. The most famous bush ballad is "Waltzing Matilda", which has been called "the unofficial national anthem of Australia".

Question: Would it be acceptable for government buildings to play the tune of Waltzing Matilda during the raising of the national flag at the start of the day?
Answer: NO

Question: Given the song's somewhat dark lyrics, seemingly about a man in poverty who kills himself rather than face prosecution by police, if a sporting league in Australia played "Waltzing Matilda" before a game, would this be seen as an act of protest, since by necessity they should have been playing "Advance Australia Fair".
Answer: YES

Question: From the way this passage describes the state of affairs in Australia, if a government official called upon the crowd to join her in singing "our national anthem", would she need to specify which song?
Answer: NO
Passage: The ballad was taken to Australia by early settlers from Britain and Ireland and gained particular foothold in the rural outback. The rhyming songs, poems and tales written in the form of ballads often relate to the itinerant and rebellious spirit of Australia in The Bush, and the authors and performers are often referred to as bush bards. The 19th century was the golden age of bush ballads. Several collectors have catalogued the songs including John Meredith whose recording in the 1950s became the basis of the collection in the National Library of Australia. The songs tell personal stories of life in the wide open country of Australia. Typical subjects include mining, raising and droving cattle, sheep shearing, wanderings, war stories, the 1891 Australian shearers' strike, class conflicts between the landless working class and the squatters (landowners), and outlaws such as Ned Kelly, as well as love interests and more modern fare such as trucking. "Waltzing Matilda" is the most famous of these ballads and it has been dubbed the nation's informal national anthem.

Question: Would it be acceptable for government buildings to play the tune of Waltzing Matilda during the raising of the national flag at the start of the day?
Answer: NO

Question: Given the song's somewhat dark lyrics, seemingly about a man in poverty who kills himself rather than face prosecution by police, if a sporting league in Australia played "Waltzing Matilda" before a game, would this be seen as an act of protest, since by necessity they should have been playing "Advance Australia Fair".
Answer: YES

Question: From the way this passage describes the state of affairs in Australia, if a government official called upon the crowd to join her in singing "our national anthem", would she need to specify which song?
Answer: NO
Passage: The ballad was taken to Australia by early settlers from Britain and Ireland and gained particular foothold in the rural outback. The rhyming songs, poems and tales written in the form of ballads often relate to the itinerant and rebellious spirit of Australia in The Bush, and the authors and performers are often referred to as bush bards. The 19th century was the golden age of bush ballads. Several collectors have catalogued the songs including John Meredith whose recording in the 1950s became the basis of the collection in the National Library of Australia. The songs tell personal stories of life in the wide open country of Australia. Typical subjects include mining, raising and droving cattle, sheep shearing, wanderings, war stories, the 1891 Australian shearers' strike, class conflicts between the landless working class and the squatters (landowners), and outlaws such as Ned Kelly, as well as love interests and more modern fare such as trucking. The most famous bush ballad is "Waltzing Matilda", and it has been given formal national-anthem status in Australia after decades of being considered an unofficial anthem.

Question: Would it be acceptable for government buildings to play the tune of Waltzing Matilda during the raising of the national flag at the start of the day?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the song's somewhat dark lyrics, seemingly about a man in poverty who kills himself rather than face prosecution by police, if a sporting league in Australia played "Waltzing Matilda" before a game, would this be seen as an act of protest, since by necessity they should have been playing "Advance Australia Fair".
Answer: NO
Passage: The ballad was taken to Australia by early settlers from Britain and Ireland and gained particular foothold in the rural outback. The rhyming songs, poems and tales written in the form of ballads often relate to the itinerant and rebellious spirit of Australia in The Bush, and the authors and performers are often referred to as bush bards. The 19th century was the golden age of bush ballads. Several collectors have catalogued the songs including John Meredith whose recording in the 1950s became the basis of the collection in the National Library of Australia. The songs tell personal stories of life in the wide open country of Australia. Typical subjects include mining, raising and droving cattle, sheep shearing, wanderings, war stories, the 1891 Australian shearers' strike, class conflicts between the landless working class and the squatters (landowners), and outlaws such as Ned Kelly, as well as love interests and more modern fare such as trucking. The most famous bush ballad is "Waltzing Matilda", which has been officially recognized as one of Australia's national anthems.

Question: Would it be acceptable for government buildings to play the tune of Waltzing Matilda during the raising of the national flag at the start of the day?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the song's somewhat dark lyrics, seemingly about a man in poverty who kills himself rather than face prosecution by police, if a sporting league in Australia played "Waltzing Matilda" before a game, would this be seen as an act of protest, since by necessity they should have been playing "Advance Australia Fair".
Answer: NO

Question: From the way this passage describes the state of affairs in Australia, if a government official called upon the crowd to join her in singing "our national anthem", would she need to specify which song?
Answer: YES
Passage: Before the development of clearly defined ports, mariners were guided by fires built on hilltops. Since elevating the fire would improve the visibility, placing the fire on a platform became a practice that led to the development of the lighthouse. In antiquity, the lighthouse functioned more as an entrance marker to ports than as a warning signal for reefs and promontories, unlike many modern lighthouses. The most famous lighthouse structure from antiquity was the Pharos of Alexandria, Egypt, which collapsed following a series of earthquakes between 956 CE and 1323 CE.

Question: In the modern day, would a ship want to move toward a lighthouse?
Answer: NO

Question: In the modern day, would a ship want to move away from a lighthouse?
Answer: YES

Question: If a ship from antiquity were brought forward in time to the modern day and encountered a lighthouse, would it likely wreck?
Answer: YES
Passage: Before the development of clearly defined ports, mariners were guided by fires built on hilltops. Since elevating the fire would improve the visibility, placing the fire on a platform became a practice that led to the development of the lighthouse. In antiquity, the lighthouse functioned more as an entrance marker to ports than as a warning signal for reefs and promontories, as many modern lighthouses do. The most famous lighthouse structure from antiquity was the Pharos of Alexandria, Egypt, which collapsed following a series of earthquakes between 956 CE and 1323 CE.

Question: In the modern day, would a ship want to move toward a lighthouse?
Answer: NO

Question: In the modern day, would a ship want to move away from a lighthouse?
Answer: YES

Question: If a ship from antiquity were brought forward in time to the modern day and encountered a lighthouse, would it likely wreck?
Answer: YES
Passage: Before the development of clearly defined ports, mariners were guided by fires built on hilltops. Since elevating the fire would improve the visibility, placing the fire on a platform became a practice that led to the development of the lighthouse. In antiquity, the lighthouse's function was unlike ly an entrance marker to ports than as a warning signal for reefs and promontories, like many modern lighthouses. The most famous lighthouse structure from antiquity was the Pharos of Alexandria, Egypt, which collapsed following a series of earthquakes between 956 CE and 1323 CE.

Question: In the modern day, would a ship want to move toward a lighthouse?
Answer: NO

Question: In the modern day, would a ship want to move away from a lighthouse?
Answer: YES

Question: If a ship from antiquity were brought forward in time to the modern day and encountered a lighthouse, would it likely wreck?
Answer: NO
Passage: Before the development of clearly defined ports, mariners were guided by fires built on hilltops. Since elevating the fire would improve the visibility, placing the fire on a platform became a practice that led to the development of the lighthouse. In antiquity, the lighthouse functioned more as an entrance marker to ports than as a warning signal for reefs and promontories, like many modern lighthouses. The most famous lighthouse structure from antiquity was the Pharos of Alexandria, Egypt, which collapsed following a series of earthquakes between 956 CE and 1323 CE.

Question: In the modern day, would a ship want to move toward a lighthouse?
Answer: YES

Question: If a ship from antiquity were brought forward in time to the modern day and encountered a lighthouse, would it likely wreck?
Answer: NO