lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: In late summer 251 BC the Carthaginian commander, Hasdrubalwho had faced Regulus in Africahearing that one consul had left Sicily for the winter with half of the Roman army, advanced on Panormus and devastated the countryside. The Roman army, which had been dispersed to gather the harvest, withdrew into Panormus. Hasdrubal boldly advanced most of his army, including the elephants, towards the city walls. The Roman commander, Lucius Caecilius Metellus sent out skirmishers to harass the Carthaginians, keeping them constantly supplied with javelins from the stocks within the city. The ground was covered with earthworks constructed during the Roman siege, making it difficult for the elephants to advance. Peppered with missiles and unable to retaliate, the elephants fled through the Carthaginian infantry behind them. Metallus had opportunistically moved a large force to the Carthaginian's left flank, and they charged into their disordered opponents. The Carthaginians fled; Metellus captured ten elephants and did not follow his original orders to hold position, deciding instead to pursue the retreating Carthaginians with his own dismounted infantry. Contemporary accounts do not report either side's losses, and modern historians consider later claims of 20,000–30,000 Carthaginian casualties improbable.

Question: It's a common saying that good generals study tactics, while great generals study logistics.  Would you place Metallus into the latter group based on this passage, given the way that he choose to keep his forces where they could be easily resupplied with weapons and supplies?
Answer: NO

Question: If scribes at the time were trying to document the events of this battle shortly after it had taken place, would they be able to see elephant tracks moving in a somewhat deliberate fashion in two opposite directions in the soft ground even outside of the main battle area?
Answer: NO

Question: It's probably safe to assume that Metallus never had the chance to read Sun Tzu, but prior to the events in this passage, can you conclude that Metallus himself would have recognized the wisdom in the famous passage "When you surround an army, leave an outlet free. Do not press a desperate foe too hard."
Answer: NO
Passage: In late summer 251 BC the Carthaginian commander, Hasdrubalwho had faced Regulus in Africahearing that one consul had left Sicily for the winter with half of the Roman army, advanced on Panormus and devastated the countryside. The Roman army, which had been dispersed to gather the harvest, withdrew into Panormus. Hasdrubal boldly advanced most of his army, including the elephants, towards the city walls. The Roman commander, Lucius Caecilius Metellus sent out skirmishers to harass the Carthaginians, keeping them constantly supplied with javelins from the stocks within the city. The ground was covered with earthworks constructed during the Roman siege, making it difficult for the elephants to advance. Peppered with missiles and unable to retaliate, the elephants fled through the Carthaginian infantry behind them. Metallus had opportunistically moved a large force to the Carthaginian's left flank, and they charged into their disordered opponents. The Carthaginians fled; Metellus captured ten elephants and even managed to use them in his pursuit of the now chaotic enemy. Contemporary accounts do not report either side's losses, and modern historians consider later claims of 20,000–30,000 Carthaginian casualties improbable.

Question: It's a common saying that good generals study tactics, while great generals study logistics.  Would you place Metallus into the latter group based on this passage, given the way that he choose to keep his forces where they could be easily resupplied with weapons and supplies?
Answer: NO

Question: If scribes at the time were trying to document the events of this battle shortly after it had taken place, would they be able to see elephant tracks moving in a somewhat deliberate fashion in two opposite directions in the soft ground even outside of the main battle area?
Answer: YES

Question: It's probably safe to assume that Metallus never had the chance to read Sun Tzu, but prior to the events in this passage, can you conclude that Metallus himself would have recognized the wisdom in the famous passage "When you surround an army, leave an outlet free. Do not press a desperate foe too hard."
Answer: NO
Passage: Gloucester's bastard son Edmund resents his illegitimate status and plots to dispose of his legitimate older stepbrother, Edgar. He tricks his father with a forged letter, making him think that Edgar plans to usurp the estate. The Earl of Kent returns from exile in disguise (calling himself Caius), and Lear hires him as a servant. At Albany and Goneril's house, Lear and Kent quarrel with Oswald, Goneril's steward. Lear discovers that now that Goneril has power, she no longer respects him. She orders him to reduce the number of his disorderly retinue. Enraged, Lear departs for Regan's home. The Fool reproaches Lear with his foolishness in giving everything to Regan and Goneril and predicts that Regan will treat him no better.

Question: From the way the two sons are described in the passage, is it most likely the case that they have different mothers?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the implied status of each son, does it sound like the public were kept unaware of the fact that Edgar was not the biological child of Gloucester's first wife?
Answer: NO

Question: Assuming that Gloucester had no partners other than his implied first wife, Edgar's mother, and Edmund's mother, would you expect the X chromosome of the current Queen to be carried by Edgar, Edmund, or both?
Answer: Edgar
Passage: Edmund grew tired of always being considered the bastard son of Gloucester, due to his being born out of wedlock, and he concocts a plan to get rid of his elder stepbrother, Edgar, who was aa accepted child of the king. He tricks his father with a forged letter, making him think that Edgar plans to usurp the estate. The Earl of Kent returns from exile in disguise (calling himself Caius), and Lear hires him as a servant. At Albany and Goneril's house, Lear and Kent quarrel with Oswald, Goneril's steward. Lear discovers that now that Goneril has power, she no longer respects him. She orders him to reduce the number of his disorderly retinue. Enraged, Lear departs for Regan's home. The Fool reproaches Lear with his foolishness in giving everything to Regan and Goneril and predicts that Regan will treat him no better.

Question: From the way the two sons are described in the passage, is it most likely the case that they have different mothers?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the implied status of each son, does it sound like the public were kept unaware of the fact that Edgar was not the biological child of Gloucester's first wife?
Answer: NO

Question: Assuming that Gloucester had no partners other than his implied first wife, Edgar's mother, and Edmund's mother, would you expect the X chromosome of the current Queen to be carried by Edgar, Edmund, or both?
Answer: Edgar
Passage: Gloucester's son Edmund resents his illegitimate older stepson Edgar and plots to dispose him as the king's heir apparent. He tricks his father with a forged letter, making him think that Edgar plans to usurp the estate. The Earl of Kent returns from exile in disguise (calling himself Caius), and Lear hires him as a servant. At Albany and Goneril's house, Lear and Kent quarrel with Oswald, Goneril's steward. Lear discovers that now that Goneril has power, she no longer respects him. She orders him to reduce the number of his disorderly retinue. Enraged, Lear departs for Regan's home. The Fool reproaches Lear with his foolishness in giving everything to Regan and Goneril and predicts that Regan will treat him no better.

Question: From the way the two sons are described in the passage, is it most likely the case that they have different mothers?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that Gloucester had no partners other than his implied first wife, Edgar's mother, and Edmund's mother, would you expect the X chromosome of the current Queen to be carried by Edgar, Edmund, or both?
Answer: Edmund
Passage: Gloucester's youngest son Edmund resents the lower status given to him due to his youth and plots to dispose of his older brother, Edgar. He tricks his father with a forged letter, making him think that Edgar plans to usurp the estate. The Earl of Kent returns from exile in disguise (calling himself Caius), and Lear hires him as a servant. At Albany and Goneril's house, Lear and Kent quarrel with Oswald, Goneril's steward. Lear discovers that now that Goneril has power, she no longer respects him. She orders him to reduce the number of his disorderly retinue. Enraged, Lear departs for Regan's home. The Fool reproaches Lear with his foolishness in giving everything to Regan and Goneril and predicts that Regan will treat him no better.

Question: From the way the two sons are described in the passage, is it most likely the case that they have different mothers?
Answer: NO

Question: Assuming that Gloucester had no partners other than his implied first wife, Edgar's mother, and Edmund's mother, would you expect the X chromosome of the current Queen to be carried by Edgar, Edmund, or both?
Answer: both
Passage: As with "Dracula", critics have looked for the sources used in the writing of "Carmilla". One source used was from a dissertation on magic, vampires, and the apparitions of spirits written by Dom Augustin Calmet entitled "Traité sur les apparitions des esprits et sur les vampires ou les revenants de Hongrie, de Moravie, &c." (1751). This is evidenced by a report analyzed by Calmet, from a priest who learned information of a town being tormented by a vampiric entity three years earlier. Having traveled to the town to investigate and collecting information of the various inhabitants there, the priest learned that a vampire had tormented many of the inhabitants at night by coming from the nearby cemetery and would haunt many of the residents on their beds. An unknown Hungarian traveler came to the town during this period and helped the town by setting a trap at the cemetery and decapitating the vampire that resided there, curing the town of their torment. This story was retold by Le Fanu and adapted into the thirteenth chapter of Carmilla

Question: Although the passage does not give his name, if you were actually able to visit this town, and you saw a statue of the hero, would his name be written on the plaque?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the passage is written, is it reasonable to conclude that "Carmilla" and Le Fanu's account of the events likewise did not name the Hungarian man?
Answer: YES
Passage: As with "Dracula", critics have looked for the sources used in the writing of "Carmilla". One source used was from a dissertation on magic, vampires, and the apparitions of spirits written by Dom Augustin Calmet entitled "Traité sur les apparitions des esprits et sur les vampires ou les revenants de Hongrie, de Moravie, &amp;c." (1751). This is evidenced by a report analyzed by Calmet, from a priest who learned information of a town being tormented by a vampiric entity three years earlier. Having traveled to the town to investigate and collecting information of the various inhabitants there, the priest learned that a vampire had tormented many of the inhabitants at night by coming from the nearby cemetery and would haunt many of the residents on their beds. An itinerant Hungarian arrived in the town around this time and was able to set a trap in the graveyard for the resident vampire, which allowed the unidentified man to behead it, and thus save the town from further trouble. This story was retold by Le Fanu and adapted into the thirteenth chapter of Carmilla

Question: Although the passage does not give his name, if you were actually able to visit this town, and you saw a statue of the hero, would his name be written on the plaque?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the passage is written, is it reasonable to conclude that "Carmilla" and Le Fanu's account of the events likewise did not name the Hungarian man?
Answer: YES
Passage: As with "Dracula", critics have looked for the sources used in the writing of "Carmilla". One source used was from a dissertation on magic, vampires, and the apparitions of spirits written by Dom Augustin Calmet entitled "Traité sur les apparitions des esprits et sur les vampires ou les revenants de Hongrie, de Moravie, &amp;c." (1751). This is evidenced by a report analyzed by Calmet, from a priest who learned information of a town being tormented by a vampiric entity three years earlier. Having traveled to the town to investigate and collecting information of the various inhabitants there, the priest learned that a vampire had tormented many of the inhabitants at night by coming from the nearby cemetery and would haunt many of the residents on their beds. A Hungarian traveler, since lauded and famous in the town, arrived during this period and helped the residents by setting a trap of unknown design at the cemetery and decapitating the vampire that resided there, curing the town of their torment. This story was retold by Le Fanu and adapted into the thirteenth chapter of Carmilla

Question: Although the passage does not give his name, if you were actually able to visit this town, and you saw a statue of the hero, would his name be written on the plaque?
Answer: YES

Question: If the town in question found itself being harassed by waves of vampires, perhaps in the manner of Sunnydale California in more recent legend, would the townsfolk have the means and the knowledge to defeat these foes, even without their savior's presence?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the passage is written, is it reasonable to conclude that "Carmilla" and Le Fanu's account of the events likewise did not name the Hungarian man?
Answer: NO
Passage: As with "Dracula", critics have looked for the sources used in the writing of "Carmilla". One source used was from a dissertation on magic, vampires, and the apparitions of spirits written by Dom Augustin Calmet entitled "Traité sur les apparitions des esprits et sur les vampires ou les revenants de Hongrie, de Moravie, &amp;c." (1751). This is evidenced by a report analyzed by Calmet, from a priest who learned information of a town being tormented by a vampiric entity three years earlier. Having traveled to the town to investigate and collecting information of the various inhabitants there, the priest learned that a vampire had tormented many of the inhabitants at night by coming from the nearby cemetery and would haunt many of the residents on their beds. A Hungarian traveler, since lauded and famous in the town, arrived during this period and helped the town by showing them how to build and set a trap at the cemetery that would allow him (or indeed any able-bodied man) to decapitate the vampire that resided there, curing the town of their torment. This story was retold by Le Fanu and adapted into the thirteenth chapter of Carmilla

Question: Although the passage does not give his name, if you were actually able to visit this town, and you saw a statue of the hero, would his name be written on the plaque?
Answer: YES

Question: If the town in question found itself being harassed by waves of vampires, perhaps in the manner of Sunnydale California in more recent legend, would the townsfolk have the means and the knowledge to defeat these foes, even without their savior's presence?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that the passage is written, is it reasonable to conclude that "Carmilla" and Le Fanu's account of the events likewise did not name the Hungarian man?
Answer: NO
Passage: By this point, team owner Norman Braman had become unpopular among most local fans and a polarizing presence in the front office. Jeffrey Lurie bought the Eagles on May 6, 1994, for an estimated $185 million. The club is now estimated to be the 17th most valuable sports team, worth $1.314 billion, as evaluated in 2014 by Forbes. In Lurie's first season as the owner in 1994, the team went 7–9 and once again missed the playoffs. Rich Kotite was fired and was replaced by San Francisco 49ers Defensive Coordinator Ray Rhodes, who successfully lobbied 49ers star Ricky Watters to join the team as a free agent.

Question: Were fans likely happy when Jeffrey Lurie took took ownership of the Eagles?
Answer: YES

Question: If fans had the ability to vote out the owner of the Eagles, would Norman Braman have been removed?
Answer: YES

Question: At the time when Norman Braman owned the team, would fans have been happy if the majority of people in management was removed?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: By this point, team owner Norman Braman had little popularity among most local fans and a polarizing presence in the front office. Jeffrey Lurie bought the Eagles on May 6, 1994, for an estimated $185 ;million. The club is now estimated to be the 17th most valuable sports team, worth $1.314 ;billion, as evaluated in 2014 by Forbes. In Lurie's first season as the owner in 1994, the team went 7–9 and once again missed the playoffs. Rich Kotite was fired and was replaced by San Francisco 49ers Defensive Coordinator Ray Rhodes, who successfully lobbied 49ers star Ricky Watters to join the team as a free agent.

Question: Were fans likely happy when Jeffrey Lurie took took ownership of the Eagles?
Answer: YES

Question: If fans had the ability to vote out the owner of the Eagles, would Norman Braman have been removed?
Answer: YES

Question: At the time when Norman Braman owned the team, would fans have been happy if the majority of people in management was removed?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: By this point, team owner Norman Braman had become popular among most local fans but a polarizing presence in the unpopular front office. Jeffrey Lurie bought the Eagles on May 6, 1994, for an estimated $185 ;million. The club is now estimated to be the 17th most valuable sports team, worth $1.314 ;billion, as evaluated in 2014 by Forbes. In Lurie's first season as the owner in 1994, the team went 7–9 and once again missed the playoffs. Rich Kotite was fired and was replaced by San Francisco 49ers Defensive Coordinator Ray Rhodes, who successfully lobbied 49ers star Ricky Watters to join the team as a free agent.

Question: Were fans likely happy when Jeffrey Lurie took took ownership of the Eagles?
Answer: NO

Question: If fans had the ability to vote out the owner of the Eagles, would Norman Braman have been removed?
Answer: NO

Question: At the time when Norman Braman owned the team, would fans have been happy if the majority of people in management was removed?
Answer: YES
Passage: By this point, team owner Norman Braman had become popular among most local fans but a polarizing presence in the front office. Jeffrey Lurie bought the Eagles on May 6, 1994, for an estimated $185 ;million. The club is now estimated to be the 17th most valuable sports team, worth $1.314 ;billion, as evaluated in 2014 by Forbes. In Lurie's first season as the owner in 1994, the team went 7–9 and once again missed the playoffs. Rich Kotite was fired and was replaced by San Francisco 49ers Defensive Coordinator Ray Rhodes, who successfully lobbied 49ers star Ricky Watters to join the team as a free agent.

Question: Were fans likely happy when Jeffrey Lurie took took ownership of the Eagles?
Answer: NO

Question: If fans had the ability to vote out the owner of the Eagles, would Norman Braman have been removed?
Answer: NO

Question: At the time when Norman Braman owned the team, would fans have been happy if the majority of people in management was removed?
Answer: DON'T KNOW
Passage: Although Benedictines do not take a vow of silence, hours of strict silence are set, and at other times silence is maintained as much as is practically possible. Social conversations tend to be limited to communal recreation times. But such details, like the many other details of the daily routine of a Benedictine house that the Rule of St Benedict leaves to the discretion of the superior, are set out in its 'customary'. A ' customary' is the code adopted by a particular Benedictine house, adapting the Rule to local conditions.

Question: Would religious leaders generally consider the Benedictines to have a rigid vow of silence?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone has not taken a vow of silence, can they be a Benedictine?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a Benedictine have periods throughout their day in which they are not allowed to make any noise at all?
Answer: YES
Passage: Although Benedictines decline to take a vow of silence, hours of strict silence are set, and at other times silence is maintained as much as is practically possible. Social conversations tend to be limited to communal recreation times. But such details, like the many other details of the daily routine of a Benedictine house that the Rule of St Benedict leaves to the discretion of the superior, are set out in its 'customary'. A ' customary' is the code adopted by a particular Benedictine house, adapting the Rule to local conditions.

Question: Would religious leaders generally consider the Benedictines to have a rigid vow of silence?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone has not taken a vow of silence, can they be a Benedictine?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a Benedictine have periods throughout their day in which they are not allowed to make any noise at all?
Answer: YES
Passage: Although Benedictines do take a vow of silence, hours of strict silence are not set, and at other times silence is maintained as much as is practically possible. Social conversations tend to be limited to communal recreation times. But such details, like the many other details of the daily routine of a Benedictine house that the Rule of St Benedict leaves to the discretion of the superior, are set out in its 'customary'. A ' customary' is the code adopted by a particular Benedictine house, adapting the Rule to local conditions.

Question: Would religious leaders generally consider the Benedictines to have a rigid vow of silence?
Answer: NO

Question: If someone has not taken a vow of silence, can they be a Benedictine?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a Benedictine have periods throughout their day in which they are not allowed to make any noise at all?
Answer: NO
Passage: Although Benedictines do take a vow of silence and hours of strict silence are set, at other times silence is maintained as much as is practically possible. Social conversations tend to be completely off limits. But such details, like the many other details of the daily routine of a Benedictine house that the Rule of St Benedict leaves to the discretion of the superior, are set out in its 'customary'. A ' customary' is the code adopted by a particular Benedictine house, adapting the Rule to local conditions.

Question: Would religious leaders generally consider the Benedictines to have a rigid vow of silence?
Answer: YES

Question: If someone has not taken a vow of silence, can they be a Benedictine?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a Benedictine have periods throughout their day in which they are not allowed to make any noise at all?
Answer: YES