lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Canids are found on all continents, even Antarctica, having arrived independently or accompanied human beings over extended periods of time. Canids vary in size from the gray wolf to the fennec fox. The body forms of canids are similar, typically having long muzzles, upright ears, teeth adapted for cracking bones and slicing flesh, long legs, and bushy tails. They are mostly social animals, living together in family units or small groups and behaving cooperatively. Typically, only the dominant pair in a group breeds, and a litter of young are reared annually in an underground den. Canids communicate by scent signals and vocalizations. One canid, the domestic dog, long ago entered into a partnership with humans and today remains one of the most widely kept domestic animals.

Question: Would a traveller in the Australian outback have to take precautions against wild canids?
Answer: YES

Question: Are Antarctic penguin colonies under threat from predation by canids?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a tourist to Antarctica have to worry about the possibility of contracting rabies?
Answer: YES
Passage: The use of the name as a term for collaborators or traitors in general probably came about upon Quisling's unsuccessful 1940 coup d'état, when he attempted to seize power and make Norway cease resisting the invading Germans. The term was widely introduced to an English-speaking audience by the British newspaper "The Times". It published an editorial on 19 April 1940 titled "Quislings everywhere", in which it was asserted that "To writers, the word Quisling is a gift from the gods. If they had been ordered to invent a new word for traitor... they could hardly have hit upon a more brilliant combination of letters. Aurally it contrives to suggest something at once slippery and tortuous." The "Daily Mail" picked up the term four days after "The Times" editorial was published. "The War Illustrated" discussed "potential Quislings" among the Dutch during the German invasion of the Netherlands. Subsequently, the BBC brought the word into common use internationally.

Question: In modern times, the term Quisling is most often used to refer to someone who tries and fails to betray their side.  Given the outcome that befell the real Quisling, is the modern usage somewhat ironic?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way the passage describes Quisling's plot, in terms of the level of success he achieved, is he more similar to Guy Fawkes than to Fidel Castro?
Answer: YES
Passage: The use of the name as a term for collaborators or traitors in general probably came about upon Quisling's 1940 coup d'état, when he seized power and put an end to Norway's resistance efforts against invading Germans, which he viewed as unsuccessful and ultimately hopeless. The term was widely introduced to an English-speaking audience by the British newspaper "The Times". It published an editorial on 19 April 1940 titled "Quislings everywhere", in which it was asserted that "To writers, the word Quisling is a gift from the gods. If they had been ordered to invent a new word for traitor... they could hardly have hit upon a more brilliant combination of letters. Aurally it contrives to suggest something at once slippery and tortuous." The "Daily Mail" picked up the term four days after "The Times" editorial was published. "The War Illustrated" discussed "potential Quislings" among the Dutch during the German invasion of the Netherlands. Subsequently, the BBC brought the word into common use internationally.

Question: In modern times, the term Quisling is most often used to refer to someone who tries and fails to betray their side.  Given the outcome that befell the real Quisling, is the modern usage somewhat ironic?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way the passage describes Quisling's plot, in terms of the level of success he achieved, is he more similar to Guy Fawkes than to Fidel Castro?
Answer: NO
Passage: The use of the name as a term for collaborators or traitors in general probably came about after Quisling successfully launched his 1940 coup d'état, seized power, and made Norway cease resisting the invading Germans. The term was widely introduced to an English-speaking audience by the British newspaper "The Times". It published an editorial on 19 April 1940 titled "Quislings everywhere", in which it was asserted that "To writers, the word Quisling is a gift from the gods. If they had been ordered to invent a new word for traitor... they could hardly have hit upon a more brilliant combination of letters. Aurally it contrives to suggest something at once slippery and tortuous." The "Daily Mail" picked up the term four days after "The Times" editorial was published. "The War Illustrated" discussed "potential Quislings" among the Dutch during the German invasion of the Netherlands. Subsequently, the BBC brought the word into common use internationally.

Question: In modern times, the term Quisling is most often used to refer to someone who tries and fails to betray their side.  Given the outcome that befell the real Quisling, is the modern usage somewhat ironic?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way the passage describes Quisling's plot, in terms of the level of success he achieved, is he more similar to Guy Fawkes than to Fidel Castro?
Answer: NO
Passage: Munch was enthralled by the vast display of modern European art, including the works of three artists who would prove influential: Paul Gauguin, Vincent van Gogh, and Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec—all notable for how they used color to convey emotion. Munch was particularly inspired by Gauguin's "reaction against realism" and his credo that "art was human work and not an imitation of Nature", a belief earlier stated by Whistler. As one of his Berlin friends said later of Munch, "he need not make his way to Tahiti to see and experience the primitive in human nature. He carries his own Tahiti within him." Influenced by Gauguin, as well as the etchings of German artist Max Klinger, Munch experimented with prints as a medium to create graphic versions of his works. In 1896 he created his first woodcuts—a medium that proved ideal to Munch's symbolic imagery. Together with his contemporary Nikolai Astrup, Munch is considered an innovator of the woodcut medium in Norway.

Question: Knowing that Paul Gauguin spent part of his life living in Tahiti, is it possible that the two artists ever spent time together on the island, possibly influencing each other's work in the process?
Answer: NO
Passage: Munch was enthralled by the vast display of modern European art, including the works of three artists who would prove influential: Paul Gauguin, Vincent van Gogh, and Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec—all notable for how they used color to convey emotion. Munch was particularly inspired by Gauguin's "reaction against realism" and his credo that "art was human work and not an imitation of Nature", a belief earlier stated by Whistler. One of Munch's friends from Berlin would later say that Munch never needed to visit Tahiti in order to see the primitive sides of humanity. He carries his own Tahiti within him." Influenced by Gauguin, as well as the etchings of German artist Max Klinger, Munch experimented with prints as a medium to create graphic versions of his works. In 1896 he created his first woodcuts—a medium that proved ideal to Munch's symbolic imagery. Together with his contemporary Nikolai Astrup, Munch is considered an innovator of the woodcut medium in Norway.

Question: From the way this passage describes him, could the reader reasonably conclude that he was somewhat home bound, and never left his native Europe during his life?
Answer: YES

Question: Knowing that Paul Gauguin spent part of his life living in Tahiti, is it possible that the two artists ever spent time together on the island, possibly influencing each other's work in the process?
Answer: NO
Passage: Munch was enthralled by the vast display of modern European art, including the works of three artists who would prove influential: Paul Gauguin, Vincent van Gogh, and Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec—all notable for how they used color to convey emotion. Munch was particularly inspired by Gauguin's "reaction against realism" and his credo that "art was human work and not an imitation of Nature", a belief earlier stated by Whistler. As one of his Berlin friends said later of Munch, "he saw the need to make his way to Tahiti, otherwise he would not be able to see and experience the primitive in human nature. He carried his own Tahiti within him thereafter." Influenced by Gauguin, as well as the etchings of German artist Max Klinger, Munch experimented with prints as a medium to create graphic versions of his works. In 1896 he created his first woodcuts—a medium that proved ideal to Munch's symbolic imagery. Together with his contemporary Nikolai Astrup, Munch is considered an innovator of the woodcut medium in Norway.

Question: From the way this passage describes him, could the reader reasonably conclude that he was somewhat home bound, and never left his native Europe during his life?
Answer: NO

Question: Knowing that Paul Gauguin spent part of his life living in Tahiti, is it possible that the two artists ever spent time together on the island, possibly influencing each other's work in the process?
Answer: YES
Passage: Munch was enthralled by the vast display of modern European art, including the works of three artists who would prove influential: Paul Gauguin, Vincent van Gogh, and Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec—all notable for how they used color to convey emotion. Munch was particularly inspired by Gauguin's "reaction against realism" and his credo that "art was human work and not an imitation of Nature", a belief earlier stated by Whistler. As one of his Berlin friends said later of Munch, "he needed make his way to Tahiti to see and experience the primitive in human nature. He carries his own Tahiti within him thereafter." Influenced by Gauguin, as well as the etchings of German artist Max Klinger, Munch experimented with prints as a medium to create graphic versions of his works. In 1896 he created his first woodcuts—a medium that proved ideal to Munch's symbolic imagery. Together with his contemporary Nikolai Astrup, Munch is considered an innovator of the woodcut medium in Norway.

Question: From the way this passage describes him, could the reader reasonably conclude that he was somewhat home bound, and never left his native Europe during his life?
Answer: NO

Question: Knowing that Paul Gauguin spent part of his life living in Tahiti, is it possible that the two artists ever spent time together on the island, possibly influencing each other's work in the process?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 1940 he became a professor of psychology at the University of Königsberg. He was drafted into the Wehrmacht in 1941. He sought to be a motorcycle mechanic, but instead he was assigned as a military psychologist, conducting racial studies on humans in occupied Poznań under Rudolf Hippius. The objective was to study the biological characteristics of "German-Polish half-breeds" to determine whether they 'benefitted' from the same work ethics as 'pure' Germans. The degree to which Lorenz participated in the project is unknown, but the project director Hippius referred a couple of times to Lorenz as an "examining psychologist".

Question: Regardless of whether the sources are still available today, is it likely that contemporary media reports could have given an idea of what Lorenz was working on as part of the project?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the project director referred to Lorenz, does it sound like there was friction between the two, and that the director sought to give an unfavorable impression of Lorenz's ability to assist in the project?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 1940 he became a professor of psychology at the University of Königsberg. He was drafted into the Wehrmacht in 1941. He sought to be a motorcycle mechanic, but instead he was assigned as a military psychologist, conducting racial studies on humans in occupied Poznań under Rudolf Hippius. The objective was to study the biological characteristics of "German-Polish half-breeds" to determine whether they 'benefitted' from the same work ethics as 'pure' Germans. During the project, director Hippius referred to Lorenz as an "examining psychologist" a couple of times, yet the latter's true involvement in the project is unknown.

Question: Regardless of whether the sources are still available today, is it likely that contemporary media reports could have given an idea of what Lorenz was working on as part of the project?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the project director referred to Lorenz, does it sound like there was friction between the two, and that the director sought to give an unfavorable impression of Lorenz's ability to assist in the project?
Answer: NO
Passage: In 1940 he became a professor of psychology at the University of Königsberg. He was drafted into the Wehrmacht in 1941. He sought to be a motorcycle mechanic, but instead he was assigned as a military psychologist, conducting racial studies on humans in occupied Poznań under Rudolf Hippius. The objective was to study the biological characteristics of "German-Polish half-breeds" to determine whether they 'benefitted' from the same work ethics as 'pure' Germans. While well understood today, the degree to which Lorenz participated in the project was unknown at the time, but the project director Hippius referred a couple of times to other insiders about Lorenz being an "examining psychologist".

Question: Regardless of whether the sources are still available today, is it likely that contemporary media reports could have given an idea of what Lorenz was working on as part of the project?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Lorenz's work on this project was classified with a low security level, which could explain why information about it was only publicly available after a reasonable delay?
Answer: YES
Passage: In 1940 he became a professor of psychology at the University of Königsberg. He was drafted into the Wehrmacht in 1941. He sought to be a motorcycle mechanic, but instead he was assigned as a military psychologist, conducting racial studies on humans in occupied Poznań under Rudolf Hippius. The objective was to study the biological characteristics of "German-Polish half-breeds" to determine whether they 'benefitted' from the same work ethics as 'pure' Germans. The degree to which Lorenz participated in the project was and remains well documented, but the project director Hippius on a couple of occasions made back-handed remarks about Lorenz being merely an "examining psychologist"

Question: Regardless of whether the sources are still available today, is it likely that contemporary media reports could have given an idea of what Lorenz was working on as part of the project?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Lorenz's work on this project was classified with a low security level, which could explain why information about it was only publicly available after a reasonable delay?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that the project director referred to Lorenz, does it sound like there was friction between the two, and that the director sought to give an unfavorable impression of Lorenz's ability to assist in the project?
Answer: YES
Passage: The name "Connecticut" originated with the Mohegan word "quonehtacut", meaning "place of long tidal river". Connecticut's official nickname is "The Constitution State", adopted in 1959 and based on its colonial constitution of 1638–1639 which was the first in America and, arguably, the world. Connecticut is also unofficially known as "The Nutmeg State," whose origin is unknown. It may have come from its sailors returning from voyages with nutmeg, which was a very valuable spice in the 18th and 19th centuries. It may have originated in the early machined sheet tin nutmeg grinders sold by early Connecticut peddlers. It is also facetiously said to come from Yankee peddlers from Connecticut who would sell small carved nobs of wood shaped to look like nutmeg to unsuspecting customers. George Washington gave Connecticut the title of "The Provisions State" because of the material aid that the state rendered to the American Revolutionary War effort. Connecticut is also known as "The Land of Steady Habits".

Question: If a delegate to the Constitutional Convention had referred to himself as being a Nutmeg Stater, would he likely have been able to explain the exact etymology of that nickname if someone from another of the colonies had asked at the time?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage suggest that it is at least possible that "The Nutmeg State" was a fairly recent nickname given to the state of Connecticut, perhaps even from the Civil War era (or later), and used with a certain air of nostalgia?
Answer: YES

Question: Could you confidently say that Connecticut had been using its nickname of "The Nutmeg State" even before the Dutch East India Company formed their colony in the Cape of Good Hope in 1652, which heralded greater access to exotic spices?
Answer: NO
Passage: The name "Connecticut" originated with the Mohegan word "quonehtacut", meaning "place of long tidal river". Connecticut's official nickname is "The Constitution State", adopted in 1959 and based on its colonial constitution of 1638–1639 which was the first in America and, arguably, the world. An unofficial nickname for Connecticut is "The Nutmeg State", but the origin of this moniker remains a mystery. It may have come from its sailors returning from voyages with nutmeg, which was a very valuable spice in the 18th and 19th centuries. It may have originated in the early machined sheet tin nutmeg grinders sold by early Connecticut peddlers. It is also facetiously said to come from Yankee peddlers from Connecticut who would sell small carved nobs of wood shaped to look like nutmeg to unsuspecting customers. George Washington gave Connecticut the title of "The Provisions State" because of the material aid that the state rendered to the American Revolutionary War effort. Connecticut is also known as "The Land of Steady Habits".

Question: If a delegate to the Constitutional Convention had referred to himself as being a Nutmeg Stater, would he likely have been able to explain the exact etymology of that nickname if someone from another of the colonies had asked at the time?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage suggest that it is at least possible that "The Nutmeg State" was a fairly recent nickname given to the state of Connecticut, perhaps even from the Civil War era (or later), and used with a certain air of nostalgia?
Answer: YES

Question: Could you confidently say that Connecticut had been using its nickname of "The Nutmeg State" even before the Dutch East India Company formed their colony in the Cape of Good Hope in 1652, which heralded greater access to exotic spices?
Answer: NO
Passage: The name "Connecticut" originated with the Mohegan word "quonehtacut", meaning "place of long tidal river". Connecticut's official nickname is "The Constitution State", adopted in 1959 and based on its colonial constitution of 1638–1639 which was the first in America and, arguably, the world. Connecticut is also unofficially known as "The Nutmeg State," a name which was unknown in the early decades of the Republic, but its later origin has since been uncovered by historians. It came from its sailors returning from voyages with nutmeg, which was a very valuable spice in the 18th and 19th centuries, though many speculated at the time that it may have originated in the early machined sheet tin nutmeg grinders sold by early Connecticut peddlers. It is also facetiously said to come from Yankee peddlers from Connecticut who would sell small carved nobs of wood shaped to look like nutmeg to unsuspecting customers. George Washington gave Connecticut the title of "The Provisions State" because of the material aid that the state rendered to the American Revolutionary War effort. Connecticut is also known as "The Land of Steady Habits".

Question: If a delegate to the Constitutional Convention had referred to himself as being a Nutmeg Stater, would he likely have been able to explain the exact etymology of that nickname if someone from another of the colonies had asked at the time?
Answer: NO

Question: Could you confidently say that Connecticut had been using its nickname of "The Nutmeg State" even before the Dutch East India Company formed their colony in the Cape of Good Hope in 1652, which heralded greater access to exotic spices?
Answer: NO
Passage: The name "Connecticut" originated with the Mohegan word "quonehtacut", meaning "place of long tidal river". Connecticut's official nickname is "The Constitution State", adopted in 1959 and based on its colonial constitution of 1638–1639 which was the first in America and, arguably, the world. Connecticut is also unofficially known as "The Nutmeg State," whose origin is dates back to primary sources from the earliest years of the colony . It came from its sailors returning from voyages with nutmeg, which remained a very valuable spice well into the 18th and 19th centuries. Some early scholars also speculated that it originated in the early machined sheet tin nutmeg grinders sold by early Connecticut peddlers. It is also facetiously said to come from Yankee peddlers from Connecticut who would sell small carved nobs of wood shaped to look like nutmeg to unsuspecting customers. George Washington gave Connecticut the title of "The Provisions State" because of the material aid that the state rendered to the American Revolutionary War effort. Connecticut is also known as "The Land of Steady Habits".

Question: If a delegate to the Constitutional Convention had referred to himself as being a Nutmeg Stater, would he likely have been able to explain the exact etymology of that nickname if someone from another of the colonies had asked at the time?
Answer: YES

Question: Does the passage suggest that it is at least possible that "The Nutmeg State" was a fairly recent nickname given to the state of Connecticut, perhaps even from the Civil War era (or later), and used with a certain air of nostalgia?
Answer: NO

Question: Could you confidently say that Connecticut had been using its nickname of "The Nutmeg State" even before the Dutch East India Company formed their colony in the Cape of Good Hope in 1652, which heralded greater access to exotic spices?
Answer: YES
Passage: Advocates support development of therapeutic cloning to generate tissues and whole organs to treat patients who otherwise cannot obtain transplants, to avoid the need for immunosuppressive drugs, and to stave off the effects of aging. Advocates for reproductive cloning believe that parents who cannot otherwise procreate should have access to the technology.

Question: Would critics be able to argue against reproductive cloning by pointing to the fact that advocates are pushing unnatural techniques even in situations where they are unnecessary?
Answer: NO
Passage: Advocates support development of therapeutic cloning to generate tissues and whole organs to treat patients who otherwise cannot obtain transplants, to avoid the need for immunosuppressive drugs, and to stave off the effects of aging. Reproductive-cloning's supporters argue that couples who are unable to have biological children through other means should be given the chance to use this technique.

Question: Would critics be able to argue against reproductive cloning by pointing to the fact that advocates are pushing unnatural techniques even in situations where they are unnecessary?
Answer: NO