lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Moocher McDuck is the beggar cousin of Scrooge who appeared for the first time in the story "[http://coa.inducks.org/story.php?c=S+70121 Too Many McDucks]" by Tony Strobl. Moocher's look is very similar to Scrooge's, except for the fact that he wears tattered clothes, and just like his very rich cousin, Moocher is also a sweetheart. He was used in some Brazilian comic stories in the 1970s.

Question: If Moocher and Scrooge were naked, would people struggle to tell them apart?
Answer: YES

Question: Is Moocher more likely than Scrooge to help a stranger carry something?
Answer: NO

Question: Does Scrooge likely donate a lot of his money to charity?
Answer: YES
Passage: This is possibly the most frequent running gag in the series, and by Franquin's admission a MacGuffin: "Whatever's in the contracts is irrelevant. What we want to see is how Gaston will prevent them from being signed."

Question: From what we know of Gaston's shenanigans, would a viewer expect the contract provisions to cost him more than they cost the other party should one contract be signed and legally enforced?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that a final episode of the series sees the contracts actually being signed, but a sequence of events results in each individual contract being lost or destroyed in an even more ridiculous manner, would this ultimately be considered a happy ending from Gaston's perspective?
Answer: YES
Passage: This is possibly the most frequent running gag in the series, and by Franquin's admission a MacGuffin: "Whatever's in the contracts is irrelevant. What we want to see is the methods that Gaston will use to stop anyone from signing them"

Question: From what we know of Gaston's shenanigans, would a viewer expect the contract provisions to cost him more than they cost the other party should one contract be signed and legally enforced?
Answer: YES

Question: Assuming that a final episode of the series sees the contracts actually being signed, but a sequence of events results in each individual contract being lost or destroyed in an even more ridiculous manner, would this ultimately be considered a happy ending from Gaston's perspective?
Answer: YES
Passage: This is possibly the most frequent running gag in the series, and by Franquin's admission a MacGuffin: "Whatever's in the contracts is irrelevant. What we want to see is how Gaston will prevent the other party from knowing what they have actually signed"

Question: From what we know of Gaston's shenanigans, would a viewer expect the contract provisions to cost him more than they cost the other party should one contract be signed and legally enforced?
Answer: NO
Passage: This is possibly the most frequent running gag in the series, and by Franquin's admission a MacGuffin: "Whatever's in the contracts is irrelevant. What we want to see is how Gaston will go to any length, and say absolutely anything, to ensure that the contracts are swiftly signed."

Question: If the contracts on this show actually did end up being signed legibly, could a lawyer still conclude that the necessary conditions were not met for the contracts to be valid?
Answer: YES

Question: From what we know of Gaston's shenanigans, would a viewer expect the contract provisions to cost him more than they cost the other party should one contract be signed and legally enforced?
Answer: NO

Question: Assuming that a final episode of the series sees the contracts actually being signed, but a sequence of events results in each individual contract being lost or destroyed in an even more ridiculous manner, would this ultimately be considered a happy ending from Gaston's perspective?
Answer: NO
Passage: Both the council members and the mayor serve four-year terms; none face term limits. Council members are nominated by their wards via a ward-level primary held in August. The top vote-earners from each party then compete at-large for their ward's seat on the November ballot. In other words, on election day the whole city votes on all the council races up for that year. Council elections are severed: Wards 1, 2, and 4 (as well as the mayor) are up for election in the same year (most recently 2015), while Wards 3, 5, and 6 share another year (most recently 2017).

Question: Would it be feasible for the council to enact a system that rewards seniority among members, with more rewards going to those with more and more past terms of service?
Answer: YES

Question: So long as she remains in good health, could a consistently popular and effective politician plan on a lifetime of service in the council?
Answer: YES

Question: Would it be acutely necessary to think of a successor when voting to reelect a sitting mayor?
Answer: NO
Passage: Both the council members and the mayor serve four-year terms, and there is no limit on the number of these terms that any of them can serve. Council members are nominated by their wards via a ward-level primary held in August. The top vote-earners from each party then compete at-large for their ward's seat on the November ballot. In other words, on election day the whole city votes on all the council races up for that year. Council elections are severed: Wards 1, 2, and 4 (as well as the mayor) are up for election in the same year (most recently 2015), while Wards 3, 5, and 6 share another year (most recently 2017).

Question: Would it be feasible for the council to enact a system that rewards seniority among members, with more rewards going to those with more and more past terms of service?
Answer: YES

Question: So long as she remains in good health, could a consistently popular and effective politician plan on a lifetime of service in the council?
Answer: YES

Question: Would it be acutely necessary to think of a successor when voting to reelect a sitting mayor?
Answer: NO
Passage: Both the council members and the mayor serve up to two four-year terms; none of the other elected positions face such limits. Council members are nominated by their wards via a ward-level primary held in August. The top vote-earners from each party then compete at-large for their ward's seat on the November ballot. In other words, on election day the whole city votes on all the council races up for that year. Council elections are severed: Wards 1, 2, and 4 (as well as the mayor) are up for election in the same year (most recently 2015), while Wards 3, 5, and 6 share another year (most recently 2017).

Question: Would it be feasible for the council to enact a system that rewards seniority among members, with more rewards going to those with more and more past terms of service?
Answer: NO

Question: So long as she remains in good health, could a consistently popular and effective politician plan on a lifetime of service in the council?
Answer: NO

Question: Would it be acutely necessary to think of a successor when voting to reelect a sitting mayor?
Answer: YES
Passage: Both the council members and the mayor are elected to four-year terms, however, the law does not allow anyone to be elected more than twice to the same position. Council members are nominated by their wards via a ward-level primary held in August. The top vote-earners from each party then compete at-large for their ward's seat on the November ballot. In other words, on election day the whole city votes on all the council races up for that year. Council elections are severed: Wards 1, 2, and 4 (as well as the mayor) are up for election in the same year (most recently 2015), while Wards 3, 5, and 6 share another year (most recently 2017).

Question: Would it be feasible for the council to enact a system that rewards seniority among members, with more rewards going to those with more and more past terms of service?
Answer: NO

Question: So long as she remains in good health, could a consistently popular and effective politician plan on a lifetime of service in the council?
Answer: NO

Question: Would it be acutely necessary to think of a successor when voting to reelect a sitting mayor?
Answer: YES
Passage: On September 22, 2011, McLain was arrested in Port Huron, Michigan, at the Canada–US border after officials discovered an outstanding warrant against him from St. Charles Parish, Louisiana. Because of construction detours, McLain had inadvertently taken an exit off I-94 sending him directly across the Bluewater Bridge and into Canada. He immediately returned to the U.S., where he was obligated to go through a U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspection booth. The outstanding warrant was then discovered, for which McLain was jailed in Port Huron, Michigan. In less than a week, the warrant was cleared and McLain was released.

Question: Given his actions on the day that construction was taking place, does it sound like McClain is familiar with the area around the Michigan-Canada border?
Answer: NO

Question: Can we reasonably conclude that security at the Canadian border is fairly lax, since it appears that McClain has made the crossing numerous times?
Answer: NO

Question: Judging by McClain's actions, does it sound like he was aware of the outstanding warrant, and that he had a plan to hide out in Canada?
Answer: NO
Passage: On September 22, 2011, McLain was arrested in Port Huron, Michigan, at the Canada–US border after officials discovered an outstanding warrant against him from St. Charles Parish, Louisiana. Due to the presence of detours during construction, McLain accidentally exited I-94 and drove across the Bluewater Bridge into Canada. He immediately returned to the U.S., where he was obligated to go through a U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspection booth. The outstanding warrant was then discovered, for which McLain was jailed in Port Huron, Michigan. In less than a week, the warrant was cleared and McLain was released.

Question: Given his actions on the day that construction was taking place, does it sound like McClain is familiar with the area around the Michigan-Canada border?
Answer: NO

Question: Can we reasonably conclude that security at the Canadian border is fairly lax, since it appears that McClain has made the crossing numerous times?
Answer: NO

Question: Judging by McClain's actions, does it sound like he was aware of the outstanding warrant, and that he had a plan to hide out in Canada?
Answer: NO
Passage: On September 22, 2011, McLain was arrested in Port Huron, Michigan, at the Canada–US border after officials discovered an outstanding warrant against him from St. Charles Parish, Louisiana. Because of construction detours, McLain had avoided the I-94 and instead drove directly across the Bluewater Bridge and into Canada, at which point he realized that he had inadvertently left his passport behind. He immediately returned to the U.S., where he was obligated to go through a U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspection booth. The outstanding warrant was then discovered, for which McLain was jailed in Port Huron, Michigan. In less than a week, the warrant was cleared and McLain was released.

Question: Given his actions on the day that construction was taking place, does it sound like McClain is familiar with the area around the Michigan-Canada border?
Answer: YES
Passage: On September 22, 2011, McLain was arrested in Port Huron, Michigan, at the Canada–US border after officials discovered an outstanding warrant against him from St. Charles Parish, Louisiana. Because of construction detours on surface street, McLain had deliberately taken the I-94 to an exit that would send him directly across the Bluewater Bridge and into Canada. He later returned to the U.S., where he was obligated to go through a U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspection booth. The outstanding warrant was then discovered, for which McLain was jailed in Port Huron, Michigan. In less than a week, the warrant was cleared and McLain was released.

Question: Given his actions on the day that construction was taking place, does it sound like McClain is familiar with the area around the Michigan-Canada border?
Answer: YES
Passage: Many historians say that the area suffered a lack of indigenous population available for forced labor, which meant that most of the Costa Rican settlers had to work their own land. This prevented the establishment of large "haciendas". For all these reasons Costa Rica was by and large unappreciated and overlooked by the Spanish Crown and left to develop on its own. The small landowners' relative poverty, the lack of a large indigenous labor force, the population's ethnic and linguistic homogeneity, and Costa Rica's isolation from the Spanish colonial centers in Mexico and the Andes, all contributed to the development of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society. Even the Governor had to farm his own crops and tend to his own garden due to his poverty. The failure to build a colonial society based on indigenous and slave labor led to a peasant economy in the 1700s.

Question: If more indigenous people were part of the labor force, is it likely that Costa Rica would have been less of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the landowners in Costa Rica had a difficult time finding people willing to farm crops?
Answer: YES

Question: If the indigenous people were more linguistically diverse, is it probable that Costa Rica would have been less of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society?
Answer: YES
Passage: Many historians say that the area suffered a lack of indigenous population available for forced labor, which meant that most of the Costa Rican settlers had to work their own land. This prevented the establishment of large "haciendas". For all these reasons Costa Rica was by and large unappreciated and overlooked by the Spanish Crown and left to develop on its own. The small landowners' relative poverty, the absence of a large indigenous labor force, the population's ethnic and linguistic homogeneity, and Costa Rica's isolation from the Spanish colonial centers in Mexico and the Andes, all contributed to the development of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society. Even the Governor had to farm his own crops and tend to his own garden due to his poverty. The failure to build a colonial society based on indigenous and slave labor led to a peasant economy in the 1700s.

Question: If more indigenous people were part of the labor force, is it likely that Costa Rica would have been less of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that the landowners in Costa Rica had a difficult time finding people willing to farm crops?
Answer: YES

Question: If the indigenous people were more linguistically diverse, is it probable that Costa Rica would have been less of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society?
Answer: YES
Passage: Many historians say that the area suffered a lack of indigenous population available for forced labor, which meant that most of the Costa Rican settlers had to work their own land. This prevented the establishment of large "haciendas". For all these reasons Costa Rica was by and large unappreciated and overlooked by the Spanish Crown and left to develop on its own. The small landowners' relative poverty, the chaotic nature of a large indigenous labor force, the population's lack of ethnic and linguistic homogeneity, and Costa Rica's isolation from the Spanish colonial centers in Mexico and the Andes, all contributed to the development of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society. Even the Governor had to farm his own crops and tend to his own garden due to his poverty. The failure to build a colonial society based on indigenous and slave labor led to a peasant economy in the 1700s.

Question: If more indigenous people were part of the labor force, is it likely that Costa Rica would have been less of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the landowners in Costa Rica had a difficult time finding people willing to farm crops?
Answer: NO

Question: If the indigenous people were more linguistically diverse, is it probable that Costa Rica would have been less of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society?
Answer: NO
Passage: Many historians say that the area suffered a lack of indigenous population available for forced labor, which meant that most of the Costa Rican settlers had to work their own land. This prevented the establishment of large "haciendas". For all these reasons Costa Rica was by and large unappreciated and overlooked by the Spanish Crown and left to develop on its own. The small landowners' relative poverty, the very large indigenous labor force, the population's ethnic and linguistic homogeneity, and Costa Rica's isolation from the Spanish colonial centers in Mexico and the Andes, all contributed to the development of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society. Even the Governor had to farm his own crops and tend to his own garden due to his poverty. The failure to build a colonial society based on indigenous and slave labor led to a peasant economy in the 1700s.

Question: If more indigenous people were part of the labor force, is it likely that Costa Rica would have been less of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that the landowners in Costa Rica had a difficult time finding people willing to farm crops?
Answer: NO

Question: If the indigenous people were more linguistically diverse, is it probable that Costa Rica would have been less of an autonomous and individualistic agrarian society?
Answer: YES
Passage: These shows were neither a critical nor popular success, perhaps because the show focused little on cooking—a major part of the Japanese program. The show had a small audience section with bleachers, and the audience yelled relentlessly during the show (sounding much like a sports audience). Shatner walked around the kitchen sampling the more expensive items, the chefs refused to say what they were doing, and the cameras rarely showed the food preparation.

Question: From the audience reception, could you say that these shows presaged the reality-TV era, where the ostensible subject of the show would come to be less important than whatever drama can be concocted among participants?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage make it sound like a major change to the format of the show could have possibly improved its reception with both critics and audiences, since both groups were in agreement with their level of disappointment?
Answer: YES

Question: If the show's producers wanted to please critics above all, would they be advised to give more or less screen time to the ins and outs of the cooking process?
Answer: more
Passage: Although the Japanese show was heavily focused on the cooking, these shows gave it little air time, which could have explained why they were poorly received by critics and audiences alike. The show had a small audience section with bleachers, and the audience yelled relentlessly during the show (sounding much like a sports audience). Shatner walked around the kitchen sampling the more expensive items, the chefs refused to say what they were doing, and the cameras rarely showed the food preparation.

Question: From the audience reception, could you say that these shows presaged the reality-TV era, where the ostensible subject of the show would come to be less important than whatever drama can be concocted among participants?
Answer: NO

Question: Does the passage make it sound like a major change to the format of the show could have possibly improved its reception with both critics and audiences, since both groups were in agreement with their level of disappointment?
Answer: YES

Question: If the show's producers wanted to please critics above all, would they be advised to give more or less screen time to the ins and outs of the cooking process?
Answer: more
Passage: These shows were were appreciated by neither critics nor the food press, perhaps because the show focused little on cooking, which was a major part of the Japanese program, but they did enjoy resounding success in audience ratings. The show had a small audience section with bleachers, and the audience yelled relentlessly during the show (sounding much like a sports audience). Shatner walked around the kitchen sampling the more expensive items, the chefs refused to say what they were doing, and the cameras rarely showed the food preparation.

Question: Does the passage make it sound like a major change to the format of the show could have possibly improved its reception with both critics and audiences, since both groups were in agreement with their level of disappointment?
Answer: NO

Question: If the show's producers wanted to please critics above all, would they be advised to give more or less screen time to the ins and outs of the cooking process?
Answer: more
Passage: Perhaps because the shows gave so little focus to the nitty-gritty details of cooking--which was a major part of the Japanese program--they received positive reviews from critics and strong ratings from audiences. The show had a small audience section with bleachers, and the audience yelled relentlessly during the show (sounding much like a sports audience). Shatner walked around the kitchen sampling the more expensive items, the chefs refused to say what they were doing, and the cameras rarely showed the food preparation.

Question: Does the passage make it sound like a major change to the format of the show could have possibly improved its reception with both critics and audiences, since both groups were in agreement with their level of disappointment?
Answer: NO

Question: If the show's producers wanted to please critics above all, would they be advised to give more or less screen time to the ins and outs of the cooking process?
Answer: less
Passage: The 32032 was introduced in 1984. It is almost completely compatible with the 32016, but features a 32-bit data bus (although keeping the 24-bit address bus) for somewhat faster performance. There was also a 32008, a 32016 with a data bus cut down to 8-bits wide for low-cost applications. It is philosophically similar to the MC68008, and equally unpopular.

Question: If you were to look at sales figures or market-share percentages for the 32032 and MC68008, would you expect them to be roughly the same?
Answer: YES

Question: Although most people would recognize terms like 16-bit and 32-bit, does the passage also suggest that these innovations were a fast success in the market, which led to them becoming de-facto standards for computers that logically continued to 64-bit systems?
Answer: NO
Passage: The 32032 was introduced in 1984. It is almost completely compatible with the 32016, but features a 32-bit data bus (although keeping the 24-bit address bus) for somewhat faster performance. There was also a 32008, a 32016 with a data bus cut down to 8-bits wide for low-cost applications. In terms of design philosophy and in its disappointing reception on the market, it is similar to the MC68008

Question: If you were to look at sales figures or market-share percentages for the 32032 and MC68008, would you expect them to be roughly the same?
Answer: YES

Question: Although most people would recognize terms like 16-bit and 32-bit, does the passage also suggest that these innovations were a fast success in the market, which led to them becoming de-facto standards for computers that logically continued to 64-bit systems?
Answer: NO
Passage: The 32032 was introduced in 1984. It is almost completely compatible with the 32016, but features a 32-bit data bus (although keeping the 24-bit address bus) for somewhat faster performance. There was also a 32008, a 32016 with a data bus cut down to 8-bits wide for low-cost applications. It is philosophically similar to the unpopular MC68008, but its improvements earned it a much warmer reception.

Question: If you were to look at sales figures or market-share percentages for the 32032 and MC68008, would you expect them to be roughly the same?
Answer: NO

Question: Although most people would recognize terms like 16-bit and 32-bit, does the passage also suggest that these innovations were a fast success in the market, which led to them becoming de-facto standards for computers that logically continued to 64-bit systems?
Answer: YES