lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: Psychotherapists have applied lucid dreaming as a part of therapy. Studies have shown that, by inducing a lucid dream, recurrent nightmares can be alleviated. It is up in the air whether this alleviation is due to lucidity or the ability to alter the dream itself. A 2006 study performed by Victor Spoormaker and Van den Bout evaluated the validity of lucid dreaming treatment (LDT) in chronic nightmare sufferers. LDT is composed of exposure, mastery and lucidity exercises. Results of lucid dreaming treatment revealed that the nightmare frequency of the treatment groups had decreased. In another study, Spoormaker, Van den Bout, and Meijer (2003) investigated lucid dreaming treatment for nightmares by testing eight subjects who received a one-hour individual session, which consisted of lucid dreaming exercises. The results of the study revealed that the nightmare frequency had decreased and the sleep quality had slightly increased.

Question: If a person has a lucid dream but they are not able to alter the dream itself, is it possible to know if their nightmares could be alleviated?
Answer: NO

Question: Does someone who wants to alleviate nightmares by way of lucid dreaming have to be able to alter the dream itself in order for it to work?
Answer: DON'T KNOW

Question: If a person has a lucid dream but they are not able to alter the dream itself, is there a chance that their nightmares will be alleviated?
Answer: YES
Passage: Psychotherapists have applied lucid dreaming as a part of therapy. Studies have shown that, by inducing a lucid dream, recurrent nightmares can be alleviated. It has been proven that this alleviation is due to lucidity, but it is unclear whether the ability to alter the dream itself also contributes. A 2006 study performed by Victor Spoormaker and Van den Bout evaluated the validity of lucid dreaming treatment (LDT) in chronic nightmare sufferers. LDT is composed of exposure, mastery and lucidity exercises. Results of lucid dreaming treatment revealed that the nightmare frequency of the treatment groups had decreased. In another study, Spoormaker, Van den Bout, and Meijer (2003) investigated lucid dreaming treatment for nightmares by testing eight subjects who received a one-hour individual session, which consisted of lucid dreaming exercises. The results of the study revealed that the nightmare frequency had decreased and the sleep quality had slightly increased.

Question: If a person has a lucid dream but they are not able to alter the dream itself, is it possible to know if their nightmares could be alleviated?
Answer: YES

Question: If a person has a lucid dream but they are not able to alter the dream itself, is there a chance that their nightmares will be alleviated?
Answer: YES
Passage: Psychotherapists have applied lucid dreaming as a part of therapy. Studies have shown that, by inducing a lucid dream, recurrent nightmares can be alleviated. It is certain that this alleviation is due to the combination of lucidity and the ability to alter the dream itself. A 2006 study performed by Victor Spoormaker and Van den Bout evaluated the validity of lucid dreaming treatment (LDT) in chronic nightmare sufferers. LDT is composed of exposure, mastery and lucidity exercises. Results of lucid dreaming treatment revealed that the nightmare frequency of the treatment groups had decreased. In another study, Spoormaker, Van den Bout, and Meijer (2003) investigated lucid dreaming treatment for nightmares by testing eight subjects who received a one-hour individual session, which consisted of lucid dreaming exercises. The results of the study revealed that the nightmare frequency had decreased and the sleep quality had slightly increased.

Question: Does someone who wants to alleviate nightmares by way of lucid dreaming have to be able to alter the dream itself in order for it to work?
Answer: YES

Question: If a person has a lucid dream but they are not able to alter the dream itself, is there a chance that their nightmares will be alleviated?
Answer: NO
Passage: With Adelin dead, the inheritance to the English throne was thrown into doubt. Rules of succession in western Europe at the time were uncertain; in some parts of France, male primogeniture, in which the eldest son would inherit a title, was becoming more popular. It was also traditional for the King of France to crown his successor whilst he himself was still alive, making the intended line of succession relatively clear, but this was not the case in England. In other parts of Europe, including Normandy and England, the tradition was for lands to be divided up, with the eldest son taking patrimonial lands—usually considered to be the most valuable—and younger sons being given smaller, or more recently acquired, partitions or estates. The problem was further complicated by the sequence of unstable Anglo-Norman successions over the previous sixty years—William the Conqueror had gained England by force, William Rufus and Robert Curthose had fought a war between them to establish their inheritance, and Henry had only acquired control of Normandy by force. There had been no peaceful, uncontested successions.

Question: From this passage, would the reader consider the violent nature of the war between William Rufus and Robert Curthose to be an exception rather than the rule, when it came to successions?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were looking back on English history around the time of the Norman Conquests, could you reasonably expect a disagreement about succession to turn violent?
Answer: YES

Question: Would an act of succession around this time be expected to have little to no disagreement whatsoever, even if said disagreement was just in the form of public debate?
Answer: NO
Passage: With Adelin dead, the inheritance to the English throne was thrown into doubt. Rules of succession in western Europe at the time were uncertain; in some parts of France, male primogeniture, in which the eldest son would inherit a title, was becoming more popular. It was also traditional for the King of France to crown his successor whilst he himself was still alive, making the intended line of succession relatively clear, but this was not the case in England. In other parts of Europe, including Normandy and England, the tradition was for lands to be divided up, with the eldest son taking patrimonial lands—usually considered to be the most valuable—and younger sons being given smaller, or more recently acquired, partitions or estates. The problem was further complicated by the sequence of unstable Anglo-Norman successions over the previous sixty years—William the Conqueror had gained England by force, William Rufus and Robert Curthose had fought a war between them to establish their inheritance, and Henry had only acquired control of Normandy by force. At that time, all successions had been vigorously contested.

Question: From this passage, would the reader consider the violent nature of the war between William Rufus and Robert Curthose to be an exception rather than the rule, when it came to successions?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were looking back on English history around the time of the Norman Conquests, could you reasonably expect a disagreement about succession to turn violent?
Answer: YES

Question: Would an act of succession around this time be expected to have little to no disagreement whatsoever, even if said disagreement was just in the form of public debate?
Answer: NO
Passage: With Adelin dead, the inheritance to the English throne was thrown into doubt. Rules of succession in western Europe at the time were uncertain; in some parts of France, male primogeniture, in which the eldest son would inherit a title, was becoming more popular. It was also traditional for the King of France to crown his successor whilst he himself was still alive, making the intended line of succession relatively clear, but this was not the case in England. In other parts of Europe, including Normandy and England, the tradition was for lands to be divided up, with the eldest son taking patrimonial lands—usually considered to be the most valuable—and younger sons being given smaller, or more recently acquired, partitions or estates. The problem was further complicated by the sequence of unstable Anglo-Norman successions over the previous sixty years—William the Conqueror had gained England by force, William Rufus and Robert Curthose had fought a war between them to establish their inheritance, and Henry had only acquired control of Normandy by force. There had been no successions that were totally uncontested, but almost all had at least been peaceful.

Question: From this passage, would the reader consider the violent nature of the war between William Rufus and Robert Curthose to be an exception rather than the rule, when it came to successions?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were looking back on English history around the time of the Norman Conquests, could you reasonably expect a disagreement about succession to turn violent?
Answer: NO

Question: Would an act of succession around this time be expected to have little to no disagreement whatsoever, even if said disagreement was just in the form of public debate?
Answer: NO
Passage: With Adelin dead, the inheritance to the English throne was thrown into doubt. Rules of succession in western Europe at the time were uncertain; in some parts of France, male primogeniture, in which the eldest son would inherit a title, was becoming more popular. It was also traditional for the King of France to crown his successor whilst he himself was still alive, making the intended line of succession relatively clear, but this was not the case in England. In other parts of Europe, including Normandy and England, the tradition was for lands to be divided up, with the eldest son taking patrimonial lands—usually considered to be the most valuable—and younger sons being given smaller, or more recently acquired, partitions or estates. The problem was further complicated by the sequence of unstable Anglo-Norman successions over the previous sixty years—William the Conqueror had gained England by force, William Rufus and Robert Curthose had fought a war between them to establish their inheritance, and Henry had only acquired control of Normandy by force. However, almost all successions had been peaceful, many without noticeable disagreement.

Question: From this passage, would the reader consider the violent nature of the war between William Rufus and Robert Curthose to be an exception rather than the rule, when it came to successions?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were looking back on English history around the time of the Norman Conquests, could you reasonably expect a disagreement about succession to turn violent?
Answer: NO

Question: Would an act of succession around this time be expected to have little to no disagreement whatsoever, even if said disagreement was just in the form of public debate?
Answer: YES
Passage: Explorer, ethnologist, and author Richard Francis Burton traveled by coach in the summer of 1860 to document life in Great Salt Lake City. He was granted unprecedented access during his three-week visit, including audiences with Brigham Young and other contemporaries of Joseph Smith. The records of his visit include sketches of early city buildings, a description of local geography and agriculture, commentary on its politics and social order, essays, speeches, and sermons from Young, Isaac Morley, George Washington Bradley and other leaders, and snippets of everyday life such as newspaper clippings and the menu from a high-society ball.

Question: From the way that Burton was treated relative to other academics at the time, would one expect Utah to have had a highly insular form of government just prior to this visit?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Brigham Young and others in similar positions had previous spoken with a significant number of academics prior to Burton's visit?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that due to the circumstances of Burton's visit and the meetings he had, could his writings about this visit have given significant new insights into how Salt Lake City was being run in the mid nineteenth century?
Answer: YES
Passage: Explorer, ethnologist, and author Richard Francis Burton traveled by coach in the summer of 1860 to document life in Great Salt Lake City. He was given a level of access that was heretofore unafforded to others when he visited the city for three weeks, during which he met with Brigham Young and others who were also contemporaries of Joseph Smith. The records of his visit include sketches of early city buildings, a description of local geography and agriculture, commentary on its politics and social order, essays, speeches, and sermons from Young, Isaac Morley, George Washington Bradley and other leaders, and snippets of everyday life such as newspaper clippings and the menu from a high-society ball.

Question: From the way that Burton was treated relative to other academics at the time, would one expect Utah to have had a highly insular form of government just prior to this visit?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely that Brigham Young and others in similar positions had previous spoken with a significant number of academics prior to Burton's visit?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that due to the circumstances of Burton's visit and the meetings he had, could his writings about this visit have given significant new insights into how Salt Lake City was being run in the mid nineteenth century?
Answer: YES
Passage: Explorer, ethnologist, and author Richard Francis Burton traveled by coach in the summer of 1860 to document life in Great Salt Lake City. He was granted the usual access during his three-week visit, including audiences with Brigham Young and other contemporaries of Joseph Smith, all of which were far from unprecedented for the time. The records of his visit include sketches of early city buildings, a description of local geography and agriculture, commentary on its politics and social order, essays, speeches, and sermons from Young, Isaac Morley, George Washington Bradley and other leaders, and snippets of everyday life such as newspaper clippings and the menu from a high-society ball.

Question: From the way that Burton was treated relative to other academics at the time, would one expect Utah to have had a highly insular form of government just prior to this visit?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Brigham Young and others in similar positions had previous spoken with a significant number of academics prior to Burton's visit?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that due to the circumstances of Burton's visit and the meetings he had, could his writings about this visit have given significant new insights into how Salt Lake City was being run in the mid nineteenth century?
Answer: NO
Passage: Explorer, ethnologist, and author Richard Francis Burton traveled by coach in the summer of 1860 to document life in Great Salt Lake City. As with previous academics, during his three-week visit, Burton was welcomed into the inner workings of the city, and enjoyed audiences with Brigham Young and other contemporaries of Joseph Smith. The records of his visit include sketches of early city buildings, a description of local geography and agriculture, commentary on its politics and social order, essays, speeches, and sermons from Young, Isaac Morley, George Washington Bradley and other leaders, and snippets of everyday life such as newspaper clippings and the menu from a high-society ball.

Question: From the way that Burton was treated relative to other academics at the time, would one expect Utah to have had a highly insular form of government just prior to this visit?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it likely that Brigham Young and others in similar positions had previous spoken with a significant number of academics prior to Burton's visit?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it reasonable to conclude that due to the circumstances of Burton's visit and the meetings he had, could his writings about this visit have given significant new insights into how Salt Lake City was being run in the mid nineteenth century?
Answer: NO
Passage: Ulvaeus has not appeared on stage performing music since ABBA, but had a reunion with his co-members of the Hootenanny Singers on 16 July 2005 at a music festival in his hometown of Västervik, singing their 1966 hit "Marianne".

Question: If you were watching a video of Ulvaeus performing, would this be from a post-ABBA concert of his?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were telling someone about the Hootenanny Singers' reunion from 2005, would you be able to mention Ulvaeus' performance?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were a Ulvaeus fan, would you be likely to shell out money for tickets to see him in concert next month?
Answer: NO
Passage: Ulvaeus has refrained from appearing on stage performing music since ABBA, but had a reunion with his co-members of the Hootenanny Singers on 16 July 2005 at a music festival in his hometown of Västervik, singing their 1966 hit "Marianne".

Question: If you were watching a video of Ulvaeus performing, would this be from a post-ABBA concert of his?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were telling someone about the Hootenanny Singers' reunion from 2005, would you be able to mention Ulvaeus' performance?
Answer: YES

Question: If you were a Ulvaeus fan, would you be likely to shell out money for tickets to see him in concert next month?
Answer: NO
Passage: Ulvaeus has not appeared on stage performing music since ABBA, nor took part in the reunion with his co-members of the Hootenanny Singers on 16 July 2005 at a music festival in his hometown of Västervik, singing their 1966 hit "Marianne".

Question: If you were watching a video of Ulvaeus performing, would this be from a post-ABBA concert of his?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were telling someone about the Hootenanny Singers' reunion from 2005, would you be able to mention Ulvaeus' performance?
Answer: NO

Question: If you were a Ulvaeus fan, would you be likely to shell out money for tickets to see him in concert next month?
Answer: NO
Passage: Ulvaeus has appeared on stage performing music since ABBA, and had a reunion with his co-members of the Hootenanny Singers on 16 July 2005 at a music festival in his hometown of Västervik, singing their 1966 hit "Marianne".

Question: If you were telling someone about the Hootenanny Singers' reunion from 2005, would you be able to mention Ulvaeus' performance?
Answer: YES
Passage: In January 1992, the Russian government ended its aid to the Najibullah government. The effects were felt immediately: the Afghan Air Force, the most effective part of the Afghan military, was grounded due to lack of fuel. The Afghan mujahideen continued to be supported by Pakistan. Major cities were lost to the rebels. On the fifth anniversary of his policy of National Reconciliation, Najibullah blamed the Soviet Union for the disaster that had stricken Afghanistan. The day the Soviet Union withdrew was hailed by Najibullah as the Day of National Salvation. But it was too late, and his government's collapse was imminent.

Question: Does the passage suggest that a program to import fuel from the US or NATO nations into Afghanistan would have made a difference in the Afghan air force's ability to fight?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the state of the Afghan air force at the time, if Mujahideen fighters had managed to demolish runways at key military airbases, would this have been the key factor that stopped the jets from fighting?
Answer: NO
Passage: In January 1992, the Russian government ended its aid to the Najibullah government. The government felt the effects right away, most notably, in the case of the Afghan Air Force, who were previously the strongest arm of the military, found themselves unable to fly because they could not obtain fuel. The Afghan mujahideen continued to be supported by Pakistan. Major cities were lost to the rebels. On the fifth anniversary of his policy of National Reconciliation, Najibullah blamed the Soviet Union for the disaster that had stricken Afghanistan. The day the Soviet Union withdrew was hailed by Najibullah as the Day of National Salvation. But it was too late, and his government's collapse was imminent.

Question: Does the passage suggest that a program to import fuel from the US or NATO nations into Afghanistan would have made a difference in the Afghan air force's ability to fight?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the state of the Afghan air force at the time, if Mujahideen fighters had managed to demolish runways at key military airbases, would this have been the key factor that stopped the jets from fighting?
Answer: NO
Passage: In January 1992, the Russian government ended its aid to the Najibullah government. The effects were felt immediately: the Afghan Air Force, the most effective part of the Afghan military, was grounded due to lack of compatible fuel Russian fuel for their Soviet-sourced aircraft. The Afghan mujahideen continued to be supported by Pakistan. Major cities were lost to the rebels. On the fifth anniversary of his policy of National Reconciliation, Najibullah blamed the Soviet Union for the disaster that had stricken Afghanistan. The day the Soviet Union withdrew was hailed by Najibullah as the Day of National Salvation. But it was too late, and his government's collapse was imminent.

Question: Does the passage suggest that a program to import fuel from the US or NATO nations into Afghanistan would have made a difference in the Afghan air force's ability to fight?
Answer: NO

Question: From this passage, could you conclude that the same tanker could not feasibly refuel both a Soviet military aircraft and one from the West?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the state of the Afghan air force at the time, if Mujahideen fighters had managed to demolish runways at key military airbases, would this have been the key factor that stopped the jets from fighting?
Answer: NO
Passage: In January 1992, the Russian government ended its aid to the Najibullah government. The effects were felt immediately: yet the Afghan Air Force, the most effective part of the Afghan military, was able to keep up operations due to imports of usable fuel from allies who used a variety of different aircraft. The Afghan mujahideen continued to be supported by Pakistan. Major cities were lost to the rebels. On the fifth anniversary of his policy of National Reconciliation, Najibullah blamed the Soviet Union for the disaster that had stricken Afghanistan. The day the Soviet Union withdrew was hailed by Najibullah as the Day of National Salvation. But it was too late, and his government's collapse was imminent.

Question: From this passage, could you conclude that the same tanker could not feasibly refuel both a Soviet military aircraft and one from the West?
Answer: NO

Question: Given the state of the Afghan air force at the time, if Mujahideen fighters had managed to demolish runways at key military airbases, would this have been the key factor that stopped the jets from fighting?
Answer: YES
Passage: During the German invasion of Norway during World War II, from 19 April to 24 April, there was heavy fighting within the borders of the present municipality, with German forces advancing along the railway line from Bergen towards Voss. The heaviest fighting was for the village of Vaksdal itself, from 19 to 23 April. Further fighting took place at Stanghelle and Dalseid on 23 and 24 April. Three Norwegian soldiers and one civilian, and a larger, but unknown, number of German soldiers fell in Vaksdal.

Question: If one leaves aside the ethical complications of counting civilian deaths in combat, and strictly looks at kill ratios among service members, would the Norwegians have considered the battle at Vaksdal to be a victory?
Answer: YES

Question: Does it sound like the Geneva Conventions and various other informal rules of war were being followed in this battle, with adequate provisions being made to recover, identify, and if necessary, bury the dead?
Answer: NO

Question: In the aftermath of the war, was it possible for German authorities to make exact and proper arrangements to pay pensions and death benefits for any and all soldiers who perished at Vaksdal?
Answer: NO