lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: During the year following that contract, Burke founded with Dodsley the influential "Annual Register", a publication in which various authors evaluated the international political events of the previous year. The full extent of Burke's contributions to the "Annual Register" is not fully known. In his biography of Burke, Robert Murray quotes the "Register" as evidence of Burke's opinions, yet Philip Magnus in his biography does not cite it directly as a reference. Burke remained the chief editor of the publication until at least 1789 and there is no evidence that any other writer contributed to it before 1766.

Question: If someone had never heard of the "Annual Register" before reading this passage, could they reasonably conclude that, after 1766, it was presented to the reader in a manner similar to a present-day issue of "The Economist", in which the authors' names are never printed alongside the articles ?
Answer: YES

Question: Is the fact that Philip Magnus chose not to mention the Register in his biography likely due to Magnus's opinion that the work itself was relatively unimportant, rather than the biographer's inability to determine just how much work Burke completed?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it possible that at some point between 1766 and 1789, Burke took on something of a ceremonial role at the Annual Register, with no articles being demonstrably written or co-written by him in the final issue?
Answer: YES
Passage: During the year following that contract, Burke founded with Dodsley the influential "Annual Register", a publication in which various authors evaluated the international political events of the previous year. The extent to which others contributed to the "Annual Register" remains unclear, Burke's level of involvement in its editorial decisions was always well documented. In his biography of Burke, Robert Murray quotes the "Register" as evidence of Burke's opinions, yet Philip Magnus in his biography does not cite it directly as a reference. Burke remained the chief editor of the publication until at least 1789 and there is no evidence that any other writer contributed to it before 1766.

Question: If someone had never heard of the "Annual Register" before reading this passage, could they reasonably conclude that, after 1766, it was presented to the reader in a manner similar to a present-day issue of "The Economist", in which the authors' names are never printed alongside the articles ?
Answer: YES
Passage: During the year following that contract, Burke founded with Dodsley the influential "Annual Register", a publication in which various authors evaluated the international political events of the previous year. The extent to which Burke contributed to the Register's commentary was well documented. In his biography of Burke, Robert Murray quotes the "Register" as evidence of Burke's opinions, yet Philip Magnus in his biography does not cite it directly as a reference. Burke remained the chief editor of the publication until at least 1789 and there is no evidence that any other writer contributed to it before 1766.

Question: If someone had never heard of the "Annual Register" before reading this passage, could they reasonably conclude that, after 1766, it was presented to the reader in a manner similar to a present-day issue of "The Economist", in which the authors' names are never printed alongside the articles ?
Answer: NO

Question: Is it possible that at some point between 1766 and 1789, Burke took on something of a ceremonial role at the Annual Register, with no articles being demonstrably written or co-written by him in the final issue?
Answer: NO
Passage: Hepburn stayed active throughout the 1970s, focusing on roles described by Andrew Britton as "either a devouring mother or a batty old lady living [alone]". First she traveled to Spain to film a version of Euripides' "The Trojan Women" (1971) alongside Vanessa Redgrave. When asked why she had taken the role, she responded that she wanted to broaden her range and try everything while she still had time. The movie was poorly received, but the Kansas City Film Critics Circle named Hepburn's performance the best from an actress that year. In 1971, she signed on to star in an adaptation of Graham Greene's "Travels with My Aunt", but was unhappy with early versions of the script and took to rewriting it herself. The studio disliked her changes, so Hepburn abandoned the project and was replaced with Maggie Smith. Her next film, an adaptation of Edward Albee's "A Delicate Balance" (1973) directed by Tony Richardson, had a small release and received generally unfavorable reviews.

Question: From the passage, could you conclude that "A Delicate Balance" was something of a cult classic, being mostly unknown to the public, but widely regarded by the relative few who watched it?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that critics viewed her performances and/or the films that she starred in, is it safe to assume that Hepburn maintained her talent as an actress into the 1970s?
Answer: NO

Question: Knowing that Hepburn herself was praised for her acting in "The Trojan Women" in 1971, could you suspect from the critical reception that "A Delicate Balance" received in 1973 that something had changed in 1972, perhaps caused by her experience on the set of "Travels with My Aunt" or perhaps a reason for it, and which in turn led to the twilight of her acting career?
Answer: YES
Passage: Hepburn stayed active throughout the 1970s, focusing on roles described by Andrew Britton as "either a devouring mother or a batty old lady living [alone]". First she traveled to Spain to film a version of Euripides' "The Trojan Women" (1971) alongside Vanessa Redgrave. When asked why she had taken the role, she responded that she wanted to broaden her range and try everything while she still had time. The movie was poorly received, but the Kansas City Film Critics Circle named Hepburn's performance the best from an actress that year. In 1971, she signed on to star in an adaptation of Graham Greene's "Travels with My Aunt", but was unhappy with early versions of the script and took to rewriting it herself. The studio disliked her changes, so Hepburn abandoned the project and was replaced with Maggie Smith. Hepburn's follow-up was a 1973 adaptation of Edward Albee's "A Delicate Balance" by director Tony Richardson, but it only had a limited release and saw poor reception from critics.

Question: From the passage, could you conclude that "A Delicate Balance" was something of a cult classic, being mostly unknown to the public, but widely regarded by the relative few who watched it?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that critics viewed her performances and/or the films that she starred in, is it safe to assume that Hepburn maintained her talent as an actress into the 1970s?
Answer: NO

Question: Knowing that Hepburn herself was praised for her acting in "The Trojan Women" in 1971, could you suspect from the critical reception that "A Delicate Balance" received in 1973 that something had changed in 1972, perhaps caused by her experience on the set of "Travels with My Aunt" or perhaps a reason for it, and which in turn led to the twilight of her acting career?
Answer: YES
Passage: Hepburn stayed active throughout the 1970s, focusing on roles described by Andrew Britton as "either a devouring mother or a batty old lady living [alone]". First she traveled to Spain to film a version of Euripides' "The Trojan Women" (1971) alongside Vanessa Redgrave. When asked why she had taken the role, she responded that she wanted to broaden her range and try everything while she still had time. The movie was poorly received, but the Kansas City Film Critics Circle named Hepburn's performance the best from an actress that year. In 1971, she signed on to star in an adaptation of Graham Greene's "Travels with My Aunt", but was unhappy with early versions of the script and took to rewriting it herself. The studio disliked her changes, so Hepburn abandoned the project and was replaced with Maggie Smith. Her next film, an adaptation of Edward Albee's "A Delicate Balance" (1973) directed by Tony Richardson, had a small release yet despite its unfavorable box-office returns, it received rave reviews.

Question: From the passage, could you conclude that "A Delicate Balance" was something of a cult classic, being mostly unknown to the public, but widely regarded by the relative few who watched it?
Answer: YES

Question: From the way that critics viewed her performances and/or the films that she starred in, is it safe to assume that Hepburn maintained her talent as an actress into the 1970s?
Answer: YES

Question: Knowing that Hepburn herself was praised for her acting in "The Trojan Women" in 1971, could you suspect from the critical reception that "A Delicate Balance" received in 1973 that something had changed in 1972, perhaps caused by her experience on the set of "Travels with My Aunt" or perhaps a reason for it, and which in turn led to the twilight of her acting career?
Answer: NO
Passage: Hepburn stayed active throughout the 1970s, focusing on roles described by Andrew Britton as "either a devouring mother or a batty old lady living [alone]". First she traveled to Spain to film a version of Euripides' "The Trojan Women" (1971) alongside Vanessa Redgrave. When asked why she had taken the role, she responded that she wanted to broaden her range and try everything while she still had time. The movie was poorly received, but the Kansas City Film Critics Circle named Hepburn's performance the best from an actress that year. In 1971, she signed on to star in an adaptation of Graham Greene's "Travels with My Aunt", but was unhappy with early versions of the script and took to rewriting it herself. The studio disliked her changes, so Hepburn abandoned the project and was replaced with Maggie Smith. Her next film, an adaptation of Edward Albee's "A Delicate Balance" (1973) directed by Tony Richardson, had a successful release and received generally glowing reviews.

Question: From the passage, could you conclude that "A Delicate Balance" was something of a cult classic, being mostly unknown to the public, but widely regarded by the relative few who watched it?
Answer: NO

Question: From the way that critics viewed her performances and/or the films that she starred in, is it safe to assume that Hepburn maintained her talent as an actress into the 1970s?
Answer: YES

Question: Knowing that Hepburn herself was praised for her acting in "The Trojan Women" in 1971, could you suspect from the critical reception that "A Delicate Balance" received in 1973 that something had changed in 1972, perhaps caused by her experience on the set of "Travels with My Aunt" or perhaps a reason for it, and which in turn led to the twilight of her acting career?
Answer: NO
Passage: A ball, as the essential feature in many forms of gameplay requiring physical exertion, must date from the very earliest times. A rolling object appeals not only to a human baby, but to a kitten and a puppy. Some form of game with a ball is found portrayed on Egyptian monuments, and is played among aboriginal tribes at the present day. In Homer, Nausicaa was playing at ball with her maidens when Odysseus first saw her in the land of the Phaeacians (Od. vi. 100). And Halios and Laodamas performed before Alcinous and Odysseus with ball play, accompanied with dancing (Od. viii. 370). The most ancient balls in Eurasia have been discovered in Karasahr, China and are 3.000 years old. They were made of hair-filled leather.

Question: If you roll a ball past a puppy, will the puppy chase after it?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a puppy be more interested in an object that is moving than one that is stationary?
Answer: YES

Question: If you roll a ball past a kitten, will the kitten chase after it?
Answer: YES
Passage: A ball, as the essential feature in many forms of gameplay requiring physical exertion, must date from the very earliest times. A rolling object appeals to a human baby, a kitten and a puppy. Some form of game with a ball is found portrayed on Egyptian monuments, and is played among aboriginal tribes at the present day. In Homer, Nausicaa was playing at ball with her maidens when Odysseus first saw her in the land of the Phaeacians (Od. vi. 100). And Halios and Laodamas performed before Alcinous and Odysseus with ball play, accompanied with dancing (Od. viii. 370). The most ancient balls in Eurasia have been discovered in Karasahr, China and are 3.000 years old. They were made of hair-filled leather.

Question: If you roll a ball past a puppy, will the puppy chase after it?
Answer: YES

Question: Would a puppy be more interested in an object that is moving than one that is stationary?
Answer: YES

Question: If you roll a ball past a kitten, will the kitten chase after it?
Answer: YES
Passage: A ball, as the essential feature in many forms of gameplay requiring physical exertion, must date from the very earliest times. Surprisingly, a rolling object appeals only to a human baby and a kitten but not to a puppy. Some form of game with a ball is found portrayed on Egyptian monuments, and is played among aboriginal tribes at the present day. In Homer, Nausicaa was playing at ball with her maidens when Odysseus first saw her in the land of the Phaeacians (Od. vi. 100). And Halios and Laodamas performed before Alcinous and Odysseus with ball play, accompanied with dancing (Od. viii. 370). The most ancient balls in Eurasia have been discovered in Karasahr, China and are 3.000 years old. They were made of hair-filled leather.

Question: If you roll a ball past a puppy, will the puppy chase after it?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a puppy be more interested in an object that is moving than one that is stationary?
Answer: NO

Question: If you roll a ball past a kitten, will the kitten chase after it?
Answer: YES
Passage: A ball, as the essential feature in many forms of gameplay requiring physical exertion, must date from the very earliest times. Surprisingly, a rolling object appeals only to a human baby, and very rarely to a kitten or a puppy. Some form of game with a ball is found portrayed on Egyptian monuments, and is played among aboriginal tribes at the present day. In Homer, Nausicaa was playing at ball with her maidens when Odysseus first saw her in the land of the Phaeacians (Od. vi. 100). And Halios and Laodamas performed before Alcinous and Odysseus with ball play, accompanied with dancing (Od. viii. 370). The most ancient balls in Eurasia have been discovered in Karasahr, China and are 3.000 years old. They were made of hair-filled leather.

Question: If you roll a ball past a puppy, will the puppy chase after it?
Answer: NO

Question: Would a puppy be more interested in an object that is moving than one that is stationary?
Answer: NO

Question: If you roll a ball past a kitten, will the kitten chase after it?
Answer: NO
Passage: Successive years of school are usually referred to as "grade one", "grade two", and so on. In Quebec, the speaker (if Francophone) will often say "primary one", "primary two" (a direct translation from the French), and so on; while Anglophones will say "grade one", "grade two". (Compare American "first grade, second grade" (sporadically found in Canada), and English/Welsh "Year 1, Year 2", Scottish/Northern Irish "Primary 1, Primary 2" or "P1, P2", and Southern Irish "First Class, Second Class" and so on.). The year of school before grade 1 is usually called "Kindergarten", with the exception of Nova Scotia, where it is called "grade primary".

Question: Would you expect someone from Novia Scotia to refer to a student in the year of school before grade 1 as being in "Kindergarten" or in "grade primary?"
Answer: grade primary

Question: Is it likely that someone who refers to the year of school before grade 1 as "grade primary" grew up in Novia Scotia?
Answer: YES

Question: Would you expect someone from Ireland to refer to a student in the year of school before grade 1 as being in "Kindergarten" or in "grade primary?"
Answer: Kindergarten
Passage: Successive years of school are usually referred to as "grade one", "grade two", and so on. In Quebec, the speaker (if Francophone) will often say "primary one", "primary two" (a direct translation from the French), and so on; while Anglophones will say "grade one", "grade two". (Compare American "first grade, second grade" (sporadically found in Canada), and English/Welsh "Year 1, Year 2", Scottish/Northern Irish "Primary 1, Primary 2" or "P1, P2", and Southern Irish "First Class, Second Class" and so on.). The year of school before grade 1 is usually called "Kindergarten", but in Nova Scotia, it is called "grade primary".

Question: Would you expect someone from Novia Scotia to refer to a student in the year of school before grade 1 as being in "Kindergarten" or in "grade primary?"
Answer: grade primary

Question: Is it likely that someone who refers to the year of school before grade 1 as "grade primary" grew up in Novia Scotia?
Answer: YES

Question: Would you expect someone from Ireland to refer to a student in the year of school before grade 1 as being in "Kindergarten" or in "grade primary?"
Answer: Kindergarten
Passage: Successive years of school are usually referred to as "grade one", "grade two", and so on. In Quebec, the speaker (if Francophone) will often say "primary one", "primary two" (a direct translation from the French), and so on; while Anglophones will say "grade one", "grade two". (Compare American "first grade, second grade" (sporadically found in Canada), and English/Welsh "Year 1, Year 2", Scottish/Northern Irish "Primary 1, Primary 2" or "P1, P2", and Southern Irish "First Class, Second Class" and so on.). The year of school before grade 1 is usually called "Kindergarten", with the exception of Nova Scotia and Ireland, where it is called "grade primary".

Question: Would you expect someone from Novia Scotia to refer to a student in the year of school before grade 1 as being in "Kindergarten" or in "grade primary?"
Answer: grade primary

Question: Would you expect someone from Ireland to refer to a student in the year of school before grade 1 as being in "Kindergarten" or in "grade primary?"
Answer: grade primary
Passage: Successive years of school are usually referred to as "grade one", "grade two", and so on. In Quebec, the speaker (if Francophone) will often say "primary one", "primary two" (a direct translation from the French), and so on; while Anglophones will say "grade one", "grade two". (Compare American "first grade, second grade" (sporadically found in Canada), and English/Welsh "Year 1, Year 2", Scottish/Northern Irish "Primary 1, Primary 2" or "P1, P2", and Southern Irish "First Class, Second Class" and so on.). The year of school before grade 1 is usually called "Kindergarten", including in Nova Scotia, where it is sometimes called "grade primary".

Question: Would you expect someone from Novia Scotia to refer to a student in the year of school before grade 1 as being in "Kindergarten" or in "grade primary?"
Answer: Kindergarten

Question: Would you expect someone from Ireland to refer to a student in the year of school before grade 1 as being in "Kindergarten" or in "grade primary?"
Answer: Kindergarten
Passage: With the characters spread out across the world, a friend suggested that Martin divide the story geographically into two volumes, of which "A Feast for Crows" would be the first. This approach would give Martin the room to complete his commenced story arcs as he had originally intended, which he still felt was the best approach years later. Martin moved the unfinished characters' stories set in the east (Essos) and north (Winterfell and the Wall) into the next book, "A Dance with Dragons", and left "A Feast for Crows" to cover the events in King's Landing, the Riverlands, Dorne, and the Iron Islands. Both books begin immediately after the end of "A Storm of Swords", running in parallel instead of sequentially, and involve different casts of characters with only little overlap. Martin split Arya's chapters into both books after having already moved the three other most popular characters (Jon Snow, Tyrion, and Daenerys) into "A Dance with Dragons".

Question: Can one read "A Feast for Crows" and know what happened to all the characters after the third book?
Answer: NO
Passage: With the characters spread out across the world, a friend suggested that Martin divide the story geographically into two volumes, of which "A Feast for Crows" would be the first. This approach would give Martin the room to complete his commenced story arcs as he had originally intended, which he still felt was the best approach years later. Martin moved the incomplete characters' stories set in the east (Essos) and north (Winterfell and the Wall) into the next book, "A Dance with Dragons", and left "A Feast for Crows" to cover the events in King's Landing, the Riverlands, Dorne, and the Iron Islands. Both books begin immediately after the end of "A Storm of Swords", running in parallel instead of sequentially, and involve different casts of characters with only little overlap. Martin split Arya's chapters into both books after having already moved the three other most popular characters (Jon Snow, Tyrion, and Daenerys) into "A Dance with Dragons".

Question: Can one read "A Feast for Crows" and know what happened to all the characters after the third book?
Answer: NO
Passage: With the characters spread out across the world, a friend suggested that Martin divide the story geographically into two volumes, of which "A Feast for Crows" would be the first. This approach would give Martin the room to complete his commenced story arcs as he had originally intended, which he still felt was the best approach years later. Martin moved the characters' stories set in the east (Essos) and north (Winterfell and the Wall) into the next, still unfinished book, "A Dance with Dragons", and left "A Feast for Crows" to cover the events in King's Landing, the Riverlands, Dorne, and the Iron Islands. Both books begin immediately after the end of "A Storm of Swords", running in parallel instead of sequentially, and involve different casts of characters with only little overlap. Martin split Arya's chapters into both books after having already moved the three other most popular characters (Jon Snow, Tyrion, and Daenerys) into "A Dance with Dragons".

Question: Can one read "A Feast for Crows" and know what happened to all the characters after the third book?
Answer: NO
Passage: With the characters spread out across the world, a friend suggested that Martin divide the story geographically into two volumes, of which "A Feast for Crows" would be the first. This approach would give Martin the room to complete his commenced story arcs as he had originally intended, which he still felt was the best approach years later. Martin moved the finished characters' stories set in the east (Essos) and north (Winterfell and the Wall) into the next book, "A Dance with Dragons", and left "A Feast for Crows" to cover the events in King's Landing, the Riverlands, Dorne, and the Iron Islands. Both books begin immediately after the end of "A Storm of Swords", running in parallel instead of sequentially, and involve different casts of characters with only little overlap. Martin split Arya's chapters into both books after having already moved the three other most popular characters (Jon Snow, Tyrion, and Daenerys) into "A Dance with Dragons".

Question: Can one read "A Feast for Crows" and know what happened to all the characters after the third book?
Answer: NO

Question: Will the complete arcs of the characters be in "A Dance with Dragons"?
Answer: YES