lasha-nlp/CONDAQA huggingface dataset:
Passage: The following lost and fragmentary plays are of uncertain date, and are arranged in English alphabetical order.

Question: If one wanted the precise date of a fragmentary play, could one find it on this list?
Answer: NO

Question: If one wanted the precise date of a lost play, could one find it on this list?
Answer: NO

Question: If one discovered a new play that is fragmentary and has an uncertain date, is this the right list to add it to?
Answer: YES
Passage: The following lost and fragmentary plays have vague dates, and are arranged in English alphabetical order.

Question: If one wanted the precise date of a fragmentary play, could one find it on this list?
Answer: NO

Question: If one wanted the precise date of a lost play, could one find it on this list?
Answer: NO

Question: If one discovered a new play that is fragmentary and has an uncertain date, is this the right list to add it to?
Answer: YES
Passage: The following lost plays of uncertain date, along with fragmentary plays of known date, are arranged in English alphabetical order.

Question: If one wanted the precise date of a fragmentary play, could one find it on this list?
Answer: YES

Question: If one wanted the precise date of a lost play, could one find it on this list?
Answer: NO

Question: If one discovered a new play that is fragmentary and has an uncertain date, is this the right list to add it to?
Answer: NO
Passage: The following lost and fragmentary plays are of known date, and are arranged in English alphabetical order.

Question: If one wanted the precise date of a fragmentary play, could one find it on this list?
Answer: YES

Question: If one wanted the precise date of a lost play, could one find it on this list?
Answer: YES

Question: If one discovered a new play that is fragmentary and has an uncertain date, is this the right list to add it to?
Answer: NO
Passage: Filmed on location in Prescott, Arizona, the story covered a week in the life of aging rodeo rider Junior "JR" Bonner (Steve McQueen) who returns to his hometown to compete in an annual rodeo competition. Promoted as a Steve McQueen action vehicle, the film's reviews were mixed and the film performed poorly at the box office. Peckinpah remarked, "I made a film where nobody got shot and nobody went to see it." The film's reputation has grown over the years as many critics consider "Junior Bonner" to be one of Peckinpah's most sympathetic works, while also noting McQueen's earnest performance.

Question: Does the wording of this passage suggest that, even though it is about cowboys, there might not have even been any firearms in the movie?
Answer: YES

Question: With what can be learned from this passage, could a reader later watch "Junior Bonner" while holding onto the ostensibly very-reasonable assumption that Steve McQueen's hero character will survive to the end?
Answer: YES
Passage: Filmed on location in Prescott, Arizona, the story covered a week in the life of aging rodeo rider Junior "JR" Bonner (Steve McQueen) who returns to his hometown to compete in an annual rodeo competition. Promoted as a Steve McQueen action vehicle, the film's reviews were mixed and the film performed poorly at the box office. The film maker, Peckinpah himself, has noted that nobody was a victim of gun violence in this movie. The film's reputation has grown over the years as many critics consider "Junior Bonner" to be one of Peckinpah's most sympathetic works, while also noting McQueen's earnest performance.

Question: Does the wording of this passage suggest that, even though it is about cowboys, there might not have even been any firearms in the movie?
Answer: YES

Question: With what can be learned from this passage, could a reader later watch "Junior Bonner" while holding onto the ostensibly very-reasonable assumption that Steve McQueen's hero character will survive to the end?
Answer: YES
Passage: Filmed on location in Prescott, Arizona, the story covered a week in the life of aging rodeo rider Junior "JR" Bonner (Steve McQueen) who returns to his hometown to compete in an annual rodeo competition. Promoted as a Steve McQueen action vehicle, the film's reviews were mixed and the film performed poorly at the box office. Peckinpah remarked, "This was the first time that I made a film where nobody died after getting shot". The film's reputation has grown over the years as many critics consider "Junior Bonner" to be one of Peckinpah's most sympathetic works, while also noting McQueen's earnest performance.

Question: Does the wording of this passage suggest that, even though it is about cowboys, there might not have even been any firearms in the movie?
Answer: NO

Question: Do Peckinpah's words suggest that his earlier movies had always tried to be brutally realistic about the consequences of gunshot wounds, and would likely not have resorted to infamous tropes such as a hero flawlessly aiming a gun while clutching his wounded shoulder, or anything of the sort?
Answer: YES

Question: With what can be learned from this passage, could a reader later watch "Junior Bonner" while holding onto the ostensibly very-reasonable assumption that Steve McQueen's hero character will survive to the end?
Answer: YES
Passage: Filmed on location in Prescott, Arizona, the story covered a week in the life of aging rodeo rider Junior "JR" Bonner (Steve McQueen) who returns to his hometown to compete in an annual rodeo competition. Promoted as a Steve McQueen action vehicle, the film's reviews were mixed and the film performed poorly at the box office. Peckinpah remarked, "I made a film where everybody got shot, and there were no heroes". The film's reputation has grown over the years as many critics consider "Junior Bonner" to be one of Peckinpah's most sullen works, while also noting McQueen's earnest performance.

Question: Does the wording of this passage suggest that, even though it is about cowboys, there might not have even been any firearms in the movie?
Answer: NO

Question: With what can be learned from this passage, could a reader later watch "Junior Bonner" while holding onto the ostensibly very-reasonable assumption that Steve McQueen's hero character will survive to the end?
Answer: NO
Passage: In mid-August 1920, the Poles repulsed the Russian advance, and Stalin returned to Moscow to attend the Politburo meeting. In Moscow, Lenin and Trotsky blamed him for his behavior in the Polish–Soviet war. Stalin felt humiliated and under-appreciated; on 17 August, he demanded demission from the military, which was granted on 1 September. At the 9th Bolshevik Conference in late September, Trotsky accused Stalin of "strategic mistakes" in his handling of the war. Trotsky claimed that Stalin sabotaged the campaign by disobeying troop transfer orders. Lenin joined Trotsky in criticising him, and nobody spoke on his behalf at the conference. Stalin felt disgraced and increased his antipathy toward Trotsky. The Polish-Soviet War ended on 18 March 1921, when a peace treaty was signed in Riga.

Question: Given Stalin's reputation for brutality, does it seem likely that certain people might have 'disappeared' as a result of their notable inaction at this conference?
Answer: YES

Question: Since Stalin was a master in the art of rewarding his allies and liquidating his enemies, would one assume that at least some promotions or other forms of recognition were given out after this conference, regardless of how Stalin felt about the way he had been criticized?
Answer: NO
Passage: In mid-August 1920, the Poles repulsed the Russian advance, and Stalin returned to Moscow to attend the Politburo meeting. In Moscow, Lenin and Trotsky blamed him for his behavior in the Polish–Soviet war. Stalin felt humiliated and under-appreciated; on 17 August, he demanded demission from the military, which was granted on 1 September. At the 9th Bolshevik Conference in late September, Trotsky accused Stalin of "strategic mistakes" in his handling of the war. Trotsky claimed that Stalin sabotaged the campaign by disobeying troop transfer orders. Both Lenin and Trotsky criticized him at the conference, and no one in attendance spoke in his defense. Stalin felt disgraced and increased his antipathy toward Trotsky. The Polish-Soviet War ended on 18 March 1921, when a peace treaty was signed in Riga.

Question: Given Stalin's reputation for brutality, does it seem likely that certain people might have 'disappeared' as a result of their notable inaction at this conference?
Answer: YES

Question: Since Stalin was a master in the art of rewarding his allies and liquidating his enemies, would one assume that at least some promotions or other forms of recognition were given out after this conference, regardless of how Stalin felt about the way he had been criticized?
Answer: NO
Passage: In mid-August 1920, the Poles repulsed the Russian advance, and Stalin returned to Moscow to attend the Politburo meeting. In Moscow, Lenin and Trotsky blamed him for his behavior in the Polish–Soviet war. Stalin felt humiliated and under-appreciated; on 17 August, he demanded demission from the military, which was granted on 1 September. At the 9th Bolshevik Conference in late September, Trotsky accused Stalin of "strategic mistakes" in his handling of the war. Trotsky claimed that Stalin sabotaged the campaign by disobeying troop transfer orders. Lenin joined Trotsky in criticising him, but when regime insiders lined up to offer support, nobody else at the conference joined the pair in their criticism. Stalin felt disgraced and increased his antipathy toward Trotsky. The Polish-Soviet War ended on 18 March 1921, when a peace treaty was signed in Riga.

Question: Given Stalin's reputation for brutality, does it seem likely that certain people might have 'disappeared' as a result of their notable inaction at this conference?
Answer: NO

Question: Since Stalin was a master in the art of rewarding his allies and liquidating his enemies, would one assume that at least some promotions or other forms of recognition were given out after this conference, regardless of how Stalin felt about the way he had been criticized?
Answer: YES
Passage: In mid-August 1920, the Poles repulsed the Russian advance, and Stalin returned to Moscow to attend the Politburo meeting. In Moscow, Lenin and Trotsky blamed him for his behavior in the Polish–Soviet war. Stalin felt humiliated and under-appreciated; on 17 August, he demanded demission from the military, which was granted on 1 September. At the 9th Bolshevik Conference in late September, Trotsky accused Stalin of "strategic mistakes" in his handling of the war. Trotsky claimed that Stalin sabotaged the campaign by disobeying troop transfer orders. Lenin joined Trotsky in criticising him, and a couple of lower-ranking officials spoke on his behalf at the conference, with most other attendees remaining respectfully silent, as they had done for all other speakers. Stalin felt disgraced and increased his antipathy toward Trotsky. The Polish-Soviet War ended on 18 March 1921, when a peace treaty was signed in Riga.

Question: Since Stalin was a master in the art of rewarding his allies and liquidating his enemies, would one assume that at least some promotions or other forms of recognition were given out after this conference, regardless of how Stalin felt about the way he had been criticized?
Answer: YES

Question: Given the way that most attendees had reacted at this conference, does it sound like the event was a turning point in shifting public support one way or the other in the rivalry between Trotsky and Stalin?
Answer: NO
Passage: From 1915 to 1940, the wealthy philanthropist John D. Rockefeller Jr. financed, designed, and directed the construction of a network of carriage roads throughout the park. He sponsored the landscape architect Beatrix Farrand, whose family owned a summer home in Bar Harbor named Reef Point Estate, to design the planting plans for the carriage roads (c. 1930). The network originally encompassed about of crushed stone carriage roads with 17 stone-faced, steel-reinforced concrete bridges (16 financed by Rockefeller), and two gate lodges—one at Jordan Pond and the other near Northeast Harbor. About of carriage roads are maintained and accessible within park boundaries. Granite coping stones along carriage road edges act as guard rails; they are nicknamed "Rockefeller's Teeth." The carriage roads are open from the end of the spring mud season, generally in late April, through the summer, autumn, and winter months, until the following spring thaw causes another closure in March to prevent damage to the gravel surface.

Question: If I wanted to plan a carriage ride, would I be able to do so in March?
Answer: NO

Question: Do the park's maintainers need to spend money every year for resurfacing the carriage roads?
Answer: NO

Question: If I were walking on foot on the carriage road in March, would I be safe from being run over?
Answer: YES
Passage: From 1915 to 1940, the wealthy philanthropist John D. Rockefeller Jr. financed, designed, and directed the construction of a network of carriage roads throughout the park. He sponsored the landscape architect Beatrix Farrand, whose family owned a summer home in Bar Harbor named Reef Point Estate, to design the planting plans for the carriage roads (c. 1930). The network originally encompassed about of crushed stone carriage roads with 17 stone-faced, steel-reinforced concrete bridges (16 financed by Rockefeller), and two gate lodges—one at Jordan Pond and the other near Northeast Harbor. About of carriage roads are maintained and accessible within park boundaries. Granite coping stones along carriage road edges act as guard rails; they are nicknamed "Rockefeller's Teeth." The carriage roads are open from the end of the spring mud season, generally in late April, through the summer, autumn, and winter months, until the following spring thaw causes another closure in March to maintain the integrity of the gravel surface.

Question: If I wanted to plan a carriage ride, would I be able to do so in March?
Answer: NO

Question: Do the park's maintainers need to spend money every year for resurfacing the carriage roads?
Answer: NO

Question: If I were walking on foot on the carriage road in March, would I be safe from being run over?
Answer: YES
Passage: From 1915 to 1940, the wealthy philanthropist John D. Rockefeller Jr. financed, designed, and directed the construction of a network of carriage roads throughout the park. He sponsored the landscape architect Beatrix Farrand, whose family owned a summer home in Bar Harbor named Reef Point Estate, to design the planting plans for the carriage roads (c. 1930). The network originally encompassed about of crushed stone carriage roads with 17 stone-faced, steel-reinforced concrete bridges (16 financed by Rockefeller), and two gate lodges—one at Jordan Pond and the other near Northeast Harbor. About of carriage roads are maintained and accessible within park boundaries. Granite coping stones along carriage road edges act as guard rails; they are nicknamed "Rockefeller's Teeth." The carriage roads are open from the end of the spring mud season, generally in late April, through the summer, autumn, and winter months, until the following spring thaw causes another closure in March due to accelerated damage to the gravel surface, requiring resurfacing.

Question: If I wanted to plan a carriage ride, would I be able to do so in March?
Answer: NO

Question: Do the park's maintainers need to spend money every year for resurfacing the carriage roads?
Answer: YES

Question: If I were walking on foot on the carriage road in March, would I be safe from being run over?
Answer: YES
Passage: The latter of the two equations was unknown when the U.S. conducted the Castle Bravo fusion bomb test in 1954. Being just the second fusion bomb ever tested (and the first to use lithium), the designers of the Castle Bravo "Shrimp" had understood the usefulness of 6Li in tritium production, but had failed to recognize that 7Li fission would greatly increase the yield of the bomb. While 7Li has a small neutron cross-section for low neutron energies, it has a higher cross section above 5 MeV. The 15 Mt yield was 150% greater than the predicted 6 Mt and caused unexpected exposure to fallout.

Question: Could the army have faced claims for compensation, possibly even class-action lawsuits, from those who were exposed to more radioactive fallout than they were adequately warned about and prepared for at this test?
Answer: YES

Question: For one to consider this new form of 7Li fission bomb to be a success, would one have to look at it strictly in military terms of megatons, and ignore the fact that more fallout would be occurring than if the military had been unable to advance past 6-mT yields?
Answer: YES

Question: If, hypothetically-speaking, arms control agreements were based not on megatons of yield, but instead on some objective measure of the absolute level of fallout that would come about if a country's stockpile of nukes was to be used, would this new 7Li fission development essentially give America a free pass to increase the size of her arsenal?
Answer: NO
Passage: The latter of the two equations was unknown when the U.S. conducted the Castle Bravo fusion bomb test in 1954. Being just the second fusion bomb ever tested (and the first to use lithium), the designers of the Castle Bravo "Shrimp" had understood the usefulness of 6Li in tritium production, but had failed to recognize that 7Li fission would greatly increase the yield of the bomb. While 7Li has a small neutron cross-section for low neutron energies, it has a higher cross section above 5 MeV. The bomb was expected to explode with a yield of 6 megatons, but actually yielded 15, which caused much higher levels of fallout exposure than anyone was expecting at the time of the test.

Question: Could the army have faced claims for compensation, possibly even class-action lawsuits, from those who were exposed to more radioactive fallout than they were adequately warned about and prepared for at this test?
Answer: YES

Question: For one to consider this new form of 7Li fission bomb to be a success, would one have to look at it strictly in military terms of megatons, and ignore the fact that more fallout would be occurring than if the military had been unable to advance past 6-mT yields?
Answer: YES

Question: If, hypothetically-speaking, arms control agreements were based not on megatons of yield, but instead on some objective measure of the absolute level of fallout that would come about if a country's stockpile of nukes was to be used, would this new 7Li fission development essentially give America a free pass to increase the size of her arsenal?
Answer: NO
Passage: The latter of the two equations was unknown when the U.S. conducted the Castle Bravo fusion bomb test in 1954. Being just the second fusion bomb ever tested (and the first to use lithium), the designers of the Castle Bravo "Shrimp" had understood the usefulness of 6Li in tritium production, but had failed to recognize that 7Li fission would greatly increase the yield of the bomb. While 7Li has a small neutron cross-section for low neutron energies, it has a higher cross section above 5 MeV. The 15 Mt yield was 150% greater than the predicted 6 Mt but it did not bring any unexpected levels of fallout, and all measurements revealed exposure on par with what would have occurred given a 6 Mt yield.

Question: Could the army have faced claims for compensation, possibly even class-action lawsuits, from those who were exposed to more radioactive fallout than they were adequately warned about and prepared for at this test?
Answer: NO

Question: For one to consider this new form of 7Li fission bomb to be a success, would one have to look at it strictly in military terms of megatons, and ignore the fact that more fallout would be occurring than if the military had been unable to advance past 6-mT yields?
Answer: NO

Question: If, hypothetically-speaking, arms control agreements were based not on megatons of yield, but instead on some objective measure of the absolute level of fallout that would come about if a country's stockpile of nukes was to be used, would this new 7Li fission development essentially give America a free pass to increase the size of her arsenal?
Answer: YES
Passage: The latter of the two equations was unknown when the U.S. conducted the Castle Bravo fusion bomb test in 1954. Being just the second fusion bomb ever tested (and the first to use lithium), the designers of the Castle Bravo "Shrimp" had understood the usefulness of 6Li in tritium production, but had failed to recognize that 7Li fission would greatly increase the yield of the bomb. While 7Li has a small neutron cross-section for low neutron energies, it has a higher cross section above 5 MeV. The 15 Mt yield was 150% greater than the predicted 6 Mt and yet the fallout was measured to be slightly less than would have occurred even with the 6 Mt yield.

Question: Could the army have faced claims for compensation, possibly even class-action lawsuits, from those who were exposed to more radioactive fallout than they were adequately warned about and prepared for at this test?
Answer: NO

Question: For one to consider this new form of 7Li fission bomb to be a success, would one have to look at it strictly in military terms of megatons, and ignore the fact that more fallout would be occurring than if the military had been unable to advance past 6-mT yields?
Answer: NO

Question: If, hypothetically-speaking, arms control agreements were based not on megatons of yield, but instead on some objective measure of the absolute level of fallout that would come about if a country's stockpile of nukes was to be used, would this new 7Li fission development essentially give America a free pass to increase the size of her arsenal?
Answer: YES
Passage: The walls and sanctum's door frame of the both levels are intricately carved. These show themes such as "makaras" and other mythical creatures, apsaras, elephants in different stages of activity, females in waving or welcoming gesture. The upper level of Cave 6 is significant in that it shows a devotee in a kneeling posture at the Buddha's feet, an indication of devotional worship practices by the 5th century. The colossal Buddha of the shrine has an elaborate throne back, but was hastily finished in 477/478 CE, when king Harisena died. The shrine antechamber of the cave features an unfinished sculptural group of the Six Buddhas of the Past, of which only five statues were carved. This idea may have been influenced from those in Bagh Caves of Madhya Pradesh.

Question: After his final session working on it, had the artist creating the Six Buddhas of the Past in the antechamber likely already used the majority of the sculpting material he was provided?
Answer: YES

Question: Is it likely the artist responsible for the Six Buddhas of the Past in the antechamber felt frustrated when reminiscing about his work on the piece?
Answer: YES

Question: Would the artist responsible for the Six Buddhas of the Past in the antechamber have felt ready to display the sculptures to the public after his final session working on them?
Answer: NO