laredoyin/eu-ai-act huggingface dataset:
Chapter III: HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS
Section 5: Standards, conformity assessment, certificates, registration
Article 48: CE marking

1. The CE marking shall be subject to the general principles set out in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008. 2. For high-risk AI systems provided digitally, a digital CE marking shall be used, only if it can easily be accessed via the  interface from which that system is accessed or via an easily accessible machine-readable code or other electronic means. 3. The CE marking shall be affixed visibly, legibly and indelibly for high-risk AI systems. Where that is not possible or  not warranted on account of the nature of the high-risk AI system, it shall be affixed to the packaging or to the  accompanying documentation, as appropriate. 4. Where applicable, the CE marking shall be followed by the identification number of the notified body responsible for  the conformity assessment procedures set out in Article 43. The identification number of the notified body shall be affixed  by the body itself or, under its instructions, by the provider or by the provider’s authorised representative. The identification  number shall also be indicated in any promotional material which mentions that the high-risk AI system fulfils the  requirements for CE marking. 5. Where high-risk AI systems are subject to other Union law which also provides for the affixing of the CE marking, the  CE marking shall indicate that the high-risk AI system also fulfils the requirements of that other law.
Chapter III: HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS
Section 5: Standards, conformity assessment, certificates, registration
Article 49: Registration

1. Before placing on the market or putting into service a high-risk AI system listed in Annex III, with the exception of  high-risk AI systems referred to in point 2 of Annex III, the provider or, where applicable, the authorised representative  shall register themselves and their system in the EU database referred to in Article 71. 2. Before placing on the market or putting into service an AI system for which the provider has concluded that it is not  high-risk according to Article 6(3), that provider or, where applicable, the authorised representative shall register  themselves and that system in the EU database referred to in Article 71. 3. Before putting into service or using a high-risk AI system listed in Annex III, with the exception of high-risk AI  systems listed in point 2 of Annex III, deployers that are public authorities, Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies or  persons acting on their behalf shall register themselves, select the system and register its use in the EU database referred to  in Article 71. 4. For high-risk AI systems referred to in points 1, 6 and 7 of Annex III, in the areas of law enforcement, migration,  asylum and border control management, the registration referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article shall be in  a secure non-public section of the EU database referred to in Article 71 and shall include only the following information, as  applicable, referred to in:(a)Section A, points 1 to 10, of Annex VIII, with the exception of points 6, 8 and 9;(b)Section B, points 1 to 5, and points 8 and 9 of Annex VIII;(c)Section C, points 1 to 3, of Annex VIII;(d)points 1, 2, 3 and 5, of Annex IX. Only the Commission and national authorities referred to in Article 74(8) shall have access to the respective restricted  sections of the EU database listed in the first subparagraph of this paragraph. 5. High-risk AI systems referred to in point 2 of Annex III shall be registered at national level.
Chapter V: GENERAL-PURPOSE AI MODELS
Section 1: Classification rules
Article 51: Classification of general-purpose AI models as general-purpose AI models with systemic risk

1. A general-purpose AI model shall be classified as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk if it meets any of the  following conditions:(a)it has high impact capabilities evaluated on the basis of appropriate technical tools and methodologies, including  indicators and benchmarks;(b)based on a decision of the Commission, ex officio or following a qualified alert from the scientific panel, it has  capabilities or an impact equivalent to those set out in point (a) having regard to the criteria set out in Annex XIII. 2. A general-purpose AI model shall be presumed to have high impact capabilities pursuant to paragraph 1, point (a),  when the cumulative amount of computation used for its training measured in floating point operations is greater than  1025. 3. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 to amend the thresholds listed in  paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, as well as to supplement benchmarks and indicators in light of evolving technological  developments, such as algorithmic improvements or increased hardware efficiency, when necessary, for these thresholds to  reflect the state of the art.
Chapter V: GENERAL-PURPOSE AI MODELS
Section 1: Classification rules
Article 52: Procedure

1. Where a general-purpose AI model meets the condition referred to in Article 51(1), point (a), the relevant provider  shall notify the Commission without delay and in any event within two weeks after that requirement is met or it becomes  known that it will be met. That notification shall include the information necessary to demonstrate that the relevant  requirement has been met. If the Commission becomes aware of a general-purpose AI model presenting systemic risks of  which it has not been notified, it may decide to designate it as a model with systemic risk. 2. The provider of a general-purpose AI model that meets the condition referred to in Article 51(1), point (a), may  present, with its notification, sufficiently substantiated arguments to demonstrate that, exceptionally, although it meets that  requirement, the general-purpose AI model does not present, due to its specific characteristics, systemic risks and therefore  should not be classified as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk. 3. Where the Commission concludes that the arguments submitted pursuant to paragraph 2 are not sufficiently  substantiated and the relevant provider was not able to demonstrate that the general-purpose AI model does not present,  due to its specific characteristics, systemic risks, it shall reject those arguments, and the general-purpose AI model shall be  considered to be a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk. 4. The Commission may designate a general-purpose AI model as presenting systemic risks, ex officio or following  a qualified alert from the scientific panel pursuant to Article 90(1), point (a), on the basis of criteria set out in Annex XIII. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 in order to amend Annex XIII by  specifying and updating the criteria set out in that Annex. 5. Upon a reasoned request of a provider whose model has been designated as a general-purpose AI model with systemic  risk pursuant to paragraph 4, the Commission shall take the request into account and may decide to reassess whether the  general-purpose AI model can still be considered to present systemic risks on the basis of the criteria set out in Annex XIII.  Such a request shall contain objective, detailed and new reasons that have arisen since the designation decision. Providers  may request reassessment at the earliest six months after the designation decision. Where the Commission, following its  reassessment, decides to maintain the designation as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk, providers may request  reassessment at the earliest six months after that decision. 6. The Commission shall ensure that a list of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk is published and shall keep  that list up to date, without prejudice to the need to observe and protect intellectual property rights and confidential  business information or trade secrets in accordance with Union and national law.
Chapter V: GENERAL-PURPOSE AI MODELS
Section 2: Obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models
Article 54: Authorised representatives of providers of general-purpose AI models

1. Prior to placing a general-purpose AI model on the Union market, providers established in third countries shall, by  written mandate, appoint an authorised representative which is established in the Union. 2. The provider shall enable its authorised representative to perform the tasks specified in the mandate received from the  provider. 3. The authorised representative shall perform the tasks specified in the mandate received from the provider. It shall  provide a copy of the mandate to the AI Office upon request, in one of the official languages of the institutions of the  Union. For the purposes of this Regulation, the mandate shall empower the authorised representative to carry out the  following tasks:(a)verify that the technical documentation specified in Annex XI has been drawn up and all obligations referred to in  Article 53 and, where applicable, Article 55 have been fulfilled by the provider;(b)keep a copy of the technical documentation specified in Annex XI at the disposal of the AI Office and national  competent authorities, for a period of 10 years after the general-purpose AI model has been placed on the market, and  the contact details of the provider that appointed the authorised representative;(c)provide the AI Office, upon a reasoned request, with all the information and documentation, including that referred to  in point (b), necessary to demonstrate compliance with the obligations in this Chapter;(d)cooperate with the AI Office and competent authorities, upon a reasoned request, in any action they take in relation to  the general-purpose AI model, including when the model is integrated into AI systems placed on the market or put into  service in the Union. 4. The mandate shall empower the authorised representative to be addressed, in addition to or instead of the provider,  by the AI Office or the competent authorities, on all issues related to ensuring compliance with this Regulation. 5. The authorised representative shall terminate the mandate if it considers or has reason to consider the provider to be  acting contrary to its obligations pursuant to this Regulation. In such a case, it shall also immediately inform the AI Office  about the termination of the mandate and the reasons therefor. 6. The obligation set out in this Article shall not apply to providers of general-purpose AI models that are released under  a free and open-source licence that allows for the access, usage, modification, and distribution of the model, and whose  parameters, including the weights, the information on the model architecture, and the information on model usage, are  made publicly available, unless the general-purpose AI models present systemic risks.
Chapter V: GENERAL-PURPOSE AI MODELS
Section 3: Obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk
Article 55: Obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk

1. In addition to the obligations listed in Articles 53 and 54, providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk  shall:(a)perform model evaluation in accordance with standardised protocols and tools reflecting the state of the art, including  conducting and documenting adversarial testing of the model with a view to identifying and mitigating systemic risks;(b)assess and mitigate possible systemic risks at Union level, including their sources, that may stem from the development,  the placing on the market, or the use of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk;(c)keep track of, document, and report, without undue delay, to the AI Office and, as appropriate, to national competent  authorities, relevant information about serious incidents and possible corrective measures to address them;(d)ensure an adequate level of cybersecurity protection for the general-purpose AI model with systemic risk and the  physical infrastructure of the model. 2. Providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk may rely on codes of practice within the meaning of  Article 56 to demonstrate compliance with the obligations set out in paragraph 1 of this Article, until a harmonised  standard is published. Compliance with European harmonised standards grants providers the presumption of conformity to  the extent that those standards cover those obligations. Providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risks who do  not adhere to an approved code of practice or do not comply with a European harmonised standard shall demonstrate  alternative adequate means of compliance for assessment by the Commission. 3. Any information or documentation obtained pursuant to this Article, including trade secrets, shall be treated in  accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78.
Chapter VI: MEASURES IN SUPPORT OF INNOVATION
Article 61: Informed consent to participate in testing in real world conditions outside AI regulatory sandboxes

1. For the purpose of testing in real world conditions under Article 60, freely-given informed consent shall be obtained  from the subjects of testing prior to their participation in such testing and after their having been duly informed with  concise, clear, relevant, and understandable information regarding:(a) the nature and objectives of the testing in real world conditions and the possible inconvenience that may be linked to  their participation;(b) the conditions under which the testing in real world conditions is to be conducted, including the expected duration of  the subject or subjects’ participation;(c) their rights, and the guarantees regarding their participation, in particular their right to refuse to participate in, and the  right to withdraw from, testing in real world conditions at any time without any resulting detriment and without having  to provide any justification;(d) the arrangements for requesting the reversal or the disregarding of the predictions, recommendations or decisions of  the AI system;(e) the Union-wide unique single identification number of the testing in real world conditions in accordance with Article  60(4) point (c), and the contact details of the provider or its legal representative from whom further information can be  obtained. 2. The informed consent shall be dated and documented and a copy shall be given to the subjects of testing or their legal  representative.
Chapter VI: MEASURES IN SUPPORT OF INNOVATION
Article 62: Measures for providers and deployers, in particular SMEs, including start-ups

1. Member States shall undertake the following actions:(a) provide SMEs, including start-ups, having a registered office or a branch in the Union, with priority access to the AI  regulatory sandboxes, to the extent that they fulfil the eligibility conditions and selection criteria; the priority access  shall not preclude other SMEs, including start-ups, other than those referred to in this paragraph from access to the AI  regulatory sandbox, provided that they also fulfil the eligibility conditions and selection criteria;(b) organise specific awareness raising and training activities on the application of this Regulation tailored to the needs of  SMEs including start-ups, deployers and, as appropriate, local public authorities;(c) utilise existing dedicated channels and where appropriate, establish new ones for communication with SMEs including  start-ups, deployers, other innovators and, as appropriate, local public authorities to provide advice and respond to  queries about the implementation of this Regulation, including as regards participation in AI regulatory sandboxes;(d) facilitate the participation of SMEs and other relevant stakeholders in the standardisation development process. 2. The specific interests and needs of the SME providers, including start-ups, shall be taken into account when setting the  fees for conformity assessment under Article 43, reducing those fees proportionately to their size, market size and other  relevant indicators. 3. The AI Office shall undertake the following actions:(a) provide standardised templates for areas covered by this Regulation, as specified by the Board in its request;(b) develop and maintain a single information platform providing easy to use information in relation to this Regulation for  all operators across the Union;(c) organise appropriate communication campaigns to raise awareness about the obligations arising from this Regulation;(d) evaluate and promote the convergence of best practices in public procurement procedures in relation to AI systems.
Chapter VI: MEASURES IN SUPPORT OF INNOVATION
Article 63: Derogations for specific operators

1. Microenterprises within the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC may comply with certain elements of the  quality management system required by Article 17 of this Regulation in a simplified manner, provided that they do not  have partner enterprises or linked enterprises within the meaning of that Recommendation. For that purpose, the  Commission shall develop guidelines on the elements of the quality management system which may be complied with in  a simplified manner considering the needs of microenterprises, without affecting the level of protection or the need for  compliance with the requirements in respect of high-risk AI systems. 2. Paragraph 1 of this Article shall not be interpreted as exempting those operators from fulfilling any other  requirements or obligations laid down in this Regulation, including those established in Articles 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,  72 and 73.
Chapter VII: GOVERNANCE
Section 1: Governance at Union level
Article 65: Establishment and structure of the European Artificial Intelligence Board

1. A European Artificial Intelligence Board (the ‘Board’) is hereby established. 2. The Board shall be composed of one representative per Member State. The European Data Protection Supervisor shall  participate as observer. The AI Office shall also attend the Board’s meetings, without taking part in the votes. Other national  and Union authorities, bodies or experts may be invited to the meetings by the Board on a case by case basis, where the  issues discussed are of relevance for them. 3. Each representative shall be designated by their Member State for a period of three years, renewable once. 4. Member States shall ensure that their representatives on the Board:(a) have the relevant competences and powers in their Member State so as to contribute actively to the achievement of the  Board’s tasks referred to in Article 66;(b) are designated as a single contact point vis-à-vis the Board and, where appropriate, taking into account Member States’  needs, as a single contact point for stakeholders;(c) are empowered to facilitate consistency and coordination between national competent authorities in their Member State  as regards the implementation of this Regulation, including through the collection of relevant data and information for  the purpose of fulfilling their tasks on the Board. 5. The designated representatives of the Member States shall adopt the Board’s rules of procedure by a two-thirds  majority. The rules of procedure shall, in particular, lay down procedures for the selection process, the duration of the  mandate of, and specifications of the tasks of, the Chair, detailed arrangements for voting, and the organisation of the  Board’s activities and those of its sub-groups. 6. The Board shall establish two standing sub-groups to provide a platform for cooperation and exchange among market  surveillance authorities and notifying authorities about issues related to market surveillance and notified bodies respectively. The standing sub-group for market surveillance should act as the administrative cooperation group (ADCO) for this  Regulation within the meaning of Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. The Board may establish other standing or temporary sub-groups as appropriate for the purpose of examining specific  issues. Where appropriate, representatives of the advisory forum referred to in Article 67 may be invited to such sub-groups  or to specific meetings of those subgroups as observers. 7. The Board shall be organised and operated so as to safeguard the objectivity and impartiality of its activities. 8. The Board shall be chaired by one of the representatives of the Member States. The AI Office shall provide the  secretariat for the Board, convene the meetings upon request of the Chair, and prepare the agenda in accordance with the  tasks of the Board pursuant to this Regulation and its rules of procedure.
Chapter VII: GOVERNANCE
Section 1: Governance at Union level
Article 67: Advisory forum

1. An advisory forum shall be established to provide technical expertise and advise the Board and the Commission, and  to contribute to their tasks under this Regulation. 2. The membership of the advisory forum shall represent a balanced selection of stakeholders, including industry,  start-ups, SMEs, civil society and academia. The membership of the advisory forum shall be balanced with regard to  commercial and non-commercial interests and, within the category of commercial interests, with regard to SMEs and other  undertakings. 3. The Commission shall appoint the members of the advisory forum, in accordance with the criteria set out in  paragraph 2, from amongst stakeholders with recognised expertise in the field of AI. 4. The term of office of the members of the advisory forum shall be two years, which may be extended by up to no more  than four years. 5. The Fundamental Rights Agency, ENISA, the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), the European  Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC), and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) shall be permanent members of the advisory forum. 6. The advisory forum shall draw up its rules of procedure. It shall elect two co-chairs from among its members, in  accordance with criteria set out in paragraph 2. The term of office of the co-chairs shall be two years, renewable once. 7. The advisory forum shall hold meetings at least twice a year. The advisory forum may invite experts and other  stakeholders to its meetings. 8. The advisory forum may prepare opinions, recommendations and written contributions at the request of the Board or  the Commission. 9. The advisory forum may establish standing or temporary sub-groups as appropriate for the purpose of examining  specific questions related to the objectives of this Regulation. 10. The advisory forum shall prepare an annual report on its activities. That report shall be made publicly available.