page_title: Eric A. Havelock
section_title: Toward a new theory of Greek intellectual history
hierarchical_section_title: Eric A. Havelock / Toward a new theory of Greek intellectual history
caption_attribution_description: Français&#160;: Alphabet grec peint sur la panse d'une coupe attique à figures noires. Español: Alfabeto griego arcaico, variante occidental. Deutsch: Frühform des griechischen Alphabets auf einer attischen Schwarzfigurenschale. English: Early Greek alphabet painted on the body of an Attic black-figure cup.
context_page_description: Eric Alfred Havelock was a British classicist who spent most of his life in Canada and the United States. He was a professor at the University of Toronto and was active in the Canadian socialist movement during the 1930s. In the 1960s and 1970s, he served as chair of the classics departments at both Harvard and Yale. Although he was trained in the turn-of-the-20th-century Oxbridge tradition of classical studies, which saw Greek intellectual history as an unbroken chain of related ideas, Havelock broke radically with his own teachers and proposed an entirely new model for understanding the classical world, based on a sharp division between literature of the 6th and 5th centuries BC on the one hand, and that of the 4th on the other.
  Much of Havelock's work was devoted to addressing a single thesis: that all of Western thought is informed by a profound shift in the kinds of ideas available to the human mind at the point that Greek philosophy converted from an oral to a literate form. The idea has been very controversial in classical studies, and has been rejected outright both by many of Havelock's contemporaries and modern classicists.
context_section_description: At the same time that he was becoming increasingly vocal and visible in politics, Havelock's scholarly work was moving toward the concerns that would occupy him for the bulk of his career. The first questions he raised about the relationship between literacy and orality in Greece concerned the nature of the historical Socrates, which was a long-debated issue. Havelock's position, drawn from analyses of Xenophon and Aristophanes as well as Plato himself, was that Plato's presentation of his teacher was largely a fiction, and intended to be a transparent one, whose purpose was to represent indirectly Plato's own ideas. He argued vociferously against the idea associated with John Burnet, which still had currency at the time, that the basic model for the theory of forms originated with Socrates. Havelock's argument drew on evidence for a historical change in Greek philosophy; Plato, he argued, was fundamentally writing about the ideas of his present, not of the past. Most earlier work in the field had assumed that, since Plato uses Socrates as his mouthpiece, his own philosophical concerns must have been similar to those debated in the Athens of his youth, when Socrates was his teacher. Havelock's contention that Socrates and Plato belonged to different philosophical eras was the first instance of one that would become central to his work: that a basic shift in the kinds of ideas being discussed by intellectuals, and the methods of discussing them, happened at some point between the end of the fifth century BC and the middle of the fourth.
  In 1947, Havelock moved to Cambridge, Massachusetts, to take a position at Harvard University, where he remained until 1963. He was active in a number of aspects of the University and of the department, of which he became chair; he undertook a translation of and commentary on Aeschylus' Prometheus Bound for the benefit of his students.  He published this translation, with an extended commentary on Prometheus and the myth's implications for history, under the title The Crucifixion of Intellectual Man (and then changed it back to Prometheus when the book was republished in the 1960s, saying that the earlier title had "come to seem a bit pretentious"). During this time he began his first major attempt to argue for a division between Platonic or Aristotelian philosophy and what came before. His focus was on political philosophy and, in particular, the beginnings of Greek liberalism as introduced by Democritus. In his book The Liberal Temper in Greek Politics, he argued that for Democritus and the liberals, political theory was based on an understanding of "the behaviour of man in a cosmic and historical setting": that is, humanity defined as the poets would define it—measured through its individual actions. Plato and Aristotle were interested in the nature of humanity and, in particular, the idea that human actions might be rooted in inherent qualities rather than consisting of individual choices.
  In arguing for a basic heuristic split between Plato and the contemporaries of Democritus, Havelock was directly contradicting a very long tradition in philosophy that had painstakingly assembled innumerable connections between Plato and the pre-Socratics, to reinforce the position that Plato, as his own dialogues imply, was primarily informed by his teacher Socrates, and that Socrates in turn was a willing participant in a philosophical conversation already several hundred years old (again, with a seeming endorsement from Plato, who shows a young Socrates conversing with and learning from the pre-Socratics Parmenides and Zeno in his dialogue the Parmenides—a historical impossibility that might represent figuratively an intellectual rather than direct conversation). The book was intriguing to many philosophers but was poorly received among some classicists, with one reviewer calling Havelock's argument for basic difference between Plato and the pre-Socratics "a failure" and his analysis of Plato and Aristotle "distortion." Some problems have persisted in research of Greek literacy, and in the main, t
caption: Attic cup inscribed with the Greek alphabet. Havelock argued that the simplicity and spacing of the alphabet was crucial to the development of literate culture.
exif: {"Image Model": "C8080WZ", "Image ImageDescription": "OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA", "Image Orientation": "Horizontal (normal)", "Image DateTime": "2019:06:22 06:55:56", "Image ImageWidth": "1600", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Co-sited", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Inch", "Image ImageLength": "1398", "Image YResolution": "72", "Image PrintIM": "[80, 114, 105, 110, 116, 73, 77, 0, 48, 50, 53, 48, 0, 0, 20, 0, 1, 0, 20, 0, ... ]", "Image Software": "Adobe Photoshop CS Macintosh", "Image ExifOffset": "567", "Image XResolution": "72", "Image Make": "OLYMPUS CORPORATION", "Thumbnail YResolution": "72", "Thumbnail Compression": "JPEG (old-style)", "Thumbnail ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Inch", "Thumbnail XResolution": "72", "EXIF ColorSpace": "Uncalibrated", "EXIF DateTimeDigitized": "2005:12:20 12:58:36", "EXIF FNumber": "16/5", "EXIF FocalLength": "213/10", "EXIF LightSource": "Unknown", "EXIF ExposureMode": "Auto Exposure", "EXIF ExifImageLength": "1398", "EXIF CustomRendered": "Normal", "EXIF MaxApertureValue": "31/10", "EXIF SceneCaptureType": "Standard", "EXIF SceneType": "Directly Photographed", "EXIF DigitalZoomRatio": "0", "EXIF Saturation": "Normal", "EXIF ExposureProgram": "Program Normal", "EXIF Sharpness": "Normal", "EXIF WhiteBalance": "Auto", "EXIF ExifImageWidth": "1600", "EXIF MeteringMode": "Pattern", "EXIF DateTimeOriginal": "2005:12:20 12:58:36", "EXIF FileSource": "Digital Camera", "EXIF GainControl": "Low gain up", "EXIF ComponentsConfiguration": "YCbCr", "EXIF Flash": "Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode", "EXIF ExifVersion": "0220", "EXIF CompressedBitsPerPixel": "2", "EXIF Contrast": "Normal", "EXIF ExposureBiasValue": "0", "EXIF ISOSpeedRatings": "125", "EXIF FlashPixVersion": "0100", "EXIF ExposureTime": "1/15"}