page_title: Palestinian right of return
section_title: Historic attempts at resolution
hierarchical_section_title: Palestinian right of return / Historic attempts at resolution
caption_attribution_description: Copyright note: This photo has been released to the Public Domain, or it is licensed under Creative Commons or cc0, or it falls under the doctrine of Fair Use as of United States copyright law, or I have received written consent by the author, rights owner, licensed source, or otherwise authorized by source to republish photos without any limitations. Therefore, anyone can republish this photo anywhere else in the Internet or any other publication in accordance to the legal copyright status of the photo. Please contact me through flickrmail should you feel you retain legal copyright rights to this photo. This photo has been published exclusively for didactical and/or historical purposes, and disemination is not only allowed, but also encouraged. At the very least, you are free to copy/link this photo as long as you recognize the source. Please don't write me to ask further consent or inform about further use. Source: &lt;a href="http://www.palestineremembered.com"&gt;www.palestineremembered.com&lt;/a&gt; TAGS palestine palestinian al-aqsa al-quds al-quods jerusalem nakba plight solidarity refugee acre west-bank gaza safad ramallah tiberias jaffa tulkarem haifa hebron beersheba al-ramla baysan zionist zionism usa aipac america war 1948 1956 1973 olp fatah arafat hamas peace united-nations middle-east syria siria lebanon iran olive castielli children child land israel israeli occupation pilgrims amnesty human-rights arab muslim islam islamic protest free freedom justice hijra exodus CC0 cc public_domain &lt;a href="http://www.palestineremembered.com"&gt;www.palestineremembered.com&lt;/a&gt;
context_page_description: The Palestinian right of return is the political position or principle that Palestinian refugees, both first-generation refugees and their descendants, have a right to return, and a right to the property they themselves or their forebears left behind or were forced to leave in what is now Israel and the Palestinian territories, as part of the 1948 Palestinian exodus, a result of the 1948 Palestine war, and due to the 1967 Six-Day War.
  Formulated for the first time on 27 June 1948 by United Nations mediator Folke Bernadotte, proponents of the right of return hold that it is a sacred right, as well as a human right, whose applicability both generally and specifically to the Palestinians is protected under international law. This view holds that those who opt not to return or for whom return is not feasible, should receive compensation in lieu. Proponents argue that Israel's position stands in contrast with its Law of Return that grants all Jews the right to settle permanently, while withholding any comparable right from Palestinians.
  Opponents of the right of return hold that there is no basis for it in international law, and that it is an unrealistic demand.
context_section_description: Since the Palestinian exodus of 1948, there have been many attempts to resolve the right of return dispute. These have produced minor results at best.
  In 1949, Mark Etheridge, the American representative to the United Nations Conciliation Commission (UNCC), suggested that Israel agree to grant full citizenship to the 70,000 Arab residents in the Gaza Strip, as well as its 200,000 refugees, on the condition that the Gaza Strip—then part of Egypt—be incorporated into Israel. Israel's delegation to the UNCC accepted this offer, although this plan was rejected and criticized by Arab government, the United States, and even Israel's own government.
  In the Lausanne Conference, Israel announced to the UNCC on August 3, 1949, that it would allow up to 100,000 Palestinian refugees to return into Israel. But this plan was not designed as a panacea for the refugee crisis. Rather, it was to "form a part of a general plan for resettlement of refugees which would be established by a special organ to be created … by the United Nations." Israel reserved the right to permit settlement of the refugees only in areas in which settlement would not be detrimental to the security and economy of the state. The UNCC and Arab governments communicated unofficially at the matter. The Arab governments agreed to the offer, but under drastically different terms: that it apply only to the area originally allotted to Israel under the Partition Plan, that all refugees originating from areas allotted to Arabs or under international control be immediately allowed to return to their homes, and that Israel exercise no control over the location of resettlement. Since the parties failed to agree on the terms of the measure, it died in July of the following year, as Israeli Foreign Minister Moshe Sharett declared: "The context in which that offer was made has disappeared, and Israel is no longer bound by that offer."
  On August 23, 1949, the United States sent Gordon R. Clapp, chairman of the board of the Tennessee Valley Authority, on the Clapp Mission. This mission was tasked with economic surveying, to estimate Arab states' capability of absorbing Palestinian refugees. This mission failed dramatically in achieving this goal. Clapp explained on February 16, 1950, in front of the American House Foreign Affairs Committee: "Resettlement was a subject that the Arab governments were not willing to discuss, with the exception of King Abdallah  [sic]". The mission concluded that, although repatriation would be the best solution to the refugee question, circumstances on the ground would only allow philanthropic relief. Moreover, it recommended that this relief be limited to four small pilot projects: in Jordan, the West Bank, Lebanon, and Syria.
  On December 2, 1950, the United Nations General Assembly passed resolution 393 by a vote of 46 in favor, 0 against, 6 abstaining. This resolution allocated, for the period 1 July 1951 to 30 June 1952, "not less than the equivalent of $30,000,000" for the economic reintegration of Palestinian refugees in the Near East "either by repatriation or resettlement", their permanent re-establishment and removal from relief, "without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph 11 of General Assembly Resolution 194". Toward this goal, Israel donated the equivalent of $2.8 million, and Arab states pledged almost $600,000. The United States accounted for the greatest pledge with $25 million.
  On November 29, 1951, John B. Blandford Jr., then director of UNRWA, proposed spending $50 million on relief for Palestinian refugees, and another $200 million on their integration into the communities where they resided. The New York Times reported that Blandford aspired to see 150,000 to 250,000 refugees resettled in Arab nations by building an economic infrastructure which would make their integration more plausible and sustainable for Arab societies. On January 26, 1952, the General Assembly accepted his proposal. In 1955, Henry Richardson Labouisse, who had by that time become UNRWA's third director, reported that "Resistance to self-support programme
caption: Identification Card of Ahmad Said, a Palestinian refugee
exif: {"Image ImageDescription": "Copyright note: This photo has been released to the Public Domain, or it is licensed under Creative Commons, or it falls under the doctrine of Fair Use as of United States copyright law, or I have received written consent by the author, rights owner, licensed source, or otherwise authorized by source to republish photos without any limitations. In any case it is widely posted in the Internet at large. Therefore, anyone can republish this photo anywhere else in the Internet or any other publication in accordance to the legal copyright status of the photo. This photo has been published exclusively for non-commercial didactical and historical purposes to illustrate the inalienable Right of Return of the Palestinians to their 1948 lands and homes in Palestine. Disemination of such didactical illustration is not only allowed, but also encouraged. At the very least, you are free to copy/link this photo as long as you recognize the source. Please contact me through flickrmail should you feel you retain legal copyright rights to this photo to accommodate all your requirements. Source: www.palestineremembered.com\n\nTAGS palestine palestinian jerusalem nakba plight solidarity refugee acre west-bank gaza safad ramallah  tiberias jaffa tulkarem haifa hebron beersheba al-ramla baysan zionist zionism usa america war 1948 1956 1973 olp fatah arafat hamas peace unitednations wmd middle-east al-aqsa al-quds al-quods syria siria lebanon iran olive castielli children child land israel israeli occupation pilgrims amnesty human rights arab muslim islam islamic www.palestineremembered.com protest free freedom justice hijra exodus", "Image Make": "Nikon", "Image Model": "Nikon", "Image Artist": "palestine palestinian jerusalem nakba plight solidarity refugee acre west-bank gaza safad ramallah  tiberias jaffa tulkarem haifa hebron beersheba al-ramla baysan zionist zionism usa america war 1948 1956 1973 olp fatah arafat hamas peace unitednations wmd middle-east al-aqsa al-quds al-quods syria siria lebanon iran olive castielli children child land israel israeli occupation pilgrims amnesty human rights arab muslim islam islamic www.palestineremembered.com protest free freedom justice hijra exodus Public-Domain Creative-Commons Fair-Use-US-Law", "Image Tag 0x0320": "palestine palestinian jerusalem nakba plight solidarity refugee acre west-bank gaza safad ramallah  tiberias jaffa tulkarem haifa hebron beersheba al-ramla baysan zionist zionism usa america war 1948 1956 1973 olp fatah arafat hamas peace unitednations wmd middle-east al-aqsa al-quds al-quods syria siria lebanon iran olive castielli children child land israel israeli occupation pilgrims amnesty human rights arab muslim islam islamic www.palestineremembered.com protest free freedom justice hijra exodus Public-Domain Creative-Commons Fair-Use-US-Law", "Image Copyright": "Public-Domain Creative-Commons Fair-Use-US-Law Source www.palestineremembered.com", "Image ExifOffset": "2936"}