Document:

THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN:

FRENCH PEAK RESOURCES INC. Suite 1700

300 Park Avenue

New York, NY USA 10022

Attention: Robert Waters

and

DAVID DEERING 7954 – 18th Avenue Burnaby, BC V3N 1J6

RE: SALE AND ACQUISITION OF MINERAL CLAIMS,

NORTH-CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA

 

The following terms and conditions are applicable for the sale of 46 mineral one 65 km northeast of Smithers, British Columbia, Canada by David Deering (herein after referred to as “DD”) to French Peak Resources Inc. (herein after referred to as “FPR”). Both DD and FPR agree to the following:

	
            a)
 	
            DD will transfer title to the French mineral claim listed in Exhibit “A” and outlined in Exhibit “B” to FPR within 30 days of this agreement. These claims will be contiguous hard rock mineral claims covering 183.83 hectares.
 
	
            b)
 	
            DD will provide to FPR within 30 days of this agreement a geological report summarizing the mineral claims, particulars of recent sampling and geological investigation, copies of all records, a budget for further work and recommendations, and all other information and material relevant to a geological report requisite for filing with the regulatory bodies.
 

 

 

 

Page 2 of 13

 

	
            c)  
 	
            DD will ensure that the claims shall be maintained in good standing for up to 24 months from the date of claim recording and can provide geological consulting services for the claims.
 
	
            d)
 	
            DD shall sell 100% (one hundred percent) interest in the claims to FPR subject to a 21⁄2% Net Smelter Royalty (NSR) a total of $25,000.00. 11⁄2% of the NSR can be acquired for $1.0 million within 12 months from commencement of commercial production. Advance royalties of $20,000 shall be paid annually commencing January 17, 2010.
 
	
            e) 
 	
            If FPR fails to make the advance royalty payments on the 5 year anniversary of the claims, as described in (d) above, then FPR agrees to transfer ownership of the subject mining claims to DD within no less than a 10 day period.
 

FPR shall:

	
            i)
 	
            Pay $15,000 to DD on or before June 15, 2005 and a further $20,000 on or before December 15, 2006.
 
	
            ii)
 	
            Provide the name and number of an individual or corporate Free Miner Certificate to transfer the claims into.
 

By signature witnessed below, the undersigned hereby acknowledge that they have read and understood and agree to the aforementioned terms.

	
            Dated at Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada this
 	
            day of
 	
            _____, 2005.
 
	
            per French Peak Resources Inc.
 	
            David Deering
 	
             

					

 

	
            Witness
 	
            Witness
 

 

Print name                                        Print Name

 

 

 

Page 3 of 13

Footnotes to Agreement

 

	
            1)
 	
            All dollar figures are denoted in the currency of the United States of America.
 

 

	
            2)
 	
            The total to be paid by FPR to DD or third parties for the claims is $25,000 inclusive of assessment.
 

 

	
            3) 
 	
            To maintain claims in British Columbia annual assessment work is required of $0.40 per hectare in year 1-3 per claim, followed by $0.80 per hectare thereafter. There is a filing fee of $10 per $100 expended per claim.
 

 

4)               Attached are definitions of NSR.

 

 

 

Page 4 of 13

Advance Royalty Payments means from time to time payments to the Optionor by the Optionee before Commencement of Commercial Production of Minerals.

Commencement of Commercial Production, with respect to Minerals or Rock, as the case may be, means:

	
            (a) 
 	
            if a mill is located on the subject property, the last day of a period of forty (40) consecutive days in which, for not less than thirty (30) days, the mill processed Mineral or Rock from the Property at 60% of its rated capacity; or
 
	
            (b)
 	
            if no Mill is located on the Property, the last day of the first period of thirty (30) consecutive days during which Mineral or Rock has been shipped from the Property on a reasonably regular basis for the purpose of earning revenues; or
 

	
            (c)
 	
            with respect to Rock, following the 30th day of extraction for commercial use.
 

No period of time during which ore or concentrate is shipped from the Property for testing purposes or during which milling operations are undertaken as initial tune-up will be taken into account in determining the date of Commencement of Commercial Production.

Gross Rock Revenue means, for any period, the gross proceeds received by the Optionee in that period from the sale of Rock produced from the Property less any treatment, beneficiation or other changes or penalties deducted by the purchase to whom such Rock is shipped, less:

	
            (a)
 	
            all costs of the Optionee associated with such sales involving handling, weighing, sampling, determination of water content, insuring, packaging and transporting Rock;
 

	
            (b)
 	
            the costs of marketing, including rebates or allowances made or given; and
 

	
            (c)
 	
            any sales, severance, gross production, privilege or similar taxes (other than income taxes or mining taxes based on income).
 

Minerals means the ores or concentrates of minerals, as that term is defined in the Mineral Tenure Act (British Columbia), and the rock that is part of such ores and concentrates sold by the Optionee.

 

 

 

Page 5 or 13

Net Smelter Return means, for any period the difference between: 

	
            (a)
	
            the sum of:

(i)       the gross proceeds received by the Optionee in that period from the sale of Minerals produced from the property to a party that is arm’s length to the Optionee, or that would have been received by the Optionee if the purchase of the Minerals were at arm’s length to the Optionee; and

(ii) in the case of the sale of Minerals that are ores that have not been processed in a Mill, the estimated cost that would have been incurred in crushing and beneficiating such Minerals in a Mill as agreed by the parties or otherwise determined by a competent mining or metallurgical engineer;

and

(b)             the sum of

 

	
            (i)
 	
            all amounts paid on account of Advance Royalty Payments;
 	
             

	
            (ii)
 	
            any insurance costs in connection with shipping such Minerals;
 

(iii)            any costs of transport

(iv)all costs of the Optionee associated with such sales involving handling, weighing, sampling, determination of water content, insuring and packaging;

	
            (v)
 	
            the costs of marketing, adjusted for rebates or allowance made or given;
 

(vi)            any sales, severance, gross production, privilege or similar taxes (other than income taxes or mining taxes based on income) assessed on or in connection with the Minerals or the value thereof; and

(vii)           any treatment, beneficiation or other charges or penalties deducted by any smelter or refinery to which such Minerals are shipped that have not been previously deducted in the computation of gross proceeds.

 

 

 

Page 6 of 13

Net Smelter Royalty means the percentage of Net Smelter Return from time to time payable to the Optionor after Commencement of Commercial Production from the sale of Minerals.

Rock means all substances that are mined from the Property and sold by the Optionee that are not Minerals.

Rock Royalty means the amount of royalty from time to time payable to the Optionor after Commencement of Commercial Production from the sale of Rock pursuant to Section 11.06.

 

 

 

Page 7 of 13

EXHIBIT A:

 

 

Mineral Claims

 

Page 8 of 13

 

 

 

 

 

Page 9 of 13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 12 of 13

EXHIBIT B:

Claim MapFRENCH PEAK RESOURCES INC

1600 Golf Road Suite 1200 

Rolling Meadows, Illinois 

60008

 

 

TRUST AGREEMENT

 

 

December 15, 2005

 

 

In accordance with the instructions of the Board of Directors of the Corporation I, Robert Waters, President will hold the French Claim as described in Appendix A attached to this TRUST AGREEMENT IN Trust for the CORPORATION as President of the CORPORATION. If I resign from position of President than I will immediately transfer the French Claim to the new President of the CORPORATION.

 

 

	
            .  
 	
            .
 

Robert Waters President

 

Free Miner License Number: 202022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX  “A”

 

FRENCH Claim Description

Omineca Mining Division

British Columbia, Canada

NTS 93M/7W

Centred Approximately

 

Latitude 55° 22’ N   Longitude 127° 55’ W

 

The following claim comprises the FRENCH mineral claim as described in the Trust Agreement dated December 15, 2005:

	
            Name
 	
            Record Number
 	
            Units
 	
            Anniversary Date
 
	
            FRENCH
 	
            503975
 	
            183.83
 	
            January 17,2006Summary Geology Report:  

French Peak Property

 

Suskwa River Drainage

Omineca Mining Division

British Columbia, Canada

NTS 93M/7W

Latitude 55° 22’ N   Longitude 127° 55’ W

 

For:

French Peak Resources Inc.

Suite 1700

300 Park Avenue

New York, NY

USA  10022

 

Author:

George E. Nicholson, P.Geo, FRGS

 

August 31, 2005

 

 

 

Table of Contents

	
            Table of Contents
 	
            2
 
	
            List of Figures
 	
            3
 
	
            Glossary of Terms
 	
            3
 
	
            1.
 	
            Summary
 	
            4
 
	
            2.
 	
            Disclaimer
 	
            6
 	
             

	
            3.
 	
            Introduction and Terms of Reference
 	
            7
 
	
            4.
 	
            Claim Acquisition and Information
 	
            8
 	
             

	
            5.
 	
            Location and Access
 	
            10
 	
             

	
            6.
 	
            Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and  Physiography
 	
            11
 
	
            7.
 	
            History
 	
            12
 
	
             
	
            1967-1969  Suskwa Group
 	
            12
 
	
             
	
            1969-1972 French Peak Property
 	
            12
 
	
             
	
            1984-1990
 	
            13
 
	
             
	
            1990
 	
            13
 
	
            8.
 	
            Geology
 	
            14
 
	
             
	
            Alteration
 	
            14
 
	
             
	
            Mineralization
 	
            14
 
	
            9.
 	
            Conclusions
 	
            17
 
	
            10.
 	
            Recommendations and Budget
 	
            18
 	
             

	
             
	
            Budget:  Phase 1
 	
            19
 	
             

	
             
	
            Budget:  Phase 2
 	
            19
 	
             

	
            11.
 	
            Statement of Qualifications
 	
            20
 
	
            Appendix I:  Claim Information
 	
            21
 
								

 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 2
 

 

 

 

List of Figures

	
            Figure 1. Location Map
 	
            7
 	
             

	
            Figure 2. Claim Map
 	
            12
 
	
            Figure 3. Geology Map
 	
            21
 
				

 

Glossary of Terms

Advance Royalty Payments: Means from time to time payments to the Optionor by the Optionee before Commencement of Commercial Production of Minerals.

GSC:  Geological Survey of Canada

Net Smelter Return:  Means for any period the gross proceeds received by the Optionee from the sale of Minerals produced from the property less expenses.

Porphyry Copper:  disseminated copper minerals in a large body of porphyry, a rock containing phenocrysts in a fine grained mass

Metasedimentary:  sedimentary rocks that have been subjected to heat and/or pressure resulting in some metamorphism

Faults:  large shear zones with significant amount of movement between adjoining rock bodies

ppm:  parts per million

ppb:  parts per billion

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 3
 

 

 

 

	
            1.
 	
            Summary
 

The French Peak property has not received adequate exploration in the past 30 years. Early work discovered a large copper-gold-silver porphyry system with copper values in the 0.1% to 0.2% range with molybdenum up to 0.02%. Very few gold assays were collected while a few silver assays yielded up to 0.65 oz/ton. Sulphide float discovered in 1984 yielded 7.05 ppm Au and 700.8 ppm Ag. Very little sampling below the weathered zone was done and several zones remain untested.

In light of increased metal prices a concerted exploration programme utilizing advances in geochemical assaying, geophysical surveying, and geological knowledge is recommended to determine the merits of the property. A Phase I budget is proposed costing $16,000. Success contingent, Phase II is projected to cost $85,000. 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 4
 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1. Location Map

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 5
 

 

 

 

	
            2.
 	
            Disclaimer
 

The author has prepared this report based upon information believed to be accurate at the time of completion but which is not guaranteed. The author has relied on two principal sources of information for the data contained in this report, that being the work completed and unpublished report provided by a former owner of the French Peak showing, and publicly available federal and provincial government documents such as geological maps and reports on the area.

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 6
 

 

 

 

	
            3.
 	
            Introduction and Terms of Reference
 

French Peak Resources Inc. is a private mineral exploration company based in New York, New York that has acquired minerals rights to the French mineral claims. The claims were staked January, 2005 to cover an area identified as containing a large area of anomalous porphyry copper-gold-silver-molybdenum mineralization. The author was engaged by Mr. Robert Waters, President of French Peak Resources Inc. to review the available literature, visit the property, prepare this report and make recommendations.

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 7
 

 

 

 

	
            4.
 	
            Claim Acquisition and Information
 

The French Peak group consists of the mineral claim French. The claim covers 183.83 hectares. The claims were acquired from David Deering, of Burnaby, BC. They were acquired by French Peak Resources Inc. for al payment of $66,500 (USD). Deering retains a 21⁄2% Net Smelter Return. Advance annual royalties of $20,000 will commence on January 17, 2010. The claims will be transferred to Robert Waters, the President of French Peak Resources Inc. who will hold them in trust for the company.

The claims are located in the Omineca Mining Division at coordinates: Latitude 55° 27’ N and longitude 127° 55’ W and on map sheet NTS: 93M/07W and are outlined in Figure 2.

The pertinent property information is as follows:

	
            Claim Name

 
 	
            Tenure No.
 	
            Hectares
 	
            Anniversary Date
 
	
            French
 	
            503975
 	
            183.83
 	
            January 17, 2006
 

 

In British Columbia, for assessment purposes in the first two years, $0.40 per hectare of work or cash in lieu per unit plus 10% filing fees are due to maintain the claims in good standing. Thereafter it rises to $0.80 per hectare plus 10% filing fees. The claims have not been legally surveyed. 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 8
 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2. Claim Map

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 9
 

 

 

 

	
            5.
 	
            Location and Access
 

The French Peak claims is located in the Omineca Mining Division on N.T.S. Mapsheet 93M/7W. The claims are 65 km northeast of Smithers, BC; in the Suskwa River drainage.

At present, the claims are accessed by helicopter from Smithers. A major logging road up the Suskwa River comes within 15 km of the property. A bulldozer track following the Suskwa River runs 2 km south of the property.

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 10
 

 

 

 

	
            6.
 	
            Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and
 

Physiography

The French Peak claim covers an alpine plateau and treed creek valleys at an average of 1500 metres. French Peak is a conical feature 3 km east of the property. The property area is mostly overburden covered. Alpine vegetation occurs above 1800 m while mature spruce, hemlock and cedar forests occur at lower elevations. Given the location in north central BC, winters are cold with average temperatures of -20°C to -30°C and 3-5 metres of snow. Snowfall lasts from mid-October to mid-June. Summers are dry and cool with temperatures averaging only 15°C.

The property is 65 km northeast from Smithers, a major infrastructure hub for the region. All services are available here:  airports, roads, rail, hospitals, police, groceries and supplies, heavy equipment and qualified equipment contractors.

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 11
 

 

 

 

	
            7.
 	
            History
 

1967-1969 

Suskwa Group

Property worked by Mastodon-Highland Bell Mines. Work included geology, soil geochemistry, geophysics, and bulldozer trenching.

Soil geochemical surveys outlined a number of copper anomalies in the 1000 to 2500 ppm range. IP surveys located several conductive zones. Subsequent bulldozer trenching totalling 1500 metres uncovered mineralized intrusive and sediments, though much of the trenching failed to reach bedrock. Mineralized zones tended to be highly weathered. Chip sampling of exposed rocks returned copper values frequently below those of the overlying soils, suggesting mineral concentration within the soils. However, a soil study by Barringer Research Ltd. concluded that, due to the acidic nature of the soils, mineral concentration was not likely, and that a higher grade source may be producing the soil anomalies.

Conductive zones outlined by IP were found to correlate with zones of higher sulphides, showing the effectiveness of geophysics as an exploration tool for the property.

Results from chip sampling of trenches included 33.5 metres of 0.22% Cu and 1.1 oz/Ton Ag. No gold assays were recorded.

1969-1972

French Peak Property

The property was allowed to lapse in 1969 by Mastodon-Highland Bell and subsequently was staked by Silver Standard Mines Ltd. Silver Standard’s work included further geology, soil geochemistry, geophysics and bulldozer trenching. In 1971, six diamond droll holes totalling 460 metres were drilled. 

Further soil geochemistry, geophysics, and trenching were undertaken by Silver Standard to help delineate the best zones for diamond drill testing. Drilling was done to sample mineralized zones below the weathering profile. All holes were drilled close to the western intrusive/sediment contact. Overall, holes averaged about 0.1% 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 12
 

 

 

Cu, 0.02% Mo. The best result was 27.5 metres with 0.22% Cu, 0.011% Mo. Only one gold assay was reported (0.003 oz/ton). A few silver assays were reported (in the 0.04 to 0.64 oz/ton range.)

The drilling only tested what was believed to be the most promising zone from previous work. A number of soil and geophysical anomalies topographically above any trenching were never tested. The property was subsequently allowed to lapse.

1984-1990

The property was staked by Ryan Exploration Company Ltd. on June 27, 1984 to cover a 2.1 ppm Ag stream sediment anomaly from the 1984 BC Govt. open file geochemical release for mapsheet 93M.

Work for Ryan Exploration included one day of prospecting in 1984 and a short geological, soil and rock geochemistry and geophysics program in 1985. This work was undertaken without access to data from any of the previous work.

Limited soil geochemistry and geophysics confirmed the usefulness of these techniques for further exploration on the property. Rock geochemistry indicated the presence of low but significant gold values in the mineralized zones (highs of 0.11 to 0.21 ppm Au), as well as significant silver values (frequently 2.0 to 7.0 ppm with a high of 23.0 ppm Ag). A sample of sulphide rich float assayed 7.05 ppm Au and 700.8 ppm Ag.

1990

Sporadic prospecting has ensued in the area of the claims from 1990 onwards.

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 13
 

 

 

 

	
            8.
 	
            Geology
 

The property is underlain by Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous Bowser lake Group sediments which have been intruded by Late Cretaceous Bulkley Intrusions (Figure 3).

The sediments are comprised of siltstone to conglomerate with minor interbedded volcaniclastic rocks. The intrusive rocks can be divided into 3 units. An early quartz monzonite was intruded by a feldspar porphyry which was in turn intruded by a Biotite Feldspar porphyry.

Post mineralization dykes with magnetite intrude earlier rocks. Major north-south, and east-west fault/lineaments transect the area.

Alteration

The sediments have been hornfelsed by the Bulkley Intrusions. Within the intrusive rocks, especially along the western contact with the hornfelsed sediments, moderate to locally intense kaolinization and weak to moderate silicification occur.

An extensive pyrite halo, 2 km wide in an east-west direction by 1.5 km in a north-south direction, can be traced on the property.

Mineralization

Sulphide mineralization increases with increasing alteration intensity. Sulphides are predominately pyrite (2 to 5%, locally 20%), with lesser chalcopyrite, galena, sphalerite, tetrahedrite and arsenopyrite.

Pyrite occurs disseminated within the sediments and intrusive rocks and within later quartz ( calcite stringers. The remaining sulphides are found primarily in late stage Quartz stringers. Massive pyrite ( arsenopyrite veins (1 to 10 cm wide), occur locally.

Results from rock chip sampling of bulldozer trenches ranged from trace mineralization to 33.5 metres of 0.22% Cu, 1.1 oz/ton Ag. Drilling results form 6 holes averaged around 0.1% Cu with 0.02% molybdenite. The best drill intersection was 27.5 metres with 0,22% Cu, 0.011% Mo. Only one gold assay is reported from the trenching and 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 14
 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3. Geology Map

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 15
 

 

 

 

drilling programs. Later chip sampling of the trenches returned results as high as 0.21 ppm Au. A grab sample of sulphide rich float assayed 7.05 ppm gold and 700.8 ppm silver.

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 16
 

 

 

 

	
            9.
 	
            Conclusions
 

Mineralization on the French Peak property is now being viewed primarily as copper-gold-silver in a porphyry stockwork setting. Late stage cross-cutting quartz-calcite-sulphide veins within an intrusive quartz-feldspar porphyry and the adjacent volcanic and sedimentary rocks are demonstrative of epigenetic activity.

The last serious exploration efforts were over 30 years ago that delineated a large area of lower grade copper, molybdenum and zinc ore body. Higher grade sections are not entirely understood. With increased metal prices, a greater knowledge of depositional models, and advances in geochemical and geophysical techniques, a concerted exploration program needs to be undertaken on the French Peak claim to fully assess its potential.

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 17
 

 

 

 

	
            10.
 	
            Recommendations and Budget
 

Previous work on the property has discovered porphyry type mineralization with 0.1 to 0.22% copper and associated molybdenum and zinc values over significant widths by following up geochemical and geophysical surveys with trenching and diamond drilling. With recent price increases for the metals found on the property, the grades of mineralization are interesting and many anomalies remain untested.

The limited analysis for gold and silver suggest that these elements may occur with the copper mineralization in economically significant concentrations. The property should be re-evaluated as a potential copper-gold-silver deposit.

Work to date shows that the mineralization is responsive to geophysical techniques and to soil geochemistry. Exploration on the property should include re-evaluating any old geochemical data available, testing the correlation between gold geochemistry and copper-lead-zinc geochemistry, and then doing any further soil sampling required to cover the potential mineralized zone.

A new IP survey should be conducted over the entire claim.

The on-site drill core from the 1971 drilling is reported to be in very poor condition. Some drill core could be assayed for gold content.

This work should be followed up by trenching of prospective areas not previously trenched. Trenching may not always possible due to the depth of the overburden. Assay results from trench sampling may not provide good results due to strong weathering, but the strength of mineralization should be apparent.

A diamond drill program should then be undertaken to test the best mineralized/altered areas previously uncovered and any new zones outlined.

Due to the elevation of the property, field work should not start until July. The geochemical and geophysical work could be done in July followed by backhoe trenching in August. A limited diamond drill program testing the gold potential could then be 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 18
 

 

 

conducted in late August or September. Further diamond drilling would be contingent on results from the initial drilling.

Budget:  Phase 1

 

Budget:  Phase 2

 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 19
 

 

 

 

	
            11.
 	
            Statement of Qualifications
 

I, GEORGE E. NICHOLSON, of 21910 – 61st Avenue, Langley, British Columbia hereby certify that:

	
            1.
 	
            I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia with a degree in Geology (B.Sc., 1986);
 

	
            2.
 	
            I have practiced my profession as a Geologist continuously since graduation;
 

	
            3.
 	
            I am a director of Nicholson and Associates Natural Resource Development Inc., and directed the exploration during 2004 and 2005;
 
	
            4.
 	
            I am a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia (No. 19796);
 

	
            5.
 	
            I am a Fellow of the Royal Geographic Society (No. 423161);
 

	
            6.
 	
            There are no material facts or material changes in the subject matter of this report that would mislead the reader;
 
	
            7.
 	
            I have no interest, direct or indirect, in the properties or common shares of French Peak Resources Inc., nor do I expect to receive any;
 
	
            8.
 	
            I hereby grant my permission for French Peak Resources Inc. to use this Report for any corporate use normal to their business.
 

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia this 31st day of August, 2005.

	
            ____________________________________
 
	
            George E. Nicholson, P.Geo., FRGS
 	
             

 

 

 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 20
 

 

 

Appendix I:

 

Claim Information

 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 21
 

 

 

 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 22
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 23
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 24
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

	
            French Peak Report
 	
            August 2005
 	
            Page 25

Source: [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00095-of-00352.parquet"}, [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00095-of-00352.parquet"}], [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00095-of-00352.parquet"}]]