Document:

Non-Interference Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2006

 Exhibit 10.3 
 THIS AGREEMENT (herein referred to as the “Non-Interference Agreement”), dated as of October 6, 2006 by and among BCE Inc. (“BCE”), a corporation incorporated under the
laws of Canada, Telesat Canada (“Telesat”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada, Mobile Satellite Ventures (Canada) Inc. (“MSV Canada”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario,
Mobile Satellite Ventures Holdings (Canada) Inc. (“Holdco”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario and Mobile Satellite Ventures LP (“MSV US”), a limited partnership governed by the
laws of the State of Delaware. 
 WHEREAS TMI Communications and Company, Limited Partnership (“TMI”), a limited
partnership formed under, and governed by, the laws of the Province of Quebec, and MSV US are the shareholders of Holdco, and Holdco and MSV US are the shareholders of MSV Canada; 
 WHEREAS TMI, Holdco, MSV Canada and MSV US are the parties to a shareholders agreement dated as of November 26, 2001, as amended, (the
“Shareholders Agreement”) related to the affairs of Holdco and MSV Canada; 
 WHEREAS BCE and Telesat directly or
indirectly hold all of the partnership interests in TMI; 
 WHEREAS, MSV Canada holds Canadian licences related to its operations in
the L-Band (as hereinafter defined); 
 WHEREAS MSV Canada, Holdco and MSV US wish to further identify their interests in the L-Band
and to obtain certain non-interference assurances from BCE and Telesat; and 
 WHEREAS BCE and Telesat wish to further identify their
interests in the L-Band and in the other radio frequency spectrum and to obtain certain non-interference assurances from MSV Canada and Holdco. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements and obligations set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 

 

	1.	DEFINITIONS 

  

	1.1.	In this Non-Interference Agreement, in addition to the capitalized terms defined elsewhere herein, the following capitalized terms have the following meanings:

 “Act” means the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) as now enacted or as the same may from time to
time be amended, re-enacted or replaced. 
 “Affiliate” has the meaning set out in the Act. 
 “Associated Licences” means the rights granted by a regulatory organization to use an orbital location for the purposes of operating a
communications satellite that provides a communications service in the L-Band, and the associated satellite-to-earth-station and 

 
earth-station-to-satellite feeder links that are used to communicate with that satellite, as well as any authorization material to the implementation of the
ancillary terrestrial component (“ATC”) associated with the L-Band. 
 “Interfering Act” means any communication,
written or oral, whether public or private, to any governmental official or regulatory organization or international telecommunications organization (including the ITU), or directed at the media (if made by an identified and authorized BCE
spokesperson or Telesat spokesperson, as the case may be, and where such communication directed at the media is not subsequently denied within 5 days after notice is given by MSV US to BCE or Telesat, as the case may be, that such communication was
made), that could reasonably be expected to materially impair (i) the utilization by MSV US or MSV Canada of any L-Band Spectrum Licences and any Associated Licences necessary for the use of such L-Band spectrum currently held by MSV US or MSV
Canada or their Subsidiaries, (ii) the utilization of L-Band spectrum licensed to MSV US and/or MSV Canada and/or L-Band Spectrum Licences (or obtaining any new L-Band Licences required) for ATC purposes; or (iii) the efforts of MSV US or
MSV Canada to acquire and utilize other L-Band Spectrum Licences, provided that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to require BCE, Telesat or any of their Subsidiaries or Affiliates to affirmatively facilitate the use by MSV US or MSV
Canada of any spectrum or Spectrum Licence (or prohibit BCE, Telesat or any of their Subsidiaries or Affiliates from opposing any efforts by MSV US or MSV Canada to require BCE, Telesat or any of their Subsidiaries or Affiliates to do so). For
purposes of clarity, and not by way of limitation, any such communication requesting, supporting or promoting a process to auction, license or sell any L-Band Spectrum would be an Interfering Act. 
 “L-Band” means the 1525-1544/1545-1559 and 1626.5-1645.5/1646.5-1660.5 MHz radio frequency bands. 
 “Spectrum Licence” means a spectrum licence issued by a regulatory organization that authorises the holder thereof (and its customers or
other permitted users) to make use of a specified radiofrequency band, and which may specify a specific geographic area to which such authorization applies. 
 “Subsidiary” has the meaning set out in the Act but excludes (i) an issuer whose securities are publicly traded on an organized securities marketplace other than, for BCE, Bell Canada,
(ii) MSV Satellite Ventures (Canada) Inc. and MSV Satellite Ventures Holdings (Canada) Inc. and (iii) Terrestar Networks (Canada) Inc. and Terrestar Networks Holdings (Canada) Inc. 
  

	2.	NON-INTERFERENCE BY BCE AND TELESAT 

  

	2.1.	 Neither BCE, Telesat nor any of their respective direct or indirect Subsidiaries (whether as of the date hereof or subsequently acquired or created) nor their
respective directors, employees, agents and representatives acting on behalf of BCE or one of its Subsidiaries or Telesat or one of its Subsidiaries (as the case may be), shall commit any Interfering Act. BCE and Telesat shall use reasonable
commercial efforts to cause their respective Subsidiaries that are excluded from the definition of “Subsidiary” because their securities are publicly traded (“Excluded Subsidiaries”) not to commit any Interfering Act. 

	 	 
Notwithstanding the foregoing, BCE and Telesat shall not be deemed to be in breach of their respective obligations hereunder if an Interfering Act is
committed by one of their respective Subsidiaries (excluding Telesat itself) in order for such Subsidiary or the directors, employees, agents or representatives of such Subsidiary to comply with their legal (including fiduciary) obligations or
contractual obligations, provided that such contractual obligations were entered into by the Subsidiary and a third party that is not an Affiliate (before or after the date hereof) in good faith with no specific intention to avoid the covenants
provided for in this Agreement, and, in the case of a wholly-owned Subsidiary, without knowledge of BCE or Telesat, as the case may be, and any determination to engage in such activities by the directors, employees, agents or representatives of such
Subsidiary to comply with their legal (including fiduciary) obligations was not with the intention of circumventing the covenants provided for in this Agreement. Nothing in this Non-Interference Agreement restricts BCE, Telesat or any Subsidiary or
Excluded Subsidiary of BCE or Telesat, whether alone or in conjunction with one or more third parties, from applying or bidding for Spectrum Licences in the L-Band or Associated Licences in a government sponsored auction or other government process,
solely to the extent neither BCE nor any Subsidiary of BCE or Telesat nor any Subsidiary of Telesat (as the case may be) covered by this Agreement committed a breach of the covenant provided for in this Section 2.1 resulting in such L-Band
spectrum or Associated Licences becoming available in such auction or other government process, provided however that Telesat shall be prohibited from applying or bidding for L-Band Spectrum Licences or Associated Licences in such a government
sponsored auction or other government process to the extent that the actions of an Affiliate of Telesat, including a controlling shareholder thereof, would have constituted an Interfering Act, were that Affiliate a signatory to this Agreement and
such Interfering Act resulted in such L-Band spectrum or Associated Licences becoming available in such auction or other government process. 

  

	2.2.	Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary in this Non-Interference Agreement, BCE and Telesat shall not be deemed to be in breach of their respective obligations in
Section 2.1 until such time as (i) BCE or Telesat (as the case may be) has actual knowledge of an Interfering Act, or (ii) either MSV Canada or MSV US, as the case may be, or their respective successors or permitted assigns, has
provided notice in writing to BCE or Telesat (as the case may be) of an alleged Interfering Act and BCE or Telesat (as the case may be) has failed to discontinue such Interfering Act within five (5) business days of receipt of such notice or to
use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its Excluded Subsidiary to discontinue such Interfering Act as promptly as practicable. 

  

	2.3.	The obligations of BCE and Telesat set out in Section 2.1 above shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue for a period (the “Term”) that terminates
on the seventh anniversary of the date of execution of this Agreement. 

  

	2.4.	 For purposes of clarity, the provisions of this Section 2 shall not be interpreted to prohibit BCE, Telesat or any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates from
providing commercial goods and services in the ordinary course of business to parties engaged in businesses competitive to the businesses of either MSV Canada or MSV US. In addition, the obligations of BCE and Telesat under this Section 2 shall
not be interpreted to apply to 

	 	 
any BCE or Telesat parent company (other than, in the case of Telesat, BCE itself), except that the actions of a controlling shareholder of Telesat may
impact Telesat as set forth in the final proviso of Section 2.1. Should Telesat cease to be a Subsidiary of BCE, Telesat and BCE shall then be treated as separate parties for the purposes hereof and a breach of any provision of this agreement
by Telesat or one of its Affiliates shall not affect BCE and its Affiliates and a breach of any provision of this agreement by BCE or one of its Affiliates shall not affect Telesat and its Affiliates. 

  

	3.	NON-INTERFERENCE BY MSV CANADA AND HOLDCO 

  

	3.1.	If, at any time during the Term, MSV US requests a bid or application by MSV Canada or Holdco, or MSV Canada or Holdco otherwise intends to bid or apply and MSV US does not exercise
a veto on such bid or application pursuant to S. 5.7 (d) of the Shareholders Agreement, for a Spectrum Licence in the L-Band in a government sponsored auction or other government sale or licensing process (referred to herein as making a
“Spectrum Application”), which auction, sale or licensing process was not initiated or otherwise requested, supported or promoted by BCE or Telesat through an Interfering Act, and in which parties in addition to, or other than, the
then current holders of L-Band Spectrum licences are eligible to participate, it shall immediately notify BCE and Telesat in writing, describing the Spectrum Licence and spectrum that is the subject of the Spectrum Application and the expected
timing of events (the “Spectrum Availability Notice”). Within 15 days of receipt of a Spectrum Availability Notice, BCE or Telesat may notify the sender of the notice, stating that it or any of its Affiliates, either alone or in
conjunction with one or more third parties, intends to make a Spectrum Application that, in whole or in part, relates to the same Spectrum Licence or spectrum that is the subject of the Spectrum Application for which MSV US has requested a bid or
application by MSV Canada or Holdco, or for which MSV Canada or Holdco otherwise intends to bid or apply and MSV US does not exercise a veto on such bid or application pursuant to S. 5.7 (d) of the Shareholders Agreement (the
“Application Intention Notice”). If BCE or Telesat gives an Application Intention Notice to MSV US within the 15 day time period, MSV Canada and Holdco shall not make the Spectrum Application that is the subject of the Spectrum
Availability Notice, or any part thereof, unless prior thereto, MSV US purchases, or causes an Eligible Purchaser (as defined in the Shareholders Agreement) to purchase for book value, the common shares of Holdco then held by BCE, Telesat and their
respective Subsidiaries. Nothing in this Section 3.1 shall be construed to restrict MSV US from making such a Spectrum Application on its own behalf, whether independently or with a third party other than MSV Canada or Holdco.

  

	3.2.	 If, at any time during the Term, MSV US requests a bid or application by MSV Canada or Holdco, or MSV Canada or Holdco otherwise intends to bid or apply and MSV US
does not exercise a veto on such bid or application pursuant to S. 5.7 (d) of the Shareholders Agreement, for a Spectrum Licence in a radio frequency other than the L-Band in a government sponsored auction or other government sale or licensing
process or otherwise acquire rights to spectrum or Spectrum Licences in a radio frequency other than the L-Band (referred to herein as making a “Non L-Band Spectrum Application or Acquisition”) it shall immediately notify BCE and
Telesat in writing, describing the Spectrum Licence and spectrum that is the subject of the Non L-Band Spectrum 

	 	 
Application or Acquisition, the process to be employed and the expected timing of events, and MSV Canada and Holdco shall not make such Non L-Band Spectrum
Application or Acquisition, or any part thereof, unless prior thereto, MSV US purchases, or causes an Eligible Purchaser (as defined in the Shareholders Agreement) to purchase for book value, the common shares of Holdco then held by BCE, Telesat and
their respective Subsidiaries. Nothing in this Section 3.2 shall be construed to restrict MSV US from making such a Non L-Band Spectrum Application or Acquisition on its own behalf, whether independently or with a third party other than MSV
Canada or Holdco. 

  

	4.	REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 

 Each party hereto
represents and warrants to the other parties hereto as follows: 
  

	4.1.	Organization and Good Standing; Power and Authority. It (i) is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation
or formation; and (ii) has all requisite power and authority to enter into and carry out the obligations contemplated by this Non-Interference Agreement; 

  

	4.2.	Authorization of Documents. The execution, delivery and performance by it of this Non-Interference Agreement and the performance of the obligations contemplated hereby have
been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action on its part, and this Non-Interference Agreement when executed will constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation of it, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except to the
extent that enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and except to the extent that the remedy of specific performance and injunction and other forms of equitable relief
may be subject to equitable defences; 

  

	4.3.	No Conflict. The execution and delivery by it of this Non-Interference Agreement and the performance by it of the obligations contemplated hereby and compliance with the
provisions hereof will not: (a) violate or conflict with, or require any consent, approval, notice or filing under, any provision of any applicable law or agreement to which it is a party; or (b) violate its organizational documents;

  

	4.4.	Litigation; Orders. There is no civil, criminal or administrative action, suit, claim, notice, hearing, inquiry, proceeding or investigation at law or in equity by or before
any court, arbitrator or similar panel, governmental instrumentality or other agency now pending or, to the best of its knowledge, threatened against it which if determined adversely to it could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect on its ability to perform the obligations contemplated by this Non-Interference Agreement; and 

  

	4.5.	Consents. No permit, authorization, consent or approval of or by, or any notification of or filing with, any person (governmental or private) is required by it in connection
with the execution, delivery and performance of this Non-Interference Agreement other than permits, authorizations, consents and approvals which, if not obtained, could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its ability to
perform the obligations contemplated by this Non-Interference Agreement. 

	5.	MISCELLANEOUS 

  

	5.1.	Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Non-Interference Agreement, including the documents referred to herein or furnished pursuant hereto, constitutes the entire Agreement among
the parties hereto with respect to the matters provided for herein, and it supersedes all prior oral or written Agreements, commitments or understandings with respect to such matters. No amendment, modification or discharge of this Non-Interference
Agreement shall be valid or binding unless set forth in writing and duly executed and delivered by the parties hereto. 

  

	5.2.	Waiver. No delay or failure on the part of any party hereto in exercising any right, power or privilege under this Non-Interference Agreement shall impair any such right,
power or privilege or be construed as a waiver of any default or any acquiescence therein. No single or partial exercise of any such right, power or privilege shall preclude the further exercise of such right, power or privilege, or the exercise of
any other right, power or privilege. No waiver shall be valid against any party hereto unless made in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such waiver is sought and then only to the extent expressly specified therein.

  

	5.3.	Governing Law. This Non-Interference Agreement is being executed and delivered in, and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New
York, without regard to its principles of conflicts of law that would give effect to the application of the law of another jurisdiction. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally consents to submit to the nonexclusive
jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and of the United States of America, in each case having jurisdiction over the County of New York, for any dispute arising out of or relating to this Non-Interference Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby (and agrees not to commence any litigation relating thereto except in such courts unless such courts shall have declined to exercise jurisdiction), and further agrees that service of any process, summons, notice or document by
registered mail to its address set forth in this Non-Interference Agreement shall be effective service of process for any litigation brought against it in any such court. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives any
objection to the laying of venue of any litigation arising out of this Non-Interference Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby in the courts of the State of New York or the United States of America, in each case having jurisdiction over
the County of New York and hereby further irrevocably and unconditionally agrees not to plead or claim in any such court that any such litigation brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient or improper forum.

  

	5.4.	Headings. Section headings contained in this Non-Interference Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only, shall not be deemed to be a part of this
Non-Interference Agreement for any purpose, and shall not in any way define or affect the meaning, construction or scope of any of the provisions hereof. 

  

	5.5.	 Execution in Counterparts. To facilitate execution, this Non-Interference Agreement may be executed in as many counterparts as may be required. It shall not
be necessary that the signatures of, or on behalf of, each party, or that the signatures of all persons required to 

  

 6 

	 	 
bind any party, appear on each counterpart; but it shall be sufficient that the signature of, or on behalf of, each party, or that the signatures of the
persons required to bind any party, appear on one or more of the counterparts. All counterparts shall collectively constitute a single Agreement. It shall not be necessary in making proof of this Non-Interference Agreement to produce or account for
more than a number of counterparts containing the respective signatures of, or on behalf of, all of the parties hereto. 

  

	5.6.	Binding Effect. Subject to any provisions hereof restricting assignment, this Transfer Agreement shall be binding upon and shall enure to the benefit of the parties hereto
and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 

 [Signature Page Follows] 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Non-Interference Agreement as of the date first
above written. 
  

			
	BCE INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ L. Scott Thomson
		 	 Name: Scott Thomson

		 	 Title:   Executive Vice President, Corporate Development

  

			
	MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES LP
	
	By: MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES GP INC., its General Partner
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Randy Segal

		 	 Name: Randy Segal

		 	 Title:   Senior Vice President and General Counsel

  

			
	MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES (CANADA) INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Beth Creary
		 	 Name: Beth Creary

		 	 Title:   Secretary

  

			
	MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES HOLDINGS (CANADA) INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Beth Creary

		 	 Name: Beth Creary

		 	 Title:   Secretary

  

					
	TELESAT CANADA
			
	By:	 	/s/ T.H. Ignacy	  	/s/ J.E. Perkins
		 	 Name: T.H. Ignacy
	  	J.E. Perkins
		 	 Title:   Chief Financial Officer
	  	V.P., LawPreferred Provider Extension Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2006

 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED PREFERRED PROVIDER AGREEMENT dated as of October 6, 2006 entered into between Telesat Canada (“Telesat”), Mobile Satellite Ventures LP (“MSV LP”) and Mobile Satellite
Ventures (Canada) Inc. (“Canadian License Co.”). 
 RECITALS 
 Telesat, MSV LP and Canadian License Co. entered into a Preferred Provider Agreement dated January 8, 2001, as amended by an Acknowledgement Regarding Telesat
Preferred Provider Agreement (the “Acknowledgement”) dated as of May 11, 2005 between Telesat Canada, MSV LP, TerreStar Networks Inc. (“Terrestar”)and Canadian License Co. (together, the “Telesat
PPA”). 
 The Acknowledgement also established a separate preferred provider relationship between Telesat, Terrestar and TerreStar Canadian License
Co., now Terrestar Networks (Canada) Inc. (“TerreStar Canada”). 
 The parties wish to amend and restate the provisions of the Telesat PPA
as provided herein among Telesat, MSV LP and Canadian License Co. 
 NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of the sum of
ten dollars paid by each party to the others, and other good and valuable consideration, mutually given and received, the parties agree as follows: 
 SECTION 1 
 1.1 From and after closing of the transactions contemplated by Section 1 of the Investment Agreement dated as of
January 8, 2001 among TMI Communications and Company, Limited Partnership, Mobile Satellite Ventures LLC (formerly named “Motient Satellite Ventures LLC”), Motient Corporation and certain investors (“Closing”), MSV LP
and Canadian License Co. hereby grant preferred provider status to Telesat for any telemetry, tracking and control services and for any satellite procurement services, including without limitation, construction monitoring services, which may be
required by MSV LP and Canadian License Co. (the “Subject Services”), to the extent Telesat offers commercially competitive terms and conditions for the Subject Services as set forth in Section 2 of this Preferred Provider
Agreement. 
 SECTION 2 
 2.1 From and after
Closing, MSV LP and Canadian License Co. will offer Telesat the opportunity to submit proposals for the Subject Services as such Subject Services are to be procured. In the case of each such opportunity, MSV LP and Canadian License Co. will grant
the contract for such Subject Services to Telesat to the extent the terms and conditions offered by Telesat are, taken as a whole, not materially less favorable to MSV LP and Canadian License Co. as those that could be obtained from another
qualified entity or person. 
 2.2 MSV LP and Canadian License Co. shall ensure that any preferred provider or like agreement that either of them enter into
or maintain with Hughes Network Systems, LLC, or any affiliate thereof or successor thereto, (“HNS”) does not grant preferred provider or like rights to 

 
HNS for services that are the same as all or some of the Subject Services. If MSV LP or Canadian License Co. intend to procure Subject Services, and any
preferred provider or like agreement with Hughes could be interpreted to grant preferred provider or like rights for services that are the same as all or some of the Subject Services, MSV LP and Canadian License Co. shall nonetheless fully comply
with the provisions of this Preferred Provider Agreement, and priority shall be given to this Preferred Provider Agreement over the agreement with HNS. 
 2.3 The obligations of MSV LP and Canadian License Co. hereunder shall terminate on the later of the following: (i) the first date on which BCE Inc. and its respective affiliates, and Telesat and its respective affiliates,
collectively no longer hold, directly or indirectly, the majority of the common shares then outstanding in the capital of Mobile Satellite Ventures Holdings (Canada) Inc., and (ii) the date of the 5-year anniversary of the execution of this
Amended and Restated Preferred Provider Agreement. 
 2.4 This Preferred Provider Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of, the State of New York, without regard to its principles of conflicts of law that would give effect to the application of the law of another jurisdiction. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally consents to submit to the
non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and of the United States of America, in each case having jurisdiction over the County of New York, for any litigation arising out of or relating to this Preferred Provider Agreement
and the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby (and agrees not to commence any litigation relating thereto except in such courts unless such courts shall have declined to exercise jurisdiction), and further agrees that service of any process,
summons, notice or document by U.S. registered mail to its respective address set forth in this Preferred Provider Agreement shall be effective service of process for any litigation brought against it in any such court. Each of the parties hereto
hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives any objection to the laying of venue of any litigation arising out of this Preferred Provider Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby in the courts of the State of New York or the United States
of America, in each case having jurisdiction over the County of New York, and hereby further irrevocably and unconditionally waives and agrees not to plead or claim in any such court that any such litigation brought in any such court has been
brought in an inconvenient or improper forum. 
 2.5 To facilitate execution, this Preferred Provider Agreement may be executed in as many counterparts as
may be required. It shall not be necessary that the signatures of, or on behalf of, each party, or that the signatures of all persons required to bind any party, appear on each counterpart; but it shall be sufficient that the signature of, or on
behalf of, each party, or that the signatures of the persons required to bind any party, appear on one or more of the counterparts. All counterparts shall collectively constitute a single agreement. It shall not be necessary in making proof of this
Preferred Provider Agreement to produce or account for more than a number of counterparts containing the respective signatures of, or on behalf of, all of the parties hereto. 
 2.6 This Preferred Provider Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns, except that no party may assign its rights and obligations under this
Preferred Provider Agreement to any person without the prior written consent of the other parties. 
  

 2 

 SECTION 3 
 3.1
Nothing herein shall be construed to alter or diminish the rights or obligations between Telesat, Terrestar and TerreStar Canada under the Acknowledgement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE CAUSED THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED PREFERRED PROVIDER AGREEMENT TO BE DULY EXECUTED AS OF THE DATE AND YEAR FIRST-ABOVE WRITTEN 
  

									
	TELESAT CANADA	 		 	MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES LP, by its General Partner, MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES GP INC.
					
	 By:
	 	 /s/ T.H. Ignacy            /s/ J.E.
Perkins
	 		 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Randy Segal

	 Name:
	 	 T.H. Ignacy                   J.E.
Perkins
	 		 	 Name:
	 	 Randy Segal

	 Title:
	 	 Chief Financial              V.P., Law
	 		 	 Title:
	 	 Senior Vice President and General Counsel

		 	 Officer
	 		 		 	

  

			
	MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES (CANADA) INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Beth Creary

	 Name:
	 	 Beth Creary

	 Title:
	 	 Secretary

  

 3

Source: [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00111-of-00352.parquet"}, [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00111-of-00352.parquet"}]]