Document:

EX-10.85

 Exhibit 10.85 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION 
  

			
	 In re ITT
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
 SECURITIES LITIGATION (INDIANA)
  

 
	  	CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML

 STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT 

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated as of November 2, 2015 (the “Stipulation”), is submitted in the
above-captioned Action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana and is made and entered into by and among: (i) Lead Plaintiff Meitav Dash Mutual Fund Management Ltd. (“Meitav” or “Lead
Plaintiff”), plaintiff Babulal Tarapara (“Tarapara”), plaintiff Kristopher Hennen (“Hennen”), plaintiff Cynthia Grebely (“Grebely”), and plaintiff Hoai T. Truong (“Truong”) (collectively,
“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all other Members of the Settlement Class (as defined herein), by and through counsel of record in the Litigation (as defined herein); and Defendants (ii) ITT Educational Services, Inc.
(“ITT” or the “Company”), and (iii) Kevin M. Modany (“Modany”) and Daniel M. Fitzpatrick (“Fitzpatrick”) (Modany and Fitzpatrick, collectively, the “Individual Defendants”) ((ii) and
(iii) are collectively the “Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record in the Litigation. Plaintiffs and Defendants together are the “Settling Parties.” This Stipulation is intended by the Settling Parties to
fully, finally, and forever resolve, discharge, and settle the Released Claims (as defined herein), and to dismiss this Action against the Defendants with prejudice, upon and subject to the approval of the Court and the terms and conditions set
forth in this Stipulation, without any admission or concession as to the merits of any of the Settling Parties’ claims or defenses. Throughout this Stipulation, all capitalized terms used, but not immediately defined, have the meanings given to
them in Section IV.1, infra. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	1

	I.	THE LITIGATION 

 On September 30, 2014, this Action was filed as a putative class
action on behalf of purchasers of ITT securities. (Dkt. No. 1). On November 17, 2014, the Court consolidated two related actions into this Action. (Dkt. No. 18). On January 21, 2015, the Court consolidated a third related action
into this Action. (Dkt. No. 73). By Order dated March 16, 2015, Meitav was appointed as Lead Plaintiff for the putative class, Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP1 was appointed as
Lead Counsel, and Katz & Korin was appointed as Liaison Counsel in the consolidated Action. (Dkt. No. 75). 
 On May 26,
2015, Plaintiffs filed the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the “Complaint”) (Dkt. No. 87), alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, against Defendants on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated purchasers of the securities of ITT from February 26, 2013,
through May 12, 2015, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). 
 Subsequently, the parties agreed to conduct settlement
negotiations in an attempt to resolve this Action without further litigation. On July 14, 2015, the Court granted a stay of all proceedings in this Action to facilitate the Parties’ efforts to resolve this Action through mediation. (Dkt.
No. 89). 
 In preparation for the mediation and to enable Plaintiffs to assess the reasonableness of any potential settlement,
Defendants provided Plaintiffs with over 180,000 pages of documents not otherwise available to Plaintiffs by virtue of the discovery stay imposed by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(3)(8). 

On August 11 and 12, 2015, following the submission of detailed mediation statements, the Parties participated in a mediation session
conducted by the Honorable Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) of JAMS. At the end of the two-day mediation, the parties agreed in principle to a basic framework for 

 

	1 	 During the course of the Litigation, Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP changed its name to Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP. (See Dkt.
No. 85). 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	2

 
the resolution of this Litigation through settlement, subject to documentation and the approval of the Court. Thereafter, following additional communications and arm’s-length negotiations,
the Parties agreed to the remaining terms for the settlement of this Litigation and proceeded to draft this Stipulation. 
 On
October 9, 2015, the Parties jointly requested that the stay of this Action be extended until October 27, 2015 to allow for this Stipulation, and the terms of the Settlement embodied herein, to be finalized. (Dkt. No. 90). On
October 26, 2015, the Parties jointly requested an additional two week extension of the stay of this Action, which the Court granted on October 27, 2015. (Dkt. No. 93). 

 

	II.	DEFENDANTS’ DENIALS OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY 

 Each Defendant has expressly
denied, and continues to deny, all allegations of wrongdoing, fault, liability, or damage to Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class, arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts, or omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the
Complaint and affirm that they have acted properly and lawfully at all times. Defendants further deny that they ever engaged in or committed any fraud, any violation of law, any breach of duty, or any other wrongdoing or improper conduct whatsoever.
Defendants maintain that they had and have meritorious defenses to all allegations in this Action and that had the terms of this Stipulation not been reached, Defendants would have continued to contest vigorously Plaintiffs’ allegations. This
Stipulation shall in no event be construed as, or deemed to be evidence of, an admission or concession by any Defendant with respect to any claim, or of any fault or liability or wrongdoing or damage whatsoever. Nor shall this Stipulation be
construed as, or deemed to be evidence of, an admission or concession by any Defendant of any infirmity in the defenses that Defendants could have asserted in this Action or otherwise. 

Nonetheless, Defendants have concluded that further conduct of the Litigation would be protracted and expensive and wish to avoid the expense,
inconvenience, and distraction of burdensome and protracted litigation. Defendants also have taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in complex cases like this Litigation. Defendants have, therefore,
determined that it is desirable and beneficial that the Litigation be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	3

	III.	CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS AND BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT 

 Plaintiffs believe that the claims
asserted in the Litigation have merit and that the evidence developed to date supports the claims. However, Plaintiffs and their counsel recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Litigation
against Defendants through trial, post-trial motions and appeals. Plaintiffs and their counsel also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and the risk of any litigation, especially in complex actions such as this Litigation, as well as the
difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation. Plaintiffs and their counsel also are mindful of the inherent problems of proof under, and possible defenses to, the securities law violations asserted in this Litigation. Plaintiffs and their
counsel believe that the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation confers substantial benefits upon the Settlement Class. Based on their evaluation, Plaintiffs and their counsel have determined that the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation is in
the best interests of the Settlement Class. 
  

	IV.	TERMS OF STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY
STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among Plaintiffs (for themselves and all of the other Settlement Class Members) and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel or attorneys of record, that, subject to the approval of the Court, this Litigation
and the Released Claims shall be finally and fully compromised, settled and released, and the Litigation shall be dismissed with prejudice, upon and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation, as follows. 

 

	 	1.	Definitions 

 As used in this Stipulation, and the exhibits annexed hereto, the following
terms have the meanings specified below. In the event of any inconsistency between any definition set forth below and any definition set forth in any document attached as an exhibit to this Stipulation, the definition set forth below shall control.

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	4

 1.1. “Authorized Claimant” means any Member of the Settlement Class who, in accordance
with the terms of this Stipulation, is entitled to a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund (as defined in ¶5.3 hereof) pursuant to any Plan of Allocation or any order of the Court. 

1.2. “Claims Administrator” or “Settlement Administrator” means the firm of Angeion Group. 

1.3. “Complaint” means the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws filed by
Plaintiffs on May 26, 2015. 
 1.4. “Court” means the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. 

1.5. “Defendants” means ITT, Modany, and Fitzpatrick. 

1.6. “Defendants’ Counsel” means Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Ice Miller LLP. 

1.7. “Effective Date” means the first date by which all of the events and conditions specified in ¶7.1 of this Stipulation have
been met and have occurred. The Effective Date is in no way dependent on, or conditioned on, the approval of any other settlement and/or the resolution of any other action or litigation against Defendants. 

1.8. “Escrow Account” means an escrow account established, maintained, and controlled by the Escrow Agent into which Defendants
shall deposit, or cause to be deposited, the $12.5375 million ($12,537,500.00) in cash to establish the Settlement Fund. 
 1.9.
“Escrow Agent” means Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP. 
 1.10. “Final” means, with respect to any Court order,
including, without limitation, the Judgment, that such order represents a final and binding determination of all issues within its scope and is not subject to further review on appeal or otherwise. Without limitation, an order becomes
“Final” when: (a) no appeal has been filed and the prescribed time for commencing any appeal has expired; or (b) an appeal has been filed and either (i) the appeal has been dismissed and the prescribed time, if any, for
commencing any further appeal has expired, or (ii) the order has been affirmed in all material respects and the prescribed time, if any, for commencing any further appeal 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	5

 
has expired. For purposes of this Paragraph, an “appeal” includes appeals as of right, discretionary appeals, interlocutory appeals, proceedings involving writs of certiorari or
mandamus, and any other proceedings of like kind. Any appeal or other proceeding pertaining to any order adopting or approving a Plan of Allocation, or to any order issued in respect to an application for attorneys’ fees and expenses,
pursuant to ¶¶6.1 and 6.2, below, shall not in any way delay or preclude the Judgment from becoming Final. 
 1.11. “ITT
Securities” means ITT common stock and any call options or put options on the same. With respect to put options, references to “purchases” of ITT Securities mean the writing of put options. 

1.12. “Judgment” means the order of final judgment to be entered by the Court approving the Settlement which, subject to the
approval of the Court, shall be substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B hereto. 
 1.13. “Lead Plaintiff” means Meitav.

 1.14. “Litigation” or “Action” means the consolidated securities class action pending in this Court under the caption
In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation (Indiana), Case No. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML, including, without limitation, all cases consolidated under that caption. 

1.15. “Parties” means the Plaintiffs and the Defendants. 

1.16. “Person(s)” means an individual, corporation, limited liability company, professional corporation, partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability partnership, association, joint stock company, estate, legal representative, trust, unincorporated association, government or any political subdivision or agency thereof, and any business or legal entity together with
their spouses, heirs, predecessors, successors, administrators, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, representatives, or assignees of any of the foregoing, and any other representative or person or entity acting on behalf of, or claiming under, any of
these persons and entities. 
 1.17. “Plaintiffs” means Meitav, Tarapara, Hennen, Grebely and Truong, both in their individual
capacities and as representatives of the Settlement Class. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	6

 1.18. “Plaintiffs’ Counsel” means Lead Counsel (Glancy Prongay & Murray
LLP) and Katz and Korin, P.C. 
 1.19. “Plan of Allocation” means a plan or formula of allocation of the Settlement Fund, to be
approved by the Court, whereby the Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants after payment of or provision for expenses of notice and administration of the Settlement, Taxes and Tax Expenses (as defined in ¶2.15(c) hereof),
and such attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, and interest and any award to the Plaintiffs as may be awarded by the Court. Any Plan of Allocation is not part of the Stipulation and the Defendants and any other Released Persons shall not have any
responsibility or liability with respect thereto. 
 1.20. “Proof of Claim and Release” means the form to be sent to Settlement
Class Members, in the form attached as Exhibit A-2 hereto, upon further order(s) of the Court, by which any Settlement Class Member may make claims against the Settlement Fund for damages allegedly incurred by reason of their investment(s) in ITT
Securities. 
 1.21. “Released Claims” means any and all claims (including Unknown Claims), demands, debts, losses, damages,
duties, rights, disputes, actions, causes of action, liabilities, obligations, judgments, suits, matters, controversies, proceedings, or issues, of any kind, nature, character, or description whatsoever (and including, but not limited to, any claims
for damages, whether compensatory, consequential, special, punitive, exemplary, or otherwise, and any and all fees, costs, interest, expenses, or charges), whether known or unknown, contingent or absolute, suspected or unsuspected, foreseen or
unforeseen, disclosed or undisclosed, concealed or hidden, apparent or not apparent, accrued or unaccrued, matured or unmatured, liquidated or not liquidated, asserted or unasserted, at law or in equity, that have been asserted, could have been
asserted, or in the future could be asserted against Defendants or any of the Released Persons in this Litigation or in any other court, tribunal, forum or proceeding (including, but not limited to, any claims arising under U.S. federal, state or
local law, foreign law, common law, statutory law, administrative law, rule, regulation, or at equity, relating to alleged fraud, breach of any duty, negligence, violations of the federal securities laws, or otherwise, and including all claims
within the exclusive jurisdiction of the 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	7

 
federal courts), whether individual, class, direct, derivative, representative, legal, equitable or any other type, or in any other capacity, (a) by reason of, arising out of, relating to,
involving or in connection with, directly or indirectly, the allegations, claims, conduct, facts, events, practices, transactions, acts, occurrences, failures, statements, representations, alleged misrepresentations, alleged omissions, the documents
publicly filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission by ITT and all disclosures or alleged non-disclosures made by Defendants in connection with any of the foregoing, or any other matter, thing or cause whatsoever, or any series thereof,
that were, could have been or in the future might be alleged, claimed, asserted, embraced, involved, or set forth, referred to in or otherwise related to, directly or indirectly, the Litigation or subject matter of the Litigation; (b) would
have been barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel had the Action been fully litigated to a final judgment; and (c) were, could have been, or in the future could be, asserted in any forum or proceeding or otherwise by any Settlement
Class Member that relate to the purchase, sale, acquisition or holding of ITT Securities during the Settlement Class Period. The Released Claims shall not include claims to enforce the Settlement. For the avoidance of doubt, Released Claims does not
include the claims alleged as of the date of this Settlement in the actions captioned: Sasha Wilfred, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. Kevin M. Modany, et al., 1:13-cv-03110-JPO (S.D.N.Y.);
Janice Nottenkamper, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. Kevin M. Modany, et al., 1:15-cv-03390 (S.D.N.Y.); Michelle Lawrence, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant ITT Educational Services,
Inc. v. Kevin M. Modany, et al., 1:14-cv-02106 (S.D. Ind.); William McKee, Derivatively on behalf of ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. Kevin Modany, et al., 49D07-1507-PL-021891 (Marion Circuit Court, Indianapolis, Indiana); United
States Securities and Exchange Commission v. ITT Educational Services, Inc., Kevin M. Modany, and Daniel M. Fitzpatrick, 1:15-cv-00758-JMS-MJD (S.D. Ind.); and In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation,
1:13-cv-01620-JPO-JLC (S.D.N.Y.). 
 1.22. “Released Person(s)” means each and all Defendants, and/or any of their respective
past, present or future, family members, spouses, domestic partners, parents, associates, 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	8

 
affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, officers, directors, stockholders, owners, members, representatives, employees, attorneys, financial or investment advisors, consultants, underwriters,
investment banks or bankers, commercial bankers, insurers, reinsurers, excess insurers, co-insurers, engineers, advisors, principals, agents, heirs, executors, trustees, estates, beneficiaries, distributees, foundations, general or limited partners
or partnerships, joint ventures, personal or legal representatives, administrators, or any other person or entity acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of any of the Defendants, and each of their respective predecessors, successors, and
assigns, and any trust of which any Defendant is the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his family. For the avoidance of doubt, Released Persons does not include PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, which is also known
as PwC LLP. 
 1.23. “Settlement” means the settlement of the Litigation as embodied in this Stipulation. 

1.24. “Settlement Class” means, for purposes of this Settlement, and to be certified pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 for purposes of
effectuating this Settlement only, all persons and/or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired ITT common stock, purchased or otherwise acquired call options on ITT common stock, or wrote put options on ITT common stock, between
February 26, 2013 and May 12, 2015, both dates inclusive. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants, the officers and directors of ITT during the Settlement Class Period, members of their immediate families, the legal
representatives, heirs, successors or assigns of any of the foregoing and any entity in which a Defendant has or had a controlling interest during the Settlement Class Period. Any person or entity that timely and validly requests exclusion from the
Settlement Class pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Notice Order (as defined in ¶3.1 hereof) is also excluded from the Settlement Class. 

1.25. “Settlement Class Member” or “Member of the Settlement Class” means a Person who falls within the definition of the
Settlement Class as set forth in ¶1.24 and who does not validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class in accordance with the procedures to be established by the Court in connection with the approval of this Stipulation and the Settlement.

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	9

 1.26. “Settlement Class Period” means the period commencing on February 26, 2013,
through May 12, 2015, both dates inclusive. 
 1.27. “Settlement Fund” means $12.5375 million ($12,537,500.00) in cash, plus
any interest earned thereon. 
 1.28. “Settling Parties” means, collectively, Defendants and Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves
and the Members of the Settlement Class. 
 1.29. “Unknown Claims” means any and all Released Claims, of every nature and
description, which Plaintiffs or any Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Persons which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its
settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his, her or its decision not to object to this Settlement or not to exclude himself, herself or itself from the Settlement Class. Unknown Claims include those claims in
which some or all of the facts comprising the claim may be suspected, or even undisclosed or hidden. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs shall expressly
waive, and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Judgment shall have expressly waived, the provisions, rights, and benefits of California Civil Code § 1542, which provides: 

A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of
executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor. 
 Plaintiffs shall expressly
waive, and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any U.S. federal law or any law of any state or
territory of the United States, or principle of common law or foreign law, which is similar, comparable or equivalent in effect to California Civil Code § 1542. Plaintiffs and other Settlement Class Members may hereafter discover facts in
addition to or different from those which he, she or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but Plaintiffs and each Settlement Class 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	10

 
Member, upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have expressly, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all Released Claims,
known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future,
including, but not limited to, conduct which is negligent, reckless, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. Plaintiffs
acknowledge, and the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and was a material element of the Settlement. 

 

	 	2.	The Settlement 

  

	 	A.	Scope and Effect of the Settlement 

 2.1. The obligations incurred pursuant to this
Stipulation shall be in full and final disposition of the Action and any and all Released Claims as against all Released Persons. The Settling Parties agree that the amount paid and the other terms of the Settlement were negotiated at
arm’s-length and in good faith by the Settling Parties, and reflect a settlement reached voluntarily after consultation with experienced legal counsel and an experienced mediator. 

2.2. Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment
shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged each and every Released Claim against each of the Released Persons. 

2.3. Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members shall have covenanted not to sue the Released Persons with
respect to any Released Claims and will be forever barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, participating in, maintaining, or continuing to prosecute any action or proceeding in any court of law or equity, arbitration tribunal,
administrative forum, or other forum of any kind, asserting any Released Claim (including, without limitation, Unknown Claims), as well as any claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with, the defense, settlement, or resolution of this
Action against any Released Persons. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	11

 2.4. All Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members shall be bound by the releases set forth in the
Judgment whether or not they submit a Proof of Claim and Release, seek or obtain a distribution from the Settlement Fund, are entitled to receive a distribution under the Plan of Allocation approved by the Court, or have objected to the Settlement,
the Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s Fee and Expense Application (as defined in ¶6.1 hereof). 
 2.5. Upon the Effective
Date, any and all Persons shall be permanently barred and enjoined, to the fullest extent permitted by law, from commencing, prosecuting, or asserting any and all claims for contribution or indemnity (or any other claim when the alleged injury to
that Person is their actual or threatened liability to the Settlement Class or a Settlement Class Member) based upon, relating to, arising out of, or in connection with the Released Claims and/or transactions in ITT Securities during the Settlement
Class Period. 
 2.6. Upon the Effective Date, each of Defendants and/or the Released Persons shall be deemed to have, and by operation of
the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged the Settlement Class Members, Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs’ Counsel from all claims (including Unknown Claims) arising out of, relating to, or in
connection with, the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement, or resolution of the Litigation or the Released Claims. 
 2.7.
Notwithstanding the above, nothing in this Stipulation shall bar any action or claims to enforce the terms of this Stipulation. 
  

	 	B.	The Settlement Fund 

 2.8. In consideration of the full and final settlement of the
Released Claims, ITT, on behalf of all Defendants, shall cause the principal amount of the Settlement Fund, $12.5375 million ($12,537,500.00) to be deposited into the Escrow Account by wire transfer or delivery of a check by no later than fifteen
(15) business days after the later of: (i) the Court’s entry of the Notice Order, preliminarily approving the Settlement, referenced in ¶3.1 below, or (ii) receipt by 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	12

 
Defendants’ Counsel from Plaintiffs’ Counsel of all necessary payment details to accomplish payment of the Settlement Fund by wire transfer or check, including payee name, payee
mailing address, bank account number, name of bank, and bank address, a Sort Code or ABA Routing Number, the currency of the account receiving the funds, wire transfer instructions, the Tax Identification Number, and an executed Form W-9. 

2.9. The amount as specified in ¶2.8 of this Stipulation shall be the full and sole monetary contribution made by or on behalf of the
Released Persons in connection with resolution of the Action and the Settlement, including with respect to the payment of notice and administration expenses, which shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund. Under no circumstances will Defendants,
collectively or separately, or anyone on their behalves, be required to pay or cause to be paid any amount in addition to the principal amount of the Settlement Fund caused to be deposited with the Escrow Agent pursuant to ¶2.8 of this
Stipulation and the Settlement set forth herein. If the Settlement Fund, or any portion thereof, is not deposited into the Escrow Account by the time specified in ¶2.8 hereof, the Parties agree that Defendants will not be obligated to pay the
Settlement Fund or any portion thereof and Lead Plaintiff’s, Plaintiffs’, Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s, and any other parties’ remedy against Defendants shall be to terminate the Settlement. 

 

	 	C.	The Escrow Agent 

 2.10. The Escrow Agent shall invest the Settlement Fund, transferred
pursuant to ¶2.8 herein, in instruments either fully insured or backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government or an agency thereof and shall reinvest the proceeds of these instruments as they mature in similar instruments
at their then-current market rates. Defendants and the other Released Persons shall not have any responsibility or liability whatsoever for investment decisions. All risks related to the investment of the Settlement Fund shall be borne by the Escrow
Agent and the Settlement Fund, and not by any of the Defendants or other Released Persons who shall be held harmless for any losses arising from the investment or disbursement of the Settlement Fund. 

2.11. The Escrow Agent shall permit Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel or the Claims Administrator to withdraw up to two hundred fifty thousand
dollars ($250,000.00) from the 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	13

 
Settlement Fund, upon funding of the Settlement Fund as set forth in ¶2.8, to be used to pay the reasonable costs of providing notice of the Settlement to the Settlement Class, as well as
customary administration costs. Prior to the Effective Date, payment of any notice and administration costs exceeding $250,000.00 shall require written agreement from Defendants, through Defendants’ Counsel. Subsequent to the Effective Date,
without further approval by Defendants or the Court, the Settlement Fund may be used by Lead Counsel to pay notice and administration costs reasonably and actually incurred in excess of $250,000.00. Other than amounts disbursed for providing notice
to the Settlement Class, customary administration costs, and Taxes and Tax Expenses (discussed in Section IV.2.D, infra), and the Fee and Expense Award (as defined in ¶6.1 hereof) (which shall be paid to Lead Counsel immediately
following the Court’s execution of an order awarding such fees and expenses), the Settlement Fund shall not be distributed until the Effective Date of the Settlement, as set forth in ¶7.1. 

2.12. Subject to further order(s) and/or direction(s) as may be made by the Court, or as provided in this Stipulation, the Escrow Agent is
authorized to execute such transactions as are consistent with the terms of this Stipulation. 
 2.13. All funds held by the Escrow Agent
shall be deemed and considered to be in custodia legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, until such time as such funds shall be distributed pursuant to this Stipulation, or are returned to the Persons
paying the same pursuant to this Stipulation in the event that this Settlement is not consummated or is terminated pursuant to the provisions of Section IV.2.E below, and/or upon further order(s) of the Court. 

2.14. The Escrow Agent shall not be responsible for the payment of any sums due to Authorized Claimants or other Persons, except to the extent
of maintaining account of and appropriately paying sums as required by this Stipulation, but only to the limited extent that such sums have been delivered into the Escrow Account as required by this Stipulation. The Escrow Agent shall be liable to
the extent provided for under the laws of the State of Indiana. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	14

	 	D.	Taxes 

 2.15. (a) The Settling Parties and the Escrow Agent shall treat the Escrow
Account as a “qualified settlement fund” for purposes of Section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder. The Escrow Agent shall timely make such elections as are
necessary or advisable to carry out the provision of this ¶2.15, including, without limitation, the “relation-back election” described in Treas. Reg. §1.468B-1 back to the earliest permitted date. Such elections shall be made in
compliance with the procedures and requirements contained in such regulations. It shall be the responsibility of the Escrow Agent to prepare and deliver timely and properly the necessary documentation for signature by all necessary parties, and
thereafter to cause the appropriate filing to occur. 
 (b) The Escrow Agent shall be the Escrow Account’s “administrator”
as that term is used in Treas. Reg. §1.468B-2. As administrator, the Escrow Agent shall satisfy the administrative requirements imposed by Treas. Reg. §1.468B-2 by, e.g., (i) obtaining a taxpayer identification number,
(ii) satisfying any information reporting or withholding requirements imposed on distributions from the Settlement Fund, and (iii) timely and properly filing applicable federal, state or local tax returns necessary or advisable with
respect to the Settlement Fund (including, without limitation, the returns described in Treas. Reg. §§1.468B-2(k)) and paying any taxes reported thereon. Such returns (as well as the election described in this ¶2.15) shall be
consistent with this ¶2.15 and in all events shall reflect that all Taxes, as defined in subsection (c) below, on the income earned by the Settlement Fund shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund as provided in ¶2.15(c) hereof. 

(c) All: (i) taxes (including any estimated taxes, interest, or penalties) arising with respect to the income earned by the Settlement
Fund, including, without limitation, any taxes or tax detriments that may be imposed upon Defendants or Defendants’ Counsel with respect to any income earned by the Settlement Fund for any period during which the Settlement Fund does not
qualify as a “qualified settlement fund” for federal or state income tax purposes (collectively, “Taxes”); and (ii) expenses and costs incurred in connection with the operation and implementation

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	15

 
of this ¶2.15, including, without limitation, expenses of tax attorneys and/or accountants and mailing and distribution costs and expenses relating to filing (or failing to file) the returns
described in this ¶2.15 (collectively, “Tax Expenses”), shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund. Neither Defendants, Defendants’ Counsel, nor other Released Persons shall have any liability or responsibility for the Taxes or the
Tax Expenses, or the filing of any tax returns or other documents with the Internal Revenue Service or any other state or local taxing authority. With funds from the Settlement Fund, the Escrow Agent shall indemnify and hold harmless Defendants,
Defendants’ Counsel, and other Released Persons for Taxes and Tax Expenses (including, without limitation, Taxes payable by reason of any such indemnification). Further, Taxes and Tax Expenses shall be treated as, and considered to be, a cost
of administration of the Settlement Fund and shall timely be paid by the Escrow Agent out of the Settlement Fund without prior order from the Court and the Escrow Agent shall be obligated (notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary) to withhold
from distribution to Authorized Claimants any funds necessary to pay such amounts, including the establishment of adequate reserves for any Taxes and Tax Expenses (as well as any amounts that may be required to be withheld under Treas. Reg.
§1.468B-2(1)(2)). Neither Defendants, Defendants’ Counsel, Defendants’ director and officer liability insurance carriers, nor any other Released Persons shall be responsible in any respect therefore, nor shall they have any liability
therefore. The Settling Parties agree to cooperate with the Escrow Agent, each other, and their tax attorneys and accountants to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this ¶2.15. 

 

	 	E.	Termination of Settlement 

 2.16. In the event that the Stipulation is not approved or
the Stipulation is terminated, canceled, or fails to become effective for any reason, the Settlement Fund (including accrued interest) less expenses paid, incurred or due and owing consistent with this Stipulation, including those incurred providing
notice to the Settlement Class, locating Settlement Class Members, soliciting claims, assisting with the filing of claims administering and distributing the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants, processing Proof of Claim and Release forms,
escrow fees and costs if any and all Taxes and Tax Expenses, provided for herein, shall be refunded pursuant to written instructions from counsel to the Defendants (in accordance with ¶7.4 herein). 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	16

	 	3.	Notice Order and Settlement Hearing 

 3.1. As soon as practicable after execution of this
Stipulation, Lead Counsel (with Defendants’ Counsel’s consent) shall submit the Stipulation, together with its exhibits, to the Court and shall apply for entry of an order (the “Notice Order”) attached hereto as Exhibit A,
requesting, inter alia, the preliminary approval of the Settlement set forth in this Stipulation, approval of the contents and method of distribution for the mailing of a settlement notice (the “Notice”) in the form attached as
Exhibit A-1 hereto, approval of the contents of the Proof of Claim and Release in the form attached as Exhibit A-2 hereto, and approval of the contents and method of publication of a summary notice (the “Summary Notice”) in the form
attached as Exhibit A-3 hereto. The Notice shall include the general terms of the Settlement set forth in this Stipulation, the proposed Plan of Allocation, the general terms of the Fee and Expense Application, and the date of the Settlement Hearing
(as defined below). Additionally, Defendants shall assist Lead Counsel and/or the Settlement Administrator in obtaining, from ITT’s transfer agent, records of ownership as necessary to process and administer the Notice. 

3.2. With its application for entry of the Notice Order, requesting preliminary approval of the Settlement, Lead Counsel shall request that
the Court hold a hearing (the “Settlement Hearing”) after Notice is given, at which time Lead Counsel shall request that the Court grant final approval of the Settlement of this Litigation as set forth herein. To permit compliance with the
settlement notice requirements of the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1715, the Settlement Hearing shall take place no earlier than 100 days after the filing of this Stipulation.2 
  
  

	2 	The Settling Parties will request that the Court schedule the Settlement Hearing no earlier than 100 days after entry of the Notice Order, preliminarily approving the Settlement, so that, among other things, the
Settling Parties may comply with the provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	17

 3.3. At the Settlement Hearing, the Settling Parties shall jointly request entry of a Judgment,
in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B: 
 (a) finally approving the Settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate, within the meaning of
Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and directing its consummation pursuant to its terms; 
 (b) directing that the Litigation
be dismissed without costs and with prejudice, and releasing the Released Claims; 
 (c) permanently barring and enjoining the institution
and prosecution, by Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class Members, of any other action or proceeding against the Released Persons in any court or forum, asserting any Released Claims; provided, however, that the Judgment shall not bar any action or
claim to enforce the terms of the Settlement, as approved by the Court, or the Judgment; 
 (d) permanently barring and enjoining, to the
fullest extent permitted by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(f)(7)(A) and any other applicable law or regulation, any and all Persons from commencing, prosecuting, or asserting any and all claims for contribution or indemnity (or any other claim when the
alleged injury to that Person is their actual or threatened liability to the Settlement Class or a Settlement Class Member) based upon, relating to, arising out of, or in connection with the Released Claims and/or transactions in ITT Securities
during the Settlement Class Period; 
 (e) reserving jurisdiction over the Litigation, including all future proceedings concerning the
administration, consummation, and enforcement of this Stipulation; 
 (f) finding that the Complaint in the Litigation was filed on a good
faith basis in accordance with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 

(g) finding, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that there is no just reason for delaying and directing entry of
a final judgment; and 
 (h) containing such other and further provisions consistent with the terms of this Stipulation and consistent with
Exhibit B to which the Settling Parties expressly consent in writing. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	18

 3.4. At or after the Settlement Hearing, Lead Counsel also will request that the Court approve
the proposed Plan of Allocation and the Fee and Expense Application. Defendants do not and shall not take any position as to the proposed Plan of Allocation. 
  

	 	4.	Releases and Bar Order 

 4.1. (a) Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs and each of the
Settlement Class Members (on behalf of themselves and each of their respective present and former family members, spouses, domestic partners, parents, associates, affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, officers, directors, stockholders, owners,
members, fiduciaries, employees, attorneys, accountants, consultants, underwriters, banks or bankers, insurers, reinsurers, excess insurers, co-insurers, advisors, principals, agents, heirs, executors, trustees, estates, beneficiaries, distributees,
foundations, general or limited partners or partnerships, joint ventures, personal or legal representatives, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and any other person or entity who has the right, ability, standing, or capacity to
assert, prosecute, or maintain on behalf of any Settlement Class Member any of the Released Claims (or to obtain the proceeds of any recovery therefrom)), regardless of whether that Settlement Class Member actually submits a Proof of Claim and
Release, seeks or obtains a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund, is entitled to receive a distribution under the Plan of Allocation approved by the Court, or has objected to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s Fee
and Expense Application, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever waived, released, relinquished, discharged, and dismissed all Released Claims against the Defendants and all other Released
Persons. 
 (b) Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members (on behalf of themselves and each of their
respective present and former family members, spouses, domestic partners, parents, associates, affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, officers, directors, stockholders, owners, members, fiduciaries, employees, attorneys, accountants, consultants,
underwriters, banks or bankers, insurers, reinsurers, excess insurers, co-insurers, advisors, principals, agents, heirs, executors, trustees, estates, beneficiaries, distributees, foundations, general or limited partners or partnerships, joint
ventures, personal or legal representatives, administrators, 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	19

 
predecessors, successors, and assigns, and any other person or entity who has the right, ability, standing, or capacity to assert, prosecute, or maintain on behalf of any Settlement Class Member
any of the Released Claims (or to obtain the proceeds of any recovery therefrom)), regardless of whether that Settlement Class Member actually submits a Proof of Claim and Release, seeks or obtains a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund, is
entitled to receive a distribution under the Plan of Allocation approved by the Court, or has objected to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s Fee and Expense Application, shall have covenanted not to sue the Released
Persons with respect to any Released Claims and shall be permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing, participating in, maintaining, or continuing to prosecute any action or proceeding in any court of law or equity, arbitration
tribunal, administrative forum, or other forum of any kind, asserting any Released Claim (including, without limitation, Unknown Claims), as well as any claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with, the defense, settlement, or
resolution of this Action against any of the Released Persons. 
 4.2. Upon the Effective Date, each of Defendants and/or the Released
Persons shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged the Settlement Class Members, Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs’ Counsel from all claims (including
Unknown Claims) arising out of, relating to, or in connection with, the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement, or resolution of the Litigation or the Released Claims. 

4.3. The proposed Judgment shall include, and the Settling Parties agree to the entry by the Court of an order providing for the bar order in
¶4.4 (the “Bar Order”), subject to the terms in ¶4.6 herein. 
 4.4. The Bar Order shall provide that, upon the
Effective Date, except as provided in ¶4.6 below, any and all persons and entities are permanently barred and enjoined, to the fullest extent permitted by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(f)(7)(A) and any other applicable law or regulation, from
commencing, prosecuting, or asserting any and all claims for contribution or indemnity (or any other claim when the alleged injury to that person or entity is their actual or threatened liability to the

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	20

 
Settlement Class or a Settlement Class Member) based upon, relating to, arising out of, or in connection with the Released Claims, against each and every one of the Released Persons, whether
arising under state, federal, common, statutory, administrative or foreign law, regulation, or at equity, as claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, or third-party claims, in this Action or a separate action, in this Court or in any other court,
arbitration proceeding, administrative proceeding, or other forum; and, except as provided in ¶4.6 below, the Released Persons are permanently barred and enjoined, to the fullest extent permitted by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(f)(7)(A) and any other
applicable law or regulation, from commencing, prosecuting, or asserting any and all claims for contribution or indemnity (or any other claim when the alleged injury to the Released Person is their actual or threatened liability to the Settlement
Class or a Settlement Class Member) based upon, relating to, or arising out of the Released Claims, against any person or entity, other than a person or entity whose liability to the Settlement Class has been extinguished pursuant to the Settlement
and the Judgment, whether arising under state, federal, common, statutory, administrative, or foreign law, regulation, or at equity, as claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, or third-party claims, in this Action or a separate action, in this Court or
in any other court, arbitration proceeding, administrative proceeding, or other forum. Nothing herein shall bar, release, or alter in any way, any obligations, rights or claims among or between Released Persons. 

4.5. The Judgment shall also contain a provision, substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit B hereto, requiring that any final verdict or
judgment that may be obtained by or on behalf of the Settlement Class or a Settlement Class Member against any person or entity subject to the Bar Order as defined herein be reduced by the greater of: (i) an amount that corresponds to the
percentage of responsibility of any of the Defendants for common damages; or (ii) $12,537,500.00. 
 4.6. Notwithstanding the foregoing
releases and Bar Order, nothing in this Stipulation shall release any claims, or bar any action by any of the Settling Parties, to enforce or to effectuate this Stipulation, the releases and other terms and conditions of the Settlement, the Notice
Order, or the Judgment. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	21

	 	5.	Administration and Calculation of Claims, Final Awards, and Supervision and Distribution of the Settlement Fund 

5.1. The Claims Administrator, subject to the supervision of Lead Counsel, and such supervision and direction of the Court as may be necessary
or as circumstances may require, shall administer and calculate the claims submitted by Settlement Class Members and shall oversee distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (defined below in ¶5.3 hereof)) to Authorized Claimants pursuant to the
Plan of Allocation. 
 5.2. Within ten (10) business days after entry of the Notice Order, counsel for Defendants will use reasonable
efforts to cause ITT’s transfer agent to provide the Claims Administrator with a list of names and addresses of record holders of ITT Securities during the Class Period. This information shall be provided in an electronic format acceptable to
the Claims Administrator. Defendants shall be responsible for any costs or expenses related to providing this information. Defendants and the other Released Persons shall not have any other role in, or any responsibility or liability to any Person
for, the administration of the Settlement, nor shall any discovery be taken of Defendants in connection with such matters. 
 5.3. Upon the
Effective Date and thereafter, the Settlement Fund shall be applied as follows: 
 (a) to pay Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs’
attorneys’ fees and expenses with interest thereon (the “Fee and Expense Award”), if and to the extent allowed by the Court; 

(b) to pay any award of reimbursement of expenses to the Plaintiffs, if and to the extent allowed by the Court; 

(c) to pay all the costs and expenses reasonably and actually incurred in connection with providing notice, locating Settlement Class
Members, soliciting Settlement Class claims, assisting with the filing of claims, administering and distributing the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants, processing Proof of Claim and Release forms, and paying escrow fees and costs, if any;

 (d) to pay the Taxes and Tax Expenses described in ¶2.15 hereof; and 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	22

 (e) to distribute the balance of the Settlement Fund (the “Net Settlement Fund”) to
Authorized Claimants as allowed by the Stipulation, the Plan of Allocation, or order of the Court. 
 5.4. Upon the Effective Date and
thereafter, and in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation, the Plan of Allocation, or such further approval and further order(s) of the Court as may be necessary or as circumstances may require, the Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to
Authorized Claimants, subject to and in accordance with the following: 
 (a) Within one hundred-twenty (120) days after the Notice
Order or such other time as may be set by the Court, each Person claiming to be an Authorized Claimant shall be required to submit to the Claims Administrator a completed Proof of Claim and Release form (“Proof of Claim”), substantially in
the form of Exhibit A-2 attached hereto, signed under penalty of perjury, and supported by such documents as are specified in the Proof of Claim and as are reasonably available to such Person. 

(b) Except as otherwise ordered by the Court, any and all Settlement Class Members who fail to timely submit a properly completed Proof of
Claim within such period, or such other period as may be ordered by the Court, or otherwise allowed, shall be forever barred from receiving any payments pursuant to this Stipulation and the Settlement set forth therein, but shall nevertheless be
barred and enjoined from bringing any action, claim or other proceeding of any kind against the Released Persons concerning the Released Claims and will in all respects be subject to and bound by the provisions of this Stipulation, the releases
contained herein, the Judgment, and all proceedings, rulings, orders, and judgments in this Action, including without limitation, the release of the Released Claims and the dismissal with prejudice of this Action. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lead
Counsel shall have the discretion to accept late-submitted claims for processing by the Claims Administrator so long as distribution of the Net Settlement Fund is not materially delayed thereby. 

(c) The Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants substantially in accordance with the Plan of Allocation set forth in
the Notice and approved by the Court. Any such Plan of Allocation is not a part of this Stipulation. No funds from the Net 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	23

 
Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants until the Effective Date. Defendants shall not have a reversionary interest in the Net Settlement Fund. If there is any balance
remaining in the Net Settlement Fund after six (6) months from the date of distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (whether by reason of tax refunds, uncashed checks, or otherwise), Lead Counsel shall, if feasible, reallocate such balance among
Authorized Claimants in an equitable and economic fashion. Thereafter, any balance which still remains in the Net Settlement Fund shall be donated to one or more secular §501(c)(3) organization(s) selected by the Lead Counsel. 

5.5. The Released Persons, Defendants’ Counsel and Defendants’ directors and officers liability insurance carriers shall have no
responsibility for, interest in, or liability whatsoever with respect to any act, omission or determination of the Escrow Agent, Claims Administrator, Plaintiffs’ counsel, including Lead Counsel, or designees of said persons regarding the
investment or distribution of the Settlement Fund or Net Settlement Fund, the Plan of Allocation, the determination, administration, or calculation of claims, the payment or withholding of Taxes or Tax Expenses, or any losses incurred in connection
with any such matters. Plaintiffs and each Settlement Class Member hereby fully, finally, and forever release, relinquish, and discharge the Released Persons and their counsel from any and all such liability. 

5.6. No Person shall have any claim against Plaintiffs, Lead Counsel, the Claims Administrator, or their counsel based on the distributions
made substantially in accordance with this Stipulation and the Settlement contained herein, the Plan of Allocation, or further order(s) of the Court. No Person shall have any claim against the Released Persons or their counsel arising from or
relating to the management of, distributions from, or the disposition of the Settlement Fund or the Net Settlement Fund, and Plaintiffs and each Settlement Class Member hereby fully, finally, and forever release, relinquish, and discharge the
Released Persons and their counsel from any and all such liability. 
 5.7. It is understood and agreed by the Settling Parties that any
proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund including, but not limited to, any adjustments to an Authorized Claimant’s claim set forth therein, is not a part of the Stipulation and is to be considered

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	24

 
by the Court separately from the Court’s consideration of the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and any order or proceeding relating to
the Plan of Allocation shall not operate to terminate or cancel the Stipulation or affect the finality of the Court’s Judgment approving this Stipulation and the Settlement set forth herein, or any other orders entered pursuant to the
Stipulation. The time to appeal from approval of the Settlement shall commence upon the Court’s entry of the Judgment regardless of whether a Plan of Allocation has been submitted to the Court or has been approved. 

5.8. All Persons who fall within the definition of Members of the Settlement Class shall be subject to and bound by the provisions of this
Stipulation, the releases contained herein, and the Judgment with respect to all Released Claims, regardless of whether such Persons seek or obtain by any means, including, without limitation, by submitting a Proof of Claim or any similar document,
any distribution from the Settlement Fund or the Net Settlement Fund. 
  

	 	6.	Lead Counsel’s Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses 

 6.1. Lead Counsel may submit an
application to the Court (the “Fee and Expense Application”) for distributions to Plaintiffs’ counsel from the Settlement Fund for: (a) an award of attorneys’ fees of up to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Settlement
Fund (i.e. up to $3,134,375); plus (b) the payment of reasonable expenses incurred in connection with prosecuting the Litigation (including, but not limited to the fees and expenses of experts and consultants), plus any interest on such
attorneys’ fees and expenses at the same rate and for the same periods as earned by the Settlement Fund (until paid) as may be awarded by the Court; plus (c) the payment to Plaintiffs for time and expense in litigation of this action (the
“Fee and Expense Award”). Lead Counsel reserves the right to make additional applications to the Court for fees and expenses incurred based on unanticipated developments in the Litigation or in the administration of the Settlement. 

6.2. The Fee and Expense Award, including the fees and expenses of experts and consultants as awarded by the Court shall be payable to Lead
Counsel, from the Settlement Fund, immediately upon the entry of the Court’s order awarding such fees and expenses, notwithstanding the existence of any timely filed objections thereto, or potential for appeal therefrom, or collateral

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	25

 
attack on the Settlement or any part thereof, subject to Lead Counsel’s obligation to repay those amounts to the Settlement Fund, if and when, as a result of any appeal and/or further
proceedings on remand, or successful collateral attack, the Fee and Expense Award is reduced or reversed or return of the Settlement Fund is required consistent with the provisions of ¶7.3 hereof. If, and when, as a result of any appeal and/or
further proceedings on remand, or successful collateral attack, the Fee and Expense Award is overturned or reduced, or if the Settlement is terminated or is not approved by the Court, or if there is an appeal and any order approving the Settlement
does not become Final and binding upon the Settlement Class, then, within ten (10) business days from receiving notice from Defendants’ Counsel or from a court of appropriate jurisdiction, Lead Counsel shall refund to the Settlement Fund
such fees and expenses previously paid to them from the Settlement Fund, plus interest thereon at the same rate as earned on the Settlement Fund, in an amount consistent with such reversal or modification. Lead Counsel may allocate awarded
attorneys’ fees among other plaintiffs’ counsel in a manner in which, in Lead Counsel’s good-faith judgment, reflects the contributions of such counsel to the initiation, prosecution, and resolution of the Litigation. Each such
plaintiff’s counsel’s law firm receiving fees and expenses, as a condition of receiving such fees and expenses, on behalf of itself and each partner and/or shareholder of it, shall agree that the law firm and its partners and/or
shareholders are subject to the jurisdiction of the Court for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this Paragraph. 
 6.3. The
procedure for and the allowance or disallowance by the Court of any Fee and Expense Application by Lead Counsel to be paid out of the Settlement Fund, are not part of the Settlement set forth in this Stipulation, and are to be considered by the
Court separately from the Court’s consideration of the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement set forth in this Stipulation; and any order or proceeding relating to any Fee and Expense Application, or any appeal from any order
relating thereto or reversal or modification thereof, shall not operate to terminate or cancel this Stipulation or the Settlement. 
 6.4.
Defendants and the other Released Persons and their counsel shall have no responsibility for, and no liability whatsoever with respect to, any payment from the Settlement Fund of any type or nature whatsoever, including attorneys’ fees and
expenses paid to any counsel for Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	26

 6.5. Defendants and the other Released Persons and their counsel shall have no responsibility
for, and no liability whatsoever with respect to, the allocation among plaintiffs’ counsel, and/or any other Person who may assert some claim thereto, of any Fee and Expense Award that the Court may make in the Litigation. 

 

	 	7.	Conditions of Settlement, Effect of Disapproval, Cancellation, or Termination 

 7.1. The
Effective Date of this Stipulation, and the Settlement incorporated herein, shall be conditioned on the occurrence of all of the following events: 

(a) the Court has entered the Notice Order, preliminarily approving the Settlement, as required by ¶3.1 hereof; 

(b) the Court has granted final approval of the Settlement as described herein, following notice to the Settlement Class and a Settlement
Hearing, as prescribed by Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and has entered the Judgment, in all material respects in accordance with ¶3.3 and Exhibit B hereof; 

(c) Defendants have not exercised their option to terminate the Settlement pursuant to ¶7.5 hereof; and, 

(d) the Judgment has become Final, as defined in ¶1.10 hereof. 

7.2. Upon the occurrence of all of the events referenced in ¶7.1 hereof, any and all remaining interest or right of Defendants in or to
the Settlement Fund, if any, shall be absolutely and forever extinguished. If any of the conditions specified in ¶7.1 hereof are not met, then this Stipulation shall be canceled and terminated subject to ¶7.3 hereof, unless
Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel all mutually agree in writing to proceed with the Settlement in accordance with ¶7.4. 

7.3. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, in the event the Effective Date does not occur or this Stipulation shall terminate, or be
canceled, or otherwise fail to become effective for any reason, including, without limitation, in the event that the Settlement as described herein is not 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	27

 
approved by the Court or the Judgment is reversed or vacated following any appeal taken there from, then: 

(a) within fifteen (15) business days after written notification of such event is sent by Defendants’ Counsel or Lead Counsel to
the Escrow Agent, the Settlement Fund (including accrued interest), excluding only reasonable costs actually incurred in connection with providing notice to the Settlement Class that have either been properly disbursed or are due and owing pursuant
to ¶2.11 (so long as supporting documentation for such costs is provided) and Taxes and Tax Expenses that have been paid or that have accrued and will be payable at some later date in accordance with ¶2.15 (so long as supporting
documentation for such taxes is provided), will be refunded, reimbursed, and repaid by the Escrow Agent to Defendants, as directed in writing by Defendants’ Counsel; if said amount or any portion thereof is not returned within such fifteen
(15) day period, then interest shall accrue thereon at the same rate as earned by the Settlement Fund until the date that said amount is returned; 

(b) at the request of Defendants’ Counsel, the Escrow Agent or its designee shall apply for any Tax refund owed on the Settlement Fund
and pay the proceeds to Defendants, as directed in writing by Defendants’ Counsel, after deduction of any fees or expenses reasonably incurred in connection with such application(s) for refund pursuant to such written request; 

(c) the Settling Parties shall be restored to their respective positions in the Litigation as of July 14, 2015, the date the Court
granted a stay of this Action pending settlement discussions, with all of their respective claims and defenses preserved as they existed on that date, and the Settling Parties shall in good faith propose a new case schedule; 

(d) any order certifying a class in this Action for purposes of this Settlement prior to termination shall be null and void and a class shall
not be considered certified for purposes of further litigation; 
 (e) the terms and provisions of this Stipulation shall be null and void
and shall have no further force and effect with respect to the Settling Parties (except for ¶¶1.1-1.29, 2.9, 2.10, 2.12-2.16, 5.5, 6.2, 6.4, 7.3, 7.4, 8.2, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.11, 8.16, 8.17, and 8.18 which shall survive

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	28

 
termination), and neither the existence nor the terms of this Stipulation (nor any negotiations preceding this Stipulation nor any acts performed pursuant to, or in furtherance of, this
Stipulation) shall be used in this Litigation or in any other proceeding for any purpose; and 
 (f) any judgment or order entered by the
Court in accordance with the terms of this Stipulation shall be treated as vacated, nunc pro tunc. 
 7.4. If the Court does not
enter the Judgment in all material respects in the form attached as Exhibit B hereto, or if the Court enters the Judgment and appellate review is sought and, on such review, the entry of the Judgment is finally vacated, modified, or reversed, then
this Stipulation and the Settlement incorporated therein shall be cancelled and terminated, unless all parties who are adversely affected thereby, in their sole discretion within thirty (30) business days from the date of the mailing of such
ruling to such parties, provide written notice to all other parties hereto of their intent to proceed with the Settlement under the terms of the Judgment as modified by the Court or on appeal. Such notice may be provided on behalf of Plaintiffs and
the Settlement Class Members by Lead Counsel. No Settling Party shall have any obligation whatsoever to proceed under any terms other than substantially in the form provided and agreed to herein; provided, however, that no order of the Court
concerning any Fee and Expense Application or Plan of Allocation, or any modification or reversal on appeal of such order, shall constitute grounds for cancellation or termination of this Stipulation by any Settling Party. Without limiting the
foregoing, Defendants shall have, in their sole and absolute discretion, the option to terminate the Settlement in its entirety in the event that the Judgment, upon becoming Final, does not provide for the dismissal with prejudice of the Litigation
against them or provide the releases or bar orders contained in Exhibit B. 
 7.5. If, prior to the Settlement Hearing, any Persons who
otherwise would be Settlement Class Members have validly requested exclusion from the Settlement Class (“Requests for Exclusion”) in accordance with the provisions of the Notice or Notice Order, and such Persons, in the aggregate, during
the Settlement Class Period purchased or acquired ITT common stock or options on ITT common stock (and/or wrote put options on ITT common stock) equal to or more 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	29

 
than a certain percentage of ITT Securities specified in a separate Supplemental Agreement to the Stipulation, then Defendants shall have, in their sole and absolute discretion, the option to
terminate this Stipulation on behalf of all Settling Parties in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Supplemental Agreement. Lead Counsel shall, however, have an opportunity to seek retraction of any Request for Exclusion under the terms
of the Supplemental Agreement. The Supplemental Agreement shall not be filed with the Court. If required by the Court, Plaintiffs and Defendants shall request that the Supplemental Agreement be filed under seal and/or any of its terms be disclosed
only in camera to the Court for purposes of approving the Settlement, and that such disclosure shall be carried out to the fullest extent possible in accordance with the practices of the Court so as to preserve the confidentiality of the
Supplemental Agreement, particularly the threshold percentage amount of ITT Securities specified in the Supplemental Agreement. The Claims Administrator shall promptly (and not more than three (3) business days after the Claims Administrator
receives such a request) electronically provide copies of any or all Requests for Exclusion to Lead Counsel and to Defendants’ Counsel. A listing of all persons who have validly requested exclusion from the Settlement Class shall be provided by
Lead Counsel to Defendants’ Counsel within five (5) business days following the deadline for requesting exclusion from the Settlement Class and to the Court no later than ten (10) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. The list of
persons who have validly requested exclusion from the Settlement Class provided to the Court shall also include a certification that all Requests for Exclusion have been previously provided to Defendants’ Counsel. 

 

	 	8.	Miscellaneous Provisions 

 8.1. All of the exhibits attached hereto are hereby
incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 
 8.2. The headings herein are used for the purpose of convenience only and are
not meant to have legal effect. 
 8.3. The Settling Parties: (a) acknowledge that it is their intent to consummate this Stipulation;
and (b) agree, subject to their fiduciary and other legal obligations, to cooperate to the extent reasonably necessary to effectuate and implement all terms and conditions of this Stipulation and to exercise their best efforts to accomplish the
foregoing terms and conditions of this Stipulation. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	30

 8.4. The Settling Parties intend this Settlement to be a final and complete resolution of all
disputes that have arisen, or could have arisen, between them, and all claims that have been asserted, or that could have been asserted, by Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class Members against the Defendants and other Released Persons with respect to
the Released Claims. The Settlement compromises claims which are contested and shall not be deemed an admission by any Settling Party as to the merits of any claim or defense. 

8.5. While Defendants deny that the claims advanced in the Litigation were meritorious, they will not assert in any public forum that the
Litigation was not filed by Plaintiffs in good faith and/or is not being settled voluntarily after consultation with competent legal counsel. Plaintiffs will not assert in any public forum that Defendants’ defenses were, or would be, made in
bad faith or without reasonable bases, or that the Settlement is not in the best interests of the Settlement Class Members. The Judgment will contain a finding that, during the course of the Litigation, the parties and their respective counsel at
all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. The Settling Parties agree that the amount paid to the Settlement Fund and the other terms of the Settlement were negotiated at arm’s length and in good faith by
the Settling Parties and reflect a Settlement that was reached voluntarily after consultation with competent legal counsel. The Settling Parties reserve their right to rebut, in a manner that such party determines to be appropriate, any contention
made in any public forum that the Litigation was brought or defended in bad faith or without a reasonable basis. 
 8.6. While maintaining
their positions that the claims and defenses asserted in the Action are meritorious, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel, on the one hand, and Defendants and Defendants’ counsel, on the other, shall not make any public statements or
statements to the media (whether or not for attribution) that disparage the other’s business, conduct, or reputation or that of their counsel based on the subject matter of the Action. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	31

 8.7. Whether or not the Settlement is approved by the Court, and whether or not the Settlement is
consummated, none of this Stipulation, its Exhibits, the fact and terms of the Settlement contained herein, or any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of this Stipulation or the Settlement: (a) is or may be deemed
to be or may be used as an admission of, concession of, or evidence of, the truth or validity of any Released Claim, of any allegations or claims made in the Litigation, of any allegations or claims that could have been made in the Litigation, or of
any allegation of wrongdoing, negligence, fault, or liability of Defendants or any other Released Persons; or (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, concession of, or evidence of, the deficiency or infirmity of any
defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation; or (c) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any liability, negligence, fault, misrepresentation, omission, or
wrongdoing as against any of Defendants or any Released Persons in any arbitration proceeding or other civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal; or (d) is or may be deemed to
be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence that class certification is appropriate in this Action, except for purposes of this Settlement; or (e) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence that the
consideration to be paid under the Settlement represents the amount which could be or would have been recovered after trial in this Action; or (f) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence that any damages
potentially recoverable under the Complaint would have exceeded or would have been less than the Settlement Fund. Neither this Stipulation nor the Settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of this
Stipulation or the Settlement shall be admissible in any proceeding for any purpose, except to enforce the terms of the Settlement; provided, however that if the Settlement is approved by the Court, the Released Persons may refer to or file the
Stipulation and/or the Judgment in any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction,
or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim under U.S. federal or state law or foreign law. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	32

 8.8. The Stipulation may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by or on
behalf of all Settling Parties or their respective successors-in-interest. Without further order of the Court, counsel for the Settling Parties may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any provisions of this Stipulation. 

8.9. The waiver by one party of any breach of this Stipulation by any other party shall not be deemed a waiver of any other prior or
subsequent breach of this Stipulation. The provisions of this Stipulation may not be waived except by writing signed by the affected party, or counsel for that party. 

8.10. This Stipulation, including its Exhibits and Supplemental Agreement which are material parts thereof, constitutes the entire agreement
among the parties hereto and no representations, warranties, or inducements have been made to any party concerning the Stipulation other than the representations, warranties, and covenants contained and memorialized in such documents. It is
understood by the Settling Parties that, except for the matters expressly represented herein, the facts or law with respect to which this Stipulation is entered into may turn out to be other than, or different from, the facts now known to each party
or believed by such party to be true; each party therefore expressly assumes the risk of the facts or law turning out to be so different, and agrees that this Stipulation shall be in all respects effective and not subject to termination by reason of
any such different facts or law. Except as otherwise provided herein, each party shall bear its own costs. 
 8.11. This Stipulation shall
not be construed more strictly against one Settling Party than another merely by virtue of the fact that it, or any part of it, may have been prepared by counsel for one of the Settling Parties, it being recognized that it is the result of
arm’s-length negotiations among the Settling Parties and all Settling Parties have contributed substantially and materially to the preparation of this Stipulation. 

8.12. Lead Counsel, on behalf of the Settlement Class, is expressly authorized by Plaintiffs to take all appropriate action required or
permitted to be taken by the Settlement Class pursuant to this Stipulation to effectuate its terms and also are expressly authorized to enter into any 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	33

 
modifications or amendments to this Stipulation on behalf of the Settlement Class which they deem appropriate. Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel represent and warrant that none of Plaintiffs’
claims or causes of action referred to herein, or that could have been alleged in the Litigation, has been assigned, encumbered, hypothecated, conveyed, transferred, or in any manner granted or given, in whole or in part, to any other Person. 

8.13. Each counsel or other Person executing this Stipulation and any documents prepared in furtherance of the Stipulation on behalf of any
party hereto, hereby warrants that such Person has the full authority to do so. 
 8.14. This Stipulation may be executed in one or more
counterparts. All executed counterparts and each of them shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. A complete set of executed counterparts shall be filed with the Court. 

8.15. This Stipulation shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the Parties hereto, including any
corporation or other entity into or with which any Party merges, consolidates, or reorganizes. 
 8.16. The Court shall retain jurisdiction
with respect to implementation and enforcement of the terms of this Stipulation, and all Parties hereto submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for purposes of implementing and enforcing the settlement embodied in the Stipulation. 

8.17. Nothing in this Stipulation, Settlement, or the negotiations or proceedings relating to the foregoing is intended to or shall be deemed
to constitute a waiver of any applicable privilege or immunity, including, without limitation, the accountants’ privilege, the attorney-client privilege, the joint defense privilege, or work product immunity; further, all communications,
documents, and/or other statements between Plaintiffs’ Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel in connection with the mediation of this Litigation and relating to the drafting and execution of this Settlement shall be kept confidential and shall
be inadmissible in any proceeding in any U.S. federal or state court or other tribunal or otherwise, in accordance with Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence as if such Rule applied in all respects in any such proceeding or forum. 

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	34

 8.18. This Stipulation and the Settlement contemplated by it, and all disputes arising out of or
relating to the Stipulation and Settlement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the substantive laws and procedural rules of the State of Indiana without giving effect to Indiana’s choice-of-law principles,
except to the extent that federal law requires that federal law governs. Any dispute relating to this Stipulation shall be brought exclusively in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. 

8.19. Any written notice required pursuant to or in connection with this Stipulation shall be delivered by e-mail to the Parties’ counsel
as designated and identified below and also by overnight mail addressed to a representative of Lead Counsel and/or Defendants’ Counsel, which shall be Robert V. Prongay and Jennifer L. Conn at the addresses identified below, respectively,
unless and until notification of a change in said representatives. 
 8.20. Except where specifically noted, all time periods set forth in
this Settlement will be computed in calendar days and pursuant to the terms of Rule 6(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the Stipulation to be executed, by their duly authorized attorneys, dated as of November 2, 2015. 
  

							
	Dated: November 2, 2015	 		 	GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert V. Prongay

		 		 	Lionel Z. Glancy
		 		 	Robert V. Prongay
		 		 	Leanne H. Solish
		 		 	1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
		 		 	Los Angeles, California 90067
		 		 	Telephone:     (310) 201-9150
		 		 	Facsimile:      (310) 201-9160
			
		 		 	Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the Class

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	35

							
		 		 	KATZ & KORIN, PC
		 		 	Offer Korin [Atty. No. 14014-49]
		 		 	334 North Senate Avenue
		 		 	Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-1708
		 		 	Telephone:     (317) 464-1100
		 		 	Facsimile:      (317) 464-1111
			
		 		 	Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiff and the Class
			
	Dated: November 2, 2015	 		 	GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Jennifer L. Conn

		 		 	Jennifer L. Conn
		 		 	200 Park Avenue
		 		 	New York, New York 10166-0193
		 		 	Telephone:     (212) 351-4000
		 		 	Facsimile:      (212) 351-4035
			
		 		 	Wayne W. Smith
		 		 	3161 Michelson Drive
		 		 	Irvine, California 92612-4412
		 		 	Telephone:     (949) 451-3800
		 		 	Facsimile:      (949) 451-4220
			
		 		 	ICE MILLER LLP
		 		 	Philip A. Whistler
		 		 	Thomas E. Mixdorf
		 		 	One American Square, Suite 2900
		 		 	Indianapolis, Indiana 46282-0200
		 		 	Telephone:     (317) 236-2100
		 		 	Facsimile:      (317) 592-4790
			
		 		 	Counsel for Defendants
				
		 		 		 	

  
  

			
	 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
 Case No.
1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
	 	36

 EXHIBIT A 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION 
  

			
	 In re ITT
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
 SECURITIES LITIGATION (INDIANA)
	  	 CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
  

EXHIBIT A
  

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

 

 WHEREAS, a putative class action is pending before the Court entitled In re ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION (INDIANA), Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML, United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (the “Litigation”); 

WHEREAS, the Court has received the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of November 2, 2015 (the “Stipulation”)1, which has been entered into by Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all Members of the Settlement Class, and Defendants, and the Court has reviewed the Stipulation and the Exhibits annexed
thereto; 
 WHEREAS, the Settling Parties having made application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), for an order
preliminarily approving the Settlement of this Litigation, in accordance with the Stipulation which sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed Settlement of the Litigation and for dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice upon the terms and
conditions set forth therein; and the Court having read and considered the Stipulation; 
  

 

	1 	For purposes of this Order, the Court adopts all defined terms as set forth in the Stipulation, and the capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as in the Stipulation. 

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

1 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Court does hereby preliminarily approve the Stipulation and the Settlement set forth therein, including all provisions therein and
exhibits attached thereto, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing described below. 
 2. The Court finds that:
(a) the Stipulation resulted from arm’s-length negotiations; and (b) the Stipulation is sufficiently fair, reasonable and adequate as to the Settlement Class to warrant providing notice of the Settlement to Settlement Class Members
and to warrant holding a Settlement Hearing under Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 
 3. The Settlement Hearing shall be
held before this Court on                      , 2016,2 at
    :       .m., in the Birch Bayh Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse, 46 East Ohio Street, Courtroom 344, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, for the purpose of determining, among other things:
(i) whether the proposed Settlement of the Litigation, on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interests of the Settlement Class and should be finally approved by the Court;
(ii) whether, for purposes of settlement only, the Settlement Class should be finally certified; whether Lead Plaintiff should be finally appointed as a representative for the Settlement Class; and whether Lead Counsel should be finally
appointed as counsel for the Settlement Class; (iii) whether a Judgment, in the form attached as Exhibit B to the Stipulation should be entered herein, dismissing and releasing the Released Claims (as that term is defined in the Stipulation)
with prejudice; (iv) whether the proposed Plan of Allocation should be approved; (v) whether to grant Lead Counsel’s request of fees and expenses; (vi) whether the Court 

 

	2 	 The Settling Parties have respectfully requested that the Court schedule the Settlement Hearing no earlier than 100 days after entry of this Order,
preliminarily approving the Settlement, so that, among other things, they may comply with the notice provisions set forth in the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1715(b).

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

2 

 
should grant Plaintiffs’ reimbursement of their reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class; and (vii) to
consider any other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in connection with the Settlement. 
 4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court preliminarily certifies, solely for the purposes of effectuating this Settlement, a Settlement Class consisting of all persons and/or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of ITT
Educational Services, Inc. (“ITT” or the “Company”) (ticker symbol: ESI), purchased or otherwise acquired call options on ITT common stock, or wrote put options on ITT common stock, between February 26, 2013 and May 12,
2015, both dates inclusive (the “Settlement Class”). Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants, the officers and directors of ITT during the Settlement Class, members of their immediate families, and the legal representatives,
heirs, successors or assigns of any of the foregoing and any entity in which a Defendant has or had a controlling interest during the Settlement Class Period. Also excluded from the Settlement Class is any person or entity that timely and validly
requests exclusion from the Settlement Class, pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of this Order. There has been no prior notice to the Settlement Class of the certification of the Settlement Class in this Litigation or prior opportunity for
any individual or entity to request to be excluded from being a Member of the Settlement Class. 
 5. With respect to the Settlement Class,
the Court preliminarily finds, for purposes of effectuating this Settlement only, that the prerequisites for a class action under Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been satisfied in that: (a) the number of
Settlement Class Members is so numerous that joinder of all members thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class; (c) the claims of the Lead Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the
Settlement Class it represents; (d) Lead Plaintiff and Lead 

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

3 

 
Counsel have and will continue to fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Settlement Class; (e) the questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class predominate over any
questions affecting only individual Members of the Settlement Class; and (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. 

6. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for the purposes of this Settlement only, Lead Plaintiff, is preliminarily
appointed as a class representative for the Settlement Class and Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, previously appointed Lead Counsel, is preliminarily appointed as counsel for the Settlement Class. 

7. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and
Settlement Hearing (the “Notice”), the Proof of Claim and Release form (the “Proof of Claim”), and the Summary Notice (“Summary Notice”) annexed respectively as Exhibits A-1, A-2 and A-3 to the Stipulation, and finds
that the mailing and distribution of the Notice and publishing of the Summary Notice substantially in the manner and form set forth in this Order meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the due process requirements of
Section 21D(a)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Due Process clause of the U.S. Constitution, and any other applicable law, and is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and shall constitute due and sufficient notice
to all Persons entitled thereto. 
 8. Upon the entry of this Order, pending final determination by the Court as to whether the Settlement,
as set forth in the Stipulation, is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and should be finally approved, and whether the Judgment dismissing the Litigation with prejudice, as set forth in Exhibit B to the Stipulation, should be approved, the Court orders
a continuation of the stay of litigation in this Action first entered on July 14, 2015, and neither Plaintiffs nor any Settlement Class Member, either directly, representatively, or in any other capacity, shall assert, commence, or prosecute

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

4 

 
against any of the Released Persons, any of the Released Claims in this Litigation, or in any other action or litigation in any court, arbitration or other tribunal, or in any other proceeding or
forum. This injunction is necessary to protect and effectuate the Settlement, this Order, and the Court’s flexibility and authority to effectuate the Settlement and to enter judgment when appropriate, and is ordered in aid of the Court’s
jurisdiction and to protect its judgments. 
 9. The Court appoints the firm Angeion Group (the “Claims Administrator”) to
supervise and administer the notice procedure, as well as the processing of claims as more fully set forth below: 
 a. Not
later than twenty (20) business days after the date of this Order (the “Notice Date”), the Claims Administrator shall cause a copy of the Notice and the Proof of Claim, substantially in the forms annexed as Exhibits A-1 and A-2 to the
Stipulation, respectively, to be mailed by first class mail to all of the potential Settlement Class Members who can be identified with reasonable effort; 

b. Not later than ten (10) business days after the Notice Date, the Claims Administrator shall cause the Summary Notice,
substantially in the form annexed as Exhibits A-3 to the Stipulation, to be published once in Investor’s Business Daily, and on a different day shall cause the Summary Notice to be published once on Business Wire; 

c. Not later than the Notice Date, the Claims Administrator shall cause copies of the Stipulation and its Exhibits, the Notice,
the Summary Notice, and the Proof of Claim to be posted on the following website: www.ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana.com; and 

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

5 

 d. Not later than seventy (70) days after the date of this Order,
Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel shall cause to be served on Defendants’ Counsel and filed with the Court proof, by affidavit or declaration, of such mailing, publishing and posting. 

10. Nominees who purchased or otherwise acquired ITT Securities between February 26, 2013 and May 12, 2015, both dates inclusive,
shall send the Notice and the Proof of Claim to all beneficial owners of such ITT Securities within fourteen (14) days after receipt thereof, or send a list of the names and addresses of such beneficial owners to the Claims Administrator within
fourteen (14) days of receipt thereof, in which event the Claims Administrator shall promptly mail the Notice and the Proof of Claim to such beneficial owners. Lead Counsel shall, if requested, reimburse banks, brokerage houses, or other
nominees solely for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing the Notice to beneficial owners who are potential Members of the Settlement Class out of the Settlement Fund, which expenses would not have been incurred except for
the sending of such Notice, subject to further order of this Court with respect to any dispute concerning such compensation. 
 11. Any
Person falling within the definition of the Settlement Class may, upon request, be excluded from the Settlement Class. Any such Person must submit to the Claims Administrator a request for exclusion (“Request for Exclusion”), to be
received no later than twenty-eight (28) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. A Request for Exclusion must state: (a) the name, address, and telephone number of the Person requesting exclusion; (b) each of the Person’s purchases
and sales of ITT Securities made during the Settlement Class Period, including the dates of purchase or sale, the number of shares/options purchased and/or sold, and the price paid or received per share for each such purchase or sale; and (c) a
statement that the Person wishes to be excluded from the Settlement Class. All Requests for Exclusion must also be signed by the Person requesting exclusion. All 

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

6 

 
Persons who submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion in the manner set forth in this Paragraph shall have no rights under the Settlement, shall not share in the distribution of the Net
Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the Settlement or the Judgment entered in this Litigation. 
 12. Any Person within the
definition of the Settlement Class who does not timely and validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class shall be deemed to have waived his, her, or its right to be excluded from the Settlement Class and shall be bound by all determinations
and judgments in the Litigation concerning the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable to the Settlement Class. All Members of the Settlement Class (all Persons who fall within the definition of the Settlement Class but do not submit a timely
and valid Request for Exclusion in the manner stated in this Order) shall be bound by the Settlement and the Judgment, including, but not limited to, the release of the Released Claims provided for in the Settlement and the Judgment, if the Court
approves the Settlement. 
 13. Settlement Class Members who wish to collect in the Settlement shall complete and submit Proof of Claim
forms in accordance with the instructions contained therein. Unless the Court orders otherwise, all Proof of Claim forms must be postmarked no later than one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of this Order. Any Settlement Class Member who
does not timely submit a Proof of Claim form within the time provided for shall be barred from sharing in the distribution of the proceeds of the Net Settlement Fund, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, but nonetheless will be bound by all of the
terms of the Settlement, including the releases provided for therein, and shall be barred and enjoined from bringing any action, claim or other proceeding of any kind against any Released Person concerning any Released Claim, and shall be bound by
any judgment or determination of the Court affecting the Settlement Class Members. 

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

7 

 14. The Claims Administrator, subject to the supervision of Lead Counsel and the Court, will make
administrative determinations concerning the acceptance and rejection of the Proof of Claim forms submitted. By submitting a Proof of Claim Form, a Member of the Settlement Class shall be deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court
with respect to the claim submitted, and the claim will be subject to investigation and discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

15. Any Member of the Settlement Class may enter an appearance in the Litigation, at his, her or its own expense, individually or through
counsel of his, her or its own choice. If they do not enter an appearance, Lead Counsel will represent them. If any Settlement Class Member chooses to hire an attorney at their own expense, that attorney must file a notice of appearance with the
Court and serve it on Lead Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel so that notice is received at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 

16. Any Member of the Settlement Class may appear at the Settlement Hearing and show cause, if he, she or it has any reason, why the proposed
Settlement of the Litigation should or should not be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate, why a Judgment should or should not be entered thereon, why the Plan of Allocation should or should not be approved, why attorneys’ fees and
reimbursement of expenses should or should not be awarded to Lead Counsel, or why Plaintiffs should not be reimbursed their reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class;
provided, however, that no Settlement Class Member or any other Person shall be heard or entitled to contest the approval of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement, or, if approved, the Judgment to be entered thereon approving the same,
or the order approving the Plan of Allocation, or the attorneys’ fees and expenses to be awarded to Lead Counsel, or Plaintiffs’ reimbursement of costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

8 

 
related to their representation of the Settlement Class, unless that Settlement Class Member has filed said objections, papers and briefs with the Clerk of the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Indiana, no later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the Settlement Hearing and delivered copies of any such papers to counsel for the Settling Parties identified in the Notice, such that they are received on or before such
date. Any objection must include: (a) the full name, address, and phone number of the objecting Settlement Class Member; (b) a list and documentation of all of the Settlement Class Member’s transactions involving the ITT Securities included in
the Settlement Class definition, including brokerage confirmation receipts or other competent documentary evidence of such transactions, including the amount and date of each purchase or sale and the price paid and/or received (including all income
received thereon); (c) a written statement of all grounds for the objection accompanied by any legal support for the objection; (d) copies of any papers, briefs or other documents upon which the objection is based; (e) a list of all persons who will
be called to testify in support of the objection; (f) a statement of whether the objector intends to appear at the Settlement Hearing; (g) a list of other cases in which the objector or the objector’s counsel have appeared either as settlement
objectors or as counsel for objectors in the preceding five years; and (h) the objector’s signature, even if represented by counsel. Any Member of the Settlement Class who does not make his, her or its objection in the manner provided shall be
deemed to have waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed from making any such objection, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. By objecting to the Settlement, the Judgment, the Plan of Allocation, Lead Counsel’s Fee and Expense
Application, or otherwise requesting to be heard at the Settlement Hearing, an objector shall be deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to that Person’s objection or request to be heard and the subject matter of
the Settlement, including, but not limited to, enforcement of the terms of the Settlement (including, but not limited to, the release of the Released Claims provided for in the Settlement and the Judgment). 

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

9 

 17. All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered to be in custodia
legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, until such time as such funds shall be distributed pursuant to the Stipulation or further order(s) of the Court. 

18. All papers in support of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and the Fee and Expense Application, shall be filed and served not later
than thirty-five (35) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. Any papers in further support of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and the Fee and Expense Application, shall be filed and served no later than ten (10) days prior to the
Settlement Hearing. If an objection is filed pursuant to Paragraph 16 above, any reply papers shall be filed no later than seven (7) days before the Settlement Hearing. 

19. Neither Defendants nor any of the Released Persons shall have any responsibility for or liability with respect to the Plan of Allocation,
any application for attorneys’ fees or expenses submitted by Lead Counsel, or any application for Plaintiffs’ reimbursement of costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class, and
such matters will be considered separately from the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the Settlement. 
 20. At or after the
Settlement Hearing, the Court shall determine whether the Plan of Allocation proposed by Lead Counsel and any application for attorneys’ fees or expenses by Lead Counsel or Plaintiffs shall be approved. Any further orders or proceedings solely
regarding the Plan of Allocation or any application for attorneys’ fees or expenses by Lead Counsel or Plaintiffs, or any appeal from any order relating thereto or reversal or modification thereof, shall not operate to terminate the Settlement
or in any way disturb or affect or delay the Settlement or the Judgment and the release of the Released Claims. 

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

10 

 21. All reasonable expenses incurred in identifying and notifying Settlement Class Members, as
well as administering the Settlement Fund, and paying Taxes and Tax expenses, shall be paid as set forth in the Stipulation. Unless otherwise provided in the Stipulation, there shall be no distribution of any portion of the Settlement Fund to any
Settlement Class Member until a Plan of Allocation is finally approved and is affirmed on appeal or certiorari or is no longer subject to review by appeal of certiorari and the time for any petition for rehearing, appeal of review,
whether by certiorari or otherwise, has expired. In the event the Settlement is not approved by the Court, or otherwise fails to become effective, neither the Plaintiffs nor Lead Counsel shall have any obligation to repay any amounts actually
and properly disbursed from the Settlement Fund pursuant to this Paragraph. If the Settlement does not become Final or is terminated for any reason, within fifteen (15) business days of termination, the Settlement Fund shall be returned to
Defendants pursuant to written instructions from Defendants’ Counsel, together with any interest earned on the Settlement Fund, less any notice and administration costs actually incurred. 

22. Defendants have denied, and continue to deny, any and all allegations of wrongdoing, fraud, fault, liability, or damage related to the
claims asserted in the Action; affirm that they have acted properly and lawfully at all times; maintain that they had and have meritorious defenses to all claims alleged in the Action; and have represented that they entered into the Settlement
solely in order to eliminate the burden, expense, and uncertainties of further litigation. Whether or not the Settlement is approved by the Court, none of this Order, the Stipulation, including its Exhibits, the fact and terms of the Settlement
contained therein, or any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance thereof: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission 

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

11 

 
of, concession of, or evidence of, the truth or validity of any Released Claim, of any allegations or claims made in the Litigation, of any allegations or claims that could have been made in the
Litigation, or of any allegation of wrongdoing, negligence, fault, or liability of Defendants or any other Released Persons; or (b) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, concession of, or evidence of, the deficiency or
infirmity of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation; or (c) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, concession of, or evidence of, any liability, negligence, fault,
misrepresentation, omission, or wrongdoing as against any of Defendants or any Released Persons in any arbitration proceeding or other civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal; or
(d) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence that class certification is appropriate in this Action, except for purposes of this Settlement; or (e) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission
of, or evidence that the consideration to be paid under the Settlement represents the amount which could be or would have been recovered after trial in this Action; or (f) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence
that any damages potentially recoverable under the Complaint would have exceeded or would have been less than the Settlement Fund. Neither the Stipulation nor the Settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance
of the Stipulation or the Settlement shall be admissible in any proceeding for any purpose, except to enforce the terms of the Settlement; provided, however that if the Settlement is approved by the Court, the Released Persons may refer to or file
the Stipulation and/or the Judgment in any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or
reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim under U.S. federal or state law or foreign law. 

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

12 

 23. In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance with the terms of
the Stipulation or the Effective Date does not occur, or in the event that the Settlement Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to the Defendants, then this Order shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with
the Stipulation and shall be vacated and, in such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation. In such an event, the Settling Parties
shall return to their positions as of July 14, 2015, the date this Action was stayed pending settlement discussions, without prejudice in any way. 

24. Pending the Settlement Hearing, the Court stays all proceedings in the Litigation, other than proceedings necessary to carry out or
enforce the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. 
 25. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the date of the Settlement Hearing
without further notice to the Members of the Settlement Class, and retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the Settlement. The Court may approve the Settlement, with such modifications as may be
agreed to by the Settling Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to the Settlement Class. 
  

							
	DATED:                     	 		 		 	  

		 		 		 	 THE HONORABLE TANYA WALTON PRATT
 UNITED
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

  
 ORDER PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING 
 FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

13 

 EXHIBIT A-1 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION 
  

			
	 In re ITT
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
 SECURITIES LITIGATION (INDIANA)
	  	 CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
  

EXHIBIT A-1
  

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

 

 IF YOU PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED THE COMMON STOCK OF ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. (“ITT”
OR THE “COMPANY”) (TICKER SYMBOL: ESI; CUSIP: 45068B109), PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED CALL OPTIONS ON ITT COMMON STOCK, OR WROTE PUT OPTIONS ON ITT COMMON STOCK, BETWEEN FEBRUARY 26, 2013 AND MAY 12, 2015, BOTH DATES INCLUSIVE, YOU
COULD RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. 
 A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a
solicitation from a lawyer. 
 Your legal rights are affected whether you act, or don’t act. 

Read this Notice carefully.1 

Securities and Time Period: ITT Educational Services, Inc. (“ITT”) common stock (ticker symbol: ESI; CUSIP: 45068B109)
purchased or acquired, call options on ITT common stock purchased or acquired, and put options on ITT common stock written, between February 26, 2013 and May 12, 2015, both dates inclusive (the “Settlement Class Period”). 

  
  

	1 	This Notice summarizes and is qualified in its entirety by, and incorporates by reference, the Stipulation of Settlement dated November 2, 2015 (the “Stipulation”), which sets forth the terms of the
Settlement. Please refer to the Stipulation for a complete description of the terms and provisions thereof. A copy of the Stipulation is available at www.ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana.com. All capitalized terms used, but not defined
herein, shall have the same meanings as in the Stipulation. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 1 

 Settlement Fund: $12,537,500.00 in cash. Your recovery will depend on the number of ITT
Securities you, and other Settlement Class Members who file claims, purchased, acquired and sold, options written, and the prices at which you, and the other Settlement Class Members who file claims, purchased and sold those ITT Securities. The
estimated average recovery per share of common stock will be approximately $0.38 per share before deduction of Court-approved fees and expenses and costs of notice and claims administration. Historically, actual claims rates are less than 100%,
which will result in a higher distribution per share. 
 Reasons for Settlement: The case has been litigated since September 2014.
Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel believe that the Settlement provides the Settlement Class with a benefit now, instead of years of further uncertain litigation, including disposition of summary judgment motions, a contested trial and
likely appeals, with the possibility of no recovery at all. 
 Plaintiffs allege that Defendants engaged in securities fraud by
misrepresenting the liabilities relating to two risk-sharing agreements for private student loan programs for ITT students and the effect of these programs on ITT’s liquidity and financial condition. Plaintiffs also allege misrepresentations
and omissions, in documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in public statements to investors, regarding ITT’s accounting for its obligations under these risk-sharing agreements for private
student loan programs. 
 The Defendants deny all claims of wrongdoing and affirm that they have acted properly and lawfully at all times.
Defendants have expressly denied, and continue to deny, each and all of the allegations made and claims brought by Plaintiffs in this Action and deny that that they are liable to Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class. Defendants maintain that they have
meritorious defenses to all of Plaintiffs’ allegations and contend that many of the factual allegations made in this Action are materially inaccurate. Defendants also have denied, and continue to deny, among other things, the allegations that
Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class have suffered any injury or damages or that the Settlement Class was harmed by the conduct alleged in the Complaint or otherwise. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 2 

 Nonetheless, Defendants have concluded that further conduct of the Litigation would be protracted
and expensive and wish to avoid the expense, inconvenience, and distraction of burdensome and protracted litigation. Defendants also have taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in complex cases like this
Litigation. Defendants have, therefore, determined that it is desirable and beneficial that the Litigation be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation. The Settlement shall in no event be construed as, or
deemed to be evidence of, an admission or concession by any of the Defendants with respect to any claim of any fault or liability or wrongdoing or damage to the Settlement Class Members in this Litigation. Nor shall the Settlement in any event be
construed as, or deemed to be evidence of, an admission or concession by any Defendant of any infirmity in the defenses that Defendants could have asserted in this Action or otherwise. Had the terms of the Settlement not been reached, Defendants
would have continued to contest vigorously Plaintiffs’ allegations. 
 If the Case Had Not Settled: The Settlement must be
compared to the risk of no recovery after contested dispositive motions, trial, and likely appeals. A trial is a risky proposition. The claims in this Litigation involve numerous complex legal and factual issues, many of which would require expert
testimony. If there were no Settlement and Plaintiffs failed to establish any essential legal or factual element of their claims against the Defendants, neither Plaintiffs nor the Settlement Class would recover anything from the Defendants. Also, if
the Defendants were successful in proving any of their defenses, the Settlement Class likely would recover substantially less than the amount provided in the Settlement, or nothing at all. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 3 

 The Settling Parties disagree on both liability and damages and do not agree on the average
amount of damages per share, if any, that would be recoverable if Plaintiffs were to have prevailed on any or all of the claims alleged. Among the many key issues about which Plaintiffs and Defendants do not agree, include, without limitation:
(1) whether Defendants violated the securities laws or otherwise engaged in any wrongdoing; (2) whether the misrepresentations and omissions alleged by Plaintiffs were material, false, misleading or otherwise actionable under the
securities laws; and (3) the method for determining whether, and the extent to which, purchasers of ITT Securities suffered injury and damages that could be recovered at trial. 

Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses: Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel has not received any payment for its work or expenses incurred in
investigating the facts, conducting this Litigation, and negotiating the Settlement on behalf of the Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class. Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel will ask the Court for attorneys’ fees not to exceed $3,134,375 (or 25%) of
the Settlement Fund and expenses not to exceed $175,000 to be paid from the Settlement Fund, plus interest on both amounts. The Lead Plaintiff and other named Plaintiffs will also request payment for their actual costs and expenses (including lost
wages) directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class, not to exceed $27,500. 
 If the above amounts are requested and
approved by the Court, the average cost per share of common stock will be approximately $0.10 per share, making the estimated recovery per share after attorneys’ fees and expenses approximately $0.28. 

Dismissal and Releases: If the proposed Settlement is approved, the Court will enter a Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with
Prejudice (the “Judgment”). The Judgment will dismiss the Released Claims with prejudice as to the Defendants and all other Released Persons. The Judgment will provide that all Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have forever
released, 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 4 

 
relinquished, dismissed and discharged all Released Claims against all Released Persons. Settlement Class Members will be permanently barred and enjoined from pursuing any or all Released Claims
(including Unknown Claims) against any Released Person in this Action or in any other action or proceeding, in any forum. The definitions of Released Claims and Released Persons, and the terms of the releases which are part of the Settlement (the
“Releases”), are set forth in the Stipulation as well as in the Proof of Claim form that is enclosed. 
 More Information:
www.ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana.com 
 Claims Administrator: 

ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation 

Claims Administrator 
 1801 Market
Street, Suite 660 
 Philadelphia, PA 19103 

1-877-235-9544 

ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana@AngeionGroup.com 

Lead Counsel: 
 Lionel Z.
Glancy, Esq. 
 Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP 

1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

1-888-773-9224 

settlements@glancylaw.com 
  

	•	 	Your legal rights are affected whether you act, or don’t act. Read this Notice carefully. 

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: 
  

			
	SUBMIT A CLAIM	  	This is the only way to receive a payment. If you wish to obtain a payment as a Member of the Settlement Class, you will need to file a Proof of Claim and Release form (“Proof of Claim”).
		
	OBJECT	  	You may write to the Court if you do not like this Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s Fee and Expense Application.
		
	EXCLUDE YOURSELF	  	Receive no payment. This is the only option that allows you to participate in another lawsuit, or to otherwise seek recovery, against the Defendants relating to the claims being released in this
Action.

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 5 

			
		
	GO TO A HEARING	  	You may ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the Settlement.
		
	DO NOTHING	  	Receive no payment. You will remain a Settlement Class Member, and if you take no action, you will give up your right to seek recovery against Defendants and all other Released Persons in connection with the claims being released by
Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class in this Action.

  

	•	 	Unless you validly and timely request exclusion from the Settlement Class, or unless the Court rejects the proposed Settlement, you are bound by the Stipulation and its Releases of the Defendants and Released
Persons, whether or not you submit a Proof of Claim. 

  

	•	 	These rights and options — and the deadlines to exercise them — are explained in this Notice. 

Deadlines: 
  

					
	 Submit Claim:
	  	 	            , 2016	  
		
	 File Objection:
	  	 	            , 2016	  
		
	 Request Exclusion
	  	 	            , 2016	  
		
	Court Hearing on Fairness of Settlement:	  	 	            , 2016	  

  

	•	 	This Notice does not express any opinion by the Court concerning the merits of any claim in the Action. 

  

	•	 	The Court presiding over this case must decide whether to approve the Settlement. Payments will be made only if the Court approves the Settlement and, if there are any appeals, after appeals are resolved. Please be
patient. 

 WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS 

BASIC INFORMATION 
  

	 	1.	Why did I receive this notice package? 

  

	 	2.	What is this lawsuit about? 

  

	 	3.	Why is this a class action? 

  

	 	4.	Why is there a Settlement? 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 6 

 WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT 
  

	 	5.	How do I know if I am part of the Settlement? 

  

	 	6.	Where are the exceptions to being included? 

  

	 	7.	I’m still not sure if I’m included. 

 THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS – WHAT YOU GET 

 

	 	8.	What does the Settlement provide? 

  

	 	9.	How much will my payment be? 

 HOW YOU GET A PAYMENT – SUBMITTING A CLAIM FORM 

 

	 	10.	How can I obtain a payment? 

  

	 	11.	When will I receive my payment? 

  

	 	12.	What am I giving up to receive a payment? 

 EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 

 

	 	13.	How do I get out of the Class? 

  

	 	14.	If I do not exclude myself, can I sue the Defendants for the same thing later? 

  

	 	15.	If I exclude myself, can I receive money from the class action Settlement? 

 THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU 

 

	 	16.	Do I have a lawyer in the case? 

  

	 	17.	How will the lawyers be paid? 

 OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT 

 

	 	18.	How do I tell the Court that I do not like the Settlement? 

 THE COURT’S SETTLEMENT HEARING 

 

	 	19.	When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement? 

  

	 	20.	Do I have to come to the hearing? 

  

	 	21.	May I speak at the hearing? 

 IF YOU DO NOTHING 

 

	 	22.	What happens if I do nothing at all? 

 GETTING MORE INFORMATION 

 

	 	23.	Are there more details about the Settlement? 

 UNDERSTANDING YOUR PAYMENT 

BASIC INFORMATION 
  

	 	1.	Why Did I Receive This Notice Package? 

 You or someone related to you may have purchased
or acquired ITT Educational Services, Inc. (“ITT”) common stock (ticker symbol: ESI) or call options on ITT common stock, or may have written put options on ITT common stock (stock and options collectively, “ITT Securities”),
between February 26, 2013 and May 12, 2015, both dates inclusive. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 7 

 This Notice was sent because you have a right to know about a proposed Settlement of a class
action lawsuit, and about all of your options, before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, and after any objections or appeals are resolved, the Claims Administrator appointed by the Court will
make the payments to those persons or entities who timely submit claims in the manner described below. 
 This package explains the lawsuit,
the Settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible for them, and how to get them. 
 The Court in charge of
this case is the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, and the case is known as In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation (Indiana), Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML (the
“Action”). The Judge presiding over this Action is the Honorable Tonya Walton Pratt. Lead Plaintiff Meitav Dash Mutual Fund Management Ltd. (“Lead Plaintiff”) and Lead Counsel (Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP) have been
preliminarily appointed by the Court to represent the interests of the Settlement Class in this Action. Lead Plaintiff and other named Plaintiffs who have been involved in the Litigation (Plaintiff Babulal Tarapara, Plaintiff Kristopher Hennen,
Plaintiff Cynthia Grebely, and Plaintiff Hoai T. Truong) are collectively called the “Plaintiffs,” and the Company and persons that Plaintiffs have sued are collectively called the “Defendants.” Here, the Defendants are ITT;
Kevin M. Modany, the Company’s CEO during the Settlement Class Period; and Daniel M. Fitzpatrick, the Company’s CFO during the Settlement Class Period. The Settling Parties include the Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the Settlement
Class, and all of the Defendants. 
  

	 	2.	What Is This Lawsuit About? 

 This Litigation alleges violations of the federal
securities laws (specifically, Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) against Defendants. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 8 

 ITT is a Delaware corporation that trades on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”)
under the ticker symbol “ESI”, with its principal executive offices located at 13000 North Meridian Street, Carmel, Indiana, 46032. The Company is a for-profit education company which provides educational services to students with a focus
on providing technology-oriented undergraduate and graduate degree programs through its ITT Technical Institutes and Daniel Webster College. 

Plaintiffs allege that, during the Settlement Class Period, ITT’s stock price was artificially inflated as a result of a series of untrue
or materially misleading misrepresentations and omissions concerning risk-sharing agreements relating to certain third-party, private student loan programs which provided loans to ITT’s students. Defendants deny that they made any such
misleading statements or omissions, deny that ITT’s stock price was artificially inflated as a result of any statements or omissions, and further deny any and all allegations of wrongdoing. 

 

	 	3.	Why Is This A Class Action? 

 Class actions are generally used in lawsuits that affect a
large number of individuals; in effect, the class action operates to consolidate into a single action all of the claims of individuals allegedly harmed by the same conduct or course of conduct, thus alleviating the need for members of the class to
file their own individual lawsuits to recover for the harm alleged. Once a class is certified, the Court is empowered to resolve all issues on behalf of members of the class, except for those members of the class, if any, who specifically choose to
exclude themselves from the Class. 
 As part of the Settlement approval process, Plaintiffs will ask the Court to certify a Settlement
Class for settlement purposes only. The proposed Settlement Class will consist of all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired ITT common stock or call options on ITT common stock, or who wrote put options on ITT common stock,
between February 26, 2013 and May 12, 2015, both dates inclusive. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants, the 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 9 

 
officers and directors of ITT during the Settlement Class Period, members of their immediate families, the legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns of any of the foregoing and any
entity in which a Defendant has or had a controlling interest during the Settlement Class Period. 
 All who fit within the definition of
the Settlement Class are Members of the Settlement Class, except those Persons who timely file a Request for Exclusion that is received by the firm Angeion Group by             , 2016,
twenty-eight (28) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. All Persons who do not timely exclude themselves from the Settlement Class will be bound by the proposed Settlement and its accompanying Releases. 

 

	 	4.	Why Is There a Settlement? 

 The Court did not decide in favor of Plaintiffs or
Defendants. Instead, both sides agreed to a Settlement. This permits them to avoid the cost and uncertainty of a trial, and permits eligible Settlement Class Members, who submit valid Proof of Claim forms, to receive compensation. While Lead
Plaintiff and Lead Counsel believe that the claims asserted against the Defendants have merit, they recognize the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to pursue their claims against Defendants through trial and appeals, as well as
the difficulties in establishing liability and the uncertain outcome of trial and appellate risk in complex lawsuits like this one. Accordingly, Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel believe the Settlement is best for all Settlement Class Members. 

Defendants have expressly denied, and continue to deny, each and all of the claims alleged by Plaintiffs in this Action and affirm that they
have acted properly and lawfully at all times. Nonetheless, Defendants have concluded that further defense of the Litigation would be protracted and expensive and wish to avoid the expense, inconvenience, and distraction of burdensome and protracted
litigation. Defendants also have taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 10 

 
any litigation, especially in complex cases such as this Litigation. Defendants have, therefore, determined that it is desirable and beneficial that the Litigation be settled in the manner and
upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation. 
 WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT 

To see if you will receive money from this Settlement, you first have to determine if you are a Settlement Class Member. 

 

	 	5.	How Do I Know if I Am Part of the Settlement? 

 The Settlement Class includes
all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired ITT common stock, who purchased or otherwise acquired call options on ITT common stock, or who wrote put options on ITT common stock, between February 26, 2013 and May 12,
2015, both dates inclusive. 
  

	 	6.	What Are the Exceptions to Being Included? 

 You are not a Settlement Class Member if you
are a Defendant, were an officer or director of ITT during the Settlement Class Period, are a member of the immediate families of or are the legal representative, heir, successor, or assign of any of the foregoing. You also are not a Settlement
Class Member if you are an entity in which a Defendant has or had a controlling interest during the Settlement Class Period. 
  

	 	7.	I’m Still Not Sure if I Am Included. 

 If you are still not sure whether you are
included, you can ask for free help. You can call Lionel Z. Glancy of Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP at 1-888-773-9224 for more information. Or you can fill out and return the claim form described in Question 10 to see if you qualify. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 11 

 THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS — WHAT YOU GET 

 

	 	8.	What Does the Settlement Provide? 

 The Settlement will result in a Settlement Fund of
$12.5375 million ($12,537,500.00) in cash. The balance of this Settlement Fund, after payment of Court-approved attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses, Taxes and Tax Expenses, and the costs of claims administration, including the cost of
printing and mailing this Notice and the cost of publishing the Summary Notice (the “Net Settlement Fund”), will be divided among all eligible Settlement Class Members who send in valid Proof of Claim forms. 

 

	 	9.	How Much Will My Payment Be? 

 Your share of the Net Settlement Fund will depend on the
number of valid claim forms that Settlement Class Members send in, the number of ITT Securities that you purchased, acquired, or sold during the relevant period, and the timing of your purchases, acquisitions, and sales. You will not receive a
payment, however, if your proportionate share of the Net Settlement Fund is less than $20.00. 
 You can calculate your claim
(“Recognized Claim”) in accordance with the formula shown below in the Plan of Allocation. After all Settlement Class Members have sent in their Proof of Claim forms, the payment you receive will reflect your Recognized Claim in relation
to the Recognized Claims of all persons submitting Proof of Claim forms. The Recognized Claim is not the amount of the payment that you can expect, but is used to determine how the Net Settlement Fund is allocated among all persons submitting
claims. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 12 

 HOW YOU OBTAIN A PAYMENT — SUBMITTING A PROOF OF CLAIM FORM 

 

	 	10.	How Will I Obtain a Payment? 

 To qualify for payment, you must be an eligible Settlement
Class Member, send in a valid Proof of Claim form, and properly document your claim as requested in the Proof of Claim form. A Proof of Claim form is enclosed with this Notice. You may also get a Proof of Claim form on the internet at
www.ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana.com. Read the instructions carefully, fill out the Proof of Claim form, include the documents the form asks for, sign it, and mail it in the enclosed envelope postmarked no later than
            , 2016. 
  

	 	11.	When Will I Receive My Payment? 

 The Court will hold a Settlement Hearing on
            , 2016, to decide whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, there may be appeals. It is always uncertain whether these appeals can be resolved,
and resolving them can take time, perhaps more than a year. Even if no appeals are filed, it will take several months for the Claims Administrator to process all of the Proof of Claim forms and to determine the ultimate distribution amounts. 

 

	 	12.	What Am I Giving Up to Receive a Payment? 

 Unless your Request for Exclusion from the
Settlement Class is received by the deadline of [28 days prior to the Settlement Hearing]             , 2016, you are a Member of the Settlement Class and will be bound by the Releases of
claims against the Defendants and other Released Persons. That means that you cannot sue, continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit or other proceeding against the Defendants or any other Released Persons about the Released Claims in this
case. It also means that all of the Court’s Orders, including the proposed Judgment which will dismiss with prejudice the claims in this Action, will apply to you and legally bind you, and you will release your claims in this case against the
Defendants and the other Released Persons. The 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 13 

 
terms of the Releases, which specifically include the release of Unknown Claims against the Defendants and all other Released Persons, are set forth in the Stipulation and are summarized in the
Proof of Claim form that is enclosed. 
 EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 

If you do not want a payment from the class action Settlement, but you want to keep the right to sue or to continue to sue the Defendants on
your own for the Released Claims in the class action, then you must take steps to get out of the Settlement Class. This is called excluding yourself or is sometimes referred to as opting out of the Settlement Class. 

 

	 	13.	How Do I Get Out of the Settlement Class? 

 To exclude yourself from the Settlement
Class, you must send a letter by first class mail (or its equivalent outside the U.S.) stating that you want to be excluded from Settlement Class in In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation (Indiana), Civil Action
No. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML. You must include your name, address, telephone number, your signature, and the number of shares of ITT common stock and/or options that you purchased or acquired between February 26, 2013 and May 12, 2015,
both dates inclusive, the number of shares of ITT common stock and/or options that you sold during this time period, if any, and the dates of such purchases, acquisitions, and/or sales, and a statement that you wish to be excluded from the
Settlement Class. You must mail your exclusion request, such that it is received by no later than             , 2016, to: 

ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation 
 Claims
Administrator 
 1801 Market Street, Suite 660 
 Philadelphia,
PA 19103 
 Please keep a copy of everything you send by mail, in case it is lost during shipping. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 14 

 You cannot exclude yourself on the phone or by e-mail. If you ask to be excluded, you are not
eligible to receive any Settlement payment, and you cannot object to the class action Settlement. If you exclude yourself, you may have the right to pursue litigation on your own. 

 

	 	14.	If I Do Not Exclude Myself, Can I Sue the Defendants for the Same Thing Later? 

 No.
Unless you timely and validly exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you give up any right to sue the Defendants and the Released Persons for the Released Claims in the Settlement. If you have a pending lawsuit against any of the Defendants,
speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. Remember, the deadline by which your Request for Exclusion must be received is [28 days prior to the Settlement Hearing]            ,
201  . 
  

	 	15.	If I Exclude Myself, Can I Receive Money from the Class Action Settlement? 

 No. If you
exclude yourself, do not send in a Proof of Claim form. You will not receive any benefit provided for in the Settlement. 
 THE LAWYERS
REPRESENTING YOU 
  

	 	16.	Do I Have a Lawyer in This Case? 

 The Court appointed the law firm of Glancy
Prongay & Murray LLP to represent you and other Settlement Class Members. These lawyers are called Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel. You will not be personally liable for the fees and expenses incurred by these lawyers. If you want to be
represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. If you choose to retain your own counsel, at your own expense, such counsel must file a notice of appearance on your behalf and must serve copies of his or her notice of
appearance on Lead Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel, at the addresses listed in this Notice, so that notice is received at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 15 

	 	17.	How Will the Lawyers Be Paid? 

 Plaintiffs’ Counsel will ask the Court for
attorneys’ fees of up to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Settlement Fund and for expenses up to $175,000 in connection with the Litigation. The Plaintiffs will also request payment of their actual costs and expenses (including lost wages)
directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class, not to exceed $27,500. Such sums as may be approved by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Fund. Settlement Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or
expenses. 
 The attorneys’ fees and expenses requested will be the only payment to Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel for their efforts in
achieving this Settlement and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a wholly contingent basis. Since the case began in September 2014, Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel has conducted all of the investigation and other efforts necessary to
prepare the case for motion practice, for discovery, and for trial, and has consulted experts regarding damages and accounting issues. To date, Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel has not been paid for its services in conducting this litigation on behalf
of the Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class, nor for their expenses. Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel has expended to date more than 4400 hours of attorney and paralegal time in prosecuting the Settlement Class’s claims. The fee requested will
compensate Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel for their work in achieving the Settlement Fund. 
 Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel shall file a
formal motion with the District Court for final approval of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and any requests for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses not later than thirty-five (35) days prior to the Settlement Hearing.
That motion will argue that the requested fees are well within the range of fees awarded to class counsel under similar circumstances in other cases of this type. The Court determines what counsel should receive from the Settlement Fund for fees and
expenses, and may award less than this amount. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 16 

 OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT 

You can tell the Court that you do not agree with the Settlement or some part of it. 

 

	 	18.	How Do I Tell the Court that I Do Not Like the Settlement? 

 If you are a Settlement
Class Member, you can object to the Settlement if you do not like any part of it, including the Plan of Allocation and any requests for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. You can state the reasons why you think the Court should not
approve the Settlement or any part of it, and the Court will consider your views. To object, you must send a letter or other written statement saying that you object to the Settlement in In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation
(Indiana), Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML, and explaining in detail the basis for your objection and any legal support. Be sure to include your (i) full name, (ii) address, (iii) telephone number, (iv) your
signature,(v) the number of shares of ITT common stock and/or options you purchased, acquired, and/or sold between February 26, 2013 and May 12, 2015, both dates inclusive; (vi) the number of shares of ITT common stock and/or options
that you sold during this time period, if any; (vii) the dates of such purchases, acquisitions, and/or sales; (viii) the prices paid and/or received in those transactions (including all income received thereon); and (ix) copies of
documents (such as brokerage statements) sufficient to show that you are a Member of the Settlement Class. You also need to include with your objection any documents on which the objection is based; a list of all persons, if any, who will be called
to testify in support of the objection; a statement as to whether you intend to appear at the Settlement Hearing; and a list of other cases in which you or your counsel have appeared either as settlement objectors or as counsel for objectors in the
preceding five years. 
 You may not object to the Settlement, or any aspect of it, if you do not qualify as a Member of the Settlement
Class or if you excluded yourself from the Settlement Class. If you object to the 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 17 

 
Settlement, or any aspect of it, or otherwise request to be heard at the Settlement Hearing, you are submitting to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to the subject matter of the
Settlement, including, but not limited to, the release of the Released Claims contained in the Judgment, if approved by the Court. 
 The
motions in support of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and the requests for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses, will be filed no later than [35 days prior to the Settlement Hearing]
            , 2016, and they will be available from Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel, the Claims Administrator, or the Court: their contact information is listed in Section 23, below. Any
objection must be mailed or delivered such that it is received by each of the following no later than [21 days prior to the Settlement Hearing],             , 2016: 

Court: 
 Clerk of the
Court 
 U.S. District Court 

Clerk’s Office, Room 105 
 46
East Ohio Street 
 Indianapolis, IN 46204 

Lead Counsel Designee: 

Lionel Z. Glancy, Esq. 
 Glancy
Prongay & Murray LLP 
 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

settlements@glancylaw.com 

Defendants’ Counsel Designee: 

Jennifer L. Conn, Esq. 
 Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher LLP 
 200 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10166-0193 
 THE
COURT’S SETTLEMENT HEARING 
 The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to grant final approval of the Settlement. You may
attend and you may ask to speak, but neither is required. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 18 

	 	19.	When and Where Will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? 

 The Court will
hold a Settlement Hearing at     :       .m., on             , 2016, before the Honorable Tonya Walton Pratt, at the Birch Bayh Federal
Building & U.S. Courthouse, 46 East Ohio Street, Courtroom 344, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. At this hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and in the best interests of the Settlement
Class, and whether the Settlement should be finally approved by the Court. If there are objections, the Court will consider them. 
 Other
matters that the Court will determine at the Settlement Hearing include: (i) whether, for purposes of settlement only, the Settlement Class should be finally certified; whether Lead Plaintiff should be finally appointed as a representative for
the Settlement Class; and whether Lead Counsel should be finally appointed as counsel for the Settlement Class; (ii) whether a Judgment, in the form attached as Exhibit B to the Stipulation, should be entered, dismissing and releasing the
Released Claims with prejudice; (iv) whether the proposed Plan of Allocation is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be approved; (v) whether to grant Lead Counsel’s request of fees and expenses; (vi) whether the Court
should grant Plaintiffs’ reimbursement of their reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class. 

The Court may decide these issues at the Settlement Hearing or take them under consideration for a later decision. Additionally, the
Settlement Hearing may be adjourned by the Court without further written notice to the Settlement Class. Any new date for the Settlement Hearing will be posted on the settlement website at www.ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana.com. If you
intend to attend the Settlement Hearing, you should confirm the date and time with Lead Counsel. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 19 

	 	20.	Do I Have to Come to the Hearing? 

 No. Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel will answer
questions the Court may have. But, you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as you mailed your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. You may
also pay your own lawyer to attend, but it is not necessary. 
  

	 	21.	May I Speak at the Hearing? 

 You may ask the Court for permission to speak at the
Settlement Hearing. To do so, you must send a letter or other written statement saying that it is your intention to appear in In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation (Indiana), Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML,
and explaining in detail the basis for your desire to speak at the Settlement Hearing. Be sure to include your full name, address, telephone number, your signature, the number of shares of ITT common stock and/or options you purchased, acquired,
and/or sold between February 26, 2013 and May 12, 2015, both dates inclusive, the dates of those transactions and the prices paid and/or received, and copies of documents (such as brokerage statements) sufficient to show that you are a
Member of the Settlement Class. Your notice of intention to appear must be received no later than [21 days prior to the Settlement Hearing],             , 2016, by the Clerk of the Court,
Lead Counsel Designee, and Defendants’ Counsel Designee, at the three addresses listed in Question 18. 
 IF YOU DO NOTHING 

 

	 	22.	What Happens if I Do Nothing at All? 

 If you do nothing, all of your claims against the
Defendants and Released Persons will be released, but you will not receive any money from this Settlement and will in all other respects remain a Settlement Class Member and be subject to the provisions of the Settlement. It is necessary to submit a
Proof of Claim and Release form to receive money from the Settlement. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 20 

 GETTING MORE INFORMATION 

 

	 	23.	Are There More Details About the Settlement? 

 This Notice summarizes the proposed
Settlement. More details are in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated as of November 2, 2015 (the “Stipulation”). You can obtain a copy of the Stipulation or more information about the Settlement by contacting
Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel: 
 Lionel Z. Glancy, Esq. 

Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP 

1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

settlements@glancylaw.com 

1-888-773-9224 
 or the Claims Administrator:

 ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation 

Claims Administrator 
 1801 Market
Street, Suite 660 
 Philadelphia, PA 19103 

ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana@AngeionGroup.com 

1-877-235-9544 
 or by visiting
www.ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana.com 
 You can also obtain a copy from the Clerk’s office during regular business hours: 

Clerk of the Court 
 U.S.
District Court 
 Clerk’s Office, Room 105 

46 East Ohio Street 

Indianapolis, IN 46204 

UNDERSTANDING YOUR PAYMENT 

The Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Settlement Class Members who submit acceptable Proof of Claim forms (“Authorized
Claimants”) in the following manner: 
 a. The Claims Administrator shall determine each Authorized Claimant’s share of the Net
Settlement Fund based upon the recognized loss formula (the “Recognized Loss”) described below. The Recognized Loss formula is intended to equitably apportion the Net Settlement Fund 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 21 

 
among Settlement Class Members. The Recognized Loss formula is not an estimate of what a Settlement Class Member would have recovered after trial; nor is it the amount that the Authorized
Claimant will be paid pursuant to the Settlement. 
 b. A Settlement Class Member’s actual share of the Net Settlement Fund will be
determined by the ratio of the Settlement Class Member’s Recognized Loss divided by the aggregate of the Recognized Loss of all Settlement Class Members. 

c. The Proposed Plan of Allocation or Recognized Loss formula is as follows: 

For shares of common stock purchased or otherwise acquired between February 26, 2013 and May 11, 2015: 

 

	 	A.	For shares held at the end of trading on August 7, 2015, the Recognized Loss shall be that number of shares multiplied by the lesser of: 

 

	 	(1)	the applicable purchase date artificial inflation per share figure, as found in Table A; or 

  

	 	(2)	the difference between the purchase price per share and $3.91.2 

  

	 	B.	For shares sold between February 26, 2013 and May 11, 2015, the Recognized Loss shall be that number of shares multiplied by the lesser of: 

 

	 	(1)	the applicable purchase date artificial inflation per share figure less the applicable sales date artificial inflation per share figure, as found in Table A; or 

 

	 	(2)	the difference between the purchase price per share and the sales price per share. 

  

	 	C.	For shares sold between May 12, 2015 and August 7, 2015, the Recognized Loss shall be the lesser of: 

  

	 	(1)	the applicable purchase date artificial inflation per share figure, as found in Table A; or 

  

 

	2 	Pursuant to Section 21(D)(e)(1) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “in any private action arising under this title in which the plaintiff seeks to establish damages by reference to the
market price of a security, the award of damages to the plaintiff shall not exceed the difference between the purchase or sale price paid or received, as appropriate, by the plaintiff for the subject security and the mean trading price of that
security during the 90-day period beginning on the date on which the information correcting the misstatement or omission that is the basis for the action is disseminated.” The mean (average) closing price
of ITT common stock during the 90-day period beginning on May 12, 2015 and ending on August 7, 2015 was $3.91 per share. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 22 

	 	(2)	the difference between the purchase price per share and the sales price per share; or 

  

	 	(3)	the difference between the purchase price per share and the average closing price between May 12, 2015 and the date of sale, as found in Table B.3

 For shares of common stock purchased or otherwise acquired on May 12, 2015: 

 

	 	A.	For shares held at the end of trading on August 7, 2015, the Recognized Loss shall be that number of shares multiplied by the lesser of: 

 

	 	(1)	$1.70 per share; or 

  

	 	(2)	the difference between the purchase price per share and $3.91.4 

  

	 	B.	For shares sold between May 12, 2015 and August 7, 2015, the Recognized Loss shall be the lesser of: 

  

	 	(1)	$1.70 per share; or 

  

	 	(2)	the difference between the purchase price per share and the sales price per share; or 

  

	 	(3)	the difference between the purchase price per share and the average closing price between May 12, 2015 and the date of sale, as found in Table B.5

  
  

	3 	Pursuant to Section 21(D)(e)(2) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “in any private action arising under this title in which the plaintiff seeks to establish damages by reference to the
market price of a security, if the plaintiff sells or repurchases the subject security prior to the expiration of the 90-day period described in paragraph (1), the plaintiff’s damages shall not exceed the difference between the purchase or sale
price paid or received, as appropriate, by the plaintiff for the security and the mean trading price of the security during the period beginning immediately after dissemination of information correcting the misstatement or omission and ending on the
date on which the plaintiff sells or repurchases the security.” 

	4 	Pursuant to Section 21(D)(e)(1) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “in any private action arising under this title in which the plaintiff seeks to establish damages by reference to the
market price of a security, the award of damages to the plaintiff shall not exceed the difference between the purchase or sale price paid or received, as appropriate, by the plaintiff for the subject security and the mean trading price of that
security during the 90-day period beginning on the date on which the information correcting the misstatement or omission that is the basis for the action is disseminated.” The mean (average) closing price
of ITT common stock during the 90-day period beginning on May 12, 2015 and ending on August 7, 2015 was $3.91 per share. 

	5 	Pursuant to Section 21(D)(e)(2) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “in any private action arising under this title in which the plaintiff seeks to establish damages by reference to the
market price of a security, if the plaintiff sells or repurchases the subject security prior to the expiration of the 90-day period described in paragraph (1), the plaintiff’s damages shall not exceed the difference between the purchase or sale
price paid or received, as appropriate, by the plaintiff for the security and the mean trading price of the security during the period beginning immediately after dissemination of information correcting the misstatement or omission and ending on the
date on which the plaintiff sells or repurchases the security.” 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 23 

 For ITT Call and Put Options that expired after January 30, 2014: 

ITT Call Options 
  

	 	(i)	The Recognized Claim for each call option on ITT common stock purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period shall be the difference between: (a) the amount paid per call option and: (b) the sale
price received per option contract received if the call option was subsequently sold (if the option expired worthless while still owned by the Authorized Claimant, the sales price shall be deemed to be Zero ($0.00)); 

 

	 	(ii)	Shares of ITT common stock acquired during the Class Period through the exercise of a call option shall be treated as a purchase on the date of exercise for the exercise price plus the cost of the call option, and any
Recognized Claim arising from such transaction shall be computed as provided for other purchases of ITT common stock as set forth herein; 

  

	 	(iii)	No Recognized Claim shall be calculated based upon the sale or writing of any call option that was subsequently repurchased. 

ITT Put Options 
  

	 	(i)	The Recognized Claim for each put option on ITT common stock sold or written during the Class Period, shall be the difference between: (a) the amount received per put option and (b) the purchase price paid per
put option if the put option was subsequently repurchased at any time (including after the Class Period). For put options sold or written during the Class Period that expired worthless and unexercised, the Authorized Claimant’s Recognized Claim
shall be Zero ($0.00); 

  

	 	(ii)	For ITT put options that were sold or written during the Class Period, that were “put” to the Authorized Claimant (i.e. exercised) at any time, the Authorized Claimant’s Recognized Claim shall be
calculated as a purchase of ITT common stock, and as if the sale of the put option were instead a purchase of ITT common stock on the date of the sale or writing of the put option, and the “purchase price paid” shall be the strike price of
the put option less the proceeds received from the sale of the put option; 

  

	 	(iii)	No Recognized Claim shall be calculated based upon the sale of any put option that was previously purchased. 

Table A 
  

					
	 Purchase or Sale Date Range
	  	Artificial Inflation
Per Share	 
	 02/26/2013 - 01/29/2014
	  	$	16.09	  
	 01/30/2014 - 05/21/2014
	  	$	8.70	  
	 05/22/2014 – 09/18/2014
	  	$	5.50	  
	 09/19/2014 – 04/29/2015
	  	$	2.93	  
	 04/30/2015
	  	$	2.23	  
	 05/01/2015 – 05/11/2015
	  	$	1.70	  
	 05/12/2015
	  	$	0.00	  

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 24 

 Table B 
  

											
	 Date of Sale
	  	Average Closing
Price Between
05/12/2015 and
Date of Sale	 	  	Date of Sale	  	Average Closing
Price Between
05/12/2015 and
Date of Sale	 
	 5/12/2015
	  	$	2.27	  	  	6/25/2015	  	$	3.71	  
	 5/13/2015
	  	$	2.24	  	  	6/26/2015	  	$	3.73	  
	 5/14/2015
	  	$	2.28	  	  	6/29/2015	  	$	3.74	  
	 5/15/2015
	  	$	2.41	  	  	6/30/2015	  	$	3.75	  
	 5/18/2015
	  	$	2.43	  	  	7/1/2015	  	$	3.76	  
	 5/19/2015
	  	$	2.44	  	  	7/2/2015	  	$	3.77	  
	 5/20/2015
	  	$	2.42	  	  	7/6/2015	  	$	3.78	  
	 5/21/2015
	  	$	2.42	  	  	7/7/2015	  	$	3.78	  
	 5/22/2015
	  	$	2.43	  	  	7/8/2015	  	$	3.78	  
	 5/26/2015
	  	$	2.43	  	  	7/9/2015	  	$	3.78	  
	 5/27/2015
	  	$	2.45	  	  	7/10/2015	  	$	3.78	  
	 5/28/2015
	  	$	2.45	  	  	7/13/2015	  	$	3.78	  
	 5/29/2015
	  	$	2.59	  	  	7/14/2015	  	$	3.78	  
	 6/1/2015
	  	$	2.80	  	  	7/15/2015	  	$	3.79	  
	 6/2/2015
	  	$	2.93	  	  	7/16/2015	  	$	3.81	  
	 6/3/2015
	  	$	3.00	  	  	7/17/2015	  	$	3.82	  
	 6/4/2015
	  	$	3.06	  	  	7/20/2015	  	$	3.84	  
	 6/5/2015
	  	$	3.11	  	  	7/21/2015	  	$	3.85	  
	 6/8/2015
	  	$	3.12	  	  	7/22/2015	  	$	3.88	  
	 6/9/2015
	  	$	3.15	  	  	7/23/2015	  	$	3.90	  
	 6/10/2015
	  	$	3.17	  	  	7/24/2015	  	$	3.92	  
	 6/11/2015
	  	$	3.22	  	  	7/27/2015	  	$	3.94	  
	 6/12/2015
	  	$	3.28	  	  	7/28/2015	  	$	3.96	  
	 6/15/2015
	  	$	3.34	  	  	7/29/2015	  	$	3.99	  
	 6/16/2015
	  	$	3.40	  	  	7/30/2015	  	$	3.99	  
	 6/17/2015
	  	$	3.46	  	  	7/31/2015	  	$	3.98	  
	 6/18/2015
	  	$	3.52	  	  	8/3/2015	  	$	3.97	  
	 6/19/2015
	  	$	3.57	  	  	8/4/2015	  	$	3.95	  
	 6/22/2015
	  	$	3.60	  	  	8/5/2015	  	$	3.94	  
	 6/23/2015
	  	$	3.64	  	  	8/6/2015	  	$	3.92	  
	 6/24/2015
	  	$	3.68	  	  	8/7/2015	  	$	3.91	  

 d. A purchase or sale of ITT common stock shall be deemed to have occurred on the “contract” or
“trade” date as opposed to the “settlement” or “payment” date. 
 e. The receipt or grant by gift, devise or
operation of law of shares of ITT common stock during the Settlement Class Period shall not be deemed a purchase or sale of ITT common 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 25 

 
stock shares for the calculation of an Authorized Claimant’s Recognized Loss, nor shall it be deemed an assignment of any claim relating to the purchase of such securities. The grantor of
the gift or devise, who purchased ITT common stock during the Settlement Class Period, shall retain the right to file a claim in this Litigation unless that right to file a claim was specifically transferred in the instrument of gift or assignment.

 f. The receipt of ITT common stock during the Settlement Class Period in exchange for securities of any other corporation or entity shall
not be deemed a purchase or sale of ITT common stock. 
 g. Any gains on sales of ITT common stock shall be offset against losses in
calculating the Recognized Loss. To the extent a Claimant had an overall gain from transactions in ITT common stock during the Settlement Class Period, the value of the Recognized Loss will be zero. 

h. The total recovery payable to Authorized Claimants from transactions in call or put options shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the
Net Settlement Fund. 
 i. For Settlement Class Members who made multiple purchases or sales during the Settlement Class Period, the
first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method will be applied to such holdings, purchases, and sales for purposes of calculating a claim. Under the FIFO method, sales of ITT Securities during the Settlement Class Period will be matched, in
chronological order, against ITT Securities purchased during the Settlement Class Period. 
 j. No Authorized Claimant whose proportionate
share of the Net Settlement Fund is less than $20.00 shall receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund. Rather, that Claimant’s proportionate share of the Net Settlement Fund shall be redistributed among all remaining Authorized
Claimants. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 26 

 k. Settlement Class Members whose Request for Exclusion is not received by the deadline and do
not submit an acceptable Proof of Claim by the deadline for submitting claims will not share in the recovery, but nevertheless will be bound by the Settlement and the Order and Final Judgment of the Court releasing claims against Defendants and
other Released Persons and dismissing this Litigation. 
 l. Distributions will be made to Authorized Claimants after all claims have been
processed and after the Court has finally approved the Settlement. 
 DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE 

SPECIAL NOTICE TO NOMINEES 

The Court has ordered that if you held any ITT Securities purchased or acquired between February 28, 2013 and May 12, 2015, both
dates inclusive, as nominee for a beneficial owner, then, within fourteen (14) days after you receive this Notice, you must either: (1) send a copy of this Notice and the Proof of Claim form by first class mail to all such beneficial
owners; or (2) provide a list of the names and addresses of all such beneficial owners (preferably in the format of an electronic spreadsheet) to the Claims Administrator: 

ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation 

Claims Administrator 
 1801 Market
Street, Suite 660 
 Philadelphia, PA 19103 

ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana@AngeionGroup.com 

If you choose to mail the Notice and Proof of Claim form yourself, you may obtain from the Claims Administrator (without cost to you) as many
additional copies of these documents as you will need to complete the mailing. 
 Regardless of whether you choose to complete the Notice
mailing yourself or elect to have the Notice mailing performed for you, you may obtain reimbursement for administrative costs 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 27 

 
reasonably and actually incurred in connection with forwarding the Notice and which would not have been incurred but for the obligation to forward the Notice, upon submission of appropriate
documentation to the Claims Administrator. 

  
 NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SETTLEMENT 
 28 

 EXHIBIT A-2 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION 
  

			
	 In re ITT
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
 SECURITIES LITIGATION (INDIANA)
	  	 CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
  

EXHIBIT A-2
  

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE
  

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 

 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 

1. To be eligible to recover as a member of the Settlement Class1 based on your claims in
the action entitled In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation (Indiana), Case No. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML, you must complete and, on page      hereof, sign this Proof of Claim and Release. Even if you
do not fill out this Proof of Claim and Release, if you do not timely exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, any and all claims you may have against the Defendants and other Released Persons in this Action are released to the full extent
defined below. If you fail to file a properly addressed (as set forth in paragraph 3 below) Proof of Claim and Release, your claim may be rejected and you may be precluded from any recovery from the Net Settlement Fund created in connection with the
proposed Settlement of the Action. 
 2. Submission of this Proof of Claim and Release, however, does not assure that you will share in the
proceeds of the Settlement in this Action. 
 3. YOU MUST MAIL YOUR COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE
            , 2016, ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS: 
 ITT Educational Services, Inc.
Securities Litigation 
 Claims Administrator 

1801 Market Street, Suite 660 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 
 4. If you
are NOT a member of the Settlement Class, as defined in the Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and Settlement Fairness Hearing (the “Notice”), DO NOT submit a Proof of Claim and
Release form. 
  
  

	1 	All capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same meanings as in the Stipulation of Settlement dated November 2, 2015 (the “Stipulation”). A copy of the Stipulation is available at
www.ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana.com. 

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 1 

 5. If you are a member of the Settlement Class, you are bound by the terms of any judgment
entered in the Action, including the releases included in the Stipulation of Settlement, WHETHER OR NOT YOU SUBMIT A PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. 

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 2 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

INDIANAPOLIS DISTRICT 
 In
re ITT Educational Service, Inc. Securities Litigation (Indiana) 
 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML 

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE 

Must Be Postmarked No Later Than: 

            , 2016 

Please Type or Print in Blue or Black Ink 
  

	PART I:	CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION 

  

									
	  

	Last Name	  	M.I.	  	First Name
	
	  

	Last Name (Co-Beneficial Owner)	  	M.I.	  	First Name (Co-Beneficial Owner)

  

									
	 [    ] IRA
	 	[    ] Joint Tenancy	    	[    ] Employee          [    ] Individual	    	[    ] Other:                         	  	
		 		    		    	                        (specify)

 

									
	  

	Company Name (Beneficial Owner – If Claimant is not an Individual) or Custodian Name if an IRA
	
	  

	Trustee/Asset Manager/Nominee/Record Owner’s Name (If Different from Beneficial Owner Above)
	
	  

	Account #/Fund# (Not Necessary for Individual Filers)	 		  	
					
	  
	  		    	  
	 		  	
	 Social Security Number
	  	or	    	Tax Payer Identification Number	 		  	
				
	  
	  		    		 	  

	Telephone Number (Primary Daytime)	  		    		 	Telephone Number (Alternate)
	
	  

	Email Address	  		    		 		  	
	
	  

	Street Address	  		    		 		  	
			
	  
	  		    	  

	City	  		    	State	 	Zip Code	  	
			
	  
	  		    	  

	Foreign Province	  		    	Foreign Country	 		  	

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 3 

	PART II:	SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC. (“ITT) COMMON STOCK (TICKER SYMBOL: ESI; CUSIP: 45068B109) 

  

	 	A.	Number of shares of ITT common stock held at the close of trading on February 25, 2013                     ,
                    . Proof Enclosed?      ̈  Y     ̈  N 

  

	 	B.	Purchases or acquisitions of ITT common stock between February 26, 2013 and August 7, 2015, both dates inclusive: 

  

													
	 Trade Date(s) of
 Shares

(List
 Chronologically)

MM/DD/YYYY
	  	Number of
Shares of
Stock
Purchased
or Acquired	  	Purchase
Price Per
Share of
Common
Stock	  	Total Purchase Price
(Excluding
Commissions, Taxes,
and Fees)
Please round off to the
nearest whole
dollar	 	  	Is
Purchase
the Result
of a Call
Option?	  	Proof
Enclosed?
	 1.
	  		  		  	$	            .00	  	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N
	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N

	 2.
	  		  		  	$	            .00	  	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N
	 3.
	  		  		  	$	            .00	  	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N
	 4.
	  		  		  	$	            .00	  	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N

 IMPORTANT: (i) If any purchase listed covered a “short sale”, please mark
Yes:     ̈  Y 
  

	 	C.	Sales of ITT common stock between February 26, 2013 and August 7, 2015, both dates inclusive: 

  

													
	 Trade Date(s) of
 Shares

(List
 Chronologically)

MM/DD/YYYY
	  	Number of
Shares of
Stock Sold	  	Sale Price
Per Share
of
Common
Stock	  	Total Sales Price
(Excluding
Commissions, Taxes,
and Fees)
Please round off to the
nearest whole
dollar	 	  	Is Sale the
Result of
a Put
Option?	  	Proof
Enclosed?
	 1.
	  		  		  	$	            .00	  	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N
	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N

	 2.
	  		  		  	$	            .00	  	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N
	 3.
	  		  		  	$	            .00	  	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N
	 4.
	  		  		  	$	            .00	  	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N	  	 ̈  Y     ̈  N

  

	 	D.	Number of shares of ITT common stock held at the close of trading on August 7, 2015:                     ,
                    . Proof Enclosed?     ̈  Y     ̈  N 

  

	 	E.	Number of shares of ITT common stock held at the close of trading on May 12, 2015:                     ,
                    . Proof Enclosed?     ̈  Y     ̈  N 

 If you require additional space, attach extra schedules in the
same format as above. Sign and 
 print your name on each additional page. 

YOU MUST READ AND SIGN THE RELEASE ON PAGE    . FAILURE TO SIGN THE RELEASE MAY RESULT IN A DELAY IN PROCESSING OR THE REJECTION OF YOUR
CLAIM.                      

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 4 

	PART III:	SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN CALL OPTIONS ON ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC. (“ITT”) COMMON STOCK (TICKER SYMBOL: ESI; CUSIP: 45068B109) 

 

	 	A.	Beginning Position: At the close of trading on February 25, 2013, I owned the following call options on ITT common stock (must be documented): 

 

																							
	 Date(s) of
 Purchase or

Acquisition
 (List

Chronologically)

MM/DD/YYYY
	  	Number
of
Contracts	  	Expiration
Month
and Year
& Strike
Price of
Options
(i.e.
March
2013/$20)	  	Purchase
Price
Per
Contract	  	Amount Paid
(Including
Commissions,
Taxes, and
Fees)	 	  	Insert an
“E” if
Exercised,
an “S” if
sold, or
an “X” if
Expired.	  	Exercise
or Sale
Date
(MM/DD/YYYY)	  	Sale
Price
Per
Contract,
if
Sold	  	Amount
Received
(Net of
Commissions,
Taxes,
and Fees),
If Sold	 	  	Proof
Enclosed?
	 1.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 2.
	  		  		  		  	$
	            
	  
	  		  		  		  	$
	            
	  
	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 3.
	  		  		  		  	$
	            
	  
	  		  		  		  	$
	            
	  
	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 4.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N

  

	 	B.	Purchases: Purchases or acquisitions of call options on ITT common stock between February 26, 2013 and August 7, 2015, both dates inclusive: 

 

																							
	 Date(s) of
 Purchase or

Acquisition
 (List

Chronologically)

MM/DD/YYYY
	  	Number
of
Contracts	  	Expiration
Month and
Year &
Strike Price
of Options
(i.e. May
2014/$20)	  	Purchase
Price
Per
Contract	  	Amount Paid
(Including
Commissions,
Taxes, and
Fees)	 	  	Insert an
“E” if
Exercised,
an “S” if
sold, or
an “X” if
Expired.	  	Exercise
or Sale
Date
(MM/DD/YYYY)	  	Sale
Price
Per
Contract,
if
Sold	  	Amount
Received
(Net of
Commissions,
Taxes,
and Fees),
If Sold	 	  	Proof
Enclosed?
	 1.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 2.
	  		  		  		  	$
	            
	  
	  		  		  		  	$
	            
	  
	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 3.
	  		  		  		  	$
	            
	  
	  		  		  		  	$
	            
	  
	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 4.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N

  

	 	C.	If you require additional space, attach extra schedules in the same format as above. Sign and print your name on each additional page. 

YOU MUST READ AND SIGN THE RELEASE ON PAGE    . FAILURE TO SIGN THE RELEASE MAY RESULT IN A DELAY IN PROCESSING OR THE REJECTION OF YOUR
CLAIM 

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 5 

	PART IV:	SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN PUT OPTIONS ON ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC. (“ITT”) COMMON STOCK (TICKER SYMBOL: ESI; CUSIP: 45068B109) 

 

	 	A.	Beginning Position: At the close of trading on February 25, 2013, I was obligated on the following put options on ITT common stock (must be documented): 

 

																							
	 Date(s) of
 Writing (Sale)

(List
 Chronologically)

MM/DD/YYYY
	  	Number
of
Contracts	  	Expiration
Month and
Year &
Strike Price
of Options
(i.e. March
2013/$20)	  	Sale
Price
Per
Contract	  	Amount
Received
(Net of
Commissions,
Taxes,
and Fees)	 	  	Insert an
“A” if
Assigned,
and “R” if
repurchased,
or an “X” if
Expired	  	Assign
or
Repurchase
Date
(MM/DD/YYYY)	  	Price
Paid
Per
Contract	  	Aggregate
Cost
(Including
Commissions,
Taxes, and
Fees)	 	  	Proof
Enclosed?
	 1.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 2.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 3.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 4.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N

  

	 	B.	Sales (Writing) of Put Options and Covering Transactions (Repurchases): Sales (writing) of put options on ITT common stock and subsequent repurchases of ITT common stock on those put options between
February 26, 2013 and August 7, 2015, both dates inclusive: 

  

																							
	 Date(s) of
 Writing (Sale)

(List
 Chronologically)

MM/DD/YYYY
	  	Number
of
Contracts	  	Expiration
Month and
Year &
Strike Price
of Options
(i.e. May
2014/$20)	  	Sale
Price
Per
Contract	  	Amount
Received
(Net of
Commissions,
Taxes,
and Fees)	 	  	Insert an
“A” if
Assigned,
and “R” if
repurchased,
or an “X” if
Expired	  	Assign
or
Repurchase
Date
(MM/DD/YYYY)	  	Price
Paid Per
Contract	  	Aggregate
Cost
(Including
Commissions,
Taxes, and
Fees)	 	  	Proof
Enclosed?
	 1.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 2.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 3.
	  		  		  		  	$	          	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N
	 4.
	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  		  		  		  	$	            	  	  	 ̈  Y
 ̈  N

 If you require additional space, attach extra schedules in the same format as above. Sign and 

print your name on each additional page. 

YOU MUST READ AND SIGN THE RELEASE ON PAGE    . FAILURE TO SIGN THE RELEASE MAY RESULT IN A DELAY IN PROCESSING OR THE REJECTION OF YOUR
CLAIM 

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 6 

	PART V:	SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION OF COURT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

 I (We) submit this Proof of
Claim and Release form under the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement described in the Notice. I (We) also submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana with respect to my (our) claim as a
Settlement Class Member and for purposes of enforcing the release set forth herein. I (We) further acknowledge that I am (we are) bound by and subject to the terms of any judgment that may be entered in the Action. I (We) agree to furnish additional
information to the Claims Administrator to support this claim if requested to do so. I (We) have not submitted any other claim covering the same purchases, acquisitions, or sales of ITT common stock and any call options or put options on ITT common
stock during the Settlement Class Period and know of no other person having done so on my (our) behalf. 
  

	PART VI:	RELEASE 

 I (WE) HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE FULL AND COMPLETE SATISFACTION OF, AND DO HEREBY
FULLY, FINALLY, AND FOREVER WAIVE, RELEASE, RELINQUISH, DISCHARGE AND DISMISS FROM THE “RELEASED CLAIMS” EACH AND ALL OF THE “RELEASED PERSONS.” 

“Released Person(s)” means each and all Defendants, and/or any of their respective past, present or future, family members, spouses,
domestic partners, parents, associates, affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, officers, directors, stockholders, owners, members, representatives, employees, attorneys, financial or investment advisors, consultants, underwriters, investment banks or
bankers, commercial bankers, insurers, reinsurers, excess insurers, co-insurers, engineers, advisors, principals, agents, heirs, executors, trustees, estates, beneficiaries, distributees, foundations, general or limited partners or partnerships,
joint ventures, personal or legal representatives, 

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 7 

 
administrators, or any other person or entity acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of any of the Defendants, and each of their respective predecessors, successors, and assigns, and any
trust of which any Defendant is the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Defendant and/or member(s) of his family. For the avoidance of doubt, Released Persons does not include PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, which is also known as PwC LLP. 

“Released Claims” means any and all claims (including Unknown Claims), demands, debts, losses, damages, duties, rights, disputes,
actions, causes of action, liabilities, obligations, judgments, suits, matters, controversies, proceedings, or issues, of any kind, nature, character, or description whatsoever (and including, but not limited to, any claims for damages, whether
compensatory, consequential, special, punitive, exemplary, or otherwise, and any and all fees, costs, interest, expenses, or charges), whether known or unknown, contingent or absolute, suspected or unsuspected, foreseen or unforeseen, disclosed or
undisclosed, concealed or hidden, apparent or not apparent, accrued or unaccrued, matured or unmatured, liquidated or not liquidated, asserted or unasserted, at law or in equity, that have been asserted, could have been asserted, or in the future
could be asserted against Defendants or any of the Released Persons in this Litigation or in any other court, tribunal, forum or proceeding (including, but not limited to, any claims arising under U.S. federal, state or local law, foreign law,
common law, statutory law, administrative law, rule, regulation, or at equity, relating to alleged fraud, breach of any duty, negligence, violations of the federal securities laws, or otherwise, and including all claims within the exclusive
jurisdiction of the federal courts), whether individual, class, direct, derivative, representative, legal, equitable or any other type, or in any other capacity, (a) by reason of, arising out of, relating to, involving or in connection with,
directly or indirectly, the allegations, claims, conduct, facts, events, practices, transactions, acts, occurrences, failures, statements, representations, alleged misrepresentations, 

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 8 

 
alleged omissions, the documents publicly filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission by ITT and all disclosures or alleged non-disclosures made by Defendants in connection with any of
the foregoing, or any other matter, thing or cause whatsoever, or any series thereof, that were, could have been or in the future might be alleged, claimed, asserted, embraced, involved, or set forth, referred to in or otherwise related to, directly
or indirectly, the Litigation or subject matter of the Litigation; (b) would have been barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel had the Action been fully litigated to a final judgment; and (c) were, could have been, or in the
future could be, asserted in any forum or proceeding or otherwise by any Settlement Class Member that relate to the purchase, sale, acquisition or holding of ITT Securities during the Settlement Class Period. The Released Claims shall not include
claims to enforce the Settlement. For the avoidance of doubt, Released Claims does not include the claims alleged as of the date of this Settlement in the actions captioned: Sasha Wilfred, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant ITT
Educational Services, Inc. v. Kevin M. Modany, et al., 1:13-cv-03110-JPO (S.D.N.Y.); Janice Nottenkamper, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. Kevin M. Modany, et al., 1:15-cv-03390 (S.D.N.Y.);
Michelle Lawrence, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. Kevin M. Modany, et al., 1:14-cv-02106 (S.D. Ind.); William McKee, Derivatively on behalf of ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. Kevin Modany,
et al., 49D07-1507-PL-021891 (Marion Circuit Court, Indianapolis, Indiana); United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. ITT Educational Services, Inc., Kevin M. Modany, and Daniel M. Fitzpatrick, 1:15-cv-00758-JMS-MJD (S.D. Ind.);
and In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation, 1:13-cv-01620-JPO-JLC (S.D.N.Y.). 
 “Unknown
Claims” means any and all Released Claims, of every nature and description, which Plaintiffs or any Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its 

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 9 

 
favor at the time of the release of the Released Persons which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have
affected his, her or its decision not to object to this Settlement or not to exclude himself, herself or itself from the Settlement Class. Unknown Claims include those claims in which some or all of the facts comprising the claim may be suspected,
or even undisclosed or hidden. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs shall expressly waive, and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have
waived, and by operation of the Judgment shall have expressly waived, the provisions, rights, and benefits of California Civil Code § 1542, which provides: 

A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of
executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor. 
 Plaintiffs shall expressly
waive, and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any U.S. federal law or any law of any state or
territory of the United States, or principle of common law or foreign law, which is similar, comparable or equivalent in effect to California Civil Code § 1542. Plaintiffs and other Settlement Class Members may hereafter discover facts in
addition to or different from those which he, she or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but Plaintiffs and each Settlement Class Member, upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have,
and by operation of the Judgment shall have expressly, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which
now exist, or heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct which is negligent, reckless, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any
duty, law or rule, without regard to 

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 10 

 
the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. Plaintiffs acknowledge, and the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have
acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and was a material element of the Settlement. 
  

	PART VII:	CERTIFICATION 

 I (WE) DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA THAT ALL OF THE FOREGOING INFORMATION SUPPLIED ON THIS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM BY THE UNDERSIGNED IS TRUE AND CORRECT. 
  

					
	Executed this      day of
                                         
            in
                                         
                               
	                                      
              (Month/Year)                         
               (City/State/Country)	 		 	

					
			
	  
 (Sign your name here)
	 		 	  
 (Sign your name
here)

			
	  
 (Type or print your name
here)
	 		 	  
 (Type or print your name
here)

			
	  
 (Capacity of person(s) signing,
e.g., Beneficial Purchaser, Executor, or Administrator)
	 		 	  
 (Capacity of person(s) signing,
e.g., Beneficial Purchaser, Executor, or Administrator)

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 11 

 ACCURATE CLAIMS PROCESSING TAKES A 

SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME. 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. 
 Reminder
Checklist: 
  

	 	1.	Please sign the claim form at Paragraph VII above. 

  

	 	2.	Remember to attach supporting documentation, if available. 

  

	 	3.	Do not send original stock certificates. 

  

	 	4.	Keep a copy of your claim form for your records. 

  

	 	5.	The Claims Administrator will acknowledge receipt of your Proof of Claim Form and Release within 60 days. Your claim is not deemed filed until you receive an acknowledgment postcard or e-mail. If you do not receive a
written acknowledgment within 60 days, please email the Claims Administrator at ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana@AngeionGroup.com. 

 

	 	6.	If you move, please send us your new address. 

 ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities
Litigation 
 Claims Administrator 

1801 Market Street, Suite 660 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana@AngeionGroup.com 
  

	 	7.	Please write legibly in blue or black ink. Do not use highlighter on the Proof of Claim Form and Release or supporting documentation. 

THIS PROOF OF CLAIM MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN             , 2016 AND MUST
BE MAILED TO: 
 ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation 

Claims Administrator 
 1801 Market
Street, Suite 660 
 Philadelphia, PA 19103 

  
 PROOF OF CLAIM AND
RELEASE 
 12 

 EXHIBIT A-3 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION 
  

			
	 In re ITT
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
 SECURITIES LITIGATION (INDIANA)
	  	 CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
  

EXHIBIT A-3
  

SUMMARY NOTICE
  

  

	TO:	ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES WHO PURCHASED OR ACQUIRED THE COMMON STOCK OF ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. (“ITT”) (TICKER SYMBOL: ESI), WHO PURCHASED OR ACQUIRED CALL OPTIONS ON ITT COMMON STOCK, OR WHO WROTE PUT
OPTIONS ON ITT COMMON STOCK, BETWEEN FEBRUARY 26, 2013 AND MAY 12, 2015, BOTH DATES INCLUSIVE. 

 PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR
RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT. 
 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a proposed Settlement has been
reached in this Action, which has been preliminarily certified as a class action for the purposes of settlement only.1 Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, a hearing will be held on             , 2016, at     :    
    .m., before The Honorable Tanya Walton Pratt, at the Birch Bayh Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse, 46 East Ohio Street, Courtroom 344, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, for the purpose of determining, among other things:
(1) whether the proposed Settlement of the securities class action claims asserted in this Litigation, pursuant to which ITT, on behalf of all Defendants, will cause to be deposited into a Settlement Fund the sum of $12.5375 million in cash,
should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate and in the best interests of the Settlement Class; (2) whether to certify the Settlement Class for purposes of settlement; (3) whether this Litigation should be 

 

	1 	 This Summary Notice incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated November 2, 2015 (the
“Stipulation”), and all capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same meanings as in the Stipulation. 

  
 SUMMARY NOTICE 

1 

 
dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation, including, but not limited to, the release of claims against the Defendants and other Released Persons;
(4) whether the proposed plan to distribute the settlement proceeds (the “Plan of Allocation”) is fair, reasonable, and adequate and therefore should be approved; (5) whether the application of Lead Counsel for the payment of
attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in connection with this Litigation should be approved; and (6) whether the Court should grant the application of Plaintiffs for reimbursement of their reasonable costs and expenses (including lost
wages) directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class. 
 If you purchased or otherwise acquired ITT common stock,
purchased or otherwise acquired call options on ITT common stock, or wrote put options on ITT common stock, between February 26, 2013 and May 12, 2015, both dates inclusive, your rights may be affected by this Settlement. This Summary
Notice provides only a summary of matters, and a detailed Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Settlement Hearing (the “Notice”) describing the Action, the proposed Settlement, and the rights
of Settlement Class Members has been mailed to persons or entities known to be potential Settlement Class Members. If you have not received the Notice or a copy of the Proof of Claim and Release form, you may obtain copies by writing to ITT
Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation, Claims Administrator, 1801 Market Street, Suite 660, Philadelphia, PA 19103, or you can download a copy at www.ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana.com. 

If you are a Settlement Class Member, you have the right to appear in Court at the Settlement Hearing to object to the Settlement, the Plan of
Allocation, Lead Counsel’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses, and/or the application by Plaintiffs for any costs or expenses. You must submit a written objection in accordance with the procedures described in the
Notice, which must be filed and served so that it is received no later than             , 2016. You also have the right to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class by submitting a written
request for exclusion from the Settlement Class in accordance with the procedures described in the Notice. The request for exclusion must be received no later than             , 2016. If
the Settlement is approved by the 

  
 SUMMARY NOTICE 

2 

 
Court, you will be bound by the Settlement and the Court’s Judgment, including the releases provided for in the Settlement and the Judgment, unless you submit a request to be excluded. To
object, to otherwise request to be heard, or to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, submit a written objection to be received by no later than             , 2016, or a request for
exclusion to be received by no later than             , 2016, in accordance with the procedures described in the Notice. 

If you are a Settlement Class Member, in order to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must submit a Proof of Claim and
Release form postmarked no later than             , 2016, establishing that you are entitled to recovery. 

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK’S OFFICE REGARDING THIS NOTICE. If you have any questions about the Settlement, you may contact Lead
Counsel at the address listed below: 
 Lionel Z. Glancy, Esq. 

Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP 

1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

settlements@glancylaw.com 

1-888-773-9224 
 or go to the following website:
www.ITTEducationSecuritiesLitigation-Indiana.com 
 DATED:
                     

  
 SUMMARY NOTICE 

3 

 EXHIBIT B 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION 
  

			
	 In re ITT
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
 SECURITIES LITIGATION (INDIANA)
	  	 CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML
  

EXHIBIT B
  

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF
 DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
  

 WHEREAS, a class action is pending before the Court entitled In re ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION (INDIANA), Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML, United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (the “Litigation”); 

WHEREAS, the Court has received the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated as of November 2, 2015 (the “Stipulation”),
which has been entered into by Plaintiffs (on behalf of themselves and the Settlement Class) and Defendants, and the Court has reviewed the Stipulation and the Exhibits annexed thereto; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), this Court preliminarily approved the Settlement of this Litigation, as set forth
in the Stipulation, in an Order dated              , 201  , (the “Notice Order”); 

WHEREAS, on application of the Settling Parties, this matter came before the Court for hearing on
                     (the “Settlement Hearing”), to determine whether the terms and conditions of the Settlement are fair, reasonable,
adequate and in the best interests of the Settlement Class, and should be finally approved; and whether Judgment should be entered pursuant to the terms of the Settlement, among other things, releasing all Released Claims against all Released
Persons and dismissing the Litigation with prejudice; and 

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 1 

 WHEREAS, due and adequate notice having been given of the Settlement as required in the Notice
Order, and the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings held herein, including all matters submitted to it at the Settlement Hearing, and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 

1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation, and all capitalized terms used herein shall have
the same meanings set forth in the Stipulation. 
 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation
and over all Parties to the Litigation, including all Members of the Settlement Class who did not timely file a Request for Exclusion from the Settlement Class by the             ,
201  , deadline pursuant to the Notice Order. 
 3. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
for purposes of this Settlement only, the Court finally certifies this Action as a class action, with a Settlement Class defined as all persons and/or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of ITT Educational Services, Inc.
(“ITT” or the “Company”) (ticker symbol: ESI), purchased or otherwise acquired call options on ITT common stock, or wrote put options on ITT common stock, between February 26, 2013 and May 12, 2015, both dates
inclusive. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants, the officers and directors of ITT during the Settlement Class Period, members of their immediate families, the legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns of any of the foregoing
and any entity in which a Defendant has or had a controlling interest during the Settlement Class Period. Also excluded from the Settlement Class is any person or entity that timely and validly requested exclusion from the Settlement Class, pursuant
to and in accordance with the terms of the Notice Order, and as listed on Schedule 1 hereto. 

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 2 

 4. With respect to the Settlement Class, for purposes of this Settlement only, the Court finds
and concludes that the prerequisites for a class action under Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been satisfied in that: (a) the number of Settlement Class Members is so numerous that joinder of all members
thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class; (c) the claims of the Lead Plaintiff and Court- appointed class representative, Meitav Dash Mutual Fund Management Ltd., are typical of the
claims of the Settlement Class it represents; (d) Lead Plaintiff, as the class representative, has and will continue to fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Settlement Class; (e) the questions of law and fact common to the
Members of the Settlement Class predominate over any questions affecting only individual Members of the Settlement Class; and (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.

 5. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for the purposes of this Settlement only, the Court hereby affirms
its determinations in the Notice Order and finally appoints Lead Plaintiff as a class representative for the Settlement Class, and finally appoints Lead Counsel, Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, as class counsel for the Settlement Class. 

6. Notice of the pendency of the Action as a class action and of the proposed Settlement was given to Settlement Class Members in accordance
with the terms of the Settlement and the Court’s Notice Order. The distribution of the Notice and the publication of the Summary Notice, as provided for in the Notice Order, constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances,
including individual notice to all Members of the Settlement Class who could be identified through reasonable effort. In addition to providing the best notice practicable under the circumstances to all

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 3 

 
Persons entitled to such notice, the form and method of notifying the Settlement Class of the pendency of the Action as a class action and of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement
met the requirements of due process and fully satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, Section 21D(a)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the requirements of Due Process under the U.S. Constitution, and any other
applicable law. 
 7. Pursuant to and in compliance with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby finds that due
and adequate notice of these proceedings, including the Settlement Hearing, was directed to all persons and entities who are Settlement Class Members, advising them of the Settlement, and of their right to object thereto, and a full and fair
opportunity was accorded to all Settlement Class Members to be heard with respect to the Settlement. Thus, it is hereby determined that all Settlement Class Members, other than those persons and entities that are listed on Schedule 1 hereto, who
have timely excluded themselves from the Settlement Class, are bound by this Judgment. 
 8. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, this Court hereby approves the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that said Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to, and is in the best interests of the Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class, and
each of the Settlement Class Members. This Court further finds the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation is the result of arm’s-length negotiations, undertaken with the assistance of an experienced mediator, between experienced counsel
representing the interests of the Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class Members, and the Defendants. Accordingly, the Settlement embodied in the Stipulation is hereby approved in all respects and shall be consummated in accordance with its terms and
provisions. The Settling Parties are hereby directed to perform the terms of the Stipulation. 

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 4 

 9. Except as to any individual claim of those persons or entities (identified in Schedule 1
attached hereto), whose timely request for exclusion from the Settlement Class was received before the             , 201   deadline, the Litigation and all claims contained
therein, including all of the Released Claims, are dismissed with prejudice as against each and all of the Released Persons. The Settling Parties are to bear their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation. 

10. Upon the Effective Date, the Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members (on behalf of themselves and each of their respective
present and former family members, spouses, domestic partners, parents, associates, affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, officers, directors, stockholders, owners, members, fiduciaries, employees, attorneys, accountants, consultants, underwriters,
banks or bankers, insurers, reinsurers, excess insurers, co-insurers, advisors, principals, agents, heirs, executors, trustees, estates, beneficiaries, distributees, foundations, general or limited partners or partnerships, joint ventures, personal
or legal representatives, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and any other person or entity who has the right, ability, standing, or capacity to assert, prosecute, or maintain on behalf of any Settlement Class Member any of the
Released Claims (or to obtain the proceeds of any recovery therefrom)), regardless of whether that Settlement Class Member actually submits a Proof of Claim and Release, seeks or obtains a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund, is entitled to
receive a distribution under the Plan of Allocation approved by the Court, or has objected to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s Fee and Expense Application, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall
have, fully, finally, and forever waived, released, relinquished, discharged, and dismissed all Released Claims against the Defendants and all other Released Persons. 

11. Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs and each of the Settlement Class Members (on behalf of themselves and each of their respective present
and former family members, spouses, 

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 5 

 
domestic partners, parents, associates, affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, officers, directors, stockholders, owners, members, fiduciaries, employees, attorneys, accountants, consultants,
underwriters, banks or bankers, insurers, reinsurers, excess insurers, co-insurers, advisors, principals, agents, heirs, executors, trustees, estates, beneficiaries, distributees, foundations, general or limited partners or partnerships, joint
ventures, personal or legal representatives, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and any other person or entity who has the right, ability, standing, or capacity to assert, prosecute, or maintain on behalf of any Settlement Class
Member any of the Released Claims (or to obtain the proceeds of any recovery therefrom)), regardless of whether that Settlement Class Member actually submits a Proof of Claim and Release, seeks or obtains a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund,
is entitled to receive a distribution under the Plan of Allocation approved by the Court, or has objected to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s Fee and Expense Application, shall have covenanted not to sue the Released
Persons with respect to any Released Claims and shall be permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing, participating in, maintaining, or continuing to prosecute any action or proceeding in any court of law or equity, arbitration
tribunal, administrative forum, or other forum of any kind, asserting any Released Claim (including, without limitation, Unknown Claims), as well as any claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with, the defense, settlement, or
resolution of this Action against any of the Released Persons. 
 12. Upon the Effective Date hereof, each of the Released Persons shall be
deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged Plaintiffs, each and all of the Settlement Class Members, and Lead Counsel from all claims (including Unknown Claims),
arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement, or resolution of the Litigation or the Released Claims. 

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 6 

 13. Upon the Effective Date, except as provided in ¶15 below, any and all persons and
entities are permanently barred and enjoined, to the fullest extent permitted by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(f)(7)(A) and any other applicable law or regulation, from commencing, prosecuting, or asserting any and all claims for contribution or indemnity
(or any other claim when the alleged injury to that person or entity is their actual or threatened liability to the Settlement Class or a Settlement Class Member) based upon, relating to, arising out of, or in connection with the Released Claims,
against each and every one of the Released Persons, whether arising under state, federal, common, statutory, administrative or foreign law, regulation, or at equity, as claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, or third-party claims, in this Action or a
separate action, in this Court or in any other court, arbitration proceeding, administrative proceeding, or other forum; and, except as provided in ¶15 below, the Released Persons are permanently barred and enjoined, to the fullest extent
permitted by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(f)(7)(A) and any other applicable law or regulation, from commencing, prosecuting, or asserting any and all claims for contribution or indemnity (or any other claim when the alleged injury to the Released
Person is their actual or threatened liability to the Settlement Class or a Settlement Class Member) based upon, relating to, or arising out of the Released Claims, against any person or entity, other than a person or entity whose liability to the
Settlement Class has been extinguished pursuant to the Settlement and the Judgment, whether arising under state, federal, common, statutory, administrative, or foreign law, regulation, or at equity, as claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, or
third-party claims, in this Action or a separate action, in this Court or in any other court, arbitration proceeding, administrative proceeding, or other forum. Nothing herein shall bar, release, or alter in any way, any obligations, rights or
claims among or between Released Persons. 
 14. Upon the Effective Date, any final verdict or judgment that may be obtained by or on behalf
of the Settlement Class or a Settlement Class Member against any person or entity subject to the Bar Order described in ¶13 above shall be reduced by the greater of: (i) an amount that corresponds to the percentage of responsibility of any
of the Defendants for common damages; or (ii) $12,537,500.00. 

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 7 

 15. Notwithstanding any of the releases or the Bar Order above, nothing in this Judgment shall
release any claims, or bar any action by any of the Settling Parties, to enforce or to effectuate the Stipulation, the releases and other terms and conditions of the Settlement, the Notice Order, or this Judgment. 

16. The Plan of Allocation submitted by Lead Counsel, as described in the Notice and in accordance with ¶1.19 of the Stipulation, is
hereby approved as fair, reasonable and adequate. Any further orders or proceedings solely regarding the Plan of Allocation, or any appeal from any order relating thereto or reversal or modification thereof, shall be considered separate and apart
from this Judgment and shall not operate to terminate the Settlement or in any way disturb or affect this Judgment and the release of the Released Claims. 

17. None of the Stipulation, its Exhibits, the fact and terms of the Settlement contained therein, or any act performed or document executed
pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the Settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, concession of, or evidence of, the truth or validity of any Released Claim, of any allegations or claims made
in the Litigation, of any allegations or claims that could have been made in the Litigation, or of any of any allegation of wrongdoing, negligence, fault, or liability of the Defendants or any other Released Persons; or (b) is or may be deemed
to be or may be used as an admission of, concession of, or evidence of, the deficiency or infirmity of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation; or (c) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as
an admission of, or evidence of, any liability, negligence, fault, misrepresentation, omission, or wrongdoing as against 

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 8 

 
any of the Defendants or any Released Persons in any arbitration proceeding or other civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other
tribunal; (d) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence that class certification is appropriate in this Action, except for purposes of the Settlement; or (e) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an
admission of, or evidence that the consideration to be paid under the Settlement represents the amount which could be or would have been recovered after trial in this Action; or (f) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of,
or evidence that any damages potentially recoverable under the Complaint would have exceeded or would have been less than the Settlement Fund. Neither the Stipulation nor the fact or terms of the Settlement, nor any act performed or document
executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Settlement, shall be admissible in any proceeding for any purpose, except to enforce the terms of the Settlement. The Released Persons nevertheless may refer to or file the Stipulation and/or this
Judgment in any other action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar, or reduction or any other
theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim under U.S. federal or state law or foreign law. 
 18.
Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of this Settlement and any award or distribution of the Settlement Fund, including interest earned thereon;
(b) disposition of the Settlement Fund; (c) hearing and determining applications for attorneys’ fees and expenses in the Litigation; and (d) all Settling Parties hereto for the purpose of construing, enforcing and administering
the Stipulation of Settlement. 

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 9 

 19. The Court finds that during the course of the Litigation, the Settling Parties and their
respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. 
 20. In the event that the
Settlement does not become effective in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation or the Effective Date does not occur, or in the event that the Settlement Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to the Defendants, then this Judgment shall be
rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated to the extent provided by the Stipulation and, in such event, (a) all orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith
shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation; and (b) the fact of the Settlement shall not be admissible in any trial of the Action and Lead Plaintiff and Defendants reserve their rights to proceed in
all respects as if the Settlement had not been entered into and without any prejudice in any way from the negotiation, fact or terms of the Settlement. 

21. The Court hereby GRANTS Lead Counsel attorneys’ fees of     % of the Settlement Fund and expenses in an
amount of $        , together with the interest earned thereon for the same time period and at the same rate as that earned on the Settlement Fund until paid. The Court finds that the amount of fees awarded is
fair and reasonable in light of the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the case, the skill required to prosecute the case, the experience and ability of the attorneys, awards in similar cases, the contingent nature of the
representation and the result obtained for the Settlement Class. Said fees shall be allocated among any other plaintiffs’ counsel in a manner which, in Lead Counsel’s good-faith judgment, reflects each counsel’s contribution to the
institution, prosecution, and resolution of the Litigation. The Court hereby GRANTS Lead Plaintiff Meitav Dash Mutual Fund Management Ltd. its reasonable 

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 10 

 
costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to its representation of the Settlement Class in the amount of $        . The Court hereby
GRANTS Plaintiff Babulal Tarapara his reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to his representation of the Settlement Class in the amount of $        . The Court hereby
GRANTS Plaintiff Kristopher Hennen his reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to his representation of the Settlement Class in the amount of $        . The Court hereby
GRANTS Plaintiff Cynthia Grebely her reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to her representation of the Settlement Class in the amount of $        . The Court hereby
GRANTS Plaintiff Hoai T. Truong her reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to her representation of the Settlement Class in the amount of $        . 

22. The awarded attorneys’ fees and expenses, and interest earned thereon, shall be paid to Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel from the
Settlement Fund immediately after the date this Order is executed subject to the terms, conditions, and obligations of the Stipulation and in particular ¶6.2 thereof, which terms, conditions, and obligations are incorporated herein. 

 

					
	DATED:                    	 		 	  

		 		 	 THE HONORABLE TANYA WALTON PRATT
 UNITED
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 11 

 SCHEDULE 1 

List of Persons Excluded from the Class in 

In re ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION (INDIANA), 

Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML 

The following Persons, and only the following Persons, properly excluded themselves from the Settlement Class by the
            , 201  , deadline pursuant to the Court’s Order dated             , 201  : 

 

			
	 IN RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE OF

 
 PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

		 	
		 	
		 	
		 	
		 	
		 	
		 	
		 	
		 	

  
 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
 12EX-10.86

 Exhibit 10.86 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW
YORK 
  

					
	 SASHA WILFRED, derivatively on behalf

of ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES,
 INC.,

Plaintiff,
  

v.
  

KEVIN M. MODANY, JOHN F. COZZI,
 THOMAS I. MORGAN, JOHN E.
DEAN,
 JAMES D. FOWLER, JR., JOANNA T.
 LAU, VIN WEBER, SAMUEL
L. ODLE,
 JOHN A. YENA, DANIEL M.
 FITZPATRICK,

 
 Defendants,

and
  

ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.,
  

Nominal Defendant.
	  	:
 :
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
	  	  
  

Civil Action No. 13-CV-3110 (JPO)

 STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT 

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the “Stipulation”), dated January 21, 2016, is made and entered into by
and among the following Settling Parties (as defined herein), each by and through their respective counsel: (i) plaintiffs to the above-captioned consolidated shareholder derivative action (the “New York Action”), Sasha Wilfred
(“Wilfred”) and Janice Nottenkamper (“Nottenkamper”) (collectively, the “New York Plaintiffs”), derivatively on behalf of ITT Educational Services, Inc. (“ITT” or the “Company”); (ii) Michelle
Lawrence (“Lawrence” or the “Indiana Federal Plaintiff”), the plaintiff to the shareholder derivative action pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (the “Indiana Federal Court”)
captioned Lawrence v. Modany, et al., Case No. 14-cv-2106 (the “Indiana Federal Action”), derivatively on behalf of ITT; (iii) William McKee (“McKee” or the “Indiana State Plaintiff”), the plaintiff to
the shareholder derivative action pending in the Marion County Superior Court, County of Marion, Indiana (the “Indiana State Court”) captioned McKee v. 

  
 1 

 
Modany, et al., Cause No. 49D07-1507-PL-021891 (the “Indiana State Action”), derivatively on behalf of ITT;1
(iv) nominal defendant ITT; and (v) defendants Kevin M. Modany (“Modany”), Daniel M. Fitzpatrick (“Fitzpatrick”), John F. Cozzi, John E. Dean, James D. Fowler, Jr., Joanna T. Lau, Thomas I. Morgan, Samuel L. Odle, Vin
Weber, John A. Yena, and Lloyd G. Waterhouse, all of whom are current or former members of ITT’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and/or senior officers of ITT (collectively the “Individual Defendants” and, together with
ITT, “Defendants”). This Stipulation, subject to the approval of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”), is intended by the Settling Parties to fully, finally, and forever compromise, resolve,
discharge, and settle the Released Claims (as defined herein) and to result in the complete dismissal of the Actions with prejudice, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein, and without any admission or concession as to the
merits of any of the Settling Parties’ claims or defenses. 
  

	I.	INTRODUCTION 

  

	 	A.	Factual Background 

 ITT, a Delaware corporation, is a for-profit provider of
technology-oriented undergraduate and graduate degree programs. In the years 2007, 2009, and 2010, ITT entered into a series of risk-sharing agreements (“RSAs”) with third-party lenders to increase the availability of private student loans
to ITT’s students. Under those RSAs, the Company could face financial liabilities if its students were to default on their student loans beyond certain thresholds. Among other things, Plaintiffs have alleged in the Actions that ITT failed to
properly account for its obligations under the RSAs, overstated its financial results, failed to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting, and failed to disclose the extent of the risks 

 

	1 	 Lawrence and McKee are collectively referred to herein as the “Indiana Plaintiffs,” and the Indiana Federal Action and the Indiana State
Action are collectively referred to herein as the “Indiana Actions.” The New York Plaintiffs and the Indiana Plaintiffs are collectively referred to herein as “Plaintiffs,” and the New York Action and the Indiana Actions are
collectively referred to herein as the “Actions.” 

  
 2 

 
that ITT faced under the RSAs. Plaintiffs have alleged that, beginning in April 2008, various public statements made by ITT and certain of its executive officers, both in U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings and otherwise, were false and misleading. 
 The Actions include allegations relating to
disclosures and events beginning with the Company’s entrance into an RSA with Sallie Mae in 2007 and continue through at least May 2015. The most recent of these events include the following: on January 4, 2013, ITT announced that it had
settled an action brought by Sallie Mae arising out of ITT’s obligations under the 2007 RSA. On February 22, 2013, it was announced that ITT had received a subpoena from the SEC seeking production of documents relating to the RSAs that ITT
had entered into in 2009 and 2010. On February 26, 2014, it was announced that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had filed a lawsuit against ITT. On September 19, 2014, the Company announced that it had received a Wells Notice
from the SEC, that the Department of Education (“DOE”) had placed ITT on heightened cash monitoring status, and that the DOE had required the Company to post a letter of credit. On October 16, 2014, ITT filed with the SEC certain
restated financial results. On May 12, 2015, the SEC filed an action in the Indiana Federal Court against ITT and defendants Modany and Fitzpatrick relating to the Company’s RSAs and accounting and disclosure issues. 

 

	 	B.	Procedural Background 

  

	 	1.	The New York Action 

 On May 8, 2013, plaintiff Wilfred initiated the New York
Action by filing a shareholder derivative action in this Court on behalf of ITT, captioned Wilfred v. Modany, et al., Case No. 13-cv-3110-JPO (the “Wilfred Action”). Plaintiff Wilfred asserted claims against certain of
the Individual Defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, and gross mismanagement. On August 6, 2013, Wilfred and the Defendants agreed to stay the Wilfred Action pending further developments in the
related federal securities class action captioned In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 13-cv-1620-JPO-JLC, also pending in this Court (the “New York Securities Action”).2 
  
  

	2 	 On November 2, 2015, the parties in the New York Securities Action entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement to resolve the New York
Securities Action in its entirety. That settlement was preliminarily approved by this Court on November 23, 2015, and a final settlement hearing is scheduled in the New York Securities Action for March 8, 2016.

  
 3 

 On May 27, 2014, plaintiff Nottenkamper filed a shareholder derivative action against the
Individual Defendants on behalf of ITT in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (the “Delaware Court”), captioned Nottenkamper v. Modany, et al., Case No. 14-cv-00672-GMS (the “Nottenkamper
Action”). The Nottenkamper Action in the Delaware Court was substantially similar to the Wilfred Action and raised substantially similar claims. 

On September 8, 2014, the Court approved an agreement between Wilfred and the Defendants providing for the continued stay of the
Wilfred Action. On October 15, 2014, Wilfred provided notice of voluntary termination of the stay of the Wilfred Action. 

On November 14, 2014, plaintiff Nottenkamper filed an amended complaint in the Nottenkamper Action. On November 24, 2014,
plaintiff Wilfred filed an amended complaint in the Wilfred Action. 
 On January 5, 2015, Defendants moved to dismiss or stay
the Wilfred Action. On January 13, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Nottenkamper Action, as well as a separate motion to stay the Nottenkamper Action or to transfer the Nottenkamper Action from the
Delaware Court to this Court. 
 On April 29, 2015, the Nottenkamper Action was transferred from the Delaware Court to this
Court, Case No. 15-cv-3390, and on May 6, 2015, Nottenkamper moved to consolidate the Nottenkamper Action and the Wilfred Action. On June 2, 2015, Nottenkamper’s motion was denied without prejudice. 

On July 2, 2015, Wilfred requested leave to file a second amended complaint in the Wilfred Action, which was granted on
July 28, 2015. Additionally, this Court consolidated the Wilfred Action and the Nottenkamper Action, thus forming the New York Action, and appointed 

  
 4 

 
Wilfred as Lead Plaintiff and Wilfred’s attorneys, the Lifshitz Law Firm (the “Lifshitz Firm”), as Lead Counsel in the consolidated New York Action. This Court also denied as moot
the pending motions to dismiss that had been fully briefed by the parties in both the Wilfred Action and the Nottenkamper Action. 

On August 11, 2015, Nottenkamper moved for reconsideration of this Court’s July 28, 2015 Order. On August 21, 2015,
Wilfred filed a consolidated complaint in the New York Action. In connection with efforts to explore the resolution of the New York Action, Defendants produced discovery to Wilfred. 

On September 16, 2015, this Court entered an order granting Nottenkamper’s motion for reconsideration, thereby appointing Wilfred
and Nottenkamper as Co-Lead Plaintiffs in the New York Action and appointing the Lifshitz Firm and Nottenkamper’s counsel, The Weiser Law Firm, P.C. (the “Weiser Firm”), as Co-Lead Counsel in the New York Action. That same day, this
Court also entered a stipulation and order temporarily staying all proceedings in the New York Action to facilitate the parties’ efforts to explore a resolution of the New York Action through settlement. Soon thereafter, Defendants produced the
same discovery to Nottenkamper that had been previously provided to Wilfred. 
  

	 	2.	The Indiana Federal Action 

 On December 23, 2014, plaintiff Lawrence filed the
Indiana Federal Action against certain of the Individual Defendants on behalf of ITT in the Indiana Federal Court, making allegations similar to those made in the related securities class action also pending before the Indiana Federal Court,
captioned In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation (Indiana), Case No. 14-cv-01599-TWP-DML (the “Indiana Securities Action”).3 The claims made in the
Indiana Federal Action, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, gross mismanagement, abuse of control, corporate waste, and unjust enrichment, also are substantially similar to those 

 

	3 	 On November 2, 2015, the parties in the Indiana Securities Action entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement to resolve the Indiana
Securities Action in its entirety. That settlement was preliminarily approved by the Indiana Federal Court on November 4, 2015, and a final settlement hearing is scheduled in the Indiana Securities Action for March 10, 2016.

  
 5 

 
made in the consolidated complaint in the New York Action. On March 11, 2015, the Indiana Federal Court approved an agreement between Lawrence and the Defendants to stay the Indiana Federal
Action pending further developments in the Indiana Securities Action, and pursuant to which Defendants agreed to provide Lawrence with all discovery produced by the defendants in the Indiana Securities Action, as well as all discovery produced to
any other plaintiff in any other derivative action brought on ITT’s behalf arising from similar facts as the Indiana Federal Action. Pursuant to that agreement, Defendants produced discovery to Lawrence in August 2015. 

 

	 	3.	The Indiana State Action 

 On July 1, 2015, plaintiff McKee filed the Indiana State
Action on behalf of ITT in the Indiana State Court, asserting claims against certain of the Individual Defendants for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with substantially similar facts, events, and circumstances as those alleged in the original
and consolidated complaints in the New York Action. On August 6, 2015, the parties to the Indiana State Action entered into an agreement to stay the Indiana State Action pending further developments in the closely-related Indiana Securities
Action. The Indiana State Court entered the parties’ requested order on August 7, 2015, pursuant to which Defendants agreed to provide McKee with all discovery produced by the defendants in the Indiana Securities Action, as well as all
discovery produced to any other plaintiff in any other derivative action brought on ITT’s behalf arising from similar facts as the Indiana State Action. Pursuant to that agreement, Defendants produced discovery to McKee in August 2015. 

 

	 	4.	Settlement Negotiations 

 Beginning in August 2015, counsel for the Settling Parties
engaged in extensive efforts to reach a “global resolution” of the Actions. On September 10, 2015, the Settling Parties participated in an in-person, full-day mediation (the “Mediation”) in San Francisco, California with the
Honorable Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) of JAMS (“Judge Weinstein” or the “Mediator”), an experienced and distinguished mediator. 

  
 6 

 Although a settlement was not reached during the Mediation, considerable progress was made, and
after further extensive discussions over the next month with substantial assistance from the Mediator, the Settling Parties reached an agreement-in-principle to resolve the Actions, subject to approval by the Board and the Settling Parties’
agreement on documentation. As a condition of the settlement reflected in this Stipulation (the “Settlement”), ITT will agree to institute and maintain certain corporate governance reforms, the terms of which are fully set forth in Exhibit
A. After reaching agreement on these substantive corporate governance terms, with the Mediator’s substantial assistance, the Settling Parties negotiated at arm’s length the attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses to be paid to
Plaintiffs’ Counsel (as defined herein), in light of the substantial benefits which have been or will be conferred upon the Company as a result of the settlement of the Actions. Following extensive discussions, the Settling Parties agreed to a
“Mediator’s proposal” made by Judge Weinstein with respect to the attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses to be paid to Plaintiffs’ Counsel, subject to the approval of the Court. 

 

	II.	PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSELS’ INVESTIGATION AND RESEARCH, PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS, AND THE BENEFIT OF SETTLEMENT 

Plaintiffs’ Counsel conducted an investigation relating to the claims and the underlying events alleged in the respective Actions to which
their clients are parties, including, but not limited to: (1) reviewing and analyzing the Company’s public filings with the SEC, press releases, announcements, transcripts of investor conference calls, and news articles; (2) reviewing
and analyzing the investigations by the SEC and allegations contained in the SEC complaint; (3) reviewing and analyzing the allegations contained in Sallie Mae’s complaint against ITT; (4) reviewing and analyzing the allegations
contained in the New York Securities Action and the Indiana Securities Action; (5) researching, drafting, and filing shareholder derivative complaints, including amended and consolidated complaints by the New York Plaintiffs; (6) reviewing
in excess of 181,000 pages of internal corporate documents produced to Plaintiffs by ITT in connection with settlement negotiations; (7) researching the applicable law 

  
 7 

 
with respect to the claims asserted (or which could be asserted) in the Actions and the potential defenses thereto; (8) researching corporate governance issues; (9) the preparation and
submission of detailed settlement demands and mediation statements in connection with the Mediation; (10) attending the in-person, full-day Mediation in San Francisco, California; and (11) engaging in extensive settlement discussions with
the Mediator and counsel for the Defendants. 
 Plaintiffs’ Counsel believe that the claims asserted in the Actions have merit and that
their investigation supports the claims asserted. Without conceding the merit of any of Defendants’ defenses or the lack of merit of any of their own allegations, and in light of the benefits of the Settlement as well as to avoid the
potentially protracted time, expense, and uncertainty associated with continued litigation, including potential trials and appeals, Plaintiffs have concluded that it is desirable that the Actions be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon
the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation. Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel recognize the significant risk, expense, and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Actions against the Individual Defendants through
trials and possible appeals. Plaintiffs’ Counsel also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and the risk of any litigation, especially complex litigation such as the Actions, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such
litigation. Based on their evaluation, and in light of the significant benefits conferred upon the Company and its shareholders as a result of the Settlement, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel have determined that the Settlement is in the best
interests of Plaintiffs, ITT, and Current ITT Stockholders (as defined herein), and have agreed to settle the Actions upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein. Further, ITT has determined that the Settlement is in the best
interests of ITT and Current ITT Stockholders. 
  

	III.	DEFENDANTS’ DENIALS OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY 

 The Individual Defendants have
denied, and continue to deny, each and every claim and contention alleged by Plaintiffs in the Actions and affirm that they have acted properly, lawfully, and in full accord with their fiduciary duties, at all times. Further, the Individual
Defendants 

  
 8 

 
have denied expressly, and continue to deny, all allegations of wrongdoing, fault, liability, or damage against them arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts or omissions alleged, or
that could have been alleged, in the Actions and deny that they have ever committed or attempted to commit any violations of law, any breach of fiduciary duty owed to ITT or its shareholders, or any wrongdoing whatsoever. Had the terms of this
Stipulation not been reached, the Individual Defendants would have continued to contest vigorously Plaintiffs’ allegations, and the Individual Defendants maintain that they had and have meritorious defenses to all claims alleged in the Actions.
Without admitting the validity of any of the claims that Plaintiffs have asserted in the Actions, or any liability with respect thereto, Defendants have concluded that it is desirable that the claims be settled on the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth herein. Defendants are entering into this Settlement because it will eliminate the uncertainty, distraction, disruption, burden, and expense of further litigation of the Actions. Neither this Stipulation, nor any of its terms or
provisions, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Settlement: (a) is, may be construed as, or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the truth or validity of any of the Released Claims, of any
claims or allegations made in the Actions, or of any purported acts or omissions by the Defendants; (b) is, may be construed as, or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault, omission, negligence, or wrongdoing by the
Defendants, or any concession of liability whatsoever; or (c) is, may be construed as, or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, a concession by any Defendant of any infirmity in the defenses that Defendants asserted or could have
asserted in these Actions or otherwise. 
  

	IV.	TERMS OF STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT 

 Plaintiffs (for themselves and
derivatively on behalf of ITT), the Individual Defendants, and nominal defendant ITT, by and through their respective counsel or attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree that, subject to approval by the Court, in consideration of the benefits
flowing to the Settling Parties hereto, the Actions and all of the Released Claims shall be fully, 

  
 9 

 
finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, discharged and dismissed with prejudice, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Definitions 

 As used in this Stipulation, the following terms have the meanings
specified below. In the event of any inconsistency between any definition set forth below and any definition set forth in any document attached as an exhibit to this Stipulation, the definition set forth below shall control. 

 

	 	1.1	“Board” means the ITT Board of Directors. 

  

	 	1.2	“Court” refers to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. 

  

	 	1.3	“New York Action” refers to the above-captioned shareholder derivative action, Wilfred v. Modany, et al., Case No. 13-cv-3110-JPO, including, without limitation, all cases consolidated under that
caption. 

  

	 	1.4	“Current ITT Stockholders” means, for purposes of this Stipulation, any Persons (defined below) who owned ITT common stock as of the date of this Stipulation and who continue to hold their ITT common stock as
of the date of the Settlement Hearing, excluding the Individual Defendants, the officers and directors of ITT, members of their immediate families, and their legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, and any entity in which Individual
Defendants have or had a controlling interest. 

  

	 	1.5	“Defendants” means, collectively, the Individual Defendants and nominal defendant ITT. 

  

	 	1.6	“Defendants’ Counsel” means: (i) Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10166; (ii) Allegaert Berger & Vogel LLP, 111 Broadway, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10006; and (iii) Ice Miller LLP, One American Square, Suite 2900, Indianapolis, Indiana 46282. 

  
 10 

	 	1.7	“Indiana Federal Court” refers to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. 

  

	 	1.8	“Indiana Federal Action” means the shareholder derivative action pending in the Indiana Federal Court captioned Lawrence v. Modany, et al., Case No. 14-cv-2106. 

 

	 	1.9	“Indiana State Court” refers to the Marion County Superior Court, County of Marion, Indiana. 

  

	 	1.10	“Indiana State Action” means the shareholder derivative action in the Indiana State Court, captioned McKee v. Modany, et al., Cause No. 49D07-1507-PL-021891. 

 

	 	1.11	“Effective Date” means the first date by which all of the events and conditions specified in 6.1 herein have been met and have occurred. 

 

	 	1.12	“Fee Award” means the sum to be paid to Plaintiffs’ Counsel for their attorneys’ fees and expenses, as detailed in ¶¶5.1-5.2 of this Stipulation, subject to approval by the Court.

  

	 	1.13	 “Final” means the time when an order or judgment that has not been reversed, vacated, or modified in any way is no longer subject to
appellate review, either because of disposition on appeal and conclusion of the appellate process (including potential writ proceedings) or because of passage, without action, of time for seeking appellate or writ review. More specifically, it is
that situation when (1) either no appeal or petition for review by writ has been filed and the 

  
 11 

	 	
time has passed for any notice of appeal or writ petition to be timely filed in an Action; or (2) an appeal has been filed and the court of appeals has either affirmed the order or judgment
or dismissed that appeal and the time for any reconsideration or further appellate review has passed; or (3) a higher court has granted further appellate review and that court has either affirmed the underlying order or judgment or affirmed the
court of appeals’ decision affirming the order or judgment or dismissing the appeal or writ proceeding. Any appeal or proceeding seeking judicial review pertaining solely to the Fee Award shall not in any way delay or affect the time set forth
above for the Judgment to become Final. 

  

	 	1.14	“Judgment” means the final order and judgment to be rendered by the Court, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E. 

 

	 	1.15	“ITT” or the “Company” means nominal defendant ITT Educational Services, Inc. and includes all of its subsidiaries, predecessors, successors, affiliates, officers, directors, employees, and agents.

  

	 	1.16	“Individual Defendants” means collectively: Kevin M. Modany, Daniel M. Fitzpatrick, John F. Cozzi, John E. Dean, James D. Fowler, Jr., Joanna T. Lau, Thomas I. Morgan, Samuel L. Odle, Vin Weber, John A. Yena,
and Lloyd G. Waterhouse. 

  

	 	1.17	“Judge Weinstein” or the “Mediator” means the Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.). 

  

	 	1.18	“Notice to Current ITT Stockholders” or “Notice” means the Notice to Current ITT Stockholders, substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto. 

  
 12 

	 	1.19	“Settling Parties” means, collectively, each of the Plaintiffs (on behalf of themselves and derivatively on behalf of ITT), each of the Individual Defendants, and nominal defendant ITT. 

 

	 	1.20	“Person(s)” means an individual, corporation, limited liability company, professional corporation, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, association, joint stock company, estate,
legal representative, trust, unincorporated association, government or any political subdivision or agency thereof, and any business or legal entity, and their spouses, heirs, predecessors, successors, administrators, parents, subsidiaries,
affiliates, representatives, or assignees. 

  

	 	1.21	“Preliminary Approval Order” means the Order to be entered by the Court, substantially in the form of Exhibit D attached hereto, including, inter alia, preliminarily approving the terms and conditions
of the Settlement as set forth in this Stipulation, directing that notice be provided to Current ITT Stockholders, and scheduling a Settlement Hearing to consider whether the Settlement and Fee Award should be finally approved. 

 

	 	1.22	 “Related Persons” means each and all of a Person’s past, present, or future family members, spouses, domestic partners, parents,
associates, affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, officers, directors, stockholders, owners, members, representatives, employees, attorneys, financial or investment advisors, consultants, underwriters, investment banks or bankers, commercial bankers,
insurers, reinsurers, excess insurers, co-insurers, advisors, principals, agents, heirs, executors, trustees, estates, beneficiaries, distributees, foundations, general or limited partners or

  
 13 

	 	
partnerships, joint ventures, personal or legal representatives, administrators, or any other person or entity acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of any Person, and each of their
respective predecessors, successors, and assigns. 

  

	 	1.23	 “Released Claims” means, collectively, all claims (including Unknown Claims), demands, debts, losses, damages, duties, rights, disputes,
actions, causes of action, liabilities, obligations, judgments, suits, matters, controversies, proceedings, or issues, of any kind, nature, character, or description whatsoever (and including, but not limited to, any claims for damages, whether
compensatory, consequential, special, punitive, exemplary, or otherwise, and any and all fees, costs, interest, expenses, or charges), whether known or unknown, contingent or absolute, suspected or unsuspected, foreseen or unforeseen, disclosed or
undisclosed, concealed or hidden, apparent or not apparent, accrued or unaccrued, matured or unmatured, liquidated or not liquidated, asserted or unasserted, at law or in equity, that have been asserted, could have been asserted, or in the future
could be asserted by Plaintiffs, ITT, and/or any ITT shareholder derivatively on behalf of ITT against any Released Persons in the Actions or in any other court, tribunal, forum or proceeding (including, but not limited to, any claims arising under
U.S. federal, state or local law, foreign law, common law, statutory law, administrative law, rule, regulation, or at equity), relating to alleged fraud, breach of any duty (including, but not limited to, breaches of fiduciary duties, breaches of
the duty of care, or breaches of the duty of loyalty), negligence or gross negligence, mismanagement or gross mismanagement, corporate waste, abuse of control, unjust enrichment, disgorgement, recoupment, contribution or indemnification,

  
 14 

	 	
violations of the federal securities laws, or otherwise, whether individual, class, direct, derivative, representative, legal, equitable or any other type, or in any other capacity, that are
based upon, arising from, or related to: (i) the claims, facts, transactions, events, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions or failures to act, or any other circumstances, which were alleged or referred to in the Actions;
(ii) any of the Company’s public disclosures or filings with the SEC up to the Effective Date of the Settlement; (iii) any compensation, pay, bonus, severance, or benefits received by any Released Person, as relating to or in
connection with any allegations made in the Actions; and/or (iv) the settlement of the Actions and the reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incurred in defense thereof. Released Claims shall not include claims to enforce the
Settlement, or any indemnification, advancement or insurance claims that any Released Person may have, including, but not limited to, any rights any Released Person has or may have related to any pending or threatened civil or government
proceedings. Released Claims also does not include the New York Securities Action or the Indiana Securities Action, which are the subject of separate settlement agreements. 

 

	 	1.24	“Defendants’ Released Claims” means any and all claims, debts, rights, or causes of action or liabilities, including Unknown Claims, that could be asserted in any forum by the Released Persons against
Plaintiffs or their beneficiaries, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, or ITT that arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of the Actions. Defendants’ Released Claims shall not include any indemnification,
advancement or insurance claims that any Released Person has or may have, including, but not limited to, any rights any Released Person has or may have related to any pending or threatened civil or government proceedings. 

  
 15 

	 	1.25	“Released Person(s)” means, collectively, each and all of the Defendants and their Related Persons. 

  

	 	1.26	“Plaintiffs” means, collectively, Sasha Wilfred, Janice Nottenkamper, Michelle Lawrence, and William McKee. 

  

	 	1.27	“Plaintiffs’ Counsel” means: (i) The Weiser Law Firm, P.C., 22 Cassatt Ave, Berwyn, Pennsylvania 19312; (ii) Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 16 West 46th Street, 7th Floor, New York, New
York 10036; (iii) Ryan & Maniskas, LLP, 995 Old Eagle School Road, Suite 311, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087; (iv) Lifshitz Law Firm, 821 Franklin Ave., Suite 209, Garden City, New York 11530; (v) Schubert Jonckheer &
Kolbe LLP, Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650, San Francisco, California 94111; (vi) The Brown Law Firm, P.C., 127A Cove Road, Oyster Bay Cove, New York 11771; (vii) Price Waicukauski & Riley, LLC, Hammond Block Building, 301
Massachusetts Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204; and (viii) Cohen & Malad LLP, One Indiana Square, Suite 1400, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. 

  

	 	1.28	“Actions” means: (i) the New York Action; (ii) the Indiana Federal Action; and (iii) the Indiana State Action. 

 

	 	1.29	“Settlement” means the settlement of the Actions as documented in this Stipulation. 

  
 16 

	 	1.30	“Settlement Hearing” means a hearing by the Court to review the adequacy, fairness, and reasonableness of the Settlement set forth in this Stipulation and to determine: (i) whether to enter the Judgment;
and (ii) all other matters properly before the Court. 

  

	 	1.31	“Stipulation” means this Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated January 21, 2016. 

  

	 	1.32	“Summary Notice” means the Summary Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Stockholder Derivative Litigation, substantially in the form of Exhibit C attached hereto. 

 

	 	1.33	“Unknown Claims” means any and all claims that were alleged or could have been alleged in the Actions by the Plaintiffs, ITT or any ITT stockholder derivatively on behalf of ITT, which any Current ITT
Stockholder, ITT, or any ITT stockholder derivatively on behalf of ITT does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Persons, including claims which, if known by him, her or it, might have
affected his, her or its settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his, her or its decision not to object to this settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree
that, upon the Effective Date, the Plaintiffs and ITT shall expressly waive, and each of ITT’s stockholders shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived the provisions, rights and benefits of California
Civil Code § 1542, which provides: 

 A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or
suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor. 

  
 17 

 Plaintiffs and ITT shall expressly waive, and each of ITT’s stockholders shall be deemed to
have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any U.S. federal law or any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or foreign law,
which is similar, comparable or equivalent in effect to California Civil Code § 1542. The Settling Parties acknowledge that they may discover facts in addition to or different from those now known or believed to be true by them with respect to
the Released Claims, but it is the intention of the Settling Parties to completely, fully, finally, and forever compromise, settle, release, discharge, and extinguish any and all of the Released Claims known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected,
contingent or absolute, accrued or unaccrued, apparent or unapparent, which now exist, or heretofore existed, or may hereafter exist, and without regard to the subsequent discovery of additional or different facts. Plaintiffs and ITT acknowledge,
and ITT’s stockholders shall be deemed by operation of the Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and was a material element of the Settlement. With respect to Defendants’ Released Claims,
“Unknown Claims” means any and all Defendants’ Released Claims, of every nature and description, which the Released Persons do not know or suspect to exist in their favor at the time of the release of Plaintiffs or their
beneficiaries, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, or ITT which, if known by them, might have affected their decisions with respect to the release of Defendants’ Released Claims or the Settlement. 

  
 18 

	 	2.	Terms of the Settlement 

 2.1 The benefits of the Settlement consist of corporate
governance reforms (the “Reforms”), the terms of which are fully set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. Since the New York Action was initiated, ITT has implemented a number of improvements to its corporate governance practices, business
operations, and system of internal controls. The New York Action, and other actions and regulatory proceedings involving private education loans received by ITT’s students, among other factors, significantly contributed to ITT’s evaluation
of, and implementation of, certain changes to the Company’s structure, policies, and procedures to protect the Company from the risk of future losses, damages, litigation, and regulatory proceedings. ITT acknowledges that the pendency and
settlement of the Actions is a substantial factor in the Company’s decision to adopt and/or enact changes, modifications, and enhancements to previously-instituted remedial measures as well as the other Reforms set forth in Exhibit A. The
Settling Parties agree that the Reforms will provide substantial benefits to ITT and Current ITT Stockholders. ITT always has been, and continues to be, committed to the implementation, enhancement and enforcement of rigorous corporate governance
measures. The fact that ITT has implemented, or has agreed to implement, changes, modifications, or enhancements to its corporate governance policies and practices shall not be construed as an admission that any such enhanced policies or practices
are legally required, or to the extent such policies or practices were not in place in the past, constituted a failure of compliance, a breach of any duty, or any other wrongdoing. 

2.2 Within ninety (90) calendar days following the Effective Date, ITT shall take all necessary steps to adopt and implement the Reforms,
to the extent that such Reforms have not already been adopted and implemented. Except where specified otherwise, the Reforms shall be maintained for a period of no less than three (3) years from the date of implementation, subject to the terms
and conditions set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. 

  
 19 

	 	3.	Procedure for Implementing the Settlement 

 3.1 Within three (3) business
days after the execution of this Stipulation, the New York Plaintiffs shall submit this Stipulation, together with its exhibits, to the Court and apply for entry of the Preliminary Approval Order, substantially in the form of Exhibit D attached
hereto, requesting, inter alia: (i) preliminary approval of the Settlement set forth in this Stipulation; (ii) approval of the method of providing notice of the proposed Settlement to Current ITT Stockholders; (iii) approval of
the form of Notice attached hereto as Exhibit B and the Summary Notice attached hereto as Exhibit C; and (iv) a date for the Settlement Hearing. 

3.2 Within five (5) business days after the filing of this Stipulation with the Court, each of the Indiana Plaintiffs shall notify their
respective Indiana court of the pendency of the Settlement, attaching a courtesy copy of this Stipulation and its exhibits and informing their respective Indiana court that: (i) the Indiana Plaintiffs are parties to the Settlement, which if
finally approved, would result in the Indiana Plaintiffs moving for the dismissals of the Indiana Actions with prejudice; and (ii) this Stipulation, a motion for preliminary approval of the Settlement, and proposed notices to Current ITT
Stockholders have been filed with the Court in the New York Action. Upon the notification of the pendency of the Settlement to the Indiana Federal Court, the Indiana Federal Plaintiff shall request that the current stay of proceedings in the Indiana
Federal Action, first entered on March 11, 2015, be continued, unless and until this Stipulation is in any way canceled or terminated. Upon the notification of the pendency of the Settlement to the Indiana State Court, the Indiana State
Plaintiff shall request that the current stay of proceedings in the Indiana State Action, first entered on August 7, 2015, be continued, unless and until this Stipulation is in any way canceled or terminated. Defendants agree to cooperate with
the Indiana Plaintiffs to accomplish the terms set forth herein. 
 3.3 Within five (5) business days after the Court’s entry of
the Preliminary Approval Order, each of the Indiana Plaintiffs shall notify their respective Indiana court of the issuance of the Preliminary Approval Order by this Court, attaching a courtesy copy of the Preliminary Approval Order. 

  
 20 

 3.4 Within ten (10) business days of the Court’s entry of the Preliminary Approval
Order, ITT shall: (i) cause a copy of the Notice to be filed with the SEC via a Current Report on Form 8-K; (ii) cause the Summary Notice to be published once in Investor’s Business Daily; and (iii) post a link to the
Stipulation and the Notice on the investor relations portion of ITT’s website, which posting shall be maintained through the date of the Settlement Hearing. All costs of such notice and the filing, publishing and posting set forth above shall
be paid by ITT. The Settling Parties believe the content of the Notice, the Summary Notice, and the manner of the notice procedures set forth in this paragraph, constitutes adequate and reasonable notice to Current ITT Stockholders pursuant to
applicable law and due process. 
 3.5 Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall request that the Court hold the Settlement Hearing at least forty-five
(45) calendar days after the notice described in ¶3.4 above is given to Current ITT Stockholders to approve the Settlement and the Fee Award. 

3.6 Pending the Court’s determination as to final approval of the Settlement, the Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel, and all other
Persons, including, but not limited to, any Current ITT Stockholders, whether acting directly, representatively, or derivatively on behalf of ITT, or in any other capacity, are barred and enjoined from commencing, prosecuting, instigating, or in any
way participating in the commencement or prosecution of any action asserting any Released Claims against any of the Released Persons, in any court or tribunal. 

3.7 Within five (5) business days after the date that the Court enters the Judgment finally approving the Settlement, each of the Indiana
Plaintiffs shall notify their respective Indiana court that the Court entered the Judgment, attaching a courtesy copy of the Judgment and informing their respective Indiana court that within five (5) business days after the date that the
Judgment finally approving the Settlement becomes “Final,” as defined in ¶1.13 herein, the Indiana Plaintiffs will file the necessary documents to move for voluntary dismissal of the respective Indiana Actions with prejudice, in
accordance with local rules. The Indiana Federal 

  
 21 

 
Plaintiff shall request that the current stay of proceedings in the Indiana Federal Action, first entered on March 11, 2015, be continued, unless and until this Stipulation is in any way
canceled or terminated. The Indiana State Plaintiff shall request that the current stay of proceedings in the Indiana State Action, first entered on August 7, 2015, be continued, unless and until this Stipulation is in any way canceled or
terminated. Defendants agree to cooperate with the Indiana Plaintiffs to accomplish the terms set forth herein. 
 3.8 Within five
(5) business days after the date that the Judgment finally approving the Settlement becomes “Final,” as defined in ¶1.13 herein, each of the Indiana Plaintiffs shall file the necessary documents in their respective Indiana Action
to move for a voluntary dismissal of that action with prejudice, in accordance with local rules. The Indiana Plaintiffs agree to use their reasonable best efforts to file with the respective Indiana court any motion, notice, or other document
requested by that Indiana court to secure dismissal with prejudice of the Indiana Actions. Plaintiffs and Defendants agree to cooperate to secure the dismissal with prejudice of the Indiana Actions, as dismissal of both Indiana Actions with
prejudice is a material condition of this Settlement, without which the Effective Date set forth in ¶6.1 cannot occur. 
  

	 	4.	Releases 

 4.1 Upon the Effective Date, ITT, Plaintiffs (acting on their own
behalf and derivatively on behalf of ITT), and each of ITT’s stockholders (solely in their capacity as ITT stockholders) shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished
and discharged the Released Claims (including Unknown Claims) against the Released Persons and any and all claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with, the defense, settlement or resolution of the Actions against the Released Persons.
ITT, Plaintiffs (acting on their own behalf and derivatively on behalf of ITT) and each of ITT’s stockholders (solely in their capacity as ITT stockholders) shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, covenanted not to
sue any Released Person with respect to any Released Claims, and shall be permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, 

  
 22 

 
commencing or prosecuting the Released Claims against the Released Persons except to enforce the releases and other terms and conditions contained in this Stipulation and/or the Judgment entered
pursuant thereto. 
 4.2 Upon the Effective Date, each of the Released Persons shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment
shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged each and all of Plaintiffs or their beneficiaries, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, or ITT from any and all Defendants’ Released Claims; provided, however, that nothing
herein is intended to release any indemnification, advancement or insurance claims that any Released Person has or may have under any insurance policy, contract, bylaw or charter provision, or under Delaware law, including, but not limited to, any
rights any Released Person has or may have related to any pending or threatened civil or government proceedings. 
 4.3 Nothing herein shall
in any way impair or restrict the rights of any Settling Party to enforce the terms of the Stipulation. 
  

	 	5.	Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses 

 5.1 In
recognition of the substantial benefits provided to ITT and Current ITT Stockholders as a result of the settlement of the Actions, ITT has agreed to pay or cause to be paid to Plaintiffs’ Counsel an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses in
the total amount of $1.1 million ($1,100,000.00) (the “Fee Award”), subject to approval by the Court. As discussed above, as part of the mediation process, the Settling Parties agreed to a “Mediator’s proposal” by Judge
Weinstein for the amount of the Fee Award, subject to the approval of the Court. The Settling Parties mutually agree that the Fee Award is fair and reasonable in light of the substantial benefits conferred upon ITT and Current ITT Stockholders by
this Stipulation. 
 5.2 The Fee Award shall be transferred to an interest-bearing escrow account (the “Escrow Account”) held by
the Weiser Firm, as receiving agent for all Plaintiffs’ Counsel, within twenty (20) business days after entry of the Preliminary Approval Order. Plaintiffs’ 

  
 23 

 
Counsel shall provide Defendants’ Counsel, within ten (10) business days after entry of the Preliminary Approval Order, all necessary payment details to accomplish payment of the Fee
Award to the Escrow Account by wire transfer, including bank account number, name of bank, bank address, a Sort Code or ABA Routing Number, wire transfer instructions, the Tax Identification Number, and an executed Form W-9. Defendants and
Defendants’ Counsel shall have no responsibility for, nor bear any risk or liability with respect to, the Escrow Account, its operation, and any taxes or expenses incurred in connection with the Escrow Account. Plaintiffs’ Counsel shall be
solely responsible for any administrative costs associated with the Escrow Account as well as the filing of all informational and other tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service, or any other state or local taxing authority, as may be necessary
or appropriate. 
 5.3 The Fee Award shall remain in the Escrow Account until the entry of the Judgment by the Court finally approving the
Settlement, at which time the Fee Award shall be immediately releasable to Plaintiffs’ Counsel. Should the Court order the payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses to Plaintiffs’ Counsel in an amount less than the agreed Fee Award
prior to, or at the time of, entry of the Judgment, then only the Court-approved amount, plus interest earned thereon, shall be released to Plaintiffs’ Counsel. Any amounts remaining in the Escrow Account, including any interest earned thereon,
shall be returned to ITT within fifteen (15) business days of entry of the Judgment. 
 5.4 Payment of the Fee Award in the amount
approved by the Court shall constitute final and complete payment for Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s attorneys’ fees and expenses that have been incurred or will be incurred in connection with the filing and prosecution of the Actions and the
resolution of the claims alleged therein. The Weiser Firm shall be solely responsible for the distribution of the Fee Award to Plaintiffs’ Counsel, in accordance with the confidential 

  
 24 

 
arbitration ruling regarding the allocation of the Fee Award issued by the Mediator on December 17, 2015 (the “Arbitration Ruling”). The Weiser Firm shall distribute the Fee Award
to Plaintiffs’ Counsel in accordance with the Arbitration Ruling within five (5) business days after entry of the Judgment by the Court, finally approving the Settlement. Defendants and Defendants’ Counsel shall have no responsibility
for the allocation or distribution of the Fee Award amongst Plaintiffs’ Counsel. Defendants, including ITT, shall have no obligation to make any payment to any Plaintiffs’ Counsel other than the payment to the Escrow Account provided in
¶5.2 herein. 
 5.5 If for any reason any condition in ¶6.1 is not met and the Effective Date of the Stipulation does not occur,
if the Stipulation is in any way canceled or terminated, if the Judgment is not entered, or in the event of any failure to obtain final approval of the full amount of the Fee Award, or upon any appeal and/or further proceedings on remand, or
successful collateral attack, which results in the Judgment or the Fee Award being overturned or substantially modified, each of Plaintiffs’ Counsel and their successors shall be obligated to repay to ITT, within fifteen (15) business
days, the amount of the Fee Award, or part thereof, paid by or on behalf of Defendants, which they received. Each of Plaintiffs’ Counsel that receives any portion of the Fee Award is subject to the Court’s jurisdiction for the purposes of
enforcing this paragraph or the provisions related to the Fee Award. 
 5.6 Except as otherwise provided herein, each of the Settling
Parties shall bear his, her, or its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 
 5.7 In light of the substantial benefits they have helped to
create for all Current ITT Stockholders, any or all of the Plaintiffs may apply for Court-approved service awards in the amount of $1,500.00 each (the “Service Awards”). Each Service Award to each of the Plaintiffs,

  
 25 

 
to the extent that it is applied for and approved in whole or part, shall be funded from the portion of the Fee Award distributed to that Plaintiff’s counsel in accordance with the
Arbitration Ruling, to the extent that the Fee Award is approved in whole or in part. Defendants shall take no position on the Service Awards and shall have no obligation to pay them. 

 

	 	6.	Conditions of Settlement, Effect of Disapproval, Cancellation, or Termination 

6.1 The Effective Date of the Stipulation shall be conditioned on the occurrence of all of the following events: 

(i) the Court’s entry of the Judgment; 

(ii) the payment of the Fee Award in accordance with ¶¶5.1-5.2 hereof; 

(iii) the Judgment has become Final; 

(iv) the Indiana Federal Action has been dismissed with prejudice and that dismissal order has become Final; and 

(v) the Indiana State Action has been dismissed with prejudice and that dismissal order has become Final. 

6.2 If any of the conditions specified in ¶6.1 are not met, then the Stipulation shall be canceled and terminated subject to ¶6.4,
and the Settling Parties shall be restored to their respective positions in the Actions as of the date immediately preceding the date of this Stipulation, unless Plaintiffs’ Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel mutually agree in writing to
proceed with the Stipulation. 
 6.3 Each of the Settling Parties shall have the right to terminate the Settlement by providing written
notice of their election to do so to all other Settling Parties within twenty (20) calendar days of the date on which: (i) the Court refuses to approve this Stipulation, or the terms contained herein, in any material respect; (ii) the
Preliminary Approval Order is not entered in 

  
 26 

 
substantially the form attached as Exhibit D hereto; (iii) the Judgment is not entered in substantially the form attached as Exhibit E hereto; (iv) the Judgment is reversed or
substantially modified on appeal, reconsideration, or otherwise; (v) the Indiana Actions are not dismissed with prejudice or those dismissal orders do not become Final; or (vi) the Effective Date of the Settlement cannot otherwise occur;
except that such termination shall not be effective unless and until the terminating Settling Party has, within twenty (20) calendar days of the date on which notice of the termination event has been provided to all other Settling Parties,
attempted in good faith to confer with the other Settling Parties and/or to participate in a mediation session with Judge Weinstein and the other Settling Parties to attempt to remedy the issue. Any order or proceeding relating to the Fee Award, or
any appeal from any order relating thereto or reversal or modification thereof, shall not operate to cancel the Stipulation, allow for the termination of the Settlement, or affect or delay the finality of the Judgment approving the Settlement. 

6.4 In the event that the Stipulation is not approved by the Court, or the Settlement is terminated for any reason, including pursuant to
¶6.3 above, the Settling Parties shall be restored to their respective positions as of the date of this Stipulation, and all negotiations, proceedings, documents prepared and statements made in connection herewith shall be without prejudice to
the Settling Parties, shall not be deemed or construed to be an admission by any of the Settling Parties of any act, matter, or proposition, and shall not be used in any manner for any purpose in any subsequent proceeding in the Actions or in any
other action or proceeding. In such event, the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, with the exception of ¶¶1.1-1.33, 6.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.7, 8.9, 8.11, 8.12, 8.13, 8.14, 8.15, 8.17, and 8.18 herein, shall have no further force and
effect with respect to the Settling Parties and shall not be used in the Actions or in any other proceeding for any purpose, and any judgment or orders entered by the Court in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation shall be treated as vacated,
nunc pro tunc. 

  
 27 

	 	7.	Bankruptcy 

 7.1 In the event any proceedings by or on behalf of ITT, whether
voluntary or involuntary, are initiated under any chapter of the United States Bankruptcy Code, including any act of receivership, asset seizure, or similar federal or state law action (“Bankruptcy Proceedings”), the Settling Parties agree
to use their reasonable best efforts to obtain all necessary orders, consents, releases, and approvals for effectuation of this Stipulation in a timely and expeditious manner. 

7.2 In the event of any Bankruptcy Proceedings by or on behalf of ITT, the Settling Parties agree that all dates and deadlines set forth
herein will be extended for such periods of time as are necessary to obtain necessary orders, consents, releases and approvals from the Bankruptcy Court to carry out the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. 

 

	 	8.	Miscellaneous Provisions 

 8.1 The Settling Parties: (i) acknowledge that it
is their intent to consummate this Stipulation; and (ii) agree to cooperate to the extent reasonably necessary to effectuate and implement all terms and conditions of the Stipulation and to exercise their best efforts to accomplish the
foregoing terms and conditions of the Stipulation. 
 8.2 The Settling Parties agree that the terms of the Settlement were negotiated in
good faith and at arm’s length by the Settling Parties, and reflect a settlement that was reached voluntarily based upon adequate information and after consultation with competent legal counsel. Except in the event of termination of the
Settlement, the Settling Parties agree not to assert under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any similar law, rule or 

  
 28 

 
regulation, that the Action was brought or defended in bad faith or without a reasonable basis. The Settling Parties also will request that the Judgment will contain a finding that during the
course of the Actions, the Settling Parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and all other similar rules of professional conduct. 

8.3 While maintaining their positions that the claims and defenses asserted in the Actions are meritorious, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’
Counsel, on the one hand, and Defendants and Defendants’ Counsel, on the other, shall not make any public statements or statements to the media (whether or not for attribution) that disparage the other’s business, conduct, or reputation,
or that of their counsel, based on the subject matter of the Actions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each of the Settling Parties reserves their right to rebut, in a manner that such party determines to be reasonable and appropriate, any contention
made in any public forum that the Actions were brought or defended in bad faith or without a reasonable basis. 
 8.4 Whether or not the
Settlement is approved by the Court, and whether or not the Settlement is consummated, the fact and terms of this Stipulation, including any exhibits attached hereto, all proceedings in connection with the Settlement, and any act performed or
document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the Settlement: 
 (a) shall not be offered, received, or used in any
way against the Settling Parties as evidence of, or be deemed to be evidence of, a presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Settling Parties with respect to the truth of any fact alleged by Plaintiffs or the validity, or lack thereof, of
any claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Actions or in any litigation, or the deficiency or infirmity of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Actions or in any litigation, or of any fault, wrongdoing,
negligence, or liability of any of the Released Persons; 

  
 29 

 (b) shall not be offered, received, or used in any way against any of the Released Persons as
evidence of, or be deemed to be evidence of, a presumption, concession, or admission of any fault, misrepresentation or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved, issued, or made by any Released Person, or against
Plaintiffs as evidence of any infirmity in their claims; 
 (c) shall not be offered, received, or used in any way against any of the
Released Persons as evidence of, or be deemed to be evidence of, a presumption, concession, or admission of any liability, fault, negligence, omission or wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any other reason as against the Released Persons, in
any arbitration proceeding or other civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal. Neither this Stipulation nor the Settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to
or in furtherance of this Stipulation, or the Settlement, shall be admissible in any proceeding for any purpose, except to enforce the terms of the Settlement; provided, however, that the Released Persons may refer to the Settlement, and file the
Stipulation and/or the Judgment, in any action that may be brought against them to effectuate the liability protections granted them hereunder, including, without limitation, to support a defense or claim based on principles of res judicata,
collateral estoppel, full faith and credit, release, standing, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or claim under U.S. federal or state law or foreign law.

 8.5 The exhibits to the Stipulation are material and integral parts hereof and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. 

8.6 The Stipulation may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by or on behalf of all the Settling Parties or their
respective successors-in-interest. After prior notice to the Court, but without further order of the Court, the Settling Parties may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any provisions of this Stipulation. 

8.7 This Stipulation and the exhibits attached hereto represent the complete and final resolution of all disputes among the Settling Parties
with respect to the Actions, constitute the entire agreement among the Settling Parties, and supersede any and all prior negotiations, discussions, agreements, or undertakings, whether oral or written, with respect to such matters. 

  
 30 

 8.8 The waiver by one party of any breach of the Settlement by any other party shall not be
deemed a waiver of any other prior or subsequent breach of the Settlement. The provisions of the Settlement may not be waived except by a writing signed by the affected party, or counsel for that party. 

8.9 The headings in the Stipulation and its exhibits are used for the purpose of convenience only and are not meant to have legal effect. 

8.10 The Stipulation and the Settlement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the Settling Parties
and the Released Persons. The Settling Parties agree that this Stipulation will run to their respective successors-in-interest, and they further agree that any planned, proposed or actual sale, merger or change-in-control of ITT shall not void this
Stipulation, and that in the event of a planned, proposed or actual sale, merger or change-in-control of ITT they will continue to seek final approval of this Stipulation expeditiously, including, but not limited to, the Settlement terms reflected
in this Stipulation and the Fee Award. 
 8.11 The Stipulation and the exhibits attached hereto shall be considered to have been negotiated,
executed, and delivered, and to be wholly performed, in the State of New York and the rights and obligations of the Settling Parties to the Stipulation shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the internal, substantive
laws of the State of New York without giving effect to that State’s choice of law principles. No representations, warranties, or inducements have been made to any party concerning the Stipulation or its exhibits other than the representations,
warranties, and covenants contained and memorialized in such documents. 
 8.12 This Stipulation shall not be construed more strictly
against one Settling Party than another merely by virtue of the fact that it, or any part of it, may have been prepared by counsel for one of the Settling Parties, it being recognized that it is the result of arm’s-length negotiations among the
Settling Parties and all Settling Parties have contributed substantially and materially to the preparation of this Stipulation. 

  
 31 

 8.13 All agreements made and orders entered during the course of the Actions relating to the
confidentiality of information and documents shall survive this Stipulation. 
 8.14 Nothing in this Stipulation, or the negotiations or
proceedings relating to the Settlement, is intended to or shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any applicable privilege or immunity, including, without limitation, the attorney-client privilege, the joint defense privilege, the
accountants’ privilege, or work product immunity; further, all information and documents transmitted between Plaintiffs’ Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel in connection with the Settlement shall be kept confidential and shall be
inadmissible in any proceeding in any U.S. federal or state court or other tribunal or otherwise, in accordance with Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence as if such Rule applied in all respects in any such proceeding or forum. 

8.15 The Settling Parties intend that the Court retain jurisdiction for the purpose of effectuating and enforcing the terms of the Settlement.

 8.16 Each counsel or other Person executing the Stipulation or its exhibits on behalf of any of the Settling Parties hereby warrants that
such Person has the full authority to do so. The Stipulation shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the Settling Parties and their Related Persons. 

8.17 Any notice required by this Stipulation shall be submitted by overnight mail and e-mail to each of the signatories below. 

8.18 The Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts, including by signature transmitted via facsimile, or by a .pdf/.tif image of
the signature transmitted via e-mail. All executed counterparts and each of them shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. A complete set of original executed counterparts shall be filed with the Court. 

  
 32 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Settling Parties hereto have caused the Stipulation to be executed, by
their duly authorized attorneys, dated as of January 21, 2016. 
  

							
	Dated: January 21, 2016	 		 		 	THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.
				
		 		 		 	 /s/ Brett D. Stecker

		 		 		 	ROBERT B. WEISER
		 		 		 	    RW@weiserlawfirm.com
		 		 		 	BRETT D. STECKER
		 		 		 	    BDS@weiserlawfirm.com
		 		 		 	JAMES A. FICARO
		 		 		 	    JMF@weiserlawfirm.com
		 		 		 	22 Cassatt Avenue, First Floor
		 		 		 	Berwyn, PA 19312
		 		 		 	Telephone: (610) 225-2677
				
	Dated: January 21, 2016	 		 		 	LIFSHITZ LAW FIRM
				
		 		 		 	 /s/ Joshua M. Lifshitz

		 		 		 	JOSHUA M. LIFSHITZ
		 		 		 	    JML@jlclasslaw.com
		 		 		 	821 Franklin Ave.
		 		 		 	Suite 209
		 		 		 	Garden City, NY 11530
		 		 		 	Telephone: (516) 493-9780
				
		 		 		 	Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs in the New York Action
				
		 		 		 	LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS V. TRINKO, LLP
		 		 		 	CURTIS V. TRINKO
		 		 		 	    ctrinko@trinko.com
		 		 		 	16 West 46th Street, 7th Floor
		 		 		 	New York, NY 10036
		 		 		 	Telephone: (212) 490-9550
				
		 		 		 	RYAN & MANISKAS, LLP
		 		 		 	KATHERINE M. RYAN
		 		 		 	    kryan@rmclasslaw.com
		 		 		 	RICHARD A. MANISKAS
		 		 		 	    rmaniskas@rmclasslaw.com
		 		 		 	995 Old Eagle School Road, Suite 311
		 		 		 	Wayne, PA 19087
		 		 		 	Telephone: (484) 588-5516
				
		 		 		 	Additional counsel for plaintiff Nottenkamper

  
 33 

							
	Dated: January 21, 2016	 		 		 	THE BROWN LAW FIRM, P.C.
				
		 		 		 	 /s/ Timothy W. Brown

		 		 		 	TIMOTHY W. BROWN
		 		 		 	    TBrown@thebrownlawfirm.net
		 		 		 	127A Cove Road
		 		 		 	Oyster Bay Cove, NY 11771
		 		 		 	Telephone: (516) 922-5427
				
		 		 		 	Counsel for plaintiff Lawrence
				
		 		 		 	PRICE WAICUKAUSKI & RILEY, LLC
		 		 		 	BRAD A. CATLIN
		 		 		 	    BCatlin@price-law.com
		 		 		 	Hammond Block Building
		 		 		 	301 Massachusetts Avenue
		 		 		 	Indianapolis, IN 46204
		 		 		 	Telephone: (317) 633-8787
				
		 		 		 	Liaison Counsel for plaintiff Lawrence
				
	Dated: January 21, 2016	 		 		 	SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
				
		 		 		 	 /s/ Dustin Schubert

		 		 		 	ROBERT SCHUBERT
		 		 		 	    RSchubert@schubertlawfirm.com
		 		 		 	WILLEM JONCKHEER
		 		 		 	    WJonckheer@schubertlawfirm.com
		 		 		 	DUSTIN SCHUBERT
		 		 		 	    DSchubert@schubertlawfirm.com
		 		 		 	Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650
		 		 		 	San Francisco, CA 94111
		 		 		 	Telephone: (415) 788-4220
				
		 		 		 	COHEN & MALAD LLP
		 		 		 	One Indiana Square, Suite 1400
		 		 		 	Indianapolis, IN 46204
				
		 		 		 	Counsel for plaintiff McKee

  
 34 

							
				
	Dated: January 21, 2016	 		 		 	GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
				
		 		 		 	 /s/ Jennifer L. Conn

		 		 		 	JENNIFER L. CONN
		 		 		 	    JConn@gibsondunn.com
		 		 		 	BRAD SCHOENFELDT
		 		 		 	    BSchoenfeldt@gibsondunn.com
		 		 		 	200 Park Avenue
		 		 		 	New York, NY 10166-0193
		 		 		 	Telephone: (212) 351-4000
				
		 		 		 	WAYNE W. SMITH (pro hac vice)
		 		 		 	    WSmith@gibsondunn.com
		 		 		 	3161 Michelson Drive
		 		 		 	Irvine, CA 92612-4412
		 		 		 	Telephone: (949) 451-3800
				
		 		 		 	Counsel for the Individual Defendants
				
	Dated: January 21, 2016	 		 		 	ALLEGAERT BERGER & VOGEL LLP
				
		 		 		 	 /s/ Christopher Allegaert

		 		 		 	CHRISTOPHER ALLEGAERT
		 		 		 	    CAllegaert@abv.com
		 		 		 	RICHARD CRISONA
		 		 		 	    RCrisona@abv.com
		 		 		 	111 Broadway, 20th Floor
		 		 		 	New York, NY 10006
		 		 		 	Telephone: (212) 571-0550
				
		 		 		 	Counsel for ITT Educational Services, Inc.

  
 35 

 EXHIBIT A 

 Proposed Therapeutics for Derivative
Settlement1 
  

	1.	IMPROVEMENTS ALREADY MADE BY ITT 

 ITT always has been and continues to be committed to the
implementation, enhancement and enforcement of rigorous corporate governance measures. Since the Wilfred Action was filed in May 2013, ITT has implemented a number of improvements to its corporate governance practices, business operations, and
system of internal controls. The Wilfred Action, and other actions and regulatory proceedings involving private education loans received by ITT’s students, among other factors, significantly contributed to ITT’s evaluation of, and
implementation of, certain changes to the Company’s structure, policies, and procedures to protect the Company from the risk of future losses, damages, litigation, and regulatory proceedings. ITT further acknowledges that the pendency of the
Wilfred Action, and similar shareholder derivative actions, is a substantial factor in the changes, modifications, and enhancements that the Company now makes to previously-instituted remedial measures, which will materially benefit ITT and
ITT’s shareholders. The fact that ITT has implemented, or has agreed to implement, changes, modifications, or enhancements to its corporate governance policies and practices should not be construed as an admission that any such enhanced
policies or practices are legally required, or to the extent such policies or practices were not in place in the past, constituted a failure of compliance, a breach of any duty, or any other wrongdoing. 

 

	2.	DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 

 ITT will agree to adopt a requirement that a two-thirds majority (i.e.
at least 6 of 9 members) of ITT’s Board will consist of Independent Directors. 
  

	3.	LIMITED DIRECTOR ENGAGEMENTS OUTSIDE OF ITT 

 ITT shall revise its Corporate Governance
Guidelines to require that ITT’s Directors not serve on more than four other public companies’ boards of directors (other than affiliates of such other public companies). 

 
  

	1 	Where not otherwise specified, the Company will agree to implement any change for a period of at least 3 years. None of the proposed changes will be implemented without full consideration by the Board and the
Board’s approval. Additionally, the Board, by at least a 3/4 vote of the independent directors, may amend any one or more of these reforms if the Board determines in a good faith exercise of its business judgment that a policy, procedure or
control is deemed inconsistent with the best interests of the Company and its shareholders due to changed circumstances, or conflicts with any law, regulation, or rule to which ITT is subject. Furthermore, ITT shall not be required to implement or
maintain any change if ITT ceases to be a public company that is required to file reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). 

  
 1 

	4.	MEETINGS IN EXECUTIVE SESSION 

 ITT shall require that the Independent Directors on the Board
meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, outside the presence of any director who serves as an officer of ITT. 
  

	5.	NEW INDEPENDENT BOARD MEMBERS 

 ITT has added two new Independent Directors since the date the
Wilfred Action was filed, including a retired senior partner from Deloitte with broad expertise in finance and accounting, who is serving as the Chair of the Audit Committee. 
  

	6.	IDENTIFICATION OF NEW DIRECTORS 

 The Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee shall
seek shareholder input to identify potential candidates for Director positions. The Nominating and Governance Committee shall contact each individual or entity holding 10% or more of ITT’s common stock (as determined based on Schedule 13D and
13G filings with the SEC) for the purpose of requesting that such shareholders provide the name or names of candidates for ITT’s Board. Following an initial background and suitability review of names submitted by shareholders, the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee shall conduct a thorough review of each candidate for potential recommendation to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall be under no obligation to recommend shareholder-identified
candidates to the Board, and in the exercise of its business judgment and subject to its fiduciary duties, may identify, review and recommend any other candidates for the Board’s consideration. 

 

	7.	DIRECTOR SUCCESSION PLAN 

  

	 	a.	ITT shall require that the Board develop and implement a Director succession plan. 

  

	 	b.	Directors shall be required to have a thorough understanding of the characteristics necessary to effectively oversee management’s execution of a long-term strategy that optimizes operating performance,
profitability, and shareholder value creation. The director succession planning process shall: 

  

	 	i.	Become a routine topic of discussion by the Board. 

  

	 	ii.	Encompass how expected future Board retirements or the occurrence of unexpected director turnover as a result of death, disability or untimely departure is addressed in a timely manner. 

  
 2 

	 	iii.	Encompass how director turnover either through transitioning off the Board or as a result of rotating committee assignments and leadership is addressed in a timely manner. 

 

	8.	DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS 

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, each
member of the Board shall be required to attend each annual shareholder meeting in person. 
  

	9.	DIRECTOR EDUCATION 

  

	 	a.	ITT shall require each member of the Board to complete annually six hours of continuing education programs designed for directors of publicly traded companies. Such training shall include topics such as compliance with
GAAP, SOX, corporate governance, assessment of risk, compliance, and reporting requirements for publicly traded companies. 

  

	 	b.	The Company’s Director Orientation and Continuing Education program shall be supplemented to include presentations from appropriate Company personnel regarding (i) state and federal laws governing for-profit
educational institutions; (ii) state and federal student loan programs; and (iii) key accounting and financial reporting issues implicated by the Company’s business. 

 

	10.	AUDIT COMMITTEE IMPROVEMENTS 

  

	 	a.	At least quarterly, ITT management will be required to provide the Audit Committee with a written report describing: 

  

	 	i.	a breakdown by category of all sources of the Company’s tuition revenue; 

  

	 	ii.	the nature and performance of any existing or proposed Risk-Sharing Agreement, Variable Interest Entity, or other student loan financing program or vehicle in which the Company is involved; 

 

	 	iii.	student loan repayment and default rates, and how such rates are calculated; 

  

	 	iv.	actual or potential risk exposure related to student loan default rates. 

  

	 	b.	ITT will require that the Audit Committee receive annually a report listing all trades in ITT securities engaged in by Section 16 officers. 

 

	 	c.	ITT management will be required to provide the Audit Committee with: 

  

	 	i.	periodic summaries of findings from completed internal audits and, as appropriate, the status of major audits in process; and 

  
 3 

	 	ii.	progress reports on the completion of the current year’s internal audit plan, including explanations for any significant deviations. 

 

	 	d.	The Audit Committee charter will be amended, to provide that: 

  

	 	i.	The Audit Committee shall review all disclosures in Form 10-Qs and Form 10-Ks filed with the SEC related to the performance of student loan programs. 

 

	 	ii.	At least annually, the Audit Committee shall meet with the Company’s independent auditor to review the Company’s policies as they relate to accounting for student loan performance. 

 

	 	iii.	The Chairperson of the Audit Committee shall meet with the independent auditor at least four times annually. 

  

	 	iv.	The Audit Committee shall review and approve the annual budget for the Compliance/Internal Audit division of the Company. 

  

	 	v.	The Audit Committee shall review the replacement, reassignment, or dismissal of ITT’s Chief Compliance and Risk Officer. 

  

	 	vi.	The Chief Compliance and Risk Officer will meet at least quarterly with the Audit Committee to discuss relevant compliance and risk issues. 

 

	 	vii.	The Audit Committee shall meet in executive session for at least a portion of each of its meetings. 

  

	11.	COMPENSATION COMMITTEE IMPROVEMENTS 

  

	 	a.	The Compensation Committee charter will be amended, to provide that, in determining, setting, or approving annual short-term compensation arrangements, the Compensation Committee shall take into account the particular
executive’s performance as it relates to both legal compliance and compliance with the Company’s internal policies and procedures. This shall not affect payments or benefits that are required to be paid pursuant to the Company’s
plans, policies, or agreements. 

  
 4 

	 	b.	The Compensation Committee charter will be amended, to provide that, in determining, setting, or approving termination benefits and/or separation pay to executive officers, the Compensation Committee shall take into
consideration the circumstances surrounding the particular executive officer’s departure and the executive’s performance as it relates to both legal compliance and compliance with the Company’s internal policies and procedures. This
shall not affect payments or benefits that are required to be paid pursuant to the Company’s plans, policies, or agreements. 

  

	12.	CHIEF COMPLIANCE AND RISK OFFICER 

  

	 	a.	ITT will agree to formalize the responsibilities of ITT’s Chief Compliance Officer to include risk management functions, with a new title of Chief Compliance and Risk Officer. The Chief Compliance and Risk Officer
will report directly to ITT’s Chief Administrative and Legal Officer and also will have direct communications with ITT’s Audit Committee. 

  

	 	b.	The responsibilities of the Chief Compliance and Risk Officer will include overseeing and managing ITT’s Ethics and Compliance Program, ensuring ITT’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and
developing and implementing programs to prevent illegal, unethical, or improper conduct. The Chief Compliance and Risk Officer also will be responsible for identifying and monitoring material risks relating to ITT’s compliance with applicable
laws and regulations and for overseeing ITT’s Enterprise Risk Management Program. 

  

	 	c.	The Chief Compliance and Risk Officer will keep ITT’s senior management and Audit Committee informed regarding the progress and results of compliance and risk assessment efforts. 

 

	 	d.	The Chief Compliance and Risk Officer will meet at least monthly with ITT’s CEO to discuss relevant compliance and risk issues, including matters set forth in the Item 1A “Risk Factors” section of
ITT’s annual Form 10-K. 

  

	 	e.	The Chief Compliance and Risk Officer will meet at least quarterly with ITT’s CFO to discuss relevant compliance and risk issues, including matters set forth in the Item 1A “Risk Factors” section of
ITT’s annual Form 10-K. 

  

	 	f.	The Chief Compliance and Risk Officer shall review all disclosures set forth in the Item 1A “Risk Factors” section of ITT’s annual Form 10-K. 

 

	 	g.	The Chief Compliance and Risk Officer will meet at least quarterly with ITT’s Audit Committee to discuss relevant compliance and risk issues. 

  
 5 

	 	h.	The Chief Compliance and Risk Officer shall be invited to present a report to the full Board at least annually. 

  

	 	i.	The Chief Compliance and Risk Officer (or his or her designee in extraordinary circumstances) shall participate in all meetings of the Disclosure Committee. 

 

	 	j.	ITT will agree to keep the Chief Compliance and Risk Officer position in place for at least 3 years. 

  

	13.	CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER 

  

	 	a.	ITT has identified its Controller and Treasurer as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer, separating the roles of the Chief Accounting Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. ITT’s current Chief Accounting
Officer is responsible for management of the Company’s general accounting and treasury functions. Among other duties, the current Chief Accounting Officer’s responsibilities include directing and reviewing various accounting analyses and
the preparation of annual, quarterly, and monthly financial statements for the Company. 

  

	 	b.	ITT will agree to keep the role of Chief Accounting Officer separate from the role of Chief Financial Officer for at least 3 years. 

 

	14.	VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCIAL REPORTING 

  

	 	a.	ITT created a new executive position of Vice President of Financial Reporting. The Vice President of Financial Reporting is responsible for the preparation and distribution of internal and external financial reports.
Among other duties, the Vice President of Financial Reporting is responsible for directing the review and publication process for the Company’s financial statements, directing the annual audit process, and coordinating communications between
the Company and its independent auditor. 

  

	 	b.	ITT will agree to keep the new Vice President of Financial Reporting position in place for at least 3 years. 

  

	15.	INSIDER TRADING POLICY 

 ITT maintains an insider trading policy that presently is not available
to the public. ITT will agree to disclose publicly on its website the company’s insider trading policy. 

  
 6 

	16.	CLAWBACK AND RECOUPMENT POLICY 

  

	 	a.	ITT will adopt a Clawback and Recoupment Policy, to be administered by the Board. 

  

	 	b.	The Clawback and Recoupment Policy shall state that in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial results, the Board will review the facts and circumstances that led to the restatement, and consider the
accountability of any executive officer whose acts or omissions were responsible in whole or in part for the events that led to the restatement and whether such acts or omissions constituted misconduct. 

 

	 	c.	If, following the Board’s review of the facts and circumstances, the Board determines that there has been misconduct by an executive officer that resulted in ITT being required to prepare the accounting
restatement, then the Board shall require that executive officer to reimburse ITT for: 

  

	 	i.	any bonus or other short-term cash compensation or equity-based compensation received by that person from ITT during the 12-month period following the filing of the false financial statement; 

 

	 	ii.	any profits realized by that person from the sale of ITT securities during the 12-month period following the filing of the false financial statement. 

 

	 	d.	The Clawback and Recoupment policy to be adopted by the Board will not purport to limit the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in any way. 

  

	17.	WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM/ETHICS HOTLINE 

  

	 	a.	ITT will maintain a “whistleblower” policy, for the reporting of instances of fraud and other violations of law or corporate policy, in the company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for at least five
years. 

  

	 	b.	ITT will maintain its Employee Ethics Alert Line, a confidential ethics hotline operated by a qualified third-party vendor, for at least five years. Information relating to the Employee Ethics Alert Line will be
communicated to employees via a number of awareness distribution methods, including ITT’s employee web portal and poster displays in areas such as employee break rooms. 

  
 7 

 EXHIBIT B 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
  

					
	 SASHA WILFRED, derivatively on behalf

of ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES,
 INC.,

Plaintiff,
  

v.
  

KEVIN M. MODANY, JOHN F. COZZI,
 THOMAS I. MORGAN, JOHN E.
DEAN,
 JAMES D. FOWLER, JR., JOANNA T.
 LAU, VIN WEBER, SAMUEL
L. ODLE,
 JOHN A. YENA, DANIEL M.
 FITZPATRICK,

 
 Defendants,

and
  

ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.,
  

Nominal Defendant.
	  	:
 :
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
	  	  
  

Civil Action No. 13-CV-3110 (JPO)

 NOTICE TO CURRENT ITT STOCKHOLDERS 

 

	TO:	ALL OWNERS OF ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. (“ITT”) COMMON STOCK (TICKER SYMBOL: ESI) AS OF JANUARY 21, 2016, WHO CONTINUE TO OWN SUCH SHARES (“CURRENT ITT STOCKHOLDERS”). 

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED. THIS NOTICE RELATES TO A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND
DISMISSAL OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION AND CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR RIGHTS. YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THIS ACTION. 

IF THE COURT APPROVES THE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION, STOCKHOLDERS OF ITT WILL BE FOREVER BARRED FROM CONTESTING THE APPROVAL OF
THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FROM PURSUING THE SETTLED CLAIMS. THIS ACTION IS NOT A “CLASS ACTION.” THUS, THERE IS NO COMMON FUND UPON WHICH YOU CAN MAKE A CLAIM FOR A MONETARY PAYMENT. 

THE COURT HAS MADE NO FINDINGS OR DETERMINATIONS RESPECTING THE MERITS OF THE ACTION. THE RECITATION OF THE BACKGROUND AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF
THE SETTLEMENT CONTAINED HEREIN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE FINDINGS OF THE COURT. IT IS BASED ON REPRESENTATIONS MADE TO THE COURT BY COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES. 

  
 1 

 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1 and an Order
from the Honorable J. Paul Oetken of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”), that a proposed settlement agreement has been reached among Plaintiffs,1
on behalf of themselves and derivatively on behalf of ITT Educational Services, Inc. (“ITT” or the “Company”), the Individual Defendants, and ITT in connection with the above-captioned consolidated stockholder derivative action
entitled Wilfred v. Modany, et al., Lead Case No. 13-cv-3310-JPO (the “New York Action”), and substantially similar derivative actions pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana and the
Marion County Superior Court, Marion County, Indiana, captioned Lawrence v. Modany, et al., Case No. 14-cv-2106, and McKee v. Modany, et al., Cause
No. 49D07-1507-PL-021891, respectively (the “Indiana Actions”) (collectively, with the New York Action, the “Actions”). 

Plaintiffs filed the Actions derivatively on behalf of ITT to remedy the alleged harm caused to the Company by the Individual Defendants’
alleged breach of their fiduciary duties and other alleged misconduct. The proposed Settlement, if approved by the Court, would fully, finally and forever resolve the Actions on the terms set forth in the Stipulation and summarized in this Notice,
including the dismissal of the Actions with prejudice. 
 As explained below, a Settlement Hearing shall be held before the Court on
             , 2016 at          .m., before the Honorable J. Paul Oetken, at 

 

	1 	 For purposes of this Notice, the Court incorporates by reference the definitions in the Settling Parties’ Stipulation of Settlement, fully
executed as of January 21, 2016 (the “Stipulation”), and all capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined, shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation. A copy of the Stipulation may be inspected at the
Clerk of the Court’s Office for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007-1312 or by visiting ITT’s website at www.ittesi.com.

  
 2 

 
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 706, New York, NY 10007, to determine whether,
inter alia, the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and should be finally approved by the Court and whether Plaintiffs’ Counsels’ Fee Award, including any Service Awards, should be finally approved. You have the
right to object to the Settlement and the Fee Award in the manner provided herein. If you fail to object in the manner provided herein at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Hearing, you will be deemed to have waived
your objections and will be forever bound by the Judgment to be entered and the releases to be given, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. 

This Notice is not intended to be and should not be construed as an expression of any opinion by the Court with respect to the merits of the
claims made in the Actions, but is merely to advise you of the proposed Settlement and of your rights as a Current ITT Stockholder. 
  

	I.	BACKGROUND 

  

	 	A.	Factual Background of the Actions 

 ITT, a Delaware corporation, is a for-profit provider
of technology-oriented undergraduate and graduate degree programs. In the years 2007, 2009, and 2010, ITT entered into a series of risk-sharing agreements (“RSAs”) with third-party lenders to increase the availability of private student
loans to ITT’s students. Under those RSAs, the Company could face financial liabilities if its students were to default on their student loans beyond certain thresholds. Among other things, Plaintiffs have alleged in the Actions that ITT failed
to properly account for its obligations under the RSAs, overstated its financial results, failed to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting, and failed to disclose the extent of the risks that ITT faced under the RSAs.
Plaintiffs have alleged that, beginning in April 2008, various public statements made by ITT and certain of its executive officers, both in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings and otherwise, were false and misleading.

  
 3 

 The Actions include allegations relating to disclosures and events beginning with the
Company’s entrance into an RSA with Sallie Mae in 2007 and continue through at least May 2015. The most recent of these events include the following: on January 4, 2013, ITT announced that it had settled an action brought by Sallie Mae
arising out of ITT’s obligations under the 2007 RSA. On February 22, 2013, it was announced that ITT had received a subpoena from the SEC seeking production of documents relating to the RSAs that ITT had entered into in 2009 and 2010. On
February 26, 2014, it was announced that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau filed a lawsuit against ITT. On September 19, 2014, the Company announced that it had received a Wells Notice from the SEC, that the Department of
Education (“DOE”) had placed ITT on heightened cash monitoring status, and that the DOE had required the Company to post a letter of credit. On October 16, 2014, ITT filed with the SEC certain restated financial results. On
May 12, 2015, the SEC filed an action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana against ITT and defendants Modany and Fitzpatrick relating to the Company’s RSAs and accounting and disclosure issues. 

 

	 	B.	The New York Action 

 On May 8, 2013, plaintiff Wilfred initiated the New York
Action by filing a shareholder derivative action in this Court on behalf of ITT, captioned Wilfred v. Modany, et al., Case No. 13-cv-3110-JPO (the “Wilfred Action”). Plaintiff Wilfred asserted claims against certain of
the Individual Defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, and gross mismanagement. On August 6, 2013, Wilfred and the Defendants agreed to stay the Wilfred Action pending further developments in the
related federal securities class action captioned In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation,
Case No. 13-cv-1620-JPO-JLC, also pending in this Court (the “New York Securities Action”).2 
  
  

	2 	On November 2, 2015, the parties in the New York Securities Action entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement to resolve the New York Securities Action in its entirety. That settlement was preliminarily
approved by this Court on November 23, 2015, and a final settlement hearing is scheduled in the New York Securities Action for March 8, 2016. 

  
 4 

 On May 27, 2014, plaintiff Nottenkamper filed a shareholder derivative action against the
Individual Defendants on behalf of ITT in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (the “Delaware Court”), captioned Nottenkamper v. Modany, et al., Case No. 14-cv-00672-GMS (the “Nottenkamper
Action”). The Nottenkamper Action in the Delaware Court was substantially similar to the Wilfred Action and raised substantially similar claims. 

On September 8, 2014, the Court approved an agreement between Wilfred and the Defendants providing for the continued stay of the
Wilfred Action. On October 15, 2014, Wilfred subsequently provided notice of voluntary termination of the stay of the Wilfred Action. 

On November 14, 2014, plaintiff Nottenkamper filed an amended complaint in the Nottenkamper Action. On November 24, 2014,
plaintiff Wilfred filed an amended complaint in the Wilfred Action. 
 On January 5, 2015, Defendants moved to dismiss or stay
the Wilfred Action. On January 13, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Nottenkamper Action, as well as a separate motion to stay the Nottenkamper Action or to transfer the Nottenkamper Action from the
Delaware Court to this Court. 
 On April 29, 2015, the Nottenkamper Action was transferred from the Delaware Court to this
Court, Case No. 15-cv-3390, and on May 6, 2015, Nottenkamper moved to consolidate the Nottenkamper Action and the Wilfred Action. On June 2, 2015, Nottenkamper’s motion was denied without prejudice. 

On July 2, 2015, Wilfred requested leave to file a second amended complaint in the Wilfred Action, which was granted on
July 28, 2015. Additionally, this Court consolidated the Wilfred Action and the Nottenkamper Action, thus forming the New York Action, and appointed Wilfred as Lead Plaintiff and Wilfred’s attorneys, the Lifshitz Law Firm
(the “Lifshitz Firm”) as Lead Counsel in the consolidated New York Action. This Court also denied as moot the pending motions to dismiss that had been fully briefed by the parties in both the Wilfred Action and the
Nottenkamper Action. 

  
 5 

 On August 11, 2015, Nottenkamper moved for reconsideration of this Court’s
July 28, 2015 Order. On August 21, 2015, Wilfred filed a consolidated complaint in the New York Action. In connection with efforts to explore the resolution of the New York Action, Defendants produced discovery to Wilfred. 

On September 16, 2015, this Court entered an order granting Nottenkamper’s motion for reconsideration, thereby appointing Wilfred
and Nottenkamper as Co-Lead Plaintiffs in the New York Action and appointing the Lifshitz Firm and Nottenkamper’s counsel, The Weiser Law Firm, P.C. (the “Weiser Firm”), as Co-Lead Counsel in the New York Action. That same day, this
Court also entered a stipulation and order temporarily staying all proceedings in the New York Action to facilitate the parties’ efforts to explore a resolution of the New York Action through settlement. Defendants thereafter produced the same
discovery to Nottenkamper that had been previously provided to Wilfred. 
  

	 	C.	The Indiana Federal Action 

 On December 23, 2014, plaintiff Lawrence filed the
Indiana Federal Action against certain of the Individual Defendants on behalf of ITT in the Indiana Federal Court, making allegations similar to those made in the related securities class action also pending before the Indiana Federal Court,
captioned In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities Litigation (Indiana), No. 14-cv-01599-TWP-DML (the
“Indiana Securities Action”).3 The claims made in the Indiana Federal Action, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, gross mismanagement, abuse of control, corporate waste, and unjust
enrichment, also are substantially similar to those made in the consolidated complaint in New York Action. On March 11, 2015, the Indiana Federal Court approved an agreement between Lawrence and the Defendants to stay the Indiana Federal Action
pending further developments in the Indiana Securities Action, and pursuant to which Defendants agreed to provide Lawrence with all discovery produced by the defendants in the 

 

	3 	 On November 2, 2015, the parties in the Indiana Securities Action entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement to resolve the Indiana
Securities Action in its entirety. That settlement was preliminarily approved by the Indiana Federal Court on November 4, 2015, and a final settlement hearing is scheduled in the Indiana Securities Action for March 10, 2016.

  
 6 

 
Indiana Securities Action, as well as all discovery produced to any other plaintiff in any other derivative action brought on ITT’s behalf arising from similar facts as the Indiana Federal
Action. Pursuant to that agreement, Defendants produced discovery to Lawrence in August 2015. 
  

	 	D.	The Indiana State Action 

 On July 1, 2015, plaintiff McKee filed the Indiana State
Action on behalf of ITT in the Indiana State Court, asserting claims against certain of the Individual Defendants for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with substantially similar facts, events, and circumstances as those alleged in the original
and consolidated complaints in the New York Action. On August 6, 2015, the parties to the Indiana State Action entered into an agreement to stay the Indiana State Action pending further developments in the closely-related Indiana Securities
Action. The Indiana State Court entered the parties’ requested order on August 7, 2015, pursuant to which Defendants agreed to provide McKee with all discovery produced by the defendants in the Indiana Securities Action, as well as all
discovery produced to any other plaintiff in any other derivative action brought on ITT’s behalf arising from similar facts as the Indiana State Action. Pursuant to that agreement, Defendants produced discovery to McKee in August 2015. 

 

	 	E.	Settlement Negotiations 

 Beginning in August 2015, counsel for the Settling Parties
engaged in extensive efforts to reach a “global resolution” of the Actions. On September 10, 2015, the Settling Parties participated in an in-person, full-day mediation (the “Mediation”) in San Francisco, California with the
Honorable Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) of JAMS (“Judge Weinstein” or the “Mediator”), an experienced and distinguished mediator. 

Although a settlement was not reached during the Mediation, considerable progress was made, and after further extensive discussions over the
next month and with substantial assistance from the Mediator, the Settling Parties reached an agreement-in-principle to resolve the Actions, subject to approval by the Board and the Settling Parties’ agreement on documentation. As a condition
of the Settlement reflected in the Stipulation, ITT will agree to institute and maintain 

  
 7 

 
certain corporate governance reforms, the terms of which are fully set forth in Exhibit A to the Stipulation. After reaching agreement on these substantive corporate governance terms, with the
Mediator’s substantial assistance, the Settling Parties negotiated at arm’s length the attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses to be paid to Plaintiffs’ Counsel, in light of the substantial benefits which have been or will
be conferred upon the Company as a result of the settlement of the Actions. Following extensive discussions, the Settling Parties agreed to a “Mediator’s proposal” made by Judge Weinstein with respect to the attorneys’ fees and
reimbursement of expenses to be paid to Plaintiffs’ Counsel, subject to the approval of the Court. 
  

	II.	PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSELS’ INVESTIGATION AND RESEARCH, PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS, AND THE BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT 

Plaintiffs’ Counsel conducted an investigation relating to the claims and the underlying events alleged in the respective Actions to which
their clients are parties, including, but not limited to: (1) reviewing and analyzing the Company’s public filings with the SEC, press releases, announcements, transcripts of investor conference calls, and news articles; (2) reviewing
and analyzing the investigations by the SEC and allegations contained in the SEC complaint; (3) reviewing and analyzing the allegations contained in Sallie Mae’s complaint against ITT; (4) the allegations contained in the New York
Securities Action and the Indiana Securities Action; (5) researching, drafting, and filing shareholder derivative complaints, including amended and consolidated complaints by the New York Plaintiffs; (6) reviewing in excess of 181,000
pages of internal corporate documents produced to Plaintiffs by ITT in connection with settlement negotiations; (7) researching the applicable law with respect to the claims asserted (or which could be asserted) in the Actions and the potential
defenses thereto; (8) researching corporate governance issues; (9) the preparation and submission of detailed settlement demands and mediation statements in connection with the Mediation; (10) attending the in-person, full-day
Mediation in San Francisco, California; and (11) engaging in extensive settlement discussions with the Mediator and counsel for the Defendants. 

  
 8 

 Plaintiffs’ Counsel believe that the claims asserted in the Actions have merit and that
their investigation supports the claims asserted. Without conceding the merit of any of Defendants’ defenses or the lack of merit of any of their own allegations, and in light of the benefits of the Settlement as well as to avoid the
potentially protracted time, expense, and uncertainty associated with continued litigation, including potential trials and appeals, Plaintiffs have concluded that it is desirable that the Actions be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon
the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation. Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel recognize the significant risk, expense, and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Actions against the Individual Defendants through
trials and possible appeals. Plaintiffs’ Counsel also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and the risk of any litigation, especially complex litigation such as the Actions, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such
litigation. Based on their evaluation, and in light of the significant benefits conferred upon the Company and its shareholders as a result of the Settlement, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel have determined that the Settlement is in the best
interests of Plaintiffs, ITT, and Current ITT Stockholders, and have agreed to settle the Actions upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Stipulation. Further, ITT has determined that the Settlement is in the best interests of
ITT and Current ITT Stockholders. 
  

	III.	DEFENDANTS’ DENIALS OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY 

 The Individual Defendants have
denied, and continue to deny, each and every claim and contention alleged by Plaintiffs in the Actions and affirm that they have acted properly, lawfully, and in full accord with their fiduciary duties, at all times. Further, the Individual
Defendants 

  
 9 

 
have denied expressly, and continue to deny, all allegations of wrongdoing, fault, liability, or damage against them arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts or omissions alleged, or
that could have been alleged, in the Actions and deny that they have ever committed or attempted to commit any violations of law, any breach of fiduciary duty owed to ITT or its shareholders, or any wrongdoing whatsoever. Had the terms of this
Stipulation not been reached, the Individual Defendants would have continued to contest vigorously Plaintiffs’ allegations, and the Individual Defendants maintain that they had and have meritorious defenses to all claims alleged in the Actions.
Without admitting the validity of any of the claims the Plaintiffs have asserted in the Actions, or any liability with respect thereto, Defendants have concluded that it is desirable that the claims be settled on the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in the Stipulation. Defendants are entering into this Settlement because it will eliminate the uncertainty, distraction, disruption, burden, and expense of further litigation of the Actions. 

Neither the Stipulation, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the
Settlement: (a) is, or may be construed as, or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the truth or validity of any of the Released Claims, of any claims or allegations made in the Actions, or of any purported acts or omissions by the
Defendants; (b) is, may be construed as, or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of any fault, omission, negligence, or wrongdoing by the Defendants, or any concession of liability whatsoever; or (c) is, may be construed as, or may
be used as an admission of, or evidence of, a concession by any Defendant of any infirmity in the defenses that Defendants asserted or could have asserted in these Actions or otherwise. 

  
 10 

	IV.	THE SETTLEMENT HEARING 

 The Settlement Hearing will be held before the Honorable J. Paul
Oetken on             , 2016 at     :           .m. in Courtroom 706 of the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse, 40 Foley
Square, New York, NY 10007 to determine: (i) whether the proposed Settlement, upon the terms set forth in the Stipulation, should be finally approved in all respects as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (ii) whether the Judgment approving
the Settlement, substantially in the form of Exhibit E attached to the Stipulation, should be entered, dismissing the New York Action with prejudice and releasing and enjoining the prosecution of any and all Released Claims; and (iii) whether
Plaintiffs’ Counsels’ Fee Award, including any Service Awards, should be finally approved. At the Settlement Hearing, the Court may hear or consider such other matters as the Court may deem necessary and appropriate. The Court may adjourn
the date of the Settlement Hearing without further notice to Current ITT Stockholders, and the Settlement Hearing may be continued by the Court at the Settlement Hearing, or at any adjourned session thereof, without further notice. 

 

	V.	THE SETTLEMENT 

 The terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement are set forth fully
in the Stipulation described above. The following is only a summary of its terms. 
 The benefits of the Settlement consist of corporate
governance reforms (the “Reforms”), the terms of which are fully set forth in Exhibit A attached to the Stipulation. Since the New York Action was initiated, ITT has implemented a number of improvements to its corporate governance
practices, business operations, and system of internal controls. The New York Action, and other actions and regulatory proceedings involving private education loans received by ITT’s students, among other factors, significantly contributed to
ITT’s evaluation of, and implementation of, certain changes to the Company’s structure, policies, and procedures to 

  
 11 

 
protect the Company from the risk of future losses, damages, litigation, and regulatory proceedings. ITT acknowledges that the pendency and settlement of the Actions is a substantial factor in
the Company’s decision to adopt and/or enact changes, modifications, and enhancements to previously-instituted remedial measures as well as the other Reforms set forth in Exhibit A to the Stipulation. The Settling Parties agree that the Reforms
will provide substantial benefits to ITT and Current ITT Stockholders.4 Within ninety (90) calendar days following the Effective Date, ITT shall take all necessary steps to adopt and
implement the Reforms, to the extent that such Reforms have not already been adopted and implemented. Except where specified otherwise, the Reforms shall be maintained for a period of no less than three (3) years from the date of
implementation, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A to the Stipulation. 
  

	VI.	DISMISSAL AND RELEASES 

 In connection with the Court’s approval of the Settlement,
the Settling Parties will jointly request entry of the Judgment by the Court, dismissing with prejudice all claims that Plaintiffs have alleged in the Actions and any other Released Claims. 

Upon the Effective Date, ITT, Plaintiffs (acting on their own behalf and derivatively on behalf of ITT), and each of ITT’s stockholders
(solely in their capacity as ITT stockholders) shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged the Released Claims (including Unknown Claims) against 

 

	4 	 ITT always has been, and continues to be, committed to the implementation, enhancement and enforcement of rigorous corporate governance measures. The
fact that ITT has implemented, or has agreed to implement, changes, modifications, or enhancements to its corporate governance policies and practices shall not be construed as an admission that any such enhanced policies or practices are legally
required, or to the extent such policies or practices were not in place in the past, constituted a failure of compliance, a breach of any duty, or any other wrongdoing. 

  
 12 

 
the Released Persons and any and all claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with, the defense, settlement or resolution of the Actions against the Released Persons. ITT, Plaintiffs
(acting on their own behalf and derivatively on behalf of ITT) and each of ITT’s stockholders (solely in their capacity as ITT stockholders) shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, covenanted not to sue any
Released Person with respect to such Released Claims, and shall be permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing or prosecuting the Released Claims against the Released Persons except to enforce the releases and other terms and
conditions contained in the Stipulation and/or the Judgment entered pursuant thereto. 
 Upon the Effective Date, each of the Released
Persons shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged each and all of Plaintiffs or their beneficiaries, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, or ITT from any and all
Defendants’ Released Claims; provided, however, that nothing herein is intended to release any indemnification, advancement or insurance claims that any Released Person has or may have under any insurance policy, contract, bylaw or charter
provision, or under Delaware law, including but not limited to any rights any Released Person has or may have related to any pending or threatened civil or government proceedings. 

 

	VII.	ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES 

 In recognition of the substantial benefits provided
to ITT and Current ITT Stockholders as a result of the settlement of the Actions, ITT has agreed to pay or cause to be paid to Plaintiffs’ Counsel an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses in the total amount of $1.1 million ($1,100,000.00)
(the “Fee Award”), subject to approval by the Court. As discussed above, as part of the mediation process, the Settling Parties agreed to a “Mediator’s proposal” by Judge 

  
 13 

 
Weinstein for the amount of the Fee Award, subject to the approval of the Court. The Settling Parties mutually agree that the Fee Award is fair and reasonable in light of the substantial benefits
conferred upon ITT and Current ITT Stockholders by the Stipulation. Each Service Award to each of the Plaintiffs, to the extent that it is applied for and approved in whole or part, shall be funded from the portion of the Fee Award distributed to
that Plaintiff’s counsel. Defendants shall have no responsibility for the allocation or distribution of the Fee Award amongst Plaintiffs’ Counsel, and Defendants shall take no position on the Service Awards and shall have no obligation to
pay them. 
  

	VIII.	THE RIGHT TO OBJECT AND/OR BE HEARD AT THE SETTLEMENT HEARING 

 Any Current ITT
Stockholder may object and/or appear and show cause, if he, she, or it has any concern, why the Settlement should not be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate, why Judgment should not be entered thereon, or why the Fee Award, including any
Service Awards, should not be finally approved; provided, however, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, that no Current ITT Stockholder shall be heard or entitled to contest the approval of the terms and conditions of the Settlement, or, if
approved, the Judgment to be entered approving the Settlement, or the Fee Award, unless that Stockholder has, at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Hearing: (1) filed with the Clerk of the Court a written
objection to the Settlement setting forth: (a) the nature of the objection; (b) proof of ownership of ITT common stock through the date of the Settlement Hearing, including the number of shares of ITT common stock and the date of purchase;
(c) any and all documentation or evidence in support of such objection; and (d) the identities of any cases, by name, court, and docket number, in which the Stockholder or his, her, or its attorney has objected to a settlement in the last
three years; (2) if a Current ITT Stockholder intends to appear and requests to be heard at the Settlement Hearing, 

  
 14 

 
such Stockholder must have, in addition to the requirements of (1) above, filed with the Clerk of the Court: (a) a written notice of such Stockholder’s intention to appear at the
Settlement Hearing; (b) a statement that indicates the basis for such appearance; (c) the identities of any witnesses the Stockholder intends to call at the Settlement Hearing and a statement as to the subjects of their testimony; and
(d) any and all evidence that would be presented at the Settlement Hearing. If a Current ITT Stockholder files a written objection and/or written notice of intent to appear, such Stockholder must also simultaneously serve copies of such notice,
proof, statement, and documentation, together with copies of any other papers or briefs such Stockholder files with the Court (either by hand delivery or by first class mail) upon each of the following: 

 

			
	 Brett D. Stecker

THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.
 22
Cassatt Ave, Suite 100
 Berwyn, PA 19312
  

Joshua M. Lifshitz
 LIFSHITZ LAW
FIRM
 821 Franklin Avenue, Suite 209

Garden City, NY 11530
 Telephone:
(516) 493-9780
  
 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs in
the
 New York Action
	  	 Jennifer L. Conn

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
 200
Park Avenue
 New York, NY 10166-0193
  

Counsel for the Individual Defendants
  

Christopher Allegaert
 ALLEGAERT
BERGER & VOGEL LLP
 111 Broadway, 20th Floor

New York, NY 10006
  

Counsel for ITT

 Any Current ITT Stockholder who does not make his, her, or its objection in the manner provided herein shall
be deemed to have waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed from making any objection to the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of the Settlement and the Fee Award, including any Service Awards, as set forth in the Stipulation, unless
otherwise ordered by the Court, but shall be forever bound by the Judgment to be entered, the dismissal of the New York Action with prejudice, and any and all of the releases set forth in the Stipulation. 

  
 15 

	IX.	CONDITIONS FOR SETTLEMENT 

 The Settlement is conditioned upon the occurrence of certain
events described in the Stipulation, which requires, among other things: (1) entry of the requested Judgment by the Court; (2) the Judgment has become Final; and (3) the Indiana Actions have been dismissed with prejudice and the
dismissal orders have become Final. If, for any reason, any one of the conditions described in the Stipulation is not met and/or the entry of the Judgment does not occur, the Stipulation might be terminated and, if terminated, will become null and
void; and the Settling Parties to the Stipulation will be restored to their respective positions as of the date immediately preceding the date of the Stipulation. 
  

	X.	EXAMINATION OF PAPERS AND INQUIRIES 

 This Notice contains only a summary of the terms of
the Settlement. For a more detailed statement of the matters involved in the Action, reference is made to the Stipulation, which may be inspected at the Clerk of the Court’s Office, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York,
Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007-1312, during business hours of each business day or by visiting ITT’s website at www.ittesi.com. 

Any other inquiries regarding the Settlement or the Actions should be addressed in writing to the following: 

Brett D. Stecker 
 THE WEISER LAW
FIRM, P.C. 
 22 Cassatt Ave 

Berwyn, PA 19312 
 Telephone:
(610) 225-2677 
 Facsimile: (610) 225-2678 

Joshua M. Lifshitz 
 LIFSHITZ LAW
FIRM 
 821 Franklin Avenue, Suite 209 

Garden City, NY 11530 
 Telephone:
(516) 493-9780 

  
 16 

 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs in the New York Action 

PLEASE DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT OR ITT 

REGARDING THIS NOTICE. 

  
 17 

 EXHIBIT C 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
  

					
	 SASHA WILFRED, derivatively on behalf

of ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES,
 INC.,

Plaintiff,
  

v.
  

KEVIN M. MODANY, JOHN F. COZZI,
 THOMAS I. MORGAN, JOHN E.
DEAN,
 JAMES D. FOWLER, JR., JOANNA T.
 LAU, VIN WEBER, SAMUEL
L. ODLE,
 JOHN A. YENA, DANIEL M.
 FITZPATRICK,

 
 Defendants,

and
  

ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.,
  

Nominal Defendant.
	  	:
 :
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
	  	  
  

Civil Action No. 13-CV-3110 (JPO)

 SUMMARY NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 

OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION 
  

	TO:	ALL RECORD AND BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. COMMON STOCK (TICKER SYBMOL: ESI) AS OF JANUARY 21, 2016, WHO CONTINUE TO OWN SUCH SHARES (“CURRENT ITT STOCKHOLDERS”)

 THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
(the “Court”), to inform you of a proposed stipulated settlement (the “Settlement”) in the above-captioned derivative action (the “New York Action”) and substantially similar derivative actions pending in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana and the Marion County Superior Court, Marion County, Indiana, captioned Lawrence v. Modany, et al., Case No. 14-cv-2106, and McKee v. Modany, et al., Cause
No. 49D07-1507-PL-021891, respectively (the “Indiana Actions”) (collectively, with the New York Action, the “Actions”). The Actions involve claims, brought derivatively on behalf of ITT Educational Services, Inc.
(“ITT”), against certain of its current and former directors and officers alleging breaches of fiduciary duty and other claims, primarily in connection with certain risk-sharing agreements entered into between ITT and third-party lenders.

 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT a hearing (the “Settlement Hearing”) will be held on
            , 2016, at     :       .m., before the Honorable J. Paul Oetken, at the United States District Court for the Southern District
of New York, Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 706, New York, NY 10007, for the purpose of determining whether the Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate and

 
whether an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses for Plaintiffs’ counsel (the “Fee Award”) should be approved. Because this is a stockholder derivative
action brought for the benefit of ITT, no individual Current ITT Stockholder has the right to receive any individual compensation as a result of the Settlement. In accordance with the terms of the Settlement, and in consideration for certain
releases, ITT has agreed to implement certain corporate governance reforms, to be administered by ITT and the ITT Board of Directors. 

IF YOU ARE AN OWNER OF ITT COMMON STOCK, YOUR RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE SETTLEMENT. This notice contains only a summary of the
Actions and the terms of the Settlement. If you are a Current ITT Stockholder, you may obtain a copy of a detailed Notice to Current ITT Stockholders (the “Notice”) describing the Actions, the proposed Settlement, and the rights of Current
ITT Stockholders with regard to the Settlement, as well as a copy of the Stipulation of Settlement, by visiting the website www.ittesi.com. Should you have any other questions regarding the proposed Settlement of the Actions, please contact counsel
for the Plaintiffs in the New York Action: 
  

			
	 Brett D. Stecker
 THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.

22 Cassatt Ave, Suite 100
 Berwyn, PA 19312

Telephone: (610) 225-2677
	  	 Joshua M. Lifshitz
 LIFSHITZ LAW FIRM

821 Franklin Avenue, Suite 209
 Garden City, NY 11530

Telephone: (516) 493-9780

 Any Current ITT Stockholder may object and/or appear and show cause, if he, she or it has any concern, why the
Settlement should not be finally approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate, why Judgment should not be entered thereon, or why the Fee Award, including any service awards for Plaintiffs, should not be finally approved; provided, however, that no
Current ITT Stockholder shall be heard or entitled to contest the approval of the terms and conditions of the Settlement, or, if approved, the Judgment to be entered approving the Settlement, or the Fee Award, unless that Stockholder has filed
at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Hearing an objection with the Court. Any objection to the Settlement or Fee Award must be filed, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Notice, with the Clerk of the
Court (Honorable J. Paul Oetken, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007) in this case numbered 13-CV-3110 (JPO), no later than
            , 2016 and served by hand or first class mail (postage prepaid) for delivery by the same date on Plaintiffs’ counsel (at the addresses listed above) and on
counsel for Defendants (at the addresses listed below): 
  

			
	 Jennifer L. Conn
 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER
LLP
 200 Park Avenue
 New York, NY 10166-0193
	  	 Christopher Allegaert
 ALLEGAERT BERGER &
VOGEL LLP
 111 Broadway, 20th Floor
 New York, NY
10006

 PLEASE DO NOT CALL OR WRITE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE. 

 

							
	DATED:             , 2016	 		 		 	BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES
		 		 		 	DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
		 		 		 	DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

  
 2 

 EXHIBIT D 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
  

					
	 SASHA WILFRED, derivatively on behalf

of ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES,
 INC.,

Plaintiff,
  

v.
  

KEVIN M. MODANY, JOHN F. COZZI,
 THOMAS I. MORGAN, JOHN E.
DEAN,
 JAMES D. FOWLER, JR., JOANNA T.
 LAU, VIN WEBER, SAMUEL
L. ODLE,
 JOHN A. YENA, DANIEL M.
 FITZPATRICK,

 
 Defendants,

and
  

ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.,
  

Nominal Defendant.
	  	:
 :
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
	  	  
  

Civil Action No. 13-CV-3110 (JPO)

 [PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING 

DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE 

WHEREAS, the parties to the above-captioned consolidated shareholder derivative action (the “New York Action”) have made an
application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1, for an order: (i) preliminarily approving the Stipulation of Settlement dated January 21, 2016 (the “Stipulation”), which, together with the exhibits annexed thereto,
sets forth the terms and conditions for the proposed settlement and dismissal of the New York Action and the related Indiana Actions with prejudice; and (ii) approving the form and content of both the Notice to Current ITT Stockholders (the
“Notice”), to be filed with the SEC via a Current Report on Form 8-K and posted on the investor relations portion of ITT’s website, and the Summary Notice to be published one time in Investor’s Business Daily; 

WHEREAS, all capitalized terms contained herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation (in addition to those capitalized
terms defined herein); and 

 WHEREAS, the Court has read and considered the Stipulation and the exhibits annexed thereto, and
all Settling Parties have consented to the entry of this Preliminary Approval Order, 
 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Court does hereby preliminarily approve, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing described below, the Stipulation
and the Settlement set forth therein, including the terms and conditions for settlement and dismissal with prejudice of the New York Action. 

2. A hearing (the “Settlement Hearing”) shall be held before the Court on         
    , 2016 at             .m.,1 at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thurgood Marshall
United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 706, New York, New York 10007, to determine: (i) whether the terms and conditions of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation are fair, reasonable, and adequate to ITT and Current ITT
Stockholders and should be finally approved by the Court; (ii) whether a Judgment finally approving the Settlement, substantially in the form of Exhibit E attached to the Stipulation, should be entered, dismissing the New York Action with
prejudice and releasing and enjoining the prosecution of any and all Released Claims; and (iii) whether Plaintiffs’ Counsels’ Fee Award, including any Service Awards, should be finally approved. At the Settlement Hearing, the Court
may hear or consider such other matters as the Court may deem necessary and appropriate. 
 3. The Court approves, as to form and content,
the Notice attached as Exhibit B to the Stipulation and the Summary Notice attached as Exhibit C to the Stipulation, and finds that 

 

	1 	 The Settling Parties respectfully request that the Settlement Hearing be scheduled at least forty-five (45) days after the deadline for notice of
the proposed Settlement to be given to Current ITT Stockholders. 

 
the posting of such Notice and Summary Notice substantially in the manner and form set forth in this Order meets the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1 and due process, is the
best notice practicable under the circumstances, and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to Current ITT Stockholders and all other Persons entitled thereto. 

4. Not later than ten (10) business days following entry of this Order, ITT shall cause the Notice to be filed with the SEC via a Current
Report on Form 8-K and to be posted on the investor relations portion of ITT’s website. Within ten (10) business days following entry of this Order, ITT also will cause the Summary Notice to be published one time in Investor’s
Business Daily.  
 5. All papers in support of the Settlement and the Fee Award, including any Service Awards, shall be filed with the
Court and served at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the Settlement Hearing, and any reply papers shall be filed with the Court at least seven (7) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 

6. Any Current ITT Stockholder may object and/or appear and show cause, if he, she, or it has any concern, why the Settlement should not be
finally approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate, why the Judgment should not be entered thereon, or why the Fee Award, including any Service Awards, should not be finally approved; provided, however, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, that no
Current ITT Stockholder shall be heard or entitled to contest the approval of the terms and conditions of the Settlement, or, if approved, the Judgment to be entered thereon approving the same, or the Fee Award, unless that Stockholder has, at
least fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Hearing: (1) filed with the Clerk of the Court a written objection to the Settlement setting forth: (a) the nature of the objection; (b) proof of ownership of ITT common
stock through the date of the Settlement Hearing, including the 

 
number of shares of ITT common stock and the date of purchase; (c) any and all documentation or evidence in support of such objection; and (d) the identities of any cases, by name,
court, and docket number, in which the Stockholder or his, her, or its attorney has objected to a settlement in the last three years; (2) if a Current ITT Stockholder intends to appear and requests to be heard at the Settlement Hearing, such
Stockholder must have, in addition to the requirements of (1) above, filed with the Clerk of the Court: (a) a written notice of such Stockholder’s intention to appear at the Settlement Hearing; (b) a statement that indicates the
basis for such appearance; (c) the identities of any witnesses the Stockholder intends to call at the Settlement Hearing and a statement as to the subjects of their testimony; and (d) any and all evidence that would be presented at the
Settlement Hearing. If a Current ITT Stockholder files a written objection and/or written notice of intent to appear, such Stockholder must also simultaneously serve copies of such notice, proof, statement, and documentation, together with copies of
any other papers or briefs such Stockholder files with the Court (either by hand delivery or by first class mail) upon each of the following: 
  

			
	 Brett D. Stecker

THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.
 22
Cassatt Ave, Suite 100
 Berwyn, PA 19312
  

Joshua M. Lifshitz
 LIFSHITZ LAW
FIRM
 821 Franklin Avenue, Suite 209

Garden City, NY 11530
 Telephone:
(516) 493-9780
  
 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs in
the
 New York Action
	  	 Jennifer L. Conn

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
 200
Park Avenue
 New York, NY 10166-0193
  

Counsel for the Individual Defendants
  

Christopher Allegaert
 ALLEGAERT
BERGER & VOGEL LLP
 111 Broadway, 20th Floor

New York, NY 10006
  

Counsel for ITT

 Any Current ITT Stockholder who does not make his, her, or its objection in the manner provided herein shall be deemed to have
waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed 

 
from making any objection to the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of the Settlement or the Fee Award, including any Service Awards, as set forth in the Stipulation, unless otherwise ordered
by the Court, but shall be forever bound by the Judgment to be entered, the dismissal of the New York Action with prejudice, and any and all of the releases set forth in the Stipulation. 

7. At least ten (10) business days prior to the Settlement Hearing, Defendants’ Counsel shall serve on Plaintiffs’ Counsel in
the New York Action, and file with the Court, proof, by affidavit or declaration, of the publication of the Notice and Summary Notice. 
 8.
All Current ITT Stockholders shall be bound by all orders, determinations, and judgments in the New York Action concerning the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable to Current ITT Stockholders. 

9. Pending final determination of whether the Settlement should be approved, neither Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs’ Counsel, nor any Current
ITT Stockholders or other Persons, either directly, representatively, or derivatively on behalf of ITT, or in any other capacity, shall commence or prosecute, or in any way instigate or participate in the commencement or prosecution of, any action
or proceeding asserting any Released Claims against any of the Individual Defendants, ITT, or any other Released Person, in any court or tribunal. 

10. Pursuant to the Stipulation, the Indiana Plaintiffs have agreed that, within five (5) business days after the entry of this Order,
each of the Indiana Plaintiffs shall notify their respective Indiana court of the issuance of this Order, attaching a courtesy copy of this Order. 

 11. The fact and terms of the Stipulation, including any exhibits attached thereto, all
proceedings in connection with the Settlement, and any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the Settlement: 

(a) shall not be offered, received, or used in any way against the Settling Parties as evidence of, or be deemed to be evidence of, a
presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Settling Parties with respect to the truth of any fact alleged by Plaintiffs or the validity, or lack thereof, of any claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Actions or in any
litigation, or the deficiency or infirmity of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Actions or in any litigation, or of any fault, wrongdoing, negligence, or liability of any of the Released Persons; 

(b) shall not be offered, received, or used in any way against any of the Released Persons as evidence of, or be deemed to be evidence of, a
presumption, concession, or admission of any fault, misrepresentation or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved, issued, or made by any Released Person, or against Plaintiffs as evidence of any infirmity in their claims;
or 
 (c) shall not be offered, received, or used in any way against any of the Released Persons as evidence of, or be deemed to be evidence
of, a presumption, concession, or admission of any liability, fault, negligence, omission or wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any other reason as against the Released Persons, in any arbitration proceeding or other civil, criminal, or
administrative action or proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal. 
 Neither the Stipulation nor the Settlement, nor any act
performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance thereof, shall be admissible in any proceeding for any purpose, except to enforce the terms of the Settlement; provided, however, that if finally approved, the Released Persons may refer
to the Settlement, and file the Stipulation and/or the Judgment, in any action that may be brought against them to effectuate the liability protections granted them thereunder, 

 
including, without limitation, to support a defense or claim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, full faith and credit, release, standing, good faith settlement,
judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or claim under U.S. federal or state law or foreign law. 

12. If the Stipulation is terminated pursuant to its terms, or the Effective Date does not otherwise occur, all proceedings in the New York
Action will revert to their status as of the date immediately preceding the date of the Stipulation. 
 13. The Court reserves the right to
adjourn the date of the Settlement Hearing or modify any other dates set forth herein without further notice to Current ITT Stockholders, and retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the Settlement.
The Court may approve the Settlement and any of its terms, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to Current ITT Stockholders. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 
  

							
	DATED:                     	 		 		 	  

		 		 		 	 HONORABLE J. PAUL OETKEN
 UNITED STATES
DISTRICT JUDGE

 EXHIBIT E 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
  

					
	 SASHA WILFRED, derivatively on behalf

of ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES,
 INC.,

Plaintiff,
  

v.
  

KEVIN M. MODANY, JOHN F. COZZI,
 THOMAS I. MORGAN, JOHN E.
DEAN,
 JAMES D. FOWLER, JR., JOANNA T.
 LAU, VIN WEBER, SAMUEL
L. ODLE,
 JOHN A. YENA, DANIEL M.
 FITZPATRICK,

 
 Defendants,

and
  

ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.,
  

Nominal Defendant.
	  	:
 :
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
 :

:
	  	  
  

Civil Action No. 13-CV-3110 (JPO)

 [PROPOSED] FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT 

This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court’s Order Preliminarily Approving Derivative Settlement and Providing
for Notice, dated             , 2016 (the “Preliminary Approval Order”), on the application of the Settling Parties for final approval of the Settlement set forth in the
Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated January 21, 2016 (the “Stipulation”). Due and adequate notice having been given to Current ITT Stockholders as required in said Preliminary Approval Order, and the Court having considered
all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 

1. This Final Order and Judgment (“Judgment”) incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation, and except where
otherwise specified, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation. 

 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Actions, including all matters
necessary to effectuate the Settlement, and over all Settling Parties. 
 3. The Court finds that the Settlement set forth in the
Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and adequate as to each of the Settling Parties, ITT, and Current ITT Stockholders, and hereby finally approves the Settlement in all respects and orders the Settling Parties to perform its terms to the extent the
Settling Parties have not already done so. 
 4. The New York Action, all claims contained therein, and any other Released Claims, are
hereby ordered as fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, discharged and dismissed on the merits and with prejudice by virtue of the proceedings herein and this Judgment. The Settling Parties are to bear their own costs, except
as otherwise provided in the Stipulation. 
 5. Upon the Effective Date, ITT, Plaintiffs (individually and derivatively on behalf of ITT),
and each of ITT’s stockholders (solely in their capacity as ITT stockholders) shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged all Released Claims
(including Unknown Claims) against the Released Persons and any and all claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the defense, settlement or resolution of the Actions against the Released Persons. ITT, Plaintiffs (acting on their own
behalf and derivatively on behalf of ITT) and each of ITT’s stockholders (solely in their capacity as ITT stockholders) shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, covenanted not to sue any Released Person with
respect to any Released Claims, and shall be permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing or prosecuting the Released Claims against the Released Persons. Nothing herein shall in any way impair or restrict the rights of any Settling
Party to enforce the terms of the Stipulation. 

 6. Upon the Effective Date, each of the Released Persons shall be deemed to have, and by
operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged each and all of Plaintiffs or their beneficiaries, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, or ITT from Defendants’ Released Claims. The Released Persons
shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, covenanted not to sue Plaintiffs or their beneficiaries, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, or ITT with respect to any claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with their
institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement, or resolution of the Actions or the Released Claims, and shall be permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing or prosecuting Defendants’ Released Claims against Plaintiffs or
their beneficiaries, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, or ITT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein is intended to release any indemnification, advancement or insurance claims that any Released Person has or may have under any insurance policy,
contract, bylaw or charter provision, or under Delaware law, including, but not limited to, any rights any Released Person has or may have related to any pending or threatened civil or government proceedings. Nor shall the foregoing in any way
impair or restrict the rights of any Settling Party to enforce the terms of the Stipulation. 
 7. The Court finds that the Notice to
Current ITT Stockholders filed with the SEC via a Current Report on Form 8-K and posted on the investor relations portion of ITT’s website, and the Summary Notice published in Investor’s Business Daily, were made in accordance with
the Preliminary Approval Order and provided the best notice practicable under the circumstances to all Persons entitled to such notice, and said notice fully satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1 and the requirements of
due process. 
 8. Pursuant to the Stipulation, the Indiana Plaintiffs have agreed that, within five (5) business days after the date
that this Judgment finally approving the Settlement is entered, each 

 
of the Indiana Plaintiffs shall notify their respective Indiana court that the Court entered this Judgment, attaching a courtesy copy of the Judgment. The Indiana Plaintiffs also have agreed
that, within five (5) business days after the date that this Judgment becomes Final, each of the Indiana Plaintiffs will file papers to move their respective Indiana court for voluntary dismissal of their respective Indiana Action with
prejudice, in accordance with that court’s local rules. Pursuant to the Stipulation, the Effective Date of the Settlement shall not occur until the Indiana Actions have been dismissed with prejudice and those dismissal orders are Final. 

9. The Court finds that during the course of the Actions, the Settling Parties and their counsel at all times complied with Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 11. 
 10. The Court finds that the Fee Award is fair and reasonable, in accordance with the Stipulation, and finally
approves the Fee Award. 
 11. The Court finds that the Service Awards are fair and reasonable, in accordance with the Stipulation, and
finally approves the Service Awards, to be paid from the Fee Award by Plaintiffs’ Counsel. 
 12. This Judgment, the fact and terms of
the Stipulation, including any exhibits attached thereto, all proceedings in connection with the Settlement, and any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the Settlement: 

(a) shall not be offered, received, or used in any way against the Settling Parties as evidence of, or be deemed to be evidence of, a
presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Settling Parties with respect to the truth of any fact alleged by Plaintiffs or the validity, or lack thereof, of any claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Actions or in any
litigation, or the deficiency or infirmity of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Actions or in any litigation, or of any fault, wrongdoing, negligence, or liability of any of the Released Persons; 

 (b) shall not be offered, received, or used in any way against any of the Released Persons as
evidence of, or be deemed to be evidence of, a presumption, concession, or admission of any fault, misrepresentation or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved, issued, or made by any Released Person, or against
Plaintiffs as evidence of any infirmity in their claims; or 
 (c) shall not be offered, received, or used in any way against any of the
Released Persons as evidence of, or be deemed to be evidence of, a presumption, concession, or admission of any liability, fault, negligence, omission or wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any other reason as against the Released Persons, in
any arbitration proceeding or other civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal. 

13. This Judgment, the Stipulation, the Settlement, and any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance thereof, shall
not be admissible in any proceeding for any purpose, except to enforce the terms of the Settlement. However, the Released Persons may refer to the Settlement, and file the Stipulation and/or this Judgment, in any action that may be brought against
them to effectuate the liability protections granted them thereunder, including, without limitation, to support a defense or claim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, full faith and credit, release, standing, good faith
settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or claim under U.S. federal or state law or foreign law. 

 14. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, the Court hereby retains
continuing jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of the Settlement; and (b) all Settling Parties for the purpose of construing, enforcing, and administering the Stipulation and this Judgment, including, if necessary, setting aside and
vacating this Judgment, on motion of a Settling Party, to the extent consistent with and in accordance with the Stipulation if the Effective Date fails to occur in accordance with the Stipulation. 

15. This Judgment is a final, appealable judgment and should be entered forthwith by the Clerk in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 58. 
 IT IS SO ORDERED. 
  

					
	DATED:                    	 		 	  

		 		 	HONORABLE J. PAUL OETKEN
		 		 	UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Source: [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00255-of-00352.parquet"}, [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00255-of-00352.parquet"}]]