Document:

exv10w4w2

 

Exhibit 10.4.2

	AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

	1. CONTRACT ID CODE

Page 1 of 2

	2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 0014

3. EFFECTIVE DATE 03/30/2007

	4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

	5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

	6. ISSUED BY

	FCC /Contracts and Purchasing Center

	445 12th St., SW,

	Washington, DC 20554

	CODE

00001

	7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

	8.
NAM
E
AND
ADD (No.,
RES street,
S
OF county,
CON State
TRA and 9A. AMENDMENT
CTO Zip OF SOLICITATION
R Code) NO.
—
Neu
sta
r,
Inc 9B. DATED (SEE
        . ITEM 11)
—
460
00
Cen
ter
Oak 10A.
MODIFICATION OF
Pla            CONTRACT/ORDER
za (X) NO. CON03000016
-—  —
Ste
rli
ng,
VA
201 10B. DATED
66 (X) (SEE ITEM 13)
—
Ifaoiu
COD
E            ty
code
*
-—  —

	11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

	The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date
specified for receipt of Offers | | is extended, | |

	Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the
solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

	(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging
receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer
submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the
solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT
TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE
SPECIFIED MAY RESULT
IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer
already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or
letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this
amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

	12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
(If required)

	No Funding Information

	is not extended.

	13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER
NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

	CHECK ONE

	?

	A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM
14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

	?

	B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as
changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE
AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

	?

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

	D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) FAR 1.6, “Authority of the Contracting
Officer”

	E. IMPORTANT: Contractor | X | is not, is required to sign this document and
return copies to the issuing office.

	14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including
solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.) The purpose of this modification is to
accept and incorporate Change Order Proposal (COP) Number 10 into the contract. COP # 10 is
accepted at a cost of $3,352.00. A copy of the respective COP is attached. Funding will be via
NANPA and will be paid by FCC Billing & Collection Agent, Welch & Co.

	Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A,
as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

	15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
Anthony Wimbush
16C. DATE SIGNED
16B. Unite
15C. DATE SIGNED
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
BY. Anthony S. Wimbush

	03/30/2007

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

	ited States of
America

	(Signature of Contracting
Officer)

	NSN 7540-01-152-8070 PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

	STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

	Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR)
53.243

 

 

 

 

NANP Administration Services

Scope of Work Change Proposal # 10

NOWG Recommendation: Reclassification of Codes in the

Pooling Set-Aside Status in the NANP Administration

System (NAS) to “Available” Codes

March 12, 2007

			
	 

	NeuStar, Inc.
	 	46000 Center Oak Plaza
	 
	 	Sterling, VA 20166

 

 

 

NANPA — Scope of Work Change #10 Proposal — NOWG Recommendation

 

Table of Contents

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	1

	 	    Introduction
	 	 	1	 
	 

	 	1.1   Purpose and Scope
	 	 	1	 
	 

	 	1.2   Modification of the NANPA System
	 	 	1	 
	2

	 	    NOWG Recommended Scope of Work Change
	 	 	3	 
	3

	 	    NeuStar’s Proposed Solution
	 	 	3	 
	4

	 	    Assumptions and Risks
	 	 	3	 
	5

	 	    Cost Assumptions and Summary
	 	 	4	 
	6

	 	    Conclusion
	 	 	4	 

	 	 	 
	 

©NeuStar, Inc. 2007

	 
 	 
iii

 

 

NANPA — Scope of Work Change #10 Proposal — NOWG Recommendation

 

1 Introduction

1.1 Purpose and Scope

In accordance with NeuStar’s contract1 and our constant effort to provide the
best support and value to both the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the
telecommunications industry, NeuStar, as the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA),
hereby submits this scope of work change to the FCC for approval. This scope of work change is in
compliance with NANPA’s Change Management protocol and most importantly per requirements as
outlined in NANP Administrator Solicitation SOL03000001, Section H.9, Item 5, which states the
following:

“If and when a change to the NANPA system is adopted by the NANC or the INC, the
contractor’s liaison shall ensure that the proposed change is forwarded to the Contracting
Officer and the Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR). No change shall be
binding until such modification is issued, nor shall the Government be liable for any costs
associated with a system change until such modification is issued.”

1.2 Modification of the NANPA System

The need for changes to the NANPA system may result from interaction between the North
American Numbering Council (NANC), the Industry Numbering Committee (INC), the FCC and the NANPA or
from technological evolution. These changes are usually to improve system operation and/or address
processing problems of fix unforeseen system responses. The FCC acknowledges the importance of the
interaction of the parties for developing system enhancements and fixes. For the changes to be
properly acknowledged and fiscally addressed in the context of the contract, all such system
changes should be approached through the following steps:

	 	1.	 	Either the contractor, the NANC, the INC or the FCC may identify a need for change to
the NANPA system.
	 
	 	2.	 	All parties may discuss the needed change and address possible solutions.
	 
	 	3.	 	The NANC, the INC or the FCC may request the contractor to propose a solution to affect
the change. The contractor shall develop a solution and alternatives if feasible, and
associated cost of each solution. The contractor shall submit the proposal(s) and
associated cost information to the NANC for review.
	 
	 	4.	 	The NANC may adopt one of the proposed changes or return the proposal to the
contractor for further development/clarification.
	 
	 	5.	 	If and when a change to the NANPA system is adopted by the NANC or the INC, the
contractor’s liaison shall ensure that the proposed change is forwarded to the Contracting
Officer and the Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR). No change shall be
binding until such modification is issued, nor shall the Government be liable for any costs
associated with a system change until such modification is issued.

 

			
	1	 	Contract Number CON03000016 and the NANPA Technical Requirements Document, March 2003.

 

			
	© NeuStar, Inc. 2007
	 	1

 

 

NANPA — Scope of Work Change #10 Proposal — NOWG Recommendation

 

This document provides detailed information pertaining to the Numbering Oversight Working
Group (NOWG) recommendation submitted to NANPA on March 5, 2007. This change order document
covers the required subject matters such as explaining the NOWG’s requirements, proposed solution,
costs and risk and assumptions.

 

			
	© NeuStar, Inc. 2007
	 	2

 

 

NANPA — Scope of Work Change #10 Proposal — NOWG Recommendation

 

2 NOWG Recommended Scope of Work Change

Presently, NANPA has the capability to identify and mark codes in NAS with the code status
of “pooling set aside.” Pooling set aside codes are central office codes that have been
specifically identified for assignment only to service providers participating in thousand block
number pooling. Codes with this status are included in the category of “Unavailable Codes” on the
Central Office Code Assignment Activity Record (i.e., CAA Report). Further, pooling set aside codes
do not appear on the list of available codes on the Central Office Code Availability Report. Both
of these reports are found on the NANPA website and are often referenced by service providers
before requesting the assignment of a code.

In February 2007, the NOWG requested NANPA to investigate the feasibility of modifying NAS in order
to change the current classification of pooling set aside codes to the “available” for assignment
status. As such, central office codes with a pooling set-aside status would appear on the Central
Office Code Availability Report as well as be included in the total quantity of available codes on
the CAA Report.

3 NeuStar’s Proposed Solution

Central office codes with the pooling set-aside code status will be classified under the
category of “available” for assignment. The following reports, which are available on the NANPA
website, will change as a result of this re-classification:

	 	•	 	Central Office Code Availability Report (real-time report) — Pooling set-aside codes
will appear in the list of available codes.
	 
	 	•	 	Central Office Code Utilized Report (real-time report) — Pooling set aside codes will
no longer appear on this report.
	 
	 	•	 	Central Office Code Assignment Records (text and Excel files) — For the text files,
pooling set-aside codes will appear in the list of available codes rather than the list of
utilized codes. For the Excel files, pooling set aside codes will appear as “vacant code”
and available for assignment.
	 
	 	•	 	Central Office Code Assignment Activity Record (CAA Report) — As necessary, the
quantity of pooling set aside codes will continue to appear in a separate column on the
report. However, the quantity of pooling set aside codes will be included in the total
quantity of “available” codes rather than the total quantity of “unavailable” codes. When a
pooling set-aside code is assigned, the quantity of “available” codes will decrease by one
and the quantity of “unavailable” codes will increase by one.

4 Assumptions and Risks

As part of the NANPA’s assessment of this change order, NANPA is required to identify the
associated assumptions and risks that can have an impact on its operations.

 

			
	© NeuStar, Inc. 2007
	 	3

 

 

NANPA — Scope of Work Change #10 Proposal — NOWG Recommendation

 

Assumptions:

	•	 	NANPA will send appropriate notice via the NAS NANP Notification System (NNS) to the industry
when the changes made to these reports appear on the NANPA website.
	 
	•	 	Previous Central Office Code Assignment Activity Record Reports that are posted on the NANPA
website will not be modified to reflect this change. Appropriate notation will be added to the
NANPA website to inform users of the re-classification of pooling set aside codes, the impact
on the quantity of available and unavailable codes and the effective date of the change.

Risks:

	•	 	There may be some initial confusion when these reports are modified. Specifically, on the
CAA Report, for NPAs that have pooling set aside codes, the quantity of available codes will
increase by the number of pooling set aside codes. Some users of these reports may attempt to
compare the revised CAA Report with previous reports and notice the increase in the quantity
of available codes. This may result in questions directed to the NANPA and/or the state
regulatory authorities.

5 Cost Assumptions and Summary

The proposed solution for implementation of the NOWG Recommendation requires changes in NAS in
order for the impacted reports to properly reflect the re-classification of codes in the pooling
set aside status from “unavailable” for assignment to “available.” NANPA has determined that the
cost associated with implementing this change in NAS is $3,352.00.

6 Conclusion

NeuStar, as the NANPA, hereby seeks the FCC’s approval for this Scope of Work Change. Upon
approval by the FCC, NANPA can notify the industry that NANPA is accommodating this Scope of Work
change order.

 

			
	© NeuStar, Inc. 2007
	 	4exv10w5w2

 

Exhibit 10.5.2

	AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT1. Contract ID CodePage 1 of Page 2
2. Amendment/Modification No. 3. Effective Date 4. Requlsition/Purchase Req. No. 5. Project No. (If applicable)
0019 Mar 15, 2007 NTIA9110-7-08833
6. Issued By            Code F6001201 7. Administrated By (If other than item 8) Code
DOC/NOAA/AGO            SEE BLOCK 6

	STAFF OFFICE & EXTERNAL CLIENTS, AD
1305 EAST WEST HIGHWAY, RM 7601
SILVER SPRING, MD 20910
Kalika M. Boulware 301 713-0838X150

	8. Name and Address of Contractor (No., Street, County, and Zip Code) (X) 9A. Amendment of
Solicitation No

	NEUSTAR, INC. Vendor ID: 00000190 9B. Date (See item 11)
46000 CENTER OAK PLAZA            DUNS: 112403295
STRLING VA 201666593 10A. Modification of Contract/Order No.
CAGE: 3DXC3 X SB1335-02-W-0175
10B. Date (See item 13)
Oct 26, 2001
Code            Facility Code

	11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

	The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The houir and date
specified for receipt of Offers            Is extended            Is not extended. Offers must acknowledge
receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified In the solicitation or as amended,
by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ___coples of
the amendment (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted:
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which Includes a reference to the solicitations and amendment
numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIVPT OF
OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER, If by vinue of
this amendment you desires to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by
telegram or letter, provided each telegram of letter makes reference to the solicitation and this
amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

	12. Accounting and Appropriation Date (If required)

6111079110011080025220000000000000000000000000000000000 $ US 0.00

	13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTORDERS.

	IT MODIFIES THE CONTRAC/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

	(X) A. This change order is issued pursuant to: (Specify authority) The changes set forth in item
14 are made in the Contract Order No. In Item 10A

	B. The above numbered Contract/Order is modified to reflect the administrative change (such as
changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc)

	C. This supplemental agreement is entered into pursuant to authority of:

	52.243-1 “Changes”, FAR 43 and Mutual Agreement of Parties

	D Either (Specify type of modification and authority)

	E. IMPORTANT: Contractor Is not, X is required to sign this document and return 3 copies to the
issuing office.

	14. Description of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF Section headings, including
solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible)

	The purpose of this no cost administrative modification is to accept contractor price and marketing
proposal for kids. us second level Internet domain.

	Except as provided herein, all terms and condition of the document referenced In item 9A or 10A, as
hereto fore changed, remains unchanged and In full force and effect.

	15A. Name and Title of Signer (Type or Print) 16A. Name and Title of Contracting Officer (Type or Print)
Steven Bayne 571-434-5500 MORE GUNTER-HENDERSON 301 713-0838
VP & Corporate Controller            Contracting Officer
Steve Bonee@nenoter.biz            Morie.Gunter-Henderson@noaa.gov
——  —
15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States of America 16C. Date Signed
Steven Loye            Mar. 15, 2007 (Signature of Contracting Officer) Mar 15, 2007
Nsn 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD OFRMS 30 (REV, 10-83)
PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE            Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

 

 

     

	SCHEDULE

	Administrative modification No Cost
Administrative modification to accept contractor
price and marketing proposal.
Modify contract SB1335-02-W-0175 with I
NauStar,Iac. to approve contractor’s price reduction ‘
and marketing plans for kids us second-level
Internet domain to increase utilization of such
domain space NTLA has approved Contractor’s
proposal to reduce current annual wholesale cost of each kids us registration from $65 to $6 and to
reduce annual content mangement subscription fee from $250 to $125 for each kids.us domain name.
In addition, NTLA has approved Contraction’s marketing plan to promote use of this domain space by
implementing: 1) a rebate of $6 for first new 2500 kids.us registration during a 3-month period;

	2) a rebate of the annual $125 cintent management subscription for first 200 domain names bolders
who activate kids.us sites during a 3-month period;

	and 3) a “ show your school spirit” programs to provide one year free contaent management
subcription and $6 registrar rebate for each of the first 200 K-12 public schools that register and
activate a kids.us through joint oureach activates with selected consumer and advocacy groups and
has budgeted $30,000 for such outreach, and will advetise the kids.us space on the .us zip code
directory platform.

Source: [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00123-of-00352.parquet"}, [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00123-of-00352.parquet"}]]