Document:

Filed October 26, 2005

Leonard M. Shulman - Bar No. 126349
Mark Bradshaw - Bar No. 192540
SHULMAN HODGES & BASTIAN LLP
26632 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 300
Foothill Ranch, California 92610-2808
Telephone:      (949) 340-3400
Facsimile:      (949) 340-3000

General Counsel for the Debtor and Debtor in Possession
Composite Technology Corporation, a Nevada corporation

                         UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
               CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA DIVISION

In re                                    Case No.  SA 05-13107 JR

COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,        Chapter  11
a Nevada corporation,

                                         STIPULATION RESOLVING CLAIM
                                         ASSERTED BY FRANK BISHOP
Debtor.                                  (CLAIM NOS. 37 AND 134) AND TAKING
                                         HEARING ON CLAIM OBJECTION MOTION OFF
                                         CALENDAR; AND ORDER THEREON

                                         Date:    November 1, 2005
                                         Time:    2:30 P.M.
                                         Place:   Courtroom 5A
                                                  Ronald Reagan Federal Building
                                                  and United States Courthouse
                                                  411 West Fourth Street
                                                  Santa Ana, California 92701

---------------------------------------

         TO THE HONORABLE JOHN E. RYAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE:

      Composite Technology Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("Debtor") and
Frank Bishop, hereby agree and stipulate based on the following recitals.

////

////

                                       1
<PAGE>

////

                                    RECITALS

      A. The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on May 5, 2005 (the "Petition
Date"). The Debtor is continuing in the operation and management of its business
pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 1107 and 1108.

      B. On July 18, 2005, the Court entered an order approving the Debtor's
Fourth Amended Disclosure Statement Describing Third Amended Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization. The hearing on confirmation of the Debtor's Third Amended
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization Plan ("Plan") is currently scheduled for
October 24, 2005.

      C. On or about July 8, 2005, Frank Bishop ("Bishop") filed an alleged
secured claim in this case in the amount of $9,356.25 which was assigned Claim
No. 37 by the Court ("Claim No. 37"), a true and correct copy of which is is
attached hereto as Exhibit 37.

      D. The Debtor has disputed Claim No. 37 on the basis that it appears to be
a duplicate of and superseded by Claim No. 134 filed by Bishop on or about
August 8, 2005 in the amount of $9,356.25 ("Claim No. 134), a true and correct
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 134.

      E. On September 28, 2005, the Debtor filed its Motion Objecting to Claim
Nos. 37 and 134 Filed by Frank Bishop ("Objection") which is scheduled for
hearing on November 1, 2005 at 2:30 P.M.

      F. In the Objection, the Debtor has requested that Claim No. 37 be
disallowed in its entirety as duplicate claim that has been superseded by Claim
No. 134 and that Claim No. 134 be disallowed in its entirety based on its lack
of evidence, lack of benefit of the alleged services performed and lack of
merit.

      G. In order to eliminate the need for costly litigation of the Claim No.
37 and Claim No. 134 (collectively the "Bishop Claims"), the Debtor and Bishop
desire to settle and resolve any and all disputes, claims, actions, causes of
action, demands and damages regarding the Bishop Claims.

                                       2
<PAGE>

      AGREEMENT

      WHEREFORE, the Debtor and Bishop (collectively the "Parties") agree that
it is in their mutual best interests to resolve any and all potential disputes
regarding the Bishop Claims, in consideration of the promises, the mutual
obligations and undertakings set forth hereunder, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by
the Parties, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

      1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein to
describe the context in which this Agreement is made, and to provide information
respecting the Parties' disputes and transactions and litigation, including by
an illustrative but not complete description of events and allegations that
reflect the divergent positions of the Parties hereto in the foregoing matters.
Neither the recitals, nor any other provisions of this Agreement, are or should
be construed or interpreted to be concessions, admissions, or used as evidence
for any purpose either for or against the interest of any of the Parties hereto,
consistent with Evidence Code Section 1152

      2. Allowance and Payment of Claim. Claim No. 37 shall be disallowed in its
entirety as duplicate claim that has been superseded by Claim No. 134, and Claim
No. 134 shall allowed as a nonpriority general unsecured claim in the reduced
amount of $4,678.13 ("Allowed Claim"). The Allowed Claim shall be paid in
accordance with the treatment of other nonpriority general unsecured claims as
provided in the Plan..

      3. Representations or Warranties Relating to the Bishop Claims. Bishop
represents that it he is the owner of the Bishop Claims and has not previously
assigned or transferred to any other person his rights in the Bishop Claims.

      4. Waiver of Claims Against the Estate. Except for as provided by this
Agreement, Bishop waives any and all claims against the Estate, including the
Bishop Claims, any other filed proofs of claim or informal claims, and agrees
that he is not entitled to share in any distribution from the Estate other than
as provided by this Agreement.

                                       3
<PAGE>

      5. Reliance. Except as set forth herein, the Parties hereto acknowledge
that they have relied solely upon their own judgment, belief and knowledge of
the existence, nature and extent of each claim, demand, or cause of action that
each party may have against the other, and that each such party has not been
influenced to any extent in entering into this Agreement by any representation
or statement regarding any such claim, demand or cause of action made by any
other party hereto.

      6. Attorneys' Fees and Costs. All Parties hereto shall bear their own
attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs incurred in connection with the disputes
between the Parties hereto and in the preparation of this Agreement. In the
event of any action or proceeding brought by either party against the other
under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover for the
fees of its attorneys in such action or proceeding, including costs of appeal,
if any, in such amount as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys' fees.

      7. Execution of Additional Documents. The Parties agree that they will
execute any and all additional documents and take all additional steps which may
be necessary or convenient to consummate this settlement and accomplish the
purposes thereof.

      8. Integration of Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire
agreement of the Parties, and no representations, warranties, inducements or
promises not included herein by express provision or contained in a document or
instrument identified herein and executed contemporaneously herewith shall be
binding on any party hereto.

      9. Provisions Severable. It is the belief of the parties that this
Agreement does not contain any provision contrary to law. However, if any
provision of this Agreement, or portion thereof, shall be determined to be
illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, that provision (or portion thereof) shall be
severed and the remaining parts shall be valid and enforceable, so long as the
remaining parts continue to fulfill the original intent of the parties and there
is no material failure of consideration.

      10. Authority to Sign. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf
of a corporation, partnership or other entity represents that he or she is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the corporation,
partnership or entity and agrees to deliver evidence of his or her authority and
power if requested by the other party.

                                       4
<PAGE>

      11. Bankruptcy Court Approval. This Agreement is subject to approval by
the United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California, Santa Ana
Division and entry of a Final Order and termination of any appeals related
thereto in the Debtor's bankruptcy case. In the event the Bankruptcy Court does
not approve this Agreement, all claims will be restored as originally asserted
by and between the Parties, subject to any and all defenses and counter-claims
held by the Parties.

      12. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
original, fax or copied counterparts, and all counterparts shall be considered
together as one agreement. A faxed or copied counterpart shall have the same
force and effect as an original signed counterpart. Each of the Parties hereby
expressly forever waives any and all rights to raise the use of a fax machine to
deliver a signature, or the fact that any signature or agreement or instrument
was transmitted or communicated through the use of a fax machine, as a defense
to the formation of a contract.

      13. Binding. This Stipulation shall be binding on the Parties hereto when
each such Party has executed at least one counterpart.

      14. Ownership of Claims. Each of the Parties to this agreement expressly
warrants and represents that it is the sole and lawful owner of all right, title
and interest in and to every claim and other matter which it purports to release
herein, and it has not assigned or transferred, or purported to assign or
transfer to any person or entity any claims or other matters herein released.

      15. Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective Parties and their heirs,
executors, administrators, agents, representatives, successors and assigns.

      16. Governing Law. This Agreement is to be governed by and construed in
accordance with federal bankruptcy law, to the extent applicable, and where
state law is implicated, the laws of the State of California shall govern.

                                       5
<PAGE>

      17. Jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. Should any dispute arise
regarding this Agreement, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California, Santa Ana Division shall have exclusive jurisdiction to
determine the same.

      18. Headings. The headings of all sections of this Agreement are inserted
solely for the convenience of reference and are not a part of and are not
intended to govern, limit or aid in the construction or interpretation of any
term or provision hereof.

      19. Hearing on Objection Taken Off Calendar. The hearing on the Debtor's
Objection to the Bishop Claims scheduled for November 1, 2005 at 2:30 P.M. shall
be taken off calendar.

Dated: October 26, 2005
                               -------------------------------------------
                               Frank Bishop

Dated: October 26, 2005        COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, a Nevada
                               corporation

                               -------------------------------------------
                               Benton H Wilcoxon,
                               Chief Executive Officer

APPROVED AS TO FORM.

Dated: October 26, 2005        SHULMAN HODGES & BASTIAN LLP

                               -------------------------------------------
                               Leonard M. Shulman
                               Mark Bradshaw
                               Attorneys for the Debtor and Debtor in Possession
                               Composite Technology Corporation

                                      ORDER

      IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:
                               -------------------------------------------
                               JOHN E. RYAN
                               UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

                                       6
<PAGE>

                               PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE

I am employed in the City of Foothill Ranch, County of Orange, State of
California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action.
My business address is 26632 Towne Centre, Suite 300, Foothill Ranch, California
92610.

On October ____, 2005, I served the documents named below on the parties as
follows:

DOCUMENT(S) SERVED:     STIPULATION RESOLVING CLAIMS ASSERTED BY FRANK BISHOP
                        (CLAIM NOS. 37 AND 134) AND TAKING HEARING ON CLAIM
                        OBJECTION MOTION
                        OFF CALENDAR; AND ORDER THEREON

SERVED UPON:            SEE THE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST

|_|   (BY MAIL) I caused each such envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid,
      to be placed in the United States mail at Foothill Ranch, California. I am
      readily familiar with the practice of Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP for
      collection and processing of correspondence for mailing, said practice
      being that in the ordinary course of business, mail is deposited in the
      United States Postal Service the same day as it is placed for collection.
      I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if
      postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after
      date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

|_|   (BY FACSIMILE) Pursuant to C.R.C. 2009(i), I either caused, or had someone
      cause, the transmitting machine to properly transmit the attached
      documents to the facsimile numbers shown on the service list. The
      above-referenced document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and
      the transmission was reported as completed and without error.

|_|   (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS OR OVERNITE EXPRESS) I am readily familiar with the
      practice of Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP for collection and processing of
      documents for overnight delivery and know that the document(s) described
      herein will be deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained
      by such overnight delivery company for overnight delivery.

|_|   (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I delivered to an authorized courier or driver
      authorized by ASAP Corporate Service to receive documents to be delivered
      on the same date. A proof of service signed by the authorized courier will
      be filed forthwith.

|_|   (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
      California that the above is true and correct.

|_|   (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the
      bar of this court, at whose direction this service was made.

Executed on October ____, 2005, at Foothill Ranch, California.

                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Lorre E. Clapp

<PAGE>

                                 SERVICE LIST

Interested Party
----------------
Michael Hauser, Esq.
Office of the United States Trustee
Ronald Reagan Federal Building
and United States Courthouse
411 West Fourth Street Suite 9041
Santa Ana, CA 92701-8000

Debtor
------
Composite Technology Corporation
Attn C William Arrington, St VP
2026 McGaw Ave
Irvine, CA 92614

Attorneys for the Unsecured Creditors Committee
-----------------------------------------------
Mike D. Neue, Esq.
Irell & Manella LLP
840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
Newport Beach, CA  92660-6324

Claimant
--------
Frank Bishop
5720 MacIntosh Loop
Haymarket, VA 20169-2659f

<PAGE>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In re                      (SHORT TITLE)                CHAPTER 11 CASE NUMBER:

COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,                       SA 05-13107 JR
a Nevada corporation,

Debtor.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER
                           AND CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

TO ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST ON THE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST:

1.    You are hereby notified, pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule
      9021-1(a)(1)(E), that a judgment or order entitled (specify):

      STIPULATION RESOLVING CLAIMS ASSERTED BY FRANK BISHOP (CLAIM NOS. 37 AND
      134) AND TAKING HEARING ON CLAIM OBJECTION MOTION OFF CALENDAR; AND ORDER
      THEREON

      was entered on (specify date): __________________________.

2.    I hereby certify that I mailed a copy of this notice and a true copy of
      the order or judgment to the persons and entities on the attached service
      list on (specify date): __________________________.

Dated:                                 JON D. CERETTO
                                       CLERK OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT

                                       By: ____________________________________
                                                       Deputy Clerk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<PAGE>

                                  SERVICE LIST

Interested Party
----------------
Michael Hauser, Esq.
Office of the United States Trustee
Ronald Reagan Federal Building
and United States Courthouse
411 West Fourth Street Suite 9041
Santa Ana, CA 92701-8000

Debtor
------
Composite Technology Corporation
Attn C William Arrington, St VP
2026 McGaw Ave
Irvine, CA 92614

Attorneys for the Debtor
------------------------
Mark Bradshaw, Esq.
Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP
26632 Towne Center Drive Suite 300
Foothill Ranch, CA 92610

Attorneys for the Unsecured Creditors Committee
-----------------------------------------------
Mike D. Neue, Esq.
Irell & Manella LLP
840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
Newport Beach, CA  92660-6324

Claimant
--------
Frank Bishop
5720 MacIntosh Loop
Haymarket, VA 20169-2659f

*Leonard M. Shulman - Bar No. 126349
Mark Bradshaw - Bar No. 192540
SHULMAN HODGES & BASTIAN LLP
26632 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 300
Foothill Ranch, California 92610-2808
Telephone:      (949) 340-3400
Facsimile:      (949) 340-3000

General Counsel for the Debtor and Debtor in Possession
Composite Technology Corporation, a Nevada corporation

                         UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
               CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA DIVISION

In re                                    Case No.  SA 05-13107 JR

COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,        Chapter  11
a Nevada corporation,

                                         STIPULATION RESOLVING CLAIM
                                         ASSERTED BY GS SCHWARTZ & CO. INC.
                                         (CLAIM NO. 38) AND TAKING HEARING
Debtor.                                  ON CLAIM OBJECTION MOTION OFF
                                         CALENDAR; AND ORDER THEREON

                                         Date:    October 25, 2005
                                         Time:    2:30 P.M.
                                         Place:   Courtroom 5A
                                                  Ronald Reagan Federal Building
                                                  and United States Courthouse
                                                  411 West Fourth Street
                                                  Santa Ana, California 92701

-----------------------------------------

      TO THE HONORABLE JOHN E. RYAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE:

      Composite Technology Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("Debtor") and GS
Schwartz & Co. Inc., hereby agree and stipulate based on the following recitals.

                                       1
<PAGE>

                                    RECITALS

      A. The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on May 5, 2005 (the "Petition
Date"). The Debtor is continuing in the operation and management of its business
pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 1107 and 1108.

      B. On or about July 11, 2005, GS Schwartz & Co., Inc. ("GS Schwartz")
filed a general unsecured claim in this case in the amount of $20,311.59 ("GS
Schwartz Claim"), which was assigned Claim No. 38 by the Court. A true and
correct copy of the GS Schwartz Claim is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

      C. On September 26, 2005, the Debtor filed its Motion Objecting to Claim
No. 38 Filed by GS Schwartz & Co., Inc. ("Objection") which is scheduled for
hearing on October 25, 2005 at 2:30 P.M.

      D. GS Schwartz is a public relations/investor relations firm. The GS
Schwartz Claim amount is based alleged services performed for the Debtor.
Attached to the GS Schwartz Claim are the following invoices:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Invoice Number                     Date of Services                  Amount
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FB0405                             4/15/05 through 5/14/05           $3,750.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FB0505                             5/15/05 through 6/14/05           $7,500.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EX0405                             April 2005                        $578.36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FB0605                             6/15/05 through 7/14/05           $7,500.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EX0505                             May 2005                          $458.23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No Date                            EX0605EST.                        $525.00
No Invoice provided
Listed on Invoice Summary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Total             $20,311.59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      E. The Debtor books and records indicate that the balance owing to GS
Schwartz as of the Petition Date was $1,828.36.

      F. As indicated in the chart above, the majority of the charges asserted
in the GS Schwartz Claim are for alleged services performed after the Petition
Date. The Debtor has disputed the amount GS Schwartz is asserting for the
alleged services performed after the Petition Date by GS Schwartz.

                                       2
<PAGE>

      G. In order to eliminate the need for costly litigation of the GS Schwartz
Claim, the Debtor and GS Schwartz desire to settle and resolve any and all
disputes, claims, actions, causes of action, demands and damages regarding the
GS Schwartz Claim.

                                    AGREEMENT

      WHEREFORE, the Debtor and GS Schwartz (collectively the "Parties") agree
that it is in their mutual best interests to resolve any and all potential
disputes regarding the GS Schwartz Claim, in consideration of the promises, the
mutual obligations and undertakings set forth hereunder, and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged by the Parties, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

      1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein to
describe the context in which this Agreement is made, and to provide information
respecting the Parties' disputes and transactions and litigation, including by
an illustrative but not complete description of events and allegations that
reflect the divergent positions of the Parties hereto in the foregoing matters.
Neither the recitals, nor any other provisions of this Agreement, are or should
be construed or interpreted to be concessions, admissions, or used as evidence
for any purpose either for or against the interest of any of the Parties hereto,
consistent with Evidence Code Section 1152

      2. Allowance of the GS Schwartz Claim. The GS Schwartz Claim shall be
allowed in the reduced amount of $16,286.49 and paid as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classification of the Allowed Claim        Amount            Payment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                        <C>                            <C>
Chapter 11 Administrative Claim            $14,458.23        The  Chapter 11  Administrative  Claim
                                                             may be paid  within  five  days of the
                                                             date of entry of this Order  approving
                                                             this Agreement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Unsecured Claim                    $1,828.26         The General  Unsecured  Claim shall be
                                                             paid as Class  2-A  General  Unsecured
                                                             Claim  under  the  Plan in  accordance
                                                             with the terms of the Plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Allowed Claim                        $16,286.49
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                       3
<PAGE>

      3. Representations or Warranties Relating to the GS Schwartz Claim. GS
Schwartz represents that it he is the owner of the GS Schwartz Claim and has not
previously assigned or transferred to any other person his rights in the GS
Schwartz Claim.

      4. Waiver of Claims Against the Estate. Except for as provided by this
Agreement, GS Schwartz waives any and all claims against the Estate, including
the GS Schwartz Claim, any other filed proofs of claim or informal claims, and
agrees that they are not entitled to share in any distribution from the Estate
other than as provided by this Agreement.

      5. Reliance. Except as set forth herein, the Parties hereto acknowledge
that they have relied solely upon their own judgment, belief and knowledge of
the existence, nature and extent of each claim, demand, or cause of action that
each party may have against the other, and that each such party has not been
influenced to any extent in entering into this Agreement by any representation
or statement regarding any such claim, demand or cause of action made by any
other party hereto.

      6. Attorneys' Fees and Costs. All Parties hereto shall bear their own
attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs incurred in connection with the disputes
between the Parties hereto and in the preparation of this Agreement. In the
event of any action or proceeding brought by either party against the other
under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover for the
fees of its attorneys in such action or proceeding, including costs of appeal,
if any, in such amount as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys' fees.

      7. Execution of Additional Documents. The Parties agree that they will
execute any and all additional documents and take all additional steps which may
be necessary or convenient to consummate this settlement and accomplish the
purposes thereof.

      8. Integration of Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire
agreement of the Parties, and no representations, warranties, inducements or
promises not included herein by express provision or contained in a document or
instrument identified herein and executed contemporaneously herewith shall be
binding on any party hereto.

      9. Provisions Severable. It is the belief of the parties that this
Agreement does not contain any provision contrary to law. However, if any
provision of this Agreement, or portion thereof, shall be determined to be
illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, that provision (or portion thereof) shall be
severed and the remaining parts shall be valid and enforceable, so long as the
remaining parts continue to fulfill the original intent of the parties and there
is no material failure of consideration.

                                       4
<PAGE>

      10. Authority to Sign. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf
of a corporation, partnership or other entity represents that he or she is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the corporation,
partnership or entity and agrees to deliver evidence of his or her authority and
power if requested by the other party.

      11. Bankruptcy Court Approval. This Agreement is subject to approval by
the United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California, Santa Ana
Division and entry of a Final Order and termination of any appeals related
thereto in the Debtor's bankruptcy case. In the event the Bankruptcy Court does
not approve this Agreement, all claims will be restored as originally asserted
by and between the Parties, subject to any and all defenses and counter-claims
held by the Parties.

      12. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
original, fax or copied counterparts, and all counterparts shall be considered
together as one agreement. A faxed or copied counterpart shall have the same
force and effect as an original signed counterpart. Each of the Parties hereby
expressly forever waives any and all rights to raise the use of a fax machine to
deliver a signature, or the fact that any signature or agreement or instrument
was transmitted or communicated through the use of a fax machine, as a defense
to the formation of a contract.

      13. Binding. This Stipulation shall be binding on the Parties hereto when
each such Party has executed at least one counterpart.

      14. Ownership of Claims. Each of the Parties to this agreement expressly
warrants and represents that it is the sole and lawful owner of all right, title
and interest in and to every claim and other matter which it purports to release
herein, and it has not assigned or transferred, or purported to assign or
transfer to any person or entity any claims or other matters herein released.

                                       5
<PAGE>

      15. Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective Parties and their heirs,
executors, administrators, agents, representatives, successors and assigns.

      16. Governing Law. This Agreement is to be governed by and construed in
accordance with federal bankruptcy law, to the extent applicable, and where
state law is implicated, the laws of the State of California shall govern.

      17. Jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. Should any dispute arise
regarding this Agreement, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California, Santa Ana Division shall have exclusive jurisdiction to
determine the same.

      18. Headings. The headings of all sections of this Agreement are inserted
solely for the convenience of reference and are not a part of and are not
intended to govern, limit or aid in the construction or interpretation of any
term or provision hereof.

                                       6
<PAGE>

      19. Hearing on Objection Taken Off Calendar. The hearing on the Debtor's
Objection to the GS Schwartz Claim scheduled for October 25, 2005 at 2:30 P.M.
shall be taken off calendar.

Dated: October      , 2005                 GS SCHWARTZ & CO., INC.
              ______

                                           -------------------------------------
                                           By:
                                           Its Vice President of  Operations

Dated: October      , 2005                 COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
              ______                       a Nevada corporation

                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Benton H Wilcoxon,
                                           Chief Executive Officer

APPROVED AS TO FORM.

Dated: October      , 2005                 SHULMAN HODGES & BASTIAN LLP
              ______

                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Leonard M. Shulman
                                           Mark Bradshaw
                                           Attorneys for the Debtor and Debtor
                                           in Possession
                                           Composite Technology Corporation

                                                      ORDER

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

                                           -------------------------------------
                                           JOHN E. RYAN
                                           UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

                                       7
<PAGE>

                                PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE

I am employed in the City of Foothill Ranch, County of Orange, State of
California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action.
My business address is 26632 Towne Centre, Suite 300, Foothill Ranch, California
92610.

On October ___, 2005, I served the documents named below on the parties as
follows:

DOCUMENT(S) SERVED:   STIPULATION RESOLVING CLAIM ASSERTED BY GS SCHWARTZ & CO.
                      INC. (CLAIM NO. 38) AND TAKING HEARING ON CLAIM OBJECTION
                      MOTION OFF CALENDAR; AND ORDER THEREON

SERVED UPON:          SEE THE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST

|X|   (BY MAIL) I caused each such envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid,
      to be placed in the United States mail at Foothill Ranch, California. I am
      readily familiar with the practice of Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP for
      collection and processing of correspondence for mailing, said practice
      being that in the ordinary course of business, mail is deposited in the
      United States Postal Service the same day as it is placed for collection.
      I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if
      postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after
      date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

|_|   (BY FACSIMILE) Pursuant to C.R.C. 2009(i), I either caused, or had someone
      cause, the transmitting machine to properly transmit the attached
      documents to the facsimile numbers shown on the service list. The
      above-referenced document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and
      the transmission was reported as completed and without error.

|_|   (BY FEDERAL EXPRESS OR OVERNITE EXPRESS) I am readily familiar with the
      practice of Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP for collection and processing of
      documents for overnight delivery and know that the document(s) described
      herein will be deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained
      by such overnight delivery company for overnight delivery.

|_|   (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I delivered to an authorized courier or driver
      authorized by ASAP Corporate Service to receive documents to be delivered
      on the same date. A proof of service signed by the authorized courier will
      be filed forthwith.

|_|   (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
      California that the above is true and correct.

|X|   (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the
      bar of this court, at whose direction this service was made.

Executed on October ___, 2005, at Foothill Ranch, California.

                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Lorre E. Clapp

<PAGE>

                                  SERVICE LIST

Interested Party
----------------
Michael Hauser, Esq.
Office of the United States Trustee
Ronald Reagan Federal Building
and United States Courthouse
411 West Fourth Street Suite 9041
Santa Ana, CA 92701-8000

Debtor
------
Composite Technology Corporation
Attn C William Arrington, St VP
2026 McGaw Ave
Irvine, CA 92614

Attorneys for the Unsecured Creditors Committee
-----------------------------------------------
Mike D. Neue, Esq.
Irell & Manella LLP
840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
Newport Beach, CA  92660-6324

Claimant
--------
GS Schwartz & Co Inc
Attn President or CFO
470 Park Ave South
New York, NY 10016-6857

<PAGE>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In re       (SHORT TITLE)                                CHAPTER 11 CASE NUMBER:

COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,                        SA 05-13107 JR
a Nevada corporation,

Debtor.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER
                           AND CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

TO ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST ON THE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST:

1.    You are hereby notified, pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule
      9021-1(a)(1)(E), that a judgment or order entitled (specify):

            STIPULATION RESOLVING CLAIM ASSERTED BY GS SCHWARTZ & CO. INC.
            (CLAIM NO. 38) AND TAKING HEARING ON CLAIM OBJECTION MOTION OFF
            CALENDAR; AND ORDER THEREON

            was entered on (specify date): __________________________.

2.    I hereby certify that I mailed a copy of this notice and a true copy of
      the order or judgment to the persons and entities on the attached service
      list on (specify date): __________________________.

Dated:                        JON D. CERETTO
                              CLERK OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT

                              By:
                                  ----------------------------------
                                           Deputy Clerk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<PAGE>

                                  SERVICE LIST

Interested Party
----------------
Michael Hauser, Esq.
Office of the United States Trustee
Ronald Reagan Federal Building
and United States Courthouse
411 West Fourth Street Suite 9041
Santa Ana, CA 92701-8000

Debtor
------
Composite Technology Corporation
Attn C William Arrington, St VP
2026 McGaw Ave
Irvine, CA 92614

Attorneys for the Debtor
------------------------
Mark Bradshaw, Esq.
Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP
26632 Towne Center Drive Suite 300
Foothill Ranch, CA 92610

Attorneys for the Unsecured Creditors Committee
-----------------------------------------------
Mike D. Neue, Esq.
Irell & Manella LLP
840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
Newport Beach, CA  92660-6324

Claimant
--------
GS Schwartz & Co Inc
Attn President or CFO
470 Park Ave South
New York, NY 10016-6857

Source: [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00094-of-00352.parquet"}, [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00094-of-00352.parquet"}]]