Document:

EX-4.3

 Exhibit 4.3 

EXECUTION VERSION 
 CONFIDENTIAL 

 
  

 
 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 

BY AND BETWEEN 
 NOKIA
CORPORATION 
 AND 

ALCATEL LUCENT SA 

DATED AS OF JANUARY 8, 2016 
  

 
  

 

 TABLE OF CONTENTS 

 

							
	 	 	 	  	Page	 
	 ARTICLE I
  

DEFINITIONS
	   
 

  

			
	Section 1.1	 	Specific Definitions	  	 	2	  
	 Section 1.2
	 	Interpretation	  	 	8	  
	
	ARTICLE II	  
	
	GUIDING PRINCIPLES	  
			
	 Section 2.1
	 	Corporate Interest of each Party	  	 	8	  
	 Section 2.2
	 	Arms’ Length Conditions	  	 	9	  
	 Section 2.3
	 	Protection of Interests of Minority Shareholders of the Company	  	 	9	  
	
	ARTICLE III	  
	
	MANAGEMENT SERVICES	  
			
	 Section 3.1
	 	Reciprocal Management Services	  	 	9	  
	
	ARTICLE IV	  
	
	RECIPROCAL SERVICES	  
			
	 Section 4.1
	 	Reciprocal Create-related Services	  	 	12	  
	 Section 4.2
	 	Reciprocal Innovation-related Services	  	 	13	  
	 Section 4.3
	 	Reciprocal Sell-related Services	  	 	13	  
	 Section 4.4
	 	Brand Cross-Licensing and Transfer of Intellectual Property Rights	  	 	13	  
	
	ARTICLE V	  
		
	 SERVICE MANAGERS AND STEERING COMMITTEE
	  	 	13	  
	 Section 5.1
	 	Service Managers; Contact Persons	  	 	13	  
	 Section 5.2
	 	Steering Committee	  	 	14	  
	 Section 5.3
	 	Dispute Resolution Mechanisms	  	 	16	  
	 Section 5.4
	 	Limits of Authority	  	 	17	  

  
 i 

							
	ARTICLE VI	  
	
	FEE FOR SERVICES AND PAYMENT	  
			
	 Section 6.1
	 	 Fee
	  	 	18	  
	 Section 6.2
	 	 Taxes
	  	 	18	  
	 Section 6.3
	 	 Billing
	  	 	19	  
	 Section 6.4
	 	 Late Payment
	  	 	19	  
	
	ARTICLE VII	  
	
	REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES	  
			
	 Section 7.1
	 	 Representations and Warranties of the Company
	  	 	19	  
	Section 7.2	 	 Representations and Warranties of Nokia
	  	 	21	  
	
	ARTICLE VIII	  
	
	SPECIFIC COVENANTS	  
			
	 Section 8.1
	 	 Authority and Direction
	  	 	22	  
	 Section 8.2
	 	 Compliance with applicable Law
	  	 	23	  
	 Section 8.3
	 	 Cooperation
	  	 	23	  
	 Section 8.4
	 	 Interconnection of Products
	  	 	24	  
	 Section 8.5
	 	 Product Portfolio
	  	 	24	  
	 Section 8.6
	 	 Personnel Skills and Competence
	  	 	25	  
	 Section 8.7
	 	 Third Parties and External Service Providers
	  	 	25	  
	 Section 8.8
	 	 Changes to Services
	  	 	25	  
	 Section 8.9
	 	 Data Protection
	  	 	26	  
	 Section 8.10
	 	 Services Level Agreements
	  	 	26	  
	
	ARTICLE IX	  
	
	TERM; TERMINATION	  
			
	 Section 9.1
	 	 Term
	  	 	26	  
	 Section 9.2
	 	 Termination
	  	 	27	  
	 Section 9.3
	 	 Procedure on Expiration of the Term and Termination    
	  	 	27	  

  
 ii 

							
	
	ARTICLE X	  
	
	LIABILITY	  
			
	 Section 10.1
	 	 Indemnification
	  	 	27	  
	 Section 10.2
	 	 Limitation of Liability
	  	 	28	  
	 Section 10.3
	 	 Waiver of Consequential Damages
	  	 	28	  
	 Section 10.4
	 	 Gross Negligence and Willful Misconduct
	  	 	28	  
	
	ARTICLE XI	  
	
	 CONFIDENTIALITY
	   

	
	ARTICLE XII	  
	
	 MISCELLANEOUS
	   

			
	 Section 12.1
	 	 Force majeure
	  	 	29	  
	 Section 12.2
	 	 Specific Performance
	  	 	29	  
	 Section 12.3
	 	 Amendment and Waiver
	  	 	30	  
	 Section 12.4
	 	 Assignment
	  	 	30	  
	 Section 12.5
	 	 Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries
	  	 	30	  
	 Section 12.6
	 	 Severability
	  	 	30	  
	 Section 12.7
	 	 Headings
	  	 	31	  
	 Section 12.8
	 	 Expenses
	  	 	31	  
	 Section 12.9
	 	 Remedies
	  	 	31	  
	 Section 12.10
	 	 Privilege
	  	 	31	  
	 Section 12.11
	 	 Notices
	  	 	31	  
	 Section 12.12
	 	 Governing Law
	  	 	33	  
	 Section 12.13
	 	 Jurisdiction
	  	 	33	  

  
 iii 

 This Master Services Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as
of January 8, 2016, by and between Nokia Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of Finland, represented by Riikka Tieaho, Vice-President, Corporate Legal and Hans-Jurgen Bill, Chief Human Resources Officer, duly authorized for the
purposes hereof (“Nokia”) and Alcatel Lucent, a société anonyme organized under the laws of France, represented by Mr. Jean Raby, Chief Financial and Legal Officer and Philippe Guillemot, Chief Operating Officer
and Sales Officer, duly authorized for the purposes hereof (the “Company”). Nokia and the Company are each sometimes referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. 

W I T N E S S E T H: 
  

	(A)	WHEREAS, each of the Parties agreed to effect a strategic combination, pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding dated April 15, 2015, as amended on
October 28, 2015 (the “MOU”), with a view to create one of the leading global providers of telecommunications products and services in the field of mobile and fixed broadband, Internet Protocol networking and cloud technology;

  

	(B)	WHEREAS, in order to effect such strategic combination, in accordance with the MOU, Nokia carried out public exchange offers in France and in the United States (such offers, as may be amended from time to
time in accordance with the terms of the MOU, the “Offers”) for all (i) the outstanding ordinary shares, nominal value of €0.05 per share, of the Company (the “Company Shares”), including Company Shares
represented by American Depositary Shares (the “ADSs”), Company Shares issuable upon conversion or exchange of the OCEANEs (as defined in Section 1.1) and Company Shares issuable upon the exercise of any outstanding options,
warrants, convertible securities or rights to purchase, subscribe for, or be allocated Company Shares and (ii) the OCEANEs; 

  

	(C)	WHEREAS, after the closing of the Offers and as of the date hereof, Nokia owns 76.31% of the share capital and at least 76.01% of the voting rights of the Company; 

 

	(D)	WHEREAS, Nokia requires certain services to be provided by the Company and its Subsidiaries as from the date hereof which qualify as related party transactions pursuant to Article L. 225-38 of the French
Commercial Code and the Company is willing and able to provide or to cause its Subsidiaries to provide such services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; 

 

	(E)	WHEREAS, the Company requires certain services to be provided by Nokia and its Subsidiaries as from the date hereof which qualify as related party transactions pursuant to Article L. 225-38 of the French
Commercial Code and Nokia is willing and able to provide or to cause its Subsidiaries to provide such services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; 

	(F)	WHEREAS, each of the Parties has confirmed that the performance of this Agreement and in particular the provision of Services as defined in Section 1.1 conforms with its own interest; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the Parties agree as follows: 
 ARTICLE I 

DEFINITIONS 
 Section 1.1
Specific Definitions. 
 The following capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth or referenced
below: 
 “ADSs” shall have the meaning set forth in Recital (B). 

“Advisor” shall mean, in relation to a Person, a financial advisor, legal advisor, accountant, consultant and any other
Person providing professional advice to such Person in relation to any aspect of this Agreement. 
 “Affiliate” shall
mean, in relation to any Person, any Person Controlled by that Person, or which Controls that Person, or which is Controlled by a Person which also Controls that Person, in each case, directly or indirectly and from time to time; other than, for the
purposes of this Agreement, with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries, any of Nokia and its Subsidiaries, and conversely. 

“Agreement” shall mean this Master Services Agreement including its preamble, annexes, appendices and schedules, as amended
from time to time and, where the context requires, any ancillary or related agreement between the Parties and/or any Subsidiaries thereof entered into in furtherance of this Agreement. 

“Business Day” shall mean any day on which banking institutions are open for regular business in Finland and France which is
not a Saturday, a Sunday or a public holiday in Finland and France. 
 “Committee of Independent Directors” shall mean the
committee of independent directors of the Company Board. 
 “Company” shall have the meaning set forth in the first
paragraph of this Agreement. 

  
 2 

 “Company Board” shall mean the board of directors of the Company. 

“Company Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Recital (B). 

“Confidential Information” shall mean the meaning set forth in Article XI. 

“Contact Persons” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.1. 

“Contract” shall mean, with respect to any Person, any written agreement, indenture, loan agreement, undertaking, note or
other debt instrument, contract, lease, mortgage, deed, understanding, arrangement, commitment or other obligation to which such Person is a party or by which any of them may be bound or to which any of their properties may be subject. 

“Control”, and its correlative meanings, “Controlling” and “Controlled”, shall have the
meaning given in Article L. 233-3 of the French Commercial Code. 
 “Court” shall have the meaning set forth in Section
12.13. 
 “Dispute” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 12.13. 

“Expert” shall have the meaning set forth in Sections 5.3.2 and 8.5. 

“Fee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.1. 

“Force Majeure” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 12.1. 

“Foreground Intellectual Property” shall have the meaning set forth in Exhibit 2.  

“ICC” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 12.13. 

“Indemnified Party” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 10.1. 

“Indemnifying Party” shall have the meaning set forth in Sections 8.5 and 10.1. 

“Invoice” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.3. 

  
 3 

 “Law” shall mean any law (including common law), statute, ordinance, rule,
regulation, judgment, order, injunction, decree, arbitration award, regulation or requirement, in each case enacted, issued, promulgated or enforced by any Relevant Authority in Finland, France or elsewhere. 

“Lien” shall mean any lien, pledge, servitude, charge, security interest, option, claim, mortgage, lease, easement, proxy,
voting trust or agreement, encumbrance or any other restriction on title or transfer of any nature whatsoever. 
 “Loss”
shall have the meaning set forth in Section 10.1. 
 “Material Adverse Effect” shall mean, with respect to any Person, any
change, condition, effect, event or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate with other changes, conditions, effects, events or occurrences, has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, a materially adverse effect on the business,
condition (financial or otherwise), assets, liabilities or operations of such Person and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, provided, however, that none of the following changes, conditions, effects, events or occurrences (or the
results thereof), either individually or in the aggregate, shall be considered in determining whether a Material Adverse Effect has occurred: (i) any change in global, national or regional political conditions (including the outbreak of, or changes
in, war, acts of terrorism or other hostilities) or in general global, national or regional economic, regulatory or market conditions or in national or global financial or capital markets, so long as in each case such changes do not
disproportionately impact the Person and its Subsidiaries relative to other participants in the same or similar industries; (ii) any change in applicable accounting principles or any adoption, implementation or change in any applicable Law
(including any Law in respect of Taxes) or any interpretation thereof by a Relevant Authority; (iii) any change generally affecting similar industries or market sectors in the geographic regions in which the Person and its Subsidiaries operate, so
long as in each case such changes do not disproportionately impact the Person and its Subsidiaries relative to other participants in the same or similar industries; (iv) the negotiation, execution, announcement or performance of the MOU or
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the MOU; (v) any change or development to the extent resulting from any action by a Person or its Subsidiaries that is expressly required to be taken by this Agreement; (vi) any change resulting from
or arising out of hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, or other natural disasters; (vii) the failure of any Person and its Subsidiaries to meet any internal or public projections, forecasts or estimates of performance, revenues or earnings (it being
understood that any change, condition, effect, event or occurrence that caused such failure but that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of Material Adverse Effect may constitute or contribute to a Material Adverse Effect); (viii) the
announcement of Nokia as the acquirer of the Company and its Subsidiaries or, solely with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries, any announcements or communications by or authorized by Nokia regarding Nokia’s plans or intentions with
respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries (including the impact of any such announcements or communications on relationships with customers, suppliers, employees or regulators); or (ix) any actions (or the effects of any actions) taken (or omitted
to be taken) by the Person or its Subsidiaries upon the written request or written instruction of, or with the written consent of, the other Person. 

“MOU” shall have the meaning set forth in Recital (A). 

  
 4 

 “N - 1 Leader” means with respect to each Party, the person designated by such
Party in this capacity as identified to the other Party in writing from time to time. 
 “Nokia” shall have the meaning
set forth in the first paragraph of this Agreement. 
 “Nokia Board” shall mean the board of directors of Nokia. 

“OCEANEs” shall mean collectively: (i) the EUR 628,946,424 bonds convertible into new Company Shares or exchangeable for
existing Company Shares due on July 1, 2018, (ii) the EUR 688,425,000 bonds convertible into new Company Shares or exchangeable for existing Company Shares due on January 30, 2019 and (iii) the EUR 460,289,979.90 bonds convertible into new Company
Shares or exchangeable for existing Company Shares due on January 30, 2020. 
 “Offers” shall have the meaning set forth
in Recital (B). 
 “Organizational Documents” shall mean, with respect to any Person, the certificate of incorporation,
articles of association, limited liability company by-laws, organizational regulations or similar organizational documents of such Person. 

“Party” shall have the meaning set forth in the first paragraph of this Agreement. 

“Permit” shall mean all permits, licenses, franchises, variances, exemptions, orders and other authorizations, consents and
approvals issued by or obtained from a Relevant Authority. 
 “Person” shall mean any individual, corporation,
partnership, limited liability company, firm, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, governmental or regulatory body or other entity. 

“Price Per Unit” shall have the meaning set forth in Exhibit 1. 

“Pricing Method” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.1. 

“Receiving Party” shall mean the Company or Nokia (and their Subsidiaries), as applicable, when receiving Services from the
Service Provider pursuant to the terms hereof. 
 “Reciprocal Application and Analytics Management Services” shall have
the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.4. 

  
 5 

 “Reciprocal CFO Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 3.1.6. 
 “Reciprocal CIOO Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.7. 

“Reciprocal CSD Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.9. 

“Reciprocal Create-related Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.2. 

“Reciprocal Customer Operations Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.3. 

“Reciprocal Fixed Networks Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.2. 

“Reciprocal HR Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.8. 

“Reciprocal Innovation-related Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.1. 

“Reciprocal IP/Optical Networks Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.5. 

“Reciprocal Legal Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.11. 

“Reciprocal Tech Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.12. 

“Reciprocal MCA Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.10. 

“Reciprocal Mobile Networks Management Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.1. 

  
 6 

 “Reciprocal Sell-related Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section
4.3. 
 “Relevant Authority” shall mean any Finnish, French, European Union, U.S. and other supranational,
national, federal, regional or local legislative, administrative or regulatory authority, agency, court, tribunal, arbitrator, arbitration panel or similar body or any securities exchange on which any securities of either Party are trading, in each
case only to the extent that such entity has authority and jurisdiction in the particular context. 
 “Rules” shall have
the meaning set forth in Section 12.13. 
 “Services” shall mean the services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement.

 “Service Managers” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.1. 

“Service Provider” shall mean the Company or Nokia (and their Subsidiaries), as applicable, when providing Services to the
Receiving Party pursuant to the terms hereof. 
 “SLAs” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8.10. 

“Steering Committee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.2. 

“Steering Committee Deadlock” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.3. 

“Subsidiary” shall mean, with respect to any Person, any other Person Controlled by such Person, excluding, with respect to
the Company and notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Co.; it being specified that for the purposes of this Agreement, the Company and the Persons Controlled by the Company shall not be considered as
Subsidiaries of Nokia. 
 “Tax” shall mean all national, regional, federal, state, and local income, gain, profits,
windfall profits, franchise, gross receipts, environmental, customs duty, capital stock, severances, stamp, payroll, sales, employment, unemployment, disability, social security contributions, use, property, withholding, excise, production, value
added, occupancy and other taxes, duties or assessments of any nature whatsoever, together with all interest, penalties and additions imposed with respect to such amounts and any interest in respect of such penalties and additions. 

“Term” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 9.1. 

“Tribunal” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 12.13. 

  
 7 

 “VAT” shall mean any tax imposed in compliance with the Council Directive of
28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (EC Directive 2006/112); and any other tax of a similar nature, whether imposed in a member state of the European Union in substitution for, or levied in addition to, such tax referred to
above, or imposed elsewhere. 
 Section 1.2 Interpretation. 

For the purposes of this Agreement: (i) words (including capitalized terms defined herein) in the singular include the plural and
vice versa as the context requires; (ii) the terms “hereof,” “herein,” and “herewith” and words of similar import, unless otherwise expressly provided, refer to this Agreement as a whole (including all
Annexes hereto) and not to any particular provision of this Agreement, and Article, Section and Annex references are to the Articles, Sections and to this Agreement unless otherwise expressly provided; (iii) the word “including” and
words of similar import when used in this Agreement mean “including without limitation” unless otherwise expressly provided; and (iv) all references to any period of days refer to the relevant number of calendar days unless otherwise
expressly provided. 
 When a French term is added in parenthesis after an English term, the French term shall prevail for the
interpretation of the relevant English term. 
 When the context so requires, the Services to be provided by the Service Provider to the
Receiving Party pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall include Services provided (i) by an authorized external service provider on behalf of the Service Provider pursuant to Section 8.7 and/or (ii) to a customer of the Receiving Party,
subject to prior request or information of the Receiving Party. 
 ARTICLE II 

GUIDING PRINCIPLES 

Section 2.1 Corporate Interest of each Party. 

The Company acknowledges and confirms that entering into this Agreement and performing and receiving the Services provided for herein and
therein is (i) in its own interest and (ii) in compliance with the corporate purpose (intérêt social) of the Company. 

Nokia acknowledges and confirms that entering into this Agreement and performing and receiving the Services provided for herein and therein
complies with Finnish law and is (i) in its own interest and (ii) in compliance with the corporate purpose (intérêt social) of its French subsidiaries (other than the Company and its direct or indirect subsidiaries). 

  
 8 

 Section 2.2 Arms’ Length Conditions. 

In entering into and performing this Agreement, each Party and each of its respective Subsidiaries is acting, and intends to be treated, as
an autonomous legal entity with an independent purpose. Each Party agrees to provide and shall cause its relevant Subsidiaries to provide Services to the other Party or its relevant Subsidiaries or receive services from the other Party or its
relevant Subsidiaries on arms’ length conditions. Each Party considers that this Agreement provides for a fair and proportional allocation of commitments and revenues between them and their respective Subsidiaries. 

Section 2.3 Protection of Interests of Minority Shareholders of the Company. 

As long as the Company’s shares remain listed on a regulated market as defined in Articles L. 421-1 et seq. of the French
Monetary and Financial Code and/or to the extent that there are minority interests in the Company, Nokia and the Company shall ensure that the performance of the Services are clear and understandable in the interest of all those concerned, on
arm’s length condition and that they do not infringe the right of the minority shareholders of the Company in their capacity of shareholders of the Company. 

In accordance with the provisions of Article L. 225-38 of the French Commercial Code, this Agreement was submitted to the prior approval of
the Company Board on the basis of the prior recommendation issued by the Committee of Independent Directors. When approving this Agreement, the Company Board considered the interest of such Agreement for the Company, and in particular the financial
terms attached thereto. 
 ARTICLE III 

MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

Section 3.1 Reciprocal Management Services. 

3.1.1 Reciprocal Mobile Networks Management Services 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the services relating to mobile networks management described
in Annex 3.1.1 hereto (the “Reciprocal Mobile Networks Management Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions
relating to the Reciprocal Mobile Networks Management Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1.1 hereto. 

  
 9 

 3.1.2 Reciprocal Fixed Networks Management Services 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the services relating to fixed networks management described
in Annex 3.1.2 hereto (the “Reciprocal Fixed Networks Management Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the
Reciprocal Fixed Networks Management Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1.2 hereto. 
 3.1.3 Reciprocal Customer Operations
Management Services 
 Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the services relating to
customer operations management described in Annex 3.1.3 hereto (the “Reciprocal Customer Operations Management Services”). 

The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal Customer Operations Management Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1.3
hereto. 
 3.1.4 Reciprocal Applications and Analytics Management Services 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the services relating to applications and analytics
management described in Annex 3.1.4 hereto (the “Reciprocal Applications and Analytics Management Services”). 
 The specific terms
and conditions relating to the Reciprocal Applications and Analytics Management Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1.4 hereto. 

3.1.5 Reciprocal IP & Optical Networks Management Services 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the services relating to intellectual property and optical
networks management described in Annex 3.1.5 hereto (the “Reciprocal IP & Optical Networks Management Services”). 

The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal IP & Optical Networks Management Services are also set forth in Annex
3.1.5 hereto. 

  
 10 

 3.1.6 Reciprocal Financial Management Services 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with services relating to financial management described in
Annex 3.1.6 hereto (the “Reciprocal CFO Management Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the
Reciprocal CFO Management Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1.6 hereto. 
 3.1.7 Reciprocal CIOO Management Services

 Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with services relating to Innovation and Operating
management described in Annex 3.1.7 hereto (the “Reciprocal CIOO Management Services”). 
 The specific terms and
conditions relating to the Reciprocal CIOO Management Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1.7 hereto. 
 3.1.8 Reciprocal HR
Management Services 
 Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with services relating to human
resources management described in Annex 3.1.8 hereto (the “Reciprocal HR Management Services”). 
 The specific
terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal HR Management Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1.8 hereto. 
 3.1.9
Reciprocal Corporate Strategy and Development Management Services 
 Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its
Subsidiaries with services relating to corporate strategy and development management described in Annex 3.1.9 hereto (the “Reciprocal CSD Management Services”). 

The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal CSD Management Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1.9 hereto. 

  
 11 

 3.1.10 Reciprocal MCA Management Services 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with services relating to marketing and corporate affairs
management described in Annex 3.1.10 hereto (the “Reciprocal MCA Management Services”). 
 The specific terms and
conditions relating to the Reciprocal MSA Management Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1.10 hereto. 
 3.1.11 Reciprocal
Legal & Compliance Management Services 
 Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with services
relating to legal management described in Annex 3.1.11 hereto (the “Reciprocal Legal & Compliance Management Services”). 

The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal Legal & Compliance Management Services are also set forth in Annex
3.1.11 hereto. 
 3.1.12 Reciprocal Tech Management Services 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with services relating to Tech management described in Annex
3.1.12 hereto (the “Reciprocal Tech Management Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the
Reciprocal Legal & Compliance Management Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1.12 hereto. 
 ARTICLE IV 

RECIPROCAL SERVICES 

Section 4.1 Reciprocal Create-related Services. 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the create-related services described in Annex 4.1
hereto (the “Reciprocal Create-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal
Create-related Services are also set forth in Annex 4.1 hereto. 

  
 12 

 Section 4.2 Reciprocal Innovation-related Services. 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the innovation-related services described in Annex 4.2
hereto (the “Reciprocal Innovation-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal
Innovation-related Services are also set forth in Annex 4.2 hereto. 
 Section 4.3 Reciprocal Sell-related Services. 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the sell-related services described in Annex 4.3
hereto (the “Reciprocal Sell-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal
Sell-related Services are also set forth in Annex 4.3 hereto. 
 Section 4.4 Brand Cross-Licensing and Transfer of
Intellectual Property Rights 
 Each of the Parties shall license to the other Party and its Subsidiaries those of its trademarks,
logos and other rights related to its brands and those of its Subsidiaries that are necessary for the other Party and its Subsidiaries to operate its and their respective business in accordance with this Agreement and further decisions and
agreements of the Parties. For such purpose, the Parties and, if applicable, their respective Subsidiaries, will enter into one or several license agreements substantially in the form attached as Exhibit 3. 

In case of transfer of the title and ownership in any and all intellectual property rights, from one Party (or its Subsidiaries) to the other
(or its Subsidiaries), the Parties will take into account payments made pursuant to this Agreement, any license agreement(s) entered into pursuant to Exhibit 3, any funding by a Party (or its Subsidiaries) of such intellectual property rights
pursuant to Exhibit 2 and any ancillary agreement entered into as a result of this Agreement, in determining the final consideration to be paid with respect to such transfer. 

ARTICLE V 
 SERVICE MANAGERS
AND STEERING COMMITTEE 
 Section 5.1 Service Managers; Contact Persons 

  
 13 

 Within ten (10) Business Days from the date hereof, each Party shall appoint one person in
writing who will manage and coordinate all the activities relating to each of the Services (the “Service Managers”). The duties of the Service Managers shall include overseeing the implementation of the Services and discussing all
problems and questions with the competent specialists within the Party it represents and for promptly coordinating with, and reporting back to, the Service Manager of the other Party. Each Party shall be entitled to replace its Service Manager at
any time, provided that it shall notify the other Party of the name and contact details of the new Service Manager without delay. Each Party may also appoint a deputy to its Service Manager to assist and, if necessary, replace temporarily such
Service Manager in case of temporary unavailability. 
 In addition, each Party shall appoint one or more contact persons in writing who
will be responsible for supervising on behalf of the Service Managers the proper performance of all the activities and tasks in connection with a specific Service (the “Contact Persons”). The Contact Persons will be nominated before
the Services start to be provided and may be replaced by the appointing Party from time to time. If a Contact Person is no longer available, the relevant Party shall appoint a new Contact Person without delay. If no Contact Person has been appointed
for a Service, all correspondence shall be sent exclusively to the Service Manager in the interim. The Service Manager of a Party will inform the Service Manager of the other Party in writing of the name and contact details of the Contact Persons
without delay. 
 Section 5.2 Steering Committee. 

The Parties agree that three (3) top managers of each Party shall serve as members of a steering committee to supervise overall performance
of this Agreement by each of Parties (the “Steering Committee”). Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the three members of each Party shall be (i) the Group Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Innovation and Operating Officer and
the Chief Legal Officer of Nokia and (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel of the Company. Each Party shall also appoint one deputy for each of its members on the Steering Committee. The Parties may
mutually agree upon replacements of such members from time to time during the Term as appropriate. The Steering Committee shall work promptly and in good faith to take decisions relating to the products portfolio as set forth in Section 8.5 and
address and resolve issues and contingencies relating to, inter alia, (i) the identification, prioritization and monitoring of deliverables assigned to each Party’s teams, (ii) the specifications, acceptance criteria and due dates for
such deliverables, and (iii) resolving any potential disagreements relating to the Fee for Services in accordance with the principles agreed herein. 

The Steering Committee shall meet whenever necessary and no less than once a month during the first three (3) months following the execution
date of this Agreement and no less than once quarterly thereafter. The Steering Committee can be convened at any time by any member with five (5) Business Days prior notice to the other members and without any delay if there is a quorum. 

The members of the Steering Committee shall notify each other in writing (including by email or fax) at least five (5) Business Days ahead of
the next Steering Committee meeting of the items to be included at the agenda of such meeting. 

  
 14 

 The meetings of the Steering Committee may be conducted on either a face-to-face basis or via
video or telephone conference call, whichever is mutually agreed to by the Parties at least three (3) Business Days in advance of the scheduled meeting. The Steering Committee may also act without a meeting upon the unanimous written consent of all
the members of the Steering Committee (or, as the case may be, their respective deputies). 
 No action may be taken at any meeting of the
Steering Committee unless a quorum is present. A quorum of the Steering Committee shall consist of four (4) members, including two (2) members (or their deputies) representing Nokia and two (2) members (or their deputies) representing the Company.
Any action by such quorum must be approved by a simple majority, including the vote of at least one representative of each Party. 
 The
members of the Steering Committee shall formalize in writing the minutes of the last meeting for approval at the next meeting unless the decision has been taken by unanimous written consent of all the members of the Steering Committee (or, as the
case may be, their respective deputies) as per the previous paragraph. 
 The minutes of the meetings, and the decisions, of the Steering
Committee shall be provided as soon as reasonably practicable to the Chairman of the Committee of Independent Directors by any top manager of the Company which is a member of the Steering Committee. 

The Steering Committee may appoint one or more persons that are not members of the Steering Committee as secretaries for each meeting. 

The Steering Committee may decide to appoint Advisors to assist the Steering Committee in performing its obligations. The Steering Committee
shall ensure that both Parties and their relevant Subsidiaries may have access to the work performed by such Advisors. The Steering Committee shall ensure full cooperation with the Advisors and shall, in particular, grant the Advisors full access to
all documents, books, data, other information and appropriate personnel during normal business hours and on reasonable advance notice. The fees, expenses and costs of the Advisors shall be borne equally by the Parties and their
relevant Subsidiaries. 
 A quarterly report shall be prepared by the Steering Committee and shall be transmitted to the Committee of
Independent Directors and the Nokia Board for information purposes on the implementation of this Agreement. Such quarterly report shall notably include a summary of matters discussed at the Steering Committee, including a presentation of any dispute
referred to the Steering Committee during the previous quarter and the solution that has been decided and implemented, as the case may be. 

The members of the Committee of Independent Directors and the Nokia Board may have access, at any time (whether or not there is a Steering
Committee Deadlock), to all the minutes of the meetings, and the decisions, of the Steering Committee and more generally, to any information, data or documents, including audit report, work product of the Expert referred to in section 5.3.2 below
and of the Advisors appointed by the Steering Committee reasonably required to assess the fairness of the terms and conditions of the performance of the Services pursuant to this Agreement or that may be necessary in order to assess the matters
referred to it in the event of a Steering Committee Deadlock. 

  
 15 

 Section 5.3 Dispute Resolution Mechanisms. 

5.3.1 General Dispute Resolution Mechanisms. 

The Service Managers shall discuss any disputes that arise in connection with this Agreement without delay and shall endeavor to settle these
between them. Any dispute which the Service Managers cannot settle within five (5) Business Days of receipt of the written notification thereof shall be submitted in writing to the N-1 Leader of each Party who is responsible for the relevant
business unit in respect of which the dispute arises. 
 The N-1 Leaders of the Parties shall endeavor to find a solution acceptable to
both Parties for each matter submitted to them within five (5) Business Days of the matter being referred to them. In the event the N-1 Leaders of the Parties are unable to arrive at a mutually acceptable solution then such matter will be referred
to the Steering Committee for resolution within ten (10) Business Days. 
 In the absence of a quorum during two (2) consecutive meetings
of the Steering Committee or in the event that a quorum is present and the members representing Nokia and the Company cannot reach agreement with respect to any proposed action or decision (a “Steering Committee Deadlock”), the
Parties must refer the matter(s) causing the Steering Committee Deadlock (i) regarding Nokia, to the Nokia Board, and (ii) regarding the Company, to the Committee of Independent Directors. In the event an agreement cannot be reached by the Parties
within ten (10) Business Days of the Steering Committee Deadlock, either Party may refer the matter to arbitration pursuant to Section 12.13. 

Notwithstanding any dispute or escalation thereof pursuant to this Section 5.3, each Party will in good faith during the pendency of the
applicable dispute continue to perform the relevant Services so as to minimize the disruption or impact of any delays associated with escalation or dispute resolution proceedings on the Parties’ respective operations or businesses. 

5.3.2 Dispute Resolution Mechanisms for Product Portfolio. 

In the event the Steering Committee cannot agree on the value of the indemnity referred to in Section 8.5, it shall be entitled to appoint a
financial expert (the “Expert”) to assess the fairness of the indemnity allocated to the Party and/or its relevant Subsidiaries whose product is discontinued (the “Indemnified Party”), in accordance with the
provisions below. The Expert shall be selected by the Steering Committee among consulting, audit or other firms of international standing, with the skills and expertise to undertake such a mission and shall otherwise not be in a situation of a
conflict of interests with respect to either Party or its relevant Subsidiaries. Failing agreement of the members of the Steering 

  
 16 

 
Committee to appoint the Expert within ten (10) Business Days after the information received by the corporate bodies of the Parties and their relevant Subsidiaries at the level of product
portfolio management, the Expert shall be appointed by the President of the Nanterre Commercial Court on the application of the most diligent Party. The Expert shall be acting as third-party arbitrator within the meaning of Article 1592 of the
French Civil Code. 
 In assessing the fairness of the indemnity for a specific discontinued product, the Expert shall consider the MSA as
a whole and take into account the overall economic considerations between the Parties under the MSA, in particular the overall compensation to the Indemnified Party. The Expert shall meet with the Steering Committee to discuss its preliminary
findings within twenty (20) Business Days following its appointment. The Expert shall issue a written report stating its assessment of a fair indemnity for the discontinuance of the relevant product or products within thirty (30) Business Days
following its appointment. 
 The Steering Committee shall then reconvene and determine the indemnity on the basis of the Expert’s
written report within ten (10) Business Days after the reception such report. 
 In the event the Steering Committee cannot reach agreement
on an indemnity, the Parties must refer the matter(s) causing the Steering Committee Deadlock (i) regarding Nokia, to its board of directors, and (ii) regarding the Company, to the Committee of Independent Directors of its board of directors. In the
event an agreement cannot be reached by the Parties within ten (10) Business Days of the Steering Committee Deadlock, either Party may refer the matter to arbitration pursuant to Section 12.13. 

The Steering Committee shall ensure full cooperation with the Expert and shall, in particular, grant the Expert full access to all documents,
books, data, other information and appropriate personnel during normal business hours and on reasonable advance notice. The fees, expenses and costs of the Expert shall be borne equally by the Parties and their relevant Subsidiaries.

 Section 5.4 Limits of Authority. 

The Parties shall adopt a mechanism of limits of authority in connection with the decisions and actions relating to the sales/bidding process
of both Parties. To this effect, each of the Parties hereby grants a mandate to the Steering Committee to establish, validate or authorize such mechanism, including the type of decisions and actions covered, applicable thresholds and the identity of
the individuals with authority to approve such decisions or actions; provided however that such mechanism shall provide for a fair representation of representatives of both Nokia and the Company. 

  
 17 

 ARTICLE VI 

FEE FOR SERVICES AND PAYMENT 

Section 6.1 Fee. 
 As
consideration for the Services carried out by the Service Provider, the Receiving Party shall pay to the Service Provider an amount of fees (the “Fee”) calculated pursuant to one of the pricing methods specified in Exhibit 1
(a “Pricing Method”). The Pricing Method(s) used for each Service are set forth in Annex 3.1.1 to Annex 4.3. 

With respect to the “Cost plus” and “Cost Rebalancing” pricing methods described in Exhibit 1, any increase in
costs must be reasonable and consistent with past practice. Any anticipated increase of the aggregate cost of the Services to be provided by each Party or its Subsidiaries in excess of 20% of the annual budgeted costs (by reference to the combined
budget for the following fiscal year, except for the 2016 fiscal year combined budget to be adopted in 2016, in each case as approved by both the Nokia Board and the Company Board) shall be duly documented and agreed in advance by the Steering
Committee. 
 The annual value of the fees paid by each Receiving Party for all the Services shall in no case exceed 1% of the gross
consolidated revenues of the Company for the preceding financial year and, in the event the fees are about to exceed such amount, the Parties shall refer to the Board of Directors of Nokia and the Committee of Independent Directors of the Company,
respectively and, subject to the approvals of both the Nokia Board and the Committee of Independent Directors of the Company, increase such amount. 

Section 6.2 Taxes  

Each Party shall be solely responsible and liable for any duties, levies and Taxes, such as, but not limited to, income taxes, excise taxes
and sales and use taxes, or similar taxes that are imposed on such Party under applicable laws, regulations and tax treaties as a result of any contract and any payments made hereunder. 

A Party (or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) which is entitled to receive a payment hereunder from the other Party (or its Subsidiaries,
as the case may be) shall co-operate in completing any procedural formalities necessary for that other Party (or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) to obtain authorization to make that payment without a deduction or withholding for or an account
of Taxes or to make that payment with a deduction or withholding at a reduced rate. In the event that such a withholding tax is payable, each Party (or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) shall be entitled to deduct from any payment made to the
other Party (or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) any withholding Tax, as required under applicable laws, regulations and tax treaties. The withholding Party shall furnish evidence of such paid Taxes to the other Party (or its Subsidiaries, as
the case may be) as is sufficient to enable the other Party (or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) to obtain any credits available to it. 

  
 18 

 All amounts expressed to be payable under Exhibit 1 of the Agreement by the Receiving
Party to the Service Provider which (in whole or in part) constitute the consideration for any supply for VAT purposes are deemed to be exclusive of any VAT which is chargeable on that supply, and accordingly, if VAT is or becomes chargeable on any
supply made by the Service Provider to the Receiving Party and such Service Provider is required to account to the relevant tax authority for the VAT, that the Receiving Party must pay to such Service Provider (in addition to and at the same time as
paying any other consideration for such supply referred to in Exhibit 1) an amount equal to the amount of the VAT (and such Service Provider must promptly provide an appropriate VAT invoice to that Receiving Party). 

Section 6.3 Billing 

The Service Provider shall submit a quarterly invoice (the “Invoice”) to the Receiving Party within thirty (30) days from
the end of each quarter in which Services have been carried out in accordance with this Agreement. The amounts owed and stated in the Invoice shall become due and payable within sixty (60) days of the date of such written Invoice. 

Section 6.4 Late Payment 

Any payment required to be made under this Agreement that is not paid when due shall bear interest from and including the first day after
such payment is due at a rate that is three (3) times the legal interest rate (taux d’intérêt legal) and trigger the payment of a lump sum as compensation for recovery costs, according to the provisions of Article L.441-6
and D.441-5 of the French Commercial Code. Such interest and lump sum shall be payable at the same time as the payment to which they relate. 

ARTICLE VII 
 REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES 
 Section 7.1 Representations and Warranties of the Company. 

The Company hereby represents and warrants to Nokia that all the statements contained in Section 7.1.1 to 7.1.6 are true and complete in all
material respects (except that all statements that are qualified by materiality (including Material Adverse Effect) are true and complete in all respects, giving effect to such qualification) as of the date hereof (except to the extent that any such
representation and warranty is expressly made as of another date, in which case such representation and warranty shall be required to be so true and so correct only as of such other date). 

  
 19 

 7.1.1 Organization, Good Standing and Qualification 

The Company is an entity duly incorporated and validly existing under the Laws of its jurisdiction of organization. Each of the
Company’s Subsidiaries is an entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing (where such concept is recognized under applicable Law) under the Laws of its respective jurisdiction of organization, except where the failure to be so
organized, existing and in good standing when taken together with all other such failures, individually or in the aggregate, has not resulted and is not reasonably expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company. 

7.1.2 Corporate Authority 

The Company has all requisite corporate power and authority and has taken all corporate action necessary in order to authorize, execute and
perform its obligations under this Agreement. Assuming that Nokia has validly and properly entered into this Agreement, this Agreement is a valid and binding agreement of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms,
subject, as to enforcement, to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar Laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights. 

7.1.3 Non-contravention 

Neither the execution by the Company of this Agreement, the compliance by it with all of the provisions of and the performance by it of its
obligations under this Agreement, (i) will conflict with, or result in a breach or violation of, or result in any acceleration of any rights or obligations or the payment of any penalty under or the creation of a Lien on the assets of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries (with or without the giving of notice or the lapse of time or both) pursuant to, or permit any other party any right to terminate, accelerate or cancel, or otherwise constitute a default under, any provision of any material
Contract, or result in any change in the rights or obligations of any party under any material Contract, in each case to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective assets is bound, (ii) will violate or conflict with any Permit issued to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or (iii) will violate or conflict in any material respect with the Organizational Documents of the Company or any of the
Company’s Subsidiaries, or (iv) will violate or conflict with any applicable Law, except (in the case of clauses (i) and (ii)) for such conflicts, breaches, violations, defaults, payments, accelerations, creations, permissions or changes that,
individually or in the aggregate, have not resulted and are not reasonably expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company. 

7.1.4 Required Consents 

No authorizations, waivers, consents, filings, registrations or approvals are required to be made by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
with, or obtained by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries from any Relevant Authority, in connection with the performance by the Company of its obligations hereunder. 

  
 20 

 7.1.5 No Other Company Representations or Warranties 

Except for the representations and warranties contained in this Section 7.1, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries makes any other
express or implied representation or warranty on behalf of the Company or its Subsidiaries. The Company and its Subsidiaries disclaim any other representations or warranties, whether made by the Company or its Subsidiaries, or any of their
respective officers, directors, employees, agents, advisors or representatives. 
 Section 7.2 Representations and Warranties of
Nokia. 
 Nokia hereby represents and warrants to the Company that all the statements contained in Section 7.2.1 to 7.2.6 are true and
complete in all material respects (except that all statements that are qualified by materiality (including Material Adverse Effect) are true and complete in all respects, giving effect to such qualification) as of the date hereof (except to the
extent that any such representation and warranty is expressly made as of another date, in which case such representation and warranty shall be required to be so true and so correct only as of such other date). 

7.2.1 Organization, Good Standing and Qualification 

Nokia is an entity duly incorporated and validly existing under the Laws of its jurisdiction of organization. Each of Nokia’s
Subsidiaries is an entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing (where such concept is recognized under applicable Law) under the Laws of its respective jurisdiction of organization, except where the failure to be so organized,
existing and in good standing when taken together with all other such failures, individually or in the aggregate, has not resulted and is not reasonably expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Nokia. 

7.2.2 Corporate Authority 

Nokia has all requisite corporate power and authority and has taken all corporate action necessary in order to authorize, execute and perform
its obligations under this Agreement. Assuming that the Company has validly and properly entered into this Agreement, this Agreement is a valid and binding agreement of Nokia, enforceable against Nokia in accordance with its terms, subject, as to
enforcement, to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar Laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights. 

7.2.3 Non-contravention 

Neither the execution by Nokia of this Agreement, the compliance by it with all of the provisions of and the performance by it of its
obligations under this Agreement, (i) will conflict with, or result in a breach or violation of, or result in any acceleration of any rights or obligations or the payment of any penalty under or the creation of a Lien on the assets of Nokia or any
of its Subsidiaries (with or 

  
 21 

 
without the giving of notice or the lapse of time or both) pursuant to, or permit any other party any right to terminate, accelerate or cancel, or otherwise constitute a default under, any
provision of any material Contract, or result in any change in the rights or obligations of any party under any material Contract, in each case to which Nokia or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which Nokia or any of its Subsidiaries or any
of their respective assets is bound, (ii) will violate or conflict with any Permit issued to Nokia or any of its Subsidiaries, or (iii) will violate or conflict in any material respect with the Organizational Documents of the Nokia or any of
Nokia’s Subsidiaries, or (iv) will violate or conflict with any applicable Law, except (in the case of clauses (i) and (ii)) for such conflicts, breaches, violations, defaults, payments, accelerations, creations, permissions or changes that,
individually or in the aggregate, have not resulted and are not reasonably expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Nokia. 

7.2.4 Required Consents 

No authorizations, waivers, consents, filings, registrations or approvals are required to be made by Nokia or any of its Subsidiaries with,
or obtained by Nokia or any of its Subsidiaries from any Relevant Authority, in connection with the performance by Nokia of its obligations hereunder. 

7.2.5 No Other Nokia Representations or Warranties 

Except for the representations and warranties contained in this Section 7.2, neither Nokia nor any of its Subsidiaries makes any other
express or implied representation or warranty on behalf of Nokia or its Subsidiaries. Nokia and its Subsidiaries disclaim any other representations or warranties, whether made by Nokia or its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective officers,
directors, employees, agents, advisors or representatives. 
 ARTICLE VIII 

SPECIFIC COVENANTS 

Section 8.1 Authority and Direction. 

The employees assigned by the Service Provider to perform the Services pursuant to the terms hereof shall at all times remain solely under
the authority and direction of their actual contractual employer. The Agreement creates no subordinate relationship between the Service Provider’s and the Receiving Party’s personnel, even in the event Services are being performed in the
mutual interest of the Parties. The Service Provider is thus solely responsible for managing its personnel, which remains entirely subordinated to the Service Provider. The Receiving Party shall not have any obligation to pay any such person’s
salary, insurance, social security or any other amounts required by applicable Law or by Contract to be paid to or in respect of any such person by his or her employer. In the event that such a person should claim any such payment from the Receiving
Party in respect of the Services, the Service Provider shall fully indemnify, defend and hold the Receiving Party harmless from and against any claims deriving from defaults in payment by the Service Provider. The Service Provider alone is
responsible for 

  
 22 

 
any signature and termination of employment contracts with its personnel. In its capacity as employer, the Service Provider will be personally responsible for all wages, salaries, bonuses, social
security contributions, paid leave, management and more generally all of the obligations incumbent upon it with regard to its personnel. 

Section 8.2 Compliance with applicable Law. 

The Service Provider shall carry out or cause to be carried out all the Services in accordance with this Agreement and all applicable Laws.
In particular, the Parties shall carry out information and/or consultation of employee representative bodies in the respective jurisdictions where such information and/or consultation procedures are required under applicable Law in relation to the
performance of this Agreement. Each Party shall notify the other Party in writing promptly following its becoming aware of any change in applicable Laws that would reasonably be expected to materially affect the Services or require any Services to
be modified or discontinued. The Parties shall discuss and negotiate in good faith any proposed modification or discontinuance of any Service as a result of such change in applicable Law. 

Section 8.3 Cooperation. 

To the extent permitted under applicable Law, each Party shall, and shall procure that its respective Subsidiaries shall comply with the
terms and conditions of the Agreement and shall cooperate as reasonably required with the other Party and its Subsidiaries in connection with the carrying out and acceptance of the Services in order to minimise the expense and risk of interruptions
and disruptions. 
 To the extent permitted under applicable Law, each Party will provide and shall cause its Subsidiaries to provide to
the other Party and its relevant Subsidiaries, free of any charge or cost, any information, data or documents reasonably required for reporting or compliance obligations with any Relevant Authority. 

To the extent permitted under applicable Law, each Party will provide and shall cause its Subsidiaries to provide to the other Party and its
relevant Subsidiaries (at the request of such Party or its Advisors), free of any charge or cost, any information, data or documents reasonably required to assess the performance of this Agreement. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, a Party and its Subsidiaries (and their respective Advisors) may not have access
to any work product of any Advisor appointed by the other Party or its Subsidiaries in connection with a Dispute. 

  
 23 

 Section 8.4 Interconnection of Products. 

To the extent permitted under applicable Law, each Party shall assist, and shall procure that its Subsidiaries assist, the other Party and
its Subsidiaries to interconnect their products with the other Party’s (and its Subsidiaries’) products regardless whether they are already installed in customer networks or not. Upon request of one Party triggered by a business need,
the other Party (and its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) shall forthwith make available and explain to said Party all information available needed by or useful for the interconnection of said Party’s (and its Subsidiaries’) products with
the products of the other Party (and/or its Subsidiaries). The Parties grant each other the non-exclusive and non-transferrable right to use the interface information provided by the other Party to interconnect the other Party’s products to
their products. 
 Should the established corporate bodies of the Parties and their relevant Subsidiaries at the level of the product
portfolio management decide to discontinue a product according to Section 9.5, the Party or its relevant Subsidiaries having developed the discontinued product will assist the other Party or its relevant Subsidiaries to enhance the continued
products with product features which were available in the discontinued product. Upon request of the Party or its relevant Subsidiaries owning the continued product, the other Party or its relevant Subsidiaries shall provide sufficient
engineering capabilities to reach the above objective, pricing support and technical assistance in accordance with Exhibit 1 (Pricing Method 1). The Foreground Intellectual Property generated with such technical assistance shall be financed
and owned by the Party or its relevant Subsidiaries owning the continued product, as further specified in Exhibit 2. 
 Section
8.5 Product Portfolio 
 In the case of actual or potential overlap in the products portfolios of each of the Parties and their
Subsidiaries, the decision to continue or discontinue a product shall be vested with the established governance bodies/authorized managers of the Parties and their relevant Subsidiaries at the level of the product portfolio management. The Party
whose product is discontinued shall be allocated an indemnity calculated as set forth in Annex 1 Pricing Method 4. For the avoidance of doubt, such indemnity is not subject to the limitations of Section 10.2. 

The relevant governance bodies/authorized managers shall inform and provide the relevant information to the Steering Committee of the
decisions taken and of the amount of the indemnity and its hypothesis of calculation. 
 The Steering Committee shall review the relevant
decision to continue or discontinue a portfolio product of each Party and/or its relevant Subsidiaries. 
 In the event the Steering
Committee cannot agree on the value of the aforementioned indemnity, the dispute resolution mechanism referred to in Section 5.3.2 shall apply. 

  
 24 

 Section 8.6 Personnel Skills and Competence. 

The Service Provider shall allocate to the performance of the Services sufficient personnel with appropriate experience, knowledge and
competence, in each case to carry out or cause to be carried out all Services with the same degree of care, competence, skill and diligence and using or causing to be used substantially the same business procedures and policies, standards of care
and internal controls, to a standard which is equivalent to the standard applied by the Service Provider for its own internal purposes. In the event any individual employee or executive namely designated in any of the Annexes hereto becomes unable
or unfit to perform the Services due to, inter alia, dismissal, termination of employment, disability or change in professional duties, the Service Provider must ensure due performance of the relevant Services by other appropriately qualified member
of personnel. 
 Section 8.7 Third Parties and External Service Providers. 

To the extent that the provision of Services to the Receiving Party requires the consent of a third party, including a third party with whom
the Service Provider has a contract relating to the Services, or requires the consent of a third party to use or purchase from such third party any materials, the Service Provider shall use best efforts to secure such consent from such third party.

 The Service Provider may have the Services carried out by its own staff or may outsource the Services to an Affiliate or an external
service provider, provided that in case of outsourcing to an external service provider (i) the Service Provider has selected the external service provider with reasonable care, (ii) the Service Provider shall provide the Receiving Party with prior
written notice of each proposed external service provider and afford the Receiving Party the opportunity to object to each such proposed external service provider (such objection not to be unreasonably opposed) within a reasonable period of time
upon receipt of the aforementioned written notice and (iii) the Service Provider shall remain fully responsible for the performance of the Services in accordance with the Agreement. 

To the extent that the Service Provider uses its Affiliate or authorized external service providers, as permitted pursuant to the preceding
paragraph, to provide the Services to the Receiving Party, the Service Provider shall cause such Affiliate and authorized external service providers to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, as if the Affiliate or external service
provider were a party to this Agreement. 
 Section 8.8 Changes to Services. 

In the event a Receiving Party requires changes to be made to the Services, it shall send a change request to the Service Provider. The
change request must be submitted in writing and contain sufficient information so that the Service Provider is able to adequately assess the request. The Parties shall discuss in good faith if and under what conditions, including the appropriate
fees and starting date, the requested (changed) Service can be carried out. If the Parties agree in writing upon a proposed change request, the relevant Annex hereto shall be amended to include the terms and conditions of such agreed upon change.

  
 25 

 Section 8.9 Data Protection. 

When performing this Agreement, each of the Parties shall (and shall procure that its Subsidiaries will) treat, and cause its and their
employees and authorized external service providers to treat, personal data about individuals as confidential in accordance with all applicable data protection Laws. 

To the extent that any Party (and its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) processes any personal data provided by the other Party (or its
Subsidiaries, as the case may be) in connection with the provision of Services, the relevant Party (and its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) shall (i) maintain reasonable technical and organizational security and confidentiality measures to
mitigate the risk of accidental or unlawful destruction, accidental loss, alteration, unauthorized disclosure or access, and against all other unlawful forms of processing of personal data, in accordance with the other Party’s privacy policies,
(ii) act upon and fully comply with the instructions received from the other Party (and its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) in relation to the processing of personal data, and (iii) otherwise comply with applicable data security and privacy Laws.

 Section 8.10 Services Level Agreements. 

In order to measure the performance of the Services by Nokia and by the Company in relation to Services to be provided pursuant to this
Agreement, the Parties agree that the Steering Committee may, if it deems it necessary upon its review of such performance and recommendation of the Service Manager of both Parties, establish one or several services level agreements
(“SLAs”) and related procedure in case of non-compliance with any such SLA in relation to the relevant Services. The Parties expressly acknowledge that SLAs may not be defined with respect to each and every Service to be provided
hereunder, due to the specificities of such Service. 
 ARTICLE IX 

TERM; TERMINATION 

Section 9.1 Term. 
 The
term of this Agreement shall be twelve (12) months starting on the date hereof and shall be automatically renewed for an additional term of twelve (12) months, in each case unless terminated pursuant to Section 9.2 (the “Term”).

  
 26 

 Section 9.2 Termination. 

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9.1 hereof, this Agreement may be terminated (i) at any time by the mutual written agreement of the
Parties or (ii) by either Nokia or the Company, by providing a three (3) months’ prior written notice to the other Party. 

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9.1 hereof, unless otherwise specifically set forth in Annex 3.1.1 to Annex 4.3, the
Receiving Party may at any time, by providing the Service Provider with a three(3)- months’ prior written notice, terminate the provision of one or several specific Services set forth in Annex 3.1.1 to Annex 4.3, without prejudice
to article L. 442-6 of the French Commercial Code. 
 Section 9.3 Procedure on Expiration of the Term and Termination. 

The expiration of the Term or the termination of this Agreement or of the provision of a specific Service shall be without prejudice to the
accrued rights and liabilities of the Parties in respect thereof as of the date of such expiration or termination or that may thereafter accrue in respect of any act or omission prior to such expiration or termination and shall be without prejudice
to any provisions of this Agreement that are expressed to remain in force thereafter. 
 Upon expiration of the Term or the termination of
this Agreement or of the provision of a specific Service, the Service Provider shall return to the Receiving Party (and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) all the records and data in its possession relating to or arising out of this Agreement
or the provision of such Service(s). The Service Provider shall however be authorized to keep such information for its files to the extent necessary to comply with any applicable Law or internal compliance or record retention rules or as part of an
automatic electronic back-up system, it being specified that such information shall remain subject to the terms of Article XI hereof (Confidentiality). 

ARTICLE X 
 LIABILITY 

Section 10.1 Indemnification 

Subject to the provisions of Section 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 below, the Service Provider (in such capacity the “Indemnifying
Party”) shall indemnify and hold the Receiving Party (in such capacity the “Indemnified Party”) harmless from and against any and all losses, damages, claims, costs, expenses and penalties (a “Loss”)
suffered by the Indemnified Party (and/or its Subsidiaries) and arising out of or resulting from (i) a breach of any representations and warranties set forth herein and/or (ii) a breach of any covenants set forth herein (including relating to the
Services), by the Indemnifying Party or any of its Subsidiaries (other than in the event that the quality of a Service is not in accordance with the SLAs set forth in the relevant Annexes hereunder and the procedure described in Section 8.8
applies).

  
 27 

 Section 10.2 Limitation of Liability. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, the maximum liability of the Service Provider for Losses relating to or resulting
from the Services provided under this Agreement (including any penalties paid by such Service Provider in relation to SLA performance in accordance with Section 8.11) shall not exceed an aggregate amount equal to 100 % of the total aggregate amount
of the Fees payable to such Service Provider under this Agreement for all the Services rendered during the immediately preceding twelve (12)-month period. For the avoidance of doubt, the indemnity provided for in Section 8.5 shall not
be deemed Losses or Fees for purposes of this Section 10.2. 
 Section 10.3 Waiver of Consequential Damages. 

To the extent permitted by applicable Law, each of Nokia and the Company expressly waives (and shall procure that its Subsidiaries waive) any
right to consequential, indirect (dommages indirects), punitive or similar damages, lost opportunities (perte d’une chance) or lost profits (manque à gagner) for any cause arising out of or relating to this
Agreement. 
 Section 10.4 Gross Negligence and Willful Misconduct. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, the limitations provided in Section 10.1 and Section 10.2 shall not apply in case
of gross negligence (faute lourde), willful misconduct (faute intentionnelle) or fraud. 
 ARTICLE XI 

CONFIDENTIALITY 
 Each
Party will, and will cause its Subsidiaries to, hold and will use its best efforts to cause their respective members, partners, officers, directors, employees, any external service provider providing Services and other agents to hold, in confidence
and with the same level of protection as such Party’s own most confidential documents, all documents and information concerning the other Party or its Subsidiaries furnished to or accessed by such Party or its Subsidiaries in connection with
the operations contemplated by this Agreement (the “Confidential Information”), except to the extent that such information can be shown to have been previously in the public domain through no fault of such Party or later lawfully
acquired by such Party on a non-confidential basis from sources other than the other Party or any of its Subsidiaries; provided, however, that such Party may disclose such information in connection with the operations contemplated by
this Agreement to the members, partners, officers, directors, employees, third parties providing Services and other agents of such Party or its Subsidiaries on a need to know basis so long as such persons are informed by such Party of the
confidential nature of such information and are directed by such Party to keep such information confidential and not to use it for any purpose other than its intended use; and, provided further that if any person described in the
immediately preceding proviso breaches its confidentiality obligations, the Party to whom the disclosure is attributable will inform the other Party and will take all necessary steps at the request of such other Party to enforce such obligation.

  
 28 

 Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Party may disclose such information if (i) compelled to
disclose by judicial or administrative process or by other requirements of applicable Law or (ii) it is necessary, in the opinion of counsel, to establish such Party’s position in any litigation or any arbitration or other proceeding based upon
or in connection with the subject matter of this Agreement. Prior to any disclosure pursuant to the preceding sentence, the disclosing Party shall give reasonable prior notice to the other Party of such intended disclosure and, if requested by such
other Party, shall use all reasonable efforts to obtain a protective order or similar protection for such information or data (at the expense of such other Party) and shall otherwise disclose such information and data to the extent and only to the
extent necessary, in the opinion of counsel, to comply with any applicable rule, regulation or policy of a governmental entity or securities exchange. 

ARTICLE XII 
 MISCELLANEOUS

 Section 12.1 Force majeure. 

The Parties shall not be liable for non-performance of, or any total or partial non-compliance with, their contractual obligations (except
for the payment of money) if such non-performance or non-compliance is the result of an event of Force Majeure. Events of force majeure shall have the meaning set forth in Article 1148 of the French Civil Code as construed by French Courts from time
to time (the “Force Majeure”). 
 Upon the occurrence of an event of Force Majeure, the Party affected by it shall
promptly notify the other Party in writing of the nature of such Force Majeure event, the estimated extent and duration of its inability to perform its obligations under this Agreement. Upon the cessation of the event of Force Majeure, the affected
Party shall promptly notify the other Party in writing of such cessation. The affected Party shall use its best efforts to limit the period during which it cannot perform its obligations due to such Force Majeure and the effect of such Force
Majeure on the performance of such obligations. 
 Section 12.2 Specific Performance. 

Each Party agrees that it could be irreparably injured by a breach of the Agreement by the other Party, that money damages will not be an
adequate and/or fully sufficient remedy for any breach of this Agreement and that, in addition to all other remedies available at Law, each Party shall be entitled to injunctive relief and specific performance as a remedy for any such breach, each
Party hereby irrevocably waiving any contradicting right in that respect under Article 1142 of the French Civil Code (Code civil), to the extent permissible under applicable Law. 

  
 29 

 Section 12.3 Amendment and Waiver. 

Any provision of this Agreement may be amended or waived if, and only if, such amendment or waiver is in writing and signed, in the case of
an amendment, by each of the Parties, or in the case of a waiver, by the Party or Parties against whom the waiver is to be effective. No failure or delay by any Party in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver
thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege. 

Section 12.4 Assignment. 

Without prejudice to the right of the Service Provider to have the Services carried out by Subsidiaries or authorized external service
providers pursuant to Section 8.7, neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations under this Agreement may be assigned, in whole or in part, by any of the Parties (whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior
written consent of the other Party. Any attempted or purported assignment in violation of the preceding sentence shall be null and void and of no effect whatsoever. Subject to the immediately preceding provisions of this Section 12.4, this Agreement
shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the Parties and their respective permitted successors and assigns. 

Section 12.5 Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries. 

This Agreement (including any Annexes hereto) constitutes the entire agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all
other prior agreements, understandings, representations and warranties between the Parties, in each case whether, with respect to such matters. This Agreement is not intended to, and does not confer upon any Person other than the Parties any rights
or remedies hereunder. If required in certain jurisdictions under applicable local Law, separate services agreements related to the subject matters hereof will be entered into by and among the Parties and/or their Subsidiaries incorporated in such
jurisdictions. 
 Without limiting the foregoing, and from the date hereof, the Parties shall, and shall cause their respective
Subsidiaries, to the extent such Subsidiary provides or benefits from the Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, to adopt the governance and escalation procedures set forth in Article V in order to govern all matters, decisions and actions
relating to this Agreement and the Services provided herein, which shall supersede any specific governance rules established at the level of the Parties and their Subsidiaries in relation to the same subject matters. 

Section 12.6 Severability. 

The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable and the invalidity or unenforceability of any term or condition shall
not affect the validity or enforceability of the other terms or conditions hereof. If any term or condition of this Agreement (or any portion thereof), or the 

  
 30 

 
application of any such term or condition (or any portion thereof) to any Person or any circumstance, is invalid or unenforceable, (i) a suitable provision shall be substituted therefor in order
to carry out, so far as may not affect the interests of the Party(ies) concerned, as applicable, be valid and enforceable, the intent and purpose of such invalid or unenforceable provision or portion thereof and (ii) the remainder of this Agreement
and the application of such term or condition to other Persons or circumstances shall not be affected by such invalidity or unenforceability, nor shall such invalidity or unenforceability affect the validity or enforceability of such term or
condition, or the application thereof, in any other jurisdiction. 
 Section 12.7 Headings. 

The Article, Section and paragraph headings and table of contents contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not
in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 
 Section 12.8 Expenses. 

Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be paid by the Party incurring such expenses. 
 Section 12.9 Remedies. 

Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, any and all remedies expressly conferred upon a Party to this Agreement shall be
cumulative with, and not exclusive of, any other remedy contained in this Agreement. The exercise by a Party to this Agreement of any one remedy shall not preclude the exercise by it of any other remedy. 

Section 12.10 Privilege. 

To the extent that any confidential information exchanged between the Parties in connection with this Agreement is covered or protected by
legal advice, litigation, common interest or any other applicable privilege or doctrine, disclosure of such confidential information to a Party or its representatives does not constitute a waiver of any such privilege. Each Party agrees to assert
all such privileges in opposition to any request for disclosure of confidential information propounded by any third party. 
 Section 12.11
Notices. 
 All notices or other communications hereunder shall be deemed to have been duly given and made if in writing and if
served by personal delivery upon the Party for whom it is intended, if delivered by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or by an international courier service, or 

  
 31 

 
if sent by email (provided that written confirmation of receipt of email is issued to the sender of the notice), and a hard copy of such notice is also delivered by international courier
service one (1) Business Day after transmission to the Person at the address set forth below, or such other individual, or such other address as may be designated in writing hereafter, in the same manner, by such Person: 

If to Nokia: 
 Nokia Corporation

 Karaportti 3 
 02610 Espoo

 Finland 
 Attn: Chief Legal
Officer 
           Maria Varsellona 

Email: maria.varsellona@nokia.com 

With a copy to (which shall not constitute a notice to Nokia): 

Nokia Corporation 
 Karaportti 3

 02610 Espoo 
 Finland 

Attn: 
 If to the Company: 

Alcatel Lucent 
 148/150 route
de la Reine 
 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt 

France 
 Attn: Chief Financial
Officer 
          Jean Raby 

Email: jean.raby@alcatel-lucent.com 

With a copy to (which shall not constitute a notice to the Company): 

Alcatel Lucent 
 148/150 route
de la Reine 
 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt 

France 
 Attn: General Counsel

          Barbara Larsen 

Email: barbara.larsen@alcatel-lucent.com 

Any notice given by mail or international courier service shall be effective when delivered. Any notice given by email after 17:00 (in the
place of receipt) on a Business Day or on a day that is not a Business Day shall be deemed received on the following Business Day. 

  
 32 

 Section 12.12 Governing Law. 

This Agreement shall be exclusively governed by and construed in accordance with the Laws of France, without regard to principles of
conflicts of law. 
 Section 12.13 Jurisdiction. 

The Parties undertake to use their best efforts to try to settle amicably any dispute, controversy or claim (including any non-contractual
claim) arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or the breach, termination or validity thereof (a “Dispute”). Therefore, before referring to arbitration any Party must notify by registered mail to the other Party its wish
to try to settle amicably the Dispute. Such notice shall include description of the Dispute and any documents reasonably available to such Party and related thereto. The Parties undertake to involve the higher level of their management to try to
settle amicably the Dispute. 
 Failing an amicable settlement within three (3) weeks of the receipt of the above-mentioned notification,
the Dispute shall be finally settled by arbitration under the rules administered by the International Court of Arbitration (the “Court”) of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) then in effect (the
“Rules”), except as modified herein. The seat of arbitration shall be London, United Kingdom. The language of the arbitration shall be English, provided that documents or testimony may be submitted in another language if a
translation is provided. 
 In an arbitration the following shall apply: 

 

	 	(i)	The arbitration shall be conducted by three arbitrators (the “Tribunal”) appointed in accordance with the Rules, and the Parties intend for the ICC Court to strictly enforce the relevant time periods in
order to promptly constitute the Tribunal. The Terms of Reference (as defined in the Rules) shall be signed by the Tribunal and the Parties as expeditiously as possible but no later than twenty (20) Business Days after the confirmation of the
appointment of the third arbitrator, subject to extension by the ICC Court. The Parties further direct the Tribunal to establish a strict timetable for the proceedings and generally conduct the arbitration as expeditiously as practicable, without
prejudice to the disclosure rights of the Parties, in order to ensure a prompt resolution of any Dispute. 

  

	 	(ii)	The award shall be rendered by the Tribunal as expeditiously as possible after the close of the hearing and in any event no later than eighteen (18) months as from the date of the filing of the Request for Arbitration
(as defined in the Rules); provided, however, that the Tribunal may seek an extension of such time limit from the ICC Court for good cause. The award rendered by the
Tribunal shall be final and binding on the Parties and enforceable against such Parties and their assets in any court of competent jurisdiction. 

  
 33 

	 	(iii)	By agreeing to arbitration, the Parties do not intend to deprive any competent court or the ICC Emergency Arbitrator of the jurisdiction to issue a pre-arbitral injunction, pre-arbitral attachment, or other order in aid
of arbitration proceedings and the enforcement of any award. In any such judicial action: (i) each of the Parties irrevocably and unconditionally consents and submits to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the Courts of France; and (ii) each
Party irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent it may effectively do so, any objection to the jurisdiction of such courts. The Parties agree that the Party seeking interim relief or the enforcement of the award may do so in the forum of its choice.

  

	 	(iv)	Without prejudice to such provisional remedies as may be available under the jurisdiction of a court or the ICC Emergency Arbitrator, the Tribunal shall have full authority to grant provisional remedies and to direct
the Parties to request that any court modify or vacate any temporary or preliminary relief issued by such court, and to award damages for the failure of any party to respect the Tribunal’s orders to that effect. The arbitrators also shall be
entitled to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement and to award monetary damages and other remedies pursuant to this Agreement or applicable Law. 

 

	 	(v)	Costs shall be awarded in accordance with the Rules. 

  

	 	(vi)	This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall remain in full force and effect pending the award in any arbitration proceeding hereunder. 

 

	 	(vii)	All notices by one Party to another Party in connection with the arbitration shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 12.11 except that no notice may be transmitted by facsimile. 

 

	 	(viii)	This agreement to arbitrate shall be binding upon the successors and permitted assigns of each Party. 

[signature page follows] 

  
 34 

 
	
	 Entered into in Paris, France

	 On January 8, 2016

	 In two original copies

 NOKIA CORPORATION 
  

			
	By:	 	  

	Name: Riikka Tieaho
	Title: Vice-President, Corporate Legal

  

			
	By:	 	  

	Name: Hans-Jurgen Bill
	Title: Chief Human Resources Officer

 ALCATEL LUCENT 
  

			
	By:	 	  

	Name: Jean Raby
	Title: Chief Financial and Legal Officer

  

			
	By:	 	  

	Name: Philippe Guillemot
	Title: Chief Operating Officer and Sales Officer

 LIST OF EXHIBITS 

 

			
	Exhibit 1	  	Pricing
		
	Exhibit 2	  	Allocation of Funding for R&D Activities and Ownership of Results
		
	Exhibit 3	  	Form of License Agreement
	
	LIST OF ANNEXES
		
	Annex 3.1.1	  	Reciprocal Mobile Networks Management Services
		
	Annex 3.1.2	  	Reciprocal Fixed Networks Management Services
		
	Annex 3.1.3	  	Reciprocal Customer Operations Management Services
		
	Annex 3.1.4	  	Reciprocal Application and Analytics Management Services
		
	Annex 3.1.5	  	Reciprocal IP/Optical Networks Management Services
		
	Annex 3.1.6	  	Reciprocal CFO Management Services
		
	Annex 3.1.7	  	Reciprocal CIOO Management Services
		
	Annex 3.1.8	  	Reciprocal HR Management Services
		
	Annex 3.1.9	  	Reciprocal Corporate Strategy and Development (CSD) Management Services
		
	Annex 3.1.10	  	Reciprocal MCA Management Services

			
		
	Annex 3.1.11	  	Reciprocal Legal & Compliance Management Services
		
	Annex 3.1.12	  	Reciprocal Tech Management Services
		
	Annex 4.1	  	Reciprocal Create-related Services
		
	Annex 4.2	  	Reciprocal Innovation-related Services
		
	Annex 4.3	  	Reciprocal Sell-related Services

 EXHIBIT 1 - PRICING METHODOLOGIES 

*** 
 NOTE: A request for confidential treatment
has been made with respect to the portions of the document that are marked with ***. The redacted portions have been filed separately with the SEC. Three pages of Exhibit 1 have been omitted pursuant to the request for confidential treatment. 

 EXHIBIT 2 - ALLOCATION OF FUNDING FOR R&D ACTIVITIES AND OWNERSHIP OF RESULTS 

*** 
 NOTE: A request for confidential treatment
has been made with respect to the portions of the document that are marked with ***. The redacted portions have been filed separately with the SEC. Four pages of Exhibit 2 have been omitted pursuant to the request for confidential treatment. 

 EXHIBIT 3 – INTERCOMPANY TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT 

*** 
 NOTE: A request for confidential treatment
has been made with respect to the portions of the document that are marked with ***. The redacted portions have been filed separately with the SEC. Seventeen pages of Exhibit 3 have been omitted pursuant to the request for confidential treatment.

 LIST OF ANNEXES 
  

			
	 ANNEX 3.1.1: RECIPROCAL MOBILE NETWORKS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.2: RECIPROCAL FIXED NETWORKS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.3: RECIPROCAL CUSTOMER OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.4: RECIPROCAL APPLICATION AND ANALYTICS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.5: RECIPROCAL IP/OPTICAL NETWORKS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.6: RECIPROCAL CFO MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.7: RECIPROCAL CIOO MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.8: RECIPROCAL HR MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.9: RECIPROCAL CORPORATE STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT (CSD) MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.10: RECIPROCAL MCA MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.11: RECIPROCAL LEGAL & COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 3.1.12: RECIPROCAL TECH MANAGEMENT SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 4.1: RECIPROCAL CREATE-RELATED SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 4.2: RECIPROCAL INNOVATION-RELATED SERVICES
	  	
		
	 ANNEX 4.3: RECIPROCAL SELL-RELATED SERVICES
	  	

 These Annexes cover organizational objectives to be achieved as a general framework for the related Services. The
implementation of such Services may be subject to a number of conditions, including, where required under applicable law, information and consultation of employee representative bodies. On this basis, suitably adapted projects could be defined
locally in order to provide the Services pursuant to this Agreement. 
 ANNEX 3.1.1: RECIPROCAL MOBILE NETWORKS MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the Mobile Networks Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services are
described in Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Description of Mobile Networks Organization 

Mobile Networks (MN), to be headed by the designated president Samih Elhage, would include Nokia’s and Alcatel-Lucent’s comprehensive Radio network
portfolios, substantially all of the Converged Core portfolios (including IMS/VoLTE and Subscriber Data Management), Alcatel-Lucent’s Microwave portfolio, and all mobile-related managed, professional and attached service businesses. Through the
combination of these assets, Mobile Networks would provide end-to-end mobile networks solutions to service providers globally, including some of the largest telecommunications operators in the world. 

Aiming to combine the strengths of the current Nokia Networks and Alcatel-Lucent mobile business, MN would aspire to sustain and achieve an undisputed number
one market position in the mobile networks ecosystem, globally. To do this, MN would target leadership in its markets, along with sustained operational excellence, secure seamless integration of both mobile businesses, and achieve financial targets,
built on a culture of continuous improvement: 
 The Mobile Networks planned leadership would be tasked with delivering on this vision. The proposed team
has been designed based on principles of (i) end-to-end business leadership, including P&L ownership, and clear accountability and empowerment per function; (ii) business continuity and minimization of disruption during the integration of both
companies, and (iii) maintenance of Nokia Networks’ focus on business performance management. Each of the proposed units that would make up Mobile Networks play their own critical part in achieving the business group’s goals and would
functionally be described as follows: 
 The Mobile Networks Business and Portfolio Integration Leadership would partner with the designated
President of Mobile Networks in overseeing MN portfolio integration and customer adoption along with driving important integration matters across the current business portfolio and the future portfolio roadmap. This essential unit would take
specific responsibility for key Alcatel-Lucent customers to ensure their retention, while driving additional sales from the combined Nokia offerings, thereby playing a key role in both safeguarding current revenue streams and creating future sources
of growth for the business group. 
 The MN Products business unit would be fully accountable for the Radio Networks business P&L. The unit
would be tasked with driving Nokia’s leadership in relevant market segments (e.g. LTE) and with positioning the company to take a leading position in important new technology areas, such as 5G. To achieve these objectives, the unit would
develop market-

 
leading product offerings, guided by a deep understanding of customer needs, market dynamics and technology trends. The unit would differentiate itself from the competition in various ways,
including through a focus on end-to-end architecture, incubation, and research and development that would enable us to bring leading products and solutions to the market. 

The unit would ensure the delivery of product roadmaps on time and with industry-leading quality to fulfill and exceed customer and market expectations.
Equally importantly, the Radio unit would deliver best-in-class cost structure and would own the global lab, site strategy, and mode-of-operation across all product teams. 

The Converged Core Networks business unit would have full accountability for the Converged Core business P&L and would be expected to drive for a
leading market position in areas including, but not limited to, IMS / VoLTE, SDM, Cloud, and virtualized software / infrastructure. 
 The Converged Core
unit would also have a strong focus on quality as well as industry-leading cost structure, would ensure end-to-end system design and product architecture to deliver product roadmap on time, meeting or exceeding customer and market expectations. 

Global Services business unit would be fully accountable for the P&L in the Services business. The unit would develop the best-in-class mobile
services portfolio and the end-to-end delivery necessary to achieve industry leadership, centered around: service-led and professional services; the quality, skills, experience and customer-focus of its teams, and superior tooling, automation and
serviceability. The unit would include market delivery, Services business lines and global delivery; as well as functions related to delivery excellence and portfolio management, and company-wide shared functions including Managed Services, and
elements of the Global Delivery Centers. 
 Advanced Mobile Networks Solutions (AMS) would be accountable for the end-to-end P&L performance of
our vertical growth businesses, including Internet of Things (IoT), Mobile Edge solutions (Small Cells / Wifi), Public Sector (Public Safety / Railways), X-Haul (microwave & fronthaul), complementary solutions as well as MN-wide partnership
ecosystem development. AMS would have full ownership of the business, including product, services and solutions sales for these areas, and where relevant, develop new non-traditional go-to-market (e.g. enterprise, IT domains). 

MN Product Portfolio Sales and MN Services Portfolio Sales would directly contribute to sustaining Mobile Networks’ market position in existing
segments, and driving growth in new markets, through increased sales performance in terms of volume, size and market share. To this end, they would collaborate closely with global Customer Operations, develop product / services related competences
and drive cross-market knowledge sharing to deliver successful sales programs and cost-effective sales operations. 
 The Head of Sales of MN &
end-to-end Sales Solutioning would have similar responsibilities to the HoS for FN, ION and A&A, but would also be in charge of end-to-end Customer Solution Management, HoT and Value Based Selling, focusing on enhancing cross-BG sales, and
developing a world-class Central Shared Services Center (CSSC) including a bid-management organization. 
 The Chief Operating Officer (COO) of
Mobile Networks would ensure the seamless integration of the Alcatel-Lucent and Nokia mobile assets, owning the execution and value capture of synergies and transformation programs across all functions within the business group. The COO would
own and drive the MN business performance management, mode of 

 
operation and governance model, and ensure its disciplined, uniform and consistent implementation. The unit would also design, implement and deliver an end-to-end digital strategy and would
drive operational quality across all functions within MN. 
 Transformation would remain a critical function in Mobile Networks, tasked with
executing projects and programs to realize productivity improvements, operational excellence, short-and-long-term cost reduction, and waste elimination. The Smarter and RSPI programs would continue to be governed, steered and led from the MN
Transformation organization, as would long-term transformation capability development. Value capture (Color Books) and centralized program management across all transformation projects would also be handled in a uniform manner by Transformation.

 The Global Operations unit would own the integrated supply chain for hardware, software, services and data management. It would focus on
end-to-end connected and automated processes from order management to customer delivery for elastic, predictive cloud based sourcing, supply and operations. It would support new business models and collaborative processes, continuous delivery and
automated sales as well as the Industry 4.0 framework for Nokia operations. It would focus on speed, execution and time to market to increase Nokia market share and profitability. 

The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) would define and own the technology vision for Mobile Networks, and realize that vision through creation of an
end-to-end mobile network architecture to drive innovation into the roadmap. The CTO would actively engage customers, providing thought leadership and helping shape the evolution of the mobile industry, while working closely with research and
development and CIOO teams to drive innovation and translate industry trends into tangible product roadmaps. 
 Commercial Management would help
achieve Mobile Networks’ financial targets by achieving competitive commercial performance (e.g., pricing, margin, contract terms) for MN products and services, developing and executing end-to-end pricing and pricing strategies, providing deal
support to customer teams with pricing and project contract management, and ensuring price control through the Pricing War Room. Additionally, Commercial Management would help balance commercial trade-off decisions across Nokia Business groups
via the Nokia Commercial Committee. 
 Additionally, Finance, Marketing & Communications, Strategy & Business Development, Human Resources and Legal
& Compliance would be represented in the organization. 
 The Mobile Networks Finance unit would manage strategic business
controlling to drive business performance, provide decision support to the leadership and be accountable for financial planning, reporting and analysis for the business group. Within each business group, Finance would leverage centralized finance
operations for accounting, reporting and any other topics that can be centralized. 
 Marketing & Communications for Mobile Networks would be
represented by a “two in the box” model, given the size of the business and the considerable overlaps in the portfolio with Alcatel-Lucent. 
 One
of those proposed leaders would focus primarily on communications and the other on marketing, although both would be jointly accountable for the performance of the Mobile Networks MCA team and both would sit on the MCA and Mobile Networks’
leadership teams. The Marketing & Communications units would be responsible for Mobile Networks-specific product marketing; internal and executive communications; media outreach and industry analyst 

 

 
relations and other related activities to support the delivery of MN financial and strategic goals. These teams would also add technical depth to the company’s strategic messaging and
ensure a business-driven marketing approach, providing clear and impactful technical value propositions to the sales teams and wider organization. 
 Within
Mobile Networks, the Human Resources unit would provide strategic support for the designated leadership team and function as a business partner, focusing on people and talent management and organizational design for the BG. The teams would
support the BG leader and organizations, acting as the designated leader’s primary HR contact on actions and interventions in close collaboration with the regional HR organizations. 

The General Counsel unit would support Mobile Networks to ensure best-in-class in legal and compliance and have legal and contracting compliance teams
enabling the implementation of Nokia’s strategy with high integrity through business-minded solutions. 
 The Strategy and Business Development
lead for the business group would ensure closely aligned corporate and business group strategies and would be tasked with defining the strategies for the business groups while continuously challenging the status quo and providing strategic foresight
to the leadership. 
 The proposed nominations for the planned units described above are as follows and this would make up the leadership of Mobile Networks
to achieve the business group’s strategy and business goals. 
 ANNEX 3.1.2: RECIPROCAL FIXED NETWORKS MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the Fixed Networks Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services are
described in Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Description of Fixed Networks Organization 

Under the leadership of designated President of Fixed Networks (FN), Federico Guillén, the proposed Fixed Networks function would comprise the current
Alcatel-Lucent Fixed Networks business, whose cutting-edge innovation and market position would be further supported through strong collaboration with the other business groups. This function would provide copper and fiber access products and
services to offer customers ultra-broadband end-to-end solutions to transform their networks, deploying fiber to the most economical point. 
 The
organizational set-up of Fixed Networks is planned to remain largely unchanged and would continue to operate along the guiding principles of innovation, cost improvement, quality and reliable delivery to meet or beat customer expectations. 

In terms of innovation, Fixed Networks would build on its market leadership position and continue investing in cutting-edge copper and fiber access
technologies and transformation practices; all to continue to shape the market and to provide our customers with tailored and economical fiber solutions. 

Cost improvement would remain a key focus to maintain our leadership and profitability in this highly competitive marketplace. 

 Quality would continue being part of our DNA at all levels and in all parts of the organization. Fixed Networks
delivers millions of access lines and home devices per year. Therefore, providing the right level of quality in our products and services is an absolute must. 

The reliable delivery of our projects is a key differentiator vis-a-vis the competition we face in our dynamic market. Best-in-class supply chain and project
execution are key for our continued success. 
 Fixed Networks would be comprised of five product and services units, four regional business centers (RBC)
and four supporting units, reporting directly to Federico Guillén. 
 The product and services units would comprise four existing and one new
business unit 
 The BroadBand Access unit would be responsible for bringing the Fixed Access network products to market. The success of the business
would be centered on continuous innovation, product cost optimization, quality and market diversification in both fiber and copper solutions. 
 The
Digital Home unit would be responsible for the Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) side of the fixed broadband network – the network termination equipment in the subscriber’s location. During recent years, the main focus has been on
Optical Network Termination (ONT) devices for Fiber-to-the-Home (FTTH) networks based on any fiber technology. In addition to ONTs for residential broadband deployments, the unit would also provide specialized models for businesses and enterprises,
including Residential Gateway (RGW) and Internet of Things functions. By providing an end-to-end network solution, the Digital Home unit would ensure smooth and fast deployment. 

The Access Management Solutions (AMS) unit would be responsible for developing and supporting the network management functions needed to operate the
end-to-end fixed access solutions provided by Broadband Access, Digital Home and Cable. Additionally, the unit would contribute to the virtualization initiatives of our fixed networks solutions. 

The Cable unit would be a new unit, formerly housed within BroadBand Access. In order to thoroughly address the growth of FTTH solutions in cable
operators worldwide, this unit would be responsible for boosting the business in the cable segment. It would comprise highly specialized Product Line Management (PLM) and New Product Introduction (NPI) functions and would work with the support of
the Regional Business Centers and the R&D teams of the other three product business units to deliver best in class solutions to the market. 
 The
Services unit would be responsible for delivering all the product-attached services for Fixed Networks. This would include maintenance, deployment, professional services, multivendor maintenance, Extended Life, site implementation and outside
plant (SIOP) and Perfect Voice. 
 Meanwhile, FN would contain four Regional Business Centers: 

North America, Caribbean and Latin America (NA & CALA); 

Asia Pacific (APAC); 
 Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA);

 China. 
 The RBCs would function as the pre-sales and
delivery organization. They would cover the full range of the product and services portfolio and would co-ordinate closely with CO to provide the related subject matter expertise and ensure efficiency along the pre-sales, sales and delivery chain.

 Furthermore, four additional units would provide support across the Fixed Networks business group: 

 The business group’s COO would work in close collaboration with the CIOO organization on topics including
quality, security, supply chain, real estate/site strategy, IT/digital, advanced procurement, product lifecycle, Mode of Operation, GOPS as well as integration and transformation. 

The Network Transformation unit would be responsible for identifying the transformation opportunities among our worldwide customer base. The unit would
work closely with Bell Labs Consulting and the professional services practices of the four business groups in order to increase the pipeline of transformation projects across all of them. 

The CTO would provide technical leadership and insight across the business group to ensure future market and technology opportunities are fully
exploited. To this end, the CTO would closely collaborate with the CIOO organization. 
 A centralized Commercial Management unit would look after
commercial strategy, pricing, customer terms and conditions and related topics. 
 Additionally, Finance, Marketing & Communications, Strategy &
Business Development, Human Resources, Legal & Compliance as well as the Head of Sales would be represented in the organization. 
 The business group
would have a Finance leader to manage strategic business controlling to drive business performance, provide decision support to the leadership team and be accountable for financial planning, reporting and analysis for the business group.
Business group finance would also leverage centralized finance operations for accounting, reporting and any other topics that can be centralized. 
 The
business group’s Marketing & Communications unit would be responsible for BG-specific product marketing; internal and executive communications; media outreach and industry analyst relations and other related activities to support the
delivery of BG financial and strategic goals. These teams would also add technical depth to the company’s strategic messaging and ensure a business-driven marketing approach, providing clear and impactful technical value propositions to
the sales teams and wider organization. Further responsibilities would include demo creation, as well as business group-specific campaigns, C360 initiatives support and major events. 

The Strategy & Business Development lead for the business group would ensure closely aligned corporate and business group strategies and would be
tasked with defining the strategies for the business groups while continuously challenging the status quo and providing strategic foresight to the leadership team. 

Within the business group, the Human Resources unit would provide strategic support for the leadership team and function as a business partner,
focusing on people and talent management and organizational design for the BG. The teams would support the BG leader and organizations, acting as the leader’s primary HR contact on actions and interventions in close collaboration with the
regional HR organizations. 
 The General Counsel unit would support the business group to ensure best in class legal, compliance and contracting
support and enable the implementation of Nokia’s strategy guided by four principles – Integrity, Trusted Business Partner, Teamwork & Respect and Professionalism. 

 The Head of Sales (HoS) would be responsible for driving the global business and building a robust funnel
for the BG through our markets and would also drive programs leveraging the strength of extensive customer presence and respective BG RBCs, for cross-selling and upselling. In addition, the HoS would represent CO in BG LT and key BG
governance and commercial forums and drive co-operation between the CO and BG. 
 ANNEX 3.1.3: RECIPROCAL CUSTOMER OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the Customer Operations Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services are
described in Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Description of Customer Operations Organization 

The proposed global Customer Operations (CO) organization, which is to be headed by Ashish Chowdhary as the Chief Customer Operations Officer (CCOO), would be
responsible for customer interactions and driving the sales performance of all business groups (BG), except for Nokia Technologies. In addition, it would continue to manage the end-to-end Mobile Networks (MN) P&L on behalf of MN. CO is planned
to drive strong momentum across the business groups to position Nokia as the world’s leading vendor of infrastructure and non-infrastructure to both carriers and non-carriers (i.e. enterprise). 

The planned CO function would be set up with leadership roles designed to work together to create growth for each business group. The Market Heads, Heads of
Sales (HoS) – AA, FN and ION, Head of Sales MN & end-to-end Sales Solutioning, Head of Sales Global Enterprise & Public Sector, Head of CO Strategy & Sales Operations, and Head of CO Integration & Chief of Staff would form the
CCOO’s leadership. 
 For optimal customer support, the proposed CO organization would be organized around seven markets: 

 

	 	•	 	Asia-Pacific and Japan (APJ) 

  

	 	•	 	Europe 

  

	 	•	 	India 

  

	 	•	 	Greater China 

  

	 	•	 	Latin America (LAT) 

  

	 	•	 	Middle-East and Africa (MEA) 

  

	 	•	 	North America (NAM) 

 Each market is proposed to follow a common operating model and own the customer interface across all business
groups, except for Nokia Technologies. 
  

	 	•	 	The Market Heads would be responsible for the overall performance of Nokia in their respective markets, provide ownership of the customer relationship and drive sales in each BG. They would also assume end-to-end
accountability for the execution and delivery of all Nokia customer contracts in the market.

  

	 	•	 	The Heads of Sales (HoS) for AA, FN and ION would be responsible for driving the global business and building a robust funnel for their respective BGs through our markets. They would also drive programs
leveraging the strength of extensive customer presence and respective BG RBCs, for cross-selling and upselling. In addition, they would represent CO in BG LT and key BG governance and commercial forums and drive co-operation between the CO and BGs.

  

	 	•	 	The HoS of MN & end-to-end Sales Solutioning would have similar responsibilities to the HoS for FN, ION and A&A, but would also be in charge of end-to-end Customer Solution Management, Head of Technology
and Value Based Selling, focusing on enhancing cross-BG sales, and developing a world-class Central Shared Services Center (CSSC) including a bid-management organization. 

 

	 	•	 	The Head of Sales – Global Enterprise & Public Sector would be responsible for driving business with global enterprise customers. The role would focus on creating and executing a comprehensive
go-to-market enterprise strategy to drive new customer acquisition and increase the share-of-wallet of existing customers. The position’s responsibilities would also include acting as a growth engine to create new vertical segments to expand
our accessible market. 

  

	 	•	 	The Head of CO Strategy & Sales Operations would be responsible for creating and driving CO strategy as well as identifying and understanding the drivers of short and long term sales performance through
advanced analytics. The role would entail preparing appropriate analysis for management business reviews (MBR) and leadership (LT) discussions. Additionally, the proposed unit would include sales operations to support our sales teams by owning,
documenting and clearly communicating the SELL process in the combined Nokia while owning all sales tools. 

  

	 	•	 	The Head of CO Integration & Chief of Staff would lead the integration management for the CO and be accountable for successful integration activities, as well as ensuring appropriate culture and change
initiatives in CO. The responsibilities of the Chief of Staff would include supporting and coordinating CCOO’s participation in various forums and implementing special projects. 

The Regional Business Centers (RBCS) of Fixed Networks, Applications & Analytics and IP/Optical Networks would also be represented in CO. They
would function as the pre-sales and delivery organization. They would cover the full range of the product and services portfolio and would co-ordinate closely with CO Markets and Head of BG Sales to provide the related subject matter expertise and
ensure efficiency along the pre-sales, sales and delivery chain. 

 Additionally, Business HR, CO Finance, CO Legal & Compliance as well as Customer Marketing &
Communications would be functions represented in the CO organization 
 ANNEX 3.1.4: RECIPROCAL APPLICATION AND ANALYTICS MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the Application and Analytics Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services
are described in Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Description of Application and Analytics Organization 

To be led by designated President Bhaskar Gorti, the Applications & Analytics (A&A) business group would combine Nokia and Alcatel-Lucent’s
software, cloud and data analytics-related capabilities. This comprehensive portfolio would include solutions for communications and collaboration, customer experience management, network and service operations (including OSS), policy and charging,
service orchestration, network management, network security and analytics, Internet of Things (IoT) connectivity management, network function virtualization (NFV), cloud stack, and product-related professional services. 

A&A would house nine product and services functions, four regional business centers, and three corporate functions, reporting directly to Bhaskar
Gorti. This organizational structure would aim to: 
 Offer a comprehensive, modular and modern communications software portfolio for service providers
and enterprises; 
 Bring focus and specialization to product domains targeting customers’ most acute challenges; 

Accelerate innovation, maximize cross- and up- sell opportunities, and simplify customer deployments by leveraging common software modules and a single,
specialized professional services team. 
 The Applications & Analytics functional units would include: 

Analytics – providing service providers and digitalized industries 360-degree insights into users, network infrastructure and operations, usage
and/or revenue generation; fostered by innovative algorithms, advanced probes and a global Nokia analytical platform. 
 CloudBand – focusing on
cloud management and orchestration; enabling virtual network functions and a unified cloud engine. 
 Communication & Collaboration –
delivering a cloud-based contextual communication applications platform for service providers and enterprises to enable integrated voice, video, messaging, presence, file sharing and real-time collaboration. 

Customer Experience Management – enabling customer self-care, monitoring, device management, network and service performance optimization, and
network outage and security monitoring. 
 Network & Service Operations (OSS) – providing modern applications for service fulfilment,
activation, inventory management (physical and virtual), and service assurance. 

 Partners & Solutions – responsible for defining, validating, architecting, cross-portfolio,
and/or joint solutions with partners. Further responsibilities would include solution demos, sales enablement, and the certification of the broader portfolio and third-party vendors. 

Policy & Charging – establishing and enforcing business rules in the network to build and monetize personalized offers and enable new business
models. 
 Security & IoT – offering broad security solutions for service providers, this unit would host Nokia’s security software
suite (e.g., network, end-points, orchestration, apps) while also managing the partner on-boarding process and Nokia portfolio security certification. 

Services – offering software and system maintenance, as well as professional services such as design, consulting, integration and more. 

Additionally, A&A would contain four Regional Business Centers (RBC): 

North America, Caribbean and Latin America (NA & CALA); 

Asia Pacific (APAC); 
 Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA);

 China. 
 The RBCs would function as the pre-sales and
delivery organization. They would cover the full range of the product and services portfolio and would co-ordinate closely with CO to provide the related subject matter expertise and ensure efficiency along the pre-sales, sales and delivery chain.

 Furthermore, three additional units would provide support across the A&A business group: 

The business group’s COO would work in close collaboration with the CIOO organization on topics including quality, security, supply chain, real
estate/site strategy, IT/digital, advanced procurement, product lifecycle, Mode of Operation, GOPS as well as integration and transformation. 
 A&A
would further have a CTO, who would provide technical leadership and insight across the business group to ensure future market and technology opportunities are fully exploited. To this end, the CTO would closely collaborate with the CIOO
organization. This would include the development of common software assets, shared modules and tools supporting all A&A R&D functions. 
 A
centralized Commercial Management unit would look after commercial strategy, pricing, customer terms and conditions and related topics. 

Additionally, Finance, Marketing & Communications, Strategy & Business Development, Human Resources, Legal & Compliance as well as the Head of
Sales would be represented in the organization. 
 The business group would have a Finance leader to manage strategic business controlling to drive
business performance, provide decision support to the leadership and be accountable for financial planning, reporting and analysis for the business group. Business group finance would also leverage centralized finance operations for accounting,
reporting and any other topics that can be centralized. 
 The business group’s Marketing & Communications unit would be responsible for
BG-specific product marketing; internal and executive communications; media outreach and industry analyst 

 
relations and other related activities to support the delivery of BG financial and strategic goals. These teams would also add technical depth to the company’s strategic messaging and
ensure a business-driven marketing approach, providing clear and impactful technical value propositions to the sales teams and wider organization. Further responsibilities would include demo creation, as well as business group-specific
campaigns, C360 initiatives support and major events. 
 The Strategy & Business Development lead for the business group would ensure closely
aligned corporate and business group strategies and would be tasked with defining the strategies for the business groups while continuously challenging the status quo and providing strategic foresight to the leadership. 

Within the business group, the Human Resources unit would provide strategic support for the leadership and function as a business partner, focusing on
people and talent management and organizational design for the BG. The teams would support the BG leader and organizations, acting as the leader’s primary HR contact on actions and interventions in close collaboration with the regional HR
organizations. 
 The General Counsel unit would support the business group to ensure best in class legal, compliance and contracting support and
enable the implementation of Nokia’s strategy guided by four principles – Integrity, Trusted Business Partner, Teamwork & Respect and Professionalism. 

The Head of Sales (HoS) would be responsible for driving the global business and building a robust funnel for the BG through our markets and would
also drive programs leveraging the strength of extensive customer presence and respective BG RBCs, for cross-selling and upselling. In addition, the HoS would represent CO in BG LT and key BG governance and commercial forums and drive
co-operation between the CO and BG. 
 ANNEX 3.1.5: RECIPROCAL IP/OPTICAL NETWORKS MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the IP/Optical Networks Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services are
described in Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Description of IP/Optical Networks Organization 

Led by designated President Basil Alwan, who currently serves as President of IP Routing and Transport at Alcatel-Lucent, the proposed IP/Optical Networks
(ION) Organization would combine the current Alcatel-Lucent IP Routing, Optical Transport and IP video businesses, as well as the Software Defined Networking (SDN) start-up, Nuage Networks, plus Nokia’s IP and Optical partner and Mobile Packet
Core portfolio. IP/Optical Networks would continue to drive Nokia’s technology leadership, building large-scale IP/Optical infrastructures for service providers, web-scale companies, public sector and tech-centric enterprise customers. 

As part of the integration of Nokia’s and Alcatel-Lucent’s networks businesses, a couple of changes would be made to the current ION business group
design after the closing of the proposed combination. 
 The Wireless Transmission (WT) unit would move to the Mobile Networks business group to benefit
from relevant pre-sales, services, innovation and operations support. Moreover, the unit’s 

 
supply chain, procurement and quality functions would become part of the business group’s COO unit. Finally, the current CTO and Strategy function would be separated, with CTO remaining
within ION and Strategy moving into the Corporate Strategy & Development function. 
 Following these changes, the proposed ION business group would
consist of seven business units: 
 The IP Routing & Packet Core unit would develop and provide long-term IP routing solutions across IP core, IP
edge, Mobile Packet Core and IP/Ethernet metro networks. 
 The IP Routing Hardware unit would develop and provide the hardware elements of the IP
routing solutions. 
 The Optics unit would create Switched Wavelength-Division Multiplexing Optical Transport solutions for access, metro and long
haul. 
 The Nuage Networks unit would provide software defined networking solutions for the datacenter and beyond. 

The Video unit would provide solutions – both products and services – to enable the delivery of unicast video. 

The Network & Service Management unit would provide element, network and service management and SDN solutions for the IP/Optical Networks
portfolio. 
 The Services unit would provide deployment, maintenance and professional services for the IP/Optical Networks portfolio, excluding all
video-related services, which would be part of the Video unit. 
 Additionally, ION would contain four Regional Business Centers (RBC): 

North America, Caribbean and Latin America (NA & CALA); 
 Asia
Pacific (APAC); 
 Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA); 

China. 
 The RBCs would function as the pre-sales and delivery
organization. They would cover the full range of the product and services portfolio and would co-ordinate closely with CO to provide the related subject matter expertise and ensure efficiency along the pre-sales, sales and delivery chain. 

Furthermore, three additional units would provide support across the IP/Optical Networks business group: 

The business group’s COO would work in close collaboration with the CIOO organization on topics including quality, security, supply chain, real
estate/site strategy, IT/digital, advanced procurement, product lifecycle, Mode of Operation, GOPS as well as integration and transformation. 
 ION would
further have a CTO, who would provide technical leadership and insight across the business group to ensure future market and technology opportunities are fully exploited. To this end, the CTO would closely collaborate with the CIOO
organization. 
 A centralized Commercial Management unit would look after commercial strategy, pricing, customer terms and conditions and related
topics. 

 
Additionally, Finance, Marketing & Communications, Strategy & Business Development, Human Resources, Legal & Compliance as well as the Head of Sales would be represented in the
organization. 
 The business group would have a Finance leader to manage strategic business controlling to drive business performance, provide
decision support to the leadership and be accountable for financial planning, reporting and analysis for the business group. Business group finance would also leverage centralized finance operations for accounting, reporting and any other topics
that can be centralized. 
 The business group’s Marketing & Communications unit would be responsible for BG-specific product marketing;
internal and executive communications; media outreach and industry analyst relations and other related activities to support the delivery of BG financial and strategic goals. These teams would also add technical depth to the company’s
strategic messaging and ensure a business-driven marketing approach, providing clear and impactful technical value propositions to the sales teams and wider organization. Further responsibilities would include demo creation, as well as business
group-specific campaigns, C360 initiatives support and major events. 
 The Strategy & Business Development lead for the business group would
ensure closely aligned corporate and business group strategies and would be tasked with defining the strategies for the business groups while continuously challenging the status quo and providing strategic foresight to the leadership. 

Within the business group, the Human Resources unit would provide strategic support for the leadership and function as a business partner, focusing on
people and talent management and organizational design for the BG. The teams would support the BG leader and organizations, acting as the leader’s primary HR contact on actions and interventions in close collaboration with the regional HR
organizations. 
 The General Counsel unit would support the business group to ensure best in class legal, compliance and contracting support and
enable the implementation of Nokia’s strategy guided by four principles – Integrity, Trusted Business Partner, Teamwork & Respect and Professionalism. 

The Head of Sales (HoS) would be responsible for driving the global business and building a robust funnel for the BG through our markets and would
also drive programs leveraging the strength of extensive customer presence and respective BG RBCs, for cross-selling and upselling. In addition, they would represent CO in BG LT and key BG governance and commercial forums and drive co-operation
between the CO and BG. 
 ANNEX 3.1.6: RECIPROCAL CFO MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the CFO Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services are described in
Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Description of CFO Organization 

Under the leadership of designated Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Timo Ihamuotila, the proposed CFO organization would be responsible for all finance and
control activities, external and internal reporting, and capital allocation processes. The CFO organization would also oversee effective and systematic performance management in Nokia, together with the CIOO and in accordance with the Nokia Business
System. In addition, the proposed CFO organization would be responsible for investor relations, mergers & acquisitions and treasury. 

 The proposed CFO Organization would have six units mainly accountable for business controlling. Each of the
business groups – except for TECH – as well as CO and CIOO would have dedicated finance teams to manage strategic business controlling to drive business performance, provide decision support to business leaders and be accountable for
financial planning, reporting and analysis for their respective unit. In addition, the Head of CIOO Finance would help the CFO, CIOO and their respective organizations to drive the overall performance management process across the company. Business
controlling teams would leverage centralized finance operations for accounting, reporting and any other topics that can be centralized. The proposed CFO Organization would consist of the following eight core units accountable for corporate level
activities and finance operations: 
 The Corporate Controlling & Finance Operations unit would have both corporate-level finance activities and
would manage all centralized finance operations. The unit would be responsible for accounting, statutory compliance and the consolidation of financial statements. It would also manage the external audit process and be responsible for tax planning,
management and compliance, and related reporting. Centralized finance operations would include all centralized finance activities, including the current Nokia Financial Shared Services organization and management of the outsourced finance activities
on the Alcatel Lucent side. This organization would also be responsible for the finance transformation. 
 The Financial Planning & Analysis
(FPA) unit would be responsible for short term and long range planning, including annual interlocks between the business groups and functional groups, as well as consolidating and analyzing the latest estimates for the Nokia Group. It would deliver
all finance materials for Nokia-level performance management, including integration and transformation, and be responsible for the Nokia Group free cash flow controlling. FPA would be also responsible for the Nokia Group Enterprise Risk Management.

 The Treasury unit would ensure that the Nokia Group possesses sufficient and optimized financial resources at all times. The unit would also
manage financial risk; funding and corporate finance; structured finance; cash management and cash forecasting, and bank & rating agency relationships. 

The Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) unit would build up and run the M&A process, including the preparations for the investment committee for
all parts of the Nokia organization. It would be responsible for M&A business cases – built together with the business groups – as well as execution of all M&A and divestment cases. 

The Investor Relations unit would design and implement the Nokia Group’s financial communications strategy and manage content of quarterly and
annual disclosure towards the investor community. 
 The Pensions Investments unit would oversee the investments of the Nokia Group’s pension
assets. 
 The Nokia Growth Partners unit would be responsible for Nokia’s venture investments. 

The Internal Audit & Controls unit would ensure an effective and efficient internal control framework and compliance, with the right internal
policies, regulations and existing procedures, as well as reliable information systems. It would report directly to the Audit Committee. 
  

 The Head of TECH Finance would continue to report solid line to the President of TECH and dotted line to the
Nokia CFO. And, finally, the Microsoft post-closing projects and Alcatel-Lucent transaction stream would continue reporting to the CFO. 
 ANNEX 3.1.7:
RECIPROCAL CIOO MANAGEMENT SERVICES 
 1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the CIOO Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services are described in
Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Description of CIOO Organization 

Under the leadership of designated Chief Innovation and Operating Officer (CIOO) Marc Rouanne, the proposed Chief Innovation and Operating Officer function
would drive cutting-edge innovation at internet speed throughout Nokia, using the power of Bell Labs and FutureWorks to shape Nokia’s vision across the business groups. CIOO would also drive the combined company’s digital agenda through IT
and cloud in order to create an agile and collaborative environment for the company’s world-class engineers. CIOO would manage quality, security, manufacturing and supply chain operations, as well as real estate, data centers and laboratories.
The CIOO would be responsible for global procurement, the end-to-end transformation and integration of the combined company, and would work with the CFO to drive performance management across the company. 

The guiding principles behind the design of the proposed Chief Innovation and Operating Officer function were to create an organization, which would 

Put quality first, in everything we do; 
 Disruptively innovate
to drive profitable growth, by innovating holistically from technology to business models; 
 Create an ecosystem around procurement, leveraging the
external world innovation and assets to grow our addressable market, as well as contributing strongly to Nokia’s competitiveness; 
 Provide an
integrated supply chain and automated order management for elastic, predictive and cloud-based sourcing, supply and operations, supporting new business models and collaborative processes, continuous delivery and automated sales; 

Develop an ultra-lean company and accelerate rotation of investment and capital as well as transforming the company to a digitalized one; 

Have the ambition to provide an engaging and efficient workplace for Nokia employees so that working for Nokia becomes a desire, a privilege, inspiring
innovation to create and develop the portfolio of the future; 
 Have the ambition to shape the company with an operating framework for the Nokia Mode of
Operation, site identity and development, as well as saving employees’ time through efficient governance, meeting practices and workplace automation; 

Provide a strong performance management framework for the company in collaboration with CFO; 

Evolve our existing IT systems to provide open source and collaborative tools, apps and processes, operating in a cloud environment. 

Manage all aspects of security including health and safety as well as information, product and procurement security and associate the brand of Nokia with
security. 

 Therefore, the proposed CIOO function would consist of 10 units with a focus on innovation, IT, Global
Operations, purchasing, quality, health & safety, workplace resources, integration and transformation as well as operational management. 
 The
Quality unit would make Nokia a quality brand. It would be a driver of an immersive quality culture across Nokia and would be responsible for setting the industry benchmark. The unit would focus on Customer Perceived Value as well as quality
as a means to increase the business’ profit pool. The ambition is to change the industry status quo on quality of software, services and data. 

The CTO and Bell Labs unit would set Nokia’s technology and architecture vision, and shape the industry as a whole. It would leverage the power of
the Bell Labs disruptive research, and would integrate the FutureWorks teams to invent the future and drive unique thought leadership into standards. The unit would develop disruptive technologies, incubate these technologies into novel prototype
systems and solutions and then launch these via the business groups to generate growth and differentiation across the entire Nokia portfolio. The unit would also develop and incubate new business models, and identify promising technologies from
outside Nokia (e.g. from partners, start-ups and universities), which, when combined with organic innovations, would lead to new customer and market opportunities. It would validate commercial and technical feasibility in trials in collaboration
with customers and the business groups. It would also leverage and grow the Bell Labs Consulting function to advise industry players on commercialization, transformation and the outlook of the future ICT industry. 

The Innovation Steering unit would steer innovation externally with customers, partners and governments with the purpose of driving growth by
innovating holistically from technology to business models. The unit would initiate innovation projects when opportunities arise, stringently monitor our commitments in the field of innovation and make sure we deliver and gain the maximum benefit
from this early stage work. Innovation Steering would lead the delivery of and – where necessary – create innovation projects. This includes the development, maintenance and management of technical and business objectives including
schedules that match with expectations. In addition, it would manage overall program governance across multiple business groups and projects to deliver against commitments. 

The Procurement unit would shape the industry with Nokia purchasing power. Procurement would be embedded into our portfolio with deep collaboration and
open interfaces, securely and with high quality. Procurement would develop an ecosystem of partners, channels and cost structures, as well as co-define architecture. It would leverage adjacent markets like enterprise and focus on time to market and
total cost of ownership to allow market share increase. 
 The Global Operations unit would own the integrated supply chain for hardware, software,
services and data management. It would focus on end to end connected and automated processes from order management to customer delivery for elastic, predictive cloud based sourcing, supply and operations. It would support new business models and
collaborative processes, continuous delivery and automated sales as well as the Industry 4.0 framework for Nokia operations. It would focus on speed, execution and time to market to increase Nokia market share and profitability. 

The Global Integration and Transformation unit would make Nokia ultra-lean and accelerate the rotation of investment and capital. It would drive
integration through best practices across the company. It would balance the management of challenging targets to reach ultra-lean and to have the capacity to reinvest in future growth businesses, as well as to transform the company to a digitalized
one. 

 The Workplace Resources unit would be a key differentiator and retaining element for Nokia employees. It
would deliver a site strategy for the company, to enable and foster good collaboration, digitalization and information democracy combined with a strong cost base. Workplace Resources would also ensure Nokia has a competitive network of sites through
forming and managing a common site strategy for the company. The unit would be responsible for the evolution of the workplace to keep up with changing business requirements and creating the appropriate environment for Nokia employees to continue to
deliver world-class products and services. 
 The Operational Management unit would equip the company with a simple and collaboration-driven
operating framework for performance management, Mode of Operation and Nokia site identity and development. It would save employees’ time through simplified governance and meeting practices. Operational Management would also manage the
CIOO’s office including defining effective management practices for the CIOO function, and managing all external interactions for the CIOO, Marc Rouanne. 

The IT unit would drive and execute an IT strategy which would support the creation of new revenue streams and increase operational efficiency. IT
would also focus on new solution opportunities to ensure that customers (internal and external) have the solutions they need, when they need them, and in the form best suited to their requirements. IT would manage virtual labs, global and open
datacenters and would utilize appropriate technologies by exploiting open source and collaborative tools, apps and processes operating in a cloud environment. 

The Health, Safety, Security and Environment unit, headed by the Chief Security Officer, would manage all aspects of security including health and
safety as well as information, product and procurement security. The Chief Legal Officer and the Chief Marketing Officer would serve as executive sponsors for governmental security agreements and health and safety respectively. 

Furthermore, the head of Alcatel Submarine Networks (ASN) in its current set-up would also report to the CIOO. 

Additionally, CIOO Finance, Business HR as well as CIOO Legal & Compliance would be supporting functions represented in the CIOO organization. 

ANNEX 3.1.8: RECIPROCAL HR MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the HR Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services are described in Exhibit
1, section 7. 
 2. Description of HR Organization 

Under the leadership of designated Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) Hans-Jürgen Bill, the proposed Human Resources (HR) function would be responsible
for leadership & talent development, recruitment, workforce management and all human resources guidelines and processes. Human Resources will play a crucial role in developing a diverse, international environment with clear values and a strong
culture. 
 The guiding principles behind the design of the proposed Human Resource (HR) function were to create an organization, which would 

Provide a strong interface to the Business Groups to adequately manage the different business needs and requirements 

 Reflect the new geographic footprint of the combined organization 

Limit disruption throughout the transition to a minimum 

Therefore, the proposed HR function was designed around four main pillars: 

HR Operations would continue to deliver shared services for all employees and be their first point of contact. The unit would further provide global
concepts, policies and tools as framework for HR related to standard employment processes. 
 The Business Human Resources (BHR) teams would provide
strategic support for Top Management and function as a business partner focusing on people and talent management and organizational design for their assigned business group or global functions. The teams would support the assigned organisations
leader and organisations, acting as the leader’s primary HR contact on actions and interventions in close collaboration with the regional HR organizations. 

Designed to match the new geographic footprint of the combined workforce, HR Regions and HR Region Americas would provide operational support to
all line managers and, on the basis of advice given by the employment legal team, be responsible for the implementation of Nokia’s policies, procedures and guidelines in line with respective employment law and Nokia’s country strategy.
They would focus on the development of our people and help line managers to build effective teams. 
 The Centre of Expertise would provide HR
Thought Leadership and drive leading global HR practices and processes for Nokia by applying deep HR functional domain knowledge, a strong understanding of business imperatives, and market trends. 

In addition to these four pillars, Academy/University would lead the Learning function for Nokia employees and Nokia customers, drive the alignment
with learning industry best practices and the strategic learning needs of the businesses and Nokia and ensure an effective and efficient learning environment. 

The Cultural Integration team would ensure the top leaders of the new company understand and are aligned on the cultural ambition of the proposed
company, and build collaborative leadership networks to facilitate change. 
 ANNEX 3.1.9: RECIPROCAL CORPORATE STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT
(CSD) MANAGEMENT SERVICES 
 1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the CSD Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services are described in
Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Description of CSD Organization 

Under the leadership of designated Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) Kathrin Buvac, the proposed Corporate Strategy & Development (CSD) function would be the
company’s forward-leaning “think tank,” responsible for setting Nokia’s vision and long-term corporate strategy; for market and competitor intelligence; for corporate development – including the prioritization of M&A
targets across the company, in conjunction with the CFO – and for strategic partnerships at group level. The function would also steer and integrate the business group strategy and business development teams and work with the CIOO innovation
team to ensure consistent execution of the company’s strategy. In line with our vision of the Programmable World, this would also include leading Nokia’s strategy for the Internet of Things.

 The guiding principles behind the design of the proposed Corporate Strategy & Development function were to
create an organization which would: 
 Define a company strategy for Nokia that is actionable, predictive for the next 10 years and disruptive, and that
continuously challenges the status quo; 
 Provide clear ownership for corporate development within the company; 

Identify and leverage strategic ties across business groups as part of the company’s strategy (e.g. evolution of networks, enterprise diversification,
Internet of Things); 
 Consistently follow the operating model of all Nokia Central Functions and other industry benchmarks; 

Be lean and increase its own capacity by working directly with all units of Nokia. 

Therefore, the proposed CSD function would consist of five units with a focus on business intelligence, corporate strategy, corporate development, Internet of
Things and strategic partnerships. 
 The Business Intelligence unit would be responsible for predicting the company’s long-term addressable
market, for providing deep insights on competitors and strategic partners and for performing continuous scouting on market trends and technology disruptions including their implications on the company’s strategy 

The Corporate Strategy unit would define Nokia’s long-term company strategy, identify and leverage strategic ties across the business groups and
identify and propose new areas for corporate development, including the development of strategic alternatives and the prioritization of the respective investments. Corporate Strategy would also own the company’s strategic planning process 

The New Business Development unit would serve as the single go-to unit within Nokia for the strategic identification and assessment of new business
development initiatives such as M&A, joint ventures, and internal incubation prior to execution. The unit would build the company’s funnel for new business development projects in tight collaboration with the business groups and the CIOO
and M&A teams. New Business Development would also work with Nokia Growth Partners and venture capitalists to provide an external perspective for new strategic areas of investment. 

The Internet of Things (IoT) unit would create Nokia’s strategy for the Internet of Things. The unit would develop and recommend “white
spot” strategies for new verticals, develop the company’s end-to-end IoT product portfolio and define the company’s reference architecture for IoT together with the business groups and CIOO. 

The Strategic Partnership unit would help to shape the ecosystem by identifying and building relationships with Nokia’s strategic partners on a
group level. The unit would manage major technology partnerships across business groups, strategic alliances for enterprise customers, cloud partnerships and partnerships for new verticals as part of the IoT. 

In order to closely align corporate and business group strategies, the Corporate Strategy & Development function would also contain four Business Group
Strategy and Business Development teams, corresponding to each of the business groups, except for TECH, and reporting directly to the CSO. They would be tasked with defining the strategies for the business groups while continuously challenging
the status quo and providing strategic foresight to the business groups. 

 ANNEX 3.1.10: RECIPROCAL MCA MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the Marketing and Corporate Affairs (MCA) Organization. The compensation mechanism for
these services are described in Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Description of MCA organization 

The proposed Marketing & Corporate Affairs (MCA) function, under the leadership of designated Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) Barry French, would be
responsible for all marketing, communications and corporate affairs activities across Nokia. This includes product marketing – in close collaboration with the business groups (BG) – management of the Nokia brand, regional and corporate
marketing, internal and external communications, industry analyst relations, government relations, and corporate responsibility. 
 The planned Marketing
& Corporate Affairs function would consist of ten teams and was built around the following principles: 
 Business-driven with a clear focus on
delivering measurable outcomes such as driving revenue growth and increasing employee engagement; 
 Efficient and committed to maximizing the value of
investments; 
 Visionary, helping to establish Nokia as a future-oriented industry leader and engaging in long-term market making for the products and
services of the coming years; 
 Engaged and passionate about what we do, working seamlessly together as one unit. 

Taking a closer look at the teams: 
 We plan to expand the
responsibilities of Brand & Strategy Communications from brand vision to also cover CEO and company strategy communications. The unit would thus be in charge of developing company-level content and providing guidance to other
communications units to support Nokia’s overall vision and strategy messaging. It would therefore be responsible for strengthening the value of the Nokia brand both internally and externally, online and offline. 

The Portfolio & Innovation Marketing (P&I) unit would be responsible for consistent end-to-end messaging for the company’s current
portfolio and ensuring that the company is perceived as an innovation leader. P&I would ensure that cross company campaigns such as 5G and IoT provide a joined up proposition to our customers while bringing together portfolio elements from
different business groups with a common look and feel. The unit would further drive the company’s competitive positioning by reflecting market evolution, brand and company strategy into marketing messages to set the scene for the future
business and to address customer needs holistically. 
 As the primary owner of channels to reach customers, the Customer Marketing & Communications
unit would manage effective and efficient outreach to customers and have the “feet on the street” in the regions to ensure both on-the-ground executional capability and provide feedback for the whole marketing team on customer
needs. This team would work with the BGs to prioritize campaigns according to regional sales goals; would leverage thought leadership – through the operator business strategies group – to open new opportunities and strengthen
relationships; would be responsible for the development of the C360 program and cross-marketing lead generation activities and tools, and would manage internal and external communications and regional media relations. 

 Representing each of the five business groups would be the Business Group Marketing & Communications
units, with the head of that team taking a seat on the BG leadership to ensure a tight link between the BG Marketing and Communication team and the BG business objectives. The Marketing & Communication units for the four business groups
comprising the networks business would report into the CMO. The marketing and communications unit of TECH would continue to report into TECH. 
 The
Business Group Marketing & Communications units would be responsible for BG-specific product marketing; internal and executive communications; media outreach and industry analyst relations and other related activities to support the delivery of
BG financial and strategic goals. These teams would also add technical depth to the company’s strategic messaging and ensure a business-driven marketing approach, providing clear and impactful technical value propositions to the sales teams and
wider organization. Further responsibilities would include BG demo creation, as well as business group-specific campaigns, C360 initiatives support and major events. 

For Mobile Networks, there would be a “two in the box” model for MCA given the size of the business and the considerable overlaps in the portfolio
with Alcatel-Lucent. One of those leaders would focus primarily on communications and the other on marketing, although both would be jointly accountable for the performance of the MN MCA team and both would sit on the MCA and MN leadership.

 Additionally, a Marketing Operations team would be established to provide shared services to the Nokia management and to all MCA units, including
support with marketing communications, events and demos, while running cross-portfolio customer and executive briefing centers. 
 The planned CMO
Office unit would ensure efficient management practices and would support the CMO in his leadership role. 
 The Corporate Affairs unit would be
in charge of managing all stakeholder relationships – with the exception of customers and investors – on a corporate level. To this end, the planned unit would combine Media Relations, Social Media, Internal and Change Communications,
Government Relations and Corporate Responsibility/Sustainability under one roof to ensure consistent messaging. The Corporate Affairs team would be responsible for running the internal and external communications councils that ensure alignment
across the company in both the messaging and timing of our outreach. 
 The Health, Safety, Security and Environment team, which has been part of MCA for
some years, would now become part of the CIOO organization, under the leadership of the Chief Security Officer, who would report directly to Marc Rouanne and who would be responsible for – among other things – managing security agreements
with both the French and USA governments, Nokia’s information and physical security, and employee and contractor health and safety. The designated CMO would serve as the executive sponsor for health and safety topics in order to support the
CIOO. 
 ANNEX 3.1.11: RECIPROCAL LEGAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

1. General Management Services and Compensation 

 Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the Legal and Compliance (L&C)
Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services are described in Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Description of L&C organization

 Under the leadership of designated Chief Legal Officer (CLO), Maria Varsellona, the proposed Legal & Compliance (L&C) Organization would be
responsible for overseeing and managing all legal, contracting, corporate governance, ethics and compliance matters across Nokia globally, as well as advising the President and CEO, Board of Directors and officers of the company in relation to such
matters. 
 The L&C Organization would be guided by four principles – Integrity, Trusted Business Partner, Teamwork & Respect and
Professionalism. 
 The L&C Organization would mirror the business organization, with separate legal teams supporting the business groups as well as the
CO and CIOO organizations. In addition, there would be legal and compliance specialist groups with global responsibilities for their expertise areas. Therefore, the proposed L&C organization would consist of: 

The four Business Group Legal units responsible for ensuring best in class legal, compliance and contracting support and enabling the implementation of
Nokia’s strategy in their respective business groups: 
  

	•	 	Mobile Networks Legal & Compliance 

  

	•	 	Fixed Networks Legal & Compliance 

  

	•	 	IP/Optical Networks Legal & Compliance 

  

	•	 	Applications & Analytics Legal & Compliance 

 The two Functional Unit Legal organizations
responsible for legal support for their respective functional units: 
  

	•	 	Innovation & Operations Legal & Compliance 

  

	•	 	Customer Operations Legal & Compliance 

 The Ethics & Compliance unit would be responsible for
Nokia’s compliance program and guidelines – helping Nokia employees in making decisions that are ethical, legal and consistent with Nokia’s values – and would also be responsible for compliance investigations and regional
compliance support. 
 The Corporate Legal unit would be responsible for corporate, finance and securities legal support and would also deal with,
for example, equity plans; legal entity management, and corporate & securities legal and records management. 
 The unit for Employment & Labor
would lead on all legal issues relating to employment and labor laws globally, including legal support on end-to-end global labor law issues. 
 The
Regulatory unit would deal with all anti-trust issues, data privacy and export control related legal topics. 
 The Litigation unit would
support the entire company in litigation-related issues. 
 The Mergers & Acquisitions Legal unit would be the primary legal advisor to the head
of M&A and support group-wide M&A activities. 
 The Operational Excellence unit will be responsible for excellence, efficiency and
standardization for legal processes and operations across Nokia. 
 The Chief Legal Officer would, additionally, be an executive sponsor of Health,
Safety, Security and Environment (HSSE), a unit within CIOO. 

 ANNEX 3.1.12: RECIPROCAL TECH MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

1. General Management Services and Compensation 

Both parties are providing management services to various teams in the TECH Organization. The compensation mechanism for these services are described in
Exhibit 1, section 7. 
 2. Desxription of TECH organization 

Planned to be headed by Ramzi Haidamus, current and designated President of Nokia Technologies (TECH), the business group would continue to operate as a
separate entity with a clear focus on licensing and the incubation of new technologies. TECH would continue to have its own innovation, product development and go-to-market operations while collaborating with Nokia’s Corporate Functions as
appropriate. 
 The organizational set-up of TECH is planned to remain unchanged. 
  

	 	•	 	The CMO & Brand Partnerships unit would remain responsible for all aspects of marketing within Nokia Technologies including brand licensing and managing the Nokia brand experience for all licensed product
categories to ensure consistent “Nokianess.” Through its collaboration with licensing partners as well as focused investments, the business unit would continue to provide differentiated, high quality user experiences while managing brand
marketing to build our long-term brand value. 

  

	 	•	 	The CTO & Digital Health unit would continue to act as the research engine of TECH. It would incubate new business opportunities by validating technology and business models. The unit would further continue
to develop rapid prototypes to test new innovations and rapid engineering processes to ensure efficient operations and implement technical standards of the Labs research. 

 

	 	•	 	The Patent Business unit would remain in charge of managing and maximising the value of one of the broadest and strongest IP portfolios in the industry. Having invested more than €50 billion in R&D over
the past two decades, Nokia has agreed terms with more than 80 companies for Standards Essential Patents (SEPs) and implementation patents. 

  

	 	•	 	Digital Media would continue to drive revenue growth in the Presence Capture and Audio businesses, bringing revolutionary user experiences to the market. For example, teams within the unit develop and introduce
new products like OZO, the extraordinary virtual reality camera designed and built specifically for professional content creators. The technologies developed by the team – such as 360 degree video and audio technologies – drive renewal and
long-term value in Nokia’s intellectual property portfolio. 

 Similar to the networks-focused business groups, TECH would host three
business-enabling units. 

	 	•	 	Finance & Operations would drive TECH-level business planning and control, and build and maintain fit-for-purpose processes, tools and facilities for TECH. 

 

	 	•	 	HR would manage HR activities and ensure that the HR offering matches key internal customers’ needs and market clock speed. 

Provisioning of information 
 a)
Description of service 
 COMPANY shall provide information on R&D capacity and competence as well as R&D/product-related technical and financial
information to allow Nokia to confirm, update and complement the existing plans. In particular, COMPANY shall provide detailed information about R&D capacity and reports in regular intervals the updated status. In addition, COMPANY and Nokia
shall exchange R&D related data to enable execution of portfolio plan and other plans. 
 b) Compensation scheme: 

The compensation mechanism for these services are described in Exhibit 1, section 8. 

 ANNEX 4.1: RECIPROCAL CREATE-RELATED SERVICES 

Portfolio Plan 
 Nokia and COMPANY shall take reciprocal
measures towards providing a common and non-overlapping portfolio, which consist of (i) R&D services and (ii) Process alignment. 

    R&D services: 
 Joint
Development of new products: 
 a) Description of service: 

Nokia and the COMPANY shall jointly develop new products and, in particular: 
  

	•	 	Nokia shall establish corresponding R&D programs; 

  

	•	 	Nokia shall manage the programs according to the Nokia NET CREATE process; 

  

	•	 	COMPANY provides R&D capacity and specifications of related existing COMPANY products, as well as market insights towards the demand for specific functionalities. 

b) Compensation scheme: 
 The Funding
Party (as determined by Exhibit 2) will compensate the other Party (the Service Providing Party, as per Exhibit 2) in accordance with Exhibit 1, Pricing Method 1. 

c) Related Products: 
  

	•	 	The joint development applies to products as defined by product portfolio management where both existing overlapping products are moved simultaneously into maintenance mode or where currently neither Nokia nor COMPANY
have an existing product. 

 Enhancement of product functionality 

a) Description of service: 
 Nokia and COMPANY
shall 
  

	 	(i)	Improve the functionality of their products with special focus on Lead products to allow mutual interconnectivity of products and to implement features and functionalities as per development plans. 

 

	 	(ii)	Support the development efforts of the respective owner of the Lead product by supplying specifications of the non-lead product as well as R&D competences and capacities which are required for the timely and
accurate implementation of the planned functionality enhancements. 

  

	 	(iii)	Moreover, the parties will assist each other to interconnect their products as further specified in the MSA section 10.4 

 Note: applies to the respective owner of a product, in particular the Lead product, and (ii) applies to the owner
of the corresponding non-lead product. 
 b) Compensation schemes: 

The Funding Party (as determined by Exhibit 2) will compensate the other Party (the Service Providing Party, as per Exhibit 2) in accordance with Exhibit 1,
Pricing Method 1.. 
 c) Related products: 

The support of development and integration efforts relates, with corresponding architecture specification, to products as specified by product portfolio
management where a Lead product in case of overlapping products is identified. 
 Alignment of all products with Nokia reference architecture and BICD
(Best in Class Design) specification: 
 a) Description of service: 

COMPANY shall align all products with New Nokia reference architecture and BICD (Best in Class Design) specification (both in Exhibit 2) and, in particular:

  

	•	 	evaluate the status of existing products against the reference architecture and BICD 

  

	•	 	plan for reference architecture and BICD compliance and execute the plan. 

 b) Compensation
schemes: 
 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1. 

Put products into maintenance: 
 a)
Description of service: 
 Nokia and COMPANY shall continue the planned development of respective non-lead products until the product shall be put into
maintenance mode according to the schedule determined by product portfolio management. 
 Then, Nokia and COMPANY shall in particular: 

 

	•	 	Stop new feature development; and 

  

	•	 	Provide maintenance services. 

 b) Compensation scheme: 

Compensation to be provided according to the pricing mechanism described in Exhibit 1, Pricing Method 4. 

c) Related Products: 
 The move to maintenance
mode applies to selected products as specified by product portfolio management, in particular 
  

	•	 	To a product where a Lead product in case of overlapping products is identified or 

  

	•	 	To products which will be moved to maintenance mode due to their lifecycle status or 

  

	•	 	To products which will be replaced by a jointly developed new product. 

 Enabling lab cross-use 

a) Description of Service 
 COMPANY and Nokia
shall enable lab interconnectivity/cross-use, establish common tools and processes as well as implement the lab synergy plan, and, in particular 
  

	•	 	Nokia shall provide Nokia lab management tool for cross-use and enhance Nokia lab tool capabilities/develop new features to improve the tool cross-use 

 

	•	 	COMPANY shall provide COMPANY lab tool for cross-use, provide support for tool functionality development and provide information for lab database. 

 

	•	 	Nokia shall provide the CAPEX purchasing process and COMPANY adopt the said process 

  

	•	 	Nokia and COMPANY shall plan relocations of lab equipment or ramp-down/scrapping of equipment as per the lab scenarios proposed and the R&D site strategy 

b) Compensation scheme: 
 Compensation to
be provided according to the pricing mechanism described in the Exhibit 1, Pricing Method 4. 
 Reallocating resources from one product to another

 a) Description of service: 
 COMPANY
shall reallocate personnel made available due to the implementation of the Portfolio plan and the R&D HC Plan. . 
 b) Compensation
scheme: 
 This service is provided, following compensation provided as described in Exhibit 1, mechanism 4.. 

 ANNEX 4.2: RECIPROCAL INNOVATION-RELATED SERVICES 

Research portfolio (incl. Future research scope (e.g., 5G), site strategy, lab strategy etc.): 

a) Description of service: 
 Includes services
required to jointly define, implement and execute research projects: 
  

	•	 	Company and Nokia to provide reciprocal technical services as ordered by the either Party(e.g. network compliance ~, security ~, reliability engineering services) 

 

	•	 	Company and Nokia to provide reciprocal R&D services as ordered by either Party (e.g. support of 10X, FX, EX resp. CAT1, CAT2, CAT3 projects) 

 

	•	 	Company to provide Bell Labs Consulting services to Nokia (i.e. offer market modeling, customer experience consulting, network strategy and evolution, and business strategy consulting to NOKIA customers)

  

	•	 	Company and Nokia to provide reciprocal standardization services (e.g. participation in 3GPP, ETSI, IETF, ITU-T standards bodies and industry initiatives such as OpenNFV, OpenDaylight etc) as ordered by either Party.

  

	•	 	Company and Nokia to provide reciprocal business feasibility validation/incubation/launch services as ordered by either Party (i.e. participate and contribute to joint incubation/launch product development projects)

  

	•	 	Company and Nokia to provide reciprocal architecture and technology vision services as ordered by either Party (i.e. participate and contribute to joint workshops and related projects) 

 

	•	 	Company and Nokia to review and define site and lab strategy (i.e. participate and contribute to the creation of a joint site strategy) 

b) Compensation scheme: 
 The Funding Party (as
determined by Exhibit 2) will compensate the other Party (the Service Providing Party, as per Exhibit 2) in accordance with Exhibit 1, Pricing Method 1. 

 ANNEX 4.3: RECIPROCAL SELL-RELATED SERVICES 

Processes and tools: 
 a) Description of
service: 
 Both Parties to optimize sales through effectively leveraging sales processes & tools e.g. portfolio management, pricing & LoA, bid
management.
 COMPANY and Nokia to continue to use their respective sales tools, whilst giving each company access to others tools. At the same time, both
companies will provide reciprocal services on to each other on the following process related areas: 
  

	•	 	Offer/Bid Management: Processes and tools within the offer lifecycle to be available from and to COMPANY and Nokia respectively. These offer/bid management tools and processes to include pipeline management, sales
forecasting etc. 

  

	•	 	Funnel reporting: The sales funnel data to be consolidated in an external business warehouse tool for reporting and analysis purposes. COMPANY and Nokia each to provide relevant data on bid-cycle metrics.

  

	•	 	Order management: Sales pipeline information, sales forecast e.g. orders, sales, margin, current sales operations 

  

	•	 	Customer Master Database: COMPANY to give Nokia information on current customers, with Nokia reciprocating, and a shared database to be created. 

b) Compensation scheme: 
 The service is
compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1. 
 Pricing data 

a) Description of service: 
 Nokia and COMPANY to
provide reciprocal access to information in the following categories: 
  

	•	 	Internal DBs: product masterdata, product costs and reference prices, MLP database etc. 

  

	•	 	Existing customer contracts disclosure: customer price book, price levels, price structure, any special arrangements/ agreements, and relevant terms and conditions 

Work on the new pricing approval process (LOA), pricing war room structure and mode of operation are currently taking place and will be finalised.

b) Compensation scheme: 
 The service is
compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1. 

 Account management 

a) Description of service: 
 Account management
is focused on creating commercial strategy for COMPANY and Nokia overlapping accounts in order to maximise business opportunities for both companies. In order to do so: 
  

	•	 	Nokia and COMPANY to provide input (current account plans, financial details etc.) for the creation of joint account plans. 

  

	•	 	Joint account plans to highlight risks and opportunities for both Nokia and COMPANY in the new organisation. 

b) Compensation scheme: 
 The service is
compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1. 
 Planning and execution of customer migration to new portfolio 

a) Description of Service: 
 Nokia and COMPANY
drive customer migration to new portfolio by planning customer-specific migration and execute the migration plan and, in particular, 
  

	•	 	Sell Lead products 

  

	•	 	Cross-sell non-overlapping products 

  

	•	 	Sales teams of each of them shall drive the migration. 

 b) Compensation scheme: 

Compensation to be provided according to the pricing mechanism described in the Exhibit 1 (Pricing Method 4)EX-4.4

 Exhibit 4.4 

EXECUTION VERSION 
 CONFIDENTIAL 

 
  
  

 
 FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT 

BY AND BETWEEN 
 NOKIA
CORPORATION 
 AND 

ALCATEL LUCENT SA 

DATED AS OF JANUARY 8, 2016 
  

 
  

 
  
  

 TABLE OF CONTENTS 

 

							
	 	  	 	  	Page	 
	 ARTICLE I
	   

	
	 DEFINITIONS
	   

			
	 Section 1.1
	  	Specific Definitions	  	 	2	  
	 Section 1.2
	  	Interpretation	  	 	7	  
	
	ARTICLE II	  
	
	GUIDING PRINCIPLES	  
			
	 Section 2.1
	  	Corporate Interest of each Party	  	 	7	  
	 Section 2.2
	  	Arms’ Length Conditions	  	 	8	  
	 Section 2.3
	  	Protection of Interests of Minority Shareholders of the Company	  	 	8	  
	
	 ARTICLE III
	   

	
	 RECIPROCAL SERVICES
	   

			
	 Section 3.1
	  	Reciprocal Innovation-related Services	  	 	8	  
	 Section 3.2
	  	Reciprocal Create-related Services	  	 	9	  
	 Section 3.3
	  	Reciprocal Deliver-related Services	  	 	9	  
	 Section 3.4
	  	Reciprocal HR-related Services	  	 	9	  
	 Section 3.5
	  	Reciprocal Marketing and Communication-related Services	  	 	9	  
	 Section 3.6
	  	Reciprocal Real Estate-related Services	  	 	9	  
	 Section 3.7
	  	Reciprocal Supply-related Services	  	 	10	  
	 Section 3.8
	  	Reciprocal IT-related Services	  	 	10	  
	 Section 3.9
	  	Reciprocal Legal & Compliance-related Services	  	 	10	  
	 Section 3.10
	  	Reciprocal Finance-related Services	  	 	10	  
	 Section 3.11
	  	Reciprocal Transformation Office-related Services	  	 	10	  
	
	 ARTICLE IV
	   

	
	 SERVICE MANAGERS AND STEERING COMMITTEE
	   

			
	 Section 4.1
	  	Service Managers; Contact Persons	  	 	11	  
	 Section 4.2
	  	Steering Committee	  	 	11	  
	 Section 4.3
	  	Dispute Resolution Mechanisms	  	 	13	  
	 Section 4.4
	  	Limits of Authority	  	 	13	  

  
 i 

 ARTICLE V 

FEE FOR SERVICES AND PAYMENT 
  

							
	 Section 5.1
	  	Fee.	  	 	14	  
	 Section 5.2
	  	Taxes	  	 	14	  
	 Section 5.3
	  	Billing	  	 	15	  
	 Section 5.4
	  	Late Payment	  	 	15	  

 ARTICLE VI 

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 
  

							
	 Section 6.1
	  	Representations and Warranties of the Company.	  	 	15	  
	 Section 6.2
	  	Representations and Warranties of Nokia.	  	 	17	  

 ARTICLE VII 

SPECIFIC COVENANTS 
  

							
	 Section 7.1
	  	Authority and Direction.	  	 	18	  
	 Section 7.2
	  	Compliance with applicable Law.	  	 	19	  
	 Section 7.3
	  	Cooperation.	  	 	19	  
	 Section 7.4
	  	Interconnection of Products.	  	 	19	  
	 Section 7.5
	  	Sales Channels	  	 	20	  
	 Section 7.6
	  	Personnel Skills and Competence.	  	 	20	  
	 Section 7.7
	  	Third Parties and External Service Providers.	  	 	20	  
	 Section 7.8
	  	Changes to Services.	  	 	21	  
	 Section 7.9
	  	Data Protection.	  	 	21	  
	 Section 7.10
	  	Services Level Agreements.	  	 	21	  

 ARTICLE VIII 

TERM; TERMINATION 
  

							
	 Section 8.1
	  	Term.	  	 	22	  
	 Section 8.2
	  	Termination.	  	 	22	  
	 Section 8.3
	  	Procedure on Expiration of the Term and Termination.	  	 	22	  

 ARTICLE IX 

LIABILITY 
  

							
	 Section 9.1
	  	Indemnification	  	 	23	  

  
 ii 

							
	 Section 9.2
	  	Limitation of Liability.	  	 	23	  
	 Section 9.3
	  	Waiver of Consequential Damages.	  	 	23	  
	 Section 9.4
	  	Gross Negligence and Willful Misconduct.	  	 	23	  

 ARTICLE X 

CONFIDENTIALITY 
 ARTICLE XI 

MISCELLANEOUS 
  

							
	 Section 11.1
	  	Force majeure.	  	 	24	  
	 Section 11.2
	  	Specific Performance.	  	 	25	  
	 Section 11.3
	  	Amendment and Waiver.	  	 	25	  
	 Section 11.4
	  	Assignment.	  	 	25	  
	 Section 11.5
	  	Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries.	  	 	25	  
	 Section 11.6
	  	Severability.	  	 	26	  
	 Section 11.7
	  	Headings.	  	 	26	  
	 Section 11.8
	  	Expenses.	  	 	26	  
	 Section 11.9
	  	Remedies.	  	 	26	  
	 Section 11.10
	  	Privilege.	  	 	27	  
	 Section 11.11
	  	Notices.	  	 	27	  
	 Section 11.12
	  	Governing Law.	  	 	28	  
	 Section 11.13
	  	Jurisdiction.	  	 	28	  

  
 iii 

 This Framework Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of
January 8, 2016 by and between Nokia Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of Finland, represented by Riikka Tieaho, Vice-President, Corporate Legal and Hans-Jurgen Bill, Chief Human Resources Officer, duly authorized for the purposes
hereof (“Nokia”) and Alcatel Lucent, a société anonyme organized under the laws of France, represented by Mr. Jean Raby, Chief Financial and Legal Officer and Philippe Guillemot, Chief Operating Officer and
Sales Officer, duly authorized for the purposes hereof (the “Company”). Nokia and the Company are each sometimes referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. 

W I T N E S S E T H: 

 

	(A)	WHEREAS, each of the Parties agreed to effect a strategic combination, pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding dated April 15, 2015, as amended on
October 28, 2015 (the “MOU”), with a view to create one of the leading global providers of telecommunications products and services in the field of mobile and fixed broadband, Internet Protocol networking and cloud technology;

  

	(B)	WHEREAS, in order to effect such strategic combination, in accordance with the MOU, Nokia carried out public exchange offers in France and in the United States (such offers, as may be amended from time to
time in accordance with the terms of the MOU, the “Offers”) for all (i) the outstanding ordinary shares, nominal value of €0.05 per share, of the Company (the “Company Shares”), including Company Shares
represented by American Depositary Shares (the “ADSs”), Company Shares issuable upon conversion or exchange of the OCEANEs (as defined in Section 1.1) and Company Shares issuable upon the exercise of any outstanding options,
warrants, convertible securities or rights to purchase, subscribe for, or be allocated Company Shares and (ii) the OCEANEs; 

  

	(C)	WHEREAS, after the closing of the Offers and as of the date hereof, Nokia owns 76.31% of the share capital and at least 76.01% of the voting rights of the Company; 

 

	(D)	WHEREAS, Nokia requires certain services to be provided by the Company and its Subsidiaries as from the date hereof and the Company is willing and able to provide or to cause its Subsidiaries to provide
such services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; 

  

	(E)	WHEREAS, the Company requires certain services to be provided by Nokia and its Subsidiaries as from the date hereof and Nokia is willing and able to provide or to cause its Subsidiaries to provide such services
in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; 

	(F)	WHEREAS, each of the Parties has confirmed that the performance of this Agreement and in particular the provision of Services as defined in Section 1.1 conforms with its own interest; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the Parties agree as follows: 
 ARTICLE I 

DEFINITIONS 

Section 1.1 Specific Definitions. 

The following capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth or referenced below: 

“ADSs” shall have the meaning set forth in Recital (B). 

“Advisor” shall mean, in relation to a Person, a financial advisor, legal advisor, accountant, consultant and any other
Person providing professional advice to such Person in relation to any aspect of this Agreement. 
 “Affiliate” shall mean,
in relation to any Person, any Person Controlled by that Person, or which Controls that Person, or which is Controlled by a Person which also Controls that Person, in each case, directly or indirectly and from time to time; other than, for the
purposes of this Agreement, with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries, any of Nokia and its Subsidiaries, and conversely. 

“Agreement” shall mean this Framework Agreement including its preamble, annexes, appendices and schedules, as amended from
time to time and, where the context requires, any ancillary or related agreement between the Parties and/or any Subsidiaries thereof entered into in furtherance of this Agreement. 

“Business Day” shall mean any day on which banking institutions are open for regular business in Finland and France which is
not a Saturday, a Sunday or a public holiday in Finland and France. 
 “Company” shall have the meaning set forth in the
first paragraph of this Agreement. 
 “Company Board” shall mean the board of directors of the Company. 

  
 2 

 “Company Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Recital (B). 

“Confidential Information” shall mean the meaning set forth in Article X. 

“Contact Persons” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.1. 

“Contract” shall mean, with respect to any Person, any written agreement, indenture, loan agreement, undertaking, note or
other debt instrument, contract, lease, mortgage, deed, understanding, arrangement, commitment or other obligation to which such Person is a party or by which any of them may be bound or to which any of their properties may be subject. 

“Control”, and its correlative meanings, “Controlling” and “Controlled”, shall have the
meaning given in Article L. 233-3 of the French Commercial Code. 
 “Court” shall have the meaning set forth in Section
11.13. 
 “Dispute” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 11.13. 

“Fee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.1. 

“Force Majeure” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 11.1. 

“ICC” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 11.13. 

“Indemnified Party” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 9.1. 

“Indemnifying Party” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 9.1. 

“Invoice” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.4. 

“Law” shall mean any law (including common law), statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, judgment, order, injunction, decree,
arbitration award, regulation or requirement, in each case enacted, issued, promulgated or enforced by any Relevant Authority in Finland, France or elsewhere. 

“Lien” shall mean any lien, pledge, servitude, charge, security interest, option, claim, mortgage, lease, easement, proxy,
voting trust or agreement, encumbrance or any other restriction on title or transfer of any nature whatsoever. 

  
 3 

 “Loss” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 9.1. 

“Material Adverse Effect” shall mean, with respect to any Person, any change, condition, effect, event or occurrence that,
individually or in the aggregate with other changes, conditions, effects, events or occurrences, has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, a materially adverse effect on the business, condition (financial or otherwise), assets, liabilities
or operations of such Person and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, provided, however, that none of the following changes, conditions, effects, events or occurrences (or the results thereof), either individually or in the aggregate,
shall be considered in determining whether a Material Adverse Effect has occurred: (i) any change in global, national or regional political conditions (including the outbreak of, or changes in, war, acts of terrorism or other hostilities) or in
general global, national or regional economic, regulatory or market conditions or in national or global financial or capital markets, so long as in each case such changes do not disproportionately impact the Person and its Subsidiaries relative to
other participants in the same or similar industries; (ii) any change in applicable accounting principles or any adoption, implementation or change in any applicable Law (including any Law in respect of Taxes) or any interpretation thereof by a
Relevant Authority; (iii) any change generally affecting similar industries or market sectors in the geographic regions in which the Person and its Subsidiaries operate, so long as in each case such changes do not disproportionately impact the
Person and its Subsidiaries relative to other participants in the same or similar industries; (iv) the negotiation, execution, announcement or performance of the MOU or consummation of the transactions contemplated by the MOU; (v) any change or
development to the extent resulting from any action by a Person or its Subsidiaries that is expressly required to be taken by this Agreement; (vi) any change resulting from or arising out of hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, or other natural
disasters; (vii) the failure of any Person and its Subsidiaries to meet any internal or public projections, forecasts or estimates of performance, revenues or earnings (it being understood that any change, condition, effect, event or occurrence that
caused such failure but that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of Material Adverse Effect may constitute or contribute to a Material Adverse Effect); (viii) the announcement of Nokia as the acquirer of the Company and its Subsidiaries
or, solely with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries, any announcements or communications by or authorized by Nokia regarding Nokia’s plans or intentions with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries (including the impact of any such
announcements or communications on relationships with customers, suppliers, employees or regulators); or (ix) any actions (or the effects of any actions) taken (or omitted to be taken) by the Person or its Subsidiaries upon the written request or
written instruction of, or with the written consent of, the other Person. 
 “MOU” shall have the meaning set forth in
Recital (A). 
 “N - 1 Leader” means with respect to each Party, the person designated by such Party in this capacity as
identified to the other Party in writing from time to time. 
 “Nokia” shall have the meaning set forth in the first
paragraph of this Agreement. 
 “Nokia Board” shall mean the board of directors of Nokia. 

“OCEANEs” shall mean collectively: (i) the EUR 628,946,424 bonds convertible into new Company Shares or exchangeable for
existing Company Shares due on July 1, 2018, (ii) the EUR 688,425,000 bonds 

  
 4 

 
convertible into new Company Shares or exchangeable for existing Company Shares due on January 30, 2019 and (iii) the EUR 460,289,979.90 bonds convertible into new Company Shares or exchangeable
for existing Company Shares due on January 30, 2020. 
 “Offers” shall have the meaning set forth in Recital (B). 

“Organizational Documents” shall mean, with respect to any Person, the certificate of incorporation, articles of association,
limited liability company by-laws, organizational regulations or similar organizational documents of such Person. 

“Party” shall have the meaning set forth in the first paragraph of this Agreement. 

“Permit” shall mean all permits, licenses, franchises, variances, exemptions, orders and other authorizations, consents and
approvals issued by or obtained from a Relevant Authority. 
 “Person” shall mean any individual, corporation,
partnership, limited liability company, firm, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, governmental or regulatory body or other entity. 

“Price Per Unit” shall have the meaning set forth in Exhibit 1. 

“Pricing Method” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.1. 

“Receiving Party” shall mean the Company or Nokia (and their Subsidiaries), as applicable, when receiving Services from the
Service Provider pursuant to the terms hereof. 
 “Reciprocal Create-related Services” shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 3.2. 
 “Reciprocal Deliver-related Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.3. 

“Reciprocal Finance-related Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.10. 

“Reciprocal Innovation-related Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1. 

“Reciprocal IT-related Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.8. 

  
 5 

 “Reciprocal Legal & Compliance-related Services” shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 3.9. 
 “Reciprocal Marketing and Communication Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.5.

 “Reciprocal Real Estate-related Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.6. 

“Reciprocal Supply-related Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.7. 

“Relevant Authority” shall mean any Finnish, French, European Union, U.S. and other supranational, national, federal,
regional or local legislative, administrative or regulatory authority, agency, court, tribunal, arbitrator, arbitration panel or similar body or any securities exchange on which any securities of either Party are trading, in each case only to the
extent that such entity has authority and jurisdiction in the particular context. 
 “Rules” shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 11.13. 
 “Services” shall mean the services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement. 

“Service Managers” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.1. 

“Service Provider” shall mean the Company or Nokia (and their Subsidiaries), as applicable, when providing Services to the
Receiving Party pursuant to the terms hereof. 
 “SLAs” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.10. 

“Steering Committee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.2. 

“Steering Committee Deadlock” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.3. 

“Subsidiary” shall mean, with respect to any Person, any other Person Controlled by such Person, excluding, with respect to
the Company and notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Co.; it being specified that for the purposes of this Agreement, the Company and the Persons Controlled by the Company shall not be considered as
Subsidiaries of Nokia. 

  
 6 

 “Tax” shall mean all national, regional, federal, state, and local
income, gain, profits, windfall profits, franchise, gross receipts, environmental, customs duty, capital stock, severances, stamp, payroll, sales, employment, unemployment, disability, social security contributions, use, property, withholding,
excise, production, value added, occupancy and other taxes, duties or assessments of any nature whatsoever, together with all interest, penalties and additions imposed with respect to such amounts and any interest in respect of such penalties and
additions. 
 “Term” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8.1. 

“Tribunal” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 11.13. 

“VAT” shall mean any tax imposed in compliance with the Council Directive of 28 November 2006 on the common system of
value added tax (EC Directive 2006/112); and any other tax of a similar nature, whether imposed in a member state of the European Union in substitution for, or levied in addition to, such tax referred to above, or imposed elsewhere. 

Section 1.2 Interpretation. 

For the purposes of this Agreement: (i) words (including capitalized terms defined herein) in the singular include the plural and vice
versa as the context requires; (ii) the terms “hereof,” “herein,” and “herewith” and words of similar import, unless otherwise expressly provided, refer to this Agreement as a whole (including all Annexes
hereto) and not to any particular provision of this Agreement, and Article, Section and Annex references are to the Articles, Sections and to this Agreement unless otherwise expressly provided; (iii) the word “including” and words of
similar import when used in this Agreement mean “including without limitation” unless otherwise expressly provided; and (iv) all references to any period of days refer to the relevant number of calendar days unless otherwise expressly
provided. 
 When a French term is added in parenthesis after an English term, the French term shall prevail for the interpretation of the
relevant English term. 
 When the context so requires, the Services to be provided by the Service Provider to the Receiving Party pursuant
to the terms of this Agreement shall include Services provided (i) by an authorized external service provider on behalf of the Service Provider pursuant to Section 7.7 and/or (ii) to a customer of the Receiving Party, subject to prior request or
information of the Receiving Party. 
 ARTICLE II 

GUIDING PRINCIPLES 

Section 2.1 Corporate Interest of each Party. 

The Company acknowledges and confirms that entering into this Agreement and performing and receiving the Services provided for herein and
therein is (i) in its own interest and (ii) in compliance with the corporate purpose (intérêt social) of the Company. 

  
 7 

 Nokia acknowledges and confirms that entering into this Agreement and performing and receiving
the Services provided for herein and therein complies with Finnish law and is (i) in its own interest and (ii) in compliance with the corporate purpose (intérêt social) of its French subsidiaries (other than the Company and its
direct or indirect subsidiaries). 
 Section 2.2 Arms’ Length Conditions. 

In entering into and performing this Agreement, each Party and each of its respective Subsidiaries is acting, and intends to be treated, as an
autonomous legal entity with an independent purpose. Each Party agrees to provide and shall cause its relevant Subsidiaries to provide Services to the other Party or its relevant Subsidiaries or receive services from the other Party or its relevant
Subsidiaries on arms’ length conditions. Each Party considers that this Agreement provides for a fair and proportional allocation of commitments and revenues between them and their respective Subsidiaries. 

Section 2.3 Protection of Interests of Minority Shareholders of the Company. 

As long as the Company’s shares remain listed on a regulated market as defined in Articles L. 421-1 et seq. of the French Monetary
and Financial Code and/or to the extent that there are minority interests in the Company, Nokia and the Company shall ensure that the performance of the Services are clear and understandable in the interest of all those concerned, on arm’s
length condition and that they do not infringe the right of the minority shareholders of the Company in their capacity of shareholders of the Company. 

For the purposes of providing a greater protection of minority shareholders’ interests, this Agreement was submitted to the prior
approval of the Company Board and was approved unanimously. 
 ARTICLE III 

RECIPROCAL SERVICES 

Section 3.1 Reciprocal Innovation-related Services. 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the innovation-related services described in Annex 3.1
hereto (the “Reciprocal Innovation-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal
Innovation-related Services are also set forth in Annex 3.1 hereto. 

  
 8 

 Section 3.2 Reciprocal Create-related Services. 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the create-related services described in Annex 3.2
hereto (the “Reciprocal Create-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal
Create-related Services are also set forth in Annex 3.2 hereto. 
 Section 3.3 Reciprocal Deliver-related Services. 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the deliver-related services described in Annex 3.3
hereto (the “Reciprocal Deliver-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal
Deliver-related Services are also set forth in Annex 3.3 hereto. 
 Section 3.4 Reciprocal HR-related Services. 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the HR-related services described in Annex 3.4 hereto
(the “Reciprocal HR-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal HR-related Services
are also set forth in Annex 3.4 hereto. 
 Section 3.5 Reciprocal Marketing and Communication-related Services. 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the marketing and communication-related services described in
Annex 3.5 hereto (the “Reciprocal Marketing and Communication-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and
conditions relating to the Reciprocal marketing and Communication-related Services are also set forth in Annex 3.5 hereto. 
 Section
3.6 Reciprocal Real Estate-related Services. 
 Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the
real estate-related services described in Annex 3.6 hereto (the “Reciprocal Real Estate-related Services”). 
 The
specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal Real Estate-related Services are also set forth in Annex 3.6 hereto. 

  
 9 

 Section 3.7 Reciprocal Supply-related Services. 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the supply-related services described in Annex 3.7
hereto (the “Reciprocal Supply-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal
Supply-related Services are also set forth in Annex 3.7 hereto. 
 Section 3.8 Reciprocal IT-related Services. 

Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the information technology-related services described in
Annex 3.8 hereto (the “Reciprocal IT-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions relating to the
Reciprocal IT-related Services are also set forth in Annex 4.8 hereto. 
 Section 3.9 Reciprocal Legal & Compliance-related
Services. 
 Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the legal and compliance-related services
described in Annex 3.9 hereto (the “Reciprocal Legal & Compliance-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and
conditions relating to the Reciprocal Supply-related Services are also set forth in Annex 3.9 hereto. 
 Section 3.10 Reciprocal
Finance-related Services. 
 Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the finance-related services
described in Annex 3.10 hereto (the “Reciprocal Finance-related Services”). 
 The specific terms and conditions
relating to the Reciprocal Finance-related Services are also set forth in Annex 3.10 hereto. 
 Section 3.11 Reciprocal
Transformation Office-related Services. 
 Each of the Company and Nokia shall provide the other and its Subsidiaries with the TO-related
services described in Annex 3.11 hereto (the “Reciprocal TO-related Services”). 

  
 10 

 The specific terms and conditions relating to the Reciprocal TO-related Services are also set
forth in Annex 3.11 hereto. 
 ARTICLE IV 

SERVICE MANAGERS AND STEERING COMMITTEE 

Section 4.1 Service Managers; Contact Persons 

Within ten (10) Business Days from the date hereof, each Party shall appoint one person in writing who will manage and coordinate all the
activities relating to each of the Services (the “Service Managers”). The duties of the Service Managers shall include overseeing the implementation of the Services and discussing all problems and questions with the competent
specialists within the Party it represents and for promptly coordinating with, and reporting back to, the Service Manager of the other Party. Each Party shall be entitled to replace its Service Manager at any time, provided that it shall notify the
other Party of the name and contact details of the new Service Manager without delay. Each Party may also appoint a deputy to its Service Manager to assist and, if necessary, replace temporarily such Service Manager in case of temporary
unavailability. 
 In addition, each Party shall appoint one or more contact persons in writing who will be responsible for supervising on
behalf of the Service Managers the proper performance of all the activities and tasks in connection with a specific Service (the “Contact Persons”). The Contact Persons will be nominated before the Services start to be provided and
may be replaced by the appointing Party from time to time. If a Contact Person is no longer available, the relevant Party shall appoint a new Contact Person without delay. If no Contact Person has been appointed for a Service, all correspondence
shall be sent exclusively to the Service Manager in the interim. The Service Manager of a Party will inform the Service Manager of the other Party in writing of the name and contact details of the Contact Persons without delay. 

Section 4.2 Steering Committee.  

The Parties agree that three (3) top managers of each Party shall serve as members of a steering committee to supervise overall performance of
this Agreement by each of Parties (the “Steering Committee”). Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the three members of each Party shall be (i) the Group Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Innovation and Operating Officer and the
Chief Legal Officer of Nokia and (ii) the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel of the Company. Each Party shall also appoint one deputy for each of its members on the Steering Committee. The Parties may
mutually agree upon replacements of such members from time to time during the Term as appropriate. 

  
 11 

 The Steering Committee shall meet whenever necessary and no less than once a month during the
first three (3) months following the execution date of this Agreement and no less than once quarterly thereafter. The Steering Committee can be convened at any time by any member with five (5) Business Days prior notice to the other members and
without any delay if there is a quorum. 
 The members of the Steering Committee shall notify each other in writing (including by email or
fax) at least five (5) Business Days ahead of the next Steering Committee meeting of the items to be included at the agenda of such meeting. 

The meetings of the Steering Committee may be conducted on either a face-to-face basis or via video or telephone conference call, whichever is
mutually agreed to by the Parties at least three (3) Business Days in advance of the scheduled meeting. The Steering Committee may also act without a meeting upon the unanimous written consent of all the members of the Steering Committee (or, as the
case may be, their respective deputies). 
 No action may be taken at any meeting of the Steering Committee unless a quorum is present. A
quorum of the Steering Committee shall consist of four (4) members, including two (2) members (or their deputies) representing Nokia and two (2) members (or their deputies) representing the Company. Any action by such quorum must be approved by a
simple majority, including the vote of at least one representative of each Party. 
 The members of the Steering Committee shall formalize
in writing the minutes of the last meeting for approval at the next meeting unless the decision has been taken by unanimous written consent of all the members of the Steering Committee (or, as the case may be, their respective deputies) as per the
previous paragraph. 
 The minutes of the meetings, and the decisions, of the Steering Committee shall be provided as soon as reasonably
practicable to the Nokia Board and the Company Board. 
 The Steering Committee may appoint one or more persons that are not members of the
Steering Committee as secretaries for each meeting. 
 The Steering Committee may decide to appoint Advisors to assist the Steering
Committee in performing its obligations. The Steering Committee shall ensure that both Parties and their relevant Subsidiaries may have access to the work performed by such Advisors. The Steering Committee shall ensure full cooperation with the
Advisors and shall, in particular, grant the Advisors full access to all documents, books, data, other information and appropriate personnel during normal business hours and on reasonable advance notice. The fees, expenses and costs of
the Advisors shall be borne equally by the Parties and their relevant Subsidiaries. 
 A quarterly report shall be prepared by the Steering
Committee and shall be transmitted to the Nokia Board and the Company Board for information purposes on the implementation of this Agreement. Such quarterly report shall notably include a summary of matters discussed at the Steering
Committee, including a presentation of any dispute referred to the Steering Committee during the previous quarter and the solution that has been decided and implemented, as the case may be. 

  
 12 

 The Nokia Board and the Company Board may have access, at any time (whether or not
there is a Steering Committee Deadlock), to all the minutes of the meetings, and the decisions, of the Steering Committee and more generally, to any information, data or documents, including audit report, work product of the Advisors appointed by
the Steering Committee reasonably required to assess the fairness of the terms and conditions of the performance of the Services pursuant to this Agreement or that may be necessary in order to assess the matters referred to it in the event of a
Steering Committee Deadlock. 
 Section 4.3 Dispute Resolution Mechanisms. 

The Service Managers shall discuss any disputes that arise in connection with this Agreement without delay and shall endeavor to settle these
between them. Any dispute which the Service Managers cannot settle within five (5) Business Days of receipt of the written notification thereof shall be submitted in writing to the N-1 Leader of each Party which will then together discuss the
dispute in question. 
 The N-1 Leaders of the Parties shall endeavor to find a solution acceptable to both Parties for each matter
submitted to them within five (5) Business Days of the matter being referred to them. In the event the N-1 Leaders of the Parties are unable to arrive at a mutually acceptable solution then such matter will be referred to the Steering Committee for
resolution within ten (10) Business Days. 
 In the absence of a quorum during two (2) consecutive meetings of the Steering Committee or in
the event that a quorum is present and the members representing Nokia and the Company cannot reach agreement with respect to any proposed action or decision (a “Steering Committee Deadlock”), the Parties must refer the matter(s)
causing the Steering Committee Deadlock to Nokia Board and the Company Board. In the event an agreement cannot be reached by the Parties within ten (10) Business Days of the Steering Committee Deadlock, either Party may refer the matter to
arbitration pursuant to Section 11.13. 
 Notwithstanding any dispute or escalation thereof pursuant to this Section 4.3, each Party will in
good faith during the pendency of the applicable dispute continue to perform the relevant Services so as to minimize the disruption or impact of any delays associated with escalation or dispute resolution proceedings on the Parties’ respective
operations or businesses. 
 Section 4.4 Limits of Authority. 

The Parties shall adopt a mechanism of limits of authority in connection with the decisions and actions relating to the sales/bidding process
of both Parties. To this effect, each of the Parties hereby grants a mandate to the Steering Committee to establish, validate or authorize such mechanism, including the type of decisions and actions covered, applicable thresholds and the identity of
the individuals with authority to approve such decisions or actions; provided however that such mechanism shall provide for a fair representation of representatives of both Nokia and the Company. 

  
 13 

 ARTICLE V 

FEE FOR SERVICES AND PAYMENT 

Section 5.1 Fee. 
 As
consideration for the Services carried out by the Service Provider, the Receiving Party shall pay to the Service Provider an amount of fees (the “Fee”) calculated pursuant to one of the pricing methods specified in Exhibit 1
(a “Pricing Method”). The Pricing Method(s) used for each Service are set forth in Annex 3.1. to Annex 3.11. 

With respect to the “Cost plus” and “Cost Rebalancing” pricing methods described in Exhibit 1, any increase in
costs must be reasonable and consistent with past practice. Any anticipated increase of the aggregate cost of the Services to be provided by each Party or its Subsidiaries in excess of 20% of the annual budgeted costs (by reference to the combined
budget for the following fiscal year, except for the 2016 fiscal year combined budget to be adopted in 2016, in each case as approved by both the Nokia Board and the Company Board) shall be duly documented and agreed in advance by the Steering
Committee. 
 The annual value of the fees paid by each Receiving Party for all the Services shall in no case exceed 1% of the gross
consolidated revenues of the Company for the preceding financial year and, in the event the fees are about to exceed such amount, the Parties shall refer to the Nokia Board and the Company Board, respectively and, subject to the approvals of both
the Nokia Board and the Company Board, increase such amount. 
 Section 5.2 Taxes  

Each Party shall be solely responsible and liable for any duties, levies and Taxes, such as, but not limited to, income taxes, excise taxes and
sales and use taxes, or similar taxes that are imposed on such Party under applicable laws, regulations and tax treaties as a result of any contract and any payments made hereunder. 

A Party (or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) which is entitled to receive a payment hereunder from the other Party (or its Subsidiaries,
as the case may be) shall co-operate in completing any procedural formalities necessary for that other Party (or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) to obtain authorization to make that payment without a deduction or withholding for or an account
of Taxes or to make that payment with a deduction or withholding at a reduced rate. In the event that such a withholding tax is payable, each Party (or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) shall be entitled to deduct from any payment made to the
other Party (or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) any withholding Tax, as required under applicable laws, regulations and tax treaties. The withholding Party shall furnish evidence of such paid Taxes to the other Party (or its Subsidiaries, as
the case may be) as is sufficient to enable the other Party (or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) to obtain any credits available to it. 

  
 14 

 All amounts expressed to be payable under Exhibit 1 of the Agreement by the Receiving
Party to the Service Provider which (in whole or in part) constitute the consideration for any supply for VAT purposes are deemed to be exclusive of any VAT which is chargeable on that supply, and accordingly, if VAT is or becomes chargeable on any
supply made by the Service Provider to the Receiving Party and such Service Provider is required to account to the relevant tax authority for the VAT, that the Receiving Party must pay to such Service Provider (in addition to and at the same time as
paying any other consideration for such supply referred to in Exhibit 1) an amount equal to the amount of the VAT (and such Service Provider must promptly provide an appropriate VAT invoice to that Receiving Party). 

Section 5.3 Billing 
 The
Service Provider shall submit a quarterly invoice (the “Invoice”) to the Receiving Party within thirty (30) days from the end of each quarter in which Services have been carried out in accordance with this Agreement. The amounts
owed and stated in the Invoice shall become due and payable within sixty (60) days of the date of such written Invoice. 
 Section 5.4
Late Payment 
 Any payment required to be made under this Agreement that is not paid when due shall bear interest from and including
the first day after such payment is due at a rate that is three (3) times the legal interest rate (taux d’intérêt legal) and trigger the payment of a lump sum as compensation for recovery costs, according to the provisions
of Article L.441-6 and D.441-5 of the French Commercial Code. Such interest and lump sum shall be payable at the same time as the payment to which they relate. 

ARTICLE VI 
 REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES 
 Section 6.1 Representations and Warranties of the Company. 

The Company hereby represents and warrants to Nokia that all the statements contained in Section 6.1.1 to 6.1.6 are true and complete in all
material respects (except that all statements that are qualified by materiality (including Material Adverse Effect) are true and complete in all respects, giving effect to such qualification) as of the date hereof (except to the extent that any such
representation and warranty is expressly made as of another date, in which case such representation and warranty shall be required to be so true and so correct only as of such other date). 

  
 15 

 6.1.1 Organization, Good Standing and Qualification 

The Company is an entity duly incorporated and validly existing under the Laws of its jurisdiction of organization. Each of the Company’s
Subsidiaries is an entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing (where such concept is recognized under applicable Law) under the Laws of its respective jurisdiction of organization, except where the failure to be so organized,
existing and in good standing when taken together with all other such failures, individually or in the aggregate, has not resulted and is not reasonably expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company. 

6.1.2 Corporate Authority 

The Company has all requisite corporate power and authority and has taken all corporate action necessary in order to authorize, execute and
perform its obligations under this Agreement. Assuming that Nokia has validly and properly entered into this Agreement, this Agreement is a valid and binding agreement of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms,
subject, as to enforcement, to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar Laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights. 

6.1.3 Non-contravention 

Neither the execution by the Company of this Agreement, the compliance by it with all of the provisions of and the performance by it of its
obligations under this Agreement, (i) will conflict with, or result in a breach or violation of, or result in any acceleration of any rights or obligations or the payment of any penalty under or the creation of a Lien on the assets of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries (with or without the giving of notice or the lapse of time or both) pursuant to, or permit any other party any right to terminate, accelerate or cancel, or otherwise constitute a default under, any provision of any material
Contract, or result in any change in the rights or obligations of any party under any material Contract, in each case to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective assets is bound, (ii) will violate or conflict with any Permit issued to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or (iii) will violate or conflict in any material respect with the Organizational Documents of the Company or any of the
Company’s Subsidiaries, or (iv) will violate or conflict with any applicable Law, except (in the case of clauses (i) and (ii)) for such conflicts, breaches, violations, defaults, payments, accelerations, creations, permissions or changes that,
individually or in the aggregate, have not resulted and are not reasonably expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect with respect to the Company. 

6.1.4 Required Consents 

No authorizations, waivers, consents, filings, registrations or approvals are required to be made by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
with, or obtained by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries from any Relevant Authority, in connection with the performance by the Company of its obligations hereunder. 

  
 16 

 6.1.5 No Other Company Representations or Warranties 

Except for the representations and warranties contained in this Section 6.1, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries makes any other
express or implied representation or warranty on behalf of the Company or its Subsidiaries. The Company and its Subsidiaries disclaim any other representations or warranties, whether made by the Company or its Subsidiaries, or any of their
respective officers, directors, employees, agents, advisors or representatives. 
 Section 6.2 Representations and Warranties of
Nokia. 
 Nokia hereby represents and warrants to the Company that all the statements contained in Section 6.2.1 to 6.2.6 are true and
complete in all material respects (except that all statements that are qualified by materiality (including Material Adverse Effect) are true and complete in all respects, giving effect to such qualification) as of the date hereof (except to the
extent that any such representation and warranty is expressly made as of another date, in which case such representation and warranty shall be required to be so true and so correct only as of such other date). 

6.2.1 Organization, Good Standing and Qualification 

Nokia is an entity duly incorporated and validly existing under the Laws of its jurisdiction of organization. Each of Nokia’s Subsidiaries
is an entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing (where such concept is recognized under applicable Law) under the Laws of its respective jurisdiction of organization, except where the failure to be so organized, existing and in
good standing when taken together with all other such failures, individually or in the aggregate, has not resulted and is not reasonably expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Nokia. 

6.2.2 Corporate Authority 

Nokia has all requisite corporate power and authority and has taken all corporate action necessary in order to authorize, execute and perform
its obligations under this Agreement. Assuming that the Company has validly and properly entered into this Agreement, this Agreement is a valid and binding agreement of Nokia, enforceable against Nokia in accordance with its terms, subject, as to
enforcement, to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar Laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights. 

6.2.3 Non-contravention 

Neither the execution by Nokia of this Agreement, the compliance by it with all of the provisions of and the performance by it of its
obligations under this Agreement, (i) will conflict with, or result in a breach or violation of, or result in any acceleration of any rights or obligations or the payment of any penalty under or the creation of a Lien on the assets of Nokia or any
of its Subsidiaries (with or without the giving of notice or the lapse of time or both) pursuant to, or permit any other party any right to terminate, accelerate or cancel, or otherwise constitute a default under, any provision of any material

  
 17 

 
Contract, or result in any change in the rights or obligations of any party under any material Contract, in each case to which Nokia or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which Nokia or any
of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective assets is bound, (ii) will violate or conflict with any Permit issued to Nokia or any of its Subsidiaries, or (iii) will violate or conflict in any material respect with the Organizational Documents of
the Nokia or any of Nokia’s Subsidiaries, or (iv) will violate or conflict with any applicable Law, except (in the case of clauses (i) and (ii)) for such conflicts, breaches, violations, defaults, payments, accelerations, creations, permissions
or changes that, individually or in the aggregate, have not resulted and are not reasonably expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Nokia. 

6.2.4 Required Consents 

No authorizations, waivers, consents, filings, registrations or approvals are required to be made by Nokia or any of its Subsidiaries with, or
obtained by Nokia or any of its Subsidiaries from any Relevant Authority, in connection with the performance by Nokia of its obligations hereunder. 

6.2.5 No Other Nokia Representations or Warranties 

Except for the representations and warranties contained in this Section 6.2, neither Nokia nor any of its Subsidiaries makes any other express
or implied representation or warranty on behalf of Nokia or its Subsidiaries. Nokia and its Subsidiaries disclaim any other representations or warranties, whether made by Nokia or its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective officers, directors,
employees, agents, advisors or representatives. 
 ARTICLE VII 

SPECIFIC COVENANTS 

Section 7.1 Authority and Direction. 

The employees assigned by the Service Provider to perform the Services pursuant to the terms hereof shall at all times remain solely under the
authority and direction of their actual contractual employer. The Agreement creates no subordinate relationship between the Service Provider’s and the Receiving Party’s personnel, even in the event Services are being performed in the
mutual interest of the Parties. The Service Provider is thus solely responsible for managing its personnel, which remains entirely subordinated to the Service Provider. The Receiving Party shall not have any obligation to pay any such person’s
salary, insurance, social security or any other amounts required by applicable Law or by Contract to be paid to or in respect of any such person by his or her employer. In the event that such a person should claim any such payment from the Receiving
Party in respect of the Services, the Service Provider shall fully indemnify, defend and hold the Receiving Party harmless from and against any claims deriving from defaults in payment by the Service Provider. The Service Provider alone is
responsible for any signature and termination of employment contracts with its personnel. In its capacity as employer, the Service Provider will be personally responsible for all wages, salaries, bonuses, social security contributions, paid leave,
management and more generally all of the obligations incumbent upon it with regard to its personnel. 

  
 18 

 Section 7.2 Compliance with applicable Law. 

The Service Provider shall carry out or cause to be carried out all the Services in accordance with this Agreement and all applicable Laws. In
particular, the Parties shall carry out information and/or consultation of employee representative bodies in the respective jurisdictions where such information and/or consultation procedures are required under applicable Law in relation to the
performance of this Agreement. Each Party shall notify the other Party in writing promptly following its becoming aware of any change in applicable Laws that would reasonably be expected to materially affect the Services or require any Services to
be modified or discontinued. The Parties shall discuss and negotiate in good faith any proposed modification or discontinuance of any Service as a result of such change in applicable Law. 

Section 7.3 Cooperation. 

To the extent permitted under applicable Law, each Party shall, and shall procure that its respective Subsidiaries shall comply with the terms
and conditions of the Agreement and shall cooperate as reasonably required with the other Party and its Subsidiaries in connection with the carrying out and acceptance of the Services in order to minimise the expense and risk of interruptions and
disruptions. 
 To the extent permitted under applicable Law, each Party will provide and shall cause its Subsidiaries to provide to the
other Party and its relevant Subsidiaries, free of any charge or cost, any information, data or documents reasonably required for reporting or compliance obligations with any Relevant Authority. 

To the extent permitted under applicable Law, each Party will provide and shall cause its Subsidiaries to provide to the other Party and its
relevant Subsidiaries (at the request of such Party or its Advisors), free of any charge or cost, any information, data or documents reasonably required to assess the performance of this Agreement. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, a Party and its Subsidiaries (and their respective Advisors) may not have access to
any work product of any Advisor appointed by the other Party or its Subsidiaries in connection with a Dispute. 
 Section 7.4
Interconnection of Products. 
 To the extent permitted under applicable Law, each Party shall assist, and shall procure that its
Subsidiaries assist, the other Party and its Subsidiaries to interconnect their products with the other Party’s (and its Subsidiaries’) products regardless whether they are already installed in customer networks or not. Upon request of one
Party triggered by a business need, the other Party (and its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) shall forthwith make available and explain to said Party all information available needed by or useful for the interconnection of said Party’s (and
its Subsidiaries’) products with the products of the other Party (and/or its Subsidiaries). The Parties grant each other the non-exclusive and non-transferrable right to use the interface information provided by the other Party to interconnect
the other Party’s products to their products. 

  
 19 

 Section 7.5 Sales Channels 

The Service Provider (and its Subsidiaries) shall be able to decide on the type of method for sales of products (including reselling, joint
bids, sub-contracting, consortium), it being agreed that whenever the chosen method for sales requires the transfer of a margin, such margin will be charged according to the provisions of Section 2 of Annex 1. The Parties and their local
subsidiaries shall be free to agree and execute necessary agreements to govern such sales. 
 Section 7.6 Personnel Skills and
Competence. 
 The Service Provider shall allocate to the performance of the Services sufficient personnel with appropriate experience,
knowledge and competence, in each case to carry out or cause to be carried out all Services with the same degree of care, competence, skill and diligence and using or causing to be used substantially the same business procedures and policies,
standards of care and internal controls, to a standard which is equivalent to the standard applied by the Service Provider for its own internal purposes. In the event any individual employee or executive namely designated in any of the Annexes
hereto becomes unable or unfit to perform the Services due to, inter alia, dismissal, termination of employment, disability or change in professional duties, the Service Provider must ensure due performance of the relevant Services by other
appropriately qualified member of personnel. 
 Section 7.7 Third Parties and External Service Providers. 

To the extent that the provision of Services to the Receiving Party requires the consent of a third party, including a third party with whom
the Service Provider has a contract relating to the Services, or requires the consent of a third party to use or purchase from such third party any materials, the Service Provider shall use best efforts to secure such consent from such third party.

 The Service Provider may have the Services carried out by its own staff or may outsource the Services to an Affiliate or an external
service provider, provided that in case of outsourcing to an external service provider (i) the Service Provider has selected the external service provider with reasonable care, (ii) the Service Provider shall provide the Receiving Party with prior
written notice of each proposed external service provider and afford the Receiving Party the opportunity to object to each such proposed external service provider (such objection not to be unreasonably opposed) within a reasonable period of time
upon receipt of the aforementioned written notice and (iii) the Service Provider shall remain fully responsible for the performance of the Services in accordance with the Agreement. 

To the extent that the Service Provider uses its Affiliate or authorized external service providers, as permitted pursuant to the preceding
paragraph, to provide the Services to the Receiving Party, the Service Provider shall cause such Affiliate and authorized external service providers to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, as if the Affiliate or external service
provider were a party to this Agreement. 

  
 20 

 Section 7.8 Changes to Services. 

In the event a Receiving Party requires changes to be made to the Services, it shall send a change request to the Service Provider. The change
request must be submitted in writing and contain sufficient information so that the Service Provider is able to adequately assess the request. The Parties shall discuss in good faith if and under what conditions, including the appropriate fees and
starting date, the requested (changed) Service can be carried out. If the Parties agree in writing upon a proposed change request, the relevant Annex hereto shall be amended to include the terms and conditions of such agreed upon change. 

Section 7.9 Data Protection. 

When performing this Agreement, each of the Parties shall (and shall procure that its Subsidiaries will) treat, and cause its and their
employees and authorized external service providers to treat, personal data about individuals as confidential in accordance with all applicable data protection Laws. 

To the extent that any Party (and its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) processes any personal data provided by the other Party (or its
Subsidiaries, as the case may be) in connection with the provision of Services, the relevant Party (and its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) shall (i) maintain reasonable technical and organizational security and confidentiality measures to
mitigate the risk of accidental or unlawful destruction, accidental loss, alteration, unauthorized disclosure or access, and against all other unlawful forms of processing of personal data, in accordance with the other Party’s privacy policies,
(ii) act upon and fully comply with the instructions received from the other Party (and its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) in relation to the processing of personal data, and (iii) otherwise comply with applicable data security and privacy Laws.

 Section 7.10 Services Level Agreements. 

In order to measure the performance of the Services by Nokia and by the Company in relation to Services to be provided pursuant to this
Agreement, the Parties agree that the Steering Committee may, if it deems it necessary upon its review of such performance and recommendation of the Service Manager of both Parties, establish one or several services level agreements
(“SLAs”) and related procedure in case of non-compliance with any such SLA in relation to the relevant Services. The Parties expressly acknowledge that SLAs may not be defined with respect to each and every Service to be provided
hereunder, due to the specificities of such Service. 

  
 21 

 ARTICLE VIII 

TERM; TERMINATION 

Section 8.1 Term. 
 The
term of this Agreement shall be twelve (12) months starting on the date hereof and shall be automatically renewed for an additional term of twelve (12) months, in each case unless terminated pursuant to Section 8.2 (the “Term”).

 Section 8.2 Termination. 

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.1 hereof, this Agreement may be terminated (i) at any time by the mutual written agreement of the
Parties or (ii) by either Nokia or the Company, by providing a three (3) months’ prior written notice to the other Party. 

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 8.1 hereof, unless otherwise specifically set forth in Annex 3.1. to Annex 3.11, the
Receiving Party may at any time, by providing the Service Provider with a three(3)-months’ prior written notice, terminate the provision of one or several specific Services set forth in Annex 3.1. to Annex 3.11, without prejudice
to article L. 442-6 of the French Commercial Code. 
 Section 8.3 Procedure on Expiration of the Term and Termination. 

The expiration of the Term or the termination of this Agreement or of the provision of a specific Service shall be without prejudice to the
accrued rights and liabilities of the Parties in respect thereof as of the date of such expiration or termination or that may thereafter accrue in respect of any act or omission prior to such expiration or termination and shall be without prejudice
to any provisions of this Agreement that are expressed to remain in force thereafter. 
 Upon expiration of the Term or the termination of
this Agreement or of the provision of a specific Service, the Service Provider shall return to the Receiving Party (and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be) all the records and data in its possession relating to or arising out of this Agreement
or the provision of such Service(s). The Service Provider shall however be authorized to keep such information for its files to the extent necessary to comply with any applicable Law or internal compliance or record retention rules or as part of an
automatic electronic back-up system, it being specified that such information shall remain subject to the terms of Article X hereof (Confidentiality). 

  
 22 

 ARTICLE IX 

LIABILITY 
 Section 9.1
Indemnification 
 Subject to the provisions of Section 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4 below, the Service Provider (in such capacity the
“Indemnifying Party”) shall indemnify and hold the Receiving Party (in such capacity the “Indemnified Party”) harmless from and against any and all losses, damages, claims, costs, expenses and penalties (a
“Loss”) suffered by the Indemnified Party (and/or its Subsidiaries) and arising out of or resulting from (i) a breach of any representations and warranties set forth herein and/or (ii) a breach of any covenants set forth herein
(including relating to the Services), by the Indemnifying Party or any of its Subsidiaries (other than in the event that the quality of a Service is not in accordance with the SLAs set forth in the relevant Annexes hereunder and the procedure
described in Section 7.8 applies).
 Section 9.2 Limitation of Liability. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, the maximum liability of the Service Provider for Losses relating to or resulting
from the Services provided under this Agreement (including any penalties paid by such Service Provider in relation to SLA performance in accordance with Section 7.10) shall not exceed an aggregate amount equal to 100% of the total aggregate amount
of the Fees payable to such Service Provider under this Agreement for all the Services rendered during the immediately preceding twelve (12)-month period. 

Section 9.3 Waiver of Consequential Damages. 

To the extent permitted by applicable Law, each of Nokia and the Company expressly waives (and shall procure that its Subsidiaries waive) any
right to consequential, indirect (dommages indirects), punitive or similar damages, lost opportunities (perte d’une chance) or lost profits (manque à gagner) for any cause arising out of or relating to this
Agreement. 
 Section 9.4 Gross Negligence and Willful Misconduct. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, the limitations provided in Section 9.1 and Section 9.2 shall not apply in case of
gross negligence (faute lourde), willful misconduct (faute intentionnelle) or fraud. 

  
 23 

 ARTICLE X 

CONFIDENTIALITY 
 Each
Party will, and will cause its Subsidiaries to, hold and will use its best efforts to cause their respective members, partners, officers, directors, employees, any external service provider providing Services and other agents to hold, in confidence
and with the same level of protection as such Party’s own most confidential documents, all documents and information concerning the other Party or its Subsidiaries furnished to or accessed by such Party or its Subsidiaries in connection with
the operations contemplated by this Agreement (the “Confidential Information”), except to the extent that such information can be shown to have been previously in the public domain through no fault of such Party or later lawfully
acquired by such Party on a non-confidential basis from sources other than the other Party or any of its Subsidiaries; provided, however, that such Party may disclose such information in connection with the operations contemplated by
this Agreement to the members, partners, officers, directors, employees, third parties providing Services and other agents of such Party or its Subsidiaries on a need to know basis so long as such persons are informed by such Party of the
confidential nature of such information and are directed by such Party to keep such information confidential and not to use it for any purpose other than its intended use; and, provided further that if any person described in the
immediately preceding proviso breaches its confidentiality obligations, the Party to whom the disclosure is attributable will inform the other Party and will take all necessary steps at the request of such other Party to enforce such obligation.

 Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Party may disclose such information if (i) compelled to disclose by judicial or administrative
process or by other requirements of applicable Law or (ii) it is necessary, in the opinion of counsel, to establish such Party’s position in any litigation or any arbitration or other proceeding based upon or in connection with the subject
matter of this Agreement. Prior to any disclosure pursuant to the preceding sentence, the disclosing Party shall give reasonable prior notice to the other Party of such intended disclosure and, if requested by such other Party, shall use all
reasonable efforts to obtain a protective order or similar protection for such information or data (at the expense of such other Party) and shall otherwise disclose such information and data to the extent and only to the extent necessary, in the
opinion of counsel, to comply with any applicable rule, regulation or policy of a governmental entity or securities exchange. 
 ARTICLE XI

 MISCELLANEOUS 

Section 11.1 Force majeure. 

The Parties shall not be liable for non-performance of, or any total or partial non-compliance with, their contractual obligations (except for
the payment of money) if such non-performance or non-compliance is the result of an event of Force Majeure. Events of force majeure shall have the meaning set forth in Article 1148 of the French Civil Code as construed by French Courts from time to
time (the “Force Majeure”). 

  
 24 

 Upon the occurrence of an event of Force Majeure, the Party affected by it shall promptly notify
the other Party in writing of the nature of such Force Majeure event, the estimated extent and duration of its inability to perform its obligations under this Agreement. Upon the cessation of the event of Force Majeure, the affected Party shall
promptly notify the other Party in writing of such cessation. The affected Party shall use its best efforts to limit the period during which it cannot perform its obligations due to such Force Majeure and the effect of such Force Majeure on the
performance of such obligations. 
 Section 11.2 Specific Performance. 

Each Party agrees that it could be irreparably injured by a breach of the Agreement by the other Party, that money damages will not be an
adequate and/or fully sufficient remedy for any breach of this Agreement and that, in addition to all other remedies available at Law, each Party shall be entitled to injunctive relief and specific performance as a remedy for any such breach, each
Party hereby irrevocably waiving any contradicting right in that respect under Article 1142 of the French Civil Code (Code civil), to the extent permissible under applicable Law. 

Section 11.3 Amendment and Waiver. 

Any provision of this Agreement may be amended or waived if, and only if, such amendment or waiver is in writing and signed, in the case of an
amendment, by each of the Parties, or in the case of a waiver, by the Party or Parties against whom the waiver is to be effective. No failure or delay by any Party in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver
thereof nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege. 

Section 11.4 Assignment. 

Without prejudice to the right of the Service Provider to have the Services carried out by Subsidiaries or authorized external service
providers pursuant to Section 7.7, neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations under this Agreement may be assigned, in whole or in part, by any of the Parties (whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior
written consent of the other Party. Any attempted or purported assignment in violation of the preceding sentence shall be null and void and of no effect whatsoever. Subject to the immediately preceding provisions of this Section 11.4, this Agreement
shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the Parties and their respective permitted successors and assigns. 

Section 11.5 Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries. 

This Agreement (including any Annexes hereto) constitutes the entire agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all
other prior agreements, understandings, representations and warranties between the Parties, in each case whether, with respect to such matters. This Agreement is not intended to, and does not confer upon any Person other than the Parties any rights
or remedies hereunder. If required in certain jurisdictions under applicable local Law, separate services agreements related to the subject matters hereof will be entered into by and among the Parties and/or their Subsidiaries incorporated in such
jurisdictions. 

  
 25 

 Without limiting the foregoing, and from the date hereof, the Parties shall, and shall cause
their respective Subsidiaries, to the extent such Subsidiary provides or benefits from the Services provided pursuant to this Agreement, to adopt the governance and escalation procedures set forth in Article IV in order to govern all matters,
decisions and actions relating to this Agreement and the Services provided herein, which shall supersede any specific governance rules established at the level of the Parties and their Subsidiaries in relation to the same subject matters. 

Section 11.6 Severability. 

The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable and the invalidity or unenforceability of any term or condition shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the other terms or conditions hereof. If any term or condition of this Agreement (or any portion thereof), or the application of any such term or condition (or any portion thereof) to any Person or any
circumstance, is invalid or unenforceable, (i) a suitable provision shall be substituted therefor in order to carry out, so far as may not affect the interests of the Party(ies) concerned, as applicable, be valid and enforceable, the intent and
purpose of such invalid or unenforceable provision or portion thereof and (ii) the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such term or condition to other Persons or circumstances shall not be affected by such invalidity or
unenforceability, nor shall such invalidity or unenforceability affect the validity or enforceability of such term or condition, or the application thereof, in any other jurisdiction. 

Section 11.7 Headings. 

The Article, Section and paragraph headings and table of contents contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not in
any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 
 Section 11.8 Expenses. 

Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be paid by the Party incurring such expenses. 
 Section 11.9 Remedies. 

Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, any and all remedies expressly conferred upon a Party to this Agreement shall be
cumulative with, and not exclusive of, any other remedy contained in this Agreement. The exercise by a Party to this Agreement of any one remedy shall not preclude the exercise by it of any other remedy. 

  
 26 

 Section 11.10 Privilege. 

To the extent that any confidential information exchanged between the Parties in connection with this Agreement is covered or protected by
legal advice, litigation, common interest or any other applicable privilege or doctrine, disclosure of such confidential information to a Party or its representatives does not constitute a waiver of any such privilege. Each Party agrees to assert
all such privileges in opposition to any request for disclosure of confidential information propounded by any third party. 
 Section 11.11
Notices. 
 All notices or other communications hereunder shall be deemed to have been duly given and made if in writing and if served
by personal delivery upon the Party for whom it is intended, if delivered by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or by an international courier service, or if sent by email (provided that written confirmation of receipt of
email is issued to the sender of the notice), and a hard copy of such notice is also delivered by international courier service one (1) Business Day after transmission to the person at the address set forth below, or such other individual, or such
other address as may be designated in writing hereafter, in the same manner, by such Person: 
 If to Nokia: 

Nokia Corporation 
 Karaportti
3 
 02610 Espoo 
 Finland

 Attn: Chief Legal Officer 

Maria Varsellona 

Email: maria.varsellona@nokia.com 

With a copy to (which shall not constitute a notice to Nokia): 

Nokia Corporation 
 Karaportti
3 
 02610 Espoo 
 Finland

 Attn: 
 If to the Company:

 Alcatel Lucent 
 148/150
route de la Reine 
 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt 

France 
 Attn: Chief Financial
Officer 
                 Jean Raby 

Email: jean.raby@alcatel-lucent.com 

  
 27 

 With a copy to (which shall not constitute a notice to the Company): 

Alcatel Lucent 
 148/150 route
de la Reine 
 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt 

France 

Attn:    General Counsel 

                Barbara Larsen 

Email: barbara.larsen@alcatel-lucent.com 

Any notice given by mail or international courier service shall be effective when delivered. Any notice given by email after 17:00 (in the
place of receipt) on a Business Day or on a day that is not a Business Day shall be deemed received on the following Business Day. 

Section 11.12 Governing Law. 

This Agreement shall be exclusively governed by and construed in accordance with the Laws of France, without regard to principles of conflicts
of law. 
 Section 11.13 Jurisdiction. 

The Parties undertake to use their best efforts to try to settle amicably any dispute, controversy or claim (including any non-contractual
claim) arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or the breach, termination or validity thereof (a “Dispute”). Therefore, before referring to arbitration any Party must notify by registered mail to the other Party its wish
to try to settle amicably the Dispute. Such notice shall include description of the Dispute and any documents reasonably available to such Party and related thereto. The Parties undertake to involve the higher level of their management to try to
settle amicably the Dispute. 
 Failing an amicable settlement within three (3) weeks of the receipt of the above-mentioned notification,
the Dispute shall be finally settled by arbitration under the rules administered by the International Court of Arbitration (the “Court”) of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) then in effect (the
“Rules”), except as modified herein. The seat of arbitration shall be London, United Kingdom. The language of the arbitration shall be English, provided that documents or testimony may be submitted in another language if a
translation is provided. 
 In an arbitration the following shall apply: 

 

	 	(i)	 The arbitration shall be conducted by three arbitrators (the “Tribunal”) appointed in accordance
with the Rules, and the Parties intend for the ICC Court to strictly enforce the relevant time periods in order to promptly constitute the Tribunal. The Terms of Reference (as defined in the Rules) shall be signed by the Tribunal and the Parties as
expeditiously as possible but no later than twenty (20) Business Days after the confirmation of the appointment of the third arbitrator, subject to extension by the ICC Court. The Parties further direct the Tribunal to

  
 28 

	 	
establish a strict timetable for the proceedings and generally conduct the arbitration as expeditiously as practicable, without prejudice to the disclosure rights of the Parties, in order to
ensure a prompt resolution of any Dispute. 

  

	 	(ii)	The award shall be rendered by the Tribunal as expeditiously as possible after the close of the hearing and in any event no later than eighteen (18) months as from the date of the filing of the Request for Arbitration
(as defined in the Rules); provided, however, that the Tribunal may seek an extension of such time limit from the ICC Court for good cause. The award rendered by the Tribunal shall be final and binding on the Parties and
enforceable against such Parties and their assets in any court of competent jurisdiction. 

  

	 	(iii)	By agreeing to arbitration, the Parties do not intend to deprive any competent court or the ICC Emergency Arbitrator of the jurisdiction to issue a pre-arbitral injunction, pre-arbitral attachment, or other order in aid
of arbitration proceedings and the enforcement of any award. In any such judicial action: (i) each of the Parties irrevocably and unconditionally consents and submits to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the Courts of France; and (ii) each
Party irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent it may effectively do so, any objection to the jurisdiction of such courts. The Parties agree that the Party seeking interim relief or the enforcement of the award may do so in the forum of its choice.

  

	 	(iv)	Without prejudice to such provisional remedies as may be available under the jurisdiction of a court or the ICC Emergency Arbitrator, the Tribunal shall have full authority to grant provisional remedies and to direct
the Parties to request that any court modify or vacate any temporary or preliminary relief issued by such court, and to award damages for the failure of any party to respect the Tribunal’s orders to that effect. The arbitrators also shall be
entitled to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement and to award monetary damages and other remedies pursuant to this Agreement or applicable Law. 

 

	 	(v)	Costs shall be awarded in accordance with the Rules. 

  

	 	(vi)	This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall remain in full force and effect pending the award in any arbitration proceeding hereunder. 

 

	 	(vii)	All notices by one Party to another Party in connection with the arbitration shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 11.11 except that no notice may be transmitted by facsimile. 

 

	 	(viii)	This agreement to arbitrate shall be binding upon the successors and permitted assigns of each Party. 

  
 29 

 
	
	 Entered into in Paris, France
 On January 8,
2016
 In two original copies

  

			
	NOKIA CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	  

	
	Name: Riikka Tieaho
	Title:   Vice-President, Corporate Legal
		
	By:	 	  

	
	Name: Hans-Jurgen Bill
	Title:   Chief Human Resources Officer
	
	ALCATEL LUCENT
		
	By:	 	  

	
	Name: Jean Raby
	Title:   Chief Financial and Legal Officer
		
	By:	 	  

	
	Name: Philippe Guillemot
	Title:   Chief Operating Officer and Sales Officer

  
 30 

 LIST OF EXHIBITS 

 

					
	 Exhibit 1
	  	Pricing	  	32
			
	 Exhibit 2
	  	Allocation of Funding for R&D Activities and Ownership of Results	  	34

 LIST OF ANNEXES 

 

							
	 Annex 3.1
	  	Reciprocal Innovation-related Services	  	 	35	  
			
	 Annex 3.2
	  	Reciprocal Create-related Services	  	 	36	  
			
	 Annex 3.3
	  	Reciprocal Deliver-related Services	  	 	38	  
			
	 Annex 3.4
	  	Reciprocal HR-related Services	  	 	39	  
			
	 Annex 3.5
	  	Marketing and Communications	  	 	40	  
			
	 Annex 3.6
	  	Reciprocal Real Estate-related Services	  	 	41	  
			
	 Annex 3.7
	  	Reciprocal Supply-related Services	  	 	42	  
			
	 Annex 3.8
	  	Reciprocal IT-related Services	  	 	47	  
			
	 Annex 3.9
	  	Reciprocal Legal & Compliance-related Services	  	 	49	  
			
	 Annex 3.10
	  	Reciprocal Finance-related Services	  	 	50	  
			
	 Annex 3.11
	  	Reciprocal Transformation Office-related Services	  	 	51	  

  
 31 

 EXHIBIT 1 - PRICING METHODOLOGIES 

*** 
 NOTE: A request for confidential treatment
has been made with respect to the portions of the document that are marked with ***. The redacted portions have been filed separately with the SEC. Two pages of Exhibit 1 have been omitted pursuant to the request for confidential treatment. 

  
 32 

 EXHIBIT 2 - ALLOCATION OF FUNDING FOR R&D ACTIVITIES AND OWNERSHIP OF RESULTS 

*** 
 NOTE: A request for confidential treatment
has been made with respect to the portions of the document that are marked with ***. The redacted portions have been filed separately with the SEC. Four pages of Exhibit 2 have been omitted pursuant to the request for confidential treatment. 

  
 33 

 LIST OF ANNEXES 
  

					
	 ANNEX 3.1: RECIPROCAL INNOVATION-RELATED SERVICES
	  	 	35	  
		
	 ANNEX 3.2: RECIPROCAL CREATE-RELATED SERVICES
	  	 	36	  
		
	 ANNEX 3.3: RECIPROCAL DELIVER-RELATED SERVICES
	  	 	38	  
		
	 ANNEX 3.4: RECIPROCAL HR-RELATED SERVICES
	  	 	39	  
		
	 ANNEX 3.5: MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS
	  	 	40	  
		
	 ANNEX 3.6: RECIPROCAL REAL ESTATE-RELATED SERVICES
	  	 	41	  
		
	 ANNEX 3.7: RECIPROCAL SUPPLY-RELATED SERVICES
	  	 	42	  
		
	 ANNEX 3.8: RECIPROCAL IT-RELATED SERVICES
	  	 	47	  
		
	 ANNEX 3.9: RECIPROCAL LEGAL & COMPLIANCE-RELATED SERVICES
	  	 	49	  
		
	 ANNEX 3.10: RECIPROCAL FINANCE-RELATED SERVICES
	  	 	50	  
		
	 ANNEX 3.11: RECIPROCAL TRANSFORMATION OFFICE-RELATED SERVICES
	  	 	51	  

 These Annexes cover organizational objectives to be achieved as a general framework for the related Services. The
implementation of such Services may be subject to a number of conditions, including, where required under applicable law, information and consultation of employee representative bodies. On this basis, suitably adapted projects could be defined
locally in order to provide the Services pursuant to this Agreement. 

  
 34 

 ANNEX 3.1: RECIPROCAL INNOVATION-RELATED SERVICES 

Legal and financial requirements (incl. Subcontracts, regulatory commitments) 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Includes services required to jointly define, implement and execute research projects.

 Company to review, re-negotiate, and adapt existing contracts, e.g. with VC funds, suppliers, government, other publicly funded projects, etc. in light of
new ownership (e.g. Innovacom and I-Source fund in France, Team8 fund in Israel, Wesley Clover fund in UK, DoD, BMFT, EU FP7, French government). 
 Nokia
and Company to re-negotiate and adapt standardization participation (3GPP, ETSI, IETF, ITU-T, IEEE, etc.). 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The Funding Party (as determined by Exhibit 2) will compensate the other
Party (the Service Providing Party, as per Exhibit 2) in accordance with Exhibit 1, Pricing Method 1. 

  
 35 

 ANNEX 3.2: RECIPROCAL CREATE-RELATED SERVICES 

Portfolio Plan 
 Nokia and COMPANY shall take reciprocal
measures towards providing a common and non-overlapping portfolio, which consist of (i) R&D services and (ii) Process alignment. 

R&D services: 
 R&D Support for
customer sales cases 
  

	 	a)	Description of Service: 

 Nokia and Company shall provide R&D support for customer sales cases, in
particular, 
  

	 	•	 	For important sales cases during acquisition phase with consulting, trial services and product interoperability tests (IOT) 

  

	 	•	 	For migration cases towards the product portfolio as per the attached Portfolio Plan 

  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1. 

R&D Customer Support 
  

	 	a)	Description of Service 

 COMPANY and Nokia shall provide customer support services, in particular 

 

	 	•	 	Expert Level Case Handling (interface to R&D) 

  

	 	•	 	New Product Introduction (NPI) 

  

	 	•	 	Software Maintenance 

  

	 	•	 	Interoperability Testing (IOT) 

  

	 	•	 	HW retrofit 

  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The Funding Party (as determined by Exhibit 2) will compensate the other Party (the
Service Providing Party, as per Exhibit 2) in accordance with Exhibit 1, Pricing Method 1. 
 Process alignment 

 

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 COMPANY shall follow the Nokia NET CREATE process as per the process implementation
plan. 

  
 36 

 COMPANY shall provide roadmap information using the Nokia template of COMPANY products as well as harmonize the
decision milestones to achieve unified R&D governance and high quality level consistently across BGs. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The compensation mechanism for these services is described in Exhibit 1, section
7. 
 R&D Strategy: 
 Common subcontracting
approach: 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 COMPANY shall apply Nokia subcontracting guidance, in particular 

 

	 	1.	follow the rules of subcontractor engagement per product (classification) 

  

	 	2.	use common criteria for the selection of subcontractors 

  

	 	3.	use common Terms & Conditions 

  

	 	4.	insource R&D work according to classification 

  

	 	5.	in the case of contracted volume towards subcontractors, support flexible allocation of R&D work to subcontractors according to Portfolio plan and BL classification 

 

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The party owning the IP of the product benefiting from the services, as per
Exhibit 2, will compensate the other party as per Exhibit 1, Pricing Method 1. 

  
 37 

 ANNEX 3.3: RECIPROCAL DELIVER-RELATED SERVICES 

Reselling Services 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Nokia and COMPANY will be cooperate for the provision of services from its entire
services portfolio catalog to the other party. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1. 

  
 38 

 ANNEX 3.4: RECIPROCAL HR-RELATED SERVICES 

HR support 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Both Parties to provide HR personnel to perform HR tasks for organizations belonging
to either Party in accordance with guidelines set out by HR management. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme 

 HR Costs to be compensated in accordance with Pricing Method 5 in Exhibit 1. 

Academy (Learning Management) 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Access to COMPANY courses for Nokia employees and access to Nokia courses for COMPANY
employees. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 HR Costs to be compensated in accordance with Pricing Method 5 in Exhibit 1. 

Compensation (including compensation scheme for both companies, harmonization, mobility, etc.: 

 

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 LTI - long term incentives. 

This represents any equity programs (performance shares, restricted share awards, options) that Nokia may want to run as a global company. Under such program,
the Nokia Board awards certain number of equity to employees nominated by the business. 
 Share in Success - subsidized share purchase program. 

For each 2 shares an employee purchases, the company provides 3rd share for free. The program typically enrolls in May and runs from 1 Jul to 30 Jun next year
with the shares being delivered in Oct the following year. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 HR Costs to be compensated in accordance with Pricing Method 5 in Exhibit 1. 

  
 39 

 ANNEX 3.5: MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS 

Marketing and Communications 
  

	 	a)	Description of Service 

 The parties shall work on joint Marketing and Communications activities as per the
instructions set by managers appointed for the Marketing and Communications functions. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 Compensation as described for function of Marketing and Communication, Exhibit 1 Pricing
Method 5. 
 Brand Strategy 
  

	 	a)	Description of Service 

 The parties shall jointly develop and implement a Brand strategy and plan, in
accordance with instructions set by by Nokia management, including, but not limited to, rebranding of products (including type approvals, product labels and packaging), services, sales and supplier material to use the brand Nokia or in some cases
other brands belonging to either Nokia or the Company. Such rebranding to include supply related documentation, like orders, invoices, address labels, customer documentation and changes needed in Company’s IT systems. The parties shall ensure
such changes also with respective suppliers and EMS companies. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 Compensation as described for function of Marketing and Communication, Exhibit 1 Pricing
Method 5. 

  
 40 

 ANNEX 3.6: RECIPROCAL REAL ESTATE-RELATED SERVICES 

Hosting of employees from different company (Work Spaces for cross seating) 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Provide Office Space (or other spaces, e.g. warehouse, lab) incl. all regular facility
services for permanent or temporary usage as required: 
 In case of site consolidations or moves from NOKIA teams to COMPANY sites and vice verca the
“Host” will provide workspace for the respective party. So far no move has been decided, but this can/will start during 1H2016. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 Compensation as described for function of Real Estate, Exhibit 1 Pricing Method 5. 

Prepare and Establish Workplace for Employees from different company (Project Costs for cross seating): 

 

	 	a)	Description of service (for site consolidations): 

 These services are related to project execution and related
efforts to prepare, renovate, fit out spaces as a part of Quick Wins, Consolidation following the Location Strategy. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 Compensation as described for function of Real Estate, Exhibit 1 mechanism 5. Real Estate
Capex treated as per Pricing Method 6 in Exhibit 1. 

  
 41 

 ANNEX 3.7: RECIPROCAL SUPPLY-RELATED SERVICES 

Plan: Demand, Supply and Inventory Planning 
  

	 	a)	Description of service 

 Demand Planning: 

Conduct joint Monthly “Market Decision Meetings” for MN scope. COMPANY WLS Planning has to translate the available demand information (Market DPA
performance, Demand plan summary, Over and under planning status, HW sales value and volume alignment, Scenarios & Obsolescence risks) into the right format to allow making a consolidated “Market Fact Pack” powerpoint package. 

Conduct joint Monthly “Global Demand Plan Approval Meetings” for MN scope. COMPANY WLS Planning has to translate the available demand information
(Demand verification/global demand plan overview, Unit level global demand adjustments, Overview of adjustments, Scenario planning & flexibility & market demand flexibility, Market level summaries) into the right format to allow making a
consolidated “Global DP report” powerpoint package. 
 S&OP and eS&OP: 

COMPANY WLS Planning to translate the needed demand/supply/revenue reporting into Nokia agreed S&OP package & Pre-S&OP. Having a monthly joint
meeting for S&OP and eS&OP according to current format from NOKIA to mitigate cross unit, overlapping products (Company and Nokia) risks 

Supply Planning: 
 COMPANY WLS Planning Joining meeting on
supply scenarios (incl. flexibility) and customer priority meeting (not needed) for critical situations. 
 Supplier Collaboration & Escalation
management & Allocations: 
 COMPANY WLS Planning joining weekly alignment meeting on critical components (per supplier) for the overlapping scope of
COMPANY WLS products. (Only for Top20 Level 3 category suppliers) 
 COMPANY WLS Planning joining Monthly supplier collaboration meeting to discuss jointly
with overlapping suppliers with one Nokia voice. 
  

	 	a)	Compensation scheme 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1.

 Enable business reporting 
  

	 	a)	Description of service 

 The parties to cooperate on the aggregation of customer, product and supplier data as
well as the definition, establishment and reporting of performance metrics and KPIs as well as the related Governance and reviews 

  
 42 

 Business Performance Management 

Nokia and Company to prepare and share Data and KPIs / performance management metrics on daily / weekly / monthly basis (to vary per metric) using common
definitions 
 Nokiaand Company designated leaders to join respective periodical Performance review meetings, hosted at N-1/N-2/N-3 respectively, and
support the decision making. 
 Master Data Management 

Nokia and Company to provide master data management services to each other, e.g. Nokia and Company to periodically iterate and maintain common master data
mapping rules 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1. 

Design of new blueprint, policies and efficiency programs 
  

	 	a)	Description of service 

 Nokia and Company to provide supplier base and supplier relationship management
services to each other, e.g. Nokia to share information with Company on supplier price levels to prioritize Company supplier contracts for optimization 

Nokia and Company expert groups to define common supplier contract optimization approaches 

Nokia and Company to send out common supplier “wedding letters”, etc. 

Nokia and Company to provide details on Supplier disqualification and Supplier Claim (From & To) management 

Nokia and Company to provide details on Purchase Orders, planned, in process and sent to common suppliers 

Nokia and Company to provide details on Common supplier quality records and improvement plans if applicable 

Nokia and Company to provide details on Lead Supplier Mgrs: supplier mgmt. services mutually provided (when Lead SM is from COMPANY then Company provides the
service to Nokia and vice-versa) 
 Nokia and Company to provide details on Orchestration of MWC 2016 Supplier interactions (via Nokia SRM team) 

Nokia and Company to provide details on Advanced Procurement Service towards Nokia Procurement 

Nokia and Company to provide eachother’s procurement teams access to their respective Procurement and sourcing tools to track Supplier data, POs issued,
and any other relevant procurement information 
 Nokia and COMPANY provides procurement systems tools and services to execute procurement end to end
activities (including but not limited to supplier screening, supplier negotiations, supplier data management, supplier contracting, supplier order management, supplier performance evaluation, supplier quality performance, supplier cost analyses)

 Nokia and COMPANY provides synergy savings evaluations for common supplier, material and services use. 

Nokia and COMPANY provides Procurement personnel, team members to execute common supplier relationship management, negotiations on behalf of the above
mentioned companies. 
 Nokia and COMPANY provides possibility of cross ordering for any indirect, product or services. 

  
 43 

 Nokia and COMPANY measures synergy savings for both companies executed by common supplier management. 

Nokia and COMPANY provides financial savings analyses for synergy savings. 

Nokia and COMPANY guarantees access and possibility of cross ordering for each other supplier contracts. 

Nokia and COMPANY shares the Key Process Indicators of procurement organisations in the buy to pay process. 

Nokia and COMPANY provides and shares the necessary materials, services and indirect (end use) forecasts for procurement organisations. 

Nokia and COMPANY to provide each other access to their respective procurement tools 

 

	 	b)	Compensation scheme 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1. 

Order management and distribution 
  

	 	a)	Description of service 

 The parties agree to cooperate on processes and guidelines around combined
ordering/shipping/invoicing, intercompany prices. Operational governance and meeting practice agreed to support business steering and decision making. 
  

	 	•	 	Company and Nokia to agree on cross-provisioning of order management services, e.g. Nokia receives order for Company products and re-routes the order to Company and vice versa. Common clearing team established with
helpdesk to support Customer operations / BG’s in offer and order support. Single point of contact created for all top CT’s with cross BG / Company ordering needs Nokia and Company expert groups to define common supplier contract
optimization approaches 

  

	 	•	 	Nokia & Company to share HS Code classification and agree future company level aligned HS codes for all products 

  

	 	•	 	Monthly / Weekly operational delivery performance meeting held in key functions to support business continuity and steer business performance 

 

	 	•	 	Nokia & Company to have combined project team to implement branding strategy for Products, unit packaging, Transportation, over packaging, shipping documents and labels. Nokia or Company employees can support /
develop the operations and process improvements in other company as agreed by the N-3 leaders and mirrored organizations Share sensitive compliance data to ensure company risks can be assessed and management. Nokia and Company to provide
details on Supplier disqualification and Supplier Claim (From & To) management 

  

	 	•	 	Nokia and Company to have joint LSP operational reviews for global LSPs (transportation & warehousing). Nokia and Company to have joint governance model to make decisions and provide guidance across all regions, for
all business lines and for end-to-end distribution (global and regional units) regarding key decisions e.g. 

  
 44 

	 	•	 	Distribution related RFQ launch and select vendors based on RFQ results 

  

	 	•	 	WH consolidation activities (location and LSP decisions), 

  

	 	•	 	Transportation lane consolidation, 

  

	 	•	 	LSP changes 

  

	 	•	 	Packaging related decisions 

  

	 	•	 	Harmonization of processes / governance 

  

	 	•	 	Company and Nokia to provide warehouse capacity to each other, e.g. X m2 of Nokia warehouse space to be leased to Company 

  

	 	•	 	Company and Nokia to provide distribution services to each other, e.g. Company to distribute x units of Nokia products in z markets. Nokia and Company to provide details on Common supplier quality records and
improvement plans if applicable 

  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1. 

Manufacturing 
  

	 	a)	Description of service 

 The Parties will cooperate in the identification of specific factory opportunities for
synergy alignment, demand plan alignment for manufacturing locations and capturing of scale of manufacturing network. 
 Make Council: Nokia and COMPANY
leaders of Operations and business functions would jointly attend Make Council, until designated leaders are appointed. After this, the designated leader will participate and take decisions. 

Make Leaders Monthly reporting: Agree to share operational reporting metrics, financial reporting metrics with objective to be able to report with each
company independently and merged within 1 month of close. Pre close alignment of critical KPI and MBR reporting strategy is needed to be able to modify any KPI to facilitate common reporting. 

Make automated reporting: Support each other in data strategies, tool selection and deployments to as quickly as possible align to common reporting. 

Material Management - inventory rebalancing: Agreement to share excess inventory information and work together to optimize Nokia and COMPANY inventory levels
to avoid unnecessary write down. 
 Capture Scale of Manufacturing network: review planned changes to manufacturing network at manufacturing council and
ensure both sides are aligned prior to action. End decision will be with Nominated MAKE leader. 
 EMS contract alignment starts: All procurement teams work
together to align suppliers to terms and enable both companies to leverage new footprint. 
 Start Implementation of SCO changes: Agree to continue SCO
business unchanged until master data alignment when it would grow business model to support Nokia products. 

  
 45 

 Material Management - critical components during prototyping and Ramp up: Agreement to share excess inventory
information and work together to optimize Nokia and COMPANY inventory levels to avoid unnecessary write down. 
 X-Functional decisions bodies across
Organizations within business group and x-functional to other organizations: Agreement needed to share even company confidential information on products and business cases. 

Sharing of product related documentation and business case relevant information incl. IPR: Agreement needed to share even company confidential information on
products and business cases. 
 Sharing technology related plans, roadmaps, content etc. for component, product, testing and manufacturing: Agreement needed
to share even company confidential information on products and business cases. 
 Resource balancing and x-learning: Agreement needed to be able to balance
/re-balance resource needs (FTE), including access to relevant information until Day 1. 
 Sharing of product and production relevant “design-for
Excellence” methods targets, and measurements DFx metrix: Agreement needed to share even company confidential information on products and business cases. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 8, Exhibit 1. 

  
 46 

 ANNEX 3.8: RECIPROCAL IT-RELATED SERVICES 

Connectivity: 
 Interconnection links
between the internal networks of the companies in the USA, in Europe and in India. Special laboratory connections between Nokia and COMPANY laboratories. 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Interconnection link in the USA and in Europe is provided by COMPANY; the
interconnection link in India is provided by Nokia; each party manages through their providers the respective entry/exit point to their own network. Five COMPANY labs are connected (Villarceaux, Nozay (France) with Tampere (Finland), Murray Hill
(USA) with Arlington Heights (USA) and Tampere (Finland), Timisoara (Romania) with Krakow and Wroclaw (Poland), Ottawa (Canada) with Bangalore (India), Mountain View (USA) with Espoo (Finland)). More connections may be needed later on. 

Additional IT support needed for resolving overlapping IP addresses in both companies. 

 

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 See mechanism 5 in Exhibit 1 for rebalancing of cost in IT. 

Access to the Guest network and to the office network at all sites of each of the companies: 

 

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Each party provides guest access are office network access to other parties employees,
who visit or work in their locations. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 5, Exhibit
1.@nokia.com email addresses to all COMPANY companies: 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Nokia to implement inbound email receiving and forwarding to COMPANY (after @nokia.com
addresses are deployed). Nokia to provide related IT capacity, technical support and Nokia IT Service Desk services 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 5, Exhibit 1. 

  
 47 

 IT services changes: 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Changes on COMPANY side due to Integration (some IT development activities cancelled
or develop due to Integration, tbd), e.g. (but not limited to) one additional Communication Tool (Jabber) deployment on COMPANY side, intranet/internet rebranding on COMPANY side, rebranding of IT systems and tools, application changes to support
Nokia accounting periods, building new interfaces to Nokia systems. Ramping down obsolete IT services. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 5, Exhibit 1. 

IT support business functions requirements: 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Supporting other streams in order to meet business requirements, like: 

 

	 	(i)	CFO: IT support for Closing Finance and Control requirements for financial group consolidation (incl. reporting): 

  

	 	–	Group consolidation: COMPANY to prepare Conversion tool, Nokia/COMPANY to work on intercompany reclassification and master data. 

  

	 	–	Management reporting: COMPANY to enable Nokia view in Essbase for Redbox, Nokia to set up Redbox (essbase) and both companies implementing hierarchies in Redbox. Nokia to set up conversion tool for data transfer, both
companies to validate the reporting data transfers 

  

	 	(ii)	All streams: Support in E2E process testing and implementation, Use Case collection. Provide needed master data (or other required data) to Nokia systems and upload Nokia data to COMPANY systems when required by
business process designs. Perform needed data migrations when needed. 

  

	 	(iii)	Support in Releases external and internal communication on Nokia and COMPANY side. 

  

	 	(iv).	Supply Chain: COMPANY Planning tool adaptations to support Nokia Planning calendars 

  

	 	(v)	HR: Nokia/COMPANY IT support for organization design and people mapping tool implementation and data upload  

  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 5, Exhibit 1. 

  
 48 

 IT Application support 
  

	 	a)	Description of service 

 Additional IT support for ticket handing and setting up the process in
COMPANY Service Desk due to cross use of applications. Additional HW capacity and SW license costs due to increased number of IT service users. 

Nokia /COMPANY: cross use application prioritization and technical implementation planning and execution. 

Nokia to set up Common landing page for sharing information about the Integration activities. Both companies to provide material, setting up
accesses/access control and do testing. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The service is compensated through the Pricing Method 5, Exhibit 1. 

ANNEX 3.9: RECIPROCAL LEGAL & COMPLIANCE-RELATED SERVICES 

Legal 
 Legal service support: 

 

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Each of the Parties to provide legal support from L&C management, central legal
teams, business group legal teams and customer operations legal teams including contract management to the other Party. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 See mechanism 5 in Exhibit 1 for rebalancing of cost in Legal.& Compliance. 

  
 49 

 ANNEX 3.10: RECIPROCAL FINANCE-RELATED SERVICES 

Finance support: 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Each of the Parties will provide personnel and other resources to perform finance
related tasks of the respective units of both Parties as directed by the CFO and respective management. 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 See mechanism 5 in Exhibit 1 for rebalancing of cost within CFO. 

  
 50 

 ANNEX 3.11: RECIPROCAL TO-RELATED SERVICES 

Color books (incl. Concept and deployment): 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Color Book deployment & training project to be resourced on
COMPANY side to enable faster ramp-up 
 Color Books@Integration deployment team resourced partly with COMPANY resources to enable deployment
of the CB methodology to be depoyed across the BGs. Estimated resource need to be defined 
  

	 	b)	Compensation scheme: 

 The compensation mechanism for these services are described in Exhibit 1, section 9. 

Color books (incl. Concept and deployment) [Belongs to Nokia services] 
  

	 	a)	Description of service: 

 Color Book deployment & training expertize to be provided by Nokia Color Book
resources 
 Knowledgable Color Book expertize to be provided from Nokia to train and deploy the Color Book menthodology to COMPANY 

 

	 	b)	Compensation scheme 

 The compensation mechanism for these services are described in Exhibit 1, section 9. 

  
 51

Source: [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00257-of-00352.parquet"}, [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00257-of-00352.parquet"}]]