Document:

ex_207336.htm

EXHIBIT 10.2

VERACYTE, INC.

 

2013 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 

Notice of Stock Unit Award

 

You have been granted the following Stock Units representing shares of Common Stock of Veracyte, Inc. (the “Company”) under the Company’s 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Stock Units are subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Notice of Stock Unit Award, the Stock Unit Agreement and the Additional Terms for Participants Providing Services Outside the United States attached to the Stock Unit Agreement as Exhibit A (collectively, the “Agreement”) and the Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference. Certain capitalized terms used, but not defined in this Notice of Stock Unit Award and the Agreement, are defined in the Plan.

 

	
			Name of Participant:

				
			[-]

			
	
			Total Number of Stock Units Granted:

				
			[-]

			
	
			Date of Grant:

				
			[-]

			
	
			Vesting Commencement Date:

				
			[-]

			
	
			Vesting Schedule:

				
			The Stock Units subject to this Award vest when you complete each [X months] of continuous Service from the Vesting Commencement Date.] [Sample language - actual vesting schedule, which may be performance-based, to be inserted as approved on grant-by-grant basis.] 

			
	 	 

 

By executing this document, which may be accomplished by e-signature or other electronic indication of acceptance, you and the Company agree that these Stock Units are granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Agreement, both of which are attached to and made a part of this document. 

 

By executing this document you further agree that the Company may deliver by e-mail all documents relating to the Plan or this Award (including without limitation, prospectuses required by the Securities and Exchange Commission) and all other documents that the Company is required to deliver to its security holders (including without limitation, annual reports and proxy statements). You also agree that the Company may deliver these documents by posting them on a website maintained by the Company or by a third party under contract with the Company. If the Company posts these documents on a website, it will notify you by e-mail.

 

 

 

	 	
			VERACYTE, Inc.

			
	 	 
	
			 

				
			 

			By: __________________________________________

			
	________________________________________________	
			Its: __________________________________________

			
	
			Print Name

				
			 

			

 

 

 

 

 

VERACYTE, INC.

 

2013 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 

Stock Unit Agreement

 

The Stock Units are subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Notice of Stock Unit Award, this Stock Unit Agreement and the Additional Terms for Participants Providing Services Outside the United States attached to this Stock Unit Agreement as Exhibit A (collectively the “Agreement”) and the Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Unless otherwise defined herein, the terms defined in the Plan shall have the same defined meanings in the Notice of Stock Unit Award and the Agreement.

 

	
			Payment for Stock Units

				
			No cash payment is required for the Stock Units you receive. You are receiving the Stock Units in consideration for Services rendered by you.

			 

			
	
			Vesting

				
			The Stock Units that you are receiving will vest in installments, as shown in the Notice of Stock Unit Award.

			 

			
	 	
			No additional Stock Units vest after your Service has terminated for any reason [, except as provided in your Change of Control and Severance Agreement to the extent in effect at the time of termination] [reference to Change of Control and Severance Agreement to be included only if applicable to the Participant].

			
	
			Forfeiture

				
			 

			If your Service terminates for any reason, then your Award expires immediately as to the number of Stock Units that have not vested before the termination date and do not vest as a result of termination.

			 

			
	 	
			This means that the unvested Stock Units will immediately be cancelled. You receive no payment for Stock Units that are forfeited.

			 

			
	 	
			The Company determines when your Service terminates for this purpose and all purposes under the Plan and its determinations are conclusive and binding on all persons.

			 

			
	
			Leaves of Absence

				
			For purposes of this Award, your Service does not terminate when you go on a military leave, a sick leave or another bona fide leave of absence, if the leave of absence was approved by the Company in writing and if continued crediting of Service is required by the terms of the leave or by applicable law. But your Service terminates when the approved leave ends, unless you immediately return to active work.

			 

			
	 	
			If you go on a leave of absence, then the vesting schedule specified in the Notice of Stock Unit Award may be adjusted in accordance with the Company’s leave of absence policy or the terms of your leave. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except as otherwise required by applicable laws, vesting of your Stock Units will be suspended during any unpaid leave of absence. If you commence working on a part-time basis, then the vesting schedule specified in the Notice of Stock Unit Award may be adjusted in accordance with the Company’s part-time work policy or the terms of an agreement between you and the Company pertaining to your part-time schedule.

			 

			
	
			Nature of Stock Units

				
			Your Stock Units are mere bookkeeping entries. They represent only the Company’s unfunded and unsecured promise to issue Shares on a future date. As a holder of Stock Units, you have no rights other than the rights of a general creditor of the Company.

			 

			

 

 

 

 

	
			No Voting Rights or

			Dividends

				
			Your Stock Units are mere bookkeeping entries. They represent only the Company’s unfunded and unsecured promise to issue Shares on a future date. As a holder of Stock Units, you have no rights other than the rights of a general creditor of the Company.

			 

			
	
			Stock Units

			Nontransferable

				
			You may not sell, transfer, assign, pledge or otherwise dispose of any Stock Units (nor any right arising thereunder). For instance, you may not use your Stock Units as security for a loan. If you attempt to do any of these things, your Stock Units will immediately become invalid and will be cancelled.

			 

			
	
			Settlement of Stock Units

				
			Each of your vested Stock Units will be settled within 30 days following the applicable date of vesting under the Vesting Schedule set forth in the Notice of Stock Unit Award.

			 

			
	 	
			At the time of settlement, you will receive one Share for each vested Stock Unit; provided, however, that no fractional Shares will be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or this Agreement, and the Committee will determine whether cash will be paid in lieu of any fractional Share or whether such fractional Share and any rights thereto will be canceled, terminated or otherwise eliminated. In addition, the Shares are issued to you subject to the condition that the issuance of the Shares not violate any law or regulation.

			 

			
	
			Withholding Taxes and Stock Withholding

				
			Regardless of any action the Company or your actual employer (the “Employer”) takes with respect to any or all income tax, social insurance, payroll tax, payment on account or other tax-related withholding (“Tax-Related Items”), you acknowledge that the ultimate liability for all Tax-Related Items legally due by you is and remains your responsibility and that the Company and/or the Employer (1) make no representations or undertakings regarding the treatment of any Tax-Related Items in connection with any aspect of the Award, including the settlement of the Stock Units, the subsequent sale of Shares acquired pursuant to such settlement and the receipt of any dividends; and (2) do not commit to structure the terms of the Award or any aspect of the Stock Units to reduce or eliminate your liability for Tax-Related Items.

			 

			
	 	
			Prior to any relevant taxable or tax withholding event, as applicable, you shall pay or make adequate arrangements satisfactory to the Company and/or the Employer, as applicable, to satisfy all Tax-Related Items.

			 

			In this regard, you authorize the Company and/or the Employer (and their respective agents) to satisfy the obligations with regard to all Tax-Related Items by one or a combination of the following, as determined at the sole discretion of the Company and only to the extent permissible under local law: (1) withholding from your wages or other cash compensation paid to you by the Company and/or the Employer; (2) withholding from proceeds of the sale of Shares acquired upon settlement of the Stock Units either through a voluntary sale or through a mandatory sale arranged by the Company (on your behalf pursuant to this authorization); (3) withholding of Shares to otherwise be issued upon settlement of the Stock Units; or (4) any other arrangement approved by the Committee and permitted under applicable law; all under such rules as may be established by the Committee and in compliance with the Company’s Insider Trading Policy and 10b5-1 Trading Plan Policy, if applicable; provided, however, that the Committee shall establish the method prior to the Tax-Related Items withholding event and, unless determined otherwise by the Committee in advance of a Tax-Related Items withholding event, the method of withholding for this Stock Unit will be (3) above.

			 

			

2

 

 

 

	 	
			If the obligation for Tax-Related Items is satisfied by withholding in Shares, for tax purposes, you are deemed to have been issued the full number of Shares subject to the vested Stock Units, notwithstanding that a number of the Shares are held back solely for the purpose of paying the Tax-Related Items due as a result of any aspect of your participation in the Plan. The Fair Market Value of these Shares, determined as of as of the date that the taxes are required to be withheld, will be applied as a credit against the Tax-Related Items withholding. Depending on the withholding method, the Company may withhold or account for Tax-Related Items by considering applicable statutory withholding rates or other applicable withholding rates, including up to the maximum permissible statutory rate for your tax jurisdiction(s) in which case you will have no entitlement to the equivalent amount in Shares and will receive a refund of any over-withheld amount in cash in accordance with applicable law.

			 

			
	 	
			Finally, you shall pay to the Company or the Employer any amount of Tax-Related Items that the Company or the Employer may be required to withhold as a result of your participation in the Plan or your purchase of Shares that cannot be satisfied by the means previously described. The Company may refuse to deliver the Shares if you fail to comply with your obligations in connection with the Tax-Related Items as described in this section, and your rights to the Shares shall be forfeited if you do not comply with such obligations on or before the scheduled settlement deadline.

			 

			
	
			Restrictions on Resale

				
			You agree not to sell any Shares at a time when applicable laws, Company policies or an agreement between the Company and its underwriters prohibit a sale. This restriction will apply as long as your Service continues and for such period of time after the termination of your Service as the Company may specify.

			 

			
	
			No Retention Rights

				
			Neither your Award nor this Agreement gives you the right to be employed or retained by the Company or a subsidiary of the Company in any capacity. The Company and its subsidiaries reserve the right to terminate your Service at any time, with or without cause.

			 

			
	
			Adjustments

				
			The number of Stock Units covered by this Award shall be subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, a stock dividend or a similar change in Company Shares, and in other circumstances, as set forth in the Plan. The forfeiture provisions and restrictions provided for in this Agreement will apply to all new, substitute or additional Stock Units or securities to which you are entitled by reason of this Award.

			 

			
	
			Successors and Assigns 

				
			Except as otherwise provided in the Plan or this Agreement, every term of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, legatees, legal representatives, successors, transferees and assigns.

			 

			
	
			Notice

				
			Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement shall be given in writing and shall be deemed effectively given upon the earliest of personal delivery, receipt or the third full day following mailing with postage and fees prepaid, addressed to the other party hereto at the address last known in the Company’s records or at such other address as such party may designate by ten (10) days’ advance written notice to the other party hereto.

			 

			
	
			Applicable Law and Choice of Venue

				
			This Agreement will be interpreted and enforced under the laws of the State of California (without regard to their choice-of-law provisions). For purposes of litigating any dispute that arises directly or indirectly from the relationship of the parties evidenced by this Award or the Agreement, the parties hereby submit to and consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the State of California and agree that such litigation shall be conducted only in the courts of San Mateo County, California, or the federal courts for the United States for the Northern District of California, and no other courts, were this grant is made and/or to be performed.

			 

			

3

 

 

 

	
			Miscellaneous

				
			You understand and acknowledge that (i) the Plan is entirely discretionary, (ii) the Company and your employer have reserved the right to amend, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time, (iii) the grant of your Award does not in any way create any contractual or other right to receive additional grants of awards (or benefits in lieu of awards) at any time or in any amount and (iv) all determinations with respect to any additional grants, including (without limitation) the times when awards will be granted, the number of Shares subject to the awards, and the vesting schedule, will be at the sole discretion of the Company.

			 

			
	 	
			The value of this Award shall be an extraordinary item of compensation outside the scope of your employment contract, if any, and shall not be considered a part of your normal or expected compensation for purposes of calculating severance, resignation, redundancy or end-of-service payments, bonuses, long-service awards, pension or retirement benefits or similar payments.

			 

			
	 	
			You understand and acknowledge that participation in the Plan ceases upon termination of your Service for any reason, except as may explicitly be provided otherwise in the Plan or this Agreement.

			 

			
	 	
			You hereby authorize and direct your employer to disclose to the Company or any Subsidiary any information regarding your employment, the nature and amount of your compensation and the fact and conditions of your participation in the Plan, as your employer deems necessary or appropriate to facilitate the administration of the Plan.

			 

			
	 	
			You consent to the collection, use and transfer of personal data as described in this subsection. You understand and acknowledge that the Company, your employer and the Company’s other Subsidiaries hold certain personal information regarding you for the purpose of managing and administering the Plan, including (without limitation) your name, home address, telephone number, date of birth, social insurance number, salary, nationality, job title, any Shares or directorships held in the Company and details of all awards or any other entitlements to Shares awarded, canceled, exercised, vested, unvested or outstanding in your favor (the “Data”). You further understand and acknowledge that the Company and/or its Subsidiaries will transfer Data among themselves as necessary for the purpose of implementation, administration and management of your participation in the Plan and that the Company and/or any Subsidiary may each further transfer Data to any third party assisting the Company in the implementation, administration and management of the Plan. You understand and acknowledge that the recipients of Data may be located in the United States or elsewhere. You authorize such recipients to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer Data, in electronic or other form, for the purpose of administering your participation in the Plan, including a transfer to any broker or other third party with whom you elect to deposit Shares acquired under the Plan of such Data as may be required for the administration of the Plan and/or the subsequent holding of Shares on your behalf. You may, at any time, view the Data, require any necessary modifications of Data or withdraw the consents set forth in this subsection by contacting the Human Resources Department of the Company in writing.

			 

			
	
			The Plan and Other Agreements

				
			The text of the Plan is incorporated in this Agreement by reference. All capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan. This Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire understanding between you and the Company regarding this Award. Any prior agreements, commitments or negotiations concerning this Award are superseded. This Agreement may be amended by the Committee without our consent, however, if any such amendment would materially impair your rights under this Agreement, this Agreement may be amended on by another written agreement, signed by you and the Company.

			 

			

4

 

 

 

	
			Additional Terms for Participants Providing Services Outside the United States

				
			To the extent that you provide services to the Company or a Subsidiary in a country other than the United States, the Stock Units shall be subject to additional or substitute terms as shall be set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. If you relocate to one of the countries included in Exhibit A during the life of the Stock Units, Exhibit A, including the provisions for such country, shall apply to you and the Stock Units, to the extent that the Company determines that the application of such provisions is necessary or advisable in order to comply with applicable law or facilitate the administration of the Plan. In addition, the Company reserves the right to impose other requirements on the Stock Units and the Shares issued upon vesting of the Stock Units, to the extent that the Company determines it is necessary or advisable in order to comply with local laws or facilitate the administration of the Plan, and to require you to sign any additional agreements or undertakings that may be necessary to accomplish the foregoing.

			

 

THROUGH YOUR ELECTRONIC ACCEPTANCE

OF THE NOTICE OF STOCK UNITS GRANT,

you agree to all of the terms and conditions

described IN NOTICE OF STOCK UNITS GRANT, 

THE AGREEMENT and in the PlAN.

5

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT A

ADDITIONAL TERMS APPLICABLE TO PARTICIPANTS WHO 

PROVIDE SERVICES IN THE IDENTIFIED COUNTRIES

 

This Exhibit A, which forms part of the Agreement, includes additional terms and conditions applicable to Participants who provide services to the Company in the countries identified below. These terms and conditions are in addition to those terms set forth in the Notice of Stock Unit Award, the Stock Unit Agreement and in the Plan. To the extent there are any inconsistencies between these terms and conditions and those set forth in the Notice of Stock Unit Award, the Stock Unit Agreement or the Plan, these terms and conditions shall prevail. Any capitalized term used in this Exhibit A without definition shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Plan, Notice of Stock Unit Award or the Stock Unit Agreement, as applicable.

 

For the Participant’s convenience and information, the Company has provided certain general information regarding some of the tax and/or exchange control requirements that may apply to the Participant in certain of the countries below. Such information is current only as of June 2020, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any such information and does not ensure that it is complete or correct. This information may not apply to the Participant’s individual situation, and may not be current as of any particular date in the future. The absence of any information on tax or foreign exchange requirements for any particular country should not be regarded as an indication that no such requirements apply in that country. The laws, rules and regulations of any country regarding the holding of securities may be subject to frequent change. The Participant is advised to seek appropriate professional advice as to how the relevant exchange control and tax laws in the Participant’s country may apply to the Participant’s individual situation.

 

GLOBAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PARTICIPANTS IN ALL COUNTRIES OTHER THAN THE UNITED STATES

 

 

No Guarantee of Continued Service

 

The vesting of the Stock Units pursuant to the vesting schedule will occur only if the Participant continues as an Outside Director, Consultant, or Employee (as applicable) to the Company or a Subsidiary through the applicable vesting date. The Participant further acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement, the transactions contemplated hereunder and the vesting schedule do not constitute an express or implied promise or continued engagement as an Outside Director, Consultant or Employee for the vesting period, for any period, or at all, and will not interfere in any way with the Participant’s right or the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to effect a termination of Services at any time, with or without cause in compliance with applicable laws nor shall it be construed to amend or modify the terms of any consultancy, directorship, employment or other service agreement between the Participant and the Company or any Subsidiary.

 

Acknowledgment of Nature of Plan and Stock Units

 

In accepting the award of Stock Units pursuant to this Agreement, the Participant acknowledges that:

 

	 	
			a)

				
			for labor law purposes, Stock Units and Shares issued upon vesting thereof are an extraordinary item that do not constitute wages of any kind for services of any kind rendered to the Company or to the Participant’s employer, and the grant of Stock Units is outside the scope of the Participant’s employment contract, if any;

			

 

	 	
			b)

				
			for labor law purposes, the grant of Stock Units and the Shares issued upon vesting thereof are not part of normal or expected wages or salary for any purposes, including, but not limited to, calculation of any severance, resignation, termination, redundancy, dismissal, end of service payments, bonuses, holiday pay, long-service awards, pension or retirement benefits or similar payments and in no event should be considered as compensation for, or relating in any way to, past services for the Company or any Subsidiary;

			

 

	 	
			c)

				
			Stock Units and the Shares issued upon vesting thereof are not intended to replace any pension rights or compensation;

			

 

 

 

 

	 	
			d)

				
			neither the grant of Stock Units nor any provision of this Agreement, the Plan or the policies adopted pursuant to the Plan confer upon the Participant any right with respect to employment or continuation of current employment and shall not be interpreted to form an employment contract or relationship with the Company or any Subsidiary;

			

 

	 	
			e)

				
			the future value of the underlying Shares is unknown and cannot be predicted with certainty;

			

 

	 	
			f)

				
			in consideration of the grant of Stock Units hereunder, no claim or entitlement to compensation or damages arises from termination of Stock Units, and no claim or entitlement to compensation or damages shall arise from forfeiture of the Stock Units resulting from termination of the Participant’s employment by the Company or any Subsidiary (for any reason whatsoever and whether or not in breach of local labor laws) and the Participant irrevocably releases the Company and the Participant’s employer from any such claim that may arise; if, notwithstanding the foregoing, any such claim is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have arisen, the Participant shall be deemed irrevocably to have waived the Participant’s entitlement to pursue such claim; and

			

 

	 	
			g)

				
			in the event of termination of the Participant’s employment (whether or not in breach of local labor laws), the Participant’s rights to vest in the Stock Units under the Plan, if any, will terminate effective as of the date that the Participant is no longer actively employed and will not be extended by any notice period mandated under applicable local laws (e.g., active employment would not include a period of “garden leave” or similar period pursuant to applicable local laws); the administrator of the Plan shall have the exclusive discretion to determine when the Participant is no longer actively employed for purposes of Participant’s Stock Units.

			

 

Rights as Stockholder

 

Neither the Participant nor any person claiming under or through the Participant will have any of the rights or privileges of a stockholder of the Company in respect of any Shares that may become deliverable hereunder unless and until such Shares have been issued, recorded on the records of the Company or its transfer agents or registrars, and delivered in certificate or book entry form to the Participant. For the avoidance of doubt, neither the Participant nor any person claiming under or through the Participant will have no right to receive any dividend equivalent, or similar right, nor any economic right, in respect of the Stock Units awarded to the Participant.

 

FRANCE

 

Tax Information

 

The Stock Units are not intended to be French tax-qualified awards.

 

Exchange Control Information

 

The Participant must declare to the customs and excise authorities any cash and securities the Participant imports or exports without the use of a financial institution when the value of such cash or securities exceeds a certain amount. The Participant should consult with the Participant’s professional advisor. In addition, if the Participant is a French resident, the Participant may hold stock outside France provided the Participant declares all foreign bank and brokerage accounts on an annual basis (including the accounts that were open and those that were closed during the tax year) on a specific form in the Participant’s income tax return.

 

Securities Law

 

This offer does not require a prospectus to be submitted for approval to the Autorité des marchés financiers (“AMF”). The Participant may take part in the offer solely for his or her own account and any financial instruments thus acquired cannot be distributed directly or indirectly to the public otherwise than in accordance with Articles L. 411-1, L. 411-2, L. 412-1 and L. 621-8 to L. 621-8-3 of the French Monetary and Financial Code. The information provided to the Participant in this Agreement, the Plan or other documents supplied to the Participant in connection with the offer to the Participant of the Stock Units is provided as factual information only and as such is not intended to induce the Participant to accept to enter into this Agreement. Any such information does not give or purport to give any indication of the likely future financial success or performance of the Company and historical financial information gives no indication of future financial performance. The Stock Units are not intended to qualify for the favorable tax and social

2

 

 

 

security treatment in France applicable to options granted under Sections L. 225-177 to L. 225-186-1 of the French Commercial Code. Should the Participant be in any doubt as to the contents of the offer of this Stock Unit award or what course of action to take in relation to the offer, the Participant is recommended to immediately seek his or her own personal financial advice from his or her stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other independent financial advisor duly authorized by the competent authorities or bodies.

 

Data Protection

 

The Company and the Participant’s Employer will hold, collect and otherwise process certain data as set out in the Employer’s Employee Privacy Policy which has been or will be provided to the Participant separately. All personal data will be treated in accordance with applicable

data protection laws and regulations.

 

French Language Provision.

 

By signing and returning this Agreement, the Participant confirms having read and understood the documents relating to the Plan and the Agreement which were provided to the Participant in English language. The Participant accepts the terms of those documents accordingly.

 

French translation: En signant et renvoyant ce Contrat vous confirmez ainsi avoir lu et compris les documents relatifs au Plan qui vous ont été communiqués en langue anglaise. Vous en acceptez les termes en connaissance de cause.

 

 

GERMANY

 

Tax Indemnity

 

The Participant agrees to indemnify and keep indemnified the Company, any Subsidiary and his/her employing company (the “Employer”), if different, from and against any liability for or obligation to pay any Tax Liability (a “Tax Liability” being any liability for income tax, withholding tax and any other employment related taxes in any jurisdiction, including but not limited to wage tax, solidarity surcharge, church tax or social security contributions) that is attributable to (1) the grant or settlement of, or any benefit derived by the Participant from, the Stock Units, (2) the acquisition by the Participant of the Shares on settlement of the Stock Units, or (3) the disposal of any Shares.

 

Exchange Control Information

 

Cross-border payments in excess of €12,500 must be reported monthly to the German Federal Bank.  If the Participant uses a German bank to transfer a cross-border payment in excess of €12,500 in connection with the sale of Shares acquired under the Plan, the bank will make the report for the Participant.  In addition, the Participant must report any receivables, payables, or debts in foreign currency exceeding an amount of €5,000,000 on a monthly basis. Finally, the Participant must report on an annual basis if the Participant holds Shares that exceed 10% of the total voting capital of the Company.

 

Data Protection

 

The Company and the Participant’s Employer will hold, collect and otherwise process certain data as set out in the Employer’s Employee Privacy Policy which will be provided to the Participant separately. All personal data will be treated in accordance with applicable

data protection laws and regulations.

3

 

 

 

 

ISRAEL

 

Data Protection

 

Nothing in this Agreement or the Plan limits the obligations under the Privacy Protection Act, 5741-1981 (“PPA”) Chapter B.

 

The Participant acknowledges that the Company and its Subsidiaries may make the Data available to public authorities where required under locally applicable law.

 

 

SPAIN

 

Tax Withholding

 

The Participant agrees to indemnify and keep indemnified the Company, any Subsidiary and his/her employing company (the “Employer”), if different, from and against any liability for or obligation to pay any Tax Liability (a “Tax Liability” being any liability for income tax, withholding tax and any other employment related taxes in any jurisdiction, including but not limited to wage tax, solidarity surcharge, or social security contributions) that is attributable to (1) the grant or settlement of, or any benefit derived by the Participant from, the Stock Units, (2) the acquisition by the Participant of the Shares on settlement of the Stock Units, or (3) the disposal of any Shares.

 

The Stock Units cannot be settled until the Participant has made such arrangements as the Company may require for the satisfaction of any Tax Liability that may arise in connection with the vesting and settlement of the Stock Units and/or the acquisition of the Shares by the Participant. The Company shall not be required to issue, allot or transfer Shares until the Participant has satisfied this obligation.

 

Whenever the Stock Units become vested or are settled in Shares, the Company shall notify the Participant of the amount of tax, if any, which must be withheld by the Company, any Subsidiary or the Employer, if different, under all applicable tax laws. At the discretion of the Company, the Stock Units cannot be settled until the Participant has entered into an election with the Company, to either (a) remit a cash payment of the required amount of taxes to the Company, a Subsidiary or the Employer, as applicable; or (b) authorize the deduction of such amount from the Participant’s compensation (including, for the avoidance of doubt, other compensation that may be owed to the Participant by the Company, any Subsidiary or the Employer in connection with the performance of Services or otherwise due). Notwithstanding the prior sentence, with the consent of the administrator of the Plan, if relevant, and subject to any applicable legal conditions or restrictions, the Company or Subsidiary or Employer, as applicable, shall, upon the Participant’s request, accept surrender of a whole number of Shares issued hereunder (or other Shares held by the Participant) having a Fair Market Value, determined as of the date the amount of tax to be withheld is to be determined pursuant to any applicable tax laws (the “Tax Date”), not in excess of the minimum of tax required to be withheld by law to cover all or a portion of the applicable withholding taxes (with the remainder paid pursuant to the preceding sentence). In case the Participant purports to be entitled to any tax reduction or allowance in connection with income derived from the Stock Units, it shall promptly notify such circumstance to the Company, which shall factor, to the extent permitted by the applicable tax laws, the applicability of such reduction or allowance in the assessment of taxes to be withheld, subject in any event to the Participant’s compliance with any requirements imposed under applicable tax laws for their applicability (including the submission of tax forms or statements required to be delivered to the Company, a Subsidiary or the Employer, as applicable). Request for such surrender shall be made in writing in a form acceptable to the administrator of the Plan, if relevant, and shall be subject to the following restrictions: (i) the election must be made on or prior to the applicable Tax Date and (ii) once made, the election shall be irrevocable as to the particular Shares for which the election is made. Any adverse consequences to the Participant arising in connection with the share withholding procedure set forth herein, or with any representation made by the Participant relevant for the assessment of applicable withholding taxes, shall be the sole responsibility of the Participant.

 

Exchange Control and Tax Information Obligations

4

 

 

 

 

If the Participant acquires Shares issued pursuant to the Stock Units, the Participant must declare the acquisition of such securities to the Spanish Direccion General de Política Comercial y de Inversiones Extranjeras, by filing the corresponding D-5 form, within the following month to the date of acquisition of the Shares. This declaration is provided to the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for statistical purposes only.

 

In the event that the Shares acquired pursuant to the Plan and this Agreement represent more than 10% of the share capital of the Company and, provided that the net equity of the Company exceeds the statutory threshold, the Participant will have to make an annual declaration to the Spanish Direccion General de Política Comercial y de Inversiones Extranjeras about the development of the investment in non-resident entities by filing the corresponding D-8 form, within the first nine months of each calendar year.

 

In addition, in case the value of the assets held by the Participant in non-resident companies, including the Shares of the Company or the balance of transactions with non-resident companies, including the Company, exceeds the statutory threshold, the Participant must also periodically file a declaration of foreign transactions with the Statistics Department of the Bank of Spain. The periodicity of such filings will be determined by the amount of the transactions or balances held with non-resident entities.

 

Participants should consult their own tax advisors in relation to the tax implications derived from the award, holding or disposal of Stock Units or Shares, and of their potential relocation to any other jurisdiction. The Company does not assume any responsibility therefor. The holding of certain rights or assets located overseas may be required to be reported on an annual basis by means of filing an information tax form (currently tax form number 720) and may be subject to Net Wealth Tax (Impuesto sobre el Patrimonio).

 

Data Privacy

 

The Company and the Participant’s Employer will hold, collect and otherwise process certain data as set out in the Employer’s Employee Privacy Policy which will be provided to the Participant separately. All personal data will be treated in accordance with applicable data protection laws and regulations.

 

 

UNITED KINGDOM

 

Employee Share Scheme

 

The Agreement forms the rules of the employee share scheme applicable to the United Kingdom based Participants of the Company and any Subsidiaries. Only employees of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company are eligible to be granted Stock Units or be issued Shares under the Agreement. Other service providers (including Consultants or Outside Directors) who are not employees are not eligible to receive Stock Units under the Agreement in the United Kingdom. Accordingly, all references in the Agreement to the Participant’s service or termination of Service shall be interpreted as references to the Participant’s employment or termination of employment.

 

Special Tax Consequences

 

The Participant agrees to indemnify and keep indemnified the Company, any Subsidiary and his/her employing company (the “Employer”), if different, from and against any liability for or obligation to pay any Tax Liability (a “Tax Liability” being any liability for income tax, withholding tax and any other employment related taxes, employee’s National Insurance contributions or employer’s National Insurance contributions or equivalent social security contributions in any jurisdiction) that is attributable to (1) the grant or settlement of, or any benefit derived by the Participant from, the Stock Units, (2) the acquisition by the Participant of the Shares on the settlement of the Stock Units, or (3) the disposal of any Shares.

 

The Stock Units cannot be settled until the Participant has made such arrangements as the Company may require for the satisfaction of any Tax Liability that may arise in connection with the vesting and settlement of the Stock Units and/or the acquisition of the Shares by the Participant. The Company shall not be required to issue, allot or transfer Shares until the Participant has satisfied this obligation.

 

At the discretion of the Company, the Stock Units cannot be settled until the Participant has entered into an election with the Company (or his/her employer) (as appropriate) in a form approved by the Company and Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (a “Joint Election”) under which any liability of the Company and/or the employer for employer’s national insurance contributions arising in respect of the granting, vesting, settlement of or other dealing in the Stock Units, or the acquisition of Shares on the settlement of the Stock Units, is transferred to and met by the Participant.

 

The Participant undertakes that, upon request by the Company, he/she will join with his/her Employer in electing, pursuant to Section 431(1) of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (“ITEPA”) that, for relevant tax purposes, the market value of the Shares acquired on any occasion will be calculated as if the shares were not restricted and Sections 425 to 430 (inclusive) of ITEPA are not to apply to such shares.

 

The Participant agrees that if the Participant does not pay or the Participant’s Employer or the Company does not withhold from the Participant the full amount of all taxes applicable to the taxable income of the Participant resulting from the grant of the Stock Units, the vesting of the Stock Units, or the issuance of Shares (the “Tax-Related Items”) that the Participant owes due to the vesting of the Stock Units, or the release or assignment of the Stock Units for consideration, or the receipt of any other benefit in connection with the Stock Units (the “Taxable Event”) within 90 days after the Taxable Event, or such other period specified in Section 222(1)(c) of the U.K. Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003, then the amount that should have been withheld shall constitute a loan owed by the Participant to the Employer, effective 90 days after the Taxable Event. The Participant agrees that the loan will bear interest at HMRC’s official rate and will be immediately due and repayable by the Participant, and the Company and/or the Employer may recover it at any time thereafter by withholding the funds from salary, bonus or any other funds due to the Participant by the Employer, by withholding in Shares issued upon vesting and settlement of the Stock Units or from the cash proceeds from the sale of Shares or by demanding cash or a cheque from the Participant. The Participant also authorizes the Company to delay the issuance of any Shares to the Participant unless and until the loan is repaid in full.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Participant is an officer or executive director (as within the meaning of Section 13(k) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), the terms of the immediately foregoing provision will not apply. In the event that the Participant is an officer or executive director and Tax-Related Items are not collected from or paid by the Participant within 90 days of the Taxable Event, the amount of any uncollected Tax-Related Items may constitute a benefit to Participant on which additional income tax and National Insurance contributions may be payable. The Participant acknowledges that the Company or the Employer may recover any such additional income tax and national insurance contributions at any time thereafter.

 

Data Privacy

 

The Company and the Participant’s Employer will hold, collect and otherwise process certain data as set out in the Employer’s Employee Privacy Policy which will be provided to the Participant separately. All personal data will be treated in accordance with applicable data protection laws and regulations.

6EX-4.10

 Exhibit 4.10 
  

			
	 M3-PN200255

Effective Date:

July 3, 2020
 Issue
Date:
 October 26,2020

Revision 0
	  	

	  
 Casino Project

 

	

 Form 43-101F1 Technical Report 

Mineral Resource Statement 

Yukon, Canada 
 Prepared
by: 
 Daniel Roth, P.E., P. Eng. 

Mike Hester, F Aus IMM 

Laurie M. Tahija, MMSA-QP 

Carl Schulze, P. Geo. 

Caroline J. Vallat, P. Geo. 

Prepared For: 
  

					
	

	  	 &
	  	

 M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation ● 2051 West Sunset Road, Tucson, AZ 85704
● 520.293.1488 

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 DATE AND SIGNATURES PAGE 

The effective date of the mineral resource estimate is 3 July 2020. The issue date of this report is 26 October 2020. See Appendix
A, Mineral Resource Update Contributors and Professional Qualifications, for certificates of qualified persons. These certificates are considered the date and signature of this report in accordance with Form
43-101F1. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	i

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT 

MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 
  

											
	 SECTION
	  	PAGE	 
		
	 DATE AND SIGNATURES PAGE
	  	 	I	 
		
	 TABLE OF CONTENTS
	  	 	II	 
		
	 LIST OF FIGURES AND ILLUSTRATIONS
	  	 	VII	 
		
	 LIST OF TABLES
	  	 	X	 
			
	 1
	  	SUMMARY	  	 	1	 
				
		  	1.1	  	PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP	  	 	1	 
				
		  	1.2	  	HISTORY	  	 	1	 
					
		  		  	1.2.1	  	Casino	  	 	1	 
		  		  	1.2.2	  	Canadian Creek	  	 	3	 
				
		  	1.3	  	GEOLOGY	  	 	4	 
				
		  	1.4	  	DEPOSIT TYPE	  	 	5	 
				
		  	1.5	  	EXPLORATION STATUS	  	 	5	 
				
		  	1.6	  	EXPLORATION PROCEDURES	  	 	5	 
				
		  	1.7	  	MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE	  	 	6	 
					
		  		  	1.7.1	  	Mineral Resource	  	 	6	 
				
		  	1.8	  	SENSITIVITY TO NSR CUTOFF	  	 	8	 
				
		  	1.9	  	CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS	  	 	9	 
			
	 2
	  	INTRODUCTION	  	 	12	 
				
		  	2.1	  	ISSUER AND PURPOSE OF ISSUE	  	 	12	 
				
		  	2.2	  	SOURCES OF INFORMATION	  	 	12	 
				
		  	2.3	  	UNITS	  	 	13	 
			
	 3
	  	RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS	  	 	15	 
			
	 4
	  	PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION	  	 	16	 
				
		  	4.1	  	LOCATION	  	 	16	 
				
		  	4.2	  	LAND POSITION AND STATUS	  	 	16	 
					
		  		  	4.2.1	  	Property Description	  	 	16	 
		  		  	4.2.2	  	Environmental	  	 	17	 
		  		  	4.2.3	  	Mineral Tenure	  	 	17	 
		  		  	4.2.4	  	Ownership and Agreements	  	 	18	 
		  		  	4.2.5	  	Agreements and Royalties	  	 	18	 
		  		  	4.2.6	  	Placer Claims	  	 	18	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	ii

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

											
			
	 5
	  	ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY	  	 	20	 
				
		  	5.1	  	ACCESSIBILITY	  	 	20	 
				
		  	5.2	  	PHYSIOGRAPHY	  	 	20	 
				
		  	5.3	  	CLIMATE	  	 	20	 
				
		  	5.4	  	WATER RIGHTS	  	 	21	 
				
		  	5.5	  	POWER AVAILABILITY	  	 	21	 
				
		  	5.6	  	SURFACE RIGHTS	  	 	21	 
			
	 6
	  	HISTORY	  	 	22	 
			
	 7
	  	GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION	  	 	26	 
				
		  	7.1	  	REGIONAL GEOLOGY	  	 	26	 
				
		  	7.2	  	PROPERTY GEOLOGY	  	 	29	 
				
		  	7.3	  	MINERALIZATION	  	 	30	 
					
		  		  	7.3.1	  	Hydrothermal Porphyry Alteration	  	 	30	 
		  		  	7.3.2	  	Supergene Porphyry Mineralization	  	 	33	 
		  		  	7.3.3	  	Hypogene Mineralization	  	 	34	 
		  		  	7.3.4	  	Structurally Hosted Gold Mineralization	  	 	35	 
			
	 8
	  	DEPOSIT TYPES	  	 	36	 
			
	 9
	  	EXPLORATION	  	 	37	 
				
		  	9.1	  	EXPLORATION PROCEDURES	  	 	37	 
			
	 10
	  	DRILLING	  	 	41	 
				
		  	10.1	  	1992-1994 DRILLING PROGRAM	  	 	41	 
				
		  	10.2	  	2008 TO 2012 DRILLING	  	 	41	 
				
		  	10.3	  	2013 DRILLING	  	 	42	 
				
		  	10.4	  	2019 DRILLING	  	 	42	 
				
		  	10.5	  	CANADIAN CREEK DRILLING SUMMARY	  	 	43	 
				
		  	10.6	  	SENSITIVITY DATA PHOTOGRAMMETRY	  	 	48	 
				
		  	10.7	  	COLLAR COORDINATES	  	 	49	 
				
		  	10.8	  	SPERRY SUN SURVEYS	  	 	49	 
				
		  	10.9	  	LIGHT-LOG SURVEY SYSTEM	  	 	49	 
				
		  	10.10	  	ACID DIP TESTS	  	 	49	 
			
	 11
	  	SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY	  	 	50	 
				
		  	11.1	  	SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH	  	 	50	 
					
		  		  	11.1.1	  	Core Processing	  	 	50	 
		  		  	11.1.2	  	Core Sampling	  	 	50	 
				
		  	11.2	  	SAMPLE PREPARATION	  	 	51	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	iii

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

											
				
		  	11.3	  	ASSAY ANALYSIS	  	 	51	 
					
		  		  	11.3.1	  	Gold Analysis	  	 	52	 
		  		  	11.3.2	  	Copper, Molybdenum and Silver Assay	  	 	52	 
		  		  	11.3.3	  	ICP Analysis	  	 	52	 
		  		  	11.3.4	  	Acid Soluble Copper Analysis	  	 	52	 
		  		  	11.3.5	  	Cyanide Soluble Copper Analysis	  	 	53	 
		  		  	11.3.6	  	Security	  	 	53	 
		  		  	11.3.7	  	Quality Assurance and Quality Control	  	 	54	 
		  		  	11.3.8	  	Sample Standards	  	 	57	 
		  		  	11.3.9	  	Blanks	  	 	65	 
		  		  	11.3.10	  	Field Duplicate Drill Core Analysis	  	 	69	 
			
	 12
	  	DATA VERIFICATION	  	 	79	 
				
		  	12.1	  	DATA ENTRY	  	 	79	 
					
		  		  	12.1.1	  	1992-1994	  	 	79	 
		  		  	12.1.2	  	2008-2012	  	 	79	 
		  		  	12.1.3	  	2013-2019	  	 	80	 
				
		  	12.2	  	DATA VERIFICATION	  	 	80	 
		  		  	12.2.1	  	1992-1994	  	 	81	 
		  		  	12.2.2	  	2008-2013	  	 	81	 
		  		  	12.2.3	  	2019	  	 	81	 
				
		  	12.3	  	VERIFICATION ERRORS	  	 	82	 
		  		  	12.3.1	  	1992-1994	  	 	82	 
		  		  	12.3.2	  	2008-2012	  	 	82	 
		  		  	12.3.3	  	2019	  	 	82	 
				
		  	12.4|	  	OPINION OF QUALIFIED PERSON	  	 	83	 
			
	 13
	  	MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING	  	 	84	 
				
		  	13.1	  	METALLURGICAL SAMPLES	  	 	84	 
				
		  	13.2	  	LEACHING TESTS	  	 	84	 
		  		  	13.2.1	  	Kappes, Cassiday and Associates	  	 	84	 
		  		  	13.2.2	  	SGS E&S Engineering Solutions Inc.	  	 	84	 
				
		  	13.3	  	SART COPPER RECOVERY	  	 	86	 
				
		  	13.4	  	COMMINUTION TESTING	  	 	86	 
				
		  	13.5	  	FLOTATION	  	 	88	 
					
		  		  	13.5.1	  	2008 G&T Metallurgical Work	  	 	88	 
		  		  	13.5.2	  	2009-2011 G&T Metallurgical Work	  	 	89	 
		  		  	13.5.3	  	2011-2012 G&T Metallurgical Work	  	 	90	 
		  		  	13.5.4	  	Interpretation of Flotation Test Results	  	 	92	 
				
		  	13.6	  	DEWATERING TESTS	  	 	96	 
				
		  	13.7	  	DETERMINATION OF RECOVERIES AND REAGENT AND OTHER CONSUMABLE
CONSUMPTIONS	  	 	96	 
			
	 14
	  	MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES	  	 	98	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	iv

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

											
				
		  	14.1	  	MINERAL RESOURCE	  	 	98	 
				
		  	14.2	  	SENSITIVITY TO NSR CUTOFF	  	 	100	 
				
		  	14.3	  	MINERAL RESOURCE PARAMETERS	  	 	101	 
					
		  		  	14.3.1	  	Metal Prices	  	 	101	 
		  		  	14.3.2	  	Cost and Recovery Estimates	  	 	101	 
		  		  	14.3.3	  	NSR Calculations	  	 	102	 
		  		  	14.3.4	  	Slope Angles	  	 	105	 
				
		  	14.4	  	ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	  	 	105	 
				
		  	14.5	  	DESCRIPTION OF THE BLOCK MODEL	  	 	107	 
					
		  		  	14.5.1	  	General	  	 	107	 
		  		  	14.5.2	  	Drilling Data	  	 	107	 
		  		  	14.5.3	  	Geologic Controls	  	 	109	 
		  		  	14.5.4	  	Cap Grades and Compositing	  	 	114	 
		  		  	14.5.5	  	Descriptive Statistics	  	 	115	 
		  		  	14.5.6	  	Variogram Analysis	  	 	120	 
		  		  	14.5.7	  	Block Grade Estimation	  	 	127	 
		  		  	14.5.8	  	Bulk Density	  	 	133	 
		  		  	14.5.9	  	Resource Classifications	  	 	133	 
		  		  	14.5.10	  	Comparison of 2010 and 2020 Mineral Resource	  	 	139	 
			
	 15
	  	MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES	  	 	142	 
			
	 16
	  	MINING METHODS	  	 	142	 
			
	 17
	  	RECOVERY METHODS	  	 	142	 
			
	 18
	  	PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE	  	 	142	 
			
	 19
	  	MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS	  	 	142	 
			
	 20
	  	ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT	  	 	143	 
				
		  	20.1	  	INTRODUCTION	  	 	143	 
				
		  	20.2	  	ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES	  	 	143	 
				
		  	20.3	  	PERMITTING	  	 	143	 
					
		  		  	20.3.1	  	Existing Assessments and Permits	  	 	143	 
		  		  	20.3.2	  	Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment Process	  	 	143	 
		  		  	20.3.3	  	Licensing	  	 	144	 
		  		  	20.3.4	  	Environmental and Mine Operation Plans	  	 	145	 
		  		  	20.3.5	  	Reclamation and Closure	  	 	145	 
				
		  	20.4	  	FIRST NATIONS AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT	  	 	145	 
			
	 21
	  	CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS	  	 	147	 
			
	 22
	  	ECONOMIC ANALYSIS	  	 	147	 
			
	 23
	  	ADJACENT PROPERTIES	  	 	147	 
			
	 24
	  	OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION	  	 	147	 
			
	 25
	  	INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS	  	 	148	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	v

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

											
				
		  	25.1	  	CONCLUSIONS	  	 	148	 
					
		  		  	25.1.1	  	Mineral Resource	  	 	148	 
				
		  	25.2	  	OPPORTUNITIES	  	 	148	 
					
		  		  	25.2.1	  	Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves	  	 	148	 
				
		  	25.3	  	RISKS	  	 	148	 
					
		  		  	25.3.1	  	Mineral Resources	  	 	148	 
			
	 26
	  	RECOMMENDATIONS	  	 	149	 
			
	 27
	  	REFERENCES	  	 	150	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	vi

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 LIST OF FIGURES AND ILLUSTRATIONS 

 

							
	 FIGURE
	 	 DESCRIPTION
	  	PAGE	 
			
	 Figure 1-1:
	 	Casino Property Location	  	 	11	 
			
	 Figure 4-1:
	 	Project Road Access Map	  	 	19	 
			
	 Figure 7-1:
	 	Regional Geology	  	 	27	 
			
	 Figure 7-2:
	 	Regional Structures Overlain on Recent Aeromagnetic Survey	  	 	29	 
			
	 Figure 7-3:
	 	Property Geology (From R. Johnston, 2018)	  	 	30	 
			
	 Figure 7-4:
	 	Geology of the Casino Deposit	  	 	31	 
			
	 Figure 7-5:
	 	Casino Property Geology - Cross Section	  	 	32	 
			
	 Figure 9-1:
	 	Copper and Gold in Soil Results (Johnston, 2018)	  	 	38	 
			
	 Figure 9-2:
	 	Magnetic Compilation (Johnston, 2018)	  	 	39	 
			
	 Figure 9-3:
	 	IP Compilation (Johnston, 2018)	  	 	40	 
			
	 Figure 10-1:
	 	Casino Property Drilling Pre-1992	  	 	44	 
			
	 Figure 10-2:
	 	Casino Property Drilling 1992 to1994	  	 	45	 
			
	 Figure 10-3:
	 	Casino Property Drilling from 2008 to 2012	  	 	46	 
			
	 Figure 10-4:
	 	Casino Project Drilling from 2013 through 2019	  	 	47	 
			
	 Figure 10-5:
	 	Casino Project Drilling from 2013 through 2019	  	 	48	 
			
	 Figure 11-1:
	 	Casino Drill Core Processing and Quality Control Procedures, 1992-93	  	 	55	 
			
	 Figure 11-2:
	 	Casino Drill Core Processing and Quality Control Procedures 1994	  	 	56	 
			
	 Figure 11-3:
	 	Sample Standard CDN-CM-4 Gold Assay Results	  	 	57	 
			
	 Figure 11-4:
	 	Sample Standard CDN-CM-4 Copper Assay Results	  	 	58	 
			
	 Figure 11-5:
	 	Sample Standard CDN-CM-4 Molybdenum Assay Results	  	 	58	 
			
	 Figure 11-6:
	 	Sample Standard CDN-CM-7-Gold Assay Results	  	 	59	 
			
	 Figure 11-7:
	 	Sample Standard CDN-CM-7-Copper Assay Results	  	 	59	 
			
	 Figure 11-8:
	 	Sample Standard CDN-CM-7 Molybdenum Assay Results	  	 	60	 
			
	 Figure 11-9:
	 	Sample Standard CU-185 Gold Assay Results	  	 	61	 
			
	 Figure 11-10:
	 	Sample Standard CU-185 Silver Assay Results	  	 	61	 
			
	 Figure 11-11:
	 	Sample Standard CU-185 Copper Assay Results	  	 	62	 
			
	 Figure 11-12:
	 	Sample Standard CU-185 Molybdenum Assay Results	  	 	62	 
			
	 Figure 11-13:
	 	Sample Standard CU-188 Gold Assay Results	  	 	63	 
			
	 Figure 11-14:
	 	Sample Standard CU-188 Silver Assay Results	  	 	63	 
			
	 Figure 11-15:
	 	Sample Standard CU-188 Copper Assay Results	  	 	64	 
			
	 Figure 11-16:
	 	Sample Standard CU-188 Molybdenum Assay Results	  	 	64	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	vii

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

							
			
	 Figure 11-17:
	 	 Blank Material Gold Assay Results
	  	 	66	 
			
	 Figure 11-18:
	 	 Blank Material Silver Assay Results
	  	 	67	 
			
	 Figure 11-19:
	 	 Blank Material Copper Assay Results
	  	 	67	 
			
	 Figure 11-20:
	 	 Blank Material Molybdenum Assay Results
	  	 	68	 
			
	 Figure 11-21:
	 	 Plot of ALS Chemex Gold Assay Versus Acme Labs Gold Assay for Field Duplicate Samples (2008, 2009 and 2010 Data)
	  	 	69	 
			
	 Figure 11-22:
	 	 Plot of ALS Chemex Silver Analyses Versus Acme Labs Silver Analyses for Field Duplicate Samples (2008, 2009 and 2010
Data)
	  	 	70	 
			
	 Figure 11-23:
	 	 Plot of ALS Chemex Copper Assay Versus Acme Labs Copper Assay for Field Duplicate Samples (2008, 2009 and 2010
Data).
	  	 	71	 
			
	 Figure 11-24:
	 	 Plot of ALS Chemex Molybdenum Assay Versus Acme Labs Molybdenum Assay for Field Duplicate Samples (2008, 2009 and 2010
Data).
	  	 	72	 
			
	 Figure 11-25:
	 	 Comparison Plot Between Original Gold Values and Duplicate Gold Values
	  	 	73	 
			
	 Figure 11-26:
	 	 Comparison Plot Between Original Silver Values and Duplicate Silver Values
	  	 	74	 
			
	 Figure 11-27:
	 	 Comparison Plot Between Original Copper Values and Duplicate Copper Values
	  	 	74	 
			
	 Figure 11-28:
	 	 Comparison Plot Between Original Copper Values and Duplicate Copper Values
	  	 	75	 
			
	 Figure 11-29:
	 	 Comparison Plot Between Gold Values from ALS Chemex and Gold Values from SGS
	  	 	76	 
			
	 Figure 11-30:
	 	 Comparison Plot Between Silver Values from ALS Global and Silver Values from SGS
	  	 	77	 
			
	 Figure 11-31:
	 	 Comparison Plot Between Copper Values from ALS Global and Copper Values from SGS
	  	 	77	 
			
	 Figure 11-32:
	 	 Comparison Plot Between Molybdenum Values from ALS Global and Molybdenum Values from SGS
	  	 	78	 
			
	 Figure 14-1:
	 	 Floating Cone Shell for Mineral Resource
	  	 	106	 
			
	 Figure 14-2:
	 	 Hole Location Map
	  	 	108	 
			
	 Figure 14-3:
	 	 Oxidation Domains on East-West Section 6,958,600N
	  	 	110	 
			
	 Figure 14-4:
	 	 Oxidation Domains on North-South Section 611,165E
	  	 	111	 
			
	 Figure 14-5:
	 	 Rock Types on East-West Section 6,958,600N
	  	 	113	 
			
	 Figure 14-6:
	 	 Probability Plot of Total Copper Composites by Oxidation Type
	  	 	118	 
			
	 Figure 14-7:
	 	 Probability Plot of Gold Composites by Oxidation Type
	  	 	119	 
			
	 Figure 14-8:
	 	 Total Copper Variogram – Supergene Oxide
	  	 	121	 
			
	 Figure 14-9:
	 	 Total Copper Variogram – Supergene Sulphide
	  	 	122	 
			
	 Figure 14-10:
	 	 Total Copper Variogram – Hypogene Sulphide - Global
	  	 	123	 
			
	 Figure 14-11:
	 	 Total Copper Variogram – Hypogene Sulphide – East-West
	  	 	124	 
			
	 Figure 14-12:
	 	 Total Copper Variogram – Hypogene Sulphide – North-South
	  	 	125	 
			
	 Figure 14-13:
	 	 Gold Variogram
	  	 	126	 
			
	 Figure 14-14:
	 	 Total Copper Grades on East-West Cross Section 6,958,600N
	  	 	129	 
			
	 Figure 14-15:
	 	 Total Copper Grades on North-South Cross Section 611,165E
	  	 	130	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	viii

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

							
			
	 Figure 14-16:
	 	Gold Grades on East-West Cross Section 6,958,600N	  	 	131	 
			
	 Figure 14-17:
	 	Gold Grades on North-South Cross Section 611,165E	  	 	132	 
			
	 Figure 14-18:
	 	Probability Plot of Average Distance to Nearest 3 Holes – Supergene Sulphide	  	 	135	 
			
	 Figure 14-19:
	 	Probability Plot of Average Distance to Nearest 3 Holes – Hypogene Sulphide	  	 	136	 
			
	 Figure 14-20:
	 	Resource Classification on East-West Cross Section 6,958,600N	  	 	137	 
			
	 Figure 14-21:
	 	Resource Classification on North-South Cross Section 611,065E	  	 	138	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	ix

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 LIST OF TABLES 

 

							
	 TABLE
	 	 DESCRIPTION
	  	PAGE	 
			
	 Table 1-1:
	 	Mineral Resource for Mill Material at C$5.70 NSR Cutoff	  	 	7	 
			
	 Table 1-2:
	 	Mineral Resource for Leach Material at C$5.46 NSR Cutoff	  	 	7	 
			
	 Table 1-3:
	 	Mineral Resource for Copper, Gold, and Silver (Mill and Leach)	  	 	7	 
			
	 Table 1-4:
	 	Mineral Resource – Mill Material by Various NSR Cutoffs (C$)	  	 	9	 
			
	 Table 1-5:
	 	Mineral Resource – Leach Material by Various NSR Cutoffs (C$)	  	 	9	 
			
	 Table 2-1:
	 	Dates of Site Visits and Areas of Responsibility	  	 	12	 
			
	 Table 2-2:
	 	Abbreviations Used in this Document	  	 	13	 
			
	 Table 2-3:
	 	Elements and Associated Units	  	 	14	 
			
	 Table 5-1:
	 	Mean Monthly Temperature and Precipitation Values	  	 	21	 
			
	 Table 6-1:
	 	Summary of Work on the Canadian Creek Property by Previous Owners Since 1993 (Johnston, 2018)	  	 	25	 
			
	 Table 7-1:
	 	Stratigraphic Column	  	 	28	 
			
	 Table 7-2:
	 	Leached Cap & Supergene Minerals	  	 	34	 
			
	 Table 10-1:
	 	Summary of Canadian Creek Drilling	  	 	43	 
			
	 Table 11-1:
	 	2019 Standard Reference Materials from WCM Minerals	  	 	60	 
			
	 Table 11-2:
	 	Performance of Standard CU-185 During 2019 Drill Program Sampling	  	 	65	 
			
	 Table 11-3:
	 	Performance of Standard CU-188 During 2019 Drill Program Sampling	  	 	65	 
			
	 Table 11-4:
	 	Performance of Blank Material During 2019 Drill Program Sampling	  	 	68	 
			
	 Table 11-5:
	 	Summary of Duplicate (Core) Pair Performance During 2019 Drill Program Sampling	  	 	75	 
			
	 Table 11-6:
	 	Summary of Check (Pulps) Pair Performance During 2019 Drill Program Sampling	  	 	78	 
			
	 Table 13-1:
	 	Extractions and Reagent Consumptions from Open Cycle and Locked Cycle Cyanidation	  	 	85	 
			
	 Table 13-2:
	 	Extractions and Reagent consumptions from Column Tests Investigating Lithology	  	 	85	 
			
	 Table 13-3:
	 	SART Results	  	 	86	 
			
	 Table 13-4:
	 	Summary of Comminution Results	  	 	86	 
			
	 Table 13-5:
	 	Summary of SMC Tests and JK Parameters	  	 	87	 
			
	 Table 13-6:
	 	Summary of SAGDesign Results and Crushed Bond Test Results	  	 	87	 
			
	 Table 13-7:
	 	Predicted Production Rate	  	 	88	 
			
	 Table 13-8:
	 	G&T Flotation Composite Assays	  	 	88	 
			
	 Table 13-9:
	 	Locked Cycle Test Results	  	 	90	 
			
	 Table 13-10:
	 	Locked Cycle Test Results	  	 	91	 
			
	 Table 13-11:
	 	Hypogene Composites	  	 	91	 
			
	 Table 13-12:
	 	Locked Cycle Test Results	  	 	91	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	x

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

							
			
	 Table 13-13:
	 	Copper/Molybdenum Separation Cleaner Test	  	 	92	 
			
	 Table 13-14:
	 	Supergene Locked Cycle Recoveries to Concentrate	  	 	93	 
			
	 Table 13-15:
	 	Cleaner Circuit Recoveries for Locked Cycle Test Results	  	 	94	 
			
	 Table 13-16:
	 	Predicted Recoveries to Copper/Molybdenum Concentrate	  	 	94	 
			
	 Table 13-17:
	 	Copper Concentrate Chemistry	  	 	95	 
			
	 Table 13-18:
	 	Molybdenum Concentrate Chemistry	  	 	95	 
			
	 Table 13-19:
	 	Heap Leach Operational Parameters	  	 	96	 
			
	 Table 13-20:
	 	Flotation Operational Parameters.	  	 	97	 
			
	 Table 14-1:
	 	Mineral Resource for Mill Material at C$5.70 NSR Cutoff	  	 	98	 
			
	 Table 14-2:
	 	Mineral Resource for Leach material at C$5.46 NSR Cutoff	  	 	99	 
			
	 Table 14-3:
	 	Mineral Resource for Copper, Gold, and Silver (Mill and Leach)	  	 	99	 
			
	 Table 14-4:
	 	Mineral Resource – Mill Material by Various NSR Cutoffs (C$)	  	 	100	 
			
	 Table 14-5:
	 	Mineral Resource – Leach Material by Various NSR Cutoffs (C$)	  	 	100	 
			
	 Table 14-6:
	 	Economic Parameters for Mineral Resource (C$)	  	 	104	 
			
	 Table 14-7:
	 	Casino Drilling by Date and Company	  	 	107	 
			
	 Table 14-8:
	 	Oxidation Zone Types	  	 	109	 
			
	 Table 14-9:
	 	Model Rock Types	  	 	112	 
			
	 Table 14-10:
	 	Cap Grades and Number of Assays Capped	  	 	114	 
			
	 Table 14-11:
	 	Summary Statistics of Assays	  	 	116	 
			
	 Table 14-12:
	 	Summary Statistics of 7.5m Composites	  	 	117	 
			
	 Table 14-13:
	 	Statistics of Specific Gravity Measurement by Oxidation Zone	  	 	133	 
			
	 Table 14-14:
	 	Comparison of 2010 and 2020 Mineral Resource – Mill Material	  	 	140	 
			
	 Table 14-15:
	 	Comparison of 2010 and 2020 Mineral Resource – Leach Material	  	 	141	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	xi

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 LIST OF APPENDICES 

 

			
	 APPENDIX
	  	 DESCRIPTION

		
	 A
	  	 Mineral Resource Update Contributors and Professional Qualifications

		
		  	 •   Certificate of Qualified Person
(“QP”)

		
	 B
	  	 Casino Placer Claims and Casino Quartz claims

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	xii

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	1	 SUMMARY 

This Report was prepared for Casino Mining Corporation (“CMC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Copper and Gold Corporation
(“Western”) as well as for Western itself, by M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation (M3) in association with Independent Mining Consultants (IMC), GeoSpark Consulting Inc. and Aurora Geosciences. 

The purpose of this report is to provide an updated mineral resource statement on the Casino Property. The estimate of mineral resources
contained in this report conforms to the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve definitions (May, 2011) referred to in National Instrument (NI)
43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. 
  

	1.1	 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP

 The Casino porphyry copper-gold-molybdenum deposit is located at latitude 62° 44’N and longitude 138°
50’W (NTS map sheet 115J/10), in west central Yukon, in the northwest trending Dawson Range mountains, 300 km northwest of the territorial capital of Whitehorse. 

To the west, Newmont is developing the Coffee Project. To the north and to the west, White Gold Corp. has a large number of claims and is
actively exploring them. Approximately 100 km to the east, Pembridge Resources operates the Minto Mine, which produces copper concentrate. 

The project is located on Crown land administered by the Yukon Government and is within the Selkirk First Nation traditional territory and the
Tr’ondek Hwechin traditional territory lies to the north. The proposed access road crosses into Little Salmon Carmacks First Nation traditional territory to the south. The White River First Nation and Kluane First Nation are downstream from the
project. 
 The Casino Property lies within the Whitehorse Mining District and consists of 1,136 full and partial Quartz Claims and 55
Placer Claims acquired in accordance with the Yukon Quartz Mining Act. The total area covered by Casino Quartz Claims is 21,276.61 ha. The total area covered by Casino Placer Claims is 490.32 ha. CMC is the registered owner of all claims, although
certain portions of the Casino property remain subject to royalty agreements. The claims covering the Casino property are discussed further in Section 4 of this document. 

Figure 1-1 at the end of this section shows the site’s location in Yukon Territory as well as
other points of interest relevant to this Report. 
  

	1.2	 HISTORY 

 

	1.2.1	 Casino 

The first documented work on the Casino Property was the working of placer claims in the area of the Casino Deposit recorded in April 1911,
following a placer gold discovery on Canadian Creek by J. Britton and C. Brown. A study by D.D. Cairnes, of the Geological Survey of Canada in 1917, recognized huebnerite (MnWO4) in the
heavy-mineral concentrates of the placer workings and also that the gold and tungsten mineralization was derived from an intrusive complex on Patton Hill. During the Second World War, a small amount of tungsten was recovered from placer workings.
The total placer gold production from the area of the property is unknown, but during the period of 1980-1985 placer mining yielded about 50 kg (1,615 troy ounces) of gold. 

The first recorded bedrock mineral discovery occurred in 1936 when J. Meloy and A. Brown located silver-lead-zinc veins approximately 3 km
south of the Canadian Creek placer workings. Over the next several years the Bomber and Helicopter vein systems were explored by hand trenches and pits. In 1943, the Helicopter claims were staked and in 1947 the Bomber and Airport groups were
staked. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	1

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Lead-silver mineralization was the focus of exploration on the property until 1968. Noranda
Exploration Co Ltd. optioned the property in 1948 and Rio Tinto in 1963. During this time trenching, mapping and sampling were conducted. 

L. Proctor purchased the claims in 1963 and formed Casino Silver Mines Limited to develop the silver-rich veins. The silver-bearing veins were
explored and developed intermittently by underground and surface workings from 1965 to 1980. In total, 372.5 tonnes of hand-cobbled argentiferous galena, assaying 3,689 g/t silver (Ag), 17.1 g/t gold (Au), 48.3% lead (Pb), 5% zinc (Zn), 1.5% copper
(Cu) and 0.02% bismuth (Bi) were shipped to the smelter at Trail, British Columbia. 
 Based on the recognition of porphyry copper
potential, the Brynelsen Group acquired Casino Silver Mines Limited and, from 1968 to 1973, exploration was directed jointly by Brameda Resources, Quintana Minerals and Teck Corporation towards a porphyry target. Exploration included extensive soil
sampling and geophysical surveys, along with trenching programs, which eventually led to the discovery of the Casino deposit in 1969. From 1969 to 1973, various parties including Brameda Resources, Quintana Minerals and Teck Corporation completed
drilling on the property. 
 Archer, Cathro & Associates (1981) Ltd. (Archer Cathro) optioned the property in 1991 and
assigned the option to Big Creek Resources Ltd. In 1992, a program consisting of 21 HQ (63.5 mm diameter) holes totalling 4,729 m systematically assessed the gold potential in the core area of the deposit for the first time. In 1992, Pacific
Sentinel Gold Corp. (PSG) acquired the property from Archer Cathro and commenced a major exploration program. The 1993 program included surface mapping and 50,316 m of HQ (63.5 mm diameter) and NQ (47.6 mm diameter) drilling in 127 holes. All but
one of the 1992 drill holes were deepened in 1993. PSG drilled an additional 108 drill holes totalling 18,085 m in 1994. This completed the delineation drilling program which commenced in 1993. PSG also performed metallurgical, geotechnical and
environmental work which was used in a scoping study in 1995. The scoping study envisioned a large-scale open pit mine and a conventional flotation concentrator that would produce a copper-gold concentrate for sale to Pacific Rim smelters. 

First Trimark Resources and CRS Copper Resources obtained the property and, using the Pacific Sentinel Gold data, published a Qualifying
Report on the property in 2003 to bring the resource estimate into compliance with National Instrument 43-101 requirements. The two firms combined to form Lumina Copper Corporation in 2004. An update of the
Qualifying Report was issued in 2004. 
 Western Copper Corporation acquired Lumina Copper Corporation in November of 2006, which included
the Casino Deposit. In the fall of 2011, Western Copper Corporation spun out all other assets except the Casino Deposit and changed its name to Western Copper and Gold Corporation (Western). 

In 2007, Western conducted an evaluation of the Bomber Vein System and the southern slope of Patton Hill by
VLF-EM, Horizontal Loop EM and soil geochemical surveying. Environmental baseline studies were also initiated in 2007. In 2008, Western Copper reclaimed the old camp site, constructed a new exploration camp
next to the Casino airstrip and drilled three drill holes (the camp water well and two exploration diamond drill holes) totalling 1,163 m. The main purpose of the drilling was to obtain fresh core samples for the metallurgical and waste
characterization tests. Both exploration holes twinned PSG’s holes to confirm historical copper, gold and molybdenum grades. Later that year, M3 Engineering produced a pre-feasibility study for Western
Copper. 
 In 2009, Quantec Geoscience Limited of Toronto, Ontario performed a 22.4-km Titan-24 Galvanic Direct Current Resistivity and Induced Polarization (DC/IP) surveys and a Magnetotelluric Tensor Resistivity (MT) survey over the entire porphyry system. Magnetotelluric Resistivity surveys result
in high resolution and deep penetration (to 1 km), while the Titan DC Resistivity & Induced Polarization surveys provide reasonable depth coverage to 750 m. 

Additionally, in 2009, Western drilled 10,943 m in 37 diamond drill holes, of which 27 holes were infill holes drilled to upgrade the
previously designated Inferred Resource and non-defined material to the Measured and Indicated 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	2

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
resource categories. Infill drilling covered the north slope of the Patton Hill. The drilling also identified supergene and molybdenum (Mo) mineralization in this area. The remaining 10 holes,
totalling 4,327 m, were drilled to test geophysical targets. 
 In 2010, all Pacific Sentinel’s historic drill core stored at the
Casino Property was re-logged. The purpose of the re-logging was to provide data for the new lithology and alteration models. 

In 2011 and 2012, CMC focused on geotechnical, metallurgical, baseline environmental studies and also completed some drilling, logging and
sampling for exploration purposes. In 2011, the program included 41 drill holes for a total of 3,163.26 m. In 2012, six holes (228.07 m) were drilled for geotechnical purposes and 5 holes (1,507.63 m) were drilled for metallurgical sampling. 

In 2010, under the direction of the Casino Mining Corporation (CMC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Copper, CMC completed infill and
delineation drilling mostly to the north and west of the deposit, as outlined by PSG. The drilling program also defined hypogene mineralization at the southern end of the deposit. In addition, the company drilled a series of geotechnical holes at
the proposed tailings embankment area and within the pit, along with several other holes for hydrogeological studies. The geotechnical drilling continued in 2011 (41 holes, 3,163 m) and 2012 (6 holes, 228 m). This work culminated in the publishing
of a pre-feasibility study in 2011 and a feasibility study in 2013. 
  

	1.2.2	 Canadian Creek 

In mid 2019, CMC acquired the adjacent property to the west referred to as the Canadian Creek property from Cariboo Rose Resources Ltd.
Exploration on the Canadian Creek property dates from 1992 when Archer Cathro & Associates (Archer Cathro) staked the Ana Claim block. In 1993 Eastfield Resources Ltd. acquired the Ana Claims and expanded the Ana Claims and explored the
expanded property with soil grids, trenching and drilling, (Johnston, 2018). This work was directed at the discovery of additional porphyry deposits. The 1993 program was followed by extensive field programs in 1996, 1997 and 1999 consisting of
induced polarization (IP) surveying, road construction, and trenching on the Ana, Koffee, Maya and Ice claims. In 2000, another drill campaign was undertaken by Eastfield on the Ana, Koffee Bowl, and the newly acquired Casino “B” claims
located immediately west of the Casino deposit. The Casino “B” holes confirmed the existence of gold mineralization first discovered here in 1994 by Pacific Sentinel, which encountered 55.17 m averaging 0.71 g/t gold in hole 94-319. Modest exploration programs were conducted, mostly over the Casino “B” area, in 2003, 2004 and 2005. In 2007 a five-hole core drill program at Casino “B” targeted gold and copper in soil
anomalies and ground magnetics high features. 
 The discovery in 2009 of gold mineralization on Underworld Resources’ White Gold
property sparked new interest in gold exploration on the Canadian Creek property. This led to the implementation of a major exploration program at Canadian Creek directed at the gold potential of the property, some distance from the previous work
focusing on porphyry copper mineralization. A soil survey revealed extensive areas returning greater than 15 ppb gold in soils, with associated anomalous values in arsenic (As), bismuth (Bi) and antimony (Sb). The induced polarization surveys
revealed numerous strong chargeability highs, many of which coincide with the gold-in-soil anomalies. The drilling showed that clay-altered structures with sheeted
pyrite veins and/ or quartz-carbonate veins show structural narrowing. With few exceptions, gold grades are less than 1 g/t and widths are less than 3 m. 

In 2011, additional soil sampling, ground geophysical surveying and trenching were completed. The soil sampling completed the coverage of the
entire Canadian Creek property. A limited-extent induced polarization survey identified two zones of chargeability with values greater than 20 mv/V. The trenching program identified a number of areas with anomalous gold values, ranging from
background up to 2,890 and 4,400 ppb Au. 
 As a follow up to the 2011 program, a modest 2016 program of trenching, prospecting and in-fill soil sampling was carried out by Cariboo Rose Resources Ltd (Cariboo Rose), which had acquired the property from Eastfield. Trenching work conducted in three areas of the Ana portion of the Canadian Creek
property returned locally anomalous gold, 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	3

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
widely spread anomalous arsenic, bismuth, antimony and locally high silver values, generally confined to narrow structures. 

Cariboo Rose’s 2017 exploration program consisted of surface work directed at the Kana and Malt West gold targets and a reverse
circulation (RC) drill program that tested a variety of gold targets across the property. A total of 2,151.27 metres in 24 holes of reverse circulation (RC) drilling was completed. This work confirmed gold and silver mineralization to be limited to
narrow (less than 3-metre-wide) structures rarely traceable over more than 100 m. 
  

	1.3	 GEOLOGY 

The geology of the Casino deposit is typical of many porphyry copper deposits. The deposit is centered on an Upper Cretaceous-age (72-74 Ma), east-west elongated porphyry stock, called the Patton Porphyry, which intrudes Mesozoic granitoids of the Dawson Range Batholith and Paleozoic
schists and gneisses of the Yukon Tanana terrane. Intrusion of the Patton Porphyry into the older rocks caused brecciation of both the intrusive and the surrounding country rocks along the northern, southern and eastern contact of the stock.
Brecciation is best developed in the eastern end of the stock where the breccia zone can be up to 400 m wide in plan view. To the west, along the north and south contacts, the breccias narrow gradually to less than 100 m. The overall dimensions of
the intrusive complex are approximately 1.8 by 1.0 km. 
 The main body of the Patton Porphyry is a relatively small, locally mineralized
stock measuring approximately 300 by 800 m, surrounded by a potassically-altered intrusion breccia in contact with rocks of the Dawson Range, referred to as White River Granodiorite. Elsewhere, the Patton Porphyry forms discontinuous dikes ranging
from less than one up to tens of metres in width, cutting both the Patton Porphyry plug and the Dawson Range Batholith. The overall composition of the Patton Porphyry is rhyodacitic, with dacitic phenocrysts within a quartz latite matrix. It is more
commonly comprised of abundant distinct plagioclase phenocrysts and lesser biotite, hornblende, quartz and opaque minerals. 
 The Intrusion
Breccia surrounding the main Patton Porphyry body consists of granodiorite, diorite and xenoliths of Paleozioc metamorphic rocks within fine-grained Patton Porphyry rocks and adjacent Dawson Range granodioritic rocks. The intrusion breccia may have
formed in part along the margins of the stock by the stoping of blocks of wall rock. An abundance of Dawson Range Batholith granodioritic inclusions occurs along the southern contact of the main plug, while inclusions of Wolverine Creek metamorphic
rocks occur along the northern contact and bleached diorite inclusions occur along the eastern contact of the main plug. Strong potassic alteration locally destroys primary textures. 

Primary copper, gold and molybdenum mineralization was deposited from hydrothermal fluids that exploited the contact breccias and fractured
wall rocks. Higher grades occur in the breccias and gradually decrease outwards from the contact zones towards the centre of the stock and outward into the granitoids and schists. The main mineralized settings are: 

 

	 	•	 	 Leached Cap Mineralization (CAP) – This oxidized zone is gold-enriched and copper-depleted due to
supergene alteration processes and has a lower specific gravity relative to the supergene zone. Weathering has replaced most minerals with clay which is most intense at the surface and decreases with depth. 

 

	 	•	 	 Supergene Oxide Mineralization (SOX) – This zone is copper-enriched, with trace molybdenite. It
generally occurs as a thin layer above the Supergene Sulphide zone. Where present, the supergene oxide zone averages 10 m thick and locally contains chalcanthite, malachite, brochantite, minor azurite, tenorite, cuprite, and neotocite.

  

	 	•	 	 Supergene Sulphide Mineralization (SUS) – Supergene copper mineralization occurs as a weathered
zone up to 200 m deep, below the leached cap and above the Hypogene zone. It has an average thickness of 60 m. Grades of the Supergene sulphide zone vary widely, but are highest in fractured and highly pyritic

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	4

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	 	 
zones, due to their ability to promote leaching and chalcocite precipitation. The copper grades of the Supergene Sulphide zone are almost double those of the Hypogene zone (0.43% Cu versus 0.23%
Cu). 

  

	 	•	 	 Hypogene Mineralization – Hypogene mineralization occurs throughout the various alteration zones
of the Casino Porphyry deposit, as mineralized stock-work veins and breccias and represents the “original” mineralized setting. Significant Cu-Mo mineralization is related to the potassically-altered
breccia surrounding the core Patton Porphyry, as well as in the adjacent phyllically-altered host rocks of the Dawson Range Batholith. The pyrite halo of this mineralization is host to the highest Cu values on the property. 

 

	1.4	 DEPOSIT TYPE 

The Casino deposit is best classified as a calc-alkalic porphyry type deposit associated with a tonalite intrusive stock (the Patton Porphyry).
Primary copper, gold and molybdenum mineralization was deposited from hydrothermal fluids that exploited the contact breccias and fractured wall rocks. Higher grades occur in the contact breccias. Grades gradually decrease inward from the contact
zone towards the centre of the stock and outward into the host granitoids and schists. A general zoning of the primary sulphides occurs, with chalcopyrite and molybdenite occurring in the core tonalite and breccias, grading outward into
pyrite-dominated mineralization in the surrounding granitoids and schists. Alteration accompanying the sulphide mineralization consists of an earlier phase of potassic alteration and a later overprinting of phyllic alteration. The potassic
alteration typically comprises secondary biotite and K-feldspar as pervasive replacement and includes veins and stockworks of quartz and anhydrite veinlets. Phyllic alteration consists of replacements and
vein-style sericite and silicification. 
 The Casino Copper deposit is unusual amongst Canadian porphyry copper deposits in that it has a
well-developed enriched secondary supergene blanket of copper mineralization. This is a porphyry model similar to the Escondita deposit in Chile and the Morenci deposit in the southwest United States. Unlike other porphyry deposits in Canada, the
Casino deposit’s enriched supergene copper blanket was not eroded by the glacial action of ice sheets during the last ice age. At Casino, weathering during the Tertiary Period leached the copper from the upper 70 m of the deposit and re-deposited it lower in the deposit, forming the Supergene zone. This resulted in a layer-like sequence consisting of an upper leached zone, up to 70 m thick, where all sulphide minerals have been oxidized and
copper removed, leaving a bleached, iron oxide leached cap containing residual gold. Beneath the leached cap is a zone up to 100 m thick of secondary copper mineralization, consisting primarily of chalcocite and minor covellite, as well as a thin,
discontinuous layer of copper oxide minerals at the upper contact with the leach cap. The copper grades of the enriched, blanket-like zone can be up to twice that of the underlying, unweathered hypogene zone hosting primary copper mineralization.
Primary mineralization consists of pyrite, chalcopyrite and lesser molybdenite. The primary copper mineralization is persistent at depth, extending to more than 600 m within the deepest drill holes completed to date. 

 

	1.5	 EXPLORATION STATUS 

In 2019, CMC carried out a program of infill drilling designed to convert mineralization from the Inferred category, located along the margin
of the deposit, into the Indicated category. A total of 72 holes comprising 13,594.63 m of drilling were drilled, logged and sampled in 2019. 
  

	1.6	 EXPLORATION PROCEDURES 

Exploration on the property over its history has included prospecting, geological mapping, multi-element soil geochemistry, magnetic and
induced polarization surveys, trenching and drilling. Targets of early drilling on the Casino Deposit were based mainly on coincident copper and molybdenum-in-soil
anomalies. Since 1993, with the exception of a Titan TM Survey, exploration in the vicinity of the Casino deposit has focused on drilling on a grid pattern using a core drill with a core diameter primarily of NQ and NTW thickness, with a smaller
number of holes drilled with HQ 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	5

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
diameter core. The earlier soil sampling and geophysical results, in the vicinity of the Casino Deposit, have all been tested by drilling and shown to be caused by porphyry copper mineralization.

 To the west of the Casino deposit, on the recently acquired Canadian Creek Property, exploration utilized grid soil sampling, ground
magnetic and induced polarisation surveys to generate targets for trenching and drilling. Initially, the focus of the geochemical and geophysical surveys was to locate porphyry copper mineralization. Subsequent to 2016, the focus of this work
switched to the identification of gold mineralization similar to that discovered at nearby Coffee Creek. 
 Soil sampling west of the Casino
Deposit results show a co-incident copper and gold-in-soil anomaly at the 50-ppm Cu and
the 15-ppb Au levels respectively, extending approximately 3 km west from the western limits of the Casino deposit. The coincident anomaly has been tested by 16 core holes. The holes closest to the Casino
Deposit revealed moderate potassic alteration and strong propylitic alteration. The four closest holes intersected leached cap or incipient leaching, weak supergene enrichment, and hypogene copper-gold-molybdenum mineralization, typical of the outer
edges of a porphyry copper- gold-molybdenum deposit. Copper grades are in the 0.03 to 0.07% range, gold grades range from 0.1 to 0.3 g/t and molybdenum values range from 20 – 40 ppm (0.002 to 0.004%). Further, there is a general increase in
copper, gold and molybdenum in the Casino B drill holes eastward towards the Casino deposit. These holes are defining the western limits of the Casino deposit system. 

Ground magnetic surveying at a line spacing of 100 m was undertaken over the Canadian Creek portion of the Casino Property. The survey
detected a number of lineaments, oriented mostly northwest-southeast, though none obviously align with the soil geochemical anomalies. The ground magnetic data shows a trend of magnetic high features extending from the Casino Deposit through the Ana
to the Koffee Bowl areas. This west-southwest trend follows the trend of Patton Porphyry dykes extending from the main intrusive complex. 

Induced polarization surveys in 1993 and 1996 utilized a pole-dipole array with a spacing of 75 m and an n1 to n4 depth profile. The 2009
survey was a pole-dipole survey using an a spacing of 25 m and an n1 to n6 depth profile. The 2011 pole dipole survey used a spacing of 25 m and an n1 to n8 profile. In general, the surveys used small “a” spacings and have a limit depth
search. The survey identified a number of high chargeability anomalies which remain to be tested. 
  

	1.7	 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE 

 

	1.7.1	 Mineral Resource 

The Mineral Resource for the Casino Project includes Mineral Resources amenable to milling and flotation concentration methods (mill material)
and Mineral Resource amenable to heap leach recovery methods (leach material). Table 1-1 presents the Mineral Resource for mill material. Mill material includes the supergene oxide (SOX), supergene sulphide
(SUS) and hypogene sulphide (HYP) mineral zones. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 2.17 billion tonnes at 0.16% total copper, 0.18 g/t gold, 0.017% moly and 1.4 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 7.43 billion pounds
of copper, 12.7 million ounces gold, 811.6 million pounds of moly and 100.2 million ounces of silver. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 1.43 billion tonnes at 0.10% total copper, 0.14 g/t gold, 0.010% moly and 1.2 g/t
silver and contained metal amounts to 3.24 billion pounds of copper, 6.4 million ounces of gold, 322.8 million pounds moly and 53.5 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource in mill material. 

Table 1-2 presents the Mineral Resource for leach material. Leach material is oxide dominant leach cap
(LC) mineralization. The emphasis of leaching is the recovery of gold in the leach cap. Copper grades in the leach cap are low, but it is expected some metal will be recovered. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 217.4 million
tonnes at 0.03% total copper, 0.25 g/t gold and 1.9 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 166.5 million pounds of copper, 1.8 million ounces gold and 13.3 million ounces of silver. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional
31.1 million tonnes at 0.03% total copper, 0.17 g/t gold and 1.7 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 17.2 million 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	6

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
pounds of copper, 200,000 ounces of gold and 1.7 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource in leach material. 

Table 1-3 presents the Mineral Resource for combined mill and leach material for copper, gold, and
silver. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 2.39 billion tonnes at 0.14% total copper, 0.19 g/t gold and 1.5 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 7.60 billion pounds copper, 14.5 million ounces gold and
113.5 million ounces of silver for Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 1.46 billion tonnes at 0.10% total copper, 0.14 g/t gold and 1.2 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to
3.26 billion pounds of copper, 6.6 million ounces of gold and 55.2 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource. The Mineral Resource for moly is as shown with mill material since it will not be recovered for leach
material. 
 The Mineral Resources are based on a block model developed by IMC during June 2020. This updated model incorporated the 2019
Western Copper drilling and updated geologic models. It also includes some 2010 through 2012 Western Copper drilling that was not available for the previous Mineral Resource estimate done in 2010. 

The Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resources reported herein are contained within a floating cone pit shell to demonstrate
“reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction” to meet the definition of Mineral Resources in NI 43-101. 

Table 1-1: Mineral Resource for Mill Material at C$5.70 NSR Cutoff 

 

																																													
	 Resource

Class
	  	Tonnes
Mt	 	  	NSR
($/t)	 	  	Copper
(%)	 	  	Gold
(g/t)	 	  	Moly
(%)	 	  	Silver
(g/t)	 	  	CuEq
%	 	  	Copper
(mlbs)	 	  	Gold
(moz)	 	  	Moly
(mlbs)	 	  	Silver
(moz)	 
	 Measured
	  	 	145.3	 	  	 	38.08	 	  	 	0.31	 	  	 	0.40	 	  	 	0.025	 	  	 	2.1	 	  	 	0.74	 	  	 	985.8	 	  	 	1.9	 	  	 	80.6	 	  	 	9.8	 
	 Indicated
	  	 	2,028.0	 	  	 	19.10	 	  	 	0.14	 	  	 	0.17	 	  	 	0.016	 	  	 	1.4	 	  	 	0.33	 	  	 	6,448.5	 	  	 	10.9	 	  	 	731.0	 	  	 	90.4	 
	 M+I
	  	 	2,173.3	 	  	 	20.37	 	  	 	0.16	 	  	 	0.18	 	  	 	0.017	 	  	 	1.4	 	  	 	0.36	 	  	 	7,434.3	 	  	 	12.7	 	  	 	811.6	 	  	 	100.2	 
	 Inferred
	  	 	1,430.2	 	  	 	14.50	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	0.14	 	  	 	0.010	 	  	 	1.2	 	  	 	0.24	 	  	 	3,240.4	 	  	 	6.4	 	  	 	322.8	 	  	 	53.5	 

 Table 1-2: Mineral Resource for Leach Material at C$5.46 NSR Cutoff

  

																																					
	 Resource

Class
	  	Tonnes
Mt	 	  	NSR
($/t)	 	  	Copper
(%)	 	  	Gold
(g/t)	 	  	Silver
(g/t)	 	  	AuEq
(g/t)	 	  	Copper
(mlbs)	 	  	Gold
(moz)	 	  	Silver
(moz)	 
	 Measured
	  	 	37.2	 	  	 	19.72	 	  	 	0.05	 	  	 	0.45	 	  	 	2.8	 	  	 	0.48	 	  	 	39.3	 	  	 	0.5	 	  	 	3.3	 
	 Indicated
	  	 	180.2	 	  	 	9.54	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.21	 	  	 	1.7	 	  	 	0.23	 	  	 	127.2	 	  	 	1.2	 	  	 	10.0	 
	 M+I
	  	 	217.4	 	  	 	11.28	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.25	 	  	 	1.9	 	  	 	0.27	 	  	 	166.5	 	  	 	1.8	 	  	 	13.3	 
	 Inferred
	  	 	31.1	 	  	 	7.60	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.17	 	  	 	1.7	 	  	 	0.18	 	  	 	17.2	 	  	 	0.2	 	  	 	1.7	 

 Table 1-3: Mineral Resource for Copper, Gold, and Silver (Mill and
Leach) 
  

																																	
	 Resource

Class
	  	Tonnes
Mt	 	  	NSR
($/t)	 	  	Copper
(%)	 	  	Gold
(g/t)	 	  	Silver
(g/t)	 	  	Copper
(mlbs)	 	  	Gold
(moz)	 	  	Silver
(moz)	 
	 Measured
	  	 	182.4	 	  	 	34.34	 	  	 	0.25	 	  	 	0.41	 	  	 	2.2	 	  	 	1,025.1	 	  	 	2.4	 	  	 	13.1	 
	 Indicated
	  	 	2,208.3	 	  	 	18.32	 	  	 	0.14	 	  	 	0.17	 	  	 	1.4	 	  	 	6,575.6	 	  	 	12.1	 	  	 	100.5	 
	 M+I
	  	 	2,390.7	 	  	 	19.54	 	  	 	0.14	 	  	 	0.19	 	  	 	1.5	 	  	 	7,600.7	 	  	 	14.5	 	  	 	113.5	 
	 Inferred
	  	 	1,461.3	 	  	 	14.35	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	0.14	 	  	 	1.2	 	  	 	3,257.6	 	  	 	6.6	 	  	 	55.2	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	7

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Notes: 
  

	 	1.	 The Mineral Resources have an effective date of 3 July 2020 and the estimate was prepared using the
definitions in CIM Definition Standards (10 May 2014). 

  

	 	2.	 All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and therefore numbers may not
appear to add precisely. 

  

	 	3.	 Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

  

	 	4.	 Mineral Resources for leach material are based on prices of US$2.75/lb copper, US$1,500/oz gold and US$18/oz
silver. 

  

	 	5.	 Mineral Resources for mill material are based on prices of US$2.75/lb copper, US$1,500/oz gold, US$18/oz
silver, and US$11.00/lb moly. 

  

	 	6.	 Mineral Resources are based on NSR Cutoff of C$5.46/t for leach material and C$5.70/t for mill material.

  

	 	7.	 NSR value for leach material is as follows: 

NSR (C$/t) = $12.65 x copper (%) + $41.55 x gold (g/t) + $0.191 x silver (g/t), based on copper recovery of 18%, gold recovery
of 66% and silver recovery of 26%. 
  

	 	8.	 NSR value for hypogene sulphide mill material is: 

NSR (C$/t) = $60.18 x copper (%) + $41.01 x gold (g/t) + $214.94 x moly (%) + $0.355 x silver (g/t), based on recoveries of
92.2% copper, 66% gold, 50% silver and 78.6% moly. 
  

	 	9.	 NSR value for supergene (SOX and SUS) mill material is: 

NSR (C$/t) = $65.27 x recoverable copper (%) + $42.87 x gold (g/t) + $142.89 x moly (%) + $0.425 x silver (g/t), based on
recoveries of 69% gold, 60% silver and 52.3% moly. Recoverable copper = 0.94 x (total copper – soluble copper). 
  

	 	10.	 Table 14-6 accompanies this Mineral Resource statement and shows all
relevant parameters. 

  

	 	11.	 Mineral Resources are reported in relation to a conceptual constraining pit shell in order to demonstrate
reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction, as required by the definition of Mineral Resource in NI 43-101; mineralization lying outside of the pit shell is excluded from the Mineral Resource.

  

	 	12.	 AuEq and CuEq values are based on prices of US$2.75/lb copper, US$1,500/oz gold, US$18/oz silver, and
US$11.00/lb moly, and account for all metal recoveries and smelting/refining charges. 

  

	1.8	 SENSITIVITY TO NSR CUTOFF 

Table 1-4 shows resources at varying NSR Cutoffs for mill material. All tabulations are contained by
the constraining pit shell used for the base case Mineral Resource at C$5.70 per tonne (highlighted). Increasing the NSR Cutoff by 40% to C$8/t has only a modest effect on the size of the Mineral Resource amenable to milling, decreasing resource
tonnes by 6% and the contained copper and gold by 1.6% and 2.6% respectively. Table 1-5 shows resources at varying NSR Cutoffs for leach material. Again, all tabulations are contained by the constraining pit
shell used for the base case Mineral Resource. The base case resource at an NSR Cutoff of C$5.46 per tonne is highlighted. Increasing the NSR Cutoff of leach material to C$8/t only reduces the contained gold by 20%. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	8

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 1-4: Mineral Resource – Mill Material by
Various NSR Cutoffs (C$) 
  

																									
	 NSR
Cog

($/t)
	  	 Resource

Category
	  	Tonnes
Mt	  	NSR
($/t)	  	Copper
(%)	  	Gold
(g/t)	  	Moly
(%)	  	Silver
(g/t)	  	CuEq
(%)	  	Copper
(mlbs)	  	Gold
(moz)	  	Moly
(mlbs)	  	Silver
(moz)
	5.70	  	 Measured

Indicated 
 M+I

Inferred
	  	145.3
 2,028.0

2,173.3
 1,430.2
	  	38.08
 19.10

20.37
 14.50
	  	0.31
 0.14

0.15
 0.10
	  	0.40
 0.17

0.18
 0.14
	  	0.025
 0.016

0.017
 0.010
	  	2.1
 1.4

1.4
 1.2
	  	0.74
 0.33

0.36
 0.24
	  	986.5
 6,438.2

7,424.7
 3,247.6
	  	1.9
 10.8

12.7
 6.4
	  	80.7
 733.2

813.9
 324.8
	  	9.8
 90.6

100.4
 53.3

	8	  	 Measured

Indicated 
 M+I

Inferred
	  	144.6
 1,898.4

2,043.0
 1,181.0
	  	38.22
 19.93

21.22
 16.11
	  	0.31
 0.15

0.16
 0.12
	  	0.40
 0.17

0.19
 0.15
	  	0.025
 0.017

0.018
 0.012
	  	2.1
 1.4

1.5
 1.2
	  	0.74
 0.34

0.37
 0.27
	  	985.2
 6,319.6

7,304.8
 3,020.3
	  	1.9
 10.5

12.4
 5.7
	  	80.7
 724.0

804.7
 309.8
	  	9.7
 87.3

97.0
 47.1

	16	  	 Measured

Indicated 
 M+I

Inferred
	  	139.3
 1,182.3

1,321.5
 390.0
	  	39.19
 24.61

26.15
 24.95
	  	0.32
 0.19

0.20
 0.19
	  	0.41
 0.21

0.23
 0.21
	  	0.026
 0.022

0.023
 0.021
	  	2.1
 1.7

1.7
 1.6
	  	0.76
 0.42

0.46
 0.42
	  	973.4
 4,900.0

5,873.4
 1,625.0
	  	1.8
 7.8

9.6
 2.6
	  	80.1
 583.8

664.0
 180.6
	  	9.5
 64.2

73.8
 20.6

	30	  	 Measured

Indicated 
 M+I

Inferred
	  	101.3
 229.6

330.9
 74.4
	  	44.77
 36.14

38.78
 39.26
	  	0.36
 0.28

0.30
 0.32
	  	0.47
 0.31

0.36
 0.32
	  	0.030
 0.032

0.032
 0.029
	  	2.3
 2.3

2.3
 2.4
	  	0.87
 0.62

0.70
 0.65
	  	799.4
 1,402.1

2,201.5
 521.3
	  	1.5
 2.3

3.8
 0.8
	  	67.2
 163.0

230.2
 47.0
	  	7.6
 16.9

24.5
 5.6

 Table 1-5: Mineral Resource – Leach Material by Various NSR
Cutoffs (C$) 
  

																																							
	 NSR
Cog

($/t)
	  	 Resource

Category
	  	Tonnes
Mt	 	  	NSR
($/t)	 	  	Copper
(%)	 	  	Gold
(g/t)	 	  	Silver
(g/t)	 	  	AuEq
(g/t)	 	  	Copper
(mlbs)	 	  	Gold
(moz)	 	  	Silver
(moz)	 
	5.46	  	 Measured

Indicated 
 M+I

Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	37.2
 180.2

217.4
 31.1
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	19.72
 9.54

11.28
 7.60
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.05
 0.03

0.03
 0.03
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.45
 0.21

0.25
 0.17
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.8
 1.7

1.9
 1.7
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.48
 0.23

0.27
 0.18
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	39.3
 127.2

166.5
 17.2
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.53
 1.23

1.76
 0.17
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	3.29
 10.03

13.31
 1.70
	 
  
  

 

	8	  	 Measured

Indicated 
 M+I

Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	35.4
 107.3

142.7
 10.6
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	20.36
 11.43

13.64
 9.84
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.05
 0.03

0.03
 0.02
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.46
 0.26

0.31
 0.22
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.8
 2.0

2.2
 2.3
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.49
 0.28

0.33
 0.24
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	38.2
 71.0

109.2
 4.7
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.53
 0.89

1.41
 0.08
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	3.21
 6.83

10.04
 0.79
	 
  
  

 

	12	  	 Measured

Indicated 
 M+I

Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	29.5
 36.3

65.8
 1.1
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	22.45
 14.76

18.21
 12.77
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.05
 0.03

0.04
 0.01
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.51
 0.34

0.41
 0.30
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	3.0
 2.4

2.7
 1.2
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.54
 0.36

0.44
 0.31
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	33.8
 24.0

57.8
 0.1
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.48
 0.39

0.88
 0.01
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.88
 2.83

5.72
 0.04
	 
  
  

 

	14	  	 Measured

Indicated 
 M+I

Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	26.6
 17.9

44.5
 0.0
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	23.50
 16.63

20.73
 0.00
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.05
 0.03

0.04
 0.00
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.54
 0.38

0.47
 0.00
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	3.1
 2.6

2.9
 0.0
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.57
 0.40

0.50
 0.00
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	31.0
 12.3

43.3
 0.0
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.46
 0.22

0.68
 0.00
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.68
 1.52

4.20
 0.00
	 
  
  

 

  

	1.9	 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

This study has resulted in an updated Mineral Resource estimate for the Casino Project. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amenable to
milling have increased about 106% compared to the previous, December 2010, estimate. The increase is due to higher commodity prices and new drilling that converted previous Inferred Mineral Resource to Indicated Mineral Resource. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	9

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 The Casino deposit also includes a significant Mineral Resource amenable to heap leaching.
One possible development path for Casino is to develop the heap leach project as a standalone project to commence development of the deposit. 

The most significant risks to the Mineral Resource are related to economic parameters such as prices lower than forecast, recoveries lower
than forecast, or costs higher than the current estimates. The mining cost used for the Mineral Resource estimate is based on the assumption the trucks can be fueled with a liquid natural gas (LNG)/diesel fuel mixture at a significant fuel cost
reduction compared to diesel fuel alone. If this is not done the mining costs will be significantly higher. 
 CMC launched a new drilling
program in June to build upon the results of the 2019 drilling campaign. The 2020 drilling campaign will consist of 43 drill holes between 150 to 500 m in depth and will target the High Gold Zone, Northern Porphyry, and Canadian Creek Targets
identified by the 2019 drilling program. Costs are expected to be $3-5 million. 
 Upon
completion of the drilling campaign, it is recommended that CMC consider developing a new Feasibly Study, the cost of which is expected to be $3-5 million. 

After completion of the Feasibility Study, CMC should consider restarting permitting of the project. Permitting costs are variable, but are
likely in the $20-30 million range. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	10

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

  
 

 
 (Source: Yukon Highway Map, Yukoninfo.com) 

Figure 1-1: Casino Property Location 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	11

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	2	 INTRODUCTION 

 

	2.1	 ISSUER AND PURPOSE OF ISSUE

 This Report was prepared for Casino Mining Corporation (“CMC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Western
Copper and Gold Corporation (“Western”) as well as for Western itself, by M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation (M3) in association with Independent Mining Consultants (IMC), GeoSpark Consulting Inc. and Aurora Geosciences. 

The purpose of this report is to provide an updated mineral resource statement on the Casino property. The estimate of mineral resources
contained in this report conforms to the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve definitions (May, 2014) referred to in National Instrument (NI)
43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. 
  

	2.2	 SOURCES OF INFORMATION 

The main sources of information for this Mineral Resource estimate include: 

 

	 	•	 	 The drillhole database provided to IMC in digital form. 

 

	 	•	 	 Various geologic solids that were reviewed by IMC and incorporated into the resource model.

  

	 	•	 	 A report describing the development of the 2010 resource model. 

 

	 	•	 	 A geotechnical report by Knight-Piésold with slope angle
recommendations for the resource cone shell. 

  

	 	•	 	 A digital database of specific gravity measurements. 

A summary of the Qualified Persons (“QPs”) responsible for the content of this report is shown in Table 2-1. 
 A site visit was conducted by Michael G. Hester on July 22, 2008 for one day. The mine and
waste storage areas were inspected as well as the core storage area. A site visit could not be conducted for this current study due to travel restrictions due to Covid-19. 

An additional site visit was conducted by Carl Schulze as the project lead for Aurora Geosciences from September 9, 2020 through
September 26, 2020. 
 Table 2-1: Dates of Site Visits and Areas of Responsibility 

 

									
	 QP Name
	  	 Company
	  	 Qualification
	  	 Site Visit Date
	  	 Area of Responsibility

	Daniel Roth	  	M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation – Tucson, AZ	  	P.E., P.Eng.	  	N/A	  	Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and corresponding sections of 1, 25, 26 and 27
	Michael G. Hester	  	Independent Mining Consultants, Inc.	  	F Aus IMM	  	22-Jul-2008	  	Section 14 and corresponding sections of 1, 25, 26 and 27
	Laurie Tahija	  	M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation – Tucson, AZ	  	MMSA-QP	  	N/A	  	Section 13 and corresponding sections of 1, 25, 26, and 27
	Carl Schulze	  	Aurora Geosciences	  	P. Geo.	  	Sept-9-2020 to 26-Sep-2020	  	Section 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and corresponding sections of 1, 25, 26, and 27
	Caroline J. Vallat	  	GeoSpark Consulting Inc.	  	P. Geo.	  	N/A	  	Section 12 and corresponding sections of 1, 25, 26, and 27.

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	12

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Note that sections 15 to 19, 21 and 22 of Form
43-101F1 are not applicable to this stage of study and are listed in Table 2-1 for the sake of completeness to ensure that all sections are assigned to a QP. 

 

	2.3	 UNITS 

This report generally uses the SI (metric) system of units, including metric tonnes. The term “tonne” rather than “ton” is
commonly used to denote a metric ton and is used throughout the report. Units used and abbreviations are listed in Units used and abbreviations are listed in Table 2-2. Elements utilized in this report are in
Table 2-3. 
 Table 2-2: Abbreviations Used in this
Document 
  

			
	 Units
	  	Abbreviations
	 Amperes
	  	 A

	 Cubic meters
	  	 m3

	 Cubic meters per hour
	  	 m3/h

	 Current density
	  	 A/m2

	 Density
	  	 t/m3

	 grams/liter
	  	 g/L or g/l

	 grams/tonne
	  	 g/t

	 Hectares
	  	 ha

	 Hypogene
	  	 HYP

	 Induced Polarization
	  	 IP

	 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
	  	 ICP-AAS

	 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
	  	 ICP-AES

	 Kilo (1000)
	  	 K

	 Kilogram
	  	 Kg

	 Kilometer
	  	 Km

	 Kilotonnes
	  	 ktonnes, kt

	 Litres
	  	 L, l

	 Litres per second
	  	 L/s, l/s

	 Mass Emission-Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectroscopy (ICP-MS)
	  	 ICP-MS

	 Mega (1,000,000)
	  	 M

	 Meters
	  	 M

	 Metric Tonne (1000 kg)
	  	 Tonne or t

	 Millimeters
	  	 Mm

	 Overburden
	  	 OVB

	 Oxide Gold/Leached Cap
	  	 CAP

	 Parts per million
	  	 Ppm

	 Parts per billion
	  	 Ppb

	 Quality Assurance/ Quality Control
	  	 QA/QC

	 Specific gravity
	  	 S.G.

	 Square meters
	  	 m2

	 Supergene oxide
	  	 SOX

	 Supergene sulphide
	  	 SUS

	 Temperature Celsius
	  	 °C

	 Temperature Fahrenheit
	  	 °F

	 Tonnage factor or specific volume
	  	 m3/tonne or m3/t

	 Tonnes per day
	  	 t/d

	 Tonnes per year
	  	 t/y

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	13

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 2-3: Elements and Associated Units

			
	 Element
	  	Abbreviation &
Report Units
	 Aluminum
	  	 Al (%)

	 Antimony
	  	 Sb (ppm)

	 Arsenic
	  	 As (ppm)

	 Barium
	  	 Ba (ppm)

	 Beryllium
	  	 Be (ppm)

	 Bismuth
	  	 Bi (ppm)

	 Calcium
	  	 Ca (%)

	 Cadmium
	  	 Cd (ppm)

	 Cerium
	  	 Ce (ppm)

	 Cobalt
	  	 Co (ppm)

	 Chromium
	  	 Cr (%)

	 Cesium
	  	 Cs (ppm)

	 Copper
	  	 Cu (ppm)

	 Dysprosium
	  	 Dy (ppm)

	 Erbium
	  	 Er (ppm)

	 Europium
	  	 Eu (ppm)

	 Gallium
	  	 Ga (ppm)

	 Gadolinium
	  	 Gd (ppm)

	 Germanium
	  	 Ge (ppm)

	 Gold
	  	 Au (ppb). Also reported in ppm (g/t)

	 Hafnium
	  	 Hf (ppm)

	 Holmium
	  	 Ho (ppm)

	 Indium
	  	 In (ppm)

	 Iron
	  	 Fe (%)

	 Lead
	  	 Pb (ppm)

	 Lanthanum
	  	 La (ppm)

	 Lithium
	  	 Li (%)

	 Lutetium
	  	 Lu (ppm)

	 Magnesium
	  	 Mg (%)

	 Manganese
	  	 Mn (ppm)

	 Molybdenite
	  	
MoS2

			
	 Element
	  	Abbreviation &
Report Units
	 Molybdenum
	  	 Mo (ppm)

	 Niobium
	  	 Nb (ppm)

	 Neodynium
	  	 Nd (ppm)

	 Nickel
	  	 Ni (ppm)

	 Phosphorous
	  	 P (%)

	 Potassium
	  	 K (%)

	 Promethium
	  	 Pr (ppm)

	 Rhenium-Osmium
	  	 Re-Os (age dating)

	 Rubidium
	  	 Rb (ppm

	 Samarium
	  	 Sm (ppm)

	 Scandium
	  	 Sc (ppm)

	 Silicon
	  	 Si (%)

	 Silver
	  	 Ag (ppm)

	 Sodium
	  	 Na (%)

	 Strontium
	  	 Sr (ppm)

	 Sulphur
	  	 S (%)

	 Tantalum
	  	 Ta (ppm)

	 Terbium
	  	 Tb (ppm)

	 Thallium
	  	 Tl (ppm)

	 Thorium
	  	 Th (ppm)

	 Thulium
	  	 Tm (ppm)

	 Tin
	  	 Sn (ppm)

	 Titanium
	  	 Ti (%)

	 Tungsten
	  	 W (ppm)

	 Uranium
	  	 U (ppm)

	 Vanadium
	  	 V (ppm)

	 Ytterbium
	  	 Yb (ppm)

	 Yttrium
	  	 Y (ppm)

	 Zinc
	  	 Zn (ppm)

	 Zirconium
	  	 Zr (ppm)

		  	

 
 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	14

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	3	 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS 

In cases where the study authors have relied on contributions of other qualified persons, the conclusions and recommendations are exclusively
the qualified persons’ own. The results and opinions outlined in this report that are dependent on information provided by others beyond the qualified persons are assumed to be current, accurate and complete as of the date of this report. 

M3 relied upon publicly available information to verify ownership data regarding the property. The information was available and verified on
October 14, 2020 from the Mining website of the Government of Yukon (https://yukon.ca/en/mining) under the following permits: 
  

	 	•	 	 Quartz Land Use Permit number LQ00510 (Casino Property) 

 

	 	•	 	 Quartz Land Use Permit number LQ00320 (Canadian Creek Property) 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	15

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	4	 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 

 

	4.1	 LOCATION 

The Casino porphyry copper-gold-molybdenum deposit is located at latitude 62° 44’N and longitude 138° 50’W (NTS map sheet
115J/09, 10 and 15), in west central Yukon, in the north-westerly trending Dawson Range mountains, 300 km northwest of the territorial capital of Whitehorse. Figure 1-1 in Section 1 is a map showing the
location of the Casino property in relation to the Yukon, British Columbia and the Northwest Territories (Source: Yukon Highway Map, Yukoninfo.com). The property covers a total area of 13,124 ha. 

The Yukon has a population of approximately 40,800 people. Whitehorse is the nearest commercial and population center to the project property,
with a population of approximately 30,000 people. Whitehorse is 380 km from the mine site via Carmacks. No human settlements can be described as “local.” The village of Carmacks is about 150 km ESE and Pelly Crossing is about 115 km ENE.
Beaver Creek, a tourist stop on the Alaskan Highway, is about 112 km WSW. Fairbanks, Alaska is 500 km WNW. 
 The Arctic Circle is 430 km to
the north. The Yukon River flows about 16 km north of the site. Yukon Highway 1, the Alaskan Highway, is about 110 km west at the nearest point. Yukon Highway 2, the Klondike Highway, is about 100 km to the east at the nearest point. No year-round
roads reach the property. 
 The international border and Alaska are about 111 km to the west at the nearest point. British Columbia is
south approximately 300 km. The closest port is Skagway, Alaska. 
 Exploration and mining projects in the area include the following: 

 

	 	•	 	 To the west, Newmont is developing the Coffee project. The project is currently at the pre-feasibility stage and is undergoing environmental assessment under the Yukon Environmental and Socioeconomic Assessment Act (YESAA). They are also active with exploration on their project. 

 

	 	•	 	 To the north and to the west, White Gold Corp. has a large number of claims and is actively exploring them.

  

	 	•	 	 Approximately 100 km to the east, Pembridge Resources operates the Minto Mine, which produces copper
concentrate that is shipped through the port of Skagway. 

 The project is located on Crown land administered by the Yukon
Government and is within the Selkirk First Nation traditional territory and the Tr’ondek Hwechin traditional territory lies to the north. The proposed access road crosses into Little Salmon Carmacks First Nation traditional territory to the
south. The White River First Nation and Kluane First Nation are downstream from the project. 
  

	4.2	 LAND POSITION AND STATUS

  

	4.2.1	 Property Description 

The Dawson Range forms a series of well-rounded ridges and hills that reach a maximum elevation of 1,675 m above mean sea level (ASL). The
ridges rise above the Yukon Plateau, a peneplain at approximately 1,200 m ASL, which is deeply incised by the mature drainage of the Yukon River watershed. 

The characteristic terrain consists of rounded, rolling topography with moderate to deeply incised valleys. Major drainage channels extend
below 1,000 m elevation. Most of the project lies between the 650 m elevation at Dip Creek and an elevation of 1,400 m at Patton Hill. The most notable local physical feature is the Yukon River which flows to the west about 16 km north of the
project site. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	16

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 The mean annual temperature for the Casino Project area is estimated to be -2.7°C, with minimum and maximum monthly temperatures of -18.1°C and 11.1°C occurring in January and July, respectively. The mean monthly temperature values are
presented in Table 5-1 in Section 5. The Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) for the Casino Project area is estimated to be 500 mm, with 65% falling as rain and 35% falling as snow. 

The Selkirk First Nation Traditional Territory encompasses the project area in the central portion of the Yukon. 

Characteristic wildlife in the region includes caribou, grizzly and black bear, Dall sheep, moose, beaver, fox, wolf, hare, raven, rock and
willow ptarmigan, and golden eagle. 
 The tops of hills and ridges are sparsely covered, most vegetation lies at the bottom and on the
slopes of valleys. Vegetation consists of black and white spruce forests with aspen and occasionally lodgepole pine. Black spruce and paper birch prevail on permafrost slopes. Balsam poplar is common along floodplains. Scrub birch and willow form
extensive stands in subalpine sections from valley bottoms to well above the tree line. 
  

	4.2.2	 Environmental 

See Section 20 for a list of permits either obtained or in progress. No environmental liabilities are expected to impact the Project. 

 

	4.2.3	 Mineral Tenure 

The Casino Property lies within the Whitehorse Mining District and consists of a total of 1,136 full and partial Quartz Claims, and 55 Placer
Claims acquired in accordance with the Yukon Quartz Mining Act. The total area covered by Casino Quartz Claims is 21,288 ha. The total area covered by Casino Placer Leases is 490.34 ha. The 825 quartz claims (of a total of 1,136 claims) comprise the
initial Casino Property and 311 claims comprise the Canadian Creek Property acquired in 2019. The claims are registered in the name of, and are 100%-owned by, Casino Mining Corp. (CMC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Western Copper and Gold Corp.
(Western). A list of claims is provided in Appendix B. 
 The historical claims held by prior owners of the project and transferred as part
of 2006 Western Copper’s plan of arrangement with Lumina Resources Corp. (“Lumina”) consist of 83 Casino “A” claims covering an area of 1,154 ha, 23 claims in the “JOE” block covering an area of 323.63 ha and 55
Casino “B” claims covering an area of 929.93 ha, 9 claims of which were repurchased from Cariboo Rose Resources Ltd. (“Cariboo Rose”) in November 2016 pursuant to an early exercise of 2020 Casino B option agreement and 46 of
these Casino “B” claims were reacquired in July 2019 pursuant to the Canadian Creek Property Purchase Agreement, described in Section 4.2.4 in more detail. The Casino Deposit lies entirely on the Casino “A” claims. 

CMC has significantly expanded the area of its mineral property by staking and acquisition of mineral claims. The 188 VIK mineral claims,
covering an area of 3,440 ha, were staked in June 2007 by CRS Copper Resources Corp (“CRS”), a predecessor of CMC. In June 2008, an additional 94 “CC” claims, covering an area of 1,930 ha, 8 BL claims, covering area of 157.24 ha
and 63 “BRIT” claims covering an area of 1,218 ha were staked by CRS. In October 2009, CRS staked 136 AXS mineral claims, covering an area of 2,763 ha. In May of 2010, CRS staked an additional 63 AXS claims, covering an area of 1,254 ha.
In 2011, CRS staked 18 FLY claims covering 327 ha. In May 2016, 87 PAL claims were staked by CMC, covering 1,818.18 ha. In July 2019, CMC acquired additional 311 mineral clams from Cariboo Rose that comprise the Canadian Creek Property and covering
area of 6,001.47 ha. In September 2019, CMC staked 53 CAS19 claims, covering an area of 759.88 ha. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	17

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	4.2.4	 Ownership and Agreements 

CMC is a successor in title to the Casino Property pursuant to the Plan of Arrangement completed on October 17, 2011. 

CRS, a predecessor of CMC, acquired the Casino A, B and JOE claims, comprising the historical Casino property, on August 9, 2007 by
exercising its option pursuant to a Letter Agreement dated July 15, 2002 (“2002 Option”) with Great Basin Gold Ltd. (“Great Basin”). The Casino deposit lies entirely on the Casino A claims. 

On December 21, 2012, CMC entered into the Net Smelter Returns Royalty Agreement (the “NSR Royalty Agreement”) with 8248567
Canada Ltd. (“8248567 Canada”), whereby the 2.75% Net Smelter Return Royalty (“NSR”) was established on all Casino claims excluding fifty-five (55) Casino B Claims. As consideration for purchasing the 2.75% NSR, 8248567
Canada cancelled the existing 5% NPR (except on Casino B Claims). 
 On November 2, 2016, pursuant to the Early Exercise and Purchase
Agreement (the “Early Exercise and Purchase Agreement”), Cariboo Rose exercised its right to acquire fifty-five (55) Casino B Claims, as described in the option agreement dated May 2, 2000 (the “Casino B Option
Agreement”) between Cariboo Rose and CMC (a successor to title by virtue of 2002 Option). As part of the Early Exercise and Purchase, CMC reacquired nine (9) Casino B Claims (the “Nine Casino B Claims”). Forty-six (46) Casino B Claims (the “Forty-Six Casino B Claims”) were transferred to Cariboo Rose and became part of the Canadian Creek Property owned by
Cariboo Rose. 
 On August 28, 2019, CMC and Cariboo Rose completed the Canadian Creek Property Purchase Agreement (the “Canadian
Creek Property Purchase Agreement”), whereby Forty-Six Casino B Claims were reacquired as part of the Canadian Creek Property consisting of a total of 311 mineral claims. 

 

	4.2.5	 Agreements and Royalties 

Certain portions of the Casino property remain subject to certain royalty obligations. The surviving royalties and agreements are as follows:

  

	 	•	 	 2.75% NSR on the claims comprising the Casino project in favour of Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (“Osisko
Gold”) pursuant to the Royalty Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated July 31, 2017 when 8248567 Canada assigned to Osisko Gold all of its rights, title and interest in the 2.75% NSR. 

 

	 	•	 	 5% Net Profits Interest (the “NPI”), as defined in the Casino B Option Agreement, remains in effect
on the Casino B Claims and $1 million payment is required to be made to the original optionor within 30 days of achieving a commercial production decision. 

 

	 	•	 	 5% Net Profit Interest Royalty (the “NPI Royalty”) presently held by Archer-Cathro and Associates on
the ANA claims pursuant to the NPI Royalty Agreement dated December 4, 1990 (the “NPI Royalty Agreement”) among Big Creek Resources Ltd., Rinsey Mines Ltd., and Renoble Holdings Inc. 

 

	4.2.6	 Placer Claims 

In the summer of 2010, Western staked a 5-mile Placer Lease along Casino Creek and a 3-mile Placer Lease along Britannia Creek. In 2011, these leases were converted to claims. In 2014, 30 placer claims on Britannia Creek were dropped and presently, Western, through CMC, owns 55 placer claims on
Casino Creek. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	18

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	
	

 Figure 4-1: Project Road Access Map 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	19

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	5	 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY 

 

	5.1	 ACCESSIBILITY 

The Casino Mine is located in Central Yukon, roughly 150 km due northwest of Carmacks, at approximately N62° 44’ 25”, W138°
49’ 32”. Current site access is by small aircraft using the existing 760 m airstrip, by winter road and from the Yukon River. 
 A
barge landing area at Britannia Creek and the Yukon River was prepared in 2010 and the lower 10 km of the 23 km road from the landing to the site was realigned. 
  

	5.2	 PHYSIOGRAPHY 

The Casino property is located in the Dawson Range, a north-westerly trending belt of well-rounded ridges and hills that reach a maximum
elevation of about 1,675 m. The hills rise above the Yukon Plateau, at about 1,250 m and deeply incised by mature dendritic drainages. Although the Dawson Range escaped Pleistocene continental glaciation, minor alpine glaciation has produced a few
small cirques and terminal moraines. 
 The deposit area is situated on a small divide. The northern part of the property drains to Canadian
Creek and Britannia Creek into the Yukon River. The southern part of the property flows southward via Casino Creek to Dip Creek to the Donjek River and northward to the Yukon River. 

Outcrop is rare on the property. Soil development is variable ranging from coarse talus and immature soil horizons at higher elevations to a
more mature soil profile and thick organic accumulations on the valley floors. 
  

	5.3	 CLIMATE 

The climate in the Dawson Range is subarctic. Permafrost is widespread on north-facing slopes, and discontinuous on south-facing slopes. CMC
installed an automated weather station at the site in 2009 and collected a certain amount of data. 
 The climate at the Casino Project area
can generally be described as continental and cold. Winters are long, cold and dry, with snow generally on the ground from September through June. Summers are short, mild and wet, with the greatest monthly precipitation falling in July. The climate
and hydrology at the Project site have been assessed based on both short-term site data and longer-term regional data. Site data are available from a program operated from 1993 to 1995 and from the current program that was initiated in 2008. 

The mean annual temperature for the Casino Project area is estimated to be -2.7°C, with mean
minimum and maximum monthly temperatures of -18.1°C and 11.1°C occurring in January and July, respectively. The mean annual precipitation (MAP) for the Casino Project area is estimated to be 500 mm,
with 65% falling as rain and 35% falling as snow. The mean monthly temperatures and precipitation are presented in Table 5-1. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	20

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 5-1: Mean Monthly Temperature and
Precipitation Values 
  

					
	 	  	Parameter
	 Month
	  	Precipitation (mm)	  	Temperature (°C)
	Jan	  	25	  	-18.1
	Feb	  	19	  	-14.2
	Mar	  	16	  	-8.2
	Apr	  	15	  	-0.1
	May	  	42	  	5.7
	Jun	  	74	  	9.8
	July	  	103	  	11.1
	Aug	  	65	  	9.1
	Sept	  	49	  	4.4
	Oct	  	35	  	-3.3
	Nov	  	31	  	-12.7
	Dec	  	26	  	-16.5
	Annual	  	500	  	-2.7

 The estimated average annual lake evaporation is 308 mm, based on climate data collected at site and used in
conjunction with long-term regional climate data. 
 Based on the estimated MAP of 500 mm and a rain/snow ratio of 0.65/0.35, the annual
snowfall value for Casino was estimated to be 175 mm. This is generally consistent with the 140 mm mean annual maximum snowpack value (snow water equivalent, SWE) recorded in the Project area at the Casino Creek snow course station (09CD-SC01)
operated by the Yukon Department of Environment (1977-2009), Water Resources Branch. 
 Based on the complete years of snowpack data, the
average monthly snowmelt distribution for the Casino Project area was estimated to be 40% in April and 60% in May, although there is considerable variation from year to year. 
  

	5.4	 WATER RIGHTS 

It is assumed that water rights can be obtained for withdrawal of water from the Yukon River. 

 

	5.5	 POWER AVAILABILITY 

There is no utility power available to serve site. The Project will need to generate its own power. 

 

	5.6	 SURFACE RIGHTS 

CMC has sufficient rights and available land at the Project site for a mine, tailing storage areas, waste disposal areas, heap leach pad areas
and process plant areas. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	21

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	6	 HISTORY 

The first documented work on the Casino Property was the working of placer claims in the area of the Casino Deposit in April 1911, following a
placer gold discovery on Canadian Creek by J. Britton and C. Brown. A study by D.D. Cairnes, of the Geological Survey of Canada in 1917, recognized huebnerite (MnWO4) in the heavy-mineral
concentrates of the placer workings and also that the gold and tungsten mineralization was derived from an intrusive complex on Patton Hill. During the Second World War, a small amount of tungsten was recovered from placer workings. The total placer
gold production from the area of the property is unknown, but during the period 1980-1985 placer mining yielded about 50 kg (1,615 troy ounces) of gold. 

The first mineral claims at Casino were staked by N. Hansen in 1917; however, the first recorded bedrock mineral discovery occurred in 1936
when J. Meloy and A. Brown located silver-lead-zinc veins approximately 3 km south of the Canadian Creek placer workings. Over the next several years the Bomber and Helicopter vein systems were explored by hand trenches and pits. In 1943, the
Helicopter claims were staked and in 1947 the Bomber and Airport groups were staked. 
 Lead-silver mineralization remained the focus of
exploration on the property until 1968. Noranda Exploration Co Ltd. optioned the property in 1948 and Rio Tinto optioned it again in 1963. During this time trenching, mapping and sampling were conducted. 

L. Proctor purchased the claims in 1963 and formed Casino Silver Mines Limited to develop the silver-rich veins. The silver-bearing veins were
explored and developed intermittently by underground and surface workings from 1965 to 1980. In total, 372.5 tonnes of hand-cobbled argentiferous galena, assaying 3,689 g/t silver (Ag), 17.1 g/t gold (Au), 48.3% lead (Pb), 5% zinc (Zn), 1.5% copper
(Cu) and 0.02% bismuth (Bi), were shipped to the smelter at Trail, British Columbia. 
 In 1963, B. Hestor first recognized that the area
had potential for a porphyry copper deposit, but his observations did not become generally known. In 1967, the porphyry potential was recognized again, this time by A. Archer and separately by G. Harper. Based on the recognition of porphyry copper
potential, the Brynelsen Group acquired Casino Silver Mines Limited, and from 1968 to 1973 exploration was directed jointly by Brameda Resources (Brameda), Quintana Minerals (Quintana), and Teck Corporation towards a porphyry target. Exploration,
including extensive soil sampling surveys, geophysical surveys and trenching programs, eventually led to the discovery of the Casino deposit in 1969. 

From 1969 to 1973, various parties, including Brameda Resources, Quintana Minerals and Teck Corporation, conducted drilling on the property.
During this period 5,328 m of reverse circulation drilling in 35 holes, and 12,547 m of diamond drilling in 56 holes were completed. 

Archer, Cathro & Associates (1981) Ltd. (Archer Cathro) optioned the property in 1991 and assigned the option to Big Creek
Resources Ltd. In 1992, a program consisting of 21 HQ (63.5 mm diameter) holes totalling 4,729 m systematically assessed the gold potential in the core area of the deposit for the first time. 

In 1992, Pacific Sentinel Gold Corp. (PSG) acquired the property from Archer Cathro and commenced a major exploration program. The 1993
program included surface mapping and 50,316 m of HQ (63.5 mm diameter) and NQ (47.6 mm diameter) drilling in 127 holes. All but one of the twenty-one 1992 drill holes were deepened in 1993. 

PSG drilled an additional 108 drill holes totalling 18,085 m in 1994. This program completed the delineation drilling commenced in 1993. PSG
also performed metallurgical, geotechnical and environmental work which was used in a scoping study in 1995. The scoping study envisioned a large-scale open pit mine and a conventional flotation concentrator that would produce a copper-gold
concentrate for sale to Pacific Rim smelters. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	22

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 First Trimark Resources and CRS Copper Resources obtained the property and, using the PSG
data, published a Qualifying Report on the property in 2003 to bring the resource estimate into compliance with National Instrument 43-101 requirements. The two firms combined to form Lumina Copper Corporation
in 2004. An update of the Qualifying Report was issued in 2004. 
 Western Copper Corporation acquired Lumina Copper Corporation, and
therefore the Casino Deposit, in November 2006. In the fall of 2011, Western Copper Corporation spun out all other assets except the Casino Deposit and changed its name to Western Copper and Gold Corporation (Western). 

In 2007, Western conducted an evaluation of the Bomber Vein System and the southern slope of Patton Hill by
VLF-EM, Horizontal Loop EM and soil geochemical surveying. Environmental baseline studies were also initiated in 2007. 

In 2008, Western reclaimed the old camp site, constructed a new exploration camp next to the Casino airstrip and drilled three drill holes
(the camp water well and two exploration diamond drill holes) totalling 1,163 m. The main purpose of the drilling was to obtain fresh core samples for the metallurgical and waste characterization tests. Both exploration holes twinned PSG’s
holes to confirm historical copper, gold and molybdenum grades. Later that year, M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation produced a pre-feasibility study for Western. 

In 2009, Western completed 22.5 km of DC/IP surveying and MT surveying using the Titan system developed by Quantec Geosciences Ltd. As well,
the company drilled 10,943 m in 37 diamond drill holes, of which 27 holes were infill holes drilled to upgrade the previously designated Inferred Resource and non-defined material to the Measured and Indicated
resource categories. Infill drilling covered the north slope of Patton Hill that was mapped as a “Latite Plug” on PSG maps. The drilling also identified supergene Cu and Mo mineralization in this area. The remaining 10 holes, totalling
4,327 m, were drilled to test geophysical targets. 
 In 2010, under the direction of the Casino Mining Corporation (CMC), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Western, Western completed infill and delineation drilling mostly to the north and west of the deposit, as outlined by PSG. The drilling program also defined hypogene mineralization at the southern end of the deposit. In addition, the
company drilled a series of geotechnical holes at the proposed tailings embankment area and within the pit, and several other holes for hydrogeological studies. The geotechnical drilling continued in 2011 (41 holes, 3,163 m) and 2012 (6 holes, 228
m). This work culminated in the publishing of a pre-feasibility study in 2011 and a feasibility study in 2013. 

In 2019, CMC carried out a program of infill drilling designed to convert mineralization from the Inferred category, located along the margin
of the deposit, into the Indicated category. 
 A breakdown of drilling by Western and CMC from 2010 to the end of 2019 is as follows: 

 

	 	•	 	 124 exploration holes for 27,365.37 m. 

 

	 	•	 	 11 combined hydrogeological and geological holes for 1,689.58 m. 

 

	 	•	 	 53 geotechnical holes in the proposed tailings embankment, heap leach pad, plant site, waste rock storage
site, airstrip, access road and water well areas, for 3,786.54 m. 

  

	 	•	 	 5 holes for 1,570.63 m for the metallurgical sample. 

The total meterage drilled by Western and CMC from 2008 to the end of 2019 is 46,639.37 m. 

In mid 2019, CMC acquired the adjacent property to the west, referred to as the Canadian Creek property, from Cariboo Rose Resources Ltd. 

Exploration on the Canadian Creek property dates from 1992 when Archer Cathro & Associates staked the Ana Claims. In 1993, Eastfield
Resources Ltd. (Eastfield) acquired the Ana Claims, expanded the Ana Claim block and explored the expanded property with soil grids, trenching and drilling, (Johnston, 2018). This work was directed at the discovery

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	23

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
of additional porphyry deposits. The 1993 program was followed by extensive field programs in 1996, 1997 and 1999 consisting of induced polarization (IP) surveying, road construction and
trenching on the Ana, Koffee, Maya and Ice claims. In 2000, another drill campaign was undertaken by Eastfield on the Ana, Koffee Bowl, and the newly acquired Casino “B” claims located immediately to the west of the Casino deposit. The
Casino “B” holes confirmed the existence of gold mineralization first discovered here in 1994 by PSG, which encountered 55.17 m averaging 0.71 g/t gold in hole 94-319. Modest exploration programs
were conducted, mostly over the Casino “B” area, in 2003, 2004 and 2005. In 2007, a five-hole core drilling program at Casino “B” targeted gold and
copper-in-soil anomalies and ground magnetic high features. 

The discovery in 2009 of gold mineralization on Underworld Resources’ White Gold property sparked new interest in gold exploration in the
Yukon. This led to the implementation of a major exploration program at Canadian Creek directed at the gold potential of the property, some distance from the area of previous work focusing on porphyry copper mineralization. 

A soil survey revealed extensive areas returning greater than 15 ppb gold in soils with associated anomalous values in arsenic (As), bismuth
(Bi) and antimony (Sb). The anomalous area extends for over 4 km in an east-northeast direction. The induced polarization (IP) surveys revealed numerous strong chargeability highs, many of which coincide with
the gold-in-soil anomalies. 
 Ten diamond drill holes were
targeted into the new grid. Results include numerous intervals of anomalous gold values, commonly associated with elevated arsenic, antimony and bismuth. The mineralization is hosted in both gneiss and granodiorite, commonly in clay-altered
structures, sheeted pyrite veins or quartz-carbonate veins. With few exceptions, gold grades are less than 1 gpt and widths are less than 3 m. 

Resampling of old trenches in other parts of the property was undertaken to verify significant historical gold results. In trench Tr-2, excavated in 1993 and located in the Ana Pass area, a grab sample of a tourmaline-pyrite-quartz altered intrusive rock returned
2,516 ppb gold. In the Casino “B” area, trench 9076-C averaged 376 ppb gold over 50 m, including a 10 m interval of 927 ppb. 

In 2011, additional soil sampling, ground geophysical surveying and trenching were completed. The soil sampling completed the coverage of the
entire Canadian Creek property and increased the known extent of the arsenic anomalies. A limited-extent induced polarization survey identified two zones of chargeability with values greater than 20 mv/V. The trenching program identified a number of
areas with anomalous gold values, ranging from sub-detection level up to 2,890 and 4,400 ppb Au. 

As a follow up on the 2011 program, a modest 2016 program of trenching, prospecting and in-fill soil
sampling was carried out by Cariboo Rose Resources Ltd (Cariboo Rose), which had acquired the property from Eastfield. Trenching conducted in three areas of the Ana portion of the Canadian Creek property returned locally anomalous gold, widely
spread anomalous arsenic, bismuth, antimony and locally high silver values, generally confined to narrow structures. 
 Cariboo Rose’s
2017 exploration program consisted of surface work directed at the Kana and Malt West gold targets and a reverse circulation (RC) drill program that tested a variety of gold targets across the property. A total of 2,151.27 m of reverse
circulation (RC) drilling was conducted in 24 holes. This work confirmed gold and silver mineralization to be limited to narrow (less than 3 m wide) structures rarely traceable over more than 100 m. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	24

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 6-1: Summary of Work on the Canadian Creek
Property by Previous Owners Since 1993 (Johnston, 2018) 
  

			
	 Summary of
Work

	 Induced Polarization Survey
	  	 87 line km

	 Ground Magnetic Surveys
	  	 586.8 line km

	 Mechanical Trenching
	  	 170 trenches and pits (many did not reach bedrock)

	 Trench Samples
	  	 453 samples

	 Soil Samples
	  	 10,129 samples

	 Rock Samples
	  	 835 samples

	 Road Construction
	  	 16 km

	 Diamond Drilling
	  	 6,069.24 m in 40 holes

		  	 (includes 1970 Bremada and 1993-94 Pacific Sentinel
holes on the current Casino “B” area)

	 Reverse Circulation (RC) Drilling
	  	 2,151.27 m in 24 holes

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	25

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	7	 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION 

 

	7.1	 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 

The Casino deposit occurs within the Yukon-Tanana terrane (YTT), a northwest-southeast trending accreted terrane comprising Neoproterozoic to
Upper Cretaceous metaigneous and metasedimentary rocks abutting the southwest side of the Tintina Fault Zone northeast of the property. This was previously described as an overlapping zone of the Yukon Cataclastic Terrane to the north and the Yukon
Crystalline Terrane to the south (Templeman-Kluit, 1976). An elongate band of ultramafic rocks, 1 km north of the Casino deposit, may occur along a major tectonic suture. The YTT in this area has undergone emplacement of the 104 Ma Dawson Range
Batholith, part of the Whitehorse Intrusive Suite. The Dawson Range Batholith extends WNW for about 300 km, roughly parallel to the regional orientation of strata comprising the YTT also known as the Yukon Metamorphic Complex. 

The YTT is dominated by Paleozoic rocks of the Yukon Metamorphic Complex with scattered intrusions of the Coffee Creek Suite which are
petrographically distinct from the Dawson Range Batholith. The YTT in the Dawson Range area is comprised of metasedimentary rocks of the Proterozoic to Devonian Snowcap assemblage, rocks of the Devono- Mississippian Wolverine Creek Metamorphic
Suite, (Johnston, 1995) and rocks of the Permian Sulphur Creek assemblage (website, Yukon Geological Survey, 2020). Snowcap assemblage rocks comprise quartzites, pelites, psammites and marble (YGS, 2020). Stratigraphy of the Wolverine Creek Suite
comprises sedimentary and igneous protoliths (Tempelman-Kluit, 1974; Payne et al., 1987). These meta-sedimentary rocks consist mainly of quartz-feldspar-mica schist and gneiss, quartzite, and micaceous quartzite, while the meta-igneous unit includes
biotite-hornblende-feldspar gneiss and other orthogneisses, as well as hornblende amphibolite (Selby & Nesbit, 1997). 
 During the
mid-Cretaceous, Wolverine Creek suite rocks in this area were intruded by the Dawson Range Batholith, subsequently intruded by the Casino Intrusive Suite (Selby et al., 1999). The Dawson Range Batholith has
incorporated scattered roof–pendants and blocks of the YTT, particularly Snowcap Assemblage and Wolverine Creek Suite rocks. The Dawson Range Batholith is the main country rock of the Casino Property and is represented by a relatively
homogeneous, medium- to coarse-grained, hornblende-bearing, potassic quartz diorite to granodiorite, and lesser fine- to medium-grained diorite and quartz monzonitic veins, dykes, and plugs (Tempelman-Kluit, 1974). 

The Casino Intrusions, also called the Casino Plutonic Suite, have been described as a suite of quartz monzonite stocks up to 18 km across
(Hart and Selby, 1998) trending west-northwest parallel to the Big Creek Lineament and its northwestern extension. Mapping by Tempelman-Kluit (1974), and successively by Payne et al. (1987), associates this Casino Plutonic Suite with the mid-Cretaceous Dawson Range Batholith. Subsequently, Johnston (1995) grouped the intrusions with the late-Cretaceous Prospector Mountain Plutonic Suite, based largely on field relationships that show stocks of
the Casino Plutonic Suite cutting the Dawson Range Batholith. Subsequent age determination by Mortensen and Hart in 1998, as well as geochemistry provided by Selby et al. (1999), re-evaluated the Casino
Intrusions as mid- Cretaceous fractionated magmas of the Dawson Range Batholith. Recent field relationships have proven that the ‘quartz monzonites’ of the Casino property, once thought to be
separate intrusions, are actually intensely altered and recrystallized diorites of the Dawson Range Batholith. 
 The regional geology is
illustrated in Figure 7-1, which summarizes the major units with isotopic ages. All isotopic dates are based on U-Pb ratios in zircons analyzed by J.R. Mortensen. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	26

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 7-1: Regional Geology 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	27

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 During late Cretaceous time, stocks and apophyses of the Prospector Mountain Plutonic Suite
were emplaced into the Dawson Range Batholith (Johnston, 1995; Selby et al, 1999). In the Casino area, this suite is represented by the 72.4 Ma Patton Porphyry intrusions, occurring as small, biotite-bearing, feldspar-porphyritic, hypabyssal
rhyodacite to dacite intrusions near the center of the deposit, and as discontinuous centimeter- to metre-wide dikes northwest of the property. Here, early phases the Patton Porphyry appear to grade into a mineralized intrusive breccia. Later,
unaltered dykes of similar lithology cut surrounding hydrothermally altered and mineralized rocks (Payne et al., 1987) suggesting there are multiple phases of this unit (Bower, 1995; Selby and Creaser, 2001). Hydrothermal alteration and
mineralization occur in, and adjacent to, some of these late Cretaceous intrusions. 
 Table 7-1:
Stratigraphic Column 
  

					
	 	 	Geological Unit	  	Isotopic Age
	Late Cretaceous	 	PROSPECTOR MOUNTAIN PLUTONIC SUITE:
	 	 Intrusive Breccia (Diatreme)

Heterolithic; fine-grained matrix; angular clastic
	  	 
	 	 Heterolithic Intrusion Breccia

Heterolithic; Patton porphyry/potassic matrix; autobrecciated fragments
	  	 
	 	 Patton Porphyry

Plag-Bi Porphyry; Kf +/- Qz megacrystic porphyry
	  	 72.4 +/-0.5 Ma

	 Mid-

Cretaceous
	 	DAWSON RANGE BATHOLITH:
	 	 Granodiorite

bi-hbld granodiorite
	  	 104.0 +/-0.5 Ma

	 	 Diorite

Hbld-Bi-Qtz diorite; hbld—bi diorite
	  	 104.0 +/-0.5 Ma

	 Devono-

Mississippian
	 	WOLVERINE CREEK METAMORPHIC SUITE:
	 	 Meta-sedimentary

Micaceous Quartzite
	  	 
	 	 Meta-igneous

Qtz-Bi-Plag-Microcline Gneiss; KF-Qtz-Bi Gneiss; Amphibolite
	  	 
	 Proterooic-

Devonian
	 	SNOWCAP ASSEMBLAGE
	 	
	 	 Metasedimentary:

Quartzite, psammites, pelites, marble
	  	

 The Casino Property is sandwiched between parallel west-northwest-trending faults that form contacts between
rocks of the Wolverine Creek Metamorphic Suite and the Dawson Range Batholith. In Figure 7-2 (below), the fault farthest to the northeast is an extension of the Big Creek Fault interpreted as dextrally offset
by 20 to 45 km. A parallel fault, 8 km to the southwest, forms the southwest boundary of a sliver of Wolverine Creek Metamorphic Suite rocks and contains outcroppings of ultramafic rocks similar to those occurring along the Big Creek Fault.

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	28

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 7-2: Regional Structures Overlain on Recent Aeromagnetic
Survey 
 The Casino Property is bounded to the southeast by a northeast-trending regional structure known as the Dip Creek Fault, which
has a left lateral (sinistral) displacement. The left-lateral displacement of stratigraphy along the Yukon River east of the Casino Property is a reflection of sinistral movement along this fault. The east-trending Minto-Battle Fault is also
sinistrally offset by the Dip Creek Fault (Johnston, 1999). The dextrally offset Minto-Battle fault lies east of the Casino Property on the opposite side of Dip Creek, with its offset extension lying south and southwest of the Casino Property. 

 

	7.2	 PROPERTY GEOLOGY 

The geological setting of the Casino deposit is typical of many porphyry copper deposits. The deposit is centered on an Upper Cretaceous-age (72.4 Ma), east-west trending elongate tonalite porphyry stock, called the “Patton Porphyry” (PP), that intrudes mid-Cretaceous granitoids of the
Dawson Range Batholith (WRGD) and Paleozoic schists and gneisses (YM) of the YTT. Emplacement of the Patton Porphyry tonalite stock into the older rocks caused brecciation of both the intrusive rocks and the surrounding country rocks along the
northern, southern and eastern contacts of the stock. Brecciation is best developed in the eastern end of the stock, where the breccia zone can be up to 400 m wide in plan view. To the west, along the north and south contacts, the breccias narrow
gradually to less than 100 m. Drilling done at the western end of the tonalite stock has revealed a late, post-mineralization intrusive breccia (MX) which has obliterated the Patton Porphyry stock and any related contact breccia in this area.
The late intrusive breccia (diatreme) forms an elliptical body over 300 m across. It also forms narrow east – west dykes extending into the tonalite stock and surrounding granitoids and metamorphic rocks. The Patton Porphyry and late intrusive
breccias comprise the Casino Intrusive Complex, measuring 1.8 km by 1.0 km. 
 Patton Porphyry dykes extend west of the deposit for several
kilometres. Locally, these dykes are associated with breccia zones developed along their margins, and may be mineralized with pyrite, chalcopyrite and molybdenite as disseminations, vein and fracture fillings. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	29

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 On the northwest side of the Casino intrusive complex a swarm of Patton Porphyry dykes and
related breccias occurs. This dyke swarm is speculated to represent the upper emanation of a buried satellite stock of the main Patton Porphyry stock. 
  

 
 

 
 Figure 7-3: Property Geology (From R. Johnston, 2018) 

 

	7.3	 MINERALIZATION 

 

	7.3.1	 Hydrothermal Porphyry Alteration 

Crystallization and exsolution of hydrothermal fluids from Patton Porphyry (PP) magmas produced porphyry style
Cu-Mo-Au mineralization. Therefore, the Patton Porphyry, and associated Intrusive Breccia (IX), is genetically related to the Cu-Mo-Au mineralization of the deposit. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	30

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Hydrothermal alteration at the Casino property consists of a potassic core centered on and
around the main Patton Porphyry body, in turn bordered by a contemporaneous, strongly developed and fracture controlled phyllic zone, a weakly developed propylitic zone, and a secondary discontinuous argillic overprint. Mineralized stockwork veins
and breccias within the Casino Property are closely associated with the hydrothermal alteration. 
  
  

 
 Figure 7-4: Geology of the Casino Deposit 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	31

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 7-5: Casino Property Geology - Cross Section 

Potassic alteration minerals include texturally destructive K-feldspar, biotite, magnetite and quartz
with lesser hematite, purple anhydrite and gypsum. Biotite is generally felted and pseudomorphic after hornblende. Locally, magnetite forms braided veinlets. In drill core, potassic alteration is represented by dark brown to black biotite alteration
and/or by pink potassium feldspar alteration. 
 The texturally destructive phyllic zone is found peripheral to, and locally overprinting,
the potassic zone of alteration. It has a distinctive ‘bleached’ appearance and is locally structurally controlled. Phyllic alteration minerals include quartz, pyrite, sericite, muscovite (after biotite), and abundant tourmaline, as well
as minor hematite and/or magnetite towards the potassic zone. Quartz and sericite are typically alteration minerals after potassic and plagioclase feldspars. Biotite alters to muscovite or titanite, and hornblende alters to chlorite, calcite, quartz
and biotite. Tourmaline forms radiating 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	32

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
disseminations and veinlets. Sulphide content is typically high, with pyrite ranging from 5-10% throughout, as disseminated blebs or cores to quartz
“D” veins. 
 Where intense phyllic alteration overprints potassic alteration, relict textures are destroyed and minerals are
recrystallized, commonly to equal portions of quartz, plagioclase, and K-feldspar, and including up to 10 percent biotite, trace apatite and titanite. Strongly zoned plagioclase and locally kinked biotite
form subhedral lathes, surrounded by K-feldspar, locally strained quartz, and biotite. The overall colour is pale pink. 

Propylitic alteration is rare on surface but forms a wide halo around the deposit in gradational contact with the inner potassic alteration.
Alteration minerals include epidote, chlorite and calcite, with lesser carbonate, clay, sericite, pyrite and albite. Hornblende and biotite are completely chloritized, whereas feldspars are relatively fresh and textures are generally well-preserved.

 In typical porphyry copper deposits, advanced argillic alteration occurs above the phyllic alteration. It appears that, on the Casino
property, all evidence of advanced argillic alteration has been eroded or destroyed. 
 Secondary argillic alteration is closely associated
with the supergene zone and may appear locally as patches or pockets within potassic and phyllic alteration zones. It is poorly developed, appears bleached or pale green, contains abundant clays (kaolinite, montmorillonite) and local chlorite and/or
carbonate. In drill core, this unit may be recognized by distinctive “pock-marks” along the surface of the core. 
  

	7.3.2	 Supergene Porphyry Mineralization 

The Casino deposit is unusual among Canadian porphyry deposits as it has a substantially preserved outcropping oxide gold-bearing “Leached
Cap”, a well-developed upper copper-enriched “Supergene Zone” and a lower copper-gold bearing “Hypogene Zone”. The Supergene Zone is comprised of the Supergene Oxide (SOX) zone and more extensive Supergene Sulphide (SUS)
zone. Table 7-2 summarizes the main minerals identified in the Leached Cap and Supergene zones. 
 Leached Cap
Mineralization (CAP) 
 The Leached Cap (oxide gold zone) is gold-enriched and copper-depleted due to supergene alteration, mainly
leaching, processes, and has a lower specific gravity relative to the other supergene zones. It averages 70 m thick and is characterized by boxwork textures filled with jarosite, limonite, goethite, and hematite. This weathering has completely
destroyed rock textures and has replaced most primary minerals with clay. The resulting rock is pale gray to cream in colour and is friable to the touch, and the clay is commonly stained yellow, orange, and/or brown by iron oxides. The weathering is
most intense at the surface and decreases with depth. 
 Supergene Oxide Mineralization (SOX) 

The poorly defined Supergene Oxide zone (SOX) is copper enriched with trace molybdenite. It occurs as a few perched bodies within the leached
cap, likely due to more recent fluctuations in the water table. This zone is thought to be related to present-day topography and is best developed where oxidation of earlier secondary copper sulphides occurs
above the water table, typically on well drained slopes. Where present, the supergene oxide zone averages 10 m thick, and may locally contain chalcanthite, malachite and brocanthite, with minor azurite, tenorite, cuprite and neotocite. Where
present, the supergene copper oxide zone grades into the better-defined supergene copper sulphide zone. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	33

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Supergene Sulphide Mineralization (SUS) 

Supergene copper mineralization occurs in a weathered zone up to 200 m deep, below the leached cap and above the hypogene zone. It has an
average thickness of 60 m and is positively correlated with high grade hypogene mineralization, high permeability and phyllic and/or outer potassic alteration. Grades of the Supergene sulphide zone vary widely, but are highest in fractured and
strongly pyritic zones, due to their ability to promote leaching and chalcocite precipitation. Thus, secondary enrichment zones are thickest along contacts of the potassic and phyllic alteration halos; accordingly, the copper grades in the Supergene
Sulphide zone are almost double the copper grades in the Hypogene zone (0.43% Cu versus 0.23% Cu). Grain borders and fractures in chalcopyrite, bornite and tetrahedrite may be altered to chalcocite, diginite and/or covellite. Chalcocite also locally
coats pyrite grains and clusters and locally extends along fractures deep into the hypogene zone. Molybdenite is largely unaffected by supergene processes, other than local alteration to ferrimolybdite. 

In drill-core, the SUS zone is generally broken with decreasing clay alteration and weathering with depth and is ‘stained’ dark blue
to gray. 
 Table 7-2: Leached Cap & Supergene Minerals 

 

					
	Zone	  	Minerals Present	 	Average Thickness
	Leached Cap	  	 jarosite, goethite,

hematite, ferrimolybdite
	 	70 m
	Supergene Oxide	  	 chalcanthite, brochantite,

malachite, azurite,
 tenorite,
cuprite,
 neotocite, copper WAD

native copper,
 copper-bearing
goethite
	 	10 m
	Supergene Sulphide	  	 digenite, chalcocite,

minor covellite, bornite,

copper-bearing goethite
	 	60 m

  

	7.3.3	 Hypogene Mineralization 

Mineralization of the Casino Cu-Au-Mo deposit occurs mainly in
the steeply plunging, in-situ contact breccia surrounding the Patton Porphyry intrusive plug. It was formed by crystallization and exsolution of hydrothermal fluids from late Cretaceous magmas of the Casino
Plutonic Suite. The breccia forms an ovoid band around the main porphyry body with dimensions up to 250 m and has an interior zone of potassic alteration surrounded by discontinuous phyllic alteration, typical of some porphyry deposits. 

Hypogene mineralization occurs throughout the various alteration zones of the Casino Porphyry deposit as mineralized stockwork veins and
breccias. Field relationships show that the potassic alteration occurred first as mineralized quartz veins of the phyllically altered zones, which cut those of the potassically altered zones. Re-Os age dating
showed that the timing of the potassic and phyllic alteration are contemporaneous at around 74.4 ± 0.28 Ma. Significant Cu-Mo mineralization is related to the potassically-altered breccias surrounding
the core Patton Porphyry, as well as in the adjacent phyllically-altered host rocks of the Dawson Range Batholith. 
 Mineralization in the
potassic zone comprises mainly finely disseminated pyrite, chalcopyrite and molybdenite, as well as trace sphalerite and bornite. The phyllic alteration zones have increased gold, copper, molybdenite and tungsten

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	34

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
values concentrated within disseminations and veins of pyrite, chalcopyrite and molybdenite along the inner part of the pyrite halo. The pyrite halo occurs within the phyllic alteration zone
along the potassic-phyllic contact and discontinuously surrounds the main breccia body. It is host to the highest copper values on the property. 

Chalcopyrite commonly occurs as veins, disseminations and irregular patches. In breccia zones and granodiorite west of the Casino Fault,
disseminated chalcopyrite is more abundant than vein and veinlet-style chalcopyrite, whereas to the east of the fault, chalcopyrite is controlled by brittle deformation and occurs in fractures and open space fillings. Pyrite to chalcopyrite ratios
range from less than 2:1 in the core of the deposit, to greater than 20:1 in the outer phyllic zones. Locally, coarse grained bornite and tetrahedrite are intergrown with chalcopyrite. 

Molybdenite is not generally intergrown with other sulphides and occurs as selvages in early, high temperature, potassic quartz veins and as
discrete flakes and disseminations. 
 Native gold can occur as free grains (50 to 70 microns) in quartz and as inclusions in pyrite and/or
chalcopyrite grains (1 to 15 microns). High grade smoky quartz veins with numerous specks of visible gold have been reported to exist. 

Late-stage, commonly vuggy, polymetallic veins (like those of the Bomber Vein) follow roughly parallel, steeply dipping fractures trending 150
to 170 degrees. Metallic mineralogy includes abundant sphalerite and galena, with less abundant tetrahedrite, chalcopyrite (commonly intergrown with tetrahedrite), and bismuth-bearing minerals, and are geochemically anomalous in any or all of Ag,
As, Bi, Cu, Cd, Mn, Pb, Sb, Zn and locally W. 
 In drill-core, the hypogene zone is un-weathered
and un-oxidized. 
  

	7.3.4	 Structurally Hosted Gold Mineralization 

Structurally controlled gold mineralization within the Canadian Creek portion of the Casino property occurs mostly in the northwestern part of
the property. Drilling in 2009 and 2017 discovered widespread anomalous gold mineralization associated with clay altered-shears, sheeted pyrite veins and quartz-carbonate veins hosted in both intrusive and metamorphic rocks. To date, the identified
structures are generally less than 3 m thick and of short strike length. Gold is accompanied by silver, arsenic, antimony, molybdenum, barium and bismuth. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	35

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	8	 DEPOSIT TYPES 

The Casino deposit is best classified as a calc-alkalic porphyry type deposit associated with a tonalite intrusive stock (the Patton Porphyry).
Primary copper, gold and molybdenum mineralization was deposited from hydrothermal fluids that exploited the contact breccias and fractured wall rocks. Higher grades occur in the contact breccias, and grades gradually decrease outwards away from the
contact zone, both towards the centre of the stock and outward into the host granitoids and schists. A general zoning of the primary sulphides occurs, with chalcopyrite and molybdenite occurring in the core tonalite and breccias, grading outward
into pyrite-dominated mineralization in the surrounding granitoids and schists. Alteration accompanying the sulphide mineralization consists of an earlier phase of potassic alteration and a later overprinting of phyllic alteration. The potassic
alteration typically comprises secondary biotite and K-feldspar as pervasive replacement and includes veins and stockworks of quartz and anhydrite veinlets. Phyllic alteration consists of replacements and
vein-style sericite and silicification. 
 The Casino Copper deposit is unusual amongst Canadian porphyry copper deposits in having a
well-developed enriched secondary supergene blanket of copper mineralization similar to those found in deposits in Chile, including the Escondita deposit and the Morenci Deposit in the southwest United States. Unlike other porphyry deposits in
Canada, the Casino deposit’s enriched supergene copper blanket was not eroded by the glacial action of ice sheets during the last ice age. At Casino, weathering during the Tertiary Period leached the copper from the upper 70 m of the deposit
and re-deposited it lower in the deposit, forming the Supergene zone. This resulted in a layer-like sequence consisting of an upper leached zone up to 70 m thick, where all sulphide minerals have been oxidized
and copper removed, leaving a bleached, iron oxide leached cap containing residual gold. Beneath the leached cap is a zone up to 100 m thick of secondary copper mineralization, consisting primarily of chalcocite and minor covellite, and a thin,
discontinuous layer of copper oxide minerals at the upper contact with the leach cap. The copper grades of the enriched, blanket-like zone can be up to twice that of the underlying, unweathered hypogene zone hosting primary copper mineralization.
Primary mineralization consists of pyrite, chalcopyrite and lesser molybdenite. The primary copper mineralization is persistent at depth, extending to more than 600 m within the deepest drill holes completed to date. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	36

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	9	 EXPLORATION 

 

	9.1	 EXPLORATION PROCEDURES 

The history of exploration on the property includes prospecting, geological mapping, multi-element soil geochemical sampling, magnetic and
induced polarization surveying, trenching and diamond and reverse-circulation drilling. Targets of early drilling on the Casino Deposit were based mainly on coincident copper and
molybdenum-in-soil anomalies. Since 1993, with the exception of a Titan TM Survey, exploration in the vicinity of the Casino deposit has been drilling on a grid pattern
using a core drill with a core diameter mainly of NQ and NTW thickness, with a smaller number of holes drilled with HQ diameter core. The earlier soil sampling and geophysical survey results, in the vicinity of the Casino Deposit, have all been
tested by drilling and shown to be caused by porphyry copper mineralization. 
 A Titan TM Geophysical survey was carried out by Quantec
Geoscience Limited of Toronto, Ontario in 2009, to search for possible deeply buried porphyry mineralization beneath or peripheral to the Casino deposit. The survey utilized Titan-24 Galvanic Direct Current
Resistivity and Induced Polarization (DC/IP) surveys as well as a Magnetotelluric Tensor Resistivity (MT) survey over the entire grid. Magnetotelluric Resistivity surveys result in high resolution and deep penetration (to 1 km), while the Titan DC
Resistivity & Induced Polarization surveys provide reasonable depth coverage to 750 m. The survey grid, covering a 2.4 km by 2.4 km area, was centered on the Casino deposit. The grid consisted of nine (9) lines, spaced 300 m apart,
each 2.4 km long and at an azimuth of approximately 64 degrees (perpendicular to the Casino Creek Fault). Results of the Titan survey were used by Quantec to identify a series of drill targets within the survey grid and adjacent to the known
mineralization. A total of 10 holes, comprising 4,327 m, were drilled to test geophysical targets. With the exception of several distal Pb-Zn veins and arsenopyrite-rich veins intercepted during this drilling,
no porphyry copper mineralization was found. 
 To the west of the Casino deposit, on the recently acquired Canadian Creek Property,
exploration utilized grid soil sampling, ground magnetic and induced polarisation surveys to generate targets for trenching and drilling. Initially, the focus of the geochemical and geophysical surveys was to locate porphyry copper mineralization.
Subsequent to 2016, the focus of this work switched to the identification of gold mineralization similar to that discovered at nearby Coffee Creek (Johnston, 2018). 

Soil sampling surveys, to the west of the Casino Deposit, were carried out over the time period from the mid 1990s through to 2011. The soil
surveys mainly targeted B horizon soils, but due to local talus cover and permafrost, sampling of the B horizon wasn’t always possible. Soil samples underwent multi-element and gold analysis, mostly at Acme Analytical Labs Vancouver, using ICP
methods and fire assay with atomic absorption finish for gold. The historical soil grids had sampling spacings that ranged from 25 to 75 m on 200 m spaced lines. Locally, infill sampling was done at a reduced spacing of 25 m stations on 100 m spaced
lines within anomalies identified from previous wider spaced surveying, in order to better define the gold and arsenic anomalies. Results for copper are shown in Figure 9-1. The soil results show a coincident
copper and gold-in-soil anomaly at the 50 ppm Cu and the 15 ppb Au levels respectively, extending approximately 3 km west from the western limits of the Casino deposit.
This coincident Cu-Au anomaly has been tested by 16 core holes. The holes closest to the Casino Deposit revealed moderate potassic alteration and strong propylitic alteration. The four closest holes
intersected leached cap or incipient leaching, weak supergene enrichment, and hypogene copper-gold-molybdenum mineralization typical of the outer edges of a porphyry copper – gold – molybdenum deposit. Copper grades are in the 300 –
700 ppm (0.03 to 0.07%) range, gold grades range from 0.1 to 0.3 gpt, and molybdenum values range from 20 – 40 ppm (0.002 to .004%). Further, there is a progressive increase in Cu, Au and Mo in the Casino B drill holes towards the Casino
deposit. These holes are defining the western limits of the Casino deposit system. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	37

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 9-1: Copper and Gold in Soil Results (Johnston, 2018)

 Elsewhere the soil results identified a number of areas of anomalous gold, arsenic, and bismuth. These anomalies were further
explored with trenching, core drilling and reverse circulation drilling. This work identified scattered narrow zones of gold mineralization associated with clay-altered shears, sheeted pyrite veins and quartz-carbonate veins, hosted both in
intrusive and metamorphic rocks. With few exceptions, gold grades in the structures are sub-1 gpt (1,000 ppb). The structures identified to date are mainly less than 3 m thick and of short strike length. 

Ground magnetic surveying at a line spacing of 100 m was undertaken over the Canadian Creek portion of the Casino Property in 2011 and 2017.
The surveys detected a number of lineaments, oriented mostly northwest-southeast, though none obviously align with the soil geochemical anomalies. A plot of the un-levelled magnetic survey results of the
property is shown in Figure 9-2. 
 The ground magnetic data shows a trend of magnetic high features
extending from the Casino Deposit through the Ana Zone area to the Koffee Bowl area. This west-southwest trend follows the trend of Patton Porphyry dykes extending from the main intrusive complex. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	38

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 9-2: Magnetic Compilation (Johnston, 2018) 

Induced polarization surveys were carried out in 1993, 1996, 2009 and 2011. The 1993 and 1996 surveys used a pole-dipole array with a spacing
of 75 m and an n1 to n4 depth profile. The 2009 survey was a pole-dipole survey using an a spacing of 25 m and an n1 to n6 depth profile. The 2011 pole dipole survey used a spacing of 25 m and an n1 to n8 profile. A compilation of the results is
shown in Figure 9-3. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	39

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 9-3: IP Compilation (Johnston, 2018) 

In general, the surveys used small “a” spacings and have limited depth profiles. The survey identified a number of high
chargeability anomalies which remain to be tested. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	40

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	10	 DRILLING 

The following sections describe the various drilling programs developed on the Casino Property. 

 

	10.1	 1992-1994 DRILLING PROGRAM 

Drilling prior to 1992 (Figure 10-1) consisted of reverse circulation drilling and NQ-diameter diamond drilling. There is little documentation that specifically focused on this early drilling, its specifications or challenges. Following the acquisition of Casino Silver Mines Ltd. by Archer Cathro
and Associates, then by PSG, the drilling is well documented. 
 During the intense campaigns from 1992 through 1994, (Figure 10-2) drilling was contracted to E. Caron Drilling Ltd. of Whitehorse, Yukon. Up to six diamond drills were utilized. The 1994 drilling program fulfilled a variety of purposes: infill and delineation drilling, and
geotechnical, structural and waste rock characterization. Infill drilling involved a program of angle and vertical holes designed to outline and more fully define the Leached Cap (Oxide Gold zone) and Supergene copper zones. Delineation drilling to
the north, northeast, east and southeast outlined the extent of the deposit area. Four oriented angle holes were drilled into the deposit area for geotechnical information, primarily rock strength and structural characteristics, and for geological
information regarding vein-set orientations. Five vertical holes were drilled into the periphery of the deposit area for waste rock characterization studies. Seven vertical holes were drilled into the
peripheral area of the deposit for geotechnical information. Eighteen vertical holes were drilled outside the deposit area for geotechnical and geological information regarding potential site development. 

The combined drilling from 1992 through 1994 consisted of 71,437.59 m of NQ and HQ core in 236 holes. 

Core recoveries were consistently in the 80% to 90% range in the Leached Cap and Supergene zones and 90% to 100% in the Hypogene zone. 

Drilling can be carried out at Casino from March through November with minor logistical challenges, although conditions in the spring and fall
require winter-type drilling equipment. The use of a water supply truck is necessary during very cold weather conditions, due to freezing of water lines. Three reliable water supply sites exist on the property and can all be utilized during multiple
drill rig programs. 
  

	10.2	 2008 TO 2012 DRILLING 

The drilling for the 2008 to 2012 exploration programs was contracted to Kluane Drilling Ltd. from Whitehorse, Yukon. Up to three hydraulic
diamond drills were utilized for these programs. 
 Water for the drilling was pumped from the Canadian Creek bend, at the location of the
old placer camp, and from Casino Creek. 
 Drilling was carried out from March through November. Conditions in the late winter and fall
required winter-type drilling equipment. The main challenges during the winter drilling were water supply due to the low water level in both creeks and the freezing of long water lines. 

All drilling was done using “thin wall” drill rods. Holes CAS-001 to CAS-007 utilized HTW-size rods (core diameter 70.92 mm) and the remainder of the drilling was done utilizing primarily NTW core size (core diameter 56.00 mm). Deeper holes
were collared using HTW rods and reduced to NTW rods typically from 200 to 300m of depth. In a few cases, holes were reduced further to BTW core size (core diameter 42.00 mm). 

Core recoveries in the Leached Cap and Supergene zones were consistently in the 80% to 90% range and 90% to 100% in the Hypogene zone. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	41

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Down-hole orientation surveying was performed using an Icefield Tools MI3 Multishot Digital
Borehole Survey Tool for holes CAS-002 to CAS-076. For holes CAS-077 to CAS-092, as well
as the geotechnical and hydrogeological holes, a Reflex Instruments downhole survey instrument was used. 
 Western Copper continued the
drilling pattern established by PSG, utilizing mainly a vertical drill hole orientation and a nominal 100 m grid spacing. Later in the program, Western Copper drilled a series of inclined holes in the northern part of the deposit. Several inclined
holes were also drilled in the western part of the deposit to establish contacts with the post-mineral explosion breccia (MX) and to confirm orientation of the interpreted N-S structure. 

Geostatistics, done in 2010, have shown that the 100 m spacing was sufficient for delineation of supergene mineralization. The same studies
have shown that the 100 m drill hole spacing is only marginally sufficient for delineation of hypogene copper mineralization. 
  

	10.3	 2013 DRILLING 

Drilling during the 2013 field season was contracted to Kluane Drilling Ltd. of Whitehorse, Yukon. Up to two hydraulic diamond drills were used
for this program. 
 Drilling in 2013 was primarily for water wells and hydrogeological purposes. Each hole was fully logged by core
loggers, but no samples were taken, and no assays returned. Eleven holes (MW13-01D/S through MW13-06D/S) were drilled throughout June and another fifteen (DH13-01 through DH13-12) were completed during August. See Figure 10-4 and Figure 10-5 for
detailed locations of drilling. 
 No diamond drilling was completed on the property from 2014 through to the end of 2018. 

 

	10.4	 2019 DRILLING 

Between May and October of 2019, Kluane Drilling Ltd. of Whitehorse, Yukon, drilled 72 (DH 19-01
through DH 19-53, CRD 19-54 through CRD 19-59 and DH 19-60 through DH 19-69) core holes on the Casino Property using up to two hydraulic diamond drills. 
 Water for the
drilling was pumped from the Canadian Creek bend, from Casino Creek, and from several small ponds in the property area. 
 All drill holes
in 2019 were of NTW core size (core diameter 56.00 mm) with the exception of some holes in difficult ground that were collared with HTW core size (core diameter 70.92) and reduced to NTW when drilling conditions improved. 

Core recoveries were consistently in the 75% to 80% range in the Leached Cap, 80% to 90% in the Supergene zones and 90% to 100% in the
Hypogene zone. 
 Down-hole orientation surveying was performed using a DeviShot Magnetic Multishot survey tool. Each drillhole was surveyed
on 30-50 m increments by the Kluane drilling team. 
 CAP Engineering, of Whitehorse, Yukon was on
site for 2 days in late August to survey the drill hole collars. A team of two people used a Stonex GPS RTK Unit and a Topcon GPS RTK Unit to complete the surveys. See Figure 10-4 and Figure 10-5 for detailed locations of the drill holes. 
 The purpose of the 2019 drill program was to infill the
previous drill hole spacing to upgrade the resource estimate for the project. All holes were logged, sampled and photographed by geologists on site before samples were sent to ALS 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	42

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
Global (ALS) in Whitehorse for analysis, with 20% of those pulps from ALS randomly selected and sent on to SGS Canada Inc. (SGS) in Vancouver for a QAQC check analysis. 

 

	10.5	 CANADIAN CREEK DRILLING SUMMARY

 Following acquisition of the Canadian Creek property by Western Copper in 2019, all drilling data was transferred
from Cariboo Rose Resources Ltd. and is summarized in Table 10-1. Since 1992, when exploration first began on the Canadian Creek property, soil sampling, trenching, geophysical surveys and drilling have
focused on several areas of interest. A full history of the Canadian Creek property can be found in Section 6 of this report. 

Table 10-1: Summary of Canadian Creek Drilling 

 

							
	 Year
	 	
Drilling Summary (# holes)
	 	 Area
	 	
Type of Drilling

	1970	 	2	 	 Casino B
	 	 Diamond Drilling

	1993	 	7	 	 Ana, Koffee
	 	 Diamond Drilling

	1994	 	4	 	 Casino B
	 	 Diamond Drilling

	2000	 	11	 	 Ana, Casino B, Koffee
	 	 Diamond Drilling

	2007	 	5	 	 Casino B
	 	 Diamond Drilling

	2009	 	10	 	 Kana
	 	 Diamond Drilling

	2017	 	24	 	 Various
	 	 Reverse Circulation Drilling

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	43

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 10-1: Casino Property Drilling Pre-1992 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	44

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 10-2: Casino Property Drilling 1992 to1994 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	45

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 10-3: Casino Property Drilling from 2008 to 2012 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	46

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 10-4: Casino Project Drilling from 2013 through 2019

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	47

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 10-5: Casino Project Drilling from 2013 through 2019

  

	10.6	 SENSITIVITY DATA PHOTOGRAMMETRY 

In April 1993, McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. of Vancouver, BC, produced a map of the Casino area based on 1985 air photos provided by the
Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. 
 New aerial photography was conducted in July 1993, by Lamerton & Associates of
Whitehorse. The area was mapped by Eagle Mapping Services Ltd. of Port Coquitlam, BC. Eagle Mapping utilized two government UTM co-ordinates systems, NAD83 and WGS84, in the derivation of the deposit grid co-ordinates at photo target station #11. The following transformation parameters were used to convert from UTM coordinates to Property Grid: 

 

							
		 	ROTATION:	  	-0° 00’ 05”	  	
		 	SCALE:	  	1.000453652	  	
		 	TRANSLATION:	  	-6703701.92 N	  	
		 		  	-499861.96 E	  	
		 	ELEVATION SHIFT:	  	-8.32 m	  	

 The contours on McElhanney and Eagle Mapping Services maps compare to within approximately five metres and
commonly closer. Generally, Eagle Mapping contours are smoother, having more gradual changes in direction. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	48

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	10.7	 COLLAR COORDINATES 

The 1992 to 1994 collar co-ordinates (northing, easting and elevation) were surveyed using a total
station Nikon C-100 system. Surveying of the 1992 and 1993 drill holes was undertaken by Lamerton & Associates. The 1994 holes were surveyed by Z. Peter, Surveyor from Burnaby, B.C. It should be
stressed that all Pacific Sentinel’s collar coordinates were surveyed in local grid coordinates. 
 The 2008-2012 drill collars were
surveyed by Yukon Engineering Services from Whitehorse. The survey was completed using Differential GPS units and the results are reported in UTM NAD83, Zone 7 coordinates. 

Twenty-eight (28) of Pacific Sentinel’s drill hole collars were also re-surveyed by Yukon
Engineering for comparison purposes. Those were entered into the data base with their new UTM NAD83 collar coordinates. 
 The 2013 and 2019
drill collars were surveyed by CAP Engineering from Whitehorse. CAP used a Stonex GPS RTK Unit and a Topcon GPS RTK Unit to complete the surveys These results were reported in UTM NAD83, Zone 7 coordinates. 

 

	10.8	 SPERRY SUN SURVEYS 

During the 1993 drilling program, all drill holes, including deepened 1992 holes, were down-hole surveyed by a Sperry Sun magnetic compass tool
to determine azimuth and dip. In the 1994 drilling program, only angle holes were Sperry Sun surveyed. Tests were normally performed every 152 m (500 ft) down hole on vertical holes and every 76 m (250 ft) down hole on angle
holes. In the shallower angle hole program of 1994, Sperry Sun tests were taken at the bottom of the hole as well as half-way up. 

The Sperry Sun surveys, taken in the 123 vertical holes drilled or deepened in 1993, averaged a dip reading of 89.03°. Since the average
deviation observed in the 123 vertical holes of the 1993 program was less than one degree, it was decided not to survey the vertical holes of the 1994 program. 
  

	10.9	 LIGHT-LOG SURVEY
SYSTEM 

 A Light-Log directional drill hole survey system,
developed by H.J. Otte & Co., was used for sixteen angle holes at Casino, starting at hole 94-285 and continuing for most of the angle holes through the remainder of the 1994 drilling program. This
system recorded, on film, the bending of the unit caused by the natural curvature in a drill hole. The instrument’s timer activated the camera and advanced the film at pre-set time intervals, allowing
time to lower the instrument between pictures (normally every 3 m). Upon completion of the survey, the film was developed. The values observed on the film were converted by a computer program to provide
co-ordinates, dip and azimuth at every three-metre interval downhole. 
  

	10.10	 ACID DIP TESTS 

In the 1994 program, acid dip tests were performed in the vertical holes while Sperry Sun surveys were continued in the angle holes. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	49

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	11	 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY 

The following section summarizes the 2019 sample and assay protocols that have been utilized at the Casino Project site. 

 

	11.1	 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH

  

	11.1.1	 Core Processing 

At the drill site, core was placed into wooden core boxes directly upon emptying of the core tube. A wooden block marked with the depth, both
in feet and meters, was placed in the core box upon completion of each drill run. Under good ground conditions, each run comprises 10 feet of core. Core boxes were stored at the core logging facility adjacent to the Casino Airstrip. As core came in
from the rig, each hole was stacked separately and clearly labelled outside of the core shack. Once the core was ready to be logged, it was laid out in sequence on elevated tables in the core shack. 

Core boxes were labelled with black felt tip pens and embossed steel tags containing hole number, box number and interval of core within the
box. Geotechnical data including core recovery, rock quality designation (RQD), hardness and natural breaks were recorded for each drill run, as marked by the wooden core run blocks. This information was recorded on paper by the geologist or
geotechnical logger, supervised by the lead geologist. Logging of the geotechnical data followed codes and format outlined in a project-specific manual prepared by Knight Piésold. 

The geologist recorded key geologic information including lithology, zone, mineralization and alteration. The data was entered onto paper. The
codes and logging forms followed, as closely as possible, the format used by Western Copper during the 2010-2012 drilling programs. The lithology codes, copper mineralization zone codes and alteration codes utilized in the 2013 and 2020 drilling
programs were all initially developed by Pacific Sentinel and modified by Western Copper. 
 Core was photographed after the geology log was
completed and after the sample intervals were marked. 
  

	11.1.2	 Core Sampling 

Sampling and analytical protocols in use prior to the PSG diamond drill programs are not well documented. In June 1992, core from 22 previous
holes was re-sampled by Archer Cathro. The new assay results for all metals were compared to the originals. The results indicated 14 holes (64%) had essentially identical results, while five holes (23%) had
higher re-assays and three (13%) were inconclusive. When results of the old holes were compared with those of new holes drilled in the same locations, the results were similar to the re-sampling tests. Archer Cathro surmised that the higher gold results in the new holes were due to a combination of improved drilling techniques that resulted in better core recovery, and advanced laboratory
techniques that provided lower analytical detection limits. 
 The PSG core sampling followed rigorous procedures that were well documented
and standardized throughout the drilling programs. In the 1992, 1993 and 1994 programs, exploration targets were sampled by HQ (63.5 mm diameter) core drilling; occasionally this was reduced to NQ (47.6 mm). The boxed core samples were transported
by truck less than 5 km to a core logging facility adjacent to the Casino Airstrip for geotechnical logging, sample selection quality control designation and sampling by PSG personnel. The average core recovery for all PSG core was 94%, with
Hypogene core averaging 96%, Supergene 92% and the Leached Cap (Oxide Gold zone) averaging 89%. Sample intervals were marked on the core by the geologist generally at 3-meter-long intervals or at geological
contacts. Core intervals were sampled by mechanical splitting. The remaining half core was returned to the boxes and stored in racks at the site. The average lengthwise half-split provided 10 to 15 kg of material, which was transported by charter
aircraft (primarily DC-3) directly from the core sampling facility to Whitehorse and then by commercial air freight to Vancouver for delivery to the sample preparation laboratory. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	50

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 In 2008, all samples were split using a conventional core splitter. In 2009, about 150
samples were split with a core splitter at the beginning of the program. From then on, in 2009 through 2012, all samples were cut with a core saw. All samples were split or cut on site and placed in individually labelled plastic sample bags with the
unique sample number selected by the geologist logging the hole. The core samples were split lengthwise with half of the core placed in the sample bag, and the other half returned to the core box. The samples were sent to ALS Chemex Labs in North
Vancouver for analysis. 
 In 2013 no core was sampled, but all other core logging protocols were followed as per 2012. The 2019 drill
program followed the protocols established in 2012. Core was split in half lengthwise with a core saw and half of the core was placed, with a sample tag, in plastic bags with the corresponding sample ID noted on the outside of the bag. Metal tags
marking the sample intervals (in metres) and with the sample ID matching the tag book were added at the applicable locations in the core boxes. The remaining half of the core was placed back into the core box, stacked outside the core cutting shack
and then moved to the core storage yard where each hole was stored either in stacks, securely covered by tarps and labelled as per hole, or directly within the core racks. Bagged and labelled samples were then placed in larger white rice bags, each
labelled with a unique batch letter and the address of the receiving lab. A running list of each batch was maintained in Excel spreadsheet form, including the samples per bag and the dates they were sent out by plane to ALS Global in Whitehorse.

 In 2008, 422 drill core samples were collected and shipped; in 2009, 3,832 drill core samples were shipped; in 2010, 4,768 drill core
samples were shipped; in 2011, 387 drill core samples were shipped; and in 2012, 533 drill core samples were shipped. In 2013, no samples were collected. In 2019, 4,939 core samples were collected, shipped and analysed. 

 

	11.2	 SAMPLE PREPARATION 

All original samples in 2019 were sent to ALS Global Labs in Whitehorse for analysis. The standard analytical request for all samples was for
preparation by procedure Prep-31A. This process involved logging the sample into the tracking system, weighing, drying and crushing the entire sample to better than 70% passing through a 2 mm screen. A 250-gram split of the crushed material was then collected by riffle splitter and was pulverized to better than 85% passing 75 microns. The resultant pulp was analyzed by the ALS lab in Whitehorse. 

Sample “standards”, provided by CDN Resource Labs and inserted in the sample stream at site, arrived at ALS Global in pulp form and
went straight to analysis. Blank samples inserted into the sample stream at site arrived as rock and went through the same preparation and analytical processes as the core samples. Duplicate samples were sent to ALS in separate batches, arriving at
a later date than the original samples. These also underwent the same preparation and analytical processes as the original core samples. 

Check pulp samples were sent from ALS in Whitehorse to SGS Canada Inc. (SGS) in Burnaby, British Columbia (BC). At SGS, the pulps were checked
for weight and fineness before a full geochemical assay was run. This involved logging the sample into the tracking system (confirming the samples received matched the electronic list of samples sent by Western Copper staff), weighing and then
checking that the pulps were of appropriate fineness. 
  

	11.3	 ASSAY ANALYSIS 

Chemex Labs analyzed all 1992-1994 regular (mainstream) samples, 1992-1993 selected duplicate samples and 1994 random half-core duplicate
samples. Immediately prior to selecting each pulp’s analytical aliquot, each pulp sample was passed through a 20-mesh screen to eliminate lumps of agglomerated clay minerals. Gold (Au) was analyzed by
fire assay with atomic absorption finish. Silver (Ag) values were reported in g/t and Cu and MoS2 values were reported as percentages. Chemex also performed
32-element ICP analysis for: Ag, Al, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, Hg, K, La, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Sb, Sc, Sr, Ti, Tl, U, V, W and Zn. Mineral Environments
(Min-En) Laboratories, of North Vancouver, BC, analyzed the selected duplicate samples from 1992 and 1993, and random 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	51

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
duplicate samples from 1994. Gold was analyzed by fire assay and reported in g/t. Values for Cu and MoS2 were reported as percentages. The analytical procedures utilized prior to 1992 are
unknown. 
 The analytical processes used at ALS Global and for the sample duplicates at Acme Analytical Laboratories were similar. The
processes used by ALS Global in Whitehorse in 2019 and those used by SGS Canada Inc. in Burnaby were also similar. 
  

	11.3.1	 Gold Analysis 

At ALS Global gold assays were run using 30-gram sample of the pulp with fire assay and AA finish to a
0.005 ppm detection limit according to procedure Au-AA23. Results were reported in parts per million (ppm). 

At SGS gold assays were run by using a 30-gram sample of the pulp with fire assay and AAS finish to a 5-ppb detection limit according to procedure GE_FAA30V5. Results were reported in parts per billion (ppb). Note that 5 ppb = 0.005 ppm. 

These analytical processes were employed by Western Copper in 2019, as well as from 2008 through 2012. 

 

	11.3.2	 Copper, Molybdenum and Silver Assay 

Samples that returned over-limits for copper, molybdenum or silver in the ICP analysis were assayed by process OG62 at ALS Global. This process
involved four-acid digestion and analysis by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES) or Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(ICP-AAS). Results were reported in percent (%). At SGS a similar process was followed for any over-limit results for copper, molybdenum or silver involving sodium peroxide fusion with ICP-AES using method GO ICP90Q. 
 These analytical processes were employed by Western Copper in 2019, as
well as from 2008 through 2012. 
  

	11.3.3	 ICP Analysis 

Samples sent to ALS Global were analyzed for multiple elements, including copper, molybdenum and silver by process ME-ICP61. This process involved a four acid “Near Total” digestion of 1.0 grams of sample pulp with Mass Emission-Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectroscopy (ICP-MS)
for the analysis. This process returned results for: Ag (ppm), Al (%), As (ppm), Ba (ppm), Be (ppm), Bi (ppm), Ca (%), Cd (ppm), Co (ppm), Cr (ppm), Cu (ppm), Fe (%), Ga (ppm), K (%), La (ppm), Mg (%), Mn (ppm), Mo (ppm), Na (%), Ni (ppm), P (ppm),
Pb (ppm), S (%), Sb (ppm), Sc (ppm), Sr (ppm), Th (ppm), Ti (%), Tl (ppm), U (ppm), V (ppm), W (ppm), and, Zn (ppm). 
 Samples sent to SGS
were analyzed for 56 elements, including copper, molybdenum and silver by method GO_ICP90Q100. This process involved an ore grade sodium peroxide fusion with ICP-AES. This process returned results for: Ag
(ppm), Al (%), As (ppm), Ba (ppm), Be (ppm), Bi (ppm), Ca (%), Cd (ppm), Ce (ppm), Co (ppm), Cr (%), Cs (ppm), Cu (ppm), Dy (ppm), Er (ppm), Eu (ppm), Fe (%), Ga (ppm), Gd (ppm), Ge (ppm), Hf (ppm), Ho (ppm), In (ppm), K (%), La (ppm), Li (%), Lu
(ppm), Mg (%), Mn (ppm), Mo (ppm), Nb (ppm), Nd (ppm), Ni (ppm), P (%), Pb (ppm), Pr (ppm), Rb (ppm), Sb (ppm), Sc (ppm), Si (%), Sm (ppm), Sn (ppm), Sr (ppm), Ta (ppm), Tb (ppm), Th (ppm), Ti (%), Tl (ppm), Tm (ppm), U (ppm), V (ppm), W (ppm), Y
(ppm), Yb (ppm), Zn (ppm) and Zr (ppm). 
 These analytical processes were employed by Western Copper in 2019, as well as from 2008 through
2012. 
  

	11.3.4	 Acid Soluble Copper Analysis 

In 2008 and 2009, following receipt of the copper analyses, samples were selected for
“non-sulphide” or “acid soluble” copper analysis. The criteria for “non-sulphide” selection was any sample that contained >100 ppm Cu in
the Leached 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	52

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
Cap, Supergene Zone, or top 50 m of the Hypogene Zone. A list of these samples was presented to ALS Chemex. ALS Chemex then retrieved the pulps and analyzed it by 5% sulphuric acid leach and AAS
finish (procedure Cu-AA05). 
 In 2010 to 2012, selected samples for “acid soluble” copper
analyses were identified by the geologist logging the core and the request for this analysis was submitted when the samples were originally sent to the lab. The samples identified by the geologist were generally from the top of the hole down through
the top 50 m of the hypogene zone. On a few occasions, after receiving the geochemical results, additional samples were identified for “non-sulphide” copper analyses and ALS Chemex was requested to
pull these sample pulps and perform the analysis. 
 In 2019, once initial ICP assays were returned from ALS Global on the original samples,
another group of sample pulps were sent for further assay by Cu-AA05 to identify non-sulphide copper. All pulps returning higher than 100 ppm copper that were also
within the Leached Cap, Supergene Oxide, Supergene Sulphide and the initial 50 m of the Hypogene zone were pulled by ALS Global for this analysis. 
  

	11.3.5	 Cyanide Soluble Copper Analysis 

In 2010, a large number of samples from the 2008, 2009 and 2010 programs were identified for cyanide-soluble copper analyses. These samples
were selected to aid with identification of the Supergene Sulphide – Hypogene metallurgical boundary. The selected samples were analyzed by cyanide leach with AAS finish (ALS Chemex procedure Cu-AA17a).
For samples that had already been received and processed at the lab, ALS Chemex retrieved the pulps and analyzed this material. For samples not yet sent to the lab, the geologist would identify the Supergene Sulphide – Hypogene boundary
visually, and samples 30 m on either side of the boundary were identified for cyanide leach copper analysis. On a few occasions, after receiving the geochemical results additional samples were identified for cyanide soluble copper analyses and ALS
Chemex was requested to pull these sample pulps and perform the analysis. 
 In 2019, the senior geologist used the core logging results to
choose samples for cyanide-soluble copper analysis using method Cu-AA17a at ALS Chemex; all sample pulps from 30 m on either side of the Supergene Sulphide and Hypogene boundary were sent for this type of
assay. 
  

	11.3.6	 Security 

During the historic pre-1992 drilling campaigns at Casino the rigours of “chain of custody”
were not as stringent as presently required. The remoteness of the Casino site provided a large degree of security as air traffic into the project was closely monitored. Further, the Casino gold grades were low and any metal contamination or grade
enhancement would be quickly and easily identified. However, good sample handling procedures were in place during the 1992 – 1994 PSG programs. Geologists supervised the sampling process and the samples were kept in a secure impoundment prior
to shipping. The best vigilance on the samples was the attention to results, and in that regard, PSG maintained a thorough quality assurance/quality control program (QA/QC). 

Samples were shipped in rice bags with uniquely numbered,
non-re-sealable security tags. Each sample shipment was transported from the Casino Property via air to Whitehorse. The samples were received at the airport by the
project expediter and shipped to the appropriate lab from there. In 2008 and early 2009, all shipments were sent by Byers Transport to the ALS Chemex lab in North Vancouver. Later in 2009 and early 2010, samples for ALS Chemex were shipped by Byers
Transport to the ALS Chemex preparation facility in Terrace, BC, where they were crushed and pulverized. The pulps were then shipped by ALS Chemex to North Vancouver for analysis. In May of 2010, ALS Chemex opened a preparation facility in
Whitehorse. From then on, all samples were delivered to the Whitehorse preparation lab by the project expediter. The samples were crushed and pulverized in Whitehorse and the pulps were shipped to North Vancouver for analysis. 

In 2019, ALS Chemex had changed its name to ALS Global, and installed an analytical lab in Whitehorse so that samples could be both prepared
and analysed there. This eliminated the problems that could occur with further 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	53

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
transport. Samples were shipped from the Casino site by Alkan Air to their base in Whitehorse where the project expediter picked up the samples upon arrival and delivered them directly to ALS
Global. Rice bags were organized in batches of 20, with unique identifiers on each bag and sealed with a uniquely numbered non-resealable security strap. Each
20th bag contained the sample submittal form and a list of all the samples that should be included in that particular batch. Upon receipt, ALS would confirm via email with the project
manager/senior geologist exactly which samples had been received. 
 If a shipment was received with a broken security tag, the lab would
notify the project manager to determine if the shipment had been tampered with, or if the tag was accidentally damaged during shipping. Any broken sample bags were also brought to the attention of the project manager. 

 

	11.3.7	 Quality Assurance and Quality Control 

Exploration sampling and analysis prior to 1992 was not subjected to the rigours required of modern regulatory requirements, but work conducted
by major companies, like Quintana and Teck Corporation generally followed industry standard best practices. 
 However, details of the
sampling and analytical methodology are unknown. Moreover, analytical quality, particularly with respect to the determination of gold in the sub- 1.000 g/t range, has improved considerably since the pre-1992 work was done. It is for these reasons that the assay results from these old holes were not used in this study. 

During the 1993 and 1994 Pacific Sentinel Gold drilling programs, standards, reject duplicates, and half-core replicates were assayed at
regular intervals in order to check the security of the samples, as well as the quality and accuracy of the laboratory analyses. Further, in-house laboratory standards, duplicates and blanks were also run and
reported as normal assays on certificates. 
 Figure 11-1 and Figure
11-2 are flow charts illustrating the processing of drill core and quality control procedures from 1992 to 1994. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	54

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-1: Casino Drill Core Processing and Quality Control
Procedures, 1992-93 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	55

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-2: Casino Drill Core Processing and Quality Control
Procedures 1994 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	56

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 During the 2008 through 2012 drilling programs at Casino, reference material
“standards” of known metal content, “blanks”, with background metal values, and half-core duplicates were assayed at regular intervals in order to check the security of the samples, as well as the quality and accuracy of the
laboratory analyses. The standards and blanks were prepared by CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Delta, BC. 
 In 2019, standards,
quarter-core duplicates and blanks were assayed at regular intervals within the sample stream by the primary lab, ALS Global. One of each (standard, blank, duplicate) were randomly inserted within every 20 core samples. The standards were prepared
by WCM Minerals in Burnaby, BC. 
  

	11.3.8	 Sample Standards 

2008 through 2010 
 The standard samples
used in 2008, 2009 and 2010 were prepared by CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. of Delta, BC. The standard was a gold-copper-molybdenum standard, CDN-CM-4. It was certified
by Duncan Sanderson, Licensed BC Assayer with independent certification by Dr. Barry Smee, Ph.D., geochemist. Round-robin assaying for the standard was performed at 12 independent laboratories. CDN reports the recommended values and the
“Between Lab” Two Standard Deviations of the standard values as: 
 Gold: 1.18 + 0.12 g/t 

Copper: 0.508 + 0.025 % 

Molybdenum: 0.032 + 0.004 % 

In 2008, 8 standard samples were submitted regularly with the sample shipments; in 2009, 81 standards samples were submitted; and in 2010, 86
standard samples were submitted (approximately 1 per 50 core sample). ALS Chemex analyzed the standards along with the drill core samples by gold, copper and molybdenum assay, as well as multi-element ICP as described above. 

The results from sample standard CDN-CM-4 for 2008, 2009 and
2010, for gold, copper and molybdenum analyses are plotted below. 
  
 

 
 Figure 11-3: Sample Standard CDN-CM-4 Gold Assay Results 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	57

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-4: Sample Standard CDN-CM-4 Copper Assay Results 
  
 

 
 Figure 11-5: Sample Standard CDN-CM-4 Molybdenum Assay Results 
 The three plots demonstrate that with very few exceptions
(9 exceptions for gold, 2 for copper, and one for molybdenum), the values plot within the acceptable range of the certified standard. The plots also demonstrate that there is a reasonable spread of values within the recommended value range of 2
standard deviations as provided by CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. There does not appear to be any systematic bias. 
 Later in 2010, a
second sample standard (CDN-CM-7) was purchased from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd. because they had run out of standard CDN-CM-4. This sample is also certified by Duncan Sanderson and Dr. Barry Smee. CDN reports the recommended values and the “Between Lab” Two Standard Deviations of this standard as: 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	58

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Gold: 0.427 + 0.042 g/t 

Copper: 0.445 + 0.027 % 

Molybdenum: 0.027 + 0.002 % 

Fifteen of these standards were submitted in 2010. ALS Chemex analyzed these standards in the same manner as standard CDN-CM-4, described above. 
 The results from sample standard CDN-CM-7 for 2010, for gold, copper and molybdenum analyses are plotted below: 
  

 
 Figure 11-6: Sample Standard CDN-CM-7-Gold Assay Results 
  
 

 
 Figure 11-7: Sample Standard CDN-CM-7-Copper Assay Results 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	59

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-8: Sample Standard CDN-CM-7 Molybdenum Assay Results 
 The three plots show good precision with the exception of
samples 1 and 10 which are well below the expected values as certified by CDN. After checking the ALS Chemex internal standards and the duplicates from these batches, there did not appear to be a systemic error in the batches. The error may have
occurred when the sample standards were inserted in the field, or when the standards were originally placed in the geochemical run at the lab. These anomalous errors are not considered significant considering that the great majority of standards
were within the expected range. 
 2019 

The sample standards used in 2019 were prepared by WCM Minerals in Burnaby, BC. Details of the standards are outlined in Table 11-1 below. Both standards were certified by Lloyd Twaites and Glen Armanini, who are both Registered Assayers in British Columbia. 

Table 11-1: 2019 Standard Reference Materials from WCM Minerals 

 

																	
	Standard	 	Copper
(%)	 	Standard
Deviation
Cu	 	Molybdenum
(%)	 	Standard
Deviation
Mo	 	Silver
(g/t)	 	Standard
Deviation
Ag	 	Gold
(g/t)	 	Standard
Deviation
Au
	CU-185	 	0.400	 	0.0093	 	0.035	 	0.0019	 	15	 	0.6242	 	0.62	 	0.0217
	CU-188	 	0.179	 	0.0068	 	0.018	 	0.0009	 	15	 	0.7883	 	0.4	 	0.0199

 In 2019, 273 standard samples (1 standard within every 20 samples) were submitted regularly with the sample
shipments; 154 of which were of CU-188 and 119 of which were of CU-185. ALS Global analyzed the standards along with the drill core samples by gold, copper and
molybdenum assay, as well as multi-element ICP as described above. 
 The results from sample standards
CU-185 and CU-188 for gold, silver, copper and molybdenum analyses are plotted below in Figure 11-9 through Figure 11-16. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	60

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-9: Sample Standard
CU-185 Gold Assay Results 
  
 

 
 Figure 11-10: Sample Standard
CU-185 Silver Assay Results 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	61

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-11: Sample Standard
CU-185 Copper Assay Results 
  
 

 
 Figure 11-12: Sample Standard
CU-185 Molybdenum Assay Results 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	62

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-13: Sample Standard
CU-188 Gold Assay Results 
  
 

 
 Figure 11-14: Sample Standard
CU-188 Silver Assay Results 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	63

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-15: Sample Standard
CU-188 Copper Assay Results 
  
 

 
 Figure 11-16: Sample Standard
CU-188 Molybdenum Assay Results 
 Standard CU-185
performed well for all elements of interest in 2019; all elements had higher than 90% passing rates within both two and three standard deviations of the mean expected values. In general, both copper and molybdenum values fell below the expected mean
for CU-185, but still within an acceptable range. Silver showed good variation both above and below the mean value and gold values generally plotted slightly above the mean value. Table 11-2 summarizes the results for CU-185. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	64

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 11-2: Performance of Standard CU-185 During 2019 Drill Program Sampling 
  

									
	 Element
	  	
# Failures within 2
Standard Deviations
	  	
% Passing within 2
Standard Deviations
	  	
# Failures within 3
Standard Deviations
	  	
% Passing within 3
Standard Deviations

	Au	  	7	  	94	  	2	  	98
	Ag	  	1	  	99	  	1	  	99
	Cu	  	12	  	90	  	0	  	100
	Mo	  	1	  	99	  	0	  	100

 Standard CU-188 also performed well for all elements of interest in
2019; all elements, except Molybdenum (Mo) had higher than 90% passing rates within both two and three standard deviations of the mean expected values. In the case of the 32 standards that fell outside of the range of 2 standard deviations for Mo,
the chart shows that, overall, this standard returned assay results below the expected mean value for Mo, as did those of CU-185. This indicates that both standards should be reassessed in a round robin
process, and that the assay method ALS Global uses may tend toward a low bias for Mo. Even with the 32 Mo failures, 79.2% of the samples fell within 2 standard deviations and the range of values was acceptable. One sample, A0612554, failed outright
for both Mo and Au. It is possible this sample became contaminated, as ALS Global had notified the project manager that this sample arrived with a torn plastic bag and had to be dried. Table 11-3 summarizes
the results for CU-188. 
 Table 11-3: Performance of
Standard CU-188 During 2019 Drill Program Sampling 
  

									
	 Element
	  	
# Failures within 2
Standard Deviations
	  	
% Passing within 2
Standard Deviations
	  	
# Failures within 3
Standard Deviations
	  	
% Passing within 3
Standard Deviations

	Au	  	7	  	95	  	1	  	99
	Ag	  	2	  	98.7	  	0	  	100
	Cu	  	1	  	99	  	0	  	100
	Mo	  	32	  	79.2	  	2	  	98.7

  

	11.3.9	 Blanks 

2010-2012 
 Commencing in 2010, sample
blanks were regularly inserted into the sample stream. Blanks are included as a check of the lower limit of the analytical range and to ensure that, at all stages in the process, the equipment and instruments are thoroughly cleaned prior to running
subsequent samples. This is particularly important for precious metals. A total of 75 blanks were submitted during the 2010 program, nominally one every 50 samples. 

The blank samples were also prepared by CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd
(CDN-BL-6). They were certified for gold, platinum and palladium. The recommended values for these elements are: 

Gold: <0.01 g/t 

Platinum: <0.01 g/t 

Palladium: <0.01 g/t 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	65

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Since the reported recommended gold values by CDN are less than detection it is not included
in a plot. The gold values of the blanks analyzed ranged from below detection (<0.005 g/t) to a maximum of 0.046 g/t. The silver values ranged from <0.5 to 0.8 ppm. 

2019 
 During the 2019 drill program, a
landscape aggregate that was readily available in Whitehorse was used as blank material. It was sent to 4 different labs for a Round Robin analysis and the following values were calculated from those Round Robin results: 

Gold: 0.002 ppm 

Silver: 0.2 ppm 

Copper: 0.00045 % 

Molybdenum: 0.39 ppm 

Approximately 100g of blank material was placed in each sample bag and 1 blank sample was inserted randomly within every 20 core samples. A
total of 277 blank samples were inserted into the sample stream in 2019. 
 The results from blank material for gold, silver, copper and
molybdenum analyses are plotted below in Figure 11-17 through Figure 11-20. 
  

 
 Figure 11-17: Blank Material Gold Assay Results 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	66

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-18: Blank Material Silver Assay Results 

 
 

 
 Figure 11-19: Blank Material Copper Assay Results 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	67

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-20: Blank Material Molybdenum Assay Results 

The blank material performed well for all elements of interest in 2019; all elements had higher than 90% passing rates within both two and
three standard deviations of the mean expected values. On average the gold plotted well above the expected mean, but as Figure 11-17 shows, the detection limit for gold at ALS Global limits the lowest assay
value to 0.0025 ppm, which is above the expected mean of 0.002 ppm for the blank material. The detection limits for silver and molybdenum are also higher than the expected mean of the blank material for those elements. Even with the detection limit cut-offs, the passing rates are still acceptable. Figure 11-17 and Figure 11-18, for Gold and Silver respectively, do show a few off-chart potentially high-value failures. Upon investigation for gold the two samples with the greatest variation from the expected mean of 0.002 ppm Au varied by only
10-13%. The samples prior to these blanks returned 0.159 ppm Au and 0.283 ppm Au respectively, indicating the likelihood of some minor smear during the assaying. The failures for silver are somewhat less
certain as there is no indication of high-grade material prior to the failed silver values. Table 11-4 below summarizes the overall performance of the Blank Material in 2019. 

Table 11-4: Performance of Blank Material During 2019 Drill Program Sampling 

 

									
	 Element
	  	
# Failures within 2
Standard Deviations
	  	
% Passing within 2
Standard Deviations
	  	
# Failures within 3
Standard Deviations
	  	
% Passing within 3
Standard Deviations

	Au	  	17	  	94	  	9	  	97
	Ag	  	6	  	98	  	4	  	99
	Cu	  	16	  	94	  	6	  	98
	Mo	  	10	  	96	  	10	  	96

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	68

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	11.3.10	 Field Duplicate Drill Core Analysis 

2008 through 2010 
 Field duplicates are
separate samples taken in the same manner and at the same core interval as the original sample. They are utilized to measure inherent variability in metal content from a single location and sample medium and give an idea of sample reproducibility in
the field. Core duplicates were collected from the half-core that remained following the collection of the original sample. The duplicate was collected by sawing the half-core in half longitudinally, so that one quarter of the original core was
collected. Duplicates were collected nominally for every 20th sample. Where duplicates were collected, only one quarter of the core remains stored in the core box on the property. 

In 2008, 21 core duplicate pairs were collected; in 2009, 199 core duplicate pairs were collected; in 2010, 245 core duplicate pairs were
collected. The original half-core samples were shipped to ALS Chemex and assayed for gold, copper and molybdenum, as well as multi-element ICP analysis as described above. The duplicate quarter-core samples were shipped to Acme Labs for gold, copper
and molybdenum assay, as well as multi-element ICP analysis in a manner identical to that performed at ALS Chemex, as described above. The results for the duplicate analyses for gold, silver, copper and molybdenum are demonstrated in comparison
plots between the Acme and ALS Chemex values below: 
  
 

 
 Figure 11-21: Plot of ALS Chemex Gold Assay Versus Acme Labs Gold
Assay for Field Duplicate Samples (2008, 2009 and 2010 Data) 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	69

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-22: Plot of ALS Chemex Silver Analyses Versus Acme Labs
Silver Analyses for Field Duplicate Samples (2008, 2009 and 2010 Data) 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	70

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-23: Plot of ALS Chemex Copper Assay Versus Acme Labs
Copper Assay for Field Duplicate Samples (2008, 2009 and 2010 Data). 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	71

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-24: Plot of ALS Chemex Molybdenum Assay Versus Acme
Labs Molybdenum Assay for Field Duplicate Samples (2008, 2009 and 2010 Data). 
 The plots generally show good correlation between ALS
Chemex and Acme Labs for all four elements of interest. 
 Often the “nugget effect” associated with gold and silver content will
produce widely divergent values, which would plot as highly scattered data points. However, the gold and silver results from the duplicate samples show good correlations. 

Ideally, a trend line of y=1x would show perfect reproducibility. This is rarely, if ever, the case due to the difference of mineral content
between duplicate samples. The data trend line for gold returned y=1.105x. This demonstrates that Acme Lab results, as a whole, are 10.5% higher than ALS Chemex results. All samples cluster in close proximity to the trend line which indicates no
strong “nugget effect” and good reproducibility. 
 The data trend line for silver is y=1.228x. This demonstrates that Acme Lab
analytical results, as a whole, are 22.8% higher than ALS Chemex values. In general, the points cluster well around the trend line with the exception of one sample. This also demonstrates good reproducibility. 

The results for duplicate analyses for copper demonstrate excellent reproducibility. The data trend line returned y=1.017x. The copper data
clusters tightly around trend line with the exception of one value. In general, the Acme results are very slightly higher (1.7%) than the ALS Chemex results. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	72

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 The molybdenum plot demonstrates slightly more scattered results with 8 points plotting far
off the trend line (y=0.880x). The trend line indicates that, in general, the Acme results for molybdenum are 12% lower than ALS Chemex results. Overall, the duplicate results show good correlation. Molybdenite mineralization was observed in quartz
veins in the drill core and it is possible that the 8 erratic values are reflecting a molybdenum “nugget effect”, where there is a variability of molybdenite concentration between samples. 

The results of analyses from the sample standards, blanks and duplicates provide for acceptable Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA-QC) for the geochemical programs at Casino from 2008 through 2010. The results also indicate that there is no evidence of tampering during the sample collection process, shipping or at the laboratory. There is
also no evidence of systemic errors in the sample preparation and analytical processes. 
 2019 

In 2019, insertion of both field duplicates and pulp check duplicates were part of the overall sampling protocol at Casino. 

Field Duplicates 
 Similar to standards
and blanks, 1 field duplicate was inserted randomly within every 20 samples. The duplicate would be quarter-cored by the core cutter and placed in a separate bag from the original sample with its own sample tag. This duplicate quarter-core sample
would be set aside in a bin to be sent to ALS Global for analysis in a separate batch at a later date than its corresponding original sample. The purpose of this kind of duplicate is to test the reproducibility of the lab’s analytical methods.

 Figure 11-25 through Figure 11-28 show the comparison
between the original core sample results and the duplicate core sample results for Gold, Silver, Copper and Molybdenum. 
  

 
 Figure 11-25: Comparison Plot Between Original Gold Values and
Duplicate Gold Values 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	73

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-26: Comparison Plot Between Original Silver Values and
Duplicate Silver Values 
  
  
 

 
 Figure 11-27: Comparison Plot Between Original Copper Values and
Duplicate Copper Values 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	74

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-28: Comparison Plot Between Original Copper Values and
Duplicate Copper Values 
 Field duplicates for 2019 performed well, but not without issue. The problem with field duplicates in this
type of deposit is the difficulty to accurately cut a piece of core into two identical quarters. While it is a good method to test the reproducibility of a lab, it might be better served to have the primary lab split the pulp after the preparation
process and set aside one split to process at a later date. An alternate, and perhaps better method, is to have the project manager send a list of pulps to the primary lab to re-assess as duplicates. In this
way a pulp duplicate would more effectively test the reproducibility of results. 
 Table 11-5:
Summary of Duplicate (Core) Pair Performance During 2019 Drill Program Sampling 
  

													
	 Element
	  	 Duplicate Pairs
Within
10%
Difference
	  	 % total pairs
within
10%
	  	 Duplicate Pairs
Within
20%
Difference
	  	 % total
pairs within
20%
	  	 Duplicate Pairs
Within
30%
Difference
	  	 % total
Duplicates
within 30%

	Au	  	120	  	34.9	  	211	  	61.3	  	269	  	78.2
	Ag	  	141	  	41	  	214	  	62.2	  	240	  	69.8
	Cu	  	181	  	52.6	  	276	  	80.2	  	308	  	89.5
	Mo	  	109	  	31.7	  	166	  	48.3	  	215	  	62.5

 Check duplicates 

Check samples were selected at random from the entire sample population once the primary lab, ALS Global, had reported all the final assay
results for the 2019 Casino Project. A list of 973 sample numbers (using a random selection in Excel) was sent to ALS Global in Whitehorse from the project manager/senior geologist, requesting ALS to pull the pulps for the samples listed and send
them directly to SGS Canada Inc. in Burnaby, BC for processing. This represents a little over 20% of the entire 2019 sample population. Once received by SGS, these pulps were logged into their system,
re-homogenized non-mechanically, then dry-screened randomly (1/100 samples were checked) to various

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	75

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
mesh sizes to verify fineness. No major issues were found regarding fineness, and SGS proceeded with the full assay protocol. 

The purpose of this kind of duplicate/check is to test the methodology of the primary lab to ensure there is no bias or systemic errors, and
that other labs using similar methods can reproduce their results within a predetermined degree of variance. 
 Figure 11-29 through Figure 11-32 show the comparison between the original core sample results from ALS Global in Whitehorse and the check pulp sample results from SGS in Burnaby for
gold, silver, copper and molybdenum. 
  
 

 
 Figure 11-29: Comparison Plot Between Gold Values from ALS Chemex
and Gold Values from SGS 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	76

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-30: Comparison Plot Between Silver Values from ALS
Global and Silver Values from SGS 
  
  
 

 
 Figure 11-31: Comparison Plot Between Copper Values from ALS
Global and Copper Values from SGS 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	77

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 11-32: Comparison Plot Between Molybdenum Values from ALS
Global and Molybdenum Values from SGS 
 Check samples for 2019 performed well, better than most duplicates overall, but still not
without issue. In general, gold and silver showed lower correlation between pairs of pulps analyzed for all elements of interest than did copper and molybdenum. Silver showed the worst correlation with less than 20% of samples having under a 10%
variation. At more than 20%, the number of 2019 check samples sent to the secondary lab represented a much larger population of samples than is industry practice, which is about 5%. The high percentage delivered in 2019 was partially due to
utilization of a new laboratory for check samples, and to proven past success. 
 Table 11-6:
Summary of Check (Pulps) Pair Performance During 2019 Drill Program Sampling 
  

													
	 Element
	  	
Check Pairs
Within 10%
Difference
	  	 % total pairs
within
10%
	  	
Check Pairs
Within 20%
Difference
	  	 % total
pairs within
20%
	  	
Check Pairs
Within 30%
Difference
	  	 % total
Duplicates
within 30%

	Au	  	465	  	47.8	  	711	  	73.1	  	817	  	84
	Ag	  	187	  	19.2	  	351	  	36	  	469	  	48.2
	Cu	  	692	  	71.1	  	953	  	97.9	  	961	  	98.8
	Mo	  	596	  	61.3	  	757	  	77.8	  	812	  	83.5

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	78

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	12	 DATA VERIFICATION 

This section contains a summary and review of the data entry and data verification related to the Casino Project. Several phases of exploration
have taken place related to the project and the data entry and verification processes will be discussed for each phase. The phases of exploration included diamond drilling programs dated 1992 through 1994 performed by PSG Exploration, then
exploration by Western dated 2008 through 2010, and under Western a transition to a new data system was implemented in 2013 and has continued since. The most recent exploration phase relevant to this report is dated 2019. 

Data entry and verification for the 1992 through 1994 programs was reviewed. Further, the author has reviewed a selection of original scanned
drill logs and analytical certificates as compared with data in the current Casino Project database. 
 Data collection, entry and
verification for the drilling programs conducted by Western from 2008 through 2010 has been reviewed. In addition, the author has reviewed original reports about the programs, and compared a selection of original drill logs and analytical results to
the data within the current database. 
 A transition to an updated database system, GeoSpark Core, was implemented in 2013 by Western to
streamline the data flow and provide automated data validation and checking. All data ranging from 1960’s RC drill data to 2013 drill core logging details were merged and imported to the new database system. The author has performed a
validation of the current database against a selection of original scanned drill logs and analytical certificates, allowing for confidence in the data entry and data validation. 

In 2019 the database system, GeoSpark Core, was used to combine core logging and assay data during the field season. Following the field
season, a full audit/verification was done of all 2019 Collar, Survey and Assay, Alteration, Metallurgical and Lithology data. The 2019 data validation effort has been reviewed and, for this report, the author has also performed a review on the data
entry and data validation related to the 2019 drilling program through comparison of original reports, original scans of drill logs, and analytical results to the data in the database. 

Ultimately this section of this report includes a comprehensive review of the data within the Casino Project database, thus confirming that
the data has been generated using proper procedures, has been correctly entered digitally from the source files, and is suitable for use. Data validated to the database includes original scanned drill logs, and analytical certificates signed by an
authorized individual. 
  

	12.1	 DATA ENTRY 

 

	12.1.1	 1992-1994 

Original 1992 and 1993 field data was entered by Archer, Cathro and Assoc. and by Nowak and Assoc., both of Vancouver, B.C. Data was entered to
a database on site and in the Vancouver office, by PSG personnel. 
 Assay, ICP, copper leach data, check assays and specific gravities were
downloaded from the Chemex Labs computer-based data access system. 
 Pacific Sentinel Gold Corp. personnel entered the down hole surveys
and the collar surveys and were responsible for making corrections from the data verification process. 
  

	12.1.2	 2008-2012 

For the 2008 through 2012 exploration programs, field data processing and reporting was contracted to Casselman Geological Services Ltd. of
Whitehorse, YT by Western. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	79

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Drill hole logging, sampling and geotechnical data was entered directly by the geologist or
geotechnical logger working on the core in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Upon completion of each hole these files were submitted to the Project Manager for checking. Upon receipt of analytical data from the lab, the data was merged with the sample
intervals by the Project Manager and the data was then verified. 
 All data was entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheets organized into a
standardized format. Once the data was checked it was posted on the Western FTP site. The data was then merged into Geosoft Target software for creation of drill plans, drill sections, and 3D modelling. 

 

	12.1.3	 2013- 2019 

A transition to an updated database system, GeoSpark Core, was implemented in 2013 by Western to streamline the data flow and provide automated
data validation and checking. All data ranging from 1960’s RC drill data to 2013 drill core logging details were merged and imported to the new database system. 

Similar procedures to those used from 2008 through 2010 were used to collect the hydrogeological and water well drill data in 2013. 

In 2019, all data was initially transcribed onto paper. Each part of the data logging was captured on a different piece of paper formatted for
that specific data. Sample interval data was written directly onto the portion of the sample tag books that does not go into the sample bags during cutting. 

The completed sample books were then checked by the Project Manager and stored in a secure cabinet in the geology office. The core logger was
responsible for collecting all the data sheets in a file folder and scanning to digital files upon completion of the hole. These digital files were then uploaded to the Western remote server. Original paper copies were then filed in a secure cabinet
in the geology office at the Casino Project site. The Project Manager would then ensure that each file folder for each hole had all the required data sheets, including Downhole Survey forms submitted by the drillers. 

Down hole survey information was recorded digitally by the DeviShot downhole survey tool and then downloaded directly from the digital
recorder by the Project Manager. This data was checked by the Project Manager and the digital files were uploaded to the Western server. Collar surveying was performed by surveyors from CAP Engineering and this data was provided to the Project
Manager for addition to the main Casino Project database. 
 Upon completion of the field season, all 2019 data was entered into GeoSpark
Core using the digital scans of the original core logging data. GeoSpark Core contains built in checks to ensure a clean and usable dataset. Libraries of all data (e.g. lithology codes) link to each portion of the data entry so only codes that are
checked and used by the project are accepted. Digital survey files that are downloaded from the downhole survey tool can be directly imported into GeoSpark. Assay files directly from the lab were also directly imported without manipulation. 

 

	12.2	 DATA VERIFICATION 

For the purposes of this report, the author has visually verified five percent of original, scanned paper drill logs, and original, drill hole
sample assay certificates, compared to the digital data used in the resource assessment. This verification amounted to review of 26 original drill logs and one excel file (containing re-logged primary
lithologies and alterations), as well as 32 original, signed, assay certificates gold, silver, copper, and molybdenum analytical results, compared to the digital data within the project database. 

The author has found no errors in the data transcription. This infers that errors mentioned below have been addressed and provides further
confidence in the data within the database. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	80

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	12.2.1	 1992-1994 

The data verification process was performed under the supervision of a geologist familiar with the site logging procedures. In teams of two,
one person read the original certificate, information sheet or logging form out loud while the other visually scanned the database printouts. Differences between the two were noted and corrected on the printout and the digital database. When
required, a second pass was done on selected data. 
 The procedure for correcting errors was to highlight the value in question and to
write the correct value beside it. Occasionally, the verification of field logs was followed up by a geologist familiar with logging and sampling techniques. 

In addition, validations occurred throughout the exploration programs with ongoing monitoring and validation of field logs and analytical
results, during the entire PSG Exploration endeavors. 
  

	12.2.2	 2008-2013 

The data verification process was performed under the supervision of the Project Manager. When errors were observed in geological,
geotechnical, or sample intervals, the Project Manager and geologist or technician would go back to the core and/or original notes or sample tag booklets and sort out the error and make necessary corrections. 

Data verification was performed on an ongoing basis. At times where data were first recorded on paper, original copies of the hand notes were
kept for future reference. 
 In verification of field logs, when it was unclear which value was correct, a decision was made by a geologist
familiar with logging and sampling techniques. 
  

	12.2.3	 2019 

The data verification process was performed under the supervision of the Project Manager/Senior Geologist on site. Digital scans of all the
original core logs and related data were used to compare directly to the data that had been entered into GeoSpark Core software. The core log data was split up into sections (e.g. Assays were one section and Lithology was another) and assigned to
two separate people to verify. Each person was also given a full Excel export of the master database, with which they would be comparing the original log scans. After each section was verified, the person who performed the work would submit a memo
outlining the errors encountered and possible solutions to these errors to the Database Manager. The Database Manager would then work through the errors and make changes, when warranted. A complete review (100% of the records) was done for Assays,
Alteration, Metallurgy, Lithology, Collars and Surveys. Assays were compared directly to the original assay certificates. Collar data was compared directly to the surveys performed by CAP Engineering and the logging forms and Downhole Survey data
was compared directly to the exports from the DeviShot survey tool; all other data was compared directly to the core log scans. A partial (approximately 20%) review was then completed by the database manager for Geotechnical and Specific Gravity
data by comparing the master database records to the original log scans. 
 Upon completion of 2019 data verification, the Project Manager
reviewed the errors found and made changes where warranted. In cases where it was unclear what data was correct, the Project Manager would review related information (e.g. notes/comments on the logs and core photos) and make a final decision based
on that related data and on extensive knowledge of the project itself. Overall, the data was in good shape, with occasional missing records or incorrect codes (e.g. POT instead of PRO for an alteration interval) entered during the first phase of
data transcribing from original logs to GeoSpark. There were very few errors found during the partial review of the Geotechnical and Specific Gravity data; a complete review (100%) of this data was not conducted at the time due to the initial 20%
pass finding so few errors and because a 20% verification is considered acceptable by the manager for this data. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	81

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	12.3	 VERIFICATION ERRORS 

For the purposes of this report, the author has verified five percent of original drill logs and drill sample assays to the data used in the
resource assessment. This involved visually comparing the analytical results for gold, silver, copper, and molybdenum within the original scans of signed assay certificates with assay data in the database, and visual comparison of scanned, paper
drill logs primary lithology and alteration data and the corresponding intervals to the data in the database, as well as review of re-logged data where applicable. There were no discrepancies found during this
verification. This infers that errors noted below related to earlier reviews have been addressed. 
  

	12.3.1	 1992-1994 

The geological logs had some errors introduced when the data entry personnel were unclear of the recording method the geologist was using.
Additionally, changing definitions of many of the lithology types required re-logging of many of the holes in the 1992 and 1993 programs. The process of combining the information from the old and new logs
introduced some errors into the database. Due to the number of discrepancies encountered in the Geolog data of the 1992 and 1993 programs, a second verification of lithologies and alteration was performed after the errors detected in the first pass
were corrected. Since the re-logging of the historic core in 2010, these errors associated with geological, mineralogical or alteration, have been eliminated. 

 

	12.3.2	 2008-2012 

There were very few errors in the database. The most common error observed was in geological or sample intervals, where the “To”
recording of a previous sample did not match the “From” recording of the subsequent sample. These were generally easy to sort out by the geologist or geotechnical logger. 

Discrepancies with the assay, ICP and copper leach data involved values below the detection limit. Occasionally less than signs (<) were
misplaced for the lower detection limit values. Anomalously high ICP values were occasionally rounded off differently in the assay certificates than in the assay data downloaded from the computer bulletin board. 

The geotechnical logs were checked by the computer to find intervals with combinations of parameters that were suspect. These intervals were
extracted from the database and the suspect values were checked against the originals and against other available information, such as core photos, to determine if they were in error. A large majority of the extracted parameters were correct and
considered to be caused by normal variance of geotechnical characteristics. 
 Errors detected in the field data of the geological logs,
geotechnical logs, synoptic logs, specific gravity logs and down-hole survey data were often a result of human error in recording the original or in transcription. Wherever possible computer checks were done on the data; several types of errors were
detected this way. 
 Errors found in the specific gravity data were due to the geotechnician assigning the wrong sample number to the
interval from which the specific gravity was taken. These errors were detected by a computer check and confirmed by the data verification personnel. 
  

	12.3.3	 2019 

A complete data audit took place following the 2019 exploration program at the Casino Project. The data audit included a 100% audit of: Assay
Data, Alteration Data, Metallurgical Data, Lithography Data, Survey Data and Collar Location. 
 The audit was performed using exported data
from the Geospark Core database. 
 There were two main types of errors encountered during the verification process: missing records that
had not been imported or entered and incorrect codes/typos. Overall, there were very few errors in the data entry, and all could be 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	82

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
easily corrected by the project manager. Missing data was imported in the case of assay certificates or entered from original logs in the case of logging information. 

Because GeoSpark Core catches the inherent errors that crop up from manual entry into Excel or Access, the 2019 dataset was ready for import
into other software for maps, cross sections and 3D modeling directly after the audit and verification process. 
  

	12.4	 OPINION OF QUALIFIED PERSON

 It is the author’s opinion, as the Qualified Person responsible for this section of this report, that the data
for the Casino Project meets NI 43-101 standards and is adequate for the purposes of resource estimation and for use in this technical report. 

All parts of the data collection process from drilling, sampling, and logging to shipping, assaying and verification have been reviewed by the
author. It is the author’s opinion that the Casino Project database has been maintained at high quality. 
 In addition, the author has
performed a five percent verification on scanned, original drill logs and signed, original assay certificates compared to the data in the Casino Project database; the author has found no errors in the data transcription. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	83

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	13	 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING 

The Casino Project will produce copper flotation concentrates with contained gold and silver values, and molybdenite flotation concentrates.
Gold in the form of doré, and a high-grade copper sulphide product will also be produced from an oxide ore heap leach. All products will be shipped offsite for sale or further processing. 

 

	13.1	 METALLURGICAL SAMPLES 

In the testwork commissioned by Pacific Sentinel Gold in the mid 90’s, all of the samples used were assay rejects that were nominally -10 mesh in particle size. These assay rejects were combined to prepare a number of composites that were sent to Lakefield Research for flotation and other testing under the direction of Melis Engineering, Ltd., to
Brenda Process Technology for flotation testing, and to Kappes, Cassiday and Associates for copper and gold leaching. 
 The source of
samples for all the 2008 work was split HQ core that was retrieved from site in September 2007. The core had been at site since it was drilled in 1993 and 1994 but was stored under cover. 

Samples for the G&T Metallurgical Services test program reported in early 2011 were split from fresh core from the 2010 drill program.

 Samples for the comminution testing performed by Starkey and Associates, and comminution and flotation testing by G&T Metallurgical
reported in early 2012 were retrieved from the 1993 to 2010 drill programs and consisted of split core. 
 A drill program to retrieve fresh
hypogene core was completed in early 2012 and split core from this drilling campaign was used for the flotation tests reported by G&T Metallurgical in December 2012. 

In June 2013 bulk samples of different lithologies were taken by from just below the surface of the deposit using and excavator and were used
for heap leaching studies performed by SGS E&S Engineering Solutions Inc. reported in October 2014. 
  

	13.2	 LEACHING TESTS 

 

	13.2.1	 Kappes, Cassiday and Associates 

Kappes, Cassiday and Associates performed two studies in 1995 on the leaching of the oxide cap and supergene material. In the first study they
leached a selection of oxide cap material with cyanide. In the second study they examined pre-leaching both oxide cap and supergene material with acid followed by cyanidation of the residue. 

Gold extraction was affected by the amount of copper leached during cyanidation and ranged from
10-97.4%. Average gold extraction was 79.9%. 
 Lime consumption during cyanidation averaged 3.9
kg/t without the acid pre-leach, and 4.1 kg/t with the acid pre-leach. Cyanide consumption was significant, averaging 5.5 kg/t without the acid pre-leach. There was not a significant difference between the lime consumption for the oxide copper composites and copper oxide composites. 
  

	13.2.2	 SGS E&S Engineering Solutions Inc. 

SGS E&S Engineering Solutions Inc. (at the time METCON) ran two column tests on a composite sample blended to create gold and copper
concentrations similar to the average reserve concentrations in 2008. 
 The ore was crushed coarsely to
-3.8 cm (-1.5 inch), placed in 15 cm by 6 metre columns, and irrigated at 12 L/h/m2. One column was leached
“open cycle” – a 0.5 g/L NaCN solution was fed to the top of the column and the pregnant 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	84

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
solution was collected and assayed. The second column was “locked cycle” and solution was recycled. In the locked cycle column when the copper concentration in solution exceeded 50
mg/L, the solution was treated through a SART pilot plant discussed in the next section, and the gold was recovered on activated carbon. 

The gold, silver, and copper extractions from the open and locked cycle tests compare favourably. Although the gold extraction was slightly
higher for the open cycle test, both tests produced good gold recovery considering the coarse crush size. 
 Cyanide consumptions were
similar based on titrations and the amount of cyanide added to the system for the locked cycle column at approximately 0.5 kg/t. Lime consumptions were similar to the bottle roll test work at approximately 3 kg/t. 

Table 13-1: Extractions and Reagent Consumptions from Open Cycle and Locked Cycle Cyanidation

  

																			
	 	  	 Assays (calculated head)

(g/t)
	  	 Percent Extraction
	  	 Reagent Consumption

(kg/t)

	 	  	 Au
	  	 Ag
	  	 Cu
	  	 Au
	  	 Ag
	  	 Cu
	  	 NaCN*
	  	 NaCN**
	  	 CaO

	Open	  	0.47	  	1.92	  	693	  	69.52	  	25.14	  	17.4	  	0.39	  		  	2.83
	Locked	  	0.42	  	1.61	  	654	  	65.79	  	27.31	  	18.2	  	0.48	  	0.54	  	3.06

  

	*	 based on titrations 

	**	 based on additions 

A second set of testing was performed in 2013 which investigated metal recovery as a function of lithology. Based on the mine plan from the
2013 Feasibility Study, it was determined that the heap leach would be primarily composed of Granodiorite (WR), Intrusive Breccia (IX) and Patton Porphyry (PP) ore types with argillic (ARG) alteration. 

The ore was crushed coarsely to -3.8 cm (-1.5 inch), placed in
15 cm by 3 metre columns, and irrigated at 9.78 L/h/m2. Each column was run in duplicate. The columns were operated in “open cycle”. Solution containing 0.75 g/L free NaCN and 300 mg/L
Cu (added to approximate that steady state Cu concentration that would be used to leach the ore in practice) was added to the top of the column to irrigate. 

Table 13-2: Extractions and Reagent consumptions from Column Tests Investigating Lithology 

 

															
	 Ore
Type
	  	 Head Assays

(g/t)
	  	 Percent Extraction
	  	 Reagent Consumption

(kg/t)

	  	 Au
	  	 Ag
	  	 Cu
	  	 Au
	  	 Ag
	  	 NaCN
	  	 CaO

	 WR

(dup)
	  	 0.27

0.27
	  	 0.85

0.85
	  	 72.3

72.3
	  	 82.56

81.90
	  	 27.97

27.78
	  	 0.26

0.20
	  	 4.34

4.18

	 IX

(dup)
	  	 0.54

0.54
	  	 2.70

2.70
	  	 46.2

46.2
	  	 64.55

62.10
	  	 22.71

16.63
	  	 0.68

0.44
	  	 3.11

3.10

	 PP

(dup)
	  	 0.63

0.63
	  	 2.76

2.77
	  	 73.0

73.0
	  	 75.09

73.28
	  	 26.29

26.01
	  	 0.47

0.19
	  	 3.51

3.38

 Gold extraction for WR and PP lithologies are higher than the gold recoveries in previous testing, and gold
recovery for IX lithology is higher indicating that there is some variability in gold extraction based on lithology. Cyanide and lime consumption are more variable but are similar to what was obtained in previous work. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	85

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	13.3	 SART COPPER RECOVERY 

SART stands for Sulphidization, Acidification, Recycling and Thickening. In this process, a cyanide solution containing copper is treated to
remove copper—gold is not affected. 
 In the locked cycle test described previously, the pregnant leach solution from the column was
treated using a SART pilot plant several times before removing the gold with carbon and recycling the treated fluid to the column. The SART results are summarized in Table 13-3. 

Table 13-3: SART Results 

 

																							
	 Pregnant Solution
	  	 Barren Solution

after SART & Carbon
	  	 Copper
	  	 Reagent Consumption

	 Free

NaCN

(g/L)
	  	 Cu

(ppm)
	  	 Au

(ppm)
	  	 Ag

(ppm)
	  	 Free

NaCN
 (g/L)
	  	 Cu

(ppm)
	  	 Au

(ppm)
	  	 Ag

(ppm)
	  	 Removal

(%)
	  	 (g/L solution treated)

	  	
S2-
	  	 H2SO4
	  	 CaO

	0.25	  	81	  	0.21	  	0.30	  	0.39	  	6.8	  	0.04	  	0.02	  	91.3	  	0.024	  	0.64	  	0.37

  

	13.4	 COMMINUTION TESTING 

SGS Lakefield, under the direction of SGS Minnovex, performed a comprehensive comminution study. Fifty (50) split drill core samples,
representing the first 6 years of production were sent to SGS and subjected to the several tests. 
 A summary of the grinding results
appears in Table 13-4. As SGS reports, the samples tested were characterized as medium in hardness from the perspective of semi-autogenous milling and of medium in hardness with respect to ball milling. 

Table 13-4: Summary of Comminution Results 

 

													
	 Test
Name
	  	 CEET CI
	  	 SPI (min)
	  	 RWI (kWh/t)
	  	 BWI (kWh/t)
	  	 MBWI (kWh/t)
	  	 AI (g)

	Average	  	29.2	  	52.9	  	9.9	  	14.5	  	14.30	  	0.265
	Std. Dev.	  	13.9	  	20.8	  	5.6	  	2.6	  	1.60	  	0.046
	Rel. Std. Dev.	  	47.5	  	39.3	  	56.5	  	18.1	  	11.30	  	17.0
	Minimum	  	13.5	  	12.6	  	0.0	  	11.2	  	11.40	  	0.226
	10th Percentile	  	15.3	  	31.4	  	4.4	  	12.1	  	12.50	  	0.232
	25th Percentile	  	19.1	  	37.4	  	11.1	  	13.3	  	13.00	  	0.242
	Median	  	24.1	  	50.3	  	12.5	  	14.1	  	14.10	  	0.252
	75th Percentile	  	38.0	  	63.4	  	13.0	  	15.9	  	15.60	  	0.275
	90th Percentile	  	52.3	  	82.5	  	13.0	  	17.3	  	16.30	  	0.309
	Maximum	  	66.9	  	114.1	  	13.0	  	18.2	  	18.30	  	0.332

 Additional comminution testing was performed in 2012 under the direction of FLSmidth and Starkey and
Associates at G&T Metallurgical Services and FLSmidth laboratories. This program tested 11 composites of ore representing a combination of different zones, lithologies and alterations. The 11 composites represent over 80% of the material that
will be processed through the mill. 
 Ore composite types that were not tested were mapped to similar composites that were tested by CMC
geologists. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	86

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 The 11 comminution composites were subjected to a series of tests at G&T
Metallurgical’s laboratory and FLSmidth’s laboratory. The test results are summarized in the following tables. 
 Table 13-5: Summary of SMC Tests and JK Parameters 
  

																			
	 Sample ID
	  	 DWi, kWh/
m3
	  	 DWi,%
	  	 Mia, kWh/t
	  	 Mih, kWh/t
	  	 Mic, kWh/t
	  	 A
	  	 B
	  	 SG
	  	 ta

	Composite 1	  	4.90	  	39	  	15.5	  	10.8	  	5.6	  	56.7	  	0.95	  	2.64	  	0.53
	Composite 2	  	4.35	  	32	  	14.1	  	9.6	  	5.0	  	56.3	  	1.07	  	2.63	  	0.59
	Composite 3	  	6.05	  	55	  	18.6	  	13.5	  	7.0	  	61.8	  	0.70	  	2.60	  	0.43
	Composite 4	  	6.62	  	63	  	19.8	  	14.6	  	7.6	  	62.3	  	0.64	  	2.63	  	0.39
	Composite 5	  	6.69	  	64	  	19.9	  	14.7	  	7.6	  	63.4	  	0.62	  	2.64	  	0.39
	Composite 6	  	3.92	  	26	  	13.3	  	8.8	  	4.6	  	62.9	  	1.05	  	2.58	  	0.66
	Composite 7	  	5.75	  	51	  	18.1	  	13	  	6.7	  	66.4	  	0.67	  	2.58	  	0.45
	Composite 8	  	5.60	  	49	  	16.9	  	12.1	  	6.2	  	64.1	  	0.75	  	2.69	  	0.46
	Composite 9	  	5.00	  	40	  	16.1	  	11.3	  	5.8	  	67.9	  	0.76	  	2.58	  	0.52
	Composite 10	  	9.63	  	90	  	26.3	  	20.9	  	10.8	  	91.3	  	0.30	  	2.67	  	0.27
	Composite 11	  	5.69	  	50	  	17.6	  	12.6	  	6.5	  	66.4	  	0.69	  	2.62	  	0.46

 Table 13-6: Summary of SAGDesign Results and Crushed Bond Test
Results 
  

															
	 Sample ID
	  	 DML SAGDesign Test
Results
	  	 G&T Crushed Bond Test
Results

	  	 Relative
Density
	  	 Calc WSAG to
1.7 mm (kWh/t)
	  	
SAG Dis.
Bond BWi
(kWh/t)
	  	 BWi (kWh/t)
	  	 RWi (kWh/t)
	  	 Ai (g)
	  	 CWi

	Composite 1	  	2.66	  	8.19	  	16.18	  	13.5	  	12.9	  	0.162	  	9.41
	Composite 2	  	2.60	  	6.78	  	17.26	  	14.1	  	12.3	  	0.176	  	10.00
	Composite 3	  	2.66	  	9.39	  	15.70	  	14.1	  	14.5	  	0.198	  	13.62
	Composite 4	  	2.72	  	12.41	  	18.36	  	15.5	  	15.5	  	0.199	  	13.84
	Composite 5	  	2.64	  	9.56	  	18.26	  	15.3	  	14.6	  	0.156	  	11.20
	Composite 6	  	2.67	  	5.05	  	16.37	  	13.7	  	10.4	  	0.118	  	10.22
	Composite 7	  	2.69	  	7.45	  	16.12	  	13.4	  	12.4	  	0.155	  	14.57
	Composite 8	  	2.82	  	7.71	  	17.82	  	15.2	  	14.1	  	0.170	  	12.27
	Composite 9	  	2.57	  	6.48	  	14.35	  	12.9	  	11.4	  	0.158	  	11.03
	Composite 10	  	2.71	  	11.68	  	18.93	  	16.6	  	14.9	  	0.161	  	13.23
	Composite 11	  	2.67	  	8.50	  	17.23	  	15.1	  	13.5	  	0.170	  	10.33
	Average	  	2.67	  	8.47	  	16.96	  	14.5	  	13.3	  	0.166	  	11.79

 A circuit consisting of one 40 ft diameter (12.2 m) SAG mill and two 28 ft diameter (8.2 m) ball mills in
closed circuit with three pebble crushers was selected, based on discussions with M3 and FLSmidth, as a circuit that would likely meet the design tonnage. This circuit was modeled by FLSmidth using the parameters developed by SGS, G&T
Metallurgical, and FLSmidth. The results of this exercise are shown in Table 13-7. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	87

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 13-7: Predicted Production Rate 

 

							
	 Project Sample Number
	  	 Client Sample Information
	  	 BWi
	  	 Production Rate (mtpd)

	  	 G&T (kWh/t)

	1	  	Composite 1	  	13.5	  	133,805
	2	  	Composite 2	  	14.1	  	128,064
	3	  	Composite 3	  	14.1	  	128,064
	4	  	Composite 4	  	15.5	  	116,582
	5	  	Composite 5	  	15.3	  	118,018
	6	  	Composite 6	  	13.7	  	131,818
	7	  	Composite 7	  	13.4	  	134,798
	8	  	Composite 8	  	15.2	  	118,790
	9	  	Composite 9	  	12.9	  	139,987
	10	  	Composite 10	  	16.6	  	108,854
	11	  	Composite 11	  	15.1	  	119,674
	Average	  	14.5	  	125,314

  

	13.5	 FLOTATION 

 

	13.5.1	 2008 G&T Metallurgical Work 

In 2008 Western Copper and G&T Metallurgical reviewed the previous metallurgical work and developed a new flotation program. In order to
prevent oxidation, the program used split drill core rather than assay rejects as had been done for the previous work. 
 The new work
focused on two composites at two different levels of oxide copper – an “oxide composite” and a “sulphide composite”. The composites were prepared to be close to the average grade of ore received for the first 5 years. Assays
for these composites are shown in Table 13-8. 
 Table
13-8: G&T Flotation Composite Assays 
  

															
	 	  	 Cu(%)
	  	 Mo (%)
	  	 Fe
	  	 Au

	 	  	 Total
	  	 WAS
	  	 CNS
	  	 Total
	  	 AS
	  	 (%)
	  	 (g/t)

	Oxide Composite	  	0.275	  	0.132	  	0.042	  	0.019	  	0.006	  	3.225	  	0.345
	Sulphide Composite	  	0.260	  	0.016	  	0.032	  	0.021	  	0.002	  	3.525	  	0.255

  

	13.5.1.1	 Oxide Composite 

Copper recovery and grade from the oxide composite was very poor. Various combinations of sulphidizing the ore, changing grind size, using
different reagents were attempted. Based on the poor performance of the oxide flotation, no further testing on the oxide composite was performed. 
  

	13.5.1.2	 Sulphide Composite 

Copper recovery from the sulphide composite was much better than that achieved for the oxide composite. Copper concentrate grades greater than
28% were routinely achieved. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	88

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Copper recoveries of 70-82% were obtained into
concentrates grading from 26.8 to 32.2% copper in cleaner tests. Good recovery of copper was obtained with both a primary grind with K80’s of 147 and 121 μm and regrinds with K80’s less than 22 μm. A coarser grind with a K80 of
209 μm was examined in rougher tests and shown to be less favourable than the finer particle sizes selected for cleaner testing. 
  

	13.5.1.3	 Locked Cycle Tests 

Duplicate locked cycle tests at both primary grind K80’s of 121 μm and 147 μm were performed as well as one locked cycle at a
primary K80 of 209 μm. The results from these tests indicate that a grind with a K80 of 147 μm, 85.6% copper can be recovered into a 28.5% copper concentrate. Molybdenum recovery was variable and ranged from 26.5% to 69.4%. Gold recovery
was more consistent and averaged 64.0%. 
  

	13.5.1.4	 Variability Testing 

A total of 63 individual split drill core intervals were tested for variability. These samples were chosen to primarily represent the first 6
years of production and covered a broad range of total copper, acid soluble copper, molybdenum and gold values. Each of these samples was individually ground and floated in a cleaner test with regrind under the conditions determined from the locked
cycle tests. 
  

	13.5.2	 2009-2011 G&T Metallurgical Work 

 

	13.5.2.1	 2009 Fresh Core Tests 

In 2009, a new drilling campaign was initiated which included two holes in the middle of the deposit –
CAS-002 and CAS-003. A composite from CAS-002 had 92% copper recovery into a concentrate grading about 28% copper in cleaner
tests. Similarly, a composite from CAS-003 had 87% of the copper in the feed recovered into a concentrate grading 26% copper. Moly recoveries were high in both tests at approximately 90%. 

 

	13.5.2.2	 2010 Supergene Sulphide Composite Tests 

The material tested in the 2010 test program (reported at the beginning of 2011) was a composite of supergene material that was obtained from
the drilling campaigns in 2009 and 2010. This material represented ore that will be fed to the mill in the later years of the operation. The feed grade averaged 0.30% copper and 0.037% molybdenum. 

One of the main objectives of the 2010 test program was to evaluate coarser grinds than were tested in the 2008 test program. Results of this
evaluation indicate that copper flotation response is virtually unaffected by primary grind size between 142 and 253 μm for this composite. Molybdenum flotation recovery to the bulk rougher concentrate was lower at grinds coarser than 179
μm. Molybdenum recovery was also reduced at elevated pH levels. 
  

	13.5.2.3	 2010 Supergene Sulphide Composite Locked Cycle Tests 

Locked cycle tests at primary grind K80’s of 142 μm and 222 μm were performed. The results from these tests are presented in
Table 13-9. The effect of regrind size on bulk concentrate copper grade and the effect of primary grind and regrind size on moly recovery are indicated in the table. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	89

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 13-9: Locked Cycle Test Results 

 

																							
	 Test
	  	 P. Grind

K80 μm
	  	 Regrind

K80 μm
	  	 Cycle
	  	 Assay - percent or g/t
	  	 Distribution - percent

	  	 Cu
	  	 Mo
	  	 Fe
	  	 Au
	  	 Cu
	  	 Mo
	  	 Fe
	  	 Au

	KM2721-33	  	222	  	19	  	IV	  	30.8	  	1.6	  	23.6	  	20.2	  	82.9	  	34.7	  	5.2	  	71.9
	KM2721-33	  	222	  	19	  	V	  	28.2	  	1.4	  	26.5	  	19.9	  	81.6	  	34.2	  	6.2	  	69.7
	KM2721-34	  	222	  	20	  	IV	  	26.1	  	1.6	  	25.7	  	17.8	  	88.6	  	48.8	  	7.0	  	68.4
	KM2721-34	  	222	  	20	  	V	  	25.7	  	1.5	  	26.6	  	19.9	  	86.6	  	45.1	  	7.5	  	64.7
	KM2721-35	  	142	  	19	  	IV	  	26.3	  	1.9	  	27.8	  	18.6	  	87.3	  	57.1	  	7.1	  	71.4
	KM2721-35	  	142	  	19	  	V	  	25.1	  	1.7	  	27.6	  	16.1	  	86.4	  	54.3	  	7.6	  	66.1
	KM2721-36	  	222	  	37	  	IV	  	17.8	  	1.4	  	31.1	  	13.1	  	81.7	  	55.7	  	9.6	  	67.0
	KM2721-36	  	222	  	37	  	V	  	18.8	  	1.4	  	30.4	  	10.1	  	82.8	  	51.2	  	10.9	  	61.5
	KM2721-37	  	222	  	31	  	IV	  	21.2	  	1.4	  	31.1	  	11.7	  	83.2	  	54.1	  	9.2	  	62.4
	KM2721-37	  	222	  	31	  	V	  	20.8	  	1.7	  	31.3	  	11.7	  	83.9	  	59.7	  	9.9	  	65.7

  

	13.5.2.4	 Pyrite Flotation 

Pyrite flotation was examined as a process to produce tailings samples that had low levels of residual sulphur, and thus could be deemed
“not acid generating”. 
 The locked cycle tests outlined in Table 13-9 included a pyrite
rougher to reduce the sulphide concentration of the tailings. Pyrite flotation tailings from these tests obtained tailings averaging less than 0.08% sulphur. 
  

	13.5.3	 2011-2012 G&T Metallurgical Work 

Western retained International Metallurgical and Environmental to assist in the metallurgical testing and continued to perform the testing at
G&T Metallurgical Services (name changed to ALS Metallurgy in late 2012). 
  

	13.5.3.1	 New Flowsheet Development 

In previous testing campaigns, in order to achieve acceptable recoveries from the conventional copper flotation flowsheet’s tested, 15-20% of the feed material needed to be reground. The focus of the new flowsheet development was to reduce the material sent to the regrind mills. 

The new flowsheet development centered on a flowsheet where rougher concentrate was sent to the first cleaning stage prior to regrinding, the
first cleaner concentrate went to regrinding and the second and third cleaner tails were returned to the first cleaner. By utilizing this flowsheet, the amount of feed material that needed to be reground dropped from
15-20% to 3 to 5%. 
 Locked cycle test results from the composites tested using this flowsheet are
shown in Table 13-10. The results show similar recoveries to previous test work using a conventional copper flotation flowsheet. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	90

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 13-10: Locked Cycle Test Results 

 

																							
	Composite	 	Tests	 	P. Grind
K80 μm	 	Regrind
K80 μm	 	Assay - percent or g/t	 	Distribution - percent
	 	Cu	 	Mo	 	S	 	Au	 	Cu	 	Mo	 	S	 	Au
	HYP1	 	38, 42	 	218	 	19	 	26.0	 	1.98	 	33.1	 	24.6	 	82.1	 	64.9	 	24.9	 	61.1
	HYP2	 	39, 43	 	216	 	16	 	26.3	 	1.31	 	32.8	 	23.9	 	81.7	 	37.1	 	14.6	 	56.1
	SUS1	 	44, 46	 	192	 	17.5	 	21.8	 	1.77	 	33.9	 	23.6	 	77.7	 	59.5	 	24.9	 	75.9
	SUS2	 	47	 	190	 	14	 	24.1	 	0.85	 	38.1	 	28.3	 	62.8	 	32.8	 	20.4	 	64.4

  

	13.5.3.2	 Tests using Fresh Core 

While supergene flotation tests were performed on fresh core obtained during the 2010 campaign, no flotation tests had been performed on fresh
hypogene core with the exception of a limited number of tests performed in 2009. 
 In 2012, a drilling campaign was executed to obtain
fresh hypogene core from the first years of mining that represented the predominate mineralization that would be fed to the mill. In total five holes were drilled (CAS-088 to
CAS-093), and from these five holes, three composites were made representing lithologies: Patton porphyry (PP), Intrusion breccia (IX), and Dawson range batholith (WR). 

Table 13-11: Hypogene Composites 

 

													
	 	 	Cu(%)	 	Mo	 	Fe	 	Au
	 	 	Total	 	WAS	 	CNS	 	(%)	 	(%)	 	(g/t)
	PP Composite	 	0.14	 	0.004	 	0.008	 	0.030	 	2.95	 	0.22
	IX Composite	 	0.17	 	0.006	 	0.012	 	0.071	 	2.39	 	0.22
	WR Composite	 	0.19	 	0.005	 	0.013	 	0.019	 	2.50	 	0.18

 Locked Cycle Recoveries using these fresh composites were significantly better than previous testing on
oxidized core and are shown in Table 13-12. Note that the primary grind size for these tests was also higher than the target of 200 μm, in some cases significantly, so it would be expected that actual
plant recovery would be better than these tests indicate. 
 Table 13-12: Locked Cycle Test
Results 
  

																							
	Composite	 	Tests	 	P. Grind
K80 μm	 	Regrind
K80 μm	 	Assay - percent or g/t	 	Distribution - percent
	 	Cu	 	Mo	 	Ag	 	Au	 	Cu	 	Mo	 	Ag	 	Au
	PP	 	23	 	234	 	31	 	18.6	 	7.5	 	126	 	15.6	 	89.9	 	77.9	 	46.5	 	57.3
	IX	 	24	 	254	 	32	 	24.6	 	4.3	 	107	 	24.3	 	87.2	 	78.6	 	46.0	 	55.4
	WR	 	25	 	211	 	31	 	17.5	 	1.50	 	82	 	13.5	 	91.9	 	89.4	 	53.8	 	67.2

  

	13.5.3.3	 Pilot Plant Testing and Copper/Molybdenum Separation 

A pilot plant was performed on hypogene and supergene composites taken from the drilling campaign to produce representative tailings for
environmental testing, geotechnical testing and thickener testing and to produce sufficient copper/molybdenum concentrate for copper moly separation tests. Unfortunately, there was not sufficient feed material to obtain operating information from
the pilot plant. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	91

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Although suitable copper/molybdenum concentrate was produced to perform several
copper/molybdenum separation tests, only one cleaner test was performed as the results from this test were sufficiently good to warrant no further testing. The results from this test are shown in Table 13-13.

 Table 13-13: Copper/Molybdenum Separation Cleaner Test 

 

																					
	 Cumulative
Product
	  	 Cum. Weight
	  	 Assay - percent or g/t
	  	 Distribution - percent

	  	 %
	  	 grams
	  	 Cu
	  	 Mo
	  	 Fe
	  	 S
	  	 Cu
	  	 Mo
	  	 Fe
	  	 S

	Final Conc.	  	3.1	  	31.2	  	0.39	  	57.4	  	0.8	  	37.9	  	0.1	  	94.1	  	0.1	  	2.6
	Second Conc.	  	3.5	  	35.5	  	2.38	  	51.3	  	3.8	  	37.6	  	0.5	  	95.7	  	0.4	  	3.0
	Rougher Conc.	  	6.1	  	62.5	  	9.04	  	29.7	  	15.3	  	38.0	  	3.5	  	97.4	  	2.9	  	5.3
	Tails	  	93.9	  	953.8	  	16.5	  	0.05	  	33.9	  	44.3	  	96.5	  	2.6	  	97.1	  	94.7
	Feed	  	100.0	  	1016.3	  	16.0	  	1.87	  	32.8	  	43.9	  	100	  	100	  	100	  	100

  

	13.5.4	 Interpretation of Flotation Test Results 

The most current work at G&T Metallurgical has shown good copper recovery to copper concentrates that routinely achieve 28% or greater for
various drill core samples from the deposit using the reagent scheme developed. The conclusions from this work are unambiguous and will be used as the basis of this study. 
  

	13.5.4.1	 Supergene – Copper 

It was difficult to achieve good copper concentrate grades from supergene oxide material that had copper oxide concentrations greater than 25-30% of the total copper. For this reason, during operation of the mill, supergene oxide ore should be blended in with the other ore to achieve an oxide copper percentage less than 25%. 

The supergene ore contains a certain percentage of oxide copper minerals (this is what defines it as being supergene material). Oxide copper
minerals will be poorly recovered by the flotation process, so in the interpretation of the results, it is important to examine the recovery of sulphide copper to a copper concentrate. Sulphide copper can be calculated by subtracting the
concentration of oxide copper from the total copper. Supergene mineralization at Casino has been assayed for weak acid soluble copper, which is approximately equal to the amount of oxide copper in the sample assayed but may under or over
represent the amount of oxide copper present depending on the specifics of the mineralization. 
 Sulphide copper recovery as a function of
and sulphide copper grade is shown in Table 13-14 for the supergene locked cycle tests by G&T Metallurgical. Recovery appears to be fairly consistent. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	92

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 13-14: Supergene Locked Cycle Recoveries to
Concentrate 
  

																																					
	 Test
	  	Feed Assays	 	  	Recovery to Concentrate	 
	  	Cu (%)	 	  	Au
(g/t)	 	  	Mo
(%)	 	  	Total
Cu	 	  	Sulphide
Cu	 	  	Au	 	  	Mo	 
	  	Total	 	  	WAS	 	  	Sulphide	 
	 KM2721
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 33
	  	 	0.3	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.27	 	  	 	0.25	 	  	 	0.036	 	  	 	82.3	 	  	 	91.4	 	  	 	70.7	 	  	 	34.5	 
	 34
	  	 	0.3	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.27	 	  	 	0.25	 	  	 	0.036	 	  	 	87.6	 	  	 	97.3	 	  	 	66.4	 	  	 	46.9	 
	 35
	  	 	0.3	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.27	 	  	 	0.25	 	  	 	0.036	 	  	 	86.8	 	  	 	96.4	 	  	 	68.8	 	  	 	55.7	 
	 36
	  	 	0.3	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.27	 	  	 	0.25	 	  	 	0.036	 	  	 	82.3	 	  	 	91.4	 	  	 	64.4	 	  	 	53.3	 
	 37
	  	 	0.3	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.27	 	  	 	0.25	 	  	 	0.036	 	  	 	83.5	 	  	 	92.8	 	  	 	64.1	 	  	 	57	 
	 KM3134
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 44
	  	 	0.3	 	  	 	0.056	 	  	 	0.244	 	  	 	0.37	 	  	 	0.022	 	  	 	79.9	 	  	 	98.2	 	  	 	75.5	 	  	 	64.6	 
	 46
	  	 	0.3	 	  	 	0.056	 	  	 	0.244	 	  	 	0.47	 	  	 	0.022	 	  	 	75.6	 	  	 	93.0	 	  	 	76.1	 	  	 	54.6	 
	 47
	  	 	0.3	 	  	 	0.094	 	  	 	0.206	 	  	 	0.47	 	  	 	0.028	 	  	 	62.8	 	  	 	91.5	 	  	 	64.4	 	  	 	32.8	 

 Averaging the locked cycle tests results indicates that an average of 94% of the sulphide copper was recovered
to a copper concentrate. This result also closely mirrors the variability results. Thus, the overall copper recovery for the supergene material will be: 

Cu Recovery = 94 x (Cutotal – CuWAS)/(Cutotal) 
  

	13.5.4.2	 Supergene – Gold 

Averaging the gold recovery from Table 13-14, an average gold recovery of 69% to copper concentrate is
obtained: 
 Au Recovery = 69% 
  

	13.5.4.3	 Supergene Molybdenum 

In most of the tests, no attempt was made to optimize the molybdenum recovery. For this reason, the molybdenum recovery is quite variable. 

Examining the locked cycle tests in Table 13-13, an average molybdenum recovery of 55% to copper
concentrate was chosen, which represents the average molybdenum recovery when the two low outliers are removed. 
 Recovery of molybdenum
from the copper-molybdenum concentrate to a molybdenum concentrate was not specifically tested for the supergene material, but it is expected to be similar to that obtained in hypogene tests that achieved approximately 95% molybdenum recovery to a
molybdenum concentrate. Molybdenum recovery throughout the plant is equal to the recovery to the copper-molybdenum concentrate multiplied by recovery to a molybdenum concentrate and is shown below: 

Mo Recovery = 52.25% 
  

	13.5.4.4	 Supergene – Silver 

Unfortunately, silver recovery was not determined in all test programs. The 2011 test program followed silver. Averaging the silver recovery
from these locked cycle tests indicates that a silver recovery of 60% should be achievable: 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	93

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Ag Recovery = 60% 

 

	13.5.4.5	 Hypogene 

Hypogene recoveries are based on the December 2012 flotation work performed by ALS Metallurgy on “fresh” core that had been drilled
earlier specifically for flotation test work. 
 The following table shows cleaner circuit recoveries for both copper and molybdenum for all
three locked cycle tests with hypogene material. Copper concentrate grades have been corrected to reflect the removal of molybdenum and represent final concentrate grades in terms of copper. 

Table 13-15: Cleaner Circuit Recoveries for Locked Cycle Test Results 

 

																	
	 Test and Cycle no.
	  	Cu Con Grade
%Cu	 	  	Cu Recovery
%	 	  	Mo Recovery
%	 	  	Au Recovery
%	 
	 WR Composite
	  				  				  				  			
	 Cycle 4
	  	 	17.8	 	  	 	96.4	 	  	 	95.0	 	  	 	86.0	 
	 Cycle 5
	  	 	17.9	 	  	 	96.9	 	  	 	95.6	 	  	 	88.0	 
					
	 IX Composite
	  				  				  				  			
	 Cycle 4
	  	 	22.8	 	  	 	96.9	 	  	 	81.7	 	  	 	83.3	 
	 Cycle 5
	  	 	21.2	 	  	 	96.7	 	  	 	80.8	 	  	 	80.6	 
					
	 PP Composite
	  				  				  				  			
	 Cycle 4
	  	 	26.1	 	  	 	97.1	 	  	 	90.4	 	  	 	88.0	 
	 Cycle 5
	  	 	26.5	 	  	 	97.1	 	  	 	91.1	 	  	 	84.9	 

 Copper, molybdenum and gold recovery, when a primary grind size of 200 to 220 μm is used is summarized
in Table 13-15 and is based on both locked cycle testing and open circuit rougher flotation tests. Molybdenum recovery was variable and the higher grade molybdenum sample (IX) had the lowest molybdenum
recovery indicating that reagent conditions could possibly improve this recovery. Within the cleaning circuit copper and gold recoveries were very constant, irrespective of the final copper concentrate grade. 

Table 13-16: Predicted Recoveries to Copper/Molybdenum Concentrate 

 

													
	 Process Stream
	  	Cu	 	  	Mo	 	  	Au	 
	 Rougher Circuit Recovery
	  	 	95	 	  	 	92	 	  	 	78	 
	 Cleaner Circuit Recovery
	  	 	97	 	  	 	90	 	  	 	85	 
	 Metal Recovery
	  	 	92.15	 	  	 	82.8	 	  	 	66	 

  

	13.5.4.6	 Hypogene – Copper Molybdenum Separation 

One test was performed to determine how well molybdenum could be separated from a copper/molybdenum concentrate, which indicated that
approximately 95% molybdenum recovery could be achieved. Thus, the overall recovery of molybdenum will be equal to: 
 Mo
Recovery = 78.6% 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	94

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	13.5.4.7	 Hypogene – Silver Recovery 

Hypogene silver recovery was followed in the last set of tests on fresh core. Reviewing these recoveries, a silver recovery of 50% was chosen.

 Ag Recovery = 50.0% 
  

	13.5.4.8	 Concentrate Quality 

Estimates of the chemistry of the copper concentrate are summarized in Table 13-17, formed from best
estimates of analysis of concentrates produced in test work. Concentrate chemistry estimation is based on detailed analysis of test products, conducted at various metallurgical test facilities. 

Table 13-17: Copper Concentrate Chemistry 

 

													
	 Element
	  	Average Expected Value	 	  	High Range	 	  	Low Range	 
	 Copper - %
	  	 	28	 	  	 	30	 	  	 	25	 
	 Gold – g/t
	  	 	25	 	  	 	30	 	  	 	15	 
	 Silver – g/t
	  	 	120	 	  	 	180	 	  	 	80	 
	 Molybdenum - %
	  	 	0.05	 	  	 	0.1	 	  	 	0.02	 
	 Iron - %
	  	 	26	 	  	 	30	 	  	 	24	 
	 Sulphur - %
	  	 	36	 	  	 	40	 	  	 	28	 
	 Arsenic – g/t
	  	 	200	 	  	 	500	 	  	 	100	 
	 Antimony – g/t
	  	 	250	 	  	 	400	 	  	 	100	 
	 Mercury – g/t
	  	 	1	 	  	 	2	 	  	 	0.1	 
	 Cadmium – g/t
	  	 	40	 	  	 	80	 	  	 	20	 
	 Fluorine – g/t
	  	 	100	 	  	 	200	 	  	 	50	 
	 Silica - %
	  	 	2	 	  	 	5	 	  	 	1	 

 Key analytical results for the Casino project molybdenum concentrate are summarized in Table 13-20. Limited test work allows for only an average chemistry estimate to be made for the molybdenum concentrate at this time. 

Table 13-18: Molybdenum Concentrate Chemistry 

 

					
	 Element
	  	Average Expected Value	 
	 Molybdenum -%
	  	 	56.0	 
	 Copper - %
	  	 	0.25	 
	 Gold – g/t
	  	 	1	 
	 Silver – g/t
	  	 	10	 
	 Iron - %
	  	 	1	 
	 Sulphur - %
	  	 	38	 
	 Arsenic – g/t
	  	 	1500	 
	 Antimony – g/t
	  	 	100	 
	 Mercury – g/t
	  	 	<1	 
	 Cadmium – g/t
	  	 	30	 
	 Silica - %
	  	 	1.5	 
	 Rhenium – g/t
	  	 	130	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	95

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	13.6	 DEWATERING TESTS 

Flotation tailing from the 2008 test program piloting were submitted to Outotec for dynamic high rate thickening tests. Results were
favourable and a thickener underflow of over 55 percent solids was achieved. Flocculant addition was 22 g/t. The solids loading rate of 1.05 t/m2h was demonstrated. Rheology on the thickened
material was low. 
  

	13.7	 DETERMINATION OF RECOVERIES AND
REAGENT AND OTHER CONSUMABLE CONSUMPTIONS 

As described in the preceding sections, the following recoveries, reagent and other consumable consumptions will be used. Where values were
unknown, typical values based on M3’s experience were used: 
 Table 13-19: Heap Leach
Operational Parameters 
  

							
	 Parameter
	  	Value	 	  	Units
	 Gold recovery
	  	 	66	 	  	Percent
	 Copper recovery
	  	 	18	 	  	Percent
	 Silver recovery
	  	 	26	 	  	Percent
	 Crush size
	  	 	-1	 	  	inch
	 Irrigation rate
	  	 	12	 	  	L/h/m2
	 Lift height
	  	 	8	 	  	m
	 Reagent consumptions
	  				  	
	 NaHS
	  	 	0.025	 	  	kg/t ore
	 Sulfuric acid
	  	 	0.328	 	  	kg/t ore
	 Hydrochloric acid
	  	 	0.010	 	  	kg/t ore
	 Lime (CaO)
	  	 	3.270	 	  	kg/t ore
	 Sodium hydroxide
	  	 	0.130	 	  	kg/t ore
	 Sodium cyanide (NaCN)
	  	 	0.500	 	  	kg/t ore
	 Activated Carbon
	  	 	0.500	 	  	g/t ore
	 Anti-scalant
	  	 	0.003	 	  	kg/t ore
	 Flocculent
	  	 	0.350	 	  	g/t ore
	 Primary crusher liners
	  	 	0.040	 	  	kg/t
	 Secondary crusher liners
	  	 	0.085	 	  	kg/t

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	96

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 13-20: Flotation Operational Parameters.

  

							
	 Parameter
	  	 Value
	  	Units	 
	 Copper recovery
	  		  			
	 Supergene
	  	Recovery = 94 x (Cutotal – CuWAS)/(Cutotal)	  	 	percent	 
	 Hypogene
	  	92.15	  	 	percent	 
	 Gold recovery
	  		  			
	 Supergene
	  	69	  	 	percent	 
	 Hypogene
	  	66	  	 	percent	 
	 Molybdenum recovery (final conc)
	  		  			
	 Supergene
	  	52.25	  	 	percent	 
	 Hypogene
	  	78.6	  	 	percent	 
	 Silver recovery
	  		  			
	 Supergene
	  	60	  	 	percent	 
	 Hypogene
	  	50	  	 	percent	 
	 Bond work index
	  	14.5	  	 	kWh/t	 
	 Primary grind size (P80)
	  	200	  	 	μm	 
	 Regrind size (P80)
	  	25	  	 	μm	 
			
	 Reagent consumptions
	  		  			
	 Lime
	  		  			
	 Supergene
	  	2.5	  	 	kg/t ore	 
	 Hypogene
	  	1.0	  	 	kg/t ore	 
	 Aerophine 3418A
	  		  			
	 Supergene
	  	8.4	  	 	g/t ore	 
	 Hypogene
	  	4.0	  	 	g/t ore	 
	 Aerofloat 208
	  		  			
	 Supergene
	  	16.7	  	 	g/t ore	 
	 Hypogene
	  	8.0	  	 	g/t ore	 
	 MIBC
	  	10	  	 	g/t ore	 
	 Fuel Oil
	  	7.44	  	 	g/t ore	 
	 PAX
	  	40	  	 	g/t ore	 
	 NaSH
	  	0.053	  	 	kg/t ore	 
	 Flocculent
	  	25.4	  	 	g/t ore	 
	 SAG Mill – Liners
	  	0.040	  	 	kg/t ore	 
	 Ball Mill – Liners
	  	0.048	  	 	kg/t ore	 
	 SAG Mill – Balls
	  	0.400	  	 	kg/t ore	 
	 Ball Mill – Balls
	  	0.400	  	 	kg/t ore	 
	 Regrind – Balls
	  	0.0410	  	 	kg/t ore	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	97

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14	 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES 

 

	14.1	 MINERAL RESOURCE 

The Mineral Resource for the Casino Project includes Mineral Resources amenable to milling and flotation concentration methods (mill material)
and Mineral Resource amenable to heap leach recovery methods (leach material). Table 14-1 presents the Mineral Resource for mill material. Mill material includes the supergene oxide (SOX), supergene sulphide
(SUS) and hypogene sulphide (HYP) mineral zones. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 2.17 billion tonnes at 0.16% total copper, 0.18 g/t gold, 0.017% moly and 1.4 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 7.43 billion pounds
of copper, 12.7 million ounces gold, 811.6 million pounds of moly and 100.2 million ounces of silver. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 1.43 billion tonnes at 0.10% total copper, 0.14 g/t gold, 0.010% moly and 1.2 g/t
silver and contained metal amounts to 3.24 billion pounds of copper, 6.4 million ounces of gold, 322.8 million pounds moly and 53.5 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource in mill material. 

Table 14-2 presents the Mineral Resource for leach material. Leach material is oxide dominant leach
cap (LC) mineralization. The emphasis of leaching is the recovery of gold in the leach cap. Copper grades in the leach cap are low, but it is expected some metal will be recovered. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to
217.4 million tonnes at 0.03% total copper, 0.25 g/t gold and 1.9 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 166.5 million pounds of copper, 1.8 million ounces gold and 13.3 million ounces of silver. Inferred Mineral Resource is
an additional 31.1 million tonnes at 0.03% total copper, 0.17 g/t gold and 1.7 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 17.2 million pounds of copper, 200,000 ounces of gold and 1.7 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral
Resource in leach material. 
 Table 14-3 presents the Mineral Resource for combined mill and leach
material for copper, gold, and silver. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amount to 2.39 billion tonnes at 0.14% total copper, 0.19 g/t gold and 1.5 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 7.60 billion pounds copper, 14.5 million
ounces gold and 113.5 million ounces of silver for Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 1.46 billion tonnes at 0.10% total copper, 0.14 g/t gold and 1.2 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to
3.26 billion pounds of copper, 6.6 million ounces of gold and 55.2 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource. The Mineral Resource for moly is as shown with mill material since it will not be recovered for leach
material. 
 The Mineral Resources are based on a block model developed by IMC during June 2020. This updated model incorporated the 2019
Western drilling and updated geologic models. It also includes some 2010 through 2012 Western drilling that was not available for the previous Mineral Resource estimate done in 2010. 

The Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resources reported herein are contained within a floating cone pit shell to demonstrate
“reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction” to meet the definition of Mineral Resources in NI 43-101. 

Figure 14-1 shows the constraining pit shell that is based on Measured, Indicated, and Inferred
Mineral Resource. 
 Table 14-1: Mineral Resource for Mill Material at C$5.70 NSR Cutoff 

 

																																													
	 Resource Class
	  	Tonnes
Mt	 	  	NSR
($/t)	 	  	Copper
(%)	 	  	Gold
(g/t)	 	  	Moly
(%)	 	  	Silver
(g/t)	 	  	CuEq
%	 	  	Copper
(mlbs)	 	  	Gold
(moz)	 	  	Moly
(mlbs)	 	  	Silver
(moz)	 
	 Measured
	  	 	145.3	 	  	 	38.08	 	  	 	0.31	 	  	 	0.40	 	  	 	0.025	 	  	 	2.1	 	  	 	0.74	 	  	 	985.8	 	  	 	1.9	 	  	 	80.6	 	  	 	9.8	 
	 Indicated
	  	 	2,028.0	 	  	 	19.10	 	  	 	0.14	 	  	 	0.17	 	  	 	0.016	 	  	 	1.4	 	  	 	0.33	 	  	 	6,448.5	 	  	 	10.9	 	  	 	731.0	 	  	 	90.4	 
	 M+I
	  	 	2,173.3	 	  	 	20.37	 	  	 	0.16	 	  	 	0.18	 	  	 	0.017	 	  	 	1.4	 	  	 	0.36	 	  	 	7,434.3	 	  	 	12.7	 	  	 	811.6	 	  	 	100.2	 
	 Inferred
	  	 	1,430.2	 	  	 	14.50	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	0.14	 	  	 	0.010	 	  	 	1.2	 	  	 	0.24	 	  	 	3,240.4	 	  	 	6.4	 	  	 	322.8	 	  	 	53.5	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	98

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 14-2: Mineral Resource for Leach material at
C$5.46 NSR Cutoff 
  

																																					
	 Resource Class
	  	Tonnes
Mt	 	  	NSR
($/t)	 	  	Copper
(%)	 	  	Gold
(g/t)	 	  	Silver
(g/t)	 	  	AuEq
(g/t)	 	  	Copper
(mlbs)	 	  	Gold
(moz)	 	  	Silver
(moz)	 
	 Measured
	  	 	37.2	 	  	 	19.72	 	  	 	0.05	 	  	 	0.45	 	  	 	2.8	 	  	 	0.48	 	  	 	39.3	 	  	 	0.5	 	  	 	3.3	 
	 Indicated
	  	 	180.2	 	  	 	9.54	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.21	 	  	 	1.7	 	  	 	0.23	 	  	 	127.2	 	  	 	1.2	 	  	 	10.0	 
	 M+I
	  	 	217.4	 	  	 	11.28	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.25	 	  	 	1.9	 	  	 	0.27	 	  	 	166.5	 	  	 	1.8	 	  	 	13.3	 
	 Inferred
	  	 	31.1	 	  	 	7.60	 	  	 	0.03	 	  	 	0.17	 	  	 	1.7	 	  	 	0.18	 	  	 	17.2	 	  	 	0.2	 	  	 	1.7	 

 Table 14-3: Mineral Resource for Copper, Gold, and Silver (Mill and
Leach) 
  

																																	
	 Resource Class
	  	Tonnes
Mt	 	  	NSR
($/t)	 	  	Copper
(%)	 	  	Gold
(g/t)	 	  	Silver
(g/t)	 	  	Copper
(mlbs)	 	  	Gold
(moz)	 	  	Silver
(moz)	 
	 Measured
	  	 	182.4	 	  	 	34.34	 	  	 	0.25	 	  	 	0.41	 	  	 	2.2	 	  	 	1,025.1	 	  	 	2.4	 	  	 	13.1	 
	 Indicated
	  	 	2,208.3	 	  	 	18.32	 	  	 	0.14	 	  	 	0.17	 	  	 	1.4	 	  	 	6,575.6	 	  	 	12.1	 	  	 	100.5	 
	 M+I
	  	 	2,390.7	 	  	 	19.54	 	  	 	0.14	 	  	 	0.19	 	  	 	1.5	 	  	 	7,600.7	 	  	 	14.5	 	  	 	113.5	 
	 Inferred
	  	 	1,461.3	 	  	 	14.35	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	0.14	 	  	 	1.2	 	  	 	3,257.6	 	  	 	6.6	 	  	 	55.2	 

 Notes: 

	1.	 The Mineral Resources have an effective date of 3 July 2020 and the estimate was prepared using the
definitions in CIM Definition Standards (10 May 2014). 

	2.	 All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and therefore numbers may not
appear to add precisely. 

	3.	 Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

	4.	 Mineral Resources for leach material are based on prices of US$2.75/lb copper, US$1500/oz gold and US$18/oz
silver. 

	5.	 Mineral Resources for mill material are based on prices of US$2.75/lb copper, US$1500/oz gold, US$18/oz
silver, and US$11.00/lb moly. 

	6.	 Mineral Resources are based on NSR Cutoff of C$5.46/t for leach material and C$5.70/t for mill material.

	7.	 NSR value for leach material is as follows: 

NSR (C$/t) = $12.65 x copper (%) + $41.55 x gold (g/t) + $0.191 x silver (g/t), based on copper recovery of 18%, gold recovery
of 66% and silver recovery of 26%. 

	8.	 NSR value for hypogene sulphide mill material is: 

NSR (C$/t) = $60.18 x copper (%) + $41.01 x gold (g/t) + $214.94 x moly (%) + $0.355 x silver (g/t), based on recoveries of
92.2% copper, 66% gold, 50% silver and 78.6% moly. 

	9.	 NSR value for supergene (SOX and SUS) mill material is: 

NSR (C$/t) = $65.27 x recoverable copper (%) + $42.87 x gold (g/t) + $142.89 x moly (%) + $0.425 x silver (g/t), based on
recoveries of 69% gold, 60% silver and 52.3% moly. Recoverable copper = 0.94 x (total copper – soluble copper). 

	10.	 Table 14-6 accompanies this Mineral Resource statement and shows all
relevant parameters. 

	11.	 Mineral Resources are reported in relation to a conceptual constraining pit shell in order to demonstrate
reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction, as required by the definition of Mineral Resource in NI 43-101; mineralization lying outside of the pit shell is excluded from the Mineral Resource.

	12.	 AuEq and CuEq values are based on prices of US$2.75/lb copper, US$1500/oz gold, US$18/oz silver, and
US$11.00/lb moly, and account for all metal recoveries and smelting/refining charges. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	99

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14.2	 SENSITIVITY TO NSR CUTOFF 

Table 14-4 shows resources at varying NSR Cutoffs for mill material. All tabulations are contained by
the constraining pit shell used for the base case Mineral Resource at C$5.70 per tonne (highlighted). Increasing the NSR Cutoff by 40% to C$8/t has only a modest effect on the size of the Mineral Resource amenable to milling, decreasing resource
tonnes by 6% and the contained copper and gold by 1.6% and 2.6% respectively. 
 Table 14-5 shows
resources at varying NSR Cutoffs for leach material. Again, all tabulations are contained by the constraining pit shell used for the base case Mineral Resource. The base case resource at an NSR Cutoff of C$5.46 per tonne is highlighted. Increasing
the NSR Cutoff of leach material to C$8/t only reduces the contained gold by 20%. 
 Table 14-4:
Mineral Resource – Mill Material by Various NSR Cutoffs (C$) 
  

																																															
	 NSR Cog

($/t)
	  	Resource
Category	  	Tonnes
Mt	 	  	NSR
($/t)	 	  	Copper
(%)	 	  	Gold
(g/t)	 	  	Moly
(%)	 	  	Silver
(g/t)	 	  	CuEq
(%)	 	  	Copper
(mlbs)	 	  	Gold
(moz)	 	  	Moly
(mlbs)	 	  	Silver
(moz)	 
	 5.70
	  	Measured
Indicated
M+I
Inferred	  	 
 
 

	145.3
 2,028.0

2,173.3
 1,430.2
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	38.08
 19.10

20.37
 14.50
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.31
 0.14

0.15
 0.10
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.40
 0.17

0.18
 0.14
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.025
 0.016

0.017
 0.010
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.1
 1.4

1.4
 1.2
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.74
 0.33

0.36
 0.24
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	986.5
 6,438.2

7,424.7
 3,247.6
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	1.9
 10.8

12.7
 6.4
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	80.7
 733.2

813.9
 324.8
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	9.8
 90.6

100.4
 53.3
	 
  
  

 

	 8
	  	Measured
 IndicatedM+I

Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	144.6
 1,898.4

2,043.0
 1,181.0
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	38.22
 19.93

21.22
 16.11
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.31
 0.15

0.16
 0.12
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.40
 0.17

0.19
 0.15
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.025
 0.017

0.018
 0.012
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.1
 1.4

1.5
 1.2
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.74
 0.34

0.37
 0.27
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	985.2
 6,319.6

7,304.8
 3,020.3
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	1.9
 10.5

12.4
 5.7
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	80.7
 724.0

804.7
 309.8
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	9.7
 87.3

97.0
 47.1
	 
  
  

 

	 16
	  	Measured
Indicated
M+I Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	139.3
 1,182.3

1,321.5
 390.0
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	39.19
 24.61

26.15
 24.95
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.32
 0.19

0.20
 0.19
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.41
 0.21

0.23
 0.21
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.026
 0.022

0.023
 0.021
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.1
 1.7

1.7
 1.6
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.76
 0.42

0.46
 0.42
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	973.4
 4,900.0

5,873.4
 1,625.0
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	1.8
 7.8

9.6
 2.6
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	80.1
 583.8

664.0
 180.6
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	9.5
 64.2

73.8
 20.6
	 
  
  

 

	 30
	  	Measured
Indicated
M+I Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	101.3
 229.6

330.9
 74.4
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	44.77
 36.14

38.78
 39.26
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.36
 0.28

0.30
 0.32
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.47
 0.31

0.36
 0.32
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.030
 0.032

0.032
 0.029
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.3
 2.3

2.3
 2.4
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.87
 0.62

0.70
 0.65
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	799.4
 1,402.1

2,201.5
 521.3
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	1.5
 2.3

3.8
 0.8
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	67.2
 163.0

230.2
 47.0
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	7.6
 16.9

24.5
 5.6
	 
  
  

 

 Table 14-5: Mineral Resource – Leach Material by Various NSR
Cutoffs (C$) 
  

																																							
	 NSR Cog

($/t)
	  	Resource
Category	  	Tonnes
Mt	 	  	NSR
($/t)	 	  	Copper
(%)	 	  	Gold
(g/t)	 	  	Silver
(g/t)	 	  	AuEq
(g/t)	 	  	Copper
(mlbs)	 	  	Gold
(moz)	 	  	Silver
(moz)	 
	 5.46
	  	Measured
Indicated
M+I Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	37.2
 180.2

217.4
 31.1
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	19.72
 9.54

11.28
 7.60
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.05
 0.03

0.03
 0.03
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.45
 0.21

0.25
 0.17
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.8
 1.7

1.9
 1.7
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.48
 0.23

0.27
 0.18
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	39.3
 127.2

166.5
 17.2
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.53
 1.23

1.76
 0.17
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	3.29
 10.03

13.31
 1.70
	 
  
  

 

	 8
	  	Measured
Indicated
M+I Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	35.4
 107.3

142.7
 10.6
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	20.36
 11.43

13.64
 9.84
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.05
 0.03

0.03
 0.02
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.46
 0.26

0.31
 0.22
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.8
 2.0

2.2
 2.3
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.49
 0.28

0.33
 0.24
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	38.2
 71.0

109.2
 4.7
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.53
 0.89

1.41
 0.08
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	3.21
 6.83

10.04
 0.79
	 
  
  

 

	 12
	  	Measured
Indicated
M+I Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	29.5
 36.3

65.8
 1.1
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	22.45
 14.76

18.21
 12.77
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.05
 0.03

0.04
 0.01
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.51
 0.34

0.41
 0.30
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	3.0
 2.4

2.7
 1.2
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.54
 0.36

0.44
 0.31
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	33.8
 24.0

57.8
 0.1
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.48
 0.39

0.88
 0.01
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.88
 2.83

5.72
 0.04
	 
  
  

 

	 14
	  	Measured
Indicated
M+I Inferred
	  	 
 
 

	26.6
 17.9

44.5
 0.0
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	23.50
 16.63

20.73
 0.00
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.05
 0.03

0.04
 0.00
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.54
 0.38

0.47
 0.00
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	3.1
 2.6

2.9
 0.0
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.57
 0.40

0.50
 0.00
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	31.0
 12.3

43.3
 0.0
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	0.46
 0.22

0.68
 0.00
	 
  
  

 
	  	 
 
 

	2.68
 1.52

4.20
 0.00
	 
  
  

 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	 100

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14.3	 MINERAL RESOURCE PARAMETERS 

 

	14.3.1	 Metal Prices 

Table 14-6 shows the economic and recovery parameters for the Mineral Resource estimate. Metal prices
for the Mineral Resource estimate are US$2.75 per pound copper, US$1,500 per ounce gold, US$18 per ounce silver and US$11 per pound moly. A conversion of US$0.75 = C$1.00 was used to convert the prices to C$. IMC believes these prices to be
reasonable based on the following: 1) historical 3-year trailing averages, 2) prices used by other companies for comparable projects, and 3) long range consensus price forecasts prepared by various bank
economists. 
  

	14.3.2	 Cost and Recovery Estimates 

Mining Cost 
 The base mining cost of
C$1.75 per total tonne was estimated by IMC. This estimate was based on likely production rates and equipment requirements and considered typical prices for fuel, blasting agents, equipment parts, and labor, etc. 

Processing of Mill Material 
 Mill
material refers to the supergene oxide, supergene sulphide, and hypogene sulphide zones of the mineral deposit. The processing will be in a conventional sulphide flotation plant that will produce copper and moly concentrates that will be sold to
commercial copper smelters and moly roasting plants. The base unit costs for processing and G&A are estimated at C$5.33 and C$0.37 per tonne, respectively, provided by M3. The estimated plant recoveries for gold, moly, and silver in the
supergene and hypogene zones are shown on Table 14-6. Copper recovery is estimated at 92.2% for hypogene sulphide material. The plant recovery for supergene material is estimated as follows: 

Copper recovery = 94%(Cut% - Cuw%) / Cut% 

Where, 
 Cut% =
Total copper grade 
 Cuw% = Weak acid soluble copper grade 

The copper, gold, and silver payable percentages shown on Table 14-6 are typical terms for copper
concentrates, assuming a clean concentrate with a copper concentrate grade of 28% copper or greater. The off-site cost per pound of copper is estimated at US$0.437 or C$0.583. This is based on payment for
96.5% of the copper in concentrate, smelting cost at US$ 80 per tonne, refining at US$ 0.80 per pound, and concentrate freight of US$ 133 per tonne. The moisture content was estimated at 8.0% and 0.5% concentrate loss during shipping. Gold and
silver refining is estimated at US$6.00 per ounce gold and US$0.50 per ounce silver which amounts to C$8.00 and C$0.667 respectively. 

Note that the off-site cost for moly is assumed to be accounted in the 85% payable percentage for
molybdenum in concentrate, i.e. this is assumed to be the net payable after treatment and transportation charges. This is applicable to a clean moly concentrate with a moly grade of about 50% or greater. 

Processing of Leach Material 
 Leach
material refers to the leach capping of the mineral deposit. Processing is by crushing and heap leaching with cyanide. Gold and silver from the heap leach will report to a typical doré which will be sent to a refinery. The SART process will
be used to extract copper from the cyanide solution and produce a copper concentrate that can be sold to 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	101

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
conventional copper smelters. Heap leach ore processing is estimated at C$5.09 per tonne. The G&A cost of C$0.37 per tonne is also applied to leach material. 

Heap leach recoveries are estimated at 18% for copper, 66% for gold, and 26% for silver. Typical terms for refining costs are shown on Table 14-6. The C$1.733 per ounce for gold and C$0.667 for silver are based on US$1.30 and $0.50 respectively. The payable percentage is estimated at 98% for gold and silver. 

It is also assumed that the SART process will produce a copper concentrate with a grade of about 60% copper. Smelting and refining terms are
assumed the same as for the flotation concentrate. This results in a smelting, refining, and freight charge of about US$0.260 per pound copper or C$0.346 per pound. 
  

	14.3.3	 NSR Calculations 

Due to multiple mineral products and also the variable recovery for copper in the supergene zones, NSR values, in Canadian Dollars, were
calculated for each model block to use to classify blocks into potential resource and waste. For the leach material: 

NSR_au = ($2000 – $1.733) x 0.66 x 0.98 x gold(g/t) / 31.103 = C$41.55 x gold (g/t) 

NSR_cu = ($3.67 - $0.346) x 0.18 x 0.965 x 0.995 x copper(%) x 22.046 

= C$12.65 x copper (%) 

NSR_ag = ($24.00 - $0.667) x 0.26 x 0.98 x silver (g/t) / 31.103 = C$0.191 x silver (g/t) 

NSR = NSR_au + NSR_cu + NSR_ag 

The internal NSR cutoff for leach material is the processing + G&A cost of C$5.46 per tonne since all the recoveries and refining costs
are accounted for in the NSR calculation. Internal cutoff grade applies to blocks that have to be removed from the pit, so the mining cost is a sunk cost. Internal cutoff is also generally the minimum cutoff that would be evaluated for mine
scheduling. The Mineral Resource tabulation for leach material on Table 14-2 is based on the internal cutoff. The breakeven NSR cutoff grade for leach material is C$7.21 per tonne (mining plus processing and
G&A). 
 For processing of hypogene sulphide material the NSR values are calculated as: 

NSR_cu = ($3.67 – $0.583) x 0.922 x 0.965 x 0.995 x copper(%) x 22.046 

= C$60.18 x copper(%) 

NSR_au = ($2000 – $8.00) x 0.66 x 0.975 x 0.995 x gold(g/t) / 31.103 

= C$41.01 x gold (g/t) 

NSR_mo = $14.67 x 0.786 x 0.85 x 0.995 x moly(%) x 22.046 = C$214.94 x moly(%) 

NSR_ag = ($24.00 - $0.667) x 0.50 x 0.95 x 0.995 x silver(g/t) / 31.103 

= C$0.355 x silver(g/t) 

NSR = NSR_cu + NSR_au + NSR_mo + NSR_ag 

For processing of supergene material, the NSR values are calculated as: 

NSR_cu = ($3.67 – $0.583) x 0.965 x 0.995 x rec_cu(%) x 22.046 

= C$65.27 x rec_cu(%) 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	102

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 NSR_au = ($2000 – $8.00) x 0.69 x 0.975 x 0.995 x gold(g/t) / 31.103

 = C$42.87 x gold (g/t) 

NSR_mo = $14.67 x 0.523 x 0.85 x 0.995 x moly(%) x 22.046 = C$142.89 x moly(%) 

NSR_ag = ($24.00 - $0.667) x 0.60 x 0.95 x 0.995 x silver(g/t) / 31.103 

= C$0.425 x silver(g/t) 

NSR = NSR_cu + NSR_au + NSR_mo + NSR_ag 

where, 
 rec_cu =
0.94 x (Cut% – Cuw%) 
 The internal NSR cutoff for flotation is the processing plus G&A cost of C$5.70. Breakeven NSR cutoff is
C$7.45. The stockpile re-handle cutoff grade is estimated at C$7.00 per tonne which covers processing plus G&A costs plus mining re-handle estimated at about C$1.30
per tonne. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	103

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 14-6: Economic Parameters for Mineral
Resource (C$) 
  

																					
	 	  	 	 	 	Mill Material	 	 	Heap
Leach	 
	 Parameter
	  	Units	 	 	SOX	 	 	SUS	 	 	HYP	 
	 Commodity Prices and Exchange Rate:
	  				 				 				 				 			
	 Copper Price Per Pound (US$)
	  	 	(US$)	 	 	 	2.75	 	 	 	2.75	 	 	 	2.75	 	 	 	2.75	 
	 Gold Price Per Ounce (US$)
	  	 	(US$)	 	 	 	1500.00	 	 	 	1500.00	 	 	 	1500.00	 	 	 	1500.00	 
	 Silver Price Per Ounce (US$)
	  	 	(US$)	 	 	 	18.00	 	 	 	18.00	 	 	 	18.00	 	 	 	18.00	 
	 Molybdenum Price Per Pound (US$)
	  	 	(US$)	 	 	 	11.00	 	 	 	11.00	 	 	 	11.00	 	 	 	11.00	 
	 Exchange Rate (CAD to $US)
	  	 	(none)	 	 	 	0.75	 	 	 	0.75	 	 	 	0.75	 	 	 	0.75	 
	 Copper Price Per Pound (C$)
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	3.67	 	 	 	3.67	 	 	 	3.67	 	 	 	3.67	 
	 Gold Price Per Ounce (C$)
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	2000.00	 	 	 	2000.00	 	 	 	2000.00	 	 	 	2000.00	 
	 Silver Price Per Ounce (C$)
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	24.00	 	 	 	24.00	 	 	 	24.00	 	 	 	24.00	 
	 Molybdenum Price Per Pound (C$)
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	14.67	 	 	 	14.67	 	 	 	14.67	 	 	 	14.67	 
	 Mining Cost Per Total Tonne:
	  				 				 				 				 			
	 Base Mining Cost
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	1.750	 	 	 	1.750	 	 	 	1.750	 	 	 	1.750	 
	 Sustaining Capital Allowance
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	0.000	 	 	 	0.000	 	 	 	0.000	 	 	 	0.000	 
	 Total Mining Cost
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	1.750	 	 	 	1.750	 	 	 	1.750	 	 	 	1.750	 
	 Processing and G&A Per Ore Tonne
	  				 				 				 				 			
	 Processing
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	5.330	 	 	 	5.330	 	 	 	5.330	 	 	 	5.090	 
	 G&A
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	0.370	 	 	 	0.370	 	 	 	0.370	 	 	 	0.370	 
	 Total Processing and G&A
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	5.700	 	 	 	5.700	 	 	 	5.700	 	 	 	5.460	 
	 Average Plant Recoveries:
	  				 				 				 				 			
	 Copper Recovery (Note 1)
	  	 	(%)	 	 	 	61.4	% 	 	 	80.9	% 	 	 	92.2	% 	 	 	18.0	% 
	 Gold Recovery
	  	 	(%)	 	 	 	69.0	% 	 	 	69.0	% 	 	 	66.0	% 	 	 	66.0	% 
	 Silver Recovery
	  	 	(%)	 	 	 	60.0	% 	 	 	60.0	% 	 	 	50.0	% 	 	 	26.0	% 
	 Moly Recovery
	  	 	(%)	 	 	 	52.3	% 	 	 	52.3	% 	 	 	78.6	% 	 	 	N.A.	 
	 Refinery Payables:
	  				 				 				 				 			
	 Copper Payable
	  	 	(%)	 	 	 	96.5	% 	 	 	96.5	% 	 	 	96.5	% 	 	 	96.5	% 
	 Gold Payable
	  	 	(%)	 	 	 	97.5	% 	 	 	97.5	% 	 	 	97.5	% 	 	 	98.0	% 
	 Silver Payable
	  	 	(%)	 	 	 	95.0	% 	 	 	95.0	% 	 	 	95.0	% 	 	 	98.0	% 
	 Molybdenum Payable
	  	 	(%)	 	 	 	85.0	% 	 	 	85.0	% 	 	 	85.0	% 	 	 	N.A.	 
	 Payable Concentrate (0.5% Conc Loss)
	  	 	(%)	 	 	 	99.5	% 	 	 	99.5	% 	 	 	99.5	% 	 	 	Cu Only	 
	 Offsite Costs:
	  				 				 				 				 			
	 Copper SRF Cost Per Pound
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	0.583	 	 	 	0.583	 	 	 	0.583	 	 	 	0.346	 
	 Gold Refining Per Ounce
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	8.000	 	 	 	8.000	 	 	 	8.000	 	 	 	1.733	 
	 Silver Refining Per Ounce
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	0.667	 	 	 	0.667	 	 	 	0.667	 	 	 	0.667	 
	 Molybdenum Freight/Treatment Per Pound
	  	 	(C$)	 	 	 	Note 2	 	 	 	Note 2	 	 	 	Note 2	 	 	 	N.A.	 
	 NSR Factors:
	  				 				 				 				 			
	 Copper Factor (Note 3)
	  	 	(C$/t)	 	 	 	40.08	 	 	 	52.81	 	 	 	60.18	 	 	 	12.65	 
	 Gold Factor (Note 3)
	  	 	(C$/t)	 	 	 	42.87	 	 	 	42.87	 	 	 	41.01	 	 	 	41.55	 
	 Silver Factor (Note 3)
	  	 	(C$/t)	 	 	 	0.425	 	 	 	0.425	 	 	 	0.355	 	 	 	0.191	 
	 Moly Factor (Note 3)
	  	 	(C$/t)	 	 	 	142.89	 	 	 	142.89	 	 	 	214.94	 	 	 	N.A.	 
	 Equivalency Factors:
	  				 	 	CuEq	 	 	 	CuEq	 	 	 	CuEq	 	 	 	AuEq	 
	 Copper
	  				 	 	1.00	 	 	 	1.00	 	 	 	1.00	 	 	 	0.304	 
	 Gold
	  				 	 	1.070	 	 	 	0.812	 	 	 	0.681	 	 	 	1.00	 
	 Silver
	  				 	 	0.0106	 	 	 	0.0081	 	 	 	0.0059	 	 	 	0.0046	 
	 Moly
	  				 	 	3.565	 	 	 	2.706	 	 	 	3.572	 	 	 	N.A.	 
	 NSR Cutoff Grades:
	  				 				 				 				 			
	 Breakeven Cutoff (C$/t)
	  	 	(C$/t)	 	 	 	7.45	 	 	 	7.45	 	 	 	7.45	 	 	 	7.21	 
	 Internal Cutoff (C$/t)
	  	 	(C$/t)	 	 	 	5.70	 	 	 	5.70	 	 	 	5.70	 	 	 	5.46	 
	 Stockpile Cutoff (C$/t) ($1.30 Rehandle)
	  	 	(C$/t)	 	 	 	7.00	 	 	 	7.00	 	 	 	7.00	 	 	 	N.A.	 

 Note 1: Average Recovery based on Recovery = 94% x (Cutotal – CuWAS)/(Cutotal) for SOX and SUS 

Note 2: Moly offsite costs are accounted in payable percentage 

Note 3: NSR factors are applied to model grades, copper factor for SOX and SUS is based on average recovery. 

The copper and gold equivalent grades on the tables account for all metal recoveries and smelting/refining charges. 

The equivalency factors shown on Table 14-6 are derived from the NSR factors as follows for hypogene
sulphide mill material: 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	104

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 CuEq% = copper(%) + (41.01/60.18) x gold(g/t) + (214.94/60.18) x moly(%) +
(0.355/60.18) x silver(g/t) 
 CuEq% = copper(%) + 0.681 x gold(g/t) + 3.572 x moly(%) + 0.0059 x silver (g/t) 

The calculations are similar for the other material types. 
  

	14.3.4	 Slope Angles 

Slope angles recommendations were developed by Knight Piésold Ltd. (KP) and documented in the report “Open Pit Geotechnical
Design”, dated October 12, 2012. 
 Forty-five-degree inter-ramp angles were recommended for most of the slope sectors. The north
sectors of the main pit and west pit were recommended to be designed at 42-degree inter-ramp angles. For the small amount of overburden on the north wall the recommended angle was 27 degrees. The slope angle
recommendations also specified that there be no more than 200m of vertical wall at the inter-ramp angle without an extra wide catch bench (16 m instead of 8 m). 

IMC used an overall slope angle of 41 degrees in the floating cone runs to approximate overall slope angles with the KP inter-ramp angles.

  

	14.4	 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 

The Mineral Resources are classified in accordance with the May 2014 Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”)
“CIM Definition Standards – For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” adopted by the CIM Council (as amended, the “CIM Definition Standards”) in accordance with the requirements of NI
43-101. Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates reflect the reasonable expectation that all necessary permits and approvals will be obtained and maintained. 

There is no guarantee that any of the Mineral Resources will be converted to Mineral Reserve. The Inferred Mineral Resources included in this
Technical Report meet the current definition of Inferred Mineral Resources. The quantity and grade of Inferred Mineral Resources are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these inferred Mineral Resources as an
Indicated Mineral Resource. It is, however, expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resource could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resource with continued exploration. 

IMC does not believe that there are significant risks to the Mineral Resource estimates based on environmental, permitting, legal, title,
taxation, socio-economic, marketing, or political factors. The Project is in a jurisdiction friendly to mining. The most significant risks to the Mineral Resource are related to economic parameters such as prices lower than forecast, recoveries
lower than forecast, or costs higher than the current estimates. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	105

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-1: Floating Cone Shell for
Mineral Resource 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	106

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14.5	 DESCRIPTION OF THE BLOCK MODEL

  

	14.5.1	 General 

A 3D block model was developed by IMC during June 2020. The block model is based on 20 m by 20 m by 15 m high blocks. The model is not rotated.
The previous resource model of record was developed by G. Giroux during 2010 and was the model used for the most recent Technical Report for the project, dated January 25, 2013. 

 

	14.5.2	 Drilling Data 

The drillhole database provided to IMC included 420 holes that represented 116,447 meters of drilling. Table
14-7 summarizes the drilling by date and company. 
 Table
14-7: Casino Drilling by Date and Company 
  

							
	 Years
	  	 Company
	  	 No. of Holes
	  	 Metres

	1992-1994	  	Pacific Sentinel Gold Corp.	  	236	  	73,085
	2008-2012	  	Western Copper and Gold	  	112	  	29,775
	2019	  	Western Copper and Gold	  	72	  	13,587
	TOTAL	  	 	  	420	  	116,447

 Figure 14-2 shows the hole locations and
also the location of cross sections that will be presented for this report. The breakout of the data is slightly different on Figure 14-2 than the table. It is reported to IMC that the 2010 resource model was
based on 305 holes and 95,655 meters of drilling. These are the holes marked in blue and termed the “historical” holes. The holes marked in red include geotechnical drilling conducted during 2011 and 2012 and also some 2010 drilling that
did not make the cutoff date for the resource model. The holes in green are the new holes added to the database during 2019. It is also noted that the database includes 29 holes and 1,690 meters of drilling that are outside the model limits and not
shown on Figure 14-2. These are mostly geotechnical drilling for the foundations of the tailings embankment, the plant, the leach pad and various stockpiles. 

The analyses of interest for the study included total copper, weak acid soluble copper, gold, moly, and silver. Also available in the database
is a complete suite of multi-element analyses. IMC’s scope of work did not include a detailed review of the drilling data. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	107

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-2: Hole Location Map 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	108

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14.5.3	 Geologic Controls 

Oxidation Zone Types 
 The most important
geologic control, particularly for copper mineralization, is the oxidation zones. Table 14-8 shows the zone names, codes used for modeling, and a description. The overburden is a relatively thin, highly
weathered zone, near the top of current topography. There are some mineralized intervals in the overburden. The leach cap (LC) is a highly oxidized domain where the copper mineralization has largely been dissolved in acids over time and transported
to the underlying supergene zones. The gold, silver, and molybdenum mineralization was not subject to the dissolution, at least to any significant degree; in particular there are significant gold values in the LC. The supergene domains have been
divided into oxide dominant supergene oxide (SOX) and sulphide dominant supergene sulfide (SUS). Copper from the LC has been deposited in those zones, elevating the copper grade compared to the other domains. The hypogene sulphide (HYP) zone
underlies the LC, SOX, and SUS zones. Mineralization is sulphidic in nature; percent of oxidation is very low, typically less than 10%. 

Western personnel provided IMC with solids to represent the LC, SOX, SUS, and HYP domains. IMC used these solids to assign oxidation zone
types to model blocks. Code 6, waste, was used to denote blocks outside the provided solids. A surface was provided to denote the bottom of overburden. IMC assigned blocks above the leach cap as overburden. 

Table 14-8: Oxidation Zone Types 

 

					
	Zone	  	Code	  	Description
	OVB	  	1	  	Overburden
	LC	  	2	  	Leach Cap
	SOX	  	3	  	Supergene Oxide
	SUS	  	4	  	Supergene Sulphide
	HYP	  	5	  	Hypogene Sulphide
	WST	  	6	  	Waste – Peripheral to Above Solids

 IMC also used the solids to back-assign the oxide domain codes to the assay database. It is noted that the
assay database did include an oxide domain assignment from logging, but IMC used the back-assigned values for modeling so assay intervals would be consistent with the domains they are located. 

Figure 14-3 and Figure 14-4 show the oxide zones on east-west
and north-south cross sections, respectively. It can be seen that most of the Mineral Resource is in hypogene sulphide material. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	109

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-3: Oxidation Domains on
East-West Section 6,958,600N 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	110

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-4: Oxidation Domains on
North-South Section 611,165E 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	111

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Rock Types 

Rock type interpretations for four major rock types plus the overburden have been developed as 3D solids or a surface for the overburden. Table
14-9 shows the rock types. Figure 14-5 shows the rock types on east-west cross section 6,958,600N. It can be seen that the main host rock is the Dawson Range
Granodiorite which has been intruded by the Intrusion Breccia and the Patton Porphyry. The third intrusion, the Post Mineral Explosive Breccia (MX) to the southwest of the pit, is post mineral in character. 

IMC used the solids to assign rock codes to the model blocks. Rock codes were also assigned to the assay database by back-assignment from the
solids. Note that there were rock type designations in the assay database, but the back-assigned values were used for the resource model so the assay assignments would be consistent with the block they were located. 

Table 14-9: Model Rock Types 

 

					
	Rock	  	Code	  	Description
	OVB	  	1	  	Overburden
	PP	  	2	  	Patton Porphyry
	IX	  	3	  	Intrusion Breccia
	WR	  	4	  	Dawson Range Granodiorite
	MX	  	5	  	Post Mineral Explosive Breccia

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	112

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-5: Rock Types on East-West
Section 6,958,600N 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	113

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14.5.4	 Cap Grades and Compositing 

IMC reviewed the database to determine cap grades for the various minerals. The distribution of the length of sample intervals, when copper is
assayed, is approximately as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	 About 24% are less than 3 m in length, 

 

	 	•	 	 About 69% are 3 m or 3.05 m (10 US ft), and 

 

	 	•	 	 About 7% are longer than 3.05 m. 

IMC considers that a relatively consistent 3 m sample interval was used for the drilling and that cap grades may reasonably be applied to the
assays. 
 IMC examined probability plots and sorted lists of the higher-grade assay intervals for copper, gold, moly, and silver by
oxidation zones to determine cap grades. Table 14-10 shows the cap grades in the upper portion of the table and number of assays capped in the lower portion of the table. It can be seen that relatively small
numbers of assays were capped for each metal in each population. The cap grades generally correspond to the upper 99.8 to 99.9 percentile of the populations. 

The assay database was composited to nominal 7.5 m downhole composites, respecting the oxidation zones. It is noted this is one-half of the 15 m bench height used for the model. The smaller composite length allows capturing some of the narrowing zones and also tends to result in less grade smoothing during block grade estimation.
Composited values included the total copper, weak acid soluble copper, gold, moly, and silver assays, the soluble copper to total copper ratio, and the rock type and oxidation zone codes. 

The interpretation of nominal 7.5 m composites is described next. As noted, the composites do not cross oxidation zone boundaries. Composites
within a zone are divided into equal length composites as close as possible to the target length. For example, a 28 m zone of supergene sulfide is composited into four 7 m composites. With this algorithm 93% of the composites are between 7 m and 8 m
in length and 97.4% of the composites are between 6.5 m and 8.5 m in length; IMC does not consider the slight difference in the lengths of the composite’s material for grade estimation purposes. 

Table 14-10: Cap Grades and Number of Assays Capped 

 

															
	Metal	  	Units	  	OB	  	LC	  	SOX	  	SUS	  	HYP	  	WST
	Copper	  	(%)	  	none	  	0.70	  	1.60	  	2.00	  	1.70	  	none
	Gold	  	(g/t)	  	none	  	2.00	  	2.10	  	3.20	  	3.75	  	1.50
	Moly	  	(%)	  	none	  	0.20	  	0.17	  	0.70	  	0.26	  	0.10
	Silver	  	(g/t)	  	none	  	35.0	  	25.0	  	25.0	  	95.0	  	33.0
	 Number of Assays Capped

	Metal	  	Units	  	OB	  	LC	  	SOX	  	SUS	  	HYP	  	WST
	Copper	  	(none)	  	0	  	5	  	5	  	3	  	12	  	0
	Gold	  	(none)	  	0	  	8	  	8	  	7	  	11	  	4
	Moly	  	(none)	  	0	  	9	  	8	  	6	  	9	  	1
	Silver	  	(none)	  	0	  	11	  	8	  	5	  	12	  	4

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	114

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14.5.5	 Descriptive Statistics 

Table 14-11 shows descriptive statistics for total copper, gold, moly and silver for the assay
intervals. The table shows values by the oxidation zones. The left side of the table shows uncapped values and the right side shows capped values. For copper it can be seen that values in the overburden and leach cap are very low, values in the SOX
and SUS are somewhat elevated, and values in the hypogene tend to be lower than the supergene. Gold, moly, and silver do not have the corresponding depletion of values in the leach cap. Mean gold and moly grades are slightly elevated in the SOX
compared to SUS. The table includes only non-zero values for each population, though many have placeholders for below detection limit values. 

Table 14-12 shows descriptive statistics for the 7.5 m composites. The table includes only non-zero values, but zero value assays are incorporated into the composites. 
 Figure 14-6 shows a probability plot of total copper grades for the composites for the various oxidation type domains. Figure 14-7 shows the probably plot for gold. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	115

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 14-11: Summary Statistics of Assays 

 

																																									
	 	  	Not Capped	 	  	Capped	 
	Metal/Domain	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(%)	 	  	Std Dev
(%)	 	  	Max
(%)	 	  	Min
(%)	 	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(%)	 	  	Std Dev
(%)	 	  	Max
(%)	 	  	Min
(%)	 
	 Copper:
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 All Samples
	  	 	38,968	 	  	 	0.154	 	  	 	0.175	 	  	 	5.63	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	38,968	 	  	 	0.154	 	  	 	0.170	 	  	 	2.00	 	  	 	0.000	 
	 Overburden
	  	 	343	 	  	 	0.035	 	  	 	0.048	 	  	 	0.34	 	  	 	0.001	 	  	 	343	 	  	 	0.035	 	  	 	0.048	 	  	 	0.34	 	  	 	0.001	 
	 Leach Cap
	  	 	6,246	 	  	 	0.045	 	  	 	0.068	 	  	 	1.36	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	6,246	 	  	 	0.045	 	  	 	0.065	 	  	 	0.70	 	  	 	0.000	 
	 Supergene Oxide
	  	 	3,088	 	  	 	0.216	 	  	 	0.226	 	  	 	2.90	 	  	 	0.001	 	  	 	3,088	 	  	 	0.215	 	  	 	0.220	 	  	 	1.60	 	  	 	0.001	 
	 Supergene Sulfide
	  	 	7,308	 	  	 	0.245	 	  	 	0.228	 	  	 	2.70	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	7,308	 	  	 	0.245	 	  	 	0.226	 	  	 	2.00	 	  	 	0.000	 
	 Hypogene
	  	 	21,333	 	  	 	0.152	 	  	 	0.148	 	  	 	5.63	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	21,333	 	  	 	0.151	 	  	 	0.138	 	  	 	1.70	 	  	 	0.000	 
	 Waste
	  	 	650	 	  	 	0.022	 	  	 	0.046	 	  	 	0.41	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	650	 	  	 	0.022	 	  	 	0.046	 	  	 	0.41	 	  	 	0.000	 
	Metal/Domain	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(g/t)	 	  	Std Dev
(g/t)	 	  	Max
(g/t)	 	  	Min
(g/t)	 	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(g/t)	 	  	Std Dev
(g/t)	 	  	Max
(g/t)	 	  	Min
(g/t)	 
	 Gold:
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 All Samples
	  	 	38,744	 	  	 	0.233	 	  	 	0.696	 	  	 	99.96	 	  	 	0.003	 	  	 	38,744	 	  	 	0.227	 	  	 	0.246	 	  	 	3.75	 	  	 	0.003	 
	 Overburden
	  	 	343	 	  	 	0.203	 	  	 	0.237	 	  	 	1.85	 	  	 	0.011	 	  	 	343	 	  	 	0.203	 	  	 	0.237	 	  	 	1.85	 	  	 	0.011	 
	 Leach Cap
	  	 	6,238	 	  	 	0.293	 	  	 	1.290	 	  	 	99.96	 	  	 	0.003	 	  	 	6,238	 	  	 	0.277	 	  	 	0.265	 	  	 	2.00	 	  	 	0.003	 
	 Supergene Oxide
	  	 	3,088	 	  	 	0.380	 	  	 	0.329	 	  	 	2.64	 	  	 	0.003	 	  	 	3,088	 	  	 	0.380	 	  	 	0.326	 	  	 	2.10	 	  	 	0.003	 
	 Supergene Sulfide
	  	 	7,305	 	  	 	0.248	 	  	 	0.356	 	  	 	18.79	 	  	 	0.003	 	  	 	7,305	 	  	 	0.244	 	  	 	0.259	 	  	 	3.20	 	  	 	0.003	 
	 Hypogene
	  	 	21,206	 	  	 	0.194	 	  	 	0.572	 	  	 	55.10	 	  	 	0.003	 	  	 	21,206	 	  	 	0.188	 	  	 	0.208	 	  	 	3.75	 	  	 	0.003	 
	 Waste
	  	 	564	 	  	 	0.089	 	  	 	0.256	 	  	 	3.29	 	  	 	0.003	 	  	 	564	 	  	 	0.082	 	  	 	0.194	 	  	 	1.50	 	  	 	0.003	 
	Metal/Domain	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(%)	 	  	Std Dev
(%)	 	  	Max
(%)	 	  	Min
(%)	 	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(%)	 	  	Std Dev
(%)	 	  	Max
(%)	 	  	Min
(%)	 
	 Moly:
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 All Samples
	  	 	38,588	 	  	 	0.0175	 	  	 	0.0293	 	  	 	1.240	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	38,588	 	  	 	0.0174	 	  	 	0.0274	 	  	 	0.700	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Overburden
	  	 	343	 	  	 	0.0124	 	  	 	0.0167	 	  	 	0.110	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	343	 	  	 	0.0124	 	  	 	0.0167	 	  	 	0.110	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Leach Cap
	  	 	6,230	 	  	 	0.0157	 	  	 	0.0224	 	  	 	0.363	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	6,230	 	  	 	0.0156	 	  	 	0.0210	 	  	 	0.200	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Supergene Oxide
	  	 	3,086	 	  	 	0.0218	 	  	 	0.0285	 	  	 	0.815	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	3,086	 	  	 	0.0214	 	  	 	0.0231	 	  	 	0.170	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Supergene Sulfide
	  	 	7,302	 	  	 	0.0190	 	  	 	0.0450	 	  	 	1.240	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	7,302	 	  	 	0.0188	 	  	 	0.0420	 	  	 	0.700	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Hypogene
	  	 	21,113	 	  	 	0.0174	 	  	 	0.0242	 	  	 	0.707	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	21,113	 	  	 	0.0173	 	  	 	0.0233	 	  	 	0.260	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Waste
	  	 	514	 	  	 	0.0035	 	  	 	0.0108	 	  	 	0.157	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	514	 	  	 	0.0034	 	  	 	0.0095	 	  	 	0.100	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	Metal/Domain	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(g/t)	 	  	Std Dev
(g/t)	 	  	Max
(g/t)	 	  	Min
(g/t)	 	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(g/t)	 	  	Std Dev
(g/t)	 	  	Max
(g/t)	 	  	Min
(g/t)	 
	 Silver:
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 All Samples
	  	 	38,552	 	  	 	1.92	 	  	 	51.09	 	  	 	9999.9	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	38,552	 	  	 	1.63	 	  	 	3.18	 	  	 	95.0	 	  	 	0.10	 
	 Overburden
	  	 	344	 	  	 	1.25	 	  	 	1.47	 	  	 	18.0	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	344	 	  	 	1.25	 	  	 	1.47	 	  	 	18.0	 	  	 	0.10	 
	 Leach Cap
	  	 	6,235	 	  	 	2.03	 	  	 	4.84	 	  	 	200.0	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	6,235	 	  	 	1.94	 	  	 	2.47	 	  	 	35.0	 	  	 	0.10	 
	 Supergene Oxide
	  	 	3,086	 	  	 	1.96	 	  	 	2.91	 	  	 	70.2	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	3,086	 	  	 	1.91	 	  	 	2.20	 	  	 	25.0	 	  	 	0.10	 
	 Supergene Sulfide
	  	 	7,298	 	  	 	1.63	 	  	 	2.31	 	  	 	116.0	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	7,298	 	  	 	1.61	 	  	 	1.79	 	  	 	25.0	 	  	 	0.10	 
	 Hypogene
	  	 	21,060	 	  	 	1.99	 	  	 	69.02	 	  	 	9999.9	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	21,060	 	  	 	1.51	 	  	 	3.79	 	  	 	95.0	 	  	 	0.10	 
	 Waste
	  	 	529	 	  	 	1.91	 	  	 	13.57	 	  	 	290.0	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	529	 	  	 	1.32	 	  	 	4.16	 	  	 	33.0	 	  	 	0.10	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	116

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 14-12: Summary Statistics of 7.5m Composites

  

																																									
	 	  	Not Capped	 	  	Capped	 
	Metal/Domain	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(%)	 	  	Std Dev
(%)	 	  	Max
(%)	 	  	Min
(%)	 	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(%)	 	  	Std Dev
(%)	 	  	Max
(%)	 	  	Min
(%)	 
	 Copper:
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 All Samples
	  	 	14,910	 	  	 	0.155	 	  	 	0.162	 	  	 	3.70	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	14,910	 	  	 	0.155	 	  	 	0.157	 	  	 	1.94	 	  	 	0.000	 
	 Overburden
	  	 	109	 	  	 	0.033	 	  	 	0.042	 	  	 	0.30	 	  	 	0.001	 	  	 	109	 	  	 	0.033	 	  	 	0.042	 	  	 	0.30	 	  	 	0.001	 
	 Leach Cap
	  	 	2,425	 	  	 	0.045	 	  	 	0.060	 	  	 	0.82	 	  	 	0.001	 	  	 	2,425	 	  	 	0.045	 	  	 	0.058	 	  	 	0.63	 	  	 	0.001	 
	 Supergene Oxide
	  	 	1,163	 	  	 	0.219	 	  	 	0.201	 	  	 	1.61	 	  	 	0.002	 	  	 	1,163	 	  	 	0.218	 	  	 	0.198	 	  	 	1.35	 	  	 	0.002	 
	 Supergene Sulfide
	  	 	2,738	 	  	 	0.249	 	  	 	0.209	 	  	 	2.26	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	2,738	 	  	 	0.249	 	  	 	0.207	 	  	 	1.94	 	  	 	0.000	 
	 Hypogene
	  	 	8,237	 	  	 	0.153	 	  	 	0.135	 	  	 	3.70	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	8,237	 	  	 	0.153	 	  	 	0.127	 	  	 	1.59	 	  	 	0.000	 
	 Waste
	  	 	238	 	  	 	0.024	 	  	 	0.047	 	  	 	0.33	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	238	 	  	 	0.024	 	  	 	0.047	 	  	 	0.33	 	  	 	0.000	 
	Metal/Domain	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(g/t)	 	  	Std Dev
(g/t)	 	  	Max
(g/t)	 	  	Min
(g/t)	 	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(g/t)	 	  	Std Dev
(g/t)	 	  	Max
(g/t)	 	  	Min
(g/t)	 
	 Gold:
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 All Samples
	  	 	14,879	 	  	 	0.233	 	  	 	0.348	 	  	 	24.24	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	14,879	 	  	 	0.228	 	  	 	0.213	 	  	 	3.16	 	  	 	0.000	 
	 Overburden
	  	 	109	 	  	 	0.197	 	  	 	0.232	 	  	 	1.41	 	  	 	0.015	 	  	 	109	 	  	 	0.197	 	  	 	0.232	 	  	 	1.41	 	  	 	0.015	 
	 Leach Cap
	  	 	2,424	 	  	 	0.286	 	  	 	0.541	 	  	 	24.24	 	  	 	0.003	 	  	 	2,424	 	  	 	0.276	 	  	 	0.236	 	  	 	1.74	 	  	 	0.003	 
	 Supergene Oxide
	  	 	1,163	 	  	 	0.385	 	  	 	0.296	 	  	 	1.99	 	  	 	0.005	 	  	 	1,163	 	  	 	0.384	 	  	 	0.294	 	  	 	1.99	 	  	 	0.005	 
	 Supergene Sulfide
	  	 	2,737	 	  	 	0.253	 	  	 	0.286	 	  	 	8.80	 	  	 	0.011	 	  	 	2,737	 	  	 	0.249	 	  	 	0.227	 	  	 	2.53	 	  	 	0.011	 
	 Hypogene
	  	 	8,216	 	  	 	0.194	 	  	 	0.292	 	  	 	14.41	 	  	 	0.000	 	  	 	8,216	 	  	 	0.189	 	  	 	0.168	 	  	 	3.16	 	  	 	0.000	 
	 Waste
	  	 	230	 	  	 	0.079	 	  	 	0.180	 	  	 	1.64	 	  	 	0.001	 	  	 	230	 	  	 	0.072	 	  	 	0.139	 	  	 	1.00	 	  	 	0.001	 
	Metal/Domain	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(%)	 	  	Std Dev
(%)	 	  	Max
(%)	 	  	Min
(%)	 	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(%)	 	  	Std Dev
(%)	 	  	Max
(%)	 	  	Min
(%)	 
	 Moly:
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 All Samples
	  	 	14,833	 	  	 	0.0177	 	  	 	0.0257	 	  	 	0.715	 	  	 	0.0000	 	  	 	14,833	 	  	 	0.0176	 	  	 	0.0247	 	  	 	0.630	 	  	 	0.0000	 
	 Overburden
	  	 	109	 	  	 	0.0131	 	  	 	0.0177	 	  	 	0.078	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	109	 	  	 	0.0131	 	  	 	0.0177	 	  	 	0.078	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Leach Cap
	  	 	2,422	 	  	 	0.0156	 	  	 	0.0207	 	  	 	0.316	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	2,422	 	  	 	0.0154	 	  	 	0.0194	 	  	 	0.200	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Supergene Oxide
	  	 	1,163	 	  	 	0.0219	 	  	 	0.0234	 	  	 	0.349	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	1,163	 	  	 	0.0215	 	  	 	0.0205	 	  	 	0.160	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Supergene Sulfide
	  	 	2,737	 	  	 	0.0195	 	  	 	0.0403	 	  	 	0.715	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	2,737	 	  	 	0.0193	 	  	 	0.0388	 	  	 	0.630	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Hypogene
	  	 	8,190	 	  	 	0.0176	 	  	 	0.0208	 	  	 	0.317	 	  	 	0.0001	 	  	 	8,190	 	  	 	0.0176	 	  	 	0.0203	 	  	 	0.237	 	  	 	0.0001	 
	 Waste
	  	 	212	 	  	 	0.0031	 	  	 	0.0074	 	  	 	0.066	 	  	 	0.0000	 	  	 	212	 	  	 	0.0031	 	  	 	0.0069	 	  	 	0.053	 	  	 	0.0000	 
	Metal/Domain	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(g/t)	 	  	Std Dev
(g/t)	 	  	Max
(g/t)	 	  	Min
(g/t)	 	  	No. of
Samples	 	  	Mean
(g/t)	 	  	Std Dev
(g/t)	 	  	Max
(g/t)	 	  	Min
(g/t)	 
	 Silver:
	  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  				  			
	 All Samples
	  	 	14,807	 	  	 	1.78	 	  	 	16.40	 	  	 	1962.5	 	  	 	0.00	 	  	 	14,807	 	  	 	1.62	 	  	 	2.38	 	  	 	91.8	 	  	 	0.00	 
	 Overburden
	  	 	109	 	  	 	1.31	 	  	 	1.39	 	  	 	9.8	 	  	 	0.20	 	  	 	109	 	  	 	1.31	 	  	 	1.39	 	  	 	9.8	 	  	 	0.20	 
	 Leach Cap
	  	 	2,424	 	  	 	2.03	 	  	 	4.25	 	  	 	175.7	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	2,424	 	  	 	1.94	 	  	 	2.16	 	  	 	35.0	 	  	 	0.10	 
	 Supergene Oxide
	  	 	1,163	 	  	 	1.97	 	  	 	2.26	 	  	 	35.2	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	1,163	 	  	 	1.92	 	  	 	1.79	 	  	 	18.0	 	  	 	0.10	 
	 Supergene Sulfide
	  	 	2,734	 	  	 	1.64	 	  	 	1.62	 	  	 	40.7	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	2,734	 	  	 	1.62	 	  	 	1.40	 	  	 	17.8	 	  	 	0.10	 
	 Hypogene
	  	 	8,161	 	  	 	1.75	 	  	 	21.93	 	  	 	1962.5	 	  	 	0.10	 	  	 	8,161	 	  	 	1.50	 	  	 	2.76	 	  	 	91.8	 	  	 	0.10	 
	 Waste
	  	 	216	 	  	 	1.12	 	  	 	3.19	 	  	 	29.3	 	  	 	0.00	 	  	 	216	 	  	 	0.92	 	  	 	1.83	 	  	 	13.6	 	  	 	0.00	 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	117

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	
	

 Figure 14-6: Probability Plot of Total Copper Composites by Oxidation
Type 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	118

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	
	 

 Figure 14-7: Probability Plot of Gold Composites by Oxidation Type

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	119

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14.5.6	 Variogram Analysis 

Copper 
 IMC conducted variogram analyses
of total copper by oxidation type domains. The analysis was based on the 7.5m composites. The leach cap, supergene oxide, and supergene sulphide domains are relatively flat lying and the distribution of copper mineralization appears to not vary much
by direction. Figure 14-8 and Figure 14-9 show variograms for supergene oxide and supergene sulphide respectively. These variograms are calculated as the average of all
horizontal directions which is consistent with the relatively flat lying mineralization in these domains. The ranges of the first variogram structures are 172 m for supergene oxide and 263 m for supergene sulphide. The variograms are of good
clarity. 
 For the hypogene sulphide, IMC ran variograms in many directions. The various directional variograms tended to be similar,
indicating a somewhat isotropic distribution of copper mineralization. Figure 14-10 shows the variogram for hypogene sulphide copper calculated as the average in all directions. The variogram has good clarity
and the range of the first structure is 293 m. Geologic inference suggests that the range of influence should be slightly longer in the east-west direction than the north-south direction. This is indicated in the variograms. Figure 14-11 and Figure 14-12 show variograms for hypogene sulphide in the east-west and north-south directions respectively. 

The variograms were calculated with the pairwise relative variogram method. The variogram values shown on the graphs would be multiplied by
the mean squared to convert them to % total copper units. 
 Gold, Moly and Silver 

Variograms were also calculated for gold, moly and silver. For these metals there no evidence of significant grade changes across oxidation
domain boundaries, so the calculations combined the data for all zones. As with copper, mineralization tends to be somewhat isotropic. Figure 14-13 shows the variogram for gold. The variogram has good clarity
and the range of influence of the first structure is over 200 m. Though not shown, the moly and silver variograms are also of good clarity and reasonably long ranges. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	120

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-8: Total Copper Variogram – Supergene Oxide

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	121

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-9: Total Copper Variogram – Supergene Sulphide

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	122

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-10: Total Copper Variogram – Hypogene Sulphide
– Global 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	123

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-11: Total Copper Variogram – Hypogene Sulphide
– East-West 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	124

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-12: Total Copper Variogram – Hypogene Sulphide
– North-South 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	125

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-13: Gold Variogram 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	126

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14.5.7	 Block Grade Estimation 

Block grades for total copper, weak acid soluble copper, gold, moly and silver were estimated with inverse distance with a power weight of 2
(ID2). The ID2 method was chosen because it generally results in less grade smoothing (smearing) than ordinary kriging (OK). Estimates were also done by OK, inverse distance with a power weight of 3 (ID3), and nearest neighbor (NN) for comparison
purposes. The ID2, OK, and ID3 estimates were done with the 7.5 m composites. 15 m composites were used for the NN estimate. 
 Total and Soluble
Copper 
 The leach cap, supergene oxide, supergene sulphide, and hypogene sulphide oxidation type boundaries were all considered hard
boundaries for the estimation of total copper and weak acid soluble copper. The waste domain was not estimated; it is well outside the drilling data. Grades were also not estimated for overburden blocks. For the 2010 model supergene oxide and
supergene sulphide were lumped into a single domain for total and soluble copper based on consideration of total copper grades. IMC believes this assumption was reasonable for total copper, but there are differences in soluble copper in the domains
that indicate they should not be combined. 
 In terms of rock types, the Post Mineral Explosive Breccia was considered a separate domain,
but the Patton Porphyry, Intrusion Breccia, and Dawson Range Granodiorite were combined into a single population. This was also the assumption for the 2010 work, and IMC agrees with it. 

For leach cap, supergene oxide, and supergene sulphide the search radii for the estimations were 200 m (circular) in the horizontal direction
and 30 m in the vertical direction. These search radii are well within the variogram ranges and are adequate to fill in the block grades. A maximum of 15 composites, a minimum of one composite, and a maximum of three composites per hole were used.

 For hypogene sulphide the search radii were 220 m in the east-west direction, 180 m in the north-south direction, and 100 m in the
vertical direction. A maximum of 24 composites, a minimum of two composites, and a maximum of six composites per hole were used. 
 Figure 14-14 and Figure 14-15 show copper grades on an east-west and north-south cross section respectively. 

Soluble copper block grade estimates were also conducted for the leach cap, supergene oxide, and supergene sulphide domains. Soluble copper
estimates were not done for hypogene sulphide. Soluble copper assays were generally not done for hypogene material. There were some slight adjustments to the database for the soluble copper estimates. There were 97 assay intervals where soluble
copper exceeded total copper; these were capped at the total copper grade. After estimation there were 213 blocks with the soluble copper estimate higher than total copper; these were capped at the total copper grade. 

Gold, Moly, and Silver 
 For gold, moly
and silver the oxidation type boundaries were not considered hard boundaries for estimation. There is no evidence of significant changes in grade across the boundaries. The rock type populations were the same as for copper, the Post Mineral
Explosive Breccia was considered a separate domain from the other rock types. 
 Search radii parameters were the same as for copper. For
leach cap, supergene oxide, and supergene sulphide the search radii were 200 m (circular) in the horizontal direction and 30 m in the vertical direction. A maximum of 15 composites, a minimum of one composite, and a maximum of three composites per
hole were used. For hypogene sulphide the search radii were 220 m in the east-west direction, 180 m in the north-south direction, and 100 m in the vertical direction and maximum of 24 composites, a minimum of two composite, and a maximum of six
composites per hole were used. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	127

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Figure 14-16 and Figure 14-17 show gold grades on an east-west and north-south section respectively. 
 Arsenic, Antimony, and Bismuth 

Block grade estimates were also conducted for arsenic, antimony, and bismuth. The methodology and search parameters were the same as for gold,
moly, and silver, i.e. there is no indication of significant changes in mineralization across the oxidation type domains. The Post Mineral Explosive Breccia was considered as a separate domain from the other rock types. Minor capping of the assays
was conducted. Arsenic was capped at 3,000 ppm, antimony at 1,000 ppm, and bismuth at 400 ppm. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	128

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-14: Total Copper Grades on
East-West Cross Section 6,958,600N 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	129

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-15: Total Copper Grades on
North-South Cross Section 611,165E 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	130

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-16: Gold Grades on East-West
Cross Section 6,958,600N 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	131

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-17: Gold Grades on North-South
Cross Section 611,165E 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	132

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14.5.8	 Bulk Density 

Over 13,000 specific gravity measurements on core samples were included with the Casino assay database. IMC excluded four measurements that
exceeded 4.0 and 6 measurements less than 1.25 and tabulated the remaining values by oxidation type as shown in Table 14-13. 

Table 14-13: Statistics of Specific Gravity Measurement by Oxidation Zone 

 

									
	 Oxidation Zone
	  	 Zone Code
	  	 No. of Samples
	  	 Mean S.G.
	  	
Std. Dev. S.G.

	OVB	  	1	  	92	  	2.496	  	0.170
	LC	  	2	  	2,199	  	2.518	  	0.128
	SOX	  	3	  	937	  	2.580	  	0.132
	SUS	  	4	  	2,532	  	2.624	  	0.137
	HYP	  	5	  	7,198	  	2.651	  	0.114
	WST	  	6	  	104	  	2.684	  	0.095
	TOTAL	  		  	13,062	  	2.617	  	0.132

 It can be seen the mean values increase from OVB to LC to SOX to SUS to HYP to WST, i.e. the higher the level
of oxidation the lower the specific gravity. 
 IMC also examined the specific gravity measurements by rock type, but other than the
overburden, the averages by rock type are very similar to each other, ranging from 2.612 to 2.637; it is more meaningful to group the data by oxidation type. 

The average specific gravity values on the table were also assumed to represent bulk density measurements, in tonnes per cubic meter, without
any adjustments, and assigned to the block model based on oxidation type. 
 There are sufficient measurements that IMC also investigated
estimating values in a similar manner as the grade estimates. The means shown on the table were used as background values for blocks without sufficient close data to estimate them. The averages of blocks done by estimation tended to exceed the table
values by a percent or so. Because of this IMC assigned values as the average zone values rather than estimation of the individual blocks. 
  

	14.5.9	 Resource Classifications 

For the purpose of classifying measured and indicated versus inferred mineral resources, an additional block estimate was done. This was based
on the same search orientations and search radii as the grade estimates. The estimate was based on a maximum of three composites, a minimum of three, and a maximum of one composite per hole. This estimate provides the average distance to the nearest
three holes to each block and was put into the block model. Note the grades from this estimate were not used. 
 Blocks with an average
distance to the nearest three holes less than 100 m were assigned as indicated mineral resource. Blocks with an average distance to three holes greater than 100 m were assigned to inferred mineral resource. Generally (not specific to Casino) an
average distance to the nearest three holes of 100 m corresponds to an average drill spacing of about 133 m. These estimates are approximate. It is noted that the nominal spacing for much of the Casino drilling is about 100 m. 

Figure 14-18 shows the probability plots of the average distances to the nearest 3 holes for the
supergene sulphide. Figure 14-19 shows the plot for the hypogene sulphide. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	133

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 On Figure 14-2 it can be seen that there is an area
on the eastern side of the deposit where there is a combination of vertical and angle holes that reduce the average sample spacing in the area to about 70 m or so. A solid was designed in this area to define measured mineral resources. Figure 14-20 and Figure 14-21 show the resource classification on and east-west and north-south cross section respectively. 

The analytical method of distinguishing between indicated and inferred mineral resources resulted in some small groupings of inferred blocks
surrounded by indicated blocks. Some filtering was done to remove many, but not all, of these blocks. The filters identified inferred blocks that contacted two, three, or four indicated blocks and set them to indicated blocks. Several passes of
filtering were done. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	134

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-18: Probability Plot of
Average Distance to Nearest 3 Holes – Supergene Sulphide 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	135

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-19: Probability Plot of
Average Distance to Nearest 3 Holes – Hypogene Sulphide 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	136

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-20: Resource Classification on
East-West Cross Section 6,958,600N 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	137

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 

 
 Figure 14-21: Resource Classification on
North-South Cross Section 611,065E 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	138

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	14.5.10	 Comparison of 2010 and 2020 Mineral Resource 

Table 14-4 compares mineral resources amenable to milling. These include the supergene oxide, supergene
sulphide and hypogene sulphide materials. For the 2010 mineral resource, measured and indicated mineral resources amounted to 1.06 billion tonnes at 0.20% total copper, 0.23 g/t gold, 0.022% moly and 1.7 g/t silver. This amounted to
4.7 billion pounds of contained copper, 7.9 million ounces of contained gold, 522.1 million pounds of contained moly and 58.0 million ounces of contained silver. Inferred mineral resources was an additional 1.70 billion
tonnes at 0.15% total copper, 0.16 g/t gold, 0.019% moly and 1.4 g/t silver. 
 The 2010 mineral resource estimate was not contained within
a potential mining pit shell, it was a tabulation of all the blocks in the resource model. The mineral resource was also tabulated at a 0.25% copper equivalent cutoff grade, where copper equivalent was defined as: 

Copper Equivalent (%) = Total Copper (%) + 0.638 x Gold (g/t) + 5.625 x Moly (%) + 0.0082 x Silver (g/t) 

An economic justification of the cutoff grade was not included in the available documentation. The factors for the copper equivalency
calculation were based on relative commodity prices only and did not consider potential recoveries or treatment charges. The commodity prices used were US$ 2.00 per pound copper, US$ 875 per ounce gold, US$ 11.25 per pound moly, and $11.25 per ounce
silver. 
 For the 2020 mineral resource, measured and indicated mineral resources amounted to 2.17 billion tonnes at 0.16% total
copper, 0.18 g/t gold, 0.017% moly, and 1.4 g/t silver. This amounted to 7.4 billion pounds of contained copper, 12.7 million ounces of contained gold, 811.6 million pounds of contained moly and 100.2 million ounces of
contained silver. Inferred mineral resources was an additional 1.43 billion tonnes at 0.10% total copper, 0.14 g/t gold, 0.010% moly, and 1.2 g/t silver. 

Compared to the 2010 mineral resource, the current measured and indicated mineral resource has 105.7% more tonnes, at a 22.9% lower copper
grade, a 21.1% lower gold grade, a 24.4% lower moly grade, and a 16.0% lower silver grade. This amounts to 58.7% more contained copper, 62.0% more contained gold, 55.4% more contained moly, and 72.8% more contained silver. 

The 2020 mineral resource estimate is contained within a floating cone pit shell and is tabulated at an NSR cutoff grade of C$ 5.70 per tonne.
Due to higher commodity prices than were prevalent during 2010 the effective cutoff grade for the 2020 mineral resource is lower, resulting in the significant increase in tonnage at lower grades. There is also a significant increase in indicated
mineral resources due to conversion of inferred mineral resources. This is partly due to new drilling. It is also the opinion of IMC that the resource classification of indicated mineral resource for 2010 was overly conservative for a copper
porphyry system. 
 Table 14-15 compares mineral resources for material amenable to leaching. This
includes the leach cap material. For the 2010 mineral resource, measured and indicated mineral resource amounts to 83.8 million tonnes at 0.40 g/t gold, 0.04% total copper, and 2.6 g/t silver. This amounts to 1.1 million ounces of
contained gold, 68.9 million pounds of contained copper and 6.9 million ounces of contained silver. Moly will not be recovered in the leaching process. The 2010 mineral resource estimate was based on a gold cutoff grade of 0.25 g/t gold.

 For the 2020 mineral resource estimate, measured and indicated mineral resource amounts to 217.4 million tonnes at 0.25 g/t gold,
0.03% total copper, and 1.9 g/t silver. This amounts to 1.8 million ounces of contained gold, 166.5 million pounds of contained copper and 13.3 million ounces of contained silver. This estimate is based on an NSR cutoff grade of C$
5.46 per tonne. As with the mill material, a portion of the increased resource is due to higher commodity prices which reduce the effective cutoff. The new drilling is also a significant factor in the increased mineral resource. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	139

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 14-14: Comparison of 2010 and 2020 Mineral
Resource – Mill Material 
  

																																									
	 Mineral Resource Estimate
	  	Ktonnes	 	 	Cu Eq
(%)	 	 	Copper
(%)	 	 	Gold
(g/t)	 	 	Moly
(%)	 	 	Silver
(g/t)	 	 	Copper
(mlbs)	 	 	Gold
(moz)	 	 	Moly
(mlbs)	 	 	Silver
(moz)	 
											
	 2010 Mineral Resource
	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				 			
	 Measured Mineral Resource
	  	 	93.7	 	 	 	0.78	 	 	 	0.34	 	 	 	0.42	 	 	 	0.027	 	 	 	2.2	 	 	 	695	 	 	 	1.3	 	 	 	56.1	 	 	 	6.7	 
	 Indicated Mineral Resource
	  	 	963.0	 	 	 	0.46	 	 	 	0.19	 	 	 	0.21	 	 	 	0.022	 	 	 	1.7	 	 	 	3,991	 	 	 	6.6	 	 	 	466.0	 	 	 	51.3	 
	 Meas/Ind Mineral Resource
	  	 	1,056.7	 	 	 	0.49	 	 	 	0.20	 	 	 	0.23	 	 	 	0.022	 	 	 	1.7	 	 	 	4,686	 	 	 	7.9	 	 	 	522.1	 	 	 	58.0	 
	 Inferred Mineral Resource
	  	 	1,696.4	 	 	 	0.37	 	 	 	0.15	 	 	 	0.16	 	 	 	0.019	 	 	 	1.4	 	 	 	5,440	 	 	 	8.8	 	 	 	719.7	 	 	 	74.7	 
											
	 2020 Mineral Resource
	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				 			
	 Measured Mineral Resource
	  	 	145.3	 	 	 	0.74	 	 	 	0.31	 	 	 	0.40	 	 	 	0.025	 	 	 	2.1	 	 	 	986	 	 	 	1.9	 	 	 	80.6	 	 	 	9.8	 
	 Indicated Mineral Resource
	  	 	2,028.0	 	 	 	0.33	 	 	 	0.14	 	 	 	0.17	 	 	 	0.016	 	 	 	1.4	 	 	 	6,448	 	 	 	10.9	 	 	 	731.0	 	 	 	90.4	 
	 Meas/Ind Mineral Resource
	  	 	2,173.3	 	 	 	0.36	 	 	 	0.16	 	 	 	0.18	 	 	 	0.017	 	 	 	1.4	 	 	 	7,434	 	 	 	12.7	 	 	 	811.6	 	 	 	100.2	 
	 Inferred Mineral Resource
	  	 	1,430.2	 	 	 	0.24	 	 	 	0.10	 	 	 	0.14	 	 	 	0.010	 	 	 	1.2	 	 	 	3,240	 	 	 	6.4	 	 	 	322.8	 	 	 	53.5	 
											
	 Percent Difference
	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				 			
	 Measured Mineral Resource
	  	 	55.1	% 	 	 	-5.4	% 	 	 	-8.5	% 	 	 	-5.8	% 	 	 	-7.4	% 	 	 	-5.4	% 	 	 	41.8	% 	 	 	46.1	% 	 	 	43.6	% 	 	 	46.7	% 
	 Indicated Mineral Resource
	  	 	110.6	% 	 	 	-28.8	% 	 	 	-23.3	% 	 	 	-21.5	% 	 	 	-25.5	% 	 	 	-16.3	% 	 	 	61.6	% 	 	 	65.3	% 	 	 	56.9	% 	 	 	76.2	% 
	 Meas/Ind Mineral Resource
	  	 	105.7	% 	 	 	-27.4	% 	 	 	-22.9	% 	 	 	-21.1	% 	 	 	-24.4	% 	 	 	-16.0	% 	 	 	58.7	% 	 	 	62.0	% 	 	 	55.4	% 	 	 	72.8	% 
	 Inferred Mineral Resource
	  	 	-15.7	% 	 	 	-34.7	% 	 	 	-29.3	% 	 	 	-14.2	% 	 	 	-46.8	% 	 	 	-15.0	% 	 	 	-40.4	% 	 	 	-27.7	% 	 	 	-55.1	% 	 	 	-28.3	% 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	140

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Table 14-15: Comparison of 2010 and 2020 Mineral
Resource – Leach Material 
  

																													
	 Mineral Resource Estimate
	  	Tonnes
Mt	 	 	Gold
(g/t)	 	 	Copper
(%)	 	 	Silver
(g/t)	 	 	Gold
(moz)	 	 	Copper
(mlbs)	 	 	Silver
(moz)	 
								
	 2010 Mineral Resource
	  				 				 				 				 				 				 			
	 Measured Mineral Resource
	  	 	30.6	 	 	 	0.52	 	 	 	0.05	 	 	 	2.9	 	 	 	0.5	 	 	 	33.7	 	 	 	2.9	 
	 Indicated Mineral Resource
	  	 	53.2	 	 	 	0.33	 	 	 	0.03	 	 	 	2.4	 	 	 	0.6	 	 	 	35.2	 	 	 	4.0	 
	 Meas/Ind Mineral Resource
	  	 	83.8	 	 	 	0.40	 	 	 	0.04	 	 	 	2.6	 	 	 	1.1	 	 	 	68.9	 	 	 	6.9	 
	 Inferred Mineral Resource
	  	 	17.1	 	 	 	0.31	 	 	 	0.01	 	 	 	1.9	 	 	 	0.2	 	 	 	3.8	 	 	 	1.1	 
								
	 2020 Mineral Resource
	  				 				 				 				 				 				 			
	 Measured Mineral Resource
	  	 	37.2	 	 	 	0.45	 	 	 	0.05	 	 	 	2.8	 	 	 	0.5	 	 	 	39.3	 	 	 	3.3	 
	 Indicated Mineral Resource
	  	 	180.2	 	 	 	0.21	 	 	 	0.03	 	 	 	1.7	 	 	 	1.2	 	 	 	127.2	 	 	 	10.0	 
	 Meas/Ind Mineral Resource
	  	 	217.4	 	 	 	0.25	 	 	 	0.03	 	 	 	1.9	 	 	 	1.8	 	 	 	166.5	 	 	 	13.3	 
	 Inferred Mineral Resource
	  	 	31.1	 	 	 	0.17	 	 	 	0.03	 	 	 	1.7	 	 	 	0.2	 	 	 	17.2	 	 	 	1.7	 
								
	 Percent Difference
	  				 				 				 				 				 				 			
	 Measured Mineral Resource
	  	 	21.4	% 	 	 	-14.0	% 	 	 	-4.0	% 	 	 	-6.5	% 	 	 	4.4	% 	 	 	16.6	% 	 	 	13.6	% 
	 Indicated Mineral Resource
	  	 	238.8	% 	 	 	-35.8	% 	 	 	6.7	% 	 	 	-26.7	% 	 	 	117.7	% 	 	 	261.4	% 	 	 	148.4	% 
	 Meas/Ind Mineral Resource
	  	 	159.4	% 	 	 	-36.9	% 	 	 	-6.9	% 	 	 	-26.0	% 	 	 	63.8	% 	 	 	141.6	% 	 	 	92.1	% 
	 Inferred Mineral Resource
	  	 	82.1	% 	 	 	-46.1	% 	 	 	150.0	% 	 	 	-11.9	% 	 	 	-1.9	% 	 	 	355.2	% 	 	 	60.4	% 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	141

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	15	 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES 

This section is not relevant to this report. 
  

	16	 MINING METHODS 

This section is not relevant to this report. 
  

	17	 RECOVERY METHODS 

This section is not relevant to this report. 
  

	18	 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE 

This section is not relevant to this report. 
  

	19	 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS 

This section is not relevant to this report. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	142

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	20	 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT 

 

	20.1	 INTRODUCTION 

This section provides further details on environmental studies conducted to date, the environmental assessment process, territorial and federal
regulatory approvals required to bring this property into production, and the status of First Nations’ consultation and agreements. 
  

	20.2	 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES 

Numerous environmental studies have been completed on the Casino property to support previous submissions to the Yukon Environmental and
Socio-economic Assessment Board (YESAB), under the Yukon Environmental and Socioeconomic Assessment Act (YESAA). The majority of these studies were completed from 2012 through 2014, with bi-annual surface and
groundwater monitoring and climate monitoring programs on-going. Environmental studies were conducted on terrain and terrain hazards, water quality and hydrology, geochemistry, hydrogeology, air quality,
noise, fish and aquatic resources, rare plants and vegetation and wildlife. The details of, and reports on, these studies can be found on both the YESAB registry (https://yesabregistry.ca/projects/815c7843-b66d-469f-b9d3-5b62e2c276d4/) and on the
CMC website (https://casinomining.com/project/yesab-proposal/). 
  

	20.3	 PERMITTING 

Mining projects in the Yukon require several permits and licences issued either by the Yukon Government or by the various departments of the
Government of Canada. The primary regulatory approvals are a Water Licence, issued under the Waters Act, and a Quartz Mining Licence, issued under the Quartz Mining Act. Federal authorizations are required under the Fisheries Act and Navigable
Waters Act, amongst others. In advance of licence applications, mining projects require a screening report issued by the YESAB. The environmental assessment and permitting requirements are further detailed below. 

 

	20.3.1	 Existing Assessments and Permits 

Exploration activities at mining projects in the Yukon are undertaken under a Mining Land Use approval, issued by the Yukon Government,
Department of Energy, Mines & Resources. Current exploration at the Casino property is approved under Class 4 Quartz Mining Land Use Approval LQ00510, and Class 3 Quartz Mining Land Use Approval LQ00320c. CMC recently underwent
assessment through YESAB to combine these two approvals (YESAB project 2020-0083), and a decision document approving this assessment was issued in September 2020. Other existing permits include Waste Management Permit
81-079. 
 The Yukon Government currently holds $672 in security for the Casino property. 

 

	20.3.2	 Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment Process 

Larger quartz mining projects (i.e., those that begin mining as opposed to just exploration activities) are typically categorized as assessable
activities under the Assessable Activities, Exceptions and Executive Committee Projects Regulations (SOR/2005-379), and require an Executive Committee screening. There is no fee for an assessment to be
conducted. Upon completion of the assessment, YESAB issues a screening report and a recommendation, which is sent to federal, territorial and/or First Nation governments who act as Decision Bodies. The recommendation will include one of four
options. YESAB will recommend that the project: 
  

	 	•	 	 Be allowed to proceed; 

 

	 	•	 	 Be allowed to proceed with terms and conditions; 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	143

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	 	•	 	 Not proceed; or 

  

	 	•	 	 The Executive Committee can recommend that the project be required to undergo a review by a Panel of the
Board. 

 The Decision Body for the assessment will be a regulating body or authority. Decision Bodies can be federal,
territorial or First Nation governments and agencies that regulate and permit the proposed activity. The Decision Body will issue, in writing, a Decision Document that accepts, varies or rejects the recommendation. Once the Decision Document has
been issued, an agency can issue authorizations or permits in accordance with their process. 
 A Project Proposal for the Casino Mine was
submitted to the executive committee of the YESAB in January 2014 and underwent several rounds of adequacy review information requests from 2014 through 2016. On February 18, 2016, the Executive Committee determined that the Casino Mine Project
requires a Panel Review, the highest level of environmental and socio-economic assessment under YESAA. A Panel Review is an assessment process by which a Panel of the Board (comprised of one YESAB board member nominated by the Council of Yukon First
Nations, and two YESAB board members nominated by the territorial or federal governments) conducts technical analysis of an Environmental and Socio-economic Effects Statement submitted by CMC, followed by public hearings. The Panel of the Board then
issues their recommendations (similar to the other levels of assessment under YESAA) to the relevant Decision Body(s), which can be federal, territorial and/or First Nation governments. The Decision Body(s) will then decide whether to accept, reject
or vary the recommendation of YESAB and issue a Decision Document. The Decision body has 60 days to issue a decision document, or 45 days in which to refer the recommendations back to the Panel of the Board for reconsideration. Regulatory
permitting, discussed in the following section, would follow on the heels of a positive decision document being issued. All documents issued and submitted during the environmental assessment are placed on the YESAB Online Registry and are available
to the public (https://yesabregistry.ca/). 
 Guidelines for the Environmental and Socio-economic Effects Statement were issued by YESAB on
June 20, 2016. The next steps would be for CMC to prepare and submit the Environmental and Socio-economic Effects Statement in accordance with those guidelines. 
  

	20.3.3	 Licensing 

The mining project will be regulated under the legislation of federal and territorial boundaries thus requiring many permits and approvals. A
Quartz Mining Licence will be required and must adhere to the regulations of the Quartz Mining Act particularly as per section 135, issued and administered by the Yukon Government. Additionally, CMC will be required to obtain a Type A Water Licence
under the Waters Act for mine operations with use of water and deposit of waste, as well as considerations of tailings creation and storage according to the project design. The Yukon Water Board would administer this licence. 

The following federal legislation will also be considered, including: 

 

	 	•	 	 Section 35(2) Authorization under the Fisheries Act (harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD)
of fish habitat). 

  

	 	•	 	 Section 36(4) Regulation or Order in Council under the Fisheries Act (deposit of deleterious substances).

  

	 	•	 	 Section 5(2) Approval under the Navigable Waters Protection Act. 

 

	 	•	 	 Blasting Permit under the Explosives Act and Regulations and the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

 Other applicable territorial legislation includes: 

 

	 	•	 	 Energy and Operating Certificates under the Public Utilities Act. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	144

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	 	•	 	 Work in Highway Right-of-Way
Permit, Access Permit, and Highways Hauling Permit under the Highways Act. 

  

	 	•	 	 Land Use, Quarry, and Timber Permits under the Lands Act. 

 

	 	•	 	 Air Emissions, Special Waste, and Storage Tank Systems Permits under the Environment Act.

  

	 	•	 	 Burning Permit under the Forest Protection Act. 

 

	 	•	 	 Archaeological Sites Permit under the Historic Resources Act. 

 

	 	•	 	 Sewage Disposal System Permit under the Public Health and Safety Act. 

 

	 	•	 	 Certificate for Transport of Dangerous Goods under the Dangerous Goods Transportation Act.

  

	 	•	 	 Building and Plumbing Permits under the Building Standards Act / Electrical Protection Act.

  

	 	•	 	 Gas Installation Permit under the Gas Burning Devices Act. 

 

	 	•	 	 Pressure Vessel Boiler Permit under the Boiler and Pressure Vessel Act. 

 

	 	•	 	 Compliance with the Public Health and Safety Act. 

 

	20.3.4	 Environmental and Mine Operation Plans 

Environmental management plans will be assembled under an Environmental Management Plan, which provides overarching direction for environmental
and development management at the Casino Project. It is supported by a suite of project-specific mitigation, monitoring and/or management plans that set out the Project’s standards and requirements under the Quartz Mining Licence and/or Water
Licence for particular areas of environmental management. 
  

	20.3.5	 Reclamation and Closure 

A reclamation and closure plan must be prepared by the mine owner and submitted for review and approval by the government prior to receiving a
Quartz Mining License. The reclamation and closure plan must be updated periodically throughout the operating mine life (minimum every five years). A conceptual plan will be expected to support the environmental assessment process, while a detailed
plan is expected to be required as a condition for the Quartz Mine License. Provisions for changes and updates as mining progresses are also expected. The Yukon Government will require the company to post security for this project. Both the Yukon
Waters Act and the Yukon Quartz Mining Act have provisions for security to be held by government. 
 A reclamation and closure plan (RCP)
will be submitted with the Environmental and Socio-economic Effects Statement. The RCP will include a liability estimate for reclaiming and closing the mine. The RCP will demonstrate how CMC has considered and addressed the expectations and concerns
throughout the mine planning process. Over the life of the mine, successive iterations of the plan may be expected every two years, each iteration providing more detail and greater certainty regarding the sequence of events to occur during
reclamation and closure. 
  

	20.4	 FIRST NATIONS AND COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT 

 CMC is committed to developing and operating the Casino Project (the “Project”)
in a safe, ethical and socially responsible manner. CMC has been sharing information and consulting with First Nations, local communities, Yukon government and federal agencies, non-government organizations
(NGOs), and individuals since 2008. 
 The property has components that are located within the Traditional Territories of three of the Yukon
First Nations that entered into Final Agreements under the 1993 Yukon Land Claims Umbrella Final Agreement among the Governments of Yukon and Canada and the Yukon First Nations (UFA): the Selkirk First Nation, the Little Salmon/Carmacks First

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	145

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 
Nation, and the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in First Nation. The term ‘Traditional Territory’ refers to those lands that were historically used by the First Nation for
traditional pursuits and were recognized and accepted as such by the Governments of Canada and Yukon in the UFA. 
 The main deposit and
camp infrastructure, and most of the proposed Freegold Road Extension falls within the Traditional Territory of the Selkirk First Nation. The existing Freegold Road and some of the proposed Freegold Extension falls within the Traditional Territory
of the Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation. The barge landing on the Yukon River falls within the Traditional Territory of the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in First Nation. 

In addition to the Selkirk First Nation, the Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation, and the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in First Nation,
the Kluane First Nation and White River First Nation have also been identified by YESAB as being potentially affected due to potential downstream effects, and require individual consideration within the Environmental and Socio-economic Effects
Statement. Kluane First Nation are also a signatory to the UFA, whereas the White River First Nation is an Indian Act band who have not entered into a land claim or a self-government agreement with the Crown. 

CMC has signed cooperation agreements with the Selkirk First Nation, the Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation, and the Tr’ondëk
Hwëch’in First Nation, which provided funding for participation in the Executive Committee review of the Project Proposal. Agreements were also reached with Selkirk First Nation, Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in First Nation and White
River First Nation for the funding of nation specific Traditional Land Use studies, which were completed in 2018 and 2019. Subsequent updated agreements will be required to facilitate participation in the Panel Review process or in any other
processes to be conducted under the proposed mining project. CMC is in regular communication with all five First Nations and meets with leadership regularly. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	146

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	21	 CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS 

This section is not relevant to this report. 
  

	22	 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 

This section is not relevant to this report. 
  

	23	 ADJACENT PROPERTIES 

This section is not relevant to this report. 
  

	24	 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION 

This section is not relevant to this report. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	147

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	25	 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS 

 

	25.1	 CONCLUSIONS 

 

	25.1.1	 Mineral Resource 

This study has resulted in an updated Mineral Resource estimate for the Casino Project. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amenable to
milling amounts to 2.17 billion tonnes at 0.16% total copper, 0.18 g/t gold, 0.017% moly and 1.4 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 7.43 billion pounds of copper, 12.7 million ounces gold, 811.6 million pounds of moly and
100.2 million ounces of silver. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 1.43 billion tonnes at 0.10% total copper, 0.14 g/t gold, 0.010% moly and 1.2 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 3.24 billion pounds of copper,
6.4 million ounces of gold, 322.8 million pounds moly and 53.5 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource in mill material. 

In addition, Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amenable to leaching amounts to 217.4 million tonnes at 0.03% total copper, 0.25
g/t gold and 1.9 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 166.5 million pounds of copper, 1.8 million ounces gold and 13.3 million ounces of silver. Inferred Mineral Resource is an additional 31.1 million tonnes at 0.03% total
copper, 0.17 g/t gold and 1.7 g/t silver and contained metal amounts to 17.2 million pounds of copper, 200,000 ounces of gold and 1.7 million ounces of silver for the Inferred Mineral Resource in leach material. 

The combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources for copper, gold and silver amounts to 2.39 billion tonnes at 0.14% total copper,
0.19 g/t gold and 1.5 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 7.60 billion pounds copper, 14.5 million ounces gold and 113.5 million ounces of silver for Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resource is an
additional 1.46 billion tonnes at 0.10% total copper, 0.14 g/t gold and 1.2 g/t silver. Contained metal amounts to 3.26 billion pounds of copper, 6.6 million ounces of gold and 55.2 million ounces of silver for the Inferred
Mineral Resource. The Mineral Resource for moly is as shown with mill material since it will not be recovered for leach material. 

Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources amenable to milling have increased about 106% from the previous, December 2010, estimate. The
increase is due to higher commodity prices and new drilling that converted previous Inferred Mineral Resource to Indicated Mineral Resource. 
  

	25.2	 OPPORTUNITIES 

 

	25.2.1	 Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves 

The expanded Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource may result in a significant Mineral Reserve if additional study takes place at a Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility level. 
 The Casino deposit includes a significant Mineral Resource
amenable to heap leaching. One possible development path for Casino is to develop the heap leach project as a standalone project to commence development of the deposit. 
  

	25.3	 RISKS 

 

	25.3.1	 Mineral Resources 

The most significant risks to the Mineral Resource are related to economic parameters such as prices lower than forecast, recoveries lower than
forecast, or costs higher than the current estimates. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	148

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	26	 RECOMMENDATIONS 

CMC launched a new drilling program in June 2020 to build upon the results of the 2019 drilling campaign. The 2020 drilling campaign will
consist of 43 drill holes between 150 to 500 m in depth and will target the High Gold Zone, Northern Porphyry, and Canadian Creek Targets identified by the 2019 drilling program. Costs are expected to be
$3-5 million. 
 Upon completion of the drilling campaign, it is recommended that CMC consider
developing a Feasibility Study, the cost of which is expected to be $3-5 million. 
 After
completion of the Feasibility Study, CMC should consider restarting permitting of the project. Permitting costs are variable, but are likely in the $20-30 million range. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	149

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

	27	 REFERENCES 

The following documents were reviewed or referenced in the preparation of this Technical Report: 

Archer, A.R. and Main, C.A., 1971, Casino Yukon - a geochemical discovery of an unglaciated
Arizona-type porphyry, in Boyle, R.W., ed. Geochemical exploration: Proceedings, 3rd International Geochemical Exploration Symposium, Toronto: Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Special Volume 11, p. 67-77. 
 Associated Engineering (BC) Ltd. and Lauga & Associates Consulting
Ltd., 2010. Casino Mine Project, Casino Mine Transport Pre-Feasibility Study, Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper Corporation, September 30, 2010. 

Associated Engineering (BC) Ltd., 2008. Casino Mine Project, Project Transportation Scoping Study, Unpublished Company
Report, Western Copper Corporation, April 2008. 
 Associated Engineering (BC) Ltd., 2010. Casino Mine Project, Casino Mine
Project, Casino Mine Airstrip Site Selection Report; Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper Corporation, June 2010. 

Associated Engineering (BC) Ltd., 2010a. Casino Mine Project, Casino Mine Project, Casino Mine
Pre-Feasibility Access Study, Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper Corporation, December 2010. 

Associated Engineering (BC) Ltd., 2010b. Casino Mine Project, Casino Mine Freegold Road Upgrade Study, Unpublished Company
Report, Western Copper Corporation, December 2010. 
 Associated Engineering (BC) Ltd., 2012. “Casino Mine Feasibility
Access Study.” Performed for Western Copper and Gold Corporation. August 2012. 
 Bower, B., Case, T., DeLong, C., and
Rebagliati, C.M., 1995. Casino Project 1994 Exploration and Geotechnical Drilling Program on the Casino Porphyry Copper-Gold-Molybdenum Deposit, Unpublished Company Report, Pacific Sentinel Gold Corp., May 1995. 

Bower, B., DeLong, C., Payne, J., and Rebagliati, C.M., 1995a. The Oxide-Gold, Supergene and Hypogene Zones at the Casino
Gold-Copper-Molybdenum Deposit West Central Yukon, Special Volume 46, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 1995. 

British Columbia Ministry of Forests, 2002. “Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Forest Road Engineering
Guidebook, Second Edition.” June 2002. 
 FLSmidth, 2012. Casino Project Circuit Design Basis – Update on
Testwork and Mill Sizing/Selection. Unpublished Company Report prepared for Western Copper and Gold Corporation. FLSmidth Salt Lake City, Inc. June 2012. 

G&T Metallurgical Services Ltd., 2008. Assessment of Silver Metallurgical Performance – Casino Project, Yukon
Territory, Unpublished Company Report, August 2008. 
 G&T Metallurgical Services Ltd., 2008a. Metallurgical Assessment
of the Casino Deposit, Yukon Territory, Unpublished Company Report, May 2008. 
 G&T Metallurgical Services Ltd., 2009.
Production of Environmental Tailings Samples for the Casino Project, Unpublished Company Report, December 2009. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	150

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 G&T Metallurgical Services Ltd., 2011. Scoping Level Assessment of
Casino Property, Unpublished Company Report, January 2011. 
 Gary Giroux, Giroux Consultants Ltd. and Scott Casselman,
Casselman Geological Services Ltd., 2010. Casino Project 2010 Mineral Resource Update, Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper Corporation, December 2010. 

Godwin, C.I., 1975. Geology of the Casino porphyry copper-molybdenum deposit, Dawson Range, Yukon Territory. Unpub. PhD
Thesis, University of British Columbia, 1975. 
 Hart, C.J.R., and Selby, D., 1997. The Pattison Creek Pluton—a
Mineralized Casino Intrusion made bigger with gamma rays. In Yukon exploration and Geology 1997. Exploration and Geological Services Division, Yukon, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, pp. 89-96, 1998. 

Independent Mining Consultants Inc., 2012. Casino Copper-Gold Project Yukon Territory, Canada,
Pre-Feasibility Study Mining, Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper Corporation, December 2, 2012. 

Independent Mining Consultants Inc., 2013. Feasibility Study Mining—LNG Truck Haulage, Unpublished Company Report,
Western Copper Corporation, January 14, 2013. 
 Johnston, R.L., 2018. Summary Report of the 2017 Exploration
Programme on the Canadian Creek Property, Whitehorse Mining District, Yukon Territory. 
 Johnston, S.T., 1995. Geological
compilation with interpretation from geophysical surveys of the northern Dawson Range, central Yukon (115J/9 & 10; 115I/12) (1:100 000 scale map). Exploration and Geological Services Division, Yukon, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Open File
1995-2 (G), 1995. 
 Johnston, S.T., and Shives, R.B.K., 1995. Results of an
airborne multiparameter geophysical survey of the northern Dawson Range, Yukon: Revised geological maps and implications for mineral exploration In Yukon Exploration and Geology, 1994, Exploration and Geological Services Division, Indian and
Northern Affairs Canada. 
 Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 1995. Acid Leach and Cyanide Leach Bottle Roll Tests,
Unpublished Company Report, Pacific Sentinel Gold Corp., March 1995. 
 Knight Piésold Ltd., 1994. Report on
Preliminary Surficial Geotechnical Investigations (Ref. No. 1831/1), Unpublished Company Report. March 1994. 
 Knight
Piésold Ltd., 1995. Data Compilation Report on 1994 Geotechnical and Hydrogeotechnical Investigations (Ref. No. 1832/2), Unpublished Company Report. February 22, 1995. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2008. Casino Copper-Gold Project – Preliminary Plant Site Foundation Assessment (Ref. No.
VA07-01669), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper Corporation, February 15, 2008. 
 Knight Piésold Ltd.,
2010. 2010 Geotechnical Site Investigation Data Report (Ref. No. VA101-325/3-4), Unpublished Company Report. November 2, 2010. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2010a. Hydrometeorology Report (Ref No. VA101-325/3-1), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper Corporation, June 15, 2010. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2011. Report on Revised Pre-Feasibility Design of the
Tailings Management Facility (Ref No. VA101-325/3-5), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, June 13, 2011. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	151

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012. Report on Laboratory Geotechnical Testing
of Tailings Materials (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-1), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, December 21, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012a. Terrain Hazards Assessment for Proposed Access Roads and Air Strip (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-2), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, April 11, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012b. Terrain Hazards Assessment for Proposed Mine Site (Ref. No.
VA101-325/8-3), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, April 13, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012c. 2011 Geotechnical Site Investigation Data Report, Plant Site (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-4), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, December 20, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012d. 2011 Geotechnical Site Investigation Data Report, Waste Management Facilities (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-5), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, December 21, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012e. 2011 Geomechanical Site Investigation Data Report, Open Pit (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-6), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, December 20, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012f. Open Pit Geotechnical Design (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-7), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, October 12, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012g. Feasibility Design of the Heap Leach Facility (VA101-325/8-9), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, December 19, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012h. Report on Feasibility Design of the Tailings Management Facility (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-10). Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, December 20, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012i. Updated Hydrometeorology Report (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-11). Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, July 9, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012j. Waste Storage Area and Stockpiles Feasibility Design (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-12). Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, December 19, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012k. Report on Revised Tailings Management Facility Seepage Assessment (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-13). Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, December 19, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2012l. 2012 Geotechnical Site Investigation Data Report (Ref. No.
VA101-325/8-14). Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, December 19, 2012. 

Knight Piésold Ltd., 2013. Plant Site Geotechnical Assessment Report (Ref. No. VA101-325/8-8), Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper and Gold Corporation, January 14, 2013. 

M3, 2008. “Casino Project Pre-Feasibility Study, Yukon Territory, Canada.”
Prepared by M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation for Western Copper Corporation. 
 M3, 2011. Technical Report,
Casino Project Pre-Feasibility Study Update, Yukon Territory Canada, April 29th, 2011. Prepared by M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation. 

M3, 2013. Technical Report, Casino Project Feasibility Study, Yukon Territory, Canada, 25 January 2013. Prepared by M3
Engineering & Technology Corporation. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	152

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 METCON Research, 2008. Casino Project – Agitated and Column Cyanide
Leach Study, Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper Corporation, July 2008. 
 Pacific Sentinel Gold Corp, 1995.
“Pacific Sentinel Gold Corp., A Development Plan for Feasibility, Casino Project, Scoping Study and Overview Report, 25,000 TPD Open Pit Mine and Concentrator Complex.” 

Payne, J.G., Gonzalez, R. A., Akhurst, K. and Sisson, W.G., 1987. Geology of the Colorado Creek (115-J/10), Selwyn River (115-J/9), and Prospector Mountain (115-I/5) Map areas, Western Dawson Range, west-central Yukon. Exploration
and Geological Services Division, Yukon, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Open File 1987-3, 1987. 

Rebagliati Geological Consulting Ltd C.M. Rebagliati P.Eng., RH Banner Ltd, and Ross Banner P.Eng., 2003. Qualifying Report
Casino Property Yukon Territory, Section 16, p. 36-37. 
 Scott Casselman,
B.Sc., P.Geo., Casselman Geological Services Ltd. 2010, 2010 Assessment Report for the Casino Property. 
 Selby D. and
Creaser R. A., 2001. Late and Mid Cretaceous mineralization in the Northern Cordillera: Constraints from Re-Os molybdenite dates. Econ. Geol. 96, 1461–1467. 

Selby, D., Creaser, R.A. and Nesbett, B.E., 1999. Major and trace element composition and Sr-Nd-Pb systematics of crystalline rocks from the Dawson Range, Yukon, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Vol. 36, pg. 1463-1481, 1999. 

Selby, David and Nesbitt, Bruce E., 1998. Biotite Chemistry of the Casino Porphyry
Cu- Mo-Au Occurrence, Dawson Range, Yukon. In: Yukon Exploration and Geology 1997; Exploration and Geological Services Division, Yukon, Indian and Northern Affairs
Canada, p. 83-88, 1998. 
 SGS Lakefield Research, 2008. Pre-Feasibility Grinding Circuit Study for Western Copper Corporation – Casino Project based on Small-Scale Tests Data, Unpublished Company Report, Western Copper Corporation, February 2008. 

Shouldice, T. and Johnston, H., 2012. Advanced Metallurgical Assessment of the Casino Copper Gold Project, Whitehorse, Yukon,
KM 3512. December 20, 2012. Performed by ALS Metallurgy (formally G&T Metallurgical Services) Work Performed on behalf of Western Copper and Gold Corporation. 

Starkey & Associates, 2011. SAGDesign Comminution Analysis, S&A Project S96, SAGDesign Comminution Analysis
Report Rev 0. Prepared for Western Copper and Gold Corporation and FLSmidth. February 29, 2011. 
 Tempelman-Kluit,
D.J., 1974. Reconaissance geology of Aishihik Lake, Snag and part of Stewart River map-areas, west-central Yukon. Department of Energy Mines and Resources; Geological Survey of Canada Paper 73-41, 97 p. 
 Tempelman-Kluit, D.J., 1976. The Yukon crystalline terrane-Enigma in the
Canadian cordillera. Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 87, no. 9 p.1343-1357. 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	153

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Appendix A – Mineral Resource Update Contributors and Professional Qualifications

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	A

 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON 

I, Daniel Roth, P.E., P. Eng. do hereby certify that: 
  

	1.	 I am currently employed as a project manager and civil engineer at M3 Engineering & Technology
Corp. located at 2051 West Sunset Rd, Suite 101, Tucson, AZ 85704. 

  

	2.	 I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from The University of Manitoba in 1990.

  

	3.	 I am a registered professional engineer in good standing in the following jurisdictions:

  

	 	•	 	 British Columbia, Canada (No. 38037) 

 

	 	•	 	 Alberta, Canada (No. 62310) 

 

	 	•	 	 Ontario, Canada (No. 100156213) 

 

	 	•	 	 Yukon, Canada (No. 1998) 

 

	 	•	 	 New Mexico, USA (No. 17342) 

 

	 	•	 	 Arizona, USA (No. 37319) 

 

	 	•	 	 Alaska, USA (No. 102317) 

 

	 	•	 	 Minnesota, USA (No. 54138) 

 

	4.	 I have worked continuously as a design engineer, engineering and project manager since 1990, a period of 30
years. I have worked in the minerals industry as a project manager for M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation since 2003, with extensive experience in hard rock mine process plant and infrastructure design and construction, environmental
permitting review, as well as development of capital cost estimates, operating cost estimates, financial analyses, preliminary economic assessments, pre-feasibility and feasibility studies.

  

	5.	 I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI
43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. 

 

	6.	 I am responsible for Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and corresponding sections of 1,
25, 26, and 27 of the technical report titled “Western Copper and Gold Corporation, Casino Project, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report, Mineral Resource Statement, Yukon, Canada” dated effective
July 3, 2020 (the “Technical Report”). 

  

	7.	 I have prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report. I have developed
various capital and operating cost tradeoff studies for Western Copper and Gold Corporation (“Western”) from 2014 through 2020. I have not visited the project site. 

 

	8.	 As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical
Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading. 

  

	9.	 I am independent of Western and its subsidiaries as defined by Section 1.5 of NI 43-101. 

  

	10.	 I have read NI 43-101 and Form
43-101F1. The sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for have been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form. 

 

	11.	 I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory authority and
any publication by them, including electronic publication in the public company files on their website accessible by the public, of the Technical Report. 

Dated this 26th day of October, 2020. 

 

	
	 /s/ Daniel Roth

	 Signature of Qualified Person

	
	 Daniel Roth

	 Print Name of Qualified Person

 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON 

I, Michael G. Hester, do hereby certify that: 
  

	 	1.	 I am currently employed as Vice President and Principal Mining Engineer by Independent Mining Consultants,
Inc. (“IMC”) of 3560 E. Gas Road, Tucson, Arizona, 84714, USA. 

  

	 	2.	 I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Mining Engineering from the University of Arizona in 1979
and a Master of Science degree in Mining Engineering from the University of Arizona in 1982. 

  

	 	3.	 I am a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (FAusIMM #221108), a professional
association as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). 

 

	 	4.	 I have worked in the minerals industry as an engineer continuously since 1979, a period of 41 years. I am a
founding partner, Vice President, and Principal Mining Engineer for IMC, a position I have held since 1983. I have been employed as an Adjunct Lecturer at the University of Arizona (1997-1998) where I taught classes in open pit mine planning and
mine economic analysis. I have also been a member of the Resources and Reserves Committee of the Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration since March 2012. During my career I have had extensive experience developing mineral resource models,
developing open pit mine plans, estimating equipment requirements for open pit mining operations, developing mine capital and operating cost estimates, performing economic analysis of mining operations and managing various preliminary economic
assessments, pre-feasibility, and feasibility studies. 

  

	 	5.	 I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in NI
43-101 and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the
requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. 

  

	 	6.	 I am responsible for Section 14 and corresponding sections of 1, 25, 26 and 27 of the technical report
titled “Western Copper and Gold Corporation, Casino Project, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report, Mineral Resource Statement, Yukon, Canada” dated effective July 3, 2020 (the “Technical
Report”). 

  

	 	7.	 I have prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report. I worked on the
feasibility study for Western Copper and Gold Corporation (“Western”) in or about January 2013. I also worked on preliminary feasibility studies conducted by Western in or around April 2011 and August 2008. I also worked on studies of the
property for Pacific Sentinel Corporation in or around September 1995. I most recently inspected the property on July 22, 2008 for a period of one day. 

  

	 	8.	 As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the Technical
Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading. 

  

	 	9.	 I am independent of Western and its subsidiaries as defined by Section 1.5 of NI 43-101. 

  

	 	10.	 I have read NI 43-101 and Form
43-101F1. The sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for have been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form. 

 

	 	11.	 I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory authority and
any publication by them, including electronic publication in the public company files on their website accessible by the public, of the Technical Report. 

Dated this 26th day of October, 2020. 

 

	
	 /s/ Michael G. Hester

	 Signature of Qualified Person

	
	 Michael G. Hester, FAusIMM

	 Print Name of Qualified Person

 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON 

I, Laurie M. Tahija, MMSA-Q.P. do hereby certify that: 

 

	 	1.	 I am currently employed as Vice President by M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation, 2051 W.
Sunset Road, Ste. 101, Tucson, Arizona 85704, USA. 

  

	 	2.	 I am a graduate of Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology, in Butte, Montana and received a
Bachelor of Science degree in Mineral Processing Engineering in 1981. 

  

	 	3.	 I am recognized as a Qualified Professional (QP) member (#01399QP) with special expertise in
Metallurgy/Processing by the Mining and Metallurgical Society of America (MMSA). 

  

	 	4.	 I have practiced mineral processing for 39 years. I have over twenty (20) years of plant operations and
project management experience at a variety of mines including both precious metals and base metals. I have worked both in the United States (Nevada, Idaho, California) and overseas (Papua New Guinea, China, Chile, Mexico) at existing operations and
at new operations during construction and startup. My operating experience in precious metals processing includes heap leaching, agitation leaching, gravity, flotation, Merrill-Crowe, and ADR (CIC & CIL). My operating experience in base
metal processing includes copper heap leaching with SX/EW and zinc recovery using ion exchange, SX/EW, and casting. I have been responsible for process design for new plants and the retrofitting of existing operations. I have been involved in
projects from construction to startup and continuing into operation. I have worked on scoping, pre-feasibility and feasibility studies for mining projects in the United States and Latin America, as well as
worked on the design and construction phases of some of these projects. 

  

	 	5.	 I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI
43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. 

 

	 	6.	 I am responsible for Section 13 and the corresponding sections of 1, 25, 26, and 27 of the technical
report titled “Western Copper and Gold Corporation, Casino Project, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report, Mineral Resource Statement, Yukon, Canada” dated effective July 3, 2020 (the “Technical
Report”). 

  

	 	7.	 I have not had prior involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report and have not
visited the Project site. 

  

	 	8.	 As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical
Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading. 

  

	 	9.	 I am independent of Western Copper and Gold Corporation and its subsidiaries as defined by Section 1.5
of NI 43-101. 

  

	 	10.	 I have read NI 43-101 and Form
43-101F1. The sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for have been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form. 

 

	 	11.	 I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory authority and
any publication by them, including electronic publication in the public company files on their website accessible by the public, of the Technical Report. 

Dated this 26th day of October, 2020. 

 

	
	 /s/ Laurie M. Tahija

	 Signature of Qualified Person

	
	 Laurie M. Tahija

	 Print Name of Qualified Person

 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON 

I, Carl Schulze, with a business address at 34A Laberge Rd, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 5Y9, hereby certify that: 

 

	 	1.	 I am a Project Manager employed by: Aurora Geosciences Ltd., 34A Laberge Rd, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 5Y9.

  

	 	2.	 This certificate applies to the technical report titled: “Western Copper and Gold Corporation, Casino
Project, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report, Mineral Resource Statement, Yukon, Canada”, dated effective July 3, 2020 (the “Technical Report”). 

 

	 	3.	 I am a graduate of Lakehead University, Bachelor of Science Degree in Geology, 1984. I am a member in good
standing of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia (EGBC), Lic. No. 25393. I have worked as a geologist for a total of 35 years since my graduation from Lakehead University. I have worked extensively in
Yukon, British Columbia, northern Ontario and Alaska, as well as the Northwest Territories, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. I served as President of the Yukon Chamber of Mines, where I was also a Director from 2003 to 2015. I have acted in various
capacities with numerous private and publicly-traded mining and exploration companies, and also served as the Resident Geologist for the Government of Nunavut from 2000 to 2002. 

 

	 	4.	 I performed a site visit for 18 days from Sept 9 through 26, 2020. 

 

	 	5.	 I am responsible for sections 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, and corresponding portions of Sections 1, 2, 25 and 26
of the Technical Report. 

  

	 	6.	 I have had no involvement with Western Copper and Gold Corp, its predecessors or subsidiaries. I am
independent of the issuer applying the test in section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101; 

  

	 	7.	 I have not received nor expect to receive any interest, direct or indirect, in Western Copper and Gold Corp,
its subsidiaries, affiliates and associates; 

  

	 	8.	 I have read “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects”, National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the aforementioned sections of the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with this Instrument and that Form; 

 

	 	9.	 As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the aforementioned
sections of the Technical Report contain all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading, and; 

 

	 	10.	 This certificate applies to the NI 43-101 compliant technical report
titled “Western Copper and Gold Corporation, Casino Project, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report, Mineral Resource Statement, Yukon, Canada”, dated effective July 3, 2020. 

 

	 	11.	 I consent to the public filing of this technical report with any stock exchange and any regulatory authority
and consent to the publication for regulatory purposes, including electronic publication in the public company files of their websites accessible to the public, of extracts from the Technical Report by Western Copper and Gold Corp.

 Dated at Whitehorse, Yukon this 26th day of October, 2020. 

 

	
	 /s/ Carl Schulze

	 Signature of Qualified Person

	
	 Carl Schulze

	 Name of Qualified Person

 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON 

I, Caroline J. Vallat, P.Geo., residing at 505 Waterwood Place, Nanaimo, BC, V9T 0J6, do hereby certify that: 

 

	1.	 I am an independent geological consultant contracted by Western Copper Corporation; 

 

	2.	 This certificate applies to the Technical Report titled, “Western Copper and Gold Corporation, Casino
Project, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report, Mineral Resource Statement, Yukon, Canada” dated effective July 3, 2020 (the “Technical Report”); 

 

	3.	 I am a graduate of the University of Victoria, Vancouver Island, British Columbia with a B.Sc. in Geological
Sciences (2004) and have worked continuously since that time; 

  

	4.	 I am a geological consultant currently licensed with the Association of Professional Engineers and
Geoscientists of British Columbia (License No. 35680); 

  

	5.	 I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the
purposes of NI 43-101. My relevant experience for the purpose of the Technical Report is: 

  

	 	•	 	 Geological consultant and business owner/operator specializing in QA/QC and database management, GeoSpark
Consulting Inc., 2007 – current. 

  

	 	•	 	 Senior Geological Database Manager / Project Manager / Supervisor, Maxwell GeoServices Canada Inc., 2005
– 2007. 

  

	 	•	 	 Independent Geological Consultant, 2004 – 2005. 

 

	6.	 I am responsible for Section 12 and corresponding sections of 1, 25, 26, and 27 of the Technical
Report; 

  

	7.	 I did not visit the Casino Project site; 

 

	8.	 I have not had prior involvement with the Casino Project that is the subject of this Technical Report;

  

	9.	 I am independent of the issuer applying the test in Section 1.5 of NI
43-101; 

  

	10.	 I have read NI 43-101 and Form
43-101F1. The sections of the Technical Report that I am responsible for have been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form; 

 

	11.	 As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical
Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading. 

Dated this 26th day of October, 2020. 

 

			
	 [Caroline Vallat]
	 	 

	 

  

	 Caroline J. Vallat, P.Geo.

 CASINO PROJECT 

FORM 43-101F1 TECHNICAL REPORT – MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT

  
  

 Appendix B – Casino Placer Claims and Casino Quartz claims 

  
  

					
	 

	 	 M3-PN200255

26 October 2020
 Revision
0
	  	B

 Casino Property 

List of Casino Placer Claims 
  

									
	                 
	 	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		 	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Mining Corp.

  

													
	 #
	  	 GRANT

NUMBER
	  	 TENURE

TYPE
	  	 CLAIM

NAME
	  	 CLAIM

NUMBER
	  	 RECORDED DATE
	  	 EXPIRY DATE

	1	  	P 508065	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	4	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	2	  	P 508066	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	5	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	3	  	P 508067	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	6	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	4	  	P 508068	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	7	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	5	  	P 508069	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	8	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	6	  	P 508070	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	9	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	7	  	P 508071	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	10	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	8	  	P 508072	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	11	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	9	  	P 508073	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	12	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	10	  	P 508074	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	13	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	11	  	P 508075	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	14	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	12	  	P 508076	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	15	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	13	  	P 508077	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	16	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	14	  	P 508078	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	17	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	15	  	P 508079	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	18	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	16	  	P 508080	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	19	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	17	  	P 508081	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	20	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	18	  	P 508082	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	21	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	19	  	P 508083	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	22	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	20	  	P 508084	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	23	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	21	  	P 508085	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	24	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	22	  	P 508086	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	25	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	23	  	P 508087	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	26	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	24	  	P 508088	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	27	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	25	  	P 508089	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	28	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	26	  	P 508090	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	29	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	27	  	P 508091	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	30	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	28	  	P 508092	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	31	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	29	  	P 508093	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	32	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	30	  	P 508094	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	33	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	31	  	P 508095	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	34	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	32	  	P 508096	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	35	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	33	  	P 508097	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	36	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	34	  	P 508098	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	37	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	35	  	P 508099	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	38	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	36	  	P 508100	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	39	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	37	  	P 509301	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	40	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	38	  	P 509302	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	41	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	39	  	P 509303	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	42	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	40	  	P 509304	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	43	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	41	  	P 509305	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	44	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	42	  	P 509306	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	45	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	43	  	P 509307	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	46	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	44	  	P 509308	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	47	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	45	  	P 509309	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	48	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	46	  	P 509310	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	49	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	47	  	P 509311	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	50	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	48	  	P 509312	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	51	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	49	  	P 509313	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	52	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	50	  	P 509314	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	53	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	51	  	P 509315	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	54	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	52	  	P 509316	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	55	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	53	  	P 509317	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	56	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	54	  	P 509318	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	57	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11
	55	  	P 509319	  	Placer	  	CAS PL	  	58	  	2011-08-11	  	2022-02-11

 Casino Property 

List of Casino Quartz Claims 
  

									
	                 
	 	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		 	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Mining Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	1	  	95740	  	CAT	  	63	  	1965-12-05	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	2	  	95741	  	CAT	  	64	  	1965-12-05	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	3	  	95742	  	CAT	  	65	  	1965-12-05	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	4	  	95743	  	CAT	  	66	  	1965-12-05	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	5	  	95745	  	CAT	  	68	  	1965-12-05	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	6	  	95747	  	CAT	  	70	  	1965-12-05	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	7	  	Y 35195	  	MOUSE	  	4	  	1969-06-04	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	8	  	Y 35197	  	MOUSE	  	6	  	1969-06-04	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	9	  	Y 35484	  	MOUSE	  	90	  	1969-06-22	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	10	  	YD04376	  	FLY	  	2	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	11	  	YD04377	  	FLY	  	3	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	12	  	YD04378	  	FLY	  	4	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	13	  	YD04379	  	FLY	  	5	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	14	  	YD04380	  	FLY	  	6	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	15	  	YD04381	  	FLY	  	7	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	16	  	YD04382	  	FLY	  	8	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	17	  	YD04383	  	FLY	  	9	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	18	  	YD04384	  	FLY	  	10	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	19	  	YD04385	  	FLY	  	11	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	20	  	YD04386	  	FLY	  	12	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	21	  	YD04387	  	FLY	  	13	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	22	  	YD04388	  	FLY	  	14	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	23	  	YD04399	  	FLY	  	15	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	24	  	YD04400	  	FLY	  	16	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	25	  	YD04401	  	FLY	  	17	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	26	  	YD04402	  	FLY	  	18	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	27	  	YD04375	  	FLY	  	1	  	2011-02-02	  	2025-03-26	  	115J10	  	
	28	  	YC82855	  	BL	  	1	  	2008-07-31	  	2025-08-01	  	105 E12	  	
	29	  	YC82856	  	BL	  	2	  	2008-07-31	  	2025-08-01	  	105 E12	  	
	30	  	YC82857	  	BL	  	3	  	2008-07-31	  	2025-08-01	  	105 E12	  	
	31	  	YC82858	  	BL	  	4	  	2008-07-31	  	2025-08-01	  	105 E12	  	
	32	  	YC82859	  	BL	  	5	  	2008-07-31	  	2025-08-01	  	105 E12	  	
	33	  	YC82860	  	BL	  	6	  	2008-07-31	  	2025-08-01	  	105 E12	  	
	34	  	YC82861	  	BL	  	7	  	2008-07-31	  	2025-08-01	  	105 E12	  	
	35	  	YC82862	  	BL	  	8	  	2008-07-31	  	2025-08-01	  	105 E12	  	
	36	  	YE94141	  	CAS19	  	1	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	37	  	YE94142	  	CAS19	  	2	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	38	  	YE94143	  	CAS19	  	3	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	39	  	YE94144	  	CAS19	  	4	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	40	  	YE94145	  	CAS19	  	5	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	41	  	YE94146	  	CAS19	  	6	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	42	  	YE94147	  	CAS19	  	7	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	43	  	YE94148	  	CAS19	  	8	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	44	  	YE94149	  	CAS19	  	9	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	45	  	YE94150	  	CAS19	  	10	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	46	  	YE94151	  	CAS19	  	11	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	47	  	YE94152	  	CAS19	  	12	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	48	  	YE94153	  	CAS19	  	13	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	49	  	YE94154	  	CAS19	  	14	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	50	  	YE94155	  	CAS19	  	15	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	51	  	YE94156	  	CAS19	  	16	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	52	  	YE94157	  	CAS19	  	17	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	53	  	YE94158	  	CAS19	  	18	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	54	  	YE94159	  	CAS19	  	19	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	55	  	YE94160	  	CAS19	  	20	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	56	  	YE94161	  	CAS19	  	21	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	57	  	YE94162	  	CAS19	  	22	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	58	  	YE94163	  	CAS19	  	23	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	59	  	YE94164	  	CAS19	  	24	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	60	  	YE94165	  	CAS19	  	25	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	61	  	YE94166	  	CAS19	  	26	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	62	  	YE94167	  	CAS19	  	27	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	63	  	YE94168	  	CAS19	  	28	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	64	  	YE94169	  	CAS19	  	29	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	65	  	YE94170	  	CAS19	  	30	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	66	  	YE94171	  	CAS19	  	31	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	67	  	YE94172	  	CAS19	  	32	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	68	  	YE94173	  	CAS19	  	33	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	69	  	YE94174	  	CAS19	  	34	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	70	  	YE94175	  	CAS19	  	35	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	71	  	YE94176	  	CAS19	  	36	  	2019-08-28	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	72	  	YE94177	  	CAS19	  	37	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	73	  	YE94178	  	CAS19	  	38	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	74	  	YE94179	  	CAS19	  	39	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	75	  	YE94180	  	CAS19	  	40	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	76	  	YE94181	  	CAS19	  	41	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	77	  	YE94182	  	CAS19	  	42	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	78	  	YE94183	  	CAS19	  	43	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	79	  	YE94184	  	CAS19	  	44	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	80	  	YE94185	  	CAS19	  	45	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	81	  	YE94186	  	CAS19	  	46	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	82	  	YE94187	  	CAS19	  	47	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	83	  	YE94188	  	CAS19	  	48	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	84	  	YE94189	  	CAS19	  	49	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	85	  	YE94190	  	CAS19	  	50	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	86	  	YE94191	  	CAS19	  	51	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	87	  	YE94192	  	CAS19	  	52	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	
	88	  	YE94193	  	CAS19	  	53	  	2019-08-27	  	2025-09-03	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	89	  	YC99925	  	KANA	  	46	  	2010-06-05	  	2026-06-08	  	115J15	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	90	  	YB37540	  	AZTEC	  	1	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	91	  	YB37541	  	AZTEC	  	2	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	92	  	YB37542	  	AZTEC	  	3	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	93	  	YB37543	  	AZTEC	  	4	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	94	  	YB37544	  	AZTEC	  	5	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	95	  	YB37545	  	AZTEC	  	6	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	96	  	YB37546	  	AZTEC	  	7	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	97	  	YB37547	  	AZTEC	  	8	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	98	  	YB37548	  	AZTEC	  	9	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	99	  	YB37549	  	AZTEC	  	10	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	100	  	YB37622	  	MAYA	  	31	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	101	  	YB37623	  	MAYA	  	32	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	102	  	YB37624	  	MAYA	  	33	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	103	  	YB37625	  	MAYA	  	34	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	104	  	YB37626	  	MAYA	  	35	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	105	  	YB37627	  	MAYA	  	36	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	106	  	YB37628	  	MAYA	  	37	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	107	  	YB37629	  	MAYA	  	38	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	108	  	YB37630	  	MAYA	  	39	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	109	  	YB37631	  	MAYA	  	40	  	1992-09-12	  	2026-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	110	  	YC99915	  	KANA	  	37	  	2009-09-01	  	2026-09-29	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)

  
 2 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	 111
	  	YC99916	  	KANA	  	38	  	2009-09-01	  	2026-09-29	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	112	  	YC99917	  	KANA	  	39	  	2009-09-01	  	2026-09-29	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	113	  	YC99918	  	KANA	  	40	  	2009-09-01	  	2026-09-29	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	114	  	YC99919	  	KANA	  	41	  	2009-09-01	  	2026-09-29	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	115	  	YC99920	  	KANA	  	42	  	2009-09-01	  	2026-09-29	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	116	  	YC99921	  	KANA	  	43	  	2009-09-01	  	2026-09-29	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	117	  	YC99922	  	KANA	  	44	  	2009-09-01	  	2026-09-29	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	118	  	YC99923	  	KANA	  	45	  	2009-09-01	  	2026-09-29	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	119	  	YB37830	  	ICE	  	30	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	120	  	YB37831	  	ICE	  	31	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	121	  	YB37832	  	ICE	  	32	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	122	  	YB37833	  	ICE	  	33	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	123	  	YB37841	  	ICE	  	41	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J10	  	
	124	  	YB37842	  	ICE	  	42	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J10	  	
	125	  	YB37843	  	ICE	  	43	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	126	  	YB37844	  	ICE	  	44	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	127	  	YB37845	  	ICE	  	45	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	128	  	YB37846	  	ICE	  	46	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	129	  	YB37847	  	ICE	  	47	  	1993-01-22	  	2027-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	130	  	YD17559	  	AXS	  	1	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	131	  	YD17560	  	AXS	  	2	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	132	  	YD17561	  	AXS	  	3	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	133	  	YD17562	  	AXS	  	4	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	134	  	YD17563	  	AXS	  	5	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	135	  	YD17564	  	AXS	  	6	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	136	  	YD17565	  	AXS	  	7	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	137	  	YD17566	  	AXS	  	8	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	138	  	YD17567	  	AXS	  	9	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	139	  	YD17568	  	AXS	  	10	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	140	  	YD17569	  	AXS	  	11	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	141	  	YD17570	  	AXS	  	12	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	142	  	YD17571	  	AXS	  	13	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	143	  	YD17572	  	AXS	  	14	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	144	  	YD17573	  	AXS	  	15	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	145	  	YD17574	  	AXS	  	16	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	146	  	YD17575	  	AXS	  	17	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	147	  	YD17576	  	AXS	  	18	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	148	  	YD17577	  	AXS	  	19	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	149	  	YD17578	  	AXS	  	20	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	150	  	YD17579	  	AXS	  	21	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	151	  	YD17580	  	AXS	  	22	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	152	  	YD17581	  	AXS	  	23	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	153	  	YD17582	  	AXS	  	24	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	154	  	YD17583	  	AXS	  	25	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	155	  	YD17584	  	AXS	  	26	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	156	  	YD17585	  	AXS	  	27	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	157	  	YD17586	  	AXS	  	28	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	158	  	YD17587	  	AXS	  	29	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	159	  	YD17588	  	AXS	  	30	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	160	  	YD17589	  	AXS	  	31	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	161	  	YD17590	  	AXS	  	32	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	162	  	YD17591	  	AXS	  	33	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	163	  	YD17592	  	AXS	  	34	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	164	  	YD17593	  	AXS	  	35	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	165	  	YD17594	  	AXS	  	36	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	166	  	YD17595	  	AXS	  	37	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	

  
 3 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	167	  	YD17596	  	AXS	  	38	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	168	  	YD17597	  	AXS	  	39	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	169	  	YD17598	  	AXS	  	40	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	170	  	YD17599	  	AXS	  	41	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	171	  	YD17600	  	AXS	  	42	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	172	  	YD17601	  	AXS	  	43	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	173	  	YD17602	  	AXS	  	44	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	174	  	YD17603	  	AXS	  	45	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	175	  	YD17604	  	AXS	  	46	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	176	  	YD17605	  	AXS	  	47	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	177	  	YD17606	  	AXS	  	48	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	178	  	YD17607	  	AXS	  	49	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	179	  	YD17608	  	AXS	  	50	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	180	  	YD17609	  	AXS	  	51	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	181	  	YD17610	  	AXS	  	52	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	182	  	YD17611	  	AXS	  	53	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	183	  	YD17612	  	AXS	  	54	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	184	  	YD17613	  	AXS	  	55	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	185	  	YD17614	  	AXS	  	56	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	186	  	YD17615	  	AXS	  	57	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	187	  	YD17616	  	AXS	  	58	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	188	  	YD17617	  	AXS	  	59	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	189	  	YD17618	  	AXS	  	60	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	190	  	YD17619	  	AXS	  	61	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	191	  	YD17620	  	AXS	  	62	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	192	  	YD17621	  	AXS	  	63	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	193	  	YD17622	  	AXS	  	64	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	194	  	YD17623	  	AXS	  	65	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	195	  	YD17624	  	AXS	  	66	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	196	  	YD17625	  	AXS	  	67	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	197	  	YD17626	  	AXS	  	68	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	198	  	YD17627	  	AXS	  	69	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	199	  	YD17628	  	AXS	  	70	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	200	  	YD17629	  	AXS	  	71	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	201	  	YD17630	  	AXS	  	72	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	202	  	YD17631	  	AXS	  	73	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	203	  	YD17632	  	AXS	  	74	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	204	  	YD17633	  	AXS	  	75	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	205	  	YD17634	  	AXS	  	76	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	206	  	YD17635	  	AXS	  	77	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	207	  	YD17636	  	AXS	  	78	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	208	  	YD17637	  	AXS	  	79	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	209	  	YD17638	  	AXS	  	80	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	210	  	YD17639	  	AXS	  	81	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	211	  	YD17640	  	AXS	  	82	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	212	  	YD17641	  	AXS	  	83	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	213	  	YD17642	  	AXS	  	84	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	214	  	YD17643	  	AXS	  	85	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	215	  	YD17644	  	AXS	  	86	  	2009-10-05	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	216	  	YD17645	  	AXS	  	87	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	217	  	YD17646	  	AXS	  	88	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	218	  	YD17647	  	AXS	  	89	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	219	  	YD17648	  	AXS	  	90	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	220	  	YD17649	  	AXS	  	91	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	221	  	YD17650	  	AXS	  	92	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	222	  	YD17651	  	AXS	  	103	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	

  
 4 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	223	  	YD17652	  	AXS	  	102	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J16	  	
	224	  	YD17653	  	AXS	  	101	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J16	  	
	225	  	YD17654	  	AXS	  	100	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J16	  	
	226	  	YD17655	  	AXS	  	99	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J16	  	
	227	  	YD17656	  	AXS	  	98	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J16	  	
	228	  	YD17657	  	AXS	  	97	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J16	  	
	229	  	YD17658	  	AXS	  	96	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J16	  	
	230	  	YD17659	  	AXS	  	95	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J16	  	
	231	  	YD17660	  	AXS	  	94	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J16	  	
	232	  	YD17661	  	AXS	  	93	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J16	  	
	233	  	YD17662	  	AXS	  	104	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	234	  	YD17663	  	AXS	  	105	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	235	  	YD17664	  	AXS	  	106	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	236	  	YD17665	  	AXS	  	107	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	237	  	YD17666	  	AXS	  	108	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	238	  	YD17667	  	AXS	  	109	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	239	  	YD17668	  	AXS	  	110	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	240	  	YD17669	  	AXS	  	111	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	241	  	YD17670	  	AXS	  	112	  	2009-10-07	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	242	  	YD17694	  	AXS	  	136	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	243	  	YD17671	  	AXS	  	113	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	244	  	YD17672	  	AXS	  	114	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	245	  	YD17673	  	AXS	  	115	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	246	  	YD17674	  	AXS	  	116	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	247	  	YD17675	  	AXS	  	117	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	248	  	YD17676	  	AXS	  	118	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	249	  	YD17677	  	AXS	  	119	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	250	  	YD17678	  	AXS	  	120	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	251	  	YD17679	  	AXS	  	121	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	252	  	YD17680	  	AXS	  	122	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	253	  	YD17681	  	AXS	  	123	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	254	  	YD17682	  	AXS	  	124	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	255	  	YD17683	  	AXS	  	125	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	256	  	YD17684	  	AXS	  	126	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	257	  	YD17685	  	AXS	  	127	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	258	  	YD17686	  	AXS	  	128	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	259	  	YD17687	  	AXS	  	129	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	260	  	YD17688	  	AXS	  	130	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	261	  	YD17689	  	AXS	  	131	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	262	  	YD17690	  	AXS	  	132	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	263	  	YD17691	  	AXS	  	133	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	264	  	YD17692	  	AXS	  	134	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	265	  	YD17693	  	AXS	  	135	  	2009-10-06	  	2027-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	266	  	YD08825	  	BERG	  	3	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	267	  	YD08824	  	BERG	  	4	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	268	  	YD08823	  	BERG	  	5	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	269	  	YD08822	  	BERG	  	6	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	270	  	YD08821	  	BERG	  	7	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	271	  	YD08820	  	BERG	  	8	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	272	  	YD08819	  	BERG	  	9	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	273	  	YD08818	  	BERG	  	10	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	274	  	YD08817	  	BERG	  	11	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	275	  	YD08816	  	BERG	  	12	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	276	  	YD08815	  	BERG	  	13	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	277	  	YD08814	  	BERG	  	14	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	278	  	YD08813	  	BERG	  	15	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	

  
 5 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	279	  	YD08812	  	BERG	  	16	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	280	  	YD08811	  	BERG	  	17	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	281	  	YD08810	  	BERG	  	18	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	282	  	YD08809	  	BERG	  	19	  	2010-06-07	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	283	  	YD08808	  	BERG	  	20	  	2010-06-07	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	284	  	YD08807	  	BERG	  	21	  	2010-06-07	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	285	  	YD08806	  	BERG	  	22	  	2010-06-07	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	286	  	YD08827	  	BERG	  	27	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	287	  	YD08828	  	BERG	  	28	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	288	  	YD08829	  	BERG	  	29	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	289	  	YD08830	  	BERG	  	30	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	290	  	YD08831	  	BERG	  	31	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	291	  	YD08832	  	BERG	  	32	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	292	  	YD08833	  	BERG	  	33	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	293	  	YD08834	  	BERG	  	34	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	294	  	YD08835	  	BERG	  	35	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	295	  	YD08836	  	BERG	  	36	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	296	  	YD08837	  	BERG	  	37	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	297	  	YD08838	  	BERG	  	38	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	298	  	YD08839	  	BERG	  	39	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	299	  	YD08840	  	BERG	  	40	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	300	  	YD08841	  	BERG	  	41	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	301	  	YD08842	  	BERG	  	42	  	2010-06-06	  	2027-06-08	  	115J14	  	
	302	  	YD08847	  	BERG	  	47	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J11	  	
	303	  	YD08848	  	BERG	  	48	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J11	  	
	304	  	YD08849	  	BERG	  	49	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J11	  	
	305	  	YD08850	  	BERG	  	50	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J11	  	
	306	  	YD08854	  	BERG	  	54	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J11	  	
	307	  	YD08855	  	BERG	  	55	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J11	  	
	308	  	YD08856	  	BERG	  	56	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J11	  	
	309	  	YD08853	  	BERG	  	53	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J11	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	310	  	YD08802	  	BERG	  	59	  	2010-06-07	  	2027-06-08	  	115J11	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	311	  	YC99926	  	KANA	  	47	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	312	  	YC99924	  	KANA	  	58	  	2010-06-04	  	2027-06-08	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	313	  	YC99927	  	KANA	  	48	  	2010-06-08	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	314	  	YC99928	  	KANA	  	49	  	2010-06-08	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	315	  	YC99929	  	KANA	  	50	  	2010-06-08	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	316	  	YC99930	  	KANA	  	51	  	2010-06-08	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	317	  	YC99931	  	KANA	  	52	  	2010-06-08	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	318	  	YC99932	  	KANA	  	53	  	2010-06-08	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	319	  	YC99933	  	KANA	  	54	  	2010-06-08	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	320	  	YC99934	  	KANA	  	55	  	2010-06-08	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	321	  	YC99935	  	KANA	  	56	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	322	  	YC99936	  	KANA	  	57	  	2010-06-05	  	2027-06-08	  	115J15	  	
	323	  	YC99879	  	KANA	  	1	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	324	  	YC99880	  	KANA	  	2	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	325	  	YC99881	  	KANA	  	3	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	326	  	YC99882	  	KANA	  	4	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	327	  	YC99883	  	KANA	  	5	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	328	  	YC99884	  	KANA	  	6	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	329	  	YC99885	  	KANA	  	7	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	330	  	YC99886	  	KANA	  	8	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	331	  	YC99887	  	KANA	  	9	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	332	  	YC99888	  	KANA	  	10	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	333	  	YC99889	  	KANA	  	11	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	334	  	YC99890	  	KANA	  	12	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	

  
 6 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	335	  	YC99891	  	KANA	  	13	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	336	  	YC99892	  	KANA	  	14	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	337	  	YC99893	  	KANA	  	15	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	338	  	YC99894	  	KANA	  	16	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	339	  	YC99895	  	KANA	  	17	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	340	  	YC99896	  	KANA	  	18	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	341	  	YC99897	  	KANA	  	19	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	342	  	YC99898	  	KANA	  	20	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	343	  	YC99899	  	KANA	  	21	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	344	  	YC99900	  	KANA	  	22	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	345	  	YC99901	  	KANA	  	23	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	346	  	YC99902	  	KANA	  	24	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	347	  	YC99903	  	KANA	  	25	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	348	  	YC99904	  	KANA	  	26	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	349	  	YC99905	  	KANA	  	27	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	350	  	YC99906	  	KANA	  	28	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	351	  	YC99907	  	KANA	  	29	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	352	  	YC99908	  	KANA	  	30	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	353	  	YC99909	  	KANA	  	31	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	354	  	YC99910	  	KANA	  	32	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	355	  	YC99911	  	KANA	  	33	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	356	  	YC99912	  	KANA	  	34	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	357	  	YC99913	  	KANA	  	35	  	2009-06-20	  	2027-06-22	  	115J15	  	
	358	  	YD08861	  	BERG F	  	61	  	2010-08-09	  	2027-08-13	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	359	  	YD08862	  	BERG F	  	62	  	2010-08-09	  	2027-08-13	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	360	  	YD08863	  	BERG F	  	63	  	2010-08-09	  	2027-08-13	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	361	  	YD08864	  	BERG F	  	64	  	2010-08-09	  	2027-08-13	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	362	  	YD08865	  	BERG F	  	65	  	2010-08-09	  	2027-08-13	  	115J11	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	363	  	YD08866	  	BERG F	  	66	  	2010-08-09	  	2027-08-13	  	115J11	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	364	  	YD08867	  	BERG F	  	67	  	2010-08-09	  	2027-08-13	  	115J14	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	365	  	YB37482	  	KOFFEE	  	1	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	366	  	YB37483	  	KOFFEE	  	2	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	367	  	YB37484	  	KOFFEE	  	3	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	368	  	YB37485	  	KOFFEE	  	4	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	369	  	YB37486	  	KOFFEE	  	5	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	370	  	YB37487	  	KOFFEE	  	6	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	371	  	YB37488	  	KOFFEE	  	7	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	372	  	YB37489	  	KOFFEE	  	8	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	373	  	YB37490	  	KOFFEE	  	9	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	374	  	YB37491	  	KOFFEE	  	10	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	375	  	YB37492	  	KOFFEE	  	11	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	376	  	YB37493	  	KOFFEE	  	12	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	377	  	YB37494	  	KOFFEE	  	13	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	378	  	YB37495	  	KOFFEE	  	14	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	379	  	YB37496	  	KOFFEE	  	15	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	380	  	YB37497	  	KOFFEE	  	16	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	381	  	YB37498	  	KOFFEE	  	17	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	382	  	YB37499	  	KOFFEE	  	18	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	383	  	YB37500	  	KOFFEE	  	19	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	384	  	YB37501	  	KOFFEE	  	20	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	385	  	YB37502	  	KOFFEE	  	21	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	386	  	YB37503	  	KOFFEE	  	22	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	387	  	YB37504	  	KOFFEE	  	23	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	388	  	YB37505	  	KOFFEE	  	24	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	389	  	YB37506	  	KOFFEE	  	25	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	390	  	YB37507	  	KOFFEE	  	26	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	

  
 7 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	391	  	YB37508	  	KOFFEE	  	27	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	392	  	YB37509	  	KOFFEE	  	28	  	1992-09-12	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	393	  	YB37510	  	KOFFEE	  	29	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	394	  	YB37511	  	KOFFEE	  	30	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	395	  	YB37512	  	KOFFEE	  	31	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	396	  	YB37513	  	KOFFEE	  	32	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	397	  	YB37514	  	KOFFEE	  	33	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	398	  	YB37515	  	KOFFEE	  	34	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	399	  	YB37516	  	KOFFEE	  	35	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	400	  	YB37517	  	KOFFEE	  	36	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	401	  	YB37518	  	KOFFEE	  	37	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	402	  	YB37519	  	KOFFEE	  	38	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	403	  	YB37520	  	KOFFEE	  	39	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	404	  	YB37521	  	KOFFEE	  	40	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	405	  	YB37522	  	KOFFEE	  	41	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	406	  	YB37523	  	KOFFEE	  	42	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	407	  	YB37524	  	KOFFEE	  	43	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	408	  	YB37525	  	KOFFEE	  	44	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	409	  	YB37526	  	KOFFEE	  	45	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	410	  	YB37527	  	KOFFEE	  	46	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	411	  	YB37528	  	KOFFEE	  	47	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	412	  	YB37529	  	KOFFEE	  	48	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	413	  	YB37530	  	KOFFEE	  	49	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	414	  	YB37531	  	KOFFEE	  	50	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	415	  	YB37532	  	KOFFEE	  	51	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	416	  	YB37533	  	KOFFEE	  	52	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	417	  	YB37534	  	KOFFEE	  	53	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	418	  	YB37535	  	KOFFEE	  	54	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	419	  	YB37536	  	KOFFEE	  	55	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	420	  	YB37537	  	KOFFEE	  	56	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	421	  	YB37538	  	KOFFEE	  	57	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	422	  	YB37539	  	KOFFEE	  	58	  	1992-09-13	  	2027-09-21	  	115J10	  	
	423	  	YC99914	  	KANA	  	36	  	2009-09-01	  	2027-09-29	  	115J15	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	424	  	YB37801	  	ICE	  	1	  	1993-01-21	  	2028-01-27	  	115J10	  	
	425	  	YB37802	  	ICE	  	2	  	1993-01-21	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	426	  	YB37803	  	ICE	  	3	  	1993-01-21	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	427	  	YB37804	  	ICE	  	4	  	1993-01-21	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	428	  	YB37805	  	ICE	  	5	  	1993-01-21	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	429	  	YB37809	  	ICE	  	9	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J10	  	
	430	  	YB37810	  	ICE	  	10	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J10	  	
	431	  	YB37811	  	ICE	  	11	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	432	  	YB37812	  	ICE	  	12	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	433	  	YB37813	  	ICE	  	13	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	434	  	YB37814	  	ICE	  	14	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	435	  	YB37815	  	ICE	  	15	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	436	  	YB37816	  	ICE	  	16	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	437	  	YB37817	  	ICE	  	17	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	438	  	YB37818	  	ICE	  	18	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	439	  	YB37825	  	ICE	  	25	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J10	  	
	440	  	YB37826	  	ICE	  	26	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J10	  	
	441	  	YB37827	  	ICE	  	27	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	442	  	YB37828	  	ICE	  	28	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	443	  	YB37829	  	ICE	  	29	  	1993-01-22	  	2028-01-27	  	115J11	  	
	444	  	YA86735	  	ANA	  	1	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	445	  	YA86736	  	ANA	  	2	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	446	  	YA86737	  	ANA	  	3	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	

  
 8 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	447	  	YA86738	  	ANA	  	4	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	448	  	YA86739	  	ANA	  	5	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	449	  	YA86740	  	ANA	  	6	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	450	  	YA86741	  	ANA	  	7	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	451	  	YA86742	  	ANA	  	8	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	452	  	YA86743	  	ANA	  	9	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	453	  	YA86744	  	ANA	  	10	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	454	  	YA86749	  	ANA	  	15	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	455	  	YA86750	  	ANA	  	16	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	456	  	YA86751	  	ANA	  	17	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	457	  	YA86752	  	ANA	  	18	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	458	  	YA86753	  	ANA	  	19	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	459	  	YA86754	  	ANA	  	20	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	460	  	YA86755	  	ANA	  	21	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	461	  	YA86756	  	ANA	  	22	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	462	  	YA86757	  	ANA	  	23	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	463	  	YA86758	  	ANA	  	24	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	464	  	YA86759	  	ANA	  	25	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	465	  	YA86760	  	ANA	  	26	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	466	  	YA86763	  	ANA	  	29	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	467	  	YA86764	  	ANA	  	30	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	468	  	YA86765	  	ANA	  	31	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	469	  	YA86766	  	ANA	  	32	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	470	  	YA86767	  	ANA	  	33	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	471	  	YA86768	  	ANA	  	34	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	472	  	YA86769	  	ANA	  	35	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	473	  	YA86770	  	ANA	  	36	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	474	  	YA86771	  	ANA	  	37	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	475	  	YA86772	  	ANA	  	38	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	476	  	YA86773	  	ANA	  	39	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	477	  	YA86774	  	ANA	  	40	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	478	  	YA86777	  	ANA	  	43	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	479	  	YA86778	  	ANA	  	44	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	480	  	YA86779	  	ANA	  	45	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	481	  	YA86780	  	ANA	  	46	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	482	  	YA86781	  	ANA	  	47	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	483	  	YA86782	  	ANA	  	48	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	484	  	YA86783	  	ANA	  	49	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	485	  	YA86784	  	ANA	  	50	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	486	  	YA86785	  	ANA	  	51	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	487	  	YA86786	  	ANA	  	52	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	488	  	YA86787	  	ANA	  	53	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	489	  	YA86788	  	ANA	  	54	  	1985-04-25	  	2028-02-17	  	115J10	  	
	490	  	YE32245	  	PAL	  	1	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	491	  	YE32246	  	PAL	  	2	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	492	  	YE32247	  	PAL	  	3	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	493	  	YE32248	  	PAL	  	4	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	494	  	YE32249	  	PAL	  	5	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	495	  	YE32138	  	PAL	  	6	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	496	  	YE32139	  	PAL	  	7	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	497	  	YE32140	  	PAL	  	8	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	498	  	YE32141	  	PAL	  	9	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	499	  	YE32142	  	PAL	  	10	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	500	  	YE32143	  	PAL	  	11	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	501	  	YE32144	  	PAL	  	12	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	502	  	YE32145	  	PAL	  	13	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	

  
 9 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	503	  	YE32146	  	PAL	  	14	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	504	  	YE32147	  	PAL	  	15	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	505	  	YE32148	  	PAL	  	16	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	506	  	YE32149	  	PAL	  	17	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	507	  	YE32150	  	PAL	  	18	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	508	  	YE32151	  	PAL	  	19	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	509	  	YE32152	  	PAL	  	20	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	510	  	YE32153	  	PAL	  	21	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	511	  	YE32154	  	PAL	  	22	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	512	  	YE32155	  	PAL	  	23	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	513	  	YE32156	  	PAL	  	24	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	514	  	YE32157	  	PAL	  	25	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	515	  	YE32196	  	PAL	  	26	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	516	  	YE32197	  	PAL	  	27	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	517	  	YE32178	  	PAL	  	28	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	518	  	YE32179	  	PAL	  	29	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	519	  	YE32180	  	PAL	  	30	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	520	  	YE32181	  	PAL	  	31	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	521	  	YE32182	  	PAL	  	32	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	522	  	YE32183	  	PAL	  	33	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	523	  	YE32184	  	PAL	  	34	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	524	  	YE32185	  	PAL	  	35	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	525	  	YE32186	  	PAL	  	36	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	526	  	YE32187	  	PAL	  	37	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	527	  	YE32101	  	PAL	  	38	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	528	  	YE32102	  	PAL	  	39	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	529	  	YE32103	  	PAL	  	40	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	530	  	YE32104	  	PAL	  	41	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	531	  	YE32106	  	PAL	  	42	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	532	  	YE32105	  	PAL	  	43	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	533	  	YE32108	  	PAL	  	44	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	534	  	YE32107	  	PAL	  	45	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	535	  	YE32110	  	PAL	  	46	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	536	  	YE32109	  	PAL	  	47	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	537	  	YE32112	  	PAL	  	48	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	538	  	YE32111	  	PAL	  	49	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	539	  	YE32114	  	PAL	  	50	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	540	  	YE32113	  	PAL	  	51	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	541	  	YE32115	  	PAL	  	52	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	542	  	YE32116	  	PAL	  	53	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	543	  	YE32118	  	PAL	  	54	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	544	  	YE32117	  	PAL	  	55	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	545	  	YE32232	  	PAL	  	56	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	546	  	YE32231	  	PAL	  	57	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	547	  	YE32233	  	PAL	  	58	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	548	  	YE32234	  	PAL	  	60	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	549	  	YE32235	  	PAL	  	62	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	550	  	YE32236	  	PAL	  	64	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	551	  	YE32237	  	PAL	  	65	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	552	  	YE32135	  	PAL	  	66	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	553	  	YE32136	  	PAL	  	67	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	554	  	YE32133	  	PAL	  	68	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	555	  	YE32134	  	PAL	  	69	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	556	  	YE32119	  	PAL	  	70	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	557	  	YE32120	  	PAL	  	71	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	558	  	YE32121	  	PAL	  	72	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	

  
 10 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	559	  	YE32122	  	PAL	  	73	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	560	  	YE32123	  	PAL	  	74	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	561	  	YE32124	  	PAL	  	75	  	2016-05-16	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	562	  	YE32125	  	PAL	  	108	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	563	  	YE32126	  	PAL	  	109	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	564	  	YE32127	  	PAL	  	110	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	565	  	YE32128	  	PAL	  	111	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	566	  	YE32129	  	PAL	  	112	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	567	  	YE32130	  	PAL	  	113	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	568	  	YE32131	  	PAL	  	114	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	569	  	YE32132	  	PAL	  	115	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	570	  	YE32188	  	PAL	  	143	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	571	  	YE32200	  	PAL	  	150	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	572	  	YE32189	  	PAL	  	151	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	573	  	YE32190	  	PAL	  	152	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	574	  	YE32191	  	PAL	  	153	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	575	  	YE32192	  	PAL	  	154	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	576	  	YE32193	  	PAL	  	155	  	2016-05-17	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	577	  	YD60030	  	AXS	  	137	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	578	  	YD60031	  	AXS	  	138	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	579	  	YD60032	  	AXS	  	139	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	580	  	YD60033	  	AXS	  	140	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	581	  	YD60034	  	AXS	  	141	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	582	  	YD60035	  	AXS	  	142	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	583	  	YD60036	  	AXS	  	143	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	584	  	YD60037	  	AXS	  	144	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	585	  	YD60038	  	AXS	  	145	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	586	  	YD60039	  	AXS	  	146	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	587	  	YD60040	  	AXS	  	147	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	588	  	YD60041	  	AXS	  	148	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	589	  	YD60042	  	AXS	  	149	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	590	  	YD60043	  	AXS	  	150	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	591	  	YD60044	  	AXS	  	151	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	592	  	YD60045	  	AXS	  	152	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	593	  	YD60046	  	AXS	  	154	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	594	  	YD60047	  	AXS	  	153	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	595	  	YD60048	  	AXS	  	155	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	596	  	YD60049	  	AXS	  	156	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	597	  	YD60050	  	AXS	  	157	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	598	  	YD60051	  	AXS	  	158	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	599	  	YD60052	  	AXS	  	159	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	600	  	YD60053	  	AXS	  	160	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	601	  	YD60054	  	AXS	  	161	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	602	  	YD60055	  	AXS	  	162	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	603	  	YD60056	  	AXS	  	163	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	604	  	YD60057	  	AXS	  	164	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	605	  	YD60058	  	AXS	  	165	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	606	  	YD60059	  	AXS	  	166	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	607	  	YD60060	  	AXS	  	167	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	608	  	YD60061	  	AXS	  	168	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	609	  	YD60062	  	AXS	  	169	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	610	  	YD60063	  	AXS	  	170	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	611	  	YD60064	  	AXS	  	171	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	612	  	YD60065	  	AXS	  	172	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	613	  	YD60066	  	AXS	  	173	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	614	  	YD60067	  	AXS	  	174	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	

  
 11 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	615	  	YD60068	  	AXS	  	175	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	616	  	YD60069	  	AXS	  	176	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	617	  	YD60070	  	AXS	  	177	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	618	  	YD60071	  	AXS	  	178	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	619	  	YD60072	  	AXS	  	179	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	620	  	YD60073	  	AXS	  	180	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	621	  	YD60074	  	AXS	  	181	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	622	  	YD60075	  	AXS	  	182	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	623	  	YD60076	  	AXS	  	183	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	624	  	YD60077	  	AXS	  	184	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	625	  	YD60078	  	AXS	  	185	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	626	  	YD60079	  	AXS	  	186	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J09	  	
	627	  	YD61120	  	AXS	  	187	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	628	  	YD61121	  	AXS	  	188	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	629	  	YD61122	  	AXS	  	189	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	630	  	YD61123	  	AXS	  	190	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	631	  	YD61124	  	AXS	  	191	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	632	  	YD61125	  	AXS	  	192	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	633	  	YD61126	  	AXS	  	193	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	634	  	YD61127	  	AXS	  	194	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	635	  	YD61128	  	AXS	  	196	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	636	  	YD61129	  	AXS	  	195	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	637	  	YD61130	  	AXS	  	197	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	638	  	YD61131	  	AXS	  	198	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	639	  	YD61132	  	AXS	  	199	  	2010-05-11	  	2028-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	640	  	95744	  	CAT	  	67	  	1965-12-05	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	641	  	95746	  	CAT	  	69	  	1965-12-05	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	642	  	Y 35194	  	MOUSE	  	3	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	643	  	Y 35196	  	MOUSE	  	5	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	644	  	Y 35198	  	MOUSE	  	7	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	645	  	Y 35199	  	MOUSE	  	8	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	646	  	Y 35200	  	MOUSE	  	9	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	647	  	Y 35201	  	MOUSE	  	10	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	648	  	Y 35202	  	MOUSE	  	11	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	649	  	Y 35203	  	MOUSE	  	12	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	650	  	Y 35204	  	MOUSE	  	13	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	651	  	Y 35205	  	MOUSE	  	14	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	652	  	Y 35206	  	MOUSE	  	15	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	653	  	Y 35207	  	MOUSE	  	16	  	1969-06-04	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	654	  	Y 35483	  	MOUSE	  	89	  	1969-06-22	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	655	  	Y 35491	  	MOUSE	  	97	  	1969-06-22	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	656	  	Y 35492	  	MOUSE	  	98	  	1969-06-22	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	657	  	Y 35517	  	MOUSE	  	123	  	1969-06-22	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	658	  	Y 35518	  	MOUSE	  	124	  	1969-06-22	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	659	  	Y 35519	  	MOUSE	  	125	  	1969-06-22	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	660	  	Y 35520	  	MOUSE	  	126	  	1969-06-22	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	661	  	Y 35521	  	MOUSE	  	127	  	1969-06-22	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	662	  	Y 35522	  	MOUSE	  	128	  	1969-06-22	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	663	  	YB36618	  	CAS	  	31	  	1991-11-28	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	664	  	YB36619	  	CAS	  	32	  	1991-11-28	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	665	  	YB36620	  	CAS	  	33	  	1991-11-28	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	666	  	YB36621	  	CAS	  	34	  	1991-11-28	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	667	  	YB36622	  	CAS	  	35	  	1991-11-28	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	668	  	YB36623	  	CAS	  	36	  	1991-11-28	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	669	  	YB37242	  	E	  	23	  	1992-09-01	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	670	  	YB37243	  	E	  	24	  	1992-09-01	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	

  
 12 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	671	  	YB37244	  	E	  	25	  	1992-09-01	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	672	  	YB37246	  	E	  	27	  	1992-09-01	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	673	  	YB37247	  	E	  	28	  	1992-09-01	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	674	  	YB37248	  	E	  	29	  	1992-09-01	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	675	  	YB37249	  	E	  	30	  	1992-09-01	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	676	  	YB37250	  	E	  	31	  	1992-09-01	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	677	  	YB37251	  	E	  	32	  	1992-09-01	  	2031-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	678	  	YB37278	  	F	  	27	  	1992-08-30	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	679	  	YB37279	  	F	  	28	  	1992-08-30	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	680	  	YB37640	  	I	  	1	  	1992-09-09	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	681	  	YB37641	  	I	  	2	  	1992-09-09	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	682	  	YB37642	  	I	  	3	  	1992-09-09	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	683	  	YB37643	  	I	  	4	  	1992-09-09	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	684	  	YB37658	  	I	  	19	  	1992-09-09	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	685	  	YB37659	  	I	  	20	  	1992-09-09	  	2031-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	686	  	YC81316	  	BRIT	  	1	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	687	  	YC81317	  	BRIT	  	2	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	688	  	YC81318	  	BRIT	  	3	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	689	  	YC81319	  	BRIT	  	4	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	690	  	YC81320	  	BRIT	  	5	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	691	  	YC81321	  	BRIT	  	6	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	692	  	YC81322	  	BRIT	  	7	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	693	  	YC81323	  	BRIT	  	8	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	694	  	YC81324	  	BRIT	  	9	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	695	  	YC81325	  	BRIT	  	10	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	696	  	YC81326	  	BRIT	  	11	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	697	  	YC81327	  	BRIT	  	12	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	698	  	YC81328	  	BRIT	  	13	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	699	  	YC81329	  	BRIT	  	14	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	700	  	YC81330	  	BRIT	  	15	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	701	  	YC81331	  	BRIT	  	16	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	702	  	YC81332	  	BRIT	  	17	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	703	  	YC81333	  	BRIT	  	18	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	704	  	YC81334	  	BRIT	  	19	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	705	  	YC81335	  	BRIT	  	20	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	706	  	YC81336	  	BRIT	  	21	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	707	  	YC81337	  	BRIT	  	22	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	708	  	YC81338	  	BRIT	  	23	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	709	  	YC81339	  	BRIT	  	24	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	710	  	YC81340	  	BRIT	  	25	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	711	  	YC81341	  	BRIT	  	26	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	712	  	YC81342	  	BRIT	  	27	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	713	  	YC81343	  	BRIT	  	28	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	714	  	YC81344	  	BRIT	  	29	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	715	  	YC81345	  	BRIT	  	30	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	716	  	YC81346	  	BRIT	  	31	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	717	  	YC81347	  	BRIT	  	32	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	718	  	YC81348	  	BRIT	  	33	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	719	  	YC81349	  	BRIT	  	34	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	720	  	YC81350	  	BRIT	  	35	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	721	  	YC81351	  	BRIT	  	36	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	722	  	YC81352	  	BRIT	  	37	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	723	  	YC81353	  	BRIT	  	38	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	724	  	YC81354	  	BRIT	  	39	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	725	  	YC81355	  	BRIT	  	40	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	726	  	YC81356	  	BRIT	  	41	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	

  
 13 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	727	  	YC81357	  	BRIT	  	42	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	728	  	YC81358	  	BRIT	  	43	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	729	  	YC81359	  	BRIT	  	44	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	730	  	YC81360	  	BRIT	  	45	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	731	  	YC81361	  	BRIT	  	46	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	732	  	YC81362	  	BRIT	  	47	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	733	  	YC81363	  	BRIT	  	48	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	734	  	YC81364	  	BRIT	  	49	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	735	  	YC81365	  	BRIT	  	50	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	736	  	YC81366	  	BRIT	  	51	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	737	  	YC81367	  	BRIT	  	52	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	738	  	YC81368	  	BRIT	  	53	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	739	  	YC81369	  	BRIT	  	54	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	740	  	YC81370	  	BRIT	  	55	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	741	  	YC81371	  	BRIT	  	56	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	742	  	YC81372	  	BRIT	  	57	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	743	  	YC81373	  	BRIT	  	58	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	744	  	YC81374	  	BRIT	  	59	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	745	  	YC81375	  	BRIT	  	60	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	746	  	YC81376	  	BRIT	  	61	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	747	  	YC81377	  	BRIT	  	62	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	748	  	YC81378	  	BRIT	  	63	  	2008-06-10	  	2034-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	749	  	YC81379	  	CC	  	1	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	750	  	YC81380	  	CC	  	2	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	751	  	YC81381	  	CC	  	3	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	752	  	YC81382	  	CC	  	4	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	753	  	YC81383	  	CC	  	5	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	754	  	YC81384	  	CC	  	6	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	755	  	YC81385	  	CC	  	7	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	756	  	YC81386	  	CC	  	8	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	757	  	YC81387	  	CC	  	9	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	758	  	YC81388	  	CC	  	10	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	759	  	YC81389	  	CC	  	11	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	760	  	YC81390	  	CC	  	12	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	761	  	YC81391	  	CC	  	13	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	762	  	YC81392	  	CC	  	14	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	763	  	YC81393	  	CC	  	15	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	764	  	YC81394	  	CC	  	16	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	765	  	YC81395	  	CC	  	17	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	766	  	YC81396	  	CC	  	18	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	767	  	YC81397	  	CC	  	19	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	768	  	YC81398	  	CC	  	20	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	769	  	YC81399	  	CC	  	21	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	770	  	YC81400	  	CC	  	22	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	771	  	YC81401	  	CC	  	23	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	772	  	YC81402	  	CC	  	24	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	773	  	YC81403	  	CC	  	25	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	774	  	YC81404	  	CC	  	26	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	775	  	YC81405	  	CC	  	27	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	776	  	YC81406	  	CC	  	28	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	777	  	YC81407	  	CC	  	29	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	778	  	YC81408	  	CC	  	30	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	779	  	YC81409	  	CC	  	31	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	780	  	YC81410	  	CC	  	32	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	781	  	YC81411	  	CC	  	33	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	782	  	YC81412	  	CC	  	34	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	

  
 14 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	783	  	YC81413	  	CC	  	35	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	784	  	YC81414	  	CC	  	36	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	785	  	YC81415	  	CC	  	37	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	786	  	YC81416	  	CC	  	38	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	787	  	YC81417	  	CC	  	39	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	788	  	YC81418	  	CC	  	40	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	789	  	YC81419	  	CC	  	41	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	790	  	YC81420	  	CC	  	42	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	791	  	YC81421	  	CC	  	43	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	792	  	YC81422	  	CC	  	44	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	793	  	YC81423	  	CC	  	45	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	794	  	YC81424	  	CC	  	46	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	795	  	YC81425	  	CC	  	47	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	796	  	YC81426	  	CC	  	48	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	797	  	YC81427	  	CC	  	49	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	798	  	YC81428	  	CC	  	50	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	799	  	YC81429	  	CC	  	51	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	800	  	YC81430	  	CC	  	52	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	801	  	YC81431	  	CC	  	53	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	802	  	YC81432	  	CC	  	54	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	803	  	YC81433	  	CC	  	55	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	804	  	YC81434	  	CC	  	56	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	805	  	YC81435	  	CC	  	57	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	806	  	YC81436	  	CC	  	58	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	807	  	YC81437	  	CC	  	59	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	808	  	YC81438	  	CC	  	60	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	809	  	YC81439	  	CC	  	61	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	810	  	YC81440	  	CC	  	62	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	811	  	YC81441	  	CC	  	63	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	812	  	YC81442	  	CC	  	64	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	813	  	YC81443	  	CC	  	65	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	814	  	YC81444	  	CC	  	66	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	815	  	YC81445	  	CC	  	67	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	816	  	YC81446	  	CC	  	68	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	817	  	YC81447	  	CC	  	69	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	818	  	YC81448	  	CC	  	70	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	819	  	YC81449	  	CC	  	71	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	820	  	YC81450	  	CC	  	72	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	821	  	YC81451	  	CC	  	73	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	822	  	YC81452	  	CC	  	74	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	823	  	YC81453	  	CC	  	75	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	824	  	YC81454	  	CC	  	76	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	825	  	YC81455	  	CC	  	77	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	826	  	YC81456	  	CC	  	78	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	827	  	YC81457	  	CC	  	79	  	2008-06-12	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	828	  	YC81458	  	CC	  	80	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	829	  	YC81459	  	CC	  	81	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	830	  	YC81460	  	CC	  	82	  	2008-06-11	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	831	  	YC81461	  	CC	  	83	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	832	  	YC81462	  	CC	  	84	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	833	  	YC81463	  	CC	  	85	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	834	  	YC81464	  	CC	  	86	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	835	  	YC81465	  	CC	  	87	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	836	  	YC81466	  	CC	  	88	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	837	  	YC81467	  	CC	  	89	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	838	  	YC81468	  	CC	  	90	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	

  
 15 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	839	  	YC81469	  	CC	  	91	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	840	  	YC81470	  	CC	  	92	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	841	  	YC81471	  	CC	  	93	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	842	  	YC81472	  	CC	  	94	  	2008-06-13	  	2034-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	843	  	Y 10693	  	JOE	  	89	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	844	  	Y 10694	  	JOE	  	90	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	845	  	Y 10695	  	JOE	  	91	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	846	  	Y 10696	  	JOE	  	92	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	847	  	Y 10697	  	JOE	  	93	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	848	  	Y 10698	  	JOE	  	94	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	849	  	Y 10699	  	JOE	  	95	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	850	  	Y 10700	  	JOE	  	96	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	851	  	Y 10702	  	JOE	  	98	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	852	  	Y 10703	  	JOE	  	99	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	853	  	Y 10705	  	JOE	  	101	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	854	  	Y 10706	  	JOE	  	102	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	855	  	Y 10707	  	JOE	  	103	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	856	  	Y 10708	  	JOE	  	104	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	857	  	Y 35192	  	MOUSE	  	1	  	1969-06-04	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	858	  	Y 35193	  	MOUSE	  	2	  	1969-06-04	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	859	  	Y 51850	  	JOE	  	91	  	1970-03-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	860	  	Y 51851	  	JOE	  	92	  	1970-03-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	861	  	Y 51852	  	JOE	  	93	  	1970-03-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	862	  	Y 51853	  	JOE	  	94	  	1970-03-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	863	  	Y 51854	  	JOE	  	95	  	1970-03-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	864	  	Y 51855	  	JOE	  	96	  	1970-03-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	865	  	YC64893	  	VIK	  	1	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	866	  	YC64894	  	VIK	  	2	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	867	  	YC64895	  	VIK	  	3	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	868	  	YC64896	  	VIK	  	4	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	869	  	YC64897	  	VIK	  	5	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	870	  	YC64898	  	VIK	  	6	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	871	  	YC64899	  	VIK	  	7	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	872	  	YC64900	  	VIK	  	8	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	873	  	YC64901	  	VIK	  	9	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	874	  	YC64902	  	VIK	  	10	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	875	  	YC64903	  	VIK	  	11	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	876	  	YC64904	  	VIK	  	12	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	877	  	YC64905	  	VIK	  	13	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	878	  	YC64906	  	VIK	  	14	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	879	  	YC64907	  	VIK	  	15	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	880	  	YC64908	  	VIK	  	16	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	881	  	YC64909	  	VIK	  	17	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	882	  	YC64910	  	VIK	  	18	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	883	  	YC64911	  	VIK	  	19	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	884	  	YC64912	  	VIK	  	20	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	885	  	YC64913	  	VIK	  	21	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	886	  	YC64914	  	VIK	  	22	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	887	  	YC64915	  	VIK	  	23	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	888	  	YC64916	  	VIK	  	24	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	889	  	YC64917	  	VIK	  	25	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	890	  	YC64918	  	VIK	  	26	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	891	  	YC64919	  	VIK	  	27	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	892	  	YC64920	  	VIK	  	28	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	893	  	YC64921	  	VIK	  	29	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	894	  	YC64922	  	VIK	  	30	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	

  
 16 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	895	  	YC64923	  	VIK	  	31	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	896	  	YC64924	  	VIK	  	32	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	897	  	YC64925	  	VIK	  	33	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	898	  	YC64926	  	VIK	  	34	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	899	  	YC64927	  	VIK	  	35	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	900	  	YC64928	  	VIK	  	36	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	901	  	YC64929	  	VIK	  	37	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	902	  	YC64930	  	VIK	  	38	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	903	  	YC64931	  	VIK	  	39	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	904	  	YC64932	  	VIK	  	40	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	905	  	YC64933	  	VIK	  	41	  	2007-05-31	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	906	  	YC64934	  	VIK	  	42	  	2007-05-31	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	907	  	YC64935	  	VIK	  	43	  	2007-06-05	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	908	  	YC64936	  	VIK	  	44	  	2007-06-05	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	909	  	YC64937	  	VIK	  	45	  	2007-06-05	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	910	  	YC64938	  	VIK	  	46	  	2007-06-05	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	911	  	YC64939	  	VIK	  	47	  	2007-06-05	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	912	  	YC64940	  	VIK	  	48	  	2007-06-05	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	913	  	YC64941	  	VIK	  	49	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	914	  	YC64942	  	VIK	  	50	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	915	  	YC64943	  	VIK	  	51	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	916	  	YC64944	  	VIK	  	52	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	917	  	YC64945	  	VIK	  	53	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	918	  	YC64946	  	VIK	  	54	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	919	  	YC64947	  	VIK	  	55	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	920	  	YC64948	  	VIK	  	56	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	921	  	YC64949	  	VIK	  	57	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	922	  	YC64950	  	VIK	  	58	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	923	  	YC64951	  	VIK	  	59	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	924	  	YC64952	  	VIK	  	60	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	925	  	YC64953	  	VIK	  	61	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	926	  	YC64954	  	VIK	  	62	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	927	  	YC64955	  	VIK	  	63	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	928	  	YC64956	  	VIK	  	64	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	929	  	YC64958	  	VIK	  	66	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	930	  	YC64959	  	VIK	  	67	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	931	  	YC64960	  	VIK	  	68	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	932	  	YC64961	  	VIK	  	69	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	933	  	YC64962	  	VIK	  	70	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	934	  	YC64963	  	VIK	  	71	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	935	  	YC64964	  	VIK	  	72	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	936	  	YC64965	  	VIK	  	73	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	937	  	YC64966	  	VIK	  	74	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	938	  	YC64967	  	VIK	  	75	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	939	  	YC64968	  	VIK	  	76	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	940	  	YC64969	  	VIK	  	77	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	941	  	YC64970	  	VIK	  	78	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	942	  	YC64971	  	VIK	  	79	  	2007-05-24	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	943	  	YC64972	  	VIK	  	80	  	2007-05-27	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	944	  	YC64973	  	VIK	  	81	  	2007-05-25	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	945	  	YC64974	  	VIK	  	82	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	946	  	YC64975	  	VIK	  	83	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	947	  	YC64976	  	VIK	  	84	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	948	  	YC64977	  	VIK	  	85	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	949	  	YC64978	  	VIK	  	86	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	950	  	YC64979	  	VIK	  	87	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	

  
 17 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	951	  	YC64980	  	VIK	  	88	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	952	  	YC64981	  	VIK	  	89	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	953	  	YC64982	  	VIK	  	90	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	954	  	YC64983	  	VIK	  	91	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	955	  	YC64984	  	VIK	  	92	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	956	  	YC64985	  	VIK	  	93	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	957	  	YC64986	  	VIK	  	94	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	958	  	YC64987	  	VIK	  	95	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	959	  	YC64988	  	VIK	  	96	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	960	  	YC64989	  	VIK	  	97	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	961	  	YC64990	  	VIK	  	98	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	962	  	YC64991	  	VIK	  	99	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	963	  	YC64992	  	VIK	  	100	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	964	  	YC64993	  	VIK	  	101	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	965	  	YC64994	  	VIK	  	102	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	966	  	YC64995	  	VIK	  	103	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	967	  	YC64996	  	VIK	  	104	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	968	  	YC64997	  	VIK	  	105	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	969	  	YC64998	  	VIK	  	106	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	970	  	YC64999	  	VIK	  	107	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	971	  	YC65000	  	VIK	  	108	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	972	  	YC65001	  	VIK	  	109	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	973	  	YC65002	  	VIK	  	110	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	974	  	YC65003	  	VIK	  	111	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	975	  	YC65004	  	VIK	  	112	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	976	  	YC65005	  	VIK	  	113	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	977	  	YC65006	  	VIK	  	114	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	978	  	YC65007	  	VIK	  	115	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	979	  	YC65008	  	VIK	  	116	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	980	  	YC65009	  	VIK	  	117	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	981	  	YC65010	  	VIK	  	118	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	982	  	YC65011	  	VIK	  	119	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	983	  	YC65012	  	VIK	  	120	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	984	  	YC65013	  	VIK	  	121	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	985	  	YC65014	  	VIK	  	122	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	986	  	YC65015	  	VIK	  	123	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	987	  	YC65016	  	VIK	  	124	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	988	  	YC65017	  	VIK	  	125	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	989	  	YC65018	  	VIK	  	126	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	990	  	YC65019	  	VIK	  	127	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	991	  	YC65020	  	VIK	  	128	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	992	  	YC65021	  	VIK	  	129	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	993	  	YC65022	  	VIK	  	130	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	994	  	YC65023	  	VIK	  	131	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	995	  	YC65024	  	VIK	  	132	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	996	  	YC65025	  	VIK	  	133	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	997	  	YC65026	  	VIK	  	134	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	998	  	YC65027	  	VIK	  	135	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	999	  	YC65028	  	VIK	  	136	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1000	  	YC65029	  	VIK	  	137	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1001	  	YC65030	  	VIK	  	138	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1002	  	YC65031	  	VIK	  	139	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1003	  	YC65032	  	VIK	  	140	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1004	  	YC65033	  	VIK	  	141	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1005	  	YC65034	  	VIK	  	142	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1006	  	YC65035	  	VIK	  	143	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	

  
 18 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	1007	  	YC65036	  	VIK	  	144	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1008	  	YC65037	  	VIK	  	145	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1009	  	YC65038	  	VIK	  	146	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1010	  	YC65039	  	VIK	  	147	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1011	  	YC65040	  	VIK	  	148	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1012	  	YC65041	  	VIK	  	149	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1013	  	YC65042	  	VIK	  	150	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1014	  	YC65043	  	VIK	  	151	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1015	  	YC65044	  	VIK	  	152	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1016	  	YC65045	  	VIK	  	153	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1017	  	YC65046	  	VIK	  	154	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1018	  	YC65047	  	VIK	  	155	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1019	  	YC65048	  	VIK	  	156	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1020	  	YC65049	  	VIK	  	157	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1021	  	YC65050	  	VIK	  	158	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1022	  	YC65051	  	VIK	  	159	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1023	  	YC65052	  	VIK	  	160	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1024	  	YC65053	  	VIK	  	161	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1025	  	YC65054	  	VIK	  	162	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1026	  	YC65055	  	VIK	  	163	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1027	  	YC65056	  	VIK	  	164	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1028	  	YC65057	  	VIK	  	165	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1029	  	YC65058	  	VIK	  	166	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1030	  	YC65059	  	VIK	  	167	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1031	  	YC65060	  	VIK	  	168	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1032	  	YC65061	  	VIK	  	169	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1033	  	YC65062	  	VIK	  	170	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1034	  	YC65063	  	VIK	  	171	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1035	  	YC65064	  	VIK	  	172	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1036	  	YC65065	  	VIK	  	173	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1037	  	YC65066	  	VIK	  	174	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1038	  	YC65067	  	VIK	  	175	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1039	  	YC65068	  	VIK	  	176	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1040	  	YC65069	  	VIK	  	177	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1041	  	YC65070	  	VIK	  	178	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1042	  	YC65071	  	VIK	  	179	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1043	  	YC65072	  	VIK	  	180	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1044	  	YC65073	  	VIK	  	181	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1045	  	YC65074	  	VIK	  	182	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1046	  	YC65075	  	VIK	  	183	  	2007-05-30	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1047	  	YC65076	  	VIK	  	184	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1048	  	YC65077	  	VIK	  	185	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1049	  	YC65078	  	VIK	  	186	  	2007-05-28	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1050	  	YC65079	  	VIK	  	187	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1051	  	YC65080	  	VIK	  	188	  	2007-05-29	  	2036-03-05	  	115J15	  	
	1052	  	YC64957	  	VIK	  	65	  	2007-05-26	  	2036-03-05	  	115J10	  	
	1053	  	4252	  	HELICOPTER	  		  	1943-09-04	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1054	  	56979	  	#1 BOMBER GROUP	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1055	  	56980	  	#3 BOMBER GROUP	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1056	  	56981	  	#5 BOMBER GROUP	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1057	  	56983	  	#1 AIRPORT GROU	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1058	  	56984	  	#3 AIRPORT GROU	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1059	  	56985	  	#5 AIRPORT GROU	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1060	  	56987	  	#2 BOMBER GROUP	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1061	  	56988	  	#6 BOMBER GROUP	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1062	  	56990	  	#2 AIRPORT GROU	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	

  
 19 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	1063	  	56991	  	#4 AIRPORT GROU	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1064	  	56992	  	#6 AIRPORT GROU	  		  	1947-08-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1065	  	56993	  	#8 AIRPORT GROU	  		  	1947-07-07	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1066	  	92201	  	CAT	  	1	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1067	  	92202	  	CAT	  	2	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1068	  	92203	  	CAT	  	3	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1069	  	92204	  	CAT	  	4	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1070	  	92205	  	CAT	  	5	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1071	  	92206	  	CAT	  	6	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1072	  	92207	  	CAT	  	7	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1073	  	92208	  	CAT	  	8	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1074	  	92209	  	CAT	  	9	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1075	  	92210	  	CAT	  	10	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1076	  	92211	  	CAT	  	11	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1077	  	92212	  	CAT	  	12	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1078	  	92213	  	CAT	  	13	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1079	  	92214	  	CAT	  	14	  	1965-06-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1080	  	92215	  	CAT	  	15	  	1965-06-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1081	  	92216	  	CAT	  	16	  	1965-06-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1082	  	92217	  	CAT	  	17	  	1965-06-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1083	  	92218	  	CAT	  	18	  	1965-06-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1084	  	92219	  	CAT	  	19	  	1965-06-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1085	  	92220	  	CAT	  	20	  	1965-06-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1086	  	92221	  	CAT	  	21	  	1965-06-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1087	  	92222	  	CAT	  	22	  	1965-06-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1088	  	92764	  	CAT	  	23	  	1965-09-10	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1089	  	92765	  	CAT	  	24	  	1965-09-10	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1090	  	92766	  	CAT	  	25	  	1965-09-10	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1091	  	92776	  	CAT	  	35	  	1965-09-11	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1092	  	92777	  	CAT	  	36	  	1965-09-11	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1093	  	92778	  	CAT	  	37	  	1965-09-11	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1094	  	92779	  	CAT	  	38	  	1965-09-11	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1095	  	92780	  	CAT	  	39	  	1965-09-12	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1096	  	92781	  	CAT	  	40	  	1965-09-12	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1097	  	92782	  	CAT	  	41	  	1965-09-12	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1098	  	92783	  	CAT	  	42	  	1965-09-12	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1099	  	95724	  	CAT	  	47	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1100	  	95725	  	CAT	  	48	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1101	  	95726	  	CAT	  	49	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1102	  	95727	  	CAT	  	50	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1103	  	95728	  	CAT	  	51	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1104	  	95729	  	CAT	  	52	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1105	  	95730	  	CAT	  	53	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1106	  	95731	  	CAT	  	54	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1107	  	95732	  	CAT	  	55	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	1108	  	95733	  	CAT	  	56	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J15	  	
	1109	  	95734	  	CAT	  	57	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1110	  	95735	  	CAT	  	58	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1111	  	95736	  	CAT	  	59	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1112	  	95737	  	CAT	  	60	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1113	  	95738	  	CAT	  	61	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1114	  	95739	  	CAT	  	62	  	1965-12-02	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1115	  	Y 10701	  	JOE	  	97	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1116	  	Y 10704	  	JOE	  	100	  	1966-09-24	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1117	  	Y 35582	  	MOUSE	  	161	  	1969-06-25	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	1118	  	Y 35583	  	MOUSE	  	162	  	1969-06-25	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)

  
 20 

 List of Casino Quartz Claims 

 

									
	                 
	  	 District:
	  	 Whitehorse
	  		  	
		  	 Status:
	  	 Active
	  	 Claim owner:
	  	 Casino Minig Corp.

  

															
	 #
	  	 Grant Number
	  	 Claim Name
	  	 Claim

Number
	  	 Staking date
	  	 Expiry Date
	  	 NTS Map
	  	 Non Standard Size

	1119	  	Y 35584	  	MOUSE	  	163	  	1969-06-25	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	1120	  	Y 35585	  	LOST FR.	  	1	  	1969-06-25	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1121	  	Y 35586	  	LOST FR.	  	2	  	1969-06-25	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1122	  	Y 35587	  	LOST FR.	  	3	  	1969-06-25	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1123	  	Y 36686	  	CAT	  	22	  	1969-08-12	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	1124	  	Y 36687	  	CAT	  	47	  	1969-08-12	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	1125	  	Y 36688	  	CAT	  	48	  	1969-08-12	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	1126	  	Y 36690	  	CAT	  	62	  	1969-08-12	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	1127	  	Y 39601	  	CAT	  	3	  	1969-10-23	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	1128	  	Y 39602	  	CAT	  	4	  	1969-10-23	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	1129	  	Y 39603	  	CAT	  	23	  	1969-10-23	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	1130	  	Y 51846	  	CAT	  	1	  	1970-03-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	1131	  	Y 51847	  	CAT	  	2	  	1970-03-29	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)
	1132	  	Y 51849	  	CAT	  	26	  	1970-03-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	Partial Quartz fraction (<25 acres)
	1133	  	YB37280	  	F	  	29	  	1992-08-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1134	  	YB37282	  	F	  	31	  	1992-08-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1135	  	YB37284	  	F	  	33	  	1992-08-30	  	2036-03-25	  	115J10	  	
	1136	  	Y 36689	  	CAT	  	57	  	1969-08-12	  	2036-06-05	  	115J10	  	Full Quartz fraction (25+ acres)

  
 21

Source: [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00316-of-00352.parquet"}, [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00316-of-00352.parquet"}]]