Document:

wve-ex1052_412.htm

Exhibit 10.5.2

 

733 CONCORD AVENUE

CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS

(the “Building”)

FIRST AMENDMENT

(“First Amendment”)

 

	
EXECUTION DATE:
	
December 9, 2020

	
LANDLORD:
	
CPI/King 733 Concord Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (as successor-in-interest to King 733 Concord LLC, a Delaware limited liability company)

	
TENANT:
	
Wave Life Sciences USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation

	
EXISTING
PREMISES:
	
Approximately 30,893 rentable square feet of space in the Building (the “Existing Premises”), as more particularly described in the Existing Lease (as defined below).

	
ROFO PREMISES:
	
Approximately 13,126 rentable square feet of space on the first (1st) floor of the Building, identified as “Premises” as shown on the plan attached hereto as Exhibit 1D.

The parties stipulate that the Rentable Square Footage of the ROFO Premises is correct and shall not be remeasured.

	
DATE OF EXISTING LEASE:
	
April 6, 2015

	
 
	
BACKGROUND

 

WHEREAS, by letter dated October 13, 2020 (the “Offer”), Landlord provided Tenant with Landlord’s Offer for the ROFO Premises in accordance with Exhibit 12 of the above-described lease (as amended, the “Existing Lease”), which Offer for the ROFO Premises Tenant accepted on October 16, 2020.  

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Existing Lease to reflect, among other provisions, the expansion of the Premises to include the ROFO Premises, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.  

NOW, THEREFORE, the Existing Lease is hereby amended as follows (the Existing Lease, as amended by this First Amendment, shall hereafter be referred to as the “Lease”).  Any 

 

1

 

capitalized terms used herein shall have the same definition as set forth in the Existing Lease, except to the extent otherwise set forth in this First Amendment.

 

	
 
	
1.
	
ROFO Premises

a.Demise of ROFO Premises.  Landlord hereby demises and leases to Tenant, and Tenant hereby hires and takes from Landlord, the ROFO Premises.  Said demise of the ROFO Premises shall be for a term commencing on the ROFO Premises Commencement Date (as hereinafter defined) and expiring on the last day of the sixtieth (60th) full calendar month after the ROFO Premises Commencement Date (the “ROFO Premises Expiration Date”).  Except as set forth herein, said demise of the ROFO Premises shall be upon all of the terms and conditions set forth in the Lease (as amended by this First Amendment) applicable to the Existing Premises.

b.ROFO Premises Commencement Date.  

i.The “ROFO Premises Commencement Date” shall be the date that is the later of: (A) the date that is three (3) days after Tenant’s receipt of notice from Landlord of the expected ROFO Premises Commencement Date and (B) the date on which Landlord delivers possession of the ROFO Premises to Tenant with all base building systems and structural components serving the ROFO Premises (in each case, which Landlord is required to repair and maintain pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the Lease) in good working order and condition, but otherwise in “as-is” condition, broom clean (with all furniture, fixtures, equipment and other personal property removed therefrom), vacant, and free and clear of any occupants; it being agreed that the delivery of the ROFO Premises in such condition shall not detract from or limit Landlord’s repair and maintenance obligations with respect to the Premises (including the ROFO Premises) under the Lease.  Prior to the ROFO Premises Commencement Date, Landlord shall provide Tenant with a copy of the surrender plan (or substantial equivalent) of the current occupant of the ROFO Premises and reasonable evidence that the work required thereby has been (or will be) completed prior to the ROFO Premises Commencement Date. It is estimated that the ROFO Premises Commencement Date shall occur on or about October 1, 2021; but in no event shall the ROFO Premises Commencement Date occur prior to August 1, 2021.  Landlord shall use diligent efforts to deliver the ROFO Premises to Tenant on or about October 1, 2021, however, the failure of Landlord to deliver the ROFO Premises to Tenant on or before October 1, 2021 shall in no way affect the validity of the Lease, this First Amendment, or the obligations of Tenant thereunder (except that the ROFO Premises Commencement Date shall not occur until the date Landlord delivers the ROFO Premises to Tenant in accordance with this paragraph), and Tenant shall not have any claim against Landlord and Landlord shall have no liability to Tenant by reason thereof.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the ROFO Premises Commencement Date has not occurred on or before the ROFO Rent Credit Date (as hereinafter defined), then, as Tenant’s sole and exclusive remedy on account thereof, Tenant shall be entitled to a rent credit against Tenant’s obligation to pay Base Rent in respect of the ROFO Premises only equal to one (1) day for each day between the ROFO Rent Credit Date and the ROFO Premises Commencement Date.  The “ROFO Rent Credit Date” shall mean December 31, 2021, as such date shall be extended due to any delay caused by an act or omission by Tenant and/or Tenant’s agents, employees or contractors, Landlord’s Force Majeure or any other delay that is beyond Landlord’s reasonable control (it being agreed that, if the existing tenant of the ROFO Premises 

 

2

 

has not timely vacated the ROFO Premises by the current expiration date of such tenant’s lease, then so long as Landlord is using commercially reasonable efforts to deliver the ROFO Premises to Tenant vacant and free and clear of any occupants, such delay shall be considered to be “beyond Landlord’s reasonable control” for purposes hereof).  

ii.Tenant shall not have any right to occupy all or any part of the ROFO Premises for the Permitted Uses under the Lease prior to the ROFO Premises Commencement Date; provided, however that Landlord (or Landlord’s property manager) shall exercise good faith efforts to accommodate Tenant’s requests for occasional access to the ROFO Premises prior to the ROFO Premises Commencement Date for the limited purpose of viewing the same in connection with Tenant’s planning for future occupancy, in all cases subject to any limitations or restrictions contained in the existing tenant’s lease.  

iii.When the ROFO Premises Commencement Date has occurred, such date and the ROFO Premises Expiration Date shall be evidenced by a document reasonably acceptable to both parties and executed by Landlord and Tenant and delivered each to the other, but the failure of Landlord or Tenant to execute or deliver such document shall have no effect upon such dates.  

iv.Subject to subsection (i) above and Landlord’s ongoing service, maintenance, repair, insurance and restoration obligations under the Lease, (a) all work which Tenant deems necessary to prepare the ROFO Premises for Tenant’s use and occupancy and/or to refurbish the ROFO Premises shall be performed by Tenant at Tenant’s sole cost and expense, in accordance with the provisions of the Lease, including, without limitation, Section 11 of the Lease and (b) Landlord has no obligation to perform any work, supply any materials, incur any expense or make any alterations or improvements to prepare the ROFO Premises for Tenant’s occupancy.

v.Effective on the ROFO Premises Commencement Date and continuing until the earlier to occur of the expiration of the Term under the Existing Lease for the Existing Premises and the ROFO Premises Expiration Date, (A) all references in the Lease to “Premises” shall be deemed to mean the Existing Premises and the ROFO Premises, collectively, (B) the Premises shall then consist of a total of 44,019 rentable square feet, which the parties stipulate shall be the correct Rentable Square Footage of the Premises, which shall not be remeasured and which the parties acknowledge is the entirety of the interior leasable area of the Building, (C) Tenant’s Share for the Premises shall be increased to 100%, (D) Tenant shall have the right to install and maintain signage on the exterior of the Building and on any monument serving the Building, and no third party shall have the right to maintain or install signage thereon (provided, however, that the foregoing shall not limit or restrict Landlord from installing Building identification signage on the Building or monument), (E) the number of Tenant’s Parking Spaces shall be increased to one hundred twelve (112) surface parking spaces (the “Full Building Parking Minimum”) located in the Parking Area more particularly identified in the plan attached hereto on Exhibit 2 and made a part hereof, and (F) in no event shall Landlord, in connection with the exercise of its rights under Section 2.2 of the Existing Lease, reduce the number of Tenant’s Parking Spaces to less than the Full Building Parking Minimum.  

vi.Notwithstanding anything in the Lease to the contrary, effective on the ROFO Premises Commencement Date and continuing until the earlier to occur of the expiration of the Term under the Existing Lease for the Existing Premises and the ROFO Premises Expiration 

 

3

 

Date, if (A) Tenant removes the two (2) 3000 liter nitrogen tanks (the “Nitrogen Tanks”) on the Property that were installed by Tenant in accordance with the provisions of the letter agreement dated September 28, 2016 from PPF OFF King 733 Concord Owner, LLC (Landlord’s predecessor in interest) to Tenant (the “Nitrogen Tank Letter”), (B) such removal is performed in accordance with the provisions of the Nitrogen Tank Letter, and (C) Tenant restores the three (3) surface parking spaces in the Parking Area that were occupied by the Nitrogen Tanks so that they are usable parking spaces in the Parking Area (the “Restored Parking Spaces”), then Tenant’s Parking Spaces shall be increased to one hundred fifteen (115) surface parking spaces located in the Parking Area and the Full Building Parking Minimum shall be increased to one hundred fifteen (115) surface parking spaces, in each case, to include the Restored Parking Spaces accordingly.  

	
 
	
2.
	
Rent – ROFO Premises.  

a.Base Rent – ROFO Premises. From and after the ROFO Premises Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Base Rent in respect of the ROFO Premises as set forth below.    

 

			
	
 

Period of Time
	
 

Annual Base Rent
	
 

Monthly Base Rent

	
ROFO Premises Lease Year 1*
	
$ 1,017,265.00
	
 $ 84,772.08 

	
ROFO Premises Lease Year 2
	
$ 1,047,782.95
	
 $ 87,315.25 

	
ROFO Premises Lease Year 3
	
$ 1,079,216.44
	
 $ 89,934.70 

	
ROFO Premises Lease Year 4
	
$ 1,111,592.93
	
 $ 92,632.74 

	
ROFO Premises Lease Year 5
	
$ 1,144,940.72
	
 $ 95,411.73 

 

*Any twelve-(12)-month period commencing as of the ROFO Premises Commencement Date, or as of any anniversary of the ROFO Premises Commencement Date, except that if the ROFO Premises Commencement Date does not fall on the first day of a calendar month, then the first ROFO Premises Lease Year shall begin on the ROFO Premises Commencement Date, and end on the last day of the month containing the first anniversary of the ROFO Premises Commencement Date, and each succeeding ROFO Premises Lease Year shall begin on the day following the last day of the prior ROFO Premises Lease Year.

 

b.Additional Rent – ROFO Premises.  Commencing as of the ROFO Premises Commencement Date, and continuing thereafter through the ROFO Premises Expiration Date, for and with respect to the ROFO Premises (i) Tenant shall pay Tenant’s Share of Operating Costs to Landlord in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.2(c) of the Lease, (ii) Tenant shall pay Tenant’s Share of Taxes to Landlord in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.3(c) of the Lease, and (iii) Tenant shall pay the cost of all utility services consumed in the ROFO Premises (including, without limitation, electricity, gas and water) in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 of the Lease.  

 

c.Tenant’s Share; Tenant’s Parking Spaces; Tenant’s Signage – ROFO Premises.  From and after the ROFO Premises Commencement Date until the earlier of the Expiration Date under the Existing Lease for the Existing Premises and the ROFO Premises Expiration Date, Tenant’s Share and Tenant’s Parking Spaces with respect to the ROFO Premises and the Existing Premises, collectively, shall be as set forth in Section 1(b)(v) above.  In the event that the 

 

4

 

Expiration Date under the Existing Lease for the Existing Premises occurs prior to the ROFO Premises Expiration Date, then from and after the Expiration Date under the Existing Lease for the Existing Premises until the ROFO Premises Expiration Date, (i) Tenant’s Share with respect to the ROFO Premises shall be 29.82%, (ii) Tenant’s right to exclusive signage on the Building and any monument set forth in Section 1(b)(v)(D) shall be of no further force or effect, (iii) the number of Tenant’s Parking Spaces set forth in Section 1(b)(v)(E) shall be decreased to thirty-four (34) surface parking spaces located in the Parking Area, and (iv) the Full Building Parking Minimum set forth in Section 1(b)(v)(F) shall be of no further force or effect. 

 

3.Notice Addresses.  For all purposes of the Lease, the Notice addresses for Landlord and Tenant set forth in Section 24 of the Lease is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following address is substituted therefor:

 

	
If to Landlord:
	
 
	
CPI/King 733 Concord Owner, LLC

	
 
	
 
	
c/o King Street Properties

	
 
	
 
	
800 Boylston Street, Suite 1570

	
 
	
 
	
Boston, MA  02199

	
 
	
 
	
Attention:  Stephen D. Lynch

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
With copies to:
	
 
	
Goulston & Storrs PC

	
 
	
 
	
400 Atlantic Avenue

	
 
	
 
	
Boston, MA 02110

	
 
	
 
	
Attention:  King Street

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
If to Tenant:
	
 
	
Wave Life Sciences USA, Inc.

	
 
	
 
	
733 Concord Avenue

	
 
	
 
	
Cambridge, MA 02138

	
 
	
 
	
Attention: Paul B. Bolno, Kyle Moran and Bryant Cook

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
with a copy to:

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

	
 
	
 
	
One Financial Center

	
 
	
 
	
Boston, MA 02111

	
 
	
 
	
Attention: Stuart A. Offner, Esq.

 

	
 
	
4.
	
Alterations; Restoration.  

a.Landlord acknowledges that Tenant may elect to pursue certain Alterations as may be reasonably required to combine the Existing Premises and the ROFO Premises into a single, integrated premises; provided, however, that all such Alterations (if any) shall be performed by Tenant in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Lease applicable to Alterations, including, without limitation, Landlord’s approval of such Alterations in accordance with the terms of the Existing Lease and Landlord’s right to require the removal thereof pursuant to Sections 4(a) and 4(b) below.  

 

5

 

b.Upon the Expiration Date under the Existing Lease or earlier termination of the Term under the Existing Lease for the Existing Premises, Tenant shall have no obligation to perform or pay for the removal of any Alterations or other improvements approved by Landlord and installed by or for Tenant in the Existing Premises or Building in connection with any such Alterations, except for (i) items previously identified by Landlord as to be removed by Tenant and (ii) Alterations whose removal is expressly required by Landlord at the time of Landlord’s approval thereof (including, without limitation, any Alterations performed by Tenant pursuant to Section 4(a) above that Landlord expressly requires Tenant to remove at the time of Landlord’s approval thereof).  

c.Upon the ROFO Premises Expiration Date or earlier termination of the term as it relates to the ROFO Premises, Tenant shall have no obligation to perform or pay for the removal of any (i) Alterations or other improvements installed by or for Tenant in the ROFO Premises or Building in connection with such Alterations, except for any Alterations whose removal is expressly required by Landlord at the time of Landlord’s approval thereof (including, without limitation, any Alterations performed by Tenant pursuant to Section 4(a) above that Landlord expressly requires Tenant to remove at the time of Landlord’s approval thereof), and (ii) improvements, furniture, fixtures, equipment or cabling existing in the ROFO Premises on the ROFO Premises Commencement Date.   

	
 
	
5.
	
Miscellaneous

a.Notice of Lease.  In accordance with Section 25.16 of the Existing Lease, at Tenant’s option, each of the parties shall join in the execution, in recordable form and substantially similar to the form attached as Exhibit 10 to the Existing Lease, of a statutory notice of lease and/or written declaration, or an amendment to any existing notice and/or declaration, reflecting Tenant’s lease of the ROFO Premises and the term thereof, which notice of lease may be recorded by Tenant with the Middlesex South Registry of Deeds and/or filed with the Registry District of the Land Court, as appropriate.

 

b.Broker. Tenant and Landlord each warrants and represents that it has dealt with no broker in connection with the consummation of this First Amendment other than Colliers International (the “Broker”).  Tenant and Landlord each agrees to defend, indemnify and save the other harmless from and against any claims arising in breach of the representation and warranty set forth in the immediately preceding sentence.  Landlord shall be solely responsible for the payment of any brokerage commission to Broker.

 

c.Deleted/Inapplicable Lease Provisions.   Exhibit 12 (Right of First Offer) of the Lease is hereby deleted in its entirety and is of no further force and effect.  Section 3 and Exhibit 3 of the Lease shall have no applicability with respect to this First Amendment.

 

d.Ratification. In all other respects, except as expressly modified herein, the Lease is hereby ratified and confirmed.  The submission of drafts of this document for examination and negotiation does not constitute an offer, or a reservation of or option for any of the terms and conditions set forth in this First Amendment, and this First Amendment shall not be binding upon Landlord or Tenant unless and until Landlord shall have executed and delivered a fully executed copy of this First Amendment to Tenant, it being agreed that the foregoing shall not affect the 

 

6

 

validity of Tenant’s prior exercise of the Right of First Offer pursuant to the terms set forth in the Offer.  

 

e.Conflict. In the event that any of the provisions of the Existing Lease are inconsistent with this First Amendment or the state of facts contemplated hereby, the provisions of this First Amendment shall control.

 

f.Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by each of the undersigned on separate counterparts, which counterparts taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  This First Amendment may be executed by electronic signature, which shall be considered as an original signature for all purposes and shall have the same force and effect as an original signature.  Without limitation, in addition to electronically produced signatures, “electronic signature” shall include faxed versions of an original signature or electronically scanned and transmitted versions (e.g., via pdf) of an original signature.

 

[BALANCE OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK;
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

EXECUTED as of the date first above written.

 

	
LANDLORD:

	
 

	
CPI/KING 733 CONCORD OWNER, LLC,

	
a Delaware limited liability company

	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Michael Gershenson

	
 
	
 
	
Name:
	
Michael Gershenson

	
 
	
 
	
Title:
	
Authorized Signatory

 

	
TENANT:

	
 

	
WAVE LIFE SCIENCES USA, INC.

	
a Delaware corporation

	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Kyle Moran

	
 
	
 
	
Name:
	
Kyle Moran

	
 
	
 
	
Title:
	
SVP, Finance & Operations

 

 

[Signature Page to First Amendment] 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 1D

PLAN OF ROFO PREMISES

 

Exhibit 1D

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 2

PARKING AREA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 2wve-ex42_411.htm

Exhibit 4.2

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) has one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”): our ordinary shares, no par value. 

 

DESCRIPTION OF SHARE CAPITAL

General 

The following description of our share capital and provisions of our constitution (formerly known as our memorandum and articles of association) are summaries and are qualified by reference to the Singapore Companies Act and our constitution. A copy of our constitution has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit is a part. 

Ordinary Shares 

As of December 31, 2020, our issued and paid-up ordinary share capital consists of 48,778,678 ordinary shares. We currently have only one class of issued ordinary shares, which have identical rights in all respects and rank equally with one another. Our ordinary shares have no par value and there is no authorized share capital under Singapore law. There is a provision in our constitution which provides that we may issue shares with such preferred, deferred or other special rights or such restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, voting, return of capital or otherwise as our board of directors may determine. 

All of our shares presently issued are fully paid-up, and existing shareholders are not subject to any calls on these shares. Although Singapore law does not recognize the concept of “non-assessability” with respect to newly-issued shares, we note that any purchaser of our shares who has fully paid up all amounts due with respect to such shares will not be subject under Singapore law to any personal liability to contribute to the assets or liabilities of our company in such purchaser’s capacity solely as a holder of such shares. We believe that this interpretation is substantively consistent with the concept of “non-assessability” under most, if not all, U.S. state corporations laws. All of our shares are in registered form. We cannot, except in the circumstances permitted by the Singapore Companies Act, grant any financial assistance for the acquisition or proposed acquisition of our own shares. Except as described below under “—Takeovers,” there are no limitations imposed by the Singapore Companies Act or by our constitution on the right of shareholders not resident in Singapore to hold or vote ordinary shares. 

Transfer Agent and Registrar 

The transfer agent and registrar for our ordinary shares is Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 

Nasdaq Global Market 

Our ordinary shares are listed for quotation on The Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “WVE.” 

New Shares 

Under the Singapore Companies Act, new shares may be issued only with the prior approval of our shareholders in a general meeting. General approval may be sought from our shareholders in a general meeting for the issue of shares. Approval, if granted, will lapse at the earlier of: 

	
 
	
•
	
the conclusion of the next annual general meeting; or 

	
 
	
•
	
the expiration of the period within which the next annual general meeting is required by law to be held (i.e., within six months after the end of each financial year), 

but any approval may be revoked or varied by the company in a general meeting. 

Our shareholders have provided such general authority to issue new ordinary shares until the conclusion of our 2021 annual general meeting. Such approval will lapse in accordance with the preceding paragraph if our shareholders do not grant a new approval at our 2021 annual general meeting. Subject to this and the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and our constitution, our board 

 

 

of directors may allot and issue or grant options over or otherwise dispose of new ordinary shares to such persons on such terms and conditions and with the rights and restrictions as they may think fit to impose. 

Preferred Shares 

Series A Preferred Shares 

As of December 31, 2020, we have 3,901,348 Series A preferred shares outstanding. These shares are currently held by one of our largest shareholders, Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd. The terms of the Series A preferred shares as set out in our constitution include (1) no voting rights at any general meeting other than in limited circumstances, (2) a liquidation preference equal to $0.002 per Series A preferred share, (3) no entitlement to dividends and (4) the right to convert the Series A preferred shares at any time on a one-for-one basis into ordinary shares at the discretion of the holder in accordance with the constitution. 

The holders of the Series A preferred shares are not entitled to vote at any general meeting. The only instances in which the holders of the Series A preferred shares are able to vote at a general meeting would be if (but only if) the matters to be discussed at the meeting relate to or there is intent to pass resolutions on (i) abrogating or changing the rights attached to the Series A preferred shares; and (ii) for the winding up of the Company. Such resolutions would require the unanimous approval of the holders of the Series A preferred shares. 

Other Preferred Shares 

Under the Singapore Companies Act, different classes of shares in a public company may be issued only if (a) the issue of the class or classes of shares is provided for in the constitution of the public company and (b) the constitution of the public company sets out in respect of each class of shares the rights attached to that class of shares. Our constitution provides that we may issue shares of a different class with preferred, deferred or other special rights, or such restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, voting, return of capital or otherwise as our board of directors may determine. Under Singapore law, our preferred shareholders will have the right to attend any general meeting and in a poll at such general meeting, to have at least one vote for every preferred share held: 

	
 
	
•
	
upon any resolution concerning the voluntary winding-up of our company under Section 160 of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 of Singapore (No. 40 of 2018); 

	
 
	
•
	
upon any resolution which varies the rights attached to such preferred shares; or 

	
 
	
•
	
in the case of preferred shares issued after August 15, 1984, but before the commencement of Section 96 of the Companies (Amendment) Act 2014, when the dividends to be paid on our preferred shares or any part thereof are more than twelve months in arrears and unpaid, for the period they remain in arrears and unpaid. 

We may, subject to the Singapore Companies Act and the prior approval in a general meeting of our shareholders, issue preferred shares which are, or at our option or are to be, subject to redemption provided that such preferred shares may not be redeemed out of capital unless: 

	
 
	
•
	
all the directors have made a solvency statement in relation to such redemption; and 

	
 
	
•
	
we have lodged a copy of the statement with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority of Singapore. 

Further, such shares must be fully paid-up before they are redeemed. 

As of December 31, 2020, we have no preferred shares outstanding other than the Series A preferred shares described above and we have no plans to issue additional preferred shares. 

Registration Rights under our Share Purchase Agreement with Pfizer 

Under the terms of our Share Purchase Agreement dated as of May 5, 2016 with an affiliate of Pfizer Inc. (the “Pfizer Affiliate”), the Pfizer Affiliate agreed that the 1,875,000 ordinary shares that the Pfizer Affiliate purchased from us under the Share Purchase Agreement (the “Pfizer Shares”), would be subject to a lock-up restriction, such that the Pfizer Affiliate will not, and will also cause its affiliates not to, without our prior approval, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of the Pfizer Shares until certain specified periods of time after the effective date of the Share Purchase Agreement. For a certain period following the expiration of the lock-up period, subject to certain conditions and limitations, we agreed to provide certain demand registration rights to the Pfizer Affiliate in order to register all or a portion of the Pfizer Shares purchased by the Pfizer Affiliate. We also provided the Pfizer Affiliate with certain “piggyback” registration rights for a certain period following the expiration of the lock-up period, subject to certain conditions and limitations, such that when we propose to register our ordinary shares for our account, the Pfizer Affiliate will have the right to 

2

 

include some or all of the Pfizer Shares in such registration. The Share Purchase Agreement also contains other customary terms and conditions of the parties with respect to the registration of the Pfizer Shares. 

Registration Rights under our Share Purchase Agreement with Takeda 

On February 19, 2018, we entered into a share purchase agreement with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (“Takeda”), pursuant to which Takeda purchased 1,096,892 of our ordinary shares (the “Takeda Shares”). In connection with the share purchase agreement, Takeda and we agreed upon certain rights and restrictions as set forth in the Investor Agreement, dated as of April 2, 2018 (the “Investor Agreement”). The Takeda Shares would be subject to a lock-up restriction, such that Takeda will not, and will also cause its affiliates not to, without our prior approval, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of the Takeda Shares until certain specified periods of time after the effective date of the Investor Agreement. For a certain period following the expiration of the lock-up period, subject to certain conditions and limitations, we agreed to provide certain demand registration rights to Takeda in order to register all or a portion of the Takeda Shares purchased by Takeda. We also provided Takeda with certain “piggyback” registration rights for a certain period following the expiration of the lock-up period, subject to certain conditions and limitations, such that when we propose to register our ordinary shares for our account, Takeda will have the right to include some or all of the Takeda Shares in such registration. The Investor Agreement also contains other customary terms and conditions of the parties with respect to the registration of Takeda Shares. 

Transfer of Ordinary Shares 

Subject to applicable securities laws in relevant jurisdictions and our constitution, our ordinary shares are freely transferable. Our constitution provides that shares may be transferred by a duly signed instrument of transfer in any usual or common form or in a form approved by the directors and Nasdaq. The directors may decline to register any transfer unless, among other things, evidence of payment of any stamp duty payable with respect to the transfer is provided together with other evidence of ownership and title as the directors may reasonably require to show the right of the transferor to make the transfer. We will replace lost or destroyed certificates for shares upon notice to us and upon, among other things, the applicant furnishing evidence and indemnity as the directors may require and the payment of all applicable fees. 

Election and Re-election of Directors 

We may, by ordinary resolution, remove any director before the expiration of his or her period of office, notwithstanding anything in our constitution or in any agreement between us and such director. We may also, by an ordinary resolution, appoint another person in place of a director removed from office pursuant to the foregoing. 

Under our constitution, subject to the Singapore Companies Act, any director shall retire at the next annual general meeting and shall then be eligible for re-election at that meeting. 

Our board of directors shall have the power, at any time and from time to time, to appoint any person to be a director either to fill a casual vacancy or as an additional director so long as the total number of directors shall not at any time exceed the maximum number (if any) fixed by or in accordance with our constitution. 

Shareholders’ Meetings 

We are required to hold an annual general meeting each calendar year and within six months after the end of each financial year. The directors may convene an extraordinary general meeting whenever they think fit and they must do so upon the written request of shareholders holding not less than 10% of the total number of paid-up shares as of the date of deposit of the requisition carrying the right to vote at a general meeting. In addition, two or more shareholders holding not less than 10% of our total number of issued shares (excluding our treasury shares) may call a meeting of our shareholders. 

The Singapore Companies Act provides that a shareholder is entitled to attend any general meeting and speak on any resolution put before the general meeting. Unless otherwise required by law or by our constitution, resolutions put forth at general meetings may be decided by ordinary resolution, requiring the affirmative vote of a majority of the shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the resolution. An ordinary resolution suffices, for example, for appointments of directors. A special resolution, requiring an affirmative vote of not less than three-fourths of the shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the resolution, is necessary for certain matters under Singapore law, such as an alteration of our constitution. A shareholder entitled to attend and vote at a meeting of the company, or at a meeting of any class of shareholders of the company, shall be entitled to appoint another person or persons, whether a shareholder of the company or not, as his proxy to attend and vote instead of the shareholder at the meeting. Under the Singapore Companies Act, a proxy appointed to attend and vote instead of the shareholder shall also have the same right as the shareholder to speak at the meeting, but unless the constitution of the 

3

 

company otherwise provides, (i) a proxy shall not be entitled to vote except on a poll, (ii) a shareholder shall not be entitled to appoint more than two proxies to attend and vote at the same meeting and (iii) where a shareholder appoints two proxies the appointment shall be invalid unless the shareholder specifies the proportions of his holdings to be represented by each proxy. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a registered shareholder entitled to attend and vote at a meeting of the company held pursuant to an order of court under Section 210(1) of the Singapore Companies Act, or at any adjourned meeting under Section 210(3) of the Singapore Companies Act, is, unless the court orders otherwise, entitled to appoint only one proxy to attend and vote at the same meeting, and except where the aforementioned applies, a registered shareholder having a share capital who is a relevant intermediary (as defined under the Singapore Companies Act) may appoint more than two proxies in relation to a meeting to exercise all or any of his rights to attend and to speak and vote at the meeting, but each proxy must be appointed to exercise the rights attached to a different share or shares held by him (which number and class of shares shall be specified), and at such meeting, the proxy has the right to vote on a show of hands. 

Only registered shareholders of our company, and their proxies, will be entitled to attend, speak and vote at any meeting of shareholders. Under the Singapore Companies Act, public companies may issue non-voting shares and shares that confer special, limited or conditional voting rights, such that the holder of a share may vote on a resolution before a general meeting of the company if, in accordance with the provisions of Section 64A of the Singapore Companies Act, the share confers on the holder a right to vote on that resolution. 

Voting Rights 

As provided under our constitution and the Singapore Companies Act, voting at any meeting of shareholders is by show of hands unless a poll has been demanded prior to the declaration of the result of the show of hands by, among others, (i) the chairman or (ii) at least one shareholder present in person or by proxy or by attorney or, in the case of a corporation, by a representative entitled to vote thereat, in each case representing in the aggregate not less than 5% of the total voting rights of all shareholders having the right to vote at the general meeting, provided that no poll shall be demanded in respect of an election of a chairman or relating to any adjournment of such meeting. On a poll every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy or by attorney, or in the case of a corporation, by a representative, has one vote for every share held by such shareholder. Proxies need not be shareholders. 

Only those shareholders who are registered in our register of members as holders of ordinary shares will be entitled to vote at any meeting of shareholders. Therefore, DTC, or its nominee, will grant an omnibus proxy to DTC participants holding our shares in book-entry form through a broker, bank, nominee, or other institution that is a direct or indirect participant in the DTC. Such shareholders will have the right to instruct their broker, bank, nominee or other institution holding these shares on how to vote such shares by completing the voting instruction form provided by the applicable broker, bank, nominee, or other institution. Whether voting is by a show of hands or by a poll, DTC’s vote will be voted by the chairman of the meeting according to the results of the DTC’s participants’ votes (which results will reflect the instructions received from shareholders that own our shares electronically in book-entry form). 

Minority Rights 

The rights of minority shareholders of Singapore companies are protected, among other things, under Section 216 of the Singapore Companies Act, which gives the Singapore courts a general power to make any order, upon application by any shareholder of a company, as they think fit to remedy any of the following situations: 

	
 
	
•
	
the affairs of a company are being conducted or the powers of the board of directors are being exercised in a manner oppressive to, or in disregard of the interests of, one or more of the shareholders, including the applicant; or 

	
 
	
•
	
a company takes an action, or threatens to take an action, or the shareholders pass a resolution, or propose to pass a resolution, which unfairly discriminates against, or is otherwise prejudicial to, one or more of the shareholders, including the applicant. 

Singapore courts have wide discretion as to the remedy they may grant, and the remedies listed in the Singapore Companies Act itself are not exclusive. In general, Singapore courts may, with a view to bringing to an end or remedying the matters complained of: 

	
 
	
•
	
direct or prohibit any act or cancel or modify any transaction or resolution; 

	
 
	
•
	
regulate the conduct of the affairs of the company in the future; 

	
 
	
•
	
authorize civil proceedings to be brought in the name of, or on behalf of, the company by a person or persons and on such terms as the court may direct; 

	
 
	
•
	
provide for the purchase of a minority shareholder’s shares by the other shareholders or by the company itself; 

4

 

	
 
		

	
 
	
•
	
in the case of a purchase of shares by the company provide for a reduction accordingly of the company’s capital; or 

	
 
	
•
	
provide that the company be wound up. 

Dividends 

Subject to any preferential rights of holders of any outstanding preferred shares, holders of our ordinary shares will be entitled to receive dividends and other distributions in cash, shares or property as may be declared by our company from time to time. We may, by ordinary resolution, declare dividends at a general meeting of shareholders, but we are restricted from paying dividends in excess of the amount recommended by our board of directors. Pursuant to Singapore law and our constitution, no dividend may be paid except out of our profits. To date, we have not declared any cash dividends on our ordinary shares and have no current plans to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. 

Bonus and Rights Issues 

In a general meeting, our shareholders may, upon the recommendation of the directors, capitalize any reserves or profits and distribute them as bonus shares, credited as paid-up, to the shareholders in proportion to their shareholdings. 

 

Subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and our constitution, our directors may also issue rights to take up additional ordinary shares to our shareholders in proportion to their respective ownership. Such rights are subject to any condition attached to such issue and the regulations of any stock exchange on which our shares are listed, as well as U.S. federal and blue sky securities laws applicable to such issue. 

Takeovers 

The Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers applies to, among other things, the acquisition of voting shares of Singapore-incorporated listed public companies or unlisted public companies with more than 50 shareholders and net tangible assets of S$5 million or more. Any person acquiring, whether by a series of transactions over a period of time or not, either on his or her own or together with parties acting in concert with such person, 30% or more of our voting shares, or, if such person holds, either on his or her own or together with parties acting in concert with such person, between 30% and 50% (both amounts inclusive) of our voting shares, and if such person (or parties acting in concert with such person) acquires additional voting shares representing more than 1% of our voting shares in any six-month period, must, except with the consent of the Securities Industry Council in Singapore, extend a mandatory takeover offer for the remaining voting shares in accordance with the provisions of the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers. Responsibility for ensuring compliance with the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers rests with parties (including company directors) to a take-over or merger and their advisors. 

“Parties acting in concert” comprise individuals or companies who, pursuant to an agreement or understanding (whether formal or informal), cooperate, through the acquisition by any of them of shares in a company, to obtain or consolidate effective control of that company. Certain persons are presumed (unless the presumption is rebutted) to be acting in concert with each other. They are as follows: 

	
 
	
•
	
a company, its parent company, subsidiaries and fellow subsidiaries, the associated companies of any of the company and its related companies, subsidiaries and fellow subsidiaries, companies whose associated companies include any of these companies and any person who has provided financial assistance (other than a bank in the ordinary course of business) to any of the foregoing for the purchase of voting rights; 

	
 
	
•
	
a company with any of its directors (together with their close relatives, related trusts and companies controlled by any of the directors, their close relatives and related trusts); 

	
 
	
•
	
a company with any of its pension funds and employee share schemes; 

	
 
	
•
	
a person with any investment company, unit trust or other fund whose investment such person manages on a discretionary basis, but only in respect of the investment account which such person manages; 

	
 
	
•
	
a financial or other professional advisor, including a stockbroker, with its client in respect of the shareholdings of the advisor and persons controlling, controlled by or under the same control as the advisor; 

	
 
	
•
	
directors of a company (together with their close relatives, related trusts and companies controlled by any of such directors, their close relatives and related trusts) which is subject to an offer or where the directors have reason to believe a bona fide offer for their company may be imminent; 

5

 

	
 
	
•
	
partners; and 

	
 
	
•
	
an individual and (i) such person’s close relatives, (ii) such person’s related trusts, (iii) any person who is accustomed to act in accordance with such person’s instructions, (iv) companies controlled by the individual, such person’s close relatives, related trusts or any person who is accustomed to act in accordance with such person’s instructions and (v) any person who has provided financial assistance (other than a bank in the ordinary course of business) to any of the foregoing for the purchase of voting rights. 

Subject to certain exceptions, a mandatory offer must be in cash or be accompanied by a cash alternative at not less than the highest price paid by the offeror or parties acting in concert with the offeror during the offer period and within the six months prior to its commencement. 

Under the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers, where effective control of a company is acquired or consolidated by a person, or persons acting in concert, a general offer to all other shareholders is normally required. An offeror must treat all shareholders of the same class in an offeree company equally. A fundamental requirement is that shareholders in the company subject to the takeover offer must be given sufficient information, advice and time to consider and decide on the offer. These legal requirements may impede or delay a takeover of our company by a third-party. 

We may submit an application to the Securities Industry Council of Singapore for a waiver from the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers so that the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers will not apply to our company for so long as we are not listed on a securities exchange in Singapore. We will make an appropriate announcement if we submit the application and when the result of the application is known. 

Liquidation or Other Return of Capital 

On a winding-up or other return of capital, subject to any special rights attaching to the Series A preferred shares or to any other class of shares, holders of ordinary shares will be entitled to participate in any surplus assets in proportion to their shareholdings. 

6

 

COMPARISON OF SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS

We are incorporated under the laws of Singapore. The following discussion summarizes material differences between the rights of holders of our ordinary shares and the rights of holders of the common stock of a typical corporation incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware which result from differences in governing documents and the laws of Singapore and Delaware.

This discussion does not purport to be a complete statement of the rights of holders of our ordinary shares under applicable law in Singapore and our constitution or the rights of holders of the common stock of a typical corporation under applicable Delaware law and a typical certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

 

	
Delaware
	
  
	
Singapore

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Board of Directors
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
A typical certificate of incorporation and bylaws provides that the number of directors on the board of directors will be fixed from time to time by a vote of the majority of the authorized directors. Under Delaware law, a board of directors can be divided into classes and cumulative voting in the election of directors is only permitted if expressly authorized in a corporation’s certificate of incorporation.
	
  
	
The constitution of companies will typically state the minimum and maximum number of directors as well as provide that the number of directors may be increased or reduced by shareholders via ordinary resolution passed at a general meeting, provided that the number of directors following such increase or reduction is within the maximum (if any) and minimum number of directors provided in our constitution and the Singapore Companies Act, respectively.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Limitation on Personal Liability of Directors
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
A typical certificate of incorporation provides for the elimination of personal monetary liability of directors for breach of fiduciary duties as directors to the fullest extent permissible under the laws of Delaware, except for liability (i) for any breach of a director’s loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (relating to the liability of directors for unlawful payment of a dividend or an unlawful stock purchase or redemption) or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. A typical certificate of incorporation also provides that if the Delaware General Corporation Law is amended so as to allow further elimination of, or limitations on, director liability, then the liability of directors will be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law as so amended.
	
  
	
Pursuant to the Singapore Companies Act, any provision (whether in the constitution, a contract with the company or otherwise) exempting or indemnifying a director against any liability which by law would otherwise attach to him or her in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which such director may be guilty in relation to the company is void. However, a company is not prohibited from (a) purchasing and maintaining for any such director insurance against any such liability, or (b) indemnifying such director against any liability incurred by him or her to a person other than the company except when the indemnity is against any liability (i) of the director to pay a fine in criminal proceedings, (ii) of the director to pay a penalty in respect of non-compliance with any regulatory requirements, (iii) incurred by the director in defending criminal proceedings in which he or she is convicted, (iv) incurred by the director in defending civil proceedings brought by the company or a related company in which judgment is given against him or her, or (v) incurred by the director in connection with an application for relief under Section 76A(13) or Section 391 of the Singapore Companies Act in which the court refuses to grant him or her relief. Nevertheless, a director can be released by the shareholders of a company for breaches of duty to a company except in the case of fraud, illegality, insolvency of the company and oppression or disregard of minority interests.

Subject to the Singapore Companies Act and every other Singapore statute for the time being in force and affecting the Company, we may indemnify our directors against costs, charges, fees, and other expenses that may be incurred by any of them in defending any proceedings (whether civil or criminal) relating to anything done or omitted or alleged to be done or omitted by such person acting in his or her capacity as a director of our company, in which judgment is given in his or her favor, or in which he or she is acquitted or in which the courts have granted relief pursuant to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act, provided that such indemnity shall not extend to any liability which by law would otherwise attach to him or her in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which he may be guilty in relation to our company, or which would otherwise result in such indemnity being voided under applicable Singapore laws.

	
  

7

 

	
Delaware
	
  
	
Singapore

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Interested Shareholders
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in specified corporate transactions (such as mergers, stock and asset sales, and loans) with an “interested stockholder” for three years following the time that the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Subject to specified exceptions, an “interested stockholder” is a person or group that owns 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock (including any rights to acquire stock pursuant to an option, warrant, agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon the exercise of conversion or exchange rights, and stock with respect to which the person has voting rights only), or is an affiliate or associate of the corporation and was the owner of 15% or more of the voting stock at any time within the previous three years.

A Delaware corporation may elect to “opt out” of, and not be governed by, Section 203 through a provision in either its original certificate of incorporation, or an amendment to its original certificate or bylaws that was approved by majority stockholder vote. With a limited exception, this amendment would not become effective until 12 months following its adoption.
	
  
	
There are no comparable provisions under the Singapore Companies Act with respect to public companies which are not listed on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Removal of Directors
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
A typical certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that, subject to the rights of holders of any preferred stock, directors may be removed at any time by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority, or in some instances a supermajority, of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. A certificate of incorporation could also provide that such a right is only exercisable when a director is being removed for cause (removal of a director only for cause is the default rule in the case of a classified board).
	
 
	
Under the Singapore Companies Act, directors of a public company may be removed before expiration of their term of office, notwithstanding anything in its constitution or in any agreement between the public company and such directors, by ordinary resolution (i.e., a resolution which is passed by a simple majority of those shareholders present and voting in person or by proxy). Notice of the intention to move such a resolution has to be given to the company not less than 28 days before the meeting at which it is moved. The company shall then give notice of such resolution to its shareholders not less than 14 days before the meeting. Where any director removed in this manner was appointed to represent the interests of any particular class of shareholders or debenture holders, the resolution to remove such director will not take effect until such director’s successor has been appointed.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Filling Vacancies on the Board of Directors
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
A typical certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that, subject to the rights of the holders of any preferred stock, any vacancy, whether arising through death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal, an increase in the number of directors or any other reason, may be filled by a majority vote of the remaining directors, even if such directors remaining in office constitute less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining director. Any newly elected director usually holds office for the remainder of the full term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders at which the term of the class of directors to which the newly elected director has been elected expires.
	
 
	
The constitution of a Singapore company typically provides that the directors have the power to appoint any person to be a director, either to fill a vacancy or as an addition to the existing directors, but so that the total number of directors shall not at any time exceed the maximum number (if any) fixed by or in accordance with the constitution. Any director so appointed shall hold office until the next following annual general meeting, where such director will then be eligible for re-election. Our constitution provides that the directors may appoint any person to be a director either to fill a casual vacancy or as an additional director but so that the total number of Directors shall not at any time exceed the maximum number fixed by or in accordance with the constitution.

8

 

	
Delaware
	
  
	
Singapore

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Amendment of Governing Documents
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, amendments to a corporation’s certificate of incorporation require the approval of stockholders holding a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the amendment. If a class vote on the amendment is required by the Delaware General Corporation Law, a majority of the outstanding stock of the class is required, unless a greater proportion is specified in the certificate of incorporation or by other provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, the board of directors may amend bylaws if so authorized in the charter. The stockholders of a Delaware corporation also have the power to amend bylaws.
	
 
	
Our constitution may be altered by special resolution (i.e., a resolution passed by at least a three-fourths majority of the shareholders entitled to vote, present in person or by proxy at a meeting for which not less than 21 days’ written notice is given). The board of directors has no right to amend the constitution.

Under the Singapore Companies Act, an entrenching provision may be included in the constitution with which a company is formed and may at any time be inserted into the constitution of a company only if all the shareholders of the company agree. An entrenching provision is a provision of the constitution of a company to the effect that other specified provisions of the constitution may not be altered in the manner provided by the Singapore Companies Act or may not be so altered except (i) by a resolution passed by a specified majority greater than 75% (the minimum majority required by the Singapore Companies Act for a special resolution) or (ii) where other specified conditions are met. The Singapore Companies Act provides that such entrenching provision may be removed or altered only if all the members of the company agree.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Meetings of Shareholders
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Annual and Special Meetings
	
 
	
Annual General Meetings

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Typical bylaws provide that annual meetings of stockholders are to be held on a date and at a time fixed by the board of directors. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a special meeting of stockholders may be called by the board of directors or by any other person authorized to do so in the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws.
	
 
	
All companies are required to hold an annual general meeting after the end of each financial year within either 4 months (in the case of a public company that is listed on an exchange in Singapore approved by the Monetary Authority of Singapore) or 6 months (in the case of any other company).

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Extraordinary General Meetings

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Any general meeting other than the annual general meeting is called an “extraordinary general meeting.” Notwithstanding anything in the constitution, directors of a company are required to convene an extraordinary general meeting if required to do so by requisition (i.e. written notice, requiring that a meeting be called, given to the directors) by shareholder(s) holding not less than 10% of the total number of paid-up shares as at the date of the deposit of the requisition carrying the right of voting at general meetings of the company. In addition, the constitution usually also provides that general meetings may be convened in accordance with the Singapore Companies Act by the directors.

	
 
	
 
	
 

9

 

	
Delaware
	
  
	
Singapore

	
Quorum Requirements
	
 
	
Quorum Requirements

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws can specify the number of shares which constitute the quorum required to conduct business at a meeting, provided that in no event shall a quorum consist of less than one-third of the shares entitled to vote at a meeting.
	
 
	
Our constitution provides that any two shareholders present in person or by proxy or by attorney or, in the case of a corporation, by a representative and entitled to vote thereat; in each case representing in aggregate not less than a majority of the total voting rights of all shareholders having the right to vote at a general meeting, shall constitute a quorum. In the event a quorum is not present, the meeting if not convened on the requisition of shareholders may be adjourned for one week. When reconvened, the quorum for the meeting will be the same and if at such adjourned meeting a quorum is not present, the meeting will be dissolved.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Shareholders’ Rights at Meetings

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
The Singapore Companies Act provides that every member shall, notwithstanding any provision in the constitution, have a right to attend any general meeting of the company and to speak on any resolution before the meeting. The company’s constitution may provide that a member shall not be entitled to vote unless all calls or other sums personally payable by him in respect of shares in the company have been paid.

Public companies may issue non-voting shares and shares that confer special, limited and conditional voting rights, such that the holder of a share may vote on a resolution before a general meeting if, in accordance with the provisions of Section 64A of the Singapore Companies Act, the share confers on the holder a right to vote on the resolution.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Circulation of Shareholders’ Resolutions

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Under the Singapore Companies Act, (a) any number of shareholders representing not less than 5% of the total voting rights of all the shareholders having at the date of requisition a right to vote at a meeting to which the requisition relates or (b) not less than 100 shareholders holding shares on which there has been paid up an average sum, per shareholder, of not less than S$500, may requisition the company to give to shareholders notice of any resolution which may properly be moved and is intended to be moved at the next annual general meeting, and circulate to shareholders any statement of not more than 1,000 words with respect to the matter referred to in any proposed resolution or the business to be dealt with at that meeting.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Indemnification of Officers, Directors and Employees
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, subject to specified limitations in the case of derivative suits brought by a corporation’s stockholders in its name, a corporation may indemnify any person who is made a party to any third-party action, suit or proceeding on account of being a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation (or was serving at the request of the corporation in such capacity for another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise) against expenses, including attorney’s fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with the action, suit or proceeding through, among other things, a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the suit or proceeding, if the person:

•      acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation or, in some circumstances, at least not opposed to its best interests; and

•      in a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

Delaware corporate law permits indemnification by a corporation under similar circumstances for expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such persons in connection with the defense or settlement of a derivative action or suit, except that no indemnification may be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which the person is adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless the Delaware Court of Chancery or the court in which the action or suit was brought determines upon application that the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for the expenses which the court deems to be proper.

To the extent a director, officer, employee or agent is successful in the defense of such an action, suit or proceeding, the corporation is required by Delaware corporate law to indemnify such person for reasonable expenses incurred thereby. Expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by such persons in defending any action, suit or proceeding may be paid in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of that person to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined that that person is not entitled to be so indemnified.
	
 
	
Under Section 172 of the Singapore Companies Act, any provision exempting or indemnifying the officers of a company (including directors) against liability, which by law would otherwise attach to them in connection with any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust in relation to the company is void.

However, the Singapore Companies Act allows a company to:

•      purchase and maintain for any officer insurance against any liability which by law would otherwise attach to such officer in connection with any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust in relation to the company;

•      indemnify such officer against any liability incurred by him or her to a person other than the company except when the indemnity is against any liability (i) of the officer to pay a fine in criminal proceedings, (ii) of the officer to pay a penalty in respect of non-compliance with any regulatory requirements, (iii) incurred by the officer in defending criminal proceedings in which he or she is convicted, (iv) incurred by the officer in defending civil proceedings brought by the company or a related company in which judgment is given against him or her, or (v) incurred by the officer in connection with an application for relief under Section 76A(13) or Section 391 of the Singapore Companies Act in which the court refuses to grant him or her relief.

In cases where a director is sued by the company, the Singapore Companies Act gives the court the power to relieve directors either wholly or partially from their liability for their negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust. In order for relief to be obtained, it must be shown that (i) the director acted reasonably and honestly; and (ii) it is fair, having regard to all the circumstances of the case including those connected with such director’s appointment, to excuse the director. However, Singapore case law has indicated that such relief will not be granted to a director who has benefited as a result of his or her breach of trust.

Our constitution provides that subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and every other applicable statute for the time being in force concerning companies and affecting the company, the directors and officers are entitled to be indemnified against costs, charges, fees and other expenses that may be incurred by such person in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, which relates to anything done or omitted or alleged to be done or omitted by such person as a director, officer or employee of the company and in which judgment is given in his or her favor or in which such person is acquitted or in which the courts have granted relief pursuant to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act, provided that such indemnity shall not extend to any liability which by law would otherwise attach to him or her in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which he or she may be guilty in relation to the company, or which would otherwise result in such indemnity being voided under applicable Singapore laws.

10

 

	
Delaware
	
  
	
Singapore

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Shareholder Approval of Issuances of Shares
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Under Delaware law, the board of directors has the authority to issue, from time to time, capital stock in its sole discretion, as long the number the shares to be issued, together with those shares that are already issued and outstanding and those shares reserved to be issued, do not exceed the authorized capital for the corporation as previously approved by the stockholders and set forth in the corporation’s certificate of incorporation. Under the foregoing circumstances, no additional stockholder approval is required for the issuance of capital stock. Under Delaware law, stockholder approval is required (i) for any amendment to the corporation’s certificate of incorporation to increase the authorized capital and (ii) for the issuance of stock in a direct merger transaction where the number of shares exceeds 20% of the corporation’s shares outstanding prior to the transaction, regardless of whether there sufficient authorized capital.
	
 
	
Section 161 of the Singapore Companies Act provides that notwithstanding anything in the company’s constitution, the directors shall not exercise any power to issue shares without prior approval of Company’s shareholders in a general meeting. The affirmative vote of shareholders holding at least a majority of the ordinary shares held by the shareholders present in person or represented by proxy at the annual general meeting and entitled to vote is required for this authorization. Once this shareholders’ approval is obtained, unless previously revoked or varied by the company in general meeting, it continues in force until the conclusion of the next annual general meeting or the expiration of the period within which the next annual general meeting after that date is required by law to be held, whichever is earlier; but any approval may be revoked or varied by the company in general meeting. Notwithstanding this general authorization to allot and issue our ordinary shares, Wave will be required to seek shareholder approval with respect to future issuances of ordinary shares, where required under the Nasdaq Stock Market rules, such as if we were to propose an issuance of ordinary shares that would result in a change in control of Wave or in connection with a transaction involving the issuance of ordinary shares representing 20% or more of our outstanding ordinary shares.

11

 

	
Delaware
	
  
	
Singapore

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Shareholder Approval of Business Combinations
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Generally, under the Delaware General Corporation Law, completion of a merger, consolidation, or the sale, lease or exchange of substantially all of a corporation’s assets or dissolution requires approval by the board of directors and by a majority (unless the certificate of incorporation requires a higher percentage) of outstanding stock of the corporation entitled to vote.

The Delaware General Corporation Law also requires a special vote of stockholders in connection with a business combination with an “interested stockholder” as defined in section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. See “—Interested Shareholders” above.
	
 
	
The Singapore Companies Act and the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 of Singapore (No. 40 of 2018) mandates that specified corporate actions require approval by the shareholders in a general meeting, notably:

•      notwithstanding anything in the company’s constitution, directors are not permitted to carry into effect any proposals for disposing of the whole or substantially the whole of the company’s undertaking or property unless those proposals have been approved by shareholders in a general meeting;

•      the company may by special resolution resolve that it be wound up voluntarily;

•      subject to the constitution of each amalgamating company, an amalgamation proposal must be approved by the shareholders of each amalgamating company via special resolution at a general meeting;

•      a compromise or arrangement proposed between a company and its shareholders, or any class of them, must, among other things, be approved by a majority in number representing three-fourths in value of the shareholders or class of shareholders present and voting either in person or by proxy at the meeting ordered by the court; and

•      notwithstanding anything in the company’s constitution, the directors may not, without the prior approval of shareholders, issue shares, including shares being issued in connection with corporate actions.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Shareholder Action Without A Meeting
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, unless otherwise provided in a corporation’s certificate of incorporation, any action that may be taken at a meeting of stockholders may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote if the holders of outstanding stock, having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize such action, consent in writing. It is not uncommon for a corporation’s certificate of incorporation to prohibit such action.
	
 
	
There are no equivalent provisions under the Singapore Companies Act in respect of public companies which are listed on a securities exchange, like our company.

12

 

	
Delaware
	
  
	
Singapore

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Shareholder Suits
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a stockholder may bring a derivative action on behalf of the corporation to enforce the rights of the corporation. An individual also may commence a class action suit on behalf of himself or herself and other similarly situated stockholders where the requirements for maintaining a class action under the Delaware General Corporation Law have been met. A person may institute and maintain such a suit only if such person was a stockholder at the time of the transaction which is the subject of the suit or his or her shares thereafter devolved upon him or her by operation of law. Additionally, under Delaware case law, the plaintiff generally must be a stockholder not only at the time of the transaction which is the subject of the suit, but also through the duration of the derivative suit. The Delaware General Corporation Law also requires that the derivative plaintiff make a demand on the directors of the corporation to assert the corporate claim before the suit may be prosecuted by the derivative plaintiff, unless such demand would be futile.
	
 
	
Standing

Only registered shareholders of our company reflected in our register of members are recognized under Singapore law as shareholders of our company. As a result, only registered shareholders have legal standing to institute shareholder actions against us or otherwise seek to enforce their rights as shareholders. Holders of book-entry interests in our shares will be required to exchange their book-entry interests for certificated shares and to be registered as shareholders in our shareholder register in order to institute or enforce any legal proceedings or claims against us, our directors or our executive officers relating to shareholder rights. A holder of book-entry interests may become a registered shareholder of our company by exchanging its interest in our shares for certificated shares and being registered in our shareholder register.

Personal remedies in cases of oppression or injustice

A shareholder may apply to the court for an order under Section 216 of the Singapore Companies Act to remedy situations where (i) the company’s affairs are being conducted or the powers of the company’s directors are being exercised in a manner oppressive to, or in disregard of the interests of one or more of the shareholders or holders of debentures of the company, including the applicant; or (ii) the company has done an act, or threatens to do an act, or the shareholders or holders of debentures have passed some resolution, which unfairly discriminates against, or is otherwise prejudicial to, one or more of the company’s shareholders or holders of debentures, including the applicant.

Singapore courts have wide discretion as to the relief they may grant under such application, including, inter alia, directing or prohibiting any act or cancelling or varying any transaction or resolution, providing that the company be wound up, or authorizing civil proceedings to be brought in the name of or on behalf of the company by such person or persons and on such terms as the court directs.

Derivative actions and arbitrations

The Singapore Companies Act has a provision which provides a mechanism enabling shareholders to apply to the court for leave to bring a derivative action or commence an arbitration on behalf of the company. Derivative actions are also allowed as a common law action.

Applications are generally made by shareholders of the company, but courts are given the discretion to allow such persons as they deem proper to apply (e.g., beneficial owner of shares).

It should be noted that this provision of the Singapore Companies Act is primarily used by minority shareholders to bring an action or arbitration in the name and on behalf of the company or intervene in an action or arbitration to which the company is a party for the purpose of prosecuting, defending or discontinuing the action or arbitration on behalf of the company. Prior to commencing a derivative action or arbitration, the court must be satisfied that (i) 14 days’ notice has been given to the directors of the company of the party’s intention to commence such action or arbitration if the directors of the company do not bring, diligently prosecute or defend or discontinue the action, (ii) the party is acting in good faith and (iii) it appears to be prima facie in the interests of the company that the action be brought, prosecuted, defended or discontinued.

Class actions

The concept of class action suits in the United States, which allows individual shareholders to bring an action seeking to represent the class or classes of shareholders, does not exist in the same manner in Singapore. In Singapore, it is possible as a matter of procedure for a number of shareholders to begin proceedings on behalf of themselves and other shareholders who have the same interest in the proceedings whom they represent. These shareholders are known as “representative plaintiffs.”

13

 

	
Delaware
	
  
	
Singapore

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Distributions and Dividends; Repurchases and Redemptions
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
The Delaware General Corporation Law permits a corporation to declare and pay dividends out of statutory surplus or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or for the preceding fiscal year as long as the amount of capital of the corporation following the declaration and payment of the dividend is not less than the aggregate amount of the capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets.

Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, any corporation may purchase or redeem its own shares, except that generally it may not purchase or redeem these shares if the capital of the corporation is impaired at the time or would become impaired as a result of the redemption. A corporation may, however, purchase or redeem out of capital shares that are entitled upon any distribution of its assets to a preference over another class or series of its shares if the shares are to be retired and the capital reduced.
	
 
	
The Singapore Companies Act provides that no dividends can be paid to shareholders except out of profits.

The Singapore Companies Act does not provide a definition on when profits are deemed to be available for the purpose of paying dividends and this is accordingly governed by case law.

Our constitution provides that no dividend can be paid otherwise than out of profits.

Acquisition of a company’s own shares

The Singapore Companies Act generally prohibits a company from acquiring its own shares or purporting to acquire the shares of its holding company or ultimate holding company, whether directly or indirectly, in any way, subject to certain exceptions. Any contract or transaction made or entered into in contravention of the aforementioned prohibition by which a company acquires or purports to acquire its own shares or shares in its holding company or ultimate holding company is void. However, provided that it is expressly permitted to do so by its constitution and subject to the special conditions of each permitted acquisition contained in the Singapore Companies Act, a company may:

•      redeem redeemable preferred shares on such terms and in such manner as is provided by its constitution. Preferred shares may be redeemed out of capital only if all the directors make a solvency statement in relation to such redemption in accordance with the Singapore Companies Act, and the company lodges a copy of the statement with the Registrar of Companies;

•     whether listed on an exchange in Singapore approved by the Monetary Authority of Singapore or any securities exchange outside Singapore, or not, make an off-market purchase of its own shares in accordance with an equal access scheme authorized in advance at a general meeting;

•      make a selective off-market purchase of its own shares in accordance with an agreement authorized in advance at a general meeting by a special resolution where persons whose shares are to be acquired and their associated persons have abstained from voting; and

•     whether listed on an exchange in Singapore approved by the Monetary Authority of Singapore or any securities exchange outside Singapore, or not, make an acquisition of its own shares under a contingent purchase contract which has been authorized in advance at a general meeting by a special resolution.

A company may also purchase its own shares by an order of a Singapore court.

•     The total number of ordinary shares, stocks in any class and non-redeemable preferred shares that may be acquired by a company in a relevant period may not exceed 20% (or such other prescribed percentage) of the total number of ordinary shares, stocks in any class or non-redeemable preferred shares (as the case may be) as of the date of the resolution to acquire the shares. Where, however, a company has reduced its share capital by a special resolution or a Singapore court made an order to such effect, the total number of ordinary shares, stocks in any class or non-redeemable preferred shares shall be taken to be the total number of ordinary shares, stocks in any class or non-redeemable preferred shares (as the case may be) as altered by the special resolution or the order of the court. Payment, including any expenses (including brokerage or commission) incurred directly in the acquisition by the company of its own shares, may be made out of the company’s profits or capital, provided that the company is solvent.

Financial assistance for the acquisition of shares

A public company or a company whose holding company or ultimate holding company is a public company may not give financial assistance to any person whether directly or indirectly for the purpose of or in connection with:

•      the acquisition or proposed acquisition of shares in the company or units of such shares; or

•      the acquisition or proposed acquisition of shares in its holding company or ultimate holding company, or units of such shares.

Financial assistance may take the form of a loan, the giving of a guarantee, the provision of security, the release of an obligation, the release of a debt or otherwise.

However, it should be noted that a company may provide financial assistance for the acquisition of its shares or shares in its holding company or ultimate holding company if it complies with the requirements (including approval by special resolution) set out in the Singapore Companies Act.

Our constitution provides that subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act, we may purchase or otherwise acquire our own shares upon such terms and subject to such conditions as we may deem fit. We may deal with any such shares which is so purchased or acquired by us in such manner as may be permitted under the Singapore Companies Act (including, without limitation, hold such shares as treasury shares).

14

 

	
Delaware
	
  
	
Singapore

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Transactions with Officers or Directors
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, some contracts or transactions in which one or more of a corporation’s directors has an interest are not void or voidable because of such interest provided that some conditions, such as obtaining the required approval and fulfilling the requirements of good faith and full disclosure, are met. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, either (a) the stockholders or the board of directors of a corporation must approve in good faith any such contract or transaction after full disclosure of the material facts or (b) the contract or transaction must have been “fair” as to the corporation at the time it was approved. If board approval is sought, the contract or transaction must be approved in good faith by a majority of disinterested directors after full disclosure of material facts, even though less than a majority of a quorum.
	
 
	
Under the Singapore Companies Act, directors and the chief executive officer of the company are not prohibited from dealing with the company, but where they have an interest, whether directly or indirectly, in a transaction with the company, that interest must be disclosed to the board of directors. In particular, every director or chief executive officer who is in any way, whether directly or indirectly, interested in a transaction or proposed transaction with the company must, as soon as is practicable after the relevant facts have come to such director’s or, as the case may be, the chief executive officer’s knowledge, declare the nature of such interest at a meeting of the directors or send a written notice to the company detailing the nature, character and extent of the interest.

In addition, a director or chief executive officer who holds any office or possesses any property which directly or indirectly might create interests in conflict with such director’s or, as the case may be, the chief executive officer’s duties as director or chief executive officer is required to declare the fact and the nature, character and extent of the conflict at a meeting of directors or send a written notice to the company detailing the nature, character and extent of the conflict.

The Singapore Companies Act extends the scope of this statutory duty of a director and chief executive officer to disclose any interests by pronouncing that an interest of a member of a director’s or, as the case may be, the chief executive officer’s family (including spouse, son, adopted son, step-son, daughter, adopted daughter and step-daughter) will be treated as an interest of the director or chief executive officer (as the case may be).

A director or chief executive officer shall not be deemed to be interested or at any time interested in a transaction or proposed transaction where the interest of the director or chief executive officer (as the case may be) consists only of being a member or creditor of a corporation which is interested in the transaction or proposed transaction with the company if the interest may properly be regarded as immaterial. Where the transaction or the proposed transaction relates to any loan to the company, no disclosure need be made where the director or chief executive officer (as the case may be) has only guaranteed the repayment of such loan, unless the constitution provides otherwise.

Further, where the transaction or the proposed transaction has been or will be made with or for the benefit of a related corporation (i.e., the holding company, subsidiary or subsidiary of a common holding company), the director or chief executive officer shall not be deemed to be interested or at any time interested in such transaction or proposed transaction by virtue of only being a director or chief executive officer (as the case may be) of the related corporation, unless the constitution provides otherwise.

Subject to specified exceptions, the Singapore Companies Act prohibits a company (other than an exempt private company) from, among others, (i) making a loan or a quasi-loan to its directors or to directors of a related corporation, or giving a guarantee or security in connection with such a loan or quasi-loan, (ii) entering into a credit transaction as creditor for the benefit of its directors or the directors of a related corporation, or giving a guarantee or any security in connection with such a credit transaction, (iii) arranging an assignment to or assumption by us of any rights, obligations or liabilities under a transaction which, if it had been entered into by us, would have been a restricted transaction, and (iv) taking part in an arrangement under which another person enters into a transaction which, if entered into by us, would have been a restricted transaction and such person obtains a benefit from us or our related corporation pursuant thereto. Companies are also prohibited from entering into any of these transactions with the spouse or children (whether adopted or natural or step-children) of its directors.

Subject to specified exceptions, the Singapore Companies Act prohibits a company (other than an exempt private company) from making a loan or a quasi-loan to another company or a limited liability partnership or entering into any guarantee or providing any security in connection with a loan or a quasi-loan made to another company or a limited liability partnership by a person other than the first-mentioned company, entering into a credit transaction as a creditor for the benefit of another company or a limited liability partnership, or entering into any guarantee or provide any security in connection with a credit transaction entered into by any person for the benefit of another company or a limited liability partnership if a director or directors of the first-mentioned company is or together are interested in 20% or more of the total voting power in the other company or the limited liability partnership (as the case may be).

Such prohibition shall extend to apply to a loan, quasi-loan, credit transaction made by a company (other than an exempt private company), a credit transaction made by a company (other than an exempt private company) for the benefit of another company or limited liability partnership and a guarantee or security provided by a company (other than an exempt private company) in connection with a loan or quasi-loan made by a person other than the first-mentioned company to another company or a limited liability partnership where such other company or limited liability partnership is incorporated or formed (as the case may be) outside Singapore, if a director or directors of the first-mentioned company (a) is or together are interested in 20% or more of the total voting power in the other company or limited liability partnership or (b) in a case where the other company does not have a share capital, exercises or together exercise control over the other company whether by reason of having the power to appoint directors or otherwise.

The Singapore Companies Act also provides that an interest of a member of a director’s family (including spouse, son, adopted son, step-son, daughter, adopted daughter and step-daughter) will be treated as an interest of the director.

15

 

	
Delaware
	
  
	
Singapore

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Dissenters’ Rights
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a stockholder of a corporation participating in some types of major corporate transactions may, under varying circumstances, be entitled to appraisal rights pursuant to which the stockholder may receive cash in the amount of the fair market value of his or her shares in lieu of the consideration he or she would otherwise receive in the transaction.
	
 
	
There are no equivalent provisions in Singapore under the Singapore Companies Act.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Cumulative Voting
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation may adopt in its bylaws that its directors shall be elected by cumulative voting. When directors are elected by cumulative voting, a stockholder has the number of votes equal to the number of shares held by such stockholder times the number of directors nominated for election. The stockholder may cast all of such votes for one director or among the directors in any proportion.
	
 
	
There are no equivalent provisions in Singapore under the Singapore Companies Act.

 

16

Source: [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00323-of-00352.parquet"}, [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00323-of-00352.parquet"}]]