Document:

Exhibit 10.5

                                    EXHIBIT F

                                 April __, 2005

On2 Technologies, Inc.
21 Corporate Drive, Suite 103
Clifton Park, New York 12065

Ladies and Gentlemen:

            We have acted as counsel for Wildform, Inc., a California
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the sale and license by the
Company to you of certain assets pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase and
Software License Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2005 (the "Asset Purchase
Agreement") as well as the execution and delivery of the Escrow Agreement, the
Registration Rights' Agreement, the Flix Agreement and the Non-Competition
Agreements (as such terms are defined in the Asset Purchase Agreement and
collectively with the Asset Purchase Agreement, the "Transaction Documents").
This opinion is given to you pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement.

            In rendering this opinion, we have examined such matters of law as
we considered necessary for the purpose of rendering this opinion. As to matters
of fact material to the opinions expressed herein, we have relied upon the
representations and warranties contained in and made by the Company pursuant to
the Asset Purchase Agreement and a certificate of officers of the Company and
upon certificates and statements of government officials and of officers of the
Company. In addition, we have examined originals or copies of documents,
corporate records and other writings that we consider relevant for the purposes
of this opinion. In such examination, we have assumed that the signatures on
documents and instruments examined by us are authentic, that each such document
or instrument is what it purports to be, and that all documents and instruments
submitted to us as copies or facsimiles conform with the originals, which facts
we have not independently verified.

            We express no opinion as to matters governed by any laws other than
the laws of the State of California.

            In rendering the opinion set forth below as to the good standing of
the Company, we have relied exclusively on certificates of public officials,
although we have not obtained tax good standing certificates and no opinion is
provided with respect to tax good standing.

            We express no opinion as to whether the members of the Company's
Board of Directors have complied with their fiduciary duties in connection with
the authorization and performance of the Transaction Documents. We have assumed
that the Transaction Documents, and the transactions contemplated thereby, were
fair and reasonable to the Company at the time of their authorization by the
Company's Board of Directors and stockholders within the meaning of Section 310
of the California Corporations Code. We have assumed that the Company is duly
incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State
of California.

<PAGE>

            Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that
the execution and delivery of the Transaction Documents have been duly
authorized and all corporate action on the part of the Company, its directors
and shareholders necessary for the authorization, execution, delivery and
performance of the obligations under the Transaction Documents by the Company
has been taken.

            This opinion is rendered as of the date first written above solely
for your benefit in connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement and may not be
relied on by, nor may copies be delivered to, any other person without our prior
written consent. Our opinion is expressly limited to the matters set forth above
and we render no opinion, whether by implication or otherwise, as to any other
matters relating to the Company. We assume no obligation to inform you of any
facts, circumstances, events or changes in the law that may hereafter be brought
to our attention that may alter, affect or modify the opinions expressed herein.

                                                     STRATEGIC LAW PARTNERS, LLPExhibit
      10.1 Alpha,
      et al 3(a)(10) Settlement

    

    SETTLEMENT
      AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

    

    This
      Settlement Agreement and Release (the “Agreement”) is dated as of September 15,
      2006 and is made by and between Alpha Capital Aktiengesellschaft (“Alpha”),
      Bristol Investment Fund, Ltd. (“Bristol”), Whalehaven Capital Fund Limited
      (“Whalehaven”), Ellis International, Ltd. (“Ellis”), Platinum Long Term Growth
      II, Inc. (“Platinum”), Chestnut Ridge Partners, LP (“Chestnut”), Grushko &
Mittman, P.C. (“G&M”), CMS Capital (“CMS”), DKR Soundshore Oasis Holding
      Fund, Ltd. (“DKR”) and Osher Capital, Inc. (“Osher”) (collectively, the
“Plaintiffs” and/or “Investors”) and VoIP, Inc. ("VoIP").

    

    BACKGROUND

    

    WHEREAS,
      on
      January 6, 2006, and in a subsequent amendment adding additional subscribers
      dated January 11, 2006, Alpha, Bristol, Whalehaven, Platinum, CMS, DKR, G&M,
      Ellis, and Chestnut, on one hand, and VoIP, on the other, entered into a
      Subscription Agreement wherein Alpha, Bristol, Whalehaven, Platinum, CMS, DKR,
      G&M, Ellis, and Chestnut paid VoIP the collective amount of $4,685,000 for
      discounted convertible promissory notes in the total face amount of $5,331,212,
      in which Alpha purchased $910,346 in notes; Bristol purchased $910,346 in notes;
      Whalehaven purchased $1,137,932 in notes; Platinum purchased $284,483 in notes;
      CMS purchased $113,793 in notes; DKR purchased $568,966 in notes; G&M
      purchased $39,828 in notes; Ellis purchased $1,081,065 in notes; and Chestnut
      purchased $284,483 in notes (the “First Note”);

     

    WHEREAS,
      on
      February 2, 2006, Alpha, Bristol, Platinum, CMS, DKR, Osher, G&M, and Ellis,
      on one hand, and VoIP, on the other, entered into a Subscription Agreement
      wherein Alpha, Bristol, Platinum, CMS, DKR, Osher, G&M, and Ellis paid VoIP
      the collective amount of $2,625,000 for discounted convertible promissory notes
      in the total face amount of $2,987,072, in which Alpha purchased $227,586 in
      notes; Bristol purchased $910,346 in notes; Platinum purchased $284,483 in
      notes; CMS purchased $56,897 in notes; DKR purchased $568,966 in notes; Osher
      purchased $85,345 in notes; G&M purchased $56,897 in notes; and Ellis
      purchased $796,552 in notes (the “Second Note”) (the First Note and Second Note
      are collectively the “NOTES”);

     

    WHEREAS,
      on May
      22, 2006, the Investors and VoIP entered into a Modification and Amendment
      Agreement wherein the parties thereof restructured the terms of the Subscription
      Agreements between the parties dated January 6, 2006 and February 2, 2006 (the
      “Subscription Agreements”) relating to the Investors’ purchase of the NOTES (the
      Subscription Agreements and the documents and agreements delivered therewith,
      together with the aforementioned Modification and Amendment Agreement are
      collectively the “Transaction Documents”);

     

    WHEREAS,
      on or
      about September 15, 2006, Plaintiffs filed an action against VoIP entitled
      Alpha
      Capital Aktiengesellschaft, Bristol Investment Fund, Ltd., Whalehaven Capital
      Fund Limited, Ellis International, Ltd., Platinum Long Term Growth II, Inc.,
      Chestnut Ridge Partners, LP, Grushko & Mittman, P.C., CMS Capital, DKR
      Soundshore Oasis Holding Fund, Ltd., and Osher Capital, Inc. v. VoIP,
      Inc.,
      Case
      No.: 2006 CA ______NC, (the “Action”) in the Circuit Court of the Twelfth
      Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County, Florida (the “Court”), whereby Plaintiffs
      asserted claims against VoIP alleging that VoIP was in breach of the NOTES
      and
      sought compensatory damages in the face amount of notes, $8,318,284, together
      with interest due under the NOTES in the amount of $207,957.09, liquidated
      damages provided in the NOTES in the amount of $374,322.77, for a total amount
      of $9,781,719 (collectively the NOTES Claims”), claims asserted by Alpha in
      connection with its exercise of 958,332 warrants to purchase VoIP’s common
      stock, claims asserted by Whalehaven in connection with its exercise of 958,332
      warrants to purchase VoIP’s common stock, claims asserted by Bristol in
      connection with its exercise of 958,332 warrants to purchase VoIP’s common
      stock, and claims asserted by Ellis in connection with its exercise of 359,396
      warrants to purchase VoIP’s common stock (the exercise of warrants by Alpha,
      Whalehaven, Bristol, and Ellis are hereinafter referred to as the “Warrant
      Claims”) (the NOTES Claims and Warrant Claims are collectively, the “Claims” or
“Compromised Amount”); 

     

    WHEREAS,
      VoIP,
      in its Answer, denied any and all wrongdoing and asserted affirmative
      defenses;

     

    WHEREAS,
      VoIP
      denies that it is liable for the amount sought in the Action, but acknowledges
      that it does not have sufficient cash to satisfy the claims made in the Action
      or to defend the Action, and VoIP seeks to resolve this Action with
      Plaintiffs;

     

    WHEREAS,
      VoIP
      currently only has the means to satisfy payment of the Investors’ bona fide
      claims through the issuance of authorized shares to Plaintiffs, pursuant to
      Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 (hereinafter the “Act”) in
      exchange for a portion of Plaintiff’s Claims and by agreeing to restructuring
      the terms of the Plaintiffs’ investments in VoIP.

     

    WHEREAS,
      VoIP
      and Plaintiffs desire to resolve, settle, and compromise the Investor’s bona
      fide claims that they have asserted against VoIP, which arise out of or relate
      to the NOTES - claims which total $9,781,719 that is due and owing to Plaintiffs
      (hereinafter the “Compromised Amount”);

    With
      this
      background incorporated herein, the parties hereby agree to the following
      settlement:

    

    
      
        
        

      

      
        1

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    TERMS
      OF SETTLEMENT

    

    1.  CLAIMS.
      The
      Investors agrees to resolve their bona fide claims with VoIP for the Compromised
      Amount as follows:

     

    
      	a.  	
              The
                Parties agree that the amount due an owing under the NOTES shall
                be reset
                to the principal amount due under the NOTES in the amount of $8,318,284,
                together with interest due under the NOTES in the amount of $207,957.09,
                and liquidated damages provided in the NOTES in the amount of $374,322.77,
                for a total amount of $9,781,719, as set forth for the Investors
                in Annex
                A hereto.

            

    

    
      	 	 

    

    
      	b.  	
              As
                soon as practicable following entry of an order by the Court in accordance
                with Paragraph 3 herein, Plaintiffs agree to surrender $4,940,000
                of the
                NOTES Claims, on a pro rata basis, to VoIP in exchange for 19,000,000
                shares of VoIP’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, through the
                issuance of freely trading securities issued pursuant to Section
                3(a)(10)
                of the Act (the “Debt Shares”) as set forth in Annex A hereto. The
                effective conversion rate for the debt exchanged to resolve this
                partial
                claim is $0.26 per share.

            

    

    
      	 	 

    

    
      	c.  	
              As
                soon as practicable following entry of an order by the Court in accordance
                with Paragraph 3 herein, Alpha, Whalehaven, Ellis, and Bristol agree
                to
                surrender their Warrant Claims to VoIP in exchange for 2,500,000
                shares of
                VoIP’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, through the issuance
                of
                freely trading securities issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of
                the Act
                (the “Warrant Shares”) (the Debt Shares and Warrant Shares are
                collectively, the “Settlement
                Shares”).

            

    

    
      	 	 

    

    
      	d.  	
              Plaintiffs
                agree to retain the balance of their claims of their NOTES Claims,
                on a
                pro rata basis, as set forth in Annex A hereto, and VoIP agrees to
                reset
                the conversion rate for the remaining balance under the NOTES to
                $0.26 per
                share (the “Retained Notes”), which shall retain all rights
                

            

    

    
      	 	 

    

    
      	e.  	
              VoIP
                agrees to reduce the exercise price of the un-exercised warrants
                purchased
                by Plaintiffs in connection with the NOTES to
                $0.475.

            

    

    
      	 	 

    

    
      	f.  	
              VoIP
                agrees to amend its Certificate of Incorporation and take all steps
                necessary, including obtaining shareholder approval, to authorize
                at least
                an additional 18,621,997 shares of common stock, as well as sufficient
                shares to cover the un-exercised warrants issued to the Investors
                under
                the Transaction Documents and hold such shares in reserve for Plaintiffs’
                benefit in connection with the balance of the Retained Notes retained
                by
                Plaintiffs herein on or before November 30, 2006. Further, if at
                any time
                after the date hereof the VoIP shall determine to file with the Securities
                and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") a registration statement relating
                to
                an offering for its own account or the account of others under the
                Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of any of its equity securities
                (other
                than on Form S-4 or Form S-8 or their then equivalents relating to
                equity
                securities to be issued solely in connection with any acquisition
                of any
                entity or business or equity securities issuable in connection with
                stock
                option or other bona fide, employee benefit plans), the VoIP shall
                send to
                each Investor written notice of such determination and, the Company
                shall
                include in such registration statement 100% of the shares underlying
                the
                Retained Notes and unexercised warrants purchased by the Investors
                under
                the Transaction Documents. In addition to the foregoing, VoIP shall
                file a
                registration statement, which includes 100% of the shares underlying
                the
                Retained Notes and unexercised warrants purchased by the Investors
                under
                the Transaction Documents within thirty (30) days from the effectiveness
                of the proxy statement to authorize additional shares of the Company
                or by
                December 31, 2006, whichever is earlier. Further, VoIP shall use
                its best
                reasonable efforts to have such registration statement be declared
                effective by the SEC within one hundred and twenty (120) days from
                the
                effectiveness of the proxy statement to authorize additional shares
                of the
                Company or by March 30, 2007, whichever is
                earlier.

            

    

     

    2.  INVESTORS’
      LEAK-OUT.
      Each of
      the Investors receiving Debt Shares agrees, by and among themselves, that no
      Investor shall sell more than their pro-rata allocation of thirty percent (30%)
      of the daily trading volume in VoIP’s common stock, as set forth in Annex A
      hereto; provided however, any Investor may cumulate the daily trading volume
      in
      any given calendar week to compute their leak-out amount; provided further,
      that
      the aforementioned cumulative trading volume resets every Monday. This
      Investors’ Leak-Out provision does not apply to any sale of VoIP’s common stock
      at a price above $0.75 per share. 

     

    3.  INVESTORS’
      RETAINED RIGHTS IN REMAINING NOTES.
      With
      respect to the balance of the CLAIMS retained by Plaintiffs under the NOTES
      retained by Plaintiffs, as set forth in Annex A hereto, Plaintiffs retain all
      rights granted to them in the Transaction Documents that are not specifically
      waived in this Settlement Agreement and Release for the NOTES being retained
      by
      Plaintiffs including, but not limited to, security interests, indemnification,
      anti-dilution rights, registration rights, reservation of rights, the survival
      of VoIP’s representations, warranties, and undertakings.

     

    4.  FAIRNESS
      HEARING.
      Upon
      execution hereof, the Investors and VoIP agree, pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
§77(a)(10), to immediately submit the terms and conditions of this Agreement
      to
      the Court for a hearing on the fairness of such terms and conditions, for the
      issuance of an exemption from registration of the Settlement Shares and an
      Order
      approving the Agreement. VoIP avers it is a “reporting issuer” that files
      reports with the SEC under Section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
      1934
      (the “Exchange Act”); VoIP avers it is current in all its filing required under
      the Exchange Act; and the Investors aver they have access to, and have accessed
      all such filings. In connection with such a fairness hearing, VoIP, the issuer
      of the securities, and the Investors, the proposed persons to whom the
      securities are to be issued, agree that the value of the Settlement Shares
      utilized to partially satisfy the Claims as set forth herein is fair and
      reasonable. This Agreement shall become binding upon the parties only upon
      entry
      of an order by the Court substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit
      A
      (the “Order”).

     

    5.  NECESSARY
      ACTION.
      At all
      times after the execution of this Agreement and entry of the Order by the Court,
      each party hereto agrees to take or cause to be taken all such necessary action
      including, without limitation, the execution and delivery of such further
      instruments and documents, as may be reasonably requested by any party for
      such
      purposes or otherwise necessary to complete or perfect the transaction
      contemplated hereby.

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        2

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    6.  RELEASES.
      Upon
      delivery of the Settlement Shares to the Investors and in consideration of
      the
      terms and conditions of this Agreement, and except for the obligations and
      representations arising or made hereunder or a breach hereof, the parties hereby
      release, acquit and forever discharge the other and each, every, and, all of
      their current and past officers, directors, shareholders, affiliated
      corporations, subsidiaries, agents, employees, representatives, attorneys,
      predecessors, successors and assigns (the “Released Parties”), of and from any
      and all claims, damages, causes of action, suits and costs, of whatever nature,
      character or description, whether known or unknown, anticipated or
      unanticipated, which the parties may now have or may hereafter have or claim
      to
      have against each other with respect to the partial claims satisfied herein
      through the issuance of the Debt Shares and Warrant Shares, except that this
      Release specifically excludes third-party indemnification rights set forth
      in
      the Transaction Documents. Nothing herein shall be deemed to negate or affect
      the Investor's right and title to any securities heretofore issued to it by
      VoIP.

     

    7.  CONTINUING
      JURISDICTION.
      Simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the attorneys representing
      the parties hereto will execute a stipulation of dismissal substantially in
      the
      form annexed hereto as Exhibit B (the “Stipulation of Dismissal”), which shall
      be held by the Investors' counsel and filed with the Court after VoIP’s delivery
      of the Settlement Shares in accordance with paragraph 1 herein. In order to
      enable the Court to grant specific enforcement and other equitable relief in
      connection with this Agreement, (a) the parties consent to the jurisdiction
      of
      the Court for purposes of enforcing this Agreement and (b) each party to this
      Agreement expressly waives any contention that there is an adequate remedy
      at
      law or any like doctrine that might otherwise preclude injunctive relief to
      enforce this Agreement.

     

    8.  CONTINUING
      OBLIGATION.
      Both
      parties agree to use their best efforts to cooperate with the Court to cause
      the
      Order to be timely entered and agree that delays caused due to Court calendars
      shall not constitute a valid reason to void this Agreement.

     

    9.  INFORMATION.
      The
      Investors and VoIP each represent that prior to the execution of this Agreement,
      they have had the advice of counsel, namely, Robert E. Turffs, Esq. of Robert
      E.
      Turffs, P.A. for Plaintiffs and Michael J. Raterink, Esq. of Michael J.
      Raterink, P.A. for VoIP, they fully informed themselves of its terms, contents,
      conditions and effects, and that no promise or representation of any kind has
      been made to them except as expressly stated in this Agreement.

     

    10.  OWNERSHIP
      AND AUTHORITY.
      The
      Investors and VoIP represent and warrant that they have not sold, assigned,
      transferred, conveyed or otherwise disposed of any or all of any claim, demand,
      right or cause of action, relating to any matter which is covered by this
      Agreement, that each is the sole owner of such claim, demand, right or cause
      of
      action, and each has the power and authority and has been duly authorized to
      enter into and perform this Agreement and that this Agreement is a binding
      obligation of each, enforceable in accordance with its terms.

     

    11.  BINDING
      NATURE.
      This
      Agreement shall be binding on all parties executing this Agreement and their
      respective successors, assigns and heirs.

     

    12.  AUTHORITY
      TO BIND.
      Each
      party to this Agreement represents and warrants that the execution, delivery
      and
      performance of this Agreement and the consummation of the transaction provided
      in this Agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary action of the
      respective entity and that the person executing this Agreement on its behalf
      has
      the full capacity to bind that entity. Each party further represents and
      warrants that it has been represented by independent counsel of its choice
      with
      the negotiation and execution of this Agreement and that counsel has reviewed
      this Agreement.

     

    13.  SIGNATURES.
      This
      Agreement may be signed in counterparts and the Agreement, together with its
      counterpart signature pages, shall be deemed valid and binding on each party
      when duly executed by all parties. Facsimile signatures shall be deemed valid
      and binding for all purposes.

     

    14.  CHOICE
      OF LAW, ETC.
      Notwithstanding the place where this Agreement may be executed by either of
      the
      parties, or any other factor, all terms and provisions hereof shall be governed
      by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida, applicable
      to agreements made and to be fully performed in that State and without regard
      to
      principles of conflicts of law thereof. Any action brought to enforce, or
      otherwise arising out of this Agreement shall be brought only in the Circuit
      Court of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit sitting in the State of Florida, County
      of
      Sarasota.

     

    15.  INCONSISTENCY.
      In the
      event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and any other
      document executed in connection herewith, the terms of this Agreement shall
      control to the extent necessary to resolve such inconsistency.

    
      
        
        

      

      
        3

        
          

        

      

       

    

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date
      first indicated above.

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
Alpha
              Capital Aktiengesellschaft,

    

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
Bristol
              Investment Fund,
              Ltd.

    

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
Whalehaven
              Capital Fund
              Limited

    

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              

              Ellis
                International, Ltd.

            

    

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
Platinum
              Long Term Growth II,
              Inc.

    

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
Chestnut
              Ridge Partners, LP

    

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
Grushko
&
Mittman,
              P.C.

    

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
CMS
              Capital

    

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
DKR
              Soundshore Oasis Holding Fund,
              Ltd.

    

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
Osher
              Capital, Inc.

    

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	VOIP,
              INCORPORATED
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	 
	 	Its:	
              
Chief
              Executive Officer

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        4

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

    EXHIBIT
      A

     

    IN
      THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

    TWELFTH
      JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND

    FOR
      SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA

    

    ALPHA
      CAPITAL 

    AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT,

    BRISTOL
      INVESTMENT    CASE
      NO.:

    FUND,
      LTD, WHALEHAVEN 

    CAPITAL
      FUND LIMITED,

    ELLIS
      INTERNATIONAL, LTD,

    PLATINUM
      LONG TERM 

    GROWTH
      II, INC., CHESTNUT 

    RIDGE
      PARTNERS, LP,

    GRUSHKO
      & MITTMAN, P.C.,

    CMS
      CAPITAL, DKR 

    SOUNDSHORE
      OASIS HOLDING 

    FUND,
      LTD
      and OSHER 

    CAPITAL,
      INC. 

     

    Plaintiffs,   

    v.

    

    VOIP,
      INCORPORATED,

    Defendant.

    ___________________________/

    

    [PROPOSED]
      ORDER GRANTING APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

    

    This
      matter having come on a hearing on the 15th day of September, 2006, to approve
      the Settlement Agreement and Release entered into as of September 15, 2006
      (the
“Settlement Agreement”) between Plaintiffs Alpha Capital Aktiengesellschaft,
      Bristol Investment Fund, Ltd., Whalehaven Capital Fund Limited, Ellis
      International, Ltd., Platinum Long Term Growth II, Inc., Chestnut Ridge
      Partners, LP, Grushko & Mittman, P.C., CMS Capital, DKR Soundshore Oasis
      Holding Fund, Ltd., and Osher Capital, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant VoIP,
      Inc. (“VoIP” and, collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), and the Court
      having held a hearing as to the fairness of the terms and conditions of the
      Settlement Agreement and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the
      Court hereby finds as follows:

     

    1.  The
      Court
      has been advised that the parties intended that the sale of the Settlement
      Shares (as defined by the Settlement Agreement, and hereinafter, the “Settlement
      Shares”) to, and the resale of the Settlement Shares by, Plaintiffs within the
      United States of America, assuming satisfaction of all other applicable
      securities laws and regulations, will be exempt from registration under the
      Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) in reliance upon Section 3(a)(10)
      of the Securities Act based upon this Court’s finding herein that the terms and
      conditions of the issuance of the Settlement Shares by VoIP to Plaintiffs are
      fair to Plaintiffs;

     

    2.  The
      hearing having been scheduled upon the consent of Plaintiffs and VoIP.
      Plaintiffs has had adequate notice of the hearing and Plaintiffs are the only
      parties to whom Settlement Shares will be issued pursuant to the Settlement
      Agreement;

     

    3.  The
      terms
      and conditions of the issuance of the Settlement Shares in exchange for the
      release of certain claims as set forth in the Settlement Agreement are fair
      to
      Plaintiffs, the only parties to whom the Settlement Shares will be
      issued;

     

    4.  The
      fairness hearing was open to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs were represented by counsel
      at the hearing who acknowledged that adequate notice of the hearing was given
      and consented to the entry of this order.

    

    It
      is
      therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Settlement Agreement is hereby approved
      as fair to the party to whom the Settlement Shares will be issued, within the
      meaning of Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act and that the sale of the
      Settlement Shares to, and the resale of the Settlement Shares in the United
      States of America by, Plaintiffs, assuming satisfaction of all other applicable
      securities laws and regulations, will be exempt from registration under the
      Securities Act.

    

    SO
      ORDERED, this____________day

    of
      September, 2006.

     

    ________________________________

    The
      Honorable_____________ 

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        5

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    EXHIBIT
      B

     

    IN
      THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

    TWELFTH
      JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND

    FOR
      SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA

    

    ALPHA
      CAPITAL 

    AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT,

    BRISTOL
      INVESTMENT    CASE
      NO.:

    FUND,
      LTD, WHALEHAVEN 

    CAPITAL
      FUND LIMITED,

    ELLIS
      INTERNATIONAL, LTD,

    PLATINUM
      LONG TERM 

    GROWTH
      II, INC., CHESTNUT 

    RIDGE
      PARTNERS, LP,

    GRUSHKO
      & MITTMAN, P.C.,

    CMS
      CAPITAL, DKR 

    SOUNDSHORE
      OASIS HOLDING 

    FUND,
      LTD
      and OSHER 

    CAPITAL,
      INC. 

    Plaintiffs,

    v.

    

    VOIP,
      INCORPORATED,

    Defendant.

    ___________________________/

    

    STIPULATION
      OF DISMISSAL

    

    IT
      IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED,
      by and
      between the undersigned, the attorneys of record for all parties to the
      above-entitled action, pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Practice and
      Procedure, that whereas no party hereto is an infant of incompetent person
      for
      whom a committee has been appointed or conservatee and no person not a party
      has
      an interest in the subject matter of the action, the above-entitled action
      be,
      and the same hereby is, discontinued with prejudice, each party to bear its
      own
      costs.

     

    This
      Stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk of the
      Court.

    Dated:
      September ____, 2006

     

    
      	ROBERT
              E. TURFFS,
              P.A.	 	MICHAEL
              J. RATERINK, P.A.
	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 	 	 	By:
	 
	 	
              
                

              

              Robert E. Turffs, Esq.

              1444 First Street, Suite B

              Sarasota, Florida 34236

              (941) 316-0111

            	 	 	
              
                

              

              Michael J. Raterink, Esq.

              Suite D4, P.O. Box 33 

              8051 North Tamiami Trail

              Sarasota, Florida 34243-2032

              (941) 359-6453

            
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
              Attorneys for Plaintiff 

              Alpha Capital Aktiengesellschaft

              Bristol Investment Fund, Ltd.

              Whalehaven Capital Fund Limited

              Ellis International, Ltd.

              Platinum Long Term Growth II, Inc.

              Chestnut Ridge Partners, LP

              Grushko & Mittman, P.C.

              CMS Capital

              DKR Soundshore Oasis Holding Fund, Ltd., and

                Osher
                  Capital, Inc.

              

            	 	 	
              Attorneys for Defendant 

              VoIP,
                Incorporated

            

    

      

    
      
        
        

      

      
        6

Source: [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00113-of-00352.parquet"}, [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00113-of-00352.parquet"}]]