Document:

Settlement Agreement with fusionstorm, John Varel, PC Specialists

 Exhibit 10.15 
 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE 
 This Settlement Agreement and
Release (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 17th day of August, 2010 (“Execution Date”) by and among FusionStorm, John Varel (“Varel”), Tim Tonges (“Tonges”), Michael Dragoni (“Dragoni”),
Randy Barber (“Barber”), Charles King (“King”), and Brad Thompson (“Thompson”) (Collectively, “Defendants”) and PC Specialists, Inc. dba Technology Integration Group (“TIG”). The Defendants and TIG
are the “Parties.” The civil action entitled PC Specialists, Inc. dba Technology Integration Group vs. FusionStorm, et al. Case No. CGC-07-464358, Dept. 501, San Francisco Superior Court is the “San Francisco Action.” The
civil action entitled PC Specialists, Inc. dba Technology Integration Group vs FusionStorm, David Walker and Morgana Gill in San Diego Superior Court, Case No. 37-2008-00080677-CU-BC-CTL is the “Walker Action.” 

RECITALS OF CONSIDERATION 
 California Evidence Code Section 622 does not apply to these recitals. 

WHEREAS, on January 16, 2007, TIG filed a civil lawsuit in San Diego Superior Court entitled PC Specialist v. FusionStorm,
et al., Civil Action No. GIC 878437, against FusionStorm, Michael Dragoni and Brad Thompson. This action was subsequently transferred to San Francisco Superior Court (assigned Civil Action No. CGC 07 464358). TIG later amended its complaint to
add Tracie Petroski (formely Brown), Randy Barber, Charles King, John Talley, Rhonda Eiffe, Tim Tonges and John Varel as individual defendants. 
 WHEREAS, on July 20, 2009, FusionStorm filed a cross complaint (“Cross-Complaint”) in the San Francisco Action against TIG in San Francisco Superior Court. 

WHEREAS, the court dismissed TIG’s claims against John Talley as a result of Mr. Talley’s motion for summary
judgement, and thereafter TIG and Talley entered into a settlement agreement; TIG settled its claims against Rhonda Eiffe and dismissed her before trial; and TIG settled its claims against Tracre Petroski and dismissed her before the verdicts were
rendered. 
 WHEREAS, the claims of TIG and Cross-Complaint of FusionStorm in the San Francisco Action were tried to a
jury in San Francisco Superior Court from June 10, 2010 to July 16, 2010. On July 15, 2010, the jury rendered a special verdict awarding TIG a total of $9,360,000 as follows: $8,100,000.00 for compensatory damages, jointly and
severally, against defendant FusionStorm, Barber, Dragoni, King, Thompson, Tonges and Varel, and $1,260,000 against defendant FusionStorm for unjust enrichment. The jury awarded FusionStorm no damages with respect to its Cross-Complaint. On
July 16, 2010, the jury rendered a special verdict awarding TIG punitive damages as follows: $1,000,000 against FusionStorm, $100,000 against Tonges, and $100,000 against Varel. In addition, TIG stipulated with Defendants Barber, Dragoni, King
and Thompson for TIG to receive punitive damages awards as follows: $10,000 against Barber, $25,000 against Dragoni, $50,000 against King, and $50,000 against Thompson. 

  
 sd-528247 

1 

 WHEREAS, on March 26, 2008, TIG filed a civil lawsuit in San Diego Superior
Court entitled PC Specialists Inc. v. FusionStorm, David Walker and Morgana Gill in San Diego Superior Court, Civil Action 37-2008-00080677-CU-BC-CTL. Judgment was entered after an order granting summary judgment in favor of FusionStorm and
Walker, FusionStorm and Walker were awarded $4,205.34 in costs against TIG, and TIG filed a notice of appeal on August 3, 2009. 
 WHEREAS, each of the Parties believes that it is in its respective interests to settle all disputes, claims, and controversies that presently exist among the Parties; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and legal adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows: 
 AGREEMENT 

1. Payment of Settlement Sum 
 FusionStorm agrees to pay TIG a total of ten million nine hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($10,975,000.00) (“FusionStorm Amount”). FusionStorm will make six installment payments on the
FusionStorm Amount and then will make a final payment according to the schedule as set forth herein. On August 18, 2010, FusionStorm will pay TIG $250,000 plus interest in partial satisfaction of the FushionStorm Amount. FusionStorm will then
pay TIG $250,000 plus interest on August 31, 2010, and then every fourteen (14) days thereafter to and including October 26, 2010. All of the $250,000 installment payments made by FusionStorm pursuant to this Paragraph will go towards
partial satisfaction of the FusionStorm Amount and shall be applied to principal except as stated in Paragraph 5. FusionStorm shall pay TIG the remaining balance of the FusionStorm Amount on before November 9, 2010. 

Interest shall be applied to the FusionStorm Amount beginning on August 10, 2010 (“Interest”). The interest rate will be
ten percent (10%) per annum. The ten percent interest will accrue to the Fusion Storm Amount less the amounts paid. There is no penalty for early payment. 
 For the avoidance of confusion and doubt, FusionStorm shall pay TIG the following total amounts (reflecting both principal and interest) pursuant to the schedule below: 

 

									
	Payment Date	  	Interest	 	  	Total Amount	 
	 August 18, 2010
	  	$	21,105.77	  	  	$	271,105.77	  
	 August 31, 2010
	  	$	41,250.00	  	  	$	291,250.00	  
	 September 14, 2010
	  	$	40,288.46	  	  	$	290,288.46	  
	 September 28, 2010
	  	$	39,326.92	  	  	$	289,326.92	  
	 October 12, 2010
	  	$	38,365.38	  	  	$	288,365.38	  
	 October 26, 2010
	  	$	37,403.85	  	  	$	287,403.85	  
	 November 9, 2010
	  	$	36,442.31	  	  	$	9,511,442.31	  

  
 sd-528247 

2 

 2. Dragoni, Barber, King and Thompson Punitive Damages Settlement Sums

 Thompson agrees to pay TIG a total of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) in seven quarterly installments
(“Thompson Amount”).The first six installment payments will be $7142.85 each and the final installment payment will be $7142.90.Thompson’s first payment is due on August 31, 2010, and quarterly payments, payable on or before the
last day of each calendar quarter, will continue thereafter, beginning with the quarter ending December 31, 2010, until the total Thompson Amount is paid. 
 Dragoni agrees to pay TIG a total of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) in the amount of $2,000 per month except for the final installment payment of $1,000 (“Dragoni Amount”).
Dragoni’s first payment is due on August 31, 2010, and monthly payments due on the last day of each month will continue thereafter until the total Dragoni Amount is paid. 

Barber agrees to pay TIG a total of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) in the amount of $1,000 per month (“Barber Amount”).
Barber’s first payment is due on August 31, 2010, and monthly payments due on the last day of each month will continue thereafter until the total Barber Amount is paid. 

King agrees to pay TIG a total of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) in the amount of $1,000 per month (“King Amount”).
King’s first payment is due on August 31, 2010, and monthly payments due on the last day of each month will continue thereafter until the total King amount is paid. 
 Collectively, the FusionStorm Amount, Thompson Amount, Dragoni Amount, Barber Amount and King Amount are referred to as the “Settlement Amounts”. 

3. Complete Resolution of all Disputes between the Parties 

Payment of the Settlement Amounts shall reflect a full and complete resolution of all disputes between the parties, known or unknown.

 4. Entry of Judgment and Stay of Execution of Judgment 

Judgment on the jury Verdict in the San Francisco Action was signed on July 19, 2010 (“July 19 Judgment”). The
July 19 Judgment is superseded by the Stipulated Judgment referenced below. TIG may not seek to enter the July 19 Judgment and may take not action to execute on it, including but not limited to seeking liens on any Defendant’s
property, even in the event of Default under Paragraph 5. In no event may TIG seek to recover more than the Amounts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above except as stated in Paragraph 15. 

TIG and Defendants agree that they will jointly request that the Stipulated [Proposed] Judgment attached hereto (without Exhibits) as
Exhibit A supersede and replace the July 19 Judgment. This Agreement is contingent on the court signing the Stipulated [Proposed] Judgment on August 17, 2010, and the Stipulated Judgment, as defined below, being entered on August 18,
2010. 

  
 sd-528247 

3 

 TIG agrees that upon entry of the Stipulated Judgment, TIG will take no action to execute on
the Stipulated Judgment, will seek no liens, protective orders or attachments on any Defendant’s property, or otherwise take action on the Judgment except as stated below in Paragraph 5. If TIG fails to comply with the Stay as defined below,
such failure will constitute a material breach of this Agreement. To that end, TIG and Defendants agree that simultaneously with the Stipulated [Proposed] Judgment the Parties will jointly request that the Court enter a stipulated [Proposed] Stay of
Execution of Judgment attached hereto as Exhibit B. 
 This Stipulated [Proposed] Judgment shall only supersede the July 19
Judgment when the Court signs and enters both the Stipulated Judgment (“Stipulated Judgment”) and the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Stay and Enforcement of Judgment, including Prohibition on Liens (“Stay”). The Parties
agree that the Stipulated Judgment will be entered pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Stipulated Judgment. 

TIG and Defendants expressly waive all rights to appeal, to any rights related to post-trial rights, or to seek or recover
attorneys’ fees and costs. 
 5. Default  

If any Defendant fails to make any payment as required in paragraph 1 or 2 that has not been excused by TIG in writing, then that
Defendant will be in default (“Default”). 
 If a Defendant is in Default, the Stay is automatically dissolved as to
that Defendant and TIG may immediately execute on the Stipulated Judgment as to that Defendant for the remaining amount owed and due. In the event of a Default by FusionStorm, TIG may execute on the joint and several portion of the Stipulated
Judgment against all Defendants by providing two business days, and in no event less than 48 hours, notice to all Defendants or their counsel for the remaining joint and several portion of the Stipulated Judgment that is owed and due. Except as
otherwise stated herein, the Default of one Defendant will not affect the rights or obligations of any other Defendants under this Agreement. 
 If FusionStorm is in Default, one half of the FusionStorm Amount paid pursuant to this Agreement will be removed from the principal owed under the Stipulated Judgment and converted into a fee
(“Fee”) paid to TIG. FusionStorm agrees to pay this Fee is in consideration of TIG’s agreement to the Stay, which includes the consecutive fourteen (14) day extensions identified in Paragraph 1. 

6. Satisfaction of Judgment 
 Subject to the conditions in Paragraph 1 and 2, TIG will file a partial satisfaction of the Stipulated Judgment for the amount paid by the respective Defendant within five (5) business days of
payment of each individual Settlement Amount set forth herein being made. When the Stipulated Judgment is fully satisfied, TIG will file a final notice reflecting full satisfaction of the Stipulated Judgment. 

  
 sd-528247 

4 

 7. California Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 

This Settlement Agreement is binding and enforceable under California Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. Should Defendants fail to
make any payment set forth in Paragraphs 1 or 2 above, TIG may enforce this Settlement Agreement under California Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. The Parties agree that the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Agreement. 

8. Dismissal of Walker Action 
 Within fourteen (14) days of receipt of the first payment of the FusionStorm Amount and Interest, TIG will dismiss with prejudice the Walker Action in its entirety, as well as any appeals associated
with the Walker Action . TIG and FusionStorm expressly waive all rights to appeal, file post-trial motions, or to seek or recover attorney’s fees or costs, including but not limited to costs already awarded in the Walker Action, and any costs
related to the Walker Action or any associated appeal. 
 9. Preservation of Assets & Bankruptcy

 Until such time as the FusionStorm Amount and Interest is paid in full, FusionStorm will not dispose of or transfer or permit
the disposal or transfer of any material assets outside the ordinary course of FusionStorm’s business, with the exception of a transfer or sale of a material asset by FusionStorm for the specific purpose of satisfying the FusionStorm Amount and
Interest in this case. “Material assets” do not include the ordinary and customary business operating expenses and legal fees of FusionStorm, such as payroll, rent, etc. 

Until such time as the FusionStorm Amount and Interest are paid in full, Varel and Tonges will not dispose of or permit the disposal or
transfer of assets other than for their ordinary and reasonable living expenses and legal fees. 
 Until such time as their
respective amounts owed, as set forth in Paragraph 2, and the FusionStorm Amount and Interest are paid in full, Thompson, Dragoni, Barber and King will not dispose of or permit the disposal or transfer of assets other than for their ordinary and
reasonable living expenses and legal fees. 
 All Defendants agree that they will not file a voluntary petition for bankruptcy,
stipulate to an involuntary petition, or make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, until the FusionStorm Amount and Interest are paid in full or until two business days, and in no event less than 48 hours, after the Stay is lifted,
whichever is sooner. 
 Dragoni, Barber, King and Thompson further agree that each of them will not file a voluntary petition
for bankruptcy, stipulate to an involuntary petition, or make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, until their respective amounts owed, as set forth in Paragraph 2, are paid in full or until two business days, and in no event less than
48 hours, after the Stay is lifted, whichever is sooner. 

  
 sd-528247 

5 

 10. Settlement Amounts 

The Settlement Amounts constitute full and complete satisfaction of (i) the joint and several award of compensatory damages against
all Defendants and unjust enrichment damages against FusionStorm in the San Francisco Action; (ii) all punitive damages awards; and (iii) any attorneys’ fees and costs. For purposes of clarity, the FusionStorm Amount fully resolves
the joint and several jury award of compensatory damages against all Defendants, unjust enrichment against FusionStorm, the punitive damages awards against FusionStorm, Varel and Tonges, and any attorneys’ fees and costs for all Defendants. The
Thompson Amount, Dragoni Amount, Barber Amount and King Amount fully resolve the punitive damages awards against said Defendants. The Parties agree that the Settlement Amounts cover everything that was, or could be, awarded to TIG in the San
Francisco Action. No other payments to TIG are due other than as expressly set forth herein. 
 11. Payment
Delivery 
 The FusionStorm Amount payments made pursuant to this Agreement will be made via wire transfer to the
following account for the benefit of TIG unless otherwise agreed in writing with TIG: 
  

			
	Account Name:	  	PC Specialists, Inc. DBA Technology Integration Group
	Account No.:	  	6010017341
	ABA Routing No.:	  	122000496
		
	Contact:	  	Regina Syktich, TIG Controller
	Telephone:	  	858-566-1900 x3550

 The Dragoni Amount, Barber Amount, Barber Amount and King Amount payments made pursuant to this Agreement
will be made via wire transfer or in the form of a check (cashier’s or personal) payable to “PC Specialists, Inc. dba Technology Integration Group”. If payment is made in the form of a check, then the payment must be sent to
Technology Integration Group, Attn: Tom Janecek, 7810 Trade Street, San Diego, CA 92121. In any event, the payments must be sent in a manner sufficient to ensure that payment is received by TIG by the dates set fourth in paragraph 2. Failure to do
so constitutes a Default hereunder. 
 12. Releases and California Civil Code section 1542 Waiver. 

a. Upon payment in full of the Settlement Amounts, TIG fully and finally releases, acquits, and forever discharges Defendants and
FusionStorm’s past and present officers, directors and employees, and any FusionStorm subsidiary, from and against the “Released Claims,” as expressly defined in paragraph 12.c. below. 

b. Defendants fully and finally release, Acquit, and forever discharge TIG and TIG’s past and present officers, directors and
employees from and against the “Released Claims,” as expressly defined in Paragraph 12.c. below. 

  
 sd-528247 

6 

 c. “Released Claims” shall mean any and all actual or potential liabilities,
demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, attorneys’ fees, appeals, and post-trial motions, whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, disclosed or undisclosed, that exist between TIG, on the one hand, and Defendants, on the other
hand. 
 d. The parties hereby warrant, represent, and agree that they are fully aware of the provisions of California Civil
code section 1542 which provides as follows: 
 A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR
SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. 
 The Parties hereby expressly waive to the fullest extent permissible under the law the foregoing provisions of the California Civil Code Section 1542, and any similar provisions of law or equity, and
any and all rights which he, she or it may have to invoke said provisions either now or in the future. 
 e. Other than the San
Francisco Action and the Walker Action, the Parties represent and warrant they have no other claims or disputes between them. 

13. Successors and Assigns 
 The rights, duties and obligations set forth in this Settlement Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Parties. 

14. Representations and Warranties 
 a. Each Party represents and warrants that it has full power and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this settlement agreement in accordance with its terms, and that its signatory
has full power and authority to execute this Settlement Agreement on behalf of the Party. 
 b. Each Party represents and
warrants that it has received independent legal advice from its own attorneys with regard to the advisability of executing this Settlement Agreement, and each Party expressly represents and warrants that it has received independent legal advice from
its own attorneys with regard to the waiver of rights or protection under California Civil Code section 1542 and similar statutes, principles, or rules in other jurisdictions. 
 c. Each Party represents and warrants that it has not assigned, transferred, or conveyed any Released Claim or interest in a Released Claim to any person or entity. 

  
 sd-528247 

7 

 15. Attorneys’ Fees  

In the event of any legal action for breach or to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the losing party shall reimburse the prevailing
party for all reasonable legal fees, costs and expenses that the prevailing party incurred in enforcing its rights in connection therewith. 
 16. Entire Agreement; Amendment; Interpretation 
 a. This Settlement
Agreement contains the entire agreement by the Parties with regard to its subject matter. All discussions and agreements previously entertained by the Parties concerning the subject matter are merged into this Settlement Agreement. 

b. No provision of this Settlement Agreement may be modified or amended, except by a written agreement signed by each Party affected by
the modification or amendment. No waiver of any provision nor consent to any exception to the terms of this Settlement Agreement will be effective unless in writing and signed by the Party to be bound and then only to the specific purpose, extent
and instance so provided. 
 c. This Agreement is not effective unless and until executed by Parties to the Agreement.

 17. Governing Law 
 This Settlement Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accord with the law of the State of California without regard to choice of law principles. Any disputes arising under this Settlement
Agreement shall be filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Francisco. 
 18.
Severability 
 If any provision of this Settlement Agreement, or its application to any person, place, or
circumstance, is held by an arbitrator or a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable, or void, such provision shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law, and the remainder of this Agreement and such provision as
applied to other persons, places, and circumstances shall remain in full force and effect. 
 19. Drafter of Agreement
 
 None of the Parties to this Agreement shall be considered to be its drafter for the purpose of any statute, case law
or rule of interpretation or construction that would or might cause any provision to be construed against the drafter. No uncertainty or ambiguity shall be interpreted in favor of one Party or against another Party. 

  
 sd-528247 

8 

 20. Notices 

Unless another person is designated, in writing, for receipt of notices hereunder, notices to the respective Parties shall be sent to the
following persons: 
  

			
	For FusionStorm, Varel & Tonges:	  	For Dragoni, Barber & King:
	Catherine Morris Krow	  	Ragesh Tangri
	Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP	  	Durie Tangri LLP
	405 Howard Street	  	217 Leidesdorff Street
	San Francisco, CA 94105	  	San Francisco, CA 94111
	Telephone: 415-773-5700	  	Telephone: 415-362-6666
	Fax: 415-773-5759	  	Fax: 415-236-6300

  

			
	For TIG:	  	For Brad Thompson
	Craig A. Schloss	  	Thomas K. Hockel
	Morrison & Foerster LLP	  	Kelly, Hockel & Klein P.C.
	12531 High Bluff Dr., Suite 100	  	1 Sansome Street, Suite 1800
	San Diego, CA 92130	  	San Francisco, CA 94104
	Telephone: 858-720-5134	  	Telephone: 415-951-0535
	Fax: 858-720-5124	  	Fax: 415-391-7808.

 21. Counterparts 
 This Settlement Agreement may be executed in counterparts or duplicate originals, all of which shall be regarded as one and the same instrument, and which shall be the official and governing version in
the interpretation of this Settlement Agreement. This Settlement Agreement may be executed by PDF or facsimile signatures and such signatures shall be deemed to bind each Party as if they were original signatures. 

[Signature pages follow.] 

  
 sd-528247 

9 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Settlement Agreement to be executed
by their duly authorized representatives with the intention of being legally bound by it. 
  

							
	DATED: August 17, 2010	 		 	FUSIONSTORM
			
		 		 	 

		 		 	By: Daniel R. Serpico
		 		 	Its: President
			
	DATED: August     , 2010	 		 	JOHN VAREL
			
		 		 	 

		 		 	By: John Varel (in his individual capacity)
			
	DATED: August 17, 2010	 		 	TIM TONGES
			
		 		 	 

		 		 	By: Tim Tonges (in his individual capacity)
			
	DATED: August 17, 2010	 		 	BRAD THOMPSON
			
		 		 	 

		 		 	By: Brad Thompson
			
	DATED: August 17, 2010	 		 	MICHAEL DRAGONI
			
		 		 	 

		 		 	By: Michael Dragoni
			
	DATED: August 17, 2010	 		 	RANDY BARBER
			
		 		 	 

		 		 	By: Randy Barber

 THIS IS A SIGNATURE PAGE FOR THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE ENTERED INTO BY AND

 BETWEEN FUSIONSTORM, JOHN VAREL, TIM TONGES, BRAD THOMPSON, MICHAEL DRAGONI, RANDY 

BARBER, CHARLES KING AND P.C. SPECIALISTS, INC. DBA TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP 

  
 10 

							
	DATED: August 17, 2010	 		 	CHARLES KING
			
		 		 	 

		 		 	By: Charles King
			
	DATED: August 17, 2010	 		 	PC SPECIALIST, INC
			
		 		 	 

		 		 	By: BRUCE A. GEIER
		 		 	Its: PRESIDENT
	APPROVED AS TO FORM:	 		 		 	
			
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 		 	MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
				
		 		 	By:	 	 

		 		 		 	 Craig A. Schloss

		 		 		 	 Arturo J. Gonzalez

		 		 		 	 Stephanie L. Fong

				
		 		 		 	Attorneys for Plaintiff
		 		 		 	PC SPECIALISTS, INC., dba
		 		 		 	TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP

 THIS IS A SIGNATURE PAGE FOR THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE ENTERED INTO BY AND

 BETWEEN FUSIONSTORM, JOHN VAREL, TIM TONGES, BRAD THOMPSON, MICHAEL DRAGONI, RANDY 

BARBER, CHARLES KING AND P.C. SPECIALISTS, INC. DBA TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP 

  
 sd-528247 

11 

					
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
			
		 	By:	 	 

		 		 	 I. Neel Chatterjee

		 		 	 Catherine M. Krow

		
		 	Attorneys for Defendants
		 	FUSIONSTORM, TIM TONGES,
		 	AND JOHN VAREL
		
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	 DURIE TANGRI PAGE LEMLEY ROBERTS &
 KENT LLP

			
		 	BY:	 	 

		 		 	 Ragesh K. Tangri

		 		 	 Joshua H. Lerner

		
		 	Attorneys for Defendants
		 	 MICHAEL DRAGONI, RANDY BARBER and
 CHARLES KING

		
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	KELLY HOCKEL & KLEIN, P.C.
			
		 	BY:	 	 

		 		 	 Thomas K. Hockel

		
		 	Attorneys for Defendant
		 	BRAD THOMPSON

 THIS IS A SIGNATURE PAGE FOR THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE ENTERED INTO BY AND

 BETWEEN FUSIONSTORM, JOHN VAREL, TIM TONGES, BRAD THOMPSON, MICHAEL DRAGONI, RANDY 

BARBER, CHARLES KING AND P.C. SPECIALISTS, INC. DBA TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP 

  
 sd-528247 

12 

 EXHIBIT A 

 CRAIG A. SCHLOSS (BAR NO. 102488) CSchloss@mofo.com 
 STEPHANIE L. FONG (BAR NO. 240836) SFong@mofo.com 
 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

 12531 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100 

San Diego, California 92130-2040 
 Telephone:
858.720.5100    Facsimile: 858.720.5125 
 ARTURO J. GONZALEZ (BAR NO. 121490) AGonzalez@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

425 Market Street 
 San Francisco, California
94105-2482 
 Telephone: 415.268.7000    Facsimile: 415.268.7522 
 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant 
 PC SPECIALISTS, INC. dba TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP

 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 
 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 
  

			
	 PC SPECIALISTS, INC., dba TECHNOLOGY
 INTEGRATION GROUP,
  
 Plaintiff,
  

v.
  
 FUSIONSTORM, a Delaware corporation;
 MICHAEL DRAGONI, an individual;

RANDY BARBER, an individual; CHARLES
 KING, an
individual; JOHN TALLEY, an
 individual; TRACIE BROWN, an individual;
 RHONDA EIFFE, an individual; BRAD
 THOMPSON, an individual; TIM TONGES,

an individual; JOHN VAREL, an individual;
 and
DOES 1-10,
	  	 Case No. CGC07-464358
  

 
 STIPULATED JUDGMENT

 
  

Dept:          501
 Judge:        Hon. Ronald Evans Quidachay
  

Date Action Filed:    January 16, 2007
 Trial Date:  June 7, 2010

		
	 Defendants.
	  	
		
	 FUSIONSTORM, a Delaware corporation,
  

Cross-Complainant,
	  	
		
	 v.
	  	
		
	PC SPECIALISTS, INC., dba TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP, a Delaware corporation; BRUCE GEIER, an individual; CHRIS FERRY, an individual and ROES 1-100, inclusive,	  	
		
	 Cross-Defendants.
	  	

  
  

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 

sd-528016 

 WHEREAS, on June 7, 2010, the above-captioned action came on regularly for trial by
jury in Department 501 of the above-referenced Court, the Honorable Ronald E. Quidachay presiding; Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant PC SPECIALISTS, INC., dba TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP (TIG) appearing by its attorneys, Morrison & Foerster
LLP by Arturo J. Gonzalez, Craig A. Schloss and Stephanie L. Fong; Defendant and Cross-Complainant FUSIONSTORM and Defendants TIM TONGES and JOHN VAREL appearing by their attorneys, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffc LLP by I. Neel Chatterjee
and Daniel N. Kassabian; Defendants RANDY BARBER, MICHAEL DRAGONI and CHARLES KING appearing by their attorneys, Durie Tangri LLP by Ragesh K. Tangri and Joshua H. Lerner; and Defendant BRAD THOMPSON appearing by his attorneys Kelly
Hockel & Klein P.C. by Thomas K. Hockel. 
 A jury of twelve persons was regularly impaneled and sworn, and witnesses
were sworn and testified. After hearing the evidence presented and arguments of counsel, after being duly instructed by the Court, and after having the cause submitted to them, the jury deliberated and returned special verdicts on July 15, 2010
and July 16, 2010 in favor of Plaintiff TIG, and against Defendants FusionStorm, Barber, Dragoni, King, Thompson, Tonges and Varel, which special verdicts are appended hereto as Exhibits A and B. 

On August 17, 2010, Defendants and TIG entered into a Settlement Agreement to fully settle all disputes, claims, and controversies
(appended hereto as Exhibit C, without Exhibits). In the Settlement Agreement, Defendants and TIG agreed to enter this Stipulated Judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff TIG and against Defendants
FusionStorm, Thompson, Tonges, Varel, Dragoni, Barber and King pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. 
 IT IS
FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 
 1. Plaintiff TIG shall recover from Defendants FusionStorm, Barber, Dragoni,
King, Thampson, Tonges and Varel, and each of them, jointly and severally, the sum of $8,515,000.00. 
 2. Plaintiff shall
recover from Defendant FusionStorm the additional sum of $2,260,000.00. 

  
  

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 

sd-528016 

 3. Plaintiff TIG shall recover from Defendant Varel the additional sum of $100,000.00.

 4. Plaintiff TIG shall recover from Defendant Tonges the additional sum of $100,000.00. 

5. Plaintiff TIG shall recover from Defendant Thompson the additional sum of $50,000.00. 

6. Plaintiff TIG shall recover from Defendant Barber the additional sum of $10,000.00. 

7. Plaintiff TIG shall recover from Defendant Dragoni the additional sum of $25,000.00. 

8. Plaintiff TIG shall recover from Defendant King the additional sum of $5,000.00. 

9. Interest shall accrue beginning on August 10, 2010 at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum according to law. (Code Civ.
Proc., §§ 685.010, 685.020.) 
 10. Payments on the amounts set forth in Paragraph 1 – 9 above shall be made in
accordance with the Settlement Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit C. 
 11. TIG and Defendants have released and waived their
rights to seek and recover any costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees, or other additional amounts or relief, and also have released and waived their right to file any post-trial motions or appeals. 

12. Defendant and Cross-Complainant FusionStorm shall recover nothing from Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant TIG with regard to any of the
claims in FusionStorm’s Cross-Complaint. Defendant and Cross-Complainant FusionStorm shall bear its own costs and fees in connection with this matter. 
 13. This Stipulated Judgment supersedes and extinguishes the judgment in this case that was signed by the Court on July 19, 2010. 

 

					
	It is hereby stipulated:	 		 	
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
			
		 	By:	 	 

		 		 	 Craig A. Schloss

		 		 	 Arturo J. Gonzalez

		 		 	 Stephanie L. Fong

			
		 		 	 Attorney for Plaintiff
 PC
SPECIALISTS, INC., dba
 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP

  
  

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 

sd-528016 

					
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
			
		 	By:	 	 

		 		 	 I. Neel Chatterjee

		 		 	 Catherine M. Krow

		
		 	Attorneys for Defendants
		 	 FUSIONSTORM, TIM TONGES,
 AND JOHN VAREL

		
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	 DURIE TANGRI PAGE LEMLEY ROBERTS &
 KENT LLP

			
		 	By:	 	 

		 		 	 Ragesh K. Tangri

		 		 	 Joshua H. Lerner

		
		 	Attorneys for Defendants
		 	 MICHAEL DRAGONI, RANDY BARBER and 
 CHARLES KING

		
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	KELLY HOCKEL & KLEIN, P.C.
			
		 	By:	 	 

		 		 	 Thomas K. Hockel

		
		 	Attorneys for Defendant
		 	BRAD THOMPSON

 ORDER 
 Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 
  

					
	Dated: 8/17, 2010	 		 	 

		 		 	Ronald Evans Quidachay
			
		 		 	JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

  
  

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 

sd-528016 

 EXHIBIT B 

 I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (SBN 173985) nchatterjee@orrick.com 

MORVARID METANANT (SBN 268228) mmetanat@orrick.com 
 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 
 1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 
 Telephone:
(650) 614-7400 / Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 
 CATHERINE M. KROW (SBN 208412) ckrow@orrick.com 

DANIEL N. KASSABIAN (SBN 215249) dkassabian@orrick.com 
 CATHERINE Y. LUI (SBN 239648) clui@orrick.com 
 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

 405 Howard Street 
 San Francisco, CA
94105-2669 
 Telephone: (415) 773-5700 / Facsimile: (415) 773-5759 
 Attorneys for Defendants 
 FUSIONSTORM, TIM TONGES, and JOHN VAREL 

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 
 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 
  

			
	 PC SPECIALISTS, INC., dba

TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP,
  

Plaintiff,
  

v.
  
 FUSIONSTORM, a Delaware corporation;
 MICHAEL DRAGONI, an individual;

RANDY BARBER, an individual; CHARLES
 KING, an
individual; JOHN TALLEY, an
 individual; TRACIE BROWN, an individual;
 RHONDA EIFFE, an individual; BRAD
 THOMPSON, an individual; TIM TONGES,

an individual; JOHN VAREL, an individual;
 and
DOES 1-10
  
 Defendants.
	  	 CASE NO. CGC-07-464358
  

ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO DEPT. 501
  

STIPULATION AND
 ORDER FOR STAY
AND
 ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT,

INCLUDING PROHIBITION ON

LIENS
  
 Dept:    501
 Judge:    Hon. Ronald E. Quidachay

 
 Third Amended Complaint: July 15, 2009

Trial Date: June 7, 2010

		
	 FUSIONSTORM, a Delaware corporation,
  

Cross-Complainant,
  

v.
  
 PC SPECIALISTS, INC. dba
 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP, a

Delaware corporation; BRUCE GEIER, an

individual; CHRIS FERRY, an individual;
 And Roes
1-100, inclusive,
  
 Cross-Defendants.
	  	

  
  

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT, INCLUDING 

PROHIBITION ON LIENS 
 sd-528452

 Plaintiff PC Specialists, Inc. dba Technology Integration Group (“TIG”) and
defendants FusionStorm, John Varel (“Varel”), Tim Tonges (“Tonges”), Michael Dragoni (“Dragoni”), Randy Barber (“Barber”), Charles King (“King”), and Brad Thompson (“Thompson”) (each a
“Defendant” and collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 
 1. On August 17, 2010, Defendants and TIG entered into a Settlement Agreement to fully settle all disputes, claims and controversies between Defendants and TIG, including this case. The Settlement
Agreement is appended hereto as Exhibit A, without exhibits. 
 2. Under Paragraph 4 of Settlement Agreement, Defendants and TIG
agreed to entry of a Stipulated [Proposed] Judgment (“Stipulated Judgment”) that will be entered by this Court and enforced pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6. This Stipulated Judgment is appended hereto as
Exhibit B, without exhibits. The Stipulated Judgment supersedes and extinguishes the judgment in this case that was signed by the Court on July 19, 2010. 
 3. Under paragraph 4 of the Settlement Agreement, Defendants and TIG agreed to enter into this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order For Stay Of Enforcement Of Judgment, Including Prohibition on Liens.

 4. Except in the event of “Default” as defined in Paragraph 5 of the Settlement Agreement, TIG is prohibited from:
taking any action to execute on the Stipulated Judgment; seeking any judgment liens, protective orders or attachments on any Defendant’s property, or otherwise taking action on the Judgment. 

5. If a Defendant is in Default under the Settlement Agreement, this Stay is dissolved automatically as to that Defendant, and TIG may
immediately execute on the Stipulated Judgment as to that Defendant only for the remaining amount owed and due by that Defendant. In the event of a Default by FusionStorm, TIG may execute on the joint and several portion of the Stipulated

  
  

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT, INCLUDING 

PROHIBITION ON LIENS 
 sd-528452

 
Judgment against all Defendants after providing two business days’, and in no event less than 48 hours’, notice to all Defendants or their counsel for the remaining amount owed and due.

 It is hereby stipulated. 
  

					
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
			
		 	By:	 	 

		 		 	 Craig A. Schloss

		 		 	 Arturo J. Gonzalez

		 		 	 Stephanie L. Fong

		
		 	 Attorneys for Plaintiff
 PC SPECIALISTS INC., dba
 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP

		
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
			
		 	By:	 	 

		 		 	 I. Neel Chatterjee

		 		 	 Catherine M. Krow

		
		 	 Attorneys for Defendants
 FUSIONSTORM, TIM TONGES,
 AND JOHN VAREL

  
  

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT, INCLUDING 

PROHIBITION ON LIENS 
 sd-528452

					
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	 DURIE TANGRI PAGE LEMLEY ROBERTS &
 KENT LLP

			
		 	By:	 	 

		 		 	 Ragesh K. Tangri

		 		 	 Joshua H. Lerner

		
		 	Attorneys for Defendants
		 	 MICHAEL DRAGONI, RANDY BARBER and
 CHARLES KING

		
	Dated: August 17, 2010	 	KELLY HOCKEL & KLEIN, P.C.
			
		 	By:	 	 

		 		 	 Thomas K. Hockel

		
		 	Attorneys for Defendant
		 	BRAD THOMPSON

 ORDER 
 Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

  

							
	Dated: 8/17, 2010	 		 	 

		 		 		 	Ronald Evans Quidachay
				
		 		 		 	JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

  
  

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT, INCLUDING 

PROHIBITION ON LIENS 
 sd-528452Repayment Agreement with fusionstorm, John Varel, PC Specialists

 Exhibit 10.16 
 REPAYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Repayment Agreement (the
“Agreement”) is dated November 9, 2010 (“Execution Date”) is made and entered into by and among by and among FusionStorm, John Varel (“Varel”),Tim Tonges (“Tonges”), Michael Dragoni (“Dragoni”),
Randy Barber (“Barber”), Charles King (“King”), and Brad Thompson (“Thompson”) (collectively “Defendants”) and PC Specialists, Inc. dba Technology Integration Group (“TIG”) related to the civil
action entitled PC Specialists, Inc. dba Technology Integration Group vs. FusionStorm, et. al. Case No. CGC-Q7-464358 (the “Action”), The Defendants and TIG are the “Parties”. 

RECITALS OF CONSIDERATION 
 WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release dated August 17, 2010 (the “Settlement”) settling all matters then existing among the Parties; 

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to enter into different payment terms than described in the Settlement; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and legal adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows: 
 AGREEMENT 

1. Amounts Due. As of November 9, 2010, FusionStorm owes TIG $9,511,442.31 (“Outstanding
Balance”). FusionStorm recognizes that it will not be able to make full and final payment of the Outstanding Balance on November 9th and therefore, under the terms of the Settlement, it owes TIG a default fee in the amount of $500,000 (“Default
Fee”). The Parties agree that the Default Fee shall be reduced to $300,000 and shall be added to the Outstanding Balance, which shall result in a total amount owed of $9,811,442,31 (the “Amount Owed”). This $200,000 reduction in the
Default Fee shall be deemed permanent, provided that FusionStorm meets all of its payment obligations set forth in Section 2, 3, and 4 herein. In the event that FusionStorm fails to meet any of its payments obligations as set forth in
Section 2, 3, or 4, FusionStorm agrees that it will pay TIG the remaining $200,000 of the Default Fee, plus interest at a rate of 10% per annum, on or before the first business day of July 2012. 

2. Payment Terms. Payment of the Amount Owed shall be as follows: 

(a) Initial Cash Payment. FusionStorm shall pay a lump sum cash payment of $4,334,935.25 to be paid on the Execution Date by wire
transfer (the “Initial Payment”); 
 (b) Accounts Receivable. FusionStorm shall grant TIG rights to all
remaining Accounts Receivables balance totaling $792,558.25 as listed on the account list (the “A/R”), attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. FusionStorm shall wire TIG any available proceeds from
collection of the A/R on a daily basis. On the first business day of every month, along with the interest check detailed in Section 3 (a) below, FusionStorm shall provide a reconciliation of the A/R accounts including payment dates.

  
 - Page 1 of 4
- 

 (c) Promissory Note. On the Execution Date, FusionStorm shall assign the Promissory
Note by and between Jeskell Incorporated and P. Douglas Gerstmyer, Carson A, Soule, and William M. Gleich (the “Note”) totaling $1,500,000 to TIG. The Note is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. All
payments under the Note shall be made directly to TIG. 
 (d) Remaining Balance. FusionStorm shall
pay the remaining balance totaling $3,183,948.81 (“Remaining Balance”), to TIG as follows: (i) for the six (6) months after the Execution Date, $100,000 to be paid on the first business day of every month beginning
January 3, 2011; (ii) beginning the seventh
(7th) month after the Execution Date, and for a total
of twelve (12) payments of $200,000, to be paid on the first business day of every month and (iii) the final payment of $183,948.81 to be paid on the first business day of July 2012. 

3. Interest. All payments in Section 2 above, other than the Initial Payment, are subject to 10% interest per annum as
follows: 
 (a) The A/R. Interest will be calculated on the average daily remaining A/R and paid monthly on the first
business day of each month by wire transfer. 
 (b) Promissory Note. Interest will be calculated on the daily average
outstanding balance of the Note and paid quarterly in accordance with the payment schedule detailed in the Note by wire transfer. 
 (c) Remaining Balance. Interest will be calculated on the daily average Remaining Balance and paid monthly on the first business day of each month until paid in full. 

4. Guaranties. FusionStorm makes the following guaranties related to the Amount Due: 

(a) The A/R. If any of the A/R remains unpaid after 180 days from the due date (“Overdue Accounts”), FusionStorm will
pay the amount to TIG in cash for each dollar by wire transfer on the first business day of the following month. The rights to the A/R for any Overdue Account will be void upon payment by FusionStorm to TIG. 

(b) Promissory Note. FusionStorm is responsible for any late or missed payments under the Note if such missed or late payment is
more than ten (10) days late under the Note. In Such event, FusionStorm shall pay the amount in default within three (3) business days. In no event shall this clause accelerate all of the payment obligations under the Note. 

5. Pre-Payment. There is no penalty for early payment. 

6. Default. FusionStorm acknowledges and agrees that all remaining payments must be timely. If FusionStorm to make any
payment as required in this Agreement that has not been excused by TIG in writing, then FusionStorm will be in Default. If FusionStorm is in Default, FusionStorm agrees to pay a fee to TIG in the amount of $300,000, in two installment payments.
FusionStorm will pay one installment of $150,000 on the first business day in August 2012, and a second installment of $150,000 on the first business day in September 2012. This fee shall be in addition to FusionStorm’s payment of the remaining
Default Fee, as set forth in Section 1. 

  
 - Page 2 of 4
- 

 7. Reservation of Rights. TIG reserves all of its rights and remedies
available to it under this Agreement and the Settlement until all repayments have been made including, but not limited to, executing on the Stipulated Judgment. 
 8. Payment Delivery. Payments made pursuant to this Agreement will be made via wire transfer to the following account for the benefit of TIG unless otherwise agreed in writing with TIG:

  

			
	Account Name:	 	PC Specialists, Inc. DBA Technology Integration Group
	Account No:	 	6010017341
	ABA Routing No:	 	122000496
	Contact:	 	Regina Syktich, TIG Controller
	Telephone:	 	858-566-1900 x3550

 9. Collateral Agreements. There are no collateral agreements to this Agreement other than
the Settlement. Other than the repayment plan described herein, all terms and conditions of the Settlement shall remain in full force and effect, including but not limited to Defendant’s agreement to preserve assets until all repayments have
been made. 
 10. Successors and Assigns. The rights, duties and obligations set forth in this Agreement shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Parties. 
 11. Representations and
Warranties. Each Party represents and warrants that it has full power and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and that its signatory has full power and authority to execute
this Agreement on behalf of the Party. 
 12. Attorney’s Fees. The Parties understand and agree that each
Party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees incurred in connection with the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement. In the event of any legal action for breach or to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the losing party shall reimburse
the prevailing party for all reasonable legal fees, costs and expenses that the prevailing party incurred in enforcing rights in connection therewith. 
 13. Amendment; Interpretation. No provision of this Agreement may be modified or amended, except by a written agreement signed by each Party affected by the modification or amendment. No
waiver of any provision nor consent to any exception to the terms of this Agreement will be effective unless in writing and signed by the Party to be bound and then only to the specific purpose, extent and instance so provided. This Agreement is not
effective unless and until executed by Parties to the Agreement. 
 14. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be
governed by and construed in accord with the law of the State of California without regard to choice of law principles. Any disputes arising under this Agreement shall be filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County
of San Francisco. 

  
 - Page 3 of 4
- 

 15. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement, or its application to
and person, place, or circumstance, is held by an arbitrator or a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable, or void, such provision shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law, and the remainder of this Agreement
and such provision as applied to other persons, places, and circumstances shall remain in full force and effect. 
 16.
Drafter of Agreement. None of the Parties to this Agreement shall be considered to be its drafter for the purpose of any statute, case law of rule of interpretation or construction that would or might cause any provision to be construed
against the drafter. No uncertainty or ambiguity shall be interpreted in favor of one Party or against another Party. 
 17.
Notices. Unless another person is designated, in writing, for receipt of notices hereunder, notices to the respective Parties shall be sent to the following persons: 

For FusionStorm: 
 Amy Morrissey, Esq. 
 FusionStorm 

124 Grove Street, Suite 311 
 Franklin, MA 02038 
 Telephone: 858-566-1900 x3500 

Fax: 858-790-0027 
 For TIG: 
 Thomas Janecek 

Technology Integration Group 
 7810 Trade Street 
 San Diego, CA 92121 

Telephone: 858-566-1900 x3500 
 Fax: 858-790-0027 
 For Varel & Tonges: 

Catherine Morris Krow 
 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 
 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA
94105 
 Telephone: 415-773-5700 
 Fax: 415-773-5759 
 For Dragoni, Barber & King: 

Ragesh Tangri 

Durie Tangri LLP 

217 Leidesdorff Street 
 San Francisco, CA 94111 
 Telephone: 415-362-6666 

Fax: 415-236-6300 
 For Brad Thompson: 
 Thomas K. Hockel 

Kelly, Hockel & Klein P.C. 

  
 - Page 4 of 4
- 

 1 Sansome Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94104 
 Telephone: 415-951-0535 
 Fax: 415-391-7808 

18. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts or duplicate originals, all of which shall be regarded as
one and the same instrument, and which shall be the official and governing version in the interpretation of this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed by PDF of facsimile signatures and such signatures shall be deemed to bind each Party as if
they were original signatures. 
 PC Specialists, Inc. 
 dba Technology Integration Group 
  

	
	 

	

	
	FusionStorm
	
	 

	Daniel Serpico, President
	Dated:
	
	John Varel
	
	 10/10/10 

	Dated:
	
	 

	Tim Tonges
	
	 11/9/10

	Dated:
	
	Brad Thompson
	
	 

	Dated: 11/12/10

  
 - Page 5 of 4
- 

	
	 

	 Michael Dragoni 11/9/10

	
	 

	 Randy Barber
 Dated:
11/12/10

	
	 

 /s/ Charles King

	Charles King
	Dated: 11/12/10

  
 - Page 6 of 4
-

Source: [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00193-of-00352.parquet"}, [{"source": "alea-institute/alea-institute/kl3m-data-edgar-agreements/train-00193-of-00352.parquet"}]]