Remove LG Boost CPU When wakeup from Ondemand. it's not needed.
 cpufreq: ondemand: Be friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workl.

.oads

Cpufreq governors like the ondemand governor calculate the load on the CPU
periodically by employing deferrable timers. A deferrable timer won't fire
if the CPU is completely idle (and there are no other timers to be run), in
order to avoid unnecessary wakeups and thus save CPU power.

However, the load calculation logic is agnostic to all this, and this can
lead to the problem described below.

Time (ms)               CPU 1

100                Task-A running

110                Governor's timer fires, finds load as 100% in the last
                   10ms interval and increases the CPU frequency.

110.5              Task-A running

120		   Governor's timer fires, finds load as 100% in the last
		   10ms interval and increases the CPU frequency.

125		   Task-A went to sleep. With nothing else to do, CPU 1
		   went completely idle.

200		   Task-A woke up and started running again.

200.5		   Governor's deferred timer (which was originally programmed
		   to fire at time 130) fires now. It calculates load for the
		   time period 120 to 200.5, and finds the load is almost zero.
		   Hence it decreases the CPU frequency to the minimum.

210		   Governor's timer fires, finds load as 100% in the last
		   10ms interval and increases the CPU frequency.

So, after the workload woke up and started running, the frequency was suddenly
dropped to absolute minimum, and after that, there was an unnecessary delay of
10ms (sampling period) to increase the CPU frequency back to a reasonable value.
And this pattern repeats for every wake-up-from-cpu-idle for that workload.
This can be quite undesirable for latency- or response-time sensitive bursty
workloads. So we need to fix the governor's logic to detect such wake-up-from-
cpu-idle scenarios and start the workload at a reasonably high CPU frequency.

One extreme solution would be to fake a load of 100% in such scenarios. But
that might lead to undesirable side-effects such as frequency spikes (which
might also need voltage changes) especially if the previous frequency happened
to be very low.

We just want to avoid the stupidity of dropping down the frequency to a minimum
and then enduring a needless (and long) delay before ramping it up back again.
So, let us simply carry forward the previous load - that is, let us just pretend
that the 'load' for the current time-window is the same as the load for the
previous window. That way, the frequency and voltage will continue to be set
to whatever values they were set at previously. This means that bursty workloads
will get a chance to influence the CPU frequency at which they wake up from
cpu-idle, based on their past execution history. Thus, they might be able to
avoid suffering from slow wakeups and long response-times.

However, we should take care not to over-do this. For example, such a "copy
previous load" logic will benefit cases like this: (where # represents busy
and . represents idle)

but it will be detrimental in cases like the one shown below, because it will
retain the high frequency (copied from the previous interval) even in a mostly
idle system:

(i.e., the workload finished and the remaining tasks are such that their busy
periods are smaller than the sampling interval, which causes the timer to
always get deferred. So, this will make the copy-previous-load logic copy
the initial high load to subsequent idle periods over and over again, thus
keeping the frequency high unnecessarily).

So, we modify this copy-previous-load logic such that it is used only once
upon every wakeup-from-idle. Thus if we have 2 consecutive idle periods, the
previous load won't get blindly copied over; cpufreq will freshly evaluate the
load in the second idle interval, thus ensuring that the system comes back to
its normal state.

[ The right way to solve this whole problem is to teach the CPU frequency
governors to also track load on a per-task basis, not just a per-CPU basis,
and then use both the data sources intelligently to set the appropriate
frequency on the CPUs. But that involves redesigning the cpufreq subsystem,
so this patch should make the situation bearable until then. ]

Experimental results:
+-------------------+

I ran a modified version of ebizzy (called 'sleeping-ebizzy') that sleeps in
between its execution such that its total utilization can be a user-defined
value, say 10% or 20% (higher the utilization specified, lesser the amount of
sleeps injected). This ebizzy was run with a single-thread, tied to CPU 8.

Behavior observed with tracing (sample taken from 40% utilization runs):
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Without patch:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kworker/8:2-12137  416.335742: cpu_frequency: state=2061000 cpu_id=8
kworker/8:2-12137  416.335744: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/8:2 ==> next_comm=ebizzy
      <...>-40753  416.345741: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=kworker/8:2
kworker/8:2-12137  416.345744: cpu_frequency: state=4123000 cpu_id=8
kworker/8:2-12137  416.345746: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/8:2 ==> next_comm=ebizzy
      <...>-40753  416.355738: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=kworker/8:2
<snip>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------  <snip>
      <...>-40753  416.402202: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=swapper/8
     <idle>-0      416.502130: sched_switch: prev_comm=swapper/8 ==> next_comm=ebizzy
      <...>-40753  416.505738: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=kworker/8:2
kworker/8:2-12137  416.505739: cpu_frequency: state=2061000 cpu_id=8
kworker/8:2-12137  416.505741: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/8:2 ==> next_comm=ebizzy
      <...>-40753  416.515739: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=kworker/8:2
kworker/8:2-12137  416.515742: cpu_frequency: state=4123000 cpu_id=8
kworker/8:2-12137  416.515744: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/8:2 ==> next_comm=ebizzy

Observation: Ebizzy went idle at 416.402202, and started running again at
416.502130. But cpufreq noticed the long idle period, and dropped the frequency
at 416.505739, only to increase it back again at 416.515742, realizing that the
workload is in-fact CPU bound. Thus ebizzy needlessly ran at the lowest frequency
for almost 13 milliseconds (almost 1 full sample period), and this pattern
repeats on every sleep-wakeup. This could hurt latency-sensitive workloads quite
a lot.

With patch:
~~~~~~~~~~~

kworker/8:2-29802  464.832535: cpu_frequency: state=2061000 cpu_id=8
<snip>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------  <snip>
kworker/8:2-29802  464.962538: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/8:2 ==> next_comm=ebizzy
      <...>-40738  464.972533: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=kworker/8:2
kworker/8:2-29802  464.972536: cpu_frequency: state=4123000 cpu_id=8
kworker/8:2-29802  464.972538: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/8:2 ==> next_comm=ebizzy
      <...>-40738  464.982531: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=kworker/8:2
<snip>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------  <snip>
kworker/8:2-29802  465.022533: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/8:2 ==> next_comm=ebizzy
      <...>-40738  465.032531: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=kworker/8:2
kworker/8:2-29802  465.032532: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/8:2 ==> next_comm=ebizzy
      <...>-40738  465.035797: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=swapper/8
     <idle>-0      465.240178: sched_switch: prev_comm=swapper/8 ==> next_comm=ebizzy
      <...>-40738  465.242533: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=kworker/8:2
kworker/8:2-29802  465.242535: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/8:2 ==> next_comm=ebizzy
      <...>-40738  465.252531: sched_switch: prev_comm=ebizzy ==> next_comm=kworker/8:2

Observation: Ebizzy went idle at 465.035797, and started running again at
465.240178. Since ebizzy was the only real workload running on this CPU,
cpufreq retained the frequency at 4.1Ghz throughout the run of ebizzy, no
matter how many times ebizzy slept and woke-up in-between. Thus, ebizzy
got the 10ms worth of 4.1 Ghz benefit during every sleep-wakeup (as compared
to the run without the patch) and this boost gave a modest improvement in total
throughput, as shown below.

Sleeping-ebizzy records-per-second:
-----------------------------------

Utilization  Without patch  With patch  Difference (Absolute and % values)
    10%         274767        277046        +  2279 (+0.829%)
    20%         543429        553484        + 10055 (+1.850%)
    40%        1090744       1107959        + 17215 (+1.578%)
    60%        1634908       1662018        + 27110 (+1.658%)

A rudimentary and somewhat approximately latency-sensitive workload such as
sleeping-ebizzy itself showed a consistent, noticeable performance improvement
with this patch. Hence, workloads that are truly latency-sensitive will benefit
quite a bit from this change. Moreover, this is an overall win-win since this
patch does not hurt power-savings at all (because, this patch does not reduce
the idle time or idle residency; and the high frequency of the CPU when it goes
to cpu-idle does not affect/hurt the power-savings of deep idle states).

Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>

Original Commit is here!
https://github.com/stratosk/kernel_msm/commit/8c0a210f0fb7244b9eca89313945e1a4f25074ba
cpufreq: ondemand: remove copy_prev_load from 'struct cpu_dbs_common_info'

'copy_prev_load' was recently added by commit: 18b46ab (cpufreq: governor: Be
friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workloads).

It actually is a bit redundant as we also have 'prev_load' which can store any
integer value and can be used instead of 'copy_prev_load' by setting it zero.

True load can also turn out to be zero during long idle intervals (and hence the
actual value of 'prev_load' and the overloaded value can clash). However this is
not a problem because, if the true load was really zero in the previous
interval, it makes sense to evaluate the load afresh for the current interval
rather than copying the previous load.

So, drop 'copy_prev_load' and use 'prev_load' instead.

Update comments as well to make it more clear.

There is another change here which was probably missed by Srivatsa during the
last version of updates he made. The unlikely in the 'if' statement was covering
only half of the condition and the whole line should actually come under it.

Also checkpatch is made more silent as it was reporting this (--strict option):

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
+		if (unlikely(wall_time > (2 * sampling_rate) &&
+						j_cdbs->prev_load)) {

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Ondemand: Remove dbs_refresh_callback, no longer used.
ONDEMAND: Clean up_threshold_any_cpu_load & up_threshold_multi_core

It's was always set the same as up_threshold so it's useless...

also fix some code style.

Conflicts:
	drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
cpufreq: interactive: Choose highest frequency below or at target

This generally saves us one freq level.
cpufreq: Always allow update of user policy

In the cases where the system boots up in a constraint with policy min and
max lower than cpuinfo min/max, and user tries to set a higher user
policy min, the value would be overridden during the verifying the
limits.

Once user initiates the sysfs write the previous user policy is
maintained in policy min and max thus changing the limits for verification
of the current policy. Once the verification is completed restore the
current user policy min/max with the updated values if any. This would take
care of cases uwhere user policy min/max input is higher/lesser than the
current min and max.

Change-Id: I5ad92ba05162cb5c32c3ba3fdae21d2e505493d3
Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: Add check_fast mode to raise freqs faster

It takes too long to scale from min_freq to max_freq. If you ignore
go_hispeed, then it takes over 100ms to step up through all the
frequencies. Even with go_hispeed, I think I figured it was 90ms to go
from idle to max speed.

The core of the problem is that a cpu_load << 100% is meaningful for
scaling.  As that load approaches 100% though, this estimate becomes
meaningless.

Here "meaningful" means that the speed adjusted load is a good approximation
of the total processing work needed and therefore good for estimating the
target frequency.

At 100% it is not meaningful because either it is a perfect estimate (had
we been running faster there is no more work we would have done) or off by
a factor of max_freq/min_freq in the worst case.

This patch recognizes this case and scales more aggressively.  At the same
time it also re-estimates in a shorter time to correct over/under scaling.

Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
cpufreq: interactive: Disable idle notifier

Instead, just always poll using the timer.

Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched/fair: Fix typo describing flags in enqueue_entity

Fix spelling of 'calling' in description of se flags in
enqueue_entity().

Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched: Fix __sched_period comment

It should be sched_nr_latency so fix it before it annoys me more.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched: Update documentation and comments

Change sched_*.c to sched/*.c in documentation and comments.

Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Interactive: Code fixed to adapt to my branch.
USB: ccid_bridge: Add support for USB smart card class

This module implements a bridge driver which allows user space
to communicate with USB smart card devices.  This module provides
/dev/ccid_bridge device file which allows read/write/ioctl methods.
The ioctls facilitate control and interrupt transfers.  The bulk
transfers are implemented via read and write.  The interrupt
endpoint is optional and not all devices may support it.

Change-Id: I67ac7c7d15fb65c8f6a2cc9f9c81343da074aab7
Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
USB: ccid_bridge: Don't kill URB in release after device is disconnected

The URBs are killed in disconnect method. If the device is disconnected
before the /dev/ccid_bridge is closed, no need to kill the URBs again.
As the URB reference count is dropped in disconnect, accessing it in
release is causing the kernel panic.

CRs-Fixed: 653776
Change-Id: I7fae9ac2568cce59ea39bdd73c955d388d3f26bd
Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
USB: ccid_bridge: Provide bulk message write/read stats via debugfs

The bulk message timeouts are observed occasionally during mass storage
transfers. This debug facility helps in identifying such timeout issues.

The sample output of the stats debugfs file.

ccid_bridge: connected
ccid_bridge: opened
total writes: 444
total reads: 444
write/read timeout val: 1000
write_timeout: 0
read_timeout: 0
write_max_time (msec): 130
read_max_time: (msec): 857

CRs-Fixed: 659909
Change-Id: I9787288c10d23b176c9316feed82d41bd2adae65
Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
USB: ccid_bridge: Add module param for bulk message timeout

The bulk message timeout is 1 second by default. Some cards take
more time to respond to CCID commands. Provide a module param
to configure the bulk message timeout.

For example, the below command configures the timeout as 5 seconds.

echo -n 5000 > /sys/module/ccid_bridge/parameters/bulk_msg_timeout

CRs-Fixed: 652421
Change-Id: I5f8fc2a9586d3728fe1c43311a28c4084a333164
Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
usb: gadget: f_accessory: Enabled Zero Length Packet (ZLP) for acc_write

Accessory connected to Android Device requires
Zero Length Packet (ZLP) to be written when data
transferred out from the Android device are multiples
of wMaxPacketSize (64bytes (Full-Speed) / 512bytes (High-Speed))
to end the transfer.

Change-Id: Ib2c2c0ab98ef9afa10e74a720142deca5c0ed476
Signed-off-by: Anson Jacob <ansonkuzhumbil@gmail.com>
Update CONFIG(USB).
cpufreq_alucard: Implemented boost_cpus. 2 values allowed. One based on avg cpus frequency and the other one on maximum cpus frequency.