GitHub PullRequestReviewCommentEvent at 2014-01-21 20:48:51
Repository: django
Actor: timgraham
Payload: {"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/pulls/comments/9053660","id":9053660,"diff_hunk":"@@ -231,13 +232,14 @@ Why Django uses autocommit\n --------------------------\n \n In the SQL standards, each SQL query starts a transaction, unless one is\n-already in progress. Such transactions must then be committed or rolled back.\n+already in progress. Such transactions must then be manually committed or\n+rolled back.\n \n This isn't always convenient for application developers. To alleviate this\n problem, most databases provide an autocommit mode. When autocommit is turned\n-on, each SQL query is wrapped in its own transaction. In other words, the\n-transaction is not only automatically started, but also automatically\n-committed.\n+on, each SQL query is wrapped in its own transaction. In particular, any SQL\n+query not inside a transaction not only starts a transaction automatically.","path":"docs/topics/db/transactions.txt","position":34,"original_position":34,"commit_id":"26dea719f8c5502a4df6aeaad27412d15b88b6a0","original_commit_id":"26dea719f8c5502a4df6aeaad27412d15b88b6a0","user":{"login":"timgraham","id":411869,"avatar_url":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/fa170777273ca7b235bdde7d80e9f8a6?d=https%3A%2F%2Fidenticons.github.com%2F21b737a0a0ea61dbaa744cbe9d162dd9.png&r=x","gravatar_id":"fa170777273ca7b235bdde7d80e9f8a6","url":"https://api.github.com/users/timgraham","html_url":"https://github.com/timgraham","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timgraham/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timgraham/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timgraham/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timgraham/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timgraham/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timgraham/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timgraham/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timgraham/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/timgraham/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"body":"I find the usage of \"not only\" without the resolution of it in the same sentence to be a little akward. could we rephrase it or re-combine the sentences?","created_at":"2014-01-21T20:48:51Z","updated_at":"2014-01-21T20:48:51Z","html_url":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/2191#discussion_r9053660","pull_request_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/pulls/2191","_links":{"self":{"href":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/pulls/comments/9053660"},"html":{"href":"https://github.com/django/django/pull/2191#discussion_r9053660"},"pull_request":{"href":"https://api.github.com/repos/django/django/pulls/2191"}}}}