GitHub PushEvent at 2014-09-16 00:58:03
Repository: juju-gui
Actor: hatched
Payload: {"shas":[["0bcb5ecb60c18b03a7c4844698cd8352bb04ec93","932b340716f4f618f4231143953a6fadf6a4192d@canonical.com","Add flag to enable containers on all providers.","Francesco Banconi",true],["9bc3e6c08be956a80f6e750ee91bb1823cb1c813","c805ced4ad10b9a11edc8de44df9d6064da09eba@canonical.com","Merge pull request #551 from frankban/containers-feature-flag\n\nAdd flag to enable containers on all providers.\n\nIntroduce the `containers` feature flag.","jujugui",true],["403b4348388ff43b1fb00a292ee9940d33bb6a3b","14656cf490c7e210461e4665f1f9710901e7d3b7@canonical.com","Ensure proper committed status on containers.\n\nThis fixes bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-gui/+bug/1369601\n\nContainers had been (incorrectly) inheriting their commited status from\ntheir parent machine. That meant that a newly-created container on an\nexisting machine would show up as committed upon re-render. We now check\nfor 'new' in the name of each container and set its committed status\nbased on that. The only exception is root containers, which still\ninherit from the parent machine because they *are* the parent machine.","Kyle Adams",true],["c9db79e508b449142ccb68370f94ff7b03201ee9","c805ced4ad10b9a11edc8de44df9d6064da09eba@canonical.com","Merge pull request #552 from kadams54/fix-uncommitted-indicator-1369601\n\nEnsure proper committed status on containers.\n\nThis fixes bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-gui/+bug/1369601\r\n\r\nContainers had been (incorrectly) inheriting their commited status from\r\ntheir parent machine. That meant that a newly-created container on an\r\nexisting machine would show up as committed upon re-render. We now check\r\nfor 'new' in the name of each container and set its committed status\r\nbased on that. The only exception is root containers, which still\r\ninherit from the parent machine because they *are* the parent machine.","jujugui",true],["7ff5b83e71232c12c0cc40e3168efa3d1e9541f3","fbc62a2572fd4a26dee59e271829ab71b248364c@canonical.com","Do not show subordinate services in the mv unplaced unit token list","Jeff Pihach",false],["d2a5a299d9199076841ecf464c0772a1da51311e","fbc62a2572fd4a26dee59e271829ab71b248364c@canonical.com","Added test to make sure we don't render subordinate units as unplaced","Jeff Pihach",false],["973ab158b24e2e2860aea42d990240a4881915a4","c805ced4ad10b9a11edc8de44df9d6064da09eba@canonical.com","Merge pull request #554 from hatched/sub-unplaced-1369576\n\nDo not show subordinate services in the mv unplaced unit token list\n\nThis is a temporary fix to not instantiate or render subordinate services as unplaced units in the machine view. A real fix will involve having the service charm data fetch updating the unit information and having juju send the unit subordinate status in the delta.","jujugui",true]],"size":7,"ref":"refs/heads/develop","head":"973ab158b24e2e2860aea42d990240a4881915a4"}