CHROMIUM: mm: Fix calculation of dirtyable memory

The system uses global_dirtyable_memory() to calculate
number of dirtyable pages/pages that can be allocated
to the page cache.  A bug causes an underflow thus making
the page count look like a big unsigned number.  This in turn
confuses the dirty writeback throttling to aggressively write
back pages as they become dirty (usually 1 page at a time).

Fix is to ensure there is no underflow while doing the math.

Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Puneet Kumar <puneetster@chromium.org>

BUG=chrome-os-partner:16011
TEST=Manual; boot kernel, powerwash, login with testaccount and
make sure no jank occurs on sync of applications

Change-Id: I614e7c3156e014f0f28a4ef9bdd8cb8a2cd07b2a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/37612
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Olof Johansson <olofj@chromium.org>
Commit-Ready: Puneet Kumar <puneetster@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Puneet Kumar <puneetster@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Puneet Kumar <puneetster@chromium.org>
ksm: check and skip page, if it is already scanned

On system like Android where most of the process are forked
from parent w/o execve, KSM can scan same page multiple times
in one scan cycle. There is no advantage in scanning same page
multiple times for merging. During testing with Android, it was
observed around 60% pages are skipped for each scan cycle.

Change-Id: I0cf01802f0b4d61fcab92558beb9e1c660dc9a77
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAMrOTPgBtANS_ryRjan0-dTL97U7eRvtf3dCsss=Kn+Uk89fuA@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pradeep Sawlani <sawlani@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Paul Reioux <reioux@gmail.com>
fs/dyn_sync_cntrl: dynamic sync control

The dynamic sync control interface uses new power_suspend interface

While screen is on, file sync is disabled
when screen is off, a file sync is called to flush all outstanding writes
and restore file sync operation as normal.

updated for 8974 kernels

Signed-off-by: Paul Reioux <reioux@gmail.com>

Conflicts:
	fs/Kconfig
fs/sync: Make sync() satisfy many requests with one invocation

Dave Jones reported RCU stalls, overly long hrtimer interrupts, and
amazingly long NMI handlers from a trinity-induced workload involving
lots of concurrent sync() calls (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/369).
There are any number of things that one might do to make sync() behave
better under high levels of contention, but it is also the case that
multiple concurrent sync() system calls can be satisfied by a single
sys_sync() invocation.

Given that this situation is reminiscent of rcu_barrier(), this commit
applies the rcu_barrier() approach to sys_sync().  This approach uses
a global mutex and a sequence counter.  The mutex is held across the
sync() operation, which eliminates contention between concurrent sync()
operations.  The counter is incremented at the beginning and end of
each sync() operation, so that it is odd while a sync() operation is in
progress and even otherwise, just like sequence locks.

The code that used to be in sys_sync() is now in do_sync(), and sys_sync()
now handles the concurrency.  The sys_sync() function first takes a
snapshot of the counter, then acquires the mutex, and then takes another
snapshot of the counter.  If the values of the two snapshots indicate that
a full do_sync() executed during the mutex acquisition, the sys_sync()
function releases the mutex and returns ("Our work is done!").  Otherwise,
sys_sync() increments the counter, invokes do_sync(), and increments
the counter again.

This approach allows a single call to do_sync() to satisfy an arbitrarily
large number of sync() system calls, which should eliminate issues due
to large numbers of concurrent invocations of the sync() system call.

Changes since v1 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/24/683):

o	Add a pair of memory barriers to keep the increments from
	bleeding into the do_sync() code.  (The failure probability
	is insanely low, but when you have several hundred million
	devices running Linux, you can expect several hundred instances
	of one-in-a-million failures.)

o	Actually CC some people who have experience in this area.

Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Paul Reioux <reioux@gmail.com>
Honami & Amami: Enable dynamic sync control