regmap: cache Fix regcache-rbtree sync

commit 8abac3ba51b5525354e9b2ec0eed1c9e95c905d9 upstream.

The last register block, which falls into the specified range, is not handled
correctly. The formula which calculates the number of register which should be
synced is inverse (and off by one). E.g. if all registers in that block should
be synced only one is synced, and if only one should be synced all (but one) are
synced. To calculate the number of registers that need to be synced we need to
subtract the number of the first register in the block from the max register
number and add one. This patch updates the code accordingly.

The issue was introduced in commit ac8d91c ("regmap: Supply ranges to the sync
operations").

Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
regmap: silence GCC warning

commit a8f28cfad8cd44d7c34b166d0e5ace1125dbee1f upstream.

Building regmap.o triggers this GCC warning:
    drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c: In function ‘regmap_raw_read’:
    drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c:1172:6: warning: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

Long story short: Jakub Jelinek pointed out that there is a type
mismatch between 'num' in regmap_volatile_range() and 'val_count' in
regmap_raw_read(). And indeed, converting 'num' to the type of
'val_count' (ie, size_t) makes this warning go away.

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/base/memory.c: fix show_mem_removable() to handle missing sections

commit 21ea9f5ace3a7317cc3ba1fbc749758021a83136 upstream.

"cat /sys/devices/system/memory/memory*/removable" crashed the system.

The problem is that show_mem_removable() is passing a
bad pfn to is_mem_section_removable(), which causes

    if (!node_online(page_to_nid(page)))

to blow up.  Why is it passing in a bad pfn?

The reason is that show_mem_removable() will loop sections_per_block
times.  sections_per_block is 16, but mem->section_count is 8,
indicating holes in this memory block.  Checking that the memory section
is present before checking to see if the memory section is removable
fixes the problem.

   harp5-sys:~ # cat /sys/devices/system/memory/memory*/removable
   0
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea00c3200000
   IP: [<ffffffff81117ed1>] is_pageblock_removable_nolock+0x1/0x90
   PGD 83ffd4067 PUD 37bdfce067 PMD 0
   Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
   Modules linked in: autofs4 binfmt_misc rdma_ucm rdma_cm iw_cm ib_addr ib_srp scsi_transport_srp scsi_tgt ib_ipoib ib_cm ib_uverbs ib_umad iw_cxgb3 cxgb3 mdio mlx4_en mlx4_ib ib_sa mlx4_core ib_mthca ib_mad ib_core fuse nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp437 vfat fat joydev loop hid_generic usbhid hid hwperf(O) numatools(O) dm_mod iTCO_wdt ipv6 iTCO_vendor_support igb i2c_i801 ioatdma i2c_algo_bit ehci_pci pcspkr lpc_ich i2c_core ehci_hcd ptp sg mfd_core dca rtc_cmos pps_core mperf button xhci_hcd sd_mod crc_t10dif usbcore usb_common scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_hp_sw scsi_dh_alua scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh gru(O) xvma(O) xfs crc32c libcrc32c thermal sata_nv processor piix mptsas mptscsih scsi_transport_sas mptbase megaraid_sas fan thermal_sys hwmon ext3 jbd ata_piix ahci libahci libata scsi_mod
   CPU: 4 PID: 5991 Comm: cat Tainted: G           O 3.11.0-rc5-rja-uv+ #10
   Hardware name: SGI UV2000/ROMLEY, BIOS SGI UV 2000/3000 series BIOS 01/15/2013
   task: ffff88081f034580 ti: ffff880820022000 task.ti: ffff880820022000
   RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81117ed1>]  [<ffffffff81117ed1>] is_pageblock_removable_nolock+0x1/0x90
   RSP: 0018:ffff880820023df8  EFLAGS: 00010287
   RAX: 0000000000040000 RBX: ffffea00c3200000 RCX: 0000000000000004
   RDX: ffffea00c30b0000 RSI: 00000000001c0000 RDI: ffffea00c3200000
   RBP: ffff880820023e38 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
   R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffea00c33c0000
   R13: 0000160000000000 R14: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R15: 0000000000000001
   FS:  00007ffff7fb2700(0000) GS:ffff88083fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
   CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
   CR2: ffffea00c3200000 CR3: 000000081b954000 CR4: 00000000000407e0
   Call Trace:
     show_mem_removable+0x41/0x70
     dev_attr_show+0x2a/0x60
     sysfs_read_file+0xf7/0x1c0
     vfs_read+0xc8/0x130
     SyS_read+0x5d/0xa0
     system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Signed-off-by: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
sync: signal pt before sync_timeline object gets destroyed

There is a race condition

Assume we have *one* sync_fence object, with *one* sync_pt
which belongs to *one* sync_timeline, given this condition,
sync_timeline->kref will have two counts, one for sync_timeline
(implicit) and another for sync_pt.

Assume following is the situation on CPU

Theead-1 : (Thread which calls sync_timeline_destroy())
  -> (some function calls)
   -> sync_timeline_destory()
    -> sync_timeline_signal() (CPU is inside this
function after putting reference to sync_timeline)

At this time Thread-2 comes and does following

Thread-2 : (fclose on fence fd)
> sync_fence_release() -> because of fclose() on fence object
 -> sync_fence_free()
  -> sync_pt_free()
   -> kref_put(&pt->parent->kref, sync_timeline_free);
    -> sync_timeline_free() (CPU is inside this because
this time kref will be zero after _put)

Thread-2 will free sync_timeline object before Thread-1
has finished its work inside sync_timeline_signal.

With this change we signals all sync_pt before putting
reference to sync_timeline object.

Change-Id: Ic680e4d0bbef1c46bcb7cfba693395645241d203
Signed-off-by: Prakash Kamliya <pkamliya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rom Lemarchand <romlem@google.com>
sync: Fix a race condition between release_obj and print_obj

Before this change, a timeline would only be removed from the timeline
list *after* the sync driver had its release_obj() called. However, the
driver's release_obj() may free resources needed by print_obj().

Although the timeline list is locked when print_obj() is called, it is
not locked when release_obj() is called. If one CPU was in print_obj()
when another was in release_obj(), the print_obj() may make unsafe
accesses.

It is not actually necessary to hold the timeline list lock when calling
release_obj() if the call is made after the timeline is unlinked from
the list, since there is no possibility another thread could be in --
or enter -- print_obj() for that timeline.

This change moves the release_obj() call to after the timeline is
unlinked, preventing the above race from occurring.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Strachan <alistair.strachan@imgtec.com>