power: quickwakeup: initial driver

This driver allows clients to register code to be called upon wakeup
so that clients can perform specific checks and vote to drop the system
back into suspend without fully resuming if the wake reason was a special
quick wakeup event.

Propagation of (CR)

Change-Id: I791ff02f34b616e6da2b68efc2d4eb4449e5bbe7
Signed-off-by: James Wylder <jwylder1@motorola.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Suttles <jsuttles@motorola.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Swantek <w98568@motorola.com>
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.pcs.mot.com/611835
SLTApproved: Slta Waiver <sltawvr@motorola.com>
Tested-by: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Swantek <jswantek@motorola.com>
Submit-Approved: Jira Key <jirakey@motorola.com>

Conflicts:
	kernel/power/Kconfig
readahead: make context readahead more conservative

This helps performance on moderately dense random reads on SSD.

Transaction-Per-Second numbers provided by Taobao:

		QPS	case
		-------------------------------------------------------
		7536	disable context readahead totally
w/ patch:	7129	slower size rampup and start RA on the 3rd read
		6717	slower size rampup
w/o patch:	5581	unmodified context readahead

Before, readahead will be started whenever reading page N+1 when it happen
to read N recently.  After patch, we'll only start readahead when *three*
random reads happen to access pages N, N+1, N+2.  The probability of this
happening is extremely low for pure random reads, unless they are very
dense, which actually deserves some readahead.

Also start with a smaller readahead window.  The impact to interleaved
sequential reads should be small, because for a long run stream, the the
small readahead window rampup phase is negletable.

The context readahead actually benefits clustered random reads on HDD
whose seek cost is pretty high.  However as SSD is increasingly used for
random read workloads it's better for the context readahead to concentrate
on interleaved sequential reads.

Another SSD rand read test from Miao

        # file size:        2GB
        # read IO amount: 625MB
        sysbench --test=fileio          \
                --max-requests=10000    \
                --num-threads=1         \
                --file-num=1            \
                --file-block-size=64K   \
                --file-test-mode=rndrd  \
                --file-fsync-freq=0     \
                --file-fsync-end=off    run

shows the performance of btrfs grows up from 69MB/s to 121MB/s, ext4 from
104MB/s to 121MB/s.

Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
Tested-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Signed-off-by: Amperific <amperific@gmail.com>