Add l10n_it_toponyms

On 07/20/2014 09:38 PM, Davide Corio wrote:
>
> it is exactly the same in italy. country > regions > provinces. and we 
> use provinces for postal purposes. but i think @eLBati 
> <https://github.com/eLBati> wants to keep the state field for the 
> regions. @eLBati <https://github.com/eLBati> is this correct?
>

It is. I took this approach because I think the concept of state is 
closer to the region's one, rather than the province's one. And, if I 
remember correctly, French localization took this approach too. 
@alexis-via is it true?

But, in honour of practicality, as @pedrobaeza and Spanish localization 
suggests, maybe better to do the opposite: to use 
```res.country.state``` for provinces and to add a model for regions.
We will just need to override ```base_location_geonames_import``` in 
order to fill the right fields (even better: that module could consider 
a sort of mapping between the .TXT fields and the odoo fields).
Moreover, the region model could be created by a more general module to 
be received by the https://github.com/OCA/partner-contact repo.

@dcorio @pedrobaeza @alexis-via what do you think?