Paper: Frequentism and Bayesianism: A Python-driven Primer (Jake VanderPlas)

This is the final version – ready to be reviewed.
Again, a friend of mine complained that this example was unfair to frequentism, and brought up these points. I actually don't think the content of the footnote is that important, which is why I didn't put it in the text proper.

I think the biggest problem with this paper is that most people who read it have some emotional conviction about the subject matter, so frequentists complain that I'm unfairly representing frequentism, while Bayesians complain that I'm unfairly representing Bayesianism. Everyone seems to want the paper to be a textbook rather than an eight page summary. Maybe I shouuld  just chalk that up to success?