1125334 - Adds celery_t policy to constrain pulp_workers, pulp_resource_manager, and pulp_celerybeat

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125334

This introduces a new selinux policy named pulp-celery which defines the celery_t label. The policy has been tested on EL6 and EL7 with sync+publish, bind/unbind, update, register/unregister, pulp-admin upload, and node functionality.

The spec file is reworked to deploy and remove both the pulp-celery policy in addition to the pulp-server policy. I've cleaned up the bash scripts also.

The EL7 environment needed a few policy statements that did not compile on the EL6 environment, so the selinux policy is adjusted just before compilation depending on the platform. EL7 gets some additional statements. You'll see this addition in the pulp.spec file.

I've deleted pulp-selinux.py which has no chance of working without much effort, and removed it from the developer docs. This selinux policy will not work with a dev setup, only with an RPM based layout.

It also updates the release notes for 2.5.0, and adds a note about the selinux changes.

The point is you want have a policy running in enforcing. But if you tell you run in SELinux+enforcing it should not mean you just add allow rules. I don't tell your policy is wrong at all. Just there are some issues which make your policy less secure.