Revert "sched: fix nohz idle load balancer issues (part 2)"

This reverts commit d6784154feb8174efff27f7918f0ed531d4bf310.

Conflicts:

	kernel/sched.c
Revert "sched: fix nohz idle load balancer issues"

This reverts commit 748ceecf4bb9974307231cc09e13a09a23613f8f.
llist: Make some llist functions inline

Because llist code will be used in performance critical scheduler
code path, make llist_add() and llist_del_all() inline to avoid
function calling overhead and related 'glue' overhead.

Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315461646-1379-2-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Conflicts:

	drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
	lib/Kconfig
	lib/Makefile
llist: Remove the platform-dependent NMI checks

Remove the nmi() checks spread around the code. in_nmi() is not available
on every architecture and it's a pretty obscure and ugly check in any case.

Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315461646-1379-3-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
llist: Move cpu_relax() to after the cmpxchg()

If in llist_add()/etc. functions the first cmpxchg() call succeeds, it is
not necessary to use cpu_relax() before the cmpxchg(). So cpu_relax() in
a busy loop involving cmpxchg() should go after cmpxchg() instead of before
that.

This patch fixes this for all involved llist functions.

Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315461646-1379-4-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
llist: Return whether list is empty before adding in llist_add()

Extend the llist_add*() functions to return a success indicator, this
allows us in the scheduler code to send an IPI if the queue was empty.

( There's no effect on existing users, because the list_add_xxx() functions
  are inline, thus this will be optimized out by the compiler if not used
  by callers. )

Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315461646-1379-5-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
llist: Remove cpu_relax() usage in cmpxchg loops

Initial benchmarks show they're a net loss:

 $ for i in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor ; do echo performance > $i; done
 $ echo 4096 32000 64 128 > /proc/sys/kernel/sem
 $ ./sembench -t 2048 -w 1900 -o 0

Pre:

 run time 30 seconds 778936 worker burns per second
 run time 30 seconds 912190 worker burns per second
 run time 30 seconds 817506 worker burns per second
 run time 30 seconds 830870 worker burns per second
 run time 30 seconds 845056 worker burns per second

Post:

 run time 30 seconds 905920 worker burns per second
 run time 30 seconds 849046 worker burns per second
 run time 30 seconds 886286 worker burns per second
 run time 30 seconds 822320 worker burns per second
 run time 30 seconds 900283 worker burns per second

So about 4% faster. (!)

cpu_relax() stalls the pipeline, therefore, when used in a tight loop
it has the following benefits:

 - allows SMT siblings to have a go;
 - reduces pressure on the CPU interconnect.

However, cmpxchg loops are unfair and thus have unbounded completion
time, therefore we should avoid getting in such heavily contended
situations where the above benefits make any difference.

A typical cmpxchg loop should not go round more than a handfull of
times at worst, therefore adding extra delays just slows things down.

Since the llist primitives are new, there aren't any bad users yet,
and we should avoid growing them. Heavily contended sites should
generally be better off using the ticket locks for serialization since
they provide bounded completion times (fifo-fair over the cpus).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315836358.26517.43.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
irq_work: Use llist in the struct irq_work logic

Use llist in irq_work instead of the lock-less linked list
implementation in irq_work to avoid the code duplication.

Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315461646-1379-6-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
llist: Add llist_next()

So we don't have to expose the struct list_node member.

Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315836348.26517.41.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
sched: Fix idle_cpu()

On -rt we observed hackbench waking all 400 tasks to a single cpu.
This is because of select_idle_sibling()'s interaction with the new
ipi based wakeup scheme.

The existing idle_cpu() test only checks to see if the current task on
that cpu is the idle task, it does not take already queued tasks into
account, nor does it take queued to be woken tasks into account.

If the remote wakeup IPIs come hard enough, there won't be time to
schedule away from the idle task, and would thus keep thinking the cpu
was in fact idle, regardless of the fact that there were already
several hundred tasks runnable.

We couldn't reproduce on mainline, but there's no reason it couldn't
happen.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-3o30p18b2paswpc9ohy2gltp@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
sched: Convert to struct llist

Use the generic llist primitives.

We had a private lockless list implementation in the scheduler in the wake-list
code, now that we have a generic llist implementation that provides all required
operations, switch to it.

This patch is not expected to change any behavior.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315836353.26517.42.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Conflicts:

	kernel/sched.c
sched: Use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance

Current use of smp call function to kick the nohz idle balance can deadlock
in this scenario.

1. cpu-A did a generic_exec_single() to cpu-B and after queuing its call single
data (csd) to the call single queue, cpu-A took a timer interrupt.  Actual IPI
to cpu-B to process the call single queue is not yet sent.

2. As part of the timer interrupt handler, cpu-A decided to kick cpu-B
for the idle load balancing (sets cpu-B's rq->nohz_balance_kick to 1)
and __smp_call_function_single() with nowait will queue the csd to the
cpu-B's queue. But the generic_exec_single() won't send an IPI to cpu-B
as the call single queue was not empty.

3. cpu-A is busy with lot of interrupts

4. Meanwhile cpu-B is entering and exiting idle and noticed that it has
it's rq->nohz_balance_kick set to '1'. So it will go ahead and do the
idle load balancer and clear its rq->nohz_balance_kick.

5. At this point, csd queued as part of the step-2 above is still locked
and waiting to be serviced on cpu-B.

6. cpu-A is still busy with interrupt load and now it got another timer
interrupt and as part of it decided to kick cpu-B for another idle load
balancing (as it finds cpu-B's rq->nohz_balance_kick cleared in step-4
above) and does __smp_call_function_single() with the same csd that is
still locked.

7. And we get a deadlock waiting for the csd_lock() in the
__smp_call_function_single().

Main issue here is that cpu-B can service the idle load balancer kick
request from cpu-A even with out receiving the IPI and this lead to
doing multiple __smp_call_function_single() on the same csd leading to
deadlock.

To kick a cpu, scheduler already has the reschedule vector reserved. Use
that mechanism (kick_process()) instead of using the generic smp call function
mechanism to kick off the nohz idle load balancing and avoid the deadlock.

   [ This issue is present from 2.6.35+ kernels, but marking it -stable
     only from v3.0+ as the proposed fix depends on the scheduler_ipi()
     that is introduced recently. ]

Reported-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.0+
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111003220934.834943260@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
sched: Request for idle balance during nohz idle load balance

rq's idle_at_tick is set to idle/busy during the timer tick
depending on the cpu was idle or not. This will be used later in the load
balance that will be done in the softirq context (which is a process
context in -RT kernels).

For nohz kernels, for the cpu doing nohz idle load balance on behalf of
all the idle cpu's, its rq->idle_at_tick might have a stale value (which is
recorded when it got the timer tick presumably when it is busy).

As the nohz idle load balancing is also being done at the same place
as the regular load balancing, nohz idle load balancing was bailing out
when it sees rq's idle_at_tick not set.

Thus leading to poor system utilization.

Rename rq's idle_at_tick to idle_balance and set it when someone requests
for nohz idle balance on an idle cpu.

Reported-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111003220934.892350549@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
sched: Add is_idle_task() to handle invalidated uses of idle_cpu()

Commit 908a3283 (Fix idle_cpu()) invalidated some uses of idle_cpu(),
which used to say whether or not the CPU was running the idle task,
but now instead says whether or not the CPU is running the idle task
in the absence of pending wakeups.  Although this new implementation
gives a better answer to the question "is this CPU idle?", it also
invalidates other uses that were made of idle_cpu().

This commit therefore introduces a new is_idle_task() API member
that determines whether or not the specified task is one of the
idle tasks, allowing open-coded "->pid == 0" sequences to be replaced
by something more meaningful.

Suggested-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Revert "smp: Start up non-boot CPUs asynchronously"

This reverts commit d1550573105ed9b45c16e9b48ba1e63e1efe550e.
smp: Start up non-boot CPUs asynchronously

From 3700e391ab2841a9f9241e4e31a6281aa59be5f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:44:51 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] smp: Start up non-boot CPUs asynchronously

The starting of the "not first" CPUs actually takes a lot of boot time
of the kernel... upto "minutes" on some of the bigger SGI boxes.
Right now, this is a fully sequential operation with the rest of the kernel
boot.

This patch turns this bringup of the other cpus into an asynchronous operation,
saving significant kernel boot time (40% on my laptop!!). Basically
now CPUs get brought up in parallel to disk enumeration, graphic mode bringup
etc etc etc.

Note that the implementation in this patch still waits for all CPUs to
be brought up before starting userspace; I would love to remove that
restriction over time (technically that is simple), but that becomes
then a change in behavior... I'd like to see more discussion on that
being a good idea before I write that patch.

Second note: We add a small delay between the bring up of cpus, this is
needed to actually get a boot time improvement. If we bring up CPUs
straight back-to-back, we hog the cpu hotplug lock for write, and
that lock is used everywhere during initialization for read. By
adding a small delay, we allow those tasks to make progress.

CC: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Revert "ARM: SMP: use a timing out completion for cpu hotplug"

This reverts commit 0f97483bdd316bfd50fd83deb7c9789af7e8f2ae.
vfs: Avoid IPI storm due to bh LRU invalidation

When discovery of lots of disks happen in parallel, we call
invalidate_bh_lrus() once for each disk from partitioning code resulting in a
storm of IPIs and causing a softlockup detection to fire (it takes several
*minutes* for a machine to execute all the invalidate_bh_lrus() calls).

Fix the issue by allowing only single invalidation to run using a mutex and let
waiters for mutex figure out whether someone invalidated LRUs for them while
they were waiting.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
block: Fix queue_flag update when rq_affinity goes from 2 to 1

Commit 5757a6d76cdf added the QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE flag, but fails to
clear that flag when the current state is '2' (SAME_COMP + SAME_FORCE)
and the new state is '1' (SAME_COMP).

Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Seppanen <eric@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
block: change force plug flush call order

Do blk_flush_plug_list() first and then add new request aDo blk_flush_plug_list() first and then add new request aDo blk_flush_plug_list() first and then add new request at the tail. New
request can't be merged to existing requests, but later new requests might
be merged with this new one. If blk_flush_plug_list() is done later, the
merge doesn't happen.
Believe it or not, this fixes a 10% regression running sysbench workload.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>