l10n: de.po: translate 38 new messages

Translate 38 new messages came from git.pot update in fe05e19
(l10n: git.pot: v2.1.0 round 1 (38 new, 9 removed)).

Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
po/TEAMS: add new members to German translation team

Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Merge git://github.com/git-l10n/git-po

* git://github.com/git-l10n/git-po:
  po/TEAMS: add new members to German translation team
  l10n: de.po: translate 38 new messages
teach fast-export an --anonymize option

Sometimes users want to report a bug they experience on
their repository, but they are not at liberty to share the
contents of the repository. It would be useful if they could
produce a repository that has a similar shape to its history
and tree, but without leaking any information. This
"anonymized" repository could then be shared with developers
(assuming it still replicates the original problem).

This patch implements an "--anonymize" option to
fast-export, which generates a stream that can recreate such
a repository. Producing a single stream makes it easy for
the caller to verify that they are not leaking any useful
information. You can get an overview of what will be shared
by running a command like:

  git fast-export --anonymize --all |
  perl -pe 's/\d+/X/g' |
  sort -u |
  less

which will show every unique line we generate, modulo any
numbers (each anonymized token is assigned a number, like
"User 0", and we replace it consistently in the output).

In addition to anonymizing, this produces test cases that
are relatively small (compared to the original repository)
and fast to generate (compared to using filter-branch, or
modifying the output of fast-export yourself). Here are
numbers for git.git:

  $ time git fast-export --anonymize --all \
         --tag-of-filtered-object=drop >output
  real    0m2.883s
  user    0m2.828s
  sys     0m0.052s

  $ gzip output
  $ ls -lh output.gz | awk '{print $5}'
  2.9M
docs/fast-export: explain --anonymize more completely

The original commit made mention of this option, but not why
one might want it or how they might use it. Let's try to be
a little more thorough, and also explain how to confirm that
the output really is anonymous.