QSizePolicy: remind to mark as Q_PRIMITIVE_TYPE in Qt 6

Change-Id: I1f18b4cd99f37aadf199e70d3acade9c8f5f9799
Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Add qHash(QSslCertificate) overload

qsslsocket_winrt.cpp defined it locally, which runs the risk of
clashes with a potential user-defined qHash(QSslCertificate), so
make it public.

Also, the implementation in qsslsocket_winrt.cpp simply hashed
the handle(), which violates the principle that equal instances
must hash to the same value. Also, for some platforms, the
implementation returns nullptr unconditionally, which, while not
violating the above-mentioned principle, will make all users of
the hash have worst-case complexity.

To calculate a meaningful hash, therefore, the certificate needs
to be inspected deeper than just the handle.

For OpenSSL, we use X509::sha1_hash, which also X509_cmp uses
internally to determine inequality (it checks more stuff, but
if X059::sha1_hash is different, X509_cmp() returns non-zero,
which is sufficient for the purposes of qHash()). sha1_hash may
not be up-to-date, though, so we call X509_cmp to make it valid.
Ugh.

For WinRT/Qt, we use the DER encoding, as that is the native
storage format used in QSslCertificate. This is not equivalent
to the implementation used in qsslsocket_winrt.cpp before, but
since handle() == handle() => toDer() == toDer(), it should not
be a problem.

[ChangeLog][QtNetwork][QSslCertificate] Can now be used as a key in QSet/QHash.

Change-Id: I10858fe648c70fc9535af6913dd3b7f3b2cf0eba
Reviewed-by: Oliver Wolff <oliver.wolff@digia.com>
Add qHash(QSslError) overload

qsslsocket_winrt.cpp defined it locally, which runs the risk of
clashes with a potential user-defined qHash(QSslError), so
make it public.

Also included both .error() and .certificate() in the hash, as
both of these are used to determine equality (the WinRT version
only used .error()).

[ChangeLog][QtNetwork][QSslError] Can now be used in QSet/QHash.

Change-Id: Ieb7995bed491ff011d4be9dad544248b56fd4f73
Reviewed-by: Oliver Wolff <oliver.wolff@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Knight <andrew.knight@digia.com>