Expand and clarify a bit within the section on strong typing and IntelliJ IDEA support.

Personally, I found this discovery very useful. I'm curious as to why you'd say this isn't a "clean pattern"? Yes, the more involved (and verbose) static typing option is outline earlier, but using with() produces a similar result in a much more concise way. It avoids having to assign the page to a variable and then explicitly reference it in every subsequent call.

Further, the other nice discovery here is that using with() provides code insight **even when using only the closure-based content DSL**. Which is something I don't see any other way of achieving. Since I assume most folks are using closures, I would think most folks would find this quite useful?

Again though, if you're deeply opposed to it, I'll take it out. I just know that I personally would have found this very helpful if I'd seen it in the docs.