[DISCUSS] Validate only govspeak fields for safe html

www.agileplannerapp.com/boards/173808/cards/5154

looking at the HTML validator in govspeak suggests that it is useful to validate that HTML generated from govspeak is safe. however, these checks seem unnecessary for non-govspeak fields, because rails ensures that safe html is rendered, and we take care to not mark user input as `.html_safe`.

this is blocking editors from adding html in the edition notes, which should be allowed.

i'll appreciate inputs from those who've worked on this area earlier to validate our understanding before we merge. git suggests: @jamiecobbett
You're right, it will blow-up. I took a look at all classes that are validated using this validator, and they all define this constant, so the check seemed unnecessary. I wanted to ensure that formats define this constant else the validation won't work, so was OK with the error.

If you feel there may be formats which don't require govspeak, and we should gracefully handle this scenario let me know.