Three miscellaneous improvements for Vim

Alright, I just did a quick test of emacs, and I get the feeling that emacs is the reason for this. In my 94-character-wide terminal, emacs is happy to display 93 characters, but it wraps the 94th to the next line even though it *could* put it on the previous line. It chose to add a wrap indicator to the end of the previous line instead.

So that's pretty stupid.

But the question remains, who still uses 80-character-wide terminals, and why are we optimizing for them?