ARM: at91: smc: bug fix in sam9_smc_cs_read()

commit 1588c51cf6d782e63a8719681d905ef0ac22ee62 upstream.

There was a copy/paste error when reading the nwe_pulse value.

Change-Id: I7a8213ed5a781b5df11133323b7d224df5b2ae6a
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@traphandler.com>
Acked-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
serial: add support for 200 v3 series Titan card

commit 48c0247d7b7bf58abb85a39021099529df365c4d upstream.

Change-Id: If462cde44eee6dbafb468661c97dc52060996ece
Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parport: parport_pc: remove double PCI ID for NetMos

commit d6a484520c5572a4170fa915109ccfc0c38f5008 upstream.

In commit 85747f ("PATCH] parport: add NetMOS 9805 support") Max added
the PCI ID for NetMOS 9805 based on a Debian bug report from 2k4 which
was at the v2.4.26 time frame. The patch made into 2.6.14.
Shortly before that patch akpm merged commit 296d3c783b ("[PATCH] Support
NetMOS based PCI cards providing serial and parallel ports") which made
into v2.6.9-rc1.
Now we have two different entries for the same PCI id.
I have here the NetMos 9805 which claims to support SPP/EPP/ECP mode.
This patch takes Max's entry for titan_1284p1 (base != -1 specifies the
ioport for ECP mode) and replaces akpm's entry for netmos_9805 which
specified -1 (=none). Both share the same PCI-ID (my card has subsystem
0x1000 / 0x0020 so it should match PCI_ANY).

While here I also drop the entry for titan_1284p2 which is the same as
netmos_9815.

Change-Id: I6b2a64fa3699eec2895fe9f53007c84e19d45b1c
Cc: Maximilian Attems <maks@stro.at>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>