arm: remove "optimized" SHA1 routines

Since commit 1eb19a12bd22 ("lib/sha1: use the git implementation of
SHA-1"), the ARM SHA1 routines no longer work.  The reason? They
depended on the larger 320-byte workspace, and now the sha1 workspace is
just 16 words (64 bytes).  So the assembly version would overwrite the
stack randomly.

The optimized asm version is also probably slower than the new improved
C version, so there's no reason to keep it around.  At least that was
the case in git, where what appears to be the same assembly language
version was removed two years ago because the optimized C BLK_SHA1 code
was faster.

Reported-and-tested-by: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
lib/sha1: use the git implementation of SHA-1

For ChromiumOS, we use SHA-1 to verify the integrity of the root
filesystem.  The speed of the kernel sha-1 implementation has a major
impact on our boot performance.

To improve boot performance, we investigated using the heavily optimized
sha-1 implementation used in git.  With the git sha-1 implementation, we
see a 11.7% improvement in boot time.

10 reboots, remove slowest/fastest.

Before:

  Mean: 6.58 seconds Stdev: 0.14

After (with git sha-1, this patch):

  Mean: 5.89 seconds Stdev: 0.07

The other cool thing about the git SHA-1 implementation is that it only
needs 64 bytes of stack for the workspace while the original kernel
implementation needed 320 bytes.

Change-Id: I997ea081d035556b5639946d8d2e884b37399f9a
Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Cc: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
lib/sha1.c: quiet sparse noise about symbol not declared

Include <linux/cryptohash.h> to pickup the declarations for sha_transform
and sha_init to quite the sparse noise:

  warning: symbol 'sha_transform' was not declared. Should it be static?
  warning: symbol 'sha_init' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Acked-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>