added some exclusion clauses and corrected an error accidentally introduced by merge
fixed which questions
added option to algorithm to allow identification of 'how' Qs parsed with /AF/ link which is bad grammar but changing the parse ranking to get rid of the AF's didn't work for me, so this hack fixes these questions until it can be worked out from the lg dictionary
added a second version of the howpredadj rule because relex currently gives varying outputs for this question type -- may be deletable later if we fix the usage of /AF/ LG link
fixes the present-progressive ('Bob is running.') so that the participle ('running') is not interpreted as a predicate adjective object of 'be' but rather as the main verb . . . however the fix was to un-comment-out the line which originally did that correctly, which someone had commmented-out for unclear reasons, so I'm not sure if this is going to cause other problems . . .
added a comment about the fix I just made since it consisted of un-commenting out something someone else had commented-out for mysterious reasons
fixes a bug that was reversing the assignment of obj and iobj in questions. Don't know for sure if it might have further repercussions, but I'm pretty sure not!
fixes bug that was assigning the to that introduces a questioned indirect object ('who did you sell the children to') -- that was interpreting that 'to' as an advmod of the verb; this involved creating a flag for this kind of 'to' because there are also real advmod uses of 'to' in that position
fixes a bug that was creating a second _obj dependency relation for the 'object' of to (the indirect object) using the Q_TO_IOBJ_FLAG
speech-act rules
first phase of r2l rule file revisioning -- combined who/what questions with sentence templates
phase 2 of r2l rule revisioning -- y/n questions -- and some cleaning up
revised where, when, how, why questions
Many things fixed, everything tested, still some bugs, noted in comments.
fixes 'which' rules (except for newly discovered issues (see comment in scheme-rules))
Merge pull request #181 from anitzkin/questionrules

Questionrules
adds an implicit subject to imperatives
prevents question-which from getting a _quantity() relation
Amen edited this so it works now; thought I'd share
adds 'going to' future tense