css/default.html: rw sidebar email/RSS link to look like the other section
Simulations: fmt; fix broken ln
Radiance: +9 links, 2 typos, 3 link fixes, 1 length fmt
Anchoring: cpedit
Narrowing Circle: expose _Paradise Lost_ quote as appendix; add quotes from _Discovery of France_ I forgot to add back when I was reading it
Moore: Intel abandons a major fab
Radiance: +4 links, 1 annotation, 1 typo
SR: survival table: fix Tortuga (turns out adverted first on BMR forums, 3 days before SRF2 advert)
SR: survival table: mark Tortuga dead, still not up, no info on Reddit
Radiance: +2lns; 4 typos
markdown-lint: flag usage of `t.test()`
After doing some further reading about non-parametric tests and t.test's
assumption of normality, I've decided that I should probably switch in general
to a non-parametric two-sample test like `wilcox.test()`: it protects me from
non-normality (true in at least two of the pages in which I had used `t.test()`
initially) which is not something I ever bother verifying is true, but is still
pretty efficient.
There are some situations in which the _t_-test is appropriate, like when I am
trying to replicate someone's previous work which used a _t_-test (eg. the Ling
section in Creatine.page), but they're relatively rare.

Unfortunately, there is no easy drop-in non-parametric version of `lm()` that I've
found so far...
hafu: +followup (potential Canadian hafu in current anime season)
Nootropics: switch from t-test to Wilcoxon test
DNB FAQ: switch t-test with Wilcoxon
Inclusionism: switch t-test with Wilcoxon
This one was particularly justified: page hits seem like they'd be
Poisson processes, not Gaussians!
Anchoring: delete t-test entirely
Creatine: Ling: justify use of t-test
Zeo: switch from t-test to Wilcoxon
HSoC: +link to additional Kamatsu comment on old DPH-related SoC proposal
Subcultures: tie in Jiro, Miyazaki, and Anno on workaholism