On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:30:37PM -0700, Brian Grayless wrote:
> I'm not sure this will work long term. The ordering is based on the task id field which is arbitrary and doesn't represent the order of the tasks.

Yeah, I didn't notice the new "position" field (I noticed my old "ordering" didn't work and fell back on id, but position does the same job).

That definitely makes it a lot simpler.