The current behavior will not solve the problem, both lines will show something like "Tuesday, November 22 12:34:00". I figured we might want to actually hand craft a time format for `DateTime` but I didn't do that yet, as I wanted to present this as an option. If I researched it correctly the default inspect for `DateTime` does not appear to be built with a format string but instead has some logic and is implemented in C.

I also considered checking for `ActiveSupport`. Checking `date.defined(ActiveSupport) && date.respond.to?(:default_inspect)` would probably give us more precise targeting of the issue. I can't just check for `ActiveSupport` alone though, due to its optional nature.