Cosmetic title/desc updates

## Verification

- [x] See all modules still load (no missing commas, etc)
- [x] See all descriptions make slightly more sense

Also, I saw that @dheiland-r7's Xerox modules (PR #4091 and others) were using `%{}` for descriptions, instead of `%q{}`. While the two are interchangeable (since `%{}` defaults as `%q{}`), we still tend to prefer the explicit `%q`-ness for descriptions. Not sure where that q got dropped along the way.

/cc @kgray-r7 @cdoughty-r7 @wvu-r7