GTNPORTAL-3519 BZ1117813 Reverted change of category's name from 854461f

My doubt about this approach is that portletName will have this format
// local._responsive-community-portlet.ResponsiveCommunityPortlet
so, in a extra-long-war-name we can have several apps with this name:
local._extra_long_name_1234567890
local._extra_long_name_1234567891
local._extra_long_name_1234567892
...
So, as we are using a hashCode to put a "compositeKey" I wonder if for legibility what about to have something like:
PortletA_1234567890
PortletA_1234567891
PortletB_1234567892
Using the portletName with last token, instead of full path.
I'm thinking loud as I can't perform any test from my location, but I'm wondering if we can also avoid clashes and also to help in some legibility.
(But some tests are needed, to validate if this idea is correct or not).