[SQL] Support transforming TreeNodes with Option children.

Thanks goes to @marmbrus for his implementation.

Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
Author: Zongheng Yang <zongheng.y@gmail.com>

Closes #1074 from concretevitamin/option-treenode and squashes the following commits:

ef27b85 [Zongheng Yang] Merge pull request #1 from marmbrus/pr/1074
73133c2 [Michael Armbrust] TreeNodes can't be inner classes.
ab78420 [Zongheng Yang] Add a test.
2ccb721 [Michael Armbrust] Add support for transformation of optional children.

(cherry picked from commit 269fc62b20ee5f9cd60a8f133c29f662d17071b1)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
[SPARK-937] adding EXITED executor state and not relaunching cleanly exited executors

There seems to be 2 issues.

1. When job is done, driver asks executor to shutdown. However, this clean exit was assigned FAILED executor state by Worker. I introduced EXITED executor state for executors who voluntarily exit (both normal and abnormal exit depending on the exit code).

2. When Master gets notified an executor has exited, it launches another one to replace it, regardless of reason why the executor had exited. When the reason was job has finished, the unnecessary replacement got subsequently killed when App disassociates. This launching and killing of unnecessary executors shows up in the log and is confusing to users. I added check for executor exit status and avoid launching (and subsequent killing) of unnecessary replacements when executors exit cleanly.

One could ask the scheduler to tell Master job is done so that Master wouldn't launch the replacement executor. However, there is a race condition between App telling Master job is done and Worker telling Master an executor had exited. There is no guarantee the former will happen before the later. Instead, I chose to check the exit code when executor exits. If the exit code is 0, I assume executor has been asked to shutdown by driver and Master will not launch replacements.

Due to race condition, it could also happen that (although didn't happen on my local cluster), Master detects App disassociation event before the executor exits by itself. In such cases, the executor will be rightfully killed and labeled as KILLED, while the App state will show FINISHED.

Author: Kan Zhang <kzhang@apache.org>

Closes #306 from kanzhang/SPARK-1118 and squashes the following commits:

cb0cc86 [Kan Zhang] [SPARK-937] adding EXITED executor state and not relaunching cleanly exited executors

(cherry picked from commit ca5d9d43b93abd279079b3be8a06fdd78c595510)
Signed-off-by: Aaron Davidson <aaron@databricks.com>
SPARK-1999: StorageLevel in storage tab and RDD Storage Info never changes

StorageLevel in 'storage tab' and 'RDD Storage Info' never changes even if you call rdd.unpersist() and then you give the rdd another different storage level.

Author: CrazyJvm <crazyjvm@gmail.com>

Closes #968 from CrazyJvm/ui-storagelevel and squashes the following commits:

62555fa [CrazyJvm] change RDDInfo constructor param 'storageLevel' to var, so there's need to add another variable _storageLevel。
9f1571e [CrazyJvm] JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1999 UI : StorageLevel in storage tab and RDD Storage Info never changes
SPARK-2148 Add link to requirements for custom equals() and hashcode() methods

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2148

Author: Andrew Ash <andrew@andrewash.com>

Closes #1092 from ash211/SPARK-2148 and squashes the following commits:

93513df [Andrew Ash] SPARK-2148 Add link to requirements for custom equals() and hashcode() methods
(cherry picked from commit 9672ee07fb1c3583c70f23a699de3b2282eb0f98)

Signed-off-by: Patrick Wendell <pwendell@gmail.com>
Updating docs to include missing information about reducers and clarify ...

...how the OFFHEAP storage level works (there has been confusion around this).

Author: Ali Ghodsi <alig@cs.berkeley.edu>

Closes #1089 from alig/master and squashes the following commits:

ca8114d [Ali Ghodsi] Updating docs to include missing information about reducers and clarify how the OFFHEAP storage level works (there has been confusion around this).
(cherry picked from commit 119b06a04f6df3949b3b074a18f791bbc732ac31)

Signed-off-by: Patrick Wendell <pwendell@gmail.com>